1: \documentclass[a4paper]{jpconf}
2: \usepackage{graphicx}
3: \begin{document}
4: \title{Neutrinos, Weak Interactions, and r-process Nucleosynthesis}
5:
6: \author{A.B. Balantekin}
7:
8: \address{University of Wisconsin, Department of Physics, Madison,
9: WI 53706, USA}
10:
11: \ead{baha@physics.wisc.edu}
12:
13: \begin{abstract}
14: Two of the key issues in understanding the neutron-to-proton ratio
15: in a core-collapse supernova are discussed. One of these is the behavior
16: of the neutrino-nucleon cross sections as supernova energies. The other
17: issue is the many-body properties of
18: the neutrino gas near the core when both one-
19: and two-body interaction terms are included.
20: \end{abstract}
21:
22: \section{Introduction}
23: \vskip 0.25cm
24: A good number of the isotopes of
25: nuclei heavier than iron are produced by the rapid
26: neutron-capture process (the so-called r-process) nucleosynthesis,
27: the site of which is not known. R-process
28: nucleosynthesis requires interaction of a large number of neutrons
29: during a relatively short duration, suggesting that its sites
30: are likely to be associated with explosive phenomena.
31: In fact, Burbidge {\it et al} originally
32: suggested that the neutrino-rich ejecta outside the collapsed core
33: in a supernova could be an r-process site \cite{Burbidge:1957vc}.
34: Recent observations of metal-poor stars and meteoric data suggest that
35: r-process nuclei may be produced at multiple sites \cite{Qian:1997kz}.
36: Possible sites for the r-process nucleosynthesis include the
37: neutrino-driven wind in a core-collapse supernova
38: \cite{Woosley:1994ux,witti} or binary neutron-star systems
39: \cite{Rosswog:1998hy}.
40:
41: Neutrino interactions play a very crucial role both in the dynamics
42: of core-collapse supernovae and in the r-process nucleosynthesis
43: \cite{Balantekin:2003ip}. Isotopic yields of r-process nucleosynthesis
44: are determined by the neutron-to-proton ratio, n/p \cite{Meyer:1998sn}.
45: There are two key issues in understanding how this ratio changes:
46: i) Neutrinos and
47: antineutrinos streaming out of the core interact both with nucleons
48: and the seed nuclei. Since these interactions determine the n/p ratio, it
49: is crucial to understand neutrino-nucleon cross sections in considerable
50: detail. ii) Before these neutrinos reach the r-process region they
51: may undergo matter-enhanced
52: neutrino oscillations as well as coherently scatter over other neutrinos.
53: Many-body behavior of this neutrino gas is not understood, but may have
54: significant impact on the r-process nucleosynthesis. Here I briefly
55: discuss our recent work addressing these two issues.
56:
57: \section{Testing Neutrino-Nucleon Interactions}
58: \vskip 0.25cm
59: The covariant matrix element for the reaction
60: $\overline{\nu }_{e}+p\rightarrow e^{+}+n$ is
61: \begin{equation}
62: \frac{G_{F}\cos \theta _{C}}{\sqrt{2}}\left\{
63: \overline{u}_{n}\left[ \gamma _{\alpha }(f_{1}-g_{1}\gamma _{5})
64: +\sigma _{\alpha \beta}k^{\beta }(f_{2}+g_{2}\gamma _{5})
65: +k_{\alpha }(f_{3}+g_{3}\gamma _{5})\right] u_{p}\right\}
66: \left\{ \overline{\nu }_{\nu }\gamma^{\alpha }(1
67: -\gamma _{5})\nu _{e}\right\}, \end{equation}
68: where $G_{F}$ is the Fermi weak coupling constant and $\cos \theta_{C}
69: =0.974$ is the Cabibbo angle.
70: The vector $f_{1}$, the axial-vector $g_{1}$,
71: the tensor $f_{2}$ (or weak magnetism), the induced tensor $g_{2}$,
72: the induced scalar $f_{3}$ and the induced pseudo-scalar $g_{3}$ form factors
73: are included in this matrix element.
74: The conserved vector current (CVC) hypothesis states that
75: \begin{eqnarray}
76: \lim_{q^2 \rightarrow 0} f_1(q^2) ~=~ 1~; \hspace{0.75cm}
77: \lim_{q^2 \rightarrow
78: 0} f_2(q^2) ~=~ \frac{\mu_p-\mu_n}{2m_N}~; \hspace{0.75cm} f_3(q^2) ~=~ 0~,
79: \end{eqnarray}
80: where $\mu _{p}-\mu _{n}=3.706$ is the difference in the anomalous
81: magnetic moments of the nucleons, and $m_{N}$ is the mass of the nucleon.
82:
83: Data for neutrino-nucleon scattering at energies relevant to
84: astrophysics are very scarce. One possibility to measure the cross section for
85: this process is to utilize proposed beta-beam facilities.
86: Beta-beams are pure $\nu_e$ or $\overline{\nu}_e$ beams produced by
87: allowing radioactive ions circulating in a storage ring to
88: decay \cite{Zucchelli:2002sa}. The low-energy option
89: \cite{Volpe:2003fi,Volpe:2006in},
90: where one can vary
91: the Lorentz boost factor $\gamma$ of the stored ions between 7 and 14,
92: is especially
93: suitable to measure the energy dependence
94: of the cross section in the energy range up to 100 MeV.
95: The potential of low-energy beta beams for neutrino-nucleus
96: scattering \cite{Serreau:2004kx,McLaughlin:2004va,Volpe:2005iy},
97: for electroweak tests of the
98: Standard Model \cite{McLaughlin:2003yg,Balantekin:2005md}, and for
99: core-collapse supernova physics \cite{Volpe:2003fi,Jachowicz:2006xx}
100: has been previously discussed.
101:
102: We recently investigated the possibility of measuring antineutrino
103: scattering off protons in a water Cerenkov detector using low-energy
104: beta beams \cite{Balantekin:2006ga}. We analyzed the sensitivity using
105: both the total number of events and the angular distribution of the
106: positrons emitted. Figure 1 shows the expected number of events at the
107: detector over a period of one year as a function of the Lorentz boost
108: factor with (solid-line) and without (dashed-line) the weak magnetism
109: term. One observes that at the highest $\gamma$ value the weak magnetism
110: term suppresses the total number of events by as much as 17 \%. We found
111: that the weak magnetism form factor may be determined with better than
112: several percent accuracy using the angular distribution information of
113: the positrons emitted. In addition to providing a test
114: of the CVC hypothesis, measurement of weak magnetism terms in
115: neutrino-nucleon interactions are of direct interest to astrophysics as
116: these terms may play an important role in the dynamic of core-collapse
117: supernovae \cite{Horowitz:2001xf}.
118:
119: %
120: \begin{figure}[t]
121: \hskip 4.3cm
122: \includegraphics[width=7cm]{fig2a.eps}
123: \caption{Expected number of the $\overline{\protect\nu}_e + p
124: \rightarrow e^+ + n$ events in a water Cerenkov detector over one year
125: with (solid-line) and without (dashed-line) the weak magnetism term
126: (From Ref. \cite{Balantekin:2006ga}).}
127: \end{figure}
128: %
129:
130: \section{Many-Body Properties of the Dense Neutrino Gas in Supernovae}
131: \vskip 0.25 cm
132: Neutrino oscillations in a core-collapse
133: supernova differ from the matter-enhanced neutrino oscillations in
134: the Sun as in the former there are additional effects coming from both
135: neutrino-neutrino scattering
136: \cite{Pantaleone:1992eq,Qian:1994wh} and
137: antineutrino flavor transformations \cite{Qian:1995ua}.
138: The standard MSW term describing the interaction of neutrinos with the
139: background electrons is a one-body term for neutrinos.
140: Exact solutions of the full neutrino many-body problem with the one-body
141: MSW term and the two-body neutrino-neutrino forward scattering term have not
142: yet been found.
143:
144: For two neutrino flavors, i.e. the
145: electron neutrino, $\nu_e$, and a combination of muon and tau
146: neutrinos, called $\nu_x$, the one-body term in the neutrino many-body
147: Hamiltonian is \cite{Balantekin:2006tg}
148: \begin{equation}
149: \label{a1}
150: H_{\nu} = \int d^3p \frac{\delta m^2}{2p} \left[ \cos{2\theta}
151: J_0(p) + \frac{1}{2} \sin{2\theta} \left(J_+(p)+J_-(p)\right)
152: \right] - \sqrt{2} G_F \int d^3p N_e J_0(p) ,
153: \end{equation}
154: where $N_e=n_{e^-}-n_{e^+}$ is the net electron density;
155: $\theta$ is the vacuum mixing angle, and
156: $\delta m^2 = m_2^2 - m_1^2$. In writing Eq. (\ref{a1}) we introduced
157: the operators
158: \begin{equation}\label{a2}
159: J_+(p)= a_x^\dagger(p) a_e(p), \ \ \ \
160: J_-(p)=a_e^\dagger(p) a_x(p), \ \ \ \
161: J_0(p)=\frac{1}{2}\left(a_x^\dagger(p)a_x(p)-a_e^\dagger(p)a_e(p)
162: \right) ,
163: \end{equation}
164: where we used the creation and annihilation operators for $\nu_e$
165: and $\nu_x$. The operators in Eq. (\ref{a2}) satisfy the commutation
166: relations
167: \begin{equation}
168: \label{a3}
169: [J_+(p),J_-(q)] = 2 \delta^3(p-q)J_0(p), \ \ \
170: [J_0(p),J_\pm(q)] = \pm \delta^3(p-q)J_\pm(p).
171: \end{equation}
172: These operators describe $N$ mutually commuting SU(2) algebras, where
173: $N$ is the number of allowed values of neutrino momenta. In fact,
174: the evolution operator for the standard MSW problem of neutrinos,
175: mixing with each other and interacting with background electrons, can be
176: written down exactly using this algebraic ansatz. In addition, there is
177: a two-body term in the
178: Hamiltonian describing neutrino-neutrino forward scattering:
179: \begin{equation}
180: H_{\nu \nu} = \frac{\sqrt{2} G_F}{V} \int d^3p \> d^3q \>
181: (1-\cos\vartheta_{pq})
182: \> {\bf J}(p) \cdot {\bf J}(q) .
183: \end{equation}
184: where $V$ is the quantization volume and $\vartheta_{pq}$ is the angle
185: between neutrino three-momenta p and q.
186:
187: One can calculate the path integral for the many-body problem using the SU(2)
188: coherent states
189: \begin{equation}
190: |z(t)\rangle = \exp{\left(\int d^3p
191: z(p,t) J_+(p) \right)} \prod_{p}
192: a_e^\dagger(p)|0 \rangle .
193: \end{equation}
194: Path integral representation of the matrix element of the
195: evolution operator calculated with $H_{\nu} + H_{\nu \nu}$ is given by
196: \begin{equation}
197: \label{a4} \langle z'(t_f)|U|z(t_i) \rangle = \int D[z,z^*] \,
198: e^{iS[z,z^*]},
199: \end{equation}
200: where the action functional is
201: \begin{equation}
202: \label{a5} S[z,z^*]= \int_{t_i}^{t_f}dt \langle z'(t_f) |
203: i\frac{\partial}{\partial t}-H_\nu-H_{\nu\nu} | z(t_i)
204: \rangle -i \log
205: \langle z'(t_f)|z(t_f) \rangle.
206: \end{equation}
207:
208: The path integral given in Eq. (\ref{a4}), to date, has not been evaluated
209: exactly. However, it is possible to evaluate it using the stationary path
210: approximation and calculate the stationary path $z_{\rm sp}(p,t)$ that
211: minimizes the action functional \cite{Balantekin:2006tg}. By interpreting
212: this stationary path as the ratio of the one-body neutrino wavefunctions,
213: i.e.
214: \begin{equation}
215: \label{a6}
216: z_{\rm sp}(p,t)=\frac{\psi_x(p,t)}{\psi_e(p,t)}
217: \end{equation}
218: and imposing the normalization condition
219: \begin{equation}
220: \label{a7} |\psi_e|^2+|\psi_x|^2=1 ,
221: \end{equation}
222: one can relate results obtained using stationary path approximation to
223: the commonly utilized Schrodinger-type equation such as the one used in Refs.
224: \cite{Fuller:2005ae,Friedland:2003dv,Duan:2005cp}.
225: Numerical solutions of this approximate
226: Schrodinger-type nonlinear equation are still
227: not easy to obtain as discussed in Refs.
228: \cite{Pastor:2002we,Balantekin:2004ug,Friedland:2006ke,Duan:2006an}.
229:
230: A description of neutrino physics with two flavors is exact only when
231: the third mixing angle, $\theta_{13}$, is zero \cite{Balantekin:1999dx}.
232: However, it is possible to incorporate both the antineutrinos (which are
233: crucial to nucleosynthesis in core-collapse supernovae) and the presence
234: of three flavors in this algebraic formalism \cite{Balantekin:2006tg}.
235:
236: \section{Conclusions}
237: \vskip 0.25cm
238: It should be emphasized that neutrino oscillations significantly
239: impact r-process
240: nucleosynthesis only if different flavors initially have well-pronounced
241: energy differences. The precise energy hierarchy of the neutrinos
242: depends on the microphysics of their production
243: \cite{Raffelt:2001kv,Keil:2002in}.
244: This microphysics is dominated by the inelastic
245: neutrino-nucleon interactions.
246:
247: In a core-collapse supernova, as the alpha particle
248: mass fraction increases, free nucleons
249: get bound in alphas and, because of the large binding energy of
250: the alpha particle, cease interacting with neutrinos. (This is called
251: ``alpha effect'' \cite{Fuller:1995ih}). Electron neutrinos radiated from
252: the proto-neutron stars are typically
253: too energetic to prevent the alpha effect (and the following demise
254: of r-process nucleosynthesis)
255: in most cases. One way to get around this issue is to convert active
256: electron neutrinos into sterile ones
257: \cite{McLaughlin:1999pd,Caldwell:1999zk,Fetter:2002xx}. Inclusion of
258: sterile neutrinos in the algebraic approach described above will be
259: discussed elsewhere.
260:
261: Finally, it should be pointed out that the neutrino gas is not necessarily
262: present in all cases. If, instead of a proto-neutron star, a black-hole
263: is formed, then the neutrino flux emission
264: may be truncated \cite{Beacom:2000qy}. Note that
265: it may be possible to find signatures of such a neutrino-flux truncation
266: in the fossil record of the isotopes produced in the r-process
267: nucleosynthesis \cite{Sasaqui:2005rh}.
268:
269: \ack
270: \vskip 0.25cm
271: This work was supported in part by the U.S. National Science
272: Foundation Grant No. PHY-0555231 and in part by the University of
273: Wisconsin Research Committee with funds granted by the Wisconsin
274: Alumni Research Foundation.
275:
276:
277:
278: \medskip
279: \section*{References}
280: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
281:
282: \bibitem{Burbidge:1957vc}
283: Burbidge M E, Burbidge G R, Fowler W A and Hoyle F 1957
284: %``Synthesis of the elements in stars,''
285: {\it Rev.\ Mod.\ Phys.} {\bf 29} 547.
286: %%CITATION = RMPHA,29,547;%%
287:
288: \bibitem{Qian:1997kz}
289: Qian Y Z, Vogel P and Wasserburg G J 1998
290: %``Diverse Supernova Sources for the r-Process,''
291: {\it Astrophys.\ J.} {\bf 494} 285
292: [arXiv:astro-ph/9706120].
293: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 9706120;%%
294:
295: \bibitem{Woosley:1994ux}
296: Woosley S E, Wilson J R, Mathews G J, Hoffman R D and Meyer B S
297: 1994
298: %``The r process and neutrino heated supernova ejecta,''
299: {\it Astrophys.\ J.} {\bf 433} 229.
300: %%CITATION = ASJOA,433,229;%%
301:
302: \bibitem{witti}
303: Takahashi K, Witti J, and Janka H T 1994 {\it Astron. Astrophys.}
304: {\bf 286} 857.
305:
306: \bibitem{Rosswog:1998hy}
307: Rosswog S, Liebendoerfer M, Thielemann F K, Davies M B, Benz W
308: and Piran T 1999 {\it Astronom. Astrophys.} {\bf 341} 499
309: %``Mass ejection in neutron star mergers,''
310: [arXiv:astro-ph/9811367].
311: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 9811367;%%
312:
313: \bibitem{Balantekin:2003ip}
314: Balantekin A B and Fuller G M 2003
315: %``Supernova Neutrino-Nucleus Astrophysics,''
316: {\it J.\ Phys.} G {\bf 29} 2513
317: [arXiv:astro-ph/0309519].
318: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0309519;%%
319:
320: \bibitem{Meyer:1998sn}
321: Meyer B S, McLaughlin G C and Fuller G M 1998
322: %``Neutrino capture and r-process nucleosynthesis,''
323: {\it Phys.\ Rev.} C {\bf 58}, 3696
324: [arXiv:astro-ph/9809242].
325: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 9809242;%%
326:
327: \bibitem{Volpe:2003fi}
328: Volpe C 2004
329: %`What about a beta beam facility for low energy neutrinos?,''
330: {\it J. Phys.} G {\bf 30} L1 [arXiv:hep-ph/0303222].
331: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0303222;%%
332:
333: \bibitem{Volpe:2006in}
334: Volpe C 2006
335: %``Topical review on 'beta-beams',''
336: {\it J. Phys.} G {\bf 32} RXXX
337: [arXiv:hep-ph/0605033].
338: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0605033;%%
339:
340: \bibitem{Zucchelli:2002sa}
341: Zucchelli P 2002
342: %`A novel concept for a anti-nu/e / nu/e neutrino factory: The beta beam,''
343: {\it Phys.\ Lett.} B {\bf 532} 166.
344: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B532,166;%%
345:
346: \bibitem{Serreau:2004kx}
347: Serreau J and Volpe C 2004
348: %``Neutrino nucleus interaction rates at a low-energy beta-beam facility,''
349: {\it Phys.\ Rev.} C {\bf 70} 055502 [arXiv:hep-ph/0403293].
350: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0403293;%%
351:
352: \bibitem{McLaughlin:2004va}
353: McLaughlin G C 2004
354: {\it Phys.\ Rev.} C {\bf 70} 045804
355: [arXiv:nucl-th/0404002].
356: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0404002;%%
357:
358: \bibitem{Volpe:2005iy}
359: Volpe C 2005
360: {\it J.\ Phys.} G {\bf 31} 903
361: [arXiv:hep-ph/0501233].
362: % %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0501233;%%
363:
364: \bibitem{McLaughlin:2003yg}
365: McLaughlin G C and Volpe C 2004
366: {\it Phys.\ Lett.} B {\bf 591} 229
367: [arXiv:hep-ph/0312156].
368: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0312156;%%
369:
370: \bibitem{Balantekin:2005md}
371: Balantekin A B, de Jesus J H and Volpe C 2006
372: %``Electroweak tests at beta-beams,''
373: {\it Phys.\ Lett.} B {\bf 634} 180
374: [arXiv:hep-ph/0512310].
375: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0512310;%%
376:
377: \bibitem{Jachowicz:2006xx}
378: Jachowicz N and McLaughlin G C 2006
379: %``Reconstructing supernova-neutrino spectra using low-energy beta-beams,''
380: {\it Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.} {\bf 96}, 172301
381: [arXiv:nucl-th/0604046].
382: %%CITATION = NUCL-TH 0604046;%%
383:
384: \bibitem{Balantekin:2006ga}
385: Balantekin A B, de Jesus J H, Lazauskas R and Volpe C 2006
386: %``A conserved vector current test using low energy beta-beams,''
387: {\it Phys.\ Rev.} D {\bf 73}, 073011
388: [arXiv:hep-ph/0603078].
389: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0603078;%%
390:
391: \bibitem{Horowitz:2001xf}
392: Horowitz C J 2002
393: %``Weak magnetism for antineutrinos in supernovae,''
394: {\it Phys.\ Rev.} D {\bf 65}, 043001
395: [arXiv:astro-ph/0109209].
396: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0109209;%%
397:
398: \bibitem{Pantaleone:1992eq}
399: Pantaleone J T 1992
400: %``Neutrino oscillations at high densities,''
401: {\it Phys.\ Lett.} B {\bf 287}, 128.
402: %%CITATION = PHLTA,B287,128;%%
403:
404: \bibitem{Qian:1994wh}
405: Qian Y Z and Fuller G M 1995
406: %``Neutrino-neutrino scattering and matter enhanced neutrino flavor
407: %transformation in Supernovae,''
408: {\it Phys.\ Rev.} D {\bf 51}, 1479
409: [arXiv:astro-ph/9406073].
410: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 9406073;%%
411:
412: \bibitem{Qian:1995ua}
413: Qian Y Z and Fuller G M 1995
414: %``Matter enhanced anti-neutrino flavor transformation and supernova
415: %nucleosynthesis,''
416: {\it Phys.\ Rev.} D {\bf 52}, 656
417: [arXiv:astro-ph/9502080].
418: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 9502080;%%
419:
420: \bibitem{Balantekin:2006tg}
421: Balantekin A B and Pehlivan Y 2006
422: %``Neutrino neutrino interactions and flavor mixing in dense matter,''
423: arXiv:astro-ph/0607527.
424: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0607527;%%
425:
426: \bibitem{Fuller:2005ae}
427: Fuller G M and Qian Y Z 2006
428: %``Simultaneous flavor transformation of neutrinos and antineutrinos with
429: %dominant potentials from neutrino neutrino forward scattering,''
430: {\it Phys.\ Rev.} D {\bf 73}, 023004
431: [arXiv:astro-ph/0505240].
432: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0505240;%%
433:
434: \bibitem{Friedland:2003dv}
435: Friedland A and Lunardini C 2003
436: % ``Neutrino flavor conversion in a neutrino background: Single- versus
437: % multi-particle description,''
438: {\it Phys.\ Rev.} D {\bf 68}, 013007
439: [arXiv:hep-ph/0304055].
440: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0304055;%%
441:
442: \bibitem{Duan:2005cp}
443: Duan H, Fuller G M and Qian Y Z 2005
444: %``Collective neutrino flavor transformation in supernovae,''
445: arXiv:astro-ph/0511275.
446: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0511275;%%
447:
448: \bibitem{Pastor:2002we}
449: Pastor S and Raffelt G 2002
450: %``Flavor oscillations in the supernova hot bubble region: Nonlinear effects
451: %of neutrino background,''
452: {\it Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.} {\bf 89}, 191101
453: [arXiv:astro-ph/0207281].
454: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0207281;%%
455:
456: \bibitem{Balantekin:2004ug}
457: Balantekin A B and Yuksel H 2005
458: %``Neutrino mixing and nucleosynthesis in core-collapse supernovae,''
459: {\it New J.\ Phys.} {\bf 7}, 51
460: [arXiv:astro-ph/0411159].
461: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0411159;%%
462:
463: \bibitem{Friedland:2006ke}
464: Friedland A, McKellar B H J and Okuniewicz I 2006
465: % ``Construction and analysis of a simplified many-body neutrino model,''
466: %
467: {\it Phys.\ Rev.} D {\bf 73}, 093002
468: [arXiv:hep-ph/0602016].
469: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0602016;%%
470:
471: \bibitem{Duan:2006an}
472: Duan H, Fuller G M, Carlson J and Qian Y Z 2006
473: % ``Simulation of coherent non-linear neutrino flavor transformation in the
474: % supernova environment. I: Correlated neutrino trajectories,''
475: arXiv:astro-ph/0606616.
476: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0606616;%%
477:
478: \bibitem{Balantekin:1999dx}
479: Balantekin A B and Fuller G M 1999
480: %``Constraints on neutrino mixing,''
481: {\it Phys.\ Lett.} B {\bf 471}, 195
482: [arXiv:hep-ph/9908465].
483: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 9908465;%%
484:
485: \bibitem{Raffelt:2001kv}
486: Raffelt G G 2001
487: %``Mu- and tau-neutrino spectra formation in supernovae,''
488: {\it Astrophys.\ J.} {\bf 561} 890
489: [arXiv:astro-ph/0105250].
490: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0105250;%%
491:
492: \bibitem{Keil:2002in}
493: Keil M T, Raffelt G G and Janka H T 2003
494: %``Monte Carlo study of supernova neutrino spectra formation,''
495: {\it Astrophys.\ J.} {\bf 590} 971
496: [arXiv:astro-ph/0208035].
497: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0208035;%%
498:
499: \bibitem{Fuller:1995ih}
500: Fuller G M and Meyer B S 1995
501: %``Neutrino capture and supernova nucleosynthesis,''
502: Astrophys.\ J.\ {\bf 453} 792.
503: %%CITATION = ASJOA,453,792;%%
504:
505: \bibitem{McLaughlin:1999pd}
506: McLaughlin G C, Fetter J M, Balantekin A B and Fuller G M 1999
507: %``An Active-Sterile Neutrino Transformation Solution for r-Process
508: %Nucleosynthesis,''
509: {\it Phys.\ Rev.} C {\bf 59} 2873
510: [arXiv:astro-ph/9902106].
511: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 9902106;%%
512:
513: \bibitem{Caldwell:1999zk}
514: Caldwell D O, Fuller G M and Qian Y Z 2000
515: %``Sterile neutrinos and supernova nucleosynthesis,''
516: {\it Phys.\ Rev.} D {\bf 61} 123005
517: [arXiv:astro-ph/9910175].
518: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 9910175;%%
519:
520: \bibitem{Fetter:2002xx}
521: Fetter J, McLaughlin G C, Balantekin A B and Fuller G M 2003
522: %``Active-sterile neutrino conversion: Consequences for the r-process and
523: %supernova neutrino detection,''
524: {\it Astropart.\ Phys.} {\bf 18} 433
525: [arXiv:hep-ph/0205029].
526: %%CITATION = HEP-PH 0205029;%%
527:
528: \bibitem{Beacom:2000qy}
529: Beacom J F, Boyd R N and Mezzacappa A 2001
530: % ``Black hole formation in core collapse supernovae and time-of-flight
531: %measurements of the neutrino masses,''
532: {\it Phys.\ Rev.} D {\bf 63}, 073011
533: [arXiv:astro-ph/0010398].
534: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0010398;%%
535:
536: \bibitem{Sasaqui:2005rh}
537: Sasaqui T, Kajino T and Balantekin A B 2005
538: % ``Supernova neutrino-effects on r-process nucleosynthesis in black hole
539: %formation,''
540: {\it Astrophys.\ J.} {\bf 634}, 534
541: [arXiv:astro-ph/0506100].
542: %%CITATION = ASTRO-PH 0506100;%%
543:
544:
545: \end{thebibliography}
546:
547:
548: \end{document}
549:
550: