1:
2:
3: %\documentstyle[12pt,epsfig]{article}
4: \documentstyle[12pt]{article}
5: %\documentstyle[aps,preprint]{revtex}
6: %\renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{1.6}
7: %\renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{1.0}
8: \oddsidemargin 0.3 in
9: \evensidemargin 0.18 in
10: %\pagestyle {empty}
11: \textwidth=15.0cm
12: \textheight=20.0cm
13: \begin{document}
14: \begin {center}
15: {\bf {\Large $\pi^+\pi^-$ Emission from Coherent $\rho^0$ Propagation
16: in Nuclei} }
17: \end {center}
18: %\smallskip
19: %\medskip
20: \begin {center}
21: Swapan Das \\
22: {\it Nuclear Physics Division,
23: Bhabha Atomic Research Centre \\
24: Mumbai-400085, India }
25: \end {center}
26: %\medskip
27:
28:
29:
30: \begin {abstract}
31: Cross sections for the $\pi^+\pi^-$ events arising due to the decay of
32: $\rho^0$ meson have been calculated. This rho meson is considered to produce
33: coherently in the $(p,p^\prime)$ reaction on a nucleus.
34: The distorted wave functions for the continuum particles and the rho meson
35: propagator are described by the eikonal form.
36: The sensitivity of the cross section on the pion emission angle as well as
37: on the beam energy has been investigated.
38: The cross sections for the $\rho^0$ decaying inside and outside the nucleus
39: are compared. In addition, the coherent and incoherent contributions to the
40: cross section due to $\rho^0$ inside and outside decay amplitudes are
41: presented.
42: The initial and final state interactions for this reaction have been studied. The
43: nuclear medium effect on the $\rho^0$ propagation through the nucleus is
44: also explored.
45: \end {abstract}
46:
47:
48: \section {Introduction}
49: \label {Int}
50:
51: ~~~~
52: The hadron parameters for vector mesons embedded in the nucleus may differ
53: significantly from their free space values due to the interaction taken
54: place between the vector mesons and the other nuclear particles present
55: in the nucleus. Therefore, the study on the in-medium properties of vector
56: mesons can offer valuable informations about the vector meson dynamics in a
57: nucleus. In compressed [$\varrho \approx (3-5) \varrho_0 $] and/or hot
58: [$\sim ~ (150-200)$ MeV] nuclei, the medium effect on the vector meson could be drastic.
59: In fact, large medium effect on the rho meson is believed to be seen in the
60: enhanced dilepton yield in CERES and HELIOS ultra-relativistic heavy ion
61: collision data \cite{dilpex} taken in CERN-SPS.
62: Theoretically, these data are found to be compatible if the $\rho$ mass
63: is reduced drastically, i.e., by $\sim ~ 300-400$ MeV \cite{dfms}. In
64: contrast to this, these data are also reproduced successfully by calculations
65: \cite{mbcl} which incorporate the hadronic interaction for the rho meson with
66: the surrounding nuclear particles. Recent analysis on the $\pi^+\pi^-$ pairs,
67: in the STAR experiment at BNL RHIC, showed a decrease in $\rho$ mass in
68: the peripheral Au + Au collisions \cite{rhic}.
69:
70:
71: There exist some model calculations which envisage the reduction of
72: vector meson mass in the nuclear medium. For example, the scaling hypothesis
73: due to Brown and Rho \cite{br} shows that the mass of vector meson in a
74: nucleus should drop, since the pion weak decay constant does. The QCD sum
75: rule calculation done by Hatsuda and Lee \cite{hat} shows that the reduction
76: in the vector meson mass increases with the nuclear density. This finding is
77: also corroborated by the vector dominance model (VDM) calculation due to
78: Asakawa et al., \cite{asa}. The quark meson (QM) coupling model calculation
79: done by Saito et al., \cite{sai} shows that the mass of $\rho$ meson in the
80: $^{12}$C nucleus is reduced by 50 MeV.
81: Beside these, the manybody calculations show that the spectral function for
82: the rho meson in the nuclear medium gets modified significantly due to its
83: interaction with the nucleon and resonances.
84: In one of these calculations, Frimann et al., \cite{fpr} have shown that the
85: $p$ wave $\rho N$ scattering [via $N(1720)$ and $\Delta (1905)$ resonances]
86: reduces the mass of rho meson, and this reduction is significant in high
87: baryon density.
88: Peters et al., \cite{ptr} have extended this calculations by incorporating
89: all four starred $s$ and $p$ wave resonances. Their calculations show a
90: strong influence of the $s$ wave resonances on the $\rho$ spectral function,
91: specifically in the static limit.
92: The density dependent two pion self-energy calculation due to Herrmann et
93: al., \cite{her} shows an enhancement in the in-medium $\rho$ width, but they
94: have not found, unlike others, any significant change in the in-medium $\rho$
95: mass. The recent developments in this field are illustrated in the
96: Ref.~\cite{redv}.
97:
98:
99: To look for the in-medium properties of vector mesons in a normal nucleus,
100: experimental programmes are there at various centers around the world.
101: For example, it has been proposed to measure the photo production of
102: vector meson in the nucleus at TJNAF through the $e^+e^-$ radiation
103: \cite{tjn}, and at 1.3 GeV Tokyo Electron Synchrotron (INS) through the
104: $\pi^+\pi^-$ emission \cite{ins}.
105: Recently, CBELSA/TAPS Collaboration at ELSA \cite{elsa} had found the
106: medium modification on the omega meson in $^{93}$Nb nucleus.
107: The KEK-PS E325 collaboration at KEK \cite{epem} had measured the $e^+e^-$
108: yield in the $p+A$ reaction at 12 GeV, and they have reported an enhancement
109: in this yield in the region of $ 0.6 \ge m_{e^+e^-} \le 0.77 $ GeV/c$^2$
110: due to modified $\rho$ meson in nuclei.
111: Another experiment \cite{phi} in this collaboration (which investigates the
112: medium effect on $\phi$ meson) is in progress.
113: There also exist experimental programmes at GSI-SIS \cite{hade} (HADE
114: collaboration) as well as at Spring-8 RCNP \cite{sprn}, which are dedicated
115: to explore the hadron parameters for vector mesons in the normal nucleus.
116: Therefore, the overall view for the medium modification on vector mesons is
117: expected in near future.
118:
119:
120: There also exist several calculations showing the medium effect on vector
121: mesons in the normal nucleus. Eletsky et al., \cite{elio} and Kondratyuk et
122: al., \cite{kscge} relate the effective mass and width for the rho meson in a
123: nucleus to the $\rho$ nucleon scattering amplitude $f_{\rho N}$ and nuclear
124: density.
125: In their calculations, it has been shown that the mass of the rho meson in
126: a normal nucleus increases with its energy. In the static limit, the $\rho$
127: mass is below its free space value, where as it exceeds 770 MeV at higher
128: energies \cite{kscge}.
129: Effenberger et al., have studied the $e^+e^-$ production from the gamma
130: \cite{effn1} and pion \cite{effn2} induced nuclear reactions at GeV energies
131: in the framework of semiclassical Boltzmann-Uehling-Uhlenbeck (BUU) transport
132: model. Their study shows that the medium modification on vector mesons
133: enhances the dilepton yields in the $e^+e^-$ invariant mass region below 770
134: MeV.
135: The Intranuclear Cascade (INC) model calculation due to Golubeva et al.,
136: \cite{inc} also supports this conclusion.
137: Several studies \cite{phim} show the width of $\phi$ meson in a nucleus
138: increases significantly, where as the mass-shift for it is insignificant.
139:
140:
141: Another way to explore the $\rho$ dynamics in a normal nucleus could
142: be through the coherent $\rho^0$ production in the $(p,p^\prime)$ reaction.
143: The coherent meson production process had been used earlier to unveil many
144: interesting aspects in the nuclear dynamics.
145: For example, the pion and delta dynamics in a nucleus were investigated
146: sometime back through the coherent photo- and electro-production of pion
147: in the $\Delta$ excitation region \cite{erwe,pid,empi}. In this energy
148: region, the measurements had been done, in the recent past, on the coherent
149: $\pi^+$ production in the charge exchange reactions \cite{cpiex}. These
150: reactions offer valuable informations \cite{cpith}, which are complementary
151: to those obtained from the scattering of real pion on a nucleus
152: \cite{erwe,pid}.
153:
154:
155: For the coherent $\rho^0$ emission in the $(p,p^\prime)$ reaction, it is
156: visualized that the beam proton emits rho meson. This rho meson, of course,
157: is a virtual particle, since the four-momentum carried by it is constrained
158: by the dispersion relation obeyed by protons.
159: It is the nucleus which scatters this $\rho^0$ meson coherently and brings
160: it on-shell. Kinematically, this process is possible because the recoiling
161: nucleus, as a whole, can adjust the momentum to put the virtual rho meson
162: on its mass-shell.
163: For simplicity, we restrict the propagation of the coherent $\rho^0$ meson
164: to the forward direction only. This rho meson, after traveling a certain
165: distance, decays into $\pi^+$ and $\pi^-$ in the final state. Naturally, the
166: $\rho^0$ dynamics in this reaction can be manifested from these $\pi^+\pi^-$
167: events. Therefore, the coherent rho meson production process can be thought
168: as a pertinent probe to acquire the knowledge about the $\rho$ nucleus
169: interaction.
170:
171:
172: The energy transfer $E_p-E_{p^\prime}$ distribution spectra have been
173: calculated for the $(p,p^\prime [\pi^+\pi^-])$ reaction on various nuclei.
174: According to the model presented here, the $\pi^+\pi^-$ in the final state
175: arise due to the decay of coherent $\rho^0$ meson, propagating through a
176: nucleus.
177: This calculation is based on Glauber approach for the nuclear effect. Where
178: the distorted wave functions for the continuum particles (i.e., $p,
179: ~p^\prime, ~\pi^+ ~ \mbox{and} ~\pi^-$) and the $\rho^0$ propagator have
180: been described by the eikonal form. The potential required to generate
181: these quantities is constructed by using $``t\varrho"$
182: approximation.
183: In this study, the dependence of the cross section on the pion emission angle
184: as well as on the beam energy is presented. The cross sections for the rho
185: meson decaying inside and outside the nucleus are compared. Along with this,
186: the coherent and incoherent contributions to the cross section due to the
187: inside and outside decay for the rho meson are also studied.
188: The initial and final state interactions for this reaction are investigated.
189: In addition, the medium effect on the rho meson propagating through the
190: nucleus is explored.
191:
192:
193: We write the formalism in Sec.~2 for the coherent rho meson production in
194: the $(p,p^\prime)$ reaction and its decay into $\pi^+$ and $\pi^-$ in the
195: final state. The results and discussion for this reaction are illustrated
196: in Sec.~3. Conclusions obtained from this study have been presented in
197: Sec.~4.
198:
199:
200:
201: \section {Formalism}
202: \label {for}
203:
204: ~~~~
205: The formalism for the $\pi^+\pi^-$ emission from the rho meson,
206: propagating through a nucleus, has been developed here. This rho meson is
207: produced coherently in the $(p,p^\prime)$ reaction on a nucleus. The
208: $T$-matrix $T_{fi}$ for this reaction consists of production,
209: propagation, and decay (into two pions) for the rho meson, i.e.,
210: \begin{eqnarray}
211: T_{fi} = \int \int d{\bf r} d{\bf r^\prime}
212: \chi^{(-)*} ({\bf k_{\pi^+}, r^\prime})
213: \chi^{(-)*} ({\bf k_{\pi^-}, r^\prime})
214: \Gamma_{\rho \pi \pi} S_\rho ( {\bf r^\prime - r} )
215: \Psi_{\rho^0} ({\bf r}).
216: \label{tmx}
217: \end {eqnarray}
218:
219:
220: The factor $ \Psi_{\rho^0} ({\bf r}) $ in the above equation represents the
221: $\rho^0$ production amplitude due to $(p,p^\prime)$ reaction. It is given
222: by
223: \begin{eqnarray}
224: \Psi_{\rho^0} ({\bf r}) = \Pi_\rho (q_0, {\bf r}) G_\rho (q^2)
225: \chi^{(-)*} ({\bf k_{p^\prime}, r})
226: \Gamma_{\rho NN} \chi^{(+)} ({\bf k_p, r}),
227: \label{rpd}
228: \end {eqnarray}
229: where
230: $ \Pi_\rho (q_0, {\bf r}) [ = 2q_0V_{O\rho} ({\bf r}) ] $ denotes the
231: self-energy for the rho meson, arising due to $\rho$ nucleus
232: optical potential $ V_{O\rho} ({\bf r}) $. This potential describes the
233: elastic scattering of the virtual rho meson to its real state.
234: $q_0 (=E_p-E_{p^\prime})$ is the energy carried out by the virtual rho meson.
235: $ {\tilde G}_\rho (q^2) $ represents the propagator for the virtual rho
236: meson emitted at the $\rho^0pp^\prime$ vertex:
237: $ {\tilde G}_\rho (q^2) = - \frac{ 1 }{ m^2_\rho-q^2 } $. Here, $m_\rho$
238: ($\sim 770$ MeV) and $ q (=k_p -k_{p^\prime}) $ are the mass and the four
239: momentum respectively for the rho meson. $\chi$s, given in Eq.~(\ref{rpd}),
240: denote the distorted wave functions for protons. In eikonal approximation,
241: they can be written as
242: \begin{eqnarray}
243: \chi^{(+)} ( {\bf k}_p, {\bf r} ) = e^{i {\bf k}_p . {\bf r} }
244: exp \left [ -\frac{i}{v_p}
245: \int^z_{-\infty} dz^\prime V_{Op} ({\bf b}, z^\prime) \right ],
246: \nonumber
247: \end{eqnarray}
248: and
249: \begin{equation}
250: \chi^{(-)*} ( {\bf k}_{p^\prime}, {\bf r} )
251: = e^{-i {\bf k}_{p^\prime} . {\bf r} }
252: exp \left [ -\frac{i}{v_{p^\prime}}
253: \int^\infty_z dz^\prime V_{O{p^\prime}} ({\bf b}, z^\prime) \right ].
254: \label{pwfn}
255: \end{equation}
256: $\Gamma_{\rho NN}$, in Eq.~(\ref{rpd}), is the vertex function at
257: the $\rho^0pp^\prime$ vertex. It describes the emission of virtual $\rho^0$
258: at this vertex. The Lagrangian, describing the interaction at the $\rho NN$
259: vertex, is given by
260: \begin{equation}
261: {\cal L}_{\rho NN} = -g_VF(q^2) {\bar N}
262: [ \gamma^\mu - i\frac{ \kappa }{ 2m_N } \sigma^{\mu\nu} q_\nu ]
263: {\bf \tau \cdot \rho_\mu} N,
264: \label{lrnn}
265: \end {equation}
266: with $g_V=2.6$ and $\kappa=6.1$ \cite{erwe}. $F(q^2)$ represents the form
267: factor at the $\rho NN$ vertex:
268: $ F(q^2) = \frac{ \Lambda^2-m^2_\rho }{ \Lambda^2-q^2 } $,
269: with $ \Lambda=1.3 $ GeV/c \cite{mach}. The quantities $m_\rho$ and $q$ are
270: already defined below the Eq.~(\ref{rpd}).
271:
272:
273: The factor $ S_\rho ({\bf r^\prime - r}) $, appearing in Eq.~(\ref{tmx}),
274: describes the propagation for the real $\rho^0$ meson from the position
275: ${\bf r}$ to another position ${\bf r^\prime}$. Which, in the present work,
276: has been restricted to the forward direction only. Therefore,
277: $ S_\rho ({\bf r^\prime - r}) $ can be expressed in the eikonal form as
278: \begin{eqnarray}
279: S_\rho ( {\bf r^\prime - r} )
280: = \delta ( {\bf b^\prime - b} ) \Theta (z^\prime - z)
281: e^{ i {\bf k_\rho . (r^\prime - r)} } D_{\bf k_\rho} ({\bf b}, z^\prime, z),
282: \label{rrp}
283: \end {eqnarray}
284: where $ D_{\bf k_\rho} ({\bf b}, z^\prime, z) $ describes the nuclear medium
285: effect on the $\rho$ propagation through a nucleus. It is given by
286: \begin{equation}
287: D_{\bf k_\rho} ({\bf b}, z^\prime, z) = - \frac{ i }{ 2k_\rho }
288: exp \left [ \frac{ i }{ 2k_\rho } \int_z^{z^\prime}
289: dz^{\prime \prime} \{ {\tilde G}^{-1}_{0\rho} ( m ) -
290: 2 E_\rho V_{O\rho} ({\bf b}, z^{\prime \prime}) \} \right ].
291: \label{drh}
292: \end{equation}
293: In this equation, $k_\rho$ is the momentum for the forward going rho meson.
294: $ V_{O\rho} ({\bf b}, z^{\prime \prime}) $, as mentioned earlier, represents
295: the optical potential for the rho meson.
296: $ {\tilde G}^{-1}_{0\rho} ( m ) $ represents the inverse of the free rho
297: meson (on-shell) propagator. It is given by
298: \begin{equation}
299: {\tilde G}^{-1}_{0\rho} ( m )
300: = m^2 - m^2_\rho +i m_\rho \Gamma_\rho ( m );
301: ~~~
302: \Gamma_\rho ( m )
303: = \Gamma_\rho ( m_\rho ) \left ( \frac{ m_\rho }{ m } \right )
304: \left [ \frac{ k ( m^2 ) }{ k ( m^2_\rho ) } \right ]^3,
305: \label{wdrh}
306: \end {equation}
307: with $ m_\rho \approx 770 $ MeV and $ \Gamma_\rho ( m_\rho ) \sim 150 $
308: MeV, for $ \rho^0 \to \pi^+\pi^- $ in the free state. $k(m^2)$ is the
309: momentum for pion in the rest frame of decaying rho meson of mass $m$.
310:
311:
312: $\Gamma_{\rho\pi\pi}$, in Eq.~(\ref{tmx}), describes the vertex function
313: for the $\rho^0$ meson decaying into $\pi^+\pi^-$ in the final state. It is
314: governed by the Lagrangian:
315: \begin{equation}
316: {\cal L}_{\rho \pi \pi}
317: = f_{\rho \pi \pi} {\bf \rho^\mu \cdot (\pi \times \partial_\mu \pi) },
318: \label{lrpi}
319: \end {equation}
320: with $ f_{\rho\pi\pi} \approx 6.1 $ \cite{erwe, rkb}.
321:
322:
323: The distorted wave functions $\chi$s, in Eq.~(\ref{tmx}), for pions in the
324: final state have been described by the eikonal form, i.e.,
325: \begin{eqnarray}
326: \chi^{(-)*} ({\bf k_{\pi^+},r^\prime})
327: \chi^{(-)*} ({\bf k_{\pi^-},r^\prime})
328: =
329: e^{ -i {\bf (k_{\pi^+}+k_{\pi^-}) . r^\prime} }
330: D_{\bf k_\pi} ({\bf b^\prime}, z^\prime).
331: \label{piwfn}
332: \end {eqnarray}
333: In this equation, $ D_{\bf k_\pi} ({\bf b^\prime}, z^\prime) $ represents
334: the distortion occurring due to the elastic scattering of pions by the
335: recoiling nucleus. It is given by
336: \begin{equation}
337: D_{\bf k_\pi} ({\bf b^\prime}, z^\prime)
338: = exp \left [ -i \int_{z^\prime}^\infty
339: dz^{\prime \prime} \left \{
340: \frac{ V_{O\pi^+} ({\bf b^\prime}, z^{\prime \prime}) }{ v_{\pi^+} }
341: + \frac{ V_{O\pi^-} ({\bf b^\prime}, z^{\prime \prime}) }{ v_{\pi^-} }
342: \right \} \right ],
343: \label{dpi}
344: \end{equation}
345: where $v_{\pi^\pm}$ is the velocity of $\pi^\pm$, and
346: $ V_{O\pi^\pm} ({\bf b^\prime}, z^\prime) $ denotes the optical potential
347: for the $\pi^\pm$ scattering on a nucleus.
348:
349:
350: The $T$-matrix $T_{fi}$, given in Eq.~(\ref{tmx}), can be factorized into
351: interaction and structure parts. The interaction part contains the
352: production and decay vertex functions
353: (i.e., $ \Gamma_{\rho NN} \Gamma_{\rho\pi\pi}$) for the rho meson. The
354: structure part carries the information about the medium effect on the rho
355: meson. The later, using Eqs.~(\ref{tmx}), (\ref{rrp}) and (\ref{piwfn}), can
356: be written as
357: \begin{equation}
358: F = \int d{\bf r} D_{\pi\rho} ({\bf k_\pi, k_\rho} ; {\bf b},z)
359: e^{-i{\bf k_\rho . r}} \Pi_\rho (q_0, {\bf r})
360: {\tilde G}_\rho (q^2)
361: \chi^{(-)*} ({\bf k_{p^\prime}, r}) \chi^{(+)} ({\bf k_p, r}),
362: \label{frh}
363: \end {equation}
364: with $ {\bf k_\rho = k_{\pi^+} + k_{\pi^-} } $. The symbol
365: $ D_{\pi\rho} ({\bf k_\pi, k_\rho} ; {\bf b},z) $ appearing in this equation
366: stands for
367: \begin{equation}
368: D_{\pi\rho} ({\bf k_\pi, k_\rho} ; {\bf b},z)
369: = \int^\infty_z dz^\prime D_{\bf k_\pi} ({\bf b}, z^\prime)
370: D_{\bf k_\rho} ({\bf b}, z^\prime, z),
371: \label{dpr}
372: \end {equation}
373: where $ D_{\bf k_\rho} ({\bf b}, z^\prime, z) $ and
374: $ D_{\bf k_\pi} ({\bf b}, z^\prime) $ are defined in Eqs. (\ref{drh}) and
375: (\ref{dpi}) respectively. The above equation describes the dynamics for
376: the pi and rho mesons in the nucleus.
377:
378:
379: The rho meson, due to its short life time ($\sim 10^{-23}$ sec), can
380: decay inside as well as outside the nucleus, depending upon its velocity and
381: the size of the nucleus. Indeed, the physical quantity which determines this
382: decay probability is the effective decay length:
383: $ \lambda^* = v/\Gamma^* $. Where $v$ and $\Gamma^*$ describe the velocity
384: and the effective decay width respectively for the rho meson in a nucleus.
385: This
386: decay length $\lambda^*$ controls over the attenuation for the in-medium
387: $\rho$ propagation. While the rho meson propagates a distance
388: $ L({\bf b},z) [ = \sqrt { R^2-b^2 } - z] $ from the production point $z$ to
389: the surface of a nucleus of radius $R$, it gets attenuated by a factor
390: $ exp [ -L({b},z)/\lambda^* ] $.
391: To
392: investigate the inside and outside decay probabilities more transparently,
393: $ D_{\pi\rho} ({\bf k_\pi, k_\rho} ; {\bf b},z) $ in Eq.~(\ref{dpr}) is
394: splitted into two parts, i.e.,
395: \begin{equation}
396: D_{\pi\rho} ({\bf k_\pi, k_\rho} ; {\bf b},z)
397: = D^{in}_{\pi\rho} ({\bf k_\pi, k_\rho} ; {\bf b},z)
398: + D^{out}_{\pi\rho} ({\bf k_\pi, k_\rho} ; {\bf b},z).
399: \label{dio}
400: \end {equation}
401: In this equation, $ D^{in}_{\pi\rho} ({\bf k_\pi, k_\rho} ; {\bf b},z) $
402: and $ D^{out}_{\pi\rho} ({\bf k_\pi, k_\rho} ; {\bf b},z) $
403: correspond to the probability for the rho meson decaying inside and outside
404: the nucleus respectively. They are given by
405: \begin{equation}
406: D^{in}_{\pi\rho} ({\bf k_\pi, k_\rho} ; {\bf b},z)
407: = \int^{\sqrt{R^2-b^2}}_z dz^\prime D_{\bf k_\pi} ({\bf b}, z^\prime)
408: D_{\bf k_\rho} ({\bf b}, z^\prime, z),
409: \label{idpr}
410: \end {equation}
411: and
412: \begin{equation}
413: D^{out}_{\pi\rho} ({\bf k_\pi, k_\rho} ; {\bf b},z)
414: = \int^\infty_{\sqrt{R^2-b^2}} dz^\prime D_{\bf k_\pi} ({\bf b}, z^\prime)
415: D_{\bf k_\rho} ({\bf b}, z^\prime, z).
416: \label{odpr}
417: \end {equation}
418: In the later equation, i.e., in Eq.~(\ref{odpr}),
419: $ D_{\bf k_\pi} ({\bf b}, z^\prime) $ goes to unity, and
420: $ D_{\bf k_\rho} ({\bf b}, z^\prime, z) $ reduces to
421: $ -\frac{i}{2k_\rho} exp [ \frac{i}{2k_\rho} {\tilde G}^{-1}_{0\rho}
422: (m_\rho) (z^\prime-z) ]. $
423:
424:
425: For the $\pi^+\pi^-$ emission in the $(p,p^\prime)$ reaction on a nucleus,
426: the differential cross section,
427: $ \frac { d\sigma } { dE_{p^\prime} d\Omega_{p^\prime}
428: dE_{\pi^+} d\Omega_{\pi^+} d\Omega_{\pi^-} } $, for the energy transfer
429: transfer $E_p-E_{p^\prime}$ distribution can be written as
430: \begin{equation}
431: \frac { d\sigma } { dE_{p^\prime} d\Omega_{p^\prime}
432: dE_{\pi^+} d\Omega_{\pi^+} d\Omega_{\pi^-} }
433: = \frac{\pi^3}{(2\pi)^{11}}
434: \frac{ m^2_p k_{p^\prime} k_{\pi^+} k_{\pi^-} }{ k_p } <|T_{fi}|^2>.
435: \label{dsg}
436: \end {equation}
437: The annular bracket around the $|T_{fi}|^2$ represents the average over the
438: spin orientations of the particles in the initial state and the summation
439: over the spin orientations of the particles in the final state.
440:
441:
442:
443: \section {Results and Discussion}
444: \label {rlds}
445:
446: ~~~~
447: To calculate the $T$-matrix $T_{fi}$, given in Eq.~(\ref{tmx}), it is
448: necessary to evaluate the wave functions for protons in Eq.~(\ref{pwfn})
449: and pions in Eq.~(\ref{piwfn}), as well as the propagator for the rho meson
450: in Eq.~(\ref{rrp}). The important ingredient required to generate these
451: quantities is the optical potential for the respective particles. This
452: potential, in the present work, has been estimated using ``$t\varrho$''
453: approximation. According to it, the optical potential
454: $ V_{OX} ({\bf r}) $ for a particle $X$ scattered off by a nucleus can be
455: expressed \cite{crp} as
456: \begin{equation}
457: V_{OX} ({\bf r}) = - \frac{v_X}{2} (i+\alpha_{XN}) \sigma_t^{XN}
458: \varrho ({\bf r}).
459: \label{opt}
460: \end{equation}
461: $\alpha_{XN}$ appearing in this equation denotes the ratio:
462: $ Re f_{XN}(0) / Im f_{XN}(0) $. Here, $f_{XN}(0)$ is the particle nucleon
463: $(X-N)$ scattering amplitude at the forward direction. $\sigma_t^{XN}$
464: represents the total scattering cross section. $\varrho ({\bf r})$ denotes
465: the spatial distribution for the nuclear density, usually approximated by
466: the charge density distribution for the nucleus.
467: The present work deals with $^{12}$C and $^{208}$Pb nuclei only. Therefore,
468: the form of $\varrho ({\bf r})$ for these nuclei, as extracted from the
469: electron scattering data \cite{at}, is given by
470: \begin{eqnarray}
471: &^{12}\mbox{C} ~~ :&
472: \varrho ({\bf r}) = \varrho_0 [ 1 + w(r/c)^2 ] e^{ -(r/c)^2 };
473: ~~ w=1.247, ~ c=1.649 ~ \mbox{fm}. ~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~ \\
474: \label{den1}
475: &^{208}\mbox{Pb}:&
476: \varrho ({\bf r})
477: = \varrho_0 \frac{1+w(r/c)^2}{1+exp(\frac{r^2-c^2}{a^2})};
478: ~ w=0.3379, c=6.3032 ~\mbox{fm}, a=2.8882 ~\mbox{fm}. ~~~~~ ~~
479: \label{den2}
480: \end{eqnarray}
481: These densities are normalized to the mass numbers of the corresponding
482: nuclei.
483:
484:
485: To evaluate the proton nucleus optical potential $ V_{Op} ({\bf r}) $
486: in Eq.~(\ref{opt}), the energy dependent measured values for the proton
487: nucleon scattering parameters, i.e., $ \alpha_{pN} $ and $\sigma_t^{pN}$,
488: \cite{scpn, pdg} have been used.
489: Similarly, $\alpha_{\pi^\pm N}$ and $\sigma_t^{\pi^\pm N}$ are used as
490: input quantities in Eq.~(\ref{opt}) to generate the $\pi^\pm$ nucleus
491: optical potential $ V_{O\pi^\pm} ({\bf r}) $. The data for
492: $\sigma_t^{\pi^\pm p}$ exist for a wide range of energy \cite{pdg}. The
493: measured values for $\alpha_{\pi^\pm p}$ are also available in
494: Ref.~\cite{pdg} at higher energies only. Therefore, $\alpha_{\pi^\pm p}$ has
495: been generated at lower energies by using SAID program \cite{said}.
496: For $\pi^\pm$ neutron scattering parameters, they are approximated as:
497: $ \alpha_{\pi^\pm n} \approx \alpha_{\pi^\mp p} $ and
498: $ \sigma_t^{\pi^\pm n} \approx \sigma_t^{\pi^\pm d } -
499: \sigma_t^{\pi^\pm p} $. The data for the pion deuteron total scattering
500: cross section $\sigma_t^{\pi^\pm d}$ are also available in the
501: Ref.~\cite{pdg}.
502:
503:
504: The rho meson, being an unstable particle, can not exist as beam. Therefore,
505: $\alpha_{\rho^0 N}$ and $\sigma_t^{\rho^0 N}$ [which are required in
506: Eq.~(\ref{opt}) to estimate the $\rho^0$ nucleus optical potential
507: $V_{O\rho} ({\bf r})$] can not be measured directly. On the other hand, they
508: can be extracted from the $\rho$ production data available for various
509: elementary reactions. In fact, several authors have done this exercise
510: recently for a wide range of $\rho$ energy.
511: In one of these calculations, using Vector Dominance Model (VDM) Kondratyuk
512: et al., \cite{kscge} have extracted the $\rho$ nucleon scattering amplitude
513: $f_{\rho N}$ from the rho meson photoproduction data at higher energies
514: $(E_\rho \ge 2 ~ \mbox {GeV})$.
515: At lower energies $(E_\rho \le 2 ~ \mbox {GeV})$ they have calculated
516: $f_{\rho N}$ using Resonance Model (RM), since the rho meson couples strongly
517: to a number of resonances in this energy region.
518: There exists another calculation, where Lutz et al., using couple channel
519: approach \cite{lwf}, have calculated $f_{\rho N}$ in the region of threshold
520: $\rho$ production. In this energy region, their calculations reproduce the
521: measured cross sections for various reactions, such as
522: $\pi N \to \rho N, ~ \gamma N \to \rho N$, very well.
523:
524:
525: As mentioned earlier, we calculate the energy transfer $E_p-E_{p^\prime}$
526: distribution spectra for the $\pi^+\pi^-$ emission, which arise due to the
527: decay of the forward going $\rho^0$ meson in the nucleus. This rho meson is
528: assumed to produce coherently in the $(p,p^\prime)$ reaction on a nucleus.
529: The coherent meson production process assures that the recoil nucleus remains in the
530: same state as of the target nucleus. The forward propagation of the $\rho^0$
531: meson, as considered here for simplicity, imposes a constrain on the pion
532: emission angle: $ \theta_{\pi^+} = -\theta_{\pi^-} $. In these calculations,
533: the $p^\prime$ emission angle is taken fixed at $1^0$.
534:
535:
536:
537: For the above reaction on $^{12}$C nucleus, the sensitivity of the cross
538: section on the pion emission angle is presented in Fig.~1 at 2.5 GeV beam
539: energy. The cross sections have been calculated for various $\pi^+$
540: emission angles $\theta_{\pi^+}$ taken sequentially from $5^0$ to $35^0$. In
541: this figure, we show the calculated results only for $\theta_{\pi^+}$ taken
542: equal to $ 20^0, ~25^0 ~\mbox{and} ~30^0 $.
543: This figure shows that the peak position gets shifted towards the lower
544: value of $E_p-E_{p^\prime}$ with the increase in the $\pi^+$ emission angle.
545: It also shows the cross section is maximum for the $\pi^+$ emission angle
546: taken equal to $25^0$.
547: For this angle, the cross section at the peak is 82.5 $\mu$b/(GeV$^2$sr$^3$),
548: which appears at the energy transfer $E_p-E_{p^\prime}$ equal to 1.64 GeV.
549: The peak cross section for $\theta_{\pi^+}$ taken equal to $20^0$ is 52.35
550: $\mu$b/(GeV$^2$sr$^3$), appearing at $E_p-E_{p^\prime}$ equal to 1.74 GeV.
551: Where as, the cross section at the peak for $\theta_{\pi^+}$ taken at $30^0$
552: is about 48 $\mu$b/(GeV$^2$sr$^3$), and it appears at $E_p-E_{p^\prime}$
553: equal to 1.43 GeV.
554:
555:
556: In nuclear reactions, it is often seen that the cross section strongly
557: depends on the beam energy. To show this dependence, the energy transfer
558: $E_p-E_{p^\prime}$ distribution spectra have been calculated for the above
559: reaction at beam energies taken equal to 2.5, 3 and 3.5 GeV. The $\pi^+$
560: emission angle $\theta_{\pi^+}$ is taken fixed at $25^0$, since this
561: settings, as shown in Fig.~1, gives the maximum cross section at 2.5 GeV
562: beam energy.
563: The calculated $E_p-E_{p^\prime}$ distribution spectra are presented in
564: Fig.~2, which shows the cross section increases with the increase in beam
565: energy. The cross section at the peak is enhanced to 0.75 mb/(GeV$^2$sr$^3$)
566: at 3.5 GeV from 82.5 $\mu$b/(GeV$^2$sr$^3$) at 2.5 GeV. The peak position at
567: 3.5 GeV beam energy appears at $E_p-E_{p^\prime}$ equal to 1.74 GeV, where as
568: it appears at $E_p-E_{p^\prime} = 1.64 $ GeV for the beam energy taken equal
569: to 2.5 GeV. At 3 GeV, the calculated cross section at the peak is 0.4
570: mb/(GeV$^2$sr$^3$), and it appears at $E_p-E_{p^\prime}$ equal to 1.7 GeV.
571:
572:
573: An unstable particle, while propagating through a nucleus, can decay inside
574: as well as outside the nucleus, depending upon its velocity and the size of
575: the nucleus. To explore it for $\rho^0$ meson propagating through the
576: $^{12}$C nucleus, the cross sections for the inside and outside decay
577: probabilities have been compared in Fig.~3 at 3.5 GeV beam energy. The $\pi^+$
578: emission angle is taken equal to $20^0$, since it gives the maximum cross
579: section (not shown) at 3.5 GeV beam energy.
580: The peak cross section for the rho meson decaying inside of this nucleus
581: is 0.12 mb/(GeV$^2$sr$^3$), appearing at $E_p-E_{p^\prime}$ equal to 1.98
582: GeV (dotted line). Where as it is equal to $\sim 1.46$ mb/(GeV$^2$sr$^3$)
583: at $E_p-E_{p^\prime} = 2.12 $ GeV for $\rho^0$ decaying outside the same
584: nucleus (dashed line). Therefore, the outside decay cross section for this
585: reaction dominates by a factor about 12 over the inside decay cross
586: section.
587: This figure also compares the coherent and incoherent contributions to the
588: cross section, coming from the inside and outside decay amplitudes for
589: $\rho^0$ traveling through the $^{12}$C nucleus. As illustrated in this
590: figure, the peak cross section due to incoherent contribution is about 1.57
591: mb/(GeV$^2$sr$^3$) at $ E_p-E_{p^\prime} = 2.12 $ GeV (dash-dot line). On
592: the other hand, it is $\sim 2.17$ mb/(GeV$^2$sr$^3$) due to coherent
593: contribution, appearing at $E_p-E_{p^\prime}$ equal to 2.08 GeV (solid line).
594: Therefore, the coherent contribution supercedes the incoherent contribution
595: by a factor about 1.4.
596:
597:
598: The inside decay probability for the rho meson should increase while it
599: propagates through a larger nucleus. To show this, the cross sections for
600: $\rho^0$ meson decaying inside as well as outside the $^{208}$Pb nucleus have been
601: calculated at 3.5 GeV beam energy. The $\pi^+$ emission angle is taken at
602: $15^0$ in this case, since it gives maximum cross section for the Pb target.
603: The
604: calculated results are presented in Fig.~4. It is noticeable in this figure
605: that the peak cross sections for the inside and outside decay probabilities
606: of the $\rho^0$ meson, traveling through the Pb nucleus, are comparable to
607: each other [$\sim$ 65 $\mu$b/(GeV$^2$sr$^3$)], unlike the case happening for
608: $^{12}$C nucleus (see in Fig.~3).
609: Another remarkable aspect appearing in this figure is the enhancement in the
610: cross section due to the interference between the inside and outside decay
611: amplitudes for the $\rho^0$ meson. The peak cross section due to incoherent
612: contribution is 0.11 mb/(GeV$^2$sr$^3$) at $E_p-E_{p^\prime}$ equal to 2.2
613: GeV (dash-dot). Where as, it is equal to 0.22 mb/(GeV$^2$sr$^3$) due to
614: coherent contribution, appearing at $ E_p-E_{p^\prime} = 2.19 $ GeV (solid
615: line). Therefore, the interference effect enhances the cross section over
616: the incoherent contribution by a factor of 2 for the Pb nucleus, which is
617: significantly larger than that for the C nucleus.
618:
619:
620: It is always very interesting to investigate the initial and final state
621: interactions in the nuclear reactions. The effect of these interactions on
622: the $\pi^+\pi^-$ emission in the $(p,p^\prime)$ reaction on $^{12}$C nucleus
623: is shown in Fig.~5 at 3.5 GeV beam energy. This figure compares the
624: calculated distorted wave results for the continuum particles (i.e., $ p,
625: ~p^\prime, ~\pi^+ ~\mbox{and} ~\pi^- $) with the plane waves results. In
626: addition, the nuclear effect on the $\rho$ propagation through the $^{12}$C
627: nucleus is also presented.
628: The plane wave result (which also includes the free $\rho^0$ propagator)
629: shows the cross section is 25.54 mb/(GeV$^2$sr$^3$) at the peak, appearing
630: at $E_p-E_{p^\prime}$ equal to 2.02 GeV (dash-dot-dot line).
631: The distortion due to projectile proton $p$ brings down the peak cross
632: section to 7.02 mb/(GeV$^2$sr$^3$) at $ E_p-E_{p^\prime} = 2.04 $ GeV
633: (dash-dot line). Therefore, the initial state interaction reduces cross
634: section by a factor about 3.64 at the peak, and it shifts the peak position
635: by 20 MeV towards the higher side in the $E_p-E_{p^\prime}$ distribution
636: spectrum.
637: The incorporation of the distortion due to ejectile proton $p^\prime$ further
638: attenuates the peak cross section to 2.6 mb/(GeV$^2$sr$^3$) at
639: $ E_p-E_{p^\prime} = 2.05 $ GeV (dashed line). Therefore, the projectile and
640: ejectile (i.e., $p$ and $p^\prime$) distortions together reduce the plane
641: wave cross section by a factor about 9.82 at the peak, and they shift the
642: peak position by 30 MeV towards the higher value of $E_p-E_{p^\prime}$.
643: The
644: final state interactions due to $\pi^+\pi^-$ together shift the peak
645: position to $ E_p-E_{p^\prime} = 2.07 $ GeV, leaving the magnitude of the
646: peak cross section [$\sim 2.38$ mb/(GeV$^2$sr$^3$)] almost unaffected
647: (dotted line).
648: Therefore, the overall final state interactions reduce the cross section
649: by a factor about 2.95 at the peak, and they shift the peak position by 30
650: MeV towards the higher side in the $E_p-E_{p^\prime}$ distribution spectrum.
651: The initial and final state interactions together, as shown in this figure,
652: bring down the plane wave cross section by a factor $\sim 10.7$ at the peak,
653: and they also shift the peak position by 50 MeV towards the higher value in
654: the $E_p-E_{p^\prime}$ distribution spectrum.
655: The $\rho^0$ nucleus interaction (which appears in the rho meson propagator)
656: is found not much sensitive to the cross section. It attenuates the peak
657: cross section only by about $8.8\%$, i.e., from 2.38 mb/(GeV$^2$sr$^3$) to
658: 2.17 mb/(GeV$^2$sr$^3$), and it shifts the peak position by 10 MeV to
659: $ E_p-E_{p^\prime} = 2.08 $ GeV (solid line).
660:
661:
662: The initial and final state interactions could be very intensive for those
663: nuclear reactions, which involve heavier nuclei. To illustrate it,
664: the calculated plane and distorted wave results for the Pb nucleus are
665: presented in Fig.~6.
666: As exhibited in this figure, the plane wave results (which also
667: incorporates the free $\rho^0$ propagator) show oscillations in the energy
668: transfer $E_p-E_{p^\prime}$ spectrum (dash-dot-dot line). It arises due to
669: the oscillatory nature of the form factor for the Pb nucleus.
670: The
671: initial state interaction reduces this oscillation drastically, showing a
672: prominent peak at 2.01 GeV in the energy transfer $E_p-E_{p^\prime}$
673: spectrum (dash-dot line). The cross section at this peak is about 0.74
674: (mb/GeV$^2$sr$^3$). Therefore, the initial state interaction alone brings
675: down the cross section at the main peak by a factor about 179, and it shifts
676: the peak position by 50 MeV towards the lower value of $E_p-E_{p^\prime}$.
677: The
678: incorporation of $p^\prime$ distortion reduces the peak cross section
679: further to 0.35 mb/(GeV$^2$sr$^3$), at $E_p-E_{p^\prime}$ equal to 2.07 GeV
680: (dashed line). Therefore, the projectile and ejectile (i.e., $p$ and
681: $p^\prime$) distortions together attenuate the cross section at the main
682: peak by a factor about 379, and it shifts the peak position by 10 MeV only
683: towards the higher side in the $E_p-E_{p^\prime}$ distribution spectrum.
684: The
685: final state interactions due to $\pi^+\pi^-$ together flatten the peak
686: considerably, and they further reduce the peak cross section to $\sim 0.25$
687: mb/(GeV$^2$sr$^3$) (dotted line). Therefore, the final state interactions
688: altogether bring down the cross section by a factor about 3.
689: In
690: this case, the $\rho$ nucleus interaction reduces the cross section $12\%$,
691: i.e., from 0.25 mb/(GeV$^2$sr$^3$) to 0.22 mb/(GeV$^2$sr$^3$), leaving the
692: shape for the spectrum unchanged (solid line).
693:
694:
695:
696: \section {Conclusion}
697: \label {cncl}
698: ~~~~
699: This study shows that the cross section for the $\pi^+\pi^-$ emission from
700: the forward going coherent $\rho^0$ meson, produced in the $(p,p^\prime)$
701: reaction, reaches its maximum value for a certain direction of the pion
702: emission. The cross section strongly depends on the beam energy.
703: The probability for the rho meson decaying inside the nucleus is less for
704: lighter nucleus. It increases with the size of the nucleus. However, the
705: interference between the inside and outside decay amplitudes for the rho
706: meson is very important in evaluating the cross section. The initial and
707: final state interactions significantly dampen the plane wave cross section,
708: which is drastic for the heavier nucleus.
709:
710:
711:
712: \section {Acknowledgement}
713: \label {ackn}
714: ~~~~
715: I gratefully acknowledge Dr. A.K. Mohanty for his encouragement.
716:
717:
718:
719: \begin{thebibliography}{100}
720:
721: \bibitem{dilpex}
722: A. Drees, Nucl. Phys. {\bf A610}, 536c (1996);
723: CERES Collaboration, Th. Ullrich, Nucl. Phys. {\bf A610}, 317c (1996);
724: HELIOS-3 Collaboration, M. Masera, Nucl. Phys. {\bf A590}, 93c (1995);
725: NA50 Collaboration, E. Scomparin, Nucl. Phys. {\bf A610}, 331c (1996).
726:
727: \bibitem{dfms}
728: G.Q. Li, C.M. Ko and G.E. Brown, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 75}, 4007 (1995);
729: G.Q. Li, C.M. Ko, G.E. Brown and H. Sorge, Nucl. Phys. {\bf A611},
730: 539 (1996);
731: W. Cassing, W. Ehehalt and C.M. Ko, Phys. Lett. {\bf B363}, 35 (1995);
732: W. Cassing, W. Ehehalt and I. Kralik, Phys. Lett. {\bf B377}, 5 (1996).
733:
734: \bibitem{mbcl}
735: G. Chanfray, R. Rapp and J. Wambach, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 76}, 368 (1996);
736: R. Rapp, G. Chanfray and J. Wambach, Nucl. Phys. {\bf A617}, 472 (1997);
737: W. Cassing, E.L. Bratkovskaya, R. Rapp and J. Wambach,
738: Phys. Rev. C {\bf 57}, 916 (1998);
739: R. Rapp and J. Wambach, Eur. Phys. J. {\bf A6}, 415 (1999).
740:
741: \bibitem{rhic}
742: J. Adams et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 92}, 092301 (2004).
743:
744: \bibitem{br}
745: G.E. Brown and M. Rho, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 66}, 2720 (1991).
746:
747: \bibitem{hat}
748: T. Hatsuda and S.H. Lee, Phys. Rev. C {\bf 46}, R34 (1992).
749:
750: \bibitem{asa}
751: M. Asakawa, C.M. Ko, P. L\'{e}vai and X.J. Qiu,
752: Phys. Rev. C {\bf 46}, R1159 (1992);
753: M. Asakawa and C.M. Ko, Phys. Rev. C {\bf 48}, R526 (1993);
754: Nucl. Phys. {\bf A560}, 399 (1993).
755:
756: \bibitem{sai}
757: K. Saito, K. Tsushima and A.W. Thomas,
758: Phys. Rev. C {\bf 55}, 2637 (1997); {\bf 56}, 566 (1997).
759:
760: \bibitem{fpr}
761: B. Friman, Nucl. Phys. {\bf A610}, 358c (1996);
762: B. Friman and H.J. Pirner, Nucl. Phys. {\bf A617}, 496 (1997).
763:
764: \bibitem{ptr}
765: W. Peters, M. Post, H. Lenske, S. Leupold and U. Mosel,
766: Nucl. Phys. {\bf A632}, 109 (1998);
767: M. Post, S. Leupold and U. Mosel, Nucl. Phys. {\bf A689}, 753 (2001).
768:
769: \bibitem{her}
770: M. Herrmann, B.L. Friman and W. N$\ddot{\mbox{o}}$renberg,
771: Z. Phys. {\bf A343}, 119 (1992); Nucl. Phys. {\bf A560}, 411 (1993).
772:
773: \bibitem{redv}
774: C.M. Ko, V. Koch and G. Li, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. {\bf 47},
775: 505 (1997);
776: W. Cassing and E.L. Bratkovskaya, Phys. Rep. {\bf 308}, 65 (1999);
777: R. Rapp and J. Wambach, Adv. Nucl. Phys. {\bf 25}, 1 (2000).
778:
779: \bibitem{tjn}
780: ``Nuclear mass dependence of vector meson using the photoproduction
781: of lepton pairs'', CEBAF proposal PR 89-001, Spokesperson: D. Heddle and
782: B.M. Preedom (unpublished);
783: ``Photoproduction of vector meson off nuclei'', CEBAF Proposal PR
784: 94-002, Spokesmen: P.Y. Bertin, M. Kossov and B.M. Preedom
785: (unpublished).
786:
787: \bibitem{ins}
788: ``Current Experiments in Elementary Particle Physics'',
789: Report Nos. INS-ES-134
790: and INS-ES-144, Report No. LBL-91 revised, UC-414, 1994 p.108
791: (unpublished);
792: K. Maruyama, Proceedings of the 25th International Symposium on
793: Nuclear and Particle Physics with High Intensity Proton Accelerators
794: (World Scientific, Singapore, 1998; Nucl. Phys. {\bf A629}, 351c (1998).
795:
796: \bibitem{elsa}
797: CBELSA/TAPS Collaboration, D. Trnka et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 94},
798: 192303 (2005).
799:
800: \bibitem{epem}
801: R. Muto et al., J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. {\bf 30}, S1023 (2004).
802:
803: \bibitem{phi}
804: H. En'yo et al., KEK Experiment E325; S. Yokkaichi et al., KEK-PS
805: E325 Collaboration, Nucl. Phys. {\bf A638}, 435c (1998).
806:
807: \bibitem{hade}
808: HADE Collaboration, W. Koenig, in Proceedings of the Workshop on
809: Dilepton Production in Relativistic Heavy Ion Collisions, edited
810: by H. Bokemeyer (GSI, Darmstadt, 1994), p.225;
811: HADE Proposal, R. Schicker et al., Nucl. Instr. Meth. {\bf A380},
812: 586 (1996); J. Friese, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. {\bf 42}, 235 (1999).
813:
814: \bibitem{sprn}
815: M. Fujiwara, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. {\bf 50}, 487 (2003).
816:
817: \bibitem{elio}
818: V.L. Eletsky and B.L. Ioffe, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 78}, 1010 (1997);
819: V.L. Eletsky, B.L. Ioffe and J.I. Kapusta, Eur. Phys. J. {\bf A3},
820: 381 (1998).
821:
822: \bibitem{kscge}
823: L.A. Kondratyuk, A. Sibirtsev, W. Cassing, Ye.S. Golubeva and
824: M. Effenberger, Phys. Rev. C {\bf 58}, 1078 (1998).
825:
826: \bibitem{effn1}
827: M. Effenberger, E.L. Bratkovskaya, and U. Mosel,
828: Phys. Rev. C {\bf 60}, 044614 (1999).
829:
830: \bibitem{effn2}
831: Th. Weidmann, E.L. Bratkovskaya, W. Cassing and U. Mosel,
832: Phys. Rev. C {\bf 59}, 919 (1999);
833: M. Effenberger, E.L. Bratkovskaya, W. Cassing and U. Mosel,
834: Phys. Rev. C {\bf 60}, 027601 (1999).
835:
836: \bibitem{inc}
837: Ye.S. Golubeva, L.A. Kondratyuk and W. Cassing,
838: Nucl. Phys. A {\bf 625}, 832 (1997).
839:
840: \bibitem{phim}
841: D. Cabrera and M.J. Vicente Vacas, Phys. Rev. C {\bf 67}, 045203 (2003);
842: D. Cabrera, L. Roca, E. Oset, H. Toki and M.J. Vicente Vacas,
843: Nucl. Phys. A {\bf 733}, 130 (2004);
844: V.K. Magas, L. Roca and E. Oset, nucl-th/0403067.
845:
846: \bibitem{erwe}
847: T. Ericson and W. Weise, Pions and Nuclei (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1988).
848:
849: \bibitem{pid}
850: E. Oset, H. Toki and W. Weise, Phys. Rep. {\bf 83}, 281 (1982);
851: C. Gaarde, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. {\bf 41}, 187 (1991).
852:
853: \bibitem{empi}
854: I. Laktineh, W.M. Alberico, J. Delorme and M. Ericson,
855: Nucl. Phys. {\bf A555}, 237 (1993);
856: R.C. Carrasco, J. Nieves and E. Oset, Nucl. Phys. {\bf A565}, 797 (1993);
857: B. Krusche et al., Phys. Lett. {\bf B526}, 287 (2002);
858: D. Drechel, L. Tiator, S.S. Kamalov and S.N. Yang,
859: Nucl. Phys. {\bf A660}, 423 (1999);
860: R.J. Loucks and V.R. Pandharipande, Phys. Rev. C {\bf 54}, 32 (1996);
861: M.J.M. van Sambeek et al., Nucl. Phys. {\bf A631}, 545c (1998).
862:
863: \bibitem{cpiex}
864: J. Chiba et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 67}, 1982 (1991);
865: T. Hennino et al., Phys. Lett. {\bf B303}, 236 (1993).
866:
867: \bibitem{cpith}
868: V.F. Dmitriev, Phys. Rev. C {\bf 48}, 357 (1993);
869: P. Oltmanns, F. Osterfeld and T. Udagawa,
870: Phys. Lett. {\bf B299}, 194 (1993);
871: F. Osterfeld, B. K$\ddot{\mbox{o}}$rfgen, P. Oltmanns and T. Udagawa,
872: Phys. Scr. {\bf 48}, 95 (1993);
873: T. Udagawa, P. Oltmanns, F. Osterfeld and S.W. Hong,
874: Phys. Rev. C {\bf 49}, 3162 (1994);
875: B. K$\ddot{\mbox{o}}$rfgen, F. Osterfeld and T. Udagawa,
876: Phys. Rev. C {\bf 50}, 1637 (1994);
877: P.F. de C$\acute{\mbox{o}}$rdoba, J. Nieves, E. Oset and M.J.
878: Vicente-Vacas, Phys. Lett. {\bf B319}, 416 (1993);
879: E. Oset, P.F. de C$\acute{\mbox{o}}$rdoba, J. Nieves and M.J.
880: Vicente-Vacas, Phys. Scr. {\bf 48}, 101 (1993);
881: P.F. de C$\acute{\mbox{o}}$rdoba, E. Oset and M.J.
882: Vicente-Vacas, Nucl. Phys. {\bf A592}, 472 (1995).
883:
884:
885:
886: \bibitem{mach}
887: R. Machleidt, Adv. Nucl. Phys. {\bf 19}, 189 (1989).
888:
889: \bibitem{rkb}
890: R.K. Bhaduri, Models of the Nucleon (Addison-Wesley Publishing Company,
891: Inc., 1988).
892:
893: \bibitem{crp}
894: Swapan Das, Phys. Rev. C {\bf 70}, 034604 (2004);
895: B.K. Jain and Bijoy Kundu, Phys. Rev. C {\bf 53}, 1917 (1996).
896:
897: \bibitem{at}
898: H.De. Vries and C.W. De Jager, Atomic data and Nuclear data tables
899: {\bf 14}, 479 (1974).
900:
901: \bibitem{scpn}
902: D.V. Bugg et al., Phys. Rev. C {\bf 146}, 980 (1966);
903: S. Barshay et al., Phys. Rev. C {\bf 11}, 360 (1975);
904: W. Grein, Nucl. Phys. B {\bf 131}, 255 (1977);
905: C. Lechanoine-LeLue, Rev. Mod. Phys. {\bf 65}, 47 (1993).
906:
907: \bibitem{pdg}
908: Particle Data Group, Phys. Rev. C {\bf 54}, 192-195 (1996).
909:
910: \bibitem{said}
911: R.A. Arndt et al., SAID Programme (URL: http://gwdac.phys.gwu.edu).
912:
913: \bibitem{lwf}
914: M.F.M. Lutz, Gy. Wolf and B. Friman, Nucl. Phys. A {\bf 706}, 431 (2002).
915:
916:
917: \end{thebibliography}
918:
919:
920:
921: {\bf Figure Captions}
922: \begin{enumerate}
923:
924: \item
925: The sensitivity of the energy transfer $E_p-E_{p^\prime}$ distribution
926: spectrum on the pion emission angle is shown in this figure. The peak cross
927: section is maximum for the $\pi^+$ emission angle taken equal to $25^0$. The
928: peak position gets shifted towards the lower value of $E_p-E_{p^\prime}$
929: with the increase in the pion emission angle.
930:
931: \item
932: The dependence of the energy transfer $E_p-E_{p^\prime}$ distribution
933: spectrum on the beam energy is presented here. With the increase in the beam
934: energy, the cross section increases and the peak position moves towards the
935: higher value of $E_p-E_{p^\prime}$. The $\pi^+$ emission angle is taken fixed
936: at $25^0$ (see text).
937:
938: \item
939: The cross sections for the rho meson decaying inside and outside the nucleus
940: are compared for $^{12}$C nucleus at 3.5 GeV beam energy. The outside decay
941: cross section superceds for this nucleus. The interference between the
942: inside and outside decay amplitudes enhances the cross section. Various
943: lines are explained in the text.
944:
945: \item
946: The inside and outside decay cross sections are shown for the rho meson
947: propagating through the $^{208}$Pb nucleus. The inside decay cross section
948: is substantially increased for the heavier nucleus. In this case, the
949: interference due to the $\rho^0$ inside and outside decay amplitudes is more
950: stronger than that for the $^{12}$C nucleus.
951:
952: \item
953: The effect of the initial and final state interactions on the cross section,
954: for the $(p,p^\prime[\pi^+\pi^-])$ reaction on the $^{12}$C nucleus, is
955: illustrated here. The beam energy is taken equal to 3.5 GeV. The nuclear
956: effect on the $\rho$ propagation is also presented. Various lines have been
957: described in the text.
958:
959: \item
960: The initial and final state interactions arising due to $^{208}$Pb nucleus
961: are exhibited in this figure. Compare to $^{12}$C nucleus, these interactions
962: are more intense for the Pb nucleus. Various lines are defined in the text.
963:
964:
965: \end{enumerate}
966:
967:
968: \end{document}
969:
970: %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
971:
972:
973: