1: \documentclass[onecolumn,floats]{revtex4}
2:
3: \oddsidemargin=-1cm
4: \usepackage{epsfig}
5: \usepackage{amssymb,latexsym,amsmath}
6: \newcommand{\eq}[1]{\begin{align} #1 \end{align}}
7:
8:
9:
10:
11: \begin{document}
12:
13: \title{Fluctuations in the Canonical Ensemble}
14:
15:
16: \author{ V.V. Begun$^{a}$, M.I. Gorenstein$^{a,b}$,
17: O.S. Zozulya$^{a,c}$}
18:
19: \affiliation{
20: $^{a}$ Bogolyubov Institute for Theoretical Physics, Kiev, Ukraine\\
21: % $^{b}$ Institut f\"ur Theoretische Physik, Universit\"at Frankfurt, Germany\\
22: $^{b}$ Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies, Frankfurt, Germany\\
23: $^{c}$ Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands}
24:
25:
26:
27:
28:
29:
30: \begin{abstract}
31: The particle number and energy fluctuations
32: in the system of charged particles are studied in the canonical
33: ensemble for non-zero net values of the conserved charge.
34: In the thermodynamic limit the fluctuations in
35: the canonical ensemble are different from the fluctuations in the grand
36: canonical one. The system with several species of particles is considered.
37: We calculate the quantum statistics effects
38: which can be taken into account for the canonical ensemble fluctuations
39: in the infinite volume limit.
40: The fluctuations of the particle numbers in the pion-nucleon gas are
41: considered in the canonical ensemble as
42: an example of the system with two conserved
43: charges -- baryonic number and electric charge.
44: \end{abstract}
45:
46:
47: \maketitle
48:
49: \section { Introduction}
50: %
51: The statistical model approach turns out to be rather successful
52: in describing the data on the particle production in relativistic
53: nuclear collisions (see e.g. Ref.\,\cite{stat-model} and recent
54: review \cite{PBM}). This stimulates further investigation of the
55: properties of the statistical models. In particular, an
56: applicability of various statistical ensembles is an interesting
57: issue. The canonical ensemble (CE) \cite{ce} or even the
58: microcanonical ensemble (MCE) \cite{mce} have been used in
59: order to describe the $pp$, $p\bar{p}$ and $e^+e^-$
60: collisions when a small number of secondary
61: particles are produced. At these conditions the
62: statistical systems are far away
63: from the thermodynamic limit, so that the statistical ensembles
64: are not equivalent, and the exact charge or both energy and charge
65: conservation laws have to be taken into account.
66: The grand canonical ensemble (GCE)
67: formulation is valid when the system volume $V$ tends to infinity.
68: All statistical ensemble become then thermodynamically equivalent.
69:
70: The analysis of the fluctuations is a useful tool to study the properties
71: of the system created during high energy
72: particle and nuclear collisions (see e.g. Refs.\,\cite{fluc,fluc1,steph}).
73: An essential part of the total fluctuations measured on the
74: event-by-event basis is expected to be the thermal ones.
75: % The question of the applicability of different statistical ensembles for
76: The particle number fluctuations have been recently studied
77: % been addressed in our previous
78: in the CE \cite{ce-fluc} and MCE \cite{mce-fluc} and compared with those
79: in the GCE.
80: % papers~\cite{ce-fluc,mce-fluc}.
81: It has been shown that these fluctuations
82: %of (negatively)
83: %positively charged particles
84: are different in various statistical ensembles
85: in the particular case of the
86: relativistic ideal gas with a total net charge equal zero in
87: the Boltzmann statistics approximation.
88: The fluctuations of negatively
89: and positively charged particles are
90: suppressed in the CE \cite{ce-fluc} in
91: comparison to the fluctuations in the GCE.
92: This suppression remains valid in the thermodynamic limit
93: too, so that the well-known equivalence of all statistical
94: ensembles refers to the average quantities, but does not apply to
95: the fluctuations.
96:
97: In Ref.\,\cite{ce-fluc} we have studied
98: the CE for one particle specie and zero
99: net value of the conserved charge. In the present paper we extend
100: our consideration. In the high energy
101: proton-proton and
102: nucleus-nucleus collisions the created system has some positive
103: values of the baryonic number and electric charge. Besides, a
104: lot of different
105: species of hadrons are created. We
106: study the CE particle number fluctuations (Secs.\,II and III)
107: and energy fluctuations (Sec.\,IV)
108: in the systems with non-zero net charge and several species of particles.
109: As the electric charge of hadrons can be both $\pm1$ and $\pm2$,
110: we consider the CE
111: system of
112: single and double charged particles in Sec\,V.
113: The effects of Bose and Fermi statistics
114: are studied in the thermodynamic
115: limit in Sec.\,VI.
116: We also calculate in Sec.\,VII
117: the CE particle number fluctuations for the ideal
118: pion-nucleon gas which is an example of the system with two conserved
119: charges -- baryonic number and electric charge.
120: We summarize our consideration and formulate the conclusions
121: in Sec.\,VIII.
122:
123:
124:
125: %
126: \section{The GCE and CE partition functions and mean particle
127: multiplicities}
128:
129: Let us start with the multi-species system of $+1$
130: and $-1$ charged particles. In applications of the statistical
131: approach to hadron production in high energy collisions the
132: conserved charge under consideration can be the electric charge
133: and baryonic number, or strangeness and charm, which are also
134: conserved in the strong interactions.
135: % with total charge Q.
136: In the case of the Boltzmann ideal gas (i.e. the interactions and quantum
137: statistics effects are neglected) the partition function in the
138: %grand canonical ensemble (
139: GCE reads:
140:
141: %
142: \begin{align}\label{Zgce}
143: &Z_{g.c.e.}(V,T,\mu)
144: \;=\;\sum_{N_{1+},~N_{1-}=0}^{\infty}...\sum_{N_{j+},~N_{j-}=0}^{\infty}...
145: ~~\frac{\left(\lambda_{1+}z_1\right)^{N_{1+}}}{N_{1+}!}~
146: \frac{\left(\lambda_{1-}z_1\right)^{N_{1-}}}{N_{1-}!}~...
147: ~\frac{\left(\lambda_{j+}z_j\right)^{N_{j+}}}{N_{j+}!}~
148: \frac{\left(\lambda_{j-}z_j\right)^{N_{j-}}}{N_{j-}!}~...~\nonumber \\
149: &=~\prod_{j}~\sum_{N_{j+},~N_{j-}=0}^{\infty}
150: \frac{\left(\lambda_{j+}z_j\right)^{N_{j+}}}{N_{j+}!}~
151: \frac{\left(\lambda_{j-}z_j\right)^{N_{j-}}}{N_{j-}!} \
152: =\; \prod_j~\exp\left(\lambda_{j+}z_j~+~\lambda_{j-}z_j\right)~
153: =~\exp\left[~2z~\cosh\left(\frac{\mu}{T}\right)\right]~,
154: \end{align}
155: %
156: where $j$ numerates the spesies, $\lambda_{j\pm}=\exp(\pm\mu/T)$, $z_j$
157: is a single particle
158: partition function
159: \begin{align}\label{z}
160: z_j\;=\; \frac{g_jV}{2\pi^2}
161: \int_{0}^{\infty}k^{2} dk\;
162: \exp\left[-~\frac{(k^{2}+m_j^{2})^{1/2}}{T}\right]
163: \;=\; \frac{g_jV}{2\pi^2} \;\;
164: T\,m_j^2\,K_2\left(\frac{m_j}{T}\right)~,
165: % \;\equiv\; V\,f(T) \;,
166: \end{align}
167: and $z\equiv \sum_{j}z_j$.
168: %
169: The $V$, $T$ and $\mu$ are respectively the system volume, temperature and
170: chemical potential connected with the conserved charge $Q$. The $g_j$ and
171: $m_j$ are respectively the degeneracy factors and masses for the $j$-th
172: particle species, and $\;K_2\;$ is the modified Hankel function.
173: %
174: The CE partition function is obtained by an
175: explicit introduction of the charge conservation constrain,
176: $\sum_{j}\left(N_{j+} - N_{j-}\right) = Q\;$, for each microscopic
177: state of the system:
178: %
179: \begin{align}\label{Zce}
180: &Z_{c.e.}(V,T,Q)
181: ~=~\sum_{N_{1+},~N_{1-}=0}^{\infty}...\sum_{N_{j+},~N_{j-}=0}^{\infty}...
182: ~~\frac{\left(\lambda_{1+}z_1\right)^{N_{1+}}}{N_{1+}!}~
183: \frac{\left(\lambda_{1-}z_1\right)^{N_{1-}}}{N_{1-}!}~...
184: \frac{\left(\lambda_{j+}z_j\right)^{N_{j+}}}{N_{j+}!}
185: \frac{\left(\lambda_{j-}z_j\right)^{N_{j-}}}{N_{j-}!}...\nonumber\\
186: &\times \delta\left[\left(N_{1+}+...+N_{j+}
187: +...-N_{1-}-...-N_{j-}-...\right)-Q\right]
188: ~=\;\int_0^{2\pi}\frac{d\phi}{2\pi}~ \prod_{j}
189: \sum_{N_{j+},N_{j-}=0}^{\infty}\;
190: \frac{\left(\lambda_{j+} z_j\right)^{N_{j+}}}{N_{j+}!}
191: \frac{\left(\lambda_{j-} z_j\right)^{N_{j-}}}{N_{j-}!}\nonumber \\
192: &\times \exp\left[i\left(N_{j+}-N_{j-}-Q\right)\phi\right]
193: \;=\;
194: \int_0^{2\pi}\frac{d\phi}{2\pi}\;\;
195: \exp\left[-i\,Q\,\phi \;+\;\sum_{j} z_j\;\left(\lambda_{j+}\;e^{i\phi}
196: \;+\; \lambda_{j-}\;e^{-i\phi}\right)\right]
197: \;=\; I_Q(2z)\;.
198: \end{align}
199: %
200: Parameters $\;\lambda_{j+}\;$ and $\;\lambda_{j-}\;$ in the CE
201: (\ref{Zce}) are only auxiliary parameters introduced in order to calculate
202: the mean number and the fluctuations of positively and negatively charged
203: particles. They are set to one in the final formulas. In Eq.\,(\ref{Zce})
204: the integral representations of the $\delta$-Kronecker symbol and the
205: modified Bessel function were used \cite{I}:
206: \begin{align} \label{IQ}
207: \delta(n) = \int_0^{2\pi}\frac{d\phi}{2\pi}~ \exp(in\phi)~,\quad I_Q(2z) =
208: \int_0^{2\pi}\frac{d\phi}{2\pi}\;
209: \exp[-i\,Q\,\phi\;+\;2z\,\cos\phi] \;.
210: \end{align}
211:
212: %
213: The averages of $N_{j+}$ and $N_{j-}$ in both the GCE and
214: CE can be presented as (in the final expressions one should
215: put $\lambda_{j\pm}=\exp(\pm\mu/T)$ and $\lambda_{j\pm}=1$ for the
216: GCE and CE, respectively):
217: \begin{align}
218: \label{Njpm} \langle N_{j\pm} \rangle \;=\;
219: \left(\lambda_{j\pm}~ \frac{\partial~\ln Z }{\partial\lambda_{j\pm} }
220: \right)
221: ~=\;
222: a_{\pm}~z_j~,
223: \end{align}
224: %
225: where $a_{\pm}$ in Eq.\,(\ref{Njpm}) is
226: \begin{align} \label{a+-}
227: a^{g.c.e.}_{\pm}~=
228: ~\exp\left(\pm\frac{\mu}{T}\right)~,~~~a^{c.e.}_{\pm}~=~\frac{I_{Q\mp
229: 1}(2z)}{I_Q(2z)}~,
230: \end{align}
231: for the GCE and CE, respectively.
232: The average number of $N_{+}$ and $N_{-}$ are equal to:
233: \begin{align} \label{Npm}
234: \langle N_{\pm}\rangle \;&=\;
235: \langle \sum_j
236: N_{j\pm}\rangle \;=\; a_{\pm}~\sum_{j}z_{j}~=~a_{\pm}~z~.
237: \end{align}
238:
239: The mean net charge in the GCE is equal to:
240: %
241: \begin{align}
242: Q \;=\; \langle N_+\rangle_{g.c.e.} - \langle N_-\rangle_{g.c.e.}
243: \;=\; 2\sinh\left(\frac{\mu}{T}\right)~z~.\label{Q}
244: \end{align}
245: %
246: which leads to a simple relation which connects the values of $Q$
247: and $\mu$
248: %
249: \begin{align}
250: \exp\left(\frac{\mu}{T}\right) \;=\;
251: \frac{Q}{2z}+\sqrt{1+\left(\frac{Q}{2z}\right)^2}
252: \;\equiv\; y+\sqrt{1+y^2}~,
253: \end{align}
254: %
255: so that
256: %
257: \begin{align}
258: \langle N_{\pm}\rangle_{g.c.e.}
259: \;=\; z \left(y+\sqrt{1+y^2}\right)^{\pm 1}~,
260: \end{align}
261: %
262: where $y\equiv Q/2z=\sinh(\mu/T)$.
263: %
264:
265: In the CE an exact charge conservation is imposed on each microscopic
266: state, so that it is evidently fulfilled also for the average values:
267: %
268: \begin{equation}\label{cons}
269: \langle N_+ \rangle_{c.e.} ~-~ \langle N_- \rangle_{c.e.} ~ =~
270: z~\frac{I_{Q-1}(2z)}{I_Q(2z)}~-~z~\frac{I_{Q+1}(2z)}{I_Q(2z)}~=~
271: Q~,
272: \end{equation}
273: %
274: as indeed can be easily seen from the identity $\;
275: I_{n-1}(x)-I_{n+1}(x)=2nI_n(x)/x \;$ \cite{I}.
276:
277: The ratios of $\;\langle N_{\pm}\rangle\;$ calculated in the
278: CE and in the GCE,
279: \begin{align}\label{Nce-Ngce}
280: \frac{\langle N_{\pm} \rangle _{c.e.}}{\langle N_{\pm} \rangle _{g.c.e.}}
281: ~=~\frac{I_{Q\mp1}(2z)}{I_Q(2z)}~\cdot~\left(y+\sqrt{1+y^2}\right)^{\mp 1}~,
282: \end{align}
283: are shown in Fig.\,1 for $Q=0$ and $Q=2$. There is the strong canonical
284: suppression effect, $\langle N_{\pm} \rangle _{c.e.}\ll
285: \langle N_{\pm} \rangle _{g.c.e.}$, for small systems
286: ($z\ll 1$), and the canonical and grand canonical ensembles
287: become equivalent,
288: $\langle N_{\pm} \rangle _{c.e.}=\langle N_{\pm} \rangle _{g.c.e.}$,
289: in the thermodynamic limit $z\rightarrow\infty$.
290: One can see that the
291: CE suppression
292: effect is reduced for a non-zero net charge of the system
293: as compared to a system with
294: zero net charge. In Fig.\,2 the ratios (\ref{Nce-Ngce}) as
295: functions of $Q=1,2,...$ are shown at fixed positive values of
296: $y=Q/2z$ which correspond to the fixed positive net charge number
297: densities ($Q=0$ corresponds to $y=0$ and is presented in
298: Fig.\,1).
299: %
300: Small values of $y$ mean large $z$, e.g. for $y=0.1$ shown in Fig.\,2
301: one finds `large' $z=5$ at $Q=1$,
302: so that the system is already close to the
303: thermodynamic limit. Due to this
304: the canonical suppression is small and it is the same
305: for positive and negative particles. The case of large $y$
306: differs, e.g. for $y=2$
307: shown in Fig.\,2 the values of $z$ are `small'
308: at small $Q$: $z=0.25$ at $Q=1$. The canonical suppression
309: effect becomes strong for
310: negative particles at small $Q$. However, the canonical suppression
311: at large $y$ is negligible for the
312: average value of positive particle number as it should be approximately equal
313: to $Q$.
314:
315:
316: For small systems ($z\ll 1$) using the series expansion \cite{I}
317: \begin{align} \label{Bessel-1lim}
318: I_{n}(2z)~=~\frac{z^{n}}{n!}~+~\frac{z^{n+2}}{(n+1)!}~
319: +~O\left(z^{n+4}\right)~,
320: \end{align}
321: %
322: one finds for $\;Q=0\;$
323: %
324: \begin{align}\label{ce2}
325: \langle N_{\pm}\rangle_{c.e.}~\simeq ~z^{2}~~ \ll ~~ \langle
326: N_{\pm}\rangle_{g.c.e.}~=~z~,
327: \end{align}
328: %
329: and for $\;Q\geq 1\;$
330: %
331: \begin{align}\label{NpQ1}
332: \langle N_{+}\rangle_{c.e.}~&\simeq ~ Q~,~~~~~ \langle
333: N_{+}\rangle_{c.e.}~ \simeq~ \langle N_{+}\rangle_{g.c.e.}~;
334: \\
335: \langle N_{-}\rangle_{c.e.}~&\simeq ~ \frac{z^{2}}{Q+1}~,
336: ~~~\langle N_{-}\rangle_{c.e.}~\simeq~\frac{Q}{Q+1}~\langle
337: N_{-}\rangle_{g.c.e.}~.\label{NmQ1}
338: \end{align}
339:
340: In the large volume limit ($V\rightarrow \infty$ corresponds also
341: to $z\rightarrow \infty$) the mean quantities in the CE
342: and GCE are equal. This result is referred to as an
343: equivalence of the canonical and grand canonical ensembles.
344: Using the uniform limit of the modified Bessel function \cite{I}
345: \begin{align}\label{IQu}
346: \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} I_{n}(n x)
347: \;=\; \frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \pi n}}\;
348: \frac{\exp{(\eta n})}{(1+x^2)^{1/4}}\;
349: \left [\; 1 + O\left(\frac{1}{n}\right) \right] \;,
350: \end{align}
351: %
352: where
353: \begin{align}\label{eta}
354: \eta = \sqrt{1+x^2} + \log \frac{x}{1+ \sqrt{1+x^2}}\;,
355: \end{align}
356: %
357: one can easily find (note that fixed $Q$ at $z\rightarrow
358: \infty$ means a zero value of the net charge density and $y= 0$):
359: %
360: \begin{align}\label{Npmce}
361: \langle N_{\pm} \rangle _{c.e.}~\simeq~
362: z\left(y+\sqrt{1+y^2}\right)^{\pm 1}~
363: =~\langle N_{\pm} \rangle_{g.c.e.}~.
364: \end{align}
365:
366:
367: %
368:
369: The total multiplicity of charged
370: particles is defined as $N_{ch} = N_++N_-$.
371: Its average in the GCE and CE reads:
372: \begin{align}\label{Nch-gce} \langle N_{ch} \rangle_{g.c.e.} &\;\equiv\;
373: \langle\;N_+ + N_-\;\rangle_{g.c.e.} \;=\; \langle N_+\rangle_{g.c.e.} +
374: \langle N_-\rangle_{g.c.e.} \;= ~2z~\cosh\left(\frac{\mu}{T}\right)\;, \\
375: \label{Nch-ce} \langle N_{ch} \rangle_{c.e.} &\,\equiv\, \langle\,N_+ +
376: N_-\,\rangle_{c.e.} \,=\, \langle N_+\rangle_{c.e.} + \langle N_-\rangle_{c.e.}
377: \,=\, z\left[\frac{I_{Q-1}(2z)}{I_Q(2z)} +
378: \frac{I_{Q+1}(2z)}{I_Q(2z)}\right]\,.
379: \end{align}
380: %
381: \begin{figure}[h!]\label{1}
382: \vspace{-0.5cm}
383: \hspace{-0.1cm}
384: \epsfig{file=NQ0.EPS,height=7cm,width=9.8cm}
385: \hspace{0.1cm}
386: \epsfig{file=NQ2.EPS,height=7cm,width=7.8cm}
387: \vspace{-1cm}
388: \caption{The ratios of the mean particle numbers in the
389: CE to those in the GCE as functions of $z$
390: for $Q=0$ and $Q=2$.
391: } %
392: \label{NQ02}
393: \end{figure}
394: %
395: \begin{figure}[h!]\label{2}
396: \vspace{0.5cm}
397: %\hspace{0.1cm}
398: \epsfig{file=NQy01.EPS,height=7cm,width=9.6cm}
399: \hspace{0.05cm}
400: \epsfig{file=NQy05.EPS,height=7cm,width=7.9cm} \\%[-0.5cm]
401: \hspace{1.6cm}
402: \epsfig{file=NQy1.EPS,height=7cm,width=8cm}
403: \hspace{0.05cm}
404: \epsfig{file=NQy2.EPS,height=7cm,width=7.9cm}
405: \vspace{-0.7cm}
406: \caption{The ratios of the mean particle numbers in the
407: CE to those in the GCE as functions
408: of $Q=1,2,3,...$ for fixed values of $y=Q/2z$. }
409: \end{figure} %
410:
411: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
412: %
413: \section{ The scaled variance}
414: %
415: A useful measure of the fluctuations of any variable $\;X\;$ is
416: the ratio of its variance $\;V(X)\equiv\langle X^2\rangle -\langle
417: X \rangle ^2\;$ to its mean value $\;\langle X \rangle$, referred
418: here as the scaled variance:
419: %
420: \begin{align} \label{omega}
421: \omega^{X} \;\equiv \; \frac{\langle X^2\rangle - \langle
422: X\rangle^2}{\langle
423: X\rangle}~.
424: \end{align}
425: %
426: Note, that $\;\omega^X=1\;$ for the Poisson distribution. In order
427: to study the fluctuations of charged particle numbers the second
428: moments of the multiplicity distribution have to be calculated.
429: %In the $~g.c.e.~$ (\ref{Zgce}) and CE (\ref{Zce})
430: One finds:
431: \begin{align}\label{Nj2}
432: \langle N_{j\pm}^{2} \rangle~ &=~ \frac{1}{Z }
433: \left[\lambda_{j\pm} \frac{\partial}{\partial \lambda_{j\pm}}
434: \left( \lambda_{j\pm} \frac{\partial \; Z}{\partial \lambda_{j\pm}}
435: \right) \right]
436: = a_{\pm}~z_{j}~+~b_{\pm}~z_{j}^{2}~,\\
437: \label{Ni+Nj-} \langle N_{j+}N_{j-}\rangle ~&=~ \frac{\lambda_{j+}
438: \lambda_{j-}}{Z}
439: ~\frac{\partial^2\;Z}{\partial \lambda_{j+}\partial \lambda_{j-}}
440: ~=~ z_{j}^{2}~,
441: \end{align}
442: where $a_{\pm}$ is given by Eq.\,(\ref{a+-}) and
443: \begin{align}\label{bpm}
444: b^{g.c.e.}_{\pm}~=~\exp\left(\pm\frac{2\mu}{T}\right)~=~
445: \left(a^{g.c.e.}_{\pm}\right)^{2},~~~~~
446: b^{c.e.}_{\pm}~=~\frac{I_{Q\mp2}(2z)}{I_{Q}(2z)}~,
447: \end{align}
448: in the GCE and CE, respectively.
449: %
450: %
451: The scaled variances $\omega^{j\,\pm}$ and $\omega^{j\,ch}$ are equal to:
452: \begin{align}\label{omega-j}
453: \omega^{j\,\pm}
454: \; &\equiv \; \frac{\langle N_{j+}^2\rangle
455: \;-\; \langle N_{j+}\rangle^2}
456: {\langle
457: N_{j+}\rangle}~=~1\;-\;z_{j}~\left(a_{\pm}~-
458: ~\frac{b_{\pm}}{a_{\pm}}\right)~,\\
459: \label{omega-ch-j} \omega^{j\,ch}~&\equiv~\frac{\langle \left(N_{j+}+
460: N_{j-}\right)^2\rangle
461: - \langle N_{j+}+ N_{j-}\rangle^2}{\langle
462: N_{j+}+N_{j-}\rangle}
463: ~=~ 1+z_{j}~\left[\frac{b_+ + b_- +2}{a_+ +a_-}-\left(
464: a_++a_-\right)\right]~,
465: \end{align}
466:
467: %
468: The Eqs.\,(\ref{omega-j}-\ref{omega-ch-j}) describe the particle number
469: fluctuations of a given specie ~$j$~. One can establish the general rule
470: how to calculate the fluctuations of $N_{\pm}=\sum_j N_{j\pm}$ and
471: $N_{ch}=N_{+}+N_{-}$. To do this one should set
472: $\lambda_{1\pm}=\lambda_{2\pm}=\cdots=\lambda_{\pm}$ in
473: Eqs.\,(\ref{Zgce},\ref{Zce}) and differentiate with respect to
474: $\lambda_{\pm}$ in Eqs.\,(\ref{Njpm},\ref{Nj2}) in order to get $\langle
475: N^{n}_{\pm} \rangle$ ($n=1,2$). This eventually results in a substitution
476: of $z$ instead of $z_j$ in all final formulas for the averages and
477: fluctuations.
478: One obtains:
479: \begin{align}\label{omega-gce}
480: \omega_{g.c.e.}^{\pm} ~
481: %& \equiv\;
482: %\frac{\langle N_{\pm}^2\rangle_{g.c.e.}
483: % \;-\; \langle N_{\pm}\rangle_{g.c.e.}^2}
484: % {\langle N_{\pm}\rangle_{g.c.e.}}~=~1~;~
485: &=~\omega_{g.c.e.}^{ch} ~=1~.\\
486: %\equiv~ \frac{\langle N_{ch}^2\rangle_{g.c.e.}
487: % \;-\; \langle N_{ch}\rangle_{g.c.e.}^2}
488: % {\langle N_{ch}\rangle_{g.c.e.}}~=1~,\\
489: %\equiv ~ \frac{\langle N_{ch}^2\rangle_{c.e.}
490: % \;-\; \langle N_{ch}\rangle^2_{c.e.}}{\langle N_{ch}\rangle_{c.e.}}
491: \omega_{c.e.}^{\pm}
492: % \;& \equiv\;
493: %\frac{\langle N_{\pm}^2\rangle_{c.e.}
494: % \;-\; \langle N_{\pm}\rangle_{c.e.}^2}
495: % {\langle N_{\pm}\rangle_{c.e.}}
496: ~ & =~
497: 1 \;-\; z~\left[\,\frac{I_{Q\mp 1}(2z)}{I_Q(2z)}
498: \;-\; \frac{I_{Q\mp 2}(2z)}
499: {I_{Q\mp 1}(2z)}\,\right]~, \label{omega-ce}\\
500: \omega_{c.e.}^{ch}~
501: %&\equiv~
502: %\frac{\langle N_{ch}^2\rangle_{c.e.}
503: % \;-\; \langle N_{ch}\rangle_{c.e.}^2}
504: % {\langle N_{ch}\rangle_{c.e.}}\\
505: & =\; 1 \;+\; z \left[ \frac{I_{Q-2}(2z) + I_{Q+2}(2z) + 2I_Q(2z)}
506: {I_{Q-1}(2z)+I_{Q+1}(2z)}
507: \;-\; \frac{I_{Q-1}(2z)+I_{Q+1}(2z)}{I_Q(2z)} \right]~.
508: \label{omega-ch-ce}
509: %2\omega_{c.e.}^{\pm}~.
510: \end{align}
511: %
512: The scaled variances $\omega_{c.e}^{\pm}$ and $\omega_{c.e}^{ch}$
513: calculated with Eqs.\,(\ref{omega-ce}) and (\ref{omega-ch-ce}) are
514: shown in Fig.\,\ref{wceQ02} for $Q=0,~Q=2$ and in Fig.\,\ref{wcey}
515: for fixed positive values of $y$. Using the asymptotic behavior
516: of the modified Bessel function for $z\rightarrow 0$,
517: Eq.\,(\ref{Bessel-1lim}), and $z,Q\rightarrow \infty$ with
518: $y=Q/2z=const$, Eqs.\,(\ref{IQu}-\ref{eta}),
519: the limits of the scaled variances can be easily
520: found, both for a given particle specie ~$j$~
521: and for the sum over all particle species:
522: %
523: \\
524: 1). A small system limit $\;z\rightarrow 0\;$ gives for $\;Q=0\;$
525: %
526: \begin{align}
527: \omega_{c.e.}^{j\,+} &\;=\; \omega_{c.e.}^-
528: \;\simeq\; 1\;-\;\frac{z_jz}{2}\;,
529: &
530: \omega_{c.e.}^+ &\;=\; \omega_{c.e.}^-
531: \;\simeq\; 1\;-\;\frac{z^2}{2}\;,
532: \\
533: \omega_{c.e.}^{j\,ch} &\;\simeq\; 1\;+\;\frac{z_j}{z}\;-\; z_jz\;,
534: &
535: \omega_{c.e.}^{ch} &\;\simeq\; 2\;-\; z^2\;,
536: \end{align}
537: %
538: and for $\;Q\geq 1\;$
539: %
540: \begin{align}
541: \omega_{c.e.}^{j\,+} &\;\cong\; 1\;-\;\frac{z_j}{z}\;+\;\frac{z_jz}{Q(Q+1)}\;,
542: &
543: \omega_{c.e.}^+ &\;\cong\; \frac{z^2}{Q(Q+1)}\;,
544: \\
545: \omega_{c.e.}^{j\,-} &\;\cong\; 1 \;-\; \frac{z_jz}{(Q+1)(Q+2)}\;,
546: &
547: \omega_{c.e.}^- &\;\cong\; 1 \;-\; \frac{z^2}{(Q+1)(Q+2)}\;,
548: \\
549: \omega_{c.e.}^{j\,ch} &\;\cong\; 1\;-\;\frac{z_j}{z}
550: \;+\;\frac{4\,z_jz}{Q(Q+1)}\;,
551: &
552: \omega_{c.e.}^{ch} &\;\cong\; \frac{4\,z^2}{Q(Q+1)}\;.
553: \end{align}
554: %
555: \begin{figure}[h!]
556: \vspace{-0.7cm}
557: \hspace{-0.2cm}
558: \epsfig{file=WceQ0.EPS,height=7cm,width=9.2cm}
559: \hspace{0.4cm}
560: \epsfig{file=WceQ2.EPS,height=7cm,width=8.2cm}
561: \vspace{-0.9cm}
562: \caption{The scaled variances $\omega_{c.e.}^{\pm}$
563: (\ref{omega-ce}) and $\omega_{c.e.}^{ch}$
564: (\ref{omega-ch-ce}) as functions of $z$ for fixed values
565: of the conserved charge $Q$.}
566: %
567: \label{wceQ02}
568: \end{figure}
569: %
570: \begin{figure}[h!]
571: \vspace{0.5cm}
572: \hspace{-0.2cm}
573: \epsfig{file=Wy01.EPS,height=7cm,width=8.8cm}
574: \hspace{0.3cm}
575: \epsfig{file=Wy05.EPS,height=7cm,width=8.5cm}
576: \\%[-0.5cm]
577: %\vspace{-0.5cm}
578: \epsfig{file=Wy1.EPS,height=7cm,width=8.5cm}
579: \hspace{0.3cm}
580: \epsfig{file=Wy2.EPS,height=7cm,width=8.5cm}
581: %
582: \vspace{-0.3cm}
583: \caption{The scaled variances $\omega_{c.e.}^{\pm}$
584: (\ref{omega-ce}) and $\omega_{c.e.}^{ch}$
585: (\ref{omega-ch-ce}) as functions of $Q=1,2,3,...$ for fixed values
586: of $y=Q/2z$.}
587: %
588: \label{wcey}
589: \end{figure}
590:
591:
592:
593: %
594: 2). A large system limit $\;z\rightarrow\infty\;$ gives for fixed
595: $Q$ (note again that fixed $Q$ in the thermodynamic limit
596: $z\rightarrow \infty$ means a zero value of the net charge density
597: and leads, therefore, to $y= 0$)
598: %
599: \begin{align}
600: \omega_{c.e.}^{j\,\pm} &\;\simeq\; 1\;-\;\frac{z_j}{2z}
601: \;+\; \frac{z_j}{8z^2} \;\mp\; \frac{Qz_j}{4z^2}\;,
602: &
603: \omega_{c.e.}^{\pm} &\;\simeq\; \frac{1}{2} \;+\; \frac{1}{8z}
604: \;\mp\; \frac{Q}{4z}\;,
605: \\
606: \omega_{c.e.}^{j\,ch} &\;\simeq\; 1\;+\; \frac{z_j}{4z^2}\;,
607: &
608: \omega_{c.e.}^{ch} &\;\simeq\; 1\;+\; \frac{1}{4z}\;,
609: \end{align}
610: %
611: and for fixed $\;Q/2z=y\;$
612: %
613: \begin{align}
614: \omega_{c.e.}^{j\,\pm}
615: &\;\simeq\; 1\;-\;\frac{z_j}{2z} \;\mp \;
616: \frac{z_j}{2z}\frac{y}{\sqrt{1+y^2}}\;,
617: &
618: \omega_{c.e.}^{\pm}
619: &\;\simeq\; \frac{1}{2} \; \mp \;\frac{y}{2\sqrt{1+y^2}}\;,
620: \label{omega-plus}
621: \\
622: \omega_{c.e.}^{j\,ch}
623: &\;\simeq\; 1\;-\;\frac{z_j}{z}\frac{y^2}{1+y^2}\;,
624: &
625: \omega_{c.e.}^{ch}
626: &\;\simeq\; \frac{1}{1+y^2}\;.\label{omega-ch}
627: \end{align}
628: %
629:
630: As one sees from Eqs.\,3-4 the scaled variances reach very fast
631: their asymptotic values. In Fig.\,\ref{wceQ02} the scaled variances
632: for $Q=0$ and $Q=2$ can be compared (for $Q=0$ see details in
633: Ref.\,\cite{ce-fluc}). One notices that their values at
634: $z\rightarrow \infty$ are the same, but the behavior at small
635: values of $z$ is different. Namely, if $Q\geq 1$ the fluctuations
636: of positively charged particles are very small at small $z$, while
637: the fluctuations of the negatively charged particles have the
638: Poisson width. This can be easy understood as for small volumes
639: the average number of positive particles is approximately equal
640: to $Q$ (see Eq.\,(\ref{NpQ1})) and the fluctuations of $N_+$ are
641: small. On the other hand, at small $z$ and fixed $Q$ the average
642: number of
643: negatively charged particles is much smaller than $Q$ (see Eq.\,(\ref{NmQ1}))
644: and the fluctuations of $N_-$
645: are not affected by the conservation law.
646: Similar physical reasons explain the behavior of the fluctuations
647: at non-zero charge density in the thermodynamic limit. The Fig.\,4
648: demonstrates the following features of the asymptotic values of
649: $\omega_{c.e.}^{+}$ and $\omega_{c.e.}^{-}$ at $Q\gg 1$. When the
650: charge density becomes larger ($y$ increases) the
651: $\omega_{c.e.}^{+}$ decreases and tends to 0 at $y\rightarrow
652: \infty$, while the $\omega_{c.e.}^{-}$ increases and tends to 1 at
653: $y\rightarrow \infty$. The physical reasons of this are seen from
654: Eq.\,(\ref{Npmce}) which at $y\gg 1$ gives: $\langle
655: N_+\rangle_{c.e.}\simeq z\cdot 2y=Q$ and $\langle
656: N_-\rangle_{c.e.}\simeq z\cdot(2y)^{-1} =Q\cdot(4y^2)^{-1}\ll Q $.
657: Therefore, at $y\gg 1$ an exact charge conservation keeps $N_+$
658: close to its average value $Q$ and makes the fluctuations of
659: $N_+$ in the CE to be small. Under the same conditions,
660: $\langle N_-\rangle_{c.e.}$ is much smaller than $Q$, so that the
661: fluctuations of $N_-$ are not affected by the CE suppression
662: effects and has the Poisson form. These features of the CE are
663: in a striking difference with those in the GCE. The GCE
664: scaled variances (\ref{omega-gce}) are equal to 1 for
665: $N_-$, $N_+$ and $N_{ch}$, and this remains valid for all
666: values of the system net charge or net charge density.
667:
668: %
669: %
670: \section{ Energy fluctuations}
671: %
672: The partition function in the GCE and CE is equal to
673: $Z\equiv \sum \exp(-E/T)$, where the sum over microstates includes
674: the summation (integration) over particle momenta and summation
675: over number of particles and over different particle species. Each
676: microscopic state has the weight factor $\prod_{j}\exp[(\mu
677: N_{j+}-\mu N_{j-})/T]$ in the GCE (\ref{Zgce})and
678: $\delta[Q-\sum_{j}(N_{j+}-N_{j-})]$ in the CE (\ref{Zce}). In
679: order to calculate the average energy and its fluctuations it is
680: convenient to rewrite the partition function as $Z =\sum
681: \exp[\sum_{j}(\beta_{j+}E_{j+}+\beta_{j-}E_{j-})/T]$, where
682: $\beta_{j+}$ and $\beta_{j-}$ are the auxiliary parameters and
683: $\beta_{j+}=\beta_{j-}=\beta\equiv 1/T$ in the final formulas. It
684: then follows:
685: %
686: \begin{align}\label{Ejpm}
687: \langle E_{j\pm} \rangle~& =~- \frac{1}{Z} \frac{\partial Z}{\partial
688: \beta_{j\pm}}~=~-~a_{\pm}z_{j}^{'}~\equiv~
689: \langle \varepsilon_{j}\rangle \langle N_{j\pm}\rangle ,\\
690: \langle E_{i\pm} E_{j\pm} \rangle~& = ~\frac{1}{Z} \frac{\partial^2
691: Z}{\partial \beta_{i\pm} \beta_{j\pm}}~ =~
692: a_{\pm}z_{j}^{''}\delta_{ij}~+~b_{\pm}z_{i}^{'}z_{j}^{'}~,\label{Eijpm} \\
693: \langle E_{i+} E_{j-} \rangle~& = ~\frac{1}{Z} \frac{\partial^2
694: Z}{\partial \beta_{i+} \beta_{j-}}~ =~z_{i}^{'}z_{j}^{'}~,\label{Eipjm}
695: \end{align}
696: where $z_{j}^{'}=\partial z_{j}/\partial \beta$, $z_{j}^{''}=\partial^{2}
697: z_{j}/\partial \beta^{2}$, and $z_{j}, a_{\pm}, b_{\pm}$ are given by
698: Eqs.\,(\ref{z},\ref{a+-},\ref{bpm}), respectively. In Eq.\,(\ref{Ejpm}) we
699: have introduced the average value of one-particle energy
700: %\begin{align}\label{epsilon}
701: $\langle \varepsilon_{j}\rangle \equiv -z_{j}^{'}/z_{j}$.
702: Introducing also $\langle \varepsilon_{j}^{2}\rangle \equiv
703: z_{j}^{''}/z_{j}$ the energy fluctuations can be then presented
704: as:
705: \begin{align}\label{omegaEj}
706: %\omega_{{E_{j\pm}}}
707: W^{j\pm}~\equiv~ \frac{\langle E_{j\pm}^{2}\rangle -\langle
708: E_{j\pm}\rangle^{2}}{\langle E_{j\pm}\rangle}~=~\frac{\langle
709: \varepsilon_{j}^{2}\rangle -\langle
710: \varepsilon_{j}\rangle^{2}}{\langle
711: \varepsilon_{j}\rangle}~+~\langle \varepsilon_{j}\rangle
712: ~\omega^{j\pm}~,
713: \end{align}
714: where $\omega^{j\pm}$ is given by Eq.\,(\ref{omega-j}).
715: %According to
716: %Eq.\,\ref{omegaEj}) the energy fluctuations consist of two terms.
717: %The first one is the fluctuations of one-particle energy, it is
718: %the same in the GCE and CE. The second term corresponds to
719: %the fluctuations of energy due to the fluctuations of the number
720: %of particles. As discussed in details in the previous sections
721: %these particle number fluctuations are different in the GCE
722: %and CE.
723: Introducing the total energies
724: %of all positively (negatively),
725: $E_{\pm}\equiv\sum_{j}E_{j\pm}$ and
726: %all charged particles,
727: $E_{ch}\equiv\sum_{j}(E_{j+}+E_{j-})$, one finds:
728: \begin{align}\label{WEpm}
729: %\omega_{{E_{j\pm}}}
730: W^{\pm}~&\equiv~ \frac{\langle E_{\pm}^{2}\rangle -\langle
731: E_{\pm}\rangle^{2}}{\langle E_{\pm}\rangle}~=~
732: \frac{\langle \varepsilon^{2}\rangle~ - ~\langle
733: \varepsilon\rangle^{2}}{\langle \varepsilon\rangle}~+
734: ~\langle \varepsilon\rangle ~\omega^{\pm}~,\\
735: W^{ch}~&\equiv~ \frac{\langle E_{ch}^{2}\rangle -\langle
736: E_{ch}\rangle^{2}}{\langle E_{ch}\rangle}~=~
737: \frac{\langle \varepsilon^{2}\rangle~ - ~\langle
738: \varepsilon\rangle^{2}}{\langle \varepsilon\rangle}~ +~\langle
739: \varepsilon\rangle ~\omega^{ch}~,\label{WEch}
740: \end{align}
741: where $\langle \varepsilon \rangle\equiv \sum_{j}z_{j}\langle
742: \varepsilon_{j}\rangle/z$, $\langle \varepsilon^{2}\rangle\equiv
743: \sum_{j}\langle \varepsilon_{j}^{2}\rangle z_{j}/z$.
744: %
745: The Eqs.\,(\ref{WEpm}-\ref{WEch}) are valid in both the GCE and
746: CE. The energy fluctuations consist of two terms. The first term takes
747: into account
748: the fluctuations of one-particle energies, the second one --
749: the fluctuations of the number
750: of particles.
751: Most often
752: %the energy fluctuations due to
753: the
754: fluctuations of the number of particles are relatively more
755: important than the fluctuations of one-particle energies. Indeed, the
756: maximal value of the first term in
757: the right hand side of Eqs.\,(\ref{WEpm}-\ref{WEch}) is equal
758: to $\langle\varepsilon\rangle/3$ for the particles with
759: $m/T\rightarrow 0$, and it decreases and goes to zero at
760: $m/T\rightarrow \infty$. On the other hand, the second term in
761: the right hand side of Eqs.\,(\ref{WEpm}-\ref{WEch}) is equal
762: to $\langle\varepsilon\rangle$ for any system in the GCE.
763: The value of $(\langle \varepsilon^{2}\rangle - \langle
764: \varepsilon\rangle^{2})/\langle \varepsilon\rangle$ in
765: Eqs.\,(\ref{WEpm}-\ref{WEch}) is the same for ``+''and ``-''
766: particles, and in both the GCE and CE. The values of
767: $\omega$'s are however different in the GCE and CE.
768: Besides, the $\omega^+_{c.e.}$, $\omega^-_{c.e.}$ and
769: $\omega^{ch}_{c.e.}$ are different from each other for the
770: non-zero net charge $Q$. Therefore, the scaled variances of the
771: energy fluctuations are different in the GCE and CE, and
772: in the CE the values of $W^{+}$, $W^{-}$ and $W^{ch}$ differ
773: from each other and depend on the net charge of the system.
774: An example of the energy
775: fluctuations $W^{+}$, $W^{-}$ and $W^{ch}$ for the ideal pion gas with
776: $Q=0$ and $Q=2$ is presented in Fig.\,\ref{weq02}. One sees that
777: the dependences of the energy fluctuations $W^{+}$, $W^{-}$ and
778: $W^{ch}$ on $z$ in the CE resemble those for
779: $\omega^+_{c.e.}$, $\omega^-_{c.e.}$ and $\omega^{ch}_{c.e.}$
780: shown in Fig.\,\ref{wceQ02}.
781:
782:
783: \begin{figure}[h!]
784: \hspace{-0.5cm}
785: \epsfig{file= WEQ0-T120.EPS,height=7cm,width=9.5cm}
786: \hspace{0.1cm}
787: \epsfig{file=WEQ2-T120.EPS,height=7cm,width=8.5cm}
788: \vspace{-0.8cm}
789: \caption{The CE energy fluctuation $W^{+}$, $W^{-}$ and
790: $W^{ch}$ in the ideal pion gas at temperature $T=120$~MeV.}
791: % \caption{$\;\frac{\langle \Delta E^2 \rangle}{\langle E\rangle}\;$ with
792: % parameters $\;m=140 MeV,\; T=160 MeV\;$.}
793: \label{weq02}
794: \end{figure}
795:
796:
797:
798: The upper horizontal dotted line in Fig.\,5 shows the value of
799: $\langle \varepsilon^{2}\rangle/\langle \varepsilon\rangle$ which
800: corresponds to the $W^{+}=W^{-}=W^{ch}$ in the GCE. The lower
801: horizontal dotted line in Fig.\,5 shows the value of $(\langle
802: \varepsilon^{2}\rangle - \langle \varepsilon \rangle^2)
803: /\langle \varepsilon \rangle$ which is the fluctuations
804: of one-pion energy.
805: %
806:
807: \section{Single and double charged particles}
808:
809: In the following
810: sections we consider the extension of the CE formalism. First, let us
811: study the system of particles and antiparticles with charges $\pm 1$ and
812: $\pm 2$.
813: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
814: %
815: The CE partition function reads:
816: \begin{align}\label{ZceMQ}
817: &Z_{c.e.}(V,T,Q)
818: ~=~\sum_{N_{+},N_{-},\widetilde{N}_{+},\widetilde{N}_{-}=0}^{\infty}
819: ~\frac{\left(\lambda_{+}z\right)^{N_{+}}}{N_{+}!}~
820: \frac{\left(\lambda_{-}z\right)^{N_{-}}}{N_{-}!}~
821: \frac{\left(\widetilde{\lambda}_{+}
822: \widetilde{z}\right)^{\widetilde{N}_{+}}}{\widetilde{N}_{+}!}
823: ~\frac{\left(\widetilde{\lambda}_{-}\widetilde{z}\right)^{\widetilde{N}_{-}}}
824: {\widetilde{N}_{-}!}~
825: \delta\left[\left(N_{+}-N_{-}
826: +2\widetilde{N}_{+}-2\widetilde{N}_{-}\right)-Q\;\right]
827: \nonumber
828: \\
829: &\;=\;
830: \int_0^{2\pi}\frac{d\phi}{2\pi}\;
831: \exp\left[-i\,Q\,\phi \;+\; z~\left(\lambda_{+}\,e^{i\phi}
832: \;+\; \lambda_{-}\,e^{-i\phi}\right)
833: \;+\;
834: \widetilde{z}\,\left(\widetilde{\lambda}_{+}\,e^{i2\phi}
835: \;+\;
836: \widetilde{\lambda}_{-}\,e^{-i2\phi}\right)\right]
837: %\nonumber
838: \;=\; \sum_{k=-\infty}^{\infty}\;\;I_{Q-2k}(2z)\;I_k(2\widetilde{z})
839: \;,
840: %\nonumber
841: \end{align}
842: %
843: where we have used the relation
844: $\exp\left[x\left(t+\frac{1}{t}\right)\right]=\sum_{k=-\infty}^{\infty}t^k
845: I_k(2x)\;$.
846: %
847: %It can be easily seen from (\ref{ZceMQ}), that all averages and can be
848: %expressed
849: The $z$ and $\tilde{z}$ in Eq.\,(\ref{ZceMQ}) are the one-particle
850: partition functions for charges $\pm 1$ and $\pm 2$, respectively.
851: In terms of variables $c_{m\pm}$ ($m=1,2,4$)
852: %
853: \begin{align}\label{cnpm}
854: c_{m\pm}
855: \;=\; \frac{\sum_{k=-\infty}^{\infty}\;\;
856: I_{Q\mp m-2k}(2z)\;I_k(2\widetilde{z})}
857: {\sum_{k=-\infty}^{\infty}\;\;
858: I_{Q-2k}(2z)\;I_k(2\widetilde{z})}\;,
859: %~~~m=1,\;2,\;4.
860: \end{align}
861: %
862: one finds:
863: \begin{align} \label{N1N2}
864: \langle N_{\pm}\rangle_{c.e.} &\;=\; c_{1\pm}\;z\;, ~~&
865: \langle \widetilde{N}_{\pm}\rangle_{c.e.} &\;=\; c_{2\pm}\;\widetilde{z}\;
866: ,
867: \\
868: \langle N_{\pm}^2\rangle_{c.e.}
869: &\;=\; c_{1\pm}\;z \;+\; c_{2\pm}\;z^2,
870: ~~&
871: \langle \widetilde{N}_{\pm}^2\rangle_{c.e.}
872: &\;=\; c_{2\pm}\;\widetilde{z} \;+\; c_{4\pm}\;\widetilde{z}^2\;
873: . \label{N1N2a}
874: \end{align}
875: %
876: From Eqs.\,(\ref{N1N2}-\ref{N1N2a}) it follows:
877: %
878: \begin{align}
879: \omega_{1\,c.e.}^{\pm}
880: & \;\equiv \; \frac{\langle N_{\pm}^2\rangle_{c.e.}
881: \;-\; \langle N_{\pm}\rangle_{c.e.}^2}
882: {\langle N_{\pm}\rangle}_{c.e.}~=
883: ~1~-~z~\left(c_{1\pm}~-~\frac{c_{2\pm}}{c_{1\pm}}\right)~, \label{omega1}
884: \\
885: \omega_{2\,c.e.}^{\pm}
886: & \;\equiv \; \frac{\langle \widetilde{N}_{\pm}^2\rangle_{c.e.}
887: \;-\; \langle \widetilde{N}_{\pm}\rangle^2_{c.e.}}
888: {\langle \widetilde{N}_{\pm}\rangle_{c.e.}}~=
889: ~1~-~\widetilde{z}~
890: \left(c_{2\pm}~-~\frac{c_{4\pm}}{c_{2\pm}}\right)~,\label{omega2}
891: \\
892: \omega_{c.e.}^{\pm}
893: & \;\equiv \; \frac{\langle\left( N_{\pm}+
894: \widetilde{N}_{\pm}\right)^2\rangle_{c.e.}
895: \;-\; \langle N_{\pm}+ \widetilde{N}_{\pm}\rangle^2_{c.e.}}
896: {\langle N_{\pm}+ \widetilde{N}_{\pm}\rangle_{c.e.}} \label{omega12}
897: % \\
898: %&
899: ~=~1~+~\frac{z^2c_{2\pm}
900: \;+\;\widetilde{z}^2c_{4\pm}
901: \;+\; 2z\widetilde{z} c_{3\pm}}
902: {z c_{1\pm}\;+\;\widetilde{z} c_{2\pm}}
903: \;-\; (z c_{1\pm}\;+\;\widetilde{z} c_{2\pm})~.
904: %\nonumber
905: \end{align}
906: %
907: To illustrate the specific features of the considered system we
908: present the CE results in the case $\;Q=0\;$. As always, all
909: $\omega$'s are equal to 1 in the GCE. For $\langle Q\rangle
910: _{g.c.e.}=0$ one also has $\langle N_{\pm}\rangle_{g.c.e.}=z$ and
911: $\langle \widetilde{N}_{\pm}\rangle_{g.c.e.}=\widetilde{z}$.
912: %then partition function
913: To calculate Eqs.\,(\ref{N1N2}--\ref{omega12}) for finite values of
914: $z$ and $\widetilde{z}$ one can effectively use Eq.\,(\ref{cnpm}).
915: In the thermodynamic limit $V\rightarrow \infty$ both
916: $z\rightarrow \infty$ and $\widetilde{z} \rightarrow\infty$. In
917: this case it is convenient to return to the integral over $\phi$
918: representation in Eq.\,(\ref{ZceMQ}) and use it also for the
919: derivatives of the CE partition function with respect to
920: $\lambda_{\pm}$ and $\widetilde{\lambda}_{\pm}$. Using the saddle
921: point method to calculate the $\phi$-integrals one finds then for
922: $z,\widetilde{z}\gg1$:
923: \begin{align}
924: \langle N_{\pm}\rangle_{c.e.}
925: & ~
926: % \frac{1}{Z_{c.e.}}\int_0^{2\pi}\frac{d\phi}{2\pi}\;\;z\;\cos\phi\;\;
927: % e^{2z \cos\phi \;+\; 2\widetilde{z}\cos2\phi}
928: % \;\longrightarrow\;
929: \simeq ~z\left[1 - \frac{1}{4(z+4\widetilde{z})}\right]~,~~
930: \langle \widetilde{N}_{\pm}\rangle_{c.e.}~=~ \widetilde{z}\left(1
931: - \frac{1}{z+4\widetilde{z}}\right)~;
932: \\
933: \omega_{1\,c.e.}^{\pm} &\; \simeq\; 1-\frac{z}{2(z+4\widetilde{z})}\;,~~
934: %\\
935: \omega_{2\,c.e.}^{\pm} \; \simeq \;
936: 1-\frac{2\widetilde{z}}{z+4\widetilde{z}}\;,~~
937: %\\
938: \omega_{c.e.}^{\pm} \; \simeq\;
939: 1-\frac{(z+2\widetilde{z})^2}{2(z
940: +\widetilde{z})(z+4\widetilde{z})}\;.\label{W12}
941: \end{align}
942: %
943: From the above formulas one finds that $ \omega_{c.e.}^{\pm} \simeq 0.5$
944: if $\widetilde{z}/z$ is either much smaller or much larger than 1.
945: The scaled variance $\omega_{c.e.}^{\pm}$ has a maximum at
946: $z=2\widetilde{z}\;$. At this point one finds $\omega_{c.e.}^{\pm}=5/9$,
947: $\omega_{1\,c.e.}^{\pm}=5/6$ and $\omega_{2\,c.e.}^{\pm}=2/3$.
948: %
949: %
950: \section{Quantum statistics effects}
951:
952: It is instructive to apply a different technique \cite{steph} to
953: calculate the fluctuations of the thermodynamical quantities with
954: the exact conservation laws imposed. This method allows to find
955: the values of the CE fluctuations in the
956: thermodynamic limit and include the effects of quantum
957: statistics.
958:
959: The ideal quantum gas of the identical Bose or Fermi particles and
960: antiparticles can be
961: characterized by the occupation numbers
962: $n_{p}^{\pm}$
963: of the one-particle states
964: labeled by momenta p. The GCE average values and fluctuations are
965: \cite{lan}:
966: \eq{
967: \langle n_p^{\pm} \rangle_{g.c.e.}
968: ~& = ~\frac {1}
969: {\exp \left[\left(\sqrt{p^{2}+m^{2}}~\mp~ \mu\right) / T\right]
970: ~-~ \gamma}~, \label{np-aver}\\
971: \langle\Delta n_p^{\pm 2}\rangle_{g.c.e.} ~& \equiv~ \langle
972: \left(n_{p}^{\pm}\right)^2\rangle_{g.c.e.}~-~
973: \langle n_{p}^{\pm}\rangle^{2}_{g.c.e.}~=~
974: %~T\frac{\partial n_p}{\partial
975: % \mu}=
976: \langle n_p^{\pm} \rangle_{g.c.e.} \left(1 + \gamma \langle n_p^{\pm}
977: \rangle_{g.c.e.}\right)
978: ~ \equiv~
979: v^{\pm 2}_p~,\label{np-fluc}
980: }
981: where $\gamma$ is equal to $+1$ and $-1$ for Bose and Fermi
982: statistics, respectively ($\gamma=0$ corresponds to the Boltzmann
983: approximation).
984: These expressions are microscopic in a sense that they describe
985: the average values and fluctuations of a single mode with momentum $p$.
986: However, the average values
987: %and fluctuations
988: of all macroscopic quantities of the system can be determined
989: through the average occupation numbers
990: %and fluctuations
991: of these single modes. The fluctuations
992: of the macroscopic observables can be written
993: in terms of the microscopic correlator $\langle \Delta n_p^\alpha \Delta
994: n_k^\beta \rangle_{g.c.e.}$, where $\alpha,\beta$ are $+$ and(or) $-$.
995: This correlator can be presented as:
996: \eq{
997: \langle \Delta n_p^\alpha \Delta n_k^\beta \rangle_{g.c.e.}~ =~
998: v_p^{\alpha2}~
999: \delta_{p\,k}~\delta_{\alpha \beta}~, \label{correlator1}
1000: }
1001: due to the statistical independence of different
1002: quantum levels and different charge states in the GCE.
1003: The variances of the
1004: total number of (negatively) positively charged particles
1005: $N_{\alpha} = \sum_p n_p^\alpha$ are equal to:
1006: \eq{
1007: \langle \Delta N_{\alpha}^2\rangle_{g.c.e.}\, \equiv\,
1008: \langle N_{\alpha}^{2} \rangle_{g.c.e.} - \langle N_{\alpha}
1009: \rangle^2_{g.c.e.}\,=\, \sum_{p,k} \left(\langle n_p^\alpha n_k^\alpha
1010: \rangle_{g.c.e.} -
1011: \langle n_p^\alpha \rangle_{g.c.e.} \langle n_k^\alpha \rangle_{g.c.e.}
1012: \right)\,
1013: =\, \sum_{p,k} \langle \Delta n_{p}^{\alpha} \Delta_k^\alpha
1014: \rangle_{g.c.e.}\, = \, \sum_p v_p^{\alpha 2}~.\nonumber
1015: }
1016: We have assumed above that the quantum $p$-levels
1017: are non-degenerate. In fact each level should be
1018: further specified by the projection of a particle
1019: spin. Thus, each $p$-level splits into $g=2j+1$
1020: sub-levels. It will be assumed that the $p$-summation includes all
1021: these sub-levels too.
1022: %This does not change the above formulation
1023: %because of statistical independence of these quantum sub-levels.
1024: The degeneracy factor enters explicitly when one substitutes, in the
1025: thermodynamic limit,
1026: the summation over discrete levels by the integration:
1027: %
1028: \eq{\sum_{p}~...~=~\frac{gV}{2\pi^{2}}\int_{0}^{\infty}p^{2}dp~...~.
1029: \nonumber}
1030: %
1031: The scaled variance $\omega^{\alpha}_{g.c.e.}$ in the thermodynamical limit
1032: $V\rightarrow\infty$ reads:
1033: %
1034: \eq{\omega^{\alpha}_{g.c.e.} ~\equiv~\frac{\langle N_{\alpha}^2
1035: \rangle_{g.c.e.}~-
1036: ~\langle N_{\alpha}\rangle^{2}_{g.c.e.}}
1037: {\langle N_{\alpha} \rangle_{g.c.e.}}~=~ \frac{\sum_{p,k} \langle
1038: \Delta n_{p}^\alpha \Delta n_{k}^\alpha \rangle_{g.c.e.}}
1039: {\sum_p \langle n^\alpha_p\rangle_{g.c.e.}}~ = ~
1040: \frac{\sum_{p}v_p^{\alpha 2}}{\sum_{p}\langle n_p^\alpha\rangle_{g.c.e.}}
1041: ~\simeq~
1042: \frac{\int_{0}^{\infty}p^{2}dp~v_p^{\alpha
1043: 2}}{\int_{0}^{\infty}p^{2}dp~\langle n_p^\alpha\rangle_{g.c.e.}
1044: }~.\label{omega-alpha}
1045: }
1046: %
1047: The Eq.\,(\ref{omega-alpha})
1048: corresponds to the particle number
1049: fluctuations in the GCE. To illustrate the role of quantum
1050: statistics let us consider the case of $\mu=0$, i.e. $\langle
1051: Q\rangle_{g.c.e.}=0$, where $Q\equiv\sum_{p,\alpha}
1052: q^{\alpha}n_{p}^{\alpha}$. In what follows we assume $q^+=1$
1053: and $q^-=-1$, however, the formulas below are valid for any values
1054: of $q^+$ and $q^-=-q^+$. From Eqs.\,(\ref{np-fluc}) and (\ref{omega-alpha})
1055: one finds
1056: $\omega^{\pm Boltz}_{g.c.e.}=1$ in the Boltzmann limit ($\gamma=0$),
1057: $\omega_{g.c.e.}^{\pm Bose}>1$ for the Bose particles ($\gamma=1$) and
1058: $\omega_{g.c.e.}^{\pm Fermi}<1$ for the Fermi particles ($\gamma=-1$).
1059: The strongest quantum effects correspond to $m/T\rightarrow 0$:
1060: \eq{
1061: \omega_{g.c.e.}^{\pm Boltz}~=~1,~~~
1062: \omega_{g.c.e.}^{\pm Bose}~=~
1063: %\omega_{g.c.e.}^{ch ~Bose}~=~
1064: \frac{\pi^{2}}{6\,\zeta(3)}~ \simeq ~1.368~,~~~
1065: \omega_{g.c.e.}^{\pm Fermi}~=~
1066: %\omega_{g.c.e.}^{ch~Fermi}~=~
1067: \frac{\pi^{2}}{9\,\zeta(3)}~ \simeq ~0.912~. \label{omegaBFgce} }
1068: The scaled variance
1069: $\;\omega^{ch}_{g.c.e.}\;$ for all charged particles can be
1070: easily obtained from
1071: (\ref{omega-alpha}) by replacing
1072: $\;\sum_p\rightarrow\sum_{p\,\alpha}\;$, and one finds:
1073: \eq{
1074: \omega_{g.c.e.}^{ch ~Boltz}~=~\omega_{g.c.e.}^{\pm Boltz}~,~~~
1075: \omega_{g.c.e.}^{ch ~Bose}~=~\omega_{g.c.e.}^{\pm Bose}~,~~~
1076: \omega_{g.c.e.}^{ch ~Fermi}~=~\omega_{g.c.e.}^{\pm Fermi}~.\
1077: \label{omegaBFgcech}
1078: }
1079:
1080: The formula for the microscopic correlator is modified if we
1081: impose the exact charge conservation in our equilibrated system.
1082: For this purpose we introduce the equilibrium
1083: probability distribution $W(n_p^{\alpha})$ of the occupation numbers.
1084: As a first step we assume that each $n_{p}^{\alpha}$ fluctuates
1085: independently according
1086: to the Gauss distribution law with
1087: the average value $\langle n_p^{\alpha}\rangle_{g.c.e.}$ (\ref{np-aver}) and
1088: the mean square deviation $v_p^{\alpha 2}$ (\ref{np-fluc}):
1089: %
1090: \eq{
1091: W(n_p^\alpha) ~\propto ~ \prod_{p,\alpha}
1092: \exp{\left[-~ \frac{\left(\Delta n_p^{\alpha}\right)^2}{2v_p^{\alpha 2}}
1093: \right]}~.
1094: \label{gauss}
1095: }
1096: %
1097: To justify this assumption (see Ref.\,\cite{steph})
1098: one can consider the
1099: sum of $n^{\alpha}_p$ in small momentum volume $\left(\Delta
1100: p\right)^3$ with the center at $p$. At fixed $\left(\Delta
1101: p\right)^3$ and $V\rightarrow \infty$ the average number of particles
1102: %$\langle n^{\alpha}_{p}\rangle
1103: %\Delta p^3 \cdot V$
1104: inside $\left(\Delta p\right)^3$ becomes large.
1105: Each particle configuration inside $\left(\Delta p\right)^3$
1106: consists of $\left(\Delta p\right)^3 \cdot V/(2\pi)^3\gg1$ statistically
1107: independent terms, each
1108: with the average value $\langle n^{\alpha}_{p}\rangle_{g.c.e.}$
1109: (\ref{np-aver}) and the scaled variance
1110: $v^{\alpha 2}_{p}$ (\ref{np-fluc}). From the central limit
1111: theorem it then follows that
1112: the probability distribution for the fluctuations
1113: inside $\left(\Delta p\right)^3$ should be Gaussian.
1114: In fact, we always convolve $n^{\alpha}_p$ with some smooth
1115: function of $p$, so instead of writing the Gaussian
1116: distribution for the sum of $n^{\alpha}_p$ in $\left(\Delta p\right)^3$
1117: we can use it directly for $n_{p}^{\alpha}$.
1118:
1119: The average value of the conserved charge
1120: $Q=\sum_{p,\alpha}q^{\alpha} n_p^{\alpha}$
1121: is regulated in the GCE by the chemical potential
1122: $\mu$. If we impose an exact charge conservation,
1123: $\Delta Q=\sum_{p,\alpha} q^{\alpha} \Delta n_p^{\alpha}=0$, the
1124: distribution (\ref{gauss}) will be modified as:
1125: %
1126: \begin{align}\label{gauss-Q}
1127: W(n_p^\alpha) ~\propto ~\prod_{p,\alpha}
1128: \exp\left[-~ \frac{\left(\Delta n_p^{\alpha}\right)^2}{2v_p^{\alpha 2}}
1129: \right]~
1130: \delta\left(\sum_{p,\alpha} q^{\alpha} \Delta n_p^{\alpha}
1131: \right)~
1132: \propto ~ \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} d \lambda~\prod_{p,\alpha}
1133: \exp\left[-~ \frac{\left(\Delta n_p^{\alpha}\right)^2}{2v_p^{\alpha 2}}
1134: + i \lambda~q^{\alpha} \Delta n_p^{\alpha} \right]~ .
1135: \end{align}
1136: %
1137: It is convenient to generalize distribution (\ref{gauss-Q})
1138: to $W(n_p^\alpha,\lambda)$ using
1139: further the integration along imaginary axis in the
1140: $\lambda$-plane.
1141: % \eq{
1142: % W(n_p^{\alpha}, \lambda) ~\ptopto~
1143: % \prod_{p,\alpha}
1144: %~ \exp\left[- \sum_{p, \alpha} \frac{\left(\Delta
1145: %n_p^{\alpha}\right)^2}{2 v_p^{\alpha 2}}
1146: % + \sum_{p,\alpha} \lambda\alpha~\Delta n_p^{\alpha}\right]~.
1147: % }
1148: After completing squares one gets:
1149: \eq{ W(n^{\alpha}_p, \lambda)~ \propto ~ \prod_{p, \alpha}
1150: \exp\left[
1151: -~\frac{\left(\Delta n_p^{\alpha} -
1152: \lambda v_p^{\alpha 2}q^{\alpha}\right)^2}
1153: {2v_p^{\alpha 2}}+
1154: \frac{\lambda^2}{2}~ v_p^{\alpha 2}q^{\alpha 2}\right]~,
1155: }
1156: and the average values are now calculated as:
1157: %
1158: \eq{\langle ... \rangle~=~\frac{\int_{-i\infty}^{i\infty}d\lambda
1159: \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\prod_{p,\alpha} dn_p^{\alpha}~... ~W(n^{\alpha}_p,
1160: \lambda)}{\int_{-i\infty}^{i\infty}d\lambda
1161: \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\prod_{p,\alpha} dn_p^{\alpha}~W(n^{\alpha}_p,
1162: \lambda)}~. \label{average} }
1163: %
1164: The Eq.\,(\ref{average}) has the meaning of the
1165: CE averaging in the thermodynamic limit $V\rightarrow\infty$.
1166: One easily finds
1167: \eq{
1168: \langle(\Delta n_p^\alpha -
1169: v_p^{\alpha 2}\lambda q^{\alpha})
1170: (\Delta n_k^{\beta} - v_k^{\beta 2}\lambda
1171: q^{\beta}) \rangle ~=~
1172: \delta_{p\,k}~\delta_{\alpha \beta}~ v_p^{\alpha 2}~,~~~
1173: &\langle \lambda^2 \rangle = - \left( \sum_{p,
1174: \alpha} v_p^{\alpha 2} q^{\alpha 2} \right)^{-1}~,
1175: ~~~
1176: \langle (\Delta n_p^{\alpha} - v_p^{\alpha 2}\lambda q^{\alpha}) \lambda
1177: \rangle ~=~ 0~,\nonumber
1178: }
1179: %
1180: so that it follows:
1181: %
1182: \begin{align}
1183: \langle \Delta n^{\alpha}_p \Delta n^{\beta}_k \rangle ~& =~
1184: \delta_{p\,k}~ \delta_{\alpha \beta}~
1185: v_p^{\alpha 2}~ - v_p^{\alpha 2} q^{\alpha}~
1186: v_k^{\beta 2} q^{\beta}~ \langle \lambda^2 \rangle +
1187: \langle \Delta n_p^{\alpha} \lambda \rangle~ v_k^{\beta 2}
1188: q^{\beta} + \langle \Delta n_k^{\beta} \lambda \rangle~ v_p^{\alpha 2}
1189: q^{\alpha} \label{corr-ch}
1190: \\
1191: &=~ \delta_{p\,k}~ \delta_{\alpha \beta}~
1192: v_p^{\alpha 2}~ +~ v_p^{\alpha 2} q^{\alpha}~
1193: v_k^{\beta 2} q^{\beta} ~\langle \lambda^2 \rangle~
1194: = ~\delta_{p\,k}~ \delta_{\alpha \beta}~ v_p^{\alpha 2} -
1195: \frac{v^{\alpha 2}_p q^{\alpha}~v^{\beta 2}_k q^{\beta}}
1196: {\sum_{p,\alpha} v^{\alpha 2}_p q^{\alpha 2}~.} \nonumber
1197: \end{align}
1198: By means of Eq.\,(\ref{corr-ch}) we obtain:
1199: %
1200: \eq{ \omega^{\alpha}_{c.e.}~\equiv~\frac{
1201: \langle N_{\alpha}^2 \rangle ~-~ \langle N_{\alpha} \rangle^2}
1202: {\langle N_{\alpha} \rangle} ~=~\frac{
1203: \sum_p v_{p}^{\alpha 2}}{\sum_{p}\langle n_{p}^{\alpha}\rangle_{g.c.e.}}
1204: ~-~
1205: \frac{\left(\sum_p v_{p}^{\alpha 2}q^{\alpha}\right)^{2}}
1206: {\sum_{p}\langle n_{p}^{\alpha}\rangle_{g.c.e.}
1207: ~\sum_{p,\alpha} v_{p}^{\alpha
1208: 2}q^{\alpha 2}
1209: } ~. \label{omega-alpha-ce}
1210: }
1211: %
1212: The Eq.\,(\ref{np-aver}) leads to
1213: $v_{p}^{\alpha 2}=\langle
1214: n_{p}^{\alpha}\rangle_{g.c.e.}$
1215: in the Boltzmann approximation, so that from Eq.\,(\ref{omega-alpha-ce})
1216: one finds
1217: ($y\equiv Q/2z=\sinh(\mu/T)$):
1218: %
1219: \eq{\omega^{\alpha}_{c.e.}~=~1~-~\frac{\exp(\alpha
1220: \mu/T)}{\exp(\mu/T)~+~\exp(-\mu/T)}~=~ \frac{1}{2}~-~\alpha
1221: ~\frac{y}{2\sqrt{1+y^{2}}}~,\label{omega-alpha1}
1222: %
1223: }
1224: %
1225: which coincides with Eq.\,(\ref{omega-plus}). Formula
1226: $\;\omega^{ch}_{c.e.}\;$ can be obtained from
1227: (\ref{omega-alpha-ce}) after replacing
1228: $\;\sum_p\rightarrow\sum_{p,\alpha}\;$, and it is the same as
1229: Eq.\,(\ref{omega-ch}).
1230: %
1231: %At
1232: %$\mu=0$ we find the CE scaled variances:
1233: %\eq{
1234: %\omega_{c.e.}^{\pm Boltz}~&=~\frac{1}{2},~~~
1235: %\omega_{c.e.}^{\pm Bose}~=~
1236: %%\omega_{c.e.}^{ch ~Bose}~=~
1237: %\frac{\pi^{2}}{12~\zeta(3)}~ \simeq ~0.684,~~~
1238: %\omega_{c.e.}^{\pm Fermi}~=~
1239: %%\omega_{c.e.}^{ch~Fermi}~=~
1240: %\frac{\pi^{2}}{18~\zeta(3)}~ \simeq ~0.456~. \label{omegaBFce} \\
1241: %\omega_{c.e.}^{ch ~Boltz}~&=~2\omega_{g.c.e.}^{\pm Boltz}~,~~~
1242: %\omega_{c.e.}^{ch ~Bose}~=~2\omega_{c.e.}^{\pm Bose}~,~~~
1243: %\omega_{c.e.}^{ch ~Fermi}~=~2\omega_{c.e.}^{\pm Fermi}~.
1244: %\label{omegaBFcech}
1245: %}
1246: %
1247: At $\mu=0$ from Eq.\,(\ref{omega-alpha-ce})
1248: we find the CE scaled variances:
1249: \eq{ \omega_{c.e.}^{\pm Boltz} & \;=\;\frac{1}{2}\,,&
1250: \omega_{c.e.}^{\pm Bose}~ & =~
1251: \frac{\pi^{2}}{12~\zeta(3)}~ \simeq ~0.684\,,&
1252: \omega_{c.e.}^{\pm Fermi}~ & =
1253: ~ \frac{\pi^{2}}{18~\zeta(3)}~ \simeq ~0.456\,, \label{omegaBFce}
1254: \\
1255: \omega_{c.e.}^{ch ~Boltz}~& =~2\,\omega_{g.c.e.}^{\pm Boltz}\,,&
1256: \omega_{c.e.}^{ch ~Bose}~ &=~2\,\omega_{c.e.}^{\pm Bose}\,,&
1257: \omega_{c.e.}^{ch ~Fermi}~ &=~2\,\omega_{c.e.}^{\pm Fermi}\,.
1258: \label{omegaBFcech} }
1259:
1260: %Similar to the Boltzmann case
1261: As seen from Eqs.\,(\ref{omegaBFgce},\ref{omegaBFce}) the scaled
1262: variance of (negative) positive particles
1263: with Bose or Fermi statistics in the CE
1264: is as half as large as the corresponding scaled variances in the GCE.
1265: Therefore, the CE suppression of the particle number fluctuations in the
1266: thermodynamic limit works at $\mu=0$ in the quantum systems similar
1267: to that in the Boltzmann case. This result can be rephrased in another way:
1268: the Bose enhancement and Fermi suppression of the GCE fluctuations
1269: remain the same in the CE for the $\omega_{c.e.}^{\pm}$ at
1270: $\mu=0$ in the thermodynamic limit.
1271: The Eq.\,(\ref{omegaBFcech}) demonstrates that the
1272: scaled variances of all charged particles in the CE
1273: for any statistics are by a factor of 2 larger than the corresponding
1274: scaled variances for (negative) positive particles,
1275: whereas in the GCE
1276: these scaled variances presented by Eq.\,(\ref{omegaBFgcech})
1277: are equal to each other.
1278:
1279:
1280: Comparing Eq.\,(\ref{corr-ch}) and Eq.\,(\ref{correlator1}) one notices the
1281: changes of the microscopic correlator due to an exact charge
1282: conservation. Namely, in the CE
1283: the fluctuations of each mode is reduced, i.e.
1284: the $\langle \left(\Delta n_{p}^{\alpha }\right)^2\rangle$ calculated
1285: from Eq.\,(\ref{corr-ch}) is smaller than that in
1286: Eq.\,(\ref{np-fluc}), and the anticorrelations
1287: between different modes $p\neq k$
1288: and the same charge states $\alpha=\beta$
1289: appear.
1290: These two changes of the microscopic correlator result in a suppression of
1291: the CE scaled variances $\omega^{\alpha}_{c.e.}$ in a comparison with
1292: the GCE ones $\omega^{\alpha}_{g.c.e.}$ (compare Eq.\,(\ref{omega-alpha-ce})
1293: and Eq.\,(\ref{omega-alpha})). Therefore,
1294: the fluctuations of both $N_-$ and $N_+$
1295: are always suppressed in the CE.
1296: As we have seen in the previous sections the behavior
1297: of $N_{ch}$ fluctuations in the CE can be more complicated. This is because
1298: of the correlations of different modes $p\neq k$
1299: for the different charge states $\alpha= -\beta$ (i.e.
1300: the second term in the right
1301: hand side of Eq.\,(\ref{corr-ch}) is positive for $\alpha= -\beta$).
1302:
1303:
1304: The exact charge conservation
1305: should also lead to the canonical suppression of $\langle
1306: n_{p}^{\alpha}\rangle$, and this should result in the canonical
1307: suppression effects for $ \langle N_{\alpha}\rangle$. They are,
1308: however, absent in the present formulation, so that formula
1309: (\ref{corr-ch}) for the microscopic correlator is not enough to
1310: calculate $\langle N^2_{\alpha} \rangle$ and $\langle N_{\alpha}
1311: \rangle^{2}$ separately with an accuracy corresponding to the
1312: effects of the canonical suppression. Nevertheless,
1313: it does allow us to calculate their difference
1314: $\langle \left(\Delta N_{\alpha}\right)^2 \rangle$
1315: with the effects of the CE correctly included. This means that
1316: the canonical suppression
1317: effects in the occupation numbers $ \langle n_{p}^{\alpha}\rangle$
1318: lead to the changes of the order of $\langle N_{\alpha}
1319: \rangle $ in both
1320: $\langle N^2_{\alpha} \rangle$ and $\langle N_{\alpha}
1321: \rangle^{2}$, but these changes are the same
1322: and the correction terms
1323: are cancelled in the calculation of
1324: $\langle \left(\Delta N_{\alpha}\right)^2
1325: \rangle$. Therefore,
1326: the macroscopic fluctuations of
1327: multiplicities are not affected by the CE
1328: corrections to the average particle numbers. The scaled variances
1329: of the CE in the thermodynamic limit $V\rightarrow\infty$
1330: feel the consequences of an exact charge conservation due to the
1331: suppression of the single mode fluctuations
1332: $\langle \left(\Delta n_{p}^{\alpha }\right)^2\rangle$ and
1333: due to the (anticorrelations ) correlations
1334: between different modes $p\neq k$ with the (same) different
1335: charge states $\alpha, \beta$. All these effects are absent in the GCE.
1336:
1337:
1338: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1339: %
1340: \section{A system with two conserved
1341: charges}
1342: %
1343:
1344: In the previous sections we have considered the system with one
1345: conserved charge.
1346: In high energy collisions the measurements of fluctuations
1347: for the particle numbers and
1348: (transverse) energies are mainly done for
1349: electrically charged hadrons. Therefore, in applications
1350: of the CE
1351: results to an analysis of the data on fluctuations
1352: it would be reasonable
1353: to start with the case when the charge $Q$
1354: is assumed to be an electric charge.
1355: On the other hand, other conserved charges are also present in
1356: the system created in high energy collisions.
1357: In this section we consider the system with two exactly conserved charges
1358: -- electric charge $Q$ and baryonic number $B$. As an example
1359: we study the ideal pion-nucleon gas and neglect
1360: the quantum statistics effects.
1361: This is the
1362: simplest realistic case where we can study the influence of an
1363: exact $B$ conservation to the
1364: CE fluctuations of the electrically charged particles.
1365: The partition function of this system in the CE is:
1366: %
1367: \begin{align}\label{ZceQB}
1368: &Z_{c.e.}(V,T,Q,B)
1369: %\nonumber
1370: ~=\!\! \sum_{N_{p},\,N_{\bar{p}}=0}^{\infty}\;
1371: \sum_{N_{n},\,N_{\bar{n}}=0}^{\infty}\;
1372: \sum_{N_{\pi},\;N_{\bar{\pi}}=0}^{\infty}
1373: \frac{\left(\lambda_{p}z_p\right)^{N_{p}}}{N_{p}!}
1374: \frac{\left(\lambda_{\bar{p}}z_{\bar{p}}
1375: \right)^{N_{\bar{p}}}}{N_{\bar{p}}!}\;
1376: \frac{\left(\lambda_{n}z_n\right)^{N_{n}}}{N_{n}!}
1377: \frac{\left(\lambda_{\bar{n}}
1378: z_{\bar{n}}\right)^{N_{\bar{n}}}}{N_{\bar{n}}!}\;
1379: \frac{\left(\lambda_{\pi^+}z_{\pi}\right)^{N_{\pi^+}}}{N_{\pi^+}!}
1380: \frac{\left(\lambda_{\pi^-}z_{\pi}
1381: \right)^{N_{\pi^-}}}{N_{\pi^-}!} \nonumber
1382: \\[0.3cm]
1383: & \times
1384: \delta\left[\;\left( N_{p}-
1385: N_{\bar{p}}\,+\,N_{\pi^+}-N_{\pi^-}\right)-Q\;\right]\;\;
1386: \delta\left[\;\left( N_{p}-N_{\bar{p}}\,+\,N_{n}-
1387: N_{\bar{n}}\right)-B\;\right] \nonumber
1388: \\[0.3cm]
1389: &\;=\;
1390: \int_0^{2\pi}\frac{d\varphi}{2\pi}\;\int_0^{2\pi}\frac{d\phi}{2\pi}\;
1391: \exp\left(\;-i\,Q\,\varphi\, -i\,B\,\phi \;\right)
1392: \times \exp \left[ z_p\left(\lambda_{p}\,e^{i(\varphi+\phi)}
1393: \,+\, \lambda_{\bar{p}}\,e^{-i(\varphi+\phi)}
1394: \right)\right] \nonumber \\
1395: &\times\exp\left[z_n \left(\lambda_{n}\,e^{i\phi}
1396: \,+\, \lambda_{\bar{n}}\,e^{-i\phi}\right)\right]
1397: \times\exp\left[ z_{\pi}\,\left(\lambda_{\pi^+}
1398: \,e^{i\varphi}
1399: \,+\, \lambda_{\pi^-}\,e^{-i\varphi}
1400: \right)
1401: \right]
1402: \;=\; \sum_{k=-\infty}^{\infty}
1403: I_{k-Q}(2z_p)\;I_{k+B-Q}(2z_n)\;I_{k}(2z_{\pi})
1404: \;,
1405: \end{align}
1406: %
1407: where we have used that
1408: $\exp[x(t+1/t)]=\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}t^k\;I_k(2x)\;$.
1409: %
1410: From Eq.\,(\ref{ZceQB}) it follows:
1411: \eq{
1412: \langle N_{j,\alpha}\rangle_{c.e.}~=~c_{1,\alpha}^j\;z_j\;,~~~
1413: \langle N_{j,\alpha}^2\rangle_{c.e.}~=~c_{1,\alpha}^j\;z_j \;+\;
1414: c_{2,\alpha}^j\;z_j^2\;, \label{NjQB}
1415: }
1416: where $j$ numerates pion, neutron and proton, $\alpha=1$ corresponds to
1417: particles $\pi^+,~n,~p$ and $\alpha=-1$ to
1418: antiparticles $\pi^-,~\overline{n},\overline{p}$, and ($m=1,2$)
1419: %
1420: \begin{align}\label{cp}
1421: c_{m,\alpha}^p
1422: \;&=\; \sum_{k=-\infty}^{\infty} I_{k+\alpha\cdot m-Q}(2z_p)\;
1423: I_{k+B-Q}(2z_n)\;I_{k}(2z_{\pi})
1424: ~\times ~\left[Z_{c.e.}(V,T,Q,B)\right]^{-1} ~,\\
1425: % \end{align}
1426: % \begin{align}
1427: c_{m,\alpha}^n
1428: \;&=\; \sum_{k=-\infty}^{\infty}
1429: I_{k-Q}(2z_p)\;I_{k+\alpha\cdot m+B-Q}(2z_n)\;I_{k}(2z_{\pi})
1430: ~\times ~\left[Z_{c.e.}(V,T,Q,B)\right]^{-1} ~,\label{cn}\\
1431: %\end{aline}
1432: %\begin{align}
1433: c_{m,\alpha}^{\pi}
1434: \;&=\; \sum_{k=-\infty}^{\infty}
1435: I_{k+\alpha\cdot m-Q}(2z_p)\;I_{k+\alpha\cdot m+B-Q}(2z_n)\;I_{k}(2z_{\pi})
1436: ~\times ~\left[Z_{c.e.}(V,T,Q,B)\right]^{-1} ~.\label{cpi}
1437: \end{align}
1438: %
1439: %
1440: %Formulas (\ref{cnp},\ref{cnn},\ref{cnpi}) look complicated, but
1441: %have a simple structure. The denominator in
1442: %(\ref{cnp},\ref{cnn},\ref{cnpi}) is nothing else then the
1443: %partition function (\ref{ZceQB}), and the numerator can be
1444: %obtained from (\ref{ZceQB}) by replacing $\;Q\rightarrow Q\mp
1445: %m\;$, for $\;\pi-$mesons, $\;B\rightarrow B\mp m\;$ for neutrons,
1446: %and $\;Q,\,B\rightarrow Q\mp m,\,B\mp m\;$ for protons.
1447: Formulas
1448: for the cross-averages $\;\langle N_i N_j\rangle\;$ can be obtained in
1449: the similar manner.
1450: The calculations with Eqs.\,(\ref{cp}-\ref{cpi}) are effective
1451: for small systems. In this case the $k$-sums in the above equations
1452: converge rapidly and small number of terms lead
1453: to the accurate results.
1454: %
1455: %
1456: %If we are not interested in the behavior of the fluctuations with
1457: %volume, then
1458: In the limit of large system volume we can use another
1459: technique, similar to that developed in the previous section.
1460: This leads to simple analytical results.
1461: % As one can see, all this formulas are very
1462: %bulky, but if we do not need to study the behavior of fluctuations
1463: %for the small systems, we can safely use some modification of
1464: %method proposed by Stephanov.
1465: Using this method one can obtain, for example, the
1466: scaled variances for (negatively) positively charged particles in the
1467: thermodynamic limit.
1468: The same pictures can be obtained directly from Eqs.\,(\ref{cp}-\ref{cpi})
1469: by numerical calculations at
1470: $\;z_p,\;z_n,\;z_{\pi} \gg 1\;$.
1471:
1472:
1473: First, we consider the case when the electric charge $Q$ is
1474: exactly conserved and the baryonic number $B$
1475: conservation is treated within the GCE. This results in:
1476: %
1477: \begin{align}\label{WQsteph}
1478: \omega_{Q}^{\pm}
1479: \;=\; 1\;-\;\frac{z_p^{\pm}+z_{\pi}^{\pm}}{z_px_p+z_{\pi}x_{\pi}}\;,
1480: \end{align}
1481: %
1482: where
1483: \eq{\;z_j^{\pm}=z_j\exp\left(\pm\frac{\mu_j}{T}\right)\;,~~~
1484: \;x_j=\exp\left(\frac{\mu_j}{T}\right)~+~\exp\left(-\frac{\mu_j}{T}\right)\;,
1485: }
1486: and the chemical potentials $\;\mu_j\;$ are equal to
1487: $\;\mu_p=\mu_Q+\mu_B\;$ for protons
1488: %, $\;\mu_n=\mu_B\;$ for
1489: %neutrons,
1490: and $\;\mu_{\pi}=\mu_Q\;$ for $\;\pi^+-$mesons.
1491: When both $Q$ and $B$ are exactly conserved,
1492: the CE scaled variances of (negatively) positively charged particles
1493: are equal to:
1494: %
1495: \begin{align}\label{WQBsteph}
1496: \omega_{Q,B}^{\pm}
1497: \;=\; 1\;-\;\frac{z_p^{\pm\,2}(z_nx_n+z_{\pi}x_{\pi})
1498: + z_{\pi}^{\pm\,2}(z_px_p+z_nx_n) + 2z_p^{\pm}z_{\pi}^{\pm}z_nx_n}
1499: {(z_p^{\pm}+z_{\pi}^{\pm})~(z_px_pz_nx_n+
1500: z_px_pz_{\pi}x_{\pi}+z_nx_nz_{\pi}x_{\pi})}\;,
1501: \end{align}
1502: %
1503: where $x_n=\exp(\mu_B/T)+\exp(-\mu_B/T)$.
1504: %As one can see, the formula (\ref{WQBsteph}) is simpler then the
1505: %combination of (\ref{cnp},\ref{cnn},\ref{cnpi}), because in this
1506: %formula we have taken an infinite volume limit.
1507: Let us repeat that both $\omega_{Q}^{\pm}$ (\ref{WQsteph})
1508: and $\omega_{Q,B}^{\pm}$ (\ref{WQBsteph}) are obtained in the thermodynamic
1509: limit $V\rightarrow\infty$.
1510: The $\omega_{Q}^{\pm}$ (\ref{WQsteph}) corresponds to the CE
1511: for electric charge and the GCE for baryonic number.
1512: The $\omega_{Q,B}^{\pm}$ (\ref{WQBsteph}) corresponds the CE for both
1513: conserved charges.
1514: It is easy to prove
1515: that $\omega_{Q,B}^{\pm}\leq \omega_{Q}^{\pm}$~, i.e.
1516: an additional exact conservation law reduces
1517: the fluctuations. However, the additional CE suppression of the
1518: scaled variances of (negatively) positively charged particles due to
1519: the exact
1520: baryonic number conservation is rather small.
1521: We have plotted (\ref{WQsteph}) and (\ref{WQBsteph}) in
1522: Fig.\,\ref{WQmceFig} for $\;\mu_Q=0\;$
1523: to study the influence of baryon charge conservation
1524: on the fluctuations of electrically charged particles.
1525: %i.e. on the fluctuations of protons and $\;\pi-$mesons in the
1526: %system of $\;p,\;\bar{p},\;n,\;\bar{n},\;\pi^+,\;\pi^-\;$.
1527: %
1528: \begin{figure}[h!]
1529: % \vspace{-0.5cm}
1530: \epsfig{file=WQWBQ-T120.EPS,height=9cm,width=13cm}
1531: %\epsfig{file=WQWBQ0.EPS,height=7.5cm,width=8.5cm}
1532: %\epsfig{file=WQWBQ100.EPS,height=7.5cm,width=8.5cm}
1533: % \vspace{-0.5cm}
1534: \caption{The scaled variances $\omega_{Q,B}^{+}$ (dashed line)
1535: and $\omega_{Q,B}^{-}$ (dashed-dotted line) given by Eq.\,(\ref{WQBsteph}).
1536: The dotted lines show the scaled variances
1537: $\omega_{Q}^{+}$ and $\omega_{Q}^{-}$ given by Eq.\,(\ref{WQsteph}).
1538: The solid line presents the scaled variance for all charged
1539: particles $\omega_{Q}^{ch}$.
1540: The results correspond to $T=120$~MeV.
1541: % and $V\rightarrow\infty$.
1542: }
1543: \label{WQmceFig}
1544: \end{figure}
1545: %
1546: As one
1547: can see from Fig.\,6 the exact CE baryonic charge conservation
1548: leads to a little additional suppression
1549: and does not change the result $\;\omega^+=\omega^-=0.5\;$ for
1550: zero values of
1551: the baryonic and electric net charges. Moreover, one can prove that
1552: at zero net charges
1553: any ideal Boltzmann gas with two exactly conserved charges
1554: (i.e. for any
1555: combination of particle charges and their masses) leads
1556: to the scaled variances
1557: equal to
1558: $\omega^{\pm}=0.5$ in the thermodynamic limit.
1559:
1560: On the other hand,
1561: Fig.\,6 demonstrates a strong dependence of the
1562: $\omega_Q^+$ and $\omega_Q^-$ values
1563: on the net baryonic density, it is not
1564: important whether the baryonic number treated within the CE or
1565: the GCE. The matter is that in
1566: the pion-nucleon gas the electric charge equals to
1567: $\;Q=N_{p}-N_{\bar{p}}\,+ \,N_{\pi^+}-N_{\pi^-}$. At $\mu_B\simeq
1568: 0$ the electric charge of the system is close to zero. Then
1569: one finds $\omega_Q^+\simeq\omega_Q^-\simeq 0.5$ (compare to Fig.\,4 at
1570: $y=0.1$). The $\mu_B>0$ leads to $\langle N_{p}\rangle >
1571: \langle N_{\bar{p}}\rangle$, and this means a non-zero electric
1572: charge of the system. In this case an exact electric charge
1573: conservation leads to $\omega_Q^- >\omega_Q^+$ (see Fig.\,4). At
1574: $\mu_B \gg T$ the electric charge density becomes large
1575: due to $\langle N_p\rangle /\langle N_{\bar{p}}\rangle \gg 1$, so
1576: that $\omega_Q^+ \rightarrow 0$ and $\omega_Q^- \rightarrow 1$
1577: (compare to Fig.\,4 at $y=2$).
1578:
1579:
1580:
1581: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1582: %
1583: \section{Summary and conclusions}
1584: %
1585: We have considered the particle number and energy fluctuations for
1586: different systems within the canonical ensemble formulation. The results are
1587: compared to those in the grand canonical ensemble.
1588: % similar to
1589: %the case $Q=0$ addressed before~\cite{ce-fluc}.
1590: We have studied the system with arbitrary number of different
1591: particle species and non-zero net charge in Secs.\,II and III. An
1592: exact charge conservation reduces the values of $N_+$ and $N_-$
1593: fluctuations in the thermodynamic limit.
1594: At the non-zero net charge $Q$ the canonical ensemble predicts a
1595: difference for the fluctuations of $N_+$ and $N_-$, they also different
1596: from the fluctuations of all charged particles $N_{ch}=N_++N_-$.
1597: All these features of the canonical ensemble are in a striking difference
1598: with those in the grand canonical ensemble.
1599: We have demonstrated in Sec.\,IV that the
1600: energy fluctuations of the system are mainly determined by the
1601: fluctuations of the number of particles and have the same volume
1602: dependence. Therefore, the energy fluctuations are rather different
1603: in the canonical and grand canonical ensembles.
1604: We extend our canonical ensemble results and calculate the
1605: particle number
1606: fluctuations in the system of
1607: single and double charged particles in Sec.\,V,
1608: include the quantum statistics effects in Sec.\,VI,
1609: study the systems with two conserved
1610: charges in Sec.\,VII.
1611:
1612: The canonical ensemble suppression effects for the charged
1613: particle multiplicities are well known, and they are
1614: successfully applied to the statistical description of hadron
1615: production in high energy collisions \cite{ce}. The canonical ensemble
1616: formulation explains, for example, the suppression in a production
1617: of strange hadrons and antibaryons in small systems, i.e. when the
1618: total numbers of strange particles or antibaryons are small. This
1619: consideration demonstrates a difference of the canonical and grand
1620: canonical ensembles -- the statistical ensembles are not
1621: equivalent for small systems. When the size of the system
1622: increases
1623: %and moves to the thermodynamic limit
1624: %$V\rightarrow\infty$
1625: all average quantities in both ensembles
1626: become equal. It means that in the
1627: thermodynamic limit $V\rightarrow\infty$
1628: the canonical ensemble and grand canonical ensemble are equivalent.
1629: Results of Ref.\,\cite{ce-fluc} and the present study demonstrate
1630: that there are also the canonical ensemble effects for the
1631: fluctuations. In contrast to the canonical suppression of average
1632: multiplicities, the canonical effects for the multiplicity
1633: fluctuations do survive at $V\rightarrow\infty$ and they are
1634: even most clearly
1635: seen in the thermodynamic limit. The changes of the scaled
1636: variances due to an exact charge conservation of the canonical
1637: ensemble are not small (about 50 percent effects) and they are
1638: in general different for positively, negatively and all charged
1639: particles. To observe these new canonical ensemble effects in an
1640: analysis of the data on multiparticle production, several points
1641: should be clarified. To use the condition of an exact charge
1642: conservation one has to apply it to the system of all secondary
1643: hadrons formed in high energy collisions, and this should be done
1644: on the event-by-event basis as we are interested in the system
1645: fluctuations. In the experimental study only a fraction of
1646: produced particles with the conserved charges is detected.
1647: Introducing a probability $q$ that a single particle is accepted
1648: in the detector a
1649: simple relation between the scaled variance of the accepted
1650: particles, $\omega_{acc}$, and the scaled variance of all
1651: particles in the statistical ensemble, $\omega$, was obtained
1652: \cite{ce-fluc}: $\omega_{acc}=q\cdot\omega +(1-q)$. To observe the
1653: real event-byevent fluctuations $\omega$ one needs $q\simeq
1654: 1$, otherwise if $q\ll 1$ one always obtains $ \omega_{acc}\simeq
1655: 1$ and makes a wrong conclusion that the fluctuations correspond to the
1656: Poisson distribution.
1657: This fact is of a very general origin,
1658: and because of relatively small experimental
1659: acceptance a large part
1660: of the event-by-event fluctuations in high energy
1661: multiparticle production is lost.
1662: To observe many interesting event-by-event
1663: fluctuations, for example, due to the QCD critical point (see,
1664: e.g. \cite{step} and references therein), one should accept an
1665: essential part of all secondary particles. In this case the role
1666: of an exact charge conservation would increase. It would also have
1667: a strong influence on an extraction of the so called dynamical
1668: fluctuations (see Ref.\,\cite{fluc1}) from the event-by-event data.
1669:
1670:
1671:
1672:
1673: \begin{acknowledgments}
1674: % \vspace{0.3cm} \noindent{ \bf Acknowledgements.}
1675: We would like to thank F.~Becattini, A.I.~Bugrij, T.~Cs\"org\H{o},
1676: M.~Ga\'zdzicki, A.~Ker\"anen, A.P.~Kostyuk, I.N.~Mishustin,
1677: St.~Mr\'owczy\'nski, L.M.~Satarov and Y.M.~Sinyukov for useful
1678: discussions. We thank A.~Swaving for help in the preparation of the
1679: manuscript. The work was supported by US Civilian Research and
1680: Development Foundation (CRDF) Cooperative Grants Program, Project
1681: Agreement UKP1-2613-KV-04.
1682: \end{acknowledgments}
1683:
1684:
1685: \begin{thebibliography}{20}
1686:
1687:
1688: \bibitem{stat-model}
1689: J. Cleymans, H. Satz, Z. Phys. C {\bf 57} (1993) 135; J.
1690: Sollfrank, M. Ga\'zdzicki, U. Heinz, J. Rafelski, {\it ibid.} {\bf
1691: 61} (1994) 659; G.D. Yen, M.I. Gorenstein, W. Greiner, S.N.~Yang,
1692: Phys. Rev. C {\bf 56} (1997) 2210; F.~Becattini, M. Ga\'zdzicki, J.
1693: Solfrank, Eur. Phys. J. C {\bf 5} (1998) 143; G.D. Yen, M.I.
1694: Gorenstein, Phys. Rev. C {\bf 59} (1999) 2788; P. Braun-Munzinger,
1695: I. Heppe, J. Stachel, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 465} (1999) 15;
1696: P.~Braun-Munzinger, D. Magestro, K. Redlich, J. Stachel,
1697: {\it ibid.} {\bf 518} (2001) 41; F.~Becattini, M. Ga\'zdzicki,
1698: A.~Keranen, J.~Mannienen, R.~Stock, Phys. Rev. C {\bf 69} (2004)
1699: 024905.
1700:
1701: \bibitem{PBM}
1702: P. Braun-Munzinger, K. Redlich, J. Stachel, nucl-th/0304013,
1703: Review for Quark Gluon Plasma 3, eds. R.C.~Hwa and X.-N.~Wang,
1704: World Scientific,Singapore.
1705:
1706: \bibitem{ce}
1707: K. Redlich, L. Turko, Z. Phys. C {\bf 5} (1980) 541; J. Rafelski,
1708: M. Danos, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 97} (1980) 279. J. Cleymans, K
1709: Redlich, E Suhonen, Z. Phys. {\bf C 51} (1991) 137; J. Cleymans,
1710: A. Ker\"anen, M. Marais, E. Suhonen, Phys. Rev. C {\bf 56} (1997)
1711: 2747; F.~Becattini, Z. Phys. C {\bf 69} (1996) 485; F. Becattini,
1712: U. Heinz, {\it ibid.} {\bf 76} (1997) 269; J. Cleymans, H.
1713: Oeschler, K. Redlich, Phys. Rev. C {\bf 59} (1999) 1663; Phys.
1714: Lett. B {\bf 485} (2001) 27; M.I. Gorenstein, M. Ga\'zdzicki, W.
1715: Greiner, {\it ibid.} {\bf 483} (2000) 60; M.I. Gorenstein, A.P.
1716: Kostyuk, H. St\"ocker, W. Greiner, {\it ibid} {\bf 509} (2001)
1717: 277.
1718:
1719: \bibitem{mce}
1720: K. Werener, J. Aichelin, Phys. Rev. C {\bf 52} (1995) 1584;
1721: F.~Liu, K.~Werner, J.~Aichelin, {\it ibid} {\bf 68} (2003)
1722: 024905;
1723: F.~Liu, K.~Werner, J.~Aichelin, M.~Bleicher,
1724: H.~St\"ocker, J. Phys. G {\bf
1725: 30} (2004) S589;
1726: %
1727: %\bibitem{mce1}
1728: F.~Becattini, L.~Ferroni, Eur. Phys. J. C
1729: {\bf 35} (2004) 243;
1730: hep-ph/0407117.
1731:
1732: \bibitem{fluc} M.A. Stephanov, K. Rajagopal, E.V.~Shuryak,
1733: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 81} (1998) 4816;
1734: %Phys. Rev. D {\bf 60} (1999) 114028;
1735: H.~Heiselberg, Phys. Rep. {\bf 351} (2001)
1736: 161;
1737: %[arXiv:nucl-th/0003046].
1738: S.~Jeon, V.~Koch, hep-ph/0304012,
1739: Review for Quark-Gluon Plasma 3, eds. R.C. Hwa and X.-N. Wang,
1740: World Scientific, Singapore.
1741:
1742: \bibitem{fluc1} M. Ga\'zdzicki, M.I.
1743: Gorenstein, St.~Mr\'owczy\'nski, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 585} (2004)
1744: 115;
1745: % [arXiv: hep-ph/0304052];
1746: M.I.~Gorenstein, M. Ga\'zdzicki,
1747: O.S.~Zozulya, {\it ibid.} {\bf 585} (2004) 237.
1748: % [arXiv: hep-ph/0309142].
1749:
1750: \bibitem{steph} M.A.~Stephanov, K.~Rajagopal, E.V.~Shuryak,
1751: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 60}
1752: (1999) 114028.
1753:
1754:
1755: \bibitem{ce-fluc} V.V. Begun, M. Ga\'zdzicki, M.I.~Gorenstein, O.S.~Zozulya,
1756: %nucl-th/0404056,
1757: Phys. Rev. C {\bf 70}(2004) 034901.
1758:
1759: \bibitem{mce-fluc} V.V. Begun, M.I. Gorenstein, A.P.~Kostyuk,
1760: O.S.~Zozulya,
1761: nucl-th/0410044.
1762:
1763:
1764:
1765: \bibitem{I}
1766: M. Abramowitz and I.E. Stegun,
1767: {\it Handbook of Mathematical Functions} (Dover, New York, 1964).
1768:
1769: %\bibitem{koch}
1770: %S. Jeon, V. Koch, K. Redlich, X.N. Wang, Nucl. Phys. {\bf A 697}
1771: %(2002) 546.
1772:
1773: \bibitem{lan}
1774: L.D.~Landau, E.M.~Lifschitz, {\it Statistical Physics}
1775: (Fizmatlit, Moscow, 2001).
1776:
1777: %\bibitem{mrow}
1778: %St.~Mr\'owczy\'nski, private communication.
1779:
1780: \bibitem{step}
1781: M. Stephanov, hep-ph/0402115.
1782:
1783:
1784: \end{thebibliography}
1785: %
1786:
1787: \end{document}
1788: