1: %%% Submitted to the PRC
2: %% as a e-print on 9 September 04
3: %%% The text - 12 pages, Fig. captions and 5 Figures
4: %%% Ni and Ga isotopes
5: \documentstyle[preprint,aps]{revtex}
6:
7: \begin{document}
8: %%% \draft \tighten
9: \title{ The $\beta$-delayed neutron emission in $^{78}$Ni region}
10: \author{I.~N.~Borzov}
11: \address {University of Leuven, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium}
12:
13: \maketitle
14:
15: \begin{abstract}
16: A systematic study of the total $\beta$-decay half-lives and $\beta$-delayed neutron emission probabilities is
17: performed. The $\beta$-strength function is treated within the self-consistent density-functional + continuum-QRPA
18: framework including the Gamow-Teller and first-forbidden transitions. The experimental total $\beta$-decay
19: half-lives for the Ni isotopes with $A\leq$76 are described satisfactorily. The half-lives predicted from $A$=70
20: up to $A$=86 reveal fairly regular $A$-behaviour which results from simultaneous account for the Gamow-Teller and
21: first-forbidden transitions. For $Z\approx$ 28 nuclei, a suppression of the delayed neutron emission probability
22: is found when the $N$=50 neutron closed shell is crossed. The effect originates from the high-energy
23: first-forbidden transitions to the states outside the $Q_{\beta} - S_n$-window in the daughter nuclei.
24: \end{abstract}
25: \pacs{PACS numbers:
26: %23.20.Lv 27.80.+w 29.30.Kv}
27: 23.40.Bw,21.60.Jz,25.30.Pt,26.30.+k}
28:
29: \section{Introduction}
30:
31: Physics of the complex nuclear systems with high isospin asymmetry is a rich and multi-faceted field. It involves
32: such exotic objects like neutron stars and short-lived $\beta$-unstable nuclei with a large neutron (proton)
33: excess. The ground state and $\beta$-decay properties of these radioactive isotopes give a valuable information on
34: structural evolution far off stability and also provide input for supernova explosion calculations. In particular
35: for the modeling of the r-process nucleosynthesis, the most important are the nuclear masses which define the path
36: of the r-process through the neutron-rich domain of the nuclear chart. The $\beta$-decays and $\nu (\bar \nu)$
37: captures are also essential, as they regulate the flow of the material to high $Z$-values and set up the r-process
38: time scale. The nuclei near the new doubly-magic $^{78}$Ni, $^{132}$Sn and "east" of $^{208}$Pb are of special
39: importance. Spectacular progress of the RNB experiments in these regions has been reached recently due to
40: $Z$-selective resonance-ionization laser ion-source technique (see e.g \cite{Mish}). It has provided a unique
41: testing ground for theoretical approaches to exotic nuclei and modeling of explosive stellar events.
42:
43: In this short paper we perform the microscopic study of the total $\beta$-decay half-lives and $\beta$-delayed
44: neutron emission probabilities of very neutron-rich nuclei. The simultaneous analysis of these $\beta$-decay
45: observables gives a possibility to reconstruct the $\beta$-strength function. Specifically, one may gain an
46: insight about the relative contribution of its Gamow-Teller (GT) and first-forbidden (FF) components. A
47: possibility of competition between the GT and FF decays in nuclei with the neutron-excess bigger than one major
48: shell has been often discussed in the literature (see \cite{KW} and Refs. therein). The experimental evidence of that
49: has been known since the first measurements in the region of $^{132}$Sn \cite{Fog}. However, the microscopic
50: global calculations \cite{KK,PM} have treated the total $\beta$-decay half-lives and delayed neutron emission
51: probabilities ($P_n$) in allowed transitions approximation. (The estimated contribution of the unique FF
52: transitions from \cite{KK98} has to be taken with some reservations.)
53:
54: Clearly, the single $\beta$-decay channel approximation is not adequate for description of the isotopic dependence
55: of the $\beta$-decay characteristics, especially for the nuclei crossing the closed $N$ and $Z$ shells. It has been
56: pointed out recently in \cite{1B} that self-consistent framework of the finite Fermi system theory including the
57: GT and first-forbidden FF decays on the same footing allows for reasonably sound predictions of the ground state
58: properties and $\beta$-decay characteristics of very neutron-rich nuclei. An important contribution of the
59: first-forbidden (FF) non-unique decays to the total half-lives of neutron-rich nuclei above the closed proton and
60: neutron shells has been stressed in \cite{1B,3B}. The purpose of the present work is to examine the impact of the
61: high-energy FF decays on the $\beta$-delayed neutron emission in the nuclei near the closed shells at $Z$=28 and
62: $N$=50. In what follows we briefly outline the particulars of the theoretical framework, present new calculations
63: of the total $\beta$-decay half-lives and $\beta$-delayed neutron emission probabilities and discuss possible
64: uncertainties.
65:
66:
67: \section{Theoretical analysis}
68: The $\beta$-delayed neutron emission is basically a multi-step process consisting of
69: a) the $\beta$-decay of the precursor ($A,Z$) which results in
70: feeding the excited states of the emitter nucleus ($A,Z+1$);
71: b) neutron or/and $\gamma$-emission to an excited state
72: or to the ground state of the final nucleus ($A-1,Z+1$).
73: The difference in the characteristic time-scales of the $\beta$-decay and subsequent particle emission
74: processes justifies an assumption of their statistical independence.
75: Thus, the total probability of the delayed neutron emission accompanying
76: the $\beta$-decay to the excited states in the daughter nucleus can be expressed
77: as \cite{PaSv}
78:
79: \begin{equation}\label{1}
80: P_n = T_{1/2} \int_{B_n(Z+1)}^{Q_{\beta}} {\rm d}{\omega} f_{0}(Z+1,\omega)
81: \sum_{\beta} <\kappa_J> S_{\beta}(\omega,\gamma)P({j^{\pi}}_{i,f}, E_n),~
82: \end{equation}
83: \noindent where $\omega$ is the energy of nuclear transitions between the ground state of the
84: parent nucleus and final states of the emitter
85: \footnote{Within the self-consistent QRPA-approach one actually calculates the transition energy $\omega$
86: (clearly, an additional "outer" variable $Q_{\beta}$ \cite{KK} is needed to "derive" $E_x$).
87: The transition energies for the main GT and FF decays
88: reveal a smooth A-dependence which simplifies the analysis.}.
89: The neutron emission threshold of the emitter $B_n(Z+1)$ and total $\beta$-decay energy
90: $Q_{\beta}$ are calculated self-consistently \cite{BF}.
91:
92: In the Eq.1, $T_{1/2}$ stands for total $\beta$-decay half-life
93:
94: \begin{equation} \label{2}
95: 1/T_{1/2}= D^{-1} (G_A/G_V)^2
96: \int_0^{Q_{\beta}}{\rm d}{\omega} f_{0}(Z+1,\omega)
97: \sum_{\beta} <\kappa_J> S_{\beta}(\omega,\gamma)~.
98: \end{equation}
99:
100: Here the integrated lepton $(e^-,\bar \nu_e)$ phase-space
101: volume for allowed transitions (the integrated relativistic Fermi function)
102: depending on the electron energy $W$
103: \begin{equation} \label{3}
104: f_0 = \int_{m_ec^2}^{W_{max}} F(Z+1,W)~p~W~(W_{max} - W)^2{\rm d}~W
105: \end{equation}
106: takes into account for the Coulomb and finite-size corrections \cite{GM}.
107:
108: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
109: If the $\beta$-decay transition energy relative to the mother nucleus ground state satisfies $\omega <
110: Q_{\beta}-B_n \equiv Q_{\beta n}$, the neutron decaying state $|j^{\pi}_i \rangle$ locates within the so-called
111: $Q_{\beta n}$-window in the particle continuum; the energy of the emitted neutron being
112: $E_n=Q_{\beta}-B_n-\omega-E_{\gamma}$. The particle emission probability from the level $|j_i^{\pi_i}\rangle$ of
113: the emitter to the level $|j_f^{\pi_f}\rangle$ of the final nucleus, as a function of the emitted neutron energy
114: $E_n$ is given by
115:
116: \begin{equation}\label{4}
117: P({j{^\pi}}_{i,f}, E_n)=\frac{\Gamma_n(E_n)}{\Gamma_n(E_n)+\Gamma_{\gamma}(E_{\gamma})},~
118: \end{equation}
119: \noindent where $\Gamma_n({j^{\pi}}_{i,f}, E_n)$ is the neutron escape width and $\Gamma_{\gamma}({j^{\pi}}_{i,f},
120: E_{\gamma})$ - gamma ray width of the emitter. These can be expressed through the transmission coefficients for
121: l-wave neutron emission with the total angular momentum $j_n$ and corresponding $\gamma$-transmission coefficients
122: calculated from statistical model of Hausser-Feshbach. In what follows we will assume that the $\gamma$-emission
123: from neutron-unbound states is absent: $\Gamma_{\gamma}\ll\Gamma_{n}$. The approximation simplifies the
124: calculations but may cause some overestimation of the resulting $P_n$-values.
125:
126: The intensity of feeding the excited states in the daughter nucleus is given by the set of $\beta$--strength
127: functions $S_{\beta}(\omega,\gamma)$ which describe the spectral distributions of the matrix elements of the GT
128: and FF $\beta$--decay transitions. The index $\beta$ in the sum corresponds to the Gamow-Teller (GT) term with $L=0, J=1$ and non-unique
129: first-forbidden (FF) terms with $L=1, J=0,1$ treated in the $\xi$-approximation. The unique $J=2$ term can be also
130: retained but in the $\xi$-approximation it should be of minor importance. For the GT and non-unique FF decays
131: $<\kappa_{J=0,1}>$=1, and for the unique FF decays, $<\kappa_{J=2}>$=$f_1/f_0$, with the Fermi integral $f_1$
132: calculated as in \cite{Zyr}.
133:
134:
135: To calculate the $\beta$--strength functions $S_{\beta}(\omega,\gamma)$ we use the continuum QRPA approach
136: based on the self-consistent ground state description within the local energy-density functional (DF)
137: theory. The Fayans phenomenological DF \cite{FTTZ00} consisting of a normal and a pairing part is adopted. The DF3
138: version of the functional \cite{BF} contains the two-body spin-orbit and velocity dependent effective
139: NN-interactions important for the full consistency, as well as the isovector spin-orbit force. The latter ensures
140: a correct description of the single-particle levels near the "magic-cross" at $^{132}$Sn \cite{Mez}. We have
141: studied also the ground state description given by the Skyrme MSk7 force \cite{MSk}. The
142: like-particle $T=1$ pairing in the ground state is treated in the diagonal approximation on the basis confined by
143: the $E_{cutoff}$=15 MeV; the empirical strength of the $T=1$ pairing decreases slightly with increasing A.
144:
145: The continuum QRPA (CQRPA) equations of the finite Fermi system theory are solved with an exact treatment of the
146: particle-hole (ph) continuum. The width $\gamma$ includes both the escape width $\Gamma^{\uparrow}$ for the decay to the continuum, as
147: well as the spreading width of the isobaric states $\Gamma^{\downarrow}$. Within the CQRPA, the latter is assumed to depend linear on
148: the excitation energy \cite{Ber} (the cut-off at $\Delta \omega=2.5 \Gamma^{\downarrow}$ is employed for the
149: high-energy wings of the individual excitations with $\omega \leq Q_{\beta}$).
150:
151: A finite-range effective NN-interactions in the particle-hole (ph) channel is chosen in a $\delta+\pi+\rho$ form.
152: The one-$\pi$ and one-$\rho$ exchange terms modified by the nuclear medium are important in describing the
153: magnetic properties of nuclei and the nuclear spin-isospin responses. The competition between the one-pion
154: attraction $g_{\pi}Q<0$ and contact spin-isospin repulsion $g_{0}^\prime>0$, determines a degree of "softness" of
155: the pionic modes in nuclei that influences the $\beta$--decay half-lives. The set of the NN-interaction parameters
156: $g^{\prime}$=0.98, $g_{\pi}$=-1.38 has been used, corresponding to the quenching factor of the spin-isospin
157: response function $Q=e_q[\sigma\tau]^2$=0.81 (see \cite{1B}).
158:
159: The effective $T=0$ NN-interaction in the particle-particle (pp) channel is chosen in the same $\delta$-function
160: form, as the like-particle $T=1$ pairing \cite {1B}. Neglecting the effective $T=0$ interaction would destroy the SO(8)
161: symmetry of the QRPA equations and cause unrealistic odd-even staggering of total $\beta$--decay half-lives.
162: Importantly, the CQRPA-like equations of the FFS allows for a reasonable description of nuclear spin-isospin modes
163: with practically A-independent constant of the pp-interaction which is far from the instability point in the pp
164: channel \cite{BFT90}.
165:
166:
167: \section{Results}
168:
169: \subsection{The $\beta$-decay half-lives}
170: %and the Table
171: The total $\beta$-decay half-lives for Ni-isotopic chain are displayed at Fig.1 in comparison to the finite-range
172: droplet model \cite{PM} and experimental data \cite{Fr98} - \cite{Am98}. The FRDM calculations overestimate the
173: experimental data and predict strong odd-even effect in the total $\beta$-decay half-lives. This clearly
174: demonstrates a significance of the effective pn-interaction in the particle-particle channel. Ignoring this
175: interaction violates the SO(8)-symmetry of the QRPA equations and leads to unrealistic scale of the odd-even
176: staggering of the total half-lives along the isotopic and isotonic chains.
177: The improved calculation performed in the present work is in better agreement with the experimental data for Ni
178: isotopes than the one from \cite{1B}. A slight underestimate of the experimental half-lives \cite{Fr98}-\cite{Am98} is
179: observed for $A=74-76$. More importantly, the total half-lives in a rather long isotopic chain of $A=71-86$ reveal
180: a fairly regular behavior. Such a smooth A-dependence of the half-lives can be achieved only by taking into
181: account the forbidden decays. To stress this point, we show at the Fig.2 the isotopic dependence of the energies
182: for the main GT and FF transitions within the $Q_{\beta}$-window. Evidently, the FF decays play a negligible role
183: for the nuclei with $A \leq 78$ because of the low transition energy (small available phase-space). In contrast,
184: after crossing the $N$=50 shell, the high-energy FF transitions give a dominant contribution to the total
185: half-life for the nuclei with $A \geq 79$.
186:
187:
188: For the Ga isotopes with $A\le 84$ (Fig.3), both calculations give practically a similar agreement with the
189: experimental data \cite{Ree86} - \cite{Ru}. As seen from Fig.3, the FRDM+RPA calculations \cite{PM} underestimate
190: the experimental data for A=84, while our calculations overestimate them. Apparently, this is related to the
191: onset of the ground state deformation in the isotopes with $A\geq$ 84 which has not been included in our
192: calculations.
193:
194: \subsection{The $\beta$-delayed neutron emission}
195: Within the allowed transitions approximation used in the global calculations \cite{KK,PM}, the isotopic dependence
196: of the $P_n$-value is rather schematic. It is mainly defined by the the decay to the so-called GT pigmy-resonance
197: located within the $Q_{\beta}$-window. The matrix element of the latter increase with $N$-$Z$, as well as the phase
198: space $Q_{\beta n}$ available for the delayed neutron emission. Thus, the $P_n$-value along the isotopic chain
199: simply tends to the maximum after the GT pigmy-resonance turns to be located within the $Q_{\beta n}$-window. On the
200: other hand, if the model includes the different $\beta$-decay channels, an isotopic dependence of the $P_n$-value is
201: defined by the relative energies of the GT and FF transitions which behave differently with increasing $A$.
202: Importantly, for the large enough neutron excess, the additional high energy FF transitions appear.
203:
204:
205: The calculations of the $\beta$-delayed neutron emission probabilities have been performed for several isotopic
206: chains with $Z\approx$28. Below, only the results for Ni and Ga isotopic chain are discussed in detail.
207: As can be seen from Fig.2,
208: for the Ni isotopes with $A\leq$79, no neutrons can be emitted following the decay to the pygmy GT resonance and
209: low transition energy FF states in the emitter nuclei. According to the present DF+CQRPA calculations they are
210: located higher than the $Q_{\beta n}$-window (Fig.2). For this reason, the increase of total delayed neutron
211: emission probability in the isotopes with A$\le$79 (Fig.4) is entirely due to relatively low-energy GT and FF
212: $\beta$-decays.
213:
214:
215: Starting from $A$=79, the GT pigmy-resonance enters the $Q_{\beta n}$-window (Fig.2). Assuming a pure GT-decay,
216: the $P_n$-values for $A\geq$79 would tend to 100\%. However, for the isotopes with $A\geq$79 crossing the $N$=50
217: shell, the drastic change in the relevant shell configurations takes place. From Fig.2 which shows the energies
218: of the different FF transition with the total transferred momentum $J=0$, it is seen that with filling of the $\nu
219: 2 d_{5/2}$-orbital in the $A\geq$79 isotopes, the high-energy FF component of the $\beta$-strength function
220: appears due to the $\nu 2 d_{5/2} \rightarrow \pi 2 f_{5/2}$ transition. As mentioned above, the high-energy FF
221: transitions give a dominant contribution to the total $\beta$-decay half-lives in the Ni isotopes with $A\geq$79.
222: At the same time, their calculated energies are higher than the $Q_{\beta n}$-threshold. Hence, the high-energy
223: part of the $\beta$-strength function does not affect the delayed neutron emission, the feature that translates
224: into a "gap"-like pattern in the $P_n(A)$-curve (Fig.4). For the nuclei with $A\geq$86 the main $J=0$ transitions
225: are located in the $Q_{\beta n}$-window (Fig.2), and the corresponding $P_n$-values tend to the maximum (Fig.4). It
226: would be important to check our prediction for Ni isotopic chain, though for $A\geq$80 for which the difference
227: with the GT approximation is observed it may be difficult at the moment.
228:
229: In the context of the possible experimental measurements, the isotopes with higher $Z$ are of special interest. To
230: exemplify this we consider the case of Ga isotopes. For $^{80-81}$Ga, the FF transitions are of minor importance
231: but with increasing $A$ their contribution becomes very significant. It follows from Fig.5 that in contrast with Ni
232: isotopes, the $P_n$-values calculated for $^{82-87}$Ga isotopes are suppressed by the factor of 4-5 compared to the
233: ones corresponding to the GT approximation. Notice that in $^{82-84}$Ga, the evaluated $P_n$-values \cite{Ru}
234: obtained by averaging of the existing experimental data \cite{Lu} - \cite{Ree85} can be described within the GT
235: approximation alone. However, it has to be realized that the discrepancy of the experimental data is very high.
236: Interestingly enough, in $^{83}$Ga, the ones from \cite{Ree85} are in agreement with the GT+FF calculations.
237: Assuming that reliability of the experimental data for Ga isotopes has been questioned in \cite{Ru}, it would be
238: of great importance to perform the new measurements for this isotopic chain.
239:
240: % L
241: % $\bullet$ Ge isotopes $P_n$ Fig.4
242:
243: %%%%%%%%%%%%%% %%%%%%%%%%%% %%%%%%%%%%%%%
244: To conclude, one has to mention that in Z=28 region, the delayed neutron emitter nuclei have relatively high
245: $Q_{\beta}$-values. For that reason, the accuracy of the calculated $T_{1/2}$ and $P_n$-values is generally
246: higher than for the heavier nuclei with lower $Q_{\beta}$-values. However, as the delayed neutron emission is
247: typically a threshold phenomenon, it is of interest to analyze the different factors which may influence its
248: probability. The first concerns the nuclear pairing, as it changes the one-quasiparticle level energies and
249: calculated $B_n$-values. This issue has been tackled in \cite{Schuk}, however the only calculation was performed
250: for $^{137}$I with a very low $Q_{\beta n}$=1.6 MeV in which case a sensitivity to the paring strength is extremely
251: high. It would be of importance to study in detail how the predicted effect might be influenced by the different
252: prescriptions of nuclear pairing. To roughly estimate the possible sensitivity we varied the $B_n$-values within
253: the $\pm 1$ MeV. It turns out that for the nuclei with high $Q_{\beta n}$-values, the resulting impact factor is
254: not that strong e.g. for $^{83}$Ni the $P_n$-value varies within the margins of 70.8 to 65.3$\%$ instead of
255: 62.7$\%$ shown at Fig.4.
256:
257: Second, the "gap-like" behavior of the $P_n$-values turns to be fairly robust against
258: the allowed choice of the effective NN-interaction parameters. (Using the set of the parameters corresponding to
259: the quenching factor of $e_q$=0.8 instead of 0.9 \cite{1B} leads to the $P_n$-value of 71$\%$ for the $^{80}$Ni.)
260:
261: Third, it is worth to estimate a possible influence of the $\beta$-strength redistribution due to the deformation
262: and/or the specific np-nh correlations which may shift the $\beta$-strength outside or inside the $Q_{\beta
263: n}$-window. As it is seen from Fig.3 for the nuclei of interest beyond $^{80}$Ni, the GT pigmy-resonance energy is
264: much lower than the position of the $Q_{\beta n}$-window and such a shift seems quite unlikely. As for possible
265: impact of the deformation, the calculations \cite{MSk} predicts the quasi-spherical shape ($\beta_2 \leq$ 0.1) for
266: Ni isotopes with $A=74-94$ and for Ga isotopes with $A=79-83$.
267:
268: Finally, as a proper account for the particle-emission channels within the Hausser-Feshbach framework has not been
269: performed, the predicted $P_n$-values may be considered as an upper limit estimate. Moreover, for very
270: neutron-rich nuclei the $B_n$-values become low, as well as the density of the neutron unbound levels in the near
271: threshold region. In such a case, a more detailed study of the $\beta$-delayed neutron emission may be of need
272: considering the contribution of direct neutron decay of the isobaric states.
273:
274:
275: \section{Summary}
276: The DF+CQRPA model of the delayed neutron emission is elaborated with the Gamow-Teller and first-forbidden
277: $\beta$-decay modes taken into account. The calculations of the total $\beta$-decay half-lives and delayed neutron
278: emission probabilities has been performed for nuclei near the closed shells at $Z$=28 and $N$=50. Within the
279: extended model, an agreement with the experimental data on the total half-lives is better than in our previous
280: calculations \cite{1B}. A suppression is predicted of the $\beta$-delayed neutron emission probabilities for $Z
281: \approx$28 isotopes above the $N$=50 shell. The first-forbidden decays in these nuclei are found to give a dominant
282: contribution to the total half-lives. A threshold character of the delayed neutron emission makes it sensitive to
283: deblocking of the shell-configurations responsible for the high-energy forbidden $\beta$-decay transitions.
284: Inclusion of the FF $\beta$-decays leads to reduction of the total delayed neutron emission probabilities, as the
285: calculated energies of the main FF transitions are systematically higher than the $Q_{\beta n}$-values.
286:
287:
288: For Ni isotopes, the scale of predicted reduction of the $P_n$-values (compared to the ones estimated in the GT
289: approximation) is at the edge of the experimental precision achievable currently with the isotope-separated beams.
290: A similar "gap-like" behavior of the total probability of delayed neutron emission has been found in our
291: calculations for the Cu isotopes. A stronger suppression of the $P_n$-values predicted for Ga isotopes, as well as
292: for the Zn and Ge-As isotopic chains provides a certain challenge, as these isotopes are more
293: accessible for the experimental measurements in the short term \cite{Fr04}.
294: %%%A detailed calculations for a wide range of the nuclei near the neutron closed shells
295: %%%at N=50, 82, 126 has been done and will be reported elsewhere.
296:
297:
298: \section{Acknowledgements}
299: The author thanks the OSTC, Belgium for support within the PAI
300: Program IAP P5/07 "Exotic Nuclei for Nuclear Physics and Astrophysics".
301: Numerous discussions with M.~Arnould, S. Goriely, J.M.~Pearson, P.~Van Duppen, M.~Huyse, D.~Pauwels,
302: N.~Severijns and J.-Ch.~Thomas are gratefully acknowledged.
303:
304: \begin{references}
305:
306: \bibitem{Mish}
307: V.I.~Mishin et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. {\bf B73}, 550 (1993);\\
308: P.~Van Duppen, ibid.,{\bf B73}, 66 (1997);\\
309: K.-L. Kratz, in ENAM 98, edited by B.M. Sherill et al., AIP Conf. Proc. No. {\bf 455}\\
310: (AIP , Woodbury, NY, 1998), p.827.
311: \bibitem{KW}
312: H.V. Klapdor, C.O. Wene, J. Phys. {\bf G6}, 1061 (1980).\
313: \bibitem{Fog}
314: J. Blomquist, M. Kerek, B. Fogelberg, Z.Phys. {\bf A314}, 199 (1983).\
315: \bibitem{KK}
316: M.~Hirsh, A.~Staudt, H.V.~Klapdor- Kleingrothaus, At.Data Nucl.Data Tables. {\bf 51}, 244 (1992).\
317: \bibitem{PM}
318: P. Moeller et al., At. Data Nucl. Data Tables. {\bf 66}, 131 (1997).\
319: \bibitem{KK98}
320: H. Homma et al., Phys. Rev. {\bf C54}, 2972 (1996).\
321: \bibitem{BF}
322: I.N. Borzov et al., Z. Phys. {\bf A335}, 127 (1996).\
323: \bibitem{1B}
324: I.N. Borzov, Phys. Rev. {\bf C67}, 025802 (2003).\
325: \bibitem{3B}
326: H.~DeWitte et al, Phys. Rev. {\bf C69}, 044305 (2004).\
327: \bibitem{PaSv}
328: A. Pappas, T. Sverdrup, Nucl. Phys. {\bf A188}, 48 (1972).\
329: \bibitem{GM}
330: N.B. Gove, M.J. Martin,
331: At. Data Nucl. Data Tables. {\bf 10}, 206 (1971).\
332: \bibitem{Zyr}
333: L.N. Zyryanova, {\it Unique beta transitions} (Russ. original, Acad.
334: Science USSR, Moscow-Leningrad, 1960); {\it Once forbidden Beta Transitions}
335: (translation Pergamon Press, 1963)
336: \bibitem{FTTZ00}
337: S.A. Fayans et al., Nucl. Phys. {\bf A676}, 49 (2000).\
338: \bibitem{Mez}
339: K.A. Mezilev et al., Pys. Scripta {\bf T56}, 272 (1975).\
340: \bibitem{MSk}
341: S.Goriely, F. Tondeur, J.M. Pearson, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables. {\bf 77}, 311 (2000).\
342: \bibitem{Ber}
343: G.F. Bertsch, P.F. Bortignon, R. Broglia, Rev. Mod. Phys. {\bf 55}, 287 (1981). \
344: \bibitem{BFT90}
345: I.N. Borzov, E.L. Trykov, S.A. Fayans, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. {\bf 52}, 627 (1990).\
346: %%%t1/2 Ni
347: \bibitem{Fr98}
348: S. Franchoo et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 81}, 3100 (1998).\
349: \bibitem{Re85}
350: P.L. Reeder et al., Phys. Rev. {\bf C31}, 1032 (1985).\
351: \bibitem{Am98}
352: F. Ameil et al., Eur. Phys.J. {\bf A1}, 1 (1998).\
353: % t1/2 Ga
354: \bibitem{Ree86}
355: P.L. Reeder et al., Research Rept. PNL-SA-14026 (1986).\
356: %%% t1/2 Pn Ga
357: \bibitem{Lu}
358: E. Lund et al., Z. Phys. {\bf A294}, 233 (1980).\
359: \bibitem{Ru}
360: G. Rudstam, K. Aleklett, L. Sihver,
361: At.Data Nucl.Data Tables. {\bf 53}, 1 (1993).\
362: \bibitem{Ree85}
363: P.L. Reeder et al.,
364: Proc. Am. Soc. Nucl. Chem. Meeting, Chicago (1985), p.171\
365: \bibitem{Fr04}
366: S. Franchoo, U. K\"oster, (private communication).\
367: \bibitem{Schuk}
368: D.S. Delion, D. Santos, P. Schuk, Phys. Lett. {\bf B398}, 1 (1997).\
369:
370:
371: \end{references}
372:
373: \newpage
374: \begin{figure}
375: \caption{
376: The total $\beta$-decay half-lives for the
377: Ni-isotopes predicted from the FRDM+RPA \protect\cite{PM}
378: and DF+CQRPA \protect\cite{1B}; the experimental data are
379: taken from \protect\cite{Fr98} - \protect\cite{Am98}
380: }
381: %\label{T.Ni}
382: \end{figure}
383:
384: \begin{figure}
385: \caption{
386: The calculated position of the $Q_{\beta n}$-window for the delayed neutron
387: emission compared to the energies of the GT pigmy-resonance and main
388: $J^{\pi}=0^-$ transitions. For the lowest energy branch of the $0^-$ transitions
389: ($\omega_1$), the points for A=77-81 are shown only
390: }
391: %\label{om.Ni}
392: \end{figure}
393:
394: \begin{figure}
395: \caption{
396: The total $\beta$-decay half-lives for the
397: Ga-isotopes predicted from the FRDM+RPA \protect\cite{PM}
398: and DF+CQRPA ( present work ); the experimental data are
399: taken from \protect\cite{Ru}
400: }
401: %\label{T.Ga}
402: \end{figure}
403:
404: \begin{figure}
405: \caption{
406: The total $\beta$-delayed neutron emission probabilities
407: for the Ni isotopic chain calculated within the DF+CQRPA
408: for the allowed GT transitions only ($\triangle$) and in the
409: GT+FF approximation ($\bigcirc$)
410: }
411: %\label{P.Ni}
412: \end{figure}
413:
414: \begin{figure}
415: \caption{
416: The total $\beta$-delayed neutron emission probabilities
417: for the Ga isotopic chain calculated within the DF+CQRPA
418: for the allowed GT transitions only ($\triangle$) and in the
419: GT+FF approximation ($\bigcirc$). The experimental data are:
420: a) \protect\cite{Ru}, b) \protect\cite{Lu}, c) \protect\cite{Ree85}
421: }
422: %\label{P.Ga}
423: \end{figure}
424:
425: \end{document}
426: