1: \documentclass[
2: ,final % use final for the camera ready runs
3: ,numberedheadings % uncomment this option for numbered sections
4: ,cmfonts % add further options here if necessary
5: ]
6: {aipproc}
7:
8: \layoutstyle{6x9}
9:
10: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
11: %% FRONTMATTER
12: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
13:
14: \begin{document}
15:
16: \title{Partial-Wave Analysis of Single-Pion Production Reactions}
17:
18: \classification{14.20.Gk, 11.80.Et, 13.30.Eg}
19: \keywords {Partial-Wave Analysis}
20:
21: \author{R.A.~Arndt}
22: {address={Center for Nuclear Studies, Department of Physics,
23: The George Washington University, Washington, D.C.
24: 20052, USA}}
25: \author{W.J.~Briscoe}
26: {address={Center for Nuclear Studies, Department of Physics,
27: The George Washington University, Washington, D.C.
28: 20052, USA}}
29: \author{I.I.~Strakovsky}
30: {address={Center for Nuclear Studies, Department of Physics,
31: The George Washington University, Washington, D.C.
32: 20052, USA}}
33: \author{R.L.~Workman}
34: {address={Center for Nuclear Studies, Department of Physics,
35: The George Washington University, Washington, D.C.
36: 20052, USA}}
37:
38: \begin{abstract}
39: We present an overview of our efforts to analyze pion-nucleon
40: elastic scattering data, along with data from related photo-
41: and electroproduction reactions, in order to study the baryon
42: spectrum. We then focus on the $\Delta(1232)$ resonance.
43: Fits to pion photo- and electroproduction data have been used
44: to extract values for the $R_{EM}$ = E2/M1 and $R_{SM}$ = S2/M1
45: ratios as functions of $Q^2$. These results are compared
46: to other recent determinations.
47: \end{abstract}
48:
49: \maketitle
50:
51: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
52: %% MAINMATTER
53: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
54:
55: Many of our fits to scattering data have been motivated by
56: ongoing studies of the $N^\ast$ properties~\cite{PDG}. Most
57: of these require, as input, amplitudes extracted from
58: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
59: \begin{figure}[htbp]
60: \includegraphics[height=0.4\textwidth, angle=90]{fig1.eps}
61: \caption{$\Delta$ multipoles from analysis
62: of scattering data $-$ a Road Map.} \label{fig:g1}
63: \end{figure}
64: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
65: elastic pion-nucleon scattering data~\cite{gw_pin}. Our
66: pion photoproduction multipoles are determined using a
67: K-matrix formalism, based upon pion-nucleon partial-wave
68: amplitudes~\cite{gw_photo}. The electroproduction
69: analysis is similarly anchored to our $Q^2 = 0$
70: photoproduction results, with additional factors intended
71: to account for the $Q^2$ variation. This relationship is
72: diagrammed in Fig.~\ref{fig:g1}. Most of what we discuss
73: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
74: \begin{figure}[htbp]
75: \includegraphics[height=0.4\textwidth, angle=90]{fig2.eps}
76: \caption{$\pi N$ analysis flow chart.} \label{fig:g2}
77: \end{figure}
78: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
79: here is confined to an energy region covering the
80: $\Delta(1232)$ resonance. Problems associated with the
81: opening of channels beyond $\pi N$~\cite{formal} are
82: avoided.
83:
84: The pion-nucleon amplitudes are determined through a fit
85: to elastic scattering, charge-exchange, and $\eta N$
86: production data, constrained to satisfy forward and fixed-t
87: dispersion relations. A flowchart for this procedure is
88: given in Fig.~\ref{fig:g2}. Two representative results for
89: the partial-wave amplitudes are given in Fig.~\ref{fig:g3},
90: which shows that the extraction of resonance contributions
91: is difficult for most states. A search of the complex
92: energy plane finds poles which are often far from the
93: physical axis, as shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:g4}, making a
94: simple Breit-Wigner
95: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
96: \begin{figure}[htbp]
97: \includegraphics[height=0.5\textwidth, angle=90]{fig3a.eps}\hfill
98: \includegraphics[height=0.5\textwidth, angle=90]{fig3b.eps}
99: \caption{Partial-wave amplitudes $S_{31}$ and $P_{11}$
100: from $T_{\pi}$ = 0 to 2.6~GeV. Solid (dashed) curves
101: give the real (imaginary) parts of amplitudes
102: corresponding to the SP06 solution~\protect\cite{gw_pin}.
103: The real (imaginary) parts of single-energy solutions
104: are plotted as filled (open) circles. The dotted curve
105: gives the unitarity limit ($ImT - T^{\ast}T$) from SP06.
106: The Karlsruhe KA84 solution~\protect\cite{KH} is
107: plotted with long dash-dotted (real part) and short
108: dash-dotted (imaginary part) lines. All amplitudes
109: are dimensionless. Vertical arrows indicate resonance
110: $W_R$ values and horizontal bars show full $\Gamma$ and
111: partial $\Gamma_{\pi N}$ widths. The lower BW
112: resonance symbols are associated with the SP06 values;
113: upper symbols give RPP~\protect\cite{PDG} values.}
114: \label{fig:g3}
115: \end{figure}
116: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
117: \begin{figure}[htbp]
118: \includegraphics[height=0.6\textwidth, angle=90]{fig4.eps}
119: \caption{Comparison of complex plane (bottom panel)
120: and Breit-Wigner (top panel) parameters for
121: resonances found in the SP06
122: solution~\protect\cite{gw_pin}. Plotted are the
123: result for S- and P-wave resonances. Complex
124: plane poles are shown as stars (the boxed star
125: denotes a second-sheet pole). $W_R$ and $W_I$
126: give real and imaginary parts of the
127: center-of-mass energy. The full ($\pi N$ partial)
128: widths are denoted by thin (thick) bars for each
129: resonance. The branch point for $\pi\Delta(1232)$,
130: 1350 - i50~MeV, is represented as a solid triangle.
131: The branch points for $\eta N$, 1487 -i0~MeV, and
132: $\rho N$, 1715 - i73~MeV, thresholds are shown as
133: a solid diamond and solid square, respectively.}
134: \label{fig:g4}
135: \end{figure}
136: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
137: parametrization questionable. For the $\Delta(1232)$,
138: however, there is general agreement about the resonance
139: width, mass, pole position, and residue~\cite{PDG}. Here,
140: as the P$_{33}$ partial wave is elastic, a Breit-Wigner
141: fit accurately describes the results of our more involved
142: analysis.
143:
144: As mentioned, in fitting the electroproduction database,
145: we fix the $Q^2$ = 0 point based on our fits to pion
146: photoproduction. The photoproduction multipoles can be
147: parametrized using the form
148: \begin{equation}
149: M = ({\rm Born} + \alpha_B )(1 + i T_{\pi N} )
150: + \alpha_R T_{\pi N} + {\rm higher \; terms},
151: \end{equation}
152: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
153: \begin{figure}[htbp]
154: \includegraphics[height=0.5\textwidth, angle=90]{fig5a.eps}\hfill
155: \includegraphics[height=0.5\textwidth, angle=90]{fig5b.eps}
156: \caption{Partial-wave $P_{33}$ amplitudes around
157: the $\Delta(1232)$ for $Q^2=0.00~GeV^2$. Magnetic
158: ($M_{1+}^{3/2}$) and electric ($E_{1+}^{3/2}$)
159: multipoles. Solid (dashed) curves give the real
160: (imaginary) parts of amplitudes corresponding to
161: the pion phoproduction SP06
162: solution~\protect\cite{gw_photo}. The MAID05
163: solution~\protect\cite{maid} is plotted with
164: long dash-dotted (real part) and short
165: dash-dotted (imaginary part) lines.}
166: \label{fig:g5}
167: \end{figure}
168: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
169: containing the Born terms and phenomenological pieces
170: ($\alpha$) maintaining the correct threshold behavior and
171: Watson's theorem below the two-pion production threshold.
172: The $\pi N$ T-matrix ($T_{\pi N}$) connects each multipole
173: to structure found in the elastic scattering analysis. In
174: the $\Delta(1232)$ resonance region, the influence of
175: channels beyond $\pi N$ is small for most partial waves
176: and it is common to drop the $\alpha_B$ and higher order
177: pieces. We retain the $\alpha_B$ term to account for
178: non-pole K-matrix contributions beyond the simple Born terms.
179: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
180: \begin{figure}[htbp]
181: \includegraphics[height=1.0\textwidth, angle=90]{fig6.eps}
182: \caption{Magnetic ($M_{1+}^{3/2}$), electric
183: ($E_{1+}^{3/2}$), and longitudinal
184: ($S_{1+}^{3/2}$) $P_{33}$ multipoles for
185: $Q^2<1.50~GeV^2$. The JM05
186: results~\protect\cite{CLAS} is plotted with
187: dotted (real and imaginary parts) lines
188: for $Q^2=0.40$ and $0.65~GeV^2$. Notation
189: as in Fig.~\protect\ref{fig:g5}.}
190: \label{fig:g6}
191: \end{figure}
192: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
193: \begin{figure}[htbp]
194: \includegraphics[height=1.0\textwidth, angle=90]{fig7.eps}
195: \caption{Magnetic, electric, and longitudinal
196: $P_{33}$ multipoles for $Q^2>1.00~GeV^2$.
197: Notation as in Fig.~\protect\ref{fig:g5}.}
198: \label{fig:g7}
199: \end{figure}
200: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
201:
202: At non-zero $Q^2$, the Born terms have built-in $Q^2$
203: dependence $-$ other terms have been modified by a
204: phenomenological factor
205: \begin{equation}
206: f(Q^2) = { k \over {k(Q^2=0)}} {1\over {1 + Q^2/0.7}}
207: e^{-\Lambda Q^2}
208: \left( 1 + Q^2 ( a + b \left[ {W \over W_R} -
209: 1 \right] + c Q^2 ) \right)
210: \end{equation}
211: where $k$ is the photon CM momentum, $\Lambda$ is a
212: universal cutoff factor, and the constants $a$, $b$, and
213: $c$ are searched for each multipole. The $W$-dependent
214: term is included to account for any residual energy
215: dependence, is purely phenomenological, and was found to
216: significantly improve fits. Note that this term is
217: constructed to given zero contribution both at the $Q^2$=0
218: (photoproduction) point and at the resonance position.
219: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
220: \begin{figure}[htbp]
221: \includegraphics[height=0.5\textwidth, angle=90]{fig8a.eps}\hfill
222: \includegraphics[height=0.5\textwidth, angle=90]{fig8b.eps}
223: \caption{$R_{EM}$ and $R_{SM}$ ratios vs $Q^2$.
224: Values were extracted from our fixed $Q^2$ analyses
225: starting from the global fit (filled circles).
226: Results from JLab~\protect\cite{jlab} (open
227: circles), MAMI-B~\protect\cite{mainz} (open
228: triangles), MIT-Bates~\protect\cite{bates} (filled
229: triangles), and ELSA~\protect\cite{elsa}
230: (open square with cross) are given. At $Q^2 = 0$,
231: $R_{EM} = -1.79\pm 0.18~\%$ determined from pion
232: photoproduction PWA~\protect\cite{gw_photo} is
233: shown (star). The solid curve gives our global
234: (energy dependent) best-fit results. The long
235: dash-dotted (MAID05) and dotted (DMT) curves are
236: from Refs.~\protect\cite{maid,DMT},
237: respectively.} \label{fig:g8}
238: \end{figure}
239: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
240:
241: In Fig.~\ref{fig:g5}, we compare the SAID and MAID results
242: for electric and magnetic multipoles connected to the
243: $\Delta (1232)$ resonance. At the resonance position, the
244: $R_{EM}$ ratio is essentially given by a ratio of the
245: imaginary parts of these multipoles. The large magnetic
246: multipole is not significantly different in these two
247: analyses (the agreement is even closer for the SAID and
248: DMT multipoles~\cite{DMT}). Differences for the electric
249: multipole are much larger.
250:
251: In Figs.~\ref{fig:g6} and~\ref{fig:g7}, we see the same
252: trend continued for non-zero values of $Q^2$. At the
253: resonance position, the magnetic ($M_{1+}^{3/2}$)
254: multipoles remain fairly consistent; the $E_{1+}^{3/2}$
255: multipoles differ significantly.
256:
257: One point of continuing interest has been the $Q^2$
258: variation of the ratio $R_{EM}$ - a quantity which should
259: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
260: \begin{figure}
261: \includegraphics[height=0.5\textwidth, angle=90]{fig9a.eps}\hfill
262: \includegraphics[height=0.5\textwidth, angle=90]{fig9b.eps}
263: \caption{$R_{EM}$ and $R_{SM}$ ratios vs $Q^2$.
264: Recent lattice~\protect\cite{lattice} and
265: previous S-L~\protect\cite{S-L} calculations
266: shown as open triangles and long dashed line,
267: respectively.} \label{fig:g9}
268: \end{figure}
269: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
270: tend to unity for suffiently high $Q^2$. In the SAID fits,
271: a cross-over from negative to positive values of $R_{EM}$
272: has been found, though the exact cross-over point has
273: tended to shift as our database has expanded. The most
274: recent results are shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:g8} compared to
275: a number of models and single-$Q^2$ fits to data. Here,
276: we also plot the ratio $R_{SM}$, for which there is at
277: least qualitative agreement up to about 4~GeV$^2$. (The
278: incorporation of high-$Q^2$ data is not complete, so there
279: could yet be changes.) While our present curve for $R_{EM}$
280: appears at odds with other determinations, it is not ruled
281: out by recent lattice data~\cite{lattice}, displayed in
282: Fig.~\ref{fig:g9}.
283:
284: We plan to continue these fits, incorporating all available
285: electroproduction data, and modifying our fitting procedure
286: as necessary. Useful comparisons will require those involved
287: in this effort to make available all amplitudes obtained in
288: any new determination of $R_{EM}$ and $R_{SM}$.
289:
290: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
291: %% BACKMATTER
292: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
293:
294: \begin{theacknowledgments}
295: This work was supported in part by the U.~S.~Department of
296: Energy Grant DE--FG02--99ER41110 and by funding from
297: Jefferson Laboratory.
298: \end{theacknowledgments}
299:
300: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
301: \bibitem{PDG}S.~Eidelman \textit{et~al.}, \textit{Review
302: of Particle Physics}, \textit{Phys. Lett. B}
303: \textbf{592}, 1 (2004) and 2005 partial update
304: for edition 2006; \hbox{http://pdg.lbl.gov}..
305: \bibitem{gw_pin}R.A.~Arndt, W.J.~Briscoe, I.I.~Strakovsky,
306: R.L.~Workman, and M.M.~Pavan, \textit{Phys. Rev. C}
307: \textbf{69}, 035213 (2004);
308: R.A.~Arndt, W.J.~Briscoe, I.I.~Strakovsky, and
309: R.L.~Workman, `Extended partial-wave analysis of
310: $\pi N$ scattering data', nucl-th/0605082.
311: \bibitem{gw_photo}R.A.~Arndt, W.J.~Briscoe, I.I.~Strakovsky,
312: and R.L.~Workman, \textit{Phys. Rev. C}
313: \textbf{66}, 055213 (2004).
314: %\bibitem{gw_elect}R.A. Arndt, I.I.~Strakovsky, and R.L.~Workman,
315: % \textit{$\pi N$ Newsletter} \textbf{16}, 150 (2002);
316: % S.S. Kamalov, L.~Tiator, D.~Drechsel, R.A.~Arndt,
317: % C.~Bennhold, I.I.~Strakovsky, and R.L.~Workman,
318: % \textit{Phys. Rev. C} \textbf{66}, 065206 (2002);
319: % R.~Arndt, W.~Briscoe, I.~Strakovsky, and R.~Workman,
320: % talk at NSTAR2002, Pittsburgh, Oct. 2002.
321: \bibitem{formal}R.L.~Workman, `Single-channel fits and K-matrix
322: constraints', nucl-th/0510025.
323: \bibitem{KH}R.~Koch, \textit{Z. Phys. C} \textbf{29}, 597 (1985);
324: G.~H\"ohler, \textit{Pion--Nucleon Scattering},
325: Landoldt--B\"ornstein Vol. \textbf{I/9b2}, edited by
326: H.~Schopper (Springer Verlag, 1983).
327: %\bibitem{CUT}R.~E.~Cutkosky \textit{et al.}, \emph{Phys.
328: % Rev. D} \textbf{20}, 2839 (1979);
329: % R.~E.~Cutkosky in \textit{Proceedings of the 4th
330: % Conference of Baryon Resonances, Toronto, 1980},
331: % edited by N.~Isgur (World Scientific, Singapore,
332: % 1981), p.~19.
333: %\bibitem{MAN}D.M.~Manley and E.M.~Saleski, \textit{Phys. Rev. D}
334: % \textbf{45}, 4002 (1992).
335: \bibitem{maid}MAID05 version; D. Drechsel, O. Hanstein,
336: S.S. Kamalov, and L. Tiator, \textit{Nucl. Phys.}
337: \textbf{A645}, 45 (1999).
338: \bibitem{DMT}S.S. Kamalov, Shin Nan Yang, D. Drechsel, O.
339: Hanstein, and L. Tiator, \textit{Phys. Rev. C}
340: \textbf{64}, 032201 (2001).
341: \bibitem{CLAS}I.G. Aznauryan, V.D. Burkert, H. Egiyan,
342: K. Joo, R. Minehart, and L.C. Smith, \textit{Phys.
343: Rev. C} \textbf{71}, 015201 (2005).
344: \bibitem{jlab}V.V. Frolov \textit{et al.}, \textit{Phys. Rev.
345: Lett.} \textit{82}, 45 (1999);
346: K. Joo \textit{et al.} (CLAS Collaboration),
347: \emph{Phys. Rev. Lett.} \textbf{88}, 122001 (2002);
348: J.J. Kelly \textit{et al.}, \textit{Phys. Rev. Lett.}
349: \textbf{95}, 102001 (2005);
350: I.G. Aznauryan \textit{et al.}, \textit{Phys. Rev.
351: C} \textbf{71}, 015201 (2005);
352: M. Ungaro \textit{et al.} (CLAS Collaboration),
353: ` Measurement of the $N$ to $\Delta(1232)$ transition at
354: high momentum transfer by $\pi^0$ electroproduction',
355: submitted to \textit{Phys. Rev. Lett.}, hep--ex/0606042.
356: \bibitem{mainz}Th. Pospischil \textit{et al.}, \textit{Phys.
357: Rev. Lett.} \textbf{86}, 2959 (2001);
358: D. Elsner \textit{et al.}, \textit{Eur. Phys. J. A}
359: \textbf{27}, 91 (2006);
360: S. Stave \textit{et al.}, `Lowest $Q^2$ measurement of
361: the $\gamma^\ast p\to\Delta$ reaction: probing the
362: pionic contribution', nucl-ex/0604013.
363: \bibitem{bates}C. Mertz \textit{et al.}, \textit{Phys. Rev.
364: Lett.} \textbf{86}, 2963 (2001);
365: C. Kunz \textit{et al.}, \textit{Phys. Lett. B}
366: \textbf{564}, 21 (2003);
367: N.F. Sparveris \textit{et al.}, \textit{Phys.
368: Rev. Lett.} \textbf{94}, 022003 (2005).
369: \bibitem{elsa}F. Kalleicher \textit{et al.}, \textit{Z. Phys.
370: A} \textbf{359}, 201 (1997).
371: \bibitem{S-L}T. Sato and T.S.H. Lee, \textit{Phys. Rev. C}
372: \textbf{54}, 2660 (1996).
373: \bibitem{lattice}C. Alexandrou \textit{et al.}, \textit{Phys.
374: Rev. Lett.} \textbf{94}, 021601 (2005).
375: \end{thebibliography}
376: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
377: \end{document}
378: