1: \documentclass[twocolumn]{revtex4}
2: \usepackage{graphics,epsfig}
3:
4: \def\lsim{\lower.5ex\hbox{$\; \buildrel < \over \sim \;$}}
5: \def\gsim{\lower.5ex\hbox{$\; \buildrel > \over \sim \;$}}
6: \def\g{\ifmmode \gamma \else $\gamma$\fi}
7: \def\gs{\ifmmode \gamma \else $\gamma~$\fi}
8:
9: \begin{document}
10:
11: \title{Reconstructing $\rho^0$ and $\omega$ mesons from non-leptonic decays in
12: C+C at 2AGeV
13: }
14:
15: \author{Sascha Vogel and Marcus Bleicher}
16:
17: \affiliation{\vspace*{3mm}Institut f\"ur Theoretische Physik, J.W. Goethe Universit\"at, \\
18: Max von Laue Stra\ss{}e 1,\\
19: 60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
20: }
21: \maketitle
22:
23: \noindent We predict transverse and longitudinal momentum spectra
24: and yields of $\rho^0$ and $\omega$ mesons reconstructed from hadron
25: correlations in C+C reactions at 2~AGeV. The rapidity and $p_T$
26: distributions for reconstructable $\rho^0$ mesons differs strongly
27: from the primary distribution, while the $\omega$'s distributions are
28: only weakly modified. We discuss the temporal and spatial
29: distributions of the particles emitted in the hadron channel.
30: Finally, we report on the mass shift of the $\rho^0$ due to its
31: coupling to the $N^*(1520)$, which is observable in both the
32: di-lepton and $\pi\pi$ channel. Our calculations can be tested with
33: the Hades experiment at GSI, Darmstadt.
34:
35:
36: \vspace{.6cm}
37:
38: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
39:
40: The Hades spectrometer at GSI opens the possibility to measure
41: di-lepton yields and spectra at moderate energies with unprecedented
42: accuracy. However, in addition it allows also to get complimentary information
43: on the most interesting di-lepton sources (the $\rho^0$ and $\omega$
44: mesons) directly from the reconstruction of their hadronic decay products.
45: I.e. the direct reconstruction of the invariant mass spectra of the resonances
46: from 2- and 3-particle pion correlations.
47: Over the last years the exploration of resonance yields and spectra from
48: hadron correlation has attracted a great amount of experimental \cite{Markert:2004xx,Markert:2003rw,Markert:2002xi,Fachini:2003dx,Fachini:2003mc,Fachini:2004jx,Adler:2004zn, Adams:2004ep}
49: and theoretical attention \cite{Johnson:1999fv,Soff:2000ae,Torrieri:2001ue,Torrieri:2001tg,Bleicher:2002dm,Torrieri:2002jp,Bleicher:2002rx,Bleicher:2003ij,Torrieri:2004zz,Vogel:2005qr}.
50:
51: Detailed experimental studies
52: of hadron resonances at the full SPS and highest RHIC energy
53: \cite{Markert:2004xx,Markert:2003rw,Markert:2002xi,Fachini:2003dx,Fachini:2003mc,Fachini:2004jx,Adler:2004zn, Adams:2004ep} have recently been performed.
54: Theoretically there are still unsolved problems concerning the absorption and
55: regeneration of resonances after chemical decoupling of the system. It is
56: expected that the inclusion of pseudo-elastic interactions between chemical and
57: kinetic freeze-out might solve some discrepancies of statistical models
58: for resonance yields at high energies \cite{Braun-Munzinger:1995bp, Braun-Munzinger:2001ip, kaischweda}.
59: At low energies, the first experimental investigations of resonances are
60: eagerly awaited to explore in-medium effects on vector mesons near
61: nuclear groundstate densities in the 1-2 AGeV beam energy range.
62:
63: Especially resonances that have electromagnetic and hadronic decay channels
64: allow deeper insights into the dynamics and lifetimes of the hot and dense hadronic
65: matter stage created in light and heavy ion reactions.
66: That is because the leptonic decay channel carries
67: information from the early stages of the reaction, since the
68: leptons can leave the dense regions undisturbed,
69: while the hadronic decay channel triggers on the late stages (near kinetic decoupling)
70: of the evolution.
71: \begin{figure}[hbt]
72: \vspace*{-1cm}\centerline{\epsfig {file=pionkaos.eps,width=.45\textwidth,angle=0}}
73: \caption{Excitation function of the pion multiplicities for C+C collisions
74: from $E_{\rm beam}=0.8$~AGeV to 2.0~AGeV.
75: Diamonds depict experimental data from the KAOS collaboration \cite{Sturm:2000dm}, squares show the
76: UrQMD results.}
77: \label{excf}
78: \end{figure}
79: \begin{figure}[h!]
80: \vspace*{-1cm}\centerline{\epsfig {file=pionhades.eps,width=.45\textwidth,angle=0}}
81: \caption{Rapidity distribution of positive and negative Pions for min. bias C+C
82: reactions at 2~AGeV. The line depicts $\pi^-$, while circles show $\pi^+$.}
83: \label{rap_pi}
84: \end{figure}
85:
86: For our studies we apply the UrQMD model. It is a non-equilibrium
87: transport approach based on the covariant propagation of hadrons and strings. All
88: cross sections are calculated by the
89: principle of detailed balance or are fitted to data where available.
90: The model allows to study the full
91: space time evolution for all hadrons, resonances and their decay products.
92: This permits to explore the emission patterns of the resonances
93: in detail and to gain insight into the origin of the resonances.
94: For further details of the model the
95: reader is referred to \cite{Bass:1998ca,Bleicher:1999xi}.
96: UrQMD has been successfully applied to study light and heavy ion
97: reactions at SIS. Detailed comparisons of UrQMD with a large body of
98: experimental data at SIS energies can be found in \cite{Sturm:2000dm}.
99:
100: The results shown in this publication are obtained by simulations of
101: more than 8 $\cdot$ $10^6$ events of min.bias C+C interactions at 2~ AGeV.
102: The statistical errors in the calculation are therefore small and
103: will not be shown separately.
104:
105: To set a baseline for the study of the $\rho^0$ and $\omega$ mesons,
106: we compare our calculations with the energy dependence of the total
107: Pion multiplicities in C+C reactions as shown in Fig. \ref{excf}.
108: For the small Carbon system, the UrQMD calculation (circles) is in
109: reasonable agreement with the experimental data from the KAOS
110: experiment \cite{Sturm:2000dm}.
111:
112:
113: Let us now turn to the HADES experiment which will soon have first data on
114: min.bias C+C reactions at 2~AGeV. In Fig. \ref{rap_pi}
115: we predict the Pion rapidity spectra for negative and positive
116: charges. As expected from this isospin symmetric nuclei, the yields of $\pi^+$ and
117: $\pi^-$ are identical and reach a maximal value of $dN/dy = 0.45$ at $y_{\rm cm}$.
118:
119: \begin{figure}[t!]
120: \vspace*{-1cm}\centerline{\epsfig
121: {file=rap.eps,width=.45\textwidth,angle=0}}
122: \caption{
123: Rapidity distribution of the decayed mesons for min. bias C+C reactions at
124: 2~AGeV. The open circles/squares show the
125: $\rho^0_{770}$'s / $\omega$'s which can be reconstructed in the pion channel, full circles
126: depict all decayed $\rho^0$'s / $\omega$'s.
127: A strong suppression of in hadron correlations reconstructable resonances
128: compared to those reconstructable via leptonic decays (indicated as 'all
129: decayed') is visible for the $\rho^0$ mesons, whereas the spectrum for the $\omega$ meson
130: is only weakly altered.
131: }
132: \label{rap}
133: \end{figure}
134: \begin{figure}[t!]
135: \vspace*{-1cm}\centerline{\epsfig
136: {file=pt.eps,width=.45\textwidth,angle=0}}
137: \caption{
138: Transverse momentum distributions of $\rho^0$ mesons (circles) and
139: $\omega_{770}$ mesons
140: (squares) for min. bias C+C reactions at 2~AGeV at midrapidity ($|y| \le
141: 0.25$).
142: Circles depict $\rho^0$ mesons, squares depict $\omega$ mesons. Open symbols
143: show all decayed resonances, whereas full symbols show those actually
144: reconstructable via hadron correlations. There is a huge modification for the
145: $\rho^0$ meson spectrum at low
146: $p_T$, whereas the high $p_T$ part is modified less (factor of 4-5 less
147: compared to the low $p_T$ part).
148: There is only a very slight modification visible for the the $\omega$ meson.
149: }
150: \label{pt}
151: \end{figure}
152: \begin{figure}[h!]
153: \vspace*{-1cm}\centerline{\epsfig
154: {file=rho_over_pi.eps,width=.45\textwidth,angle=0}}
155: \caption{
156: The $\rho^0/\pi^-$ ratio as a function of transverse momentum for min. bias
157: C+C reactions at 2~AGeV at midrapidity ($|y| \le
158: 0.25$).
159: Full circles depict the via hadron correlations reconstructable $\rho^0$'s
160: over pions, whereas the blue circles depict all decayed $\rho^0$'s over pions.
161: It is evident that there is less suppression at higher transverse momentum.
162: }
163: \label{ratio}
164: \end{figure}
165:
166:
167: After these preliminaries, we focus for the rest of this work on the resonance
168: production. Experimentally, the identification of resonances proceeds via
169: the reconstruction of the invariant mass distribution (e.g. of charged pions) for
170: each event. Then, an invariant mass distribution of mixed events is generated (here the
171: particle pairs are uncorrelated by definition) and subtracted from the mass
172: distribution of the correlated events. As a result one obtains the
173: mass distributions and yields (after all experimental corrections) of
174: the resonances by fitting the resulting distribution with a suitable
175: function (usually a Breit-Wigner distribution peaked around the pole mass).
176: \begin{figure}[t!]
177: \vspace*{-1cm}\centerline{\epsfig
178: {file=time_rho.eps,width=.45\textwidth,angle=0}}
179: \caption{
180: Temporal distribution of $\rho^0$ resonances for min. bias C+C reactions at
181: 2~AGeV. Open circles depict all decayed
182: $\rho^0$'s, full circles the via hadron correlations reconstructable ones.
183: Those visible via pion decay products decay at a very late stage of the
184: collision, roughly at 7-8 fm/c.
185: }
186: \label{time_rho}
187: \end{figure}
188:
189:
190: For the model calculation of the resonances, we employ a different
191: method to extract the resonances. Here, we follow the decay products of each
192: decaying resonance (the daughter particles). If any of the daughter hadrons
193: rescatters, the signal of this resonance is lost. If the daughter particles
194: do not rescatter in the further evolution of the system, the resonance is counted
195: as 'reconstructable'. Note that all decaying resonances are dubbed
196: with the term 'all decayed'. These resonances
197: are reconstructable by an invariant mass analysis of di-leptons (after multiplication with
198: the respective branching ratio $\Gamma (R\rightarrow e^+e^-)$).
199: The advantage of this method is that it allows
200: to trace back the origin of each individual resonance to study their spatial and temporal
201: emission pattern. Even more, it enables one to study the production process of the finally
202: observed resonance itself, shedding light on the origin of mass modifications.
203:
204: Figure \ref{rap} depicts the rapidity distributions of the meson resonances for min.bias
205: C+C interactions at 2 AGeV. The full
206: symbols display those $\rho^0$ (circles) and $\omega$ (squares) resonances
207: which are reconstructable via hadron
208: correlations. This means that the daughter particles do not interact after
209: the decay of the resonance. The open symbols show the spectra for all
210: decayed $\rho^0$ and $\omega$ resonances.
211: This can be interpreted as the spectrum which can be measured via a
212: di-leptonic decay, not taking into account any interferences of the $\rho$ and
213: the $\omega$.
214: In the case of the $\rho^0$ one observes a drastic reduction of the observable
215: yield at midrapidity from 3.5\% (in the di-lepton channel) to 0.8\% in the hadronic channel.
216: In contrast, the $\omega$ meson is only slightly altered when the reconstruction
217: probabilities in both channels are compared.
218: This can be traced back to the much longer lifetime of the $\omega$ compared to
219: the $\rho$. Most of the $\omega$'s will leave the interaction zone before they decay,
220: thus reducing the possibility of the rescattering of the daughters.
221:
222: If this interpretation is valid, one expects a strong transverse
223: momentum ($p_T = \sqrt{p_x^2+p_y^2}$) dependence of the suppression pattern.
224: One would expect a larger modification of short lived resonances
225: at low transverse momentum.
226: The spectrum at higher transverse momenta will only be slightly altered, because high
227: $p_T$-resonances are more likely to escape from the interaction region before they decay.
228: As shown in Fig. \ref{pt} the $\rho^0_{770}$ meson is suppressed, especially
229: at low $p_T$, in line with our expectations from the rescattering picture. Only at very low
230: transverse momenta, the $\omega_{782}$ is weakly suppressed.
231: It should be noted that a similar behaviour was also found experimentally for larger systems
232: at higher energies \cite{Adams:2004ep}.
233: \begin{figure}[t!]
234: \vspace*{-1cm}\centerline{\epsfig
235: {file=time_omega.eps,width=.45\textwidth,angle=0}}
236: \caption{
237: Temporal distribution of $\omega$ resonances for min. bias C+C reactions at
238: 2~AGeV. Open squares depict all decayed
239: $\omega$'s, full squares the via hadron correlations reconstructable ones.
240: Note that the $\omega$ meson decays at a very late stage of a collision due
241: to its long lifetime. One also observes a long tail of the distribution
242: because of that.
243: }
244: \label{time_omega}
245: \end{figure}
246:
247: Figure \ref{ratio} depicts the $\rho^0/\pi^-$ ratio as a function of $p_T$.
248: A strong suppression of the $\rho^0/\pi^-$ ratio at low $p_T$ is evident for
249: the reconstructable resonances, which vanishes at
250: high $p_T$. This also supports the rescattering scenario, since
251: high $p_T$ pions and $\rho^0$'s leave the medium directly and do not
252: experience modifications due to
253: rescattering.
254:
255: What is the temporal and spatial emission pattern of the resonances observable in the
256: di-leptonic compared to those in the hadronic channel?
257: Figures \ref{time_rho} and \ref{time_omega} depict the temporal distributions
258: of reconstructable and all decayed $\rho^0$ and $\omega$ mesons.
259: One observes a shift by 2~fm/c in the peak of the emission times from 5.5~fm/c for
260: the di-lepton channel compared to the reconstructable $\rho^0$'s that are emitted at
261: later stages of the collision, around 7.5~fm/c. Overall, the $\omega$'s decay even
262: later (notice the different scaling) at 7.5~fm/c (di-lepton channel) and
263: 13 fm/c (pion channel), i.e. outside of the collision zone.
264: That is the reason why there is nearly no suppression of the $\omega$ meson in
265: the hadron channel.
266:
267: Figures \ref{rt_rho} and \ref{rt_omega} depict the transverse distance
268: $r_T = \sqrt{r_x^2+r_y^2}$
269: of the meson resonances at the point of their decay.
270: Here it is interesting to notice that there is only a rather small difference in the
271: peak emission radii of the $\rho^0$ resonances observable in the di-lepton spectrum
272: (maximal emission at $r_T=1.3$~fm)
273: compared to those in the hadronic correlation with $r_T=1.8$~fm.
274: Comparing both emission radii to the size of the Carbon nucleus ($r\sim 2.7$ ~fm)
275: it seems that both reconstruction channels seem to be sensitive to similar
276: in-medium modifications. A detailed comparison of the thermal parameters at
277: the decay point of the resonances will be given in a follow-up work.
278: \begin{figure}[t!]
279: \vspace*{-1cm}\centerline{\epsfig
280: {file=rt_rho.eps,width=.45\textwidth,angle=0}}
281: \caption{Spatial distribution of $\rho^0$ resonances for min. bias C+C reactions at
282: 2~AGeV. Full symbols depict those resonances whose decay products did not
283: interact after the decay, whereas open symbols depict all decayed
284: resonances.
285: }
286: \label{rt_rho}
287: \end{figure}
288:
289:
290: \begin{figure}[t!]
291: \vspace*{-1cm}\centerline{\epsfig
292: {file=rt_omega.eps,width=.45\textwidth,angle=0}}
293: \caption{Spatial distribution of $\omega$ resonances for min. bias C+C reactions at
294: 2~AGeV. Full symbols depict those resonances whose decay products did not
295: interact after the decay, whereas open symbols depict all decayed
296: resonances.
297: }
298: \label{rt_omega}
299: \end{figure}
300: \begin{figure}[h!]
301: \vspace*{-1cm}\centerline{\epsfig
302: {file=mass_rho.eps,width=.45\textwidth,angle=0}}
303: \caption{
304: Mass distribution for $\rho^0$ mesons for min. bias C+C reaction at 2~AGeV.
305: The peak around 500~MeV is due to a strong contribution from
306: $N^*_{1520} \rightarrow p+\rho$ which amounts to 75\% for masses below 600~MeV.
307: }
308: \label{mass}
309: \end{figure}
310:
311:
312: Let us finally discuss, one of the most interesting effects,
313: the modification of the mass spectrum of the $\rho^0$ meson as has
314: been discussed earlier for example in \cite{Brown:1991kk, Rapp:1999qu, Cassing:1997jz}.
315: The mass distribution of the $\rho^0$ in min.bias C+C reaction at 2~AGeV is shown
316: in Fig. \ref{mass}. Open circles depict all decayed $\rho$'s (this is similar to the
317: di-leptons invariant mass distribution multiplied by the branching ratio
318: and the vector meson dominance factor of $1/m^3$), while the
319: $\rho$'s reconstructable in $\pi\pi$ correlations are shown as full circles.
320: In both distributions, one observes a clear double peak structure,
321: with maxima at the $\rho$ pole mass (770~MeV) and around 500 to 600~MeV.
322: Usually an enhancement of the $\rho$ spectral function in this
323: mass region has been attributed to strong in-medium modifications,
324: due to finite densities and temperatures.
325: However, in the present calculation, we do not make explicit use
326: of any in-medium modification, but only include the coupling of the $\rho$
327: to pions and baryons via the employed cross sections calculated
328: from detailed balance.
329:
330: A detailed analysis shows that the low mass peak is due to the
331: decay chain $N^*_{1520} \rightarrow p+\rho^0$ which contributes to 75\%
332: to the reconstructable $\rho$ mass spectrum below 600~MeV.
333: Without in-medium modifications, this decay process restricts the mass of the
334: $\rho$ to $m_\rho\le m_{N^*_{1520}}-m_p\sim 580$~MeV and thus feeds strongly
335: into the low invariant mass region of the $\rho$.
336: Above 600~MeV, $\rho$'s are mostly produced from $\pi\pi\rightarrow\rho$.
337: It seems that a dramatic modification of the $\rho$ spectral function
338: is mostly due to the decay kinematics of the production channel of the
339: $\rho$. However, on top of these kinematic effects additional modifications
340: of the $\rho$ mass spectrum might occur.
341:
342:
343: In summary, we have explored $\rho$ and $\omega$ production in C+C interactions
344: at 2~AGeV. We have predicted the yields and spectra of these meson resonances
345: when reconstructed in ''di-lepton-like'' and hadronic channel.
346: The present calculations show a strong difference (factor 5) between the
347: yields observable in the di-lepton and hadron channel.
348: This can be understood due to a rescattering of the resonance
349: daughter particles, shifting them out of the $\rho$ peak.
350: At midrapidity $8\cdot 10^{-3}$ $\rho^0$'s per event can be reconstructed
351: from the pion correlations.
352: We predict a strong transverse momentum dependence of the $\rho$ suppression
353: pattern leading to an apparent heat-up of the $\rho$'s observed in the hadronic
354: channel compared to the di-lepton channel.
355: Finally, we have pointed out that the mass spectrum of the reconstructable $\rho$'s
356: shows a strong double peak structure.
357: This second peak around an invariant mass of 500~MeV is due to $\rho$'s
358: from the decay of the $N^*(1520)$ which feeds directly in to the
359: $\rho$ mass region below 580~MeV.
360: Our prediction are a complimentary approach to the di-lepton measurements
361: underway at HADES/GSI. The reconstruction of resonances in the hadronic channel
362: yields additional information on the later stages of the reaction and
363: is of special interest for direct tests of hadronic transport
364: models without involving any di-lepton ''after burners''.
365:
366:
367: \section*{Acknowledgements}
368:
369: The authors thank GSI and BMBF for support.
370: We thank Diana Schumacher and Christian Sturm for detailed discussions about the KAOS data.
371: Fruitful discussions with Horst St\"ocker, Peter Zumbruch and
372: Joachim Stroth are greatfully acknowledged.
373: The computational resources have been provided by the
374: Center for Scientific Computing in Frankfurt.
375:
376:
377: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
378:
379: \begin{thebibliography}{00}
380:
381:
382:
383:
384:
385: %\cite{Markert:2004xx}
386: \bibitem{Markert:2004xx}
387: C.~Markert [STAR Collaboration],
388: %`Strange resonance production in p + p and Au + Au collisions at RHIC
389: %energies,''
390: J.\ Phys.\ G {\bf 30} (2004) S1313
391: [arXiv:nucl-ex/0404003].
392: %%CITATION = NUCL-EX 0404003;%%
393:
394: %\cite{Markert:2003rw}
395: \bibitem{Markert:2003rw}
396: C.~Markert [STAR Collaboration],
397: %`Resonance production in STAR,''
398: arXiv:nucl-ex/0308029.
399: %%CITATION = NUCL-EX 0308029;%%
400:
401: %\cite{Markert:2002xi}
402: \bibitem{Markert:2002xi}
403: C.~Markert [STAR Collaboration],
404: %`Lambda(1520) production at SPS and RHIC energies,''
405: J.\ Phys.\ G {\bf 28} (2002) 1753
406: [arXiv:nucl-ex/0308028].
407: %%CITATION = NUCL-EX 0308028;%%
408:
409: %\cite{Fachini:2003dx}
410: \bibitem{Fachini:2003dx}
411: P.~Fachini [STAR Collaboration],
412: %`rho(770)0 and f0(980) production in Au + Au and p p collisions at
413: %s(NN)**(1/2) = 200-GeV,''
414: J.\ Phys.\ G {\bf 30} (2004) S565
415: [arXiv:nucl-ex/0305034].
416: %%CITATION = NUCL-EX 0305034;%%
417:
418: %\cite{Fachini:2003mc}
419: \bibitem{Fachini:2003mc}
420: P.~Fachini,
421: %`Resonance production in Au + Au and p + p collisions at s(NN)**(1/2) =
422: %200-GeV,''
423: Acta Phys.\ Polon.\ B {\bf 35} (2004) 183
424: [arXiv:nucl-ex/0311023].
425: %%CITATION = NUCL-EX 0311023;%%
426:
427: %\cite{Fachini:2004jx}
428: \bibitem{Fachini:2004jx}
429: P.~Fachini,
430: %`Resonance production,''
431: J.\ Phys.\ G {\bf 30} (2004) S735
432: [arXiv:nucl-ex/0403026].
433: %%CITATION = NUCL-EX 0403026;%%
434:
435: %\cite{Adams:2004ep}
436: \bibitem{Adams:2004ep}
437: J.~Adams {\it et al.} [STAR Collaboration],
438: %`K(892)* Resonance Production in Au+Au and p+p Collisions at sqrt(sNN) =
439: %200
440: %GeV at STAR,''
441: arXiv:nucl-ex/0412019.
442: %%CITATION = NUCL-EX 0412019;%%
443:
444:
445: %\cite{Adler:2004zn}
446: \bibitem{Adler:2004zn}
447: S.~S.~Adler {\it et al.} [PHENIX Collaboration],
448: %`Systematic studies of the centrality and s(NN)**(1/2) dependence of
449: %dE(T)/d
450: %mu and d N(ch)/d mu in heavy ion collisions at mid-rapidity,''
451: arXiv:nucl-ex/0409015.
452: %%CITATION = NUCL-EX 0409015;%%
453:
454: %\cite{Johnson:1999fv}
455: \bibitem{Johnson:1999fv}
456: S.~C.~Johnson, B.~V.~Jacak and A.~Drees,
457: %`Rescattering of vector meson daughters in high-energy heavy ion
458: %collisions,''
459: Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 18} (2001) 645
460: [arXiv:nucl-th/9909075].
461: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 9909075;%%
462:
463:
464: %\cite{Bleicher:2002dm}
465: \bibitem{Bleicher:2002dm}
466: M.~Bleicher and J.~Aichelin,
467: %`Strange resonance production: Probing chemical and thermal freeze-out in
468: %relativistic heavy ion collisions,''
469: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 530} (2002) 81
470: [arXiv:hep-ph/0201123].
471: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0201123;%%
472:
473: %\cite{Torrieri:2002jp}
474: \bibitem{Torrieri:2002jp}
475: G.~Torrieri and J.~Rafelski,
476: %``Statistical hadronization probed by resonances,''
477: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 68} (2003) 034912
478: [arXiv:nucl-th/0212091].
479: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0212091;%%
480:
481: %\cite{Bleicher:2002rx}
482: \bibitem{Bleicher:2002rx}
483: M.~Bleicher,
484: %``Probing hadronization and freeze-out with multiple strange hadrons and
485: %strange resonances,''
486: Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 715} (2003) 85
487: [arXiv:hep-ph/0212378].
488: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0212378;%%
489:
490: %\cite{Bleicher:2003ij}
491: \bibitem{Bleicher:2003ij}
492: M.~Bleicher and H.~Stocker,
493: %``Dynamics and freeze-out of hadron resonances at RHIC,''
494: J.\ Phys.\ G {\bf 30} (2004) S111
495: [arXiv:hep-ph/0312278].
496: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0312278;%%
497:
498: %\cite{Torrieri:2004zz}
499: \bibitem{Torrieri:2004zz}
500: G.~Torrieri, S.~Steinke, W.~Broniowski, W.~Florkowski, J.~Letessier and J.~Rafelski,
501: %``SHARE: Statistical hadronization with resonances,''
502: arXiv:nucl-th/0404083.
503: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0404083;%%
504:
505: %\cite{Vogel:2005qr}
506: \bibitem{Vogel:2005qr}
507: S.~Vogel and M.~Bleicher,
508: %``Resonance absorption and regeneration in relativistic heavy ion
509: %collisions,''
510: arXiv:nucl-th/0505027.
511: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0505027;%%
512:
513:
514: %\cite{Soff:2000ae}
515: \bibitem{Soff:2000ae}
516: S.~Soff {\it et al.},
517: %``Enhanced strange particle yields - signal of a phase of massless
518: %particles?,''
519: J.\ Phys.\ G {\bf 27} (2001) 449
520: [arXiv:nucl-th/0010103].
521: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0010103;%%
522:
523:
524: %\cite{Soff:2000ae,Torrieri:2001ue,Torrieri:2001tg,Bleicher:2002dm,Torrieri:2002jp,Bleicher:2002rx,Bleicher:2003ij,Torrieri:2004zz,Vogel:2005qr}
525: \bibitem{Torrieri:2001ue}
526: G.~Torrieri and J.~Rafelski,
527: %`Strange hadron resonances as a signature of freeze-out dynamics,''
528: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 509} (2001) 239
529: [arXiv:hep-ph/0103149].
530: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0103149;%%
531:
532: %\cite{Torrieri:2001tg}
533: \bibitem{Torrieri:2001tg}
534: G.~Torrieri and J.~Rafelski,
535: %``Strange hadron resonances and QGP freeze-out,''
536: J.\ Phys.\ G {\bf 28} (2002) 1911
537: [arXiv:hep-ph/0112195].
538: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0112195;%%
539:
540:
541: %\cite{Braun-Munzinger:1995bp}
542: \bibitem{Braun-Munzinger:1995bp}
543: P.~Braun-Munzinger, J.~Stachel, J.~P.~Wessels and N.~Xu,
544: %`Thermal and hadrochemical equilibration in nucleus-nucleus collisions at
545: %the SPS,''
546: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 365} (1996) 1
547: [arXiv:nucl-th/9508020].
548: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 9508020;%%
549:
550: %\cite{Braun-Munzinger:2001ip}
551: \bibitem{Braun-Munzinger:2001ip}
552: P.~Braun-Munzinger, D.~Magestro, K.~Redlich and J.~Stachel,
553: %`Hadron production in Au Au collisions at RHIC,''
554: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 518} (2001) 41
555: [arXiv:hep-ph/0105229].
556: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0105229;%%
557:
558:
559: %\cite{kaischweda}
560: \bibitem{kaischweda}
561: K.~Schweda,
562: Talk given at the Quark Matter 2004
563:
564:
565:
566:
567: %\cite{Bass:1998ca}
568: \bibitem{Bass:1998ca}
569: S.~A.~Bass {\it et al.},
570: %icroscopic models for ultrarelativistic heavy ion collisions,''
571: Prog.\ Part.\ Nucl.\ Phys.\ {\bf 41} (1998) 225
572: [arXiv:nucl-th/9803035].
573: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 9803035;%%
574:
575: %\cite{Bleicher:1999xi}
576: \bibitem{Bleicher:1999xi}
577: M.~Bleicher {\it et al.},
578: %elativistic hadron hadron collisions in the ultra-relativistic quantum
579: %molecular dynamics model,''
580: J.\ Phys.\ G {\bf 25} (1999) 1859
581: [arXiv:hep-ph/9909407].
582: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9909407;%%
583:
584:
585: %\cite{Sturm:2000dm}
586: \bibitem{Sturm:2000dm}
587: C.~Sturm {\it et al.} [KAOS Collaboration],
588: %`Evidence for a soft nuclear equation of state from kaon production in
589: %heavy ion collisions,''
590: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 86} (2001) 39
591: [arXiv:nucl-ex/0011001].
592: %%CITATION = NUCL-EX 0011001;%%
593:
594:
595: %\cite{Brown:1991kk}
596: \bibitem{Brown:1991kk}
597: G.~E.~Brown and M.~Rho,
598: %`Scaling effective Lagrangians in a dense medium,''
599: Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ {\bf 66} (1991) 2720.
600: %%CITATION = PRLTA,66,2720;%%
601:
602: %\cite{Rapp:1999qu}
603: \bibitem{Rapp:1999qu}
604: R.~Rapp and C.~Gale,
605: %`rho properties in a hot meson gas,''
606: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 60} (1999) 024903
607: [arXiv:hep-ph/9902268].
608: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9902268;%%
609:
610: %\cite{Cassing:1997jz}
611: \bibitem{Cassing:1997jz}
612: W.~Cassing, E.~L.~Bratkovskaya, R.~Rapp and J.~Wambach,
613: %`Probing the rho spectral function in hot and dense nuclear matter by
614: %dileptons,''
615: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 57} (1998) 916
616: [arXiv:nucl-th/9708020].
617: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 9708020;%%
618:
619:
620:
621:
622:
623:
624:
625:
626:
627:
628:
629:
630:
631:
632:
633:
634: \end{thebibliography}
635:
636:
637: \end{document}
638: