1: % %%%%%%%%% espcrc1.tex %%%%%%%%%%
2: % $Id: espcrc1.tex,v 1.2 2004/02/24 11:22:11 spepping Exp $
3: %
4: % Nucleus-Nucleus conference
5: % Rio 2006
6: %
7: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
8: %
9: % P R E A M B L E
10: %
11: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
12: %
13: \documentclass[fleqn,12pt,twoside, amsmath,amssymb,psfig]{article}
14: \usepackage[headings]{espcrc1}
15: \usepackage{graphicx}
16: \usepackage{bm}% bold math
17:
18: % identification
19: \readRCS
20: $Id: espcrc1.tex,v 1.2 2004/02/24 11:22:11 spepping Exp $
21: \ProvidesFile{espcrc1.tex}[\filedate \space v\fileversion
22: \space Elsevier 1-column CRC Author Instructions]
23: %
24: % --- NEW COMMANDS
25: %
26: \newcommand{\dif}{\mathrm{d}}
27: \newcommand{\I}{\mathbf{i}}
28: \newcommand{\J}{\mathbf{j}}
29: \newcommand{\zero}{\mathbf{0}}
30: \newcommand{\m}{\mathbf{m}}
31: \newcommand{\n}{\mathbf{n}}
32: \newcommand{\R}{\mathbf{r}}
33: \newcommand{\II}{\mathbf{i}'}
34: \newcommand{\JJ}{\mathbf{j}'}
35: \newcommand{\nI}{n_{\I}}
36: \newcommand{\nJ}{n_{\J}}
37: \newcommand{\sI}{s_{\I}}
38: \newcommand{\sJ}{s_{\J}}
39: \newcommand{\qI}{q_{\I}}
40: \newcommand{\qJ}{q_{\J}}
41: \newcommand{\Hn}{{\mathcal H}_{\mathrm{n}}}
42: \newcommand{\HC}{{\mathcal H}_{\mathrm{C}}}
43: \newcommand{\betan}{\beta_{\mathrm{n}}}
44: \newcommand{\betacr}{\beta_{\mathrm{lim}}}
45: \newcommand{\betaC}{\beta_{\mathrm{C}}}
46: \newcommand{\En}{E_{\mathrm{n}}}
47: \newcommand{\EC}{E_{\mathrm{C}}}
48: \newcommand{\HnC}{{\mathcal H}_{\mathrm{n+C}}}
49: \newcommand{\HFe}{{\mathcal H}_{\mathrm{Fe}}}
50: \newcommand{\esr}{{\epsilon}_{\mathrm{sr}}}
51: \newcommand{\elr}{{\epsilon}_{\mathrm{lr}}}
52: \newcommand{\M}{{\mathcal M}}
53: \newcommand{\Ntot}{N_{\mathrm{t}}}
54: \newcommand{\sumNIJ}{\sum^V_{\I,\J}\hspace{-2pt}' }
55: \newcommand{\SUMNIdifJ}{\sum^V_{\I\neq\J}}
56: \newcommand{\SUMNIJ}{\sum^V_{\I,\J}}
57: \newcommand{\SUMmn}{\sum^{R}_{\m,\n}}
58: %
59: \newcommand{\ttbs}{\char'134}
60: \newcommand{\AmS}{{\protect\the\textfont2
61: A\kern-.1667em\lower.5ex\hbox{M}\kern-.125emS}}
62:
63: % add words to TeX's hyphenation exception list
64: \hyphenation{author another created financial paper re-commend-ed Post-Script}
65:
66: % set the starting page if not 1
67: % \setcounter{page}{17}
68: %
69: %
70: %
71: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
72: %
73: % H E A D I N G
74: %
75: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
76: %
77: \runtitle{ Thermodynamics of compact-star matter within
78: an Ising approach}
79: \title{ Thermodynamics of compact-star matter within
80: an Ising approach}
81:
82: \runauthor{ P. Chomaz}
83: \author{ P. Chomaz\address[MCSD]{Ganil(DSM-CEA/IN2P3-CNRS), Blvd. H. Becquerel, BP 55027, F-14076 Caen c\'edex5, France},
84: C. Ducoin\addressmark[MCSD]\address[2]{LPC(IN2P3-CNRS/Ensicaen et Universit\'e), F-14076 Caen c\'edex, France},
85: F. Gulminelli\addressmark[2]\footnote{member of the Institut Universitaire de France},
86: K. Hasnaoui\addressmark[MCSD]
87: and
88: P. Napolitani\addressmark[MCSD]\addressmark[2]
89: }
90:
91: \begin{document}
92:
93: % typeset front matter
94: \maketitle
95:
96: \begin{abstract}
97: In the formation and evolution of compact stars,
98: nuclear matter explores high thermal excursions and is the site
99: of intense neutrino emission.
100: Neutrino transport as well as structural properties of
101: this matter depend on the presence of inhomogeneous phases (named
102: ``pasta'' phases), which are the result of Coulomb frustration of the
103: Liquid-Gas phase transition.
104: We take into account charge fluctuations by employing
105: a frustrated lattice-gas model to which we impose a neutrality constraint
106: by the addition of an homogeneous
107: background of charge, representing delocalised electrons.
108: Within this schematic model we highlight a generaic
109: feature of the phase-transition phenomenology:
110: the temperature interval where pasta phases are formed is
111: enhanced by Coulomb-frustration effects. This result is at variance
112: with the behaviour of frustrated ferromagnetic systems as well as
113: hot nuclei and mean-field approaches.
114: Moreover, the region of phase coexistence is not found to
115: end upon a critical point, indicating that no critical opalescence
116: can occur in compact-star matter.
117:
118: \end{abstract}
119: %
120: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
121: % PARAGRAPH 1
122: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
123: %
124: \section{Introduction: stars and atomic nuclei}
125:
126: Nuclear matter present in compact and hot astrophysical
127: objects generated in a gravitational collapse suffers from high
128: thermal excursions.% and is an intense source of neutrino emission.
129: In the accessible range of temperature and densities, nuclear matter
130: presents phase transitions characterized by density fluctuations.
131: % The properties of such matter are greatly conditioned by
132: %the Coulomb interaction.
133: %At microscopic scale,
134: Because of the presence of the long range
135: Coulomb interaction, those charge fluctuations give rise to so
136: called ``frustration effects''~\cite{Negele1973}.
137: % This phenomenon, largely investigated in solid-state
138: %physics, is driven by the impossibility for the system of
139: %minimising all interactions simultaneously and conditions several
140: %physical systems, from liquid crystals to protein folding.
141: % Frustration effects appear in compact-star matter when the
142: %density approaches nuclear saturation and forces the Coulomb
143: %interaction to enter in competitions with the nuclear
144: %interaction~\cite{Negele1973}.
145: Under these conditions, the system organises in
146: inhomogeneous phases, named ``pasta phases'' due to their unusual
147: topologies
148: %, which form crystalline structures at low
149: %energy
150: ~\cite{pasta}.
151: The evolution of these structures with density is
152: expected to be connected to the properties of
153: the inner neutron-star crust.%, as the elasticity and superfluidity.
154: The survival of pasta-phases at finite temperature has been inferred from recent
155: molecular-dynamics simulations~\cite{mol_din}.
156: As these complex structures are related to
157: coherent neutrino scattering~\cite{Horowitz2004},
158: % neutrino scattering~\cite{Margueron2004,wata_rev,Horowitz2004},
159: their evolution with density and temperature or, more generally, the
160: underlying equation of state, becomes a key quest for exploring
161: several interconnected astrophysical phenomena,
162: %still not completely understood,
163: like the dynamics of supernova explosion
164: and the thermodynamics of proto-neutron-stars cooling.
165:
166: A tempting connection can be searched with the physics of
167: atomic nuclei, which are experimentally accessible.
168: Comparable conditions of temperature and density can
169: be probed in rather violent processes like nuclear
170: multifragmentation.
171: However, compact-star matter differs from normal nuclear matter
172: due to the presence of electrons.
173: They constitute an incompressible degenerated gas,
174: which establishes a condition of global charge neutrality at large
175: scale.
176:
177: % We wish to explore if this difference has consequences on
178: %the phase-transition phenomenology.
179: % Mean-field approximations are not adapted to take
180: %frustration effects into account.
181: % Mean-field calculations of compact-star nuclear
182: %matter~\cite{Lattimer1985,Haensel2000}, even when incorporating
183: %this condition of neutrality by taking into account the presence of
184: %electrons~\cite{Ducoin2006}, still are insensitive to the effect of
185: %charge fluctuations, which dominate at small scale.
186: % Therefore, within such approximation, the phase-transition
187: %phenomenology is not expected to differ substantially from the case
188: %of atomic nuclei where, besides surface effects, the Coulomb
189: %interaction has the effect of reducing the liquid-gas coexistence
190: %region and decreasing the critical
191: %temperature~\cite{Bonche1985,Gulminelli2003}.
192:
193:
194: To understand the phenomenology of phase transitions
195: in compact stars, we consider an Ising model. Indeed widely used mean-field
196: approximations ~\cite{Lattimer1985,Haensel2000,Ducoin2006}
197: are known to fail to describe critical phenomena in 3D.
198: The Ising model is specifically suited for the analysis of charge
199: fluctuations by exact calculations, since phase transitions are universal
200: phenomena. Moreover, it was largely employed in the
201: study of ferromagnetic systems subjected to
202: frustration~\cite{Grousson} as well as for nuclear
203: matter~\cite{Gulminelli2003} where, in the form of the lattice-gas
204: model, magnetic spins are replaced by site occupations.
205: %
206: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
207: % PARAGRAPH 2
208: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
209: %
210: \section{Ising analogue to compact-star matter}
211:
212: We construct a cubic periodic lattice composed of $V$
213: sites, each characterised by a position $\I$ and an occupation
214: number $\nI=1$ or $0$, to indicate the presence or the absence of
215: positive charge, respectively.
216: This distribution of positive charge simulates the
217: distribution of nuclear-matter charge (neutron and protons without
218: distinction are considered as nucleons with an effective charge Z/A).
219: The strongly incompressible gas of electrons is represented
220: by a uniform distribution of negative charge~\cite{Maruyama2005}
221: imposing a strict condition of neutrality.
222: In any site we find therefore an effective charge
223: $\qI = \nI - \bar{n} $, where $\bar{n} =\sum^{V}_{\J}\nJ/V$
224: is the charge per site of the background of negative charge.
225:
226: The schematic Hamiltonian $\HnC=\Hn+\HC$ with
227: \begin{equation}
228: \Hn =
229: \frac{\epsilon}{2}
230: \sumNIJ \nI\nJ
231: ,\quad
232: %
233: \HC =
234: \frac{\lambda\epsilon}{2}
235: \SUMNIdifJ \frac{\qI\qJ}{r_{\I\J}}
236: \label{eq:Hamiltonian}
237: \end{equation}
238: is introduced to study %examine the situation which arises from
239: the interplay of nuclear-like ($\Hn$) and Coulomb-like forces ($\HC$).
240: $\sum'^V_{\I,\J}$ is a sum extended over closest
241: neighbors, and $r_{\I\J}$ is the distance between sites $\I$ and $\J$.
242: The short-range and long-range interactions are characterized
243: by the coupling constants $\epsilon$
244: % by the coupling constants $\epsilon = -5.5$ MeV,
245: and $\lambda\epsilon = \alpha\hbar c \rho_0^{1/3} x^2$ respectively, where $\rho_0$
246: is the nuclear saturation density, and $x$ is the proton fraction.
247: The ratio of the two coupling constants $\lambda$ measures the
248: strength of frustration.
249: In the sequel, $x$ is fixed to $1/3$, a value expected for
250: proto-neutron stars.
251: $\HC$ can be rewritten in terms of
252: occupation products times the geometric constants $C_{\I\J}$ as
253: \begin{equation}
254: \HC =
255: \frac{\lambda\epsilon}{2}
256: \SUMNIJ \nI\nJ C_{\I\J}
257: .
258: \label{eq:HC}
259: \end{equation}
260: Translational invariance, which is ensured
261: by imposing the distance $\R_{\I\J}$ to be the shortest
262: between $\I$ and $\J$ in the periodic space, imposes
263: $\sum^{V}_{\I} C_{\I\J}=0$.
264: Hence, $C_{\I\J}$ can be calculated by adopting periodic
265: boundary conditions in the form
266: \begin{equation}
267: C_{\I\J} = D_{\I\J} - {\mathcal D}
268: ,\quad\mathrm{ with }\quad
269: {\mathcal D}=\frac{1}{V}\sum_{i'}^{V}D_{\zero\I'}
270: ,
271: \label{eq:Cij}
272: \end{equation}
273: where $D_{\I\J}=0$ if $\I=\J$, and
274: $D_{\I\J}=|\R_{\I\J}|^{-1}$ otherwise; ${\mathcal D}$ is calculated
275: with respect to any position $\zero$.
276: %
277: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
278: % MODEL: ISOMORPHISM WITH ISING
279: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
280:
281: $\HC$ preserves all the characteristic symmetries of the
282: Ising model and the Coulomb energy is therefore invariant for
283: lattice-occupation reversal.
284: % However, due to the uniform background of negative charge,
285: %no isomorphism is kept with the standard Ising model with
286: %Coulomb-like forces~\cite{Grousson,Ruffo2001}.
287: We should also point out that, despite some tempting
288: similarities, the correspondent of eq.(\ref{eq:Hamiltonian}) in spin
289: variable $\sI=\nI-1/2$ and $\rho=\M/V+1/2$ with the
290: magnetization $\M=\sum_{\I}^{V}\sI$
291: is not identical to the Hamiltonian of the
292: frustrated Ising ferromagnet~\cite{Grousson}, defined
293: by
294: \begin{equation}
295: \HFe =
296: \frac{\epsilon}{2}
297: \sumNIJ \sI\sJ
298: +
299: \frac{q\epsilon}{2}
300: \SUMNIJ \sI\sJ D_{\I\J}
301: .
302: \label{eq:Fe}
303: \end{equation}
304: % To find a correspondence, we would have to modify our
305: %model substantially and impose that $\rho=\M/V+1/2=1/2$ and that
306: %negative charges, still in equal proportions to the positive
307: %charges, were also discretised in localised charges equal in
308: %magnitude to the positive ones.
309: Indeed, %in presence of an external field,
310: $\HFe$ %can not be mapped into
311: and $\HnC$ are related by%because their relation, written as
312: \begin{equation}
313: \HFe=
314: \HnC
315: + \frac{\lambda\epsilon}{2}{\mathcal D} \M^2
316: + 3\epsilon\M
317: - \frac{3\epsilon}{4}V
318: ,
319: \label{eq:isomorphism}
320: \end{equation}
321: This connection includes a term in $\M^2$, scaling with $V^2$. Such term
322: deeply modifies the thermodynamics in a finite system, and imposes
323: $\M=0$ at the thermodynamic limit for $\HFe$.
324: % $\M$ or, equivalently, $\rho$, which, as clarified in the
325: %following, are order parameters, should vanish in order to have a
326: %thermodynamic limit.
327: The strict constraint $\M=0$ on the order parameter $\M$
328: leads to a substantial
329: modification of the thermodynamics of the system\cite{Carmona2003}.
330: The phase diagram of the frustrated ferromagnet~\cite{Grousson}, where
331: , as in nuclei, the Coulomb interaction
332: reduces the phase-coexistence region (i.e. decreases the limiting
333: temperature), cannot be directly exported to our system $\HnC$.
334:
335: %
336: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
337: % PARAGRAPH 3
338: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
339: %
340: \section{Simulation in the multi-grandcanonical ensemble}
341: %
342: % --- Figure 1
343: %
344: \begin{figure}[pb!]
345: \begin{center}
346: \vspace{-0.3 cm}
347: \includegraphics[angle=0, width=0.35\textwidth]{Fig1.eps}
348: \end{center}
349: \vspace{-0.7 cm}
350: \caption{\label{fig:fig1}
351: Example of a Metropolis calculation ($\mu=\mu_c$ ).
352: Density distribution for a fixed value of $\betaC$ and a
353: series of temperatures, each one associated to one
354: spectrum.
355: The ensemble of explored temperatures and densities defines
356: the phase diagram.
357: The ridge of the distribution defines three branches
358: joining at the limiting temperature.
359: The phase-coexistence region is delimited by the gas (low
360: density) and liquid (high density) branches.
361: }
362: \end{figure}
363: %
364: %
365:
366: For the numerical simulation of the $\HnC$ system, in order
367: to take into account the long-range Coulomb
368: interactions in a rapidly converging form, the finite lattice is
369: repeated in all three directions of space a large number $R$ of
370: times.
371: Each site $\I$ has $R$ replicas of itself, each one displaced
372: from $\I$ of a vector $\m L$, where $\m$ has integer components and
373: $L = \sqrt[3]{V}$.
374:
375: To treat a frustrated system, described by the
376: interplay of several interactions, the multi-(grand) canonical
377: ensemble\cite{Gulminelli2003} is specifically suited.
378: It consists in associating a Lagrange multiplier to each
379: component of the Hamiltonian that we want to treat as a separate
380: observable.
381: In particular, it makes possible to construct one single
382: phase diagram for both neutral and charged matter by associating
383: one Lagrange multiplier, $\betan$, to the nuclear energy (related
384: to $\Hn$) and another, $\betaC$, to the Coulomb energy $\EC$
385: (related to $\HC$).
386: The multi-canonical partition sum reads:
387: \begin{equation}
388: Z_{\betan,\betaC,V}(\rho V,V) =\int W_V(\En,\EC,\rho V,V)
389: e^{-\betan \En -\betaC \EC } \dif\En\dif\EC \nonumber\,
390: ,
391: \label{cano}
392: \end{equation}
393: where $W_V(\En,\EC,\rho V,V)$ is the density of states.
394: For any finite value of $\betaC$, we treat the system as
395: equilibrated at the temperature $T=1/\betan$ and described by an
396: equivalent effective charge
397: $q_{\mathrm{eff}}^2 = \lambda\betaC/\betan$.
398: When $\betaC = 0$, the Coulomb energy $\EC$ does no more
399: influence the partition sum and the system behaves as uncharged,
400: reducing to the standard Ising model.
401: The generalised grand potential is defined as
402: \begin{equation}
403: Z^G_{\betan,\betaC,\alpha}(V)=\int Z_{\betan,\betaC}(\rho V,V)
404: e^{-\alpha \rho V}\dif\rho \,
405: ,
406: \label{macro}
407: \end{equation}
408: where the fugacity is linked to the chemical potential by
409: $\alpha = -\betan \mu$.
410: When $\betaC = \betan$ the ensemble coincides with the
411: conventional grand-canonical form.
412:
413: We sampled the density distribution from eq.(\ref{macro})
414: %within the grandcanonical ensemble
415: for a chemical potential value $\mu=\mu_c=3\epsilon$,
416: by employing a standard Metropolis technique~\cite{Chomaz2002}.
417: An example is presented in Fig.~\ref{fig:fig1} where, for
418: a fixed value of $\betaC$, several density distributions are
419: calculated for different temperatures $T = 1/\betan$.
420: All bimodal distributions present a peak for the gas phase
421: (low-density) and one for the liquid (high-density) phase.
422: Their height is equal because of the choice of $\mu=\mu_c$.
423: All distributions are composed together to draw a phase
424: diagram: the ridge of the overall distribution of density and
425: temperature delimits with its gas branch and liquid branch the
426: phase coexistence.
427: The two branches join at the limiting temperature.
428: %
429: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
430: % PARAGRAPH 4
431: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
432:
433: \section{Results}
434:
435: %
436: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
437: % DISCUSSION: PHASE DIAGRAM
438: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
439: %
440: %\subsection{Phase diagram and finite-size scaling}
441: %
442: For two cases, either $\betan=0$ (corresponding to
443: the standard Ising model), or $\betan=\betaC$, and for a series of
444: different lattice sizes $L$, we collected a series of calculations
445: of the phase diagram.
446: The results are schematized in Fig.~\ref{fig:fig2}.
447: The phase-coexistence region in the system $\betan=0$
448: shrinks for progressively larger lattice sizes according to the
449: characteristic finite-size scaling behaviour of the Ising system.
450: In particular, since the asymptotic value of the limiting
451: temperature
452: $T_{\mathrm{lim}}=\lim_{L\rightarrow\infty} \dot{T}_{\mathrm{lim}}(L)$
453: corresponds to a critical point, finite-size scaling requires that
454: $\dot{T}_{\mathrm{lim}}(L)$ evolves as
455: $\dot{T}_{\mathrm{lim}}(L) - T_{\mathrm{lim}} \propto L^{-1/\nu}$~\cite{scaling}.
456: This is comfirmed by the calculated values of the critical
457: exponent $\nu$ and the critical point ${T}_{\mathrm{lim}}$,
458: which correspond to the Ising values.
459: %
460: % --- Figure 2
461: %
462: \begin{figure}[bp!]
463: \begin{center}
464: \vspace{-0.3 cm}
465: \includegraphics[angle=0, width=0.65\columnwidth]{Fig2.eps}
466: \end{center}
467: \vspace{-0.7 cm}
468: \caption{\label{fig:fig2}
469: \textbf{Left panel}.
470: Calculations of phase diagrams for the systems
471: $\betan=0$ (Ising-like) and $\betan=\betaC$ (frustrated).
472: Calculations for a series of
473: different lattice sizes $L$ are associated to different
474: limiting temperatures for the system $\betan=0$;
475: they overlap for the system $\betan=\betaC$.
476: \textbf{Right panel}.
477: For the system $\betan=0$ the test of the
478: finite-size scaling law
479: $\dot{T}_{\mathrm{lim}}(L) - T_{\mathrm{lim}} \propto L^{-1/\nu}$
480: gives Ising values for the critical exponent $\nu$ and the
481: critical temperature $T_{\mathrm{lim}}$.
482: No scaling is observed for the system $\betan=\betaC$: this
483: is a first indication of the quench of criticality in
484: presence of a Coulomb field.
485: }
486: \end{figure}
487: %
488: %
489: %
490:
491: At variance with the Ising behaviour, the phase diagram of
492: the system $\betan=\betaC$ does however not vary with the lattice
493: size.
494: % (some slight deviations occur for very small $L$ when
495: % finite-size effects are relevant)
496: % and, if finite-size scaling laws
497: % still hold, the value of $\nu$ should be infinite.
498: This first sign of incompatibility of the frustrated system
499: with the Ising model, is also a first indication of quenching of
500: the critical behaviour.
501: $\nu$ rules in fact the divergence of the correlation
502: length at the critical point, which evolves as
503: $\xi\propto t^{-\nu}$ with $t = T/T_{\mathrm{lim}}-1$.
504: If a critical point existed, %finite-size scaling
505: %laws would still hold, imposing
506: it would correspond to a very large value for $\nu$, which
507: would then be hardly compatible with a diverging correlation length.
508:
509: The major result we infer from comparing the two systems
510: and the corresponding asymptotic limiting temperature,
511: is that the coexistence region expands under the action of a
512: Coulomb field.
513: %
514: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
515: % DISCUSSION: ENERGY-DENSITY DISTRIBUTIONS
516: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
517: %
518: % --- Figure 3
519: %
520: \begin{figure}[pb!]
521: \begin{center}
522: \vspace{-0.3 cm}
523: \includegraphics[angle=0, width=0.85\columnwidth]{Fig3.eps}
524: \end{center}
525: \vspace{-0.7 cm}
526: \caption{\label{fig:fig3}
527: \textbf{(A)}
528: Increase of the limiting point and expansion of the
529: phase-coexistence region with increasing frustration (i.e.
530: for higher $\betaC/\betan$ ratios). Four points determine
531: different thermodynamical situations:
532: points (1) and (3) belong to the coexistence region,
533: points (2) and (4) are at the limiting temperature;
534: while points (1) and (2) refer to the system $\betaC=0$
535: (Ising-like), points (3) and (4) refer to the system
536: $\betaC=\betan$ (frustrated).
537: The calculation refers to $L=10$;
538: \textbf{(B)}
539: In correspondence with the points marked in panel (A),
540: the probability distribution is evaluated for the two
541: Hamiltonian components, $(1/2V)\sumNIJ \nI\nJ$, which
542: corresponds to the nuclear-energy density $\En/V$, and
543: $(\lambda/2V)\SUMNIdifJ \qI\qJ/r_{\I\J}$,
544: representing the Coulomb-energy density $\EC/V$
545: in the case of the frustrated system.
546: Contour plots refer to $L=10$;
547: logarithmic cluster plots refer to $L=20$.
548: Points (1) and (3) manifest bimodal patterns.
549: The critical scaling effect exhibited at point (2)
550: quenches at point (4).
551: }
552: \end{figure}
553: %
554: %
555:
556: The connection between the increase of the limiting point
557: and charge fluctuations can be searched in the evolution of the
558: event distribution with temperature and Coulomb-field strength.
559: Fig.~\ref{fig:fig3}A illustrates the evolution of the
560: limiting temperature with the strength of the Coulomb field and
561: the phase coexistence is indicated for the uncharged system
562: $\betaC=0$ and the frustrated system $\betaC=\betan$, in
563: correspondence with the phase diagrams shown in
564: Fig.~\ref{fig:fig2}.
565: We analyzed the event distribution along the path 1-2-3-4,
566: determined by four different thermodynamic situations.
567:
568: In Fig.~\ref{fig:fig3}B the distributions are shown,
569: as a function of the two Hamiltonian components,
570: $(1/2V)\sumNIJ \nI\nJ$ and
571: $(\lambda/2V)\SUMNIdifJ \qI\qJ/r_{\I\J}$.
572: Point (1) belongs to the region of phase coexistence
573: sampled for the uncharged system $\betaC=0$ and presents a bimodal
574: pattern with respect to the abscissa, which corresponds to the
575: nuclear-energy density $\En/V$, so that pure liquid or gas
576: partitions are preferred to mixed events.
577: Point (2) corresponds to the limiting temperature of
578: the uncharged system $\betaC=0$, where mixed partitions are
579: favoured.
580: To pass from point (2) to point (3) the temperature
581: is left unchanged while $\betaC$ is increased from $0$ till it
582: equals $\betan$.
583: Once introduced the Coulomb field,
584: $(\lambda/2V)\SUMNIdifJ \qI\qJ/r_{\I\J}$ represents the
585: Coulomb-energy density $\EC/V$, which should be minimized in the
586: frustrated system.
587: In order to satisfy this constraint, the positive-charge
588: distribution searches uniform patterns, which are better
589: compensated by the uniform background of negative charges.
590: As a result, the system moves to the phase-coexistence region to search
591: pure partitions, and bimodality appears.
592: In the frustrated system, the temperature should be
593: further increased with respect to the limiting temperature of the
594: system $\betaC=0$, point (3), in order to find the limiting
595: temperature, as indicated at point (4).
596:
597: Fig.~\ref{fig:fig3}B presents the event distributions
598: sampled for two different lattice sizes, in order to test
599: scaling effects which could indicate the presence of critical
600: points.
601: At a critical point the correlation length $\xi$ diverges
602: and determines the exponential decay of the correlation
603: function $\sigma(\R_{\I,\J}) =
604: \langle \nI\nJ \rangle - \langle \nI \rangle \langle \nJ \rangle$
605: according to the expression
606: $\sigma(r) \propto e^{-r/\xi} \cdot r^{-(D-2+\eta)}$,
607: where $D$ is the space dimension and $\eta$ is a critical exponent.
608: On the basis of the properties of the $C_{\I\J}$ matrix,
609: $\sigma(r)$ is related to the mean Coulomb-energy density by
610: %
611: \begin{equation}
612: \Bigg\langle \frac{\lambda\epsilon}{2V}
613: \SUMNIdifJ \frac{\qI\qJ}{r_{\I\J}} \Bigg\rangle =
614: \Bigg\langle\frac{\EC}{V}\Bigg\rangle =
615: \frac{\lambda\epsilon}{2} \left(\sigma(0){\mathcal D} +
616: \sum_{\J \neq \zero}^{V}
617: \frac{\sigma(\R_{\zero\J})}{r_{\zero\J}}\right)
618: .
619: \label{eq:energydens}
620: \end{equation}
621: It is therefore typical of a critical point to exhibit
622: a divergence of the quantity
623: $\langle \SUMNIdifJ \qI\qJ/r_{\I\J} \rangle$ for progressively
624: larger lattice sizes.
625: This indicates that, at point (2), the limiting point is
626: compatible with a critical point, as we already expected from the
627: finite-size scaling law tested in Fig.~\ref{fig:fig2} for the
628: critical exponent $\nu$.
629: On the contrary, no scaling is observed at the point (4).
630: Indeed, as indicated by Eq.(\ref{eq:energydens}), when the
631: Coulomb field is introduced in the system, the diverging quantity
632: would be the Coulomb-energy density $\EC/V$.
633: To avoid such a singularity, the correlation length keeps
634: a finite value at the limiting temperature and the critical
635: character of the limiting temperature is lost~\cite{Chomaz2005}.
636: A more formal discussion on the suppression of criticality
637: on the basis of finite-size-scaling analysis is presented in
638: ref.~\cite{in-progress}.
639:
640: %
641: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
642: % PARAGRAPH 4
643: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
644: %
645: \section{Conclusions}
646:
647: By employing a specific model for studying the
648: thermodynamical features of a frustrated system, we could define
649: general properties of a neutral system in presence of charge
650: fluctuations, in analogy to compact-star matter.
651: The study of the phase diagram and the phase-transition
652: phenomenology indicated that the introduction of a Coulomb field
653: has the effect of increasing the limiting temperature without
654: preserving any critical character.
655:
656: This result is the opposite as found for many other
657: physical systems subject to Coulomb frustration in the absence of
658: global charge neutrality, from hot atomic nuclei to frustrated
659: ferromagnets~\cite{Bonche1985,Lee2001,Grousson,Raduta2002,Gulminelli2003}.
660: This discrepancy with the phase-transition
661: phenomenology characteristic of atomic nuclei, indicates that a
662: connection between compact-star matter and nuclei is not trivial.
663: Conversely a widening of the density range connected to the pasta
664: phases was found~\cite{Maruyama2005} within the RMF model, when the
665: Coulomb field is included under the constraint of global charge
666: neutrality over the Wigner-Seitz cells.
667: Such a finding is directly compatible with the
668: thermodynamic phenomenology we are drawing.
669:
670: It was also discussed~\cite{Margueron2004,wata_rev} that neutrino propagation
671: can be highly concerned by the presence of pasta phases and
672: characterizes the process of neutron-star formation and cooling.
673: With respect to homogeneous phases, the inhomogeneous
674: phases (like pasta phases) present in the coexistence region are
675: characterized by a larger opalescence to neutrino propagation.
676: % Projecting these general statements to compact-star matter,
677: % we infer that, Coulomb frustration expands the
678: % region where inhomogeneous phases (like pasta phases) are present.
679: % With respect to homogeneous phases, these phases are
680: % characterised by a larger opalescence to the passage of neutrinos.
681: In the presence of a critical point
682: the opalescence would diverge as a direct consequence
683: of the divergence of the correlation length, and neutrinos would be
684: trapped.
685: On the contrary, we conclude that the medium stays ``grey''
686: at any temperature.
687: This result seems also connected to the observation of
688: small opacity for the transport of neutrinos discussed in
689: ref.~\cite{Horowitz2005}.
690: %
691: % Our conclusion are twofold:
692: % First, we observed that in a strictly neutral system, the
693: % Coulomb field originating from density fluctuations results in
694: % increasing the limiting temperature.
695: % Therefore, the mixed-phase phenomenology may be relevant
696: % for the proto-neutron-star structure in a wider temperature-range
697: % than usually expected~\cite{pasta}.
698: % Such an expansion of the coexistence region is at
699: % variance with the mean-field expectations, which suggest a
700: % reduction of the instability region when the Coulomb energy is
701: % introduced~\cite{Lattimer1985,Haensel2000}.
702: % This contrast stresses the importance of
703: % realistic calculations beyond
704: % the mean-field level~\cite{Watanabe2005,Horowitz2004}.
705: % Second, the Coulomb field suppresses the critical
706: % character of the limiting temperature.
707: % For this reason we expect warm stellar matter to show a
708: % small opacity to neutrino scattering~\cite{Horowitz2005}, with
709: % important consequences on the cooling dynamics~\cite{Margueron2004}.
710: %
711: % These conclusions describe the thermodinamic phenomenology
712: % of globally neutral and frustrated dense matter.
713: % In this respect, their general character goes beyond the
714: % model dependence.
715: % First and foremost because we demonstrated that such a
716: % system does not belong to a universality class (contrarely to
717: % uncharged nuclear matter), to deduce quantitative results,
718: % extremely detailed prescriptions of the effective interactions are
719: % required and impose as a necessary perspective for future
720: % theoretical and experimental investigations.
721: %
722:
723: %
724: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
725: % BIBLIOGRAPHY
726: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
727: %
728: \begin{thebibliography}{9}
729: %
730: % [1]
731: \bibitem{Negele1973}
732: J.W. Negele and D. Vautherin,
733: Nucl. Phys. A \textbf{207}, 298 (1973).
734: %
735: % [2]
736: \bibitem{pasta}
737: D.G. Ravenhall, C.J. Pethick, and J.R. Wilson,
738: Phys. Rev. Lett. \textbf{50}, 2066 (1983);
739: M. Lassaut \textit{et al.}, %, H.Flocard, P.Bonche, P.H.Heenen and E.Suraud,
740: Astron. Astrophys. \textbf{183} L3 (1987);
741: C.J. Pethick and D.G. Ravenhall,
742: Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. \textbf{45}, 429 (1995);
743: G. Watanabe \textit{et al.},
744: Nucl.Phys. A \textbf{676}, 455 (2000);
745: N.K. Glendenning,
746: Phys. Rep. \textbf{342}, 393 (2001);
747: J.M. Lattimer and M. Prakash,
748: Phys. Rep. \textbf{333}, 121 (2000).
749: %
750: % [6]
751: \bibitem{Horowitz2004}
752: C. Horowitz \textit{et al.},
753: Phys. Rev. C \textbf{70}, 065806 (2004).
754: %
755: % [3]
756: \bibitem{mol_din}
757: G. Watanabe \textit{et al.}, %, T.Maruyama, K. Sato, K. Yasuoka, T. Ebisuzaki,
758: Phys. Rev. Lett. \textbf{94}, 031101 (2005);
759: C.J. Horowitz \textit{et al.},
760: Phys. Rev. C \textbf{69}, 045804 (2004).
761: %
762: % [17]
763: \bibitem{Lattimer1985}
764: J.M. Lattimer \textit{et al.}, %, C.J.Pethick, D.G.Ravenhall, D.Q.Lamb,
765: Nucl. Phys. A \textbf{432}, 646 (1985).
766: %
767: % [18]
768: \bibitem{Haensel2000}
769: F. Douchin, P. Haensel and J. Meyer,
770: Nucl. Phys. A \textbf{665}, 419 (2000).
771: %
772: % [19]
773: \bibitem{Ducoin2006}
774: C. Ducoin \textit{et al.},
775: to be published.
776: %
777: % [7]
778: \bibitem{Bonche1985}
779: P. Bonche, S. Levit and D. Vautherin,
780: Nucl. Phys. A \textbf{436}, 265 (1985).
781: %
782: % [8]
783: \bibitem{Gulminelli2003}
784: F. Gulminelli \textit{et al.},
785: Phys. Rev. Lett. \textbf{91}, 202701 (2003).
786: %
787: % [9]
788: \bibitem{Grousson}
789: M. Grousson, G. Tarjus and P. Viot,
790: Phys. Rev. E \textbf{62}, 7781 (2000);
791: Phys. Rev. E \textbf{64}, 036109 (2001).
792: %
793: % [10]
794: \bibitem{Maruyama2005}
795: T. Maruyama \textit{et al.},
796: Phys. Rev. C \textbf{72}, 015802 (2005).
797: %
798: % [ ]
799: \bibitem{Ruffo2001} J. Barr\'{e}, D. Mukamel and S. Ruffo,
800: Phys. Rev. Lett.\textbf{87} 030601 (2001).
801: %
802: % [12]
803: \bibitem{Carmona2003}
804: F. Gulminelli \textit{et al.},
805: Phys. Rev. E \textbf{68}, 026120 (2003).
806: %
807: % [14]
808: \bibitem{Chomaz2002}
809: Ph. Chomaz, F. Gulminelli,
810: in \textit{``Dynamics and thermodynamics of systems with long range
811: interactions''}, Lecture Notes in Physics vol.\textbf{602},
812: Springer (2002).
813: %
814: % [20]
815: \bibitem{scaling}
816: K. Binder,
817: \textit{``Monte Carlo Methods in Statistical Mechanics''},
818: 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag (1986).
819: %
820: % [11]
821: \bibitem{Chomaz2005}
822: Ph. Chomaz \textit{et al.},
823: arXiv:astro-ph/0507633 (2005).
824: %
825: % [13]
826: \bibitem{in-progress}
827: P. Napolitani \textit{et al.},
828: in preparation.
829: %
830: % [15]
831: \bibitem{Lee2001}
832: S.J. Lee, A.Z. Mekjian,
833: Phys. Rev. C \textbf{63}, 044605 (2001).
834: %
835: % [16]
836: \bibitem{Raduta2002}
837: Al.H. Raduta, Ad.R. Raduta,
838: Nucl. Phys. A \textbf{703}, 876 (2002).
839: %
840: % [4]
841: \bibitem{Margueron2004}
842: J. Margueron, J. Navarro and P. Blottiau,
843: Phys. Rev. C \textbf{70}, 28801 (2004).
844: %
845: % [5]
846: \bibitem{wata_rev}
847: G. Watanabe, H. Sonoda,
848: AIP Conf. Proc. \textbf{791}, 101 (2005).
849: %
850: % [21]
851: \bibitem{Horowitz2005}
852: C.J. Horowitz, and J. Piekarewicz,
853: Phys. Rev. C \textbf{72}, 035801 (2005).
854: %
855: \end{thebibliography}
856: %
857: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
858: %
859: % T H E E N D
860: %
861: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
862: %
863: \end{document}
864: