1:
2: %\documentclass{elsart}
3: \documentclass{ws-procs9x6}
4:
5: \usepackage{graphicx}
6:
7: \usepackage{amssymb}
8:
9:
10: \begin{document}
11:
12: %\section{WCI3 - Neck Dynamics}
13: %\setcounter{figure}{0}
14: %\setcounter{equation}{0}
15:
16:
17: \title{Isospin in Reaction Dynamics. The Case of Dissipative Collisions at
18: Fermi Energies}
19:
20: \author{M. Di Toro}
21:
22: \address{Laboratori Nazionali del Sud INFN, Phys.Astron. Dept.
23: Catania University\\
24: Via S. Sofia 62, \\
25: I-95123 Catania, Italy\\
26: E-mail: ditoro@lns.infn.it}
27:
28: \maketitle
29:
30: \abstracts
31: {A key question in the physics of
32: unstable nuclei is the knowledge of the $EOS$ for asymmetric nuclear
33: matter ($ANM$) away from normal conditions.
34: We recall that the symmetry energy at low densities has important effects
35: on the neutron skin structure, while the knowledge in
36: high densities region is crucial for supernovae dynamics
37: and neutron star properties. The $only$ way to probe such region
38: of the isovector $EOS$ in terrestrial laboratories is through
39: very dissipative collisions of asymmetric (up to exotic) heavy ions
40: from low to relativistic energies. A general introduction to the
41: topic is firstly presented. We pass then to a detailed discussion
42: on the $neck-fragmentation$ process as the main dissipative mechanism at
43: the Fermi energies and to the related isospin dynamics.
44: From Stochastic Mean Field simulations the isospin effects on all the
45: phases of the reaction
46: dynamics are thoroughly analysed, from the fast nucleon emission to
47: the mid-rapidity fragment formation up to the dynamical fission of the
48: $spectator$ residues. Simulations have been performed with an increasing
49: stiffness of the symmetry term of the $EOS$.
50: Some differences
51: have been noticed, especially for the fragment charge asymmetry.
52: New isospin effects have been revealed from the correlation of fragment
53: asymmetry with dynamical quantities at the freeze-out time.
54: A series of isospin sensitive observables to be further
55: measured are finally listed.}
56:
57:
58: \section{Introduction}
59:
60:
61: While we
62: are planning second and third generation facilities for
63: radioactive beams our basic knowledge of the symmetry
64: term of the $EOS$ is still extremely poor.
65: Effective interactions are obviously tuned to symmetry properties
66: around normal conditions and any extrapolation can be quite
67: dangerous. Microscopic approaches based on realistic $NN$
68: interactions, Brueckner or variational schemes, or on effective
69: field theories show a rather large variety of predictions.
70: While all the potential symmetry energies obviously cross at normal
71: density $\rho_0$, quite
72: large differences are present for values, slopes and curvatures
73: in low density and particularly in high density
74: regions.
75: Moreover even at the relatively well known ``crossing point'' at normal
76: density the various effective forces are presenting controversial
77: predictions for the momentum dependence of the fields acting on
78: the nucleons and consequently for the splitting of the neutron/proton
79: effective masses, of large interest for nuclear structure and dynamics.
80:
81: In the recent years under the stimulating perspectives offered from
82: nuclear astrophysics and from the new Radioactive Ion Beam ($RIB$) facilities
83: a relevant activity has started in the field of the isospin degree of freedom
84: in heavy ion reactions, see \cite{BaoJMPE7,Isospin01,DitoroEPJA13}.
85: Here we quickly review the field trying to pin down the most interesting
86: theory
87: questions and eventually the related key observables.
88:
89: The slope and curvature of the density dependence of the symmetry term
90: around saturation is related
91: to physics properties of exotic nuclei, bulk densities, neutron distributions
92: and monopole frequencies. The momentum dependence of the interactions in the
93: isovector channel can be analysed discussing the effects
94: on the energy-slope of the Lane Potential at normal density and
95: on the symmetry field seen by high momentum nucleons \cite{Erice98,BaranPR05}.
96:
97: The study of symmetry properties at
98: low density is important for
99: the Liquid-Gas Phase
100: Transition in Asymmetric Matter.
101: A dynamical approach of great relevance since
102: it leads to the space-time properties of the unstable normal modes
103: which give rise to fragments inside the extended spinodal boundary.
104: Characteristic coupled dispersion relations must be solved.
105: We remind that the coupling of the isoscalar and isovector
106: collective response is well known for stable modes \cite{GR98,HamamotoPRC60}
107: in neutron rich exotic nuclei,
108: with transition densities that show a mixed nature. We can extend the same
109: results to the unstable responses of interest in fragmentation reactions.
110: The mixed nature of the unstable
111: density oscillations will naturally lead to the {\it isospin distillation}
112: effect, i.e. a different {\it concentration} ($N/Z$) between the liquid
113: and the gas phase \cite{MuellerPRC52,BaranPRL86,ColonnaPRL88,MargueronPRC67}.
114: We can expect that quantitatively this effect will be dependent
115: on properties of the symmetry energy in very dilute matter, well below the
116: saturation point.
117:
118: The early emission of particles in heavy ion collisions is
119: relevant for understanding both the reaction dynamics and the mechanism of
120: particle production. The density
121: behavior of the symmetry potential largely influences the value of the
122: pressure that is governing the early reaction dynamics
123: \cite{DanielNPA685}. Therefore
124: we can predict important symmetry effects
125: on transport properties ( fast particle emission, collective flows)
126: in the asymmetric $NM$ that will
127: be probed by Radioactive Beam collisions at Fermi and intermediate energies.
128: Different
129: parametrizations in the momentum dependence of the isovector channel
130: can be tested, in particular the transport effect of
131: the sign of the $n/p$ effective mass splitting $m^*_n-m^*_p$ in
132: asymmetric matter at high baryon and isospin density
133: \cite{RizzoNPA732,BaranPR05}.
134:
135: The Fermi
136: energy domain represents the transition
137: region between a dynamics mainly driven by the mean-field,
138: below $15-20~AMeV$,
139: and the one where the nucleon-nucleon collisions play a central role,
140: above $100~AMeV$. We can have then a very rich variety of dissipative
141: reaction mechanisms, with related different isospin dynamics.
142: One of the new distinctive features is the enhanced production of
143: Intermediate Mass Fragments $(IMF, 3 \le Z \le 20)$. We analyse then
144: with great detail the isovector channel effect on the onset of the
145: fragmentation
146: mechanism and on the isotopic content of the produced fragments.
147: In the reaction simulations it is essential the use of a
148: {\it Stochastic Transport Approach} since fluctuations, instabilities and
149: dynamical branchings are very important in this energy range
150: \cite{ColonnaNPA642,ColonnaNPA742}.
151: With the centrality of the collision we can have different
152: scenarios for
153: fragment production, from the growing instabilities of dilute matter in central
154: reactions to the cluster formation at the interface between low and normal
155: density regions in semicentral collisions. We can then expect a large variety
156: of isospin effects, probing different regions of the symmetry energy
157: below saturation.
158:
159: The traditional approach to nuclear physics starts from non-relativistic
160: formalisms in which non-nucleonic degrees of freedom are integrated out
161: giving nucleon-nucleon potentials. Then nuclear matter is described as a
162: collection of quantum nonrelativistic nucleons interacting through an
163: istantaneous effective potential. Although this approach has had a great
164: success, a more appropriate set of degrees of freedom consists of strongly
165: interacting effective hadron fields, mesons and baryons. These variables
166: are the most efficient in a wide range of densities and temperatures and
167: they are the degrees of freedom actually observed in experiments, in
168: particular in Heavy Ion Collisions at intermediate energies.
169: Moreover this framework appears in any case a fundamental ``Doorway Step''
170: towards a more microscopic understanding of the nuclear matter.
171: Relativistic contributions to the isospin physics for static properties
172: and reaction dynamics deserve an appropriate discussion.
173:
174:
175: The $QHD$ (Quantum-Hadro-Dynamics) effective field model represents a
176: very successful attempt to
177: describe, in a fully consistent relativistic picture, equilibrium and
178: dynamical properties of nuclear systems at the hadronic
179: level \cite{WaleckaAP83,SerotIJMPE6}.
180: The same isospin physics described in detail at the
181: non-relativistic level can be naturally reproduced. Moreover some new
182: genuine relativistic effects can be revealed, due to the covariant structure
183: of the effective interactions.
184: One of the main points of the discussion is the relevance of the coupling
185: to a scalar isovector channel, the effective $\delta[a_0(980)]$ meson, not
186: considered in the usual nuclear structure studies
187: \cite{LiuboPRC65,GrecoPRC67}.
188: Particular attention is
189: devoted to the expectations for the splitting of the nucleon effective
190: masses in asymmetric matter, with a detailed analysis of the
191: relationship between the Dirac masses of the effective field approach and
192: the Schr\"odinger masses of the non-relativistic models.
193: A relativistic Dirac-Lane potential is deduced, which shows a structure
194: very similar to the Lane potential of the non-relativistic optical
195: model, but now in terms of isovector self-energies and coupling constants
196: \cite{BaranPR05}.
197:
198: The Relativistic Mean Field ($RMF$) approximation is allowing
199: more physics transparent results, often even analytical. We must
200: always keep a close connection to the more microscopic
201: Dirac-Brueckner-Hartree-Fock ($DBHF$) approaches, in their extension to
202: asymmetric matter, \cite{LeePRC57,JongPRC57,HofmannPRC64,DalenarNPA744}
203: It is
204: well known that correlations are naturally leading to a density
205: dependence of the coupling constants, see ref.\cite{JongPRC57} for the
206: $DBHF$ calculations
207: and ref.\cite{GrecoPRC64} just for the basic Fock correlations.
208: Within the $RMF$ model we can get a clear qualitative estimation of the
209: contribution
210: of the various fields to the nuclear dynamics. The price to pay is that
211: when we try to get quantitative effects we are forced to use different
212: sets of couplings in different baryon density regions.
213: In this case we can use the $DBHF$ results as guidelines
214: \cite{GrecoPLB562,GaitanosNPA732,GaitanosPLB595}.
215:
216: Results for relativistic Heavy Ion Collisions ($HIC$) in the $AGeV$
217: beam energy region, for collective flows, charged
218: pion production and isospin stopping, are presented
219: in refs. \cite{GrecoPLB562,GaitanosNPA732,GaitanosPLB595}.
220: We recall that intermediate energy $HIC$'s represent the only way
221: to probe in terrestrial laboratories the in-medium effective interactions
222: far from saturation, at high densities as well as at high momenta.
223: Within a relativistic
224: transport model it is shown that the
225: isovector-scalar $\delta$-meson, which affects the high density
226: behavior of the symmetry term and the nucleon effective mass splitting,
227: influences the
228: isospin dynamics. The effect is largely enhanced by a relativistic
229: mechanism related to the covariant nature of the fields
230: contributing to the isovector channel. The possibility is emerging of
231: a direct measurement of the Lorentz structure of the effective
232: nuclear interaction in the isovector channel.
233: Very sensitive quantities appear to be the elliptic flow, related to
234: the time scale of the particle emissions, and the isospin transparency in
235: central collisions.
236:
237: \section{Neck Dynamics at the Fermi Energies: Theory Survey}
238:
239: The possibility of observation of new effects, beyond the Deep-Inelastic
240: binary picture, in fragment formation for semicentral collisions with
241: increasing energy was advanced on the basis of the reaction dynamics
242: studied with transport models \cite{BertschPLB141,ColonnaNPA541,SobotkaPRC50}.
243: The presence of a time matching between the instability growth in the dilute
244: overlap zone and the expansion-separation time scale was suggesting
245: the observation of mean field instabilities first at the level of
246: anomalous widths in the mass/charge/... distributions of Projectile-Like
247: or Target-Like ($PLF/TLF$) residues in binary events, then through a direct
248: formation
249: of fragments in the $neck-region$, \cite{ColonnaNPA589,Erice98}.
250: It is clear that in the transport simulations stochastic terms should be
251: consistently built in the kinetic equations in order to have a correct
252: description of instability effects. Stochastic Mean Field approaches
253: have been introduced, that well reproduce the presently available data
254: and reveal a large predictive power,
255: \cite{DitNPA681,BaranNPA703,BaranNPA730,BaranPR05}.
256:
257: In conclusion at the Fermi energies we expect an interplay between binary
258: and $neck-fragmentation$ events, where Intermediate Mass Fragments ($IMF$,
259: in the range $3 \le Z \le 10$) are directly formed in the overlapping region,
260: roughly at mid-rapidity in semicentral reactions. The competition
261: between the two mechanisms is expected to be rather sensitive to the
262: nuclear equation of state, in particular to its compressibility that will
263: influence the interaction time as well as the density oscillation in the
264: $neck-region$. In the case of charge asymmetric colliding systems the
265: poorly known stiffness of the symmetry term will also largely influence
266: the reaction dynamics. An observable sensitive to the stiffness of the
267: symmetry term can be just the relative yield of incomplete fusion vs.
268: deep-inelastic vs neck-fragmentation events \cite{ColonnaPRC57}.
269: Moreover for n-rich systems in the asy-soft case we expect more interaction
270: time available for charge equilibration. This means that even the binary
271: events will show a sensitivity through a larger isospin diffusion. At variance,
272: in the asy-stiff case the two final fragments will keep more memory of the
273: initial conditions.
274:
275: Systematic transport studies of isospin effects in the neck dynamics have been
276: performed so far for collisions of Sn-Sn isotopes at 50AMeV
277: \cite{DitNPA681,BaranNPA703}, Sn-Ni isotopes at 35AMeV
278: \cite{BaranNPA730,BaranPR05} and finally Fe-Fe and Ni-Ni, mass 58, at
279: 30 and 47 AMeV \cite{LiontiarX05}.
280:
281: We show in Fig. \ref{iso6} the density contour plots
282: of a neck fragmetation event at $b=6fm$, for the
283: reaction $^{124}Sn+$$^{124}Sn$ at $50AMeV$, obtained
284: from the numerical calculations based on the stochastic transport
285: approach described before, \cite{BaranNPA703}.
286: \begin{figure}
287: \centering
288: \includegraphics*[scale=0.35]{itjpfig1.ps}
289: \caption{$^{124}Sn+^{124}Sn$ collision at $50AMeV$: time evolution of the
290: nucleon density projected on the reaction plane.
291: Left column: $b=4fm$. Right column: $b=6fm$.}
292: \label{iso6}
293: \end{figure}
294:
295: We clearly see neck-fragmentation events even at lower energies, now
296: mostly ternary. For the system $^{124}Sn$+$^{64}Ni$ at $35 AMeV$ ($b=6fm$),
297: neck instabilities favour the appearance of $NIMF$'s,
298: after $150fm/c$, in a variety of places and ways as can be seen
299: by looking at Fig.\ref{neck3}, \cite{BaranNPA730}. For four events, we
300: illustrate
301: two characteristic stages, the early phase of the fragment formation process
302: and the configuration close to freeze-out.
303:
304: \begin{figure}
305: \centering
306: \includegraphics*[scale=0.40]{itjpfig2.ps}
307: \caption{Density contour plots for $^{124}Sn$+$^{64}Ni$ at $35 AMeV$
308: ($b=6fm$). Early stage of fragment
309: formation (top)
310: and same events close to the freeze-out (bottom) for four ternary cases a), b), c), d)
311: in neck fragmentation.}
312: \label{neck3}
313: \end{figure}
314:
315: \section{Neck Dynamics at the Fermi Energies: Experimental Survey}
316:
317: It is now quite well established that the largest part of the reaction
318: cross section for dissipative collisions at Fermi energies goes
319: through the {\it Neck Fragmentation} channel, with $IMF$s directly
320: produced in the interacting zone in semiperipheral collisions on very short
321: time scales. We can expect different isospin effects for this new
322: fragment formation mechanism since cluster are formed still in a dilute
323: asymmetric matter but always in contact with the regions of the
324: Projectile-Like and Target-Like remnants almost at normal densities.
325:
326: A first evidence of this new dissipative mechanism was suggested
327: at quite low energies, around $19AMeV$, in semicentral $^{100}Mo+^{100}Mo$,
328: $^{120}Sn+^{120}Sn$ reactions \cite{CasiniPRL71,StefaniniZFA351}.
329: A transition from binary, deep-inelastic, to ternary events was observed,
330: with a fragment formed dynamically
331: that influences the fission-like decay of the primary
332: projectile-like ($PLF$) and target-like ($TLF$) partners.
333: Similar conclusions were reached in \cite{TokePRL75}.
334: Consistent with
335: the dynamical scenario was the anisotropic azimuthal distribution of IMF's.
336: In fact the $IMF$ {\it alignement} with respect to the ($PLF^*$) velocity
337: direction has been one clear property of the ``neck-fragments'' first
338: noticed by Montoya et al.\cite{MontoyaPRL73} for
339: $^{129}Xe + ^{63,65}Cu$ at $50AMeV$.
340:
341: A rise and fall of the neck mechanism for mid-rapidity fragments
342: with the centrality, with a maximum for intermediate
343: impact parameters $b \simeq \frac{1}{2} b_{max}$,
344: as observed in \cite{LukasikPRC55},
345: suggests the special
346: physical conditions required.
347: The size of the participant zone is of course important but it
348: appears that a good time matching between the reaction and the
349: neck instabilities time-scales is also needed, as suggested in
350: refs. \cite{BertschPLB141,ColonnaNPA589}.
351: In fact a simultaneous presence, in noncentral collisions,
352: of different $IMF$ production mechanisms
353: at midrapidity was inferred in several experiments
354: \cite{LefortNPA662,PlagnolPRC61,LarochellePRC62,GingrasPRC65,DavinPRC65,BocageNPA676,ColinPRC67,PaganoNPA734}.
355:
356: We can immediately predict an
357: important isospin dependence of the neck dynamics, from the presence of
358: large density
359: gradients and from the possibility of selecting various time-scales
360: for the fragment formation.
361: The first evidences of isospin effects in neck fragmentation
362: were suggested by Dempsey et al. in \cite{DempseyPRC54} from
363: semiperipheral collisions of the systems $^{124,136}Xe +$ $^{112,124}Sn$
364: at $55AMeV$, where
365: correlations between the average number of $IMF$'s,
366: $N_{IMF}$, and neutron and charged particle multiplicities
367: were measured.
368: The variation of the relative yields of
369: $^{6}He/$$^{3,4}He$, $^{6}He/Li$
370: with $v_{par}$ for several $Z_{PLF}$ gates
371: shows that the fragments produced in the midvelocity
372: region are more neutron rich than are the fragments
373: emitted by the $PLF$.
374: Enhanced $triton$ production an midrapidity was considered
375: in ref.\cite{LukasikPRC55}, and more recently in \cite{PoggiNPA685},
376: as an indication of a neutron neck enrichement.
377:
378: P.M. Milazzo et al. \cite{MilazzoPLB509,MilazzoNPA703} analyzed the
379: the $IMF$ parallel velocity distribution for $^{58}Ni$$+ ^{58}Ni$
380: semiperipheral collision at $30AMeV$. The two-bumps structure
381: for $IMF$s with $5 \le Z \le 12$,
382: located around the center of mass velocity and close
383: to the quasiprojectile ($PLF^*$) source respectively,
384: was explained assuming the simultaneous presence of two
385: production mechanisms:
386: the statistical disassembly of an equilibrated $PLF^*$ and
387: the dynamical fragmentation of the participant region.
388: The average elemental event multiplicity $N(Z)$
389: exhibits a different trend for the two processes: more n-rich
390: in the mid-rapidity source..
391: This experiment has a particular importance since
392: isospin effects were clearly observed, {\it in spite of the very low
393: inital asymmetry}.
394: The same reactions have been recently studied at the Cyclotron Inst.
395: of Texas $A\&M$ at various beam energies with measurements of the correlations
396: of fragment charge/mass vs. dynamical observables (emission angles and
397: velocities) \cite{ShettyPRC68R,ShettyPRC70}.
398:
399: \subsection*{Isospin Diffusion}
400:
401: The isospin equilibration appears of large interest
402: even for more peripheral collisions, where we have
403: shorter interaction times, less overlap and a competition
404: between binary and neck-fragmentation processes. The low density
405: neck formation and the preequilibrium emission are adding
406: essential differences with respect to what
407: is happening in the lower energies regime.
408: Tsang et al. \cite{TsangPRL92} have probed the isospin
409: diffusion mechanism for the systems $^{124}Sn +$ $^{112}Sn$ at
410: $E=50AMeV$ in a peripheral impact parameter range $b/b_{max}>0.8$,
411: observing the isoscaling features of the light
412: isotopes $Z=3-8$ emitted around the projectile rapidity.
413: An incomplete equilibration has been deduced. The
414: value of the isoscaling parameter $\alpha=0.42 \pm 0.02$
415: for $^{124}Sn +$ $^{112}Sn$ differs substantialy from
416: $\alpha=0.16 \pm 0.02$ for $^{112}Sn +$ $^{124}Sn$.
417: The isospin imbalance ratio \cite{RamiPRL84}, defined as
418:
419: \begin{equation}\label{imb}
420: R_{i}(x) = \frac{ 2 x - {x}^{124+124} - {x}^{112+112}}
421: {{x}^{124+124} - {x}^{112+112}}
422: \end{equation}
423:
424: ($i=P,T$ refers to the projectile/target rapidity measurement,
425: and $x$ is an isospin dependent observable, here
426: the isoscaling $\alpha$ parameter) was estimated to be
427: around $R_P(\alpha)=0.5$
428: (vs.$R_P(\alpha)=0.0$ in full equilibration).
429: This quantity can be sensitive to the
430: density dependence of symmetry energy term since the
431: isospin transfer takes place through the lower density
432: neck region.
433:
434: \section{Neck Observables}
435:
436:
437: \subsubsection*{
438: Properties of Neck-Fragments, mid-rapidity $IMF$ produced in semicentral
439: collisions: correlations between $N/Z$, $alignement$ and size}
440:
441: The alignement between $PLF-IMF$ and $PLF-TLF$ directions
442: represents a very convincing evidence of the dynamical origin of the
443: mid-rapidity fragments produced on short time scales \cite{BaranNPA730}.
444: In fact a very selective correlation is provided by the anisotropy
445: in the fragment emission, measured by the in-plane azimuthal angle,
446: $\Phi_{plane}$, defined as the angle between
447: the projection of the $PL-IMF$ scission axis onto the reaction plane and
448: the separation axis between $PLF$ and $TLF$, \cite{StefaniniZFA351}.
449: A $\vert \Phi_{plane} \vert \simeq 0$ collects events
450: corresponding to asymmetric ``fissions'' of the $PL$-system very aligned
451: along the outgoing $PL-TL$ separation axis. At variance a statistical
452: fission dominance
453: would correspond to a flat $\Phi_{plane}$ behavior.
454: The form of the
455: $\Phi_{plane}$ distributions (centroid and width) can give a direct
456: information on the fragmentation mechanism \cite{Dynfiss05}.
457:
458: \subsubsection*{Time-scale measurements}
459:
460: The estimation of time scales for fragment formation from velocity
461: correlations appears to be a very exciting possibility
462: \cite{PaganoNPA734,Velcorr04}. With a good event by event detection of
463: the $TL/PL$ residues we can measure the violations of the Viola systematics
464: for the $TLF-IMF$ and $PLF-IMF$ systems which tell us how much the $IMFs$
465: are uncorrelated to the $spectator$ remnants \cite{wilcz}.
466:
467: For each Neck-$IMF$ we can evaluate the ratios
468: $r=v_{rel}(PLF)/v_{viola}(PLF)$, ($r1=v_{rel}(TLF)/v_{viola}(TLF)$).
469: In Figure \ref{wilcz2}
470: we plot $r1$ against $r$ for each $NIMF$ for the $Sn+Ni$ reaction
471: \cite{BaranNPA730}.
472: We call such a representation
473: a $Wilczynski-2$ plot \cite{wilcz}.
474: The solid lines represent the loci of the $PL$-($r=1$) and $TL$-($r1=1$)
475: fission events respectively.
476: The values $(r,r1)$ appear simultaneously
477: larger than $1$ suggesting a weak $NIMF$ correlation with {\it both}
478: $PLF$ and $TLF$, in contrast to a statistical fission mechanism.
479: The process has some similarities
480: with the participant-spectator scenario. However the dynamics appear much
481: richer than in the simple sudden abrasion model, where the locus of
482: the $r-r1$ correlation should be on mainly the bisectrix. Here the wide
483: distributions
484: of Fig.\ref{wilcz2} reveal
485: a broad range of fragment velocities, typical of the
486: instability evolution in the neck region
487: that will lead to large dynamical fluctuations on $NIMF$ properties.
488:
489: \begin{figure}
490: \centering
491: \includegraphics*[scale=0.45]{itjpfig3.ps}
492: \caption{Wilczynski-2 Plot: correlation between deviations from Viola
493: systematics, see text. Results are shown for two $asy-EOS$.}
494: \label{wilcz2}
495: \end{figure}
496:
497: The $\Phi_{plane}$ distributions, corresponding to the same $NIMF$
498: events analysed before, are covering a quite
499: limited angular window, close to the full alignment configuration,
500: $\Phi_{plane}=0^{\circ}$. The distribution becomes wider when
501: we approach the two $r,r1~=~1$ lines of the Fig.\ref{wilcz2}.
502:
503: With appropriate cuts in the velocity correlation plots
504: and $\Phi_{plane}$ distributions
505: we
506: can follow the properties of clusters produced from sources with
507: a "controlled" different degree of equilibration. We can figure out
508: a continous transition from fast produced fragments via neck instabilities
509: to clusters formed in a dynamical fission of the Projectile(Target)
510: residues up to the evaporated ones (statistical fission). Along this
511: line it would be even possible to disentangle the effects of volume
512: and shape instabilities. The isospin dynamics will look different
513: in the various scenarios and rather dependent on the symmetry
514: term of the $EOS$.
515:
516: A more promising observable seems to be the isotopic content
517: of the Neck-$IMF$.
518: For the three $asy-EOSs$ introduced before we plot in
519: Fig.\ref{papisorr} the average isotopic composition $I$ of
520: the $NIMF$'s as a function of the $PLF$ $r$-deviation from Viola
521: systematics. At all impact parameters clear differences
522: are evident. The average asymmetry does not depend
523: strongly on $r$. We notice however that it increases
524: with the stiffness of the symmetry potential around and below saturation.
525: The {\it superasystiff}
526: parametrization, i.e. with an almost parabolic increasing behavior
527: around $\rho_0$, produces systematically more neutron rich
528: $NIMF$s.
529: \begin{figure}
530: \centering
531: \includegraphics*[scale=0.35]{itjpfig4.ps}
532: \caption{$124Sn+64Ni$ at $35AMeV$. $NIMF$ isospin content for $asysoft$
533: (circles), $asystiff$ (rombs)
534: and $superasystiff$ (squares)
535: $EOS$ as a function of $r$-deviation from Viola systematics,
536: at impact parameters from $b=5fm$ to $8fm$. The two solid lines
537: represent the mean asymmetries of the projectile (top) and target (bottom). }
538: \label{papisorr}
539: \end{figure}
540: This effect is clearly due to a different neutron/proton migration
541: at the interface between $PL/TL$ ''spectator'' zone of normal
542: density and the dilute neck region where the $NIMF$s are
543: formed.
544: The Wilczynski-2 plot will
545: help to make the selections.
546: We have to remind that all the results presented here refer to properties of
547: primary (excited) fragments. The neutron excess signal appears likely to be
548: washed out from later evaporation decays. A reconstruction of the
549: primary fragments with neutron coincidence measurements would be very
550: important.
551:
552:
553:
554: \subsubsection*{Isospin Dynamics}
555:
556: Isospin effects on the reaction dynamics and $Isospin~Migration$:
557: an interesting neutron enrichment of the overlap ("neck") region is
558: expected, due to the neutron migration from higher (spectator) to
559: lower (neck) density regions. This effect is also nicely connected to
560: the slope of the symmetry energy. Neutron and/or light isobar measurements
561: in different rapidity regions appear important.
562: Moreover, moving from mid- to "spectator"- rapidities an increasing
563: hierarchy in the mass and $N/Z$ of the fragments is expected
564: \cite{LiontiarX05}.
565: Some experimental evidences are in ref.\cite{ColinPRC67}. An interesting
566: related
567: observable is the corresponding angular correlation due to the driving
568: force of the Projectile(Target)-like partners \cite{LiontiarX05}.
569: The analysis of the $N/Z$ distribution versus the emission angle reveals
570: that larger fluctuations are present close to forward and backward angles,
571: suggesting that IMF's that are more correlated to the spectator
572: matter may become more neutron-rich, see Fig.\ref{NZ_angle} for the
573: $Fe,Fe/Ni,Ni$ systems at $47AMeV$ \cite{LiontiarX05}.
574: \begin{figure}[t]
575: \begin{center}
576: \includegraphics[bb = 16 277 563 552, scale=0.45]{itjpfig5.eps}
577: \caption{$Fe,Fe$ vs. $Ni,Ni$ reactions at $47AMev$ ($b=4fm$): Contour
578: plots of the N/Z distribution versus the emission angle.}
579: \label{NZ_angle}
580: \end{center}
581: \end{figure}
582:
583: We stress again that the $neck-IMF$ always present a neutron enrichment,
584: {\it even in the case of a n-poor system}. The latter paradox is due
585: to the pre-equilibrium isospin dynamics.
586: In fact, as anticipated above,
587: due to pre-equilibrium, the system will loose some protons
588: and acquire a $N/Z$ larger than the initial one. Then, before the di-nuclear
589: system reseparates, the neutron excess is transferred to the neck region
590: that is at low density.
591:
592:
593:
594: \subsubsection*{Isospin Diffusion}
595:
596: Measure of charge equilibration in the "spectator"
597: region in semicentral collisions: $Imbalance~Ratios$ for different
598: isospin properties. Test of the interplay between
599: concentration and density gradients in the isospin dynamics
600: \cite{BaranPR05,Isodiff05,ChenPRL05}.
601: For the reasons noted before we expect to see a clear difference
602: in the isospin diffusion between binary (deep-inelastic like)
603: and neck-fragmentation events.
604:
605: We report its dependence on the interaction time (impact parameter)
606: for asysoft (squares)
607: and asysuperstiff (circles) $EOS$ in Fig.\ref{imbalance},
608: for the $Sn,Sn$ case \cite{BaranPR05,Isodiff05}.
609: A good degree of isospin equilibration corresponds to
610: a ``convergence'' to $0$ of both $R_{P}$ (upper curves)
611: and $R_{T}$ (lower curves).
612: From our results we conclude that an asystiff-like
613: $EOS$ provides a better agreement to the experimental
614: observations, shown as arrows in Fig.\ref{imbalance},
615: \cite{TsangPRL92}.
616: In fact in the
617: $MSU$ experiment there is no particular selection on binary events.
618: We expect that the presence of events with production of Neck-$IMFs$
619: will induce an apparent larger isospin equilibration since
620: more neutrons will migrate to the neck region (and viceversa for protons),
621: as discussed before.
622:
623: \begin{figure}
624: \begin{center}
625: \includegraphics*[scale=0.50]{itjpfig6.ps}
626: \caption{$^{124}Sn+^{112}Sn$ $50~AMeV$ collision:
627: interaction time evolution of the projectile (upper) and target (lower)
628: isospin imbalance ratios. Squares: $Asysoft~ EOS$. Circles: $Superasystiff$.
629: The arrows correspond to the data of ref.\protect\cite{TsangPRL92}.}
630: \label{imbalance}
631: \end{center}
632: \end{figure}
633:
634: A clear difference between the two equations of state
635: is evident especially for the longer interacting time, $b=8fm$ case.
636: Smaller values
637: of the isospin imbalance ratios for asysoft $EOS$
638: point towards a faster equilibration rate.
639: In ref. \cite{TsangPRL92} a possible explanation was
640: proposed related to the observation that below normal
641: density the asysoft $EOS$ has a larger value of symmetry
642: energy. Therefore an enhanced isospin equilibration
643: has to be triggered if the diffusion takes place at lower density.
644: In fact the mechanism of charge equilibration
645: is more complicated at these energies due to
646: reaction dynamics (fast particle emissions,
647: density gradients, etc.), with interesting compensation effects.
648:
649: \subsubsection*{ ``Pre-equilibrium'' emissions}
650:
651: As already remarked, the isospin content of the fast particle emission
652: can largely influence the subsequent reaction dynamics, in particular the
653: isospin transport properties (charge equilibration, isospin diffusion).
654: We can reach the paradox of a detection of isospin dynamics effects
655: in charge symmetric systems.
656:
657: Finally the simultaneous measurements of properties of fast nucleon emissions
658: and of the neck dynamics can even shed lights on the very controversial
659: problem of the isospin momentum dependence \cite{BaranPR05,ChenPRL05}.
660:
661: \subsubsection*{Outlook}
662: We stress the richness of the phenomenology and nice opportunities of
663: getting several cross-checks from completely different experiments.
664: Apart the interest of this new dissipative mechanism and the
665: amazing possibility of studying properties of fragments produced
666: on an almost continous range of time scales, we remark the
667: expected dependence on the isovector part of the nuclear $EOS$.
668: From transport simulations we presently get some indications of
669: "asy-stiff" behaviors, i.e. increasing repulsive density dependence of
670: the symmetry term, but not more fundamental details.
671: Moreover, all the available data are obtained with stable beams, i.e.
672: within low asymmetries.
673:
674: \subsection*{Acknowledgements}
675: This report is deeply related to ideas and results reached in
676: very pleasant and fruitful collaborations with extremely nice people:
677: V.Baran, M.Colonna, G.Fabbri,
678: G.Ferini, Th.Gaitanos, V.Greco, R.Lionti,
679: B.Liu, S.Maccarone, F.Matera, M.Zielinska-Pfabe', J.Rizzo, L.Scalone
680: and H.H.Wolter. I have learnt a lot
681: from all of them in physics as well as in human relationships.
682:
683:
684: \include{itjp_bib}
685:
686:
687: \end{document}
688:
689:
690: