1: \documentclass[12pt]{article}
2: \textwidth=16cm \textheight=23cm \topmargin -0.0cm
3: \oddsidemargin-0.0cm \evensidemargin -0.0cm
4: \newcommand{\rr}{\mbox{\boldmath $r$}}
5: \newcommand{\kk}{\mbox{\boldmath $k$}}
6: \renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\fnsymbol{footnote}}
7: \usepackage{epsfig,cite,graphicx}
8: \begin{document}
9: \begin{center}
10: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
11: {\bf\Large Hypercentral Constituent Quark Model with a Meson Cloud}\\
12: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
13: \vspace*{1cm}
14: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
15: D. Y. Chen $^{1}$, Y. B. Dong$^{2,1}$, M. M. Giannini$^{3}$ and E.
16: Santopinto$^{3}$ \\
17: \vspace{0.3cm} %
18: {Institute of High Energy Physics \\
19: Chinese Academy of Science,\ Beijing,\ 100049,\ P.R.China$^1$}\\
20: {CCAST (World Lab.) Beijing 100080, P. R. China$^2$}\\
21: and\\
22: {INFN, Sezione di Genova and Dipartimento di Fisica dell
23: Universit\`a di Genova \\ Genova,
24: Italy$^3$ }
25: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
26: \vspace*{1cm}
27: \end{center}
28: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
29: \begin{abstract}
30: The results for the elastic nucleon form factors and the
31: electromagnetic transition amplitudes to the $\Delta(1232)$
32: resonance, obtained with the Hypercentral Constituent Quark Model
33: with the inclusion of a meson cloud correction are briefly
34: presented. The pion cloud effects are explicitly discussed.\\
35: \end{abstract}
36: \textbf{PACS:} 13.40.-f, 13.40.Em, 13.40.Gp\\%
37: \textbf{Key words:} Electromagnetic form factors, nucleon and
38: $\Delta(1232)$, Hypercentral Constituent Quark Model, meson cloud.
39:
40: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
41:
42: \section{Introduction}
43: \label{introduction}%
44: In recent years, various constituent quark potential models have
45: been proposed to describe the intrinsic structure of baryons.
46: Typical examples of the models are the Igsur-Karl model
47: \cite{isgur}, the Capstic and Isgur relativized model
48: \cite{capstic}, the chiral model \cite{glozman} and the Hypercentral
49: Constituent Quark Model (HCQM) \cite{PLB364}. Various baryon
50: properties, such as baryon spectroscopy, nucleon form factors and
51: the transverse and the longitudinal electromagnetic transition
52: amplitudes of $3$ and $4$ stars resonances, have been systematically
53: calculated with the HCQM \cite{PLB364, JPG24, PRC62}. In this work,
54: we will present calculations of the nucleon electromagnetic form
55: factors and nucleon-$\Delta(1232)$ electromagnetic transition
56: amplitudes based on the framework of the Hypercentral Constituent
57: Quark Model with a meson cloud. Particularly, we shall stress the
58: corrections due to the pion meson cloud. In our calculation, a
59: baryon is considered as a three-quark core surrounded by the pion
60: meson cloud. Thus, we have new degrees of freedom in addition to the
61: conventional three constituent quarks.
62: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
63:
64: \section{The Hypercentral Model}
65: \label{Hyc model}%
66: The Hypercentral Constituent Quark Model \cite{PLB364} contains a
67: linear plus a coulomb-like potential
68: \begin{eqnarray}
69: V(x)=-\frac{\tau}{x}+\alpha x, ~~~~ \mbox{with}~~~~~~
70: x=\sqrt{\mbox{\boldmath{$\rho$}}^2+\mbox{\boldmath{$\lambda$}}^2}
71: \label{vx}
72: \end{eqnarray}
73: where $x$ is the hyperradius defined in terms of the standard Jacobi
74: coordinates \mbox{\boldmath{$\rho$}} and
75: \mbox{\boldmath{$\lambda$}}. It should be mentioned that this
76: hypercentral potential has the following features. First of all, it
77: contains three-body force effects. Secondly, it can be considered as
78: the hypercentral approximation of a two-body potential of the form
79: linear plus coulomb, as suggested by lattice QCD calculations
80: \cite{latgunnar}. Thirdly, its predictions of the proton form
81: factors decrease as powers of the virtual photon momentum, while the
82: form factors of the conventional harmonic oscillator potential
83: decrease as gaussians. Finally, its predictions for the transition
84: amplitudes $A_{1/2}(Q^2)$ of $S_{11}(1535)$ and $D_{13}(1520)$
85: resonances \cite{JPG24} agree with the data, particularly in the
86: momentum transfer region of $Q^2\sim 1\sim 1.5GeV^2$.
87: \par %
88: The hypercentral model contains also a standard hyperfine interaction
89: fitted to the $N-\Delta$ mass difference and in this form it
90: has been employed for the calculation of various baryon properties
91: \cite{JPG24,PRC62, PLB387}. However it has been shown that a good description
92: of the lower part of the spectrum and of the transition amplitudes
93: can be obtained also using simply the hyper-Coulomb (Hyc) potential to
94: which a linear and a spin-dependent interactions are added as perturbations
95: \cite{ref2,r121}.
96:
97: Thus, for the low-lying resonance states it is a good approximation to
98: simply take the space wave functions of the Hyc potential instead of the
99: ones coming from the numerical solution of the linear plus Coulomb
100: potentials with hyperfine interaction.
101: \par%
102:
103: \section{Pion meson cloud correction}
104: \label{correction}%
105: To take the pion meson cloud effects into account, one may consider
106: the following Lagrangian density with a $\pi qq$ coupling ( similar to
107: the $\pi NN$ case) \cite{NPA393}
108: \begin{eqnarray}
109: \mathcal{L}&=&
110: i\overline{\psi}_q(x)\gamma^{\mu}\partial_{\mu}\psi_q(x)-
111: m_q\overline{\psi}_q(x)\psi_q(x)+
112: \frac{1}{2}(\partial_{\mu}\pi(x))^2-\frac{1}{2}m_{\pi}^2\pi^2(x)\nonumber\\
113: &&-ig\overline{\psi}_q(x)\gamma_5\psi_q(x)\mathbf{\tau}\cdot\mathbf{\pi}(x).
114: \label{lag}
115: \end{eqnarray}
116: From Eq. (\ref{lag}) the conserved local electromagnetic current can
117: be derived using the principle of minimal coupling
118: $\partial_\mu\rightarrow\partial_\mu+i e_q A_\mu$, where $e_q$ is the
119: charge carried by the field upon which the derivative operator acts.
120: The total electromagnetic current $J^\mu$ is then
121: \begin{eqnarray}
122: J^\mu(x)&=&j_q^\mu(x)+j_\pi^\mu(x),
123: \end{eqnarray}
124: where
125: \begin{eqnarray}
126: j_q^\mu(x)&=& \sum_a Q_a e\overline{\psi}_a(x)\gamma^\mu
127: \psi_a(x),\nonumber\\
128: j_\pi^\mu(x)&=&-ie[\pi^\dag(x)\partial^\mu\pi(x)
129: -\pi\partial^\mu\pi(x)^\dag(x)].
130: \end{eqnarray}
131: Because of the $\pi qq$ coupling, a physical baryon state can be
132: described as a superposition of a three-quark core and its surrounding pion
133: cloud,
134:
135: \begin{eqnarray}
136: \left|A\right>=\sqrt{Z_2^A}\left[1+(E_A-H_0-\Lambda
137: {\mathcal{H}}_{int} \Lambda)^{-1}{\mathcal{H}}_{int}\right]
138: \left|A_0\right> ,
139: \label{z2a} %
140: \end{eqnarray}
141: where $Z_2^A$ is the bare baryon probability in the physical baryon
142: state, $\Lambda$ is the projection operator projecting out all the
143: components of $\left|A\right>$ with at least one pion, and
144: ${\mathcal{H}}_{int}$ is the interaction Hamiltonian which describes
145: the process of emission and absorption of pions, which can be
146: obtained from the Lagrangian density with the $\pi qq$ coupling,
147: Eq. (\ref{lag}) \cite{NPA393}.
148:
149: \par%
150:
151: Our numerical calculations of the elastic nucleon form factors and
152: of the $N-\Delta$ electromagnetic transition amplitudes are
153: performed with the analytical model of Ref. \cite{ref2,r121}
154: without the spin-spin interaction and with the explicit inclusion
155: of the pion cloud corrections. We set the parameters for the HCQM
156: potential as $\tau=4.59$, $\alpha=1.61 fm^{-2}$ \cite{PLB364} and
157: $g=0.585$ (corresponding to the usual $\pi NN$ coupling constant
158: $g^2_{\pi NN}/(4\pi)=13.6$).
159:
160: \par%
161:
162: Moreover, we also take the results of the conventional harmonic
163: oscillator potential with $\alpha=0.410~GeV$ (corresponding to a
164: wave function with radius of the order of $0.5~fm$) for a
165: comparison. To calculate the electromagnetic interaction between the
166: photon and the nucleon with the pion meson cloud, we consider the following
167: couplings: photon-quark, photon-quark with the pion meson cloud in
168: flight, and photon-charged pion. Fig. 1 illustrates the three
169: couplings between the photon and the nucleon or the $\Delta$ with the pion
170: meson cloud.
171:
172: \par%
173:
174: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
175:
176: \begin{figure}[h]
177:
178: \centering
179:
180: \includegraphics[width=150mm]{feynman.eps} %
181: \renewcommand{\figurename}{Fig.}
182: \caption{Diagrams illustrating the various contributions included in
183: the calculation. The intermediate baryons $B$ and $C$ are here restricted
184: to the $N$ and $\Delta$.} %
185: \label{feynman}
186: \end{figure}
187:
188: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
189:
190: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
191:
192: \begin{figure}[h]
193: \centering
194: \includegraphics[width=75mm,height=75mm]{pmf.eps} %
195: \hspace{7mm} %
196: \includegraphics[width=75mm,height=75mm]{pef.eps} %
197: \renewcommand{\figurename}{Fig.}
198: \caption{Comparison between the experimental data and the
199: theoretical predictions (Hyc and HO) for (a) the proton magnetic
200: form factor and (b) the proton electric form factor. The
201: experimental data are taken from \cite{pexp}. Each figure also
202: explicitly shows the different contributions from Fig. \ref{feynman}
203: for the Hyc case.}
204: \label{pf} %
205: \end{figure}
206:
207: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
208: \section{Results and discussions}
209: \par\noindent\par%
210:
211: As shown in Eq. \ref{z2a}, a baryon wave function contains
212: a three-quark core component and a three-quark core plus a pion
213: meson cloud component. One can directly calculate the three-quark
214: core probability $Z_2^A$\cite{NPA393}. For the nucleon, we have
215: $Z_2^N=0.567$ in the Hyc potential and $Z_2^N=0.442$ in the classical HO
216: potential. Our result for $<r>_P$ is $0.68~ fm$ in Hyc potential and
217: $0.54~ fm$ in the HO potential. The probability of the pion meson in the HO
218: potential is larger than that in the Hyc potential. This can be explained
219: by the fact that the pionic contribution is competing with that of the quark
220: core and a smaller r.m.s radius means a stronger pion coupling.
221:
222: \par%
223:
224: Figure \ref{pf} shows the obtained proton electromagnetic form
225: factors compared with the experimental data. We use the Hyc wave
226: function as the wave function of the nucleon. Figure \ref{pf} also
227: shows different contributions from Fig. 1 to the proton form factors
228: (see the insets in the top right corner of Figs.(2a) and (2b)). In
229: the small $Q^2$ region, the contribution of the $\gamma \pi\pi$
230: interaction is more than $15\%$ and as $Q^2$ increases it decreases
231: quickly. When $Q^2$ is beyond $1.0~GeV^2$ the contribution nearly
232: vanishes. One finds that the contribution of the pion meson cloud is
233: important especially in the low $Q^2$ region and also one can draw
234: the conclusion that for the proton form factors the hypercentral
235: constituent quark model can give a better prediction than that of
236: the HO model.
237:
238: \par%
239:
240: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
241: \begin{figure}[h]
242: \centering
243: \includegraphics[width=75mm,,height=75mm]{nmf.eps} %
244: \hspace{7mm}%
245: \includegraphics[width=75mm,,height=75mm]{nef.eps} %
246: \renewcommand{\figurename}{Fig.}
247: \caption{Neutron magnetic (a) and electric (b) form factors
248: predicted by the Hyc potential and the HO potentials compared with
249: the experimental data \cite{nmexp,neexp}. The inset in the top right
250: corner of (b) shows the different contributions to $G_E^N$ of Fig.
251: \ref{feynman} in the Hyc case}.
252: \label{nf} %
253: \end{figure}
254:
255: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
256: Our results for the neutron electromagnetic form factors are shown in
257: Figure \ref{nf}. For the magnetic form factor the Hyc gives a
258: better prediction, however for the electric form factor the result
259: of the Hyc wave function is smaller than the experimental data.
260: It is also smaller than that of HO potential since the pionic contribution
261: in the Hyc potential is smaller and the non-zero value of the neutron
262: charge distribution in the present calculation results from the pionic
263: contribution. It should be stressed that here we have not considered the
264: hyperfine mixing. We know that spin-spin forces lead to configuration mixing;
265: for example, the octet wave function $\psi(8,~\frac{1}{2}^+)$ not
266: only gets contribution from the octet $\left|56,~0^+\right>_{N=0}$
267: but also from $\left|56,~0^+\right>_{N=2},~\left|70,~0^+\right>_{N=0}$ and
268: $\left|70,~2^+\right>_{N=2}$. This mixing gives rise to a non-zero electric
269: form factor of the neutron. It is expected that the mixing effect
270: has to be taken into account for a further analysis of the
271: neutron charge form factor in order to get a better result in comparison with
272: the experimental data
273:
274: \par%
275:
276: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
277: \begin{figure}[h]
278: \centering
279: \includegraphics[width=75mm,height=75mm]{a3.eps} %
280: \hspace{7mm}%
281: \includegraphics[width=75mm,height=75mm]{a1.eps} %
282: \renewcommand{\figurename}{Fig.}
283: \caption{ The real part of the helicity amplitudes (a) $A_{3/2}$ and
284: (b) $A_{1/2}$ (b) of the $\Delta(1232)$ resonance with the different
285: contributions of Fig. \ref{feynman}. }
286: \label{helicity} %
287: \end{figure}
288:
289: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
290: Figures \ref{helicity} (a) and \ref{helicity}(b) show the real part
291: of the individual contribution to the helicity amplitudes
292: $A_{3/2}(Q^2)$ and $A_{1/2}(Q^2)$ of the $\Delta(1232)$ resonance
293: respectively. As $Q^2=0$, the Hyc prediction of $A_{3/2}$
294: ($A_{1/2}$) is $-243\times 10^{-3}~GeV^{-1/2}$ ($-135 \times
295: 10^{-3}~GeV^{-1/2}$). Comparing it to the result $A_{3/2}=-187\times
296: 10^{-3}~GeV^{-1/2}$ ($A_{1/2}=-108\times 10^{-3}~GeV^{-1/2}$)
297: without the pion meson cloud, we clearly see that the results with
298: the pion meson cloud effects reproduce the experimental data
299: $(-250 \pm 8) \times 10^{-3}~GeV^{-1/2}$ ($(-135 \pm 6) \times
300: 10^{-3}~GeV^{-1/2}$) \cite{pdg} much better. It is clear that the
301: contributions from the pion cloud are significant in the real photon
302: point.
303:
304: \par%
305:
306: Another important observable in the $N-\Delta$ transition is the
307: ratio of $E2/M1$. Our result for it is -0.012. It reasonably agrees
308: with the experimental value reported in Particle data group
309: $-0.015\pm0.004$\cite{pdg}. If no meson cloud is considered, the
310: ratio of the simple hCQM (without the configuration mixing)
311: vanishes. Our results show that the meson cloud effect also plays a
312: role on this ratio. Thus, we conclude that we are able to
313: reproduce, at least partially, the experimental data of the
314: $N-\Delta$ transition in the low $Q^2$ region with hCQM and with the
315: pion meson cloud.
316:
317: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
318: \section{Summary}
319: \par\noindent\par%
320: In this work, we have studied the nucleon form factors and the form
321: factors of $\gamma^\star N\rightarrow\Delta$ transitions based on a
322: hCQM with Hyc wave function. The pion meson cloud effects are
323: explicitly included and discussed. From our numerical results, one
324: may conclude that the pion cloud contribution is crucial for a
325: reasonable explanation of the measured nucleon form factors as well
326: as of the helicity amplitudes of the $\Delta(1232)$ resonance.
327:
328: \par%
329:
330: Certainly, the pion meson cloud mainly affects the observables in the low
331: momentum transfer region. In the large momentum transfer region, we need
332: the hypercentral constituent quark model in the relativized version
333: \cite{hcqmff}, in addition to the inclusion of a perturbative
334: pion cloud. It will also be important to explore the effect of $SU(6)$
335: violating admixtures in the baryon wave functions \cite{isgur} simultaneously,
336: since the deformations of the nucleon and $\Delta$ wave functions can also
337: provide part of the E2/M1 ratio and part of the neutron charge form factor.
338:
339: \par%
340:
341: Finally, from the analysis of our results, we see that a
342: hypercentral constituent quark potential model ( with a
343: hyper-coulomb plus a linear confinement term and the hyperfine term)
344: together with the pion cloud corrections might be able to give a
345: more reasonable description of the form factors of the nucleon and
346: of the transition form factors of the $\Delta(1232)$. It is of great
347: interest to see the pion meson cloud effects on the Roper resonance
348: and on the resonances $S_{11}(1535)$ and $D_{13}(1520)$ since the
349: transition amplitude to the $S_{11}(1535)$ resonance can be well
350: explained by the Hypercentral Constituent Quark Model in a large
351: $Q^2\sim 1~GeV^2$ region. This work is in progress.
352:
353: \par%
354:
355: \section*{Acknowledgments}
356: \par\noindent\par\vspace{0.2cm}
357: This work is supported by the Chinese National Science Foundations
358: (10475088, and 90103020), and by CAS Knowledge Innovation Project No.
359: KC2-SW-N02.
360:
361: \par%
362:
363: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
364:
365: \begin{thebibliography}{00}
366: \bibitem{isgur} N. Isgur and G. Karl, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 18} (1978) 4187;
367: D19 (1979) 2653; D {\bf 20} (1979) 1191; S. Godfrey and N. Isgur,
368: Phys. Rev. D {\bf 32} (1985) 189.
369: \bibitem{capstic} S. Capstick and N. Isgur, Phys. Rev. D {\bf 34} (1986)
370: 2809.
371: \bibitem{glozman} L. Ya. Glozman and D. O. Riska, Phys. Rep. C {\bf 268}
372: (1996) 263.
373: \bibitem{PLB364} M. Ferraris, M. M. Giannini, M. Pizzo, E. Santopinto
374: and L. Tiator, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 364} (1995) 231-238.
375: \bibitem{JPG24} M. Aiello, M. M. Giannini and E. Santopinto, J.
376: Phys. G : Nucleon part. Phys {\bf 24} (1998) 753-762.
377: \bibitem{PRC62} M. De. Sanctis, M. M. Giannini, L. Repetto and E.
378: Santopinto, Phys. Rev. C {\bf 62} (2000) 025208.
379: \bibitem{latgunnar} Gunnar S. Bali et al., Phys. Rev. D {\bf 62}, (2000)
380: 054503; Gunnar S. Bali, Phys. Rep. {\bf 343} (2001) 1.
381: G. Bali et al., Phys. Rev. D51, 5165 (1995).
382: \bibitem{PLB387} M. Aiello, M. Ferraris, M. M. Giannini, M. Pizzo
383: and E. Santopinto, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 387} (1996) 215.
384: \bibitem{ref2} E. Santopinto, F. Iachello, and M. M. Giannini, Eur
385: Phys. J. A {\bf 1} (1998) 307-315.
386: \bibitem{r121} E. Santopinto, F. Iachello and M. M. Giannini,
387: \emph{DA$\Phi$CE Workshop (Frascati November, 11-14, 1996)} Nucl.
388: Phys. A {\bf 623} (1997) 101.
389: \bibitem{NPA393} S. Theberge and A. W. Thomas, Nucl. Phys. A {\bf 393}(1983)
390: 252.
391: \bibitem{pexp} R.C. Walker et al., Phys. Rev. D {\bf 49} (1994) 5671;
392: M.E. Christy et al., Phys. Rev. C {\bf 70} (2004) 015206; I.A.
393: Qattan et al., nucl-ex/0410010.
394: \bibitem{nmexp} W. Bartel et al Nucl Phys B {\bf 58} (1973) 429;
395: A. Lung et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 70} (1993) 718; W. Xu et al.,
396: Phys. Rev. C 67 (2003) 012201; G. Kubon et al., Phys. Lett. B {\bf
397: 524} (2002) 26.
398: \bibitem{neexp} R. Madey et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 91} (2003) 122002;
399: C. Herberg et al., Eur. Phys. J. A {\bf 5} (1999) 131; R. Schiavilla
400: and I. Sick, Phys. Rev. C {\bf 64} (2001) 041002.
401: \bibitem{pdg} Review of Particle Physics, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 592}
402: 1-4 (2004); Phys Rev D{\bf 54} (1996) 601.
403: \bibitem{hcqmff}
404: M. De Sanctis, M.M. Giannini, E. Santopinto and A. Vassallo, e-Print Archive:
405: nucl-th/0506033 and Contribution to this Conference.
406: \end{thebibliography}
407:
408: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
409:
410: \end{document}
411: