1: \documentclass[12pt] {article}
2: \usepackage{psfrag}
3: \usepackage{graphicx}
4: \usepackage{latexsym,amsfonts}
5: \usepackage{amssymb}
6: \pagestyle{plain}
7: \textwidth=16truecm
8: \textheight=23.6truecm
9: \topmargin-1.5cm
10: \hoffset-1.2cm
11: \baselineskip=24pt
12:
13: %
14: \begin{document}
15: \setcounter{page}{1}
16: \def\theequation{\arabic{section}.\arabic{equation}}
17: \def\theequation{\thesection.\arabic{equation}}
18: \setcounter{section}{0}
19:
20:
21:
22: \title{On strangeness production in the reactions\\ $pp \to p
23: \Lambda^0K^+$ and $pn \to n\Lambda^0K^+$ \\ near threshold}
24:
25: \author{A. N. Ivanov$^{1,2,3}$\,\thanks{Corresponding author. E--mail:
26: ivanov@kph.tuwien.ac.at, Tel.: +43--1--58801--14261, Fax:
27: +43--1--58801--14299}~\thanks{Permanent Address: State Polytechnic
28: University, Department of Nuclear Physics, 195251 St. Petersburg,
29: Russian Federation}, Ya. A. Berdnikov$^3$, M. Faber$^1$,\\
30: V. A. Ivanova$^3$, J.
31: Marton$^2$\,\thanks{http://www.oeaw.ac.at/smi}, N. I.
32: Troitskaya$^3$}
33:
34: \date{\today}
35:
36:
37: \maketitle
38:
39: \begin{center}
40: {\it $^1$Atominstitut der \"Osterreichischen Universit\"aten, Technische
41: Universit\"at Wien, Wiedner Hauptstrasse 8-10, A-1040 Wien,
42: \"Osterreich \\ $^2$Stefan Meyer Institut f\"ur subatomare Physik,
43: \"Osterreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften,
44: Boltzmanngasse 3, A-1090, Wien, \"Osterreich\\ $^3$State Polytechnic
45: University, Polytechnicheskaya 29,\\
46: 195251, St Petersburg, Russian Federation}
47: \end{center}
48:
49: \begin{center}
50: \begin{abstract}
51: The cross sections for the reactions $pp \to p\Lambda^0K^+$ and $pn
52: \to n\Lambda^0K^+$ are calculated near threshold of the final
53: states. The theoretical ratio of the cross sections $R = \sigma(pn
54: \to n\Lambda^0K^+)/\sigma(pp \to p\Lambda^0K^+) \simeq 3$ shows the
55: enhancement of the $pn$ interaction with respect to the $pp$
56: interaction near threshold of the strangeness production
57: $N\Lambda^0K^+$. Such an enhancement is caused by the contribution
58: of the $np$ interaction in the isospin--singlet state, which is
59: stronger than the $pn$ interaction in the isospin--triplet state.
60: For the confirmation of this result we calculate the cross sections
61: for the reactions $pp \to pp\pi^0$, $\pi^0 p \to \Lambda^0 K^+$ and
62: $\pi^-p \to \Lambda^0 K^0$ near threshold of the final states. The
63: theoretical cross sections agree well with the experimental data.
64: \end{abstract}
65: \end{center}
66:
67: PACS: 11.10.Ef, 12.39. Fe, 13.75.Jz, 14.20.Jn
68:
69: \newpage
70:
71: \section{Introduction}
72: \setcounter{equation}{0}
73:
74: Recent experiments on the production of $K^+$\,--\, mesons in the
75: reaction $p d \to K^+ X N$, where $X$ is a hadronic state with
76: strangeness $S = - 1$ and baryon number $B = 2$ and $N$ is a nucleon,
77: have led to the prediction for the ratio of the cross sections for the
78: reactions $pp \to K^+ X $ and $pn \to K^+ X$
79: %
80: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label1.1}
81: R = \frac{\sigma(pn \to K^+ X)}{\sigma(pp \to K^+ X)} \sim 3 - 4.
82: \end{eqnarray}
83: %
84: The estimate has been obtained for proton beam energies $T_p =
85: 1.83\,{\rm GeV}$ and $T_p = 2.02\,{\rm GeV}$ giving $R \sim 3$ and $R
86: \sim 4$, respectively, to fit the experimental data on the
87: differential cross section for the reaction $p d \to K^+ X N$
88: \cite{COSY}. The parameter $R$ has been used as an input parameter.
89: This has been justified by the fact that the scattering of the proton
90: by the deuteron can be treated in the {\it impulse} approximation
91: \cite{TE88}, since there is no indication for any collective target
92: behaviour \cite{COSY} (see also \cite{EC94}).
93:
94: Since the main contribution to the cross sections for the reactions
95: $pp \to K^+ X$ and $pn \to K^+ X$ comes from the channels $pp \to
96: p\Lambda^0 K^+$ and $pn \to n \Lambda^0 K^+$ \cite{COSY,KT99}, the
97: ratio Eq.(\ref{label1.1}) can be rewritten as follows
98: %
99: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label1.2}
100: R = \frac{\sigma(pn \to n \Lambda^0 K^+)}{\sigma(pp \to p \Lambda^0 K^+)}
101: \sim 3 - 4.
102: \end{eqnarray}
103: %
104: Can such a ratio be valid near threshold of the final state
105: $N\Lambda^0K^+$ ? \cite{VK05}.
106:
107: A theoretical explanation of the ratio $R \sim 3 - 4$ near threshold
108: of the final $N\Lambda^0 K^+$ state has been proposed in \cite{KT99}
109: and \cite{CW97}. As has been pointed out in \cite{CW97}, the value $R
110: \sim 3$ can be mainly due to the dominant contribution of the
111: $\rho$\,--\,meson exchange in addition to the contribution of the
112: resonances $N(1535)$ and $N(1650)$ with the quantum numbers $I(J^P) =
113: \frac{1}{2}(\frac{1}{2}^-)$ \cite{PDG04}, described within the
114: Breit--Wigner approach \cite{CW05}. In \cite{KT99} the cross sections
115: for the reactions $pN \to N\Lambda^0K^+$ have been calculated within
116: the resonance model of $NN$ scattering for energies of the incident
117: proton far from threshold. Within such an approach the ratio $R$ can
118: be obtained assuming the validity of the cross sections in the
119: vicinity of threshold \cite{AS05}. Recently \cite{AI01} the
120: strangeness production in $pp$ collisions $pp \to p\Lambda^0K^+$ and
121: $pp\to p\Sigma^0K^+$ near threshold of the final states has been
122: analysed by using chiral Lagrangians with linear realization of chiral
123: symmetry and non--derivative meson--baryon couplings
124: \cite{HP73}--\cite{GG69}. The matrix elements of the transitions $pp
125: \to p\Lambda^0K^+$ and $pp \to p\Sigma^0 K^+$ have been calculated in
126: the one--meson exchange approximation \cite{NK99}. For the calculation
127: of the amplitudes of the reactions $pp \to p\Lambda^0K^+$ and $pp \to
128: p\Sigma^0 K^+$ there has been taken into account the $pp$ rescattering
129: in the initial state, i.e. the initial state interaction \cite{KN99},
130: and $p\Lambda^0K^+$ and $p\Sigma^0K^+$ final--state interaction
131: \cite{FSI,FSIa}. As has been shown in \cite{IV4} the same analysis of
132: the strangeness production has turned out to be very useful for the
133: correct description of the reactions $K^-d \to NY$ of $K^-d$
134: scattering at threshold, where $NY = p\Sigma^-$, $n\Sigma^0$ and
135: $n\Lambda^0$. In this paper we apply such an analysis of the
136: strangeness production to the calculation of the cross sections for
137: the reactions $pN \to N\Lambda^0K^+$ near threshold of the final state
138: $N\Lambda^0K^+$ and the ratio $R$.
139:
140: The paper is organised as follows. In Section 2 we calculate the cross
141: section for the reaction $pp \to p\Lambda^0K^+$. The obtained result
142: agrees with the experimental data \cite{JB98} with an accuracy better
143: $16\,\%$. We show that the contribution of the vector $\rho$\,-- and
144: $\omega^0$\,--\,meson exchanges to the cross section for the reaction
145: $pp \to p\Lambda^0K^+$ makes up about $9\,\%$ only. In Section 3 we
146: calculate the cross section for the reaction $pn \to n\Lambda^0K^+$.
147: We calculate the cross sections for the reactions with the $pn$ pair
148: in the state with isospin $I = 1$ and isospin $I = 0$ and demonstrate
149: that $R^{(I = 1)} = \sigma((pn)_{I = 1} \to n\Lambda^0K^+)/\sigma(pp
150: \to p\Lambda^0K^+) \simeq 1$. We find that the contribution of the
151: vector $\rho$\,-- and $\omega^0$\,--\,meson exchanges to the cross
152: section for the reaction $(pn)_{I = 1} \to n\Lambda^0K^+$ with the
153: $pn$ pair in the isospin--triplet state is about $3\,\%$. In turn,
154: the vector\,--\,meson exchanges do not influence on the value of the
155: cross section for the reaction $(pn)_{I = 0} \to n\Lambda^0K^+$ with
156: the $pn$ pair in the isospin--singlet state. In Section 4 we
157: calculate the ratio $R$ of the cross sections for the reactions $pn
158: \to n\Lambda^0K^+$ and $pp \to p\Lambda^0K^+$. We get $R \simeq 3$.
159: This agrees with the enhancement of the $pn$ interaction with respect
160: to the $pp$ interaction in the reactions of the strangeness production
161: observed by the ANKE--Collaboration at COSY and the theoretical
162: prediction in \cite{KT99} and \cite{CW97}. We show that such an
163: enhancement is caused by the contribution of $pn$ interaction in the
164: isospin--singlet state $(pn)_{I = 0}$, which is stronger than the $pn$
165: interaction in the isospin--triplet state $(pn)_{I = 1}$. In Section 5
166: we analyse the contribution of the resonances $N(1535)$ and $N(1650)$,
167: treating them as elementary particles \cite{MR96}--\cite{IV9}. We
168: show that the contribution of these resonances to the amplitudes of
169: the reactions $pN \to N\Lambda^0K^+$ can be neglected with respect to
170: the contribution of the ground state baryon octet coupled to the
171: octets of the pseudoscalar and scalar mesons. In Section 6 we
172: calculate the cross section for the reaction $pp \to pp\pi^0$, caused
173: by the pure ${^3}{\rm P}_0 \to {^1}{\rm S}_0$ transition with
174: pseudoscalar and scalar meson exchanges. Near threshold the
175: theoretical cross section agrees well with the experimental data. In
176: Section 7 we calculate the cross sections for the reactions $\pi^0p\to
177: \Lambda^0 K^+$ and $\pi^-p \to \Lambda^0 K^0$. We show that the
178: theoretical cross section for the reaction $\pi^-p \to \Lambda^0 K^0$
179: agrees well with the experimental data for the energy excess
180: $\varepsilon \le 13\,{\rm MeV}$ \cite{JJ71} and the results obtained
181: within $SU(3)$ chiral dynamics with coupled channels \cite{WW97}. We
182: show that for the correct description of the cross sections for the
183: reactions $\pi^0p\to \Lambda^0 K^+$ and $\pi^-p \to \Lambda^0 K^0$ the
184: contribution of the resonances $N(1535)$ and $N(1650)$ as well as
185: $\Sigma(1750)$ is very important due to the cancellation of the
186: non--resonance contribution. The dominant role of resonances $N(1535)$
187: and $N(1650)$ in the amplitudes of the reactions $\pi^0p\to \Lambda^0
188: K^+$ and $\pi^-p \to \Lambda^0 K^0$ has been pointed out by Kaiser
189: {\it et al.} \cite{WW97}. In the Conclusion we discuss the obtained
190: results. In Appendix A we analyse the contribution of the
191: final--state interaction to the amplitudes of the reactions $pN \to
192: N\Lambda^0K^+$.
193:
194: \section{Cross section for the reaction $pp \to p \Lambda^0K^+$ near
195: threshold}
196: \setcounter{equation}{0}
197:
198: Following \cite{KT99,CW97} and \cite{AI01,NK99,IV4} we define the
199: amplitude of the transition $pp \to p\Lambda^0 K^+$ in the
200: tree--approximation with one--meson exchanges. A complete set of
201: Feynman diagrams, describing the transition $pp \to p\Lambda^0 K^+$
202: near threshold of the final $p\Lambda^0 K^+$ state, is depicted in
203: Fig.1 and Fig.2.
204: %
205: \begin{figure}
206: \centering
207: \psfrag{K+}{$K^+$}
208: \psfrag{K-}{$K^-$}
209: \psfrag{L0}{$\Lambda^0$} \psfrag{p0}{$\pi^0$}
210: \psfrag{S0}{$\Sigma^0$}
211: \psfrag{Sp}{$\Sigma^+$}\psfrag{p}{$p$}
212: \psfrag{e}{$\eta$}
213: \psfrag{s}{$\sigma$}
214: \psfrag{d}{$\delta^0$}
215: \psfrag{k+}{$\kappa^+$}
216: \psfrag{k-}{$\kappa^-$}
217: \includegraphics[height= 0.90\textheight]{fig1.eps}
218: \caption{The set of Feynman diagrams contributing to the effective
219: coupling constant $C^{\,pp}_{p\Lambda^0K^+}$ of the $p p \to p
220: \Lambda^0K^+$ transition in the one--pseudoscalar meson exchange
221: approximation.}
222: \end{figure}
223: %
224: \begin{figure}
225: \centering
226: \psfrag{K+}{$K^+$}
227: \psfrag{K-}{$K^-$}
228: \psfrag{L0}{$\Lambda^0$} \psfrag{p0}{$\pi^0$}
229: \psfrag{S0}{$\Sigma^0$}
230: \psfrag{Sp}{$\Sigma^+$}\psfrag{p}{$p$}
231: \psfrag{e}{$\eta$}
232: \psfrag{s}{$\sigma$}
233: \psfrag{d}{$\delta^0$}
234: \psfrag{k+}{$\kappa^+$}
235: \psfrag{k-}{$\kappa^-$}
236: \includegraphics[height= 0.60\textheight]{fig2.eps}
237: \caption{The set of Feynman diagrams contributing to the effective
238: coupling constant $C^{\,pp}_{p\Lambda^0K^+}$ of the $ p p \to p
239: \Lambda^0 K^+$ transition in the one--scalar meson exchange
240: approximation.}
241: \end{figure}
242: %
243: The calculation of these diagrams we carry out using chiral Lagrangian
244: with non--derivative meson--baryon couplings invariant under linear
245: transformations of chiral $SU(3)\times SU(3)$ symmetry
246: \cite{HP73}--\cite{GG69}. Since masses of scalar partners of
247: pseudoscalar mesons are not well--defined, we calculate the amplitudes
248: in the limit of infinite masses of scalar mesons. According to
249: \cite{SW67,BL69}, such a limit corresponds to the calculation of the
250: amplitudes with chiral Lagrangian invariant under non--linear
251: transformations of chiral $SU(3)\times SU(3)$ symmetry\cite{GG69}. Of
252: course, such an equivalence has been proved only in the
253: tree--approximation \cite{SW67}--\cite{GG69}.
254:
255: For the derivation of the analytical expressions of these diagrams we
256: use the meson--baryon interactions (see Eqs.({\rm D}.4), ({\rm D}.7)
257: and ({\rm D}.9) of Ref.\cite{IV4} and also \cite{MN79}) and the wave
258: functions of the initial and the final states in the particle number
259: representation:
260: %
261: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label2.1}
262: |p(\vec{p}_1,\sigma_1)p(\vec{p}_2,\sigma_2)\rangle &=&
263: a^{\dagger}_p(\vec{p}_1,\sigma_1)a^{\dagger}_p(\vec{p}_2,\sigma_2)|0\rangle,\nonumber\\
264: |p(\vec{k}_p,\sigma_p)\Lambda^0(\vec{k}_{\Lambda},\sigma_{\Lambda})
265: K^+(\vec{Q}_K)\rangle &=&
266: a^{\dagger}_p(\vec{k}_p,\sigma_p)a^{\dagger}_{\Lambda}
267: (\vec{k}_{\Lambda},\sigma_{\Lambda})c^{\dagger}_{K^+}(\vec{Q}_K)|0\rangle,
268: \end{eqnarray}
269: %
270: where creation (annihilation) operators of baryons and the
271: $K^-$\,--\,meson obey standard relativistic covariant anti--commutation
272: and commutation relations \cite{IV4}.
273:
274: Near threshold of the final state $p\Lambda^0K^+$ the Feynman diagrams
275: in Fig.\,1 and Fig.\,2 can be described by the effective local
276: Lagrangian of the transition $pp \to p\Lambda^0K^+$ \cite{AI01,IV4}:
277: %
278: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label2.2}
279: {\cal L}^{pp \to p\Lambda^0K^+}_{\rm eff}(x) &=& A^{pp}_{p\Lambda^0K^+}
280: [\bar{\Lambda}^0(x)p(x)][\bar{p}(x)i\gamma^5 p(x)]\,K^{+\dagger}(x)\nonumber\\
281: &+&
282: B^{pp}_{p\Lambda^0K^+}[\bar{\Lambda}^0(x)i\gamma^5 p(x)][\bar{p}(x)p(x)]\,K^{+\dagger}(x),
283: \end{eqnarray}
284: %
285: where the coefficients $A^{pp}_{p\Lambda^0K^+}$ and
286: $B^{pp}_{p\Lambda^0K^+}$ are equal to
287: %
288: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label2.3}
289: A^{pp}_{p\Lambda^0K^+} &=&-\,\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}\,\frac{(3 - 2\alpha_D)\,
290: g^3_{\pi NN}}{m^2_{\pi} + 2m_N T_N}\,\frac{1}{m_N + m_{\Lambda^0} + m_K}
291: \nonumber\\
292: &&+\frac{2}{\sqrt{3}}\,\frac{\alpha_D\,(2\alpha_D - 1)\,g^3_{\pi NN}}{m^2_{\pi}
293: + 2m_N T_N}\,\frac{m_{\Sigma} + m_K - m_N}{m^2_{\Sigma} + 2 m_K T_N
294: - (m_N - m_K)^2}
295: \nonumber\\
296: &&-\,\frac{1}{3\sqrt{3}}\,\frac{(3 - 2\alpha_D)(3- 4\alpha_D)^2\,g^3_{\pi NN}}{
297: m^2_{\eta} + 2m_N T_N}\,\,\frac{1}{m_N + m_{\Lambda^0} + m_K}\nonumber\\
298: &&+\frac{2}{3\sqrt{3}}\,\frac{\alpha_D\,(3 - 2\alpha_D)(3 - 4\alpha_D)\,
299: g^3_{\pi NN}}{m^2_{\eta} + 2m_N T_N}\,\frac{m_{\Lambda^0} + m_K - m_N}{
300: m^2_{\Lambda} + 2 m_K T_N - (m_N - m_K)^2}\nonumber\\
301: && - \,\frac{1}{2\sqrt{3} g^2_A}\,\frac{(3 - 2\alpha_D)\,g^3_{\pi NN}}{m^2_{\pi} + 2 m_N T_N}\,
302: \frac{1}{m_N} + \,\frac{1}{6 g^2_A}\,\frac{(3 - 4\alpha_D)\,g^3_{\pi NN}}{m^2_{\eta} + 2 m_N T_N}\,
303: \frac{1}{m_N} = \nonumber\\
304: &=&-\,1.93\times 10^{-6}\,{\rm MeV}^{-3},\nonumber\\
305: B^{pp}_{p\Lambda^0K^+} &=&+\,\frac{1}{3\sqrt{3}}\,\frac{(3 - 2\alpha_D)^3
306: \,g^3_{\pi NN}}{m^2_K + 2m_{\Lambda^0} T_N - (m_{\Lambda^0} - m_N)^2}\,
307: \frac{m_{\Lambda^0} + m_K - m_N}{
308: m^2_{\Lambda} + 2 m_K T_N - (m_N - m_K)^2}\nonumber\\
309: &&+\,\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}\,\frac{(2\alpha_D - 1)^2(3 - 2\alpha_D)\,
310: g^3_{\pi NN}}{m^2_K +
311: 2m_{\Lambda^0} T_N - (m_{\Lambda^0} - m_N)^2}\,\frac{m_{\Sigma}
312: + m_K - m_N}{m^2_{\Sigma} + 2 m_K T_N - (m_N - m_K)^2}\nonumber\\
313: &&-\,\frac{1}{\sqrt{3} g^2_A}\,\frac{(3 - 2\alpha_D)\,g^3_{\pi NN}}{m^2_K
314: + 2 m_{\Lambda^0} T_N - (m_{\Lambda^0} - m_N)^2}\,\frac{1}{m_N} =\nonumber\\
315: &=& -\,0.35\times 10^{-6}\,{\rm MeV}^{-3},
316: \end{eqnarray}
317: %
318: where $g_{\pi NN} = 13.21$ is the coupling constant of $\pi NN$
319: interactions \cite{PSI2}, $g_A = 1.267$ is the axial--vector coupling
320: constant, renormalized by strong low--energy interactions, $F_{\pi} =
321: 92.4\,{\rm MeV}$ is the PCAC constant and $\alpha_D = D/(D + F) =
322: 0.635$ is the Gell--Mann parameter \cite{PDG04}, $T_N = E_N - m_N =
323: (m_{\Lambda^0} + m_K - m_N)/2 = 335\,{\rm MeV}$ is the kinetic energy
324: of the relative motion of the protons at threshold in the center of
325: mass frame, calculated for $m_N = 940\,{\rm MeV}$, $m_{\Lambda^0} =
326: 1116\,{\rm MeV}$ and $m_K = 494\,{\rm MeV}$. We have used also
327: $m_{\Sigma} = 1193\,{\rm MeV}$, $m_{\pi} = 140\,{\rm MeV}$ and
328: $m_{\eta} = 550\,{\rm MeV}$ \cite{PDG04}.
329:
330: By a Fierz transformation we get
331: %
332: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label2.4}
333: {[\bar{\Lambda}^0(x)p(x)][\bar{p}(x)i\gamma^5 p(x)]} &=& - \frac{1}{4}\,
334: [\bar{\Lambda}^0(x)i\gamma^5 p^c(x)][\bar{p^c}(x)p(x)]\nonumber\\
335: && + \frac{1}{4}\,i\,
336: [\bar{\Lambda}^0(x)\gamma_{\mu} p^c(x)][\bar{p^c}(x)\gamma^{\mu} \gamma^5 p(x)]
337: + \ldots,
338: \nonumber\\
339: {[\bar{\Lambda}^0(x)i\gamma^5p(x)][\bar{p}(x)p(x)]} &=& - \frac{1}{4}\,
340: [\bar{\Lambda}^0(x)i\gamma^5 p^c(x)][\bar{p^c}(x)p(x)]\nonumber\\
341: && - \frac{1}{4}\,i\,
342: [\bar{\Lambda}^0(x)\gamma_{\mu} p^c(x)][\bar{p^c}(x)\gamma^{\mu} \gamma^5 p(x)]
343: + \ldots\,.
344: \end{eqnarray}
345: %
346: Hence, the effective Lagrangian of the transition $pp\to
347: p\Lambda^0K^+$ is equal to
348: %
349: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label2.5}
350: {\cal L}^{pp \to p\Lambda^0K^+}_{\rm eff}(x) &=& -\,\frac{1}{4}\,
351: C^{(pp)_{{^3}{\rm P}_0}}_{(p\Lambda^0)_{{^1}{\rm S}_0}K^+}\,
352: [\bar{\Lambda}^0(x)i\gamma^5 p^c(x)][\bar{p^c}(x)p(x)]\,K^{+\dagger}(x)\nonumber\\
353: && + \,\frac{1}{4}\,
354: C^{(pp)_{{^3}{\rm P}_1}}_{(p\Lambda^0)_{{^3}{\rm S}_1}K^+}\,
355: [\bar{\Lambda}^0(x)i\gamma^{\mu} p^c(x)][\bar{p^c}(x)\gamma_{\mu}\gamma^5 p(x)]\,K^{+\dagger}(x),
356: \end{eqnarray}
357: %
358: where the first and the second terms describe the production of the
359: $p\Lambda^0$ pair in the ${^1}{\rm S}_0$ and ${^3}{\rm S}_1$ state by
360: the $pp$ pair in the ${^3}{\rm P}_0$ and ${^3}{\rm P}_1$ state,
361: respectively. The effective coupling constants $C^{(pp)_{{^3}{\rm
362: P}_0}}_{(p\Lambda^0)_{{^1}{\rm S}_0}K^+}$ and $C^{(pp)_{{^3}{\rm
363: P}_1}}_{(p\Lambda^0)_{{^3}{\rm S}_1}K^+}$ are equal to
364: %
365: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label2.6}
366: C^{(pp)_{{^3}{\rm P}_0}}_{(p\Lambda^0)_{{^1}{\rm S}_0}K^+} &=&
367: A^{pp}_{p\Lambda^0K^+} + B^{pp}_{p\Lambda^0K^+} = -\,2.28\times 10^{-6}\,
368: {\rm MeV}^{-3},\nonumber\\
369: C^{(pp)_{{^3}{\rm P}_1}}_{(p\Lambda^0)_{{^3}{\rm S}_1}K^+} &=&
370: A^{pp}_{p\Lambda^0K^+} - B^{pp}_{p\Lambda^0K^+} = -\,1.58\times 10^{-6}\,
371: {\rm MeV}^{-3}
372: \end{eqnarray}
373: %
374: The total cross section for the reaction $pp \to
375: p\Lambda^0K^+$ is given by
376: %
377: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label2.7}
378: \hspace{-0.3in} &&\sigma^{pp\to p\Lambda^0K^+}(\varepsilon) = \sigma^{(pp)_{{^3}{\rm
379: P}_0}\to (p\Lambda^0)_{{^1}{\rm S}_0}K^+}(\varepsilon) +
380: \sigma^{(pp)_{{^3}{\rm P}_1}\to (p\Lambda^0)_{{^3}{\rm
381: S}_1}K^+}(\varepsilon) =\nonumber\\
382: \hspace{-0.3in} &&\hspace{1in} = \frac{1}{128\pi^2}\frac{\varepsilon^2}{m_K}\frac{p_0}{E_0}\,
383: \Big(\frac{m_Km_{\Lambda^0}m_N}{m_K + m_{\Lambda^0} +
384: m_N}\Big)^{3/2}\nonumber\\
385: \hspace{-0.3in} &&
386: \times \,\Big(\frac{1}{3}\,
387: \Big|C^{(pp)_{{^3}{\rm P}_0}}_{(p\Lambda^0)_{{^1}{\rm S}_0}K^+}\Big|^2
388: \Big|f_{(pp)_{{^3}{\rm
389: P}_0}}(p_0)\Big|^2 + \frac{2}{3}\,
390: \Big|C^{(pp)_{{^3}{\rm P}_1}}_{(p\Lambda^0)_{{^3}{\rm S}_1}K^+}\Big|^2
391: \Big|f_{(pp)_{{^3}{\rm
392: P}_1}}(p_0)\Big|^2\Big)\,\Omega_{p\Lambda^0 K^+}(\varepsilon),
393: \end{eqnarray}
394: %
395: where $\varepsilon = 2E_N - m_K - m_{\Lambda^0} - m_N$ is the excess
396: energy for the relative energy of the $pp$ pair in the center of mass
397: frame $E_N = \sqrt{p^{\;2} + m^2_N}$. It is measured in MeV. The
398: function $\Omega_{p\Lambda^0 K^+}(\varepsilon)$ is related to the
399: account for the final--state interaction in the $p\Lambda^0$ and
400: $pK^+$ channels defined in Appendix A (see also \cite{AI01}). For
401: $\varepsilon \ge 6.68\,{\rm MeV}$ the contribution of the Coulomb
402: repulsion in the $K^+p$ pair makes up about $15\,\%$. Therefore for
403: $\varepsilon \ge 6.68\,{\rm MeV}$ we carry out the calculation of
404: $\Omega_{p\Lambda^0 K^+}(\varepsilon)$ at the neglect of the Coulomb
405: repulsion.
406:
407:
408: The amplitudes $f_{(pp)_{{^3}{\rm P}_0}}(p_0)$ and $f_{(pp)_{{^3}{\rm
409: P}_1}}(p_0)$ describe the $pp$ rescattering in the ${^3}{\rm
410: P}_0$ and ${^3}{\rm P}_1$ state at threshold of the final
411: $p\Lambda^0K^+$ state, respectively. The detailed procedure for the
412: calculation of the amplitudes $f_{(pp)_{{^3}{\rm P}_0}}(p_0)$ and
413: $f_{(pp)_{{^3}{\rm P}_1}}(p_0)$ is expounded in \cite{IV4}. Following
414: this procedure one gets
415: %
416: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label2.8}
417: |f_{(pp)_{{^3}{\rm P}_0}}(p_0)| &=& \Big|\Big\{1 +
418: \frac{C_{(pp)_{{^3}{\rm P}_0}}(p_0)}{8\pi^2}\,
419: \frac{p^3_0}{E_N}\,\Big[{\ell n}\Big(\frac{E_N + p_0}{E_N - p_0}\Big)
420: +\,i\,\pi\Big]\Big\}^{-1}\Big| = 0.15,\nonumber\\
421: |f_{(pp)_{{^3}{\rm P}_1}}(p_0)| &=& \Big|\Big\{1 -
422: \frac{ C_{(pp)_{{^3}{\rm P}_1}}(p_0)}{12\pi^2}\,
423: \frac{p^3_0}{E_N}\,\Big[{\ell n}\Big(\frac{E_N + p_0}{E_N - p_0}\Big)
424: -\,i\,\pi\Big]\Big\}^{-1}\Big| = 0.24,
425: \end{eqnarray}
426: %
427: where the effective coupling constants $C_{(pp)_{{^3}{\rm P}_0}}(p_0)$
428: and $C_{(pp)_{{^3}{\rm P}_1}}(p_0)$ are defined by the $\pi^0$\,-- and
429: $\eta$\,--\,meson exchanges\,\footnote{By using our expression for the
430: amplitude $f_{(pp)_{{^3}{\rm P}_0}}(p_0)$ and the results obtained
431: in \cite{KN99} we can estimate the values of the phase shift
432: $\delta_{{^3}{\rm P}_0}(p_0)$ and the inelasticity $\eta_{{^3}{\rm
433: P}_0}(p_0)$ of $pp$ scattering in the ${^3}{\rm P}_0$ state. We
434: get $\delta_{{^3}{\rm P}_0}(p_0) = -\,63.0^0$ and $\eta_{{^3}{\rm
435: P}_0}(p_0) = 0.80$. This does not contradict the SAID analysis
436: of the experimental data \cite{SAID1,SAID2}: $\delta_{{^3}{\rm
437: P}_0}(p_0) = -\,62.7^0$ and $\eta_{{^3}{\rm P}_0}(p_0) =
438: 0.65$.}.
439:
440: For the relative momentum of the $pp$ pair $p_0 = \sqrt{T_N(T_N +
441: 2m_N)} = 861\,{\rm MeV}$ at threshold of the reaction $pp \to
442: p\Lambda^0K^+$, the effective coupling constants $C_{(pp)_{{^3}{\rm
443: P}_0}}(p_0)$ and $C_{(pp)_{{^3}{\rm P}_1}}(p_0)$ amount to
444: \cite{IV4}
445: %
446: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label2.9}
447: C_{(pp)_{{^3}{\rm P}_1}}(p_0) = C_{(pp)_{{^3}{\rm P}_0}}(p_0)
448: &=& \frac{g^2_{\pi NN}}{4p^2_0}\,{\ell n}\Big(1 +
449: \frac{4p^2_0}{m^2_{\pi}}\Big) + (3 - 4\alpha_D)^2\,
450: \frac{g^2_{\pi NN}}{12 p^2_0}\,{\ell n}\Big(1 +
451: \frac{4p^2_0}{m^2_{\eta}}\Big) = \nonumber\\
452: &=& 3.05\times 10^{-4}\,{\rm MeV}^{-2},
453: \end{eqnarray}
454: %
455: The cross section for the reaction $pp \to p\Lambda^0K^+$ is equal to
456: %
457: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label2.10}
458: \sigma^{pp\to p\Lambda^0K^+}(\varepsilon) &=& \sigma^{(pp)_{{^3}{\rm
459: P}_0}\to (p\Lambda^0)_{{^1}{\rm S}_0}K^+}(\varepsilon) +
460: \sigma^{(pp)_{{^3}{\rm P}_1}\to (p\Lambda^0)_{{^3}{\rm
461: S}_1}K^+}(\varepsilon) =\nonumber\\
462: &=& (1.50\,\varepsilon^2 + 3.70\,\varepsilon^2)\,
463: \Omega_{p\Lambda^0 K^+}(\varepsilon)\,{\rm n b} = 3.49\,\varepsilon^2\,{\rm n b},
464: \end{eqnarray}
465: %
466: where $\Omega_{p\Lambda^0 K^+}(\varepsilon) = 0.67$ is calculated at
467: $\varepsilon = 6.68\,{\rm MeV}$ (see Appendix A). The theoretical
468: value (\ref{label2.10}) agrees with the experimental data
469: $\sigma^{pp\to p\Lambda^0K^+}(\varepsilon)_{\exp} =
470: 3.68\,\varepsilon^2\,{\rm n b}$ \cite{JB98} within an accuracy better
471: than $6\,\%$.
472:
473: Now we take into account the contribution of the $\rho^0$\,-- and
474: $\omega^0$\,--\,mesons. The effective Lagrangian of the $pp \to
475: p\Lambda^0K^+$ transition, caused by the vector\,--\,meson exchanges,
476: is equal to\,\footnote{Since we compare are results with those by
477: F\"aldt and Wilkin \cite{CW97}, for the calculation of the
478: contribution of vector--meson exchanges we follow F\"aldt and Wilkin
479: \cite{CW97} and treat vector mesons as Yang--Mills fields
480: \cite{HP73,GG69}. The interactions of vector mesons with hadronic
481: fields are defined by a minimal extension \cite{HP73,GG69}. For the
482: derivation of the Lagrangian of the interactions of baryons with
483: vector mesons one can use the Lagrangian ({\rm D}.4) of
484: Ref.\cite{IV4} with the replacements $g_{\pi NN} \to g_{\rho}/2$,
485: $\alpha_D \to 0$, $i\gamma^5 \to \gamma^{\mu}$, $\pi(x) \to
486: \rho_{\mu}(x)$ and $\eta(x) \to \omega^0_{\mu}(x)/\sqrt{3}$.}
487: %
488: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label2.11}
489: \hspace{-0.3in}\delta {\cal L}^{pp \to p\Lambda^0K^+}_{\rm eff}(x) &=&
490: -\, \frac{1}{2\sqrt{3}}\,\frac{(3 - 2\alpha_D)\,g_{\pi NN}\,
491: g^2_{\rho}}{m^2_{\rho} + 2 m_N T_N}\,\frac{1}{m_N + m_{\Lambda^0} + m_K}\nonumber\\
492: \hspace{-0.3in}&&\times\,
493: i\,[\bar{\Lambda}^0(x)\gamma_{\mu}\gamma^5p(x)][\bar{p}(x) \gamma^{\mu}p(x)]\,K^{+\dagger}(x).
494: \end{eqnarray}
495: %
496: By a Fierz transformation we reduce the effective interaction to the
497: form
498: %
499: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label2.12}
500: &&i\,[\bar{\Lambda}^0(x)\gamma_{\mu}\gamma^5p(x)][\bar{p}(x) \gamma^{\mu}p(x)]
501: \to -\,[\bar{\Lambda}^0(x)i\gamma^5 p^c(x)][\bar{p^c}(x)p(x)]\nonumber\\
502: &&\hspace{2.15in}-\,\frac{1}{2}\,
503: [\bar{\Lambda}^0(x)i\gamma_{\mu}p^c(x)][\bar{p^c}(x)
504: \gamma^{\mu}\gamma^5 p(x)] + \ldots\,.
505: \end{eqnarray}
506: %
507: The contributions of the $\rho^0$\,-- and $\omega^0$\,--\,meson
508: exchanges to the coefficients $C^{(pp)_{{^3}{\rm
509: P}_0}}_{(p\Lambda^0)_{{^1}{\rm S}_0}K^+}$ and $C^{(pp)_{{^3}{\rm
510: P}_1}}_{(p\Lambda^0)_{{^3}{\rm S}_1}K^+}$ are equal to
511: %
512: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label2.13}
513: \hspace{-0.5in}&&\delta C^{(pp)_{{^3}{\rm
514: P}_0}}_{(p\Lambda^0)_{{^1}{\rm S}_0}K^+} = -\frac{2}{\sqrt{3}}
515: \frac{(3 - 2\alpha_D)g_{\pi NN}
516: g^2_{\rho}}{m^2_{\rho} + 2 m_N T_N}\frac{1}{m_N + m_{\Lambda^0} + m_K}
517: = - 0.30 \times 10^{-6}\,{\rm MeV}^{-3},\nonumber\\
518: \hspace{-0.5in}&&\delta C^{(pp)_{{^3}{\rm
519: P}_1}}_{(p\Lambda^0)_{{^3}{\rm S}_1}K^+} = +\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}
520: \frac{(3 - 2\alpha_D)g_{\pi NN}
521: g^2_{\rho}}{m^2_{\rho} + 2 m_N T_N}\frac{1}{m_N + m_{\Lambda^0} + m_K}
522: = + 0.15\times 10^{-6}\,{\rm MeV}^{-3}.
523: \end{eqnarray}
524: %
525: For the numerical calculation we set $m_{\rho} = m_{\omega} =
526: 780\,{\rm MeV}$ \cite{PDG04}. The contributions of the $\rho^0$\,--
527: and $\omega^0$\,--\,meson exchanges to the effective coupling constants
528: $C_{(pp)_{{^3}{\rm P}_0}}(p_0)$ and $C_{(pp)_{{^3}{\rm P}_1}}(p_0)$
529: amount to
530: %
531: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label2.14}
532: \delta C_{(pp)_{{^3}{\rm P}_0}} = -\,\frac{g^2_{\rho}}{2p^2_0}\,
533: {\ell n}\Big(1 + \frac{4 p^2_0}{m^2_{\rho}}\Big) =
534: -\, 0.43\times 10^{-4}\,{\rm MeV}^{-2},\nonumber\\
535: \delta C_{(pp)_{{^3}{\rm P}_1}} = +\,\frac{g^2_{\rho}}{4p^2_0}\,
536: {\ell n}\Big(1 + \frac{4 p^2_0}{m^2_{\rho}}\Big) =
537: +\,0.22\times 10^{-4}\,{\rm MeV}^{-2}.
538: \end{eqnarray}
539: %
540: This gives $|f_{(pp)_{{^3}{\rm P}_0}}(p_0)| = 0.16$ and
541: $|f_{(pp)_{{^3}{\rm P}_1}}(p_0)| = 0.22$. The cross section for the
542: reaction $pp \to p\Lambda^0K^+$ with the $\rho^0$\,-- and
543: $\omega^0$\,--\,meson exchanges is
544: %
545: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label2.15}
546: \sigma^{pp\to p\Lambda^0K^+}(\varepsilon) &=& \sigma^{(pp)_{{^3}{\rm
547: P}_0}\to (p\Lambda^0)_{{^1}{\rm S}_0}K^+}(\varepsilon) +
548: \sigma^{(pp)_{{^3}{\rm P}_1}\to (p\Lambda^0)_{{^3}{\rm
549: S}_1}K^+}(\varepsilon) =\nonumber\\
550: &=& (2.19\,\varepsilon^2 + 2.55\,\varepsilon^2)\,\Omega_{p\Lambda^0 K^+}(\varepsilon)\,{\rm n b} = 3.18\,
551: \varepsilon^2\,{\rm n b}.
552: \end{eqnarray}
553: %
554: Thus, the $\rho^0$\,-- and $\omega^0$\,--\,meson exchanges decrease
555: the value of the cross section for the reaction $pp\to p\Lambda^0K^+$
556: by about $9\,\%$ and lead to the agreement with the experimental data
557: $\sigma^{pp\to p\Lambda^0K^+}(\varepsilon)_{\exp} =
558: 3.68\,\varepsilon^2\,{\rm n b}$ \cite{JB98} with an accuracy about
559: $16\,\%$.
560:
561: \section{Cross section for the reaction $pn\to n \Lambda^0K^+$ near
562: threshold}
563: \setcounter{equation}{0}
564:
565: The $pn$ pair in the reaction $pn \to n\Lambda^0K^+$ can interact both
566: in the isospin--triplet $(pn)_{I = 1}$ state and isospin--singlet
567: $(pn)_{I = 0}$ state. According to the {\it generalised Pauli
568: exclusion principle}, the $pn$ pair with isospin $I = 1$ can be in
569: the ${^3}{\rm P}_0$ and ${^3}{\rm P}_1$ state with the $n\Lambda^0$
570: pair in the ${^1}{\rm S}_0$ and ${^3}{\rm S}_1$ state, respectively,
571: whereas the $pn$ pair in the state with isospin $I =0$ can be in the
572: ${^1}{\rm P}_1$ state only with the $n\Lambda^0$ pair in the ${^3}{\rm
573: S}_1$ state.
574:
575: A complete set of Feynman diagrams for the $pn \to n\Lambda^0 K^+$
576: transition near threshold of the final state is depicted in Fig.3 and
577: Fig.4.
578: %
579: \begin{figure}
580: \centering
581: \psfrag{K+}{$K^+$}
582: \psfrag{K-}{$K^-$}
583: \psfrag{K0}{$K^0$}
584: \psfrag{L0}{$\Lambda^0$}
585: \psfrag{p0}{$\pi^0$}
586: \psfrag{p+}{$\pi^+$}
587: \psfrag{S0}{$\Sigma^0$}
588: \psfrag{S-}{$\Sigma^-$}
589: \psfrag{p}{$p$}
590: \psfrag{n}{$n$}
591: \psfrag{e}{$\eta$}
592: \psfrag{s}{$\sigma$}
593: \psfrag{d}{$\delta^0$}
594: \psfrag{k+}{$\kappa^+$}
595: \psfrag{k-}{$\kappa^-$}
596: \includegraphics[height= 0.70\textheight]{fig3.eps}
597: \caption{The set of Feynman diagrams contributing to the effective
598: coupling constants of the $p n \to n
599: \Lambda^0K^+$ transition in the one--pseudoscalar meson exchange
600: approximation.}
601: \end{figure}
602: %
603: \begin{figure}
604: \centering
605: \psfrag{K+}{$K^+$}
606: \psfrag{K0}{$K^0$}
607: \psfrag{L0}{$\Lambda^0$}
608: \psfrag{p0}{$\pi^0$}
609: \psfrag{p-}{$\pi^-$}
610: \psfrag{e}{$\eta$}
611: \psfrag{p}{$p$}
612: \psfrag{n}{$n$}
613: \psfrag{d-}{$\delta^-$}
614: \psfrag{k-}{$\kappa^-$}
615: \psfrag{k0}{$\kappa^0$}
616: \includegraphics[height= 0.30\textheight]{fig4.eps}
617: \caption{The set of Feynman diagrams contributing to the effective
618: coupling constants of the $ p n \to n
619: \Lambda^0 K^+$ transition in the one--scalar meson exchange
620: approximation.}
621: \end{figure}
622: %
623: The wave functions of the initial and final states we take in the form
624: %
625: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label3.1}
626: |p(\vec{p}_1,\sigma_1)n(\vec{p}_2,\sigma_2)\rangle &=&
627: a^{\dagger}_p(\vec{p}_1,\sigma_1)a^{\dagger}_n(\vec{p}_2,\sigma_2)|0\rangle,\nonumber\\
628: |n(\vec{k}_n,\sigma_n)\Lambda^0(\vec{k}_{\Lambda},
629: \sigma_{\Lambda})K^+(\vec{Q}_K)\rangle &=& a^{\dagger}_n(\vec{k}_n,\sigma_n)
630: a^{\dagger}_{\Lambda}
631: (\vec{k}_{\Lambda},\sigma_{\Lambda})c^{\dagger}_{K^+}(\vec{Q}_K)|0\rangle,
632: \end{eqnarray}
633: %
634: The matrix element of the $pn \to n\Lambda^0K^+$ transition, defined
635: by the Feynman diagrams in Fig.3 and Fig.4, is described by the
636: effective local Lagrangian of the transition $pn \to n\Lambda^0K^+$:
637: %
638: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label3.2}
639: {\cal L}^{pn \to n\Lambda^0K^+}_{\rm eff}(x) &=& (A^{pn}_{n\Lambda^0K^+}
640: [\bar{\Lambda}^0(x)n(x)][\bar{n}(x)i\gamma^5 p(x)] +
641: B^{pn}_{n\Lambda^0K^+}[\bar{\Lambda}^0(x)p(x)][\bar{n}(x)i\gamma^5 n(x)]
642: \nonumber\\
643: &+& C^{pn}_{n\Lambda^0K^+}[\bar{\Lambda}^0(x)i\gamma^5 n(x)][\bar{n}(x) p(x)]
644: + D^{pn}_{n\Lambda^0K^+}[\bar{\Lambda}^0(x)i\gamma^5 p(x)][\bar{n}(x) n(x)]),
645: \nonumber\\
646: &&\times\,K^{+\dagger}(x),
647: \end{eqnarray}
648: %
649: where the effective coupling constants $A^{pn}_{n\Lambda^0K^+}$,
650: $B^{pn}_{n\Lambda^0K^+}$, $C^{pn}_{n\Lambda^0K^+}$ and
651: $D^{pn}_{n\Lambda^0K^+}$ are equal to
652: %
653: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label3.3}
654: A^{pn}_{n\Lambda^0K^+}&=& -\,\frac{2}{\sqrt{3}}\,\frac{(3 -2 \alpha_D)
655: \,g^3_{\pi NN}}{m^2_{\pi} + 2 m_N T_N}\,\frac{1}{m_N +
656: m_{\Lambda^0} + m_K}\nonumber\\
657: &&+\,\frac{4}{\sqrt{3}}\,\frac{\alpha_D\,(2\alpha_D - 1)\,
658: g^3_{\pi NN}}{m^2_{\pi} + 2 m_N T_N}\,\frac{m_{\Sigma} +
659: m_K - m_N}{m^2_{\Sigma} + 2m_K T_N - (m_N - m_K)^2}\nonumber\\
660: &&+\,\frac{1}{\sqrt{3} g^2_A}\,\frac{1}{m_N}\,
661: \frac{(3 - 2\alpha_D)\,g^3_{\pi NN}}{m^2_{\pi} + 2 m_N T_N} =
662: 0.23\times 10^{-6}\,{\rm MeV}^{-3},\nonumber\\
663: B^{pn}_{n\Lambda^0K^+}&=&+\,\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}\,\frac{(3 -2 \alpha_D)
664: \,g^3_{\pi NN}}{m^2_{\pi} + 2 m_N T_N}\,
665: \frac{1}{m_N + m_{\Lambda^0} + m_K}\nonumber\\
666: &&-\,\frac{2}{\sqrt{3}}\,\frac{\alpha_D\,(2\alpha_D - 1)
667: \,g^3_{\pi NN}}{m^2_{\pi} + 2 m_N T_N}\,
668: \frac{m_{\Sigma} + m_K - m_N}{m^2_{\Sigma} + 2m_K T_N - (m_N - m_K)^2}
669: \nonumber\\
670: &&+\,\frac{2}{3\sqrt{3}}\,\frac{\alpha_D\,(3 - 2\alpha_D)
671: (3 - 4 \alpha_D)\,g^3_{\pi NN}}{m^2_{\eta} + 2 m_N T_N}\,
672: \frac{m_{\Lambda^0} + m_K - m_N}{m^2_{\Lambda} +
673: 2 m_K T_N - (m_N - m_K)^2}\nonumber\\
674: &&-\,\frac{1}{3\sqrt{3}}\,\frac{(3 - 2\alpha_D)(3 -
675: 4\alpha_D)^2\,g^3_{\pi NN}}{m^2_{\eta} + 2 m_N T_N}\,
676: \frac{1}{m_N + m_{\Lambda^0} + m_K}\nonumber\\
677: &&+\,\frac{1}{2\sqrt{3} g^2_A}\,\frac{1}{m_N}\,
678: \frac{(3 - 2\alpha_D)\,g^3_{\pi NN}}{m^2_{\pi} + 2 m_N T_N} +
679: \frac{1}{6\sqrt{3} g^2_A}\,\frac{1}{m_N}\,\frac{(3 - 2\alpha_D)(3 -
680: 4 \alpha_D)\,g^3_{\pi NN}}{m^2_{\eta} + 2 m_N T_N}=\nonumber\\
681: &&= 2.52\times 10^{-6}\,{\rm MeV}^{-3},\nonumber\\
682: C^{pn}_{n\Lambda^0K^+}&=&-\,\frac{1}{3\sqrt{3}}\,
683: \frac{(3 - 2\alpha_D)^3\,g^3_{\pi NN}}{m^2_K +
684: 2 m_{\Lambda^0}T_N - (m_{\Lambda^0} - m_N)^2}\,
685: \frac{m_{\Lambda^0} + m_K - m_N}{m^2_{\Lambda} + 2 m_K T_N - (m_N - m_K)^2}
686: \nonumber\\
687: &&+\,\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}\,
688: \frac{(3 - 2\alpha_D)(2\alpha_D - 1)^2\,g^3_{\pi NN}}{m^2_K +
689: 2 m_{\Lambda^0}T_N - (m_{\Lambda^0} - m_N)^2}\,\frac{m_{\Sigma} +
690: m_K - m_N}{m^2_{\Sigma} +
691: 2 m_K T_N - (m_N - m_K)^2}\nonumber\\
692: &&+\,\frac{1}{\sqrt{3} g^2_A}\,\frac{1}{m_N}\,
693: \frac{(3 - 2\alpha_D)\,g^3_{\pi NN}}{m^2_K + 2 m_{\Lambda^0} T_N -
694: (m_{\Lambda^0} - m_N)^2} =
695: 0.51\times 10^{-6}\,{\rm MeV}^{-3},\nonumber\\
696: D^{pn}_{n\Lambda^0K^+} &=& \frac{2}{\sqrt{3}}\,
697: \frac{(3 - 2\alpha_D)(2\alpha_D - 1)^2\,g^3_{\pi NN}}{m^2_K +
698: 2 m_{\Lambda^0}T_N - (m_{\Lambda^0} - m_N)^2}\,\frac{m_{\Sigma} +
699: m_K - m_N}{m^2_{\Sigma} +
700: 2 m_K T_N - (m_N - m_K)^2} =\nonumber\\
701: &=& 0.17\times 10^{-6}\,{\rm MeV}^{-3}.
702: \end{eqnarray}
703: %
704: Since at low energies the $n\Lambda^0$ pair can be produced in the
705: ${^1}{\rm S}_0$ and ${^3}{\rm S}_1$ state only, we have to extract
706: these interactions from the effective Lagrangian Eq.(\ref{label3.2})
707: by a Fierz transformation. We get
708: %
709: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label3.4}
710: \hspace{-0.3in} &&{[\bar{\Lambda}^0(x)n(x)][\bar{n}(x)i\gamma^5 p(x)]} = -\,\frac{1}{4}\,
711: [\bar{\Lambda}^0(x)i\gamma^5 n^c(x)][\bar{n^c}(x)p(x)]\nonumber\\
712: \hspace{-0.3in} &&+\,\frac{1}{4}\,[\bar{\Lambda}^0(x)i\gamma_{\mu}n^c(x)]
713: [\bar{n^c}(x)\gamma^{\mu}\gamma^5 p(x)] -\,\frac{1}{8}\,
714: [\bar{\Lambda}^0(x)i\sigma_{\mu\nu} n^c(x)][\bar{n^c}(x)\sigma^{\mu\nu}\gamma^5 p(x)] + \ldots,
715: \nonumber\\
716: \hspace{-0.3in} &&{[\bar{\Lambda}^0(x)p(x)][\bar{n}(x)i\gamma^5 n(x)]} = -\,\frac{1}{4}\,
717: [\bar{\Lambda}^0(x)i\gamma^5 n^c(x)][\bar{n^c}(x)p(x)]\nonumber\\
718: \hspace{-0.3in} &&+\,\frac{1}{4}\,[\bar{\Lambda}^0(x)i\gamma_{\mu}n^c(x)]
719: [\bar{n^c}(x)\gamma^{\mu}\gamma^5 p(x)] + \,\frac{1}{8}\,
720: [\bar{\Lambda}^0(x)i\sigma_{\mu\nu} n^c(x)][\bar{n^c}(x)\sigma^{\mu\nu}\gamma^5 p(x)] + \ldots,
721: \nonumber\\
722: \hspace{-0.3in} &&{[\bar{\Lambda}^0(x)i\gamma^5 n(x)][\bar{n}(x)p(x)]} = -\,\frac{1}{4}\,
723: [\bar{\Lambda}^0(x)i\gamma^5 n^c(x)][\bar{n^c}(x)p(x)]\nonumber\\
724: \hspace{-0.3in} &&-\,\frac{1}{4}\,[\bar{\Lambda}^0(x)i\gamma_{\mu}n^c(x)]
725: [\bar{n^c}(x)\gamma^{\mu}\gamma^5 p(x)] -\,\frac{1}{8}\,
726: [\bar{\Lambda}^0(x)i\sigma_{\mu\nu} n^c(x)][\bar{n^c}(x)\sigma^{\mu\nu}\gamma^5 p(x)] + \ldots,
727: \nonumber\\
728: \hspace{-0.3in} &&{[\bar{\Lambda}^0(x)i\gamma^5 p(x)][\bar{n}(x) n(x)]} = -\,\frac{1}{4}\,
729: [\bar{\Lambda}^0(x)i\gamma^5 n^c(x)][\bar{n^c}(x)p(x)]\nonumber\\
730: \hspace{-0.3in} &&-\,\frac{1}{4}\,[\bar{\Lambda}^0(x)i\gamma_{\mu}n^c(x)]
731: [\bar{n^c}(x)\gamma^{\mu}\gamma^5 p(x)] + \,\frac{1}{8}\,
732: [\bar{\Lambda}^0(x)i\sigma_{\mu\nu} n^c(x)][\bar{n^c}(x)\sigma^{\mu\nu}\gamma^5 p(x)] + \ldots.
733: \end{eqnarray}
734: %
735: Hence, the effective Lagrangian of the $pn\to n\Lambda^0K^+$
736: transition is equal to
737: %
738: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label3.5}
739: {\cal L}^{pn \to n\Lambda^0K^+}_{\rm eff}(x) &=& -\,\frac{1}{2}\,
740: C^{(pn)_{{^3}{\rm P}_0}}_{(n\Lambda^0)_{{^1}{\rm S}_0}K^+}\,
741: [\bar{\Lambda}^0(x)i\gamma^5 n^c(x)][\bar{n^c}(x)p(x)]\,K^{+\dagger}(x)\nonumber\\
742: && + \,\frac{1}{2}\,
743: C^{(pn)_{{^3}{\rm P}_1}}_{(n\Lambda^0)_{{^3}{\rm S}_1}K^+}\,
744: [\bar{\Lambda}^0(x)i\gamma_{\mu} n^c(x)][\bar{n^c}(x)\gamma^{\mu}\gamma^5 p(x)]
745: \,K^{+\dagger}(x)\nonumber\\
746: && - \,\frac{1}{4}\,
747: C^{(pn)_{{^1}{\rm P}_1}}_{(n\Lambda^0)_{{^3}{\rm S}_1}K^+}\,
748: [\bar{\Lambda}^0(x)i\sigma_{\mu\nu} n^c(x)][\bar{n^c}(x)\sigma^{\mu\nu}\gamma^5 p(x)]
749: \,K^{+\dagger}(x),
750: \end{eqnarray}
751: %
752: where the first and the second terms describe the production of the
753: $n\Lambda^0$ pair in the ${^1}{\rm S}_0$ and ${^3}{\rm S}_1$ state by
754: the $pn$ pair in the isospin--triplet and the ${^3}{\rm P}_0$ and
755: ${^3}{\rm P}_1$ states, respectively, the third term corresponds to
756: the interaction of the $pn$ pair in the isospin--singlet and the
757: ${^1}{\rm P}_1$ state. At threshold for the $pn$ pair in the ${^1}{\rm
758: P}_1$ state with isospin $I = 0$ the $n\Lambda^0$ pair produces
759: itself in the ${^3}{\rm S}_1$ state.
760:
761: The effective coupling constants are equal to
762: %
763: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label3.6}
764: C^{(pn)_{{^3}{\rm P}_0}}_{(n\Lambda^0)_{{^1}{\rm S}_0}K^+} &=&
765: \frac{1}{2}\,(A^{pn}_{n\Lambda^0K^+} + B^{pn}_{n\Lambda^0K^+} +
766: C^{pn}_{n\Lambda^0K^+} + D^{pn}_{n\Lambda^0K^+}) = \nonumber\\
767: &=&+\,1.72\times 10^{-6}\,
768: {\rm MeV}^{-3},\nonumber\\
769: C^{(pn)_{{^3}{\rm P}_1}}_{(n\Lambda^0)_{{^3}{\rm S}_1}K^+} &=&
770: \frac{1}{2}\,(A^{pn}_{n\Lambda^0K^+} + B^{pn}_{n\Lambda^0K^+} -
771: C^{pn}_{n\Lambda^0K^+} - D^{pn}_{n\Lambda^0K^+}) = \nonumber\\
772: &=& +\,1.04\times 10^{-6}\,{\rm MeV}^{-3},\nonumber\\
773: C^{(pn)_{{^1}{\rm P}_1}}_{(n\Lambda^0)_{{^3}{\rm S}_1}K^+} &=&\frac{1}{2}\,
774: (A^{pn}_{n\Lambda^0K^+} - B^{pn}_{n\Lambda^0K^+} +
775: C^{pn}_{n\Lambda^0K^+} - D^{pn}_{n\Lambda^0K^+}) = \nonumber\\
776: &=&-\,1.95\times 10^{-6}\,
777: {\rm MeV}^{-3},
778: \end{eqnarray}
779: %
780: The total cross section for the reaction $pn \to
781: n\Lambda^0K^+$ is given by
782: %
783: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label3.7}
784: \sigma^{pn\to n\Lambda^0K^+}(\varepsilon) =
785: \frac{1}{2}\,( \sigma^{(pn)_{I = 1} \to n\Lambda^0K^+}(\varepsilon) + \sigma^{(pn)_{I = 0}
786: \to n\Lambda^0K^+}(\varepsilon)),
787: \end{eqnarray}
788: %
789: where the cross sections $\sigma^{(pn)_{I = 1} \to
790: n\Lambda^0K^+}(\varepsilon)$ and $ \sigma^{(pn)_{I = 0} \to
791: n\Lambda^0K^+}(\varepsilon)$ are defined by
792: %
793: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label3.8}
794: \hspace{-0.3in} &&\sigma^{(pn)_{I = 1}\to n\Lambda^0K^+}(\varepsilon) = 2\,(\sigma^{(pn)_{{^3}{\rm
795: P}_0}\to (n\Lambda^0)_{{^1}{\rm S}_0}K^+}(\varepsilon) +
796: \sigma^{(pn)_{{^3}{\rm P}_1}\to (n\Lambda^0)_{{^3}{\rm
797: S}_1}K^+}(\varepsilon)) =\nonumber\\
798: \hspace{-0.3in} &&\hspace{1in} = \frac{1}{64\pi^2}\frac{\varepsilon^2}{m_K}\frac{p_0}{E_0}\,
799: \Big(\frac{m_Km_{\Lambda^0}m_N}{m_K + m_{\Lambda^0} +
800: m_N}\Big)^{3/2}\nonumber\\
801: \hspace{-0.3in} &&
802: \times \,\Big(\frac{1}{3}\,
803: \Big|C^{(pn)_{{^3}{\rm P}_0}}_{(n\Lambda^0)_{{^1}{\rm S}_0}K^+}\Big|^2
804: \Big|f_{(pn)_{{^3}{\rm
805: P}_0}}(p_0)\Big|^2 + \frac{2}{3}\,
806: \Big|C^{(pn)_{{^3}{\rm P}_1}}_{(p\Lambda^0)_{{^3}{\rm S}_1}K^+}\Big|^2
807: \Big|f_{(pn)_{{^3}{\rm
808: P}_1}}(p_0)\Big|^2\Big)\,\Omega_{n\Lambda^0 K^+}(\varepsilon),\nonumber\\
809: \hspace{-0.3in} &&\sigma^{(pn)_{I = 0}\to n\Lambda^0K^+}(\varepsilon) = 2\,\sigma^{(pn)_{{^1}{\rm
810: P}_1}\to (n\Lambda^0)_{{^1}{\rm S}_0}K^+}(\varepsilon) = \nonumber\\
811: \hspace{-0.3in} &&=
812: \frac{1}{64\pi^2}\frac{\varepsilon^2}{m_K}\frac{p_0}{E_0}\,
813: \Big(\frac{m_Km_{\Lambda^0}m_N}{m_K + m_{\Lambda^0} +
814: m_N}\Big)^{3/2}\,\frac{1}{3}\,
815: \Big|C^{(pn)_{{^1}{\rm P}_1}}_{(n\Lambda^0)_{{^3}{\rm S}_1}K^+}\Big|^2
816: \Big|f_{(pn)_{{^1}{\rm
817: P}_1}}(p_0)\Big|^2\,\Omega_{n\Lambda^0 K^+}(\varepsilon).
818: \end{eqnarray}
819: %
820: The function $\Omega_{n\Lambda^0 K^+}(\varepsilon)$ takes into account
821: the final--state interaction in the $n\Lambda^0$ channel (see Appendix
822: A). The amplitude $f_{(pn)_{{^1}{\rm P}_1}}(p_0)$ describes the
823: rescattering of the $pn$ pair in the isospin--singlet and ${^1}{\rm
824: P}_1$ state.
825:
826: Since the amplitudes of the $pn$ rescattering in the ${^3}{\rm P}_0$
827: and ${^3}{\rm P}_1$ state, $f_{(pn)_{{^3}{\rm P}_0}}(p_0)$ and
828: $f_{(pn)_{{^3}{\rm P}_1}}(p_0)$, are equal to the amplitudes of the
829: $pp$ rescattering, the value of the cross section for the reaction
830: $(pn)_{I = 1} \to n\Lambda^0K^+$ is equal to
831: %
832: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label3.9}
833: \sigma^{(pn)_{I = 1}\to n\Lambda^0K^+}(\varepsilon) =
834: (1.71\,\varepsilon^2 + 3.21\,\varepsilon^2)\,\Omega_{n\Lambda^0 K^+}(\varepsilon)\,{\rm n b} =
835: 3.30\,\varepsilon^2\,{\rm n b},
836: \end{eqnarray}
837: %
838: where $\Omega_{n\Lambda^0 K^+}(\varepsilon) = 0.67$ for $\varepsilon =
839: 6.68\,{\rm MeV}$ (see Appendix A).
840:
841: For the cross sections of the reactions $(pn)_{I = 1}\to
842: n\Lambda^0K^+$ and $pp \to p \Lambda^0K^+$, defined by
843: Eqs.(\ref{label2.10}) and (\ref{label3.9}), we get the ratio
844: %
845: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label3.10}
846: R^{(I = 1)} = \frac{\sigma^{(pn)_{I = 1}\to n\Lambda^0K^+}(\varepsilon)}{
847: \sigma^{pp\to p\Lambda^0K^+}(\varepsilon)} \simeq 1,
848: \end{eqnarray}
849: %
850: agreeing well with isospin--invariance of strong $pN$ interactions.
851:
852: According to \cite{IV4}, the result of the calculation of the
853: amplitude $f_{(pn)_{{^1}{\rm P}_1}}(p_0)$ is
854: %
855: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label3.11}
856: |f_{(pn)_{{^1}{\rm P}_1}}(p_0)| = \Big|\Big\{1 -
857: \frac{ C_{(pn)_{{^1}{\rm P}_1}}(p_0)}{24\pi^2}\,
858: \frac{p^3_0}{E_N}\,\Big[{\ell n}\Big(\frac{E_N + p_0}{E_N - p_0}\Big)
859: -\,i\,\pi\Big]\Big\}^{-1}\Big| = 0.49,
860: \end{eqnarray}
861: %
862: where the coupling constant $C_{(pn)_{{^1}{\rm P}_1}}(p_0)$ is defined
863: by the $\pi$\,-- and $\eta$\,--\,meson exchanges and is equal to
864: $C_{(pn)_{{^1}{\rm P}_1}}(p_0) = C_{(pn)_{{^3}{\rm P}_1}}(p_0) =
865: 3.05\times 10^{-4}\,{\rm MeV}^{-2}$ \cite{IV4}. The cross section for
866: the reaction $(pn)_{I = 0} \to n\Lambda^0K^+$ amounts to
867: %
868: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label3.12}
869: \sigma^{(pn)_{I = 0}\to n\Lambda^0K^+}(\varepsilon) =
870: 23.50\,\varepsilon^2\,\Omega_{n\Lambda^0K^+}(\varepsilon)\,{\rm n b} = 15.75\,\varepsilon^2\,{\rm n b}.
871: \end{eqnarray}
872: %
873: For the total cross section for the reaction $pn \to n\Lambda^0K^+$ we get
874: %
875: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label3.13}
876: \sigma^{pn\to n\Lambda^0K^+}(\varepsilon) &=&
877: \frac{1}{2}(\sigma^{(pn)_{I = 1} \to n\Lambda^0K^+}(\varepsilon) + \sigma^{(pn)_{I = 0}
878: \to n\Lambda^0K^+}(\varepsilon)) = \nonumber\\
879: &=& \Delta \sigma^{pn \to n\Lambda^0K^+}(\varepsilon) + \sigma^{(pn)_{I = 1} \to n\Lambda^0K^+}(\varepsilon) =
880: 9.52\,\varepsilon^2\,{\rm n b},
881: \end{eqnarray}
882: %
883: where we have denoted
884: %
885: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label3.14}
886: \Delta \sigma^{pn \to n\Lambda^0K^+}(\varepsilon) =
887: \frac{1}{2}(\sigma^{(pn)_{I = 0}
888: \to n\Lambda^0K^+}(\varepsilon) - \sigma^{(pn)_{I = 1} \to n\Lambda^0K^+}(\varepsilon)) =
889: 6.22\,\varepsilon^2\,{\rm n b}.
890: \end{eqnarray}
891: %
892: Now we can take into account the contribution of the vector meson
893: exchanges. Unlike the reaction $pp \to p\Lambda^0K^+$ the contribution
894: of the $\rho^0$\,-- and $\omega^0$\,--\,meson exchanges is cancelled
895: and there are only the contributions of the charged $\rho$\,--\,meson
896: exchange. The effective Lagrangian, caused by the charged
897: $\rho$\,--\,meson exchanges, is equal to
898: %
899: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label3.15}
900: \hspace{-0.3in}\delta {\cal L}^{pn \to n\Lambda^0K^+}_{\rm eff}(x) &=&
901: -\,\frac{1}{2\sqrt{3}}\,\frac{(3 - 2\alpha_D)\,
902: g_{\pi N5}\,g^2_{\rho}}{m^2_{\rho} + 2 m_N T_N}\,\frac{1}{m_N +
903: m_{\Lambda^0} + m_K}
904: \nonumber\\
905: \hspace{-0.3in} &&\times\,
906: [\bar{\Lambda}^0(x)\,i\,\gamma_{\mu}\gamma^5n(x)][\bar{n}(x)
907: \gamma^{\mu}p(x)]\,K^{+\dagger}(x).
908: \end{eqnarray}
909: %
910: By a Fierz transformation
911: %
912: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label3.16}
913: {[\bar{\Lambda}^0(x)i\gamma_{\mu} \gamma^5 n(x)][\bar{n}(x)\gamma^{\mu} p(x)]}
914: &=& -\,\frac{1}{4}\,
915: [\bar{\Lambda}^0(x)i\gamma^5 n^c(x)][\bar{n^c}(x)p(x)]\nonumber\\
916: &&-\,\frac{1}{4}\,[\bar{\Lambda}^0(x)i\gamma_{\mu}n^c(x)]
917: [\bar{n^c}(x)\gamma^{\mu}\gamma^5 p(x)] + \ldots
918: \end{eqnarray}
919: %
920: we obtain the contributions of the charged $\rho$\,--\,meson exchanges
921: to the effective coupling constants $C^{(pn)_{{^3}{\rm
922: P}_0}}_{(n\Lambda^0)_{{^1}{\rm S}_0}K^+}$, $C^{(pn)_{{^3}{\rm
923: P}_1}}_{(n\Lambda^0)_{{^3}{\rm S}_1}K^+}$ and $C^{(pn)_{{^1}{\rm
924: P}_1}}_{(n\Lambda^0)_{{^3}{\rm S}_1}K^+}$
925: %
926: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label3.17}
927: \delta C^{(pn)_{{^3}{\rm P}_0}}_{(n\Lambda^0)_{{^1}{\rm S}_0}K^+} &=&
928: -\,\frac{1}{4\sqrt{3}}\,\frac{(3 - 2\alpha_D)\,
929: g_{\pi NN}\,g^2_{\rho}}{m^2_{\rho} + 2 m_N T_N}\,\frac{1}{m_N +
930: m_{\Lambda^0} + m_K} = -\,0.04\times 10^{-6}\,
931: {\rm MeV}^{-3} ,\nonumber\\
932: \delta C^{(pn)_{{^3}{\rm P}_1}}_{(n\Lambda^0)_{{^3}{\rm S}_1}K^+} &=&+\,
933: \frac{1}{4\sqrt{3}}\,\frac{(3 - 2\alpha_D)\,
934: g_{\pi NN}\,g^2_{\rho}}{m^2_{\rho} + 2 m_N T_N}\,\frac{1}{m_N +
935: m_{\Lambda^0} + m_K} = +\,0.04\times 10^{-6}\,
936: {\rm MeV}^{-3},\nonumber\\
937: \delta C^{(pn)_{{^1}{\rm P}_1}}_{(n\Lambda^0)_{{^3}{\rm S}_1}K^+} &=& 0.
938: \end{eqnarray}
939: %
940: The contributions of the charged $\rho$\,--\,meson exchanges to the
941: effective coupling constants $C_{(pn)_{{^3}{\rm P}_0}}(p_0)$ and
942: $C_{(pn)_{{^3}{\rm P}_1}}(p_0)$ amount to
943: %
944: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label3.18}
945: \delta C_{(pn)_{{^3}{\rm P}_0}}(p_0) = -\,\frac{g^2_{\rho}}{2p^2_0}\,
946: {\ell n}\Big(1 + \frac{4 p^2_0}{m^2_{\rho}}\Big) =
947: -\, 0.43\times 10^{-4}\,{\rm MeV}^{-2},\nonumber\\
948: \delta C_{(pn)_{{^3}{\rm P}_1}}(p_0) = +\,\frac{g^2_{\rho}}{4p^2_0}\,
949: {\ell n}\Big(1 + \frac{4 p^2_0}{m^2_{\rho}}\Big) =
950: +\,0.22\times 10^{-4}\,{\rm MeV}^{-2}.
951: \end{eqnarray}
952: %
953: This gives $|f_{(pn)_{{^3}{\rm P}_0}}(p_0)| = 0.16$ and
954: $|f_{(pn)_{{^3}{\rm P}_1}}(p_0)| = 0.22$. The cross section for the
955: reaction $(pn)_{I = 1} \to n\Lambda^0K^+$ with the contribution of the
956: vector\,--\,meson exchanges is
957: %
958: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label3.19}
959: \sigma^{(pn)_{I = 1}\to n\Lambda^0K^+}(\varepsilon) =
960: (1.86\,\varepsilon^2 + 2.91\,\varepsilon^2)\,
961: \Omega_{n\Lambda^0K^+}(\varepsilon)\,{\rm n b} = 3.20\,\varepsilon^2\,{\rm n b}.
962: \end{eqnarray}
963: %
964: This gives the following value of the ratio $R^{(I = 1)}$:
965: %
966: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label3.20}
967: R^{(I = 1)} = \frac{\sigma^{(pn)_{I = 1}\to n\Lambda^0K^+}(\varepsilon)}{
968: \sigma^{pp\to p\Lambda^0K^+}(\varepsilon)} \simeq 1,
969: \end{eqnarray}
970: %
971: which is in agreement with isospin invariance of strong $pN$ interactions.
972:
973: The vector\,--\,meson exchanges lead to the decrease of the cross
974: section for the reaction $(pn)_{I = 1}\to n\Lambda^0K^+$ by about
975: $3\,\%$. Thus, the total cross section for the reaction $pn \to
976: n\Lambda^0K^+$ is equal to
977: %
978: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label3.21}
979: \sigma^{pn\to n\Lambda^0K^+}(\varepsilon) &=&
980: \frac{1}{2}(\sigma^{(pn)_{I = 1} \to n\Lambda^0K^+}(\varepsilon) + \sigma^{(pn)_{I = 0}
981: \to n\Lambda^0K^+}(\varepsilon)) = \nonumber\\
982: &=& \Delta \sigma^{pn \to n\Lambda^0K^+}(\varepsilon) + \sigma^{(pn)_{I = 1} \to n\Lambda^0K^+}(\varepsilon) =
983: \nonumber\\
984: &=& (6.28\,\varepsilon^2 + 3.20\,\varepsilon^2)\,{\rm n b} = 9.48\,
985: \varepsilon^2\,{\rm n b}.
986: \end{eqnarray}
987: %
988: Hence, due to the dominant contribution of the $pn$ interaction in the
989: isospin--singlet state, the vector\,--\,meson exchanges have
990: practically no influence on the cross section for the reaction $pn \to
991: n\Lambda^0K^+$. The decrease of the total cross section for the
992: reaction $pn \to n \Lambda^0 K^+$, caused by the vector\,--\,meson
993: exchanges, is about $0.4\,\%$.
994:
995: \section{Ratio of the cross sections}
996: \setcounter{equation}{0}
997:
998: Using the results obtained above we can calculate the ratio of the
999: cross sections for the reactions $pn \to n\Lambda^0K^+$ and $pp \to
1000: p\Lambda^0K^+$. For the theoretical cross sections, calculated with
1001: the account for vector\,--\,meson exchanges Eq.(\ref{label3.12}) and
1002: Eq.(\ref{label2.15}) and without vector\,--\,meson exchanges
1003: Eq.(\ref{label3.12}) and Eq.(\ref{label2.10}), we get
1004: %
1005: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label4.1}
1006: R = \frac{\sigma^{pn\to n\Lambda^0K^+}(\varepsilon)}{\sigma^{pp\to
1007: p\Lambda^0K^+}(\varepsilon)} \simeq 3.
1008: \end{eqnarray}
1009: %
1010: The obtained result confirms an enhancement of the $pn$ interaction
1011: with respect to the $pp$ interaction near observed by the
1012: ANKE--Collaboration at COSY \cite{COSY}. In our analysis such an
1013: enhancement is due to the contribution of the $pn$ interaction in the
1014: isospin--singlet state $\Delta \sigma^{pn\to
1015: n\Lambda^0K^+}(\varepsilon) = \frac{1}{2}(\sigma^{(pn)_{I = 0} \to
1016: n\Lambda^0K^+}(\varepsilon) - \sigma^{(pn)_{I = 1} \to
1017: n\Lambda^0K^+}(\varepsilon)) \approx 6.3\,{\rm nb}$.
1018:
1019: \section{On the $N(1535)$ and $N(1650)$ resonance exchanges}
1020: \setcounter{equation}{0}
1021:
1022: As has been pointed out by Wilkin \cite{CW05}, an important
1023: contribution to the cross sections for the reactions $pN \to
1024: N\Lambda^0K^+$ should come from the exchange with the $N(1535)$
1025: resonance \cite{PDG04a}. This is the $S_{11}(1535)$ resonance with the
1026: quantum numbers $I(J^P) = \frac{1}{2}(\frac{1}{2}^-)$ \cite{PDG04a}.
1027:
1028: The inclusion of the $N(1535)$--resonance exchange demands the
1029: knowledge of its interactions with the octets of the ground baryons
1030: and the pseudoscalar mesons. Since the $N(1535)$ resonance is the
1031: member of octet \cite{PDG04b}, the effective Lagrangian of its
1032: interactions with the ground state baryons and the pseudoscalar
1033: mesons reads
1034: %
1035: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label5.1}
1036: {\cal L}_{\rm PBN_1}(x) &=& \sqrt{2}\,g_{\pi NN_1}\,\bar{p}(x)n_1(x)\pi^+(x) +
1037: \sqrt{2}\,g_{\pi NN_1}\,\bar{n}(x)p_1(x)\pi^-(x)\nonumber\\
1038: &+& g_{\pi NN_1}\,[\bar{p}(x)p_1(x) - \bar{n}(x)n_1(x)]\,\pi^0(x)\nonumber\\ &+&
1039: \frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}\,(3 - 4\alpha_{D1})\,g_{\pi NN_1}\,[\bar{p}(x)p_1(x)
1040: + \bar{n}(x)n_1(x)]\,\eta(x)\nonumber\\
1041: &+& \frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}\,(3 - 2\alpha_{D1})\,
1042: g_{\pi NN_1}\,\bar{\Lambda}^0(x)p_1(x)K^-(x) + \ldots + {\rm h.c.},
1043: \end{eqnarray}
1044: %
1045: where $N_1(x) = (p_1(x),n_1(x))$ are the local interpolating field of
1046: the resonance $N(1535)$, which we treat as an elementary particle
1047: \cite{MR96}--\cite{IV9} as well as the $\Delta(1232)$ resonance
1048: \cite{AI99,TE05}.
1049:
1050: Due to the ambiguity of the parameters of the $N(1535)$ resonance the
1051: numerical value of the contribution of this resonance is rather
1052: ambiguous \cite{PDG04}. Below we use the following parameters: the
1053: mass $m_{N(1535)} = 1520\,{\rm MeV}$, the width $\Gamma_{N(1535)} =
1054: 100\,{\rm MeV}$ and the branching ratios $B(N(1535)\to N\pi) = 40\,\%$
1055: and $B(N(1535)\to N\eta) = 35\,\%$. We leave $25\,\%$ of the total
1056: width for other decay channels such as $N(1535)\to \Delta(1232)\pi$
1057: and so on \cite{PDG04}. For such a choice of the parameters the
1058: coupling constants are equal to $g_{\pi NN_1} = 0.53$ and $\alpha_{D1}
1059: = -\,0.52$.
1060:
1061: For the reaction $pp \to p\Lambda^0K^+$ the $N(1535)$ resonance gives
1062: the contribution only to the effective coupling constant
1063: $A^{pp}_{p\Lambda^0K^+}$. We get
1064: %
1065: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label5.2}
1066: \hspace{-0.3in}&&(\delta A^{pp}_{p\Lambda^0K^+})_{N(1535)} =
1067: \frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}\,\frac{(3 - 2\alpha_{D1})g_{\pi NN}\,
1068: g^2_{\pi NN_1}}{m_{N_1} - m_{\Lambda^0} - m_K}\nonumber\\
1069: \hspace{-0.3in}&&\times\,\Big[\frac{1}{m^2_{\pi} + 2m_NT_N}
1070: + \frac{1}{3}\,\frac{(3 - 4\alpha_{D1})(3 - 4\alpha_{D})}{m^2_{\eta} + 2m_NT_N}\Big] =
1071: -\,0.22\times 10^{-6}\,{\rm MeV}^{-3}.
1072: \end{eqnarray}
1073: %
1074: We can also take into account the contribution of the $N(1650)$
1075: resonance (the $S_{11}(1650)$ resonance) with the quantum numbers
1076: $I(J^P) = \frac{1}{2}(\frac{1}{2}^-)$, which is the octet partner of
1077: the resonances $\Lambda(1800)$ and $\Sigma(1750)$ \cite{PDG04b}. The
1078: coupling constants of the $N(1650)$ resonance with the ground state
1079: baryons and the pseudoscalar mesons are equal to $g_{\pi NN_2} = 0.62$
1080: and $\alpha_{D2} = 1.17$. They are calculated for $m_{N(1650)} =
1081: 1640\,{\rm MeV}$, $B(N(1650)\to N\pi) = 70\,\%$ and $B(N(1650)\to
1082: \Lambda^0K) = 10\,\%$ and $\Gamma_{N(1650)} = 170\,{\rm MeV}$
1083: \cite{PDG04}.
1084:
1085: The $N(1650)$ resonance as well as the $N(1535)$ resonance gives the
1086: contribution to the effective coupling constant
1087: $A^{pp}_{p\Lambda^0K^+}$. The result is
1088: %
1089: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label5.3}
1090: \hspace{-0.3in}&&(\delta A^{pp}_{p\Lambda^0K^+})_{N(1650)} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}\,
1091: \frac{(3 - 2\alpha_{D2})g_{\pi NN}\,
1092: g^2_{\pi NN_2}}{m_{N_2} - m_{\Lambda^0} - m_K}\nonumber\\
1093: \hspace{-0.3in}&&\times\,\Big[\frac{1}{m^2_{\pi} + 2m_NT_N}
1094: + \frac{1}{3}\,\frac{(3 - 4\alpha_{D1})(3 - 4\alpha_{D})}{m^2_{\eta} + 2m_NT_N}\Big] =
1095: 0.08\times 10^{-6}\,{\rm MeV}^{-3}.
1096: \end{eqnarray}
1097: %
1098: Hence, the total contribution of the resonances $N(1535)$ and
1099: $N(1650)$ is about $8\,\%$.
1100:
1101: The values of the parameters of the resonances $N(1535)$ and $N(1650)$
1102: are rather ambiguous. Nevertheless, as we show in Section 7 our choice
1103: of the parameters of the resonances $N(1535)$ and $N(1650)$ fits well
1104: the experimental data on the amplitude and the cross section for the
1105: reaction $\pi^- p \to \Lambda^0 K^0$ near threshold of the
1106: $\Lambda^0K^0$ state.
1107:
1108: We would like to accentuate that a cancellation of contributions of
1109: the resonances $N(1535)$ and $N(1650)$ occurs only in the Lagrangian
1110: approach, where the resonances are treated as elementary particles
1111: \cite{MR96}--\cite{IV9}. We cannot claim that such a cancellation
1112: between the contributions of these resonances should be within the
1113: approaches developed by Wilkin {\it et al.} \cite{CW97,CW05} or by
1114: Sibirtsev {\it et al.} \cite{KT99,AS05}, where the $N(1535)$ and
1115: $N(1650)$ resonances were described within the relativistic
1116: generalisation of the Breit--Wigner approach \cite{PDG04}.
1117:
1118: Thus, treating the the resonances $N(1535)$ and $N(1650)$ as
1119: elementary particles we have shown that the total contribution of the
1120: resonances $N(1535)$ and $N(1650)$ to the matrix elements of the $pN
1121: \to N\Lambda^0K^+$ transitions near threshold of the final state is less
1122: important in comparison with the contribution of the ground state
1123: baryon octet coupled to the octets of the pseudoscalar and scalar
1124: mesons.
1125:
1126: \section{Cross section for the reaction $pp \to pp\pi^0$}
1127: \setcounter{equation}{0}
1128:
1129: In this Section we show that the same procedure, which we have used
1130: for the analysis of the strangeness production in $pN$ collisions near
1131: threshold, can be applied well to the description of the reaction $pp
1132: \to pp\pi^0$.
1133:
1134: Near threshold the reaction $pp \to pp\pi^0$ is defined by a pure
1135: ${^3}{\rm P}_0 \to {^1}{\rm S}_0$ transition \cite{HM1}--\cite{NK02}.
1136: The effective Lagrangian responsible for the $(pp)_{{^3}{\rm P}_0} \to
1137: (pp)_{{^1}{\rm S}_0} \pi^0$ transition, calculated in the analogy with
1138: the effective Lagrangians (\ref{label2.2}) and (\ref{label3.5}), is
1139: %
1140: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label6.1}
1141: {\cal L}^{(pp\to pp\pi^0)}(x) = \frac{1}{4}\,C^{pp}_{pp\pi^0}(p_0)[\bar{p}(x)p^c(x)]
1142: [\bar{p^c}(x)i\gamma^5p(x)]\pi^0(x).
1143: \end{eqnarray}
1144: %
1145: The effective coupling constant $C^{pp}_{pp\pi^0}$ is equal to
1146: %
1147: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label6.2}
1148: C^{pp}_{pp\pi^0}(p_0) &=& \frac{g^3_{\pi NN}}{m_N}\Big[
1149: \Big(1 - \frac{1}{g^2_A}\Big)\frac{1}{m^2_{\pi} + p^2_0} + \frac{1}{3}\,
1150: \frac{(3 - 4\alpha_D)}{m^2_{\eta} + p^2_0}\Big(3 - 4 \alpha_D - \frac{1}{g^2_A}\Big)
1151: \Big] = \nonumber\\
1152: &=& 6.04\times 10^{-6}\,{\rm MeV}^{-3},
1153: \end{eqnarray}
1154: %
1155: where $p_0 = 362.2\,{\rm MeV}$ is a relative threshold momentum of the
1156: $pp$ pair in the initial state.
1157:
1158: For the cross section for the reaction $pp \to pp\pi^0$ we obtain the
1159: following expression
1160: %
1161: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label6.3}
1162: \sigma^{pp\to pp\pi^0}(\varepsilon) &=& \frac{1}{192\pi^2}\,\frac{p_0}{E_0}
1163: \frac{\varepsilon^2}{m_{\pi}}\Big(\frac{m^2_p m_{\pi}}{2 m_N + m_{\pi}}\Big)^{3/2}
1164: \vert C^{pp}_{pp\pi^0}(p_0)\vert^2\vert f_{(pp)_{{^3}{\rm P}_0}}(p_0)\vert^2
1165: \Omega_{pp\pi^0}(\varepsilon) =\nonumber\\
1166: &=& 0.43\,\varepsilon^2\,\Omega_{pp\pi^0}(\varepsilon)\,{\rm \mu b},
1167: \end{eqnarray}
1168: %
1169: where $\vert f_{(pp)_{{^3}{\rm P}_0}}(p_0)\vert = 0.38$
1170: Eq.(\ref{label2.8}). The excess energy $\varepsilon$ is related to the
1171: kinetic energy of the proton in the laboratory frame as $\varepsilon =
1172: \frac{1}{2}\,T_N - m_{\pi}$. It is measured in ${\rm MeV}$. The
1173: function $\Omega_{pp\pi^0}(\varepsilon)$ is defined by the phase volume of the
1174: $pp\pi^0$ state. It is given by
1175: %
1176: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label6.4}
1177: \Omega_{pp\pi^0}(\varepsilon) = \frac{16}{\pi}\int^1_0d\xi\,\xi^2\,\sqrt{1 - \xi^2}\,
1178: \vert\psi_{pp}(\sqrt{m_N\varepsilon}\,\xi)\vert^2.
1179: \end{eqnarray}
1180: %
1181: The wave function $\psi_{pp}(k)$, describing the final--state
1182: interaction in the $pp$ channel accounting for the Coulomb repulsion,
1183: is determined by \cite{AI1} (see also \cite{KM58}):
1184: %
1185: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label6.5}
1186: \psi_{pp}(k) = e^{\textstyle i\,\delta^{\,\rm e}_{\rm
1187: pp}(k)}\,\frac{\sin\,\delta^{\,\rm e}_{\rm pp}(k)}{-a^{\rm e}_{\rm
1188: pp}kC_0(k)} = \frac{\displaystyle C_0(k)}{\displaystyle1
1189: - \frac{1}{2}\,a^{\rm e}_{\rm pp} r^{\rm e}_{\rm pp}k^2 + \frac{a^{\rm
1190: e}_{\rm pp}}{r_C}\,h(2 k r_C) + i\,a^{\rm e}_{\rm pp}\,k\,C^2_0(k)},
1191: \end{eqnarray}
1192: %
1193: where we have denoted \cite{AI1}
1194: %
1195: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label6.6}
1196: C^2_0(k) &=& \frac{\pi}{k r_C}\,
1197: \frac{1}{\displaystyle e^{\textstyle \pi/k r_C} - 1},\nonumber\\
1198: h(2 k r_C) &=& - \gamma + {\ell n}(2 k r_C) +
1199: \sum^{\infty}_{n=1}\frac{1}{n(1 + 4n^2k^2r^2_C)},\nonumber\\
1200: {\rm ctg}\delta^{\rm e}_{\rm pp}(k) &=& \frac{1}{\displaystyle
1201: C^2_0(k)\,k}\,\Big[ - \frac{1}{a^{\rm e}_{\rm pp}} + \frac{1}{2}\,r^{\rm
1202: e}_{\rm pp}k^2 - \frac{1}{r_{\rm C}}\,h(2 k r_{\rm C})\Big],
1203: \end{eqnarray}
1204: %
1205: where $\gamma = 0.57721\ldots$ is Euler's constant, $r_C = 1/m_N\alpha
1206: = 28.82\,{\rm fm}$ with $\alpha = 1/137.036$ is the fine--structure
1207: constant, $\delta^{\rm e}_{\rm pp}(k)$ is the phase shift of
1208: low--energy elastic pp scattering in terms of the S--wave scattering
1209: length $a^{\rm e}_{\rm pp} = ( - 7.8196\pm 0.0026)\,{\rm fm}$ and the
1210: effective range $r^{\rm e}_{\rm pp} = (2.790\pm 0.014)\,{\rm fm}$
1211: \cite{MN79}. At $\alpha \to 0$ and $k \to 0$ the wave function
1212: $\psi_{pp}(k)$ tends to unity $\psi_{pp}(k) \to 1$ (see \cite{AI1} and
1213: Appendix A).
1214:
1215: The theoretical cross section for the reaction $pp\to pp\pi^0$
1216: together with experimental data are depicted in Fig.5. In Table 1 we
1217: adduce numerical values of the theoretical and experimental cross
1218: section for the reaction $pp\to pp\pi^0$.
1219: %
1220: \begin{figure}[h]
1221: \psfrag{0}{$0$}\psfrag{20}{$20$}\psfrag{40}{$40$}
1222: \psfrag{60}{$60$}\psfrag{80}{$80$}\psfrag{100}{$100$}
1223: \psfrag{a}{$T_N({\rm MeV})\,\rightarrow$}
1224: \psfrag{e}{$\varepsilon({\rm MeV})\,\rightarrow$}
1225: \psfrag{b}{$2.5$}
1226: \psfrag{c}{$5.0$}
1227: \psfrag{d}{$7.5$}
1228: \psfrag{s}{$\sigma(\mu b)$}
1229: \centering
1230: \includegraphics[scale=0.9]{ppp.eps}
1231: \caption{The theoretical cross-section for the reaction $pp \to
1232: pp\pi^0$, defined by the ${^3}{\rm P}_0 \to {^1}{\rm S}_0$
1233: transition. The experimental data are taken from \cite{HM1}, $T_N$
1234: is a kinetic energy of the incident proton in the laboratory frame.}
1235: \end{figure}
1236: %
1237: \begin{table}[h]
1238: \begin{tabular}{|l||r|r|r|r|r|r|r|r|}
1239: \hline
1240: $T_N({\rm MeV})$& $285$ & $286$& $287$ & $288$& $289$& $290$& $291$& $292$\\[0.5ex]
1241: \hline
1242: $\sigma^{(\exp)}(T_N)$& $0.56(3)$ & $0.70(3) $ & $0.82(3)$& $0.98(3)$ &
1243: $1.22(4)$ & $1.31(4)$& $1.45(4)$& $1.53(4)$\\
1244: \hline
1245: $\sigma^{(\rm th)}(T_N)$& $0.55~~~\,$ & $0.69~~~\,$ & $0.82~~~\,$& $0.95~~~\,$ & $1.08~~~\,$ &
1246: $1.21~~~\,$& $1.33~~~\,$& $1.45~~~~$\\
1247: \hline
1248: \end{tabular}
1249: \caption{The theoretical and experimental values of the cross section for the reaction $pp \to
1250: pp\pi^0$, caused by the ${^3}{\rm P} \to {^1}{\rm S}_0$ transition. The experimental
1251: data are taken from \cite{HM1}. The cross section is measured in ${\mu b}$.}
1252: \end{table}
1253: %
1254:
1255: \noindent The theoretical cross section agrees well with the
1256: experimental data. This implies that the analysis of the strangeness
1257: production near threshold of $pN$ collisions given above works also
1258: well for the description of the pion--production in the $pp$
1259: collisions. The cross sections for other channels $pN \to NN\pi$
1260: \cite{NK02} can be calculated in a similar way.
1261:
1262:
1263: \section{Cross section for the reaction $\pi^0 p \to K^+ \Lambda^0$}
1264: \setcounter{equation}{0}
1265:
1266: Within chiral Lagrangian approach the reaction $\pi^0 p \to K^+
1267: \Lambda^0$ has been investigated in \cite{WW97} (see also
1268: \cite{NK99}). Due to isospin invariance the amplitude of the reaction
1269: $\pi^-p \to K^0\Lambda^0$ is related to the amplitude of the reaction
1270: $\pi^0 p \to K^+ \Lambda^0$ as
1271: %
1272: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label7.1}
1273: M(\pi^-p\to K^0\Lambda^0) = \sqrt{2}\,M(\pi^0p \to K^+ \Lambda^0).
1274: \end{eqnarray}
1275: %
1276: The relative threshold momentum of the $\pi^0p$ pair is equal to $p_0
1277: = 520\,{\rm MeV}$. At threshold we define the amplitude of the
1278: reaction $\pi^0p \to K^+\Lambda^0$
1279: %
1280: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label7.2}
1281: M(\pi^0p \to K^+ \Lambda^0) = 8\pi (m_K + m_{\Lambda^0})\,a_{K^+\Lambda^0}(p_0)
1282: \end{eqnarray}
1283: %
1284: and the cross section \cite{JJ71}
1285: %
1286: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label7.3}
1287: \sigma^{\pi^0p\to K^+\Lambda^0}(p_{\pi^0}) = A_{K^+\Lambda^0}\,p_{K^+\Lambda^0}.
1288: \end{eqnarray}
1289: %
1290: Here $p_{K^+\Lambda^0}$ is a relative momentum of the $K^+\Lambda^0$
1291: pair, measured in ${\rm GeV}$, and $A_{K^+\Lambda^0}$ is equal to
1292: %
1293: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label7.4}
1294: A_{K^+\Lambda^0} = \frac{4\pi}{p_0}\,\vert a_{K^+\Lambda^0}(p_0)\vert^2.
1295: \end{eqnarray}
1296: %
1297: For the amplitude $a_{K^+\Lambda^0}$ we obtain the following expression
1298: %
1299: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label7.5}
1300: \hspace{-0.3in}&&a_{K^+\Lambda^0}(p_0) = \frac{\sqrt{m_{\Lambda^0}m_N}}{
1301: 4\pi( m_K + m_{\Lambda^0})}\,
1302: \Big[
1303: \frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}\,(3 - 2\alpha_D)\,
1304: \Big(\frac{g^2_{\pi NN}}{m_N + m_K + m_{\Lambda^0}} -
1305: \frac{g^2_{\pi NN}}{g^2_A}\,\frac{1}{2m_N}\Big)\nonumber\\
1306: \hspace{-0.3in}&&- \frac{2}{\sqrt{3}}\,\alpha_D(2\alpha_D - 1)\,
1307: \frac{ g^2_{\pi NN}\,(m_{\Sigma^0} + m_K - m_N)}{m^2_{\Sigma^0} +
1308: 2m_KT_N -
1309: (m_N - m_K)^2} - \frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}\frac{(3 - 2\alpha_{D1})\,
1310: g^2_{\pi NN_1}}{m_{N_1} - m_K - m_{\Lambda^0}}\nonumber\\
1311: \hspace{-0.3in}&& -\,\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}\frac{(3 - 2\alpha_{D2})\,g^2_{\pi NN_2}}{m_{N_2}
1312: - m_K - m_{\Lambda^0}} + \frac{2}{\sqrt{3}}\,\alpha_{D2}(2\alpha_{D2} - 1)\,
1313: \frac{ g^2_{\pi NN_2}\,(m_{\Sigma^0_2} + m_N - m_K)}{m^2_{\Sigma^0_2} +
1314: 2m_KT_N -
1315: (m_N - m_K)^2}\Big] = \nonumber\\
1316: \hspace{-0.3in}&&= (0.109 - 0.190_{\Sigma^0} + 0.073_{N_1} - 0.047_{N_2} + 0.005_{\Sigma_2})
1317: \,{\rm fm} = -\,0.050\,{\rm fm},
1318: \end{eqnarray}
1319: %
1320: where $m_{\Sigma_2} = 1750\,{\rm MeV}$. We remind that the resonance
1321: $\Sigma(1750)$ is the octet partner of the $N(1650)$--resonance
1322: \cite{PDG04}. One can show that the contribution of the resonance
1323: $\Sigma(1620)$, the octet partner of the resonance $N(1535)$
1324: \cite{PDG04}, is negligible small.
1325:
1326: For the constant $A_{K^+\Lambda^0}$ we get the value
1327: %
1328: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label7.6}
1329: A_{K^+\Lambda^0} = 0.61\,{\rm m\,b}/{\rm GeV}.
1330: \end{eqnarray}
1331: %
1332: Due to isospin invariance the constant $A_{K^0\Lambda^0}$ of the
1333: reaction $\pi^-p \to K^0\Lambda^0$ is equal to
1334: %
1335: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label7.7}
1336: A_{K^0\Lambda^0} = 2 A_{K^+\Lambda^0} = 1.22\,{\rm m\,b}/{\rm GeV}.
1337: \end{eqnarray}
1338: %
1339: Near threshold of the reaction $\pi^- p\to K^0\Lambda^0$ the constant
1340: $A_{K^0\Lambda^0}$ defines the cross section \cite{JJ71}
1341: %
1342: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label7.8}
1343: \sigma^{\pi^- p \to K^0\Lambda^0}(p_{\ell ab}) = A_{K^0\Lambda^0}\,p_{K^0\Lambda^0},
1344: \end{eqnarray}
1345: %
1346: where $p_{\ell ab}$ is a $\pi^-$--meson momentum in the laboratory
1347: frame and $p_{K^0\Lambda^0}$ is the relative momentum of the
1348: $K^0\Lambda^0$ pair.
1349: %
1350: \begin{figure}[h]
1351: \psfrag{p}{$p_{\ell ab}({\rm GeV})\,\rightarrow$}
1352: \psfrag{s}{$\sigma(\rm m b)$}
1353: \centering
1354: \includegraphics[scale=0.9]{pkl.eps}
1355: \caption{The theoretical cross-section for the reaction $\pi^- p \to
1356: \Lambda^0 K^0$ with the $\pi^-p$ and $\Lambda^0K^0$ pairs in the
1357: S--wave state. The experimental points are taken from \cite{JJ71},
1358: $p_{\ell ab}$ is a momentum of the incident $\pi^-$--meson in the
1359: laboratory frame.}
1360: \end{figure}
1361: %
1362: The theoretical value $A_{K^+\Lambda^0} = 1.22\,{\rm m\,b}/{\rm GeV}$
1363: agrees well with the experimental data $A^{(\exp)}_{K^0\Lambda^0} =
1364: (1.23 \pm 0.23)\,{\rm m\,b}/{\rm GeV}$ \cite{JJ71}. The cross section
1365: for the reaction $\pi^-p \to K^0\Lambda^0$ Eq.(\ref{label7.8}) agrees
1366: also well with the theoretical results obtained in \cite{WW97} within
1367: $SU(3)$ chiral dynamics with coupled channels.
1368:
1369: In the laboratory frame the threshold momentum of the $\pi^-$--meson
1370: is equal to $p_{\rm th} = 0.887\,{\rm GeV}$. In the vicinity of
1371: threshold the momentum $p_{K^0\Lambda^0}$ of the $K^0\Lambda^0$ pair
1372: depends on the laboratory momentum $p_{\ell ab}$ of the $\pi^-$--meson
1373: as follows
1374: %
1375: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label7.9}
1376: p_{K^0\Lambda^0} = \sqrt{\frac{2 m^2_p m_{\Lambda^0} m_K\,( p^2_{\ell ab} - p^2_{\rm th})}{
1377: (m_{\Lambda^0} + m_K)^2((m_{\Lambda^0} + m_K)^2
1378: - m^2_p - m^2_{\pi})}} = 0.472\,\sqrt{p^2_{\ell ab} - p^2_{\rm th}}.
1379: \end{eqnarray}
1380: %
1381: It is measured in ${\rm GeV}$. For the cross section for the reaction
1382: $\pi^-p \to K^0\Lambda^0$ as a function of $p_{\ell ab}$ we get
1383: %
1384: \begin{eqnarray}\label{label7.10}
1385: \sigma^{\pi^-p \to K^0 \Lambda^0}(p_{\ell ab}) = (0.60 \pm 0.11)\,\sqrt{p^2_{\ell ab} - p^2_{\rm th}}
1386: \end{eqnarray}
1387: %
1388: For $p_{\ell ab} = 0.910\,{\rm GeV}$ the theoretical cross section
1389: $\sigma^{\pi^-p\to K^0\Lambda^0}(p_{\ell ab}) = 0.117\,{\rm mb}$ agrees
1390: well with the experimental one $\sigma^{\pi^-p\to K^0\Lambda^0}_{ \exp}(p_{\ell ab})
1391: = 0.122\pm 0.010\,{\rm mb}$ \cite{JJ71}.
1392:
1393: One can see that unlike the reactions $pN \to N\Lambda^0K^+$ the
1394: contribution of the resonances $N(1535)$ and $N(1650)$ is very
1395: important for the correct description of the reactions $\pi^0 p \to
1396: \Lambda^0K^+$ and $\pi^-p \to \Lambda^0 K^0$ near threshold of the
1397: final states \cite{WW97}. Indeed, the neglect of the resonance
1398: contributions leads to the increase of the cross section for the
1399: reaction $\pi^- p\to \Lambda^0K^+$ by a factor 3. This disagrees with
1400: the experimental data \cite{JJ71}. The importance of the contributions
1401: of the resonances $N(1535)$ and $N(1650)$ is caused by the substantial
1402: cancellation of the non--resonance contributions described by the
1403: first two terms in r.h.s. of Eq.(\ref{label7.5}).
1404:
1405: In Fig.\,6 we show that the region of the applicability of our
1406: theoretical cross section is restricted from above by the laboratory
1407: momentum $p_{\ell ab} \le 0.910\,{\rm GeV}$. This corresponds to $0 \le
1408: p_{K^0\Lambda^0} \le 0.095\,{\rm GeV}$. In terms of the energy excess
1409: this region is defined by $0\le \varepsilon \le 13\,{\rm MeV}$, where
1410: $\varepsilon = p^2_{K^0\Lambda^0}/2\mu$ and $\mu =
1411: m_Km_{\Lambda^0}/(m_K + m_{\Lambda^0})$ is the reduced mass of the
1412: $K^0\Lambda^0$ pair. It is obvious that the curve in Fig.6 is a branch
1413: of hyperbola.
1414:
1415: \section{Conclusion}
1416: \setcounter{equation}{0}
1417:
1418: Using chiral Lagrangians with linear realisation of chiral
1419: $SU(3)\times SU(3)$ symmetry and non--derivative meson--baryon
1420: couplings we have calculated the cross sections for the reactions $pN
1421: \to N \Lambda^0 K^+$ near threshold of the final $N\Lambda^0K^+$
1422: state. We have taken into account the contributions of the rescattering
1423: in the initial $pN$ state and the final--state interactions in the
1424: $N\Lambda^0$ channels. We have shown that the ratio of the cross
1425: sections is equal to $R \simeq 3$. This agrees with an enhancement of
1426: the strangeness production in the $pn$ interaction with respect to the
1427: strangeness production in the $pp$ interaction observed by the
1428: ANKE--Collaboration at COSY \cite{COSY}. We have explained such an
1429: enhancement by the contribution of the $pn$ interaction in the
1430: isospin--singlet state, which is much stronger than the $pn$
1431: interaction in the isospin--triplet state.
1432:
1433: We have shown that the contribution of the vector--meson exchanges is
1434: at the level of a few percent. Hence, the vector\,--\,meson exchanges
1435: cannot be fully responsible for the dynamics of strong low--energy
1436: $pN$ interactions near threshold of the reaction $pN \to
1437: N\Lambda^0K^+$. We have also shown that the contribution of the
1438: resonances $N(1535)$ and $N(1650)$, treated as elementary particles,
1439: to the matrix elements of the $pN \to N\Lambda^0K^+$ transitions does
1440: not exceed $8\,\%$. However, such an assertion should not be valid
1441: within Wilkin's approach \cite{CW97,CW05}, where the main
1442: contributions to the amplitudes of the reactions $pN \to
1443: N\Lambda^0K^+$ come from the resonances $N(1535)$ and $N(1650)$,
1444: described by the Breit--Wigner shapes.
1445:
1446: In addition to vector--meson exchanges and resonances $N(1535)$ and
1447: $N(1650)$ one can estimate the contributions of the scalar meson
1448: $f_0(980)$ and the tensor meson $f_2(1270)$ \cite{PDG04}. Following
1449: \cite{VC03} and \cite{BR70,TL04} one finds that the contribution of
1450: the scalar meson $f_0(980)$ makes up about $2\,\%$ \cite{VC03},
1451: whereas the contribution of the tensor meson $f_2(1270)$ is about
1452: $5.7\,\%$ for the coupling constants $g^{(1)}_{f_2 NN} \simeq 2$ and
1453: $g^{(2)}_{f_2 NN} = 0$ \cite{BR70,TL04}. Since the theoretical
1454: accuracy of our approach is not better than $15\,\%$, one can drop the
1455: contributions of vector, tensor, exotic scalar mesons and resonances
1456: $N(1535)$ and $N(1650)$ with respect to the contributions of ground
1457: state baryon octet coupled to octets of pseudoscalar mesons and their
1458: chiral scalar partners, which are taken in the infinite mass limit.
1459:
1460: For the confirmation of our results, obtained for the strangeness
1461: production near threshold of $pN$ interactions, we have calculated the
1462: cross sections for the reactions $pp \to pp\pi^0$, $\pi^0p \to
1463: \Lambda^0K^+$ and $\pi^-p \to \Lambda^0K^0$. The theoretical results
1464: agree well with the experimental data. Unlike the strangeness
1465: production in the $pN$ interactions the contribution of resonances
1466: $N(1535)$ and $N(1650)$ to the amplitudes of the reactions $\pi N \to
1467: \Lambda^0K$ has turned out to be very important. This is caused by the
1468: substantial cancellation of the non--resonance contributions, defined
1469: by interactions of ground state baryon octet with octets of
1470: pseudoscalar and scalar mesons.
1471:
1472:
1473: \section{Acknowledgement}
1474:
1475: We are grateful to Vladimir Koptev for calling our attention to the
1476: problem, investigated in this paper, and numerous and fruitful
1477: discussions stimulating this work.
1478:
1479: One of the authors (A. Ivanov) is grateful to Colin Wilkin, Alexander
1480: Sibirtsev, Alexander Kudryavtsev, Vadim Baru and all participants of
1481: the seminar at Institut f\"ur Kernphysik at Forschungszentrum in
1482: J\"ulich for fruitful discussions and constructive critical comments.
1483: A. Ivanov thanks Prof. Str\"oher for warm hospitality extended to him
1484: during his stay at Institut f\"ur Kernphysik at Forschungszentrum in
1485: J\"ulich. The assistance of Yurii Valdau during the stay of A.
1486: Ivanov at Institut f\"ur Kernphysik is greatly appreciated.
1487:
1488: We are grateful to Igor Strakovsky for the discussions and comments on
1489: the SAID analysis of the experimental data on $pp$ scattering
1490: \cite{SAID1,SAID2}.
1491:
1492: \section*{Appendix A: Cross sections for the reaction $pN \to
1493: N\Lambda^0K^+$ accounting for the final--state interaction}
1494: \renewcommand{\theequation}{A-\arabic{equation}}
1495: \setcounter{equation}{0}
1496:
1497:
1498: The amplitude of the reaction $pN \to N\Lambda^0K^+$, where
1499: $N\Lambda^0$ pair in the S--wave state, is related to the matrix
1500: element of the $\mathbb{T}$--matrix as follows
1501: %
1502: \begin{eqnarray}\label{labelA.1}
1503: M(pN \to N\Lambda^0K^+) = \lim_{TV \to \infty}\frac{\langle N\Lambda^0K^+|\mathbb{T}|pN\rangle}{VT},
1504: \end{eqnarray}
1505: %
1506: where $TV$ is a 4--dimensional volume defined by
1507: $(2\pi)^4\delta^{(4)}(0) = TV$ and the $\mathbb{T}$--matrix obeys the
1508: unitary condition \cite{SS61}
1509: %
1510: \begin{eqnarray}\label{labelA.2}
1511: \mathbb{T} - \mathbb{T}^{\dagger} = i\,\mathbb{T}^{\dagger}\mathbb{T}.
1512: \end{eqnarray}
1513: %
1514: The amplitude $M(pN \to N\Lambda^0K^+)$, defined by
1515: Eq.(\ref{labelA.1}), describes the total amplitude of the reaction $pN
1516: \to N\Lambda^0K^+$ accounting for the all kinds of interactions.
1517:
1518: In order to separate the contributions of the final--state interaction
1519: we propose to follow \cite{FSI1} (see also \cite{FSI} and \cite{AI1}).
1520: First we define the amplitude of the reaction $pN \to N\Lambda^0K^+$,
1521: which is calculated by the diagrams depicted in Fig.1--Fig.4:
1522: %
1523: \begin{eqnarray}\label{labelA.3}
1524: M_0(pN \to N\Lambda^0K^+) =
1525: \lim_{TV \to \infty}\frac{\langle N\Lambda^0K^+(0)|\mathbb{T}|pN\rangle}{VT},
1526: \end{eqnarray}
1527: %
1528: where $|N\Lambda^0K^+(0)\rangle$ is the wave function of the final
1529: state with free particles \cite{FSI1}. The account for the
1530: final--state interaction in the $N\Lambda^0$ channel with the
1531: $N\Lambda^0$ pair in the S--wave state can be given by means of the
1532: wave function $|N\Lambda^0K^+(k_{N\Lambda})\rangle$ defined by
1533: \cite{FSI1}
1534: %
1535: \begin{eqnarray}\label{labelA.4}
1536: |N\Lambda^0K^+(k_{N\Lambda})\rangle = e^{\textstyle i\delta_{N\Lambda^0}(k_{N\Lambda^0})}
1537: \frac{\sin \delta_{N\Lambda^0}(k_{N\Lambda^0})}{k_{N\Lambda^0}(- a_{N\Lambda^0})}|N\Lambda^0K^+(0)\rangle,
1538: \end{eqnarray}
1539: %
1540: where $k_{N\Lambda^0}$ is a relative moment of the $N\Lambda^0$ pair,
1541: $\delta_{N\Lambda^0}(k_{N\Lambda^0})$ and $a_{N\Lambda^0}$ are the
1542: phase shift and the S--wave scattering length of $N\Lambda^0$
1543: scattering in the S--wave state. As has been shown in \cite{IV4} (see
1544: also \cite{AI1}) such a wave function (\ref{labelA.4}) can be obtained
1545: by summing up an infinite series of bubble--diagrams in the
1546: $N\Lambda^0$ channel.
1547:
1548: The wave function $|N\Lambda^0K^+(0)\rangle$ is normalised by \cite{IV4}
1549: %
1550: \begin{eqnarray}\label{labelA.5}
1551: \hspace{-0.3in} && '\langle K^+(0)\Lambda^0 N|N\Lambda^0K^+(0)\rangle =
1552: (2\pi)^3 2E_{K^+}(\vec{p}_{K^+})\,
1553: \delta^{(3)}(\vec{p}_{K^+}\,' - \vec{p}_{K^+})\nonumber\\
1554: \hspace{-0.3in}&&\times\,(2\pi)^3 2E_{\Lambda^0}(\vec{p}_{\Lambda^0})
1555: \delta^{(3)}(\vec{p}_{\Lambda^0}\,' - \vec{p}_{\Lambda^0})\,\delta_{\sigma_{\Lambda^0}\,'\sigma_{\Lambda^0}}\,
1556: (2\pi)^3 2E_N(\vec{p}_N)
1557: \delta^{(3)}(\vec{p}_N\,' - \vec{p}_N)\,\delta_{\sigma_N\,'\sigma_N},
1558: \end{eqnarray}
1559: %
1560: where $\vec{p}_{K^+}, \vec{p}_X$ and $\vec{p}_{K^+}\,',\vec{p}_X\,'$
1561: with $X =\Lambda^0, N$ are momenta of particles in the initial and
1562: final states, $E_{K^+}(\vec{p}_{K^+})$ is the $K^+$--meson energy,
1563: $E_X(\vec{p}_X)$ and $\sigma_X$ are the energy and polarisation of
1564: the particle $X$. Due to (\ref{labelA.5}) the wave function
1565: $|N\Lambda^0K^+(k_{N\Lambda})\rangle$ is normalised as follows
1566: %
1567: \begin{eqnarray}\label{labelA.6}
1568: \hspace{-0.3in} && '\langle K^+(k_{N\Lambda^0})\Lambda^0 N|N\Lambda^0K^+(k_{N\Lambda^0})\rangle =
1569: \frac{\sin^2 \delta_{N\Lambda^0}(k_{N\Lambda^0})}{k^2_{N\Lambda^0}a^2_{N\Lambda^0}}\,
1570: (2\pi)^3 2E_{K^+}(\vec{p}_{K^+})\,
1571: \delta^{(3)}(\vec{p}_{K^+}\,' - \vec{p}_{K^+})\nonumber\\
1572: \hspace{-0.3in}&&\times\,(2\pi)^3 2E_{\Lambda^0}(\vec{p}_{\Lambda^0})
1573: \delta^{(3)}(\vec{p}_{\Lambda^0}\,' - \vec{p}_{\Lambda^0})\,\delta_{\sigma_{\Lambda^0}\,'\sigma_{\Lambda^0}}\,
1574: (2\pi)^3 2E_N(\vec{p}_N)
1575: \delta^{(3)}(\vec{p}_N\,' - \vec{p}_N)\,\delta_{\sigma_N\,'\sigma_N} = P(k_{N\Lambda^0})\nonumber\\
1576: \hspace{-0.3in}&&\times\,(2\pi)^3 2E_{\Lambda^0}(\vec{p}_{\Lambda^0})
1577: \delta^{(3)}(\vec{p}_{\Lambda^0}\,' - \vec{p}_{\Lambda^0})\,\delta_{\sigma_{\Lambda^0}\,'\sigma_{\Lambda^0}}\,
1578: (2\pi)^3 2E_N(\vec{p}_N)
1579: \delta^{(3)}(\vec{p}_N\,' - \vec{p}_N)\,\delta_{\sigma_N\,'\sigma_N}.
1580: \end{eqnarray}
1581: %
1582: The factor $P(k_{N\Lambda^0})$ can be rewritten in terms of the
1583: cross sections for $N\Lambda^0$ scattering in the S--wave state
1584: %
1585: \begin{eqnarray}\label{labelA.7}
1586: P(k_{N\Lambda^0}) = \frac{\sin^2 \delta_{N\Lambda^0}(k_{N\Lambda^0})}{k^2_{N\Lambda^0}a^2_{N\Lambda^0}}=
1587: \frac{\sigma^{N\Lambda^0\to N\Lambda^0}(k_{N\Lambda^0})}{\sigma^{N\Lambda^0\to N\Lambda^0}(0)} \le 1,
1588: \end{eqnarray}
1589: %
1590: where the cross sections $\sigma^{N\Lambda^0\to
1591: N\Lambda^0}(k_{N\Lambda^0})$ and $\sigma^{N\Lambda^0\to
1592: N\Lambda^0}(0)$ are equal to
1593: %
1594: \begin{eqnarray}\label{labelA.8}
1595: \sigma^{N\Lambda^0\to N\Lambda^0}(k_{N\Lambda^0}) = 4\pi\,
1596: \frac{\sin^2 \delta_{N\Lambda^0}(k_{N\Lambda^0})}{k^2_{N\Lambda^0}}\quad,\quad
1597: \sigma^{N\Lambda^0\to N\Lambda^0}(0) = 4\pi\,a^2_{N\Lambda^0}.
1598: \end{eqnarray}
1599: %
1600: The factor $P(k_{N\Lambda^0})$ can be interpreted as a probability to
1601: find a non--interacting system $N\Lambda^0 K^+$ with a relative
1602: momentum $k_{N\Lambda^0}$ of the $N\Lambda^0$ pair \cite{SS61}. For
1603: $k_{N\Lambda^0} = 0$, when the particles $N$ and $\Lambda^0$ are
1604: separated by an infinite relative distance $r_{N\Lambda^0} \sim
1605: 1/k_{N\Lambda^0} \to \infty$ at $k_{N\Lambda^0} \to 0$, the probability
1606: to find non--interacting particles in the state $|N\Lambda^0
1607: K^+\rangle$ is equal to unity, i.e. $P(k_{N\Lambda^0} = 0) =1$. For
1608: any finite $k_{N\Lambda^0}$ it is less than unity , i.e.
1609: $P(k_{N\Lambda^0}) \le 1$ \cite{SS61}.
1610:
1611: The amplitude of the reaction $pN \to N \Lambda^0 K^+$ accounting for
1612: the final--state interaction in the $N\Lambda^0$ channel is defined by
1613: \cite{FSI1}
1614: %
1615: \begin{eqnarray}\label{labelA.9}
1616: &&M(pN \to N\Lambda^0K^+) = \lim_{TV \to \infty}\frac{\langle N\Lambda^0K^+(k_{N\Lambda})|\mathbb{T}
1617: |pN\rangle}{VT} =\nonumber\\
1618: &&= \lim_{TV \to \infty}e^{\textstyle -\,i\delta_{N\Lambda^0}(k_{N\Lambda^0})}
1619: \frac{\sin \delta_{N\Lambda^0}(k_{N\Lambda^0})}{k_{N\Lambda^0}(- a_{N\Lambda^0})}\,
1620: \frac{\langle N\Lambda^0K^+(0)|\mathbb{T}|pN\rangle}{VT}=\nonumber\\
1621: &&= e^{\textstyle -\,i\delta_{N\Lambda^0}(k_{N\Lambda^0})}
1622: \frac{\sin \delta_{N\Lambda^0}(k_{N\Lambda^0})}{k_{N\Lambda^0}(- a_{N\Lambda^0})}\,M_0(pN \to N\Lambda^0K^+).
1623: \end{eqnarray}
1624: %
1625: The same result can be obtained by summing up an infinite series of
1626: bubble diagrams in the $N\Lambda^0$ channel \cite{IV4} (see also
1627: \cite{AI1}). Hence the amplitude of the reaction $pN \to
1628: N\Lambda^0K^+$ taking into account the final--state interaction in the
1629: $N\Lambda^0$ channel is
1630: %
1631: \begin{eqnarray}\label{labelA.10}
1632: \hspace{-0.3in} M(pN \to N\Lambda^0K^+) = e^{\textstyle -\,i\delta_{N\Lambda^0}(k_{N\Lambda^0})}
1633: \frac{\sin \delta_{N\Lambda^0}(k_{N\Lambda^0})}{k_{N\Lambda^0}(- a_{N\Lambda^0})}\,M_0(pN \to N\Lambda^0K^+),
1634: \end{eqnarray}
1635: %
1636: where the amplitude $M_0(pN \to N\Lambda^0K^+)$ is defined by the
1637: Feynman diagrams in Fig.1--Fig.4.
1638:
1639: At $k_{N\Lambda^0} = 0$ we get $M(pN \to N\Lambda^0K^+) = M_0(pN \to
1640: N\Lambda^0K^+)$. The reduction of the amplitude of the final--state
1641: $N \Lambda^0$ interaction to unity at $k_{N\Lambda^0} = 0$ is clear
1642: due to the short--range character of strong interactions. Indeed, at
1643: $k_{N\Lambda^0} = 0$, corresponding to infinitely large relative
1644: distance of the baryons in the $N\Lambda^0$ pair, the baryons do not
1645: influence each other, since the wave functions of them do not overlap.
1646:
1647: The contribution of the Coulomb interaction can be taken into account
1648: according to the prescription \cite{FSI1} and Balewski {\it et al.}
1649: \cite{FSI,JB98}. This gives
1650: %
1651: \begin{eqnarray}\label{labelA.11}
1652: \hspace{-0.3in} M(pN \to N\Lambda^0K^+) = e^{\textstyle - i\delta_{N\Lambda^0}(k_{N\Lambda^0})}
1653: \frac{\sin \delta_{N\Lambda^0}(k_{N\Lambda^0}}{k_{N\Lambda^0}(- a_{N\Lambda^0})}\,
1654: C_0(k_{NK^+}) M_0(pN \to N\Lambda^0K^+).
1655: \end{eqnarray}
1656: %
1657: Here $C_0(k_{NK^+})$ is the Gamow factor \cite{MN79,FSI1}
1658: %
1659: \begin{eqnarray}\label{labelA.12}
1660: C^2_0(k_{NK^+}) = \frac{2\pi\alpha Z_N\eta}{\displaystyle e^{\textstyle 2\pi\alpha Z_N\eta} - 1},
1661: \end{eqnarray}
1662: %
1663: where $\alpha = 1/137.036$ is the fine--structure constant, $k_{NK^+}$
1664: is a relative momentum of the $NK^+$ pair, $\eta = \mu_{NK^+}/k_{NK^+}
1665: = 1/v_{NK^+}$ is the inverse relative velocity of the $N K^+$ pair,
1666: $Z_N = 1$ for $N = p$ and $Z_N = 0$ for $N = n$.
1667:
1668: In the case of the Coulomb interaction the wave function
1669: $|N\Lambda^0K^+\rangle$ has the normalisation (\ref{labelA.6}) with
1670: the factor $P(k_{N\Lambda^0},k_{NK^+})$ equal to
1671: %
1672: \begin{eqnarray}\label{labelA.13}
1673: P(k_{N\Lambda^0},k_{NK^+}) = C^2_0(k_{NK^+})\,
1674: \frac{\sin^2 \delta_{N\Lambda^0}(k_{N\Lambda^0})}{k^2_{N\Lambda^0}a^2_{N\Lambda^0}} \le 1.
1675: \end{eqnarray}
1676: %
1677: It defines the probability to find a non--interacting system
1678: $N\Lambda^0K^+$ at relative momenta $k_{N\Lambda^0}$ and $k_{NK^+}$.
1679:
1680: The cross section for the reaction $pN \to N\Lambda^0K^+$ with the
1681: account for the final--state interaction is defined by
1682: %
1683: \begin{eqnarray}\label{labelA.14}
1684: \sigma^{pN \to N\Lambda^0K^+}(\varepsilon) = A_{pN}\,\varepsilon^2\,
1685: \Omega_{N\Lambda^0K^+}(\varepsilon),
1686: \end{eqnarray}
1687: %
1688: where $A_{pN}$ is a constant, calculated at threshold momentum.
1689:
1690: The definition (\ref{labelA.14}) is correct in the vicinity of
1691: threshold, where for the calculation of the amplitude $M_0(pN \to
1692: N\Lambda^0K^+)$ of the reaction $pN \to N\Lambda^0K^+$ (or the
1693: constant $A_{pN}$) one can neglect the dependence on the momenta of
1694: the particle in the final state $N\Lambda^0K^+$. The function
1695: $\Omega_{N\Lambda^0K^+}(\varepsilon)$ is determined by
1696: %
1697: \begin{eqnarray}\label{labelA.15}
1698: \Omega_{N\Lambda^0K^+}(\varepsilon) &=& \frac{2}{\pi^3}\int f_{\rm FSI}(\varepsilon,x)\,
1699: \delta(1 - \vec{x}^{\,2} - \vec{y}^{\,2}\,)\,C^2_0(\vec{x},\vec{y}\,)d^3x d^3y,
1700: \end{eqnarray}
1701: %
1702: where the function $f_{FSI}(\varepsilon,x)$ describes the final--state
1703: interaction in the $N\Lambda^0$ channel \cite{FSI}. It is normalised
1704: to unity at $\varepsilon = 0$ and equal to \cite{FSI,FSIa}
1705: %
1706: \begin{eqnarray}\label{labelA.16}
1707: f_{\rm FSI}(\varepsilon,x) = \frac{1 }{\displaystyle
1708: \Big(1 - \frac{\varepsilon m_{\Lambda^0}m_N}{m_{\Lambda^0} + m_N}\,a_{N\Lambda^0}r_{N\Lambda^0}x^2\Big)^2 +
1709: \frac{2 \varepsilon m_{\Lambda^0}m_N}{m_{\Lambda^0} + m_N}\,a^2_{N\Lambda^0}x^2},
1710: \end{eqnarray}
1711: %
1712: where $a_{N\Lambda^0} = -\,2\,{\rm fm}$ and $r_{N\Lambda^0} = 1\,{\rm
1713: fm}$ are the S--wave scattering length and effective range of
1714: $N\Lambda^0$ scattering \cite{FSI}.
1715:
1716: The Gamow factor depends on the variables $\vec{x}$ and $\vec{y}$ as
1717: follows
1718: %
1719: \begin{eqnarray}\label{labelA.17}
1720: \eta = \sqrt{\frac{m_p (m_{\Lambda^0} + m_p)}{2\varepsilon m_{\Lambda^0}}}\,
1721: \frac{1}{\displaystyle \Big| \vec{x} -
1722: \sqrt{\frac{m_p (m_{\Lambda^0} + m_p + m_K)}{m_{\Lambda^0} m_K}}\,\vec{y}\,\Big|} =
1723: \frac{1}{v}\,\sqrt{\frac{m_p (m_{\Lambda^0} + m_p)}{2\varepsilon m_{\Lambda^0}}}.
1724: \end{eqnarray}
1725: %
1726: The function $\Omega_{N \Lambda^0K^+}(\varepsilon)$ is equal to to
1727: unity for $\alpha = 0$ and $a_{N\Lambda^0} = r_{N\Lambda^0} = 0$. For
1728: the reactions $pp \to p \Lambda^0 K^+$ and $pn \to n\Lambda^0 K^+$ we
1729: get
1730: %
1731: \begin{eqnarray}\label{labelA.18}
1732: \hspace{-0.3in}\Omega_{p\Lambda^0K^+}(\varepsilon) = \sqrt{\frac{m_K(m_{\Lambda^0} + m_p)}{2
1733: \varepsilon (m_{\Lambda^0} + m_p + m_K)}}
1734: \frac{8}{\pi}\int^1_0 \int^{v_+(x)}_{v_-(x)}\!\!\!\frac{f_{\rm FSI}(\varepsilon,x)2\pi \alpha dv x dx}{\displaystyle
1735: \exp\Big\{\frac{2\pi \alpha}{v}
1736: \sqrt{\frac{m_p(m_{ \Lambda^0} + m_p)}{2\varepsilon m_{\Lambda^0}}}\Big\} - 1},
1737: \end{eqnarray}
1738: %
1739: where we have denoted
1740: %
1741: \begin{eqnarray}\label{labelA.19}
1742: v_+ &=& x + \sqrt{\frac{m_p (m_{\Lambda^0} + m_p + m_K)}{m_{\Lambda^0} m_K}}\,\sqrt{1 - x^2},\nonumber\\
1743: v_- &=& \Big|x - \sqrt{\frac{m_p (m_{\Lambda^0} + m_p + m_K)}{m_{\Lambda^0} m_K}}\,\sqrt{1 - x^2}\Big|
1744: \end{eqnarray}
1745: %
1746: and
1747: %
1748: \begin{eqnarray}\label{labelA.20}
1749: \Omega_{n\Lambda^0K^+}(\varepsilon) =
1750: \frac{16}{\pi}\int^1_0
1751: f_{\rm FSI}(\varepsilon,x)\,x^2 \sqrt{1 - x^2}\,dx.
1752: \end{eqnarray}
1753: %
1754: For $\varepsilon = 6.68\,{\rm MeV}$ the contribution of the Coulomb
1755: repulsion in the $K^+p$ pair to function
1756: $\Omega_{p\Lambda^0K^+}(\varepsilon)$ makes up about $15\,\%$. At the
1757: neglect of the contribution of the Coulomb repulsion
1758: $\Omega_{p\Lambda^0K^+}(\varepsilon) =
1759: \Omega_{n\Lambda^0K^+}(\varepsilon) = 0.67$ at $\varepsilon =
1760: 6.68\,{\rm MeV}$.
1761:
1762: In the reaction $pp \to pp\pi^0$ the account for the final--state
1763: interaction in the $pp$ channel has been carried out within the scheme
1764: expounded above. As we have shown the theoretical cross sections for
1765: the reactions $pp \to p \Lambda^0 K^+$ and $pp \to pp \pi^0$ agree
1766: well with the experimental data.
1767:
1768: \begin{thebibliography}{9}
1769: \bibitem{COSY}
1770: M. B\"uscher {\it et al.},
1771: Eur. Phys. J. A {\bf 22}, 301 (2004).
1772: \bibitem{TE88}
1773: T. E. O. Ericson and W. Weise,
1774: in {\it PIONS AND NUCLEI}, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1988.
1775: \bibitem{EC94}
1776: E. Chiavassa {\it et al.},
1777: Phys. Lett. B {\bf 337}, 192 (1994).
1778: \bibitem{KT99}
1779: K. Tsushima {\it et al.},
1780: Phys. Rev. C {\bf 59}, 369 (1999).
1781: \bibitem{VK05}
1782: V. Koptev (private communication), 2005.
1783: \bibitem{CW97}
1784: G. F\"aldt and C. Wilkin,
1785: Eur. Phys. J. A {\bf 24}, 431 (2005), nucl--th/0411019;
1786: Z. Phys. A {\bf 357}, 241 (1997).
1787: \bibitem{PDG04}
1788: S. Eidelman {\it et al.} (The Particle Data Group),
1789: Phys. Lett. B {\bf 595}, 1 (2004).
1790: \bibitem{CW05}
1791: C. Wilkin (private communication), J\"ulich 2005.
1792: \bibitem{AS05}
1793: A. Sibirtsev (private communication), J\"ulich 2005.
1794: \bibitem{AI01}
1795: A. Ya. Berdnikov {\it et al.}, Eur. Phys. J. A {\bf 9}, 425 (2000);
1796: Eur. Phys. J. A {\bf 12}, 341 (2001).
1797: \bibitem{HP73}
1798: V. De Alfaro, S. Fubini, G. Furlan, and C. Rossetti,
1799: in {\it Currents in Hadron Physics},
1800: North--Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam $\,\bullet\,$ London,
1801: American Elsevier Publishing Co., Inc.,
1802: New York, 1973.
1803: \bibitem{SW67}
1804: S. Weinberg,
1805: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 18}, 188 (1967).
1806: \bibitem{BL69}
1807: W. Bardeen and B. W. Lee,
1808: Phys. Rev. {\bf 177}, 2389 (1969).
1809: \bibitem{GG69}
1810: S. Gasiorowicz and D. A. Geffen,
1811: Rev. Mod. Phys. {\bf 41}, 531 (1969).
1812: \bibitem{NK99}
1813: N. Kaiser,
1814: Eur. Phys. J. A {\bf 5}, 105 (1999).
1815: \bibitem{KN99}
1816: C. Hanhart and K. Nakayama,
1817: Phys. Lett. B {\bf 454}, 176 (1999).
1818: \bibitem{FSI}
1819: J. T. Balewski {\it et al.},
1820: Eur. Phys. J. A {\bf 2}, 99 (1998) and references therein.
1821: \bibitem{FSIa}
1822: (see \cite{FSI} Eq.(4)).
1823: \bibitem{IV4}
1824: A. N. Ivanov {\it et al.},
1825: Eur. Phys. J. A {\bf 23}, 79 (2005); nucl--th/0406053.
1826: \bibitem{JB98}
1827: J. T. Balewski {\it et al.},
1828: Phys. Lett. B {\bf 420}, 211 (1998).
1829: \bibitem{MR96}
1830: C.--H. Lee, D.--P. Min, and M. Rho,
1831: Phys. Lett. B {\bf 326}, 14 (1994);
1832: C.--H. Lee, G. E. Brown, and M. Rho,
1833: Phys. Lett. B {\bf 335}, 266 (1994);
1834: C.--H. Lee, G. E. Brown, D.--P. Min, and M. Rho,
1835: Nucl. Phys. A {\bf 585}, 401 (1995);
1836: C.--H. Lee, D.--P. Min, and M. Rho,
1837: Nucl. Phys. A {\bf 602}, 334 (1996).
1838: \bibitem{AI99}
1839: A. N. Ivanov,
1840: M. Nagy, and N. I. Troitskaya,
1841: Phys. Rev. {\bf C59}, 451 (1999) and references therein.
1842: \bibitem{TE05}
1843: T. E. O. Ericson and A. N. Ivanov,
1844: Phys. Lett. B {\bf 634}, 39 (2006).
1845: \bibitem{IV3}
1846: A. N. Ivanov {\it et al.},
1847: Eur. Phys. J. A {\bf 21}, 11 (2004); nucl--th/0310081.
1848: \bibitem{IV5}
1849: A. N. Ivanov {\it et al.},
1850: Phys. Rev. A {\bf 71}, 052508 (2005).
1851: \bibitem{IV8}
1852: A. N. Ivanov {\it et al.},
1853: Eur. Phys. J. A {\bf 25}, 329 (2005), nucl\,--\,th/0505078.
1854: \bibitem{IV9}
1855: A. N. Ivanov {\it et al.},
1856: {\it Recent Theoretical Studies on Hadronic Atoms},
1857: Invited talk at International Conference on Exotic Atoms -- EXA05
1858: at Stefan Meyer Institute of Austrian Academie of Sciences, Vienna,
1859: Austria, 21-25 February 2005, nucl--th/0505022.
1860: \bibitem{JJ71}
1861: J. J. Jones {\it et al.},
1862: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 26}, 860 (1971).
1863: \bibitem{WW97}
1864: N. Kaiser, T. Waas, and W. Weise,
1865: Nucl. Phys. A {\bf 612}, 297 (1997).
1866: \bibitem{MN79}
1867: M. M. Nagels {\it et al.}
1868: {\it Compilation of coupling constants and low--energy parameters},
1869: Nucl. Phys. B {\bf 147}, 189 (1979);
1870: O. Dumbrajs {\it et al.},
1871: {\it Compilation of coupling constants and low--energy parameters},
1872: Nucl. Phys. B {\bf 216}, 277 (1983).
1873: \bibitem{PSI2}
1874: H.--Ch. Schr\"oder {\it et al.},
1875: Eur. Phys. J. C {\bf 21}, 473 (2001).
1876: \bibitem{SAID1}
1877: R. A. Arndt, I. I. Strakovsky, and R. L. Workman,
1878: Phys. Rev. C {\bf 62}, 034005 (2000), nucl--th/0004039;
1879: http://gwdac.phys.gwu.edu
1880: \bibitem{SAID2}
1881: I. I. Strakovsky (private communication), 2005.
1882: \bibitem{PDG04a}
1883: (see \cite{PDG04} p.872)
1884: \bibitem{PDG04b}
1885: (see \cite{PDG04} p.158)
1886: \bibitem{HM1}
1887: H. O. Meyer {\it et al.},
1888: Nucl. Phys. A {\bf 539}, 633 (1992).
1889: \bibitem{HM2}
1890: H. Machner and J. Haidenbauer,
1891: J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. {\bf 25}, R231 (1999).
1892: \bibitem{NK01}
1893: V. Bernard, N. Kaiser, and Ulf.--G. Mei\ss ner,
1894: Eur. Phys. A {\bf 4}, 259 (1999).
1895: \bibitem{NK02}
1896: C. Hanhart and N. Kaiser,
1897: Phys. Rev. C {\bf 66}, 054005 (2002) and references therein.
1898: \bibitem{AI1}
1899: A. N. Ivanov, N. I. Troitskaya, H. Oberhummer, and M. Faber,
1900: Eur. Phys. J. A {\bf 8}, 223 (2000).
1901: \bibitem{KM58}
1902: K. B. Mather and P. Swan,
1903: in {\it Nuclear scattering}, Cambridge at the University Press, 1958, p.214.
1904: \bibitem{VC03}
1905: V. Cirigliano, G. Ecker, H. Neufeld, A. Pich,
1906: JHEP {\bf 0306}, 012 (2003).
1907: \bibitem{BR70}
1908: B. Renner,
1909: Phys. Lett. B {\bf 33}, 599 (1970).
1910: \bibitem{TL04}
1911: Y. Oh and T.--S. H. Lee,
1912: Phys. Rev. C {\bf 69}, 025201 (2004).
1913: \bibitem{SS61}
1914: S. S. Schweber,
1915: in {\it An introduction to relativistic field theory},
1916: Row, Peterson and Co$\,\bullet\,$ Evanston, Ill.,
1917: Elmsford, New York, 1961.
1918: \bibitem{FSI1}
1919: (see also \cite{HM2} p.241).
1920: \end{thebibliography}
1921: \end{document}
1922:
1923: