1: \documentclass
2: [preprint,tightenlines,prc,bibnotes,showpacs,noshowkeys,nofootinbib]{revtex4}%
3: \usepackage{amsfonts}
4: \usepackage{amsmath}
5: \usepackage{amssymb}
6: \usepackage{graphicx}%
7: \setcounter{MaxMatrixCols}{30}
8: %TCIDATA{OutputFilter=latex2.dll}
9: %TCIDATA{Version=4.00.0.2321}
10: %TCIDATA{CSTFile=revtex4.cst}
11: %TCIDATA{Created=Thursday, September 30, 2004 17:46:52}
12: %TCIDATA{LastRevised=Wednesday, May 04, 2005 14:15:10}
13: %TCIDATA{<META NAME="GraphicsSave" CONTENT="32">}
14: %TCIDATA{<META NAME="DocumentShell" CONTENT="Articles\SW\REVTeX 4">}
15: %TCIDATA{Language=American English}
16: \newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}
17: \newtheorem{acknowledgement}[theorem]{Acknowledgement}
18: \newtheorem{algorithm}[theorem]{Algorithm}
19: \newtheorem{axiom}[theorem]{Axiom}
20: \newtheorem{claim}[theorem]{Claim}
21: \newtheorem{conclusion}[theorem]{Conclusion}
22: \newtheorem{condition}[theorem]{Condition}
23: \newtheorem{conjecture}[theorem]{Conjecture}
24: \newtheorem{corollary}[theorem]{Corollary}
25: \newtheorem{criterion}[theorem]{Criterion}
26: \newtheorem{definition}[theorem]{Definition}
27: \newtheorem{example}[theorem]{Example}
28: \newtheorem{exercise}[theorem]{Exercise}
29: \newtheorem{lemma}[theorem]{Lemma}
30: \newtheorem{notation}[theorem]{Notation}
31: \newtheorem{problem}[theorem]{Problem}
32: \newtheorem{proposition}[theorem]{Proposition}
33: \newtheorem{remark}[theorem]{Remark}
34: \newtheorem{solution}[theorem]{Solution}
35: \newtheorem{summary}[theorem]{Summary}
36: \newenvironment{proof}[1][Proof]{\noindent\textbf{#1.} }{\ \rule{0.5em}{0.5em}}
37: \begin{document}
38: \preprint{JLAB-THY-05-01}
39: \preprint{NT@UW-04-030}
40: \title[lfcbm lattice form factor]{Comparison of Nucleon Form Factors from Lattice QCD Against the Light Front
41: Cloudy Bag Model and Extrapolation to the Physical Mass Regime \ }
42: \author{Hrayr H. Matevosyan}
43: \affiliation{Louisiana State University, Department of Physics \& Astronomy, 202 Nicholson
44: Hall, Tower Dr., LA 70803, USA, / Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator
45: Facility,12000 Jefferson Ave., Newport News, VA 23606, USA}
46: \author{Gerald A. Miller}
47: \affiliation{University of Washington, Department of Physics, Box 351560, Seattle, WA
48: 98195-1560, USA}
49: \author{Anthony W. Thomas}
50: \affiliation{Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, 12000 Jefferson Ave., Newport
51: News, VA 23606, USA }
52: \keywords{Nucleon electromagnetic form factors, lfcbm, lattice QCD}
53: \pacs{13.40.Gp; 11.15.Ha; 12.38.Gc}
54:
55: \begin{abstract}
56: We explore the possibility of extrapolating state of the art lattice QCD
57: calculations of nucleon form factors to the physical regime. We find that the
58: lattice results can be reproduced using the Light Front Cloudy Bag Model by
59: letting its parameters be analytic functions of the quark mass. We then use
60: the model to extend the lattice calculations to large values of $Q^{2}$ of
61: interest to current and planned experiments. These functions are also used to
62: define extrapolations to the physical value of the pion mass, thereby allowing
63: us to study how the predicted zero in $G_{E}(Q^{2})/G_{M}(Q^{2})$ varies as a
64: function of quark mass.
65:
66: \end{abstract}
67: \volumeyear{year}
68: \volumenumber{number}
69: \issuenumber{number}
70: \eid{identifier}
71: \startpage{1}
72: \endpage{31}
73: \maketitle
74:
75:
76: \section{Introduction}
77:
78: The electromagnetic form factors of the nucleon are an invaluable source of
79: information on its structure~\cite{Thomas:2001kw}. For example, observing
80: their fall as $Q^{2}$ increases from zero revealed the finite extent of the
81: nucleon, and measuring the Sachs electric form factor of the neutron,
82: $G_{E}^{n}$~\cite{Reichelt:2003iw,Glazier:2004ny}, that it has a positive core
83: surrounded by a long-range, negative
84: tail~\cite{Friedrich:2003iz,Thomas:1982kv,cbm}. In the last few years
85: particular interest has focused on the ratio of the electric and magnetic form
86: factors of the proton, $G_{E}/G_{M}$, where recoil polarization
87: data~\cite{Jones:1999rz,Gayou:2001qd} have revealed a dramatic decrease with
88: $Q^{2}$ -- in contrast with earlier work based on the Rosenbluth separation.
89: These data have allowed one of us to deduce a {}fascinating spin dependence of
90: the shape of the nucleon~\cite{Miller:2003sa}.
91:
92: While the behavior of $G_{E}/G_{M}$ with $Q^{2}$ was anticipated in some
93: models (e.g. see Ref.~\cite{Frank:1995pv}, \cite{Chung:1991st}), there is no
94: consensus as to which explanation best represents how QCD works. Direct
95: guidance from QCD itself would be most valuable and for that purpose lattice
96: QCD represents the one and only technique by which one can obtain
97: non-perturbative solutions to QCD.
98:
99: The QCDSF Collaboration recently presented lattice QCD simulations for the
100: {}form factors of the nucleon over a wide range of values of momentum
101: transfer~\cite{QCDSF Collaboration}. While these were based on the quenched
102: approximation, with an unsophisticated action, several lattice spacings were
103: chosen with the smallest being around $0.05%
104: %TCIMACRO{\unit{fm}}%
105: %BeginExpansion
106: \operatorname{fm}%
107: %EndExpansion
108: $ ($\beta=6.4$) and at present these are the state of the art. The quark
109: masses used in the simulations correspond to pion masses in the range
110: $(0.6,1.2)%
111: %TCIMACRO{\unit{GeV}}%
112: %BeginExpansion
113: \operatorname{GeV}%
114: %EndExpansion
115: $. Therefore one needs to parametrize the form factors as a function of pion
116: mass and extrapolate to the physical value before comparing these lattice
117: results with the experimental data.
118:
119: At $Q^{2}=0$ there have been a number of studies of the chiral extrapolation
120: of baryon magnetic moments
121: ~\cite{Leinweber:1998ej,Hackett-Jones:2000qk,Hemmert:2002uh,Young:2004tb}.
122: However, there is no model independent way to respect the constraints of
123: chiral symmetry over the range of $Q^{2}$ and $m_{\pi}$ required by the QCDSF
124: data. Instead, at finite $Q^{2}$, one has been led to study various
125: phenomenological parameterizations~\cite{Ashley:2003sn}, which have at least
126: ensured the correct leading order non-analytic structure as $m_{\pi
127: }\rightarrow0$. Our purpose here is three-fold. First, we wish to use the
128: lattice data to investigate whether a particular quark model is capable of
129: describing the properties of the nucleon in this additional dimension of
130: varying $m_{\pi}$ - an important test which any respectable quark model should
131: satisfy\footnote{Just as the study of QCD as a function of $N_{c}$ has proven
132: extremely valuable, so the study of hadron properties as a function of quark
133: mass, using the results of lattice QCD calculations, undoubtedly offers
134: significant \ insight into QCD, as well as new ways to model it
135: \cite{Cloet:2002eg}.}. Second, having confirmed that the model is consistent
136: with the lattice data over the range of $m_{\pi}$ noted earlier, we use the
137: model to extrapolate to large values of $Q^{2}$ (for lattice values of
138: $m_{\pi}$). Third, we also use the model to extrapolate to the physical pion mass.
139:
140: The model which we consider here is the light front cloudy bag model
141: (LFCBM)~\cite{Miller:2002ig}, which was developed as a means of preserving the
142: successes of the original cloudy bag model \cite{cbm}, while ensuring
143: covariance in order to deal unambiguously with modern high energy experiments.
144: The light front constituent quark model, upon which it is built
145: \cite{Frank:1995pv}, predicted the rapid decrease of $G_{E}/G_{M}$ with
146: $Q^{2}$ and, as the pion cloud is expected to be relatively unimportant at
147: large $Q^{2}$, this success carries over to the LFCBM \cite{Miller:2002ig}.
148: Furthermore the LFCBM corresponds to a Lagrangian built upon chiral symmetry,
149: so it can be extended to the limit of low quark mass as well as low and high
150: $Q^{2}$.
151:
152: The outline of the paper follows. In Sect. 2 we briefly review the LFCBM. In
153: Sect. 3 we present the lattice QCD data, explain the fitting procedure and
154: present the results. Sect. 4 contains some concluding remarks.
155:
156: \section{Review of the LFCBM}
157:
158: The light front cloudy bag model (LFCBM) respects chiral symmetry and Lorentz
159: invariance and reproduces the four nucleon electromagnetic form factors.
160: Therefore it is reasonable to try to use it to extrapolate the form factors
161: computed using lattice QCD to the physical pion mass. We begin by briefly
162: introducing the key features of the LFCBM.
163:
164: The LFCBM is a \textit{relativistic} constituent quark model incorporating the
165: effect of \textit{pion-loops}, key features motivated by chiral symmetry. The
166: light-front dynamics is employed to maintain the Poincar\'{e} invariance, and
167: one pion-loop corrections are added to incorporate significant pion cloud
168: effects (particularly in the neutron electric form factor and magnetic
169: moments) as well as the leading non-analytic behavior imposed by chiral
170: symmetry. In light-front dynamics the fields are quantized at a fixed
171: \textquotedblleft time\textquotedblright$=\tau=x^{0}+x^{3}\equiv x^{+}.$ The
172: light front time or $\tau$-development operator is then $P^{0}-P^{3}\equiv
173: P^{-}$. The canonical spatial variable is $x^{-}=x^{0}-x^{3}$, with a
174: canonical momentum $P^{+}=P^{0}+P^{3}$. The other coordinates are
175: $\mathbf{x}_{\perp}$ and $\mathbf{P}_{\perp}$. The relation between the energy
176: and momentum of a free particle is given by $p^{-}=(p_{\perp}^{2}+m^{2}%
177: )/p^{+}$, with the quadratic form allowing the separation of center of mass
178: and relative coordinates. The resulting wave functions are frame independent.
179: The light front technique is particularly relevant for calculating form
180: factors because one uses boosts that are independent of interactions.
181:
182: Our goal is to calculate the Dirac $F_{1}$ and Pauli $F_{2}$ form factors
183: given by:%
184: \begin{equation}
185: \left\langle N,\lambda^{\prime}p^{\prime}\left\vert J^{\mu}\right\vert
186: N,\lambda p\right\rangle =\overline{u}_{\lambda^{\prime}}(p^{\prime})\left[
187: F_{1}(Q^{2})\gamma^{\mu}+\frac{F_{2}(Q^{2})}{2M_{N}}i\sigma^{\mu\nu}%
188: (p^{\prime}-p)_{\nu}\right] u_{\lambda}(p)\,. \label{FORMULA_EM_CURRENT}%
189: \end{equation}
190: The momentum transfer is $q^{\mu}=($ $p^{\prime}-p)^{\mu},~Q^{2}=-q^{2}$ and
191: $J^{\mu}$ is taken to be the electromagnetic current operator for a free
192: quark. For $Q^{2}=0$ the form factors $F_{1}$ and $F_{2}$ are, respectively,
193: equal to the charge and the anomalous magnetic moment $\kappa$ in units of $e$
194: and $e/(2M_{N})$ , and the magnetic moment is $\mu=F_{1}(0)+F_{2}(0)=1+\kappa
195: $. The evaluation of the form factors is simplified by using the so-called
196: Drell-Yan reference frame in which $q^{+}=0$, so that $Q^{2}=q_{\bot}%
197: ^{2}=q_{1}^{2}$. If light-front spinors for the nucleons are used, the form
198: factors can be expressed in terms of matrix elements of the plus component of
199: the current \cite{Brodsky:1980zm}:%
200: \begin{equation}
201: F_{1}(Q^{2})=\langle N,\uparrow\left\vert J^{+}\right\vert N,\uparrow
202: \rangle,\;\hspace{1cm}\mathrm{and}\hspace{1cm}QF_{2}(Q^{2})=(-2M_{N})\langle
203: N,\uparrow\left\vert J^{+}\right\vert N,\downarrow\rangle\,.
204: \label{FORMULA_F1_F2_CURRENT}%
205: \end{equation}
206: The form factors are calculated using the \textquotedblleft
207: good\textquotedblright\ component of the current, $J^{+}$, to suppress the
208: effects of quark-pair terms. Finally, we note that in our fits we will use the
209: Sachs form factors, which are defined as
210: \begin{equation}
211: G_{E}=F_{1}-\frac{Q^{2}}{4M_{N}^{2}}F_{2},\hspace{2cm}G_{M}=F_{1}+F_{2}
212: \label{FORMULA_G_TO_F}%
213: \end{equation}
214:
215:
216: The next step is to construct the bare (pionless) nucleon wave function $\Psi
217: $, which is a symmetric function of the quark momenta, independent of
218: reference frame, and an eigenstate of the canonical spin operator. The
219: commonly used ansatz is:
220: \begin{align}
221: \Psi(p_{i}) & =\Phi(M_{0}^{2})u(p_{1})u(p_{2})u(p_{3})\psi(p_{1},p_{2}%
222: ,p_{3}),\label{FORMULA_WAV_FUNC}\\
223: p_{i} & =\mathbf{p}_{i}s_{i},~\tau_{i},\nonumber
224: \end{align}
225: where $\psi$ is a spin-isospin color amplitude factor, the $p_{i}$ are
226: expressed in terms of relative coordinates, the $u(p_{i})$ are Dirac spinors
227: and $\Phi$ is a momentum distribution wave function. The specific form of
228: $\psi$ is given in Eq.~(12) of Ref.~\cite{Miller:2002qb} and earlier in Ref.
229: \cite{Chung:1991st}. This is a relativistic version of the familiar SU(6) wave
230: function, with no configuration mixing included. The notation is that
231: $\mathbf{p}_{i}=(p_{i}^{+},$ $\mathbf{p}_{i\bot})$. The total momentum
232: is\ $\mathbf{P}=\mathbf{p}_{1}+\mathbf{p}_{2}+\mathbf{p}_{3}$, the relative
233: coordinates are $\xi=p_{1}^{+}/(p_{1}^{+}+p_{2}^{+})$,~$\eta=(p_{1}^{+}%
234: +p_{2}^{+})/P^{+}$, and $\mathbf{k}_{\bot}=(1-\xi)\mathbf{p}_{1\bot}%
235: -\xi\mathbf{p}_{2\bot}$,~$\mathbf{K}_{\bot}=(1-\eta)(\mathbf{p}_{1\bot
236: }+\mathbf{p}_{2\bot})-\eta\mathbf{p}_{3\bot}$. In computing a form factor, we
237: take quark 3 to be the one struck by the photon. The value of $1-\eta$ is not
238: changed $(q^{+}=0)$, so only one relative momentum, $\mathbf{K}_{\bot}$ is
239: changed: $\mathbf{K}_{\bot}^{\prime}=\mathbf{K}_{\bot}-\eta\mathbf{q}_{\bot}$.
240: The form of the momentum distribution wave function is taken from Schlumpf
241: \cite{Schlumpf:1992ce}:%
242: \begin{equation}
243: \Phi(M_{0})={N}{\left( M_{0}^{2}+\beta^{2}\right) ^{\gamma}}\,,
244: \label{FORMULA_SPAT_WAV_FUNC}%
245: \end{equation}
246: with $M_{0}^{2}$ the mass-squared operator for a non-interacting system:%
247: \begin{equation}
248: M_{0}^{2}=\frac{K_{\bot}^{2}}{\eta(1-\eta)}+\frac{k_{\bot}^{2}+M^{2}}{\eta
249: \xi(1-\xi)}+\frac{M^{2}}{1-\eta}\,. \label{FORMULA_M0}%
250: \end{equation}
251: Schlumpf's parameters were $\beta=0.607~%
252: %TCIMACRO{\unit{GeV}}%
253: %BeginExpansion
254: \operatorname{GeV}%
255: %EndExpansion
256: $, $\gamma=-3.5$, $M=0.267~%
257: %TCIMACRO{\unit{GeV}}%
258: %BeginExpansion
259: \operatorname{GeV}%
260: %EndExpansion
261: $, where the value of $\gamma$ was chosen so that $Q^{4}G_{M}(Q^{2})$ is
262: approximately constant for $Q^{2}>4~%
263: %TCIMACRO{\unit{GeV}}%
264: %BeginExpansion
265: \operatorname{GeV}%
266: %EndExpansion
267: ^{2}$, in accord with experimental data. The parameter $\beta$ helps govern
268: the values of the transverse momenta allowed by the wave function $\Phi$ and
269: is closely related to the rms charge radius. The constituent quark mass, $M$,
270: was primarily determined by the magnetic moment of the proton. We shall use
271: different values when including the pion cloud and fitting lattice data.
272:
273: A physical nucleon can sometimes undergo a quantum fluctuation so that it
274: consists of a bare nucleon and a virtual pion. In this case, an incident
275: photon can interact electromagnetically with a bare nucleon,
276: Fig.~\ref{fig:diagrams}a, with a nucleon while a pion is present,
277: Fig.~\ref{fig:diagrams}b, or with a charged pion in flight,
278: Fig.~\ref{fig:diagrams}c. These effects are especially pronounced for the
279: neutron $G_{E}$\cite{cbm}, at small values of $Q^{2}$. The tail of the
280: negatively charged pion distribution extends far out into space, causing the
281: mean square charge radius, $R_{n}^{2}$, to be negative. The effects of the
282: pion cloud need to be computed relativistically if one is to confront data
283: taken at large $Q^{2}$. This involves evaluating the Feynman diagrams of
284: Fig.~\ref{fig:diagrams} using photon-bare-nucleon form factors from the
285: relativistic model, and using a relativistic $\pi$-nucleon form factor. The
286: resulting model is defined as the light-front cloudy bag model LFCBM
287: \cite{Miller:2002ig}. The light-front treatment is implemented by evaluating
288: the integral over the virtual pion four-momentum $k^{\pm},\mathbf{k}_{\perp}$,
289: by first performing the integral over $k^{-}$ analytically, re-expressing the
290: remaining integrals in terms of relative variables ($\alpha=k^{+}/p^{+})$, and
291: shifting the relative $_{\perp}$ variable to $\mathbf{L}_{\perp}$ to simplify
292: the numerators. Thus the Feynman graphs, Fig.~\ref{fig:diagrams}, are
293: represented by a single $\tau$-ordered diagram. The use of $J^{+}$ and the Yan
294: identity\cite{Chang:qi} $S_{F}(p)=\sum_{s}u(p,s)\overline{u}(p,s)/(p^{2}%
295: -m^{2}+i\epsilon)+\gamma^{+}/2p^{+}$ allows one to see that the nucleon
296: current operators appearing in Fig.\ref{fig:diagrams}b act between
297: on-mass-shell spinors.%
298: %TCIMACRO{\FRAME{ftbpFU}{5.2529in}{1.6734in}{0pt}{\Qcb{Diagrams}}%
299: %{\Qlb{fig:diagrams}}{feynman_diagram.eps}%
300: %{\special{ language "Scientific Word"; type "GRAPHIC";
301: %maintain-aspect-ratio TRUE; display "ICON"; valid_file "F";
302: %width 5.2529in; height 1.6734in; depth 0pt; original-width 12.0001in;
303: %original-height 9.0001in; cropleft "0"; croptop "1"; cropright "1";
304: %cropbottom "0"; filename 'feynman_diagram.eps';file-properties "XNPEU";}}}%
305: %BeginExpansion
306: \begin{figure}
307: [ptb]
308: \begin{center}
309: \includegraphics[
310: height=1.6734in,
311: width=5.2529in
312: ]%
313: {feynman_diagram.eps}%
314: \caption{Diagrams}%
315: \label{fig:diagrams}%
316: \end{center}
317: \end{figure}
318: %EndExpansion
319:
320:
321: The results can be stated as
322: \begin{equation}
323: F_{i\alpha}(Q^{2})=Z\left[ F_{i\alpha}^{(0)}(Q^{2})+F_{ib\alpha}%
324: (Q^{2})+F_{ic\alpha}(Q^{2})\right] , \label{FORMULA_F_TO_F0_FB_FC}%
325: \end{equation}
326: where $i=1,2$ denotes the Dirac and Pauli form factors, $\alpha=n,p$
327: determines the identity of the nucleon, and $F_{i\alpha}^{(0)}(Q^{2})$ are the
328: form factors computed in the absence of pionic effects. The wave function
329: renormalization constant, $Z$, is determined from the condition that the
330: charge of the proton be unity: $F_{1p}(Q^{2}=0)=1$. For illustration we start
331: with the calculation of the neutron form factors. Then, evaluating the graph
332: in {}Fig.~\ref{fig:diagrams}b gives%
333: \begin{multline}
334: F_{1bn}(Q^{2})=g_{0}^{2}\int_{0}^{1}d\alpha\alpha\int{\frac{d^{2}L}{(2\pi
335: )^{3}}}R_{N}({\mathbf{L}^{(+)}}^{\;2},\alpha)R_{N}({\mathbf{L}^{(-)}}%
336: ^{\;2},\alpha)\label{FORMULA_F1BN}\\
337: \lbrack(F_{1p}^{({0})}(Q^{2})+F_{1n}^{({0})}(Q^{2})/2)(\alpha^{2}(M^{2}%
338: -Q^{2}/4)+L^{2})-(F_{2p}^{({0})}(Q^{2})+F_{2n}^{({0})}(Q^{2})/2))(\alpha
339: ^{2}Q^{2}/2)],
340: \end{multline}%
341: \begin{multline}
342: F_{2bn}(Q^{2})=-g_{0}^{2}\int_{0}^{1}d\alpha\alpha\int{\frac{d^{2}L}%
343: {(2\pi)^{3}}}R_{N}({\mathbf{L}^{(+)}}^{\;2},\alpha)R_{N}({\mathbf{L}^{(-)}%
344: }^{\;2},\alpha)\label{FORMULA_F2BN}\\
345: \lbrack(F_{1p}^{({0})}(Q^{2})+{\frac{1}{2}}F_{1n}^{({0})}(Q^{2}))(2\alpha
346: ^{2}M^{2})\\
347: +(F_{2p}^{({0})}(Q^{2})+{\frac{1}{2}}F_{2n}^{({0})}(Q^{2})))(\alpha^{2}%
348: M^{2}(1-Q^{2}/4M^{2})+(L_{x}^{2}-L_{y}^{2}))]
349: \end{multline}
350: where $g_{0}$ is the bare $\pi$N coupling constant, and the renormalized
351: coupling constant $Zg_{0}^{2}=g^{2}/4\pi=13.5\;$,$\mathbf{L}_{\perp}^{(\pm
352: )}\equiv\mathbf{L}_{\perp}\pm\alpha\mathbf{q}_{\perp}/2$, $\alpha\equiv
353: {\frac{k^{+}}{p^{+}}}$, $D_{N}(k_{\perp}^{2},\alpha)\equiv{M^{2}\alpha
354: ^{2}+k_{\perp}^{2}+\mu^{2}(1-\alpha)}$, and $R_{N}(k_{\perp}^{2},\alpha
355: )\equiv{\frac{F_{\pi N}^{N}(k_{\perp}^{2},\alpha)}{D_{N}(k_{\perp}^{2}%
356: ,\alpha)}}.$ The $\pi$N form factor is taken as
357: \cite{Zoller:1991cb,Szczurek:gw}
358: \begin{equation}
359: F_{\pi N}(k_{\perp}^{2},\alpha)=e^{{-(D_{N}(k_{\perp}^{2},\alpha
360: )/2\alpha(1-\alpha)\Lambda^{2})}}{,} \label{FORMULA_PI_N_FF}%
361: \end{equation}
362: and maintains charge conservation \cite{Speth:pz}. The constant $\Lambda$ is a
363: free parameter, but very large values are excluded by the small flavor
364: asymmetry of the nucleon sea.
365:
366: {}From Eqns.~(\ref{FORMULA_F1BN}) and (\ref{FORMULA_F2BN}) we see that each
367: term in the nucleon current operator contributes to both $F_{1}$ and $F_{2}$.
368: The evaluation of graph \ref{fig:diagrams}c yields
369: \begin{equation}
370: F_{1cn}(Q^{2})=-g_{0}^{2}F_{\pi}(Q^{2})\int_{0}^{1}d\alpha\alpha\int
371: {\frac{d^{2}K}{(2\pi)^{3}}}R({\mathbf{K}^{(+)}}^{\;2},\alpha)R({\mathbf{K}%
372: ^{(-)}}^{\;2},\alpha)\left[ K^{2}+M^{2}\alpha^{2}-(1-\alpha)^{2}{\frac{Q^{2}%
373: }{4}}\right] \label{FORMULA_F1CN}%
374: \end{equation}%
375: \begin{equation}
376: F_{2cn}(Q^{2})=-g_{0}^{2}(2M^{2})F_{\pi}(Q^{2})\int_{0}^{1}d\alpha\alpha
377: ^{2}(1-\alpha)\int{\frac{d^{2}K}{(2\pi)^{3}}}R({\mathbf{K}^{(+)}}^{\;2}%
378: ,\alpha)R({\mathbf{K}^{(-)}}^{\;2},\alpha) \label{FORMULA_F2CN}%
379: \end{equation}
380: where $\mathbf{K}_{\perp}^{(\pm)}\equiv\mathbf{K}_{\perp}\pm(1-\alpha
381: )\mathbf{q}_{\perp}/2$.\footnote{These formulae are slightly different from
382: those of Ref.~\cite{Miller:2002ig}. This leads to slight changes in the
383: parameters that will be discussed elsewhere.}
384:
385: The proton form factors can be obtained by simply making the replacements
386: $n\rightarrow p$ in Eqs.~(\ref{FORMULA_F1BN},\ref{FORMULA_F2BN}) and
387: $-g_{0}^{2}\rightarrow g_{0}^{2}$ in Eqs.~(\ref{FORMULA_F1CN}%
388: ,\ref{FORMULA_F2CN}). The change in sign accounts for the feature that the
389: $\pi^{-}$ cloud of the neutron becomes a $\pi^{+}$ cloud for the proton. The
390: mean-square isovector radii $\left\langle r^{2}\right\rangle _{i}^{V}$,
391: computed using Eqs.~(\ref{FORMULA_F_TO_F0_FB_FC}), and then taken to the
392: chiral limit at low-$Q^{2}$, have the same singular $\log$ terms as those of
393: the relativistic results of Beg and Zepeda \cite{Beg:1973sc}.
394:
395: The LFCBM was defined by choosing four free parameters: $m,\beta
396: ,\gamma,\Lambda$ so as to best reproduce the four experimentally measured
397: electromagnetic form factors of the nucleon \cite{Miller:2002ig}. In the
398: present work, the most relevant of these parameters will be varied to
399: reproduce lattice data, and the resulting dependence on the quark mass and
400: lattice spacing used to extrapolate to the physical region.
401:
402: \section{Fitting the QCDSF Form Factors and Extrapolating to the Physical Pion
403: Mass.}
404:
405: In this section we discuss the fitting procedure used to parametrize the
406: nucleon form factors calculated in lattice QCD. We use data produced by the
407: QCDSF Collaboration \cite{QCDSF Collaboration} and employ the LFCBM to
408: calculate the corresponding form factors, varying the model parameters to find
409: the best-fit to the different sets of lattice data obtained for different
410: values of the current quark mass, $m_{q}$. The behavior of the fitting
411: parameters is then represented by a polynomial function of the quark mass
412: $m_{q}$. This polynomial fit in $m_{q}$, or equivalently in pion mass squared,
413: $m_{\pi}^{2}$, can then be used to extrapolate the values of the fitting
414: parameters to the physical pion mass. Nucleon form factors for the physical
415: pion mass are then calculated using the extrapolated values for the model
416: parameters. In the following few subsections a more elaborate explanation is
417: given and the results are presented. In section \ref{QCDSF_DATA}\ we describe
418: the available data and the analysis procedure used to extract the quantities
419: necessary for further fits. In sec. \ref{DATA_FIT} we describe the details of
420: the fitting and extrapolation process and in the sec. \ref{M_PHYS} we present
421: the nucleon form factors resulting from the extrapolation to the physical pion
422: mass and make comparisons with experiment.
423:
424: \subsection{QCDSF Data and Its Analysis\label{QCDSF_DATA}}
425:
426: The form factor calculations in Ref.\cite{QCDSF Collaboration} \ were carried
427: out for three different values of the lattice spacing, $a=\{0.47,0.34,0.26\}%
428: %TCIMACRO{\unit{GeV}}%
429: %BeginExpansion
430: \operatorname{GeV}%
431: %EndExpansion
432: ^{-1}$. For each value of $a$ several sets of pion (or equivalently nucleon)
433: masses were considered. For each mass set Dirac and Pauli form factors for
434: both the proton and neutron were calculated at several values of $Q^{2}$. The
435: typical range for the pion mass used varied from $1.2%
436: %TCIMACRO{\unit{GeV}}%
437: %BeginExpansion
438: \operatorname{GeV}%
439: %EndExpansion
440: $ to $0.6%
441: %TCIMACRO{\unit{GeV}}%
442: %BeginExpansion
443: \operatorname{GeV}%
444: %EndExpansion
445: $, with the corresponding nucleon mass ranging from approximately $2%
446: %TCIMACRO{\unit{GeV}}%
447: %BeginExpansion
448: \operatorname{GeV}%
449: %EndExpansion
450: $ to $1.5%
451: %TCIMACRO{\unit{GeV}}%
452: %BeginExpansion
453: \operatorname{GeV}%
454: %EndExpansion
455: $. The typical range for $Q^{2}$ was $0.6%
456: %TCIMACRO{\unit{GeV}}%
457: %BeginExpansion
458: \operatorname{GeV}%
459: %EndExpansion
460: ^{2}$ to $2.3%
461: %TCIMACRO{\unit{GeV}}%
462: %BeginExpansion
463: \operatorname{GeV}%
464: %EndExpansion
465: ^{2}$.
466:
467: The LFCBM is basically a relativistic constituent quark model, so we need to
468: relate the model constituent mass of Eq.~(\ref{FORMULA_M0}) to the masses of
469: the nucleon and pion. To do so we use the approach of Ref.~\cite{Cloet:2002eg}%
470: , ( Eq.~(8))%
471: \begin{equation}
472: M=M_{\chi}+\frac{cm_{q}^{phys}}{(m_{\pi}^{phys})^{2}}m_{\pi}^{2},
473: \label{MCHI_EQ}%
474: \end{equation}
475: where $M_{\chi}$\ is the constituent quark mass in the chiral limit,
476: $m_{q}^{phys}$\ is the current quark mass and $c$ is of order 1. In the study
477: of octet magnetic moments in the AccessQM model of Ref.~\cite{Cloet:2002eg},
478: the best fit value for $M_{\chi}$ was $0.42%
479: %TCIMACRO{\unit{GeV}}%
480: %BeginExpansion
481: \operatorname{GeV}%
482: %EndExpansion
483: $, while for $cm_{q}^{phys}$ it was $0.0059%
484: %TCIMACRO{\unit{GeV}}%
485: %BeginExpansion
486: \operatorname{GeV}%
487: %EndExpansion
488: $.
489:
490: \subsection{Lattice Data Fit and Extrapolation\label{DATA_FIT}}
491:
492: The first step in our extrapolation of the lattice results to the physical
493: quark mass is to fit the lattice results for each quark mass $m_{q}$ by
494: adjusting the parameters of the LFCBM calculation. For that purpose two
495: fitting parameters were chosen. The first parameter is $M_{\chi}$ in
496: Eq.~(\ref{MCHI_EQ}), which determines the constituent quark mass. This
497: parameter was varied for each lattice spacing separately, since some
498: dependence upon lattice spacing was anticipated. The second parameter is the
499: internal parameter, $\gamma$, in the nucleon wave function Eq.
500: (\ref{FORMULA_SPAT_WAV_FUNC}), which is varied separately for each pion (or
501: equivalently nucleon) mass. For convenience, we express all magnetic form
502: factors \textbf{$G_{M}$ }in \textquotedblleft physical" units of
503: $e/2M_{N}^{Physical}$. Since the LFCBM\ uses the mass of the $\rho$-meson
504: included in the pion electromagnetic form factor, we need the extrapolated
505: value for its mass. We use the simple fitting function from
506: Ref.~\cite{RHO_MASS}:%
507: \begin{equation}
508: m_{\rho}=c_{0}+c_{1}m_{\pi}^{2}, \label{M_RHO}%
509: \end{equation}
510: with $c_{0}=0.776%
511: %TCIMACRO{\unit{GeV}}%
512: %BeginExpansion
513: \operatorname{GeV}%
514: %EndExpansion
515: $ and $c_{1}=0.427%
516: %TCIMACRO{\unit{GeV}}%
517: %BeginExpansion
518: \operatorname{GeV}%
519: %EndExpansion
520: ^{-1}$ .
521:
522: A function representing the $\chi^{2}$ for the deviation between the lattice
523: data and the values calculated using the LFCBM was constructed and minimized
524: by varying the fitting parameters. Changing the value of $M_{\chi}$ causes the
525: the calculated form factors to move up or down by an amount approximately
526: independent of $Q^{2}$, thereby causing a relatively small change in $\chi
527: ^{2}$. Therefore a simple grid variation for that parameter was employed, with
528: grid boundaries $M_{\chi}\in\left[ 0.15,0.45\right]
529: %TCIMACRO{\unit{GeV}}%
530: %BeginExpansion
531: \operatorname{GeV}%
532: %EndExpansion
533: $, and step size of $\delta_{M_{\chi}}=0.01%
534: %TCIMACRO{\unit{GeV}}%
535: %BeginExpansion
536: \operatorname{GeV}%
537: %EndExpansion
538: $. As for the parameter, $\gamma$, the variation of $\chi^{2}$ was much
539: stronger and the Minuit package of CERN's Root framework \cite{ROOT} was used
540: for the minimization. At first the boundaries for $\gamma$ were set to keep it
541: in the physical region, but successful boundless runs were also performed in
542: order to confirm the true minimum and error sizes. The pion masses used in the
543: lattice calculation are very large, and the resulting pionic effects are very
544: small. Therefore the value of $\Lambda$ could not be determined from lattice
545: data and its value was held fixed at $\Lambda=0.58%
546: %TCIMACRO{\unit{GeV}}%
547: %BeginExpansion
548: \operatorname{GeV}%
549: %EndExpansion
550: $ Similarly, varying $\beta$ did not change the description of the lattice
551: data, so it was held fixed at $\beta=0.607%
552: %TCIMACRO{\unit{GeV}}%
553: %BeginExpansion
554: \operatorname{GeV}%
555: %EndExpansion
556: /c$. The resulting fits are in good agreement with data, as one can see in
557: Figs. \ref{PLOT_PROTON_GE_6_4_3}, \ref{PLOT_PROTON_GM_6_4_3},
558: \ref{PLOT_NEUTRON_GE_6_4_3} and \ref{PLOT_NEUTRON_GM_6_4_3}. The best-fit
559: values of the parameters are shown in Table I. The figures show results for
560: the smallest lattice spacing, $a=0.26%
561: %TCIMACRO{\unit{GeV}}%
562: %BeginExpansion
563: \operatorname{GeV}%
564: %EndExpansion
565: ^{-1}$, but the reproduction of lattice data is equally successful for larger
566: values of $a$.
567: %TCIMACRO{\FRAME{ftbpFU}{4.9009in}{4.5636in}{0pt}{\Qcb{(Color online) LFCBM fit
568: %to QCDSF data for $G_{E}^{P}(in~units~of~e)$ for a lattice spacing
569: %$a=0.26~\unit{GeV}^{-1}$, $M_{P}=1.80~\unit{GeV}$ and $m_{\pi}=0.93~\unit{GeV}%
570: %$}}{\Qlb{PLOT_PROTON_GE_6_4_3}}{plot_proton_ge.eps}%
571: %{\special{ language "Scientific Word"; type "GRAPHIC";
572: %maintain-aspect-ratio TRUE; display "ICON"; valid_file "F";
573: %width 4.9009in; height 4.5636in; depth 0pt; original-width 7.8776in;
574: %original-height 7.331in; cropleft "0"; croptop "1"; cropright "1";
575: %cropbottom "0"; filename '6_4_3_plot_proton_ge.eps';file-properties "XNPEU";}%
576: %}}%
577: %BeginExpansion
578: \begin{figure}
579: [ptb]
580: \begin{center}
581: \includegraphics[
582: height=4.5636in,
583: width=4.9009in
584: ]%
585: {6_4_3_plot_proton_ge.eps}%
586: \caption{(Color online) LFCBM fit to QCDSF data for $G_{E}^{P}(in~units~of~e)$
587: for a lattice spacing $a=0.26~\operatorname{GeV}^{-1}$, $M_{P}%
588: =1.80~\operatorname{GeV}$ and $m_{\pi}=0.93~\operatorname{GeV}$}%
589: \label{PLOT_PROTON_GE_6_4_3}%
590: \end{center}
591: \end{figure}
592: %EndExpansion%
593: %TCIMACRO{\FRAME{ftbpFU}{4.8836in}{4.5455in}{0pt}{\Qcb{(Color online) LFCBM fit
594: %to QCDSF data for $G_{M}^{P}(in~units~of~e/(2M_{N}^{Physical}))$ for a lattice
595: %spacing $a=0.26~\unit{GeV}^{-1}$, $M_{P}=1.80~\unit{GeV}$ and $m_{\pi
596: %}=0.93~\unit{GeV}$}}{\Qlb{PLOT_PROTON_GM_6_4_3}}{plot_proton_gm.eps}%
597: %{\special{ language "Scientific Word"; type "GRAPHIC";
598: %maintain-aspect-ratio TRUE; display "ICON"; valid_file "F";
599: %width 4.8836in; height 4.5455in; depth 0pt; original-width 7.8776in;
600: %original-height 7.331in; cropleft "0"; croptop "1"; cropright "1";
601: %cropbottom "0"; filename '6_4_3_plot_proton_gm.eps';file-properties "XNPEU";}%
602: %}}%
603: %BeginExpansion
604: \begin{figure}
605: [ptbptb]
606: \begin{center}
607: \includegraphics[
608: height=4.5455in,
609: width=4.8836in
610: ]%
611: {6_4_3_plot_proton_gm.eps}%
612: \caption{(Color online) LFCBM fit to QCDSF data for $G_{M}^{P}%
613: (in~units~of~e/(2M_{N}^{Physical}))$ for a lattice spacing
614: $a=0.26~\operatorname{GeV}^{-1}$, $M_{P}=1.80~\operatorname{GeV}$ and $m_{\pi
615: }=0.93~\operatorname{GeV}$}%
616: \label{PLOT_PROTON_GM_6_4_3}%
617: \end{center}
618: \end{figure}
619: %EndExpansion%
620: %TCIMACRO{\FRAME{ftbpFU}{4.9009in}{4.5636in}{0pt}{\Qcb{(Color online) LFCBM fit
621: %to QCDSF data for $G_{E}^{N}(in~units~of~e)$ for a lattice spacing
622: %$a=0.26~\unit{GeV}^{-1}$, $M_{P}=1.80~\unit{GeV}$ and $m_{\pi}=0.93~\unit{GeV}%
623: %$}}{\Qlb{PLOT_NEUTRON_GE_6_4_3}}{plot_neutron_ge.eps}%
624: %{\special{ language "Scientific Word"; type "GRAPHIC";
625: %maintain-aspect-ratio TRUE; display "ICON"; valid_file "F";
626: %width 4.9009in; height 4.5636in; depth 0pt; original-width 7.8776in;
627: %original-height 7.331in; cropleft "0"; croptop "1"; cropright "1";
628: %cropbottom "0";
629: %filename '6_4_3_plot_neutron_ge.eps';file-properties "XNPEU";}}}%
630: %BeginExpansion
631: \begin{figure}
632: [ptbptbptb]
633: \begin{center}
634: \includegraphics[
635: height=4.5636in,
636: width=4.9009in
637: ]%
638: {6_4_3_plot_neutron_ge.eps}%
639: \caption{(Color online) LFCBM fit to QCDSF data for $G_{E}^{N}(in~units~of~e)$
640: for a lattice spacing $a=0.26~\operatorname{GeV}^{-1}$, $M_{P}%
641: =1.80~\operatorname{GeV}$ and $m_{\pi}=0.93~\operatorname{GeV}$}%
642: \label{PLOT_NEUTRON_GE_6_4_3}%
643: \end{center}
644: \end{figure}
645: %EndExpansion%
646: %TCIMACRO{\FRAME{ftbpFU}{4.8836in}{4.5455in}{0pt}{\Qcb{(Color online) LFCBM fit
647: %to QCDSF data for $G_{M}^{N}(in~units~of~e/(2M_{N}^{Physical}))$ for a lattice
648: %spacing $a=0.26~\unit{GeV}^{-1}$, $M_{P}=1.80~\unit{GeV}$ and $m_{\pi
649: %}=0.93~\unit{GeV}$}}{\Qlb{PLOT_NEUTRON_GM_6_4_3}}{plot_neutron_gm.eps}%
650: %{\special{ language "Scientific Word"; type "GRAPHIC";
651: %maintain-aspect-ratio TRUE; display "ICON"; valid_file "F";
652: %width 4.8836in; height 4.5455in; depth 0pt; original-width 7.8776in;
653: %original-height 7.331in; cropleft "0"; croptop "1"; cropright "1";
654: %cropbottom "0";
655: %filename '6_4_3_plot_neutron_gm.eps';file-properties "XNPEU";}}}%
656: %BeginExpansion
657: \begin{figure}
658: [ptbptbptbptb]
659: \begin{center}
660: \includegraphics[
661: height=4.5455in,
662: width=4.8836in
663: ]%
664: {6_4_3_plot_neutron_gm.eps}%
665: \caption{(Color online) LFCBM fit to QCDSF data for $G_{M}^{N}%
666: (in~units~of~e/(2M_{N}^{Physical}))$ for a lattice spacing
667: $a=0.26~\operatorname{GeV}^{-1}$, $M_{P}=1.80~\operatorname{GeV}$ and $m_{\pi
668: }=0.93~\operatorname{GeV}$}%
669: \label{PLOT_NEUTRON_GM_6_4_3}%
670: \end{center}
671: \end{figure}
672: %EndExpansion
673: %
674:
675: \begin{gather*}
676: \text{TABLE I.~Lattice data and LFCBM fitting parameters.(All expressed in
677: powers of }%
678: %TCIMACRO{\unit{GeV}}%
679: %BeginExpansion
680: \operatorname{GeV}%
681: %EndExpansion
682: \text{.)}\\%
683: \begin{tabular}
684: [c]{p{0.8in}p{0.8in}p{0.8in}p{0.8in}p{0.8in}}\hline\hline
685: $a$ & $m_{\pi}$ & $M_{N}$ & $M_{\chi}$ & $\gamma$\\\hline\hline
686: $0.47$ & $1.146$ & $2.062$ & $0.390(5)$ & $-6.12(7)$\\
687: $0.47~$ & $1.068$ & $1.981$ & $0.390(5)$ & $-5.67(6)$\\
688: $0.47$ & $0.873$ & $1.746$ & $0.390(5)$ & $-4.95(9)$\\
689: $0.47$ & $0.752$ & $1.567$ & $0.390(5)$ & $-4.78(12)$\\
690: $0.47$ & $0.638$ & $1.503$ & $0.390(5)$ & $-4.67(15)$\\
691: $\mathit{0.47}$ & $\mathit{0.135}$ & $\mathit{0.938}$ & $\mathit{0.390(5)}$ &
692: $\mathit{-4.79(46)}$\\\hline
693: $0.34$ & $1.201$ & $2.141$ & $0.280(5)$ & $-5.03(6)$\\
694: $0.34$ & $1.035$ & $1.933$ & $0.280(5)$ & $-4.37(5)$\\
695: $0.34$ & $0.881$ & $1.732$ & $0.280(5)$ & $-4.99(5)$\\
696: $0.34$ & $0.706$ & $1.522$ & $0.280(5)$ & $-3.51(6)$\\
697: $\mathit{0.34}$ & $\mathit{0.135}$ & $\mathit{0.938}$ & $\mathit{0.280(5)}$ &
698: $\mathit{-2.91(29)}$\\\hline
699: $0.26$ & $1.237$ & $2.202$ & $0.210(5)$ & $-4.78(5)$\\
700: $0.26$ & $1.092$ & $2.028$ & $0.210(5)$ & $-4.14(7)$\\
701: $0.26$ & $0.925$ & $1.802$ & $0.210(5)$ & $-3.69(5)$\\
702: $0.26$ & $0.744$ & $1.600$ & $0.210(5)$ & $-3.09(6)$\\
703: $0.26$ & $0.580$ & $1.379$ & $0.210(5)$ & $-3.01(13)$\\
704: $\mathit{0.26}$ & $\mathit{0.135}$ & $\mathit{0.938}$ & $\mathit{0.210(5)}$ &
705: $\mathit{-2.41(22)}$\\\hline
706: \end{tabular}
707: \end{gather*}
708:
709:
710: The next step is to extrapolate the fitting parameters to the physical quark
711: mass. This is done using the assumption that the parameters vary smoothly as
712: functions of the quark mass, and the fact that $m_{q}\thicksim m_{\pi}^{2}$
713: over the mass range investigated. We limited the extrapolation function to a
714: low order polynomial in $m_{\pi}^{2}$. The resulting fits for two lattice
715: spacings are presented in Figs. \ref{PLOT_GAMMA_VS_MPI_6_0} and
716: \ref{PLOT_GAMMA_VS_MPI_6_4}, from which we see that the fitting function
717: provides a very accurate representation of the values obtained from lattice
718: data.%
719: %TCIMACRO{\FRAME{ftbpFU}{3.6772in}{3.5016in}{0pt}{\Qcb{(Color online)
720: %Polynomial extrapolation of $\gamma$ vs. $m_{\pi}$ for lattice spacing
721: %$a=0.47~GeV^{-1}$ }}{\Qlb{PLOT_GAMMA_VS_MPI_6_0}}{Gamma vs MPi 6.0}%
722: %{\special{ language "Scientific Word"; type "GRAPHIC";
723: %maintain-aspect-ratio TRUE; display "ICON"; valid_file "F";
724: %width 3.6772in; height 3.5016in; depth 0pt; original-width 7.8776in;
725: %original-height 7.4988in; cropleft "0"; croptop "1"; cropright "1";
726: %cropbottom "0"; filename '6_0_gamma_vs_mpi_fit.eps';file-properties "XNPEU";}%
727: %}}%
728: %BeginExpansion
729: \begin{figure}
730: [ptb]
731: \begin{center}
732: \includegraphics[
733: height=3.5016in,
734: width=3.6772in
735: ]%
736: {6_0_gamma_vs_mpi_fit.eps}%
737: \caption{(Color online) Polynomial extrapolation of $\gamma$ vs. $m_{\pi}$ for
738: lattice spacing $a=0.47~GeV^{-1}$ }%
739: \label{PLOT_GAMMA_VS_MPI_6_0}%
740: \end{center}
741: \end{figure}
742: %EndExpansion%
743: %TCIMACRO{\FRAME{ftbphFU}{3.6884in}{3.5129in}{0in}{\Qcb{(Color online)
744: %Polynomial extrapolation of $\gamma$ vs. $m_{\pi}$ for lattice spacing
745: %$a=0.26~GeV^{-1}$}}{\Qlb{PLOT_GAMMA_VS_MPI_6_4}}{Gamma vs MPi}%
746: %{\special{ language "Scientific Word"; type "GRAPHIC";
747: %maintain-aspect-ratio TRUE; display "ICON"; valid_file "F";
748: %width 3.6884in; height 3.5129in; depth 0in; original-width 7.8776in;
749: %original-height 7.4988in; cropleft "0"; croptop "1"; cropright "1";
750: %cropbottom "0"; filename '6_4_gamma_vs_mpi_fit.eps';file-properties "XNPEU";}%
751: %}}%
752: %BeginExpansion
753: \begin{figure}
754: [ptbptbh]
755: \begin{center}
756: \includegraphics[
757: height=3.5129in,
758: width=3.6884in
759: ]%
760: {6_4_gamma_vs_mpi_fit.eps}%
761: \caption{(Color online) Polynomial extrapolation of $\gamma$ vs. $m_{\pi}$ for
762: lattice spacing $a=0.26~GeV^{-1}$}%
763: \label{PLOT_GAMMA_VS_MPI_6_4}%
764: \end{center}
765: \end{figure}
766: %EndExpansion
767: The fitted values of $\gamma$ and the extrapolation to the physical value of
768: $m_{\pi}$, with their corresponding errors, are shown in Figs.
769: \ref{PLOT_GAMMA_VS_MPI_6_0} and \ref{PLOT_GAMMA_VS_MPI_6_4}.
770:
771: In our calculations, $M_{\chi}$ has a very weak dependence on the pion mass,
772: but it has a rather strong dependence upon the lattice spacing. As we see in
773: Table~I and Figs. \ref{PLOT_PROTON_GE_6_4_3}-\ref{PLOT_NEUTRON_GM_6_4_3}, very
774: good fits to the lattice data are obtained even without varying $M_{\chi}$ for
775: each quark mass. By contrast, Fig. \ref{PLOT_MCHI_VS_LAT_A} and Table I show
776: rather dramatic variation of $M_{\chi}$ for different values of the lattice
777: spacing, $a$. This suggests that the larger values of the lattice spacing are
778: rather far from the continuum limit and (at best) only the results for the
779: smallest lattice spacing should be compared with experimental data. It would
780: clearly be desirable to have new data at even smaller $a$, or using an
781: improved action, known to provide a good approximation to the continuum limit.%
782: %TCIMACRO{\FRAME{ftbpFU}{4.6899in}{4.4564in}{0pt}{\Qcb{(Color online) Variation
783: %of $M_{\chi}$with lattice spacing $a.$The best-fit values of $M_{\chi}$ for
784: %physical $m_{\pi}$ using LFCBM and AcessQM models are presented as well.}%
785: %}{\Qlb{PLOT_MCHI_VS_LAT_A}}{mchi_vs_lat_a.eps}%
786: %{\special{ language "Scientific Word"; type "GRAPHIC";
787: %maintain-aspect-ratio TRUE; display "ICON"; valid_file "F";
788: %width 4.6899in; height 4.4564in; depth 0pt; original-width 7.8776in;
789: %original-height 7.4832in; cropleft "0"; croptop "1"; cropright "1";
790: %cropbottom "0"; filename 'mchi_vs_lat_a.eps';file-properties "XNPEU";}}}%
791: %BeginExpansion
792: \begin{figure}
793: [ptb]
794: \begin{center}
795: \includegraphics[
796: height=4.4564in,
797: width=4.6899in
798: ]%
799: {mchi_vs_lat_a.eps}%
800: \caption{(Color online) Variation of $M_{\chi}$with lattice spacing $a.$The
801: best-fit values of $M_{\chi}$ for physical $m_{\pi}$ using LFCBM and AcessQM
802: models are presented as well.}%
803: \label{PLOT_MCHI_VS_LAT_A}%
804: \end{center}
805: \end{figure}
806: %EndExpansion
807:
808:
809: Use of the values of $\gamma,M$ determined by the lattice data in the LFCBM
810: defines a lattice version of the LFCBM. We may use this new model to compute
811: the form factors at arbitrarily large values of $Q^{2}$, thereby extending the
812: kinematic range of the lattice calculations. The results are shown in
813: Figs.~\ref{PLOT_COMPARE_LAT_PROT_GE_6_4}, \ref{PLOT_COMPARE_LAT_PROT_GM_6_4},
814: \ref{PLOT_COMPARE_LAT_NEUT_GE_6_4} and \ref{PLOT_COMPARE_LAT_NEUT_GM_6_4}. In
815: Figs. \ref{PLOT_COMPARE_LAT_PROT_6_4} and \ref{PLOT_COMPARE_LAT_NEUT_6_4} we
816: show the corresponding plots of $\mu_{0}G_{E}/G_{M}$.
817: %TCIMACRO{\FRAME{ftbpFU}{6.3235in}{7.8395in}{0pt}{\Qcb{(Color online) LFCBM
818: %calculations using parameters (Figs. \ref{PLOT_GAMMA_VS_MPI_6_0},
819: %\ref{PLOT_GAMMA_VS_MPI_6_4} and \ref{PLOT_MCHI_VS_LAT_A}) obtained by fitting
820: %the lattice results for the proton electric form factor, $G_{E}$, at lattice
821: %\ spacing $a=0.26~GeV^{-1}$.}}{\Qlb{PLOT_COMPARE_LAT_PROT_GE_6_4}%
822: %}{6_4_plot_proton_ge.eps}{\special{ language "Scientific Word";
823: %type "GRAPHIC"; maintain-aspect-ratio TRUE; display "ICON";
824: %valid_file "F"; width 6.3235in; height 7.8395in; depth 0pt;
825: %original-width 7.8698in; original-height 9.7646in; cropleft "0";
826: %croptop "1"; cropright "1"; cropbottom "0";
827: %filename '6_4_plot_proton_ge.eps';file-properties "XNPEU";}}}%
828: %BeginExpansion
829: \begin{figure}
830: [ptb]
831: \begin{center}
832: \includegraphics[
833: height=7.8395in,
834: width=6.3235in
835: ]%
836: {6_4_plot_proton_ge.eps}%
837: \caption{(Color online) LFCBM calculations using parameters (Figs.
838: \ref{PLOT_GAMMA_VS_MPI_6_0}, \ref{PLOT_GAMMA_VS_MPI_6_4} and
839: \ref{PLOT_MCHI_VS_LAT_A}) obtained by fitting the lattice results for the
840: proton electric form factor, $G_{E}$, at lattice \ spacing $a=0.26~GeV^{-1}$.}%
841: \label{PLOT_COMPARE_LAT_PROT_GE_6_4}%
842: \end{center}
843: \end{figure}
844: %EndExpansion%
845: %TCIMACRO{\FRAME{ftbpFU}{6.3235in}{7.8395in}{0pt}{\Qcb{(Color online) LFCBM
846: %calculations using parameters (Figs. \ref{PLOT_GAMMA_VS_MPI_6_0},
847: %\ref{PLOT_GAMMA_VS_MPI_6_4} and \ref{PLOT_MCHI_VS_LAT_A}) obtained by fitting
848: %the lattice results for the proton magnetic form factor, $G_{M}$, at lattice
849: %\ spacing $a=0.26~GeV^{-1}$.}}{\Qlb{PLOT_COMPARE_LAT_PROT_GM_6_4}%
850: %}{6_4_plot_proton_gm.eps}{\special{ language "Scientific Word";
851: %type "GRAPHIC"; maintain-aspect-ratio TRUE; display "ICON";
852: %valid_file "F"; width 6.3235in; height 7.8395in; depth 0pt;
853: %original-width 7.8698in; original-height 9.7646in; cropleft "0";
854: %croptop "1"; cropright "1"; cropbottom "0";
855: %filename '6_4_plot_proton_gm.eps';file-properties "XNPEU";}}}%
856: %BeginExpansion
857: \begin{figure}
858: [ptbptb]
859: \begin{center}
860: \includegraphics[
861: height=7.8395in,
862: width=6.3235in
863: ]%
864: {6_4_plot_proton_gm.eps}%
865: \caption{(Color online) LFCBM calculations using parameters (Figs.
866: \ref{PLOT_GAMMA_VS_MPI_6_0}, \ref{PLOT_GAMMA_VS_MPI_6_4} and
867: \ref{PLOT_MCHI_VS_LAT_A}) obtained by fitting the lattice results for the
868: proton magnetic form factor, $G_{M}$, at lattice \ spacing $a=0.26~GeV^{-1}$.}%
869: \label{PLOT_COMPARE_LAT_PROT_GM_6_4}%
870: \end{center}
871: \end{figure}
872: %EndExpansion%
873: %TCIMACRO{\FRAME{ftbpFU}{6.3235in}{7.8395in}{0pt}{\Qcb{(Color online) LFCBM
874: %calculations using parameters (Figs.\ref{PLOT_GAMMA_VS_MPI_6_0},
875: %\ref{PLOT_GAMMA_VS_MPI_6_4} and \ref{PLOT_MCHI_VS_LAT_A}) obtained by fitting
876: %the lattice results for the neutron electric form factor, $G_{E}$, at lattice
877: %\ spacing $a=0.26~GeV^{-1}$.}}{\Qlb{PLOT_COMPARE_LAT_NEUT_GE_6_4}%
878: %}{6_4_plot_neutron_ge.eps}{\special{ language "Scientific Word";
879: %type "GRAPHIC"; maintain-aspect-ratio TRUE; display "ICON";
880: %valid_file "F"; width 6.3235in; height 7.8395in; depth 0pt;
881: %original-width 7.8698in; original-height 9.7646in; cropleft "0";
882: %croptop "1"; cropright "1"; cropbottom "0";
883: %filename '6_4_plot_neutron_ge.eps';file-properties "XNPEU";}}}%
884: %BeginExpansion
885: \begin{figure}
886: [ptbptbptb]
887: \begin{center}
888: \includegraphics[
889: height=7.8395in,
890: width=6.3235in
891: ]%
892: {6_4_plot_neutron_ge.eps}%
893: \caption{(Color online) LFCBM calculations using parameters
894: (Figs.\ref{PLOT_GAMMA_VS_MPI_6_0}, \ref{PLOT_GAMMA_VS_MPI_6_4} and
895: \ref{PLOT_MCHI_VS_LAT_A}) obtained by fitting the lattice results for the
896: neutron electric form factor, $G_{E}$, at lattice \ spacing $a=0.26~GeV^{-1}%
897: $.}%
898: \label{PLOT_COMPARE_LAT_NEUT_GE_6_4}%
899: \end{center}
900: \end{figure}
901: %EndExpansion%
902: %TCIMACRO{\FRAME{ftbpFU}{6.3235in}{7.7608in}{0pt}{\Qcb{(Color online) LFCBM
903: %calculations using parameters (Figs.\ref{PLOT_GAMMA_VS_MPI_6_0},
904: %\ref{PLOT_GAMMA_VS_MPI_6_4} and \ref{PLOT_MCHI_VS_LAT_A}) obtained by fitting
905: %the lattice results for the neutron magnetic form factor, $G_{M}$, at lattice
906: %\ spacing $a=0.26~GeV^{-1}$.}}{\Qlb{PLOT_COMPARE_LAT_NEUT_GM_6_4}%
907: %}{6_4_plot_neutron_gm.eps}{\special{ language "Scientific Word";
908: %type "GRAPHIC"; maintain-aspect-ratio TRUE; display "ICON";
909: %valid_file "F"; width 6.3235in; height 7.7608in; depth 0pt;
910: %original-width 7.8698in; original-height 9.7646in; cropleft "0";
911: %croptop "1"; cropright "1"; cropbottom "0";
912: %filename '6_4_plot_neutron_gm.eps';file-properties "XNPEU";}}}%
913: %BeginExpansion
914: \begin{figure}
915: [ptbptbptbptb]
916: \begin{center}
917: \includegraphics[
918: height=7.7608in,
919: width=6.3235in
920: ]%
921: {6_4_plot_neutron_gm.eps}%
922: \caption{(Color online) LFCBM calculations using parameters
923: (Figs.\ref{PLOT_GAMMA_VS_MPI_6_0}, \ref{PLOT_GAMMA_VS_MPI_6_4} and
924: \ref{PLOT_MCHI_VS_LAT_A}) obtained by fitting the lattice results for the
925: neutron magnetic form factor, $G_{M}$, at lattice \ spacing $a=0.26~GeV^{-1}%
926: $.}%
927: \label{PLOT_COMPARE_LAT_NEUT_GM_6_4}%
928: \end{center}
929: \end{figure}
930: %EndExpansion%
931: %TCIMACRO{\FRAME{ftbpFU}{6.3235in}{7.8395in}{0pt}{\Qcb{(Color online) LFCBM
932: %calculations using parameters (Figs.\ref{PLOT_GAMMA_VS_MPI_6_0},
933: %\ref{PLOT_GAMMA_VS_MPI_6_4} and \ref{PLOT_MCHI_VS_LAT_A}) obtained by
934: %reproducing lattice results for the ratio of proton form factors, $\mu
935: %_{0}G_{E}/G_{M}$, at lattice \ spacing $a=0.26~GeV^{-1}$. }}%
936: %{\Qlb{PLOT_COMPARE_LAT_PROT_6_4}}{6_4_plot_compare_proton_ge_gm.eps}%
937: %{\special{ language "Scientific Word"; type "GRAPHIC";
938: %maintain-aspect-ratio TRUE; display "ICON"; valid_file "F";
939: %width 6.3235in; height 7.8395in; depth 0pt; original-width 7.8698in;
940: %original-height 9.7646in; cropleft "0"; croptop "1"; cropright "1";
941: %cropbottom "0";
942: %filename '6_4_plot_compare_proton_ge_gm.eps';file-properties "XNPEU";}}}%
943: %BeginExpansion
944: \begin{figure}
945: [ptbptbptbptbptb]
946: \begin{center}
947: \includegraphics[
948: height=7.8395in,
949: width=6.3235in
950: ]%
951: {6_4_plot_compare_proton_ge_gm.eps}%
952: \caption{(Color online) LFCBM calculations using parameters
953: (Figs.\ref{PLOT_GAMMA_VS_MPI_6_0}, \ref{PLOT_GAMMA_VS_MPI_6_4} and
954: \ref{PLOT_MCHI_VS_LAT_A}) obtained by reproducing lattice results for the
955: ratio of proton form factors, $\mu_{0}G_{E}/G_{M}$, at lattice \ spacing
956: $a=0.26~GeV^{-1}$. }%
957: \label{PLOT_COMPARE_LAT_PROT_6_4}%
958: \end{center}
959: \end{figure}
960: %EndExpansion%
961: %TCIMACRO{\FRAME{ftbpFU}{6.3209in}{7.8395in}{0pt}{\Qcb{(Color online) LFCBM
962: %calculations using parameters (Figs.\ref{PLOT_GAMMA_VS_MPI_6_0},
963: %\ref{PLOT_GAMMA_VS_MPI_6_4} and \ref{PLOT_MCHI_VS_LAT_A}) obtained by
964: %reproducing lattice results for the ratio of neutron form factors, $\mu
965: %_{0}G_{E}/G_{M}$, at lattice \ spacing $a=0.26~GeV^{-1}$. }}%
966: %{\Qlb{PLOT_COMPARE_LAT_NEUT_6_4}}{6_4_plot_compare_neutron_ge_gm.eps}%
967: %{\special{ language "Scientific Word"; type "GRAPHIC";
968: %maintain-aspect-ratio TRUE; display "ICON"; valid_file "F";
969: %width 6.3209in; height 7.8395in; depth 0pt; original-width 7.8698in;
970: %original-height 9.7646in; cropleft "0"; croptop "1"; cropright "0.9997";
971: %cropbottom "0";
972: %filename '6_4_plot_compare_neutron_ge_gm.eps';file-properties "XNPEU";}}}%
973: %BeginExpansion
974: \begin{figure}
975: [ptbptbptbptbptbptb]
976: \begin{center}
977: \includegraphics[
978: trim=0.000000in 0.000000in 0.002361in 0.000000in,
979: height=7.8395in,
980: width=6.3209in
981: ]%
982: {6_4_plot_compare_neutron_ge_gm.eps}%
983: \caption{(Color online) LFCBM calculations using parameters
984: (Figs.\ref{PLOT_GAMMA_VS_MPI_6_0}, \ref{PLOT_GAMMA_VS_MPI_6_4} and
985: \ref{PLOT_MCHI_VS_LAT_A}) obtained by reproducing lattice results for the
986: ratio of neutron form factors, $\mu_{0}G_{E}/G_{M}$, at lattice \ spacing
987: $a=0.26~GeV^{-1}$. }%
988: \label{PLOT_COMPARE_LAT_NEUT_6_4}%
989: \end{center}
990: \end{figure}
991: %EndExpansion
992:
993:
994: \subsection{Results at the Physical Pion Mass and Comparison With
995: Experiment\label{M_PHYS}}
996:
997: We use the extrapolated values of $\gamma$ and $M$
998: (Figs.~\ref{PLOT_GAMMA_VS_MPI_6_0}-\ref{PLOT_MCHI_VS_LAT_A}) to calculate the
999: nucleon electric and magnetic form factors using the physical pion and nucleon
1000: masses. The resulting plots for $G_{E}$, $G_{M}$ and their ratios vs. $Q^{2}$
1001: for both proton and neutron are shown in Figs.~\ref{PLOT_PHYS_GE_PROT_6_4}%
1002: -\ref{PLOT_PHYS_GE/GM_NEUT_6_4}. Figure~\ref{PLOT_PHYS_GE/GM_PROT_6_4} shows
1003: that our results are in\ more or less good agreement with the experimental
1004: data in the low-$Q^{2}$ region, but yield a slightly lower value of $Q^{2}$
1005: for the zero cross-over point than that extrapolated from
1006: experiment~\cite{GE/GM_0_MELNICHUK}. A new analysis that includes an estimate
1007: of all of the effects of two photon exchange yields a zero-crossing value that
1008: is somewhat closer to ours~\cite{GE/GM-0-CROSS} but future data will resolve
1009: this unambiguously.
1010: %TCIMACRO{\FRAME{ftbpFU}{6.2958in}{7.8118in}{0pt}{\Qcb{(Color online)
1011: %Extrapolated calculations for the proton electric form factor, $G_{E}$, for
1012: %lattice spacing $a=0.26~GeV^{-1}$. The dashed and dotted curves show the upper
1013: %and lower limits of variation of the calculated values due to the
1014: %uncertainties of the parameters $\gamma$ and $M_{\chi}$.}}%
1015: %{\Qlb{PLOT_PHYS_GE_PROT_6_4}}{6_4_phys_plot_proton_ge.eps}%
1016: %{\special{ language "Scientific Word"; type "GRAPHIC";
1017: %maintain-aspect-ratio TRUE; display "ICON"; valid_file "F";
1018: %width 6.2958in; height 7.8118in; depth 0pt; original-width 7.8698in;
1019: %original-height 9.7646in; cropleft "0"; croptop "1"; cropright "1";
1020: %cropbottom "0";
1021: %filename '6_4_phys_plot_proton_ge.eps';file-properties "XNPEU";}}}%
1022: %BeginExpansion
1023: \begin{figure}
1024: [ptb]
1025: \begin{center}
1026: \includegraphics[
1027: height=7.8118in,
1028: width=6.2958in
1029: ]%
1030: {6_4_phys_plot_proton_ge.eps}%
1031: \caption{(Color online) Extrapolated calculations for the proton electric form
1032: factor, $G_{E}$, for lattice spacing $a=0.26~GeV^{-1}$. The dashed and dotted
1033: curves show the upper and lower limits of variation of the calculated values
1034: due to the uncertainties of the parameters $\gamma$ and $M_{\chi}$.}%
1035: \label{PLOT_PHYS_GE_PROT_6_4}%
1036: \end{center}
1037: \end{figure}
1038: %EndExpansion%
1039: %TCIMACRO{\FRAME{ftbpFU}{6.2958in}{7.8118in}{0pt}{\Qcb{(Color online)
1040: %Extrapolated calculations for the proton magnetic form factor, $G_{M}$, for
1041: %lattice spacing $a=0.26~GeV^{-1}$. The dashed and dotted curves show the upper
1042: %and lower limits of variation of the calculated values due to the
1043: %uncertainties of the parameters $\gamma$ and $M_{\chi}$.}}%
1044: %{\Qlb{PLOT_PHYS_GM_PROT_6_4}}{6_4_phys_plot_proton_gm.eps}%
1045: %{\special{ language "Scientific Word"; type "GRAPHIC";
1046: %maintain-aspect-ratio TRUE; display "ICON"; valid_file "F";
1047: %width 6.2958in; height 7.8118in; depth 0pt; original-width 7.8698in;
1048: %original-height 9.7646in; cropleft "0"; croptop "1"; cropright "1";
1049: %cropbottom "0";
1050: %filename '6_4_phys_plot_proton_gm.eps';file-properties "XNPEU";}}}%
1051: %BeginExpansion
1052: \begin{figure}
1053: [ptbptb]
1054: \begin{center}
1055: \includegraphics[
1056: height=7.8118in,
1057: width=6.2958in
1058: ]%
1059: {6_4_phys_plot_proton_gm.eps}%
1060: \caption{(Color online) Extrapolated calculations for the proton magnetic form
1061: factor, $G_{M}$, for lattice spacing $a=0.26~GeV^{-1}$. The dashed and dotted
1062: curves show the upper and lower limits of variation of the calculated values
1063: due to the uncertainties of the parameters $\gamma$ and $M_{\chi}$.}%
1064: \label{PLOT_PHYS_GM_PROT_6_4}%
1065: \end{center}
1066: \end{figure}
1067: %EndExpansion%
1068: %TCIMACRO{\FRAME{ftbpFU}{6.3235in}{7.8395in}{0pt}{\Qcb{(Color online)
1069: %Extrapolated calculations for the ratio of proton form factors, $\mu_{0}%
1070: %G_{E}/G_{M}$, for lattice spacing $a=0.26~GeV^{-1}$. The dashed and dotted
1071: %curves show the upper and lower limits of variation of the calculated values
1072: %due to the uncertainties of the parameters $\gamma$ and $M_{\chi}$.}%
1073: %}{\Qlb{PLOT_PHYS_GE/GM_PROT_6_4}}{6_4_phys_plot_proton_ge_over_gm.eps}%
1074: %{\special{ language "Scientific Word"; type "GRAPHIC";
1075: %maintain-aspect-ratio TRUE; display "ICON"; valid_file "F";
1076: %width 6.3235in; height 7.8395in; depth 0pt; original-width 7.8698in;
1077: %original-height 9.7646in; cropleft "0"; croptop "1"; cropright "1";
1078: %cropbottom "0";
1079: %filename '6_4_phys_plot_proton_ge_over_gm.eps';file-properties "XNPEU";}}}%
1080: %BeginExpansion
1081: \begin{figure}
1082: [ptbptbptb]
1083: \begin{center}
1084: \includegraphics[
1085: height=7.8395in,
1086: width=6.3235in
1087: ]%
1088: {6_4_phys_plot_proton_ge_over_gm.eps}%
1089: \caption{(Color online) Extrapolated calculations for the ratio of proton form
1090: factors, $\mu_{0}G_{E}/G_{M}$, for lattice spacing $a=0.26~GeV^{-1}$. The
1091: dashed and dotted curves show the upper and lower limits of variation of the
1092: calculated values due to the uncertainties of the parameters $\gamma$ and
1093: $M_{\chi}$.}%
1094: \label{PLOT_PHYS_GE/GM_PROT_6_4}%
1095: \end{center}
1096: \end{figure}
1097: %EndExpansion%
1098: %TCIMACRO{\FRAME{ftbpFU}{6.3235in}{7.7617in}{0pt}{\Qcb{(Color online)
1099: %Extrapolated calculations for the neutron electric form factor, $G_{E}$, for
1100: %lattice spacing $a=0.26~GeV^{-1}$. The dashed and dotted curves show the upper
1101: %and lower limits of variation of the calculated values due to the
1102: %uncertainties of the parameters $\gamma$ and $M_{\chi}$.}}%
1103: %{\Qlb{PLOT_PHYS_GE_NEUT_6_4}}{6_4_phys_plot_neutron_ge.eps}%
1104: %{\special{ language "Scientific Word"; type "GRAPHIC";
1105: %maintain-aspect-ratio TRUE; display "ICON"; valid_file "F";
1106: %width 6.3235in; height 7.7617in; depth 0pt; original-width 7.8698in;
1107: %original-height 9.6669in; cropleft "0"; croptop "1"; cropright "1";
1108: %cropbottom "0";
1109: %filename '6_4_phys_plot_neutron_ge.eps';file-properties "XNPEU";}}}%
1110: %BeginExpansion
1111: \begin{figure}
1112: [ptbptbptbptb]
1113: \begin{center}
1114: \includegraphics[
1115: height=7.7617in,
1116: width=6.3235in
1117: ]%
1118: {6_4_phys_plot_neutron_ge.eps}%
1119: \caption{(Color online) Extrapolated calculations for the neutron electric
1120: form factor, $G_{E}$, for lattice spacing $a=0.26~GeV^{-1}$. The dashed and
1121: dotted curves show the upper and lower limits of variation of the calculated
1122: values due to the uncertainties of the parameters $\gamma$ and $M_{\chi}$.}%
1123: \label{PLOT_PHYS_GE_NEUT_6_4}%
1124: \end{center}
1125: \end{figure}
1126: %EndExpansion%
1127: %TCIMACRO{\FRAME{ftbpFU}{6.2958in}{7.7323in}{0pt}{\Qcb{(Color online)
1128: %Extrapolated calculations for the neutron magnetic form factor,$\ G_{M}$, for
1129: %lattice spacing $a=0.26~GeV^{-1}$. The dashed and dotted curves show the upper
1130: %and lower limits of variation of the calculated values due to the
1131: %uncertainties of the parameters $\gamma$ and $M_{\chi}$.}}%
1132: %{\Qlb{PLOT_PHYS_GM_NEUT_6_4}}{6_4_phys_plot_neutron_gm.eps}%
1133: %{\special{ language "Scientific Word"; type "GRAPHIC";
1134: %maintain-aspect-ratio TRUE; display "ICON"; valid_file "F";
1135: %width 6.2958in; height 7.7323in; depth 0pt; original-width 7.8698in;
1136: %original-height 9.6669in; cropleft "0"; croptop "1"; cropright "1";
1137: %cropbottom "0";
1138: %filename '6_4_phys_plot_neutron_gm.eps';file-properties "XNPEU";}}}%
1139: %BeginExpansion
1140: \begin{figure}
1141: [ptbptbptbptbptb]
1142: \begin{center}
1143: \includegraphics[
1144: height=7.7323in,
1145: width=6.2958in
1146: ]%
1147: {6_4_phys_plot_neutron_gm.eps}%
1148: \caption{(Color online) Extrapolated calculations for the neutron magnetic
1149: form factor,$\ G_{M}$, for lattice spacing $a=0.26~GeV^{-1}$. The dashed and
1150: dotted curves show the upper and lower limits of variation of the calculated
1151: values due to the uncertainties of the parameters $\gamma$ and $M_{\chi}$.}%
1152: \label{PLOT_PHYS_GM_NEUT_6_4}%
1153: \end{center}
1154: \end{figure}
1155: %EndExpansion%
1156: %TCIMACRO{\FRAME{ftbpFU}{6.3235in}{7.8395in}{0pt}{\Qcb{(Color online)
1157: %Extrapolated calculations for the ratio of neutron form factors, $\mu_{0}%
1158: %G_{E}/G_{M}$, for lattice spacing $a=0.26~GeV^{-1}$. The dashed and dotted
1159: %curves show the upper and lower limits of variation of the calculated values
1160: %due to the uncertainties of the parameters $\gamma$ and $M_{\chi}$.}%
1161: %}{\Qlb{PLOT_PHYS_GE/GM_NEUT_6_4}}{6_4_phys_plot_neutron_ge_over_gm.eps}%
1162: %{\special{ language "Scientific Word"; type "GRAPHIC";
1163: %maintain-aspect-ratio TRUE; display "ICON"; valid_file "F";
1164: %width 6.3235in; height 7.8395in; depth 0pt; original-width 7.8698in;
1165: %original-height 9.7646in; cropleft "0"; croptop "1"; cropright "1";
1166: %cropbottom "0";
1167: %filename '6_4_phys_plot_neutron_ge_over_gm.eps';file-properties "XNPEU";}}}%
1168: %BeginExpansion
1169: \begin{figure}
1170: [ptbptbptbptbptbptb]
1171: \begin{center}
1172: \includegraphics[
1173: height=7.8395in,
1174: width=6.3235in
1175: ]%
1176: {6_4_phys_plot_neutron_ge_over_gm.eps}%
1177: \caption{(Color online) Extrapolated calculations for the ratio of neutron
1178: form factors, $\mu_{0}G_{E}/G_{M}$, for lattice spacing $a=0.26~GeV^{-1}$. The
1179: dashed and dotted curves show the upper and lower limits of variation of the
1180: calculated values due to the uncertainties of the parameters $\gamma$ and
1181: $M_{\chi}$.}%
1182: \label{PLOT_PHYS_GE/GM_NEUT_6_4}%
1183: \end{center}
1184: \end{figure}
1185: %EndExpansion
1186:
1187:
1188: An alternative method of determining the value of the $Q^{2}$ for which
1189: $G_{E}/G_{M}$ passes through zero at the physical pion mass is to fit the
1190: crossover values as a linear function of $m_{\pi}^{2}$ and extrapolate again
1191: to the physical pion mass. The resulting plot is shown in {}%
1192: Fig.~\ref{PLOT_GE_GM_0_INTERCEPT}.%
1193: %TCIMACRO{\FRAME{ftbpFU}{5.0566in}{4.8144in}{0pt}{\Qcb{(Color online)
1194: %Extrapolation of $Q_{Cross}^{2}$ where $G_{E}/G_{M}$ passes through zero for
1195: %lattice spacing $a=0.26~GeV^{-1}$.\ }}{\Qlb{PLOT_GE_GM_0_INTERCEPT}%
1196: %}{ge_gm_intersept_sq_vs_mpi_sq_fit_6_4.ps}%
1197: %{\special{ language "Scientific Word"; type "GRAPHIC";
1198: %maintain-aspect-ratio TRUE; display "ICON"; valid_file "F";
1199: %width 5.0566in; height 4.8144in; depth 0pt; original-width 7.8776in;
1200: %original-height 7.4988in; cropleft "0"; croptop "1"; cropright "1";
1201: %cropbottom "0";
1202: %filename '6_4_plot_prot_ge_gm_interpet_vs_mpi_sq_fit.eps';file-properties "XNPEU";}%
1203: %}}%
1204: %BeginExpansion
1205: \begin{figure}
1206: [ptb]
1207: \begin{center}
1208: \includegraphics[
1209: height=4.8144in,
1210: width=5.0566in
1211: ]%
1212: {6_4_plot_prot_ge_gm_interpet_vs_mpi_sq_fit.eps}%
1213: \caption{(Color online) Extrapolation of $Q_{Cross}^{2}$ where $G_{E}/G_{M}$
1214: passes through zero for lattice spacing $a=0.26~GeV^{-1}$.\ }%
1215: \label{PLOT_GE_GM_0_INTERCEPT}%
1216: \end{center}
1217: \end{figure}
1218: %EndExpansion
1219: This procedure yields approximately the same cross-over point as found in
1220: Fig.~\ref{PLOT_PHYS_GE/GM_PROT_6_4}.
1221:
1222: \section{Discussion\label{RESULTS_AND_MODEL}}
1223:
1224: Our study of the form factors calculated using the LFCBM with parameters
1225: determined by lattice data and by extrapolation to the physical pion masses
1226: yields very interesting results. The ratio $G_{E}^{p}/G_{M}^{p}$ passes
1227: through zero for all of the calculations. The main variation of the position
1228: of the crossover between the fitting curves shown in
1229: Figs.~\ref{PLOT_COMPARE_LAT_PROT_6_4} and \ref{PLOT_COMPARE_LAT_NEUT_6_4}
1230: comes from the variation of the nucleon mass, and not the variation of
1231: $\gamma$. Even though for the physical pion mass, the ratio varies rapidly as
1232: a function of $\gamma$ in the region $\gamma\thicksim-2$, the function
1233: $G_{E}/G_{M}$ for the neutron has a turning point at about $\gamma
1234: \thicksim-2.3$. We shall explain these features using the LFCBM.
1235:
1236: Let us express the ratio $G_{E}/G_{M}$ in terms of Pauli and Dirac form
1237: factors, $F_{1}$ and $F_{2}$, respectively, using Eq.~(\ref{FORMULA_G_TO_F})%
1238: \begin{equation}
1239: \frac{G_{E}}{G_{M}}=\frac{F_{1}-Q^{2}/(4M_{N}^{2})F_{2}}{F_{1}+F_{2}}%
1240: =1-\frac{1+Q^{2}/(4M_{N}^{2})}{1+F_{1}/F_{2}} \label{FORMULA_GE/GM_EXPAND}%
1241: \end{equation}
1242: Consider first the values of $Q^{2}=(Q^{2}_{\mathrm{Cross}})$ where the ratio
1243: $G_{E}/G_{M}$ for the proton passes through zero for the set of calculations
1244: shown in Fig. \ref{PLOT_COMPARE_LAT_PROT_6_4}.
1245: Equation~(\ref{FORMULA_GE/GM_EXPAND}) tells us that
1246: \begin{equation}
1247: Q_{\mathrm{Cross}}^{2}=4M_{N}^{2}\frac{F_{1}}{F_{2}}
1248: \label{FORMULA_Q2_CROSS_OVER}%
1249: \end{equation}
1250:
1251:
1252: Now let us consider the formula for $F_{i\alpha}(Q^{2})$,
1253: Eq.~(\ref{FORMULA_F_TO_F0_FB_FC}). The second and third terms in
1254: Eq.~(\ref{FORMULA_F_TO_F0_FB_FC}) are only significant in the $low-Q^{2}$
1255: region for physical pion masses. In the $high-Q^{2}$ region, or for lattice
1256: calculations with high pion mass, these terms are vanishingly small. Indeed
1257: the numerical calculations support these statements, so we can neglect their
1258: contribution in the rest of the discussion.
1259:
1260: The corresponding formulas for $F_{1}^{(0)}$ and $F_{2}^{(0)}$ from
1261: Ref.~\cite{Miller:2002qb} are%
1262: \begin{equation}
1263: F_{1}^{(0)}(Q^{2})=\int\frac{d^{2}q_{\bot}d\xi}{\xi(1-\xi)}\frac{d^{2}K_{\bot
1264: }d\eta}{\eta(1-\eta)}\tilde{\Phi}^{\dagger}(M_{0}^{\prime})\tilde{\Phi}%
1265: (M_{0})\times\left\langle \chi_{0}^{rel}(\mathbf{p}_{1}^{\prime}%
1266: ,\mathbf{p}_{2}^{\prime})|\chi_{0}^{rel}(\mathbf{p}_{1},\mathbf{p}%
1267: _{2})\right\rangle \left\langle \uparrow\mathbf{p}_{3}^{\prime}|\uparrow
1268: \mathbf{p}_{3}\right\rangle \label{FORMULA_F10_PROT}%
1269: \end{equation}%
1270: \begin{equation}
1271: {\frac{QF_{2}^{(0)}(Q^{2})}{2M_{N}}}=\int\frac{d^{2}q_{\bot}d\xi}{\xi(1-\xi
1272: )}\frac{d^{2}K_{\bot}d\eta}{\eta(1-\eta)}\tilde{\Phi}^{\dagger}(M_{0}^{\prime
1273: })\tilde{\Phi}(M_{0})\times\left\langle \chi_{0}^{rel}(\mathbf{p}_{1}^{\prime
1274: },\mathbf{p}_{2}^{\prime})|\chi_{0}^{rel}(\mathbf{p}_{1},\mathbf{p}%
1275: _{2})\right\rangle \left\langle \uparrow\mathbf{p}_{3}^{\prime}|\downarrow
1276: \mathbf{p}_{3}\right\rangle \label{FORMULA_F20_PROT}%
1277: \end{equation}
1278: The $\tilde{\Phi}(M_{0})$ factors are wave functions of the form of
1279: Eq.~(\ref{FORMULA_SPAT_WAV_FUNC}), but using the lattice values of $\gamma,M$
1280: shown in Figs.\ref{PLOT_GAMMA_VS_MPI_6_0}-\ref{PLOT_MCHI_VS_LAT_A}. We stress
1281: that these two integrals differ only by the last factor, which gives the spin
1282: non-flip and spin-flip dependence of $F_{1}^{(0)}$ and $QF_{2}^{(0)}/2M_{N}$,
1283: respectively. At high $Q^{2}$ these matrix elements are each of order $Q$,
1284: causing the ratio $QF_{2}/F_{1}$ to be approximately constant. So we can
1285: express $Q_{Cross}^{2}$ as%
1286: \begin{equation}
1287: Q_{Cross}^{2}=4M_{N}^{2}\left( \frac{\int\nolimits_{\uparrow\uparrow}}%
1288: {\int_{\uparrow\downarrow}}\right) ^{2} \label{FORMULA_Q2_CROSS_VIA_INTGL}%
1289: \end{equation}
1290: where $\int\nolimits_{\uparrow\uparrow}$ denotes the integral for $F_{1}%
1291: ^{(0)}$, and $\int_{\uparrow\downarrow}$ denotes the integral for $F_{2}%
1292: ^{(0)}$.
1293:
1294: In the high-$Q^{2}$ region the ratio in Eq.~(\ref{FORMULA_Q2_CROSS_VIA_INTGL})
1295: is approximately a constant, because the difference comes only from the
1296: overlap factors of the spin-dependent parts of the wave functions in the
1297: integrals (See \cite{Miller:2002ig},\cite{Miller:2003sa}). So the behavior of
1298: $Q_{Cross}^{2}$ is governed primarily by the factor $M_{N}^{2}$. The linear
1299: variation of $Q_{Cross}^{2}$ vs. $M_{N}^{2}$ presented in
1300: Fig.~\ref{PLOT_GE_GM_0_INTERCEPT_VS_MNUCL} shows the validity of this
1301: interpretation.
1302: %TCIMACRO{\FRAME{ftbpFU}{4.7547in}{4.5186in}{0pt}{\Qcb{(Color online) Linear
1303: %fit of $Q_{Cross}^{2}$ where $G_{E}/G_{M}$ passes through zero for lattice
1304: %spacing $a=0.26~GeV^{-1}$.\ }}{\Qlb{PLOT_GE_GM_0_INTERCEPT_VS_MNUCL}%
1305: %}{6_4_plot_prot_ge_gm_interpet_vs_mnucl_sq_fit.eps}%
1306: %{\special{ language "Scientific Word"; type "GRAPHIC";
1307: %maintain-aspect-ratio TRUE; display "ICON"; valid_file "F";
1308: %width 4.7547in; height 4.5186in; depth 0pt; original-width 7.8776in;
1309: %original-height 7.4832in; cropleft "0"; croptop "1"; cropright "1";
1310: %cropbottom "0";
1311: %filename '6_4_plot_prot_ge_gm_interpet_vs_mnucl_sq_fit.eps';file-properties "XNPEU";}%
1312: %}}%
1313: %BeginExpansion
1314: \begin{figure}
1315: [ptb]
1316: \begin{center}
1317: \includegraphics[
1318: height=4.5186in,
1319: width=4.7547in
1320: ]%
1321: {6_4_plot_prot_ge_gm_interpet_vs_mnucl_sq_fit.eps}%
1322: \caption{(Color online) Linear fit of $Q_{Cross}^{2}$ where $G_{E}/G_{M}$
1323: passes through zero for lattice spacing $a=0.26~GeV^{-1}$.\ }%
1324: \label{PLOT_GE_GM_0_INTERCEPT_VS_MNUCL}%
1325: \end{center}
1326: \end{figure}
1327: %EndExpansion
1328:
1329:
1330: We can also understand the behavior of $G_{E}/G_{M}$ versus $\gamma$, by
1331: considering its role in the wave function. The factor $\gamma$ determines the
1332: size of the momenta appearing in the integrands of Eqs.(\ref{FORMULA_F10_PROT}%
1333: ) and (\ref{FORMULA_F20_PROT}). The corresponding integrands differ by terms
1334: that are ratios of second order polynomials of the integration variables. For
1335: large absolute values of $\gamma$, the high momenta are cut off more strongly,
1336: so that the contribution of terms that cause differences between the integrals
1337: are not very significant. For small absolute values of $\gamma$ the integrals
1338: become more sensitive to those terms and we obtain a larger variation of the
1339: ratios of the integrals and hence the ratio $G_{E}/G_{M}$.
1340:
1341: \section{Conclusion}
1342:
1343: We have seen that the LFCBM can produce a very good description of the lattice
1344: QCD data for the nucleon form factors over a wide range of quark masses with a
1345: smooth, analytic variation of the wave function parameter, $\gamma$, and the
1346: constituent quark mass, $M$. The pion cloud plays very little role in the mass
1347: range for which the lattice simulations have been made but it rapidly becomes
1348: more important as we approach the chiral limit. From the rather strong
1349: dependence of the form factors on the lattice spacing, $a$, it is not yet
1350: clear that we have obtained a good approximation to the continuum limit, but
1351: the form factors obtained at the smallest value of $a$ are in reasonable
1352: agreement with experimental data in the low-$Q^{2}$ region for which the
1353: lattice simulations were made.
1354:
1355: At present the lattice simulations are limited to values of the momentum
1356: transfer at or below $2%
1357: %TCIMACRO{\unit{GeV}}%
1358: %BeginExpansion
1359: \operatorname{GeV}%
1360: %EndExpansion
1361: ^{2}$ and it is therefore a very big extrapolation to look at the behavior of
1362: the form factors in the region of greatest current interest. Nevertheless, the
1363: behavior of $G_{E}/G_{M}$ which we find is particularly interesting. The ratio
1364: crosses zero for all values of the quark mass but the position where this
1365: happens varies over a very wide range of $Q^{2}$. This variation can be
1366: understood almost entirely in terms of the variation of the corresponding
1367: nucleon mass, given that the ratio $QF_{1}/F_{2}$ is approximately $Q^{2}$
1368: independent in the model. We obtain the same value of $Q^{2}$ for the
1369: cross-over whether we extrapolate the position as a function of quark mass or
1370: simply evaluate the form factors at the physical pion mass, using the fitted
1371: dependence of the wave function parameters on pion mass.
1372:
1373: In the immediate future it is clearly very important to improve on the lattice
1374: data, both by ensuring that we really have a good approximation to the
1375: continuum limit (e.g., by using a suitably improved action) and by extending
1376: the calculations to higher values of $Q^{2}$. It would also be important to
1377: remove the need for quenching, even though that may not be such a limitation
1378: at large $Q^{2}$. From the point of view of developing a deeper understanding
1379: of QCD itself it is important that the LFCBM is able to describe the present
1380: lattice data over such a wide range of masses. We would encourage a similar
1381: exercise for other models as a novel test of their validity. It remains to be
1382: seen whether the LFCBM has indeed been successful in predicting the behavior
1383: of the form factors at higher $Q^{2}$ and indeed whether it will match future
1384: experimental data.
1385:
1386: \section*{Acknowledgements}
1387:
1388: This work was supported in part by the U.S. National Science Foundation (Grant
1389: Number 0140300), the Southeastern Universities Research Association(SURA), DOE
1390: grant DE-AC05-84ER40150, under which SURA operates Jefferson Lab, and also DOE
1391: grant DE-FG02-97ER41014. G.~A.~M. thanks Jefferson Lab for its hospitality
1392: during the course of this work. H. H. M. thanks the Graduate School of
1393: Louisiana State University for a fellowship partially supporting his research.
1394:
1395: \begin{thebibliography}{99} %
1396: %\cite{Thomas:2001kw}
1397:
1398:
1399: \bibitem {Thomas:2001kw}A.~W.~Thomas and W.~Weise, ``The Structure of the
1400: Nucleon,'' Wiley-VCH, New York (2001)
1401: %\href{http://www.slac.stanford.edu/spires/find/hep/www?irn=4679733}{SPIRES entry}
1402: %\cite{Reichelt:2003iw}
1403:
1404:
1405: \bibitem {Reichelt:2003iw}T.~Reichelt \textit{et al.} [Jefferson Laboratory
1406: E93-038 Collaboration],
1407: %``Measurement of the neutron electric form factor via recoil polarimetry,''
1408: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ A \textbf{18}, 181 (2003).
1409: %%CITATION = EPHJA,A18,181;%%
1410: %\cite{Glazier:2004ny}
1411:
1412:
1413: \bibitem {Glazier:2004ny}D.~I.~Glazier \textit{et al.},
1414: %``Measurement of the Electric Form Factor of the Neutron at Q^2 = 0.3-0.8
1415: %(GeV/c)^2,''
1416: arXiv:nucl-ex/0410026.
1417: %%CITATION = NUCL-EX 0410026;%%
1418: %\cite{Friedrich:2003iz}
1419:
1420:
1421: \bibitem {Friedrich:2003iz}J.~Friedrich and T.~Walcher,
1422: %``A coherent interpretation of the form factors of the nucleon in terms of a
1423: %pion cloud and constituent quarks,''
1424: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ A \textbf{17}, 607 (2003) [arXiv:hep-ph/0303054].
1425: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0303054;%%
1426: %\cite{Thomas:1982kv}
1427:
1428:
1429: \bibitem {Thomas:1982kv}A.~W.~Thomas,
1430: %``Chiral Symmetry And The Bag Model: A New Starting Point For Nuclear
1431: %Physics,''
1432: Adv.\ Nucl.\ Phys.\ \textbf{13}, 1 (1984).
1433: %%CITATION = ANUPB,13,1;%%
1434: G.\ A.\ Miller, Int. Rev. Nucl. Phys. \textbf{2},190 (1984).
1435:
1436: \bibitem {cbm}S.~Theberge, A.~W.~Thomas and G.~A.~Miller,
1437: %``The Cloudy Bag Model. 1. The (3,3) Resonance,''
1438: Phys.\ Rev.\ D \textbf{22}, 2838 (1980) [Erratum-ibid.\ D \textbf{23}, 2106
1439: (1981)].
1440: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D22,2838;%%
1441: A.~W.~Thomas, S.~Theberge and G.~A.~Miller,
1442: %``The Cloudy Bag Model Of The Nucleon,''
1443: Phys.\ Rev.\ D \textbf{24}, 216 (1981).
1444: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D24,216;%%%(1981);
1445: S.~Th\'eberge, G.~A.~Miller and A.~W.~Thomas,
1446: %``The Cloudy Bag Model. 4. Higher Order Corrections To The Nucleon Properties,''
1447: Can.\ J.\ Phys.\ \textbf{60}, 59 (1982).
1448: %%CITATION = CJPHA,60,59;%%
1449: G.~A.~Miller, A.~W.~Thomas and S.~Theberge,
1450: %``Pion - Nucleon Scattering In The Cloudy Bag Model,''
1451: Phys.\ Lett.\ B \textbf{91}, 192 (1980).
1452: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B91,192;%%
1453:
1454:
1455: %\cite{Jones:1999rz}
1456:
1457:
1458: \bibitem {Jones:1999rz}M.~K.~Jones \textit{et al.} [Jefferson Lab Hall A
1459: Collaboration],
1460: %``G(E(p))/G(M(p)) ratio by polarization transfer in e(pol.) p $\to$ e
1461: %p(pol.),''
1462: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ \textbf{84}, 1398 (2000).
1463: %%CITATION = NUCL-EX 9910005;%%
1464: %\cite{Gayou:2001qd}
1465:
1466:
1467: \bibitem {Gayou:2001qd}O.~Gayou \textit{et al.} [Jefferson Lab Hall A
1468: Collaboration],
1469: %``Measurement of G(E(p))/G(M(p)) in e(pol.) p $\to$ e p(pol.) to Q**2 =
1470: %5.6-GeV**2,''
1471: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ \textbf{88}, 092301 (2002).
1472: %%CITATION = NUCL-EX 0111010;%%
1473: %\cite{Miller:2003sa}
1474:
1475:
1476: \bibitem {Miller:2003sa}G.~A.~Miller,
1477: %``Shapes of the proton,''
1478: Phys.\ Rev.\ C \textbf{68}, 022201 (2003).
1479: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0304076;%%
1480: %\cite{Frank:1995pv}
1481:
1482:
1483: \bibitem {Frank:1995pv}M.~R.~Frank, B.~K.~Jennings and G.~A.~Miller,
1484: %``The Role of Color Neutrality in Nuclear Physics--Modifications of Nucleonic
1485: %Wave Functions,''
1486: Phys.\ Rev.\ C \textbf{54}, 920 (1996).
1487: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 9509030;%%
1488: %\cite{Chung:1991st}
1489:
1490:
1491: \bibitem {Chung:1991st}P.~L.~Chung and F.~Coester,
1492: %``Relativistic constituent quark model of nucleon form-factors,''
1493: Phys.\ Rev.\ D \textbf{44}, 229 (1991);
1494: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D44,229;%%
1495: %\cite{Cardarelli:2000tk}
1496: F.~Cardarelli and S.~Simula,
1497: %``SU(6) breaking effects in the nucleon elastic electromagnetic form
1498: %factors,''
1499: Phys.\ Rev.\ C \textbf{62}, 065201 (2000);
1500: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0006023;%%
1501: R.~F.~Wagenbrunn, S.~Boffi, W.~Klink, W.~Plessas and M.~Radici,
1502: %``Covariant nucleon electromagnetic form factors from the Goldstone-boson
1503: %exchange quark model,''
1504: Phys.\ Lett.\ B \textbf{511}, 33 (2001).
1505: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0010048;%%
1506:
1507:
1508: \bibitem {QCDSF Collaboration}M.~Gockeler \textit{et al.} [QCDSF
1509: Collaboration],
1510: %, T.~R.~Hemmert, R.~Horsley,
1511: %D.~Pleiter, P.~E.~L.~Rakow, A.~Schafer and G.~Schierholz [QCDSF
1512: %Collaboration],
1513: %``Nucleon electromagnetic form factors on the lattice and in chiral effective
1514: %field theory,''
1515: arXiv:hep-lat/0303019.
1516: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0303019;%%
1517: %\cite{Leinweber:1998ej}
1518:
1519:
1520: \bibitem {Leinweber:1998ej}D.~B.~Leinweber, D.~H.~Lu and A.~W.~Thomas,
1521: %``Nucleon magnetic moments beyond the perturbative chiral regime,''
1522: Phys.\ Rev.\ D \textbf{60}, 034014 (1999) [arXiv:hep-lat/9810005].
1523: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 9810005;%%
1524: %\cite{Hackett-Jones:2000qk}
1525:
1526:
1527: \bibitem {Hackett-Jones:2000qk}E.~J.~Hackett-Jones, D.~B.~Leinweber and
1528: A.~W.~Thomas,
1529: %``Incorporating chiral symmetry in extrapolations of octet baryon magnetic
1530: %moments,''
1531: Phys.\ Lett.\ B \textbf{489}, 143 (2000) [arXiv:hep-lat/0004006].
1532: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0004006;%%
1533: %\cite{Hemmert:2002uh}
1534:
1535:
1536: \bibitem {Hemmert:2002uh}T.~R.~Hemmert and W.~Weise,
1537: %``Chiral magnetism of the nucleon,''
1538: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ A \textbf{15}, 487 (2002) [arXiv:hep-lat/0204005].
1539: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0204005;%%
1540: %\cite{Young:2004tb}
1541:
1542:
1543: \bibitem {Young:2004tb}R.~D.~Young, D.~B.~Leinweber and A.~W.~Thomas,
1544: Phys.\ Rev.\ \textbf{D71}, 014001 (2005);
1545: %``Leading quenching effects in the proton magnetic moment,''
1546: arXiv:hep-lat/0406001.
1547: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0406001;%%
1548: %\cite{Ashley:2003sn}
1549:
1550:
1551: \bibitem {Ashley:2003sn}J.~D.~Ashley \textit{et al.},
1552: %``Nucleon electromagnetic form factors from lattice QCD,''
1553: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ A \textbf{19}, 9 (2004);
1554: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0308024;%%
1555: %\cite{Thomas:2003pd}
1556: %\bibitem{Thomas:2003pd}
1557: A.~W.~Thomas \textit{et al.},
1558: %``Progress in the calculation of nucleon form factors and parton distribution
1559: %functions,''
1560: Nucl.\ Phys.\ A \textbf{721} (2003) 915.
1561: %%CITATION = NUPHA,A721,915;%%
1562: %\cite{Miller:2002ig}
1563: %\cite{Cloet:2002eg}
1564:
1565:
1566: \bibitem {Cloet:2002eg}I.~C.~Cloet, D.~B.~Leinweber and A.~W.~Thomas,
1567: %``Simple quark model with chiral phenomenology,''
1568: Phys.\ Rev.\ C \textbf{65}, 062201 (2002) [arXiv:hep-ph/0203023].
1569: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0203023;%%
1570:
1571:
1572: \bibitem {Miller:2002ig}G.~A.~Miller,
1573: %``Light front cloudy bag model: Nucleon electromagnetic form factors,''
1574: Phys.\ Rev.\ C \textbf{66}, 032201 (2002).
1575: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0207007;%%
1576:
1577:
1578: \bibitem {Miller:2002qb}G.~A.~Miller and M.~R.~Frank,
1579: %``Q**2 independence of QF(2)/F(1), Poincare invariance and the non-conservation of helicity,''
1580: Phys.\ Rev.\ C \textbf{65}, 065205 (2002)
1581: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0201021;%%
1582:
1583:
1584: \bibitem {Brodsky:1980zm}S.~J.~Brodsky and S.~D.~Drell,
1585: %``The Anomalous Magnetic Moment And Limits On Fermion Substructure,''
1586: Phys.\ Rev.\ D \textbf{22}, 2236 (1980).
1587: %\cite{Gockeler:2003ay}
1588: %\cite{Schlumpf:1992ce}
1589:
1590:
1591: \bibitem {Schlumpf:1992ce}{}F.~Schlumpf,
1592: %``Relativistic constituent quark model for baryons,''
1593: arXiv:hep-ph/9211255.
1594: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9211255;%%
1595:
1596:
1597: \bibitem {Chang:qi}S.~J.~Chang and T.~M.~Yan,
1598: %``Quantum Field Theories In The Infinite Momentum Frame. 2. Scattering Matrices Of Scalar And Dirac Fields,''
1599: Phys.\ Rev.\ D \textbf{7}, 1147 (1973).
1600:
1601: \bibitem {Zoller:1991cb}V.~R.~Zoller,
1602: %``Peripheral structure of nucleon in probing with high Q**2 photons,''
1603: Z.\ Phys.\ C \textbf{53}, 443 (1992).
1604: %%CITATION = ZEPYA,C53,443;%%
1605:
1606:
1607: %\cite{Szczurek:gw}
1608:
1609:
1610: \bibitem {Szczurek:gw}H.~Holtmann, A.~Szczurek and J.~Speth,
1611: %``Flavour and Spin of the Proton and the Meson Cloud,''
1612: Nucl.\ Phys.\ A \textbf{596}, 631 (1996).
1613: %[arXiv:hep-ph/9601388].
1614: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9601388;%%
1615:
1616:
1617: %\cite{Beg:1973sc}
1618:
1619:
1620: \bibitem {Beg:1973sc}M.~A.~B.~Beg and A.~Zepeda,
1621: %``Pion Radius And Isovector Nucleon Radii In The Limit Of Small Pion Mass,''
1622: Phys.\ Rev.\ D \textbf{6}, 2912 (1972).
1623: %%CITATION = PHRVA,D6,2912;%%
1624:
1625:
1626: \bibitem {Speth:pz}J.~Speth and A.~W.~Thomas,
1627: %``Mesonic Contributions To The Spin And Flavor Structure Of The Nucleon,''
1628: Adv.\ Nucl.\ Phys.\ \textbf{24}, 83 (1997).
1629:
1630: %\cite{Leinweber:2001ac}
1631:
1632:
1633: \bibitem {RHO_MASS}D.~B.~Leinweber \textit{et al.},
1634: %``Chiral behaviour of the rho meson in lattice QCD,''
1635: Phys.\ Rev.\ D \textbf{64}, 094502 (2001).
1636: %%CITATION = HEP-LAT 0104013;%%
1637:
1638:
1639: \bibitem {ROOT}http://root.cern.ch.
1640:
1641: \bibitem {GE/GM_0_MELNICHUK}P.~G.~Blunden, W.~Melnitchouk and J.~A.~Tjon,
1642: %``Two-photon exchange and elastic electron proton scattering,''
1643: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ \textbf{91}, 142304 (2003);
1644: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0306076;%%
1645: Y.~C.~Chen \textit{et al.},
1646: %``Partonic calculation of the two-photon exchange contribution to elastic
1647: %electron proton scattering at large momentum transfer,''
1648: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ \textbf{93}, 122301 (2004).
1649: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0403058;%%
1650: %\cite{Arrington:2003df}
1651:
1652:
1653: \bibitem {GE/GM-0-CROSS}J.~Arrington,
1654: %``How well do we know the electromagnetic form factors of the proton?,''
1655: Phys.\ Rev.\ C \textbf{68}, 034325 (2003) [arXiv:nucl-ex/0305009].
1656: %%CITATION = NUCL-EX 0305009;%%
1657:
1658: \end{thebibliography}
1659:
1660:
1661: \end{document}