1: %\documentstyle[aps,graphicx,epsfig,times,here]{revtex4}
2: \documentclass[twocolumn,showpacs,preprintnumbers,amsmath,amssymb]{revtex4}
3: \usepackage{graphicx}% Include figure files
4: \usepackage{dcolumn}% Align table columns on decimal point
5: \usepackage{bm}% bold math
6: \raggedbottom
7: \oddsidemargin=0.0in
8: \topmargin=-0.75in
9: \textwidth6.5in
10: \textheight9.15in
11: \widowpenalty=10000
12: \clubpenalty=10000
13: \def\bea {\begin{eqnarray}}
14: \def\eea {\end{eqnarray}}
15: \def\be {\begin{equation}}
16: \def\ee {\end{equation}}
17: \def\nn {\nonumber}
18: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
19: \begin{document}
20:
21: \title{$\phi$ production at RHIC: characterization of co-existence phase}
22:
23: \author{Jajati K. Nayak$^1$, Jan-e Alam$^1$, Bedangadas Mohanty$^1$,
24: Pradip Roy$^2$ and Abhee K. Dutt-Mazumder$^2$}
25:
26: \medskip
27:
28: \affiliation{(1) Variable Energy Cyclotron Centre, 1/AF, Bidhan Nagar ,
29: Kolkata - 700064}
30:
31: \affiliation{(2) Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics, 1/AF, Bidhan Nagar ,
32: Kolkata - 700064}
33:
34: \begin{abstract}
35:
36: We extract the effective degrees of freedom
37: that characterize the co-existing phase of quark gluon plasma and
38: hadrons. Experimental data on $\phi$ at
39: mid-rapidity is used to set a lower bound to the critical temperature
40: of quark hadron phase transition. The production and evolution
41: of strangeness have been studied by using Boltzmann equation.
42: The results have been contrasted with the
43: experimental data obtained by STAR collaboration at RHIC
44: for Au + Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=200$ GeV.
45: Our study reveals that the $\phi$ mesons freeze out
46: at a temperature $\sim 160$ MeV, a value close to the
47: transition temperature for quark-hadron phase transition.
48:
49: \end{abstract}
50:
51: \pacs{25.75.-q,25.75.Dw,24.85.+p}
52:
53: \maketitle
54:
55: The goal of the ultra-relativistic heavy ion collisions
56: is to create and study quark gluon plasma (QGP).
57: The pre-requisite
58: for the formation of QGP is to create a hot and dense system
59: of nuclear matter.
60: Experimental results from the Relativistic Heavy-Ion Collider (RHIC)
61: have indicated the formation of such a state of matter in the
62: early stage~\cite{rhicwhitepapers}. Among others,
63: one of the promising signals of QGP formation is the enhanced production of
64: strange and anti-strange particles~\cite{rafelski}. As a result, the production of
65: particles with hidden ({\it e.g.} $\phi$) as well as open strangeness have
66: become a field of intense theoretical~\cite{chen,pal,fuchs,letessier}
67: and experimental~\cite{phenix,STAR,STAR1,na49} activities.
68:
69:
70: In the present work we study
71: the production of $\phi$ meson at RHIC. The $\phi$ meson is composed of a
72: strange ($s$) and anti-strange ($\bar{s}$) quark and its interaction
73: with nuclear matter is suppressed
74: according to Okubo-Zweig-Izuka (OZI) rule. In QGP
75: $s$ and $\bar{s}$ quarks are produced mainly by
76: gluon fusion and annihilation of light ($u$ and $d$) quarks and anti-quarks.
77: These $s\bar{s}$ will form $\phi$ through the hadronization process.
78: This process
79: is not OZI suppressed. Therefore, we expect excess $\phi$ if
80: QGP is formed in the initial state of heavy ion collisions as
81: compared to hadronic initial state.
82: The production of $\phi$ mesons from sources
83: other than plasma is expected to be small, so they will not overshadow the
84: plasma signal.
85: The other advantage of $\phi$
86: is that after its production during the hadronization of the QGP,
87: it suffers less re-scattering in the hadronic matter, thereby retaining
88: information of the thermodynamic state of the matter during its
89: hadronization stage. Therefore, study of $\phi$ spectra will be
90: very useful to determine the transition temperature ($T_c$) for quark-hadron
91: phase transition.
92: However, it may be mentioned
93: that the kaons which come from decay of $\phi$ mesons will
94: undergo re-scattering, and the $\phi$'s experimentally reconstructed from
95: these kaons may carry some re-scattering effect.
96: Still reliable information on
97: $T_{c}$ can be extracted by measuring $\phi$ productions
98: in high energy heavy ion collisions~\cite{shor}.
99:
100: Hence we shall show the usefulness of $\phi$ as
101: a probe for co-existence phase by studying its production at
102: $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV~\cite{STAR}.
103: First we demonstrate from the experimental data that $\phi$
104: meson freezes out at a temperature close to $T_{c}$, the value of which is
105: obtained from lattice QCD simulations~\cite{lattice}.
106: We argue, using the yield of $\phi$ mesons at mid-rapidity
107: ($\frac{dN_{\phi}}{dy}$)
108: that the enhanced production is possible if
109: the system has passed through a mixed phase of quarks, gluons and hadrons
110: and the temperature during the hadronization is $> 160$ MeV.
111: Finally, attempt will be made to characterize the mixed phase by putting
112: bounds on the the effective statistical degeneracy.
113:
114: Relativistic hydrodynamics with (3+1) dimensional expansion~\cite{hvg}
115: and boost invariance along the longitudinal direction~\cite{bjorken}
116: has been used to study
117: the evolution of the matter formed in heavy ion collisions.
118: We take the equation
119: of state from lattice QCD simulations~\cite{lattice}. The initial
120: velocity and energy density profiles are taken as $v(r,\tau_i)=0$ and
121: $\epsilon(r,\tau_i)=\epsilon_0/(1+exp(r-R)/\delta)$ respectively. Here
122: $\tau_i$ is the thermalization time, $R$ is nuclear radius. Results will
123: be shown for two sets of values of $\tau_i=0.15$ and $0.2$ fm/c.
124: Such values of $\tau_i$~\cite{jane,peress} have recently been used
125: to reproduce the thermal photon spectra measured by PHENIX collaboration
126: ~\cite{phenixphoton} in Au + Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=200$ GeV.
127: The corresponding
128: values for the initial temperatures are 590 and 480 MeV respectively.
129: Results of transverse momentum spectra of $\phi$ mesons are shown in
130: fig.~\ref{fig1}.
131: It appears that the results for
132: $T_i=590$ MeV describes the data quite well for the entire range of
133: transverse momentum ($p_T$) under consideration. However,
134: for $p_T$ more than 2 GeV (or $m_T-m_\phi\sim 1.2$ GeV, where
135: $m_T=\sqrt{p_T^2+m_\phi^2}$, is the transverse mass and $m_\phi$ is the
136: mass of the $\phi$ meson)
137: the application of hydrodynamics may be questionable and
138: contributions from perturbative QCD may become important.
139: In fact, at low $p_T$ domain the contribution of thermal $s\bar{s}$
140: for $\phi$ formation is dominant~\cite{hwa}.
141: In that case,
142: the description for $T_i=480$ MeV is better suited.
143: From the inverse slope (for $0.45\leq p_T$ (GeV)$\leq 2$)
144: of the data we get the effective temperature as
145: $257\pm 8$ MeV. We find that the average radial velocity
146: $<v_r>\sim 0.43$ at the freeze-out surface. Therefore, using the
147: relation $T_{eff}=T_{true}+(1/2)m_\phi<v_r>^2$, we get the `true'
148: freeze-out temperature $T_{true}\sim 162\pm 8$ MeV (error bars
149: correspond to the experimental error bars~\cite{STAR}). It should be
150: noted that the value of $T_{true}$ is close to $T_c$ predicted by
151: lattice QCD simulation. The value of the hadronization temperature
152: in statistical hadronization model~\cite{jrafelski} was found as
153: $T_c=155\pm 8$ MeV (see also~\cite{pbm}). The similar value
154: of hadronization temperature was obtained ~\cite{gorenstein}
155: from the analysis of
156: experimental data on heavier hadrons.
157: %Furthermore,
158: %the value of average radial velocity is larger at the point
159: %of kinetic freeze-out for pions~\cite{nuxu}.
160:
161:
162: \begin{figure}
163: \begin{center}
164: \includegraphics[scale=0.5]{phi_mt_dist.eps}
165: \caption{
166: Transverse mass distribution of $\phi$ mesons for 0-5\% central
167: Au+Au collisions at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. Compared to hydrodynamical
168: calculations with and without radial flow and for two different initial
169: conditions. The equation of sate used is obtained from
170: lattice QCD results.
171: }
172: \label{fig1}
173: \end{center}
174: \end{figure}
175:
176:
177: Now we turn to the yield of $\phi$ mesons at mid
178: rapidity. The experimental value of $\frac{dN_{\phi}}{dy}$
179: for 0-5\% central collisions is 7.7 $\pm$ 0.30~\cite{STAR}.
180: It is more convenient
181: to deal with the ratio, $\frac{dN_{\phi}}{dy}$/$\frac{dN}{dy}$,
182: where $dN/dy$ is the total particle multiplicity at mid-rapidity.
183: This ratio has the advantage in the sense that some of the uncertainties
184: ({\it e.g.} volume)are removed. From
185: thermal model calculations it can be shown that at the critical
186: temperature $T_{c}$,
187:
188: \be
189: \noindent \frac{\frac{dN_{\phi}}{dy}}{\frac{dN}{dy}} = 0.7 \frac{1}{g_{eff}(T_{c})}
190: \int^{\infty}_{M_{\phi}/T_{c}}{ \frac{x^{2} dx}{e^{x} - 1}}.
191: \label{eq1}
192: \ee
193:
194: where, $m_{\phi}$=1.02 GeV,
195: and $g_{eff}$ is the effective
196: statistical degeneracy. Eq.~\ref{eq1} indicates that the ratio
197: $\frac{dN_{\phi}}{dy}$/$\frac{dN}{dy}$
198: depends on $T_c$ and the statistical degeneracy
199: where the $\phi$ mesons freeze out.
200: Taking $T_{c}$ and $g_{eff}$ from lattice QCD simulations~\cite{lattice}
201: as 170 MeV and 18 respectively,
202: we get $\frac{dN_{\phi}}{dy}$/$\frac{dN}{dy}$
203: = 4.77$\times$ $10^{-3}$ from Eq.~\ref{eq1}.
204: The experimental value of $\frac{dN_{\phi}}{dy}$/$\frac{dN}{dy}$ is
205: 7.7$\times 10^{-3}$. This indicates that there is a clear
206: over production of $\phi$ mesons. The data can be expressed
207: in terms of the calculated value of $dN_\phi/dy\mid_{eq}$ by
208: a simple relation:
209: \be
210: \gamma_\phi=\frac{dN_\phi/dy|_{expt}}{dN/dy|_{eq}}
211: \ee
212: $dN_\phi/dy|_{eq}$
213: is the value of $\phi$ meson multiplicity
214: expected from thermal model at $T_c$ and $\gamma_\phi$ is the enhancement
215: factor (a value of $\gamma_\phi=1$ ($<1$)
216: indicates equilibrium (under production). The experimental data
217: requires the value of $\gamma_\phi$ to be $\sim 1.3$.
218: This indicates that there seems to be
219: a over saturation of strangeness production at the temperature where
220: $\phi$ freezes out.
221:
222:
223: \begin{figure}
224: \begin{center}
225: \includegraphics[scale=0.5]{tc150.eps}
226: \caption{
227: The time evolution of the ratio of non-equilibrium to
228: equilibrium number density of strange quarks/hadrons for
229: transition temperature $T_c=150$ MeV. The variation of temperature
230: with time is also shown.
231: }
232: \label{fig2}
233: \end{center}
234: \end{figure}
235:
236:
237: \begin{figure}
238: \begin{center}
239: \includegraphics[scale=0.5]{tc170.eps}
240: \caption{
241: Same as Fig.\ref{fig2} for $T_c=170$ MeV.
242: }
243: \label{fig3}
244: \end{center}
245: \end{figure}
246:
247: \begin{figure}
248: \begin{center}
249: \includegraphics[scale=0.5]{tc195.eps}
250: \caption{
251: Same as Fig.\ref{fig2} for $T_c=195$ MeV.
252: }
253: \label{fig4}
254: \end{center}
255: \end{figure}
256:
257:
258: Now we ask, at what stage of the evolution
259: of the system formed in heavy-ion collisions gives the required over production
260: of strangeness? We adopt the momentum integrated Boltzmann equation
261: to study the evolution of the strangeness density.
262: This has also been used extensively to investigate the density
263: evolution in the early universe~\cite{kolb}.
264: The initial state is considered
265: as a thermalized state of gluons and light quarks with initial temperature,
266: $T_i\sim 480 $ MeV and thermalization time, $\tau_i\sim 0.2$ fm/c. The
267: reactions considered for the strange quark
268: productions in QGP are:
269: $q\bar{q}$ $\rightarrow$ $s\bar{s}$ and
270: $gg$ $\rightarrow$ $s\bar{s}$. For the production
271: of strange hadrons the following reactions are considered
272: ~\cite{lileebrown}:
273: $\pi^{+} + \pi^{-}$ $\rightarrow$ $K^{+} + K^{-}$,
274: $\pi^{+} + \pi^{0}$ $\rightarrow$ $K^{+} + \bar{K^{0}}$ and
275: $\pi^{0} + \pi^{0}$ $\rightarrow$ $K^{+} + K^{-}$ in the
276: meson-meson sector and
277: $\pi^{+} + n$ $\rightarrow$ $\Lambda + K^{+}$,
278: $\pi^{0} + p$ $\rightarrow$ $\Lambda + K^{+}$,
279: $\pi^{+} + p$ $\rightarrow$ $\Sigma^{+} + K^{+}$,
280: $\pi^{-} + p$ $\rightarrow$ $\Sigma^{-} + K^{+}$ and
281: $\pi^{0} + n$ $\rightarrow$ $\Sigma^{-} + K^{+}$ for
282: the meson-baryon sector.
283:
284: The evolution of $\bar{s}$ in QGP phase with proper time $\tau$
285: is given by
286:
287: \begin{equation}
288: \frac{dr_{\bar{s}}}{d\tau} = \frac{R_{\bar{s}}(T)}{n^{eq}_{\bar{s}}}
289: [ 1 - r_{s}r_{\bar{s}}]
290: \label{eq2}
291: \end{equation}
292: Similar equation can be written down for $s$ quarks. In the present
293: case $r_s=r_{\bar{s}}$.
294: The evolution of $K^+ (u\bar{s}$ mesons
295: in the mixed phase is governed by
296: the following equation:
297:
298: \bea
299: \frac{dr_{K^{+}}}{d\tau}&=&\frac{R_{K^{+}}(T_c)}{n^{eq}_{K^{+}}}
300: \left(1 - r_{K^{+}}r_{K^{-}}\right)\nn\\
301: &+&\frac{R_{\Lambda}(T_c)}{n^{eq}_{K^{+}}}
302: \left(1-r_{K^{+}}r_{\Lambda}\right)\nn\\
303: &+&\frac{R_{\Sigma}(T_c)}{n^{eq}_{K^{+}}}
304: \left(1-r_{K^{+}}r_{\Sigma}\right)\nn\\
305: &+&\frac{1}{f}\frac{df}{dt}\left(\alpha\frac{r_{\bar{s}}n^{eq}_{\bar{s}}}
306: {n^{eq}_{K^{+}}}
307: - r_{K^{+}}\right)
308: \label{eq3}
309: \eea
310:
311: In the above equation the last term stands for the hadronization of
312: $\bar{s}$ quarks to $K^+$~\cite{kapusta,matsui}. $\alpha$ is a
313: parameter which indicates the fraction of $s$ ($\bar{s}$) quarks
314: hadronizing to $K^-$ ($K^+$), the value of $\alpha=0.5$
315: if we consider $K^+$, $\bar{K^0}$, $K^-$ and $K^0$ formation
316: in the mixed phase. $r_i$ denotes
317: the ratio of non-equilibrium ($n_i$) to equilibrium ($n_i^{eq}$) density
318: of the particle $i$.
319: Similar equation can be written for $r_k$ in the hadronic phase.
320: The evolution of other particles {\it e.g.}
321: $K^-$ can be treated similarly with appropriate cross
322: sections~\cite{lileebrown}
323: as inputs and solving the coupled set of equations. The initial value
324: of $s$ and $\bar{s}$ quarks are taken close to their equilibrium value.
325: However, a small change in the initial values of $r_s$
326: do not change the final results
327: drastically. Even with lower initial values of $s$ and $\bar{s}$
328: the system reaches equilibrium very fast due to their production
329: in the high temperature heat bath.
330: In Eq.~\ref{eq3} $f$ and $(1-f)$ are the fractions of hadrons and QGP
331: respectively in the mixed phase.
332: $R_i(T)$ is the production rate of particle $i$ at temperature $T$.
333: The cooling of the heat bath is governed by the following equation~\cite{ijmpa}:
334: \bea
335: \frac{dT}{d\tau}&=&-c_s^2\frac{T}{\tau}\nn\\
336: &-&\frac{b(\dot{r_s}+\dot{r_{\bar{s}}})}{\alpha(a+b(r_s+r_{\bar{s}}))}
337: \label{eq4}
338: \eea
339: where $\alpha=(1+c_s^2)/c_s^2$, $a=8\pi^2/(45c_s^2)$ and
340: $b=7\pi^2n_F/(120c_s^2$), $c_s^2$ is the velocity of sound, $n_F$
341: is the number of flavours and
342: $\dot{r_s}=dr_s/d\tau$.
343: It may be noted that the Bjorken's cooling law can be recovered
344: from Eq.~\ref{eq4} when the second term vanishes. The value of
345: net baryon number at the central rapidity has been assumed to be zero.
346:
347: The time evolutions of the
348: ratios of non-equilibrium to equilibrium number density ($r_{i}$)
349: for $T_c=$ 150, 170 and 195 MeV
350: are shown in Fig.~\ref{fig2},\ref{fig3} and \ref{fig4}
351: respectively. It should be mentioned here that the corresponding
352: $g_{eff}$ for the above values of temperature are
353: taken from lattice QCD~\cite{lattice}.
354: We observe a clear over saturation in number density of kaons
355: at the end of the mixed phase (Fig.~\ref{fig3}\& \ref{fig4}).
356: For $T_c=170 - 195$ MeV the value of
357: $r_{K}$ is 1.4 - 1.5
358: at the end of the mixed phase, before it reaches the equilibrium value
359: of 1 in the hadronic phase. It may be noted that there is a
360: small difference between $r_{K^+}$ and $r_{K^-}$ in the
361: hadronic phase because of their different production cross sections.
362: For the value of $T_{c}$ = 150 MeV, we observe that $r_{K^+}$ $\sim$ 1,
363: for $\alpha=0.5$. For smaller values of $\alpha$, $r_{K^+}$ will
364: be even smaller.
365:
366: Considering that we need a $\gamma_{\phi}> 1$ to explain the experimental
367: data (as explained before) our calculations set a lower bound
368: on the value of $T_{c}$, it must be $>$ 160 MeV.
369: For a hadronic initial state with temperature of 250 MeV
370: the value of $r_{K}$ remains $\leq$ 1.
371: This indicates that the
372: enhanced production of $\phi$ mesons in heavy-ion collisions
373: at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV can be explained if the
374: system passes through a mixed phase during it's evolution with a
375: $T_{c}$ $>$ 160 MeV. At this value of $T_c$, the
376: enhancement factor, $\gamma_\phi\sim
377: r_{K^+}\times r_{K^-}\sim \gamma_{K}^2 \sim 1.24$.
378: Considering the fact that the experimental data indicate
379: $\gamma_\phi\sim 1.4\pm 0.1$ we argue that $T_c > 160$ MeV.
380:
381:
382: The life time of the mixed phase crucially depends on the effective
383: statistical degeneracy of QGP and hadronic phases. $g_{eff}\sim 9, 26$ and
384: 31 for $T=150, 170$ and 195 MeV respectively. Larger difference in
385: the statistical degeneracy gives rise to larger discontinuity in the
386: entropy density which consequently generates more latent heat. In the
387: mixed phase the cooling due to expansion is compensated by the
388: liberation of latent heat. Hence if larger latent is generated
389: then the system will spend more time in the mixed phase {\it i.e.}
390: the life time of the mixed phase will be larger. This is clearly
391: reflected in the results shown in Fig.~\ref{fig2}-\ref{fig4}.
392:
393: We characterize the mixed phase in terms of effective
394: statistical degeneracy $g_{eff}$. This is justified
395: because, (i) $\phi$ mesons freeze out at $T_c$ and (ii)
396: its production can only be explained by the existence of
397: mixed phase. For fixed $g_{eff}$
398: we calculate $\frac{dN_{\phi}}{dy}$/$\frac{dN}{dy}$ from Eq.~\ref{eq1}
399: This ratio is then multiplied by
400: $\gamma_\phi$ and compared with the corresponding value from experimental
401: data (lies within the two thick horizontal lines in Fig.~\ref{fig5}).
402: The results for $g_{eff}$ =
403: 18, 24, and 30 are shown in Fig.~\ref{fig5}. We find that
404: $g_{eff}\sim 18$ may be considered as a lower bound.
405:
406: \begin{figure}
407: \begin{center}
408: \includegraphics[scale=0.5]{dndyphi_band.eps}
409: \caption{
410: The variation of $(dN_\phi/dy)/(dN/dy)$ with $T_c$ for three values
411: of $g_{eff}$.
412: The thick solid horizontal lines represents experimental
413: value of $(dN_\phi/dy)/(dN/dy)$ with associated error bars.
414: }
415: \label{fig5}
416: \end{center}
417: \end{figure}
418:
419:
420: %\section{Summary}
421: In summary, we have studied the production of $\phi$ mesons in Au+Au collisions
422: at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}$ = 200 GeV. The transverse momentum spectra is well explained
423: by hydrodynamical model with the equation of state taken from lattice QCD.
424: It is observed that
425: $\phi$ mesons freezes out around the transition temperature
426: predicted by lattice QCD.
427: The over production of $\phi$ meson at mid-rapidity can only be explained
428: if QGP is formed in the initial state and passes
429: through a co-existence phase of QGP and hadrons, {\it i.e.}
430: over saturation in strangeness indicates the formation of co-existing
431: phase of QGP and hadrons (indications of which has already been pointed out at
432: SPS energies~\cite{us,gazdzicki}).
433: The analysis of the
434: experimental data reveals a lower bound on the transition temperature
435: and the effective statistical degeneracy.
436: The extracted value of $T_c\sim162\pm 8$
437: and the lower bound on $g_{eff}\sim$ 18.
438: The study of $K/\pi$ in the similar framework is under progress~\cite{jajati}.
439:
440:
441: \begin{thebibliography}{00}
442:
443: \bibitem{rhicwhitepapers} I. Arsene et al., BRAHMS Collaboration,
444: Nucl. Phys. A 757 (2005) 1;
445: B.B. Back et al., PHOBOS Collaboration,
446: Nucl. Phys. A 757 (2005) 28;
447: J. Adams et al.,STAR Collaboration,
448: Nucl. Phys. A 757 (2005) 102;
449: K. Adcox et al., PHENIX Collaboration,
450: Nucl. Phys. A 757 (2005) 184;
451: M. Gyulassy and L. McLerran,
452: Nucl. Phys. A 750 (2005) 30;
453: E. V. Shuryak,
454: Nucl. Phys. A 750 (2005) 64.
455:
456: \bibitem{rafelski} J. Rafelski and B. Muller,
457: Phys. Rev. Lett. 48 (1982) 1066;
458: P. Koch, B. Muller, J. Rafelski
459: Phys. Rep. 142 (1986)167.
460: \bibitem{chen} J. H. Chen {\it et al.}, arXiv:nucl-th/0504055.
461:
462: \bibitem{pal} S. Pal, C. M. Ko and Z. Lin, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 707} (2002) 525.
463:
464: \bibitem{fuchs} C. Fuchs, arXiv:nucl-th/0507017.
465:
466: \bibitem{letessier} J. Letessier and J. Rafelski, arXiv:nucl-th/0504028.
467:
468: \bibitem{phenix} S. S. Adler {\it et al.}, PHENIX collaboration,
469: Phys. Rev. C {\bf 72} (2005) 014903.
470:
471: \bibitem{STAR} J. Adams, {\it et al.}, STAR Collaboration,
472: Phys. Lett. B 612 (2005) 181.
473:
474: \bibitem{STAR1} J. Adams, {\it et al.}, STAR Collaboration,
475: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 92} (2004) 182301.
476:
477: \bibitem{na49} S. V. Afanasiev {\it et al.}, NA49 Collaboration,
478: Phys. Lett. B {\bf 491} (2000) 59.
479:
480: \bibitem{shor} A. Shor, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 54} (1985) 1122.
481:
482: \bibitem{lattice} F. Karsch, Nucl. Phys. A {\bf 698} (2002) 199c.
483:
484:
485: \bibitem{hvg} H. von Gersdorff, M. Kataja, L. McLerran and P. V. Ruuskanen,
486: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 34} (1986) 794.
487:
488: \bibitem{bjorken} J. D. Bjorken, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 27} (1983) 140.
489:
490: \bibitem{jane} J. Alam, J. K. Nayak, P. Roy, A. K. Dutt-Mazumder and
491: B. Sinha, arXiv:nucl-th/0508043.
492:
493: \bibitem{peress} D. d'Enterria and D. Peressounko, arXiv: nucl-th/0503054.
494:
495: \bibitem{phenixphoton}H. Buesching (for PHENIX Collaboration),
496: 18$^{th}$ International Conference on Ultra-Relativistic Nucleus-Nucleus
497: Collisions, August 4-9, 2005, Budapest, Hungary.
498:
499: \bibitem{hwa} R. C. Hwa and C. B. Yang, arXiv:nucl-th/0406072.
500:
501: \bibitem{jrafelski} J. Rafelski, J. Letessier and G. Torrieri,
502: arXiv:nucl-th/0412072.
503:
504: \bibitem{pbm} P. Braun-Munzinger, K. Redlich and
505: J. Stachel,arXiv:nucl-th/0304013.
506:
507: \bibitem{gorenstein} M.I. Gorenstein,K.A. Bugaev, M. Gazdzicki,
508: Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 (2002) 132301.
509:
510: %\bibitem{nuxu} N. Xu, hep-ph/0112122
511:
512: \bibitem{kolb} E. W. Kolb and M. S. Turner, The Early Universe,
513: Addison-Wesley, NY, 1990.
514:
515: \bibitem{lileebrown} G. Q. Li, C. H. Lee and G. E. Brown, Nucl. Phys. A
516: {\bf 625} (1997) 372.
517:
518: \bibitem{kapusta}J. Kapusta and A. Mekjian, Phys. Rev. D 33 (1986) 1304.
519:
520: \bibitem{matsui} T. Matsui, B. Svetitsky, L. D. McLerran,
521: Phys. Rev. D 34 (1986) 783;
522: T. Matsui, B. Svetitsky, L. D. McLerran,
523: Phys. Rev. D 34 (1986) 2047.
524:
525: \bibitem{ijmpa} J. Alam, P. Roy, S. Sarkar, S. Raha and B. Sinha,
526: Int. J. Mod. Phys. A {\bf 12} (1997) 5151.
527:
528: \bibitem{us} B. Mohanty, J. Alam, S. Sarkar, T. K. Nayak and B. Nandi,
529: Phys. Rev. C {\bf 68} (2003) 021901R.
530:
531:
532: \bibitem{gazdzicki} M. Gazdzicki {\it et al.} NA49 Collaboration,
533: J. Phys. G {\bf 30} (2004) S701.
534:
535: \bibitem{jajati} J. K. Nayak {\it et al.} to be published.
536: \end{thebibliography}
537:
538: \end{document}
539: