1: \documentclass[12pt]{iopart}
2: \usepackage{graphicx}
3: \usepackage{subfigure}
4:
5: %\bibliographystyle{num}
6:
7: \begin{document}
8:
9: \title{Strange particle production in a single-freeze-out model}
10:
11: \author{W.~Florkowski$^{1,2}$, W.~Broniowski$^1$, and A.~Baran$^1$}
12:
13: \address{$^1$ The H. Niewodnicza\'nski Institute of Nuclear Physics,
14: Polish Academy of Sciences, 31-342 Krak\'ow, Poland}
15: %
16: \address{$^2$ Institute of Physics, \'Swi\c{e}tokrzyska Academy,
17: 25-406 Kielce, Poland}
18:
19: \begin{abstract}
20: The transverse-momentum spectra and elliptic flow of strange particles
21: are calculated in the framework of the single-freeze-out model and compared
22: with the recent RHIC data. An overall very good agreement between the
23: model predictions and the data is obtained.
24: \end{abstract}
25:
26:
27: In this paper we use the single-freeze-out model of Refs.
28: \cite{Broniowski:2001we,Broniowski:2001uk,Broniowski:2002nf} to analyze the
29: production of strange particles in relativistic heavy-ion collisions. The model
30: results are compared with the recent RHIC data on the transverse-momentum spectra
31: and elliptic flow of hyperons \cite{Adams:2003fy,Castillo:2004jy}.
32: In the original formulation \cite{Broniowski:2001we,Broniowski:2001uk,Broniowski:2002nf},
33: the single-freeze-out model is used to describe cylindrically symmetric sytems such as
34: those created in the most central events.
35: A natural extension of the original formulation is obtained by the introduction of the
36: azimuthal asymmetry in both the shape of the freeze-out hyper-surface and the transverse-flow
37: field. The asymmetry of the freeze-out hypersurface is taken into account by the following
38: parameterization \cite{Broniowski:2002wp}:
39: %
40: \begin{eqnarray}
41: t &=& \tau\, \hbox{cosh} \alpha_\parallel \, \hbox{cosh} \alpha_\perp , \quad
42: r_z = \tau\, \hbox{sinh} \alpha_\parallel \, \hbox{cosh} \alpha_\perp
43: , \nonumber \\
44: r_x&=& \tau\, \hbox{sinh} \alpha_\perp \sqrt{1-\epsilon} \,\cos \phi , \quad
45: r_y = \tau\, \hbox{sinh} \alpha_\perp \sqrt{1+\epsilon} \,\sin \phi.
46: \label{rmod}
47: \end{eqnarray}
48: %
49: Here the coordinates $t$ and $r_z$ are kept as in the symmetric formulation:
50: $\tau$ denotes the lifetime of the system, whereas $\alpha_\parallel$ and
51: $\alpha_\perp$ are the longitudinal and transverse space-time rapidity.
52: The $r_x$-axis lies in the reaction plane, and the $r_y$-axis
53: is perpendicular to the reaction plane. The almond-like shape of the system in
54: the transverse plane is achieved by the introduction of the factors
55: $\sqrt{1 \pm \epsilon}$. For positive $\epsilon$ the system is
56: elongated out of the reaction plane, as seen in the experiment.
57: The value of $\epsilon$ is fitted to reproduce the dependence of the $R_{\rm side}$
58: HBT radius on the azimuthal angle \cite{Broniowski:2002wp}.
59: The four-velocity field is defined in the following way:
60: %
61: \begin{eqnarray}
62: u_t = \frac{t}{N}, \quad u_z = \frac{r_z}{N}, \quad
63: u_x = \frac{r_x}{N} \sqrt{1+\delta} \,\cos \phi, \quad
64: u_y = \frac{r_y}{N} \sqrt{1-\delta} \,\sin \phi.
65: \label{umod}
66: \end{eqnarray}
67: %
68: Here the normalization $N$ is taken in such a way that the four-velocity field
69: is properly normalized, $u^\mu u_\mu=1$. Positive $\delta$ means a faster flow in
70: the reaction plane, which corresponds to positive $v_2$. Certainly, the choice (\ref{rmod},
71: \ref{umod}) is by no means unique, but it takes into account the essential
72: features found in the experiments.
73:
74:
75: \begin{figure}[b]
76: \begin{center}
77: \includegraphics[width=9cm]{casti.eps}
78: \end{center}
79: \caption{Comparison of our prediction \cite{Broniowski:2001uk}
80: on the production of $\Xi$ and $\Omega+{\bar \Omega}$
81: in Au-Au collisions at the energy $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = $ 130 GeV
82: with the final data for most central collisions
83: published by the STAR Collaboration \cite{Adams:2003fy}. }
84: \end{figure}
85:
86: The transverse-momentum spectra are calculated from the Cooper-Frye formula
87: \cite{Cooper:1974mv}
88: %
89: \begin{equation}
90: \frac{dN}{d^{2}p_{\perp }dy}
91: =
92: \int p^{\mu }d\Sigma _{\mu }\ f\left(p\cdot u\right),
93: \label{Ni}
94: \end{equation}
95: %
96: where $d\Sigma_\mu$ denotes the element of the hypersurface defined by Eq. (\ref{rmod}),
97: the four-velocity $u$ is defined by Eq. (\ref{umod}), and the hadron
98: distribution functions $f$ include sequential decays of the resonances, as
99: described in a greater detail in Refs. \cite{Broniowski:2001uk,Broniowski:2002nf}.
100: Then, the coefficient of the elliptic flow is obtained from the formula
101: %
102: \begin{equation}
103: v_2(p_\perp) = { \int\limits_0^{2\pi} d\phi \frac{dN}{d^{2}p_{\perp }dy} \cos(2\phi)
104: \over \int\limits_0^{2\pi} d\phi \frac{dN}{d^{2}p_{\perp }dy} }.
105: \label{v2}
106: \end{equation}
107:
108:
109: We note that the
110: parameters of the model may be classified into three independently-fitted groups: the two
111: {\it thermodynamic parameters} (temperature $T$ and the baryon chemical potential $\mu_B$)
112: are obtained from the study of the ratios of hadronic abundances \cite{Florkowski:2001fp};
113: the two {\it geometric parameters } (the lifetime of the system $\tau$ and the radius of
114: the firecylinder $\rho_{\rm max} = \tau \, \hbox{sinh} \alpha^{\rm max}_\perp$)
115: are obtained from the study of the azimuthally averaged transverse-momentum spectra;
116: and, finally, the two {\it deformation parameters} ($\epsilon$ and $\delta$)
117: are obtained from the experimental information on $R_{\rm side}$ and the $v_2$
118: coefficient.
119:
120:
121: It is important to stress that in the fits of the geometric and deformation parameters we
122: use only the data for the most abundant particles (pions, kaons, protons and antiprotons).
123: In this way, the calculation of the
124: transverse-momentum spectra or $v_2$ of strange particles may be regarded as the prediction
125: of the model. An example of such a procedure is the calculation of the
126: transverse-momentum spectra of hyperons \cite{Broniowski:2001uk}. In Fig. 1 we can see the
127: comparison of the predicted spectra for the energy $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = $ 130 GeV
128: with the final results published recently by the STAR
129: Collaboration \cite{Adams:2003fy}. In this case the most central collisions are taken into
130: account, hence $\epsilon=0$ and $\delta=0$. The fit of the remaining parameters gives:
131: $T =$ 165~MeV, $\mu_B=$ 41~MeV, $\tau = 7.66$ fm, and $\rho_{\rm max}$ = 6.69 fm
132: \cite{Broniowski:2001uk}. We can observe a very good agreement of the model predictions
133: with the data. A similar comparison for other particles can be found in
134: \cite{Broniowski:2001uk,Broniowski:2002wp2}.
135: The overall agreement is satisfactory although some discrapancies for the case of
136: Lambdas (normalization) or antiprotons may be noticed.
137: %
138: \begin{figure}[b]
139: \begin{center}
140: \includegraphics[width=10.5cm]{v2ph200mba.eps}
141: \end{center}
142: \caption{The fit of the elliptic-flow coefficient $v_2$ for pions, kaons,
143: and (anti)protons. The symbols represent preliminary minimum bias data from the
144: PHENIX Collaboration collected at the energy $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV (presented
145: by Voloshin in Ref. \cite{Voloshin:2002wa} ) .}
146: \end{figure}
147:
148: In Fig. 2 we show the fit to the PHENIX minimum-bias data for the energy
149: $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = $ 200 GeV showing the $p_\perp$-dependence
150: of the $v_2$ coefficient of pions, kaons, and (anti)protons \cite{Voloshin:2002wa}.
151: In this case the values of the thermodynamic parameters are:
152: $\mbox{$T$ = 165 MeV}$ and $\mu_B = 26$ MeV,
153: whereas the values of the geometric parameters are $\tau = 4.04$ fm and $\rho_{\rm max} =
154: 3.90$ fm \cite{Baran:2003nm,AnnaBaranPhD}. The new experimental information
155: contained in the $p_\perp$-dependence of the $v_2$ coefficient allows us to fit
156: the value of $\delta$. In the considered case we find
157: $\delta = 0.25$, while $\epsilon = 0.13$ has been read off from the
158: azimuthally-dependent HBT data \cite{Broniowski:2002wp}.
159: The solid lines in Fig. 2 correspond to the calculations
160: done without the inclusion of the sequential hadronic decays, while the dotted lines
161: describe the results obtained with the full feeding from such decays. We conclude
162: that the effects of the resonance decays are not important for the good
163: description of the elliptic-flow coefficient $v_2$ (nota bene, the effects of
164: the hadronic decays are crucial for good description of the $p_\perp$-spectra).
165: A very good descrition of the discussed data has been achieved by Hirano and Tsuda
166: in their full hydrodynamical calculation \cite{Hirano}.
167:
168:
169:
170: The values of the parameters obtained in the analysis of the production of
171: the most abundant particles may be used to obtain the function $v_2(p_\perp)$ for
172: strange particles. In Fig. 3
173: we show a comparison of the model calculation with the data representing
174: the elliptic flow of the Lambda ($\Lambda + {\bar \Lambda}$) and, what is
175: especially interesting, of the multistrange baryons \cite{Castillo:2004jy}.
176: In both cases we find a very good agreement.
177:
178: \begin{figure}[t]
179: \begin{center}
180: \subfigure{\includegraphics[angle=0,width=0.49\textwidth]{v2lambmb.eps}}
181: \subfigure{\includegraphics[angle=0,width=0.49\textwidth]{OMIKSI.eps}} \\
182: \end{center}
183: \caption{The $v_2$ coefficient for the sum $\Lambda+{\bar \Lambda}$ (left) and
184: multistrange baryons (right). The points show the minimum-bias data from STAR
185: collected at the beam energy $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. The model parameters are
186: the same as those obtained in the analysis of the most abundant
187: particles measured in the
188: minimum-bias events by PHENIX, shown in Fig. 2.}
189: \end{figure}
190:
191: As a conclusion, we would like to emphasize that the single freeze-out model
192: describes in the unified way the production of ordinary and strange hadrons
193: in the soft region $p_\perp < 2$ GeV.
194: The values of the parameters extracted from the pion, kaon, and (anti)proton
195: data allow us
196: to make predictions about the behavior of strange particles. Such
197: predictions give a satisfactory description of the experimental data.
198:
199: This research was supported in part by the Polish State Committee for
200: Scientific Research, grant number 2~P03B~05925.
201:
202: %\bibliography{liter}
203:
204: \begin{thebibliography}{10}
205: \expandafter\ifx\csname url\endcsname\relax
206: \def\url#1{\texttt{#1}}\fi
207: \expandafter\ifx\csname urlprefix\endcsname\relax\def\urlprefix{URL }\fi
208:
209: \bibitem{Broniowski:2001we}
210: W.~Broniowski, W.~Florkowski, Phys. Rev. Lett., {\bf 87} (2001) 272302.
211:
212: \bibitem{Broniowski:2001uk}
213: W.~Broniowski, W.~Florkowski, Phys. Rev., {\bf C65} (2002) 064905.
214:
215: \bibitem{Broniowski:2002nf}
216: W.~Broniowski, A.~Baran, W.~Florkowski, Acta Phys. Polon., {\bf B33} (2002)
217: 4235.
218:
219: \bibitem{Adams:2003fy}
220: J.~Adams, {\it et~al.}, STAR, Phys. Rev. Lett., {\bf 92} (2004) 182301.
221:
222: \bibitem{Castillo:2004jy}
223: J.~Castillo, STAR, J. Phys., {\bf G30} (2004) S1207.
224:
225: \bibitem{Broniowski:2002wp}
226: W.~Broniowski, A.~Baran, W.~Florkowski, AIP Conf. Proc., {\bf 660} (2003)
227: 185--195, nucl-th/0212053.
228:
229: \bibitem{Cooper:1974mv}
230: F.~Cooper, G.~Frye, Phys. Rev., {\bf D10} (1974) 186.
231:
232: \bibitem{Florkowski:2001fp}
233: W.~Florkowski, W.~Broniowski, M.~Michalec, Acta Phys. Polon., {\bf B33} (2002)
234: 761.
235:
236: \bibitem{Voloshin:2002wa}
237: S.~A. Voloshin, Nucl. Phys., {\bf A715} (2003) 379.
238:
239: \bibitem{Broniowski:2002wp2}
240: W.~Florkowski and W.~Broniowski, AIP Conf. Proc., {\bf 660} (2003)
241: 177--184, nucl-th/0212052.
242:
243: \bibitem{Baran:2003nm}
244: A.~Baran, W.~Broniowski, W.~Florkowski, Acta Phys. Polon., {\bf B35} (2004)
245: 779.
246:
247: \bibitem{AnnaBaranPhD}
248: A.~Baran, ~PhD Thesis, unpublished.
249:
250: \bibitem{Hirano}
251: T.~Hirano and K.~Tsuda, Phys. Rev., {\bf C66} (2002) 054905.
252:
253: \end{thebibliography}
254:
255:
256:
257: \end{document}
258:
259: