1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2: % %
3: % LATEX FILE USING ELSEART %
4: % %
5: % %
6: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
7: \documentclass[twoside,12pt]{article}
8: \usepackage{epsfig}
9: \usepackage{graphicx}
10: \usepackage{amssymb}
11: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
12: \renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\fnsymbol{footnote}}
13: \topmargin-2.8cm
14: \oddsidemargin-1cm
15: \evensidemargin-1cm
16: \textwidth18.5cm
17: \textheight25.0cm
18: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
19: \begin{document}
20: \newcommand{\p}{\partial}
21: \newcommand{\ls}{\left(}
22: \newcommand{\rs}{\right)}
23: \newcommand{\beq}{\begin{equation}}
24: \newcommand{\eeq}{\end{equation}}
25: \newcommand{\beqa}{\begin{eqnarray}}
26: \newcommand{\eeqa}{\end{eqnarray}}
27: \newcommand{\bdm}{\begin{displaymath}}
28: \newcommand{\edm}{\end{displaymath}}
29: \newcommand{\fps}{f_{\pi}^2 }
30: \newcommand{\mks}{m_{{\mathrm K}}^2 }
31: \newcommand{\ms}{m_{{\mathrm K}}^{*} }
32: \newcommand{\mk}{m_{{\mathrm K}} }
33: \newcommand{\msq}{m_{{\mathrm K}}^{*2} }
34: \newcommand{\rhos}{\rho_{\mathrm s} }
35: \newcommand{\rhob}{\rho_{\mathrm B} }
36: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
37: % %
38: % BEGIN OF DOCUMENT %
39: % %
40: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
41: \title{Kaon production in heavy ion reactions at intermediate energies
42: \footnote{To appear in Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys., [nucl-th/0507017]}}
43: \author{Christian Fuchs\\
44: Institut f\"ur Theoretische Physik der Universit\"at T\"ubingen,\\
45: Auf der Morgenstelle 14, D-72076 T\"ubingen, Germany
46: }
47: \maketitle
48: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
49: \begin{abstract}
50: The article reviews the physics related to kaon and antikaon production
51: in heavy ion reactions at intermediate energies. Chiral dynamics predicts
52: substantial modifications of the kaon properties in a dense nuclear
53: environment. The status of the theoretical predictions as well as
54: experimental evidences for medium effects such as repulsive/attractive
55: mass shifts for $K^+/K^-$ are reviewed.
56: In the vicinity of the thresholds, and even more pronounced
57: below threshold, the production of strangeness is a highly collective
58: process. Starting from elementary reaction channels the phenomenology
59: of $K^+$ and $K^-$ production, i.e. freeze-out densities, time scales etc.
60: as derived from experiment and theoretical
61: transport calculations is presented. Below threshold kaon production
62: shows a high sensitivity on the nuclear compression reached in heavy
63: ion reactions.
64: This allows to put constraints on the nuclear equation-of-state which
65: are finally discussed. \\ \\
66: {\it Keywords:} Kaons, strangeness production, heavy ion reactions,
67: subthreshold particle production, ChPT,
68: chiral symmetry restoration, transport models, QMD, collective flow,
69: nuclear equation of state.
70: \end{abstract}
71: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
72: % %
73: % BEGIN OF TEXT %
74: % %
75: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
76: \tableofcontents
77: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
78: \section{Introduction}
79: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
80: For more than two decades strangeness production has been one of the
81: major research topics of heavy ion physics at intermediate energies.
82: First experiments on strangeness production were already performed in the
83: early 80ties at the LBL in Berkeley \cite{lbl}. These were, however,
84: restricted to collisions of light nuclei.
85: In the middle of the 90ties the whole
86: field obtained a significant push
87: when the KaoS \cite{kaos94} and the FOPI \cite{fopi95} Collaborations at
88: the Gesellschaft f\"ur Schwerionenforschung (GSI) in Darmstadt/Germany
89: started to deliver high precision data for kaon and antikaon production
90: in heavy systems. The kaon spectrometer KaoS has stopped
91: data acquisition in 2004 and will be dismantled at the GSI. Hence it is
92: a proper time to draw some resume on what has been achieved during the
93: last twenty years and which problems still have to be settled.
94: The present article tries to summarize the status
95: of the field and to draw conclusions from the various experimental and
96: theoretical efforts.
97:
98: Strangeness production in heavy ion reactions at intermediate energies
99: is of high interest since it opens the possibility to attack several
100: fundamental questions of nuclear and hadron physics which are not
101: only interesting by themselves but have also astrophysical
102: implications and/or are related to
103: fundamental aspects of Quantum Chromo Dynamics (QCD).
104:
105: What makes the production of strange hadrons special is
106: the fact that strangeness is exactly conserved in hadronic reactions.
107: Open strangeness can be produced by the creation of kaon
108: ($K^+ ({\bar u}s),K^0 ({\bar d}s)$) - antikaon
109: ($K^- (u{\bar s}),{\bar K}^0 (d {\bar s})$) pairs or by kaon-hyperon pairs.
110: The hyperons carrying one strange quark are $\Lambda (uds)$ and
111: $\Sigma$ ($\Sigma^-(dds),~\Sigma^0(uds),~\Sigma^+(uus)$)
112: hyperons. The production of hidden strangeness through
113: $\phi (s{\bar s})$ mesons is possible but
114: suppressed according to the Okubo-Zweig-Iizuka
115: selection rule \cite{OZI}. Since data on $\phi$ production
116: are extremely scarce at intermediate energies, the present article
117: will mainly focus on kaon and antikaon production.
118:
119: A first consequence of strangeness conservation is the fact that $K^+$
120: mesons, once produced, cannot be absorbed by
121: the surrounding nucleons. This results in a rather long mean free
122: path of about 7 fm of $K^+$ mesons in nuclear matter and makes them
123: a suitable 'penetrating' probe for the dense fireball produced
124: in heavy ion reactions. Final state interactions such as elastic
125: kaon-nucleon scattering or the propagation in potentials
126: influence the dynamics but do not change the total yields.
127: A second consequence of strangeness conservation
128: are the high production thresholds. The cheapest way to
129: produce an $s{\bar s}$
130: pair is the reaction $NN\longrightarrow N\Lambda K^+$ which has a
131: threshold of $E_{\rm lab} =1.58$ GeV for the incident
132: nucleon. When the
133: incident energy per nucleon in a heavy ion reaction is below this
134: value one speaks about {\it subthreshold} kaon production. Subthreshold
135: kaon production is in particular interesting since it ensures that the
136: kaons originate from the high density phase of the reaction. The missing
137: energy has to be provided either by the Fermi motion of the nucleons or
138: by energy accumulating multi-step reactions. Both processes exclude significant
139: distortions from surface effects if one goes sufficiently far below
140: threshold. In combination with the long mean free path subthreshold $K^+$
141: production is an ideal tool to probe compressed nuclear matter in relativistic
142: heavy ion reactions. Indeed, one of the
143: major motivations to start the kaon project at the GSI was to explore
144: the nuclear equation-of-state (EOS) at supra-normal densities, i.e.
145: significantly above nuclear saturation density
146: $\rho_0 \simeq 0.16~{\rm fm}^{-3}$. A better knowledge of the high
147: density behavior of the nuclear EOS is relevant for astrophysical
148: purposes, e.g. for the understanding of neutron stars and supernovae
149: explosions. Heavy ion reactions provide the only possibility to attack
150: this question experimentally and to constrain theoretical models
151: above saturation density. After a more than thirty years quest for
152: the nuclear EOS it seems that by studying subthreshold $K^+$
153: production substantial progress could be achieved in the recent years.
154:
155: A second push of more theoretical nature was given to the field when
156: chiral models became more and more popular in the late 80ties and
157: early 90ties.
158: Chiral symmetry is an exact symmetry of QCD
159: in the limit of massless quarks.
160: Since the up and down current quark masses
161: are small, i.e. of the order of 5-10 MeV,
162: this symmetry is still approximately fulfilled. In nature it is,
163: however, spontaneously broken by the
164: non-vanishing -- and large -- expectation value of the scalar chiral quark
165: condensate $\langle {\bar q}q \rangle$ of the QCD vacuum (for a
166: pedagogical review see e.g. \cite{koch}).
167: The spontaneous symmetry breaking, similar to the
168: spontaneous magnetization of a ferromagnet which breaks the symmetry of the
169: underlying Hamiltonian, implies the existence of massless Goldstone
170: bosons which are the pions. The small pion mass of 140 MeV ensures that
171: the concept of chiral symmetry is a fundamental feature of low
172: energy hadron physics. By the extension to the full SU(3) sector the
173: pseudoscalar meson octet of $\pi,\eta,K$ and ${\bar K}$ mesons plays now the
174: role of the Goldstone bosons. With a strange quark mass of about 150 MeV
175: the explicit symmetry breaking is much larger in the strange sector than
176: in the SU(2) sector but
177: the general concepts of chiral symmetry and its spontaneous breaking
178: are believed to be still valid. They do not only allow to
179: understand the origin of the
180: pseudoscalar meson masses. Chiral perturbation theory (ChPT) is
181: also considered as the {\it exact}, QCD based, theory of
182: the pion-nucleon interaction at low energies \cite{gasser82}.
183:
184: Hence it was a natural step to extend ChPT to the SU(3) flavor sector
185: \cite{kaplan86}. However, the situation turned out to be more
186: complicated than in pure SU(2).
187: While the $\pi N$ and the $K N$ interactions can be treated
188: perturbatively, the ${\bar K} N$ interaction is already around threshold
189: dominated by the presence of resonances. This makes a perturbative treatment
190: of the antikaon-nucleon interaction impossible. Instead, non-perturbative
191: approaches are required, which can be achieved
192: within chiral dynamics, however, by the price of loosing of a well defined
193: expansion scheme. This essential difference between kaons and antikaons
194: will be reflected at many points in the following discussions. It is
195: the main reason why conclusions on in-medium modifications of kaon
196: properties are much firmer than those for antikaons.
197:
198: Such medium modifications are closely connected to the conjecture of a partial
199: restoration of chiral symmetry in dense matter. The chiral
200: condensate $\langle {\bar q}q \rangle$ is expected to be reduced at
201: finite density and/or temperature \cite{brown96,weise,tuebingenC} which should
202: be reflected, e.g., in shifts of the corresponding meson masses.
203: Heavy ion reactions open thus the possibility to test
204: fundamental concepts of hadron physics and QCD. A strong reduction of the
205: $K^-$ mass, as also supported by the investigation of kaonic atoms
206: \cite{gal94}, will have severe astrophysical consequences. It can lead
207: to $K^-$ condensation in neutron stars \cite{kaplan86,brown94,prakash94,li97b}
208: which, due to additional negative charge, increases the proton
209: fraction and softens thus the equation-of-state for the neutron star.
210: The onset of $K^-$ condensation is reached when the electron
211: chemical potential starts to exceed that of the kaons $\mu_e \ge m^*_{K^-}$
212: which might happen at around 4-5 times nuclear saturation density.
213: This lowers the maximal neutron star mass to about 1.5 solar masses
214: and the core of a supernova, if heavier than this value, will collapse
215: into a black hole. This, on the other hand will lead to a large
216: number of low mass black holes in the universe \cite{bethe94}
217: (for a recent review see \cite{weber05}).
218:
219: In the late 80ties/ early 90ties first mean field
220: calculations \cite{kaplan86,lutz94} predicted already a
221: moderately repulsive $K^+$ potential ($V \sim + (20\div 30)$ MeV) and a
222: strongly attractive $K^-$ potential ($V \sim - (100\div 200)$ MeV) at
223: nuclear saturation density. Such a value of the $K^+$ potential is
224: in accordance with the $K^+N$ scattering length and theoretical
225: estimates for the potential remained fairly stable over the years.
226: For antikaons the
227: situation is more complex. The resonant character of the $K^-N$
228: interaction makes the mean field picture highly questionable
229: and the size of the in-medium $K^-$ potential is even not yet
230: completely settled from the theoretical side.
231:
232: A major challenge studying strangeness production in
233: heavy ion reactions is to verify (or falsify)
234: the conjecture of the existence
235: of these two potentials, to determine their size from experiment and
236: to put constraints on theoretical models.
237: However, heavy ion reactions are highly dynamical processes. At intermediate
238: energies the phase space distributions of the colliding nuclei are far
239: from global and even local equilibrium over most of the duration of
240: the reaction \cite{fuchs03}. Since observables are not snapshots but the
241: results of space-time integrals over the entire reaction dynamics
242: it is unavoidable to account for this dynamical evolution.
243: This means that the link between experiment and the underlying
244: physics has to be provided by dynamical transport models. Semi-classical
245: transport equations of a Boltzmann type can be derived from
246: non-equilibrium quantum field theory \cite{dani84,btm90}. Corresponding
247: Boltzmann-Uehling-Uhlenbeck (BUU) \cite{buu,rbuu}
248: models or, alternatively, the
249: Quantum-Molecular-Dynamics (QMD) approach \cite{Ai91} are well
250: established transport models and explain successfully a
251: large variety of hadronic
252: observables in heavy ion reactions, such as e.g. collective flow
253: pattern or spectra and abundances of newly produced particles
254: \cite{bass98,cassing99}. Most of the results presented in this
255: review are based on the QMD approach. Details of the T\"ubingen
256: QMD model can be found in \cite{shekhter03,uma97}.
257:
258: Such hadronic transport models propagate one-body phase space
259: distributions in self-consistent potentials and account for
260: elastic and inelastic two-body scattering processes. They contain
261: basic quantum features such as final state Pauli-blocking for fermions.
262: As soon as particle production comes into play the transport approach
263: becomes a coupled-channel problem. The various hadron species are coupled
264: via production and absorption processes and by their mean fields.
265: Transport models are generally
266: mean field approaches which rely on the quasi-particle approximation (QPA)
267: for stable particles and narrow resonances. $K^+$ mesons can safely be
268: treated within such a framework since they retain good quasi-particle
269: properties also in a dense environment. Antikaons, in contrast, seem to
270: develop complex structures in their spectral functions which would require
271: to account for off-shell effects beyond the quasi-particle approximation.
272: There exist first attempts to go in this direction \cite{cassing00}
273: but most available calculations on $K^-$ production are based on the QPA.
274:
275:
276: The review is now organized as follows: Chapter 2 gives an overview
277: of the theoretical predictions for the in-medium modifications
278: which the kaons should experience in a dense nuclear environment. Since
279: chiral perturbation theory is considered as the most suitable tool to study
280: the interactions of pseudoscalar mesons with nucleons
281: at low energies the chapter starts with a short outline of the
282: derivation of effective kaon-nucleon models based on chiral dynamics.
283: Mean field models as well as more elaborated coupled channel dynamics
284: which are required by the resonant structure of the antikaon-nucleon
285: interactions, are briefly discussed. For completeness also the expected
286: scenario in the complementary case, i.e. in a high temperature, baryon
287: dilute but pion dominated, environment is mentioned.
288: Chapter 3 summarizes the phenomenology of strangeness
289: production in heavy ion collisions around threshold energies.
290: Starting from elementary processes, i.e. strangeness
291: production and exchange reactions, the presently accepted
292: scenarios for kaon and antikaon production are developed
293: as they can be deduced from
294: experiments and corresponding dynamical simulations. This concerns
295: the questions of system size dependences, freeze-out
296: densities, time scales etc.. An important question is in this context
297: the degree of equilibration which the $K^\pm$ mesons reach or do not
298: reach in the expanding system. This question is intimately connected
299: with the possibility to probe the early high density phase of a
300: heavy ion reaction. If the kaons would have time to
301: equilibrate they would loose their memory on the early reaction stages.
302: Chapter 4 turns then to the treatment of strangeness production
303: within dynamical transport models. Here we focus on the $K^+$
304: production and discuss exemplarily the realization
305: within the T\"ubingen QMD approach. The treatments within transport
306: models used by other groups are similar in principle, but can differ
307: in details. Finally
308: a comparison of the predictions from various transport models
309: for selected pion and kaon observables is given. The search for signatures
310: of in-medium mass shifts, or more generally, in-medium potentials is
311: discussed in Chapter 5. Mass shifts lead first of all to shifts of the
312: production threshold which are reflected in the total particle yields.
313: Since conclusions are only possible relative to a free mass scenario they
314: have to be based on transport simulations. The data situation strongly supports
315: the in-medium mass scenario, at least concerning the $K^+$ mesons. These observations
316: are complemented by the study of dynamical observables such as the collective
317: in-plane and out-of-plane pattern. Finally Chapter 6 turns to the original
318: issue which motivated the kaon program at the GSI, namely to extract
319: information on the nuclear equation-of-state. The measurement of $K^+$ excitation
320: functions down to energies far below threshold can
321: be considered as a breakthrough. Before coming to the interpretation
322: of the data a brief summary on the present status of the theoretical
323: prediction for the nuclear EOS is given. The dependence of the
324: kaon production on the compression achieved in heavy ion reactions
325: puts constraints on the EOS which are discussed in detail. Finally
326: the consistency with information from other sources such as
327: nucleon and neutron stars is outlined.
328:
329: The review closes with a summary of the major results.
330:
331:
332: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
333: \input{chapter2.tex}
334: \input{chapter3.tex}
335: \input{chapter4.tex}
336: \input{chapter5.tex}
337: \input{chapter6.tex}
338: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
339:
340:
341: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
342: \section{Summary and outlook}
343: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
344: Kaon and antikaon production in nucleus-nucleus collisions around
345: threshold energies opens the possibility to attack a variety of
346: physics questions which have important implications in nuclear
347: physics, QCD and astrophysics. The present article tried to summarize
348: the status of the field and to point out which problems could be
349: settled and which questions are still open.
350:
351: Theory predicts strong modifications of the kaon and antikaon properties
352: in a dense hadronic environment. Mean field models as well as chiral
353: perturbation theory predict a repulsive $K^+$ potential of about
354: $V_{K^+} \simeq +(20\div 30)$ MeV at nuclear saturation
355: density. Such a value is in agreement with empirical kaon-nucleon
356: scattering. The $K^-$-nucleon interaction, in contrast, is resonant around
357: threshold and requires non-perturbative approaches. The strength of the
358: $K^-$ potential is still an open question. The depth of the attractive
359: antikaon-nucleon potential ranges from
360: $V_{K^-} \simeq - (50\div 100)$ MeV, obtained within chiral coupled
361: channel dynamics, to $V_{K^-} \simeq - (100\div 200)$ MeV predicted by
362: mean field approaches and the analysis of kaonic atoms. In contrast to
363: the $K^+$ mesons the $K^-$ mesons develop complicated
364: spectral properties in the medium.
365:
366: In heavy ion collisions at intermediate energies, i.e. at energies around
367: the threshold region, strangeness is generally produced in the early and
368: high density phase of the reaction. However, the freeze-out conditions
369: for kaons and antikaons are completely different. Due to strangeness
370: conservation $K^+$ mesons cannot
371: be reabsorbed by the surrounding nucleons and their chemical
372: freeze-out takes place early. Final state interactions, i.e. elastic
373: scattering or charge exchange reactions and the influence of the optical
374: kaon-nucleon potential change their dynamical pattern but not the abundances.
375: This makes $K^+$ mesons to a suitable 'penetrating' probe to study the
376: dense fireball created in a heavy ion reaction. Antikaons, in contrast, are
377: strongly coupled to the environment through strangeness exchange reactions.
378: This leads to a late freeze-out and a loss of memory on the early
379: reaction stages.
380:
381: The link of the underlying physics to the heavy ion experiments must be provided by
382: dynamical transport models. The precision of such models depends thereby
383: crucially on the elementary input, i.e. the knowledge of the elementary reaction
384: cross sections. This input is much better constrained by data
385: for the $K^+$ mesons than for $K^-$. In addition, the quasiparticle picture
386: which underlies all types of semiclassical transport approaches,
387: is much better justified for the kaons than for the antikaons.
388: Hence state of the art transport calculations have reached a reasonable
389: degree of consistency concerning $K^+$ production and dynamics. The
390: comparison to experiment concerning both, total yields as well as
391: dynamical observables such as in-plane and out-off-plane flow pattern,
392: supports the existence of a slightly repulsive in-medium potential as predicted
393: by chiral dynamics. This picture is complemented by data from
394: proton-nucleus reactions.
395:
396: Concerning the antikaons the
397: situation is less satisfactory, both from the experimental
398: as well as from the theoretical side. To settle the question of
399: a strongly attractive $K^-$-nucleon potential is one of the major
400: challenges of this field in future. If the $K^-$-nucleon potential is
401: strong enough, this can lead to deeply
402: bound $K^-$ states in nuclei \cite{hirenzaki05} and even to light
403: kaonic nuclear clusters \cite{yamazaki05}. Such
404: states would be much stronger bound than the
405: $\pi^-$ states observed in pionic atoms \cite{kienle04}.
406: Some calculations predict
407: even a collapse of the nuclear wave functions to densities significantly
408: above saturation density in $K^-$-nuclear clusters which would allow to access the
409: nuclear forces at very short distances. The existence of
410: such molecule states would thus open a completely new field in hadron physics
411: with strong implications on nuclear structure. Heavy ion reactions as well
412: as proton-nucleus reactions are the tools to clarify the preconditions
413: for this hypothesis.
414:
415:
416: To draw firm conclusions on the
417: in-medium antikaon properties will, however, require significant efforts to control
418: their off-shell dynamics. The same holds for other hadrons, e.g.
419: vector mesons, where dramatic changes of their spectral properties
420: are expected. First attempts towards a quantum transport have been made but an
421: exact treatment of the quantum evolution equations requires a better
422: knowledge of off-shell transition elements and in-medium spectral functions
423: of all the involved hadron species. To develop a consistent
424: quantum transport is the major challenge of future theoretical
425: heavy ion physics. The same holds for proton-nucleus reactions. Also
426: there the quantitative understanding of high precision meson production data,
427: e.g. from GSI, COSY or KEK, requires to control the off-shell dynamics
428: of such processes.
429:
430:
431:
432:
433: Finally the kaons turned out to provide a suitable tool to attack another
434: longstanding question, namely the stiffness of the nuclear
435: equation-of-state. The high density behavior of the EOS has severe
436: astrophysical consequences since it determines e.g. the maximal mass
437: and the radii of neutron stars. Although heavy ion reactions test
438: mainly isospin symmetric matter they put constraints on theoretical
439: models which are also applied to neutron stars. The systematic measurement
440: of the $K^+$ excitation function in heavy and light systems down to energies
441: far below threshold can here be considered as a breakthrough. Extreme
442: subthreshold energies exclude distortions from surface effects and ensure
443: that the $K^+$ mesons originate from supra-normal nuclear densities. To
444: overcome the production thresholds
445: requires a high degree of collectivity which, on
446: the other hand, introduces the sensitivity on the compression achieved
447: in the reaction. The comparison with data strongly supports an EOS which is
448: 'soft' in a density regime between 1-3 times saturation density. Such
449: a behavior is consistent with the predictions from microscopic
450: many-body calculations and the constraints obtained from nucleon flow
451: data in heavy ion reactions. Based on similar arguments the $K^+/K^0$ ratio
452: has recently been proposed as a tool to access the isospin dependence of the
453: nuclear EOS and to constrain the symmetry energy. If this turns out to be
454: true, subthreshold kaon production can probably
455: be considered as the most successful
456: observable to constrain nuclear forces at high densities.\\
457:
458:
459:
460: {\bf Acknowledgments:}\\
461: The author would like to thank the following people
462: for valuable discussions and/or for providing experimental data
463: or results of theoretical calculations:\\
464: J. Aichelin, H.-W. Barz, E. Bratkovskaya, G. Burau,
465: W. Cassing, L.-W. Chen, A. Faessler, T. Gaitanos,
466: T. Gutsche, Ch. Hartnack, N. Herrmann, E. Kolomeitsev, C.M. Ko, A. Larionov, M. Lutz,
467: V. Lyubowitzki, H. Oeschler, A. Ramos, P. Senger, C. Sturm,
468: L. Tolos, K. Tsushima, Y.-M. Zheng
469:
470: \input{biblio.tex}
471:
472: \end{document}
473:
474:
475:
476:
477:
478:
479:
480:
481:
482:
483:
484:
485:
486:
487:
488:
489:
490:
491:
492:
493:
494:
495:
496:
497:
498:
499:
500:
501:
502:
503:
504:
505:
506:
507:
508:
509:
510:
511:
512:
513:
514:
515:
516:
517:
518:
519:
520: