1: %%%%%%%%%% espcrc1.tex %%%%%%%%%%
2: %
3: % $Id: espcrc1.tex,v 1.2 2004/02/24 11:22:11 spepping Exp $
4: %
5: \documentclass[fleqn,12pt,twoside]{article}
6: % \usepackage{espcrc1}
7: % Use the option 'headings' if you want running headings
8: \usepackage{amsbsy}
9: \usepackage{amssymb}
10: \usepackage[headings]{espcrc1}
11:
12: % identification
13: \readRCS
14: $Id: espcrc1.tex,v 1.2 2004/02/24 11:22:11 spepping Exp $
15: \ProvidesFile{espcrc1.tex}[\filedate \space v\fileversion
16: \space Elsevier 1-column CRC Author Instructions]
17:
18: % change this to the following line for use with LaTeX2.09
19: % \documentstyle[12pt,twoside,fleqn,espcrc1]{article}
20:
21: % if you want to include PostScript figures
22: \usepackage{graphicx}
23: \usepackage{epsfig}
24: % if you have landscape tables
25: \usepackage[figuresright]{rotating}
26:
27: % put your own definitions here:
28: \newcommand{\be}{\begin{equation}}
29: \newcommand{\ee}{\end{equation}}
30: \newcommand{ \bea }{\begin{eqnarray}}
31: \newcommand{ \eea }{\end{eqnarray}}
32: \newcommand{ \la }{\langle}
33: \newcommand{ \ra }{\rangle}
34: \newcommand{ \eps }{{\varepsilon}}
35: \newcommand{ \ds }{\displaystyle}
36: % ...
37: \newcommand{\ttbs}{\char'134}
38: \newcommand{\AmS}{{\protect\the\textfont2
39: A\kern-.1667em\lower.5ex\hbox{M}\kern-.125emS}}
40:
41: % add words to TeX's hyphenation exception list
42: %\hyphenation{author another created financial paper re-commend-ed Post-Script}
43:
44: % set the starting page if not 1
45: % \setcounter{page}{17}
46:
47: % declarations for front matter
48:
49: % SWAT 06/467
50:
51: \title{Forward-Backward Charge Fluctuations at RHIC Energies}
52: %\footnote{poster presented at Strong \& Electroweak Matter
53: %(SEWM2006), BNL, United States, May 10-13 2006}
54:
55:
56:
57: \author{
58: Stephane Haussler\address{
59: Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies (FIAS), J.W. Goethe Universit\"at, \\
60: Max von Laue Stra\ss{}e 1, 60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany},
61: Mohamed Abdel-Aziz\address[MCSD]{Institut f\"ur Theoretische Physik, J.W. Goethe Universit\"at, \\
62: Max von Laue Stra\ss{}e 1, 60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
63: }%
64: , Marcus Bleicher\addressmark.}
65: % If you use the option headings,
66: % the title is also used as the running title,
67: % and the authors are also used as the running authors.
68: % You can change that by using \runtitle and \runauthor.
69:
70: %\runtitle{Meson spectral functions at nonzero momentum in hot QCD}
71: %\runauthor{Gert Aarts et.\ al.}
72:
73: \begin{document}
74:
75: % typeset front matter
76: \maketitle
77: \begin{abstract}
78: We use the ultra-relativistic quantum molecular dynamic UrQMD
79: version 2.2 to study forward backward fluctuations and compare our
80: results with the published data by the PHOBOS.
81: \end{abstract}
82: \vspace{0.6cm}
83: \section{Introduction}\label{sec:introduction}
84: %
85: One of the main goals of the relativistic heavy ion program is to
86: understand the nature of the hadron production mechanism (e.g.\
87: parton coalescence, string fragmentation or cluster decay). Recent
88: RHIC data suggested the formation of a quark gluon plasma (QGP)
89: during the collision of two heavy gold nuclei at center of mass
90: energy $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=200$~GeV. Using correlations and
91: fluctuations to probe the nature of the created QCD matter has
92: been proposed by many authors, see for
93: example\cite{Haussler:2005ei}.
94: %.\cite{Haussler:2005ei,Jeon:2005kj,Koch:2001zn,Bleicher:2000ek,Bleicher:1998wu,Abdel-Aziz:2006fe}
95: Recently, the PHOBOS experiment performed a similar analysis to
96: the UA5 experiment \cite{Alpgard:1983xp} for Au+Au reactions at
97: $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=200$~GeV \cite{Back:2006id}. In ref
98: \cite{Abdel-Aziz:2006fe}, a simple model was introduced to extract
99: the effective cluster multiplicity $K_{\rm eff}$ from PHOBOS data
100: and $K_{\rm eff}\sim2.7$ was found for peripheral collisions and
101: $K_{\rm eff}\sim 2.2$ for central collisions. The value of $K_{\rm
102: eff}$ in central collisions is close to the $pp$ value reported by
103: UA5 \cite{Alpgard:1983xp}. Note that all measured cluster
104: multiplicities $K_{\rm eff}$ are larger than the one that is
105: computed for a hadron resonance gas ($K_{\rm HG}=1.5$)
106: \cite{Stephanov:1999zu}, indicating that the measured charge
107: correlations can not be described by simple statistical models
108: based on hadronic degrees of freedom. Our goal in the current
109: study is to get a baseline estimate for forward-backward
110: fluctuations based on the microscopic hadronic transport model
111: UrQMD. For a complete review of the model see \cite{Bass:1998ca}.
112: In this paper we analyze $5\times10^5$ $pp$ and minimum bias Au+Au
113: events at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=200$~GeV.
114: %
115: \section{Forward-Backward Fluctuations}\label{sec:model}
116: In this section, we introduce the variable $C$ that measures the
117: asymmetry between the forward and backward charges. We define two
118: symmetric rapidity regions at $\pm\eta$ with equal width
119: $\Delta\eta$. The number of charged particles in the forward
120: rapidity interval $\eta\pm\Delta\eta/2$ is $N_F$ while the
121: corresponding number in the backward hemisphere
122: $-\eta\pm\Delta\eta/2$ is given by $N_B$. We define the asymmetry
123: variable $C=(N_F-N_B)/\sqrt{N_F+N_B}$,
124: %
125: in each event. The variance of the charged particle multiplicity
126: in the forward hemisphere is given by $D_{FF}=\la N_F^2\ra-\la
127: N_F\ra^2$ and similarly for the backward hemisphere $D_{BB}=\la
128: N_B^2\ra-\la N_B\ra^2$. We also introduce the covariance of
129: charged particles in both hemispheres by $D_{FB}=\la N_FN_B\ra-\la
130: N_F\ra\la N_B\ra$, where $\la....\ra$ stands for the average over
131: all events. The PHOBOS measure of the dynamical fluctuations
132: $\sigma^2_C$ can be written as
133: %
134: \be \sigma^2_C\approx \frac{D_{FF}+D_{BB}-2D_{FB}}{\la
135: N_F+N_B\ra}.\ee
136:
137: Recently STAR \cite{Tarnowsky:2006nh} reported a preliminary
138: results of the so called correlation strength parameter
139: $b=D_{FB}/D_{FF}$. The effective cluster multiplicity $K_{\rm eff}$ is propotional to
140: $\sigma^2_C$, such that if b=0, then the covariance $D_{FB}$ vanishes.
141: In this case we have $\sigma^2_C=K_{\rm eff}$.
142: %
143: We emphasize that $K_{\rm eff}$ should be understood as a product
144: of the true cluster multiplicity times a leakage factor $\xi$ that
145: takes into account the limited observation window $\Delta\eta$.
146: The event by event fluctuations of the asymmetry parameter
147: (variance) $\sigma^2_C$ in the absence of any correlations among
148: the produced particles will be $\sigma^2_C=1$.
149: %If there is only
150: %long range correlation, then $0<\sigma^2_C<1$.
151: %
152: %
153: \begin{figure}
154: \vspace*{-0.0cm}
155: \centerline{
156: %\epsfig{figure=sigma_eta_auauecm200_Deltaeta0[1].5.eps,width=7.5cm}
157: \epsfig{figure=fig1.eps,width=7.5cm}
158: \hspace*{0.cm}
159: \epsfig{figure=fig2.eps,width=7.5cm}
160: } \vspace*{-0.95cm}
161: \caption{UrQMD results of dynamic fluctuations as a function of $\eta$ with $\Delta\eta$=0.5 (left) and as a function of $\Delta\eta$ with $\eta$=2 (right).}
162: \label{fig:1}
163: \vspace*{-0.4cm}
164: \end{figure}
165: %
166: \section{Results}
167: %
168:
169: \begin{figure}
170: \vspace*{-0.0cm}
171: \centerline{
172: \epsfig{figure=fig3.eps,width=7.5cm}
173: \hspace*{0.cm}
174: \epsfig{figure=fig4.eps,width=7.5cm}
175: } \vspace*{-0.95cm} \caption{$\sigma^2_C$ as a function of $\eta$ at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=200$
176: GeV, with $\Delta\eta$=0.5.
177: (Left) $0-20\%$ central Au+Au, (right) $40-60\%$ peripheral Au+Au collisions.
178: Black circles are PHOBOS \cite{Back:2006id} data, open squares HIJING and open circles are UrQMD results.}
179: \label{fig:2}
180: \vspace*{-0.4cm}
181: \end{figure}
182: %
183: %
184: %
185: In Fig.~\ref{fig:1}(left) we show $\sigma^2_C$ as a function of
186: $\eta$ at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=200$~GeV computed from UrQMD. We find
187: that for $pp$ collisions $\sigma^2_C\approx1$ when $\eta=0.25$,
188: then $\sigma^2_C$ increases to 1.1 for $\eta=2.75$. In
189: Fig.~\ref{fig:1}(right) we plot $\sigma^2_C$ as a function of
190: $\Delta\eta$, we notice that $\sigma^2_C$ reaches approximately
191: 1.6. This value is close to the resonance gas value $K_{\rm
192: eff}\sim 1.5$ mentioned in \cite{Stephanov:1999zu}.
193: %
194: In Fig. \ref{fig:1}, we plot UrQMD results for Au+Au at different
195: centralities. UrQMD shows that $\sigma^2_C$ as a function of
196: $\eta$ and $\Delta\eta$ has a clear centrality dependance, such
197: that $\sigma^2_C$ increases with centrality and then starts to
198: decrease with more centrality cuts. In \cite{Abdel-Aziz:2006fe} we
199: predicted that, for PHOBOS data, with more centrality cut,
200: $\sigma^2_C$ may be reduce to 1.9, and this reduction in
201: $\sigma^2_C\sim K_{\rm eff}$ may be regarded as an indication
202: for cluster melting at RHIC. In Fig.~\ref{fig:2} we show our UrQMD
203: with PHOBOS data \cite{Back:2006id} and their HIJING results for
204: $0-20\%$ central (left) and $40-60\%$ peripheral (right) Au+Au
205: collisions. In both figures, we keep $\Delta\eta=0.5$. From
206: Fig.~\ref{fig:2} we find that for both centralities $\sigma^2_C$
207: increases with increasing $\eta$. This behavior exists in both the
208: experimental data and HIJING. For both centralities we find that
209: $\sigma^2_C\approx 1$ when $\eta=0.25$. This is because the
210: competition between long and short range correlations almost
211: cancels. In $0-20\%$ central collisions Fig.~\ref{fig:2}, UrQMD
212: and HIJING roughly reproduce the experimental data within
213: 1.5$\sigma$. In $40-60\%$ peripheral collisions
214: Fig.~\ref{fig:2}(right), UrQMD can roughly produce the PHOBOS data
215: while HIJING deviates by more than two $\sigma$ for the large
216: rapidity gaps.
217: %
218: In ref \cite{Abdel-Aziz:2006fe}, we show that by varying the
219: observation window $\Delta\eta$ one can see the whole cluster
220: structure. We keep the center of the observation window at
221: $\eta=\pm 2$ while we allow for the observation window to change.
222: In Fig.~\ref{fig:3} we show the PHOBOS data \cite{Back:2006id} in
223: addition to HIJING and our UrQMD analysis. We see that the
224: measured $\sigma^2_C$ increases up to 2.2 and 2.8 for central and
225: peripheral collisions respectively. In contrast to HIJING which
226: gives the same value for both centralities. UrQMD shows a
227: centrality dependance as shown in Fig \ref{fig:3}. For $0-20\%$
228: cental collisions, HIJING can reproduce the data. HIJING fails to
229: reproduce the the peripheral data. UrQMD over estimates
230: $\sigma^2_C$ in the central collisions while it succeeded to
231: reproduce the peripheral collisions. The failure of UrQMD to
232: reproduce the the central data indicated that the cluster
233: structure in UrQMD can survive, because the hadronic rscattering
234: is not strong enough to destroy such clusters.
235: %
236: \begin{figure}
237: \vspace*{-0.0cm}
238: \centerline{
239: \epsfig{figure=fig52,width=7.5cm}
240: \hspace*{0.cm}
241: \epsfig{figure=fig62,width=7.5cm}
242: } \vspace*{-0.95cm}
243: \caption{$\sigma^2_C$ as a function of $\Delta\eta$ at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=200$
244: GeV, with $\eta$=2.
245: (Left) $0-20\%$ central Au+Au, (right) $40-60\%$ peripheral Au+Au collisions.
246: Black circles are PHOBOS data \cite{Back:2006id}, open squares HIJING and open circles are UrQMD
247: results.}
248: \label{fig:3}
249: \vspace*{-0.4cm}
250: \end{figure}
251: %
252: \section{Summary and Conclusion}\label{sec:summary}
253: %
254: In this paper we computed forward-backward fluctuations and
255: compared UrQMD calculations results to the available experimental
256: data measured by PHOBOS. We started by studying proton-proton
257: collisions and we find that long range correlation persists over a
258: wide rapidity gap between the two rapidity hemispheres. The
259: variance of the asymmetry parameter $C$ was found to increase with
260: increasing $\Delta\eta$ such that $\sigma^2_C$ changes from
261: $\sigma^2_C(\eta=2,\Delta\eta=0.25)\approx 1$ to
262: $\sigma^2_C(\eta=2,\Delta\eta=3)\approx 1.6$, this can be due the
263: saturation of the leakage factor $\xi\rightarrow 1$.
264: %
265: For Au+Au collisions, we find that for both centrality bins
266: $0-20\%$ and $40-60\%$, $\sigma^2_C\approx 1$ for small
267: $\eta$. This can be seen as a cancellation between short and long
268: range fluctuations. By increasing $\eta$ we see that $\sigma^2_C$
269: also increases and approaches 1.6 and 1.8 for $0-20\%$ and
270: $40-60\%$ respectively. This increase can be attributed to the
271: decrease in the long range correlations. This will be true if the
272: particle production mechanism does not change with $\eta$. To see
273: the whole cluster structure, we fix the center of the observation
274: window at 2 and allow $\Delta\eta$ to increase. We find that UrQMD
275: can reproduce the peripheral data while it overestimates the
276: experimental results for central collisions. HIJING gives the
277: opposite behavior to UrQMD. HIJING produces the central data while
278: it fails to reproduce the peripheral data as shown by PHOBOS.
279: %
280: Also we find that UrQMD shows a smaller centrality dependance than
281: the data.
282: %
283: The discrepancies between HIJING, UrQMD and the data encourage
284: more theoretical study to be done in order to clarify the
285: correlation between produced particles in high energy nuclear
286: collisions.
287: %
288: The next step in this work is to measure $b$ and $\sigma^2_C$
289: consistently to extract the cluster multiplicity $K_{\rm eff}$ and
290: test for the survival or melting of such clusters.
291: %
292:
293: \section*{Acknowledgements}This work is supported by BMBF and GSI.
294:
295: \begin{thebibliography}{9}
296: %\cite{Haussler:2005ei}
297: \bibitem{Haussler:2005ei}
298: S.~Haussler, H.~Stoecker and M.~Bleicher,
299: % ``Event-by-event analysis of baryon-strangeness correlations: Pinning down
300: %the critical temperature and volume of QGP formation,''
301: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 73}, 021901 (2006);
302: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0507189;%%
303: %
304: %
305: %\cite{Jeon:2005kj}
306: %\bibitem{Jeon:2005kj}
307: ~S.~Jeon, L.~Shi and M.~Bleicher,
308: %``Detecting QGP with charge transfer fluctuations,''
309: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 73}, 014905 (2006);
310: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0506025;%%
311: %
312: %\cite{Koch:2001zn}
313: %\bibitem{Koch:2001zn}
314: ~V.~Koch, M.~Bleicher and S.~Jeon,
315: %``Event-by-event fluctuations and the QGP,''
316: Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 698}, 261 (2002) [Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 702},
317: 291 (2002)];
318: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0103084;%%
319: %
320: %\cite{Bleicher:2000ek}
321: % \bibitem{Bleicher:2000ek}
322: M.~Bleicher, S.~Jeon and V.~Koch,
323: % ``Event-by-event fluctuations of the charged particle ratio from
324: %non-equilibrium transport theory,''
325: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 62}, 061902 (2000);
326: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0006201;%%
327: %
328: %\cite{Bleicher:1998wu}
329: %\bibitem{Bleicher:1998wu}
330: ~M.~Bleicher {\it et al.},
331: % ``Can momentum correlations prove kinetic equilibration in heavy ion
332: %collisions at 160-A-GeV?,''
333: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 435}, 9 (1998);
334: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9803345;%%
335: %
336: %\cite{Armesto:2006bv}
337: %\bibitem{Armesto:2006bv}
338: N.~Armesto, L.~McLerran and C.~Pajares,
339: %``Long range forward-backward correlations and the color glass condensate,''
340: arXiv:hep-ph/0607345;
341: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0607345;%%
342: %\cite{Cunqueiro:2005hx}
343: %\bibitem{Cunqueiro:2005hx}
344: L.~Cunqueiro, E.~G.~Ferreiro, F.~del Moral and C.~Pajares,
345: %``Multiplicity fluctuations in the string clustering approach,''
346: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 72}, 024907 (2005).
347: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0505197;%%
348:
349: %\cite{Abdel-Aziz:2006fe}
350: \bibitem{Abdel-Aziz:2006fe}
351: M.~Abdel-Aziz and M.~Bleicher,
352: % ``Indications for cluster melting from forward-backward charge fluctuations
353: %at RHIC energies,''
354: arXiv:nucl-th/0605072.
355: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0605072;%%
356:
357: %\cite{Alpgard:1983xp}
358: \bibitem{Alpgard:1983xp}
359: K.~Alpgard {\it et al.} [UA5 Collaboration],
360: % ``Forward - Backward Multiplicity Correlations In P Anti-P Collisions At
361: %540-Gev,''
362: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 123}, 361 (1983);
363: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B123,361;%%
364: %\cite{Ansorge:1988fg}
365: %\bibitem{Ansorge:1988fg}
366: R.~E.~Ansorge {\it et al.} [UA5 Collaboration],
367: % ``CHARGED PARTICLE CORRELATIONS IN ANTI-P P COLLISIONS AT C.M. ENERGIES OF
368: %200-GEV, 546-GEV AND 900-GEV,''
369: Z.\ Phys.\ C {\bf 37}, 191 (1988).
370: %%CITATION = ZEPYA,C37,191;%%
371:
372: %\cite{Back:2006id}
373: \bibitem{Back:2006id}
374: B.~B.~Back {\it et al.} [PHOBOS Collaboration],
375: % ``Forward-backward multiplicity correlations in s(NN)**(1/2) = 200-GeV Au +
376: %Au collisions,''
377: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 74}, 011901 (2006).
378: %%CITATION = NUCL-EX 0603026;%%
379: %
380:
381: %\cite{Stephanov:1999zu}
382: \bibitem{Stephanov:1999zu}
383: M.~A.~Stephanov, K.~Rajagopal and E.~V.~Shuryak,
384: %``Event-by-event fluctuations in heavy ion collisions and the {QCD} critical
385: %point,''
386: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 60}, 114028 (1999).
387: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9903292;%%
388:
389: %\cite{Bass:1998ca}
390: \bibitem{Bass:1998ca}
391: S.~A.~Bass {\it et al.},
392: %``Microscopic models for ultrarelativistic heavy ion collisions,''
393: Prog.\ Part.\ Nucl.\ Phys.\ {\bf 41}, 225 (1998),
394: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 9803035;%%
395: %\cite{Bleicher:1999xi}
396: %\bibitem{Bleicher:1999xi}
397: M.~Bleicher {\it et al.},
398: %``Relativistic hadron hadron collisions in the ultra-relativistic quantum
399: %molecular dynamics model,''
400: J.\ Phys.\ G {\bf 25} (1999) 1859.
401: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9909407;%%
402: %
403: %
404: %
405: %\
406: %\cite{Tarnowsky:2006nh}
407: \bibitem{Tarnowsky:2006nh}
408: T.~J.~Tarnowsky [STAR Collaboration],
409: % ``Long-range multiplicity correlations in Au + Au at s(NN)**(1/2) =
410: %200-GeV,''
411: arXiv:nucl-ex/0606018.
412: %%CITATION = NUCL-EX 0606018;%%
413: %
414: %
415: \end{thebibliography}
416: \end{document}
417:
418: %\cite{Haussler:2005ei}
419: \bibitem{Haussler:2005ei}
420: S.~Haussler, H.~Stoecker and M.~Bleicher,
421: % ``Event-by-event analysis of baryon-strangeness correlations: Pinning down
422: %the critical temperature and volume of QGP formation,''
423: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 73}, 021901 (2006)
424: [arXiv:hep-ph/0507189],
425: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0507189;%%
426: %
427: %
428: %\cite{Jeon:2005kj}
429: %\bibitem{Jeon:2005kj}
430: ~S.~Jeon, L.~Shi and M.~Bleicher,
431: %``Detecting QGP with charge transfer fluctuations,''
432: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 73}, 014905 (2006) [arXiv:nucl-th/0506025],
433: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0506025;%%
434: %
435: %\cite{Koch:2001zn}
436: %\bibitem{Koch:2001zn}
437: ~V.~Koch, M.~Bleicher and S.~Jeon,
438: %``Event-by-event fluctuations and the QGP,''
439: Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 698}, 261 (2002) [Nucl.\ Phys.\ A {\bf 702},
440: 291 (2002)] [arXiv:nucl-th/0103084],
441: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0103084;%%
442: %
443: %\cite{Bleicher:2000ek}
444: % \bibitem{Bleicher:2000ek}
445: M.~Bleicher, S.~Jeon and V.~Koch,
446: % ``Event-by-event fluctuations of the charged particle ratio from
447: %non-equilibrium transport theory,''
448: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 62}, 061902 (2000) [arXiv:hep-ph/0006201],
449: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0006201;%%
450: %
451: %\cite{Bleicher:1998wu}
452: %\bibitem{Bleicher:1998wu}
453: ~M.~Bleicher {\it et al.},
454: % ``Can momentum correlations prove kinetic equilibration in heavy ion
455: %collisions at 160-A-GeV?,''
456: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 435}, 9 (1998) [arXiv:hep-ph/9803345],
457: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9803345;%%
458: %
459: %\cite{Armesto:2006bv}
460: %\bibitem{Armesto:2006bv}
461: N.~Armesto, L.~McLerran and C.~Pajares,
462: %``Long range forward-backward correlations and the color glass condensate,''
463: arXiv:hep-ph/0607345,
464: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0607345;%%
465: %\cite{Cunqueiro:2005hx}
466: %\bibitem{Cunqueiro:2005hx}
467: L.~Cunqueiro, E.~G.~Ferreiro, F.~del Moral and C.~Pajares,
468: %``Multiplicity fluctuations in the string clustering approach,''
469: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 72}, 024907 (2005) [arXiv:hep-ph/0505197].
470: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0505197;%%
471:
472: %\cite{Abdel-Aziz:2006fe}
473: \bibitem{Abdel-Aziz:2006fe}
474: M.~Abdel-Aziz and M.~Bleicher,
475: % ``Indications for cluster melting from forward-backward charge fluctuations
476: %at RHIC energies,''
477: arXiv:nucl-th/0605072.
478: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0605072;%%
479:
480: %\cite{Alpgard:1983xp}
481: \bibitem{Alpgard:1983xp}
482: K.~Alpgard {\it et al.} [UA5 Collaboration],
483: % ``Forward - Backward Multiplicity Correlations In P Anti-P Collisions At
484: %540-Gev,''
485: Phys.\ Lett.\ B {\bf 123}, 361 (1983);
486: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B123,361;%%
487: %\cite{Ansorge:1988fg}
488: %\bibitem{Ansorge:1988fg}
489: R.~E.~Ansorge {\it et al.} [UA5 Collaboration],
490: % ``CHARGED PARTICLE CORRELATIONS IN ANTI-P P COLLISIONS AT C.M. ENERGIES OF
491: %200-GEV, 546-GEV AND 900-GEV,''
492: Z.\ Phys.\ C {\bf 37}, 191 (1988).
493: %%CITATION = ZEPYA,C37,191;%%
494:
495: %\cite{Back:2006id}
496: \bibitem{Back:2006id}
497: B.~B.~Back {\it et al.} [PHOBOS Collaboration],
498: % ``Forward-backward multiplicity correlations in s(NN)**(1/2) = 200-GeV Au +
499: %Au collisions,''
500: Phys.\ Rev.\ C {\bf 74}, 011901 (2006)
501: [arXiv:nucl-ex/0603026].
502: %%CITATION = NUCL-EX 0603026;%%
503: %
504:
505: %\cite{Stephanov:1999zu}
506: \bibitem{Stephanov:1999zu}
507: M.~A.~Stephanov, K.~Rajagopal and E.~V.~Shuryak,
508: %``Event-by-event fluctuations in heavy ion collisions and the {QCD} critical
509: %point,''
510: Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 60}, 114028 (1999)
511: [arXiv:hep-ph/9903292].
512: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9903292;%%
513:
514: %\cite{Bass:1998ca}
515: \bibitem{Bass:1998ca}
516: S.~A.~Bass {\it et al.},
517: %``Microscopic models for ultrarelativistic heavy ion collisions,''
518: Prog.\ Part.\ Nucl.\ Phys.\ {\bf 41}, 225 (1998)
519: [arXiv:nucl-th/9803035],
520: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 9803035;%%
521: %\cite{Bleicher:1999xi}
522: %\bibitem{Bleicher:1999xi}
523: M.~Bleicher {\it et al.},
524: %``Relativistic hadron hadron collisions in the ultra-relativistic quantum
525: %molecular dynamics model,''
526: J.\ Phys.\ G {\bf 25} (1999) 1859 [arXiv:hep-ph/9909407].
527: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9909407;%%
528: %
529: %
530: %
531: %\
532: %\cite{Tarnowsky:2006nh}
533: \bibitem{Tarnowsky:2006nh}
534: T.~J.~Tarnowsky [STAR Collaboration],
535: % ``Long-range multiplicity correlations in Au + Au at s(NN)**(1/2) =
536: %200-GeV,''
537: arXiv:nucl-ex/0606018.
538: %%CITATION = NUCL-EX 0606018;%%
539: %
540: %
541: