1: \documentclass[amsmath,amssymb,floatfix]{revtex4}

2: \input epsf

3: \topmargin=-.2in

4: \pagestyle{headings}

5: \newcommand {\cen}[1]{\begin{center} #1 \end{center}}

6: \newcommand {\eq}{\begin{equation}}

7: \newcommand {\qe}{\end{equation}}

8: \newcommand {\p}{^{\prime}}

9: \newcommand {\bfk} {{\bf k}}

10: \newcommand {\bfq} {{\bf q}}

11: \newcommand {\bfr} {{\bf r}}

12: \newcommand {\bfp} {{\bf p}}

13: \newcommand {\bfv} {{\bf v}}

14: \newcommand {\bfa} {{\bf a}}

15: \newcommand {\bfb} {{\bf b}}

16: \newcommand {\bfc} {{\bf c}}

17: \newcommand {\bft} {{\bf t}}

18: \newcommand {\bfm} {{\bf m}}

19: \newcommand {\bfn} {{\bf n}}

20: \newcommand {\bfl} {{\bf l}}

21: \newcommand {\bfH} {{\bf H}}

22: \newcommand {\bfK} {{\bf K}}

23: \newcommand {\bfA} {{\bf A}}

24: \newcommand {\bfB} {{\bf B}}

25: \newcommand {\h}{\frac{1}{2}}

26: \newcommand {\calf} {{\cal F}}

27: \newcommand {\calM} {{\cal M}}

28: \newcommand {\calK} {K(w,t)}

29: \newcommand {\bfs}{\mbox {\boldmath $\sigma$}}

30: \newcommand {\bfg}{\mbox {\boldmath $\gamma$}}

31: \newcommand {\caft}{ $^{42}$Ca }

32: \newcommand {\caff}{ $^{44}$Ca }

33: \newcommand {\cafe}{ $^{48}$Ca }

34: \newcommand {\cft}{ $^{14}$C }

35: \newcommand {\pip}{$\pi^+$}

36: \newcommand {\pim}{$\pi^-$}

37: \newcommand {\ea} {{\it et al.}}

38: \newcommand {\slq}{\slash{\!\!\!q}}

39: \newcommand {\slp}{\slash{\!\!\!p}}

40: \newcommand {\slk}{\slash{\!\!\!k}}

41: \newcommand {\qt}{\widetilde{q}}

42: \newcommand {\kt}{\widetilde{k}}

43: \newcommand {\qb}{w}

44: \newcommand {\qm}{q_{max}}

45: \newcommand {\qmm}{q_0^{max}}

46: \newcommand {\srt}{\sqrt{2}}

47: \newcommand {\pr}{Phys. Rev. }

48: \newcommand {\nucp}{Nucl. Phys.}

49: \def\ecart{\noalign{\medskip}}

50: \def\gras#1{\mbox{\boldmath $#1$}}

51: \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-0.5in}

52: \textwidth=180mm

53: \textheight=220mm

54: \footskip=12ex

55: \usepackage{epsfig}

56: \begin{document}

57: \hspace{5.5in}{\Large LPNHE 2006-04}  \\

58: \cen{\large \bf

59:      Two-Pion Exchange in Proton-Proton Scattering}

60: 

61: \vspace{.5in}

62: 

63: \cen{\bf \large  W. R. Gibbs}

64: 

65: \cen{New Mexico State University, Las Cruces NM 88003}

66: 

67: \cen{and}

68: 

69: \cen{\bf \large B. Loiseau}

70: \cen{LPNHE-Laboratoire de Physique Nucl\'eaire et de Hautes 

71: \'Energies, Groupe Th\'eorie,\\  

72: IN2P3-CNRS, Universit\'es P. \& M. Curie et Denis Diderot,

73:  4 Pl. Jussieu, 75252 Paris, France}

74: 

75: 

76: 

77: The contribution of the box and crossed two-pion-exchange diagrams to

78: proton-proton scattering at 90$^{\circ}_{c.m.}$ is calculated in the

79: laboratory momentum range up to 12 GeV/c. Relativistic form factors

80: related to the nucleon and pion size and representing the pion source

81: distribution based on the quark structure of the hadronic core are

82: included at each vertex of the pion-nucleon interaction. These form

83: factors depend on the four-momenta of the exchanged pions and scattering

84: nucleons. Feynman-diagram amplitudes calculated without form factors are

85: checked against those derived from dispersion relations. In this

86: comparison, one notices that a very short-range part of the crossed

87: diagram, neglected in dispersion-relation calculations of the

88: two-pion-exchange nucleon-nucleon potential, gives a sizable

89: contribution. In the Feynman-diagram calculation with form factors the

90: agreement with measured spin-separated cross sections, as well as

91: amplitudes in the lower part of the energy range considered, is much

92: better for pion-nucleon pseudo-vector vis \`a vis pseudo-scalar

93: coupling.  While strengths of the box and crossed diagrams are

94: comparable for laboratory momenta below 2 GeV/c, the crossed diagram

95: dominates for larger momenta, largely due to the kinematics of the

96: crossed diagram allowing a smaller momentum transfer in the nucleon

97: center of mass. An important contribution arises from the

98: principal-value part of the integrals which is non-zero when form

99: factors are included. It seems that the importance of the exchange of

100: color singlets may extend higher in energy than expected.

101: 

102: 

103: 

104: \newpage

105: 

106: \section{Introduction}

107: 

108: The nucleon-nucleon interaction at intermediate energy (up to 12 GeV/c

109: laboratory momentum, P$_{Lab}$) has been the focus of a number of

110: experimental \cite{lin,bhatia,crosbie,court,crabb,fallon,

111: akerlof,kammerud, abe} and theoretical \cite{brod1,farrar,

112: sivers1,sivers2} studies. The momentum dependence of the spin transfer

113: shows a very interesting behavior. The spin correlation observable, 

114: $C_{NN}$, for proton-proton scattering at $90^{\circ}_{c.m.}$, has values

115: near unity at low energies, decreases to a constant value of around 0.07

116: from 4 GeV/c to 8 GeV/c and then increases to values around 0.5.

117: 

118: While one-pion exchange has been shown to be a very important contributor

119: to the NN interaction at low energies \cite{rosa,fg,ballot} and at higher

120: energies at small momentum transfer \cite{gl}, it alone predicts a

121: constant value of 1/3 for $C_{NN}$. Not only is this value in disagreement

122: with the data, but it is not expected that single pion exchange will still

123: be important at this higher momentum transfer (see Fig. \ref{b2ope} and

124: comments below).

125: 

126: Brodsky \cite{brod1} and Farrar \cite{farrar} have shown that the simple

127: quark-exchange mechanism also gives 1/3 for $C_{NN}$. No calculations of

128: absolute cross sections with quark-exchange models exist to our knowledge,

129: although predictions do exist \cite{bf} for the energy dependence of the

130: cross section. These predictions for the slope are in quite good

131: agreement, not only with proton-proton scattering, but with other

132: scattering processes at high energies.

133: 

134: While it is natural to think that this behavior could be an indicator of

135: the nature of the elastic scattering process, this idea of the

136: identification of a mechanism has languished for many years for lack of

137: candidate theories.  We present here the calculation of the contribution

138: of two-pion exchange in this energy region.  We find that this mechanism

139: predicts the right size for the cross section, hence provides a candidate

140: theory for the dominant mechanism in this intermediate energy region.

141: 

142: The interest in two-pion exchange as a contributor to the nucleon-nucleon

143: interaction is very old, beginning just after the discovery of the pion

144: \cite{tns,tmo,bw,so,mach}. The seminal work of Partovi and Lomon

145: \cite{partovi} was one of the first to create a viable potential based on

146: this idea.  Since these works were aimed at obtaining the

147: two-pion-exchange contribution to the NN potential, non-relativistic

148: approximations were made.

149: 

150: The Paris potential group \cite{Cottingham73,Lacombe81,

151: Richard75} has worked extensively with this contribution within a

152: dispersion relation approach.  Again, the interest was primarily

153: to obtain a non-relativistic potential for the nucleon-nucleon

154: interaction.

155: 

156: Studies of the relation of chiral symmetry to the two-pion-exchange potential have 

157: been made recently \cite{friarcoon,

158: robilotta} which led to more recent studies by Rentmester et al.

159: \cite{rent} on the long range part of the two-pion-exchange

160: potential. Ref. \cite{rent} concludes that

161: there is strong evidence for the existence and importance of

162: two-pion exchange.

163: 

164: Seeing this significant body of study at low energy, it is

165: natural to ask about the two-pion interaction at higher energies.  

166: We will investigate its role by calculating the lowest order

167: Feynman graphs \cite{feynman} for this process in the range P$_{Lab}$

168: from 0 to 12 GeV/c.

169: 

170: \begin{figure}[htb]

171: \epsfig{file=b2ope.ps,angle=90,height=3.in}

172: \caption{Values of $2|b|^2$ (see Ref. \cite{Bystricky78} and

173: appendix A)  at $90^{\circ}_{c.m.}$, extracted as discussed in the

174: text, compared with one-pion exchange and an estimated unitary

175: limit. The dash-dot curve gives the energy dependence

176: predicted by Brodsky and Farrar \cite{bf} normalized at 6

177: GeV/c.}

178: \label{b2ope}

179: \end{figure}

180: 

181: Before beginning the calculations, some discussion is needed as to the 

182: general approach. A common methodology has been to proceed by ranges 

183: \cite{tns,tmo}. In this point of view one says that the one- and 

184: two-pion exchange are valid (and give essentially all of the 

185: potential) beyond a certain inter-nucleon separation. In order to 

186: confront the data it is then necessary to construct the potential at 

187: shorter ranges, perhaps with phenomenology as in Ref. \cite{Lacombe81}.

188:  We take the point of view that the pion exchanges are between quarks and hence

189: (to some approximation) the interaction calculated remains valid even at short

190: distances. There is no reason {\it a priori} to exclude pion exchange at short

191: distances provided that the distribution of quarks within the nucleon is

192: properly taken into account. Even when the relative coordinate between the {\it

193: centers} is zero the range of the exchange between the quarks will be of the

194: order of the size of the nucleon. In fact, there are a number of studies

195: \cite{qpiq} of baryon spectra based on the exchange of mesons between quarks

196: within the interior of a single nucleon.

197: 

198: Of course, we do not expect that one- and two-pion exchanges represent 

199: the entire interaction, other contributions are certainly present. We 

200: calculate the two-pion contribution with a view to examining to what 

201: extent the scattering properties can be explained with this mechanism 

202: alone.

203: 

204: Since a common view is that nucleons and pions have an intrinsic

205: finite size, the present approach includes the form

206: factor resulting from this distribution in the Feynman integrals.

207: There is a long history of treating form factors of complex systems

208: in nuclear physics.  It is often regarded as the amplitude for

209: the probability of being able to transfer the three-momentum represented

210: by its argument to the object while leaving it intact, 

211: hence is related to the probability of an {\it elastic} scattering or 

212: absorption.

213:   

214: The inclusion of such a form factor is not simple, however. The full

215: Feynman integrals are in four dimensions, requiring a form factor with a

216: dependence on all 4 variables. Many form factors deal only with

217: three-momentum, although the problem of adding a fourth variable has been

218: addressed by a number of groups (see section \ref{form} for a discussion).  

219: We approach the problem of the form factor from the point of view of

220: invariants and analyticity with guidance from the argument that the

221: function should represent a boost into the center of mass frame of the

222: nucleon in the on-shell limit.  We will argue that a selection can be made

223: on this dependence according to the view of the physical origin of the

224: size of the system, i.e. if it arises from the interaction with virtual

225: mesons (or more generally the sea) or with the ``permanent'' quark core

226: constituents. We assume here that the pion exchanges take place between

227: quarks contained within the core of the nucleon.

228: 

229: We will treat the cases of both pure pseudo-scalar (PS) and pure

230: pseudo-vector (PV) coupling even though some authors have found evidence

231: for a mixture of the couplings \cite{mix1,mix2,kon}. Some of the integrals

232: involved in the PV calculation are divergent and, while the PS integrals

233: converge, the resulting cross sections are orders of magnitude too large at

234: the higher energies if no form factor is included.  The introduction of

235: form factors solves divergence problems which arise in the calculation but,

236: more importantly, it takes into account the confinement core of the nucleon

237: explicitly introducing an interaction range of this size.

238:  

239: To represent the proton-proton amplitude, we use the Saclay

240: \cite{Bystricky78} decomposition into components called $a$, $b$, $c$, $d$

241: and $e$.  These independent amplitudes have individual characteristics

242: similar to common non-relativistic representations (see appendix A in Ref.  

243: \cite{gl}) and hence provide a natural extension of our familiar concepts

244: of the spin dependence of the amplitude at low energy. At $90^{\circ}$

245: center of mass scattering angle, some simplification occurs since $a\equiv

246: 0$ and $b\equiv -c$ so that only 3 independent amplitudes are needed.

247: 

248: For data comparison we combine the values of $C_{NN}$

249: \cite{lin,bhatia,crosbie} with the measured cross sections at $90^{\circ}$

250: \cite{akerlof,kammerud, abe} to obtain the value of the absolute square of

251: the Saclay $b$ amplitude and the sum of the absolute squares of the $d$

252: and $e$ amplitudes (see Appendix A).  These experimental measurements will

253: constitute the primary data with which we will compare.  Figure

254: \ref{b2ope} shows the values of $2|b|^2$ compared with a calculation of

255: the corresponding values from one-pion exchange with a dipole form factor

256: with a range of $\Lambda=1.4$ GeV/c (see Section \ref{form} for a

257: discussion of this quantity).  The one-pion-exchange mechanism is clearly

258: important below 1 GeV/c but the predicted cross section decreases rapidly

259: above that.

260: 

261: There are other problems with the comparison with data of a simple 

262: perturbative calculation of the type that we make here.  The results 

263: will not, in general, be unitary.  At low energies it is not 

264: reasonable to compare with data without a unitary theory, which is 

265: the reason that a potential is normally calculated and followed by a 

266: solution of the Schr\"{o}dinger equation or a relativistic 

267: generalization.  We have made an estimate of what might be expected 

268: for a maximum cross section at 90$^{\circ}$ based on unitarity by 

269: setting each partial-wave S-matrix element to --1 and performing the 

270: partial-wave sum up to $k_{c.m.}R$ where $R$ was taken as 1 fm. From 

271: this estimate we see that above about 1.5 GeV/c the experimental 

272: cross section is sufficiently below this limit that unitarity can be 

273: expected to play a minor role. The introduction of a form factor also 

274: leads to questions about causality \cite{bjd,polyzou,nussenzveig} 

275: which we discuss in section \ref{form}.

276: 

277: Section II gives the general method of calculation with the introduction of

278: the pseudo-scalar and pseudo-vector operators for the box and crossed

279: kinematics. Section III develops the method for the numerical treatment of

280: the singularities of the propagators. Section IV introduces the form

281: factors used and discuses their physical basis. Section V presents the

282: dispersion relation calculation.  Section VI gives the basic results of the

283: study while section VII gives a summary of the work and states some

284: conclusions. Appendix A gives the projection of the spin-dependent

285: amplitudes onto the Saclay amplitudes, appendix B outlines the general

286: method used to treat the singularities numerically and appendix C gives an

287: interpretation of the variable used in the form factor in terms of a

288: four-dimensional cross product.

289: 

290: \section{Method of Calculation}

291: 

292: The differential cross section in the center of mass (c.m.) is written in

293: terms of the matrix element, $\calM$, as

294: 

295: \eq

296: \sigma(\theta)=\left(\frac{m^2}{4\pi E}\right)^2|\calM|^2.

297: \qe

298: Here $E$ is the energy of one proton in the c.m. and $m$ is

299: the proton mass. Spin sums are implicit. Since we consider

300: both the box and crossed diagrams, $\calM$ will be the sum of the

301: two. We will study only the cases of pure pseudo-scalar or

302: pure pseudo-vector coupling.

303: 

304: \subsection{Pseudo-scalar Coupling}

305: 

306: \subsubsection{Box Diagram}

307: 

308: We may write the Feynman diagram for the matrix element with

309: the box kinematics (see Fig.~ \ref{boite}) as

310: 

311: $$ \calM_{PS}\delta(k_1+k_2-k'_1-k'_2)=$$

312: $$

313: \frac{g^4}{(2\pi)^4}\int \frac{dq dq' dp dp' 

314: \left[\bar{u}(k'_1)\gamma_5(\slash{\!\!\!p}+m)\gamma_5

315: u(k_1)\right]_1\left[\bar{u}(k'_2)\gamma_5(\slash{\!\!\!p'}+m)\gamma_5

316: u(k_2)\right]_2}

317: {(p^2-m^2+i\epsilon)(p'^2-m^2+i\epsilon)(q^2-\mu^2+i\epsilon)

318: (q'^2-\mu^2+i\epsilon)}\calf(k_1,k_2,k_1',k_2'q,q')$$

319: \eq \times \delta (q-p+k_1) \delta (q'-p+k'_1)

320: \delta (-q-p'+k_2) \delta (-q'-p'+k'_2).\label{def}

321: \qe

322: Here $g$ is the pseudo-scalar coupling constant with the normalization 

323: $\frac{g^2}{4\pi}= 13.75$ and $\calf(k_1,k_2,k_1',k_2',q,q')$ is the 

324: form factor derived from the intrinsic size of the interacting system.  

325: Since $\calf$ is assumed to have no spin dependence and has no poles 

326: on the real axes, it plays no direct role in the treatment of 

327: singularities or spin reduction. We suppress the arguments of $\calf$ 

328: in the equations for the remainder of this section and for the next 

329: section.

330: Using the first and third delta function to eliminate the integral

331: over $p$ and $p'$ and the (one dimensional) relationship

332: $ \delta(x)\delta(y)=2\delta(x+y)\delta(x-y) $,

333: the remaining two delta functions can be written as

334: $$ 2^4\delta(k_1+k_2-k'_1-k'_2)\delta(2q-2q'+k_1-k_2+k'_2-k'_1). $$

335: The first delta function factors out of the integral and cancels

336: the one on the left-hand-side of Eq. (\ref{def}).

337: 

338: \begin{figure}

339: \hspace*{.8in}

340: \begin{picture}(500,180)

341: \put(5,170){$k_1=(E,\bfk)$}

342: \put(275,170){$k_1'=(E,\bfk')$}

343: \put(120,170){$p=(E+q_0,\bfk+\bfq)$}

344: \put(3,30){$k_2=(E,-\bfk)$}

345: \put(275,30){$k_2'=(E,-\bfk')$}

346: \put(110,30){$p'=(E-q_0,-\bfk-\bfq)$}

347: \put(30,110){$q=(q_0,\bfq)$}

348: \put(265,110){$q'=(q_0,\bfk-\bfk'+\bfq)$}

349: \put(5,160){\line(1,0){380}}

350: \put(5,161){\line(1,0){380}}

351: \put(5,50){\line(1,0){380}}

352: \put(5,49){\line(1,0){380}}

353: % first pion

354: \put(100,50){\line(0,1){10}}

355: \put(100,70){\line(0,1){10}}

356: \put(100,90){\line(0,1){10}}

357: \put(100,110){\line(0,1){10}}

358: \put(100,130){\line(0,1){10}}

359: \put(100,150){\line(0,1){10}}

360: % first arrow up

361: %\put(95,128){\line(1,2){5}}

362: \put(95,129){\line(1,2){5}}

363: \put(95,130){\line(1,2){5}}

364: %\put(105,129){\line(-1,2){5}}

365: \put(105,130){\line(-1,2){5}}

366: \put(105,131){\line(-1,2){5}}

367: % second arrow up

368: %\put(95,68){\line(1,2){5}}

369: \put(95,69){\line(1,2){5}}

370: \put(95,70){\line(1,2){5}}

371: %\put(105,69){\line(-1,2){5}}

372: \put(105,70){\line(-1,2){5}}

373: \put(105,71){\line(-1,2){5}}

374: % second pion

375: \put(260,50){\line(0,1){10}}

376: \put(260,70){\line(0,1){10}}

377: \put(260,90){\line(0,1){10}}

378: \put(260,110){\line(0,1){10}}

379: \put(260,130){\line(0,1){10}}

380: \put(260,150){\line(0,1){10}}

381: % first arrow down

382: %\put(255,78){\line(1,-2){5}}

383: \put(255,77){\line(1,-2){5}}

384: \put(255,76){\line(1,-2){5}}

385: \put(260,66){\line(1,2){5}}

386: \put(260,67){\line(1,2){5}}

387: %\put(260,68){\line(1,2){5}}

388: % second arrow down

389: %\put(255,138){\line(1,-2){5}}

390: \put(255,137){\line(1,-2){5}}

391: \put(255,136){\line(1,-2){5}}

392: \put(260,126){\line(1,2){5}}

393: \put(260,127){\line(1,2){5}}

394: %\put(260,128){\line(1,2){5}}

395: \end{picture}

396: \caption{Kinematics for the box diagram. Note that in our

397: calculation, starting from Eq. \protect{(\ref{def})} form factors are used

398: at each vertex 

399: even though we have not indicated their presence here. }\label{boite}

400: \end{figure}

401: We work in the center-of-mass system where

402: \eq 

403: \bfk_1=-\bfk_2\equiv\bfk,\ \ E_1=E_2,\ \ \bfk'_1=-\bfk'_2\equiv\bfk'

404: ,\ \ E'_1=E'_2, 

405: \qe

406: since the external lines are on shell and

407: \eq E_1=E'_2\equiv E \qe

408: by the conservation of energy.  With these relations, the remaining

409: delta function under the integral sign becomes

410: $$ 2^4\delta(2q-2q'+2k-2k')=\delta(q-q'+k-k'). $$

411: For the box, (see Fig. \ref{boite}), we have 

412: \eq

413: \bfp=\bfk+\bfq=\bfk'+\bfq',\ \ \ \bfp'=-\bfk-\bfq=-\bfk'-\bfq',\ \ \ 

414: \bfp'=-\bfp,

415: \qe

416: and

417: \eq 

418: q_0=q'_0;\ \  p_0=E+q_0;\ \ p'_0=E-q_0 .

419: \qe

420: Thus, the expression to be evaluated reduces to a

421: 4-dimensional integral

422: 

423: \eq

424: \calM_{PS}=\frac{g^4}{(2\pi)^4}\int \frac{dq

425: \left[\bar{u}(E,\bfk')\gamma_5(\slash{\!\!\!p}+m)\gamma_5u(E,\bfk)\right]^1

426: \left[\bar{u}(E,-\bfk')\gamma_5(\slash{\!\!\!p'}+m)\gamma_5u(E,-\bfk)\right]^2}

427: {(p^2-m^2+i\epsilon)(p'^2-m^2+i\epsilon)(q^2-\mu^2+i\epsilon) 

428: (q'^2-\mu^2+i\epsilon)}\calf .

429: \qe

430: We can reduce the spinor algebra of the operators on the two lines

431: using the general relationship (for on-shell spinors)

432: 

433: \eq \bar{u}(E_{v'},\bfv')\gamma_5u(E_v,\bfv)=\chi^{\dagger}

434: \frac{\sqrt{(E_{v'}+m)(E_v+m)}}{2m}

435: \bfs\cdot \left[\frac{\bfv}{E_v+m}-\frac{\bfv '}{E_{v'}+m}

436: \right]\chi, 

437: \qe

438: where $\chi$ is a Pauli spinor and we have used

439: \eq

440: u(E_v,\bfv)=\sqrt{\frac{E_v+m}{2m}}\left(

441: \begin{array}{c}

442: 1\\

443: \frac{\bfs\cdot\bfv}{E_v+m}

444: \end{array}\right)\chi .

445: \qe

446: Here $E_v=\sqrt{\bfv^2+m^2}$ and $\bfs$ is the Pauli matrix. 

447: 

448: 

449: The expression can be written as an operator in spin space in the form

450: \eq \calM_{PS}=

451: \frac{g^4}{(2\pi)^4}\int \frac{dq\  \Theta_1(p_0,\bfp)

452: \Theta_2(p_0',\bfp')\calf}

453: {(p^2-m^2+i\epsilon)(p'^2-m^2+i\epsilon)(q^2-\mu^2+i\epsilon)

454: (q'^2-\mu^2+i\epsilon)}.

455: \label{gen}

456: \qe

457: With

458: \eq \bar{u}_{r'}(E,\bfk')\gamma_5(\slash{\!\!\!p}+m)\gamma_5u_r(E,\bfk)=

459: \bar{u}_{r'}(E,\bfk')(-\gamma_0p_0+m+\gamma\cdot\bfp)u_r(E,\bfk),

460: \qe 

461: $\Theta_1$ can be written as an operator between Pauli spinors 

462: $\chi_{r'}$ and $\chi_r$  where the index r corresponds to the 

463: spin of the proton, 

464: 

465: $$

466: 2m\Theta_1=

467: -p_0(E+m)\left(1+\frac{\bfs_1\cdot\bfk'\bfs_1\cdot\bfk}{(E+m)^2}\right)

468: +m(E+m)\left(1-\frac{\bfs_1\cdot\bfk'\bfs_1\cdot\bfk}{(E+m)^2}\right)

469: $$

470: 

471: $$

472: +(E+m)\left(\begin{array}{cc}

473: 1&-\frac{\bfs_1\cdot\bfk'}{E+m}\end{array}\right)

474: \left( \begin{array}{cc}

475: 0&\bfs_1\cdot\bfp\\

476: -\bfs_1\cdot\bfp&0\\

477: \end{array}\right)

478: \left( \begin{array}{c}

479: 1\\

480: \frac{\bfs_1\cdot\bfk}{E+m}\\

481: \end{array}\right),

482: $$

483: 

484: $$2m\Theta_1

485: =E^+(m-p_0)-\frac{\bfs_1\cdot\bfk'\bfs_1\cdot

486: \bfk}{E^+}(m+p_0)+\bfs_1\cdot\bfp\bfs_1\cdot\bfk

487: +\bfs_1\cdot\bfk'\bfs_1\cdot\bfp,

488: $$

489: 

490: \eq

491: 2m\Theta_1

492: =E^+(m-p_0)-\frac{m+p_0}{E^+}

493: \left(\bfk\cdot\bfk'+i\bfs_1\cdot\bfk'\times\bfk\right)

494: +\bfp\cdot(\bfk+\bfk')+i\bfs_1\cdot\bfp \times (\bfk-\bfk'),

495: \qe

496: where $E^+=E+m$. These expressions allow us to identify $G$ and 

497: $\bfH$ in the operator,

498: \eq

499: 2m\Theta_1=G+i\bfs_1\cdot \bfH , 

500: \qe

501: \eq

502: G=E^+(m-p_0)-\frac{m+p_0}{E^+}\bfk\cdot\bfk'

503: +\bfp\cdot (\bfk+\bfk'),

504: \label{gdef}

505: \qe

506: \eq

507: \bfH=-\left[\frac{m+p_0}{E^+}\bfk'\times\bfk-

508: \bfp\times (\bfk-\bfk')\right] \label{hdef}.

509: \qe

510: 

511: \begin{figure}

512: \hspace*{.8in}

513: \begin{picture}(500,180)

514: \put(120,170){$p=(E-q_0,\bfk'-\bfq)$}

515: \put(118,30){$p'=(E-q_0,-\bfk-\bfq)$}

516: \put(10,170){$k_1=(E,\bfk)$}

517: \put(280,170){$k_1'=(E,\bfk')$}

518: \put(235,90){$q'=(q_0,\bfk-\bfk'+\bfq)$}

519: \put(90,90){$q=(q_0,\bfq)$}

520: \put(10,30){$k_2=(E,-\bfk)$}

521: \put(280,30){$k_2'=(E,-\bfk')$}

522: \put(5,160){\line(1,0){380}}

523: \put(5,159){\line(1,0){380}}

524: \put(5,50){\line(1,0){380}}

525: \put(5,49){\line(1,0){380}}

526: % first pion

527: \put(100,50){\line(3,2){10}}

528: \put(115,60){\line(3,2){10}}

529: \put(130,70){\line(3,2){10}}

530: \put(145,80){\line(3,2){10}}

531: \put(160,90){\line(3,2){10}}

532: \put(175,100){\line(3,2){10}}

533: \put(190,110){\line(3,2){10}}

534: \put(205,120){\line(3,2){10}}

535: \put(220,130){\line(3,2){10}}

536: \put(235,140){\line(3,2){10}}

537: \put(250,150){\line(3,2){15}}

538: %first arrow up

539: \put(139,70){\line(2,5){4}}

540: \put(140,70){\line(2,5){4}}

541: \put(134,79){\line(1,0){9}}

542: \put(134,80){\line(1,0){9}}

543: % second arrow up

544: \put(216,120){\line(2,5){4}}

545: \put(217,120){\line(2,5){4}}

546: \put(209,129){\line(1,0){9}}

547: \put(209,130){\line(1,0){9}}

548: % first arrow down

549: \put(216,90){\line(2,-5){4}}

550: \put(217,90){\line(2,-5){4}}

551: \put(210,79){\line(1,0){10}}

552: \put(210,80){\line(1,0){10}}

553: % second arrow down

554: \put(141,140){\line(2,-5){4}}

555: \put(142,140){\line(2,-5){4}}

556: \put(135,129){\line(1,0){10}}

557: \put(135,130){\line(1,0){10}}

558: % second pion

559: \put(100,160){\line(3,-2){10}}

560: \put(115,150){\line(3,-2){10}}

561: \put(130,140){\line(3,-2){10}}

562: \put(145,130){\line(3,-2){10}}

563: \put(160,120){\line(3,-2){10}}

564: \put(175,110){\line(3,-2){10}}

565: \put(190,100){\line(3,-2){10}}

566: \put(205,90){\line(3,-2){10}}

567: \put(220,80){\line(3,-2){10}}

568: \put(235,70){\line(3,-2){10}}

569: \put(250,60){\line(3,-2){15}}

570: \end{picture}

571: \caption{Crossed diagram kinematics. Form factors are to be included

572: here as in Fig. \protect{\ref{boite}}.}\label{croise}

573: \end{figure}

574: 

575: For the lower line where

576: \eq

577: 2m\Theta_2=G'+i\bfs_2\cdot \bfH',

578: \qe

579: \eq

580: G'=E^+(m-p'_0)-\frac{m+p'_0}{E^+}\bfk\cdot\bfk'

581: -\bfp'\cdot (\bfk+\bfk');\ \ 

582: \bfH'=-\left[\frac{m+p'_0}{E^+}\bfk'\times\bfk+

583: \bfp'\times (\bfk-\bfk')\right].

584: \qe

585: 

586: 

587: \subsubsection{Crossed Diagram}

588: 

589: The expressions for the matrix element in Eq. (\ref{gen}), and for 

590: $\Theta_1$ and $\Theta_2$, for the two-pion crossed diagram are the same 

591: as in the case of the box except that now the relations between momenta 

592: are those corresponding to the diagram in Fig. \ref{croise},

593: 

594: \eq \bfp+\bfq '=\bfk ,\ \ \bfp '+\bfq=-\bfk,\ \  \bfp+\bfq=\bfk',\ \

595: \bfp'+\bfq'=-\bfk', \qe

596: 

597: \eq p_0=p_0';\ \ q_0=q_0';\ \ q_0=E-p_0. \qe

598: Since only neutral pions can be exchanged in the case of the box diagram 

599: and both neutral and charged pions can be exchanged in the crossed 

600: diagram, a factor of 5 multiplies the crossed diagram result. This isospin

601: factor is explicitly given in the dispersion relation approach in Eqs.

602: (\ref{Tbox}) and (\ref{Tcro}).

603: 

604: \subsection{Pseudo-vector Coupling}

605:  

606: In this case the interaction is given by

607: $\frac{f}{\mu}\bar{\psi}\gamma_{\mu}\gamma_5\tau\cdot

608: \partial^{\mu}\phi_{\pi}\psi $ and for one nucleon 

609: propagator, $P_{PV}$, the expectation value leads to

610: \eq

611: P_{PV}(p^2-m^2+i\epsilon)=-\frac{f^2}{\mu^2}\bar{u}(k')

612: \slq'\gamma_5(\slp+m)\slq\gamma_5u(k).

613: \qe

614: Using $k+q=p=k'+q'$

615: and the Dirac equation $(\slk-m)u(k)=0$ we can write

616: \eq

617: P_{PV}(p^2-m^2+i\epsilon)=\frac{f^2}{\mu^2}\bar{u}(k')

618: \gamma_5(\slp+m)(\slp+m)(\slp+m)\gamma_5u(k).

619: \qe

620: By regrouping the terms

621: \eq

622: P_{PV}(p^2-m^2+i\epsilon)=\frac{f^2}{\mu^2}\bar{u}(k')

623: \gamma_5(\slp+m)[(\slp-m)+2m][(\slp-m)+2m]\gamma_5u(k),

624: \qe

625: we find

626: \eq

627: P_{PV}(p^2-m^2+i\epsilon)=\frac{f^2}{\mu^2}\bar{u}(k')

628: \gamma_5(p^2-m^2)(\slp+3m)\gamma_5u(k)

629: +\frac{f^24m^2}{\mu^2}\bar{u}(k')\gamma_5(\slp+m)\gamma_5u(k).

630: \qe

631: The last term can be seen to be the pseudo-scalar expression

632: considered in the last section for one nucleon propagator.  Hence,

633: the operator can be separated into a term which corresponds to a

634: contact term and one which is identical to the pseudo-scalar

635: expression developed before.

636: \eq

637: P_{PV}=\frac{f^2}{\mu^2}\bar{u}(k')

638: \gamma_5(\slp+3m)\gamma_5u(k)

639: +g^2\frac{\bar{u}(k')\gamma_5(\slp+m)\gamma_5u(k)}

640: {p^2-m^2}\equiv P_C+P_{PS},

641: \qe

642: where we have used the standard correspondence 

643: $g^2=\frac{f^24m^2}{\mu^2} $.

644: We can write 

645: \eq

646: P_C=\frac{g^2}{4m^2}\left[

647: 2m\bar{u}_{r'}(k')u_r(k)+\chi_{r'}^{\dagger}\Theta_1(p_0,\bfp)

648: \chi_r\right].

649: \qe

650: 

651: It is useful to define an operator analogous to the

652: $\Theta_1(p_0,\bfp)$ as before for the contact term for the upper

653: line for the case of the box diagram

654: \eq \chi_{r'}^{\dagger}C_1(p_0,\bfp)\chi_r=

655: 2m\bar{u}_{r'}(k')u_r(k)+\chi_{r'}^{\dagger}\Theta_1(p_0,\bfp)

656: \chi_r.

657: \qe

658: We can also define operators corresponding to the contact

659: terms which are very similar to those defined before in Eqs.

660: (\ref{gdef}) and (\ref{hdef}).

661: 

662: \eq

663: G_C=G+2m\left(E^+-\frac{\bfk '\cdot\bfk}{E^+} \right);\ \

664: G_C'=G'+2m\left(E^+-\frac{\bfk '\cdot\bfk}{E^+} \right),

665: \label{gcdef}\qe

666: \eq

667: \bfH_C=\bfH-2m \frac{\bfk '\times\bfk}{E^+};\ \ 

668: \bfH_C'=\bfH'-2m \frac{\bfk '\times\bfk}{E^+},

669: \label{hcdef}   

670: \qe

671: with

672: \eq

673: 2mC_1(p_0,\bfp)=G_C+i\bfs_1\cdot\bfH_C;\ 

674: \  2mC_2(p_0,\bfp)=G_C'+i\bfs_2\cdot\bfH_C'.

675: \qe

676: The same generalization to the crossed diagram can be made as in the

677: previous section and we do not repeat it here.

678: We can write for either the box or crossed diagram 

679: $$

680: \calM_{PV}=

681: \frac{g^4}{16m^4}\frac{1}{(2\pi)^4}\int dq\frac{C_1(p_0,\bfp)

682: C_2(p'_0,\bfp')\calf}{(q_0^2-\omega^2)(q_0^2-\omega'^2)}

683: +\frac{g^4}{4m^2}\frac{1}{(2\pi)^4}\int dq\frac{C_1(p_0,\bfp)

684: \Theta_2(p'_0,\bfp')\calf}{(p'^2-m^2)(q_0^2-\omega^2)(q_0^2-\omega'^2)}

685: $$

686: \eq

687: +\frac{g^4}{4m^2}\frac{1}{(2\pi)^4}\int dq\frac{\Theta_1(p_0,\bfp)

688: C_2(p'_0,\bfp')\calf}{(p^2-m^2)(q_0^2-\omega^2)(q_0^2-\omega'^2)}

689:  +\calM_{PS}. \label{4terms}

690: \qe

691: The first term will be referred to as the bubble diagram and

692: the second and third (numerically equal) as the triangle.

693: 

694: \section{Treatment of Singularities}

695: 

696: In principle, each of the propagators contribute two $\delta$-functions

697: and two principal-value integrals. However, for one fermion on shell

698: neither pion can be on shell and for one pion on shell neither fermion can

699: be on shell. This fact considerably reduces the number of terms which

700: contribute. For numerical calculation, the poles and their order must be

701: identified and separated into $\delta$-function and principal value parts.

702: The general technique for doing this is outlined in Appendix B. We cannot

703: use the classical methods of reduction \cite{feynman} because of the

704: existence of the form factor at each vertex. In the following we treat the

705: case for a general scattering angle $\chi$ and assume that the incident

706: beam direction, parallel to $\bfk$, is along the z-axis and the final

707: proton momentum, $\bfk'$, lies in the z-x plane.

708: 

709: \subsection{Contact-Contact Term (Bubble Diagram)}

710: 

711: For the first term in Eq. (\ref{4terms}) for either the

712: crossed or box configuration we have

713: 

714: \eq \calM_{CC}=

715: \frac{g^4}{16m^4}\frac{1}{(2\pi)^4}\int d\bfq

716: \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dq_0\frac{C_1(p_0,\bfp)

717: C_2(p'_0,\bfp)\calf}{(q_0^2-\omega^2+i\epsilon)(q_0^2-\omega'^2+i\epsilon)}

718: \qe

719: \eq

720: =\frac{g^4}{16m^4}\frac{1}{(2\pi)^4}\int d\Omega\int_0^{\infty}

721: d\qt \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} dq_0\frac{O(q_0,\bfq)\calf}

722: {(q_0^2-\omega^2+i\epsilon)(q_0^2-\omega'^2+i\epsilon)},

723: \qe

724: where $\qt=|\bfq|$ and the volume factor $\qt^2$ has been 

725: included in $O(q_0,\bfq)$. Taking large finite limits for the integrals

726: 

727: \eq \calM_{CC}

728: =-\frac{g^4}{16m^4}\frac{1}{(2\pi)^4}\int d\Omega\int_0^{\qt_{max}}

729: \frac{d\qt}{\omega^2-\omega'^2} 

730: \int_{-\qmm}^{\qmm} dq_0 O(q_0,\bfq)

731: \left[\frac{1}{q_0^2-\omega^2+i\epsilon}

732: -\frac{1}{q_0^2-\omega'^2+i\epsilon}\right]\calf.

733: \label{127}\qe

734: If we consider the contribution of one pole in $q_0$ ($q_0=\omega$

735: for example) then a counting of powers of $\qt$ in the numerator

736: and denominator shows that, for large $\qt$, the integrand is proportional

737: to $\qt$ so that the integral diverges as $\qt_{max}^2$ if the form 

738: factor is set to a constant. The integral can now be evaluated by

739: the method given in Appendix B.  

740: 

741: For the first term of the integrand of the solid angle we have

742: \eq

743: \int_0^{\qt_{max}}\frac{d\qt}{\omega^2-\omega'^2+i\epsilon}

744: \int_{-\qmm}^{\qmm} dq_0 \frac{O(q_0,\bfq)\calf}                          

745: {q_0^2-\omega^2+i\epsilon}

746: \qe

747: \eq

748: =\int_0^{\qt_{max}}\!\!\!\!\!\! 

749: \frac{d\qt}{\omega^2-\omega'^2+i\epsilon}

750: \int_{-\qmm}^{\qmm} dq_0 \left[\frac{O(q_0,\bfq)-T(q_0,\bfq)}  

751: {q_0^2-\omega^2+i\epsilon}+\frac{T(q_0,\bfq)}

752: {q_0^2-\omega^2+i\epsilon}\right]\calf

753: =\int_0^{\qt_{max}}\!\!\!\!\!\!\frac{d\qt}{\omega^2-\omega'^2+i\epsilon}

754: F(\qt,\Omega),

755: \qe

756: where

757: $$

758: F(\qt,\Omega)=\int_{-\qmm}^{\qmm}dq_0\frac{O(q_0,\bfq)-T(q_0,\bfq)}

759: {q_0^2-\omega^2}\calf

760: $$

761: \eq

762: +\calf\frac{[O(\omega,\bfq)+O(-\omega,\bfq)]}

763: {2\omega}\ln {\frac{\qmm-\omega}{\qmm+\omega}}

764: -\frac{i\pi}{2\omega} [O(\omega,\bfq)+O(-\omega,\bfq)]\calf

765: \qe

766: and

767: \eq

768: T(q_0,\bfq)=\left[\frac{q_0+\omega}{2\omega}O(\omega,\bfq)

769: -\frac{q_0-\omega}{2\omega}O(-\omega,\bfq)\right]\calf.

770: \qe

771: We have included the $+i\epsilon$ in the denominator of the

772: external factor $1/(\omega^2-\omega'^2)$ but, in fact, there is

773: no singularity in the combined integral so this choice is

774: arbitrary. The remaining indicated integral is computed

775: numerically. We now need to treat the singularity in the

776: $\qt$ integral in a similar manner. Since

777: \eq

778: \omega^2-\omega'^2=\bfq^2-\bfq'^2=-2k^2(1-\cos\chi)

779: -2\bfq\cdot(\bfk-\bfk')=-2kX(\qt-\qb)

780: \qe

781: with

782: \eq

783: X=x(1-\cos\chi)-\sqrt{1-x^2}\sin\chi\cos\phi

784: \stackrel{\chi=90^{\circ}}{\longrightarrow} 

785: \cos\theta-\sin\theta\cos\phi;\ \ {\rm and}\ \ 

786: \qb\equiv -k(1-\cos\chi)/X. \label{wdef}

787: \qe

788: Here $\theta$ and $\phi$ are the angles of $\bfq$ in polar coordinates

789: and $x=\cos\theta$. We can now write

790: \eq

791: \int_0^{\qt_{max}}\frac{d\qt}{\omega^2-\omega'^2+i\epsilon}F(\qt,\Omega)

792: =-\frac{1}{2kX}\int_0^{\qt_{max}}\frac{d\qt F(\qt,\Omega)}

793: {\qt-\qb+i\epsilon}

794: \qe

795: \eq

796: =-\frac{1}{2kX}\int_0^{\qt_{max}}\frac{d\qt[ F(\qt,\Omega)

797: -F(\qb,\Omega)]}{\qt-\qb}-\frac{1}{2kX}

798: \ln (\qt_{max}/\qb-1)+\frac{i\pi}{2kX}F(\qb,\Omega).

799: \qe

800: The imaginary parts will cancel when the two terms of 

801: Eq. (\ref{127}) are combined.

802: 

803: \subsection{Contact-PS and PS-Contact Terms (Triangle Diagram)}

804: 

805: In this case there is one nucleon propagator in addition to the two

806: pion propagator and the  second and third terms in Eq. (\ref{4terms}) can 

807: be written in the form

808: \eq

809: -\frac{g^4}{4m^2}\frac{1}{(2\pi)^4}\int d\Omega\int_0^{\qt_{max}}

810: \frac{d\qt}{\omega^2-\omega'^2+i\epsilon}

811: \int_{-\qmm}^{\qmm} \frac{dq_0 O(q_0,\bfq)}

812: {p_0^2-E_p^2+i\epsilon}

813: \left[\frac{1}{q_0^2-\omega^2+i\epsilon}-

814: \frac{1}{q_0^2-\omega'^2+i\epsilon}\right]\calf.

815: \qe

816: A count of the powers of $\qt$ at a pole of $q_0$ shows that the integrand

817: varies as $1/\qt$ for large $\qt$ so the integral diverges (in the absence

818: of a form factor) logarithmically in $\qt_{max}$. Again there are no

819: double poles and the first method of Appendix B can be used to calculate

820: the 4 poles in $q_0$.

821: 

822: For the crossed-pion configuration we define, for the first

823: term in the above equation

824: \eq

825: P_1=E-E_p;\ \ P_2=E+E_p;\ \ P_3=\omega;\ \ P_4=-\omega,

826: \qe

827: while for the second we have,

828: \eq

829: P_1=E-E_p;\ \ P_2=E+E_p;\ \ P_3=\omega';\ \ P_4=-\omega'.

830: \qe

831: With the definition

832: \eq

833: G(q_0,\bfq)=\sum_{i=1}^4\frac{\prod_{j\ne i}(q_0-P_j)}

834: {\prod_{j\ne i}(P_i-P_j)}O(P_i,\bfq)\calf

835: \qe

836: the integral can be written as

837: \eq

838: -\frac{g^4}{4m^2}\frac{1}{(2\pi)^4}\int d\Omega\int_0^{\qt_{max}}

839: \frac{d\qt}{\omega^2-\omega'^2+i\epsilon} 

840: \left\{

841: \int_{-\qmm}^{\qmm} dq_0\left[\frac{[O(q_0,\bfq)-G(q_0,\bfq)]}

842: {\prod_{i=1}^4(q_0-P_i+i\epsilon)}+\frac{G(q_0,\bfq)}

843: {\prod_{i=1}^4(q_0-P_i+i\epsilon)}\right]\calf\right\}.

844: \qe

845: The last integral in the above becomes

846: \eq

847: \int_{-\qmm}^{\qmm} dq_0\frac{G(q_0,\bfq)\calf}

848: {\prod_{i=1}^4(q_0-P_i+i\epsilon)}

849: =\sum_{i=1}^4\int_{-\qmm}^{\qmm} dq_0\frac{O(P_i,\bfq)\calf}

850: {(q_0-P_i+i\epsilon)\prod_{j\ne i}(P_i-P_j)} 

851: \qe

852: \eq

853: =\sum_{i=1}^4 \frac{O(P_i,\bfq)\calf}{\prod_{j\ne i}(P_i-P_j)}

854: \ln{\left(\frac{q_0^{max}-P_i}{q_0^{max}+P_i}\right)}

855: +i\pi\sum_{i=1}^4 \frac{O(P_i,\bfq)\calf}

856: {\prod_{j\ne i}(P_i-P_j)}.

857: \qe

858:    

859: \subsection{PS-PS Term}

860: 

861: The pseudo-scalar term is given by Eq. (\ref{gen}). There are now two more 

862: factors of $\qt$ in the denominator so the integral is convergent. For 

863: this case, i.e. when there are two nucleon poles, the box and crossed 

864: diagrams must be treated separately.

865: 

866: \subsubsection{Crossed Diagram}

867: 

868: For the crossed-pion configuration, where $p_0=p'_0=E-q_0$,

869: there is formally a second order pole when $E_p=E_{p'}$, so we write

870: $$

871: \frac{1}{({p}_0^2-E_{p}^2+i\epsilon)

872: (p_0^2-E_{p'}^2+i\epsilon)

873: (q_0^2-\omega^2+i\epsilon)(q_0^2-\omega'^2+i\epsilon)}

874: $$

875: \eq

876: =\frac{1}{E_p^2-E_{p'}^2}\left[\frac{1}{p_0^2-E_p^2+i\epsilon}

877: -\frac{1}{p_0^2-E_{p'}^2+i\epsilon}\right]

878: \frac{1}{\omega^2-\omega'^2}

879: \left[\frac{1}{q_0^2-\omega^2+i\epsilon}

880: -\frac{1}{q_0^2-\omega'^2+i\epsilon}\right].

881: \label{fourterms}\qe

882: 

883: The integration can now be done with the methods of Appendix B

884: with four poles in the $q_0$ integration.

885: 

886: The first factor can be evaluated using

887: \eq

888: E_p^2-E_{p'}^2=\bfp^2-\bfp'^2=(\bfk'-\bfq)^2-(\bfq+\bfk)^2

889: =-2\qt |\bfk|f(x),

890: \qe

891: where

892: \eq

893: f(x)=x(1+\cos\chi)+\sqrt{1-x^2}\cos\phi\sin\chi

894: \stackrel{\chi=90^{\circ}}{\longrightarrow} 

895: (x+\sqrt{1-x^2}\cos\phi).

896: \qe

897: From this expression we see that the second pole has 

898: been transformed to the $x$ integration. The 

899: singularity falls at

900: \eq

901: x_0=-\frac{\sin\chi\cos\phi}{\sqrt{(1+\cos\chi)^2+\sin^2\chi

902: \cos^2\phi}}\stackrel{\chi=90^{\circ}}{\longrightarrow} 

903: -\frac{\cos\phi}{\sqrt{1+\cos^2\phi}}	

904: \qe

905: and gives a delta-function contribution of the type

906: $\delta[f(x)]$ with

907: \eq 

908: f'(x_0)=1+\cos\chi+\frac{\sin^2\chi\cos^2\phi}{1+\cos\chi}

909: \stackrel{\chi=90^{\circ}}{\longrightarrow} 1+\cos^2\phi.

910: \qe

911: Thus, for the first of the four terms in Eq. (\ref{fourterms}) we

912: can write

913: \eq

914: -\frac{g^4}{2k(2\pi)^4}\int d\phi \int_{-1}^1 \frac{dx}{f(x)}

915: \int_0^{\qt_{max}}\frac{d\qt}{\qt(\omega^2-\omega'^2)} 

916: \int_{-\qmm}^{\qmm} \frac{dq_0 O(q_0,\bfq)\calf}

917: {(p_0^2-E_p^2+i\epsilon)(q_0^2-\omega^2+i\epsilon)}

918: \qe

919: 

920: \eq =

921: -\frac{g^4}{2k(2\pi)^4}\int d\phi\int_{-1}^1 dx 

922: \frac{J(x,\phi)}{f(x)+i\epsilon}

923: \qe

924: 

925: \eq =

926: -\frac{g^4}{2k(2\pi)^4}\int d\phi \int_{-1}^1 dx \left[\frac{J(x,\phi)-

927: Q(x,\phi)}{f(x)+i\epsilon}+\frac{Q(x,\phi)}{f(x)+i\epsilon}\right],

928: \label{60}

929: \qe

930: where

931: \eq Q(x,\phi)\equiv 

932: \frac{f(x)}{f'(x_0)(x-x_0+i\epsilon)}J(x_0,\phi).

933: \qe

934: The first integral in Eq. (\ref{60}) now has no singularity

935: and can be performed numerically. The second becomes

936: \eq

937: \int_{-1}^1 dx\frac{Q(x,\phi)}{f(x)+i\epsilon}

938: =\frac{J(x_0,\phi)}{f'(x_0)}\int_{-1}^1 \frac{dx}{x-x_0+i\epsilon}

939: =\frac{J(x_0,\phi)}{f'(x_0)}\ln\left(\frac{1-x_0}{1+x_0}\right)

940: -i\pi\frac{J(x_0,\phi)}{f'(x_0)}.

941: \qe

942: 

943: \subsubsection{Box Diagram}

944: 

945: For the box diagram we have for the pole structure

946: $$

947: \frac{1}{(p_0^2-E_{p}^2+i\epsilon)

948: ({p'}_0^2-E_{p}^2+i\epsilon)

949: (q_0^2-\omega^2+i\epsilon)(q_0^2-\omega'^2+i\epsilon)}.

950: $$

951: The pion pole part can be expanded as before

952: but the nucleon poles have a very different development since the

953: fourth integration variable is not the same in the two factors

954: but $E_p=E_{p'}$ leading to a second order pole.

955: We can write (with $p_0=E+q_0$ and $p'_0=E-q_0$)

956: $$

957: \frac{1}{[p_0^2-(E_p-i\epsilon)^2][{p'}_0^2-(E_p-i\epsilon)^2]}=

958: \frac{1}{[(E+q_0)^2-(E_p-i\epsilon)^2][(E-q_0)^2-(E_p-i\epsilon)^2]}

959: $$

960: \eq

961: =\frac{1}{[q_0^2-(E+E_p-i\epsilon)^2][q_0^2-(E-E_p+i\epsilon)^2]}.

962: \qe

963: The first factor can be handled by standard methods since there

964: is no second order pole.  The second factor, however, does 

965: contain a second order pole when $E_p=E$.  For this factor 

966: we write

967: $$

968: \frac{1}{q_0^2-(E-E_p+i\epsilon)^2}=\frac{E+E_p}{2(E^2-E_p^2+i\epsilon)}

969: \left[\frac{1}{q_0-E+E_p-i\epsilon}-\frac{1}{q_0+E-E_p+i\epsilon}\right].

970: $$

971: The integral can now be done with the methods of Appendix B with

972: five poles in the $q_0$ integral in the following manner.

973: 

974: We express

975: $$

976: E^2-E_p^2=k^2-\bfp^2=-\qt^2-2k\qt x=-\qt(\qt+2kx).

977: $$

978: Including the pion poles with this factor we have

979: $$

980: \frac{E+E_p}{2\qt(\qt+2kx+i\epsilon)}\frac{1}{2kX(\qt-\qb)}

981: \times

982: $$

983: \eq

984: \left[\frac{1}{q_0-E+E_p-i\epsilon}-\frac{1}{q_0+E-E_p+i\epsilon}\right]

985: \left[\frac{1}{q_0^2-\omega^2+i\epsilon}

986: -\frac{1}{q_0^2-\omega'^2+i\epsilon}\right],

987: \qe

988: where $w$ was defined in Eq. (\ref{wdef}).

989: 

990: We expand the factor

991: \eq

992: \frac{1}{(\qt+2kx)(\qt-\qb)}=\frac{1}{\qb+2kx}\left[

993: \frac{1}{\qt+2kx}+\frac{1}{\qb-\qt}\right] \label{twoterm}

994: \qe

995: and write

996: \eq

997: \frac{1}{\qb+2kx}=\frac{X}{k(1-2xX)}=\frac{X}{kf(x)},

998: \qe

999: where

1000: \eq

1001: f(x)=1-\cos\chi-2xc(x)\ \ 

1002: {\rm and}\ \ \

1003: c(x)=x-\sin\chi\sqrt{1-x^2}\cos\phi-x\cos\chi .

1004: \qe

1005: 

1006: The function $f(x)$ has two zeros given by

1007: \eq

1008: x_{\pm}=\pm \sqrt{\frac{1\pm \frac{z}{\sqrt{1+z^2}}}{2}}

1009: \ \ {\rm with}\ \ 

1010: z=\frac{\sin\chi\cos\phi}{1-\cos\chi}.

1011: \qe

1012: The ``+'' under the radical goes with the ``+'' on the exterior

1013: and vice versa. The derivatives at the zeros are 

1014: \eq

1015: f'(x_{\pm})=\frac{2\sqrt{1+z^2}}{x_{\pm}}.

1016: \qe

1017: Denoting the inner integrals over $\qt$ (and $q_0$) as $J_1$ and

1018: $J_2$ corresponding to the two terms in Eq. (\ref{twoterm}) we write

1019: the integral over the variable $x$ as

1020: \eq

1021: -\frac{g^4}{4k^2(2\pi)^4}\int d\phi \int_{-1}^1 dx 

1022: \left[\frac{J_i(x,\phi)-

1023: Q_i(x,\phi)}{f(x)+i\epsilon}+\frac{Q_i(x,\phi)}{f(x)+i\epsilon}\right],

1024: \label{ji} 

1025: \qe

1026: where

1027: \eq

1028: Q_i(x,\phi)=f(x)\left[\frac{J_i(x_+,\phi)}{f'(x_+)(x-x_+)}

1029: +\frac{J_i(x_-,\phi)}{f'(x_-)(x-x_-)}\right].

1030: \qe

1031: 

1032: The second term in Eq. (\ref{ji}) can be evaluated by

1033: $$

1034: \int_{-1}^1dx\frac{Q_i(x,\phi)}{f(x)+i\epsilon}=

1035: \frac{J_i(x_+,\phi)}{f'(x_+)}\ln \left(\frac{1-x_+}{1+x_+}\right)

1036: -i\pi\frac{J_i(x_+,\phi)}{f'(x_+)}

1037: $$

1038: \eq

1039: +

1040: \frac{J_i(x_-,\phi)}{f'(x_-)}\ln \left(\frac{1-x_-}{1+x_-}\right)

1041: -i\pi\frac{J_i(x_-,\phi)}{f'(x_-)},

1042: \qe

1043: with  

1044: $$

1045: J_1(x,\phi)=

1046: \int_0^{\infty}d\qt \qt \frac{E+E_p}{\qt+2kx}

1047: \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dq_0

1048: \frac{O(q_0,\bfq)\calf}{q_0^2-(E+E_p-i\epsilon)^2}\times

1049: $$

1050: \eq

1051: \left[\frac{1}{q_0-E+E_p-i\epsilon}-\frac{1}{q_0+E-E_p+i\epsilon}\right]

1052: \left[\frac{1}{q_0^2-\omega^2+i\epsilon}-

1053: \frac{1}{q_0^2-\omega'^2+i\epsilon}\right]

1054: \qe

1055: and

1056: $$

1057: J_2(x,\phi)=

1058: \int_0^{\infty}d\qt \qt \frac{E+E_p}{\qb-\qt}

1059: \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dq_0

1060: \frac{O(q_0,\bfq)\calf}{q_0^2-(E+E_p+i\epsilon)^2}\times

1061: $$

1062: \eq

1063: \left[\frac{1}{q_0-E+E_p-i\epsilon}-\frac{1}{q_0+E-E_p+i\epsilon}\right]

1064: \left[\frac{1}{q_0^2-\omega^2+i\epsilon}-

1065: \frac{1}{q_0^2-\omega'^2+i\epsilon}\right].

1066: \qe

1067: 

1068: \section{Form Factors\label{form}}

1069: 

1070: The two protons are treated as finite-sized particles with their intrinsic

1071: internal structure providing an extended source for the exchanged pions.  

1072: In this case the range of the form factor is not a cut-off parameter to be

1073: taken to infinity at the end of the calculation, as is often done in a

1074: local field theory, but a physically meaningful quantity.  We consider

1075: that the true interaction of the pion is with the partons within the

1076: nucleons but we use an effective field theory (assumed to obey Feynman

1077: rules) to describe the composite system.

1078: 

1079: \subsection{Basic Considerations \label{iva}}

1080: 

1081: In general, one may expect a finite distribution of the interacting

1082: constituents of the nucleon to have two components: one due to the

1083: confinement range of the valence quarks (and other non-color-singlet

1084: partons) and one due to the meson cloud.  Because of G parity, the

1085: exchange pions cannot couple directly to the pion part of the cloud

1086: (likely to be the most important part) and the cloud can be expected to

1087: have a larger extent (and hence be ``softer'' in momentum space).  For

1088: these reasons we consider only that part of the density due to the

1089: distribution of valence quarks. This argument is by no means new (see e.g.  

1090: Maekawa and Robilotta \cite{maekawarobilotta} for the case of one-pion

1091: exchange as well as Refs. \cite{bozoian,nozawa,haberzettl}). Form factors

1092: of the mesonic dressing type have been extensively studied (see e.g. Ref.

1093: \cite{gourdin}).

1094: 

1095: \begin{figure}[htb]

1096: \epsfig{file=quarkdist.ps,angle=90,height=3.5in}

1097: \caption{Comparison with distributions arising from the dipole

1098: form factor with those obtained from the lattice calculations

1099: of Lissia et al. \protect{\cite{lissia}} by the procedures given

1100: in the text.}

1101: \label{quarkdist}

1102: \end{figure}

1103: 

1104: The non-relativistic form factor can be obtained directly by calculating

1105: the Fourier transform of the density (see e.~g. Ref. \cite{gl}).  While

1106: more realistic forms are possible, we assume here an exponential density

1107: in the center of mass of the nucleon corresponding to a dipole form factor

1108: of the type

1109: \eq 

1110: \frac{(\Lambda^2-\mu^2)^2}{(\bfq^2+\Lambda^2)^2}=

1111: \left(\frac{\Lambda^2-\mu^2}{\Lambda^2}\right)^2

1112: \left(\frac{\Lambda^2}{\bfq^2+\Lambda^2}\right)^2 \label{dipole} 

1113: \qe 

1114: if we chose to normalize the form factor to unity at the nucleon pole and we have

1115: neglected the small recoil correction, $\mu^4/(4m^2)$, to $-\mu^2$. The spatial

1116: distribution corresponding to this form is proportional to $e^{-\Lambda r}$. It is

1117: well known that there is a problem with this density since it has a finite

1118: derivative with respect to $r$ at the origin but this presumably only causes

1119: significant corrections at very high momenta. The value of $\Lambda=1.4$ GeV most

1120: often used in our calculations corresponds to an rms core radius of the exponential

1121: density of 0.49 fm.

1122: 

1123: An exponential shape is indeed suggested by lattice calculations. Lissia

1124: et al. \cite{lissia} gave spatial distributions for the distance between

1125: quarks, $\rho_{qq}(r_{qq})$, in the nucleon, and the pion and $\rho$

1126: mesons.  To find the distribution about a fixed center, $\rho_q(r)$ needed

1127: here, a conversion must be made. If we assume no correlations between

1128: quarks and make no center-of-mass correction (in the same manner as Lissia

1129: et al. did to compare with the MIT bag model) the conversion between these

1130: two densities is given by the rule that the Fourier transform of

1131: $\rho_{qq}$ is the square of that for $\rho_q$. The distributions given in

1132: Ref. \cite{lissia} for $\rho_{qq}$ are well fit by an exponential,

1133: $e^{-\alpha r_{qq}}$, except for the smallest values of $r_{qq}$, leading

1134: to a dipole form factor. The square root of this form factor gives a

1135: monopole form factor with the same value of $\alpha$.  Since the

1136: pion-nucleon interaction will be governed by a convolution of the pion and

1137: nucleon distributions, or a product of the form factors, the result of

1138: this type of conversion is the product of two monopole form factors, or,

1139: if the ranges are the same, a single dipole form factor. The ranges we

1140: extract from the figures in Ref. \cite{lissia} are $\alpha=7.0\ {\rm

1141: fm}^{-1}$ for the proton and $\beta=6.4\ {\rm fm}^{-1}$ for the pion. If

1142: we were to take both ranges to be $7.0\ {\rm fm}^{-1}$ the result would be

1143: a dipole form factor with a range very nearly 1.4 GeV/c which is what we

1144: have used in most of the calculations shown. For two different values of

1145: the ranges the density is given by

1146: 

1147: \eq 

1148: \rho_{\pi q}(r)=

1149: \frac{\alpha^2\beta^2}{\beta^2-\alpha^2}\frac{\left(e^{-\alpha r}

1150: -e^{-\beta r}\right)}{r}. 

1151: \qe 

1152: This density is shown by the open circles in Fig. \ref{quarkdist} compared

1153: with densities resulting from dipole form factors, i.e. pure exponentials.

1154: The the root mean square radius, $R_{ms}$, corresponding to this

1155: distribution is 0.52 fm.

1156: 

1157: Another possibility for the conversion of the pion distribution is to take 

1158: the distance to the center of mass to be half the distance between quarks. 

1159: This choice leads to a product form factor 

1160: \eq

1161: \frac{\alpha^2}{\alpha^2+\bfq^2}\left(\frac{\beta^2}{\beta^2+\bfq^2}

1162: \right)^2,

1163: \qe

1164: where the $\beta$ is twice the value found in the fit to

1165: $\rho_{qq}$. This form factor gives the density

1166: \eq \rho_{\pi q}(r)=

1167: \frac{\alpha^2\beta^4}{r(\beta^2-\alpha^2)^2}\left[

1168: e^{-\alpha r}-e^{-\beta r}-\frac{(\beta^2-\alpha^2)r}{2\beta}

1169: e^{-\beta r}\right],

1170: \qe

1171: which is shown as the solid dots in Fig. \ref{quarkdist}. The 

1172: $R_{ms}$ corresponding to this density is 0.44 fm.

1173: 

1174: Alexandrou et al. \cite{alex} also made calculations of $\rho_{qq}$ and

1175: commented that their distributions were very well fit with an exponential

1176: form. In a variety of calculations they found $R_{rms}$ values of the

1177: pion-proton system in the range from 0.55 to 0.60 fm.

1178: 

1179: Another estimate of this radius can be obtained directly from

1180: form factors for pion-nucleon coupling. For a monopole form

1181: factor, a value of $\Lambda$ of 800 MeV to 1 GeV was found

1182: \cite{coon}. Choosing an equivalent rms radius leads to values 

1183: in the range 1.13 to 1.41 GeV/c for a dipole form.

1184: 

1185: While the original MIT bag model used a radius near 1 fm. (for

1186: all of the constituents of the nucleon), corrections due to the

1187: inclusion of a pion cloud and the recoil degree of freedom made

1188: by Bolsterli and Parmentola \cite{mark} led to values of the 

1189: rms radius near 0.45 fm.

1190: 

1191: \subsection{Relativistic Generalization}

1192: 

1193: One often attempts to make a generalization of Eq.

1194: (\ref{dipole})  to a relativistic dependence on momentum of

1195: the type

1196: \eq

1197: \frac{(\Lambda^2-\mu^2)^2}{(q_0^2-\bfq^2-\Lambda^2)^2}, 

1198: \label{mesonform}

1199: \qe

1200: i.e. $-\bfq^2\rightarrow q^2=q_0^2-\bfq^2$. While this

1201: substitution makes the form factor invariant, it is not the only

1202: way to achieve this objective. This procedure introduces

1203: additional singularities on the real axis in $q_0$  which are often 

1204: regarded as spurious.

1205: 

1206: We suppose that the distribution of quarks is known in the rest frame of

1207: the nucleon and assume it to be spherically symmetric with its Fourier

1208: transform being a function of the square of the conjugate momentum,

1209: $\bft^2$. This distribution should be boosted into the center of mass

1210: system of the two nucleons but a boost is only defined for on-shell

1211: particles.

1212:  

1213: On general principle, to preserve Lorentz invariance, the form factor

1214: should be a function of Lorentz scalars only.  In the case of a

1215: pion-nucleon vertex (neglecting spin) there are three four-vectors to work

1216: with, the initial and final nucleon momenta and the pion momentum.  Due to

1217: 4-momentum conservation only two are independent.  Let us choose the

1218: initial nucleon momenta (k)  and the pion momentum (q).  From them we can

1219: construct three scalars $q^2,\ k^2,\ \ {\rm and}\ \ k\cdot q $.

1220: 

1221: We expect the desired invariant to involve the nucleon momentum if it is

1222: to represent a boost into the nucleon rest frame in the on-shell limit.  

1223: Working with these invariants and taking into account that there should be

1224: scaling with the dimensions of q, to evaluate to $\bft^2$, the expression

1225: should be bilinear in q.  Since $k\cdot q$ is linear in q we must use its

1226: square, which implies that, in order to be coherent in k as well, the only

1227: two invariants to consider are $(k\cdot q)^2$ and $k^2q^2$. The linear

1228: combination

1229: \eq

1230:  (k\cdot q)^2-k^2q^2\equiv m^2Z^2(k,q)\label{qdef}

1231: \qe

1232: indeed reduces to $m^2\bft^2=m^2\bfq^2$ when the nucleon 

1233: four-momentum, k, is taken to be $(m,0)$.  We shall adopt the variable 

1234: $Z^2(k,q)$, which provides an off-shell generalization of the boost to the 

1235: nucleon rest frame, to replace $\bfq^2$ in Eq. (\ref{dipole}). For a 

1236: discussion of the Lorentz tensor which represents the 4-dimensional cross 

1237: product of k and q and can be contracted to form $Z^2$ see appendix C.

1238: 

1239: \subsection{Singularities in $q_0$}

1240: 

1241: The problem of the possible unwanted poles in $q_0$ on the 

1242: real axis is at least partially resolved since the condition 

1243: for a singularity $ (k\cdot q)^2-k^2q^2+m^2\Lambda^2=0 $

1244:  gives as roots for $q_0$ 

1245: \eq q_0=\frac{k_0\bfk\cdot\bfq \pm \sqrt{-\{

1246: k^2[\bfk^2\bfq^2-(\bfk\cdot\bfq)^2]+\bfk^2m^2\Lambda^2\}}}

1247: {\bfk^2}.  \label{polepos}

1248: \qe

1249: As long as the nucleon remains time-like ($k^2>0$) the quantity

1250: under the radical is negative so that there is no zero on the

1251: real axis.  Since, for the exchange of two pions, at least one of

1252: the nucleons at each vertex is on shell, and there is no

1253: zero on the real axis for $q_0$ for the nucleon momentum on

1254: shell, the problem of unwanted additional singularities is

1255: resolved.

1256: 

1257: Poles \underline{do} exist in the complex plane and lead a finite value of

1258: the principal-value integral on $q_0$ (an integral over only poles on the

1259: real axis will lead to a principal value contribution of zero).  Since, if

1260: the pole is very far from the real axis its contribution will become

1261: negligible, in the limit of $\Lambda\rightarrow\infty$ the principal-value

1262: part of the $q_0$ integral vanishes as expected.  We can see from Eq.

1263: (\ref{polepos}) that in the limit of $\bfk\rightarrow 0$\ the pole also

1264: moves far from the real axis so at low energies the principal-value

1265: contribution tends to zero.

1266: 

1267: Such poles in the upper half of the complex plane are often considered to

1268: lead to a violation of causality.  In the present case we are considering

1269: a pair of finite-size particles which are described in terms of the motion

1270: of their centers.  Hence, they can start to interact when they are a

1271: distance apart equal to twice their radii.  The usual considerations of

1272: causality \cite{bjd,polyzou,nussenzveig} deal with two point particles and

1273: the expectation that any interaction between them can not propagate faster

1274: than the speed of light. This criterion does not apply to the present case

1275: since the points which need to be connected by the speed of light are not

1276: the centers but any co-moving points included in their structure. The

1277: scattered wave can start to appear before the centers of the distributions

1278: can be connected by a light ray. The appearance of these poles is natural

1279: and expected.  Of course, their contribution tends to zero as the size of

1280: the system goes to zero ($\Lambda \rightarrow\infty$).

1281: 

1282: Since the size of the system becomes unmeasurable at very low energy we

1283: should expect that the nucleons could be treated as point particles in

1284: this regime so that we expect that standard causality will be

1285: valid in the low-energy limit. We see that, since the pole off of the real

1286: axis gives a negligible contribution in this region being very far from

1287: the real axis this expectation is realized.

1288: 

1289: \subsection{Properties of $Z^2$}

1290: 

1291: The function $Z^2$ has the property  

1292: \eq

1293: Z^2(p\pm q,q)=Z^2(p,q) \ {\rm or,\ in\ particular}\ 

1294: Z^2(k',q)=Z^2(k,q).  \label{kpmq}

1295: \qe

1296: Since $Z^2$ is independent of the use of the initial or final

1297: nucleon momentum, the vertex function is a property of the

1298: vertex itself and not of the individual four-momenta.  If the

1299: three 4-momenta which are connected to the vertex are $p_1,\

1300: p_2$ and $p_3$ with a conservation law between them, say

1301: $p_3=\pm p_1\pm p_2$, then any two of the momenta can be used

1302: for the evaluation of the vertex function, i.e.

1303: \eq

1304: Z^2(p_1,p_2)=Z^2(p_1,p_3)=Z^2(p_3,p_2)=\dots

1305: \qe

1306: An equivalent way to express this function is

1307: \eq

1308: Z^2=\frac{[p_1^2]^2+[p_2^2]^2+[p_3^2]^2-2(p_1^2p_2^2

1309: +p_1^2p_3^2+p_2^2p_3^2)}{4m^2}.\label{squares}

1310: \qe

1311: 

1312: In a more general view, there are two invariants available;

1313: $(k\cdot q)^2/m^2$, which evaluates to $q_0^2$ in the rest

1314: frame of the nucleon and $\frac{(k\cdot q)^2-k^2q^2}{m^2}$

1315: which evaluates to $\bfq^2$ in this rest frame. One could

1316: choose any combination of $\bfq^2$ and $q_0^2$ desired for the

1317: dependence in the rest frame. However, only $[(k\cdot

1318: q)^2-k^2q^2]/m^2$ (and $q^2$ by dint of containing no

1319: reference to the nucleon momentum at all) are independent of

1320: which nucleon momentum ($k$ or $k'$) is used.

1321: 

1322: The use of the form factor obtained from the Fourier transform of the 

1323: density in the nucleon center of mass without any dependence on $q_0$ 

1324: corresponds to an interaction which is instantaneous in time. This is 

1325: perhaps to be expected since the valence quarks are always present 

1326: for interaction, whereas the interaction through the intermediate 

1327: step of the emission of a meson requires a time $\hbar$/Mass for the 

1328: meson to be formed and propagate.

1329: 

1330: Other authors \cite{pena,others} have used relativistic

1331: generalizations of the form factor.  In particular Ramalho,

1332: Arriaga and Pe\~na \cite{pena} have argued that the first

1333: type of form factor dependence, Eq. (\ref{mesonform})  

1334: corresponds to the dressing of the nucleon by mesons of mass

1335: $\Lambda$ and suggest that the variable $\bfq^2$ should be

1336: replaced by

1337: \eq

1338: {\cal Q}^2\equiv \frac{(P\cdot q)^2}{P^2}-q^2,

1339: \qe

1340: where $P$ is the center-of-mass momentum of the two nucleons.  

1341: The value of ${\cal Q}^2$ evaluates to $\bfq^2$ in the center of 

1342: mass system so that there is no dependence on $q_0$ if one

1343: calculates in that reference frame, hence no possible

1344: singularity in that variable. This may be a useful form but

1345: the underlying basis in physics is not clear since the form factor

1346: should be a property of the pion-nucleon vertex and not the

1347: entire system.  How a pion interacts with a single nucleon

1348: should not depend on the momentum of a second nucleon.

1349: 

1350: \subsection{Conditions on the Form Factor}

1351: 

1352: Reviewing the previous paragraphs, we may summarize the desired properties 

1353: of an off-shell form factor arising from an extended source.

1354: 

1355: \begin{enumerate}

1356: \item

1357: There should be no poles of $q_0$ on the real axis.

1358: 

1359: \item

1360: For the case of the nucleon on shell and at rest, the form factor

1361: should be independent of $q_0$ so that the interaction is instantaneous.

1362: 

1363: \item

1364: As the nucleon energy approaches zero, poles in $q_0$ should tend to $\pm

1365: i\infty$. This is necessary since, in this limit, the interaction could be

1366: regarded as being among point particles and, by causality, there can be no

1367: contribution from poles off of the real axis. While the arguments of the

1368: previous point and this one arise from different physical bases, they are

1369: mathematically related.

1370: 

1371: For a typical example consider a form factor of the type

1372: \eq

1373: \frac{\Lambda^2}{aq_0^2+bq_0+\bfq^2+\Lambda^2},

1374: \qe

1375: where $a$ and $b$ are real functions of $\bfq$, $\bfk$ and $k_0$.

1376: The poles in $q_0$ will be given by

1377: \eq

1378: q_0=\frac{-b\pm \sqrt{b^2-4a(\bfq^2+\Lambda^2)}}{2a}.

1379: \qe

1380: In order that $q_0\rightarrow \pm i\infty$ as $|\bfk|\rightarrow 0$

1381: both $a$ and $b$ must tend to zero in this limit. This, in turn, 

1382: means that the form factor becomes independent of $q_0$ in the limit 

1383: $|\bfk|\rightarrow 0$.

1384: 

1385: \item

1386: In the nucleon rest frame the form factor (which is a function of

1387: $|\bfq|^2$ only) is the Fourier transform of the source density, a 

1388: positive definite function.

1389: 

1390: \end{enumerate}

1391: 

1392: \subsection{Application to the present case.}

1393: 

1394: For the application of the form factor in the present calculation

1395: we can always choose the nucleon to be one of the external 

1396: lines and hence on shell with energy E.  If we define

1397: \eq

1398: f(E,\bfk ,q_0,\bfq)=f(k,q)=\left[\frac{\Lambda^2-\mu^2}{\frac{(k\cdot

1399: q)^2}{m^2}-q^2+\Lambda^2}\right]^2, \label{fdef}

1400: \qe

1401: a product of four of these factors will appear, one for each 

1402: vertex. For the box diagram we have

1403: 

1404: \eq \calf=

1405: f(E,\bfk,q_0,\bfq)f(E,-\bfk,q_0,\bfq)f(E,\bfk',q_0,\bfq')

1406: f(E,-\bfk',q_0,\bfq'), \label{ffbox}

1407: \qe

1408: while for the crossed diagram the product

1409: \eq \calf=

1410: f(E,\bfk,q_0,\bfq')f(E,-\bfk,q_0,\bfq)f(E,\bfk',q_0,\bfq)

1411: f(E,-\bfk',q_0,\bfq') \label{ffcross}

1412: \qe

1413: enters. Since these functions are scalars and do not have any poles

1414: on the real axis, the manipulation of the spin observables

1415: and the treatment of the singularities is not affected by

1416: their presence.

1417: 

1418: 

1419: \section{Dispersion Relation Approach}

1420: 

1421: In order to cross-check our Feynman diagram results we have

1422: calculated the two-pion exchange in the dispersion

1423: relation approach following Ref. \cite{Cottingham73}. The

1424: matrix element $\calM$ of Eq.~(1) in section II can be written

1425: as,

1426: 

1427: \begin{equation}

1428:         \calM=\sum_{i=1}^{5}\left[3p_{i}^{+}\left(w,t,\bar t\right)

1429: +2p_{i}^{-}\left(w,t,\bar t\right)

1430: \mbox{\boldmath $\tau$}_{1}\cdot\mbox{\boldmath $\tau$}_{2}\right]P_{i}.

1431:         \label{M+-}

1432: \end{equation}

1433: Here, $w$, $t$, $\bar t$ are the Mandelstam invariants satisfying 

1434: $w+t+\bar t=4m^2$, $\mbox{\boldmath $\tau$}_{1(2)}$ the 

1435: isospin Pauli matrices for the nucleon 1(2) and $P_i$ the perturbative 

1436: invariants. One has,

1437: 

1438: \begin{equation}

1439: w  = \left(k_1+k_2\right)^2,

1440:                 \qquad

1441: t  = \left(k_1-k_1'\right)^2,

1442:                 \qquad

1443: \bar t  = \left(k_1-k_2'\right)^2

1444: \label{wttb}

1445: \end{equation}

1446: and

1447:  \begin{equation}

1448:         \begin{array}{rcl}

1449:                 P_{1} & = & 1^{1}1^{2},  \\

1450:                 \ecart

1451:                 P_{2} & = & -\left[\left(\gamma^{1} \cdot N\right)1^{2}+\left(\gamma^{2} \cdot P\right)1^{1}\right],  \\

1452:                 \ecart

1453:                 P_{3} & = & \left(\gamma^{1} \cdot N\right)\left(\gamma^{2} \cdot P\right), \\

1454:                 \ecart

1455:                 P_{4} & = & \gamma^{1}\cdot \gamma^{2}, \\

1456:                 \ecart

1457:                 P_{5} & = & \gamma^{1}_{5} \gamma^{2}_{5},

1458:         \end{array}

1459:         \label{Pi}

1460:   \end{equation}

1461: with

1462:   \begin{equation}

1463:                 N  =  \frac{1}{2}\left(k_{2}+k'_{2}\right),

1464:                 \qquad  

1465:                 P  =  \frac{1}{2}\left(k_{1}+k'_{1}\right).

1466:                 \label{NP}

1467:    \end{equation}

1468: 

1469: Assuming the Mandelstam representation \cite{Mandelstam55}, the

1470: two-pion exchange invariant amplitudes $p_{i}^{\pm}\left(w,t,\bar

1471: t\right)$ of Eq.~(\ref{M+-}) satisfy the following double dispersion

1472: relations,

1473: 

1474:  \begin{eqnarray}

1475:     p_{i}^{\pm}\left(w,t,\bar{t}\right) & = &{\displaystyle

1476:     \frac{1}{\pi^2}\int_{4\mu^{2}}^{+\infty}\frac{dt'}{t'-t-\imath\epsilon}\ 

1477: \int_{4m^{2}}^{+\infty}    \frac{dw'}{w'-w-\imath\epsilon}\ y_{i}^{\pm}\left(w',t'\right)}

1478: \nonumber\\

1479: &&{\displaystyle\mp (-1)^i\frac{1}{\pi^2}\int_{4\mu^{2}}^{+\infty}\frac{dt'}{t'-t-\imath\epsilon}\

1480: \int_{4m^2}^{+\infty}\frac{dw'}{w'-\bar t-\imath\epsilon}\ y_{i}^{\pm}\left(w',t'\right)},

1481: \label{pi+-d}

1482: \end{eqnarray}

1483: where the $y_{i}^{\pm}(w,t)$ are the double spectral functions. In 

1484: Eq.~(\ref{pi+-d}) the first double integrals represent the contributions 

1485: of the two-pion-exchange box diagram (see Fig.~\ref{boite}).   The second 

1486: double integrals  give the contribution of the crossed-pion diagram   

1487: (Fig.~\ref{croise}). They are obtained from the contributions of the box  

1488: diagram by the substitution $k_1 \leftrightarrow -k_1'$ which is 

1489: equivalent  to that of $ w  \leftrightarrow \bar t$. This substitution  

1490: changes the sign of the invariants $P_1$,  $P_3$, $P_5$ while  $P_2$ and  

1491: $P_4$ are not modified. It also changes the isospin dependence. These  

1492: changes result in the signs given here. We shall show below how one can  

1493: calculate the two-pion-exchange double spectral functions 

1494: $y_{i}^{\pm}(w,t)$.  Use of the following decomposition

1495: 

1496: 

1497: \begin{eqnarray}

1498: \label{twprime}

1499: \frac{1}{t-t'-\imath\epsilon} \ \frac{1}{w'-(4m^2-w-t)-\imath\epsilon} &=&

1500: \frac{1}{t-t'-\imath\epsilon}\ \frac{1}{w'-(4m^2-w-t')-\imath\epsilon}\nonumber\\

1501: &&+\frac{1}{w'-(4m^2-w-t)-\imath\epsilon}\ \frac{1}{t'-(4m^2-w-w')-\imath\epsilon}

1502: \end{eqnarray}

1503: allows us to write Eq.~(\ref{pi+-d}) as

1504: 

1505:  \begin{eqnarray}

1506:     p_{i}^{\pm}\left(w,t,\bar{t}\right) & = &{\displaystyle

1507:     \frac{1}{\pi}\int_{4\mu^{2}}^{+\infty}\frac{dt'}{t'-t-\imath\epsilon}\ [\rho_{i}^{\pm}\left(w,t'\right)\mp (-1)^{i}\rho_{i}^{\pm}\left(4m^2-w-t',t'\right)]}\nonumber\\

1508: &&{\displaystyle\mp (-1)^i\frac{1}{\pi}\int_{4m^2}^{+\infty}\frac{dw'}{w'-\bar t-\imath\epsilon}\ a_i^\pm\left(w',4m^2-w-w'\right)},

1509: \label{pi+-}

1510: \end{eqnarray}

1511: with

1512: \begin{equation}

1513:      \rho_{i}^{\pm}(w,t)=\mbox{Im}_t\ p_{i}^{\pm}(w,t)=\frac{1}{\pi}

1514:      \int_{4m^{2}}^{+\infty}    \frac{dw'}{w'-w-\imath\epsilon}\ y_{i}^{\pm}\left(w',t\right),

1515: \label{rhoi+-}

1516: \end{equation}

1517: and

1518: \begin{equation}

1519:      a_{i}^{\pm}\left(w',4m^2-w-w'\right)=\frac{1}{\pi}

1520:      \int_{4\mu^{2}}^{+\infty}    \frac{dt'}{t'-\left(4m^2-w-w'\right)-

1521: \imath\epsilon}\ y_{i}^{\pm}\left(w',t'\right).

1522:         \label{ai+-}

1523: \end{equation}

1524: Since the term with $a_{i}^{\pm}\left(w',4m^2-w-w'\right)$

1525: in Eq.~(\ref{pi+-}) gives rise to a rather short range force

1526: with mass exchanges larger than $2m$ it was neglected in

1527: the Paris Potential \cite{Cottingham73, Richard75,

1528: Lacombe81}.  In Eq.~(\ref{rhoi+-}) the notation

1529: $\mbox{Im}_t$ comes from the use of the relation

1530: \begin{equation}

1531:         \frac{1}{t'-t-\imath\epsilon}=\frac{P}{t'-t}+\imath\pi\delta(t'-t),

1532:         \label{delta}

1533: \end{equation}

1534: where $P$ indicates the principal value part of the 

1535: integral.

1536: 

1537: \begin{figure}[htb]

1538: \hspace*{0.9in}

1539: {\large

1540: \begin{picture}(500,180)

1541: \put(5,170){$k_1=(\sqrt{t}/2,\bfk')$}

1542: \put(275,170){$k_1'=(\sqrt{t}/2,-\bfk')$}

1543: \put(120,170){$p=(q_0-\sqrt{t}/2,\bfq-\bfk')$}

1544: \put(3,30){$k_2=(\sqrt{t}/2,\bfk)$}

1545: \put(275,30){$k_2'=(\sqrt{t}/2,-\bfk)$}

1546: \put(110,30){$p'=(\sqrt{t}/2-q_0,\bfk-\bfq)$}

1547: \put(30,110){$q=(q_0,\bfq)$}

1548: \put(265,110){$q'=(\sqrt{t}-q_0,-\bfq)$}

1549: \put(5,160){\line(1,0){380}}

1550: \put(5,161){\line(1,0){380}}

1551: \put(5,50){\line(1,0){380}}

1552: \put(5,49){\line(1,0){380}}

1553: % first pion

1554: \put(100,50){\line(0,1){10}}

1555: \put(100,70){\line(0,1){10}}

1556: \put(100,90){\line(0,1){10}}

1557: \put(100,110){\line(0,1){10}}

1558: \put(100,130){\line(0,1){10}}

1559: \put(100,150){\line(0,1){10}}

1560: % first arrow up

1561: %\put(95,128){\line(1,2){5}}

1562: \put(95,129){\line(1,2){5}}

1563: \put(95,130){\line(1,2){5}}

1564: %\put(105,129){\line(-1,2){5}}

1565: \put(105,130){\line(-1,2){5}}

1566: \put(105,131){\line(-1,2){5}}

1567: % second arrow up

1568: %\put(95,68){\line(1,2){5}}

1569: \put(95,69){\line(1,2){5}}

1570: \put(95,70){\line(1,2){5}}

1571: %\put(105,69){\line(-1,2){5}}

1572: \put(105,70){\line(-1,2){5}}

1573: \put(105,71){\line(-1,2){5}}

1574: % second pion

1575: \put(260,50){\line(0,1){10}}

1576: \put(260,70){\line(0,1){10}}

1577: \put(260,90){\line(0,1){10}}

1578: \put(260,110){\line(0,1){10}}

1579: \put(260,130){\line(0,1){10}}

1580: \put(260,150){\line(0,1){10}}

1581: % first arrow up

1582: %\put(255,78){\line(1,2){5}}

1583: %\put(255,77){\line(1,2){5}}

1584: %\put(255,76){\line(1,2){5}}

1585: %\put(260,66){\line(-1,2){5}}

1586: %\put(260,67){\line(-1,2){5}}

1587: \put(255,69){\line(1,2){5}}

1588: \put(255,70){\line(1,2){5}}

1589: \put(265,70){\line(-1,2){5}}

1590: \put(265,71){\line(-1,2){5}}

1591: \put(255,129){\line(1,2){5}}

1592: \put(255,130){\line(1,2){5}}

1593: \put(265,130){\line(-1,2){5}}

1594: \put(265,131){\line(-1,2){5}}

1595: \end{picture}

1596: }

1597: \caption{Box diagram kinematics in the t-channel c.m.. 

1598: }\label{tboite}

1599: \end{figure}

1600:  

1601: The unitarity condition in the t-channel for the $N \bar N \to

1602: 2\pi \to N \bar N$ process \cite{Richard75} leads to

1603: 

1604: \begin{equation}

1605:   \begin{array}{l}

1606:         \sum_{i}\lbrack \rho_{i}^{\pm}(w,t) \mp (-1)^{i}\rho_{i}^{\pm}\left(4m^{2}-w-t,t\right)

1607:         \rbrack P_{i} =  \\

1608:         \ecart

1609:  {\displaystyle \frac{1}{128\pi^{2}}\sqrt{\frac{t-4\mu^{2}}{t}}       

1610:        \int d \Omega_{Q}\left\lbrack A_{1}^{*\pm}\left(s_1,t,\bar s_1\right)1^1

1611:         +\mbox{\boldmath $\gamma^1$}\cdot

1612:         \mathbf{Q}B_{1}^{*\pm}\left(s_1,t,\bar s_1\right)\right\rbrack

1613:         \left\lbrack A_{2}^{\pm}\left(s_2,t,\bar s_2\right)1^2

1614:           +\mbox{\boldmath $\gamma^2$}\cdot

1615:         \mathbf{Q}B_{2}^{\pm}\left(s_2,t,\bar s_2\right)\right\rbrack},

1616:  \end{array}   

1617:         \label{tchannelunitarity}

1618: \end{equation}

1619: where the four-momenta of the on-shell exchanged pions, in their t-channel center of mass (see the kinematics given in Fig.~\ref{tboite}), are,

1620: 

1621: \begin{equation}

1622:   q = \left(\frac{\sqrt{t}}{2}, -{\bf Q}\right),

1623:   \qquad 

1624:   q' = \left(\frac{\sqrt{t}}{2},{\bf Q}\right).

1625: \label{qq'tcms}

1626: \end{equation}

1627: 

1628: 

1629: The amplitudes $A(B)_{1(2)}^{\pm}\left(s_{1(2)},t,\bar

1630: s_{1(2)}\right)$ are the usual invariants for the reaction $N

1631: \bar N \to \pi \pi$ \cite{Hoehler83}. The Mandelstam invariants

1632: $s_{1(2)}$, $t$ and $\bar s_{1(2)}$, satisfying, $s_{1(2)}+t+\bar

1633: s_{1(2)}=2m^2+2\mu^2$, are

1634: 

1635: \begin{equation}

1636:   \begin{array}{rcccl}

1637: s_1      & = & \left(k_1-q'\right)^2   & = & m^2+\mu^2-\displaystyle\frac{t}{2}-2{\bf P}\cdot {\bf Q },\\

1638:                 \ecart

1639: t        & = & \left(k_1-k_1'\right)^2 & = & 4\left({\bf Q}^2 + \mu^2\right), \\

1640:                 \ecart

1641: \bar s_1 & = & \left(k_1+q\right)^2   & = & m^2+\mu^2-\displaystyle\frac{t}{2}+2{\bf P}\cdot {\bf Q} 

1642: \end{array}

1643: \label{s1ts1b}

1644: \end{equation}

1645: and

1646: 

1647: \begin{equation}

1648: s_2       =  \left(k_2-q\right)^2    =  m^2+\mu^2-\frac{t}{2}-2{\bf N}\cdot {\bf Q} ,\\

1649:                 \qquad

1650: \bar s_2  =  \left(k_2+q'\right)^2    =  m^2+\mu^2-\frac{t}{2}+2{\bf N}\cdot {\bf Q},

1651: \label{s2s2b}

1652: \end{equation}

1653: with, $ q^2=q'^2=\mu^2=\frac{t}{4}-{\bf Q}^2 $.

1654: Expressions~(\ref{s1ts1b}) and~(\ref{s2s2b}) follow from 

1655: 

1656: \begin{equation}

1657:   \begin{array}{rcccl}

1658:   k_1 & = & \left(-\displaystyle\frac{\sqrt{t}}{2}, {\bf k}_1\right),

1659: \qquad

1660:    k'_1 & = & \left(\displaystyle\frac{\sqrt{t}}{2}, {\bf k}_1\right),\\

1661:                 \ecart

1662:     k_2  & = & \left(\displaystyle\frac{\sqrt{t}}{2}, {\bf k}_2\right),

1663: \qquad

1664:      k'_1  & = &  \left(-\displaystyle\frac{\sqrt{t}}{2}, {\bf k}_2\right),\\

1665:                 \ecart

1666:      P & = & \left(0, {\bf k}_1\right),

1667: \qquad

1668:   \   N & = & \left(0, {\bf k}_2\right),

1669: \end{array}

1670: \label{ki}

1671: \end{equation}

1672: since $ {\bf k}_2- {\bf k'}_2= {\bf q}- {\bf q'}= {\bf k'}_1- {\bf k}_1=0 

1673: $ (see Fig.~\ref{tboite} and Eq.(\ref{NP})).  Introducing the 

1674: four-vector $ L_\lambda=\varepsilon_{\lambda \nu \rho \sigma} 

1675: M^\nu K^\rho \Delta^\sigma $, where,

1676: 

1677: \begin{equation}

1678: \begin{array}{rcccl}

1679: M & = & N+P & =& (0,{\bf N} + {\bf P}),\\

1680:                 \ecart

1681: K & = & N-P & =& (0,{\bf N} - {\bf P}),\\

1682:                 \ecart

1683: \Delta & = & k'_1-k_1 & =& (\sqrt{t},0),

1684: \end{array}

1685: \label{MKD}

1686: \end{equation}

1687: $Q$ can be represented as

1688: \begin{equation}

1689: Q=\frac{Q\cdot M}{M^2}M+\frac{Q\cdot K}{K^2}K

1690: +\frac{Q\cdot \Delta}{\Delta^2}\Delta+\frac{Q\cdot L}{L^2}L.

1691: \label{Q}

1692: \end{equation}

1693: Eq.~(\ref{tchannelunitarity}) can then be decomposed in the invariants 

1694: $P_i$ of Eq.~(\ref{Pi}) as \cite{Richard75,Brown76},

1695:  \begin{eqnarray}

1696:         &&\sum_{i}\lbrack \rho_{i}^{\pm}(w,t) \mp (-1)^{i}\rho_{i}^{\pm}\left(4m^{2}-w-t,t\right)

1697:         \rbrack P_{i} = {\displaystyle \frac{1}{128\pi^{2}}\sqrt{\frac{t-4\mu^{2}}{t}}} \nonumber \\

1698:         \ecart

1699:                  && {\displaystyle \times \left[\left({\cal A}^{\pm}+2m {\cal C}^{\pm}+m^2 {\cal E}^{\pm} \right) P_1

1700: +\left({\cal B}^{\pm}+m {\cal D}^{\pm}\right)P_2+{\cal E}^{\pm} P_3-{\cal F}^{\pm} P_4 \right]},

1701: \label{rhoionPi}

1702: \end{eqnarray}

1703: with 

1704: 

1705:  \begin{equation}

1706:         \begin{array}{rcl}

1707:  {\cal A}^{\pm} & = &  {\displaystyle \int d \Omega_{Q} A_{1}^{*\pm} A_{2}^{\pm}}, \\

1708:                 \ecart

1709: {\cal B}^{\pm} & = & {\displaystyle \int d \Omega_{Q} B_{1}^{*\pm} A_{2}^{\pm} 

1710: \left(\frac{Q\cdot M}{M^2}+\frac{Q\cdot K}{K^2}\right)},\\

1711:                 \ecart

1712: {\cal C}^{\pm} & = &  {\displaystyle \int d \Omega_{Q} B_{1}^{*\pm} A_{2}^{\pm}

1713: \left(\frac{Q\cdot M}{M^2}-\frac{Q\cdot K}{K^2}\right)},\\

1714:                 \ecart

1715: {\cal D}^{\pm} & = &  {\displaystyle\frac{1}{M^2 K^2}\int d \Omega_{Q} B_{1}^{*\pm} B_{2}^{\pm}

1716: \left[\frac{(Q\cdot M)^2}{M^2}\left(2K^2+M^2\right)+\frac{(Q\cdot K)^2}{K^2}

1717: \left(K^2+2M^2\right)-Q^2\left(K^2+M^2\right)\right]},\\

1718:                 \ecart

1719: 

1720: {\cal E}^{\pm} & = &  {\displaystyle\frac{1}{M^2 K^2}\int d \Omega_{Q} B_{1}^{*\pm} B_{2}^{\pm}

1721: \left[\frac{(Q\cdot M)^2}{M^2}\left(2K^2-M^2\right)+\frac{(Q\cdot K)^2}{K^2}

1722: \left(K^2-2M^2\right)-Q^2\left(K^2-M^2\right)\right]},\\

1723:                 \ecart

1724: {\cal F}^{\pm} & = & {\displaystyle \int d \Omega_{Q} B_{1}^{*\pm} B_{2}^{\pm} 

1725: \left[-Q^2+\frac{(Q\cdot M)^2}{M^2}+\frac{(Q\cdot K)^2}{K^2}\right]}.\\

1726: \end{array}

1727: \label{ABCDEF}

1728: \end{equation}

1729: Here $M^2=w$ and $K^2=\bar t = 4m^2-w-t$. Note that the 

1730: Bjorken-Drell metric used here leads to some sign differences with

1731: respect to references \cite{Richard75, Brown76} where the Pauli metric was 

1732: used.

1733: 

1734: 

1735: \subsection{Nucleon Pole Contribution for Pseudo-scalar Coupling}

1736: 

1737: If the invariant amplitudes $A(B)_{1(2)}^{\pm}$ are expressed as

1738: fixed-t dispersion relations \cite{Hoehler83} one can write the

1739: $\rho_i^{\pm}$ given by Eqs.~(\ref{rhoionPi}) and~(\ref{ABCDEF})

1740: in the spectral form~(\ref{rhoi+-}). Following Ref. 

1741: \cite{Nishijima69} one can use the Cutkosky rules 

1742: \cite{Cutkosky54} to calculate the imaginary part of the 

1743: $\rho_i^{\pm}$ from Eq.~(\ref{ABCDEF}). The expressions for the

1744: $y_i^{\pm} (w,t)$ of Eq.~(\ref{rhoi+-}) in terms of double

1745: integrals over $s_1$ and $s_2$ on quantities depending on elastic

1746: pion-nucleon scattering absorptive parts, are given by Eqs.~(2.6)

1747: to (2.8) of Ref. \cite{Cottingham73}.  The double spectral

1748: functions $y_{i,N}^{\pm}(w,t)$ of the box diagram for

1749: pseudo-scalar (PS) pion-nucleon coupling can then be obtained

1750: from these equations. In this case the $A(B)_{1(2),PS}^{\pm}$ for

1751: the $\pi N$ nucleon Born term are (see e.g. Eq.~(A.6.30) of

1752: Ref. \cite{Hoehler83}),

1753: 

1754: \begin{equation}

1755: A_{1(2),PS}^{\pm}=0,

1756: \qquad

1757: B_{1(2),PS}^{\pm}=g^2 \left(\frac{1}{m^2-s_{1(2)}-\imath\epsilon}

1758: \mp\frac{1}{m^2-\bar s_{1(2)}-\imath\epsilon}\right).

1759: \label{ABPS}

1760: \end{equation}

1761: The absorptive parts of $A_{1(2),PS}^{\pm}$ are zero and those of  

1762: $B_{1(2),PS}^{\pm}$ are given by $\pi g^2\ \delta (s_{1(2)}-m^2)$ 

1763: for  the direct term leading to,

1764: 

1765:   \begin{equation}

1766:         \begin{array}{rcl}

1767:          y_{1,N}^{\pm}(w,t) & = & {\displaystyle \pm 

1768:          \frac{\pi^{2}}{2}\left(\frac{g^{2}}{4\pi}\right)^{2}

1769:           \frac{m^{2}}{\sqrt{t}}\frac{\calK}{\left(4m^{2}-t-w\right)^{2}}

1770:           \left[\frac{4m^{2}-2w-t}{w^{2}\calK^{2}}

1771:           +\left(t-2\mu^{2}\right)^{2}\right]},\\

1772:            \ecart    y_{2,N}^{\pm}(w,t)& = & {\displaystyle \pm 

1773:            \frac{\pi^{2}}{2}\left(\frac{g^{2}}{4\pi}\right)^{2}

1774:            \frac{m}{\sqrt{t}}\frac{\calK}{\left(4m^{2}-t-w\right)^{2}} 

1775:   \left[-\frac{4m^{2}-t}{w^{2}\calK^{2}}+\left(t-2\mu^{2}\right)^{2} 

1776:                 \right]},\\

1777:                 \ecart

1778:                 y_{3,N}^{\pm}(w,t) & = & {\displaystyle\frac{ 

1779:                 y_{1}^{\pm}(w,t)}{m^{2}}},\\

1780:                 \ecart

1781:                 y_{4,N}^{\pm}(w,t) & = & {\displaystyle \pm 

1782:                 \frac{\pi^{2}}{2}\left(\frac{g^{2}}{4\pi}\right)^{2}

1783:           \frac{1}{\sqrt{t}}\calK\left[-\frac{1}{w\left(4m^{2}-t-w\right) 

1784:                 \calK^{2}}\right]},\\

1785:                 \ecart

1786:                 y_{5,N}^{\pm}(w,t)& = & 0,  

1787:         \end{array}

1788:         \label{yiboite}

1789:   \end{equation}

1790: with

1791:  

1792: \begin{equation}

1793:        \calK=w^{-1/2}\left\lbrack\left(t-4\mu^{2}\right)\left(w-4m^{2}\right)

1794:         -4\mu^{4}\right\rbrack^{-1/2}.

1795:         \label{Kwt}

1796: \end{equation}

1797: We define,

1798: 

1799:  \begin{equation}

1800:         A(y,t')=\int_{x_{0}}^{+\infty}\frac{dw'}{w'-y}\ K(w',t'), 

1801: \qquad

1802:          C(y,t')=\int_{x_{0}}^{+\infty}\frac{dw'}{(w'-y)^{2}}\ K(w',t') 

1803:         \label{DefdeC}

1804: \end{equation}

1805: where $x_{0}$ is the lower limit of the $w'$ integration such that

1806:  $K(w',t')$ is defined, i. e.,

1807: $(t'-4\mu^{2})(w'-4m^{2})-4\mu^{4}\ge 0$, which leads to, 

1808:   \begin{equation}

1809:         x_{0}(t')=4m^{2}+\frac{4\mu^{4}}{t'-4\mu^{2}} \ge 4m^2.

1810:         \label{DefdeX0}

1811:   \end{equation}

1812: With the definition,

1813: 

1814: \begin{equation}

1815:         \eta(w',t')  =  4\mu^{4}-(t'-4\mu^{2})(w'-4m^{2})

1816:           = (x_{0}-w')(t'-4\mu^{2}),

1817:         \label{DefdeAlpha}

1818:   \end{equation}

1819: we have  \cite{Zytnicki01},

1820:  \begin{equation}

1821:         \rho_{1}^{\pm}(w,t')=\rho_{11}^{\pm}(w,t')-\rho_{12}^{\pm}(w,t')

1822:         \label{Ro1}

1823:  \end{equation}

1824:  with

1825:  \begin{equation}

1826:         \begin{array}{rcl}

1827:                 \rho_{11}^{\pm}(w,t') & = & {\displaystyle \pm \frac{\pi}{2} 

1828:                 \left(\frac{g^{2}}{4\pi}\right)^{2} \frac{m^{2}}{\sqrt{t'}}\ 

1829:                 \frac{(t'-2\mu^{2})^{2}}{4m^{2}-w-t'}\left\lbrack  

1830:           \frac{A(w,t')-A(4m^{2}-t',t')}{4m^{2}-w-t'}

1831:                   +C(4m^{2}-t',t') \right\rbrack}, \\

1832:                 \ecart

1833:             \rho_{12}^{\pm}(w,t')& = & {\displaystyle \pm \frac{\pi}{2} 

1834:                 \left(\frac{g^{2}}{4\pi}\right)^{2} \frac{m^{2}}{\sqrt{t'}}

1835:                 \left\lbrack \mathcal{F}_{1}A(0,t')+\mathcal{F}_{2}A(w,t')

1836:                 +\mathcal{F}_{3}C(4m^{2}-t',t')

1837:                  +\mathcal{F}_{4}A(4m^{2}-t',t')\right\rbrack}.

1838:         \end{array}

1839:         \label{Ro11etRo12}

1840:  \end{equation}

1841:  The ${\cal F}_i$ are given by,

1842: \begin{equation}

1843:         \begin{array}{rcccccl}

1844:                 \mathcal{F}_{1} & = & {\displaystyle 

1845:                 -\frac{4\left[m^{2}\left(t'-4\mu^{2}\right)+\mu^{4} \right]}{w\left(4m^{2}-t'\right)}},

1846:                 \qquad

1847:                 & \mathcal{F}_{2} & & = & {\displaystyle 

1848:                 -\frac{\eta\left(w,t'\right)\left(2w+t'-4m^{2}\right)}

1849:                 {w\left(w+t'-4m^{2}\right)^{2}}},  \\

1850:                 \ecart

1851:                 \mathcal{F}_{3} & = & {\displaystyle -\frac{\left(t'-2\mu^{2}\right)^{2}}

1852:                 {4m^{2}-w-t'}},

1853:                 \qquad

1854:                & \mathcal{F}_{4}&  & = & -\mathcal{F}_{1} -\mathcal{F}_{2}.

1855:         \end{array}

1856:         \label{DefdeF}

1857: \end{equation}

1858: The expression for $\rho_{2}^{\pm}(w,t')$ is,

1859: \begin{equation}

1860:         \rho_{2}^{\pm}(w,t')=\rho_{21}^{\pm}(w,t')+\rho_{22}^{\pm}(w,t')

1861:         \label{Ro2}

1862: \end{equation}

1863: with

1864: \begin{equation}

1865:         \begin{array}{rcl}

1866:                 \rho_{21}^{\pm}(w,t') & = & {\displaystyle \frac{\rho_{11}^{\pm}(w,t')}

1867:                 {m}},  \\

1868:                 \ecart

1869:                 \rho_{22}^{\pm}(w,t') & = & {\displaystyle \pm \frac{\pi}{2} 

1870:                 \left(\frac{g^{2}}{4\pi}\right)^{2} \frac{m}{\sqrt{t'}}}

1871: (t'-4m^{2})

1872:                 \left[\mathcal{G}_{1}A(0,t')+ \mathcal{G}_{2}A(w,t')

1873:                  +\mathcal{G}_{3}C(4m^{2}-t',t')

1874:                 +\mathcal{G}_{4}A(4m^{2}-t',t')

1875:                  \right]

1876:         \end{array}

1877:         \label{Ro21etRo22}

1878: \end{equation}

1879: and,

1880: \begin{equation}

1881:         \begin{array}{rcccl}

1882:                 \ecart

1883:                 \mathcal{G}_{1} & = & {\displaystyle 

1884:                 -\frac{\mathcal{F}_{1}}{4m^{2}-t'}}, 

1885:                 \qquad

1886:                 \mathcal{G}_{2}& = & {\displaystyle \frac{\mathcal{F}_{2}}{2w+t'-4m^{2}}},  \\

1887:                 \ecart

1888:                \mathcal{G}_{3} & = & {\displaystyle \frac{\mathcal{F}_{3}}

1889:                 {4m^{2}-t'}},

1890:                 \qquad

1891:                \mathcal{G}_{4} & = & -\mathcal{G}_{1} -\mathcal{G}_{2}.

1892:         \end{array}

1893:         \label{DefdeG}

1894: \end{equation}

1895: Furthermore,

1896:  

1897: \begin{equation}

1898:         \rho_{3}^{\pm}(w,t')  = {\displaystyle 

1899:         \frac{\rho_{1}^{\pm}(w,t')}{m^{2}}},

1900:         \label{Ro3}

1901: \end{equation}

1902:  

1903:  \begin{equation}

1904:         \rho_{4}^{\pm}(w,t')  =  \pm {\displaystyle 

1905: \frac{\pi^{2}}{2} 

1906:                 \left(\frac{g^{2}}{4\pi}\right)^{2} 

1907: \frac{1}{\sqrt{t'}}\ 

1908:                 \frac{1}{4m^{2}-w-t'}}

1909:                 \left[\eta(w,t')A(w,t')

1910:                  -(t'-2\mu^{2})^{2}A(4m^{2}-t',t')\right].

1911:         \label{Ro4}

1912:  \end{equation} 

1913: 

1914: The functions $A(y,t')$ and  $C(y,t')$ can be calculated analytically. First notice that,

1915: 

1916: \begin{equation}

1917:         C(y,t')=-\frac{\sqrt{t'-4\mu^{2}}}

1918:         {(t'-4m^{2})(t'-2\mu^{2})^{2}}

1919:         +\frac{(t'-4\mu^{2})(2t'-4m^{2})+4\mu^{4}}

1920:         {(t'-4m^{2})(t'-2\mu^{2})^{2}}\ A(y,t'),

1921:         \label{DefdeC2}

1922: \end{equation}

1923: 

1924: \begin{equation}

1925:      A(y,t')=\int_{x_{o}}^{+\infty}\frac{K(w',t')}{w'-y-\imath\epsilon}\ dw'

1926:      =P\int_{x_{o}}^{+\infty}\frac{K(w',t')}{w'-y}\ dw'

1927:      +i\pi K(y,t').                     

1928:         \label{modifA}

1929: \end{equation}

1930: One obtains Eq.~(\ref{modifA}) using Eq.~(\ref{delta}). 

1931: Depending on the value of $y$ one has the following results:

1932:  

1933: \begin{itemize}

1934:         \item  if $y<0$, then $\eta(y,t')=(x_{0}-y)(t'-4\mu^{2})>0$

1935:  \begin{equation}

1936:         A(y,t')=\frac{1}{\sqrt{-\eta(y,t') y}}

1937:                 \ln{

1938:                 \frac{

1939:                 1+\sqrt{\frac{-y(t'-4\mu^{2})}{\eta(y,t')}}

1940:                 }

1941:                 {

1942:                 1-\sqrt{\frac{-y(t'-4\mu^{2}}{\eta(y,t')}}

1943:                 }}

1944:                = \frac{1}{\sqrt{-\eta(y,t') y}}

1945:                 \ln{

1946:                 \frac{1+\sqrt{\frac{y}{y-x_{0}}}}

1947:                 {

1948:                 1-\sqrt{\frac{y}{y-x_{0}}}

1949:                 }

1950:                 },

1951:         \label{A1}

1952:  \end{equation} 

1953: 

1954:         \item  if $0<y<x_{0}$, then $\eta(y,t')>0$ and 

1955: \begin{equation}

1956:         A(y,t')=\frac{2}{\sqrt{\eta(y,t') y}}

1957:                 \arctan{\sqrt{\frac{y(t'-4\mu^{2})}{\eta(y,t')}}}

1958:                 =\frac{2}{\sqrt{\eta(y,t') y}}

1959:                 \arctan{\sqrt{\frac{y}{x_{0}-y}}},      

1960:                 \label{A2}

1961: \end{equation}

1962: 

1963:         \item  if $y>x_{0}$, then $\eta(y,t')<0$, $A$ has an imaginary 

1964: part:

1965: \begin{equation}

1966:      \begin{array}{rcl}

1967:         \text{Re}A(y,t') & = & {\displaystyle 

1968:         -\frac{1}{\sqrt{-\eta(y,t') y}}

1969:         \ln{

1970:         \frac{

1971:         1+\sqrt{

1972:         \frac{-y(t'-4\mu^{2})}{\eta(y,t')}

1973:         }

1974:         }

1975:             {

1976:             \sqrt{\frac{-y(t'-4\mu^{2})}{\eta(y,t')}}-1}

1977:             }}

1978:               =  {\displaystyle 

1979:              -\frac{1}{\sqrt{-\eta(y,t') y}}

1980:                 \ln{

1981:                 \frac{

1982:                 1+\sqrt{\frac{y}{y-x_{0}}}

1983:                 }

1984:                 {

1985:                 \sqrt{\frac{y}{y-x_{0}}}-1

1986:                 }

1987:                 }

1988:                 },\\

1989:             \ecart       

1990:         \text{Im}A(y,t') & = & K(y,t').

1991:      \end{array}

1992:          \label{A3}

1993: \end{equation}

1994: \end{itemize}

1995: 

1996: It can be seen from Eqs.~(\ref{A1}) and~(\ref{A2}) that $A$ is continuous 

1997: at y=0 with the value,

1998: 

1999:         \begin{equation}

2000:                 A(0,t')=\frac{2\sqrt{t'-4\mu^{2}}}{\eta(0,t')w}

2001:                 \label{Aen0}.

2002:         \end{equation}

2003: 

2004: On the other hand, $A$ is discontinuous at $x_{0}$, since 

2005: taking the limits in Eqs. ~(\ref{A2}) and~(\ref{A3}),

2006: 

2007:         \begin{equation}

2008:                 \begin{array}{l}

2009:                         {\displaystyle A(y,t')\underset{y \to x_{0}^{-}}{\sim}\quad 

2010:                         \frac{\pi}

2011:                         {\sqrt{(x_{0}-y)(t'-4\mu^{2})y}}\,\longrightarrow  \, 

2012:                         \infty}, \\

2013:                         \ecart

2014:                         {\displaystyle 

2015:                         \lim_{y \to x_{0}^{+}}A(y,t')=-\frac{1}{y 

2016:                         \sqrt{t'-4\mu^{2}}}}.

2017:                 \end{array}

2018:                 \label{limite}

2019:         \end{equation}

2020: This square root divergence will disappear after performing the 

2021: integration over  $t'$.

2022: 

2023: The integration over $t'$ in Eq.~({\ref{ai+-}) is performed analytically. 

2024: Let us define, 

2025:  

2026: \begin{equation}

2027:         \widetilde K(w',t')=t'^{-1/2}

2028: \left\lbrack\left(t'-4\mu^{2}\right)\left(w'-4m^{2}\right)-4\mu^{4}\right\rbrack^{-1/2},

2029:         \label{tildaKwt}

2030: \end{equation}

2031: 

2032:  \begin{equation}

2033:         \widetilde A(w',\widetilde y)=\int_{\widetilde x_{0}}^{+\infty}\frac{dt'}{t'-\widetilde y}\ \widetilde K(w',t'), 

2034: \qquad

2035:          \widetilde C(w',\widetilde y)=

2036: \int_{\widetilde x_{0}}^{+\infty}\frac{dt'}{(t'-\widetilde y)^{2}}\ 

2037: \widetilde K(w',t'), 

2038:         \label{DefdetildeC}

2039: \end{equation}

2040: where $\widetilde x_{0}$ is the lower limit of the $t'$ integration such that

2041:  $\widetilde K(w',t')$ is defined, i. e.,

2042: $(t'-4\mu^{2})(w'-4m^{2})-4\mu^{4}\ge 0$, which leads to, 

2043:   \begin{equation}

2044:         \widetilde x_{0}(t')=4\mu^{2}+\frac{4\mu^{4}}{w'-4m^{2}} \ge 4\mu^2.

2045:         \label{DefdetildeX0}

2046:   \end{equation}

2047: One obtains, with $\widetilde y=4m^2-w-w'$ and $\widetilde w'=4m^2-w'$,

2048:  \begin{equation}

2049:         \begin{array}{rcl}

2050:         a_{1}^{\pm}(w',\widetilde y) & = & {\displaystyle \pm \frac{\pi}{2} 

2051:                 \left(\frac{g^{2}}{4\pi}\right)^{2} 

2052:  \left\lbrack a_{11}(w',\widetilde y)+a_{12}(w',\widetilde y)\right\rbrack},\\

2053: 	\ecart

2054:         a_{2}^{\pm}(w',\widetilde y) & = & {\displaystyle \pm \frac{\pi}{2} 

2055:                 \left(\frac{g^{2}}{4\pi}\right)^{2} 

2056:  \left\lbrack \frac{ a_{11}(w',\widetilde y)}{m}+ \widetilde a_{12}(w',\widetilde y)\right\rbrack},\\

2057: 	\ecart

2058:         a_{3}^{\pm}(w',\widetilde y) & = & {\displaystyle 

2059: 	\frac{a_{1}^{\pm}(w',\widetilde y)}{m^2}},\\

2060: 	\ecart

2061:         a_{4}^{\pm}(w',\widetilde y)& = & {\displaystyle  \pm \frac{\pi}{2} 

2062:                 \left(\frac{g^{2}}{4\pi}\right)^{2} 

2063:              \frac{1}{w\sqrt{w'}}

2064:                 \left\lbrack \eta(w',\widetilde y)\widetilde A(w',\widetilde y)

2065:                  - \eta(w',\widetilde w')\widetilde A(w',\widetilde w')

2066:                 \right\rbrack}.

2067:         \end{array}

2068:          \label{a1234+-}

2069:  \end{equation}

2070:  In Eq.~(\ref{a1234+-}),

2071:  \begin{equation}

2072:         \begin{array}{rcl}

2073: a_{11}(w',\widetilde y) & = & {\displaystyle 

2074: \frac{m^{2}}{w^2\sqrt{w'}}\ \left\lbrack

2075: \left(\widetilde y -2\mu^2 \right )^2 \widetilde A(w',\widetilde w')

2076:  -\left(\widetilde w'-2\mu^2\right)\left(\widetilde y-w-2\mu^2 

2077: \right)\widetilde A(w',\widetilde w')

2078: +w\left (\widetilde w'-2\mu^2 \right )^2 \widetilde 

2079: C(w',\widetilde w') \right\rbrack}, \\

2080:                 \ecart

2081:             a_{12}(w',\widetilde y)& = & {\displaystyle  

2082:              \frac{m^{2}}{w^2w'\sqrt{w'}}

2083:                 \left\lbrack (w-w')\eta(w',\widetilde y)\widetilde A(w',\widetilde y)

2084:                  - [w^2+(w'-w) \eta(w',\widetilde y)]\widetilde A(w',\widetilde w')

2085:                +w w' \eta(w',\widetilde w') \widetilde C(w',\widetilde w')\right\rbrack},\\

2086: 	\ecart

2087:             \widetilde a_{12}(w',\widetilde y)& = & {\displaystyle  

2088:    \frac{m}{w^2w'\sqrt{w'}}

2089: \left\lbrack (w+w')\eta(w',\widetilde y)\widetilde 

2090: A(w',\widetilde y)

2091: +[w^2-(w+w') \eta(w',\widetilde y)]\widetilde A(w',\widetilde w')

2092: +ww'\eta(w',\widetilde w') \widetilde C(w',\widetilde 

2093: w')\right\rbrack}.

2094:         \end{array}

2095:         \label{a11eta12}

2096:  \end{equation}

2097: The functions $\widetilde A(w',\widetilde y)$ and  

2098: $\widetilde C(w',\widetilde y)$ with  $\widetilde y \le 0$  are, 

2099: \begin{equation}

2100:       \widetilde A(w',\widetilde y) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{-\eta(w',\widetilde y) \widetilde y}}

2101:                 \ln{

2102:                 \frac{1+\sqrt{\frac{\widetilde y}{\widetilde y-\widetilde x_{0}}}}

2103:                 {

2104:                 1-\sqrt{\frac{\widetilde y}{\widetilde y-\widetilde x_{0}}}

2105:                 }

2106:                 },

2107:         \label{tildeA1}

2108:  \end{equation} 

2109: \begin{equation}

2110:         \widetilde C(w',\widetilde y)=\frac{\sqrt{-\widetilde w'}}

2111:         {\widetilde y \eta(w',\widetilde y)}

2112:         -\frac{\widetilde w'(\widetilde y-2m^{2})+2\mu^{4}}

2113:         {\widetilde y \eta(w',\widetilde y)}\ \widetilde A(w',\widetilde y).

2114:         \label{DefdetildeC2}

2115: \end{equation}

2116: 

2117:   We have calculated the discontinuities of the  

2118: $p_{i}^{\pm}$ along $w$, i. e.,

2119: 

2120:  \begin{equation}

2121:         \lim_{\epsilon \to 0} \left[

2122:         p_{i}(w+\imath\epsilon,t')-p_{i}(w-\imath\epsilon,t')\right]

2123:         =2i\text{Im}_w \  p_{i}(w,t')=2i 

2124:                 \frac{1}{\pi}\int_{4\mu^{2}}^{+\infty}\frac{dt'}{t'-t}

2125:                 \ \text{Im}_w \  \rho_{i}^\pm(w,t').    

2126:       \label{rappel}

2127:  \end{equation}

2128: We introduce the following explicit notations

2129: \begin{equation}

2130:         \begin{array}{rcl}

2131:            \rho_{i}^{\pm \, \text{box}}(w,t') & = & \text{Re}\rho_{i}^{\pm}(w,t'),  \\

2132:            \ecart

2133:            \rho_{i}^{\pm \, \text{cro}}(w,t') & = & \mp (-1)^{i}

2134:            \rho_{i}^{\pm \, \text{box}}(w\leftrightarrow 4m^{2}-t'-w,t'),  \\

2135:            \ecart

2136:            \text{Im}_w\ \rho_{i}^{\pm \, \text{box}}(w,t') & = & 

2137:            \text{Im}_w\ \rho_{i}^{\pm}(w,t')= y_{i,N}^{\pm}(w,t').

2138:         \end{array}

2139:         \label{notation1}

2140:   \end{equation}

2141: Here again, the last equality of Eq.~(\ref{notation1}) follows from

2142: the application of Eq.~(\ref{delta}). In the expressions

2143: (\ref{Ro11etRo12}), (\ref{Ro21etRo22}), (\ref{Ro4}) and (\ref{A3}),

2144: the imaginary part of the $\rho_{i}^{\pm}(w,t')$ comes only from $A$.

2145: There are only three $A$ terms:  $A(w,t')$, $A(0,t')$ and

2146: $A(4m^{2}-t',t')$ in Eqs. (\ref{Ro11etRo12})  and (\ref{Ro21etRo22})

2147: that have a non-zero imaginary part for $y>x_{0}$. However, from

2148: (\ref{DefdeX0}) one cannot have $4m^{2}-t'>x_{0}$, so, \textit{a

2149: fortiori} one cannot have $4m^{2}-t'-w>x_{0}$ and \textbf{only the box

2150: diagram has an imaginary part} which justifies the superscript ``box''

2151: in the expression for the imaginary part. The superscript "cro"

2152: denotes the contribution from the crossed diagram. We write

2153: 

2154: \begin{eqnarray}

2155:                 p_{i}^{\pm \, \text{box}}(w,t) & = & {\displaystyle 

2156:                 \frac{1}{\pi}\int_{4\mu^{2}}^{+\infty}\frac{dt'}{t'-t}

2157:                 \ \rho_{i}^{\pm \, \text{box}}(w,t')},

2158:                 \label{Pech} \\

2159:         \ecart 

2160:                 p_{i}^{\pm \, \text{cro}}(\bar{t},t) & = & {\displaystyle 

2161:                 \frac{1}{\pi}\int_{4\mu^2}^{+\infty}\frac{dt'}{t'-t}\ 

2162:                 \rho_{i}^{\pm \, \text{cro}}(\bar{t},t')}\nonumber\\&&

2163:   {\displaystyle \mp (-1)^i\frac{1}{\pi}\int_{4m^2}^{+\infty}

2164:  \frac{dw'}{w'-\bar t}\ a^{\pm}_i(w',4m^2-w-w')},  \label{Pcro} \\

2165:                 \ecart

2166:                 \text{Im}_w\ p_{i}^{\pm}(w,t) & = & {\displaystyle 

2167:                 \frac{1}{\pi}\int_{4\mu^{2}}^{+\infty}\frac{dt'}{t'-t}\ 

2168:                 y_{i,N}^{\pm}(w,t')

2169:                 }. \label{Pima}

2170: \end{eqnarray}

2171: It can be seen from studying the high $t'$ behavior of the functions

2172: (\ref{notation1}) that they decrease like $1/t'$ or $\ln (t')/t'$ for

2173: $t'\to +\infty$, so that the integrals~(\ref{Pech}), (\ref{Pcro}) and

2174: (\ref{Pima}) on $t'$ converge. A similar convergence holds for the

2175: integrals on $w'$. Note that the physical values of $t (\bar t)$ being

2176: negative, there are no poles in the $t' (w')$ integration, so there is no

2177: further imaginary part. In the present form, the numerical calculation of

2178: Eqs.~(\ref{Pech}), (\ref{Pcro}) and (\ref{Pima}) requires one numerical

2179: integration over $t'$ or $w'$.

2180: 

2181: We have seen (Eq. (\ref{limite})) that $A(y,t')$ has a divergence in $y \to

2182: x_{o}^{-}$. In the expressions for integration on $t'$, $y$ takes the values

2183: $4m^{2}-t'$, $0$, $4m^{2}-t'-w$ and $w$ (see Eqs. (\ref{Ro11etRo12}),

2184: (\ref{Ro21etRo22}) and (\ref{notation1})). The divergence at $y=x_{0}$ is in

2185: the expression for $\rho_{11}^{\pm}$ in Eq. (\ref{Ro11etRo12}) where the first

2186: argument of $A$ is $w$, so that only the box diagram has this divergence.

2187: Fixing $w$ and using Eq.~(\ref{DefdeX0}) the condition $w=x_{0}$ gives 

2188: for $\rho_{i}^{\pm \, \text{box}}(w,t')$ a discontinuity at 

2189: $t'=t'_{0}$ with

2190: 

2191:                 \begin{equation}

2192:                         t'_{0}=4\mu^{2}+\frac{4\mu^{4}}{w-4m^{2}}.

2193:                         \label{defdeT0}

2194:                 \end{equation}

2195:  The integral (\ref{Pech}) can be split into  two pieces,

2196:  

2197:                 \begin{equation}

2198:                         p_{i}^{\pm \, \text{box}}(w,t) = 

2199:                 \frac{1}{\pi}\int_{4\mu^{2}}^{t'_{0}}\frac{dt'}{t'-t}

2200:                \ \rho_{i}^{\pm \, \text{box}}(w,t')+

2201:                 \frac{1}{\pi}\int_{t'_{0}}^{+\infty}\frac{dt'}{t'-t}

2202:                 \ \rho_{i}^{\pm \, \text{box}}(w,t').

2203:                         \label{Pech2}

2204:                 \end{equation}

2205: The first integral, of the type,

2206: 

2207:                 \begin{equation}

2208:                         \int_{4\mu^{2}}^{t'_{0}}\frac{dt'}{\sqrt{t'_{0}-t'}}\ F(t'),

2209:                         \label{integrale1}

2210:                 \end{equation}

2211: becomes, with $x=\sqrt{t'_{0}-t'}$, 

2212: 

2213:                 \begin{equation}

2214:                         2\int_{0}^{\sqrt{t'_{0}-4\mu^{2}}}dx\ F(t'_{0}-x^{2})

2215:                         \label{integrale2}.

2216:                 \end{equation}

2217: This transformation is applied to

2218: $F(t')=\left[\sqrt{t'_{0}-t'}/(\pi(t'-t))\right]\ 

2219: \rho_{i}^{\pm \, 

2220:                 \text{box}}(w,t')$.

2221: The second integral can be recast into a finite domain by the following 

2222: change of variable

2223:                 $$t'=\frac{\lambda (x+1)-2t'_{0}}{x-1},$$

2224: where $\lambda$ is a free parameter. One then has to calculate, 

2225:                 \begin{equation}

2226:                         \frac{1}{\pi}\int_{-1}^{1}\frac{2(t'_{0}-\lambda)dx}

2227:                         {\left\lbrack\lambda (x+1)-2t'_{0}-t(x-1)\right\rbrack}

2228:                         \ \rho_{i}^{\pm \, \text{box}}(w,t'(x)).

2229:                         \label{integrale3}

2230:                  \end{equation} 

2231:         

2232: For the calculation of $p_{i}^{\pm \,  \text{cro}}(\bar{t},t)$ and  

2233: $\text{Im}_w\ p_{i}^{\pm}(w,t)$ there is no discontinuity in  $t'_{0}$. For 

2234: $p_{i}^{\pm \, \text{cro}}(\bar{t},t)$, one can transform the first term of

2235: (\ref{Pcro}) into an integral of the type (\ref{integrale3}). For the 

2236: imaginary part the domain of definition of $K(w,t')$ restricts the 

2237: integration interval to 

2238: $[t'_{0},+\infty]$. There is a singularity at the lower limit in

2239:                  $1/\sqrt{t'-t'_{0}}$ which we treat as above 

2240: (see Eqs.~(\ref{integrale1}) and (\ref{integrale2})).

2241: 

2242: We have (see Eqs.~(\ref{yiboite}), (\ref{notation1}) and (\ref{Pcro})),

2243:                 \begin{equation}

2244:                         p_{i}^{+ \, \text{box}}(w,t)=-p_{i}^{- \, \text{box}}(w,t),

2245:                         \qquad

2246:                         p_{i}^{+ \, \text{cro}}(\bar{t},t)=p_{i}^{- \, \text{cro}}

2247:                         (\bar{t},t).

2248:                         \label{isospin3}

2249:                  \end{equation}

2250: 

2251: The proton-proton amplitude being  a pure isospin one state (I=1), 

2252: one has (see Eq.~(\ref{M+-})), 

2253: 

2254: \begin{equation}

2255: \calM^{I=1}=\sum_{i=1}^{4}\left[p_{i}^{+ \,

2256: \text{box}}(w,t)+Imp_{i}^{+}(w,t)+5p_{i}^{+ \,

2257: \text{cro}}(\bar{t},t)\right]P_{i}.

2258: \label{isospin4}

2259:                   \end{equation}

2260: 

2261: 

2262: We give below the formulae which express, for a given isospin 

2263: state, the 

2264: nucleon-nucleon helicities amplitudes $\varphi_{i}$ in terms of the $p_i$ 

2265: amplitudes. One has \cite{Richard75},

2266: \begin{equation}

2267:         \begin{array}{rcl}

2268:                 \varphi_{1} & = & {\displaystyle 

2269:                 \frac{1+z}{2}\left(p_{1}-2mDp_{2}+m^{2}D^{2}p_{3}\right)

2270:                 +\left(D- \frac{1-z}{2}\right)p_{4}

2271:                  },\\

2272:                 \ecart

2273:                 \varphi_{2} & = & {\displaystyle -\frac{1-z}{2}\left(\frac{E^{2}}{m^{2}}p_{1}

2274:                 -\frac{2E^{2}}{m}p_{2}+E^{2}p_{3}+p_{4}+\frac{k^2}{m^2}p_{5}\right) }, \\

2275:                 \ecart

2276:                 \varphi_{3} & = & {\displaystyle \frac{1+z}{2}\left(p_{1}-2mDp_{2}  

2277:                 +m^{2}D^{2}p_{3}+Dp_{4}\right) },\\

2278:                 \ecart

2279:                 \varphi_{4} & = &  {\displaystyle \frac{1-z}{2}\left( 

2280:                    \frac{E^{2}}{m^{2}}p_{1}-\frac{2E^{2}}{m}p_{2}+E^{2}p_{3}+p_{4}-\frac{k^2}{m^2}p_{5}\right) },\\

2281:                 \ecart

2282:                  \varphi_{5}& = & {\displaystyle \frac{E\sqrt{1-z^2}}{2m}\left(-p_{1}

2283:                  +\frac{2E^{2}}{m}p_{2}-m^{2}Dp_{3}-p_{4}\right)},

2284:         \end{array}

2285:         \label{invtohel2}

2286: \end{equation}

2287: where $D=(E^{2}+k^{2})/m^{2}$ and $z=\cos\theta$ (let us remember that in 

2288: the center of mass of the nucleon-nucleon w-channel, $w=4E^2=4(k^2+m^2)$ 

2289: and $t=-2k^2(1-z)$). The Saclay amplitudes $a,\ b,\ c,\ d$ and $e$ are 

2290: given in terms of the $\varphi_i$ amplitudes by the following 

2291: expressions  \cite{Bystricky78},

2292: 

2293:  \begin{equation}

2294:         \begin{array}{rcl}

2295:                 a & = &  {\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}\left[ \left(\varphi_{1}   

2296:                  +\varphi_{2}+\varphi_{3} -\varphi_{4}\right)z 

2297: -4\varphi_{5}\sqrt{1-z^2}\right]},\\

2298:                 \ecart

2299:                 b & = &  {\displaystyle \frac{1}{2} \left(  \varphi_{1}   

2300:                 -\varphi_{2} +\varphi_{3} +\varphi_{4}

2301:                 \right)}, \\

2302:                 \ecart

2303:                 c & = & {\displaystyle \frac{1}{2} \left( - \varphi_{1}   

2304:                 +\varphi_{2} +\varphi_{3} +\varphi_{4}

2305:                 \right)},  \\

2306:                 \ecart

2307:                 d & = &  {\displaystyle \frac{1}{2} \left(  \varphi_{1}   

2308:                 +\varphi_{2}- \varphi_{3} +\varphi_{4}

2309:                 \right)}, \\

2310:                 e & = & {\displaystyle -\frac{i}{2} \left[ \left( \varphi_{1}   

2311:                 +\varphi_{2} +\varphi_{3} -\varphi_{4}

2312:                 \right)\sqrt{1-z^2}+4\varphi_{5}z\right]}.

2313:         \end{array}

2314:         \label{heltobis}

2315:  \end{equation}

2316: 

2317: \subsection{Nucleon pole contribution for Pseudo-vector coupling}

2318: 

2319: For pseudo-vector pion-nucleon coupling, the $A(B)_{1(2),PV}^\pm$ 

2320: for the $\pi N$ nucleon Born term are (see e.g. Eqs.~(A.8.1) and (A.8.2) 

2321: of Ref. \cite{Hoehler83}),

2322: 

2323: \begin{equation}

2324:  \begin{array}{rcl}

2325: \label{ABPV}

2326: A_{1(2),PV}^+ & = & \displaystyle\frac{g^2}{m},\quad A_{1(2),PV}^-=0, \\

2327: \ecart

2328: B_{1(2),PV}^+  & = & B_{1(2),PS}^+,\  B_{1(2),PV}^-= 

2329: B_{1(2),PS}^--\displaystyle\frac{g^2}{2m^2}.

2330:  \end{array}

2331: \end{equation}

2332: One can then use Eqs.~(\ref{rhoionPi}) and (\ref{ABCDEF}) to calculate 

2333: the corresponding $\rho^\pm_i$.

2334: One recovers first the contribution for pseudo-scalar coupling from 

2335: $B_{1,PS}^\pm\ B_{2,PS}^\pm$ given in the above section.

2336: There are further bubble ($bub$) diagram contributions arising from 

2337: $A_{1,PV}^+\ A_{2,PV}^+$ and proportional to 

2338: $\left(\displaystyle\frac{g^2}{m}\right)^2$ and from $B_{1,PV}^-\ 

2339: B_{2,PV}^-$ and proportional to $\left(\displaystyle\frac{g^2}{2m^2}\right)^2$.

2340: There are also triangle ($tri$) diagram contributions arising from $ 

2341: B_{1,PV}^-\ B_{2,PV}^-$ and proportional to 

2342: $\displaystyle\frac{g^2}{2m^2}\ B_{1(2),PS}^-$. 

2343: One finds

2344: \begin{equation}

2345: \label{rhoibubtri}

2346: \begin{array}{rcl}

2347:  \rho_{1}^{+bub}(t')& = &\displaystyle\frac{g^4}{32\pi 

2348: m^2}\sqrt{\displaystyle\frac{t'-4\mu^2}{t'}},\\

2349: \ecart

2350: \rho_{1}^{+tri}(t')& = &\displaystyle\frac{g^4}{16\pi}\sqrt{\displaystyle\frac{t'-4\mu^2}{t'}}\ 

2351: \displaystyle\frac{t'-4\mu^2}{t'-2\mu^2}\ I_2(t'), \\

2352: \ecart

2353: \rho_{2}^{-tri}(t')& = &-\displaystyle\frac{g^4}{128\pi 

2354: m}\sqrt{\displaystyle\frac{t'-4\mu^2}{t'}}\ 

2355: \displaystyle\frac{t'-4\mu^2}{t'-4m^2}\ [I_0(t')-3I_2(t')], \\

2356: \ecart

2357: \rho_{4}^{-bub}(t')& = &-\displaystyle\frac{t'-4\mu^2}{48m^2}\ 

2358: \rho_{1}^{+bub}(t'), \\

2359: \ecart

2360: \rho_{4}^{-tri}(t')& = &\displaystyle\frac{g^4}{256\pi 

2361: m^2}\sqrt{\displaystyle\frac{t'-4\mu^2}{t'}}\ 

2362: (t'-4\mu^2)\ [I_0(t')-I_2(t')].

2363:  \end{array}

2364: \end{equation}

2365: In the above formulae~(\ref{rhoibubtri}) 

2366: \begin{equation}

2367: \label{I2n}

2368: I_{2n}(t')=\int_{-1}^{+1}\displaystyle\frac{u^{2n}du}{\alpha+\bar\beta u},\ 

2369: I_2(t')=\displaystyle\frac{\alpha}{\bar\beta^2}

2370: [-2+\alpha I_0(t')],

2371: \end{equation}

2372: with $\alpha=\mu^2-t'/2$. For $t'<4m^2,\ 

2373: \bar\beta=i\beta=i2[(m^2-t'/4)(t'/4-\mu^2)]^{1/2}$ and

2374: \begin{equation}

2375: \label{I0petit}

2376: I_0(t')=\displaystyle\frac{2}{\beta}\arctan\displaystyle\frac{\beta}{\alpha}.

2377: \end{equation}

2378: For $t'>4m^2,\ \bar\beta=\beta=2[(t'/4-m^2)(t'/4-\mu^2)]^{1/2}$ and

2379: \begin{equation}

2380: \label{I0grand}

2381:  I_0(t')=\displaystyle\frac{1}{\beta}\ln\left\vert\displaystyle\frac{\alpha+\beta}{\alpha-\beta}\right\vert.

2382: \end{equation}

2383: The functions $I_0(t')$ and $I_2(t')$ are continuous at $t'=4m^2$ and

2384: \begin{equation}

2385: \label{I0I2t4m2}

2386: I_0(4m^2)=\displaystyle\frac{2}{\alpha},\ 

2387: I_2(4m^2)=\displaystyle\frac{2}{3\alpha}.

2388: \end{equation}

2389: Furthermore $\rho_2^{-tri}(t')$ is also continuous at $t'=4m^2$, with,

2390: \begin{equation}

2391: \label{rho2tri4m2}

2392: \lim_{t'\to 4m^2}\displaystyle\frac{I_0(t')-3I_2(t')}{t'-4m^2}=

2393: \displaystyle\frac{2(m^2-\mu^2)}{(\mu^2-2m^2)^3}.

2394: \end{equation}

2395:  For $t'\to\infty$ the functions $I_{0,2}(t')\to 

2396:  (2/t')\ln(t'/m^2)$ and $(t'/4-\mu^2)[I_0(t')-I_2(t')]\to 

2397: \textrm{constant}$.

2398: It can then be seen from Eqs.~(\ref{pi+-}) and (\ref{rhoibubtri}) that 

2399: the amplitudes $p_1^{+tri}(t)$ and $p_2^{-tri}(t)$ are convergent, 

2400: $p_1^{+bub}(t)$ and $p_4^{-tri}(t)$ are logarithmically divergent and 

2401: $p_4^{-bub}(t)$ is linearly divergent. Introducing an upper limit of 

2402: integration, $t_M$, in the integrals~(\ref{pi+-}), one finds

2403: \begin{equation}

2404: \label{p1+bub}

2405: p_1^{+bub}(t,t_M)=\displaystyle\frac{g^4}{32\pi^2m^2}\ I_1(t,t_M),

2406: \end{equation}

2407: \begin{equation}

2408: \label{p4-bub}

2409: p_4^{-bub}(t,t_M)=\displaystyle\frac{g^4}{1536\pi^2m^4}\ I_4(t,t_M),

2410: \end{equation}

2411: with

2412: \begin{equation}

2413: \label{I1ttm}

2414: I_1(t,t_M)=I_1(0,t_M)+J_1(t,t_M),

2415: \end{equation}

2416: \begin{equation}

2417: \label{I10ttm}

2418: I_1(0,t_M)=-2X(t_M)-I_\textrm{ln}(X(t_M),1),

2419: \end{equation}

2420: \begin{equation}

2421: \label{J1ttm}

2422: J_1(t,t_M)=2X(t_m)+X(t)I_\textrm{ln}(X(t_M),X(t)),

2423: \end{equation}

2424: \begin{equation}

2425: \label{XIln}

2426: X(t)=\sqrt{1-\displaystyle\frac{4\mu^2}{t}},\ I_\textrm{ln}(Y,Z)=\ln

2427: \left\vert

2428: \frac{Y-Z}{Y+Z}

2429: \right\vert,

2430: \end{equation}

2431: \begin{equation}

2432: \label{I4ttm}

2433: I_4(t,t_M)=I_4(0,t_M)+J_4^1(t,t_M)+J_4^2(t,t_M),

2434: \end{equation}

2435: \begin{equation}

2436: \label{I40tm}

2437: I_4(0,t_M)=t_MX^5(t_M)-6(\mu^2/t_M)J_4^1(t_M,t_M),

2438: \end{equation}

2439: \begin{equation}

2440: \label{J4ttm}

2441: J_4^1(t,t_M)=-t[(2/3)X^3(t_M)-I_1(0,t_M)],

2442: \end{equation}

2443: \begin{equation}

2444: \label{J42ttm}

2445: J_4^2(t,t_M)=t

2446: \left[

2447: (2/3)X^3(t_M)+X^2(t)J_1(t,t_M)

2448: \right].

2449: \end{equation}

2450: The logarithmic divergence of $p_1^{+bub}(t)$ is seen in

2451: Eq.~(\ref{J1ttm}) and the linear divergence of $p_4^{-bub}(t)$ in

2452: Eq.~(\ref{I40tm}).

2453: 

2454: The $\rho_1^{+bub}(t'),\ \rho_1^{+tri}(t')$ contributions and those of

2455: $\rho_2^{-tri}(t'),\ \rho_4^{-bub(tri)}(t')$ can be interpreted as

2456: coming from the correlated $2\pi$-exchange in the S-wave ($\sigma$

2457: or $f_0(600)$ exchange) and in the P-wave ($\rho$ exchange),

2458: respectively (see Eqs.~(2.29), (2.30), (2.31) of Ref. \cite{Richard75}

2459: and Eqs.~(2.12), (2.13) of Ref. \cite{Cottingham73}). However, here there

2460: is no contribution to $\rho_1^-$ as $A^-=0$.

2461: 

2462: It is interesting to examine the box- and crossed-diagram

2463: contributions to the bubble and triangle diagrams arising from the

2464: pseudo-vector coupling case. Performing a similar reduction to that of

2465: $P_{PV}$ (see Eq.~(26) in section II.B) one can write the direct and

2466: crossed, $T_{s_1}^{\alpha\beta}\pi N$ amplitudes as

2467: 

2468: \begin{equation}

2469: \label{Ts1ab}

2470: T_{s_1}^{\alpha\beta}=\tau_\alpha^1\tau_\beta^1

2471: [A1^1+\mbox{\boldmath{$\gamma^1$}}\cdot \textbf{Q}(B_{s_1}-B_r)],

2472: \end{equation}

2473: \begin{equation}

2474: \label{Ts1bab}

2475: T_{\bar s_1}^{\alpha\beta}=\tau_\beta^1\tau_\alpha^1

2476: [A1^1-\mbox{\boldmath{$\gamma^1$}}\cdot \textbf{Q}(B_{\bar s_1}-B_r)].

2477: \end{equation}

2478: Here the Pauli matrices $\tau_{\alpha(\beta)}^1$ represent the isospin 

2479: coupling of the pion field $\pi_{\alpha(\beta)}$ to the nucleon 1.

2480: In Eqs.~(\ref{Ts1ab}) and (\ref{Ts1bab}),

2481: \begin{equation}

2482: \label{ABrBs}

2483: A=\displaystyle\frac{g^2}{2m},\ B_r=

2484: \displaystyle\frac{g^2}{4m},\ B_s=\displaystyle\frac{g^2}{m^2-s}.

2485: \end{equation}

2486: Note that

2487: \begin{equation}

2488: \label{taubox}

2489: \sum_{\alpha,\beta=1,2,3}\tau_\alpha^1\tau_\beta^1\tau_\alpha^2\tau_\beta^2=

2490: \sum_{\alpha,\beta}

2491: \left(\delta_{\alpha\beta}+\imath\epsilon_{\alpha\beta\gamma} 

2492: \tau_\gamma^1\right)

2493: \left(\delta_{\alpha\beta}+\imath\epsilon_{\alpha\beta\gamma} 

2494: \tau_\gamma^2\right)

2495: =3-2\mbox{\boldmath{$\tau^1$}}\cdot\mbox{\boldmath{$\tau^2$}}.

2496: \end{equation}

2497: The $2\pi$-exchange box diagram contribution arises from

2498:  \begin{eqnarray}

2499: \label{Tbox}

2500:   T_{box}    &  = & T_{s_1}^{\alpha\beta} T_{s_2}^{\alpha\beta} +

2501:   T_{\bar s_1}^{\alpha\beta} T_{\bar s_2}^{\alpha\beta}  \nonumber \\

2502:       \ecart

2503:       &   = & (3-2\mbox{\boldmath{$\tau^1$}}\cdot\mbox{\boldmath{$\tau^2$}})

2504:       \left\{

2505:       2A^21^11^2+(B_{s_1}-B_{\bar s_1})A(1^2\mbox{\boldmath{$\gamma^1$}}\cdot \textbf{Q}

2506:       +1^1\mbox{\boldmath{$\gamma^2$}}\cdot \textbf{Q})\right.\nonumber\\

2507:       \ecart

2508:     &&  \left. +2

2509:     \left[B_{s_1}B_{s_2}-B_r(B_{s_1}+B_{s_2})+B_r^2\right]

2510:    \mbox{\boldmath{$\gamma^1$}}\cdot \textbf{Q}\mbox{\boldmath{$\gamma^2$}}\cdot \textbf{Q}\right\}.

2511: \end{eqnarray}

2512: The crossed diagram contribution is,

2513:  \begin{eqnarray}

2514: \label{Tcro}

2515:   T_{cro}    &  = & T_{s_1}^{\alpha\beta} T_{\bar s_2}^{\alpha\beta} +

2516:   T_{\bar s_1}^{\alpha\beta} T_{s_2}^{\alpha\beta}  \nonumber\\

2517:   \ecart

2518:       &   = & (3+2\mbox{\boldmath{$\tau^1$}}\cdot\mbox{\boldmath{$\tau^2$}})

2519:       \left\{

2520:       2A^21^11^2+(B_{s_1}-B_{\bar s_1})A(1^2\mbox{\boldmath{$\gamma^1$}}\cdot \textbf{Q}

2521:       +1^1\mbox{\boldmath{$\gamma^2$}}\cdot \textbf{Q})\right.\nonumber\\

2522:       \ecart

2523:     &&  \left. -2

2524:     \left[B_{s_1}B_{\bar s_2}-B_r(B_{s_1}+B_{\bar s_2})+B_r^2\right]

2525:    \mbox{\boldmath{$\gamma^1$}}\cdot Q \gamma^2\cdot \textbf{Q}\right\}.

2526: \end{eqnarray}

2527: In Eqs.~(\ref{Tbox}) and (\ref{Tcro}) the terms $B_{s_1}B_{s_2}$ and $B_{s_1}B_{\bar s_2}$ correspond to the $2\pi$-exchange nucleon pole contribution for pseudo-scalar coupling. For the bubble and triangle diagram contributions,

2528: use of Eqs.~(\ref{rhoionPi}) and (\ref{ABCDEF}) leads to

2529: \begin{equation}

2530: \label{rhoi+-boxcro}

2531: \begin{array}{rcl}

2532: \rho_{1\ box}^{\pm bub}(t')   &= & \pm\ \rho_{1\ cro}^{\pm bub}(t')=\pm 

2533:    \displaystyle\frac{1}{2}\   \rho_1^{+ bub}(t'), \\

2534:    \ecart

2535: \rho_{1\ box}^{\pm tri}(t')   &= & \pm\ \rho_{1\ cro}^{\pm tri}(t') = 

2536:   \pm \displaystyle\frac{1}{2}\   \rho_1^{+ tri}(t'), \\

2537:    \ecart

2538: \rho_{2\ box}^{\pm tri}(t') &  = & \mp\ \rho_{2\ cro}^{\pm tri}(t') = 

2539:   \mp \displaystyle\frac{1}{2}\   \rho_2^{- tri}(t'), \\

2540:    \ecart

2541: \rho_{4\ box}^{\pm bub}(t')   &  = & \mp\ \rho_{4\ cro}^{\pm bub}(t')= 

2542:  \mp  \displaystyle\frac{1}{2}\   \rho_4^{- bub}(t'), \\

2543:   \ecart

2544: \rho_{4\ box}^{\pm tri}(t')   &  = & \mp\ \rho_{4\ cro}^{\pm tri}(t') = 

2545:   \mp \displaystyle\frac{1}{2}\   \rho_4^{- tri}(t').

2546:  \end{array}

2547: \end{equation}

2548: It can be seen that the total $\rho_{i\ box}^{\pm 

2549: bub(tri)}(t')+\rho_{i\ cro}^{\pm bub(tri)}(t')$ from the above 

2550: formulae~(\ref{rhoi+-boxcro}) are in agreement with the 

2551: formulae~(\ref{rhoibubtri}) calculated from Eqs.~(\ref{ABPV}). 

2552: Formulae~(\ref{rhoi+-boxcro}) satisfy the relations of 

2553: Eq.~(\ref{notation1}) between the box and crossed $\rho_i$.

2554: 

2555: \subsection{Comparison with Feynman diagram calculation}

2556: 

2557: We have checked, at different energies and angles, that the Saclay

2558: amplitudes given by Eq. (\ref{heltobis}) for both box and crossed diagrams

2559: for pseudo-scalar coupling calculated in Section II-A from the Feynman

2560: diagram expressions with no form factor ($\Lambda\rightarrow\infty$)  are

2561: in agreement with the corresponding dispersion relation

2562: results Eq.~(\ref{Pech}), Eq.~(\ref{Pcro}) and Eq.~(\ref{Pima}). We 

2563: found that the

2564: short range contribution of the crossed diagram coming from the term

2565: containing $a_{i}^{\pm}\left(w',4m^2-w-w'\right)$ in Eq.~(\ref{pi+-}) is

2566: crucial for the agreement. Numerical comparisons will be shown in the next

2567: section.

2568: 

2569: For the pseudo-vector coupling, the comparison of the bubble and triangle

2570: contributions Eq.~(\ref{rhoibubtri}) is less straightforward due to the

2571: divergence of some of these terms when integrated on $t'$ in the

2572: dispersion relation or of the corresponding terms in the limit of

2573: $\Lambda\rightarrow\infty$ in the Feynman method. The results of both

2574: approaches for the convergent invariant amplitudes $p_1^{+tri}(t)$ and

2575: $p_2^{-tri}(t)$ (see Eqs.~(\ref{rhoibubtri})) compare well. The

2576: logarithmically divergent $p_1^{+bub}(t)$ and $p_4^{-tri}(t)$ require one

2577: subtraction and a comparison can be made with the $dp_1^{+bub}(t)/dt$ and

2578: $dp_4^{-tri}(t)/dt$.  For the linearly divergent $p_4^{-bub}(t)$ the

2579: second derivative, $d^2p_4^{-bub}(t)/dt^2$, converges and can be compared

2580: with the Feynman calculation.

2581: 

2582: To obtain these amplitudes in the Feynman calculation the amplitudes $p_4$

2583: and $p_1$ are extracted by solving for them from Eqs. (\ref{invtohel2})

2584: and (\ref{heltobis}) thus removing the explicit dependence on the cosine

2585: of the scattering angle, $z$. Then the derivatives with respect to $z$ are

2586: essentially the same as the derivatives with respect to $t$ in the case of

2587: the dispersion relations allowing a direct numerical comparison. Since

2588: this process requires numerical derivatives and a calculation for large

2589: $\Lambda$ it is more difficult, but a good agreement is obtained.

2590: 

2591: \begin{figure}[htb]

2592: \epsfig{file=amrps1400.ps,height=4.5in}

2593: \epsfig{file=amips1400.ps,height=4.5in}

2594: \caption{Contributions to the real (left) and imaginary (right) 

2595: parts of the amplitudes $b$, $d$ and $e$ as a function of energy for  

2596: pseudo-scalar coupling. The dashed line corresponds to the box, 

2597: the dashed-dot line to the crossed-pion diagram and the solid 

2598: line to their sum.}

2599: \label{amrps}   

2600: \end{figure}

2601: 

2602: 

2603: 

2604: \begin{figure}[htb]

2605: \epsfig{file=amr1400.ps,height=4.4in}

2606: \epsfig{file=ami1400.ps,height=4.4in}

2607: \caption{Comparison of the real (left) and imaginary (right)  

2608: parts of the  amplitudes $b$, $d$ and $e$ corresponding to the 

2609: pseudo-scalar and pseudo-vector couplings. The dashed curve 

2610: represents the PS and the solid curve the PV.}\label{amr}   

2611: \end{figure}

2612: 

2613: \begin{figure}[htb]

2614: \epsfig{file=b2c1400.ps,angle=90,height=2.2in}

2615: \epsfig{file=b2b1400.ps,angle=90,height=2.2in}

2616: \caption{Results for the crossed (left) and box diagram (right) for 

2617: the $b$ amplitude. The dash-dot curves show the results of the 

2618: dispersion relation calculation, equivalent to the Feynman 

2619: calculation for $\Lambda\rightarrow\infty$.}

2620: \label{b2c1400}

2621: \end{figure}

2622: 

2623: \begin{figure}[htb]

2624: \epsfysize=165mm

2625: \epsfig{file=d2e2c1400.ps,angle=90,height=2.2in}

2626: \epsfig{file=d2e2b1400.ps,angle=90,height=2.2in}

2627: \caption{Results for the crossed (left) and box diagram (right) for the $d$ 

2628: and $e$ amplitudes. The curves have the same meaning as in Fig. 

2629: \protect{\ref{b2c1400}}.}\label{d2e2c1400}

2630: \end{figure}

2631: 

2632: 

2633: \begin{figure}[htb]

2634: \epsfig{file=b2t1400.ps,angle=90,height=2.2in}

2635: \epsfig{file=d2e2t1400.ps,angle=90,height=2.2in}

2636: \caption{Results of the sum of the crossed and box diagrams for 2$|b|^2$ (left) and

2637: $|d|^2+|e|^2$ (right). The dash-dot curves show the results of the

2638: dispersion relation calculation, equivalent to the Feynman calculation

2639: for $\Lambda\rightarrow\infty$.}\label{b2t1400}

2640: \end{figure}

2641: 

2642: \begin{figure}[htb]

2643: \epsfig{file=b2tlam.ps,angle=90,height=2.2in}

2644: \epsfig{file=d2e2lam.ps,angle=90,height=2.2in}

2645: \caption{Comparison of the data for 2$|b|^2$ (left) and $|d|^2+|e|^2$ (right) 

2646: with the results of the sum of the crossed and box diagrams for different values 

2647: of $\Lambda$. Increasing cross sections correspond to increasing values of $\Lambda$.}

2648: \label{b2tcmp}

2649: \end{figure}

2650: 

2651: 

2652: 

2653: \begin{figure}[htb]

2654: \epsfig{file=ampsr1400.ps,height=6in}

2655: \caption{Comparison of the real parts of the calculated PS (left) and PV (right) 

2656: $b$, $d$ and $e$ amplitudes (solid lines) with the results of SAID \cite{arndt} 

2657: (dashed lines) and those obtained by Bystricky et al.  (points) \cite{bystdata}. 

2658: The phase has been chosen such that the amplitude $e$ is real.}

2659: \label{ampsr}   

2660: \end{figure}

2661: 

2662: \begin{figure}[htb]

2663: \epsfig{file=ampsi1400.ps,height=5in}

2664: \caption{As in Fig. \protect{\ref{ampsr}} but for the imaginary part of 

2665: the $b$ and $d$ amplitudes.}

2666: \label{ampsi}   

2667: \end{figure}

2668: 

2669: \section{Results and Discussion}}

2670: 

2671: Test calculations were made with and without the antiproton poles 

2672: ($p_0=-E$). At low values of P$_{Lab}$ or for large $\Lambda$ they give 

2673: significant contributions and are essential to get agreement with the 

2674: dispersion relation results.  However, for realistic values of $\Lambda$ 

2675: at higher energies they become unimportant and can be neglected.

2676: 

2677: Figure \ref{amrps} shows the behavior of the real and imaginary parts 

2678: of the amplitudes as a function of incident momentum for the 

2679: pseudo-scalar coupling. For the crossed-pion diagram only terms with 

2680: a single nucleon or pion on shell and the principal value integral on 

2681: $q_0$ survive.  That is to say, only the contributions from the $q_0$ 

2682: integral need to be treated specially, the rest of the indicated 

2683: integrals have no singularities. For the box diagram, in addition to 

2684: the two contributions just mentioned, the diagram in which two 

2685: nucleons are on shell also gives a real contribution (in the form we 

2686: are looking at now, it becomes an imaginary contribution to the 

2687: amplitude after application of the factor of $i$ to be consistent with the 

2688: dispersion relation approach).  That is, the 

2689: integral on the magnitude of the three-momentum also has a 

2690: $\delta$-function part which contributes.

2691: 

2692: In figure \ref{amrps} (imaginary part) we see that the principal-value

2693: part of the integral goes rapidly to zero for the crossed diagram as the

2694: momentum drops below 500 MeV/c.  This behavior can be traced to the form

2695: factor and its dependence on $q_0$.  For low energy the form factor

2696: becomes independent of $q_0$, since the pole moves far from the real axis.  

2697: Since it is the only pole off of the real axis the integrand limits to a

2698: function with only poles on the real axis and hence contains only the

2699: $\delta$-function parts.

2700: 

2701: The imaginary part of the box contains both the principal value and double

2702: pole contribution.  At low energies the real parts of the amplitudes are

2703: dominated by the term with two nucleons on shell. By 2 GeV/c that

2704: situation has been reversed with the crossed-pion principal value

2705: dominating.

2706: 

2707: Figure \ref{amr} compares the results for the pseudo-scalar and

2708: pseudo-vector couplings. One sees that the real part of the Saclay

2709: amplitude $b$ is very large for the PS coupling but is greatly reduced

2710: for PV coupling. The $d$ amplitude shows only a modest difference

2711: between PS and PV coupling while the $e$ amplitude is again

2712: significantly modified. We note that the $b$ amplitude is a mixture of

2713: central and spin-spin character, the $d$ amplitude is of tensor

2714: character and the $e$ amplitude is of spin-orbit character \cite{gl}.

2715: 

2716: Figures \ref{b2c1400} and \ref{d2e2c1400} show a comparison of the box and

2717: crossed-pion contributions.  It is readily seen that the crossed-pion

2718: diagram dominates at high energy.  This result can be traced back to the

2719: relative ability of the two diagrams to transfer energy and momentum.  

2720: Because factors of momentum transfer in the numerator cancel the decrease

2721: coming from the propagators, the integrand without form factors does not

2722: fall off with increasing momentum transfer so that the decrease in cross

2723: section is mainly due to the form factors.  Since the form factor falls

2724: off with increasing pion momentum in the center of mass of the nucleon,

2725: one can see that for the box diagram with the four-vector $q$ connecting

2726: vertices with $(E,\bfk)$ and $(E,-\bfk)$ both momenta in the respective

2727: centers of momentum cannot be zero (or even small) at the same time. The

2728: crossed diagram does not suffer from this contradiction since $\bfq$

2729: connects $-\bfk$ and $\bfk'$ and, for some value of the 4-vector, $q$,

2730: there is a chance to minimize the momenta at both vertices. We now look at

2731: the behavior of the form factor chosen for these calculations.

2732: 

2733: The crucial element for the understanding of the behavior of

2734: the box and crossed diagrams is the argument $Z^2$ in Eq. 

2735: (\ref{fdef}). Since one nucleon is always on-shell we can write 

2736: $Z^2$ as

2737: \eq

2738: Z^2=\frac{(a\cdot b)^2}{m^2}-b^2,

2739: \qe

2740: where $a=\pm k\ {\rm or}\ \pm k'$ and $b=q\ {\rm or}\ q'$.

2741: 

2742: The order of magnitude of $\qt=|\bfq|$ will be the same as $|\bfk|$ since

2743: $\qt$ cannot be taken as small to maximize the integrand because of the

2744: powers of $\qt$ in the numerator.  For values of momenta greater than the

2745: mass of the nucleon, the first term, $(a\cdot b)^2$, will dominate so we

2746: need only consider the size of that term to obtain some sense of the

2747: behavior of the form factor. Out-of-plane values of $\bfq$ (in the y

2748: direction in the system we are using) only increase $Z^2$ so consider

2749: $q_y=0$. Let $x$ be the cosine between the incident direction $\bfk$ and

2750: the vector $\bfq$ and consider the pole at $q_0=\omega$ in an extreme

2751: relativistic limit $E\rightarrow \kt$ ($\kt=|\bfk|$) and

2752: $\omega\rightarrow \qt$.

2753: 

2754: It is useful to look for the minimum in the four values of $Z^2$ in order

2755: to maximize the form factor.  Corresponding to the four factors in Eq.

2756: (\ref{ffbox}) we have (neglecting the second term in $Z^2$)  the following

2757: four values for $a\cdot b$ for the box diagram;

2758: 

2759: \newpage

2760: 

2761: $$ 1)\ E\omega-\bfk\cdot

2762: \bfq \rightarrow \kt\qt(1-x);\ \ 2)\ E\omega+\bfk\cdot \bfq

2763: \rightarrow \kt\qt(1+x);

2764: $$ 

2765: \eq 3)\ E\omega-\bfk'\cdot \bfq'

2766: \rightarrow \kt[\qt(1-\sqrt{1-x^2})+\kt];\ \ 4)\

2767: E\omega+\bfk'\cdot \bfq' \rightarrow

2768: \kt[\qt(1+\sqrt{1-x^2})-\kt] .

2769: \qe 

2770: Since the first and second vertices involve the sum and difference of the

2771: same quantities, they cannot both be small at the same time. The form factor

2772: being an even function of $x$, there is an extremum at $x=0$ and, in fact, it

2773: is a maximum. If we choose $x=0$ and the fourth value of $a\cdot b$ to be

2774: zero with $\qt=\h \kt$ then, in this limit

2775: 

2776: \eq \calf_{box}^{\rm max}\rightarrow \frac{1}{\left(

2777: 1+\frac{\kt^4}{4m^2\Lambda^2}

2778: \right)^4}\frac{1}{\left(1+\frac{\kt^4}{m^2\Lambda^2}\right)^2}.

2779: \qe

2780: We can apply the same considerations for the crossed-pion graph from

2781: Eq (\ref{ffcross}). 

2782: The values of $a\cdot b$ at the four vertices are

2783: $$

2784: 1)\ E\omega-\bfk\cdot\bfq' \rightarrow \kt\qt(1-x)-\kt^2;\ \ 

2785: 2)\ E\omega+\bfk\cdot\bfq \rightarrow \kt\qt(1+x);

2786: $$

2787: \eq

2788: 3)\ E\omega-\bfk'\cdot \bfq \rightarrow \kt\qt(1- \sqrt{1-x^2});\ \ 

2789: 4)\ E\omega+\bfk'\cdot \bfq' \rightarrow \kt\qt(1+\sqrt{1-x^2})-\kt^2.

2790: \qe

2791: It is possible to find values of $\qt$ and $x$ such that any

2792: of the values of $Z^2$ is zeroed, unlike the case of the box

2793: diagram where the third value can never be zero. For example,

2794: one could take $x=-1$ and $\qt=\h \kt$ to set the first and

2795: second values of $Z^2$ to zero.

2796: The  maximum comes about, however, if we take the first and

2797: fourth values of $a\cdot b$ to be zero which leads to

2798: \eq

2799: \qt=(2-\sqrt{2})\kt;\ \ x=-1/\sqrt{2} \label{peakvalues}.

2800: \qe

2801: The second and third values of $a\cdot b$ become

2802: \eq

2803: (3-2\sqrt{2})\kt^2\approx 0.1716\kt^2,

2804: \qe 

2805: which is much smaller than what one was able to achieve 

2806: in the case of the box diagram. The form factor is then

2807: \eq

2808: \calf_{crossed}^{\rm max}\rightarrow 

2809: \frac{1}{\left[1+\left(\frac{0.1716\kt^2}{m\Lambda}\right)^2\right]^4}.

2810: \qe

2811: 

2812: Thus, not only is it possible to make two of the arguments zero at the

2813: same time but the other two are relatively small also. Numerical studies

2814: of the relative sizes of the form factors alone confirm that the values of

2815: the maximum of the crossed form factor occurs at the values given by Eq.

2816: (\ref{peakvalues}).  While it is necessary to go to very high energy to

2817: justify the ultra-relativistic limit used above for illustration, at

2818: P$_{Lab}$=5.5 GeV/c typical values of the crossed diagram form factor are

2819: more than two orders of magnitude larger than that for the box diagram.

2820: 

2821: Since the crossed-pion form factor peaks at definite values of

2822: $\bfq$ and $x$ at high energies, analytical predictions of the

2823: relative size of the different amplitudes can be made. From

2824: these values we find for the Saclay amplitudes, in the very high-energy 

2825: limit

2826: \eq

2827: e=-2b;\ \ \ \ d=0,

2828: \qe

2829: which was verified by a calculation at P$_{Lab}= 46$ GeV/c. 

2830: These values lead to a value of $C_{NN}$ which is again 1/3.

2831: In the energy range where we compare with data we are far

2832: from this limit, however.

2833: 

2834: \begin{figure}[htb]

2835: \epsfig{file=b2bchh.ps,height=3.5in,angle=90}

2836: \epsfig{file=d2e2bchh.ps,height=3.5in,angle=90}

2837: \caption{Comparison of calculations using $Z^2$ as the 

2838: variable in a dipole form factor with that of Eq. 

2839: (\ref{hhvariable}) from Haberzettl et al. \cite{haberzettl}.

2840: No attempt has been made to make the

2841: range the same in the two calculations and this figure gives

2842: only the PS contribution. The graph shows that the slopes of 

2843: the calculations with the different form factors are similar 

2844: and in both cases the box diagram contribution falls off much 

2845: more rapidly than that of the crossed diagram.}\label{hh}   

2846: \end{figure}

2847: 

2848: We see that the values of the spin separated cross sections shown in Fig.

2849: \ref{b2tcmp} indicate a preference for the PV coupling and values of

2850: $\Lambda$ in the range 1.2 to 1.4.  Since $\Lambda$ has been limited from

2851: other sources (see Section \ref{iva}), the agreement is obtained in a 

2852: nearly parameter free manner.

2853: 

2854: Some experimental values of the Saclay amplitudes are known at high

2855: enough energy that unitarity corrections can be expected to be small

2856: enough that they can be compared with the present calculation. Arndt et

2857: al. \cite{arndt} give amplitudes up to P$_{Lab}=3.82$ GeV/c and

2858: Bystricky et al. \cite{bystdata} present several single energy values.  

2859: Ghahramany and Forozani \cite{ghah} found values of the amplitudes at

2860: two energies in reasonable agreement with Refs. \cite{arndt} and

2861: \cite{bystdata}. Figure \ref{ampsr} shows a comparison of the present

2862: calculation with the SAID values (broken line) and the Bystricky et al.

2863: points. The agreement for the pseudo-vector coupling is seen to be

2864: considerably better than the pseudo-scalar one and gives a reasonable

2865: representation of the data except for the imaginary part of $b$.

2866: 

2867: One may ask if the difference in fall-off of the crossed and box diagrams

2868: is a general result of the kinematics or if it depends on the particular

2869: form of the variable $Z^2$ used in the form factor.  To attempt to give a

2870: partial answer to this question we have calculated the pseudo-scalar

2871: result for the crossed diagram with a different, though superficially

2872: similar, variable. Haberzettl et al.  \cite{haberzettl} use a variable

2873: which is of the form

2874: 

2875: \eq

2876: W^2(p_1,p_2,p_3)=\frac{(p_1^2-m_1^2)^2+(p_2^2-m_2^2)^2+

2877: (p_3^2-m_3^2)^2}{4m^2}\label{hhvariable}

2878: \qe

2879: where we have chosen the normalization such that the limit

2880: for large values of the invariant masses the limit matches that

2881: of Eq. (\ref{squares}). Figure \ref{hh} shows the comparison

2882: of the two calculations and one sees that the fall-off for this

2883: variable is very similar to the presently used form factor.

2884: The rise at small momenta is at least partially due to the

2885: contribution of the principal value integral since the pole

2886: in the complex plane does not move far from the real axis as

2887: the energy goes to zero so that causality is not respected

2888: in that limit.

2889: 

2890: It is useful to examine the decrease of the cross section with increasing

2891: energy.  The prediction of slope of Brodsky and Farrar \cite{bf} (see Fig.

2892: \ref{b2ope}) based on counting of internal propagators and our calculation of

2893: $2|b|^2$ are very similar.  The high energy limit of a form factor has been

2894: compared with the picture of the propagators between interacting constituents

2895: by the authors of Ref. \cite{amado} for the case of scattering from nuclear

2896: constituents. The two-pion-exchange diagram may be able to provide a bridge

2897: between the low and high-energy points of view.

2898: 

2899: The present result bears directly on the question of the energy regime

2900: where the transition from a color singlet hadronic exchange to a

2901: quark-gluon basis might reasonably take place.  This, in turn, may impact

2902: the question of color transparency (see, for example Jain et al.  

2903: \cite{jain}). If the exchange of color singlets (pions in this case)

2904: continues to be important through 12 GeV/c it might negate the basis for

2905: color transparency (dominance of quark-gluon exchange) in the moderate

2906: energy range P$_{Lab}\le$ 12 GeV/c.  This is the entire range covered in

2907: the color transparency experiments of Carroll et al. \cite{carroll}.

2908: However, it may be that, even if color singlet exchange continues to be

2909: very important for elastic scattering, quark-gluon exchange might dominate

2910: the inelastic processes.

2911: 

2912: \begin{figure}[htb]

2913: \epsfig{file=cnnlams.ps,angle=90,height=3.3in}

2914: \caption{Comparison of the result for the spin-correlation observable

2915: $C_{NN}$ for the PS and PV couplings for three values of 

2916: $\Lambda$. Data are: Squares, Bhatia et al. 

2917: \protect{\cite{bhatia}}, Filled circles, Lin et al. 

2918: \protect{\cite{lin}}, Open circles, Crosbie 

2919: et al. \protect{\cite{crosbie}}.}\label{cpi}   

2920: \end{figure}

2921: 

2922: The comparison with the spin transfer observable $C_{NN}$ is given in Fig.

2923: \ref{cpi} for several values of $\Lambda$. For the pseudo-vector choice of

2924: coupling it is seen that the qualitative features are reproduced. One, in

2925: fact, needs a mechanism (or several mechanisms) with considerable

2926: structure in order to reproduce the data. The plateau in the data from 4

2927: to 8 GeV/c is not found but there is a minimum in the calculation in this

2928: region.

2929: 

2930: \section{Summary and Conclusions}

2931: 

2932: We have calculated the contribution of the box and crossed

2933: two-pion-exchange diagrams to proton-proton scattering at

2934: 90$^{\circ}_{c.m.}$ for laboratory momenta up to 12 GeV/c.  The cases of

2935: both pure pseudo-scalar and pure pseudo-vector pion-nucleon coupling are

2936: treated. 

2937: 

2938: We assume that the interaction of the pion is with the valence quarks

2939: within the nucleons and use an effective field theory obeying Feynman rules

2940: to describe the composite system.  At each pion-nucleon-interaction vertex

2941: we introduce a relativistic Lorentz-invariant form factor. These form

2942: factors are related to the convolution of the nucleon and pion sizes and

2943: represent the pion source distribution based on the quark structure of the

2944: hadronic cores and explicitly introduce an interaction range of this size.

2945: These form factors are functions of the four-momenta of the exchanged pions

2946: and scattering nucleons. One can use any two of the three momenta which

2947: converge at a given vertex to calculate the function so that the dependence

2948: on the nucleon and pion momenta displays a high degree of symmetry.  This

2949: behavior can be traced to the fact that the basic scalar on which the form

2950: factors depend can be written as the square of the four-dimensional cross

2951: product of any two of the three four-vectors.

2952: 

2953: While we believe the form factors that we introduce are quite reasonable,

2954: we make no claim as to their uniqueness. However, there exist a set of

2955: conditions, based on short reaction time, causality etc., that any

2956: relativistic Lorentz invariant form factor should satisfy.  Our form

2957: factors obey these rules, but other form factors used by some authors do

2958: not.

2959: 

2960: As a check of the calculation, we compare the two-pion-exchange

2961: Feynman-diagram amplitudes for both pseudo-scalar and pseudo-vector

2962: coupling calculated with point-like nucleons with those obtained from the

2963: dispersion relation approach and find agreement.  The antiproton poles in

2964: the Feynman calculations are essential for the comparison but for a more

2965: realistic calculation with a finite value of the form-factor range,

2966: $\Lambda$, they are unimportant. While performing this study, we found it

2967: essential to include a contribution of the crossed diagram which was

2968: neglected in the dispersion-relation calculations of the two-pion-exchange

2969: Paris potential because of its very short range.

2970: 

2971: The numerical technique for calculating the 4-dimensional Feynman

2972: integrals, taking into account multiple poles is presented. Standard

2973: transformation methods are not always applicable in the presence of  

2974: form factors.

2975: 

2976: In the Feynman diagram calculations, using the form factors constrained

2977: by the valence quark distribution, comparison with experimental data

2978: favors the pseudo-vector coupling over the pseudo-scalar one.  This is

2979: seen in the comparison with the magnitude of the spin-separated cross

2980: sections, in the agreement with amplitudes extracted up to $~4$ GeV/c

2981: and in the spin transfer parameter $C_{NN}$, although in this later case

2982: it is only the general behavior which is correctly given.

2983: 

2984: The exchange of one pion is important only at momentum less than

2985: P$_{Lab}$=1 GeV/c. While the strengths of the box and crossed diagrams for

2986: the exchange of two pions are comparable for laboratory momenta below 2

2987: GeV/c, for larger momenta the crossed diagram dominates, mainly due to the

2988: mathematical structure of the form factors and to the fact that the

2989: kinematics of the crossed diagram allows a repartition of momenta at the

2990: vertices in a favorable manner. An important contribution arises from the

2991: principal-value contribution of the integrals which is non-zero when form

2992: factors are included.

2993: 

2994: While here we compare only with the extracted spin-separated cross

2995: sections at 90$^{\circ}_{c.m.}$, our calculation can be extended to all

2996: scattering angles. Further studies such as unitarity corrections can be

2997: considered.

2998: 

2999: To conclude, we have shown that the two-pion exchange plays a

3000: significant role in proton-proton scattering even up to P$_{Lab}$=12

3001: GeV/c.  This result suggests that the importance of the exchange of

3002: color singlets in elastic scattering may extend to higher energies than

3003: expected.

3004: 

3005: \begin{center}Acknowledgments\end{center}

3006: 

3007: We thank Helmut Haberzettl for a useful conversation regarding causality,

3008: Henri Zytnicki for providing support for this project with his work and Jean-Pierre 

3009: Dedonder and R. Vinh Mau for helpful comments on the manuscript.

3010: 

3011: This work was supported by the National Science Foundation under

3012: contract PHY-0099729.

3013: 

3014: \cen{\bf \Large Appendices}

3015: 

3016: \begin{appendix}

3017: 

3018: \section{Projection onto the Saclay Amplitudes}

3019: 

3020: The Saclay amplitudes \cite{Bystricky78} are defined by the equation

3021: 

3022: $$

3023: M(\bfk_f,\bfk_i)=\frac{1}{2}[(a+b)+(a-b)

3024: \bfs_1\cdot\bfn \bfs_2\cdot\bfn

3025: +(c+d)\bfs_1\cdot\bfm \bfs_2\cdot\bfm, $$

3026: 

3027: \eq

3028: +(c-d)\bfs_1\cdot\bfl \bfs_2\cdot\bfl

3029: +e(\bfs_1+\bfs_2)\cdot\bfn]

3030: \qe

3031: where the center-of-mass basis vectors are:

3032: 

3033: \eq

3034: \bfl=\frac{\bfk_f+\bfk_i}{|\bfk_f+\bfk_i|},\ \ 

3035: \bfm=\frac{\bfk_f-\bfk_i}{|\bfk_f-\bfk_i|},\ \

3036: \bfn=\frac{\bfk_i\times\bfk_f}{|\bfk_i\times\bfk_f|}.\ \

3037: \qe

3038: 

3039: Observables at $90^{\circ}$ are

3040: 

3041: \eq \sigma=\frac{1}{2}(2|b|^2+|d|^2+|e|^2);\ \ \ 

3042: \sigma C_{NN}=\frac{1}{2}(-2|b|^2+|d|^2+|e|^2); \qe

3043: 

3044: \eq \sigma D_{NN}=\frac{1}{2}(-|d|^2+|e|^2) =\sigma K_{NN};\ \ 

3045: \sigma C_{MMMM}=\frac{1}{2}(2|b|^2+|d|^2-|e|^2). \qe

3046: 

3047: The expressions for the amplitudes in terms of the 

3048: singlet-triplet matrix elements are:

3049: 

3050: \eq

3051: a=\frac{1}{2}(M_{11}+M_{00}-M_{1-1});\ \ \ 

3052: b=\frac{1}{2}(M_{11}+M_{ss}+M_{1-1});

3053: \qe

3054: 

3055: \eq

3056: c=\frac{1}{2}(M_{11}-M_{ss}+M_{1-1});\ \ \ 

3057: d=-\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}\sin\theta}(M_{10}+M_{01});\ \ \ 

3058: e=\frac{i}{\sqrt{2}}(M_{10}-M_{01}).

3059: \qe

3060: 

3061: The two-pion exchange box and crossed amplitudes can be written in the form

3062: \eq

3063: M(\bfk_f,\bfk_i)=<<(G^1+i\sigma_1\cdot\bfH^1)(G^2+i\sigma_2\cdot\bfH^2)>>

3064: \qe

3065: where the double brackets indicate integrations over the propagators and the

3066: G and $\bfH$ here are related to the corresponding quantities in Section II by

3067: the factor $\frac{m^2}{4\pi E}$ ($G^1=\frac{m^2}{4\pi E}G$,

3068: $G^2=\frac{m^2}{4\pi E}G'$, etc.).   With our choice of coordinate system $G$ and 

3069: $H_y$ are even in

3070: $q_y$ while $H_x$ and $H_z$ are odd.  Any totally odd quantity will integrate

3071: to zero and those terms have been dropped in the following expressions. In

3072: the remainder of this appendix it is to be understood that each term bilinear

3073: in G and/or $\bfH$ is surrounded by double brackets. One has

3074: \eq

3075: M_{1,1}=G^1G^2-H^1_zH^2_z;\ \ M_{s,s}=G^1G^2+\bfH^1\cdot\bfH^2;\ \ 

3076: M_{1,-1}=-H_x^1H_x^2+H_y^1H_y^2;

3077: \qe

3078: \eq

3079: M_{0,0}=G^1G^2+H^1_zH^2_z-H_x^1H_x^2-H_y^1H_y^2;

3080: \qe

3081: \eq

3082: M_{0,1}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}[-H_z^1H_x^2-H_x^1H_z^2

3083: -G^1H_y^2-G^2H_y^1];

3084: \qe

3085: \eq

3086: M_{1,0}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}[-H_z^1H_x^2-H_x^1H_z^2

3087: +G^1H_y^2+G^2H_y^1].

3088: \qe

3089: 

3090: From these expressions we can construct the amplitudes as

3091: \eq

3092: a=G^1G^2-H_y^1H_y^2;\ \ b=G^1G^2+H_y^2H_y^2;\ \ \ c=-H_x^1H_x^2-H_z^1H_z^2;

3093: \qe

3094: \eq

3095: d=\frac{1}{\sin\theta}(H_z^1H_x^2+H_x^1H_z^2);\ \ \ 

3096: e=i(G^1H_y^2+G^2H_y^1).

3097: \qe

3098: 

3099: With the symmetry due to the identical particles

3100: \eq

3101: a(\theta)\rightarrow a(\theta)-a(\pi-\theta),

3102: \qe

3103: \eq

3104: b(\theta)\rightarrow b(\theta)-c(\pi-\theta)=G^1(\theta)G^2(\theta)+

3105: \bfH^1(\pi-\theta)\cdot\bfH^2(\pi-\theta),

3106: \qe

3107: \eq 

3108: c(\theta)=-b(\pi-\theta),

3109: \qe

3110: \eq

3111: d(\theta)\rightarrow \frac{1}{\sin\theta}

3112: [H_z^1(\theta)H_x^2(\theta)+H_x^1(\theta)H_z^2(\theta)

3113: H_z^1(\pi-\theta)H_x^2(\pi-\theta)+H_x^1(\pi-\theta)H_z^2(\pi-\theta)],

3114: \qe

3115: \eq

3116: e(\theta)\rightarrow G^1(\theta)H_y^2(\theta)+G^2(\theta)H_y^1(\theta)

3117: +G^1(\pi-\theta)H_y^2(\pi-\theta)+G^2(\pi-\theta)H_y^1(\pi-\theta).

3118: \qe

3119: At 90$^{\circ}$

3120: \eq

3121: a=0;\ \ \ b=G^1G^2+\bfH^1\cdot\bfH^2=-c;\ \ \ d=2(H_z^1H_x^2+H_x^1H_z^2);

3122: ;\ \ \ e=2(G^1H_y^2+G^2H_y^1),

3123: \qe

3124: where the quantities are evaluated at 90$^{\circ}$.

3125: 

3126: \section{Calculation Technique}

3127: 

3128: Consider the interior integrals over $q$ and $q_0$ with the

3129: integrals over the solid angle to be done at the exterior.

3130: We apply two formulae depending on the case. 

3131: In the integral of the type

3132: \eq

3133: \int dy \int dx \left\{ \frac{f(x,y)}{[x-x_1(y)][x-x_2(y)]}

3134: \right\}

3135: \qe

3136: there are two possibilities.  

3137: If $x_1$ and $x_2$ are distinct

3138: for all values of $y$ then we can write the integral as

3139: \eq

3140: \int dy \int dx \frac{f(x,y)-g(x,y)}{[x-x_1(y)][x-x_2(y)]}

3141: +\int dy \int dx \frac{g(x,y)}{[x-x_1(y)][x-x_2(y)]},

3142: \qe

3143: where

3144: 

3145: \eq

3146: g(x,y)=\frac{x-x_2(y)}{x_1(y)-x_2(y)}f(x_1(y),y)+

3147: \frac{x-x_1(y)}{x_2(y)-x_1(y)}f(x_2(y),y).

3148: \qe

3149: The combination $f(x,y)-g(x,y)$ vanishes at each of the poles

3150: so that there is no singularity in the first term. For the

3151: second integral we have

3152: \eq \int_{-x_0}^{x_0}  

3153: \frac{g(x,y)dx}{[x-x_1(y)][x-x_2(y)]}=

3154: \frac{f(x_1(y),y)}{x_1(y)-x_2(y)}\int_{-x_0}^{x_0} \frac{1}{x-x_1(y)}

3155: +\frac{f(x_2(y),y)}{x_2(y)-x_1(y)}\int_{-x_0}^{x_0} \frac{1}{x-x_2(y)}

3156: \qe

3157: 

3158: \eq

3159: =\frac{f(x_1(y),y)}{x_1(y)-x_2(y)}\left[\pm i\pi 

3160: +ln\left(\frac{x_0-x_1(y)}{x_0+x_1(y)}\right)\right]

3161: + \frac{f(x_2(y),y)}{x_2(y)-x_1(y)}\left[\pm i\pi 

3162: +ln\left(\frac{x_0-x_2(y)}{x_0+x_2(y)}\right)\right].

3163: \qe

3164: 

3165: For the general case of $n$ distinct poles

3166: \eq

3167: \int dy \int \frac{dx f(x,y)}{\prod_{i=1}^n[x-x_i(y)]}

3168: =\int dy \int \frac{dx [f(x,y)-g(x,y)]}{\prod_{i=1}^n[x-x_i(y)]}

3169: +\int dy \int \frac{dx g(x,y)}{\prod_{i=1}^n[x-x_i(y)]},

3170: \qe

3171: where

3172: \eq

3173: g(x,y)=\sum_{i=1}^n \frac{\prod_{j\ne i}[x-x_j(y)]}

3174: {\prod_{j\ne i}[x_i(y)-x_j(y)]}f(x_i(y),y)

3175: \qe

3176: and the second integral is given by

3177: \eq

3178: \sum_{i=1}^n \frac{f(x_i(y),y)}{\prod_{j\ne i}

3179: [x_i(y)-x_j(y)]}\left[\pm i \pi 

3180: +ln\left(\frac{x_0-x_i(y)}{x_0+x_i(y)}\right)\right].

3181: \qe

3182: 

3183: If two poles are not distinct (for some value of $y$) then

3184: this method does not work.  Instead we may write

3185: 

3186: \eq

3187: \int dy \int \frac{dxf(x,y)}{[x-x_1(y)][x-x_2(y)]}=

3188: \int dy \frac{1}{x_1(y)-x_2(y)}\int dxf(x,y)

3189: \left[\frac{1}{x-x_1(y)}-\frac{1}{x-x_2(y)}\right].

3190: \qe

3191: Each of these integrals can be done separately and

3192: a second singularity has been pushed into the $y$ integral.

3193: In the cases where the pole occurs in quadratic expressions

3194: it may be more efficient to take that into account as

3195: \eq

3196: \int dy \int dx  \frac{f(x,y)}{[x^2-x_1^2(y)]

3197: [x^2-x_2^2(y)]}=

3198: \int dy \frac{1}{x_1^2(y)-x_2^2(y)}\int dxf(x,y)

3199: \left[\frac{1}{x^2-x_1^2(y)}-\frac{1}{x^2-x_2^2(y)}

3200: \right].

3201: \qe

3202: 

3203: \section{Interpretation of $Z^2$}

3204: 

3205: One can be led to the form of Eq. (\ref{qdef}) from the condition given in  

3206: Eq. (\ref{kpmq}).

3207: Since $k'=k+q$ (for example) we observe the analogous condition in three

3208: dimensions is indicative of the vector cross product and are thus led to

3209: consider the four-dimensional version of the cross product.  If we define

3210: this cross product by the use of a totally antisymmetric 4-component

3211: tensor, $\epsilon_{ijk\ell}$, in analogy with the 3-dimensional case,

3212: for two vectors (say a and b) the result is a tensor

3213: 

3214: \eq

3215: T_{ij}=\sum_{0,1,2,3}\epsilon_{ijk\ell}a_kb_{\ell}.

3216: \qe

3217: Since this tensor has 6 independent components, it cannot be expressed as

3218: an ordinary 4-vector.  It is useful to separate the components into two

3219: classes:  one in which the zero index is free and one in which it is

3220: contained in the sum. 

3221: 

3222: \eq

3223: T_{0j}=\sum_{1,2,3}\epsilon_{0jk\ell}a_kb_{\ell}=[\bfa\times\bfb]_j

3224: ;\ \ j=1,2,3,

3225: \qe

3226: 

3227: \eq

3228: T_{ij}=a_0b_k-b_0a_k=[a_0\bfb -b_0\bfa]_k,\ \ \ i,j,k=1,2,3

3229: \ \  {\rm and\ cyclic}.

3230: \qe

3231: Contracting this tensor with itself with the standard metric tensor

3232: $g_{i,j}=g_i\delta_{i,j};\ \ g_0=1;\ \ g_i=-1,\ i=1,2,3$

3233: we find

3234: 

3235: \eq

3236: \h\sum g_{ii'}g_{jj'}T_{ij}T_{i'j'}=

3237: \h \sum g_{ii}g_{jj}T_{ij}T_{ij}=(a_0\bfb-b_0\bfa)^2- 

3238: (\bfa\times\bfb)^2

3239: \equiv (a\cdot b)^2-a^2b^2.

3240: \qe

3241: The last identity may be verified by direct evaluation and has the

3242: form used for $Z^2$ showing that it corresponds to the contraction of

3243: a four-dimensional cross product.

3244: 

3245: \end{appendix}

3246: 

3247: \begin{thebibliography}{99}

3248: 

3249: \bibitem{lin} A. Lin et al., Phys. Lett. {\bf 74B},

3250: 273 (1978): \textit{Energy dependence of spin-spin forces in

3251: 90$^{\circ}_{cm}$ elastic} pp \textit{scattering}.

3252: 

3253: \bibitem{bhatia} T. S. Bhatia et al., \prl {\bf 49},

3254: 1135 (1982): \textit{Spin Correlation for }pp \textit{Elastic

3255: scattering at $\Theta_{c.m.}=\pi/2$ in the Energy Region of

3256: Dibaryon Resonances.}

3257: 

3258: \bibitem{crosbie} E. A. Crosbie et al., \pr {\bf D 23}, 600 

3259: (1981):

3260: \textit{Energy dependence of spin-spin effects in} pp  

3261: \textit{elastic scattering at 90$^{\circ}$~c.m..}

3262: 

3263: \bibitem{court} G. R. Court et al., \prl {\bf 57}, 507 

3264: (1986):

3265: \textit{Energy Dependence of Spin Effects in} p$_\uparrow  $ 

3266: +p$_\uparrow\to$ p + p.

3267: 

3268: \bibitem{crabb} D. G. Crabb et al, \prl {\bf 41}, 1257 (1978):

3269: \textit{Spin dependence of High-p$^2_{\bot}$ Elastic} p-p 

3270: \textit{Scattering.}

3271: 

3272: \bibitem{fallon} J. R. O'Fallon et al., \prl {\bf 39}, 733 (1977):

3273: \textit{Spin-Spin Interaction in High-p$^2_{\bot}$ Elastic} 

3274: p-p \textit{Scattering.}

3275: 

3276: \bibitem{akerlof} C. W. Akerlof, R. H. Hieber, A. D. Krisch,

3277: K. W.  Edwards, L. G. Ratner and K. Ruddick, \pr {\bf 159}, 1138 (1967):  

3278: \textit{Elastic Proton-Proton scattering at

3279: 90$^\circ$ and Structure within the Proton}.

3280: 

3281: \bibitem{kammerud} R. C. Kammerud, B. B. Brabson, R. R.

3282: Crittenden, R. M. Heinz, H. A. Neal, H. W. Paik and R.

3283: Sidwell, \pr D {\bf 4}, 1309 (1971): \textit{Large-Angle

3284: Proton-Proton Elastic Scattering at Intermediate Momenta}.

3285: 

3286: \bibitem{abe} K. Abe, B. A. Barnet, J. H. Goldman, A. T.

3287: Laasanen, P. H. Steinberg, G. J. Marmer, D. R. Moffett and E.

3288: F. Parker, \pr D {\bf 12}, 1 (1975): \textit{ Wide-angle 

3289: differential cross sections for elastic proton-proton 

3290: scattering in the region of $\Delta(1236)$ production}.

3291: 

3292: \bibitem{brod1} S. J. Brodsky, C. E. Carlson and H. Lipkin,

3293: \pr D {\bf 20}, 2278 (1979):

3294: \textit{Spin effects in large-transverse-momentum exclusive Scattering 

3295: processes.}

3296: 

3297: \bibitem{farrar} G. R. Farrar, S. Gottlieb, D.

3298: Sivers and G. H. Thomas, \pr D {\bf 20}, 202 (1979):

3299:  \textit{Constituent description of NN elastic

3300: scattering observables at large angles}.

3301: 

3302: \bibitem{sivers1} G. P. Ramsey and D. Sivers, \pr D {\bf 45}, 79 (1992): 

3303: \textit{Spin observables for NN $\to$ NN at large momentum transfer.}

3304: 

3305: \bibitem{sivers2} G. P. Ramsey and D. Sivers, \pr D {\bf 47}, 93 (1993):

3306: \textit{ Proton-proton elastic

3307: spin observables at large t}.

3308: 

3309: \bibitem{rosa} T. E. O. Ericson and M. Rosa-Clot, Nucl. Phys.  

3310: {\bf A405}, 497 (1983):

3311: \textit{The deuteron asymptotic D-state

3312: as a probe of the nucleon-nucleon force}.

3313: 

3314: \bibitem{fg}J. L. Friar, B. F. Gibson and G. L. Payne, 

3315: Phys. Rev. C {\bf 30}, 1084 (1984):

3316: \textit{One-pion exchange potential deuteron}. 

3317: 

3318: \bibitem{ballot} J. L. Ballot and M. R. Robilotta, Phys. Rev.  

3319: C {\bf 45}, 986 (1992): 

3320: \textit{Pionic values for deuteron

3321: observables}; Phys. Rev. C {\bf 45}, 990 (1992):

3322: \textit{Nonpionic effects in deuteron asymptotic observables};

3323: J. L. Ballot, A. M. Eir\'{o} and M. R. Robilotta, Phys. Rev. C

3324: {\bf 40}, 1459 (1989):

3325: \textit{Pions in the deuteron}.

3326: 

3327: \bibitem{gl} W. R. Gibbs and B. Loiseau, Phys. Rev. C {\bf 50}, 2742 

3328: (1994):

3329: \textit{Neutron-Proton charge exchange}.

3330: 

3331: \bibitem{bf} S. J. Brodsky and G. R. Farrar, \pr D {\bf 11}, 1309 (1975):

3332: \textit{Scaling laws for large-momentum-transfer processes}.

3333: 

3334: \bibitem{tns} M. Taketani, S. Nakamura and M. Sasaki,

3335: Prog. Theor. Phys. {\bf 6}, 581 (1951):

3336: {\it On the Method of the Theory of Nuclear Forces}.

3337: 

3338: \bibitem{tmo} M. Taketani, S. Machida, and S. Ohnuma, Prog.

3339: Theor. Phys. {\bf 7}, 45 (1952): {\it The Meson Theory of Nuclear

3340: Forces}.

3341: 

3342: \bibitem{bw} K. A. Brueckner and K. M. Watson, \pr {\bf 92}, 

3343:  1023 (1953): {\it Nuclear Forces in Pseudoscalar Meson Theory}.

3344: 

3345: \bibitem{so} M. Sugawara and S. Okubo, \pr {\bf 117}, 605 (1960): 

3346: {\it Two-Nucleon Potential from Pion Field Theory with Pseudoscalar 

3347: Coupling}; ibid {\bf 117}, 611 (1960):

3348:  {\it Two-Nucleon Potential from Pion Field Theory with Pseudovector 

3349: Coupling}.

3350: 

3351: \bibitem{mach} S. Machida, Prog. Theor. Phys. (Suppl.)

3352: {\bf 39}, 91 (1967): {\it Nonstatic Nuclear Potential}.

3353: 

3354: \bibitem{partovi} M. H. Partovi and E. L. Lomon, Phys. Rev. D 

3355: {\bf 2}, 1999 (1970):

3356: \textit{Field-Theoretical Nucleon-Nucleon Potential}.

3357: 

3358: \bibitem{Cottingham73} W.~N.~Cottingham, M.~Lacombe,

3359: B.~Loiseau, J.-M.~Richard and R.~Vinh Mau, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 8}, 800 

3360: (1973):  \textit{Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction from

3361: Pion-Nucleon Phase-Shift Analysis}

3362: 

3363: \bibitem{Lacombe81} M.~Lacombe, B.~Loiseau, J.-M.~Richard,

3364: R.~Vinh Mau, J.~C\^ot\'e, P.~Pir\`es and R.~de~Tourreil Phys.

3365: Rev. C {\bf 21}, 861 (1980):  \textit{Parameterization of the

3366: Paris NN potential}.

3367: 

3368: \bibitem{Richard75} J.-M.~Richard, \textit{Contribution \`a

3369: l'\'etude th\'eorique et ph\'enom\'enologique des forces

3370: nucl\'eaires}, Th\`ese de Doctorat d'\'Etat Es-Sciences

3371: Physique, Universit\'e P.~\&~M.~Curie, 19 June 1975.

3372: 

3373: \bibitem{friarcoon} J. L. Friar and S. A. Coon, \pr C {\bf 49}, 1272 

3374: (1994):

3375: {\it Non-adiabatic contributions to static two-pion-exchange nuclear 

3376: potentials}.

3377: 

3378: \bibitem{robilotta} M. R. Robilotta and C. A. da Rocha, Nucl.

3379: Phys. {\bf A615}, 391 (1997): \textit{Two-pion-exchange

3380: nucleon-nucleon potential model independent features}.

3381: 

3382: \bibitem{rent} M. C. M. Rentmeester, R. G. E. Timmermans, J.

3383: L. Friar and J. J. de Swart, \prl {\bf 82}, 4992 (1999):

3384: \textit{Chiral Two-Pion Exchange and Proton-Proton

3385: Partial-Wave Analysis}.

3386: 

3387: \bibitem{feynman} R. P. Feynman \pr {\bf 76}, 769 (1949):

3388: \textit{Space-Time Approach to Quantum Electrodynamics};

3389: see also Jauch and Rohrlich, {\it The Theory of Photons and

3390: Electrons}, Springer-Verlag, New York 1976.

3391: 

3392: \bibitem{qpiq} L. Y. Glozman and D. O. Riska,  Phys. Repts. 

3393: {\bf 268}, 264 (1996):

3394: {\it The spectrum of the nucleons and the strange hyperons 

3395: and chiral dynamics};

3396: L. Y. Glozman, W. Plessas, K. Varga and R. F. Wagenbrunn, \nucp\ {\bf 

3397: A631}, 469c (1998):  

3398: {\it  Light and strange baryons in a chiral quark model with 

3399: Goldstone-boson-exchange interactions}; 

3400: S. N. Jena, P. Panda, and T.~C.~Tripathy, Jour. Phys. {\bf G27}, 227 

3401: (2001): 

3402: {\it  Masses of low-lying baryons in the ground states in a power-law 

3403: potential model with pseudoscalar meson, one-gluon and centre-of-mass 

3404: corrections};

3405: C. Helminen and  D. O. Riska, \pr C {\bf 58}, 2928 (1998):

3406: {\it  $\pi$-gluon exchange interaction between constituent quarks}:

3407: A. Valcarce, H. Garcilazo and J. Vijande, \prc {\bf 72}, 025206 (2005):

3408: {\it  Constituent quark model study of light- and strange-baryon spectra};

3409: M. Arima, K. Masutani and T.~Sato, Prog. Theor. Phys. Supp. {\bf 137}, 169 

3410: (2000):

3411: {\it Baryon resonances in a constituent quark model};

3412: H. R. Pang, J. L. Ping, F. Wang and T. Goldman, \pr C {\bf 65}, 

3413: 014003 (2002): 

3414: {\it Phenomenological study of hadron interaction models}.

3415: 

3416: \bibitem{mix1} F. Gross and Y. Surya, Phys. Rev. C {\bf 47},

3417: 703 (1993):

3418: \textit{Unitary, relativistic resonance model for $\pi$N

3419: scattering}.

3420: 

3421: \bibitem{mix2} P. F. A. Goudsmit, H. J. Leisi, E. Matsinos, B.

3422: L. Birbrair and A. B.  Gridnev, Nucl. Phys. {\bf A575}, 673

3423: (1994):

3424: \textit{The extended tree-level model for the pion-nucleon interaction}.

3425: 

3426: \bibitem{kon}S. Kondratyuk and O. Scholten, Phys. Rev. {\bf

3427: C 59}, 1070 (1999): 

3428: \textit{Consistent off-shell vertex and nucleon self-energy}.

3429: 

3430: \bibitem{Bystricky78} J. Bystricky, F. Lehar and P.

3431: Winternitz, J. Phys. \textbf{39}, 1 (1978): \textit{Formalism

3432: of Nucleon-Nucleon elastic scattering experiments}.

3433: 

3434: \bibitem{bjd} J. D. Bjorken and S. D. Drell, {\it Relativistic 

3435: Quantum Fields} McGraw-Hill, (1965), Chapter 18. 

3436: 

3437: \bibitem{polyzou} B.D. Keister and W.N. Polyzou, Advances in

3438: Nuclear Physics, Volume 20, Ed. J. W. Negele and E.W. Vogt,

3439: Plenum Press 1991: \textit{Relativistic Hamiltonian Dynamics

3440: in Nuclear and Particle Physics}.

3441: 

3442: \bibitem{nussenzveig} H.M. Nussenzveig, \textit{Causality and

3443: dispersion relations}, Academic Press NY (1972).

3444: 

3445: \bibitem{maekawarobilotta} C. M. Maekawa and M. R. Robilotta,

3446: \pr C {\bf 55}, 2675 (1977): {\it Chiral symmetry: 

3447: Pion-nucleon interactions in constituent quark models}.

3448: 

3449: \bibitem{bozoian} M. Bozoian, J. C. H. van Doremalen and H. J. Weber,

3450: Phys. Lett. {\bf 122B}, 138 (1983):

3451: {\it Are There Bound A=2 Hyperon States?}.

3452: 

3453: \bibitem{nozawa} S. Nozawa, B. Blankleider and T.-S. H. Lee,

3454: Nucl. Phys. {\bf A513}, 459 (1990):

3455: {\it A Dynamical Model of Pion Photoproduction on the Nucleon}.

3456: 

3457: \bibitem{haberzettl} H. Haberzettl, C. Bennhold, T. Mart and T. 

3458: Feuster, \prc {\bf 58}, R40 (1998):

3459: {\it Gauge-invariant Tree-level Photoproduction Amplitudes with Form 

3460: Factors}.

3461: 

3462: \bibitem{gourdin} M. Gourdin, Phys. Rept., {\bf 11}, 29 (1974):

3463: \textit{Weak and electromagnetic form-factors of hadrons}.

3464: 

3465: \bibitem{lissia} M. Lissia, M.-C. Chu, J. W. Negele and J.

3466: M. Grandy, \nucp\ {\bf A555}, 272 (1993):

3467: \textit{Comparison  of hadron quark distribution from lattice QCD and the 

3468: MIT bag model}.

3469: 

3470: \bibitem{alex} C. Alexandrou, Ph. de Forcrand and A Tsapalis, 

3471: \pr D {\bf 68}, 074504 (2003):

3472: \textit{Matter and pseudoscalar densities in lattice QCD}.

3473: 

3474: \bibitem{coon} S. A. Coon and M. D. Scadron, Phys. Rev. C {\bf 42}, 2256 

3475: (1990):

3476: \textit{$\pi NN$ couplings, the $\pi NN$ form factor and the 

3477: Goldberger-Treiman discrepancy};  

3478: Phys. Rev. C {\bf 23}, 1150 (1981): 

3479: \textit{Goldberger-Treiman discrepancy and the momentum variation of the 

3480: pion-nucleon form factor and pion decay constant}.

3481: 

3482: \bibitem{mark} M. Bolsterli and J. Parmentola,  Phys. Rev. D {\bf 39}, 

3483: 1304 (1989):

3484: \textit{P-wave pion in the Los Alamos soliton model}.

3485: 

3486: \bibitem{pena} G. Ramalho, A. Arriaga and M. T. Pe\~{n}a, Phys.

3487: Rev.  C {\bf 60}, 047001 (1999):

3488: \textit{Two-pion exchange and strong form factors in covariant field 

3489: theories}.

3490: 

3491: 

3492: \bibitem{others}B. D. Keister and L. S. Kisslinger, Nucl. Phys. {\bf 

3493: A326}, 445 (1979): 

3494: \textit{A relativistic study of} pp $\to$ d $\pi^+$: 

3495: \textit{Forward scattering};  

3496: G. Wolf, Phys. Rev. {\bf 182}, 1538 (1969): 

3497: \textit{Single- and Double-Pion Production by One-Pion Exchange and a 

3498: Comparison with Experimental Data between 1.6 and 2.6 GeV/c}; 

3499: H.~P. Durr  and H.~P. Pilkuhn, Nuovo Cim. {\bf 40}, 899 (1965): 

3500: \textit{Kinematical form factors in the peripheral model}; 

3501: J. Benecke and H. P. Durr, Nuovo Cim. {\bf 56}, 269 (1968):

3502: \textit{A Relativistic Model for Kinematical Form Factors}; 

3503: L.  Mathelitsch and H.  Garcilazo, \pr C {\bf 33}, 

3504: 2075 (1986): \textit{Relativistic one-pion exchange potentials}.

3505: 

3506: \bibitem{Mandelstam55} S.~Mandelstam, Phys. Rev. {\bf 112},

3507: 1344 (1958):

3508: \textit{Determination of the Pion-Nucleon Scattering

3509: Amplitude from Dispersion Relations and Unitarity. General

3510: Theory}.

3511: 

3512: \bibitem{Hoehler83} G. H\"ohler, \textit{$\pi$ N scattering} in

3513: Landolt-B\"orstein, New Series, Vol. 9b (1983).

3514: 

3515: \bibitem{Brown76}G.~E.~Brown, A.~D.~Jackson, 

3516: \textit{The Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction}, North-Holland/American 

3517: Elsevier (1976) chap. XIV.

3518: 

3519: \bibitem{Nishijima69} K.~Nishijima, \textit{Fields and

3520: particles}, W.~A. Benjamin Inc. 1969, pp 419-421.

3521: 

3522: \bibitem{Cutkosky54} R.~E.~Cutkosky, J. Math. Phys. \textbf{1},

3523: 429 (1960):

3524:   \textit{Singularities and Discontinuities of Feynman Amplitudes}.

3525: 

3526: \bibitem{Zytnicki01} H.~Zytnicki, \textit{Param\`etre de

3527: corr\'elation de spin proton-proton \`a 90$^\circ$ jusqu'\`a 12

3528: GeV/c et \'echange de deux pions \`a l'aide des relations de

3529: dispersion}, Rapport de stage de D.E.A. de Physique Quantique,

3530: Uni. P. \& M. Curie, Paris, http://lpnhe-theorie.in2p3.fr/TH-Rapp.html.

3531: 

3532: \bibitem{arndt} SAID program at http://gwdac.phys.gwu.edu;

3533: R. A. Arndt, I. I Strakovsky and R. L.  Workman, Phys. Rev. C {\bf 62}, 

3534: 034005 (2000):

3535: \textit{Nucleon Nucleon Elastic Scattering to 3 GeV}.

3536: 

3537: \bibitem{bystdata} J. Bystricky, C. Lechanoine-LeLuc and F.

3538: Lehar, Eur. Phys. J. {\bf C4}, 607 (1998):

3539: \textit{Direct reconstruction of} pp \textit{elastic scattering amplitudes

3540: and phase shift analyses at fixed energies from 1.80 to 2.70 GeV}.

3541: 

3542: \bibitem{ghah} N. Ghahramany, G. Forozani, \pr C {\bf 61},

3543: 064004 (2000):

3544: \textit{Direct reconstruction of} pp

3545: \textit{elastic scattering amplitudes at 1.8 and 2.1 GeV}.

3546: 

3547: \bibitem{amado} R. D. Amado and R. M. Woloshyn, \pl {\bf 62B}, 

3548: 253 (1976):

3549: \textit{Momentum distribution in the nucleus}.

3550: 

3551: \bibitem{jain} P. Jain, B. Pire and J. P. Ralston, Phys.

3552: Rept. {\bf 271}, 67 (1996): 

3553: \textit{Quantum color transparency and nuclear filtering}.

3554: 

3555: \bibitem{carroll} A. S. Carroll et al. \prl {\bf 61},

3556: 1698 (1988): \textit{Nuclear Transparency to Large-Angle} pp

3557: \textit{Elastic Scattering}.

3558: 

3559: \end{thebibliography}

3560: \end{document}

3561: 

3562: