1: % KL paper
2: \documentclass[prc,aps,showpacs]{revtex4}
3: \usepackage{graphicx}
4: \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-0.25in}
5: \setlength{\evensidemargin}{-0.25in}
6: \setlength{\topmargin}{0.3in}
7: \setlength{\textheight}{9in}
8: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
9: \begin{document}
10:
11: \title{Effect of exotic S=+1 resonances on $K^0_L p$ scattering data}
12: \author{R.~L.~Workman}
13: \email{rworkman@gwu.edu}
14: \author{R.~A.~Arndt}
15: \author{I.~I.~Strakovsky}
16: \affiliation{Department of Physics, The George Washington
17: University, Washington, D.C. 20052-0001}
18: \author{D.~M.~Manley}
19: \email{manley@kent.edu}
20: \author{J.~Tulpan}
21: \affiliation{Department of Physics, Kent State University,
22: Kent, OH 44242-0001}
23:
24: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
25: %%% Abstract
26: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
27: \begin{abstract}
28:
29: We consider the effect of an exotic S=+1 $\Theta^+$ resonance on
30: the scattering of neutral kaons off protons. Explicit results are
31: presented for the $K^0_L p$ total cross sections.
32:
33: \end{abstract}
34:
35: \pacs{13.75.Jz, 11.80.Et, 14.20.Jn}
36:
37: \maketitle
38:
39: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
40: Results from a wide range of recent experiments are now consistent with the
41: existence of an exotic S=+1 resonance, the $\Theta^+(1540)$,
42: having a narrow width and a mass near 1540~MeV~\cite{Nakano}.
43: Width determinations have been hindered by limitations
44: on experimental resolutions, resulting in upper bounds of
45: order 10~MeV. The quantum numbers of this state remain unknown,
46: though a prediction of $J^P$ = $1/2^+$ was obtained in the
47: work~\cite{DPP} that provided a motivation for the original search.
48:
49: An examination of older $K^+d$ and $K^+p$ data has provided
50: no confirmation for the $\Theta^+$ or an associated
51: $\Theta^{++}$ state~\cite{Page}.
52: In fact, these older measurements seem to
53: require a width much smaller than 10~MeV~\cite{Nussinov,DAC,HK,CaT}.
54: Most investigations of the older data have focused on $K^+d$
55: experiments from which the $K^+ n$ interaction has been extracted.
56: The effect of Fermi motion in the deuteron is particularly
57: important for a narrow structure, making the observation
58: of a `bump' in any cross section unlikely. This point has
59: been extensively demonstrated by Nussinov~\cite{Nussinov},
60: and by Cahn and Trilling~\cite{CaT}.
61:
62: The problems of Fermi motion can be avoided if instead one
63: considers the $K_L^0 p$ interaction. However, as the
64: $K^0_L$ is a mixture of $K^0$ and $\overline{K^0}$, this
65: approach requires an accounting of the $\overline{K}N$
66: interaction. This we have done, combining results from
67: analyses of $\overline{K}N$~\cite{Y1} and $K N$~\cite{Z0}
68: data.
69:
70: The amplitude for $K_L^0 p$ scattering is given by
71: \begin{equation}
72: M_{K^0_L p} \; = \; {1\over 4} ( Z_1 + Z_0 + 2 Y_1 )
73: \end{equation}
74: where $Z_{0,1}$ are the strangeness
75: S = 1, I = 0 and 1 amplitudes, and $Y_1$ is
76: the S = $-1$, I = 1 amplitude. The $Y_1$ contribution dominates at low
77: energies, the S = 1 component growing in relative importance with
78: increasing energy. Our result for the
79: $K^0_L p$ total cross section, calculated from the imaginary part of
80: the forward scattering amplitude, is given in Fig.~\ref{fig:g1}.
81: Note that this is not a fit but rather a prediction
82: based on analyses of other reactions.
83:
84: Starting from this description of the data, we have added
85: a narrow Breit-Wigner resonance in order to demonstrate the magnitude
86: of its effect. In doing so, we have taken into account
87: the fact that the incident $K^0_L$ beam has a momentum
88: spread, which also tends to smear out a narrow structure.
89: In Fig.~\ref{fig:g2}, we have added an S = +1 resonance,
90: having a
91: 5~MeV width, to the $P_{01}$
92: partial wave. Here we compare the result for beam momentum
93: distributions (assumed Gaussian) having widths of 10 and 20~MeV/$c$
94: at 440 MeV/$c$,
95: the latter being an estimate of the momentum spread
96: associated with the beam used in Ref.~\cite{Cleland}.
97: A resonance in the $D_{03}$ partial wave is also included for
98: comparison.
99:
100: The measurement of Ref.~\cite{Cleland} was
101: reported with total cross sections calculated over 20~MeV/$c$
102: bins. We have accordingly averaged over this interval,
103: finding
104: a further minimal reduction in the peak. Results for resonances with
105: a range of widths are compared in Fig.~\ref{fig:g3}.
106: From Fig.~\ref{fig:g1}, the most pronounced deviations from
107: our predicted smooth
108: behavior occur near 280 and 460~MeV/$c$ (corresponding to C.M. energies
109: of 1480 and 1550~MeV). The apparent `bump' at 1480~MeV could be more
110: than a statistical fluctuation.
111: The PDG~\cite{PDG} reports a 1-star $\Sigma (1480)$
112: based on an analysis of $K^-p\to\overline{K^0}p\pi^-$,
113: with a 3.5 standard deviation signal being seen in
114: $\overline{K^0}p$. (The data of Ref.\cite{Sayer}
115: does not show this structure.)
116: Given the large experimental uncertainties,
117: a fluctuation near 1550~MeV is only interesting in that it
118: occurs near the expected $\Theta^+(1540)$ signal. (The overall momentum
119: scale has a quoted uncertainty of 2\%.) Here too the PDG reports a
120: weak evidence for a nearby bump, the $\Sigma (1560)$.
121:
122: In conclusion, present $K_L^0 p$ scattering data are insufficiently precise to
123: confirm the $\Theta (1540)$.
124: However, if more precise data were to become available, with improved
125: momentum resolution,
126: this method would have the advantage of producing a resonance structure,
127: unlike the $K^+ n$ cross sections extracted from deuteron target
128: experiments which are fundamentally limited by Fermi momentum.
129: In this case, the main limiting factor for a determination
130: of $\Theta^+$ properties would be our knowledge of weak
131: $\Sigma$ resonances\cite{Yakov}.
132:
133:
134: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
135: %%%% Acknowledgments
136: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
137: \acknowledgments
138:
139: This work was supported in part by the U.~S. Department of
140: Energy Grants DE--FG02--99ER41110 and
141: DE-FG02-01ER41194. We acknowledge useful communications
142: with Ya.~I.~Azimov and A.~G.~Dolgolenko.
143: R.~W. and I.~S. gratefully
144: acknowledge a contract from Jefferson Lab under which
145: this work was done. Jefferson Lab is operated by the
146: Southeastern Universities Research Association under the
147: U.~S.~Department of Energy Contract DE--AC05--84ER40150.
148:
149: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
150: %%% References
151: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
152: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
153:
154: \bibitem{Nakano}
155: See for example, `Experimental Review on Exotic Baryons',
156: T.~Nakano, plenary talk at NSTAR 2004, Grenoble, March 2004.
157:
158: \bibitem{DPP}
159: D.~Diakonov, V.~Petrov, and M.~Polyakov, Z.\ Phys.\ A\
160: \textbf{359}, 305 (1995).
161:
162: \bibitem{Page}
163: S.~Capstick, P.~R.~Page, and W.~Roberts, Phys.\ Lett.\
164: \textbf{B570}, 185 (2003).
165:
166: \bibitem{Nussinov}
167: S.~Nussinov, hep-ph/0307357 (unpublished).
168:
169: \bibitem{DAC}
170: R.~A.~Arndt, I.~I.~Strakovsky, and R.~L.~Workman,
171: contribution to 8th Int. Conf. on Hypernuclear and
172: Strange Particle Physics, Newport News, October 2003
173: [nucl-th/0311030]; Phys.\ Rev.\ C\ \textbf{68}, 042201
174: (2003).
175:
176: \bibitem{HK}
177: J.~Haidenbauer and G.~Krein, Phys.\ Rev.\ C\ \textbf{68},
178: 052201 (2003).
179:
180: \bibitem{CaT}
181: R.~N.~Cahn and G.~H.~Trilling, Phys.\ Rev.\ D\ \textbf{69},
182: 011501 (2004). This work also reports an absolute value for
183: the $\Theta^+(1540)$ width, $0.9\pm0.3$ MeV, based upon a
184: reanalysis of the DIANA experiment, V.~V.~Barmin {\it et al.},
185: Phys.\ At.\ Nucl.\ \textbf{66}, 1715 (2003).
186:
187: \bibitem{Y1}
188: G.~P.~Gopal, R.~T.~Ross, A.~J.~van~Horn, A.~C.~McPherson,
189: E.~F.~Clayton, T.~C.~Bacon, and I.~Butterworth, Nucl.\
190: Phys.\ \textbf{B119}, 362 (1977). The employed amplitudes
191: have been unitarized in a K-matrix fit
192: (J. Tulpan and D.~M. Manley, to be published).
193:
194: \bibitem{Z0}
195: J.~S.~Hyslop, R.~A.~Arndt, L.~D.~Roper, and R.~L.~Workman,
196: Phys.\ Rev.\ D \textbf{46}, 961 (1992).
197:
198: \bibitem{Cleland}
199: W.~Cleland, B.~Goz, D.~Freytag, T.~J.~Devlin, R.~J.~Esterling,
200: and K.~G.~Vosburgh, Phys.\ Rev.\ D\ \textbf{12}, 1247
201: (1975).
202:
203: \bibitem{Sayer}
204: G.~A.~Sayer, E.~F.~Beall, T.~J.~Devlin, P.~Shepard, and
205: J.~Solomon, Phys.\ Rev.\ \textbf{169}, 1045 (1968).
206:
207: \bibitem{PDG}
208: K.~Hagiwara \textit{et al.}, Phys.\ Rev.\ D\ \textbf{66},
209: 010001 (2002).
210:
211: \bibitem{Yakov}
212: The possibility of a $\Sigma (1480)$ resonance was also raised in
213: Y.~Azimov, R.~A.~Arndt, I.~I.~Strakovsky, and R.~L.~Workman,
214: Phys.\ Rev.\ C \textbf{68}, 045204 (2003).
215:
216: \end{thebibliography}
217:
218: \eject
219: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
220: \begin{figure}[th]
221: \centering{
222: \includegraphics[height=0.7\textwidth, angle=90]{xsec1.eps}
223: }\caption{Total cross section for $K^0_L p$ (solid) and
224: contributions (dashed) from S = $-1$~\protect\cite{Y1}
225: and (dotted) S = +1~\protect\cite{Z0}. Data sets
226: from Ref.~\protect\cite{Cleland} (open and solid circles)
227: and Ref.~\protect\cite{Sayer} (open triangles).
228: \label{fig:g1}}
229: \end{figure}
230: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
231: \begin{figure}[th]
232: \centering{
233: \includegraphics[height=0.7\textwidth, angle=90]{xsec2.eps}
234: }\caption{Effect of 1540~MeV $P_{01}$ resonance of width 5~MeV
235: for a 10~MeV/$c$ (dashed) and 20~MeV/$c$ (solid) momentum
236: spread. Effect of a $D_{03}$ resonance of same mass
237: and width (20~MeV/$c$ spread) displayed for comparison
238: (dotted). Dash-dotted curve gives the unmodified total
239: cross section for $K^0_L p$. Data as
240: in Fig.~\protect\ref{fig:g1}. \label{fig:g2}}
241: \end{figure}
242: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
243: \begin{figure}[th]
244: \centering{
245: \includegraphics[height=0.7\textwidth, angle=90]{xsec3.eps}
246: }\caption{Resonance signal for a 1540~MeV $P_{01}$ resonance
247: of width 1~MeV (dotted), 2~MeV (dashed), and 5~MeV
248: (solid), for a 20~MeV/$c$ momentum spread.
249: Dash-dotted curve gives the unmodified total cross section
250: for $K^0_L p$. Data as in
251: Fig.~\protect\ref{fig:g1}. \label{fig:g3}}
252: \end{figure}
253:
254: %\vfil
255: %\eject
256:
257: \end{document}
258: