1: \documentclass[12pt]{article}
2: %
3: \usepackage{graphicx}% Include figure files
4: \usepackage{bm}% bold math
5:
6: \topmargin -40pt
7: \oddsidemargin -5mm
8: \evensidemargin -5mm
9: \setlength{\textheight} {240mm}
10: \setlength{\textwidth} {160mm}
11: \setlength{\marginparsep} {3mm}
12: \setlength{\marginparwidth} {18mm}
13:
14: \begin{document}
15:
16: \title{\bf Polarized Proton Pionic Capture in Deuterium
17: as a Probe of $3N$ Dynamics}
18:
19: %-------------------------------------- Authors --------------------
20: \author{Luciano~Canton$^{1,2}$ and Leonid~G.~Levchuk$^{2,3}$}
21: \date{}
22: \maketitle
23: \begin{center}
24: {\em
25: $^1$ Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, 35131 Padova, via Marzolo, n. 8 Italy,\\
26: $^2$ Dipartimento di Fisica dell'Universit\`a, 35131 Padova, via Marzolo, n. 8 Italy,\\
27: $^3$ Kharkov Institute of Physics and Technology, 61108 Kharkov, Ukraine\\
28: }
29: \end{center}
30:
31: \vspace{5mm}
32: %\begin{center}
33: %ABSTRACT
34:
35: \begin{abstract}
36: \sloppy
37: The proton analyzing power $A_y$ in pion production reaction
38: $\overrightarrow{p} d \rightarrow \pi^0{\ ^{3}}\rm{He}$
39: has been calculated including one- and two-body meson production mechanisms
40: with a proper
41: treatment of the three-nucleon dynamics and
42: an accurate solution of the 3$N$ bound-state problem for
43: phenomenological two-nucleon potentials. In the region around
44: the $\Delta$ resonance, the structure of the analyzing power can
45: be understood once interference effects among amplitudes
46: describing intermediate $\Delta N$ formation in different orbital states
47: are considered along with the additional interference with the $S$-wave
48: pion production amplitudes. Then, the inclusion of
49: three-nucleon dynamics in the initial state produces the
50: structure of the analyzing power that has been observed experimentally.
51: \end{abstract}
52:
53: %\pacs{25.40.Qa, 13.75.Cs, 24.70.+s, 25.10.+s}
54: %\keywords{polarization phenomena,
55: %pion production, few-nucleon systems}
56:
57: \maketitle
58:
59: \newcommand{\ve}[1]{{\bf{#1}}}
60: \newcommand{\vegr}[1]{{\bm{#1}}}
61: \fussy
62: It has been known for almost twenty years that the
63: experimental structure of the analyzing power $A_y$ for the
64: $\overrightarrow{p} d \rightarrow \pi^0 {\ ^{3}}\rm{He}$ reaction
65: (in the region around the $\Delta$ resonance) exhibits a rapid
66: variation at the c.m. polar angle of $\Theta_{\rm c.m.} =90^{\circ}$,
67: with the appearence of an
68: additional (second) peak and changing the sign as one moves from
69: lower energies to the $\Delta$-resonance region.
70: To our knowledge, this behavior of the proton analyzing power has
71: never been interpreted theoretically before, while the understanding
72: of the underlying mechanisms is of great importance to describe
73: and understand the basic $NN\rightarrow NN \pi$ inelasticities in the
74: most simple ``complex'' nuclear environment,
75: the three-nucleon system. Single pion production represents the first
76: process that needs to be understood in order to consider more
77: complicated hadronic processes that occur at moderately higher
78: energy, such as double-pion production, or heavier meson ({e.g.},~$\eta$)
79: production. In addition, single pion production
80: could also reveal mechanisms involving multinucleon
81: exchanges, thus providing important information that bridges
82: intermediate-energy phenomena to low-energy three-nucleon and multinucleon
83: forces, to be used in the study of low-energy nuclear systems.
84:
85: \sloppy
86: Theoretically, pion production in proton-deuteron collisions was studied
87: long time ago with the deuteron model~\cite{Rud}, which describes the
88: $pd \rightarrow \pi^+ t$ reaction in terms of the differential
89: cross section for the more elementary $pp \rightarrow \pi^+ d$ process.
90: The model has been subsequently refined by Locher and Weber~\cite{LochWeb},
91: who introduced additional mechanisms based on the elastic
92: $\pi d \rightarrow \pi d$ cross section, and by Fearing~\cite{Fearing} who gave
93: phenomenological estimates of the effects introduced
94: by optical-model distortions.
95: The deuteron model has been later extended by Germond and
96: Wilkin~\cite{GermWilk} who developed a simple spin-dependent analysis in
97: plane waves by which they predicted the deuteron tensor analyzing
98: power $T_{20}$ to approach its geometrical limit $-\sqrt{2}$ at
99: threshold, based on low-energy theorems. Recently, Falk~\cite{Falk} developed
100: further the deuteron model in its spin dependent form and performed a
101: phenomenological analysis of polarization observables
102: near threshold. Calculations including explicitly $\Delta$ dynamics and
103: meson-exchange processes were
104: pioneered in the late '70~\cite{GreeSai}, but the complexity involved in
105: the computation of the corresponding amplitudes forced the authors
106: to restrict themselves with only exploratory calculations.
107: Laget and Lecolley~\cite{LagetLec}
108: performed calculations that tried to go beyond one- and two-body pion
109: production mechanisms and included effective three-body mechanisms
110: {via} meson double rescatterings, showing beneficial effects at
111: higher energies, well beyond the $\Delta$ resonance. Results around
112: the isobar resonance, however, were not quite satisfactory, and
113: especially the proton analyzing power $A_y$, {i.e.},
114: the asymmetry of the reaction yield for the opposite proton spin
115: directions,
116: %perpendicular to the reaction plane,
117: \begin{equation}
118: A_y={{N_\uparrow-N_\downarrow}\over {N_\uparrow+N_\downarrow}}\, ,
119: \end{equation}
120: was in poor accord with
121: the data~\cite{Cameron}.
122:
123: \sloppy
124: The approach involving the $3N$ dynamics has been pushed forward
125: recently in a series of
126: papers~\cite{CantonSchad}, where explicit $\Delta$ excitation mechanisms
127: were treated in the three-nucleon system using the few-body
128: techniques~\cite{Canton_ea_1}. Intermediate $\Delta$ propagation and
129: rescattering were described phenomenologically using an isobar
130: complex-mass scaling that has been tested and parametrized on the
131: $pp \rightarrow \pi^+ d$ reaction~\cite{Canton_ea_2}.
132: Such test calculations have shown that, for the
133: description of the proton pionic capture by
134: protons, the interplay between ($\Delta$-mediated) $P$-wave mechanisms
135: and $S$-wave two-body rescattering mechanisms (in the isoscalar
136: and isovector channels) is a fundamental feature that has to be taken
137: into account for the overall reproduction of both spin-averaged
138: and spin-dependent observables. Anti-symmetrization prescriptions due
139: to the identity of the nucleons were fully taken into account.
140:
141: \sloppy
142: Nowadays, the calculations can be performed with more
143: accurate knowledge of the nuclear wave functions (WF), and with including a
144: much larger number of intermediate three-nucleon states. Furthermore,
145: the nucleon-deuteron initial-state interaction (ISI) can be calculated
146: through, {e.g}, the Alt-Grassberger-Sandhas (AGS) scheme~\cite{AGS},
147: with realistic nucleon-nucleon transition matrices. The complete
148: calculation of the reaction represents a very complicated theoretical
149: task, and involves, due to the variety of the few-body intermediate states
150: that have to be expanded in partial waves, computation of an exorbitant
151: number of multidimensional integrals.
152:
153: \fussy
154: The amplitude of the ${p} d \rightarrow \pi^0{\ ^{3}}\rm{He}$ reaction
155: (or the inverse pion absorption process) is determined by the matrix element
156: \begin{equation}
157: A_{if} = ^{(-)}{_S \langle}\ve{q},\psi_{d} | A |\psi_{t}, \ve{P}^\pi_{0} \rangle\, ,
158: \label{AMPL}
159: \end{equation}
160: where $\psi_t$ represents the three-nucleon bound-state and
161: ${^{(-)}}{_S\langle}\ve{q},\psi_d |$ refers to a properly antisymmetrized
162: interacting nucleon-deuteron state in the initial channel.
163: Diagrammatically, this amplitude is illustrated by
164: Fig.~\ref{diag1}.
165: \begin{figure}[hbtp]
166: \begin{center}
167: \resizebox{13cm}{!}{\includegraphics{figure1.eps}}
168: \caption{Diagrammatic representation of the pion production amplitude.
169: }
170: \label{diag1}
171: \end{center}
172: \end{figure}
173: Within the model discussed here, it includes
174: the proton-deuteron ISI, the bound-state two- (deuteron) and
175: three-nucleon ($^3$He) WF, the matrix element of a $3N$ permutation operator
176: that gives rise to the exchange contribution to the amplitude,
177: and an operator of pion production on a pair of nucleons.
178: Note that in formulation of the AGS formalism employed in our
179: calculations, the 3$N$ break-up process is effectively included
180: in the ISI block in Fig.~\ref{diag1}.
181: %---------------------------------------------------------------------
182:
183: The meson production mechanisms are given by the
184: two-body (Fig.~\ref{diag2}a,b,c)
185: %----------------------------------------- Figure --------------------
186: \begin{figure}[hbtp]
187: \begin{center}
188: \resizebox{12cm}{!}{\includegraphics{figure2.eps}}
189: \caption{Meson production mechanisms considered.
190: }
191: \label{diag2}
192: \end{center}
193: \end{figure}
194: %---------------------------------------------------------------------
195: and one-body (plain $\pi NN$ vertex in Fig.~\ref{diag2}d) contributions.
196: The $\Delta$ excitation mechanism (Fig.~\ref{diag2}c) has the structure
197: \begin{equation}
198: {\cal A}_\Delta = V_{NN-N\Delta} G_\Delta F_{\Delta N\pi} \, ,
199: \end{equation}
200: where $V_{NN-N\Delta}$ is the $NN\rightarrow N \Delta$
201: transition potential generated by $\pi$- and $\rho$-exchanges,
202: $G_\Delta$ effectively describes the intermediate $\Delta NN$
203: propagation, and $F_{\Delta N\pi}$ is the $\Delta N \pi$ transition
204: vertex function. All the corresponding details including the extended formulas
205: representing the mechanisms in the three-nucleon partial waves have been
206: published elsewhere~\cite{CantonSchad,Canton_ea_1}.
207: The asymptotic pion wave is not decomposed in partial waves but
208: treated directly in three dimensions.
209: An important quantity for the present calculation is the maximum
210: orbital momentum $l_\Delta$ in the $\Delta N$ subsystem.
211: We found that $l_\Delta = 0$ is not sufficient to describe
212: polarization observables, and one has to go up to $l_\Delta = 2$,
213: at least.
214:
215: In the $\Delta$ resonance region, the spin structure of the reaction amplitude
216: is dependent strongly also on the interference effects
217: with the other mechanisms, particularly the $S$-wave
218: two-body pion production contributions shown in Fig.~\ref{diag2}a,b.
219: Each of these mechanisms can be schematically described
220: as
221: \begin{equation}
222: {\cal A}_\pi = F_{N N\pi} G_\pi \lambda_{N\pi-N\pi} +
223: {\rm time\ reordering} \ ,
224: \end{equation}
225: where $F_{N N\pi}$ is the $\pi N N$ vertex, $G_\pi$ is the pion propagator, and
226: $\lambda_{N\pi- N\pi}$ is the corresponding contribution to the half-off-shell
227: $\pi N$ scattering amplitude.
228: By ``time reordering'' we denote a term coming from
229: ``backward in time'' propagation of the intermediate-state pion ,
230: in which case $\lambda_{N\pi- N\pi}$ is replaced
231: by a $N\to 2\pi N$ vertex amplitude for double-pion production.
232:
233: The starting point for the construction of $\lambda_{N\pi- N\pi}$ is
234: the phenomenological low-energy ($S$-wave) pion-nucleon
235: interaction Hamiltonian ~\cite{KR}
236: \begin{eqnarray}
237: {\cal H}_{\rm{int}} =
238: {\frac{\lambda_V}{m_\pi ^2}}
239: \bar{\psi}\gamma ^{\mu} \vegr{\tau} \psi \cdot
240: \left[\vegr{\phi} \times \partial_\mu \vegr{\phi}\right]
241: + {\frac{\lambda_S}{m_\pi}}
242: \bar{\psi} \psi
243: \left[\vegr{\phi} \cdot \vegr{\phi}\right] .
244: \label{Lag-piN}
245: \end{eqnarray}
246:
247: \sloppy
248: The calculations herein illustrated have been performed
249: with the set of parameters used in the previous study~\cite{CantonSchad}.
250: Namely, for the isovector coupling constant in Eq.~(\ref{Lag-piN}), we have
251: $\lambda_V/4{\pi} = 0.045$, whereas the $\pi NN$ and $\pi N\Delta$ coupling constants
252: are equal to ${f_{\pi NN}^2 / 4 \pi} = 0.0735$
253: and ${f_{\pi N\Delta}^2 / 4 \pi} = 0.32$, respectively.
254: %%A crucial aspect is introduced by the off-shell extrapolation of
255: %%the parameters $\lambda_{V,S}$.
256: Our present treatment is based on Ref.~\cite{MWB_HO}.
257: The isospin-odd contribution is given in terms of
258: a $\rho$-exchange model, while
259: the isospin-even term is described as
260: the combined effect of a phenomenological
261: short-range (SR) process (Fig.~\ref{diag2}b) and an effective scalar-meson
262: ($\sigma$) exchange of Fig.~\ref{diag2}a. The two latter mechanisms act in opposite
263: directions and almost cancel each other in case of the free pion-nucleon scattering.
264: However, an off-shell enhancement of the probability amplitude takes place
265: in the scalar-isoscalar channel for pion production off a bound system.
266: A question still remains open,
267: if this form mimics other physical effects, such as
268: the 2$N$ SR-exchange contributions proposed in Ref.~\cite{LeeRiska} (see also
269: Ref.~\cite{Hanhart}, where the current status of theory and phenomenology
270: of pion production in $NN$ collisions close to threshold is reviewed).
271:
272:
273: Further details (in particular,
274: the treatment of the fully antisymmetrized matrix elements
275: with respect to the Faddeev three-nucleon wave function) are not discussed
276: here and can be found in the papers~\cite{CantonSchad,Canton_ea_1,Canton_ea_2}.
277: The three-body dynamics in the initial state has been described following
278: the treatment~\cite{Januschke} of the low-energy proton-deuteron
279: scattering, with the set of the AGS equations being reduced
280: through application of the spline-interpolation technique
281: to a linear equation system.
282:
283: \fussy
284: In Fig.~\ref{fig-Ay-1},
285: %----------------------------------------- Figure --------------------
286: \begin{figure}[hbtp]
287: \begin{center}
288: \resizebox{10cm}{!}{\includegraphics{figure3.eps}}
289: \caption{Proton analyzing power for three different
290: proton lab energies. Solid, dash-dotted and dotted lines denote our complete calculations
291: for Bonn-B, Bonn-A, and Paris $NN$ potentials, respectively, while
292: thin solid line corresponds to the plane-wave calculation (without the $pd$ ISI).
293: Full triangles, blank circles, blank
294: triangles and full circles mark data of
295: Refs.~\protect\cite{Cameron,Abegg,Cameron81} and~\protect\cite{Lolos}, correspondingly.}
296: \label{fig-Ay-1}
297: \end{center}
298: \end{figure}
299: %---------------------------------------------------------------------
300: the results for the proton analyzing power
301: are compared with what has been observed in experiments. For the three
302: different phenomenological nucleon-nucleon potentials, one observes
303: an additional peak at $\Theta_{\rm c.m.} \simeq 100^{\circ}$
304: when going from $E_{\rm lab}=350$ MeV towards higher energies.
305: This behaviour is fully explained by the model calculation,
306: once the ISI involving the three-nucleon dynamics
307: is taken into account. Otherwise, if one neglects these
308: three-body effects in the initial channel, the structure of
309: the observable is poorly reproduced.
310:
311: In generation of this structure, another quantity that plays
312: an important role is
313: the angular momentum of the intermediate $\Delta N$ state. While $l_\Delta=0$
314: is sufficient in description of the general behaviour of
315: the excitation function (see Ref.~\cite{CantonSchad}),
316: one must consider higher $\Delta N$ partial
317: waves, at least up to $l_{\Delta}=2$, in case of the analyzing power $A_y$.
318: As follows from Fig.~\ref{fig-Ay-2},
319: %----------------------------------------- Figure --------------------
320: \begin{figure}[hbtp]
321: \begin{center}
322: \resizebox{14cm}{!}{\includegraphics{figure4.eps}}
323: \caption{Results for different values of the maximum $\Delta N$ orbital momentum.
324: Dotted, solid and dashed-dotted curve refer to calculations with
325: $l_\Delta=0$, $2$, and $4$, respectively,
326: performed with the Bonn-B potential and inclusion of the $3N$ ISI.}
327: \label{fig-Ay-2}
328: \end{center}
329: \end{figure}
330: %---------------------------------------------------------------------
331: there is no need, however, to go beyond this value,
332: since the numerical convergence is already reached with the $\Delta N$ $D$-waves.
333:
334: Apart from the analyzing power $A_y$, also the angular
335: differential cross-section
336: has always been a challenge for the theory.
337: Recent COSY data~\cite{GEM} provided new
338: information about the shape of the cross-section,
339: being at the same time consistent with earlier
340: TRIUMF measurements~\cite{Cameron}.
341: All these data compare fairly well
342: with our calculations, as shown in Fig.~\ref{fig-diff-1}.
343: %----------------------------------------- Figure --------------------
344: \begin{figure}[hbtp]
345: \begin{center}
346: \resizebox{16.4cm}{!}{\includegraphics{figure5.eps}}
347: \caption{Differential cross-section
348: of the ${p} d \rightarrow \pi^0 {\ ^{3}}\rm{He}$ reaction.
349: Data of Refs.~\protect\cite{GEM} and~\protect\cite{Cameron}
350: are shown by full circles and triangles, respectively.
351: Notations for the curves are the same as in Fig.~\protect\ref{fig-Ay-1}.}
352: \label{fig-diff-1}
353: \end{center}
354: \end{figure}
355: %---------------------------------------------------------------------
356: Indeed, almost all of the data points fall in the strip determined
357: by the calculations performed with different $NN$ potentials.
358: It is worth noting that for higher energies and backward angles,
359: the data seem to favor more the Paris potential, while
360: in the lower part of the energy range considered,
361: the Bonn potentials (Bonn-B, in particular) give rise to
362: the results which are closer to the data.
363:
364: \sloppy
365: To summarize,
366: we have described the pionic capture processes in nucleon-deuteron
367: collisions employing elementary production mechanisms obtained from
368: the non-relativistic reduction of the phenomenological $\pi N$
369: and $\pi\Delta$ Hamiltonians. The corresponding matrix elements
370: between the three-nucleon states have been evaluated within a
371: large-basis space, consisting of 464 three-nucleon partial waves.
372: Total angular momenta of the system up to $7/2$ for both the parities
373: have been considered. The prescriptions required by the Pauli principle
374: have been taken into account through the application of the
375: permutation formalism to the three-nucleon system. Finally,
376: these matrix elements have been folded with the nuclear WF to
377: obtain the probability amplitudes, with the complete details
378: of the procedure being outlined in Refs.~\cite{CantonSchad,Canton_ea_1,Canton_ea_2}.
379: In the calculation of the plane-wave part of the amplitude, we mainly
380: follow these papers. The only difference is modification of the standard
381: Jacobi momentum set for the system through the replacement of
382: the pion mass by its total energy, what is more adequate to
383: the kinematics of the present calculations.
384: An extended paper explaining this and some other ingredients of
385: the model is in progress.
386: However, much more important turns out to be our regard of the $3N$
387: dynamics in the initial proton-deuteron state, which was not extensively
388: investigated in the previous treatment of the reaction.
389:
390: \fussy
391: The results obtained suggest that one achieves a fairly good reproduction
392: of the phenomenology, when including,
393: in addition to the $\Delta$-rescattering mechanism, the
394: $\rho$-exchange process in the $S$-wave, as well as
395: another $S$-wave mechanism that generates a significant amount of interaction
396: in the scalar-isoscalar $\pi N$ channel.
397: On the contrary, the
398: one-body term (the off-energy-shell ${\pi { NN}}$ vertex) adds contributions
399: that are significantly smaller. For the scalar-isoscalar component
400: we have considered an off-shell model~\cite{MWB_HO}, which has been used
401: before.
402: We do not claim here that this particular way to generate the flux in
403: the scalar-isoscalar channel is more realistic than other
404: alternatives ({e.g.}, the above-mentioned SR-exchange
405: contributions proposed in Ref.~\cite{LeeRiska}).
406: A study on how really the flux is generated in the scalar-isoscalar channel
407: is beyond the scope of the present work, but can
408: represent at this point a subject for future investigations.
409: We hope that studies of spin observables close to threshold
410: of this specific reaction can shed light on that problem.
411:
412:
413: This work shows that, with a combination of two-body
414: mechanisms, one can explain the structure of the
415: proton analyzing power $A_y$,
416: which has been accurately measured about 20 years ago
417: and represented since then a challenge for theorists,
418: being a difficult observable to interpret.
419: We conclude that it is possible to reproduce qualitatively the
420: nontrivial energy dependence of $A_y$ around the $\Delta$ resonance,
421: provided that the three-body
422: nuclear dynamics in the initial state is taken into account.
423: It is worth mentioning also that we have made use of the techniques
424: that have been developed, in fact, mainly for
425: low-energy few-nucleon applications. It is remarkable that they can be
426: successfully used in this energy regime, where the use of the three-body
427: non-relativistic quantum-mechanical equations and the concept of the
428: standard $NN$ potentials is, in some sense, questionable.
429:
430: \bigskip
431:
432: L.G.L. is indebted to the University of Padova and INFN for
433: their kind hospitality
434: and support in October-November, 2003 and April-August, 2004.
435:
436: \newcommand{\etal}{{\em et al.}}
437:
438: %\bibliography{references}
439: \begin{thebibliography}{21}
440: %
441: %------------------------------------- References --------------------
442: %
443: \bibitem{Rud} M.~Ruderman, Phys. Rev. {\bf 87}, 383 (1952).
444: \bibitem{LochWeb} M.~P.~Locher and H.~J.~Weber, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B76}, 400 (1974).
445: \bibitem{Fearing} H.~Fearing, Phys. Rev. C {\bf 4}, 1210 (1975).
446: \bibitem{GermWilk} J.~F.~Germond and C.~Wilkin, J. Phys.~G {\bf 14}, 181 (1988).
447: \bibitem{Falk} W.~R.~Falk, Phys.Rev. C {\bf 61}, 034005 (2000).
448: \bibitem{GreeSai} A.~M.~Green and M.~E.~Sainio, Nucl. Phys. {\bf A329}, 477 (1979).
449: \bibitem{LagetLec} J.~M.~Laget and J.~F.~Lecolley, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 194}, 177 (1987).
450: \bibitem{Cameron} J.~M.~Cameron \etal, Nucl. Phys. {\bf A472}, 718 (1987).
451: \bibitem{CantonSchad} L.~Canton and W.~Schadow, Phys. Rev. C {\bf 61}, 064009 (2000);
452: {\textit ibid.} {\bf 56}, 1231 (1997); L.~Canton \etal , {\textit ibid.} {\bf 57}, 1588 (1998),
453: L. Canton \etal, nucl-th/0210078.
454: \bibitem{Canton_ea_1} L.~Canton, J.~P.~Svenne, and G.~Cattapan, Phys. Rev. C {\bf 48}, 1562 (1993).
455: \bibitem{Canton_ea_2} L.~Canton, A.~Davini, and J.~P.~Dortmans,
456: Phys. Rev. C {\bf 58}, 1929 (1998);
457: L.~Canton, G.~Cattapan, P.~J.~Dortmans, G.~Pisent, and J.~P.~Svenne,
458: Can. J. Phys. {\bf 74} 209 (1996); P.~J.~Dortmans, L.~Canton, and K.~Amos,
459: J. Phys. G {\bf 23} 479 (1997).
460: \bibitem{AGS} E.~O.~Alt, P.~Grassberger, and W.~Sandhas, Nucl. Phys. {\bf B2}, 167 (1967).
461: \bibitem{KR} D.~Koltun and A.~Reitan, Phys. Rev. {\bf 141}, 1413 (1966).
462: \bibitem{MWB_HO} O.~V.~Maxwell, W.~Weise, and M.~Brack, Nucl. Phys. {\bf A348}, 338 (1980);
463: E.~Hernandez and E.~Oset, Phys. Lett. {\bf B350} 158, (1995).
464: \bibitem{LeeRiska} T.-S.~H.~Lee and D.~O.~Riska, Phys. Rev. Lett.~{\bf 70}, 2237 (1993).
465: \bibitem{Hanhart} C.~Hanhart, Phys. Rep.~{\bf 397} 155, (2004); H.~Machner and
466: J.~Haidenbauer, J. Phys. G {\bf 25} R231, (1999).
467: \bibitem{Januschke}
468: T.~Januschke, Ph.D. thesis, Bonn University, 1990.
469: %%\bibitem{deBoor}
470: %%C.~de~Boor, {\em A practical guide to Splines}
471: %%(Springer, NY, 1978).
472: \bibitem{Abegg} R.~Abegg \etal, Proc. X Int. Conf. of Few-Body Problems
473: in Physics, Karlsruhe, {\bf 2} 255 (1983) (B.~Zeitnitz ed.)
474: \bibitem{Cameron81} J.~Cameron \etal, Phys. Lett. {\bf 103 B}, 317 (1981).
475: \bibitem{Lolos} J.~Lolos \etal, Nucl. Phys. {\bf A422}, 582 (1984).
476: \bibitem{GEM} S.~Abdel-Samad \etal, Phys. Lett. {\bf 553 B}, 31 (2003).
477: %---------------------------------------------------------------------
478: %
479: \end{thebibliography}
480:
481: \end{document}
482:
483:
484:
485:
486:
487: