1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2: %%
3: %% Copyright (c) 2006, Sergei Petrovich Maydanyuk
4: %% e-mail: maidan@kinr.kiev.ua, Sergei_Maydanyuk@yahoo.com
5: %%
6: %% Version 2 epsilon of Standard LaTeX
7: %% The style for the European Physical Journal A
8: %%
9: %% Угловой анализ тормозного излучения при альфа-распаде
10: %% (статья)
11: %%
12: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Springer-Verlag %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
13:
14:
15:
16: % ***************************************************************************
17: \documentclass[epj,final]{svjour}
18:
19: \usepackage[dvips]{graphicx}
20: % \usepackage{showkeys}
21: \usepackage{hyperref}
22:
23: % \oddsidemargin = -12mm % опция удобна при печати ссылок (для черновика)
24: % \renewcommand{\abstractname}{}
25: % \renewcommand{\figurename}{Рис.}
26: % \renewcommand{\refname}{Литература:}
27: %---------------------------------------------------------------------------
28:
29: %---------------------------------------------------------------------------
30: \begin{document}
31:
32: \title{Angular analysis of bremsstrahlung in $\alpha$-decay}
33: % \subtitle{Angular bremsstrahlung in $\alpha$-decay}
34: %
35: \dedication{This paper is dedicated to the memory of
36: Dr.~Ivan~Egorovich~Kashuba ---
37: a brilliant scientist with bright nature
38: who worked in science till his last days.
39: }
40:
41: \author{Sergei~P.~Maydanyuk\thanks{maidan@kinr.kiev.ua}%
42: \and
43: Vladislav~S.~Olkhovsky\thanks{olkhovsk@kinr.kiev.ua}}
44: %
45: % \offprints{Sergei~P.~Maydanyuk}
46: \mail{Sergei~P.~Maydanyuk}
47: %
48: \institute{Institute for Nuclear Research, %
49: National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine\\%
50: prosp. Nauki, 47, Kiev-28, 03680, Ukraine}
51: %
52: \date{Received: 9 March 2006 \newline
53: %
54: Published online: 14 July 2006 ---
55: Societa Italiana di Fisica / Springer-Verlag 2006 \newline
56: %
57: Communicated by G.~Orlandini}
58: % \date{\today}
59: %---------------------------------------------------------------------------
60:
61: %---------------------------------------------------------------------------
62: \abstract{
63: \rm
64: A new quantum electrodynamical method of calculations of bremsstrahlung
65: spectra in the $\alpha$-decay of heavy nuclei taking into account the
66: angle between the directions of $\alpha$-particle motion (or its
67: tunneling) and photon emission is presented.
68: %
69: The angular bremsstrahlung spectra for $^{210}\mbox{Po}$ have
70: been obtained for the first time.
71: %
72: According to calculations, the bremsstrahlung in the $\alpha$-decay
73: of this nucleus depends extremely weakly on the angle. Taking into account
74: nuclear forces, such dependence is not changed visibly.
75: %
76: An analytical formula of the angular dependence of the bremsstrahlung
77: spectra is proposed and gives its harmonic behavior.
78: The extremal values of the angle, at which the bremsstrahlung has
79: maximal and minimal values, has been found.
80: % An accuracy of the method is maximal inside the low-energy photon
81: % region.
82: %
83: \keywords{Alpha-decay, %
84: photon bremsstrahlung, %
85: angular spectra for $^{210}\mbox{Po}$, %
86: sub-barrier, %
87: tunneling}
88: }
89: %
90: \PACS{%
91: {23.60.+e}{Alpha decay} \and
92: {41.60.-m}{Radiation by moving charges} \and
93: {23.20.Js}{Multipole matrix elements
94: (in electromagnetic transitions)} \and
95: {03.65.Xp}{Tunneling, traversal time, quantum Zeno dynamics}
96: %{27.80.+w}{A is greater than or equal to 190 and is less than or equal
97: %to 219 (properties of specific nuclei listed by mass ranges)}
98: }
99: %---------------------------------------------------------------------------
100:
101: %---------------------------------------------------------------------------
102: % \arxiv{nucl-th/0408022}
103:
104: \maketitle
105: \hugehead
106:
107: % \newpage
108: % \tableofcontents
109: % ***************************************************************************
110:
111:
112:
113:
114: % ***************************************************************************
115: \section{Introduction
116: \label{introduction}}
117:
118: Experiments
119: \cite{D'Arrigo.1994.PHLTA,Kasagi.1997.JPHGB,Kasagi.1997.PRLTA}
120: with measurements of bremsstrahlung (Br) spectra in the $\alpha$-decay
121: of the nuclei $^{210}\mbox{Po}$, $^{214}\mbox{Po}$, $^{226}\mbox{Ra}$ and
122: $^{244}\mbox{Cm}$ have caused an increased interest. One of the key
123: ideas of the fulfillment of such experiments consists in finding a method
124: of extraction of a new information about $\alpha$-decay dynamics
125: from the Br spectra (and a detailed information about the dynamics of
126: tunneling).
127: %
128: One can note a certain difference between the Br spectra
129: \cite{D'Arrigo.1994.PHLTA} and
130: \cite{Kasagi.1997.JPHGB,Kasagi.1997.PRLTA} for $^{210}\mbox{Po}$,
131: obtained experimentally for the values $90^{\circ}$ and $25^{\circ}$ of the
132: angle between the directions of the $\alpha$-particle propagation and the
133: photon emission (these experiments and the difference of their spectra
134: are discussed in~\cite{Eremin.2000.PRLTA,Kasagi.2000.PRLTA}).
135: %
136: One can explain such difference between the Br angular spectra on the
137: basis of the following idea: \emph{the Br intensity depends on the
138: directions of emission of the photons and motion (with possible tunneling)
139: of the $\alpha$-particle relatively the daughter nucleus}.
140: %
141: In such a way, a three-dimensional picture of the $\alpha$-decay with
142: the accompanying Br in the spatial region of nuclear boundaries has
143: been devised.
144:
145: However, if the Br intensity varies enough visibly with changing the
146: angle value, then one can suppose, that the photon emission is able
147: to influence essentially on the $\alpha$-decay dynamics and,
148: therefore, to change all of its characteristic.
149: %
150: From this point of view, the discussions
151: \cite{Eremin.2000.PRLTA,Kasagi.2000.PRLTA} open a way for obtaining
152: a new information about the $\alpha$-decay --- through the \emph{angular
153: analysis of the Br during the $\alpha$-decay}.
154: %
155: But for such researches a model describing the Br in the
156: $\alpha$-decay, which takes into account the value of the angle between
157: the directions of the $\alpha$-particle propagation (or tunneling) and
158: the photon emission, is needed.
159:
160: In theoretical aspect, some progress has been made here.
161: One can note models of calculations of the Br spectra in the $\alpha$-decay,
162: developed on the basis of quantum electrodynamics with use of
163: perturbation theory:
164: the first paper \cite{Batkin.1986.SJNCA} where
165: a general quantum-mechanical formalism of the calculation of the Br
166: spectra in the $\alpha$-decay is proposed and the Br spectrum for
167: $^{210}\mbox{Po}$ inside the photons energy region up to 200 keV was
168: estimated (even until the fulfillment of the first experiments);
169: essentially improved models in the dipole approximation
170: \cite{Papenbrock.1998.PRLTA,Takigawa.1999.PHRVA} and in the
171: multipolar expansion \cite{Tkalya.1999.PHRVA} of photons current
172: (wave function) with application of the \emph{Fermi golden rule};
173: an approach \cite{Kurgalin.2004} of the calculation of the Br spectra
174: with realistic barriers of the $\alpha$-decay),
175: %
176: models \cite{Dyakonov.1996.PRLTA,Dyakonov.1999.PHRVA,%
177: Bertulani.1999.PHRVA,Takigawa.1999.PHRVA} developed in semiclassical
178: approximation (see also the Br spectra calculations
179: in~\cite{Kasagi.1997.PRLTA}),
180: %
181: \emph{instant accelerated models}
182: \cite{D'Arrigo.1994.PHLTA,Tkalya.1999.PHRVA} constructed on the
183: basis of classical electrodynamics
184: (see also \cite{Dyakonov.1999.PHRVA}),
185: %
186: methods \cite{Bertulani.1999.PHRVA,Misicu.2001.JPHGB,Dijk.2003.FBSSE,%
187: Dyakonov.1996.PRLTA,Dyakonov.1999.PHRVA}, directed on a nonstationary
188: description of the $\alpha$-decay with the accompanying Br and the
189: calculations of such non-stationary characteristics as \emph{tunneling
190: time}. One can recall also papers
191: \cite{Serot.1994.NUPHA,Dijk.1999.PRLTA,Dijk.2002.PHRVA,Ivlev.2004.PHRVA}
192: with study of dynamics of subbarrier tunneling in the $\alpha$-decay;
193: an effect, opened in \cite{Flambaum.1999.PRLTA} and named
194: \emph{M\"{u}nchhausen effect}, which increases the barrier
195: penetrability due to charged-particle emission during its tunneling
196: and which can be extremely interesting for further study of the photon
197: bremsstrahlung during subbarier tunneling in the $\alpha$-decay).
198: %
199: However, one needs to say that at this stage the calculations
200: of the Br spectra by all these approaches are reduced to
201: obtaining their integral (or averaged by angles) values and,
202: therefore, they do not allow to fulfill an angular analysis of the
203: experimental Br spectra (here, one can quote an
204: approach in~\cite{Misicu.2001.JPHGB} based on classical
205: electrodynamics, which shows a way for obtaining the angular spectra
206: (see (15) and (17), p.~999), however here we shall use the direct
207: quantum-mechanical approach of the Br spectra calculation, which
208: describes the quantum effect of the \emph{subbarrier
209: Br} more precisely).
210:
211: In~\cite{Maydanyuk.2003.PTP} we had developed a multipolar method
212: which takes into account the angle between the directions of the
213: $\alpha$-particle propagation and the photon emission. But the angular
214: integrals used in this method are difficult enough to be obtained and
215: some approximations are used, there was a convergence problem with the
216: calculations of multipoles of larger orders, only the angular dependences
217: of matrix elements of the selected multipoles E1 and M1 were found,
218: while it is interesting to know also the angular dependence of
219: the total Br spectra.
220: %
221: Moreover, computer calculations of the Br spectra and their angular
222: analysis will be essentially more complicated, if one passes from the
223: type of the potential used in this paper (and also
224: in~\cite{Papenbrock.1998.PRLTA,Tkalya.1999.PHRVA}) to
225: realistic potentials. In this sense, the approach proposed
226: in~\cite{Maydanyuk.2003.PTP} is not convenient enough.
227:
228: In this paper we present a new method for the angular calculations of
229: the Br spectra in the $\alpha$-decay of nuclei (started in
230: \cite{Maydanyuk.nucl-th.0404013}, with the resolution of a convergence
231: problem in the Br spectra calculations existing in
232: \cite{Maydanyuk.nucl-th.0404013}).
233: %
234: In our approach we introduce a simplified transformation, which reduce
235: the complicated angular formalism of the calculation of the Br spectra
236: (presented in~\cite{Maydanyuk.2003.PTP}) to a maximally simple form
237: (this makes the method clearer and more \underline{comprehensible}),
238: with keeping the calculating accuracy as good as possible, where
239: only one angle from all angular parameters is used --- the angle
240: used in experiments
241: \cite{Eremin.2000.PRLTA,Kasagi.2000.PRLTA} for $^{210}\mbox{Po}$.
242: %
243: We show, that this proposed transformation works in the low-energy region
244: of photons and, therefore, it can be applied to the analysis of all up to
245: now existing experimental data of Br spectra in the $\alpha$-decay of
246: spherical nuclei (we relate $^{210}\mbox{Po}$ to them).
247: %
248: In this paper we present the results of calculations of the angular
249: spectra of the Br in the $\alpha$-decay for $^{210}\mbox{Po}$
250: (the Br angular spectra in the $\alpha$-decay have been obtained for the
251: first time).
252: %
253: We show, how the Br spectra are changed after deformation of the form
254: of the $\alpha$-decay barrier as a result of the correction of a
255: component of the $\alpha$-nucleus potential of nuclear forces
256: (we did not find such calculations in other papers).
257: %
258: An analysis of the problem of the calculations convergence of the Br
259: spectra in the $\alpha$-decay is included in the paper, whose resolution
260: plays a key role for obtaining of the reliable values of the spectra.
261: % ***************************************************************************
262:
263:
264:
265: % ***************************************************************************
266: \section{A formalism of the calculations of the bremsstrahlung
267: spectra in the stationary approach
268: \label{sec.2}}
269:
270: We shall consider the decay of the nucleus as the decay of the
271: compound quantum system: $\alpha$-particle and daughter nucleus.
272: The $\alpha$-particle is the electrically charged particle and
273: during its motion inside the electromagnetic field of the daughter
274: nucleus it emits photons. The spontaneous emission of the photon
275: changes a state of the compound system, which is described by its
276: wave function.
277: %
278: For a quantitative estimation of the photon Br we use a transition
279: of the system from its state before the photon emission (we name such
280: state as the \emph{initial $i$-state}) into its state after the
281: photon emission (we name such state as the \emph{final $f$-state}).
282: %
283: One can define a matrix element of such transition of the system and
284: on its basis find the Br probability during the $\alpha$-decay (for
285: convenience, we denote it as $W(w)$). According to
286: \cite{Maydanyuk.2003.PTP}, we obtain:
287: %
288: \begin{equation}
289: \begin{array}{cccc}
290: % \displaystyle\frac{dW(w)}{d\Omega_{\nu}} =
291: W(w) =
292: N_{0} k_{f} w \bigl| p(w) \bigr|^{2}, &
293: N_{0} = \displaystyle\frac{Z_{\rm eff}^{2} e^{2}}{(2\pi)^{4} m}, &
294: k_{i,f} = \sqrt{2mE_{i,f}}, &
295: w = E_{i} - E_{f},
296: \end{array}
297: \label{eq.2.1}
298: \end{equation}
299: %
300: where $p(w)$ has a form
301: %
302: \begin{equation}
303: p(w) =
304: \sum\limits_{\alpha = 1, 2}
305: \mathbf{ e}^{(\alpha)*}
306: \int\limits^{+\infty}_{0} dr \int
307: r^{2} \psi^{*}_{f}(\mathbf{ r})
308: e^{-i\mathbf{ kr}}
309: \displaystyle\frac{\partial}{\partial \mathbf{ r}}
310: \psi_{i}(\mathbf{ r}) d\Omega.
311: \label{eq.2.2}
312: \end{equation}
313: %
314: Here
315: $Z_{\rm eff}$ and $m$ are effective charge and reduced mass of the
316: system,
317: $E_{i,f}$, $k_{i,f}$ and $\psi_{i,f}(\mathbf{r})$ are total energy,
318: wave vector and wave function of the system in the initial $i$-state
319: or in the final $f$-state (in dependence on the index $i$ or $f$ in
320: use),
321: $\psi_{i}(\mathbf{r})$ and $\psi_{f}(\mathbf{r})$ are the wave
322: function of the system in the initial $i$- and the final $f$-states,
323: $\mathbf{e}^{(\alpha)}$ is polarization vector of the photon emitted,
324: $\mathbf{k}$ is photon wave vector,
325: $w = k = \bigl|\mathbf{k}\bigr|$ is photon frequency (energy).
326: The vector $\mathbf{e}^{(\alpha)}$ is perpendicular to $\mathbf{k}$
327: in Coulomb calibration.
328: %
329: We use such system of units: $\hbar = 1$ and $c = 1$. Notations are
330: used in accordance with \cite{Maydanyuk.2003.PTP}.
331: Similar expressions for the Br probability are used in
332: \cite{Papenbrock.1998.PRLTA,Takigawa.1999.PHRVA,Tkalya.1999.PHRVA}
333: with further application of Fermi golden rule.
334:
335: In accordance with main statements of quantum mechanics, the wave
336: functions of the system in the states before and after the photon
337: emission are defined inside all space region, including the region
338: of the subbarrier tunneling. A definition of a matrix element of
339: the transition of this system requires an account of all space
340: region of the definition of the wave functions of this system in two
341: states. Therefore, \emph{we should include the tunneling region into
342: the definition of the matrix element of the Br, irrespective of we
343: know, whether the photons emission is possible during tunneling or
344: not}.
345:
346: Let's consider a subintegral expression in (\ref{eq.2.2}). Here, the
347: wave function $\psi_{i}(\mathbf{r})$ for the initial $i$-state and
348: the wave function $\psi_{f}(\mathbf{r})$ for the $f$-final state take
349: into account the directions of propagation (or tunneling) of the
350: $\alpha$-particle before the photon emission and after it,
351: correspondingly; the photons wave function (its main part consists in
352: the exponent $\exp{(-i\mathbf{ kr})}$) points to the direction of
353: propagation of the photon emitted.
354: We see, that the quantum mechanical approach for calculation of the
355: Br spectra initially has a detailed angular information about the
356: process of $\alpha$-decay with the accompanying Br.
357:
358: However, we see that a further development of the approach for the
359: calculations of the Br spectra in the $\alpha$-decay on the basis of
360: the formulas (\ref{eq.2.1}) and (\ref{eq.2.2}) by other authors
361: (which consist in the calculations of $p(w)$) gives rise to angular
362: averaging of the spectra.
363: %
364: And a necesity has been arising in construction of an approach,
365: which allows simply enough to calculate the Br spectra
366: (with possible resolving the convergence problem in the computer
367: calculations)
368: with taking into account of the angle between the directions of the
369: $\alpha$-particle propagation (with possible tunneling) and the
370: photon emission and without (essential) decreasing of the accuracy.
371: % ***************************************************************************
372:
373:
374:
375: % ***************************************************************************
376: \section{A simplified angular method of the calculations of the
377: matrix element
378: \label{sec.3}}
379:
380: In \cite{Maydanyuk.nucl-th.0404013} the approach for the calculation
381: of the Br spectra, allowing to find a dependence of the total Br
382: spectra on the angle between the directions of the $\alpha$-particle
383: propagation (or tunneling) and the photon emission, was proposed.
384: However, further research has shown, that it is extremely difficult
385: to achieve a convergence in the computer calculations of the Br
386: spectra by such approach and, therefore, such a method requires an
387: essential development. Here, we propose a consecutive statement of
388: such approach with a resolution of the convergence problem.
389:
390: Let's rewrite vectors $\mathbf{e}^{\alpha}$ of polarization through
391: the vectors $\mathbf{\xi}_{-1}$ and $\mathbf{\xi}_{+1}$ of circular
392: polarization with opposite directions of rotation
393: (see~\cite{Eisenberg.1973}, p.~42):
394: %
395: \begin{equation}
396: \begin{array}{ll}
397: \mathbf{\xi}_{-1} = \displaystyle\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}
398: (\mathbf{e}^{1} - i\mathbf{e}^{2}), &
399: \mathbf{\xi}_{+1} = -\displaystyle\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}
400: (\mathbf{e}^{1} + i\mathbf{e}^{2}).
401: \end{array}
402: \label{eq.3.1}
403: \end{equation}
404: %
405: Substituting these values into (\ref{eq.2.2}), we obtain:
406: %
407: \begin{equation}
408: p(w) =
409: \sum\limits_{\mu = -1, 1}
410: h_{\mu}\mathbf{\xi}^{*}_{\mu}
411: \int\limits^{+\infty}_{0} dr \int
412: r^{2} \psi^{*}_{f}(\mathbf{r})
413: e^{-i\mathbf{kr}}
414: \displaystyle\frac{\partial}{\partial \mathbf{r}}
415: \psi_{i}(\mathbf{r}) d\Omega,
416: \label{eq.3.2}
417: \end{equation}
418: %
419: where
420: %
421: \begin{equation}
422: \begin{array}{lcr}
423:
424: h_{-1} = \displaystyle\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} (1-i), &
425: h_{1} = - \displaystyle\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} (1+i), &
426: h_{-1} + h_{1} = -i \sqrt{2}.
427: \end{array}
428: \label{eq.3.3}
429: \end{equation}
430:
431: Using the following properties (see~\cite{Eisenberg.1973} p.~44--46,
432: \cite{Maydanyuk.2003.PTP}):
433: %
434: \begin{equation}
435: \begin{array}{l}
436: \displaystyle\frac{\partial}{\partial \mathbf{r}}
437: \psi_{i}(\mathbf{r}) =
438: -\displaystyle\frac{d\psi_{i}(r)}{dr}
439: \mathbf{ T}_{01,0}(\mathbf{n}^{i}_{r}), \\
440: \mathbf{T}_{01,0}(\mathbf{n}^{i}_{r}) =
441: \displaystyle\sum\limits_{\mu = -1,1} (110|-\mu\mu 0)
442: Y_{1,-\mu}(\mathbf{n}^{i}_{r}) \mathbf{\xi}_{\mu}, \\
443: (110|1, -1, 0) = (110|-1, 1, 0) = \sqrt{\displaystyle\frac{1}{3}},
444: \end{array}
445: \label{eq.3.4}
446: \end{equation}
447: %
448: where
449: $(110 | -\mu\mu 0)$ are Clebsch-Gordan coefficients and
450: $\mathbf{T}_{ll',\mu}(\mathbf{n})$ are vector spherical harmonics
451: (see~\cite{Eisenberg.1973}, p.~45 and we use quantum numbers $l=m=0$
452: in the initial $i$-state),
453: $Y_{1,\mu}(\mathbf{n}^{i,f}_{r})$ are normalized spherical functions
454: (see~\cite{Landau.1989}, p.~118--121 (28.7), p.~752--755),
455: we obtain:
456: %
457: \begin{equation}
458: \displaystyle\frac{\partial}{\partial \mathbf{r}} \psi_{i}(\mathbf{r}) =
459: -\displaystyle\frac{d\psi_{i}(r)}{dr}
460: \sqrt{\displaystyle\frac{1}{3}}
461: \sum\limits_{\mu^{\prime} = -1,1}
462: Y_{1,-\mu^{\prime}}(\mathbf{n}^{i}_{r}) \mathbf{\xi}_{\mu^{\prime}}.
463: \label{eq.3.5}
464: \end{equation}
465: %
466: Taking into account (\ref{eq.3.2}), (\ref{eq.3.5}) and the
467: ortogonality condition of the vectors $\mathbf{\xi}^{*}_{\pm 1}$ and
468: $\mathbf{\xi}_{\mp 1}$ of polarization, we find:
469: %
470: \begin{equation}
471: p(w) = -
472: \sqrt{\displaystyle\frac{1}{3}}
473: \sum\limits_{\mu = -1, 1}
474: h_{\mu}
475: \int\limits^{+\infty}_{0} dr
476: r^{2} \psi^{*}_{f}(r)
477: \displaystyle\frac{\partial \psi_{i}(r)}{\partial r}
478: \int
479: Y_{l'm'}^{*}(\mathbf{n}^{f}_{r})
480: Y_{1,-\mu}(\mathbf{n}^{i}_{r})
481: e^{-i\mathbf{k}\mathbf{r}}
482: d\Omega,
483: \label{eq.3.6}
484: \end{equation}
485: %
486: where
487: $\psi_{f}(\mathbf{r}) =
488: \psi_{f}(r) Y_{l^{\prime},m^{\prime}}(\mathbf{n}^{f}_{r})$.
489:
490:
491: Let's consider the vectors $\bf k$ and $\bf r$.
492: The vector $\bf k$ is an impulse of the photon, pointed out the
493: direction of its propagation.
494: %
495: The vector $\bf r$ is a radius-vector, pointed out a position of
496: the $\alpha$-particle relatively a center of mass of the daughter
497: nucleus and (because of mass of the daughter nucleus is larger
498: sufficiently than mass of the $\alpha$-particle) pointed out the
499: direction of its motion (or tunneling).
500: %
501: Then an angle between the vectors $\bf k$ and $\bf r$ (let's denote
502: it as $\beta$) is the angle between the direction
503: $\mathbf{n}_{r} = \mathbf{r}/r$ of motion (or tunneling) of
504: the $\alpha$-particle and the direction
505: $\mathbf{n}_{ph} = \mathbf{k}/k$ of a propagation of the photon
506: emited, i.~e. it is the angle used in the experiments
507: \cite{Eremin.2000.PRLTA,Kasagi.1997.PRLTA,D'Arrigo.1994.PHLTA}.
508: % (with taking into account of a transition of expressions into системы центра
509: % масс в лабораторную систему).
510: %
511: One can write
512: %
513: \begin{equation}
514: \begin{array}{lcr}
515: \exp{(-i\mathbf{kr})} = \exp{(-ikr \cos{\beta})}, &
516: k = |\mathbf{k}|, &
517: r = |\mathbf{r}|.
518: \end{array}
519: \label{eq.3.7}
520: \end{equation}
521:
522: Now we make such \underline{assumptions}:
523:
524: \begin{itemize}
525: \vspace{-2mm}
526: \item
527: the photon emission process does not change the direction of motion
528: (or tunneling) of the $\alpha$-particle:
529: %
530: \begin{equation}
531: \mathbf{n}^{i}_{r} = \mathbf{n}^{f}_{r},
532: \label{eq.3.8}
533: \end{equation}
534:
535: \vspace{-2mm}
536: \item
537: the angle $\beta$ is not depended on the direction of the outgoing
538: $\alpha$-particle motion from the nucleus region.
539: \end{itemize}
540: %
541: Then, taking into account these assumptions and the ortogonality
542: property of the functions $Y_{lm}(\mathbf{n}_{r})$, we obtain the
543: following expression for $p(w,\beta) $:
544: %
545: \begin{equation}
546: p(w, \beta) =
547: -\sqrt{\displaystyle\frac{1}{3}}
548: \sum\limits_{\mu = -1, 1}
549: h_{\mu}
550: \int\limits^{+\infty}_{0}
551: r^{2} \psi^{*}_{f}(r)
552: \displaystyle\frac{\partial \psi_{i}(r)}
553: {\partial r}
554: e^{-ikr \cos{\beta}}
555: dr
556: \label{eq.3.9}
557: \end{equation}
558: %
559: and selection rules for quantum numbers $l$ and $m$ of the final
560: $f$-state:
561: %
562: \begin{equation}
563: \begin{array}{lll}
564: \mbox{the initial state:} & l_{i} = 0, & m_{i} = 0;\\
565: \mbox{the final state: } & l_{f} = 1, & m_{f} = -\mu = \pm 1.
566: \end{array}
567: \label{eq.3.10}
568: \end{equation}
569: % ***************************************************************************
570:
571:
572:
573: % ***************************************************************************
574: \section{Spherical wave expansion
575: \label{sec.4}}
576:
577: For further computer calculations of the integral (\ref{eq.3.9}),
578: let's use an expansion of the plane wave in the spherical waves
579: (for example, see \cite{Landau.1989}, p.~144, (34.1)):
580: %
581: \begin{equation}
582: e^{ikz} =
583: \displaystyle\sum\limits_{l=0}^{+\infty}
584: (-i)^{l} (2l+1) P_{l} (\cos{\beta})
585: \biggl(\displaystyle\frac{r}{k} \biggr)^{l}
586: \biggl(\displaystyle\frac{1}{r} \displaystyle\frac{d}{dr} \biggr)^{l}
587: \displaystyle\frac{\sin {kr}}{kr},
588: \label{eq.4.1}
589: \end{equation}
590: %
591: where $z=r \cos{\beta}$.
592: %
593: Introducing spherical Bessel functions (see \cite{Landau.1989},
594: p.~139, (33.9), (33.10) and (33.11)):
595: %
596: \begin{equation}
597: j_{l}(kr) =
598: (-1)^{l} \biggl(\displaystyle\frac{r}{k} \biggr)^{l}
599: \biggl(\displaystyle\frac{1}{r} \displaystyle\frac{d}{dr} \biggr)^{l}
600: \displaystyle\frac{\sin {kr}}{kr},
601: \label{eq.4.2}
602: \end{equation}
603: %
604: we obtain:
605: %
606: \begin{equation}
607: e^{-ikr \cos{\beta}} =
608: \biggl(e^{ikr \cos{\beta}} \biggr)^{*} =
609: \displaystyle\sum\limits_{l=0}^{+\infty}
610: i^{l} (-1)^{l} (2l+1) P_{l} (\cos{\beta}) j_{l}(kr)
611: \label{eq.4.3}
612: \end{equation}
613: %
614: and from (\ref{eq.3.9}) we find:
615: %
616: \begin{equation}
617: p(w, \beta) =
618: -\sqrt{\displaystyle\frac{1}{3}}
619: \displaystyle\sum\limits_{l=0}^{+\infty}
620: i^{l} (-1)^{l} (2l+1) P_{l} (\cos{\beta})
621: \sum\limits_{\mu = -1, 1} h_{\mu}
622: J_{m_{f}}(l,w),
623: \label{eq.4.4}
624: \end{equation}
625: %
626: where
627: %
628: \begin{equation}
629: J_{m_{f}}(l,w) =
630: \int\limits^{+\infty}_{0}
631: r^{2} \psi^{*}_{f}(r)
632: \displaystyle\frac{\partial\psi_{i}(r)} {\partial r}
633: j_{l} (kr) dr.
634: \label{eq.4.5}
635: \end{equation}
636: %
637: $J_{m_{f}}(l,w)$ is a radial integral, not depended on the angle
638: $\beta$.
639: %
640: Now \emph{we obtain an explicit analytical dependence of the matrix
641: element $p(w,\beta)$ on the angle $\beta$ between the directions of
642: the $\alpha$-particle propagation and the photon emission}
643: (for the first time, in \cite{Maydanyuk.2003.PTP} the angular integrals
644: were obtained for selected components of this matrix element ---
645: multipoles E1 and M1 only, with use of more difficult calculations).
646: % ***************************************************************************
647:
648:
649:
650: % ***************************************************************************
651: \section{The bremsstrahlung in the Coulomb field
652: \label{sec.5}}
653:
654: Practically, in the numerical calculation of the Br spectra it is
655: convenient to divide the whole region of the integration into two
656: parts: the region 1 of a joint action of the Coulomb and nuclear
657: forces not far from the nucleus and the region 2, in which one can
658: neglect by the action of the nuclear forces in comparison with the
659: action of the Coulomb forces.
660: %
661: Our analysis has shown, that an attainment of the \emph{convergence}
662: of the Br spectra calculations (which determines their \emph{accuracy},
663: \emph{reliability} of the found Br spectra) is reached first of all
664: by correctness of the calculations in the region 2.
665: %
666: Namely, in this region it needs to solve a problem with definition of
667: the external boundary of integration (its increasing leads to
668: increasing of the accuracy of the obtained spectra, but to increasing
669: of difficulty of the calculations and analysis),
670: to choose the most effective method of the numerical integration
671: (of an improper integral with an oscillating and weakly damping
672: sub-integral function),
673: to solve a problem with attainment of needed accuracy and convergence
674: of the calculations.
675: %
676: It defines time of the calculations, minimization of which appears
677: extremely important for fulfillment of the real analysis of the
678: obtained Br spectra in dependence on needed parameters.
679: %
680: Therefore, maximal simplification of the formulas for the Br spectra
681: in the region 2 is useful.
682:
683: Let's assume, that the potential, used in the radial integral
684: (\ref{eq.4.5}), in spatial region of $r$ is \emph{Coulomb} since the
685: value $R_{c}$. We accept $R_{c}$ as the internal boundary of the
686: region 2.
687: %
688: One can write the radial integral $J(l,w)$ in (\ref{eq.4.5}) so:
689: %
690: \begin{equation}
691: J_{m_{f}}(l,w) = J_{in, m_{f}}(l,w) + J_{c}(l,w),
692: \label{eq.5.1}
693: \end{equation}
694: %
695: where
696: %
697: \begin{equation}
698: \begin{array}{lcl}
699: J_{in, m_{f}}(l,w) & = &
700: \displaystyle\int\limits^{R_{c}}_{0}
701: r^{2} \psi^{*}_{f}(r, m_{f})
702: \displaystyle\frac{\partial\psi_{i}(r)} {\partial r}
703: j_{l} (kr) dr, \\
704: J_{c}(l,w) & = &
705: \displaystyle\int\limits^{+\infty}_{R_{c}}
706: r^{2} \psi^{*}_{f}(r)
707: \displaystyle\frac{\partial\psi_{i}(r)} {\partial r}
708: j_{l} (kr) dr.
709: \end{array}
710: \label{eq.5.2}
711: \end{equation}
712: %
713: The radial integral $J_{c}(l,w)$ does not depend on the quantum
714: number $m$ of the systems in the final $f$-state. Then, one can
715: write $p(w,\beta)$ so (with taking into account (\ref{eq.3.3}) for
716: the Coulomb component):
717: %
718: \begin{equation}
719: p(w,\beta) = p_{in}(w,\beta) + p_{c}(w,\beta),
720: \label{eq.5.3}
721: \end{equation}
722: %
723: where
724: %
725: \begin{equation}
726: \begin{array}{lcl}
727: p_{in}(w,\beta) & = &
728: -\sqrt{\displaystyle\frac{1}{3}}
729: \displaystyle\sum\limits_{l=0}^{+\infty}
730: i^{l} (-1)^{l} (2l+1) P_{l} (\cos{\beta})
731: \displaystyle\sum\limits_{\mu = -1, 1} h_{\mu}
732: J_{in, m_{f}}(l,w), \\
733: p_{c}(w,\beta) & = &
734: \sqrt{\displaystyle\frac{2}{3}}
735: \displaystyle\sum\limits_{l=0}^{+\infty}
736: i^{l+1} (-1)^{l} (2l+1) P_{l} (\cos{\beta}) J_{c}(l,w).
737: \end{array}
738: \label{eq.5.4}
739: \end{equation}
740: %
741: We see, that there is no any interference between the components
742: $p_{in}(w,\beta)$ and $p_{c}(w,\beta)$ in the calculations of the
743: total value of $p(w,\beta)$, but it exists in calculations of the
744: total Br spectra.
745: % ***************************************************************************
746:
747:
748:
749: % ***************************************************************************
750: \section{The first approximation at $l=0$
751: \label{sec.6}}
752:
753: % Найдем нулевое приближение вероятности ТИ в кулоновском поле при
754: % $l=0$.
755:
756: Legandre's polynomial of the order $l$ equals (for example, see
757: \cite{Landau.1989}, p.~752 (c.1)):
758: %
759: \begin{equation}
760: \begin{array}{cccc}
761: P_{l}(\theta) =
762: \displaystyle\frac{1}{2^{l} l!}
763: \displaystyle\frac{d^{l}}{(d\theta)^{l}}
764: (\theta^{2} - 1)^{l}, &
765: P_{0}(\theta) = 1, &
766: P_{1}(\theta) = \theta, &
767: \theta = \cos{\beta}.
768: \end{array}
769: \label{eq.6.1}
770: \end{equation}
771: %
772: Then at $l=0$ we find:
773: %
774: \begin{equation}
775: \begin{array}{lcl}
776: p_{in}^{(l=0)} (w,\beta) & = &
777: -\sqrt{\displaystyle\frac{1}{3}}
778: \displaystyle\sum\limits_{\mu = -1, 1} h_{\mu}
779: J_{in, m_{f}}(0,w), \\
780: p_{c}^{(l=0)} (w,\beta) & = &
781: i \sqrt{\displaystyle\frac{2}{3}} J_{c}(0,w).
782: \end{array}
783: \label{eq.6.2}
784: \end{equation}
785:
786: If for nuclei $^{210}\mbox{Po}$, $^{214}\mbox{Po}$, $^{226}\mbox{Ra}$ to use the
787: potential with parameters as in~\cite{Maydanyuk.2003.PTP} (and as
788: in~\cite{Papenbrock.1998.PRLTA,Tkalya.1999.PHRVA} also), then we
789: find, that Br from the internal spatial region till to $R_{c}$ is
790: extremely small ($p_{in}(w,\beta) << p_{c}(w,\beta)$). According to
791: our estimations, for such potential it is smaller in
792: $10^{-22}$--$10^{-24}$ times then Br from the external region.
793: Therefore, one can neglect by Br from the internal region, and the
794: total Br can be determined by the Coulomb field inside the barrier
795: region and the external region.
796: %
797: From (\ref{eq.2.1}) we write down the Br probability in the first
798: approximation at $l=0$:
799: %
800: \begin{equation}
801: W_{l=0}(w) =
802: N_{0} k_{f} w \bigl| p_{c}^{(l=0)}(w,\beta) \bigr|^{2} =
803: \displaystyle\frac{2}{3} N_{0} k_{f} w \bigl| J_{c}(0,w) \bigr|^{2}.
804: \label{eq.6.3}
805: \end{equation}
806:
807: \underline{One can conclude} (it has obtained for the first time):
808: %
809: \begin{itemize}
810: \item
811: The Br probability in the first approximation at $l=0$, formed by the
812: Coulomb field both with taking into account of the nuclear forces of
813: any shape, and without such forces, does not depend on a value of the
814: angle $\beta$ between the directions of the $\alpha$-particle
815: propagation (or its tunneling) and the photon emission.
816:
817: \item
818: The Coulomb field is degenerated by the quantum number $m$. This
819: property distinguishes the Coulomb field from the nuclear forces at
820: their account in the model. This difference is shown in the matrix
821: elements (\ref {eq.6.2}).
822: The nuclear forces participate in formation of the decay barrier and,
823: therefore, one can consider approximately them as forces working in
824: the spatial region of the barrier, where there is a tunneling.
825: One can assume, that one can divide the emissions from the barrier
826: region and from the external region on the basis of the quantum
827: number $m_{f}$.
828: It can be interesting to find a possible way of extraction of the Br
829: spectrum from the barrier region (or from the external region) from
830: experimental Br spectrum on the basis of this property.
831: \end{itemize}
832: % ***************************************************************************
833:
834:
835:
836: % ***************************************************************************
837: \section{The second approximation at $l=1$
838: \label{sec.7}}
839:
840: Taking into account (\ref{eq.6.1}), we find the Br probability in
841: the second approximation at $l=1$:
842: %
843: \begin{equation}
844: \begin{array}{lcl}
845: p_{in}^{(l=1)}(w,\beta) & = &
846: i\sqrt{3} \cos{\beta}
847: \displaystyle\sum\limits_{\mu = -1, 1} h_{\mu}
848: J_{in, m_{f}}(1,w), \\
849: p_{c}^{(l=1)}(w,\beta) & = & \sqrt{6} \cos{\beta} J_{c}(1,w).
850: \end{array}
851: \label{eq.7.1}
852: \end{equation}
853:
854: Neglecting by Br from the internal region, we obtain the following
855: expressions for the component of the Br probability of the second
856: approximation at $l=1$:
857: %
858: \begin{equation}
859: W^{(l=1)}(w, \beta) =
860: N_{0} k_{f} w \Bigl| p_{c}^{(l=1)}(w,\beta) \Bigr|^{2} =
861: 6 N_{0} k_{f} w \Bigl| J_{c}(1,w) \Bigr|^{2} \cos^{2}{\beta}
862: \label{eq.7.2}
863: \end{equation}
864: %
865: and for the total Br probability in the second approximation at
866: $l=1$:
867: %
868: \begin{equation}
869: \begin{array}{lr}
870: W_{l=1}(w, \beta) = W_{l=0}(w) \Bigl| 1 - N(w) \cos{\beta} \Bigr|^{2}, &
871: N(w) = 3i \displaystyle\frac{J_{c}(1,w)}{J_{c}(0,w)}.
872: \end{array}
873: \label{eq.7.3}
874: \end{equation}
875:
876: \underline{One can conclude} (it has found for the first time):
877: %
878: \begin{itemize}
879: \item
880: The dependence of the Br probability in the $\alpha$-decay on the
881: value of the angle $\beta$ between the directions of the
882: $\alpha$-particle propagation (or its tunneling) and the photon
883: emission has harmonic type (\ref{eq.7.3}).
884:
885: \item
886: The account of the nuclear forces does not change the dependence of
887: the Br probability in the second approximation at $l=1$ on such angle
888: value.
889:
890: \item
891: Exp.~(\ref{eq.7.3}) allows to find analytically maximums and
892: minimums in the Br spectra in dependence on the angle $\beta$.
893: \end{itemize}
894: % ***************************************************************************
895:
896:
897:
898: % ***************************************************************************
899: \section{Convergence of calculations in asymptotic region
900: \label{sec.8}}
901:
902: There is an essential difficulty in the calculations of the Br
903: spectra for the given nucleus, concerned with obtaining of the radial
904: integrals (\ref{eq.5.2}) (or (\ref{eq.4.5})). This difficulty is
905: caused by that such integral is improper, and its sub-integral
906: function is oscillated and damped slowly with increasing of $r$.
907: The function damps weaker with increasing of $r$, the larger region
908: of integration should be taken into account in the numerical
909: integration.
910: For $^{210}\mbox{Po}$ the damping degree of the sub-integral function is
911: such as for reliable values of the first 2-3 digits for the Br
912: spectrum it needs to take into account (with the higher accuracy of
913: calculations) 1 million of oscillations of this function.
914:
915: As an evident demonstration of this problem, let's consider an
916: one-dimensional integral:
917: %
918: \begin{equation}
919: \int\limits^{+\infty}_{a}
920: \displaystyle\frac{\sin {x}}{x} dx.
921: \label{eq.8.1}
922: \end{equation}
923: %
924: An exact analytical value of this integral at $a=0$ is known from
925: theory of functions of complex variables, equal to $\pi /2$. The
926: numerical calculation of the integral (with use of simple method of
927: trapeziums, method of Gauss or other methods of the numerical
928: integration) allows to obtain quickly the same result also, but with
929: a given degree of accuracy (which determines a region of the
930: numerical integration).
931: It proves a convergence of the computer calculations of such integral
932: with a concrete choice of the parameter $a$.
933: %
934: But \emph{at weak increasing of the parameter $a$ the region of the
935: numerical integration for obtaining of the same calculating accuracy
936: for the integral (\ref{eq.8.1}) increases \underline{essentially},
937: and, therefore, a difficulty to calculate this integral numerically
938: increases essentially}.
939: %
940: However, the application of methods of theory of functions of complex
941: variables makes the calculation of such integral as simple again.
942: So, on the example of the simple integral (\ref{eq.8.1}) one can meet
943: with the numerical problem of the convergence of the calculations of
944: the improper integrals with the damping slowly, oscillating
945: sub-integral functions.
946:
947: We fulfill an analysis of the convergence of the calculation of the
948: integral (\ref{eq.5.2}) on the basis of the analysis of damping of
949: its sub-integral function in the asymptotic region, which is defined
950: by wave functions in the initial $i$-, final $f$-states and the
951: spherical Bessel function of order $l$.
952:
953: For enough large values of $r$ one can use an asymptotic
954: representation of the spherical Bessel function of order $l$:
955: %
956: \begin{equation}
957: j_{l}^{(as)}(kr) = \displaystyle\frac{1}{kr}
958: \sin{\biggl(kr - \displaystyle\frac{\pi l}{2} \biggl)}
959: \label{eq.8.2}
960: \end{equation}
961: %
962: or
963: %
964: \begin{equation}
965: \begin{array}{ccl}
966: j_{2n}^{(as)}(kr) & = &
967: (-1)^{n} j_{0}^{(as)}(kr) =
968: (-1)^{n} \displaystyle\frac{\sin{kr}}{kr}, \\
969: j_{2n+1}^{(as)}(kr) & = &
970: (-1)^{n} j_{1}^{(as)}(kr) =
971: (-1)^{n+1} \displaystyle\frac{\cos{kr}}{kr}.
972: \end{array}
973: \label{eq.8.3}
974: \end{equation}
975: %
976: where $n$ is a natural number.
977:
978: The wave functions $\psi_{i}(r)$ and $\psi_{f}(r)$ of the initial
979: $i$- and the final $f$-states are linear combinations of the Coulomb
980: functions $F_{l}(\eta,\rho)$ and $G_{l}(\eta,\rho)$ (divided on
981: $\rho_{i,f}$, with quantum number $l=0$ or $l=1$ for the initial $i$-
982: or the final $f$-state, correspondingly). One can write the Coulomb
983: functions for $l$ in the asymptotic region so:
984: %
985: \begin{equation}
986: \begin{array}{cc}
987: F_{l}(\eta, \rho) = \sin{\theta_{l}}, &
988: G_{l}(\eta, \rho) = \cos{\theta_{l}}.
989: \end{array}
990: \label{eq.8.4}
991: \end{equation}
992: %
993: where
994: %
995: \begin{equation}
996: \begin{array}{lcllcl}
997: \theta_{l} & = &
998: \rho - \eta \log{2\rho} +
999: \displaystyle\frac{1}{2}\pi l + \sigma_{l}(\eta), &
1000: \rho_{i,f} & = & k_{i,f} r, \\
1001: \sigma_{l} (\eta) & = & \arg \Gamma (i\eta+l+1), &
1002: \eta_{i,f} & = & \displaystyle\frac{m \nu}{k_{i,f}}.
1003: \end{array}
1004: \label{eq.8.5}
1005: \end{equation}
1006: %
1007: where $\Gamma(x)$ is Gamma function with argument $x$,
1008: $\nu$ is Zomerfield parameter.
1009:
1010: Now one can conclude:
1011: %
1012: \begin {itemize}
1013: \item
1014: The spherical Bessel function $j_{l}^{(as)}(kr)$ in the asymptotic
1015: region damps (and oscillates) with increasing of $r$ equally for any
1016: order $l$.
1017:
1018: \item
1019: The Coulomb functions $F_{0}(\eta_{i},\rho_{i})$ and
1020: $G_{0}(\eta_{i},\rho_{i})$ of order $0$ for the initial $i$-state
1021: and the Coulomb functions $F_{1}(\eta_{f},\rho_{f})$ and
1022: $G_{1}(\eta_{f},\rho_{f})$ of order $l=1$ for the final $f$-state
1023: damp in the asymptotic region with increasing of $r$ equally,
1024: oscillate equally and are shifted at a phase between each other.
1025:
1026: \item
1027: The total sub-integral function of the integral (\ref{eq.5.2}) in the
1028: asymptotic region damps with increasing of $r$ equally for any order
1029: $l$.
1030:
1031: \end {itemize}
1032:
1033: Taking into account (\ref{eq.5.2}) and (\ref{eq.8.3}), we obtain:
1034: %
1035: \begin{equation}
1036: \begin{array}{cc}
1037: J_{c}^{(as)}(2n,w) = (-1)^{n} J_{c}^{(as)}(0,w), &
1038: J_{c}^{(as)}(2n+1,w) = (-1)^{n} J_{c}^{(as)}(1,w).
1039: \end{array}
1040: \label{eq.8.6}
1041: \end{equation}
1042: %
1043: I.~e. one can reduce any integral inside the asymptotic region to
1044: one of two integrals $J^{(as)}(0,w)$ or $J^{(as)}(1,w)$.
1045:
1046: Let's find the matrix element $p_{c}^{(as)}(w,\beta)$ in the
1047: asymptotic region:
1048: %
1049: \begin{equation}
1050: \begin{array}{lcl}
1051: p_{c}^{(as)}(w,\beta) & = &
1052: i\sqrt{\displaystyle\frac{2}{3}} J_{c}^{(as)}(0,w)
1053: \Biggl( \displaystyle\sum\limits_{n=0}^{+\infty}
1054: (4n+1) P_{2n} (\cos{\beta}) \Biggr) + \\
1055: & + &
1056: \sqrt{\displaystyle\frac{2}{3}} J_{c}^{(as)}(1,w)
1057: \Biggl( \displaystyle\sum\limits_{n=0}^{+\infty}
1058: (4n+3) P_{2n+1} (\cos{\beta}) \Biggr).
1059: \end{array}
1060: \label{eq.8.7}
1061: \end{equation}
1062: %
1063: Thus, we reduce the formula (\ref{eq.3.9}) for the Br spectra to
1064: the linear combination of two radial integrals, which are convergent
1065: (one can calculate them with a desirable accuracy limited by the
1066: calculations accuracy of a concrete computer) and do not depend on
1067: the angle, and factors - sums on $n$, into which the problem of
1068: convergence is carried out (one can meet with it in (\ref{eq.3.9})).
1069:
1070: It should seem, that one can cut off the region of the numerical
1071: integration in one boundary $R$ for calculation of the integral
1072: $J_{c}(l,w)$ from (\ref{eq.5.2}) for any $l$.
1073: However, the calculation convergence of the integral is determined
1074: not only by the damping of the sub-integral function at large $r$,
1075: but by its behavior on the whole integration region also.
1076: %
1077: An analysis has shown, that the sub-integral function inside the
1078: barrier region and inside the external region closer to the barrier
1079: behaves so, that the calculation of the total integral becomes more
1080: and more sensible to it with increasing of $l$ and the calculation
1081: convergence becomes worse.
1082: %
1083: Therefore, \emph{for obtaining the reliable values of the integrals
1084: $J_{c}(l,w)$ (for the same accuracy) it needs to increase the
1085: external boundary $R$ of the integration region for larger $l$} (such
1086: a conclusion has obtained by us is calculating of the angular Br
1087: spectra for $^{210}\mbox{Po}$ also).
1088: % ***************************************************************************
1089:
1090:
1091:
1092: % ***************************************************************************
1093: \section{Angular calculations for the Br spectra in the
1094: $\alpha$-decay of $^{210}\mbox{Po}$
1095: \label{sec.9}}
1096:
1097: As a demonstration of the described above method, let's calculate
1098: the angular Br spectra in the $\alpha$-decay of $^{210}\mbox{Po}$. For
1099: a comparison of results obtained in such approach, with results
1100: obtained by models
1101: \cite{Papenbrock.1998.PRLTA,Tkalya.1999.PHRVA,Takigawa.1999.PHRVA},
1102: we shall choose the potential parameters as
1103: in~\cite{Maydanyuk.2003.PTP} (they coincide with the parameters of
1104: the potential with the external Coulomb field
1105: in~\cite{Tkalya.1999.PHRVA} and in~\cite{Papenbrock.1998.PRLTA}).
1106:
1107: In spite of the fact that there are methods allowed to calculate
1108: absolute values of the Br spectra, in this paper at first we shall
1109: find the relative values of the Br spectrum for the given nucleus
1110: and then we shall normalize obtained spectra at one selected point of
1111: the Br experimental spectrum for the given angle value. This approach
1112: as against the previous one allows with a larger accuracy to analyze a
1113: behavior of the Br spectra in dependence on the angle (besides, it is
1114: more easy in application).
1115:
1116: In the beginning we calculate the total Br probability in the second
1117: approximation at $l=1$ for the angle $90^{\circ}$ by (\ref{eq.6.3})
1118: with taking into account (\ref{eq.6.3}) (because the component of the
1119: Br probability (\ref{eq.7.2}) in the second approximation at $l=1$
1120: equals to zero at such angle). Then we normalize the obtained spectrum
1121: by the third point of the experimental data \cite{D'Arrigo.1994.PHLTA}
1122: (we have such values $w=0.179$ keV and
1123: $W = 10.1 \cdot 10^{-10}$ 1 / keV / decay), which were obtained for
1124: the angle $\beta = 90^{\circ}$ also. Knowing the normalized factor
1125: and using formulas (\ref{eq.7.3}), we find the Br probability in the
1126: second approximation for the other values of the angle $\beta$.
1127:
1128: The angular values of the Br probability in the second approximation
1129: at $l=1$ are shown in the Table 1. Here, one can see a variation of
1130: the Br probability in dependence on the angle $\beta$, however this
1131: change is extremely small.
1132: %
1133: The Br probability in the first approximation at $l=0$ coincides with
1134: the Br probability in the second approximation at $l=1$ for the angle
1135: $90^{\circ}$.
1136: One can see that a contribution of the Br probability in the first
1137: approximation into the total spectrum is the largest for any angle
1138: value, i.~e. it is extremely larger then the contribution of the
1139: component of the Br probability in the second approximation at $l=1$
1140: into the total spectrum.
1141: \emph{This conclusion has a physical sense (obtained for the first
1142: time):
1143: Br in the $\alpha$-decay for $^{210}\mbox{Po}$ depends extremely weakly
1144: on the value of the angle between directions of the $\alpha$-particle
1145: propagation (or tunneling) and the photon emission (in the given
1146: approach)}.
1147: The account of not zero component of the Br probability in the second
1148: approximation (for the angle values which are distinct from
1149: $90^{\circ}$) increases the total Br probability.
1150: Absolute and relative variations of the Br probability relatively its
1151: maximal and minimal values
1152: %
1153: \begin{equation}
1154: \begin{array}{lcl}
1155: \Delta W_{1}(w) & = &
1156: W_{l=1}(w, \beta=0^{\circ}) - W_{l=1}(w, \beta=90^{\circ}); \\
1157: \Delta W_{2}(w) & = &
1158: \displaystyle\frac
1159: {|W_{l=1}(w, \beta=0^{\circ}) - W_{l=1}(w, \beta=90^{\circ})|}
1160: {W_{l=1}(w, \beta=90^{\circ})} \cdot 100
1161: \end{array}
1162: \label{eq.9.1}
1163: \end{equation}
1164: %
1165: are included into the table also.
1166: %
1167: \begin{table}
1168: % \hspace{-20mm}
1169: \begin{center}
1170: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|} \hline
1171: $w$, &
1172: \multicolumn{7}{|c|}{$W_{l=1}(w, \beta)$, 1 / keV / decay} &
1173: $\Delta W_{1}$, &
1174: $\Delta W_{2}$ \\ \cline{2-8}
1175: %
1176: keV &
1177: $\beta=0^{\circ}$ &
1178: $\beta=15^{\circ}$ &
1179: $\beta=30^{\circ}$ &
1180: $\beta=45^{\circ}$ &
1181: $\beta=60^{\circ}$ &
1182: $\beta=75^{\circ}$ &
1183: $\beta=90^{\circ}$ &
1184: 1/keV/dec. &
1185: \\ \hline
1186: %
1187: 50 & 1.641E-08 & 1.635E-08 & 1.617E-08 & 1.589E-08 & 1.553E-08 & 1.511E-08 & 1.467E-08 & 1.735E-09 & 11.8 \\
1188: 100 & 4.974E-09 & 4.953E-09 & 4.892E-09 & 4.796E-09 & 4.673E-09 & 4.531E-09 & 4.381E-09 & 5.928E-10 & 13.5 \\
1189: 150 & 1.897E-09 & 1.890E-09 & 1.869E-09 & 1.836E-09 & 1.793E-09 & 1.744E-09 & 1.692E-09 & 2.047E-10 & 12.1 \\
1190: 200 & 8.021E-10 & 7.993E-10 & 7.912E-10 & 7.783E-10 & 7.618E-10 & 7.427E-10 & 7.226E-10 & 7.949E-11 & 11.0 \\
1191: 250 & 3.548E-10 & 3.534E-10 & 3.493E-10 & 3.429E-10 & 3.346E-10 & 3.250E-10 & 3.149E-10 & 3.993E-11 & 12.7 \\
1192: 300 & 1.611E-10 & 1.605E-10 & 1.585E-10 & 1.554E-10 & 1.515E-10 & 1.469E-10 & 1.421E-10 & 1.901E-11 & 13.4 \\
1193: 350 & 7.628E-11 & 7.590E-11 & 7.480E-11 & 7.306E-11 & 7.082E-11 & 6.826E-11 & 6.557E-11 & 1.071E-11 & 16.3 \\
1194: 400 & 3.251E-11 & 3.236E-11 & 3.194E-11 & 3.127E-11 & 3.042E-11 & 2.943E-11 & 2.840E-11 & 4.110E-12 & 14.5 \\
1195: 450 & 1.278E-11 & 1.275E-11 & 1.266E-11 & 1.252E-11 & 1.234E-11 & 1.213E-11 & 1.191E-11 & 8.716E-13 & 7.3 \\
1196: 500 & 6.094E-12 & 6.077E-12 & 6.030E-12 & 5.956E-12 & 5.860E-12 & 5.749E-12 & 5.632E-12 & 4.615E-13 & 8.2 \\
1197: 550 & 3.198E-12 & 3.179E-12 & 3.124E-12 & 3.038E-12 & 2.928E-12 & 2.802E-12 & 2.671E-12 & 5.271E-13 & 19.7 \\
1198: 600 & 1.624E-12 & 1.612E-12 & 1.578E-12 & 1.524E-12 & 1.455E-12 & 1.378E-12 & 1.297E-12 & 3.266E-13 & 25.2 \\
1199: 650 & 5.731E-13 & 5.712E-13 & 5.656E-13 & 5.569E-13 & 5.456E-13 & 5.326E-13 & 5.189E-13 & 5.422E-14 & 10.5 \\
1200: 700 & 2.198E-13 & 2.186E-13 & 2.150E-13 & 2.094E-13 & 2.023E-13 & 1.942E-13 & 1.858E-13 & 3.398E-14 & 18.3 \\
1201: 750 & 9.515E-14 & 9.445E-14 & 9.240E-14 & 8.920E-14 & 8.512E-14 & 8.050E-14 & 7.571E-14 & 1.944E-14 & 25.7 \\
1202: 800 & 2.409E-14 & 2.411E-14 & 2.418E-14 & 2.430E-14 & 2.446E-14 & 2.467E-14 & 2.490E-14 & -8.094E-16 & 3.3 \\ \hline
1203: \end{tabular}
1204: \end{center}
1205: \caption{Angular values of Br probability in $\alpha$-decay of
1206: $^{210}\mbox{Po}$ in approximation $l=1$
1207: \label{table.1}}
1208: \end{table}
1209:
1210: The results of the calculations of the Br probability in the
1211: $\alpha$-decay of $^{210}\mbox{Po}$ in the second approximation at $l=1$
1212: by our approach are shown in Fig.~\ref{fig.1}.
1213: %
1214: \begin{figure}[h]
1215: \centering\includegraphics[width=11cm]{210PoWS.eps}
1216: % \caption{Спектры ТИ при распаде $^{210}\mbox{Po}$:
1217: % 1 --- кривая, полученная в подходе модели мгновенного ускорения
1218: % (на основе классической элекстродинамики) и извлеченная из
1219: % \cite{Tkalya.1999.PHRVA};
1220: % 2 --- экспериментальные данные из \cite{D'Arrigo.1994.PHLTA,Eremin.2000.PRLTA};
1221: % 3 --- экспериментальные данные из \cite{Kasagi.1997.PRLTA};
1222: % 4 --- кривая вероятности ТИ $W_{l=1}$ в первом приближении $l=1$ по
1223: % нашему методу, практически совпадает с кривыми по квантово-механическим
1224: % моделям \cite{Papenbrock.1998.PRLTA} и \cite{Tkalya.1999.PHRVA};
1225: % 5 --- кривая составляющей $W^{(l=1)}$ вероятности ТИ первого приближения
1226: % $l=1$ для угла $45^{\circ}$ по нашему методу.
1227: %
1228: \caption{The Br spectra in $\alpha$-decay of $^{210}\mbox{Po}$:
1229: 1 is a curve, extracted from \cite{Tkalya.1999.PHRVA} by the instant
1230: accelerated model;
1231: %
1232: 2 is the experimental data \cite{D'Arrigo.1994.PHLTA,Eremin.2000.PRLTA};
1233: %
1234: 3 is the experimental data \cite{Kasagi.1997.PRLTA};
1235: %
1236: 4 is a curve of the Br probability $W_{l=1}$ in the first approximation
1237: $l=1$ by our approach at $\beta=90^{\circ}$;
1238: %
1239: 5 is a curve of the Br probability component $W^{(l=1)}$ in the
1240: first approximation $l=1$ at the angle $45^{\circ}$ by our approach;
1241: %
1242: 6 is a curve calculated by us with radial integral (6) and formula
1243: %
1244: $d\psi_{i}(r) / dr = - \psi_{i}(r)/w \: dV(r) / dr$
1245: %
1246: (it coincides with radial integral (7) in \cite{Tkalya.1999.PHRVA}
1247: with factor $-1/w$)
1248: and further normalization at the third point of data
1249: \cite{D'Arrigo.1994.PHLTA,Eremin.2000.PRLTA};
1250: %
1251: 7 is a curve calculated on the basis of the potential
1252: (\ref{eq.11.1})--(\ref{eq.11.3})
1253: \label{fig.1}}
1254: \end{figure}
1255: %
1256: From the figure one can see, that for the angle $90^{\circ}$ our
1257: method gives the Br spectrum, which is very close to the Br spectra,
1258: obtained by the models \cite{Papenbrock.1998.PRLTA} and
1259: \cite{Tkalya.1999.PHRVA}. However, as against the models
1260: \cite{Papenbrock.1998.PRLTA,Tkalya.1999.PHRVA} our method shows the
1261: angular variation of the Br spectra.
1262: % ***************************************************************************
1263:
1264:
1265:
1266: % ***************************************************************************
1267: \section{An analyses of the maximums and minimums in the angular Br
1268: spectra
1269: \label{sec.10}}
1270:
1271: Let's find the values of the angle $\beta$ between the directions of
1272: the $\alpha$-particle propagation (or tunneling) and the photon
1273: emission, at which the Br probability has the maximal and minimal
1274: values. Using a derivative
1275: %
1276: \begin{equation}
1277: \displaystyle\frac{d W_{l=1}(w, \beta)}{d\beta} =
1278: W_{l=0}(w)
1279: \Bigl(N^{*}(w) + N(w) - 2|N(w)|^{2}\cos{\beta} \Bigr) \sin{\beta},
1280: \label{eq.10.1}
1281: \end{equation}
1282: %
1283: we find conditions of extremal values of the function
1284: $W_{l=1}(w,\beta)$:
1285: %
1286: \begin{equation}
1287: \begin{array}{l}
1288: \sin(\beta) = 0; \\
1289: \cos(\beta) =
1290: \displaystyle\frac{N^{*}(w) + N(w)} {2|N(w)|^{2}} =
1291: \displaystyle\frac{Re(N(w))} {Re(N(w))^{2} + Im(N(w))^{2}}.
1292: \end{array}
1293: \label{eq.10.2}
1294: \end{equation}
1295:
1296: Calculations for $^{210}\mbox{Po}$ for the given potential have shown,
1297: that the second condition in (\ref{eq.10.2}) in a range $w$ = 50--800
1298: keV is not carried out. One can explain this by that the integral
1299: $J_{c}(1,w)$ is smaller than the integral $J_{c}(0,w)$ in
1300: $10^{2}$--$10^{4}$ times (that is in agreement with a condition of
1301: the convergence of the Br spectra at increasing of $l$).
1302: From the first condition in (\ref{eq.10.2}) we obtain such extremal
1303: values for the angle $\beta$:
1304: %
1305: \begin{equation}
1306: \beta = 0, \pi.
1307: \label{eq.10.3}
1308: \end{equation}
1309: %
1310: The Br probability with such angle values has the maximal and
1311: minimal values, and between them it varies monotonously for any
1312: energy of the photon emitted in the range $w$ = 50--800 keV. One can
1313: see this also from the Table 1.
1314: % ***************************************************************************
1315:
1316:
1317:
1318:
1319: % ***************************************************************************
1320: \section{Inclusion of Woods-Saxon potential into the model
1321: \label{sec.11}}
1322:
1323: Now let's analyze, how the Br spectrum in the $\alpha$-decay of the
1324: studied nucleus $^{210}\mbox{Po}$ is changed, if in the approach for
1325: calculations of the Br spectra from the potential of interaction
1326: between the $\alpha$-particle and the daughter nucleus, pointed out in
1327: Sec.~\ref{sec.9} and having the simplified barrier, to pass to a
1328: potential with the barrier, constructed on the basis of the account
1329: of realistic nuclear forces of interaction between the
1330: $\alpha$-particle and the daughter nucleus which is used in realistic
1331: nuclear models.
1332:
1333: With such a purpose we shall take a potential, proposed
1334: in~\cite{Denisov.2005.PHRVA} for description of the $\alpha$-decay
1335: and synthesis of nuclei. Among extensive set of literature giving us
1336: different types of the $\alpha$-nucleus potentials, we have given
1337: preference to such a paper because of here we see universal and clear
1338: approach for calculation of parameters of the potential after choice
1339: of needed such nucleus. In result, we suppose to obtain universal
1340: recipe for calculation of the Br spectra after choosing the nucleus.
1341:
1342: So, according to~\cite{Denisov.2005.PHRVA} (see~(6)--(10)), we use
1343: such potential of interaction:
1344: %
1345: \begin{equation}
1346: V (r, \theta, l, Q) =
1347: V_{C} (r, \theta) + V_{N} (r, \theta, Q) + V_{l} (r),
1348: \label{eq.11.1}
1349: \end{equation}
1350: %
1351: where
1352: %
1353: \begin{equation}
1354: \begin{array}{lcl}
1355: V_{C} (r, \theta) & = &
1356: \displaystyle\frac{2 Z e^{2}} {r}
1357: \biggl(1 +
1358: \displaystyle\frac{3 R^{2}} {5 r^{2}} \beta Y_{20}(\theta) \biggr), \\
1359:
1360: V_{N} (r, \theta, Q) & = &
1361: \displaystyle\frac{v(A,Z,Q)}
1362: {1 + \exp{\displaystyle\frac{r-r_{0}} {d}}}, \\
1363:
1364: V_{l} (r) & = & \displaystyle\frac{l(l+1)} {2mr^{2}}.
1365: \end{array}
1366: \label{eq.11.2}
1367: \end{equation}
1368: %
1369: At current stage (with a purpose to simplify the numerical
1370: calculations of the Br spectra), for determination of the component
1371: $V_{C}(r,\theta)$ we use the formula (7) in~\cite{Denisov.2005.PHRVA}
1372: on whole region of $r$
1373: (without use of (8) in~\cite{Denisov.2005.PHRVA}).
1374:
1375: According to (14)--(20) in~\cite{Denisov.2005.PHRVA}, we calculate
1376: the parameters as follows:
1377: %
1378: \begin{equation}
1379: \begin{array}{rcl}
1380: v(A,Z,Q) & = &
1381: -(30.275 - 0.45838 Z/A^{1/3} + 58.270 I - 0.24244 Q), \\
1382: r_{m} & = & 1.5268 + R, \\
1383: R & = & R_{p}(1 + 3.0909/R_{p}^{2}) + 0.1243 t, \\
1384: R_{p} & = & 1.24 A^{1/3} (1 + 1.646/A - 0.191 I), \\
1385: t & = & I - 0.4 A/(A+200), \\
1386: d & = & 0.49290,
1387: \end{array}
1388: \label{eq.11.3}
1389: \end{equation}
1390:
1391: According to \cite{Muntyan.2003}, we see, that the parameter $\beta$
1392: for $^{210}\mbox{Po}$ is very small, that points out to a high degree
1393: of sphericity of this nucleus. Therefore, for calculation of the Br
1394: spectra we note the following:
1395: %
1396: \begin {itemize}
1397:
1398: \item
1399: In definition of $r_{m}(\theta)$ and $R(\theta)$ we do not use (21)
1400: and (22) of~\cite{Denisov.2005.PHRVA} (using (15)
1401: from~\cite{Denisov.2005.PHRVA}).
1402:
1403: \item
1404: The formalism for calculation of the Br spectra, presented in
1405: Sec.~\ref{sec.3}--\ref{sec.10}), is constructed on the basis of
1406: division of the total wave function into its radial and angular
1407: components, i.~e. in the assumption of spherical symmetry of the
1408: decaying nucleus.
1409: \emph{Therefore, for the nucleus $^{210}\mbox{Po}$ our approach for
1410: calculation of the Br spectra is applicable with account of realistic
1411: nuclear forces also}.
1412: \end {itemize}
1413:
1414: Further, we calculate the radial wave function of the decaying system
1415: for the potential (\ref{eq.11.1})--(\ref{eq.11.3}).
1416: This gives us the general solution for the wave function in
1417: dependence on the selected energy level for $\alpha$-decay.
1418: To achieve, that the found solutions describe the states of the
1419: decaying system before and after the spontaneous photon emission, we
1420: should take into account boundary conditions in initial and final
1421: states.
1422: %
1423: Here, we use such conditions:
1424: %
1425: \begin {equation}
1426: \begin {array} {ll}
1427: \mbox {the initial $i$-state:} & \chi_{i}(r \to +\infty) \to G(r)+iF(r), \\
1428: \mbox {the final $f$-state:} & \chi _ {f} (r=0) = 0,
1429: \end {array}
1430: \label{eq.11.4}
1431: \end {equation}
1432: %
1433: where
1434: $\varphi_{i,f}(r) = \displaystyle\frac{\chi_{i,f}(r)}{r}$,
1435: $F$ and $G$ are Coulomb functions.
1436:
1437: One note, that in against of a scattering of the $\alpha$-particle
1438: on the nucleus, where as the boundary condition for the initial
1439: $i$-state \emph{a finiteness of the radial wave function
1440: $\varphi_{i}(r)$ should be used at point $r=0$ ($\chi_{i}(r=0)=0$)},
1441: for decay we choose a natural requirement, that the radial wave
1442: function tend to a spherical divergent wave in asymptotic region
1443: ($\chi_{i}(r\to\infty)$ tend to a plane divergent wave).
1444: \emph{This condition gives us inevitably the divergence of the total
1445: radial wave function in the initial $i$-state at point $r=0$
1446: (which real and imaginary parts consist from regular and singular
1447: solutions)!}
1448: %
1449: One can make sure in this by requiring a fulfillment of the continuity
1450: condition for the radial wave function on the whole region on its
1451: definition; or by requiring the constancy of the radial flux density,
1452: which is distinct from zero and is directed outside in the asymptotic
1453: region (and, therefore, it should be not zero near point $r=0$, that
1454: is impossible to execute with null wave function at any chosen point
1455: of $r$).
1456: %
1457: This peculiarity complicates essentially the calculations of the Br
1458: spectra for the $\alpha$-decay in comparison with the problems of the
1459: calculation of the Br spectra for the scattering of charged particles
1460: on nuclei (where the essential progress has been achieved and a lot of
1461: papers are published).
1462:
1463: \emph{It turns out, that real and imaginary parts of a sub-integral
1464: function of (\ref {eq.4.5}) for the calculation of the matrix elements,
1465: constructed on the basis of the found solutions for the wave function
1466: for the initial and final states, tend to zero at point $r\to 0$!}
1467: %
1468: This interesting peculiarity provides the convergence of the matrix
1469: elements near point $r=0$ and, therefore, in the whole region of $r$
1470: (in the asymptotic region the convergence of the wave function is
1471: determined by the convergence of the Coulomb functions, considered
1472: above).
1473: Thus, we resolve the divergence problem in the calculations of the
1474: Br spectra in the $\alpha$-decay of the nucleus $^{210}\mbox{Po}$.
1475:
1476: The Br spectrum for the nucleus $^{210}\mbox{Po}$ with the
1477: $\alpha$-nucleus potential (\ref{eq.11.1})--(\ref{eq.11.3}) by our
1478: approach and calculations is shown by the curve with number 7 in
1479: Fig.~\ref{fig.1}.
1480: From here one can see, that the new curve 7 of the Br probability is
1481: located very close to the curve 4 for the Br probability with the
1482: potential from Sec.~\ref{sec.9} with the simplified barrier (and also
1483: close to the curve 6 by the approaches
1484: \cite{Papenbrock.1998.PRLTA,Tkalya.1999.PHRVA}).
1485:
1486: \vspace {5mm}
1487: \noindent
1488: \underline {Conclusions:}
1489: %
1490: \begin {itemize}
1491: \item
1492: The account of nuclear forces, essentially changed a shape of the
1493: barrier in its internal part (and essentially changed Br from this
1494: internal region), changes very slowly the spectrum of the total Br
1495: in the $\alpha$-decay of the nucleus $^{210}\mbox{Po}$ (in comparison
1496: with the earlier obtained Br spectrum on the basis of the potential
1497: from Sec.~\ref{sec.9} with the simplified barrier).
1498:
1499: \item
1500: This point confirms the result (obtained early on the basis of the
1501: $\alpha$-nucleus potential pointed out in Sec.~\ref{sec.9} with the
1502: barrier of the simplified shape) that the Br emission from the
1503: internal region till point $r$ for barrier maximum gives the very
1504: small contribution into the total Br spectrum.
1505: This conclusion coincides logically with a property (found on the
1506: basis of microscopic models of the nuclei with their $\alpha$-decay)
1507: of leaving of the $\alpha$-particle from the nuclear surface during
1508: the first decay stage.
1509:
1510: \end {itemize}
1511: % ***************************************************************************
1512:
1513:
1514:
1515:
1516:
1517: % ***************************************************************************
1518: \section{Conclusions and perspectives
1519: \label{conclusions}}
1520:
1521: We present the new method of calculation of the Br spectra in the
1522: $\alpha$-decay, where the angle between the directions of the
1523: $\alpha$-particle motion (with tunneling) and the photon emission
1524: (used in the experiments \cite{Eremin.2000.PRLTA,Kasagi.2000.PRLTA})
1525: is taken into account. Using it, the angular spectra for the nucleus
1526: $^{210}\mbox{Po}$ are obtained for the first time. Now let us formulate
1527: the main conclusions and perspectives:
1528:
1529: \begin{itemize}
1530: \item
1531: The method gives such a dependence of the bremsstrahlung spectrum in
1532: the $\alpha$-decay of $^{210}\mbox{Po}$ on the angle (this has been obtained
1533: for the first time):
1534: %
1535: \begin{itemize}
1536: \item
1537: the first approximation at $l=0$ gives independence of the spectrum
1538: on the angle;
1539:
1540: \item
1541: the second approximation at $l=1$ gives a slow monotonous variation
1542: of the slope of the spectrum curve with changing the angle and without
1543: a visible change of the shape of the spectrum curve (i.~e. without the
1544: appearance of humps and holes in the spectrum);
1545:
1546: \item
1547: for arbitrary energy of the photon emitted in the range of
1548: $w$ = 50--750 keV the bremsstrahlung probability is maximal at the
1549: angle $0^{\circ}$ and is minimal at the angle $180^{\circ}$, between
1550: these angular values the bremsstrahlung probability varies
1551: monotonously.
1552: \end{itemize}
1553:
1554: \item
1555: Results for $^{210}\mbox{Po}$ have obtained on the basis of these
1556: approximations:
1557: \begin{itemize}
1558:
1559: \item
1560: the bremsstrahlung process does not depend on the direction of the
1561: leaving the $\alpha$-particle relatively to the shape of the daughter
1562: nucleus before the photon emission (this supposition has been fulfilled
1563: for $^{210}\mbox{Po}$, because, in accordance with \cite{Muntyan.2003}
1564: (see Fig.~5 on p.~33), coefficients $\beta_{\lambda}^{0}$ of the
1565: shape deformation for this nucleus at $\lambda=2,4,6,8$ are extremely
1566: close to zero in comparison with other nuclei with other numbers of
1567: protons and neutrons, i.~e. $^{210}\mbox{Po}$ is one of the most
1568: spherical nuclei);
1569:
1570: \item
1571: the photon emission does not change the direction of the
1572: $\alpha$-particle propagation (this supposition is suitable for the
1573: low-energy photons, and, therefore, it is applicable for analysis of
1574: all existing experimental data of the bremsstrahlung spectra, where
1575: one can select a region with smaller photons energies for increasing
1576: accuracy);
1577:
1578: \item
1579: the bremsstrahlung spectra have been calculated by means of the
1580: $\alpha$-nucleus potential with the simplified barrier pointed out in
1581: Sec.~\ref{sec.9} (they coincide with the $\alpha$-nucleus potential
1582: in~\cite{Maydanyuk.2003.PTP}, and also with the potential with the
1583: external Coulomb field in~\cite{Tkalya.1999.PHRVA} and
1584: in~\cite{Papenbrock.1998.PRLTA}) and with use of the $\alpha$-nucleus
1585: potential with the barrier, pointed out in Sec.~\ref{sec.11}
1586: (see~\cite{Denisov.2005.PHRVA}) and constructed on the basis of
1587: realistic nuclear forces.
1588: \end{itemize}
1589:
1590:
1591: \item
1592: Taking into account nuclear forces in the method gives the following:
1593: %
1594: \begin{itemize}
1595: \item
1596: it does not change dependences on the angle of bremsstrahlung
1597: probability in the first and second approximations;
1598:
1599: \item
1600: it essentially changes the shape of the barrier in its internal region
1601: (sufficiently changes the Br from such internal region) and changes
1602: very little the spectrum of the total Br in the $\alpha$-decay
1603: for the nucleus $^{210}\mbox{Po}$ at selected angle value.
1604:
1605: \end{itemize}
1606: \end{itemize}
1607:
1608:
1609: From here a question naturally arises:
1610: \emph{which improvement should be made in the method that results
1611: in enough visible changes of the Br spectrum curve, to achieve a
1612: better description of the experimental data?} Note the following:
1613: \begin {itemize}
1614:
1615: \item
1616: According to our calculations, in consideration of the possibility of
1617: the $\alpha$-particle leaving at the energy of the \emph{exited state} of
1618: the decaying system, the angle of the slope of the Br spectrum curve
1619: increases (monotonously).
1620: Apparently, it allows to displace the calculated Br curve (for example,
1621: by our method) essentially closer to the experimental data
1622: \cite{D'Arrigo.1994.PHLTA}.
1623:
1624: \item
1625: For obtaining \underline{reliable values} of the Br spectra for the
1626: $\alpha$-decay one needs to achieve in the calculations the convergence
1627: of integrals for such spectra.
1628: This leads to the necessity to consider wave functions inside a large
1629: space region with the external boundary far enough from the nucleus.
1630: From here a new question naturally arises as to taking into
1631: account electrons shells of the atom with such nuclear
1632: $\alpha$-decay in the calculation of the Br spectra in the
1633: $\alpha$-decay and one can formulate the following \emph{hypothesis
1634: about the visible influence of the electrons shells of the atom on the
1635: total Br spectrum in the $\alpha$-decay}.
1636: %
1637: One can note that an essential progress has been made by
1638: M.~Amusia in the study of the Br in atomic physics
1639: \cite{Amusia.1988.PRPLC,Amusia.1990}.
1640: %
1641: Moreover, according to \cite{Amusia.2005} (see~p.20--21), there is an
1642: inevitable influence of the $\alpha$-decay process at its starting
1643: time stage on the electrons shells of the atom whose nucleus decays.
1644: So, the $\alpha$-particle during its leaving (with tunneling) deforms
1645: and polarizes these electrons shells.
1646: %
1647: In one's turn, the changed electrons shells can correct our
1648: understanding of the real $\alpha$-nucleus potential in the model,
1649: which should be used for the calculations of the Br spectra
1650: (one should note that these effects are still not studied in details).
1651: %
1652: Note that these effects (partially) take place in the same space region,
1653: where it is necessary to use the wave functions for the calculation
1654: of the matrix elements to achieve converging values of the Br
1655: spectra.
1656: Therefore, it is desirable to study these effects to obtain for more
1657: accurately the total Br spectra of the $\alpha$-decay.
1658:
1659: \item
1660: The inclusion of the $\alpha$-nucleus potential from
1661: \cite{Denisov.2005.PHRVA} in our method, deforming the decay
1662: barrier, does not essentially displace a point, where the $\alpha$-particle
1663: starts to tunnel through the barrier.
1664: It turns out that the displacement of this point is much smaller in
1665: comparison with the tunneling region and even with a \emph{``mixed
1666: region''}, introduced in \cite{Takigawa.1999.PHRVA}.
1667: Therefore, after taking into account the realistic nuclear forces
1668: in the method, the interest to analyze the Br from these regions
1669: (with detailed study of tunneling) remains.
1670:
1671: \item
1672: We assume that further development of the time formalism for the
1673: description of the Br in the $\alpha$-decay at its first stage
1674: will give new abilities in the accurate description of the Br. One
1675: cannot exclude the assumption about appearance of \emph {``holes''} in the
1676: Br spectra (see \cite{Kasagi.1997.JPHGB,Takigawa.1999.PHRVA}), that
1677: can allow to better describe the experimental data
1678: \cite{Kasagi.1997.JPHGB,Kasagi.1997.PRLTA}. However, in such a case
1679: it is not clear how to connect this with the available experimental data
1680: \cite{D'Arrigo.1994.PHLTA} without of ``holes'' in the logical basis
1681: of our method.
1682: \end{itemize}
1683:
1684:
1685:
1686: Now let's formulate the conclusions, which have a physical sense and
1687: on the basis of the calculations for $^{210}\mbox{Po}$ by our model:
1688: %
1689: \begin{itemize}
1690: \item
1691: The bremsstrahlung in the $\alpha$-decay of the spherical nuclei
1692: depends on the angle extremely weakly. In taking into account of the
1693: nuclear forces, such dependence is not changed visibly.
1694:
1695: \item
1696: It is not enough to take into account only one angle for the
1697: explanation of the difference between the experimental spectra
1698: \cite{D'Arrigo.1994.PHLTA} and
1699: \cite{Kasagi.1997.JPHGB,Kasagi.1997.PRLTA} for $^{210}\mbox{Po}$
1700: (which equals to $90^{\circ}$ and $25^{\circ}$, correspondingly)
1701: on the basis of our model
1702: %
1703: and for the explanation of the difference between these experimental
1704: spectra and the calculated curves averaged by angle values in the
1705: approaches
1706: \cite{Papenbrock.1998.PRLTA,Takigawa.1999.PHRVA,Tkalya.1999.PHRVA}
1707: (that can be supposed in~\cite{Eremin.2000.PRLTA,Kasagi.2000.PRLTA}).
1708:
1709: \item
1710: The small visible change of the Br spectra after taking into account
1711: of the realistic nuclear forces in our method confirms the result
1712: (obtained on the basis of the $\alpha$-nucleus potential from
1713: Sec.~\ref{sec.9} with the barrier of the simplified shape, also see
1714: \cite{Maydanyuk.2003.PTP}) that the Br from the internal region till
1715: point $r$ for barrier maximum gives the very small contribution into
1716: the total Br spectrum. This conclusion become natural if to take into
1717: account such a property (found on the basis of microscopic models of
1718: the $\alpha$-decay) as the $\alpha$-decay starts from leaving of the
1719: $\alpha$-particle from the nuclear surface.
1720:
1721: \end{itemize}
1722:
1723:
1724:
1725: In closing, supposing that the Br spectra in the $\alpha$-decay must
1726: to change essentially at change of the angle value, we note, how this
1727: point can be explained, analyzing this question in theoretical and
1728: experimental aspects:
1729: \begin{itemize}
1730:
1731: \item
1732: One can explain such angular change of the bremsstrahlung spectrum so:
1733: \begin{itemize}
1734:
1735: \item
1736: In the $\alpha$-decay of the (initially) spherical nuclei ---
1737: by strong angular deformation of the decay barrier and continuous
1738: redistribution of the electromagnetic charge (or \emph{``nuclear
1739: polarization''} likely the polarization of the electrons shells
1740: during tunneling of the $\alpha$-particle, according to
1741: \cite{Amusia.2005} (see p.~20--21)).
1742: %
1743: One can suppose, that here non-central forces between the
1744: $\alpha$-particle and nucleons of the daughter nucleus play essential
1745: role, which exist in the barrier region mainly.
1746: %
1747: Note, that a serious progress was achieved early in the microscopic
1748: approach in study of the bremsstrahlung in scattering of the
1749: nucleons and the $\alpha$-particles on the light nuclei (see
1750: \cite{Baye.1985.NUPHA,Descouvemont.1986.PHLTA,%
1751: Liu.1990.PHRVA.C41,Liu.1990.PHRVA.C42,Baye.1992.NUPHA}),
1752: in study of the bremsstrahlung in collisions between heavy ions
1753: and the nuclei (see \cite{Biro.1987.NUPHA}),
1754: %
1755: and in the non-microscopic approaches in study of bremsstrahlung
1756: induced by protons during their collisions on heavier nuclei
1757: (see \cite{Pluyko.1987.FECAA}).
1758:
1759: \item
1760: In the $\alpha$-decay of the deformed nuclei --- by essential
1761: appearance of the angular anisotropy of the $\alpha$-nucleus potential.
1762: Then one can extract an information about the shape of the nucleus
1763: from the angular bremsstrahlung spectra.
1764:
1765: \end{itemize}
1766:
1767:
1768: \item
1769: Experimental confirmation of the change the Br spectrum in the
1770: $\alpha$-decay of the spherical nuclei at change of the angle value
1771: gives the following:
1772: \begin{itemize}
1773:
1774: \item
1775: It will prove an existence of essential microscopic forces between
1776: the $\alpha$-particle and the nucleons of the daughter nucleus,
1777: reinforcing the angular deformation of the barrier.
1778:
1779: \item
1780: It will prove a visible influence of the bremsstrahlung on dynamics
1781: of the $\alpha$-decay. In accordance with our model, it will be an
1782: experimental confirmation of the effect of variation of the barrier
1783: penetrability in result of the emission during tunneling of a charged
1784: particle, proposed in \cite{Flambaum.1999.PRLTA}.
1785:
1786: \end{itemize}
1787: \end{itemize}
1788:
1789: The angular analysis of the bremsstrahlung spectra gives the new
1790: additional information about the $\alpha$-decay. Therefore, further
1791: angular experimental measurements of the bremsstrahlung spectra will
1792: have the interest.
1793: % ***************************************************************************
1794:
1795:
1796:
1797: % ***************************************************************************
1798: \section*{Acknowledgements
1799: \label{acknowledgements}}
1800:
1801: Authors express their deep gratitude to Dr.~I.~E.~Kashuba for his
1802: valuable assistance in development of numerical algorithms for
1803: calculation of Coulomb functions with higher accuracy, that has
1804: allowed to obtain a convergence in calculations of the
1805: bremsstrahlung spectra for $^{210}\mbox{Po}$.
1806: % ***************************************************************************
1807:
1808:
1809:
1810: % ***************************************************************************
1811: % \bibliographystyle{h-physrev4}
1812: \bibliography{Be}
1813: % ***************************************************************************
1814:
1815:
1816: % ***************************************************************************
1817: \end{document}
1818: