1: \documentclass[seceq]{ptptex}
2: %\documentclass[seceq,preprint]{ptptex}
3:
4: \usepackage{graphicx}
5: %\usepackage{wrapft}
6:
7: %\let\tabularsize\normalsize % Table size
8: \notypesetlogo % Logo of PTP
9:
10: %%%%% Personal Macros %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
11: \newcommand{\nc}{\newcommand} % new command
12: \newcommand{\renc}{\renewcommand} % re-new command
13: \nc{\nuc}[2] {$^{#1}${#2}} % nucleus
14: \nc{\vc}[1] {\mbox{\boldmath $#1$}} % boldmath(vector)
15: \nc{\bra} {\langle} % bra state
16: \nc{\ket} {\rangle} % ket state
17: \nc{\wtil} {\widetilde} % wide-tilde
18: \nc{\del} {\partial}
19: \nc{\mapleft}[1]{ % something under arrow
20: \smash{\mathop{\, %
21: \hbox to 1.2cm{\rightarrowfill}\, }\limits_{#1}}}
22: \nc{\mydraft} {
23: % \topmargin -1.5cm
24: \oddsidemargin +01mm
25: \evensidemargin +01mm
26: \textheight 230mm
27: \textwidth 155mm}
28: %\mydraft
29:
30: \begin{document}
31: \markboth{T. Myo, K. Kat\=o and K. Ikeda}{
32: Tensor Correlation in $^4$He and Its Effect on the Doublet Splitting in $^5$He
33: }
34:
35:
36: \title{
37: Tensor Correlation in $^4$He and Its Effect on the Doublet Splitting in $^5$He
38: }
39:
40:
41: \author{
42: Takayuki MYO,$^{1,}$\footnote{\noindent E-mail : myo@rcnp.osaka-u.ac.jp}
43: Kiyoshi KAT\=O$^2$ %\footnote{\noindent E-mail : kato@nucl.sci.hokudai.ac.jp}
44: and
45: Kiyomi IKEDA$^3$ %\footnote{\noindent E-mail : k-ikeda@postman.riken.go.jp}
46: }
47:
48: \inst{
49: $^1$Research Center for Nuclear Physics (RCNP), Osaka University, Ibaraki 567-0047, Japan\\
50: $^2$Division of Physics, Graduate School of Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0810, Japan\\
51: $^3$The Institute of Physical and Chemical Research (RIKEN), Wako 351-0198, Japan.
52: }
53:
54: \recdate{November 21, 2004}
55:
56: \abst{
57:
58: We investigate the role of tensor correlation on the structures
59: of \nuc{4}{He} and its effect on the doublet splitting in \nuc{5}{He}.
60: We perform a configuration mixing calculation in the shell model type bases
61: to represent the tensor correlation for $^4$He.
62: It is found that our model describes the characteristics of the tensor correlation,
63: which is represented by an admixture of the $0s_{1/2}$ configuration
64: with a spatially modified $0p_{1/2}$ orbit.
65: For $^5$He, we solve a coupled OCM equation for an extended $^4$He+$n$ model,
66: while taking into account the tensor correlation in the $^4$He cluster.
67: It is shown that the tensor correlation produces the Pauli blocking, in particular, for the $J^\pi={1/2}^-$ state,
68: and its effect causes about half of the $p$-wave doublet splitting in $^5$He.
69: This indicates that the strength of the effective spin-orbit interaction should be reduced
70: by about half from the conventional one.
71: We obtain a reliable $^4$He-$n$ interaction, including the tensor correlation,
72: which further improves the behavior of the $d$- and $f$-wave phase shifts in the $^4$He+$n$ system.
73:
74: }
75:
76: \maketitle\section{Introduction}
77:
78:
79: The tensor force is an important ingredient in the nuclear force
80: derived from the meson theory, and it plays a characteristic role in
81: the nuclear structure. Actually, we know that the contribution of
82: the tensor force to the binding energy in \nuc{4}{He} is
83: of the same order of magnitude as that of the central force\cite{Ak86,Ka01}.
84: An important point of variational calculations is that the trial wave function
85: should consist of not only the simple component with the $(0s_{1/2})^4$
86: configuration of the shell model but also the $D$-state component.
87: The latter has the set of angular momenta $(J,L,S)=(0,2,2)$ obtained by
88: applying the tensor operator to the $(0s_{1/2})^4$ state.
89: However, in many nuclear models, such a $D$-state component is not taken into account explicitly,
90: and the dominant effect of the tensor force is renormalized into central and spin-orbit terms
91: of the $G$-matrix as an effective interaction\cite{Ak72}.
92: In recent calculations in real space employing a realistic interaction,
93: the tensor force has been treated explicitly and shown to play a crucially important role
94: in the contribution to the binding energy\cite{Ka01,No00}.
95: However, beyond the results that the $D$-state components increase by 15\% in $^4$He and
96: the expectation value of the tensor force reaches about 60 MeV,
97: there is little information about more detailed connections between tensor correlations and
98: nuclear structures.
99: It is a very important problem to understand the effect of the tensor force
100: on the nuclear structure in a physically transparent manner
101: by explicitly describing the tensor correlation in the model space.
102:
103:
104: Recently, Toki, Sugimoto and one of the present authors (Ikeda) made progress forward obtaining
105: a description of the tensor correlation in the model space.
106: Considering that the dominant term of the tensor force is expressed by a one-pion exchange potential,
107: they showed that the tensor correlation can be described as
108: that which causes the charge-parity mixing of the single-nucleon orbit mediated by the pion field.
109: More precisely, the creation or annihilation of a virtual pion, which causes
110: coupling between a pseudo-scalar meson and a nucleon, brings about an excitation
111: that changes the parity and induces a crossing over the major shell, for example, of a nucleon in a closed configuration.
112: Furthermore, because of the isovector character of a pion,
113: the charge mixing of a single particle orbit is required to realize charge exchange excitations.
114: Their extension of the concept of a single particle orbit of a finite nucleus is
115: natural for incorporating the tensor force based on the mean field approach.
116: They made a further improvement of the variation under projections of the parity and charge number\cite{Su04}.
117: This projection procedure is very important to obtain a realization of the characteristics
118: of the strong tensor correlation. One important reason for this is that the tensor correlation due to
119: the pion exchange force is realized by the collection of tensor components up to a very high momentum
120: caused by two-particle excitations beyond a major shell.
121: They applied this improved framework of the charge-parity projected Hartree-Fock method (CPPHF) to the
122: alpha particle and obtained a satisfactory amount of the tensor correlation energy.\cite{Su04}
123:
124:
125: The basic purpose of this paper is to understand the essential effects of the tensor correlation
126: by treating the tensor force explicitly.
127: For this purpose, \nuc{4}{He} and \nuc{5}{He} are good objects of study, due to the simpleness of their structures.
128: Therefore, in this paper, we re-investigate the role of the tensor correlation
129: in the structure of \nuc{4}{He} and study its effect on \nuc{5}{He},
130: by taking into account the characteristic results studied with CPPHF.\cite{Su04}
131: In the present study, we use the simpler and more conventional shell model approach,
132: which we now explain.
133: Here we extend the doubly closed shell configuration $(0s)^4$ to $(0s)^4 + (0s)^2(0p)^2$, at least
134: up to $2p$-$2h$ configurations. Through this mixture of $2p$-$2h$ configurations,
135: the tensor force can contribute explicitly to the binding energy of \nuc{4}{He}.
136: These extended shell-model calculations are performed in the sense of perturbation theory
137: for the nearly degenerate case.
138: This approach is simple, but is convenient for investigating physical characters of the tensor correlation.
139: The studies of the CPPHF\cite{Su04,Ak04} and the approach using
140: antisymmetrized molecular dynamics (AMD)\cite{Do05} have shown that
141: the optimum length of the mixed $p_{1/2}$ orbital is much narrower than that for a simple harmonic oscillator basis,
142: and that a pair configuration of the $p_{1/2}$ orbital generates the $D$-state (with $[J,L,S]=[0,2,2]$) in the total system.
143: Therefore, we treat the length parameters ($b_{0s_{1/2}}$, $b_{0p_1/2}$ and $b_{0p_{3/2}}$)
144: of the single particle orbits in our wave function as variational parameters.
145: Through these variational studies of \nuc{4}{He},
146: we can check the applicability of our model approach.
147: We also attempt to use several kinds of effective interactions
148: including the tensor part in order to understand the characteristics of the tensor correlation.
149:
150:
151: For \nuc{5}{He}, the effect of the tensor force was shown at an early stage in the study of nuclear physics
152: to have a dependence on the orbital states occupied by the last neutron.
153: Terasawa\cite{Te60} performed a configuration mixing calculation for the \nuc{4}{He} part
154: that is similar to the present one, and he found that the internal excitation of \nuc{4}{He}
155: causes Pauli blocking in \nuc{5}{He}, which produces an orbital-state dependence.
156: As a result, the state-dependent effect is responsible for more than half of the observed doublet
157: splitting of $p$-wave states.
158: Nagata et al.\cite{Na59} also succeeded in reproducing almost all of the doublet splitting
159: by adopting the tensor force of a pion theoretical one
160: through the analysis with the coupled resonating group method (RGM).
161:
162:
163: Here, we re-analyze the doublet splitting of $p$-waves within an extended \nuc{4}{He}+$n$ model,
164: in which we explicitly take into account the tensor correlation in the \nuc{4}{He} cluster
165: by mixing $2p$-$2h$ configurations of $(0s)^2(0p)^2$ with the $(0s)^4$ configuration.
166: The $(0s)^2(0p)^2$ configurations are suppressed due to the Pauli principle
167: between a valence neutron and $0p$ orbital neutrons in the \nuc{4}{He} cluster.
168: This Pauli-blocking effect is treated in the framework of the orthogonality condition model (OCM).
169: We obtain a set of coupled OCM equations of the extended \nuc{4}{He}+$n$ model,
170: since \nuc{4}{He} is represented by the configuration mixing.
171: Thus, we are able to investigate to what extent the tensor correlation of \nuc{4}{He} generates
172: the Pauli blocking and results in the doublet splitting of $p$-waves in \nuc{5}{He}.
173: It is shown that this $(0s)^2(0p)^2$ excitation is related to the pion-like $0^-$ coupling
174: nature of the tensor correlation\cite{To02,Og04},
175: because the $0^-$ coupling causes a distinctly large admixture of the $(0p_{1/2})^2(0s_{1/2})^2$ configuration in \nuc{4}{He}
176: and leads to a particularly strong Pauli-blocking effect on the $p_{1/2}$ valence neutron in \nuc{5}{He}.
177: This point was not clarified in previous studies\cite{Te60,Na59}.
178: Finally, we present the new \nuc{4}{He}-$n$ interaction including the tensor correlation in \nuc{4}{He}
179: to study the behavior of the partial waves of the \nuc{4}{He}+$n$ scattering up to $d$- and $f$-waves.
180: We show that the tensor correlation plays an important role in accounting for \nuc{4}{He}+$n$ scattering phenomena.
181:
182:
183: In \S\ref{sec:4He}, we present the model, which is able to describe the tensor correlation,
184: and investigate the structure of \nuc{4}{He}.
185: We also discuss the effective interaction including the tensor force used in the present model.
186: In \S\ref{sec:5He}, we investigate the \nuc{4}{He}-$n$ interaction that leads to the doublet splitting of \nuc{5}{He}
187: by solving the coupled equation of the extended \nuc{4}{He}+$n$ model.
188: A summary is given in \S\ref{sec:summary}.
189: \section{Tensor correlation in \nuc{4}{He}}\label{sec:4He}
190:
191:
192: We examine the physical aspects of the tensor correlation in the
193: structure of \nuc{4}{He}. The \nuc{4}{He} nucleus is a good test case,
194: because an exact four-body calculation can be carried out.
195: In this calculation, the amount of the dissolution of \nuc{4}{He} from the
196: $(0s_{1/2})^4$ configuration is estimated to be more than 10\% for
197: the $D$-state probability. \cite{Ak86,Ka01} The tensor force tends
198: to change the parity and to flip the spin of single particle
199: orbital states of a nucleon due to the vertex operator of
200: $(\boldmath{\sigma}\cdot\vc{r})$. Hence, in \nuc{4}{He}, two orbits
201: of $0s$ and $0p$ are expected to be coupled by the tensor force.
202: We, therefore, extend the description of \nuc{4}{He} from $(0s)^4$
203: to $(0s)^4 + (0s)^2(0p)^2$, at least up to $2p$-$2h$
204: excitations\cite{To02,Su04}. Thus, the tensor force can contribute
205: explicitly to the nuclear structure through the mixture of
206: $2p$-$2h$ configurations\cite{Te60}.
207:
208:
209: \subsection{Model space and variational equations}\label{sec:4He_model}
210:
211:
212: In this study, we use the harmonic oscillator wave function
213: (h.o.w.f.) for \nuc{4}{He}. In this approach, it is easy to understand
214: the physical mechanism of the tensor correlation. Each single
215: particle h.o.w.f. is described using different length parameters
216: $\{b_\alpha\}$, where $\alpha$ indicates $0s_{1/2}$, $0p_{1/2}$ and
217: $0p_{3/2}$, and we treat the parameters in the set $\{b_\alpha\}$ as variational ones
218: to conveniently include the higher shell effect caused by the tensor force,
219: as shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:4He_ene}. This is a kind of extension
220: of the shell model suggested by the results of \nuc{4}{He}
221: given in Refs.~\citen{Su04} and \citen{Ak04}.
222: Neutron-rich He isotopes were studied in a similar framework by Kohno et al.\cite{Ko78}.
223:
224:
225: The \nuc{4}{He} wave function with $(J^\pi,T)=(0^+,0)$ for spin and isospin
226: can be expressed by a superposition of the
227: following configurations $\Phi_i$:
228: \begin{eqnarray}
229: \Psi(^{4}{\rm He})
230: &=& \sum_{i=1}^{6}\ a_i\: \Phi_i
231: \label{eq:WF_4He}\ ,
232: \qquad
233: \renc{\arraystretch}{1.5}
234: \begin{array}{rcl}
235: \Phi_1
236: &=& (0s_{1/2})^4_{00}\ ,
237: \\
238: \Phi_2
239: &=& \left[(0s_{1/2})^2_{01},(0p_{1/2})^2_{01}\right]_{00}\ ,
240: \\
241: \Phi_3
242: &=& \left[(0s_{1/2})^2_{10},(0p_{1/2})^2_{10}\right]_{00}\ ,
243: \\
244: \Phi_4
245: &=& \left[(0s_{1/2})^2_{01},(0p_{3/2})^2_{01}\right]_{00}\ ,
246: \\
247: \Phi_5
248: &=& \left[(0s_{1/2})^2_{10},(0p_{3/2})^2_{10}\right]_{00}\ ,
249: \\
250: \Phi_6
251: &=& \left[(0s_{1/2})^2_{10}, \left[(0p_{1/2})(0p_{3/2})\right]_{10}\right]_{00}\ .
252: \end{array}
253: \end{eqnarray}
254: The subscripts 00, 01, 10 or 11 represent $J$ and $T$, spin and isospin for the two-nucleon
255: pair and for the total system, respectively. Here, in order to maintain
256: the orthogonality of the configurations $\Phi_i$, we choose the same value
257: for the length parameters of orbits that possess the same quantum numbers
258: in every configuration $\Phi_i$; for example,
259: $b_{0s_{1/2}}$ in $\Phi_1$ is equal to $b_{0s_{1/2}}$ in $\Phi_2$.
260:
261:
262: The Hamiltonian of \nuc{4}{He} is given by
263: \begin{eqnarray}
264: H
265: &=& \sum_{i=1}^A{t_i} - T_G
266: + \sum_{i<j}^A v_{ij}\ ,
267: \label{eq:Ham}
268: \end{eqnarray}
269: with
270: \begin{eqnarray}
271: v_{ij}
272: &=& v_{ij}^C + v_{ij}^{T} + v_{ij}^{LS} + v_{ij}^{Clmb}\ ,
273: \end{eqnarray}
274: where the mass number $A$ is 4. The effective $NN$ interaction
275: $v_{ij}$ consists of central ($v^C_{ij}$), tensor ($v^T_{ij}$), LS
276: ($v^{LS}_{ij}$) and Coulomb ($v_{ij}^{Clmb}$) terms.
277: In this analysis, we do not explicitly treat the short-range correlation
278: caused by the strong short-range repulsion of the central force.
279: We use several kinds of effective interactions
280: to check the dependence of the tensor correlation on the employed interactions.
281: One of the effective interactions
282: is constructed from a realistic interaction based on the $G$-matrix theory viewpoint.
283: The component of the tensor force with momentum that exceeds than
284: the cut off momentum of the $Q$ space is considered to be renormalized into the effective central force.
285: Following to Ref.\citen{Ak04}, this cut off momentum $k_Q$ is taken
286: to be more than twice the Fermi momentum,
287: because the high momentum region ($k>k_Q$) caused by the tensor force is
288: considered to be coupled strongly with the short-range correlation.
289: This also indicates that in the region satisfying $r\le 0.8$ fm, where the short-range correlation dominates,
290: the effective interactions are strongly screened so strongly that the bare tensor force in the very short-range region disappears.
291: Detailed properties of the effective interactions are discussed in \S\ref{sec:e_int}.
292:
293:
294: The wave function $\Psi=\Psi(^{4}{\rm He})$ in Eq.~(\ref{eq:WF_4He})
295: is used as a variational function.
296: The variation of the energy expectation value with respect to $\Psi$ is given by
297: \begin{eqnarray}
298: \delta\frac{\bra\Psi|H|\Psi\ket}{\bra\Psi|\Psi\ket}&=&0\ ,
299: \end{eqnarray}
300: which leads to the following equations:
301: \begin{eqnarray}
302: \frac{\del \bra\Psi| H - E |\Psi \ket} {\del b_\alpha}
303: &=& 0\ ,\quad
304: \frac{\del \bra\Psi| H - E |\Psi \ket} {\del a_i}
305: = 0\ .
306: \label{eq:vari}
307: \end{eqnarray}
308: Here, $E$ is a Lagrange multiplier corresponding to the total
309: energy. The parameters $b_\alpha$ (explicitly, $b_{0s_{1/2}}$, $b_{0p_{1/2}}$ and $b_{0p_{3/2}}$)
310: appear non-linearly in the energy expectation value and $\{a_i\}$ are the coefficients defined in
311: Eq.~(\ref{eq:WF_4He}). We solve these two kinds of variational
312: equations in the following two steps.
313: First, fixing the values of all the parameters $b_\alpha$, we solve the linear equation for $\{a_i\}$ as
314: an eigenvalue problem for $H$ with the basis $\{\Phi_i;i=1,\cdots,6\}$.
315: Next, for the obtained eigenvalue $E$, which is a function of $\{b_\alpha\}$,
316: we search for the minimum value of $E(\{b_\alpha\})$.
317: In all the calculational procedures, the c.m.motion is treated by subtracting
318: the expectation value of the operator $T_G$ in the Hamiltonian given in Eq.~(\ref{eq:Ham}).
319:
320:
321: \subsection{Characteristic features of the tensor correlation in \nuc{4}{He}}\label{sec:4He-2}
322:
323:
324: Here, we study the characteristic features of the tensor correlation with regard to the results for \nuc{4}{He}
325: by solving the variational equations (\ref{eq:vari}).
326: Before investigating the properties of the effective interaction, in the studies,
327: we would like to understand the changes of the \nuc{4}{He} structure
328: from that given by conventional $(0s)^4$ description by adding the tensor force.
329: We use the Volkov No. 2\cite{Vo65} and G3RS \cite{Ta68,Fu80} for the central and LS terms
330: of the effective $NN$ interaction, respectively,
331: both of which have often been used in many cluster model studies assuming the $(0s)^4$ configuration of \nuc{4}{He}.
332: The Majorana parameter of the Volkov No. 2 and the strength of the G3RS are chosen as 0.6 and 900 MeV, respectively,
333: in order to reproduce the energy difference between $p_{1/2}$-$p_{3/2}$ orbits. As a tensor term,
334: we use the Furutani-Tamagaki (FT) tensor force\cite{Fu80,Fu79}, which was used in the analysis of the
335: nucleus with mass $A=4$ to reproduce the scattering data of the \nuc{3}{He}+$p$ system \cite{Fu79}.
336:
337:
338: First, we check the calculational results for the variational length parameters $\{b_\alpha\}$
339: at the energy minimum point.
340: It is confirmed that the values for $b_{0p_{1/2}}$ and $b_{0p_{3/2}}$
341: are almost the same at the point of minimal energy.
342: Hence, in the following calculations, we choose the same value for
343: $b_{0p_{1/2}}$ and $b_{0p_{3/2}}$, and we have two variational length
344: parameters, $b_{0s}$ for the $s$ orbit and $b_{0p}$ for the $p$ orbit.
345:
346:
347: \begin{figure}[t]
348: \centering
349: \includegraphics[width=9.5cm,clip]{fig1.eps}
350: \caption{The total energy of \nuc{4}{He} is plotted by the thick
351: solid curve as a function of the length parameter ratio,
352: $b_{0p}$/$b_{0s}$.
353: The dashed and dash-dotted curves are the expectation values of the tensor force
354: and the kinetic energy, respectively.
355: The dotted curve is the probability of $2p$-$2h$ components $P(2p$-$2h)$ in the \nuc{4}{He} wave
356: function. The thin solid curve denotes the total energy of
357: \nuc{4}{He} calculated without the tensor force.}
358: \label{fig:4He_ene}
359: \end{figure}
360:
361:
362: The calculated results are shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:4He_ene} for the total energy,
363: the expectation value of the tensor force $\bra V_T \ket$, and
364: the mixing of the probability of the $2p$-$2h$ configuration states
365: as functions of the length parameter ratio, $b_{0p}/b_{0s}$.
366: Here, we fix $b_{0s}$ to 1.4 fm in order to reproduce the observed charge radius (1.68 fm).
367: The energy minimum is obtained at $b_{0p}\approx 0.6\ b_{0s}$.
368: It is shown that $\bra V_T \ket$ has the largest contribution for values of the ratio $b_{0p}/b_{0s}$
369: near the energy minimum.
370: The $2p$-$2h$ configuration states are well mixed near the energy minimum.
371: The kinetic energies also realize their maximum values very near the energy minimal point.
372: However, in the range $0.3 < b_{0p}/b_{0s} < 1.5$,
373: the amounts by which the kinetic energies increase and confined within a range of about 7 MeV,
374: which is almost half of the energy gain from $\bra V_T \ket$.
375: Then, the total energy can have an energy minimum pocket.
376: These results imply that the tensor force can be incorporated with
377: a small $b_{0p}$ value, which enables us to describe higher momentum components and
378: thereby higher shell effects of excited two-particle wave functions in $\{\Phi_i;i=2,3,\cdots,6\}$.
379: It is noted that at the point $b_{0p}=b_{0s}$, that is, in the case of the standard shell model,
380: $\bra V_T \ket$ is small, about one-third of the minimal energy value of this calculation.
381: In Fig.~\ref{fig:4He_ene}, we also plot the total energies in the case that there is no tensor force,
382: and we see that the energy minimum disappears
383: where the mixing of $2p$-$2h$ components caused by the central and LS forces is negligibly small, less than 2\% at most.
384: In such a case, the $(0s)^4$ configuration of the ground state is considered to be approximated well.
385: These results for \nuc{4}{He} indicate that the tensor force plays
386: an important role in the dissolution from the double-closed
387: $(0s)^4$ configuration and leads to a tensor correlation through the mixing of $2p$-$2h$ configuration states.
388:
389:
390: Adoption of the tensor force in addition to the Volkov No. 2 central force
391: as the effective interaction leads to the overbinding of the total binding energy shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:4He_ene}.
392: This regards to be a double counting of the contribution of the tensor force,
393: because the Volkov No. 2 central force is already renormalized by the tensor force.
394: However, a quantitative treatment of the total binding energy
395: in which we solve the double counting problem is beyond the scope of the present model.
396: Here we postulate to adjust the total binding energy with the experimental one
397: simply through the reduction of the strength of the attractive long-range part of the triplet-even ($^3E$)
398: central term in the Volkov No. 2 by the factor $a(^3E)$,
399: since it is favorable to fit the binding energy for a quantitative understanding of the characteristic
400: features of the configuration mixing through detailed contributions of the mixed configurations.
401: The value of $a(^3E)$ is determined so as to fit the observed energy at the energy minimum,
402: as shown in Table~\ref{tab:4He1}.
403: In this calculation, we also change $b_{0s}$ as a variational length parameter in addition to $b_{0p}$.
404: The optimum values to obtain the energy minimum are ($b_{0s},~b_{0p}$)=(1.26,~0.77) fm.
405:
406:
407: \begin{table}[t]
408: \begin{center}
409: \caption{The properties of \nuc{4}{He} with the observed binding
410: energy (28.3 MeV) reproduced with two types of the strengths
411: of the tensor force. We list the contributions from each term in
412: the Hamiltonian (in units of MeV) and the matter radius ($R_m$, in units of fm)
413: and the probabilities $P$ (in \%) of each configuration in Eq.~(\ref{eq:WF_4He}).
414: The values $P(D)$ are the $D$-state probabilities.} \renc{\baselinestretch}{1.15} \label{tab:4He1}
415: \begin{tabular}{l|cc}\hline\hline
416: & $V_T \times$ 1.0 (original) & $V_T \times$ 1.5 (strengthen) \\ \hline
417: a($^3 E$) & 0.8379 & 0.6119 \\ \hline
418: $\bra T\ket$ & 65.21~\: & 88.10~\: \\
419: $\bra V_{C}\ket$ & $-$72.43~~~~ & $-$58.39~~~~ \\
420: $\bra V_{T}\ket$ & $-$22.62~~~~ & $-$60.65~~~~ \\
421: $\bra V_{LS}\ket$ & 0.66 & 1.67 \\
422: $\bra V_{Clmb}\ket$ & 0.89 & 0.96 \\ \hline
423: $R_m$ & 1.34 & 1.22 \\ \hline
424: $P(2p$-$2h)$ & 7.24 & 16.81~\: \\
425: ~~~$\Phi_2$ & 0.13 & 0.37 \\
426: ~~~$\Phi_3$ & 6.09 & 14.49~\: \\
427: ~~~$\Phi_4$ & 0.07 & 0.19 \\
428: ~~~$\Phi_5$ & 0.75 & 1.67 \\
429: ~~~$\Phi_6$ & 0.20 & 0.09 \\ \hline
430: $P(D)$ & 4.58 & 10.87~\: \\ \hline
431: \end{tabular}
432: \end{center}
433: \end{table}
434:
435:
436: In Table~\ref{tab:4He1}, we list the properties of the \nuc{4}{He} wave functions
437: and obtain characteristics of the configuration mixing.
438: It is shown that the $2p$-$2h$ component of $\Phi_3$ in Eq.~(\ref{eq:WF_4He})
439: with an excitation to $(0p_{1/2})^2_{10}$ is strongly mixed.
440: This result of the strong mixing of the $(0p_{1/2})^2_{10}$ excitation can be
441: understood as follows: One particle in the $2p$-$2h$ components of $\Phi_3$ has
442: a dominant configuration caused by the $0^-$ coupling between the
443: orbits of $0s_{1/2}$ and $0p_{1/2}$. This $0^-$ coupling is
444: considered to exhibit the pion effect studied by Sugimoto et al.\cite{Su04}
445: Furthermore, the two excited nucleons in $\Phi_3$
446: have the quantum numbers $(j,t)=(1,0)$ of spin and isospin,
447: respectively, which are the same as those of the deuteron.
448: Therefore this two-particle coupling causing the $(0p_{1/2})^2_{10}$ mixing is
449: understood to be a deuteron-like correlation. That is the $(0s)_{10}^2$
450: component with quantum numbers $(L,S)=(0,1)$ for the orbital angular momentum and spin
451: in the $(0s_{1/2})^4$ configuration of $\Phi_1$ in Eq.~(\ref{eq:WF_4He}) is strongly excited to
452: the $(0p_{1/2})_{10}^2$ component by the tensor force
453: when changing the orbital angular momentum by 2 ($\Delta L=2$).
454: Here, $(0p_{1/2})_{10}^2$ has three components with $(L,S)$=(0,1), (2,1) and (1,0)
455: in the $LS$ coupling scheme, and the middle part produces the $D$-state probability given in the last row of Table~\ref{tab:4He1},
456: in which the component of the set of the total orbital angular momentum $L_t=2$ and total spin $S_t=2$
457: is chosen in the total wave function of $\Psi(^{4}{\rm He})$ in Eq.~(\ref{eq:WF_4He}).
458: However, the obtained $D$-state probability is inconsistent with exact four-body calculations,
459: using realistic nuclear interactions which give about twice the present value.
460:
461:
462: In order to see effects of the tensor force on the $2p$-$2h$
463: components and the $D$-state probability, we perform the same
464: calculation with the matrix element of the tensor force strengthened by 50\%,
465: while the total energy is reproduced by changing $a(^3E)$ as shown in Table~\ref{tab:4He1}.
466: The optimum values are found to be ($b_{0s}$, $b_{0p}$)=(1.14, 0.73) fm, which are slightly smaller than
467: in the case of the tensor force with its original strength.
468: The contribution of the tensor force, the amplitude of $\Phi_3$ and
469: the $D$-state probability increase by more than a factor 2 in comparison with the original ones.
470: From these results, we confirm that the $\Phi_3$ component is strongly correlated with the tensor force.
471:
472:
473: \begin{figure}[t]
474: \centering
475: \includegraphics[width=9.5cm,clip]{fig2.eps}
476: \caption{
477: Coupling matrix elements of the central and tensor terms with respect to the $b_{0p}$/$b_{0s}$ ratio
478: in \nuc{4}{He}.
479: The configurations $[(0s_{1/2})^2_{10}(0p_{j})^2_{10}]_{00}$ are chosen for $2p$-$2h$ components,
480: where $j$ is 1/2($\Phi_3$) and 3/2($\Phi_5$).
481: }
482: \label{fig:coupling}
483: \end{figure}
484:
485:
486: In Fig.~\ref{fig:coupling}, we display the $b_{0p}/b_{0s}$ dependence of the coupling matrix elements
487: between $\Phi_3$ and $\Phi_1$ and, for comparison, between $\Phi_5$ and $\Phi_1$,
488: where the $2p$-$2h$ components have the same quantum numbers as the deuteron for the excited two-nucleon part.
489: Here we use the original strength of the tensor force and fix $b_{0s}$ to 1.26 fm.
490: It is found that the coupling matrix elements of the tensor force are enhanced for a narrow range of values of $b_{0p}$.
491: In particular, the matrix elements between $\Phi_3$ and $\Phi_1$ are strongly increased for $b_{0p}/b_{0s}\sim$0.4.
492: It is also seen that the value of $b_{0p}/b_{0s}$ giving the point of minimal energy
493: is somewhat larger than that for the point at the absolute maximum for the coupling matrix elements of the tensor force.
494: This results from an increase in the kinetic energy for small values of $b_{0p}$.
495:
496:
497: As shown in Table~\ref{tab:4He1}, wave functions give
498: a matter radius smaller than the experimental value (1.48 fm) by 0.2 fm.
499: This is due to the fact that $b_{0s}$ and $b_{0p}$ are narrow in comparison to the case
500: of the $(0s)^4$ single configuration without the tensor force.
501: Apparently, then, the tensor force tends to shrink a nucleus.
502: This problem is considered to result from a problem with the effective
503: interaction employed here, and we discuss this in the next subsection.
504:
505:
506: To conclude this subsection, we can say that the present
507: model describes the characteristics of the tensor correlation in \nuc{4}{He} well.
508: However, the saturation properties of \nuc{4}{He} cannot be studied quantitatively
509: without detailed investigations of appropriate effective interactions.
510: In order to make the studies of the tensor correlations more quantitative,
511: we examine the effective interaction of the tensor part in more detail
512: in the following subsection.
513:
514:
515: \subsection{Effective interaction and tensor correlation}\label{sec:e_int}
516:
517:
518: Here we attempt to find an effective interaction that includes the tensor force and is suitable for the present model.
519: Recently, from a similar viewpoint, Akaishi constructed the effective interaction
520: based on the $G$-matrix theory using the realistic AV8' interaction \cite{Ak04} for \nuc{4}{He}.
521: In his prescription, the cut off momentum for the $Q$-space in the calculated $G$-matrices
522: is chosen as $k_Q=2.8$ fm$^{-1}$, which is larger than twice the Fermi momentum ($2k_F$),
523: where $k_F$ is taken as 1.1 fm$^{-1}$ in \nuc{4}{He}.
524: The reason why a very high cut off momentum
525: is adopted is that in the case of $D$-waves, momenta up to $\sim 2k_F$ are produced by the long-range part of
526: the tensor correlations that appear in the realistic momentum distribution of nucleons in \nuc{4}{He}.
527: In this new prescription, short-range correlations including very high momentum ($k>k_Q$) components of
528: tensor correlations are renormalized in the central term of the $G$-matrices.
529: However, after screening the high momentum tensor components with $k>k_Q$, the tensor component in the $G$-matrices
530: survives strongly in the range around 0.8 fm with a width of 0.5 fm\cite{Ik04},
531: together with the one-pion tail in the truly long-range region.
532: Furthermore, he discussed the fact that the renormalized central force having a one-pion tail exhibits
533: a very weak density dependence\cite{Ik04}.
534: Therefore, we use this interaction, called ``AK'', constructed by Akaishi,
535: as a criterion for the effective interaction.
536: We also refer to the so-called GPT interaction\cite{Go70}, which has Gaussian forms
537: and is constructed to reproduce the two nucleon properties
538: and to satisfy the charge radius of the doubly magic nuclei within the HF method.
539:
540:
541: \begin{figure}[t]
542: \centering
543: \includegraphics[width=13.0cm,clip]{fig3.eps}
544: \caption{Right: Three kinds of tensor forces for the triplet-even ($^3$E) state without the tensor operator part.
545: Left: Two kinds of central forces for $^3$E and singlet-even ($^1$E) states.}
546: \label{fig:int_CT}
547: \end{figure}
548:
549:
550: In order to demonstrate the properties of these interactions,
551: we show in Fig.~\ref{fig:int_CT} radial forms of the tensor term without the tensor operator part and
552: of the central term for two effective interactions, AK and GPT.
553: For the tensor part, we also show the Furutani-Tamagaki force (FT) for comparison.
554: It is found that AK and FT have similar shapes globally, but their tails behave slightly differently.
555: GPT has a shallow, long-range form.
556: For the central part, AK has a spike in the short range and a small long tail.
557: GPT has a mild short-range repulsion and a longer range than AK.
558: For AK, the $^3E$ component is smaller than the $^1E$ component in a volume integral,
559: because the renormalization from the tensor force into the central force is small in AK,
560: in keeping with the character of the original AV8'.
561: This feature is not seen for GPT.
562: In GPT, renormalization of the tensor force is considered to be based on
563: the conventional approach, which gives a strong $^3E$ component in the central force.
564:
565:
566: \begin{table}[t]
567: \caption{Properties of \nuc{4}{He} with three kinds of effective interactions.}
568: \label{tab:4He2}
569: \centering
570: \begin{tabular}{l|ccc}\hline\hline
571: & AK & GPT & GA0 \\ \hline
572: ($b_{0s}$,$b_{0p}$)~~[fm]~&~(1.12,0.65)~ &~(1.36,0.93)~ &~(1.26,0.75)~ \\ \hline
573: Energy~~[MeV]~ & $-$19.3~~~~ & $-$17.5~~~~ & $-$22.0~~~~ \\ \hline
574: $\bra V_T \ket$~~[MeV] & $-$32.5~~~~ & $-$11.1~~~~ & $-$20.8~~~~ \\ \hline
575: $R_m$~~[fm] & \,~1.20 & \,~1.46 & \,~1.35 \\ \hline
576: $P(2p$-$2h)$~~[\%] & 12.1~\, & 8.3 & 8.0 \\ \hline
577: $P(\Phi_3)$~~~[\%] & 8.3 & 6.8 & 5.6 \\ \hline
578: $P(D)$~~[\%] & 6.3 & 5.1 & 4.3 \\ \hline
579: \end{tabular}
580: \end{table}
581:
582:
583: In Table~\ref{tab:4He2}, we show the results for \nuc{4}{He} obtained using AK and GPT in our model.
584: Both interactions give small binding energies, because the higher-order correlations
585: are needed to reproduce the observed energy for these
586: interactions. AK gives a small radius with the present h.o.w.f.,
587: but a large tensor contribution. Since $k_Q > 2\ k_F$ in AK, we
588: can roughly estimate that $b_{0p} \sim b_{0s}/2 $ is allowed.
589: Contrastingly, GPT gives a good radius, but a small tensor
590: contribution. The difference between the two interactions mainly comes from
591: the strength of the tensor force. Since AK gives a small radius,
592: we also consider replacing the central part of AK by that of GPT. We
593: call this interaction ``GA0'', and its results are shown in Table~\ref{tab:4He2}.
594: It is seen that the total energy is good and the radius has improved, but, it is still smaller than the experimental value.
595: For all three interactions used here, a large mixing of the $\Phi_3$ component in Eq.~(\ref{eq:WF_4He}) is found.
596: This implies that the characteristics of the tensor correlation do not depend strongly on the choice of the effective interaction.
597:
598:
599: It is noted that the tensor force of AK does not have a triplet-odd ($^3O$) component.
600: This may contribute to the structure of \nuc{4}{He}. We study its effect using FT with
601: both even and odd components, instead of AK. The $^3O$ component
602: of the tensor force is found to contribute very little in the present model,
603: about a few hundred keV in energy.
604: From this result, we believe that this component does not play an essential role in the behavior considered in this study.
605:
606:
607: The above results show that neither AK nor GPT reproduces the saturation properties
608: of \nuc{4}{He} quantitatively. It is necessary to improve the AK and
609: GPT interactions or to construct other appropriate interactions
610: that take into account the short-range and tensor correlations consistently in the present model space.
611:
612:
613: Here, we discuss the evaluation of the tensor correlation in our model
614: in relation to the physical reason for strengthening the matrix elements of the tensor force,
615: here, e.g., by 50\%, as shown in Table~\ref{tab:4He1}.
616: As seen in Fig.~\ref{fig:int_CT}, the tensor force multiplying $r^2$
617: not only has a large value in the pocket around $r\sim 1.0$ fm ($0.6<r<1.4$)
618: from the short- to intermediate-range regions
619: but also has an appreciable value in the widely extended long-range region
620: $1.4<r<3.0$, which exceeds the average distance between two nucleons.
621: However, our model wave function based on the so-called $V$-type basis
622: is not necessarily sufficient to treat the tensor correlation from the short- to the long-range regions simultaneously,
623: and it is found that the present $V$-type basis favorably describes the tensor correlation
624: from the deep pocket in the intermediate region with the narrow $0p$ orbit solution.
625: This problem is expected to be overcome by adding $T$-type basis wave functions,
626: such as $[\phi_2(\vc{r},b_r),\phi_0(\vc{R},b_R)]_2$,
627: with arbitrary h.o. length parameters ($b_r$, $b_R$), where $(\vc{r}, \vc{R})$ are the coordinates of the
628: relative and c.m.motion of the two nucleons, respectively, and the subscripts represent the orbital angular momenta.
629: This basis is suitable for describing the behavior of the $D$-state
630: in the wave function emerging from the tensor force, especially, in the short- and intermediate-range regions.
631: In the hybrid wave functions combined with $V$-type and $T$-type bases,
632: the $V$-type wave function expanded with several Gaussian bases\cite{Ao95}
633: is expected to be suitable for describing the long-range part of the tensor correlation.
634:
635: To strengthen the matrix element of the tensor force by 50\% in the present $V$-type basis,
636: it is helpful to consider the relation between $V$-type and $T$-type bases.
637: They can overlap, and the $(0p)^2$ component in the $V$-type basis can be expanded
638: in terms of the $T$-type basis as
639: \begin{eqnarray}
640: (0p)^2_{L=2}
641: &=& \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\biggl( [\phi_2(\vc{r},b_r'),\phi_0(\vc{R},b_R')]_2
642: + [\phi_0(\vc{r},b_r'),\phi_2(\vc{R},b_R')]_2 \biggr),
643: \label{eq:VT}
644: \end{eqnarray}
645: where the spin part is ignored for simplicity and the h.o. length parameters are related to
646: $b_{0p}$ of the $0p$-orbit by $b_r'=\sqrt{2}\cdot b_{0p}$ and $b_R'=(1/\sqrt{2})\cdot b_{0p}$.
647: This relation shows that the first term on the right-hand side of
648: Eq.~(\ref{eq:VT}) of the $T$-type basis can be reduced by a factor of $1/\sqrt{2}$.
649: Since we restrict the model wave function to that of the shell model of the $V$-type basis in this study,
650: we postulate the strengthening of the matrix elements of the tensor force by an appreciable amount,
651: which is assumed to be $50$\%. Justification of the present argument is given
652: by extending the analysis of \nuc{4}{He} using the hybrid wave functions
653: of the $V$-type and of $T$-type.
654:
655: \section{Tensor correlation in \nuc{5}{He}: doublet splitting}\label{sec:5He}
656:
657:
658: In the nucleus, a large doublet (LS) splitting is observed,
659: and this can be explained by a strong spin-orbit (LS) force.
660: For $p$-shell nuclei, the doublet splitting of $p$-wave resonances
661: ($3/2^-$ and $1/2^-$) in \nuc{5}{He} has been studied
662: as a way of finding the strength of the LS force, because \nuc{5}{He}
663: is the lightest nucleus in which the doublet splitting is
664: observable and is considered to be the simplest nucleus to have one
665: nucleon above the double-closed $(0s)^4$ core. However, as shown
666: in the previous section, the tensor force produces a mixture of
667: a large amount of the $D$-state component with the $(0s)^4$
668: configuration in \nuc{4}{He}.
669:
670:
671: \subsection{A tensor-correlated \nuc{4}{He}-cluster plus neutron model}
672:
673:
674: We analyze the $p$-wave resonances of \nuc{5}{He} with an extended
675: \nuc{4}{He}+$n$ model, where we explicitly take into account the
676: tensor correlation in the \nuc{4}{He} cluster by mixing $2p$-$2h$
677: components with the $(0s)^4$ configuration.
678: In this analysis, we are chiefly interested in the coupling between the internal
679: structure of the \nuc{4}{He} cluster and the motion of the $p$-wave valence neutron.
680: In particular, the $2p$-2$h$ (tensor) correlation of \nuc{4}{He} is considered to be
681: suppressed due to the Pauli principle with the valence neutron, and therefore the
682: \nuc{4}{He} cluster in \nuc{5}{He} loses energy as compared
683: to the isolated case. This is the so-called Pauli-blocking effect,
684: which is similar to the case induced by the pairing correlation in
685: the \nuc{9}{Li}+$n$ system \cite{Ka99,My02}.
686:
687:
688: From the results for \nuc{4}{He}, we learn that $\Phi_3$ including
689: the $0p_{1/2}$ orbit in Eq.~(\ref{eq:WF_4He}) is strongly mixed.
690: Therefore, the large $0p_{1/2}$ mixing in \nuc{4}{He} results in a stronger
691: Pauli-blocking effect for the $1/2^-$ state of \nuc{5}{He} than
692: for the $3/2^-$ state.
693: For this reason, we expect that the $1/2^-$ state of
694: \nuc{5}{He} experiences a larger energy loss for the \nuc{4}{He} cluster
695: than does the $3/2^-$ state and as a result leads to doublet
696: splitting. This has also been investigated qualitatively in previous studies\cite{Te60,Na59},
697: where about a half of the doublet splitting comes from the tensor correlation.
698:
699:
700: In order to evaluate the Pauli-blocking effect in \nuc{5}{He}
701: correctly, it is necessary to carry out the configuration mixing
702: in the \nuc{4}{He} cluster and the antisymmetrization between
703: nucleons in the \nuc{4}{He} cluster and the valence neutron $n$.
704: In order to accomplish this, we start by adopting the following wave function of the resonating group method (RGM) with
705: six \nuc{4}{He}-cluster configurations:
706: \begin{eqnarray}
707: \Psi^J(^5{\rm He})
708: &=& \sum_{i=1}^6 {\cal A}\left\{ [\Phi_i(^4{\rm He}),\chi_i^J(r)]^J \right\}\ .
709: \label{eq:WF_5He}
710: \end{eqnarray}
711: Here ${\cal A}$, $r$, $\{\chi^J_i(r)\}$ and $J$ are
712: an anti-symmetrizer, the \nuc{4}{He}-$n$ relative coordinate, unknown
713: relative wave functions and the total spin of \nuc{5}{He},
714: respectively. $\Phi_i(^4{\rm He})$ is the configuration of \nuc{4}{He}
715: defined in Eq.~(\ref{eq:WF_4He}). Corresponding to the
716: \nuc{5}{He} wave function, the Hamiltonian of \nuc{5}{He} is given by
717: \begin{eqnarray}
718: H(^{5}{\rm He})
719: &=& H(^{4}{\rm He}) + \sum_{k=\alpha,n} t_k - T_G(\alpha,n) + V_{\alpha n},
720: \end{eqnarray}
721: where $H(^{4}{\rm He})$, $t_k$, $T_G(\alpha,n)$ and $V_{\alpha n}$ are
722: the internal Hamiltonian of \nuc{4}{He}, the kinetic energy operators
723: for each cluster (\nuc{4}{He} and $n$), the c.m.motion of the
724: two-body system, and the \nuc{4}{He}-$n$ interaction, respectively.
725:
726:
727: The variation of the total energy for the Hamiltonian with respect
728: to the wave function in Eq.~(\ref{eq:WF_5He}) leads to the
729: following coupled integro-differential equations:
730: \begin{eqnarray}
731: \sum_{i=1}^6\ \bra \Phi_j(^4{\rm He})| H(^{5}{\rm He}) - E |
732: {\cal A}\left\{ [\Phi_i(^4{\rm He}),\chi_i^J(r)]^J \right\}\ket
733: &=& 0
734: \quad
735: {\rm for}~j=1,\cdots,6.
736: \label{eq:RGM}
737: \end{eqnarray}
738:
739:
740: Here we study the behavior of $\{\chi^J_i(r)\}$ and
741: $\Psi^J(^5{\rm He})$ in the asymptotic region ($r\to\infty$).
742: There, the effect of antisymmetrization between
743: the \nuc{4}{He} cluster and the valence neutron is negligible, and
744: $V_{\alpha n}$ vanishes. Therefore the coupling between the \nuc{4}{He}
745: cluster and the valence neutron disappears, and the \nuc{4}{He}
746: cluster has the same configuration as the isolated \nuc{4}{He}
747: ground state:
748: \begin{eqnarray}
749: \Psi^J(^5{\rm He})
750: &~~ \mapleft{r\to\infty}~~&
751: \left[ \Psi(^{4}{\rm He}),\chi^J(r) \right]^J,\quad
752: {\rm where}\quad
753: \Psi(^{4}{\rm He})
754: ~=~ \sum_{i=1}^{6}\ a_i\: \Phi_i
755: \label{eq:asympt}.
756: \end{eqnarray}
757: Therefore, it is easy to obtain the following
758: asymptotic forms of $\{\chi^J_i(r)\}$ from the above
759: asymptotic form of $\Psi^J(^5{\rm He})$:
760: \begin{eqnarray}
761: \chi^J_i(r)
762: &~~ \mapleft{r\to\infty}~~& a_i \cdot \chi^J(r).
763: \label{eq:asympt_rel}
764: \end{eqnarray}
765: Equation (\ref{eq:asympt_rel}) implies that the asymptotic wave
766: function $\chi^J_I(r)$ is decomposed into the internal amplitude
767: $a_i$ of the \nuc{4}{He} cluster and the relative wave function
768: $\chi^J(r)$ between the \nuc{4}{He} ground state and the valence
769: neutron. The coefficients $\{a_i\}$ are the same as those in
770: Eq.~(\ref{eq:WF_4He}), and then the tensor correlation in the
771: \nuc{4}{He} cluster is the same as that of the isolated \nuc{4}{He}.
772: On the other hand, when the valence neutron is close to the
773: \nuc{4}{He} cluster, the motion of the valence neutron dynamically
774: couples to configurations of the \nuc{4}{He} cluster in order to
775: satisfy the Pauli principle. This causes the coefficients $\{a_i\}$ and the
776: tensor correlation in the \nuc{4}{He} cluster to be different from those
777: in the isolated case.
778: This implies that $\{a_i\}$ and the tensor correlation depend
779: on the relative coordinate $r$ via the \nuc{4}{He}-$n$ coupling.
780:
781:
782: In order to solve the coupled equations of RGM, we apply the
783: orthogonality condition model (OCM) \cite{Ka99,My02,Sa77}. In the OCM,
784: antisymmetrization between nucleons in the \nuc{4}{He} cluster and
785: the valence neutron is replaced by the condition that the relative wave functions $\{\chi_i^J(r)\}$
786: be orthogonal to the Pauli forbidden states due to antisymmetrization.
787: Then, integrating over the internal coordinates of the \nuc{4}{He} cluster in the Hamiltonian and
788: the overlap in Eq.~(\ref{eq:RGM}), we obtain the following coupled
789: Schr\"odinger equations for the set of relative wave functions $\{\chi_i^J(r)\}$:
790: \begin{eqnarray}
791: \sum_{j=1}^{6} \left[ (T_r + \wtil{V}_{\alpha n} + \Lambda_i)\
792: \delta_{ij} + h_{ij}(^4{\rm He}) \right] \chi_j^J(r)
793: &=& E\ \chi_i^J(r)\quad
794: {\rm for}~i=1,\cdots,6,
795: \label{eq:OCM}
796: \\
797: \Lambda_i
798: ~=~ \lambda \sum_{\alpha\in \Phi_i(^{4}{\rm He})} |\phi_\alpha(\wtil{b}_{\alpha})
799: \ket\bra \phi_\alpha(\wtil{b}_{\alpha})|\quad
800: &&
801: {\rm with}~~~\wtil{b}_{\alpha}
802: ~=~ (\sqrt{5/4})\cdot b_{\alpha}.
803: \end{eqnarray}
804: Here $T_r$ and $\wtil{V}_{\alpha n}$ are the kinetic energy
805: operator for the relative motion and the effective \nuc{4}{He}-$n$
806: interaction studied in detail below, respectively.
807: Also, $h_{ij}(^4{\rm He})=\bra \Phi_i | H(^{4}{\rm He}) | \Phi_j \ket$
808: and $\Lambda_i$ is the projection operator to remove the Pauli
809: forbidden states $\phi_\alpha(\wtil{b}_{\alpha})$ from the relative wave
810: functions \cite{Ku86,Ka99}, where $\phi_\alpha(\wtil{b}_{\alpha})$ and
811: $\alpha$ are the h.o.w.f. with the length parameter $\wtil{b}_{\alpha}$
812: and the occupied nucleon orbit in each configuration
813: $\Phi_i(^{4}{\rm He})$, respectively. The value of $\lambda$ is
814: taken as $10^6$~MeV in the present calculation in order to project out the
815: components of the Pauli forbidden states into an unphysical energy
816: region.
817:
818:
819: Before proceeding to the numerical results, we discuss the modification
820: of the effective $NN$ interaction for the \nuc{4}{He} cluster in
821: the extended \nuc{4}{He}+$n$ model. As seen from Eq.~(\ref{eq:OCM}), the \nuc{4}{He}-$n$ interaction
822: $\wtil{V}_{\alpha n}$ and the internal Hamiltonian matrix $h_{ij}$ of
823: the \nuc{4}{He} cluster play an important role, in addition to the
824: antisymmetrization (Pauli) effect described by $\Lambda_i$ in the
825: dynamics of couplings between the internal tensor correlation in
826: the \nuc{4}{He} cluster and the motion of the valence neutron. To
827: see the deviation in energy of the \nuc{4}{He} cluster due to the
828: coupling, it is important to reproduce the asymptotic binding
829: energy of \nuc{4}{He} and the range of the \nuc{4}{He}-$n$
830: interaction. However, our study presented in the previous section shows
831: that the tensor correlation tends to shrink the nucleus of \nuc{4}{He},
832: and as a result, the experimental binding energy cannot be reproduced by the employed $NN$ interactions.
833:
834:
835: \begin{table}[b]
836: \caption{Properties of \nuc{4}{He} in two effective $NN$
837: interactions with the observed binding energy (28.3 MeV) and the
838: matter radius (1.48 fm) being reproduced.} \label{tab:4He3}
839: \begin{center}
840: \begin{tabular}{l|cc}\hline\hline
841: & GA1 & GA2 \\ \hline
842: ($b_{0s}$,$b_{0p}$) & (1.385, 0.75) & (1.385, 0.785) \\ \hline
843: ($\Delta_v$, $\Delta_R)$ & ($-$0.3234, 0.245) & ($-$0.4179, 0.310) \\ \hline
844: $\bra V_T \ket$~~ [MeV]~ & $-$14.5\;~~~ & $-$29.9\,~~ \\ \hline
845: $P(2p$-$2h)$~~ [\%] & 6.9 & 12.5 \\ \hline
846: $P(\Phi_3)$~~~ [\%] & 3.8 & ~\,7.7 \\ \hline
847: $P(D)$~~ [\%] & 3.4 & ~\,6.9 \\ \hline
848: \end{tabular}
849: \end{center}
850: \end{table}
851:
852:
853: With the above considerations, in order to fit the experimental matter radius and binding energy of
854: the \nuc{4}{He} cluster, we introduce a phenomenological effective
855: $NN$ interaction referred to as ``GA1'' by adjusting only the central part,
856: while retaining the tensor and LS parts of the effective interaction AK
857: considered in the previous section.
858: For the central part, we employ GPT, which has a relatively long-range form.
859: The combination of the GPT central part with the tensor and LS parts of AK was called GA0
860: in the previous section. However, we know that GA0 gives a radius of \nuc{4}{He} which is small by about 0.1 fm,
861: as shown in Table~\ref{tab:4He2}.
862: For this reason, in GA1, further modifications needed to reproduce the matter radius are carried out
863: by changing the second range (attractive part) of the GPT central part as follows:
864: \begin{eqnarray}
865: v_2\cdot e^{-(r/R_2)^2}
866: &\to& v'_2\cdot e^{-(r/R'_2)^2}
867: ,\quad
868: v'_2
869: ~=~ v_2 \cdot (1+\Delta_v),
870: \quad
871: R_2'
872: ~=~ R_2 + \Delta_R.
873: \end{eqnarray}
874: We introduce the two parameters $\Delta_v$ and $\Delta_R$ to reproduce
875: the binding energy (28.3 MeV) and matter radius (1.48 fm) of
876: \nuc{4}{He}.
877: The results for \nuc{4}{He} using GA1 are presented in Table~\ref{tab:4He3}.
878: It is found that GA1 incorporates the tensor correlation, but it cannot reproduce a large amount of the $D$-state
879: probability. This shortcoming with regard to the $D$-state probability is improved
880: by strengthening the tensor force by fifty percent, as discussed in \S\ref{sec:4He}. We call this interaction ``GA2''.
881:
882:
883: \begin{figure}[t]
884: \centering
885: \includegraphics[width=13.0cm,clip]{fig4.eps}
886: \caption{The central parts of GA1 (solid curves) and GA2 (dashed curves)
887: in comparison with that of GPT (dotted curves) for even channels.}
888: \label{fig:int_C2}
889: \end{figure}
890:
891:
892: In Fig.~\ref{fig:int_C2}, we show the form of the central parts of GA1 and GA2
893: in comparison to that of GA0, namely, the original GPT central part.
894: It is found that the ranges of the central parts of GA1 and GA2 are extended to the outside region
895: in order to recover the shrinkage effect of the tensor force.
896: This means that the forms of the central forces in the effective interactions with
897: and without the tensor force must be changed with respect to the range.
898: The GA1 and GA2 interactions are regarded as phenomenological effective interactions,
899: constructed in order to allow us to analyze the \nuc{5}{He} structures in this study.
900:
901:
902: \subsection{Effect of the tensor correlation on the doublet splitting and the \nuc{4}{He}-$n$ interaction}
903:
904:
905: We now solve Eq.~(\ref{eq:OCM}) and determine to what extent the tensor correlation of \nuc{4}{He}
906: generates the doublet splitting of $p$-waves in \nuc{5}{He}. For \nuc{4}{He}, we prepare two kinds of
907: wave functions solved using GA1 and GA2, with different strengths of the tensor correlation.
908: For the \nuc{4}{He}-$n$ interaction, $\wtil{V}_{\alpha n}$, in order to elucidate a single effect
909: of the Pauli blocking from the tensor correlation,
910: we consider a Gaussian form for the central part and ignore the LS part, using the following form:
911: \begin{eqnarray}
912: \wtil{V}_{\alpha n}
913: &=& V_0 \cdot \exp(-(r/R_0)^2)\ .
914: \end{eqnarray}
915: The two parameters $V_0$ and $R_0$ are determined so as to reproduce the
916: energy (0.74 MeV) and the width (0.60 MeV) of the resonant \nuc{5}{He}($3/2^-$) state.\cite{Ao95}
917: This \nuc{4}{He}-$n$ interaction $\wtil{V}_{\alpha n}$ depends on the wave functions of \nuc{4}{He}
918: solved with GA1 and GA2 here.
919: For the wave functions obtained with GA1, ($V_0$, $R_0$) are ($-$62.60 MeV, 2.15 fm),
920: and for those obtained with GA2, ($V_0$, $R_0$) are ($-$77.96 MeV, 1.95 fm).
921:
922:
923: The results for two $p$-wave resonant poles are listed in
924: Table~\ref{tab:5He}. It is found that both cases produce visible
925: splits in the energies of the $3/2^-$ and $1/2^-$ states without the LS force,
926: and that GA2 gives a value that is twice as large as that given by GA1,
927: due to the strong Pauli-blocking effect. For comparison, we also
928: calculate poles with the so-called KKNN \nuc{4}{He}-$n$ potential\cite{Ka79}
929: with a simple \nuc{4}{He}[$(0s)^4$]+$n$ model.
930: The KKNN potential is a semi-phenomenological \nuc{4}{He}-$n$ interaction
931: possessing central and LS parts and is constructed to fit the observed
932: $s$- and $p$-wave phase shifts based on the RGM analysis,
933: assuming the $(0s)^4$ configuration of \nuc{4}{He}.
934: Therefore, there is no tensor correlation of \nuc{4}{He} and
935: no Pauli blocking for $p$-waves in the KKNN potential, and
936: the observed splitting is accounted for by only the LS part. In comparison to the KKNN
937: potential, GA2 produces about half of the splitting energy.
938: This is consistent with the results of a previous study\cite{Na59}.
939:
940:
941: \begin{table}[t]
942: \caption{The positions of the $p$-wave resonant poles (energy and width) of
943: \nuc{5}{He}(3/2$^-$,1/2$^-$) measured from the
944: \nuc{4}{He}+$n$ threshold energy for three interactions. $\Delta
945: E$ is the splitting energy. All values are in units of MeV.}
946: \label{tab:5He}
947: \begin{center}
948: \begin{tabular}{c|cccc}\hline\hline
949: & GA1 & GA2 & KKNN \\\hline
950: 3/2$^-$ & (0.74,~0.60) & (0.74,~0.60) & (0.74,~0.60) \\
951: 1/2$^-$ & (1.10,~1.45) & (1.47,~3.10) & (2.13,~5.84) \\\hline
952: $\Delta E$ & 0.36 & 0.73 & 1.39 \\\hline
953: \end{tabular}
954: \end{center}
955: \end{table}
956: \begin{figure}[t]
957: \centering
958: \includegraphics[width=13.0cm,clip]{fig5.eps}
959: \caption{$p$-wave phase shifts of the \nuc{4}{He}+$n$ system
960: measured from the \nuc{4}{He}+$n$ threshold energy for three interactions.}
961: \label{fig:5He_ph1}
962: \end{figure}
963:
964:
965: In Fig.~\ref{fig:5He_ph1}, we show the $p$-wave phase shifts of
966: the extended \nuc{4}{He}+$n$ model using three interactions
967: corresponding to Table~\ref{tab:5He}. We used the level density
968: formalism in the complex scaling method to calculate these phase shifts
969: \cite{Sz04}.
970: It is seen that the splittings in the phase shifts are similar to cases of resonant poles.
971: In the results, the mechanism of the doublet splitting is understood from the viewpoint of the
972: tensor correlation via the Pauli blocking. Our results also
973: indicate that the conventional LS interaction determined to
974: reproduce the observed splitting energy should be weakened when
975: the tensor correlation is taken into account explicitly.
976:
977:
978: It is noted that in some previous studies\cite{Te60},
979: it is claimed that the origin of the doublet splitting in \nuc{5}{He} is the difference
980: between the multiplicities of the $0p_{1/2}$ (two) and $0p_{3/2}$(four) orbits,
981: which lead to different strengths of the Pauli-blocking.
982: However, in our study, this effect contributes only 20\%-30\% of the splitting, and a large mixing of the
983: $0p_{1/2}$ orbit in \nuc{4}{He} caused by the tensor force has a much more important effect.
984: The latter is interpreted as a pion effect considered in other studies\cite{To02,Su04,Og04}.
985:
986:
987: Based on the knowledge obtained in the above analysis, we now
988: construct a reliable \nuc{4}{He}-$n$ interaction $\wtil{V}_{\alpha
989: n}$ including the tensor correlation in the \nuc{4}{He} cluster,
990: which reproduces the observed phase shifts of this system. This
991: interaction is useful for the quantitative studies of the \nuc{5}{He} structure.
992:
993:
994: \begin{table}[t]
995: \caption{Values of the four parameters in the KKNN-T1 and KKNN-T2 potentials}
996: \label{tab:KKNN-T}
997: \begin{center}
998: \begin{tabular}{c|cccc}\hline\hline
999: & $a_C$ & $a^P_C$ & $a_{LS}$ & $V^C_{2}$ [MeV] \\\hline
1000: KKNN-T1 & 1.20 & 0.78 & 0.70 & 100.0 \\
1001: KKNN-T2 & 1.36 & 0.67 & 0.52 & 120.0 \\\hline
1002: \end{tabular}
1003: \end{center}
1004: \end{table}
1005:
1006:
1007: We start from the KKNN potential which consists of the central
1008: and LS parts in the following:
1009: \begin{eqnarray}
1010: \wtil{V}^{\mbox{\scriptsize KKNN}}_{\alpha n}
1011: &=& V_C(r) + V^P_C(r)\cdot P_r + V_{LS}(r) + V^P_{LS}(r)\cdot P_r,
1012: \label{eq:KKNN}
1013: \end{eqnarray}
1014: where $P_r$ is the parity operator with respect to the relative
1015: coordinate $r$. The radial forms of each term in Eq.~(\ref{eq:KKNN})
1016: are described by a linear combination of two- or three-range
1017: Gaussians\cite{Ka79}. Next, we attempt to modify the KKNN potential
1018: in such a way that it cooperates with the blocking effect of the tensor correlation in
1019: the \nuc{4}{He}+$n$ system. As discussed in the previous
1020: subsection, the blocking effect can be quantitatively represented by
1021: repulsive potentials depending on the $p$-wave doublet states,
1022: and the resultant difference between the resonance energies of
1023: the doublet states can be understood as the effect of an LS
1024: interaction. Accordingly, we constructed a new \nuc{4}{He}-$n$
1025: interaction by modifying the form of the KKNN potential as follows:
1026: \begin{eqnarray}
1027: \wtil{V}^{\mbox{\scriptsize KKNN-T}}_{\alpha n}
1028: &=& a_C\cdot V'_C(r) + a^P_C\cdot V^P_C(r)\cdot P_r
1029: + a_{LS}\cdot \bigl\{ V_{LS}(r) + V^P_{LS}(r)\cdot P_r\bigr\}.~
1030: \end{eqnarray}
1031: This potential, which we call the KKNN-T potential, has four
1032: parameters, $a_C$, $a^P_C$, $a_{LS}$ and the potential strength of
1033: the repulsive part in $V'_C(r)$, which is expressed by $V^C_2$.
1034: All the other parts of the $\wtil{V}^{\mbox{\scriptsize KKNN-T}}_{\alpha n}$
1035: are taken to be unchanged from the original KKNN potential. We chose the
1036: set of the four parameters ($a_C$,~$a^P_C$,~$a_{LS}$,~$V^C_2$) so
1037: as to reproduce the observed $s$- and $p$-wave phase shifts by
1038: solving the OCM Eq.~(\ref{eq:OCM}) in the extended \nuc{4}{He}+$n$
1039: model. We construct potentials with two parameter sets, called KKNN-T1 and -T2,
1040: incorporating the tensor correlation induced by GA1 and GA2, respectively.
1041: The parameter sets of the KKNN-T1 and -T2 potentials are listed in Table \ref{tab:KKNN-T}.
1042:
1043:
1044: Since we know that the tensor correlation contributes to the
1045: $p$-wave doublet splitting, the strength of the LS part must be
1046: weaker than that in the original KKNN potential, as seen from the values
1047: of $a_{LS}$ in Table~\ref{tab:KKNN-T}. This reduction effect is
1048: stronger for the KKNN-T2 potential ($a_{LS}=0.52$) than for the KKNN-T1 potential ($a_{LS}=0.70$).
1049: We find that the central part for the $p$-waves is
1050: slightly strengthened in total, and the weak Pauli-blocking
1051: effect and the weak contribution from the LS part for the
1052: $p_{3/2}$ state of \nuc{5}{He} are recovered. The obtained $s$- and $p$-wave phase
1053: shifts are shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:5He_ph2}. We see good agreement
1054: with the experimental data\cite{St72} in both cases.
1055: In this study, the splitting of $p$-wave phase shifts is decomposed into
1056: two kinds of contributions that from the Pauli blocking
1057: due to the tensor correlation and that from the LS part
1058: in the \nuc{4}{He}-$n$ interaction.
1059: In the right panels of Fig.~\ref{fig:5He_ph2}, we can divide
1060: the two contributions using the results obtained by omitting the LS part in KKNN-T1 and -T2 potentials.
1061: It is then found that the KKNN-T2 potential gives a large splitting
1062: from the tensor correlation, about half of the observed one.
1063:
1064:
1065: \begin{figure}[t]
1066: \centering
1067: \includegraphics[width=12.7cm,clip]{fig6.eps}
1068: \includegraphics[width=12.7cm,clip]{fig7.eps}
1069: \caption{Left: $s$- and $p$-wave phase shifts for the \nuc{4}{He}+$n$
1070: system with KKNN-T1 (upper) and KKNN-T2 (lower) in comparison with
1071: the experimental results\cite{St72} represented by the circles.
1072: Right: Decomposition of the $p$-wave doublet splitting. The dashed curves represent the calculations
1073: without the LS force in the KKNN-T1 (upper) and KKNN-T2 (lower) potentials.}
1074: \label{fig:5He_ph2}
1075: \end{figure}
1076: \begin{figure}[t]
1077: \centering
1078: \includegraphics[width=12.7cm,clip]{fig8.eps}
1079: \includegraphics[width=12.7cm,clip]{fig9.eps}
1080: \caption{$d$- and $f$-wave phase shifts of the \nuc{4}{He}+$n$ system
1081: obtained with the KKNN-T1 (upper) and KKNN-T2 (lower) potentials in comparison to those obtained with the
1082: KKNN potential and the experimental results\cite{St72}.
1083: }
1084: \label{fig:5He_ph3}
1085: \end{figure}
1086:
1087: In order to show the reliability of the KKNN-T1 and -T2 potentials,
1088: we also investigate the $d$- and $f$-wave phase shifts
1089: and compare the results obtained using these potentials to those obtained using the KKNN potential shown in
1090: Fig.~\ref{fig:5He_ph3}. The KKNN potential cannot reproduce the
1091: experimental data\cite{Ao95,St72}, in particular, the $d$-waves exhibit
1092: repulsive behaviors, and doublet splittings are larger than the
1093: experimental values in both cases.
1094: Contrastingly, for the KKNN-T1 and -T2 potentials
1095: with the extended \nuc{4}{He}+$n$ model, these discrepancies are decreased,
1096: and calculated phase shifts are closer to their experimental values.
1097: The improvement is confirmed in the KKNN-T2 potential. This success results from the fact
1098: that the tensor correlation in \nuc{4}{He} does not contribute to the $d$- and $f$-waves
1099: as much as in the case of the KKNN potential and that the weakening of the LS part in the
1100: KKNN-T1 and -T2 potentials works well to reproduce the observed
1101: small splittings. These results imply that the description of
1102: higher partial waves in \nuc{5}{He} are naturally improved by
1103: considering the tensor correlation.
1104:
1105:
1106: The ratio of the two contributions of the tensor correlation and
1107: the LS force in the doublet splitting depends on the strength of
1108: the tensor correlation in the \nuc{4}{He} cluster. This point will
1109: be investigated quantitatively in a subsequent study using a hybrid
1110: $V$+$T$ model of \nuc{4}{He}, in order to make the evaluation of the tensor
1111: correlation firmer.
1112:
1113:
1114: The mechanism of the doublet splitting in \nuc{5}{He} is related
1115: to the structure of \nuc{6}{He} concerning the $0p_{1/2}$ orbit,
1116: in particular, resonances\cite{My01}. To examine this, it is
1117: interesting to carry out an extended \nuc{4}{He}+$n$+$n$ model
1118: analysis by considering the tensor correlation in \nuc{4}{He}.
1119:
1120:
1121:
1122: \section{Summary}\label{sec:summary}
1123:
1124:
1125: We have investigated the role of the tensor correlation
1126: in the structure of \nuc{4}{He} and its effect on \nuc{5}{He}.
1127: From the meson theory with a rigorous treatment of the NN interaction,
1128: the contribution of the tensor force to the binding energy of \nuc{4}{He}
1129: is found to be comparable to that of the central force.
1130: But in most nuclear models, the tensor force is not treated
1131: explicitly, and the physical properties of the tensor correlation are not clarified.
1132: The purpose of this paper is to treat the tensor force explicitly
1133: and to understand the essential effects of the tensor correlation.
1134: For this purpose, \nuc{4}{He} and \nuc{5}{He} are good objects of studies, due to the simpleness of their structures.
1135:
1136:
1137: In our study, we adopt a similar framework to the CPPHF proposed by Sugimoto et al.\cite{Su04},
1138: but a simpler and more conventional shell model approach.
1139: For \nuc{4}{He}, we have extended the shell model type wave function from the
1140: original $(0s)^4$ configuration to the $(0s)^4$+$(0s)^2(0p)^2$ configurations,
1141: taking into consideration the properties of the tensor force; that is, in the wave function,
1142: all the $2p$-$2h$ configurations of $(0s)^2(0p)^2$ can be coupled with
1143: the original $(0s)^4$ configuration by the tensor force.
1144: The length parameters of the $0p$ orbits were chosen to be free in order to
1145: take into account the high momentum components induced by the tensor force.
1146: It is found that the obtained wave function composed of the superposition
1147: of all the configurations with spatially modified $0p$ orbits describes
1148: the basic characteristics of the tensor correlation, and that they agree with
1149: those obtained in CPPHF.\cite{Su04}
1150: The numerical results show that the tensor correlation has two characteristics:
1151: One is a strong coupling of the $0s_{1/2}$ orbit to the $0p_{1/2}$ orbit, which
1152: reflects the $0^-$ coupling of the pion nature,
1153: and the other is a large mixing of the excited two-nucleon pair of
1154: the $(0p_{1/2})^2$ configuration, which shows a similar correlation in deuteron.
1155:
1156:
1157: For \nuc{5}{He}, we have studied the Pauli-blocking effect of the tensor correlation
1158: on the $p$-wave doublet splitting.
1159: We clarified that because the $0p_{1/2}$ orbit is preferentially mixed in the $2p$-$2h$ components of \nuc{4}{He}
1160: induced by the coupling from the tensor force with the pion nature,
1161: there arises a coupling produced dominatingly by the Pauli principle
1162: between the $2p$-$2h$ configurations of \nuc{4}{He} and the $p_{1/2}$ valence neutron in \nuc{5}{He}.
1163: This coupling was treated by solving the coupled OCM equation in the extended \nuc{4}{He}+$n$ model.
1164: The calculated results show that the tensor correlation causes about
1165: half of the $p$-wave doublet splitting in \nuc{5}{He},
1166: and the pion nature of the tensor correlation plays an important role in the splitting.
1167: This finding cannot be accounted for within the old understanding\cite{Te60,Na59}.
1168: Our explicit treatment of the tensor correlation leads to a weakening of
1169: the conventional strength of the LS force.
1170: In fact, we have a newly constructed \nuc{4}{He}-$n$ interaction realized through the reduction of
1171: the strength of the LS part by introducing the tensor correlation in \nuc{4}{He}.
1172: This new interaction not only reproduces the $s$- and $p$-wave properties
1173: but also improves the $d$- and $f$-wave phase shifts.
1174: These results demonstrate that the tensor correlation is necessary to reproduce
1175: all the phase shifts of the neutron scattering with \nuc{4}{He} in various partial waves.
1176:
1177:
1178: The tensor correlation depends strongly on the coupling matrix element of the tensor force.
1179: Therefore, one important problem is to study the coupling from the tensor force, as discussed in \S\ref{sec:4He}.
1180: We would like to extend our model wave function for \nuc{4}{He} to the hybrid $V+T$ bases in future analyses.
1181:
1182: \section*{Acknowledgements}
1183:
1184:
1185: The authors would like to thank Prof. H. Toki for fruitful discussions and encouragement.
1186: We also would like to acknowledge valuable discussions with Dr. S. Sugimoto.
1187: We thank Prof. Akaishi for providing us the results of
1188: the $G$-matrix calculation for the AV8' potential.
1189: One of the authors (T. Myo) thanks Mr. R. Suzuki
1190: for helping with the calculation of the phase shifts of the \nuc{4}{He}+$n$ system
1191: using level densities calculated with the complex scaling method.
1192: This work was performed as a part of the ``Research Project for
1193: Study of Unstable Nuclei from Nuclear Cluster Aspects (SUNNCA)''
1194: sponsored by RIKEN.
1195:
1196: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
1197: \bibitem{Ak86} Y.~Akaishi,~Int. Rev. of Nucl. Phys. \textbf{4}(1986), 259.
1198: \bibitem{Ka01} H.~Kamada et al.,~\PRC{64,2001,044001}.
1199: \bibitem{Ak72} Y.~Akaishi, H. Band\=o and S. Nagata,~\PTPS{52,1972,339}.
1200: \bibitem{No00} For example, A. Nogga, H. Kamada and W. Gl\"ockle, \PRL{85,2000,944}.\\
1201: R. B. Wiringa, S. C. Pieper, J. Carlson and V. R. Pandharipande, \PRC{62,2000,014001}.
1202: \bibitem{To02} H.~Toki, S. Sugimoto and K. Ikeda,~\PTP{108,2002,903}.
1203: \bibitem{Su04} S.~Sugimoto,~K. Ikeda and~H.~Toki,~\NPA{740,2004,77}.
1204: \bibitem{Do05} Dot\'e et al., private communication.
1205: \bibitem{Ak04} Y. Akaishi,~\NPA{738,2004,80}.
1206: \bibitem{Te60} T. Terasawa,~\PTP{22,1959,150}; \andvol{23,1960,87},\\
1207: A. Arima and T. Terasawa,~\PTP{23,1960,115}.
1208: \bibitem{Na59} S. Nagata, T.~Sasakawa,~T.~Sawada and R.~Tamagaki,~\PTP{22,1959,274}.
1209: \bibitem{Og04} Y.~Ogawa, H.~Toki,~S. Tamenaga, H. Shen,~A.~Hosaka,~S.~Sugimoto and~K.~Ikeda,~\PTP{111,2004,75}.
1210: \bibitem{Ko78} M.~Kohno,~S.~Nagata and R.~Tamagaki,~\PTP{59,1978,1230}.
1211: \bibitem{Vo65} A.B. Volkov,~\NP{74,1965,33}.
1212: \bibitem{Ta68} R. Tamagaki,~\PTP{39,1968,91}.
1213: \bibitem{Fu80} H. Furutani et al.,~\PTPS{68,1980,193}.
1214: \bibitem{Fu79} H.~Furutani, H. Horiuchi and R. Tamagaki,~\PTP{62,1979,981}.
1215: \bibitem{Ik04} K. Ikeda, S. Sugimoto and H. Toki,~\NPA{738,2004,73}.
1216: \bibitem{Go70} D.~Gogny,~P.~Pires and R.~De~Tourreil,~\PLB{32,1970,591}.
1217: \bibitem{Ao95} S.~Aoyama, S.~Mukai, K.~Kat\=o and K.~Ikeda,~\PTP{93,1995,99}.
1218: \bibitem{Ka99} K,~Kat\=o,~T.~Yamada and K.~Ikeda,~\PTP{101,1999,119}.
1219: \bibitem{My02} T.~Myo, S. Aoyama, K. Kat\=o and K. Ikeda, \PTP{108,2002,133}.
1220: \bibitem{Sa77} S.~Saito,~\PTPS{62,1977,11}.
1221: \bibitem{Ku86} V.~I.~Kukulin,~V.~M.~Krasnopol'sky,~V.~T.~Voronchev and P.~B.~Sazonov,~\NPA{453,1986,365}.
1222: \bibitem{Ka79} H.~Kanada, T. Kaneko, S. Nagata and M. Nomoto, \PTP{61,1979,1327.}
1223: \bibitem{Sz04} R.~Suzuki, T.~Myo and K. Kat\=o, nucl-th/0502012, to be published in Prog. Theor. Phys.
1224: \bibitem{St72} Th. Stammbach~and~R.~L.Walter,~\NPA{180,1972,225}.
1225: \bibitem{My01} T.~Myo, S. Aoyama, K. Kat\=o and K. Ikeda, \PRC{63,2001,054313}.
1226: \end{thebibliography}
1227: \end{document}
1228: