1: % Template article for preprint document class `elsart'
2: % with harvard style bibliographic references
3: % SP 2006/04/26
4:
5: \documentclass{elsart}
6: %\documentclass{article}
7:
8: % Use the option doublespacing or reviewcopy to obtain double line spacing
9: % \documentclass[doublespacing]{elsart}
10:
11: % the natbib package allows both number and author-year (Harvard)
12: % style referencing;
13: \usepackage{natbib}
14:
15: % if you use PostScript figures in your article
16: % use the graphics package for simple commands
17: %\usepackage{graphics}
18: % or use the graphicx package for more complicated commands
19: \usepackage{graphicx}
20: % or use the epsfig package if you prefer to use the old commands
21: %\usepackage{epsfig}
22:
23: % The amssymb package provides various useful mathematical symbols
24: \usepackage{amssymb}
25:
26: % The lineno packages adds line numbers. Start line numbering with
27: % \begin{linenumbers}, end it with \end{linenumbers}. Or switch it on
28: % for the whole article with \linenumbers.
29: % \usepackage{lineno}
30:
31: % \linenumbers
32: \begin{document}
33:
34: \begin{frontmatter}
35:
36: % Title, authors and addresses
37:
38: % use the thanksref command within \title, \author or \address for footnotes;
39: % use the corauthref command within \author for corresponding author footnotes;
40: % use the ead command for the email address,
41: % and the form \ead[url] for the home page:
42: % \title{Title\thanksref{label1}}
43: % \thanks[label1]{}
44: % \author{Name\corauthref{cor1}\thanksref{label2}}
45: % \ead{email address}
46: % \ead[url]{home page}
47: % \thanks[label2]{}
48: % \corauth[cor1]{}
49: % \address{Address\thanksref{label3}}
50: % \thanks[label3]{}
51:
52: \title{A Monte Carlo approach to study
53: neutron and fragment emission in heavy-ion reactions}
54:
55: % use optional labels to link authors explicitly to addresses:
56: % \author[label1,label2]{}
57: % \address[label1]{}
58: % \address[label2]{}
59:
60: \author[miuni,minfn]{M.V. Garzelli\corauthref{cor1}}
61: \corauth[cor1]{Corresponding author.}
62: \ead{garzelli@mi.infn.it}
63: \author[minfn]{P.R. Sala}
64: \author[pvunin]{F. Ballarini}
65: \author[minfn]{G. Battistoni}
66: \author[cern]{F. Cerutti}
67: \author[cern]{A. Ferrari}
68: \author[miuni,minfn]{E. Gadioli}
69: \author[pvunin]{A. Ottolenghi}
70: \author[hou]{L.S. Pinsky}
71: \author[sie]{J. Ranft}
72:
73: \address[miuni]{University of Milano, Department of Physics,
74: via Celoria 16, I-20133 Milano, Italy}
75: \address[minfn]{INFN, Sezione di Milano, via Celoria 16, I-20133 Milano, Italy}
76: \address[pvunin]{University of Pavia, Department of Theoretical and Nuclear Physics, and INFN, Sezione di Pavia, via Bassi 6, I-27100 Pavia, Italy}
77: \address[cern]{CERN, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland}
78: \address[hou]{University of Houston, Department of Physics,
79: 617 Science \& Research Bldg 1, Houston, TX 77204-5005, US}
80: \address[sie]{Siegen University, Fachbereich 7 - Physik,
81: D-57068 Siegen, Germany}
82: \begin{abstract}
83: % Text of abstract
84: Quantum Molecular Dynamics models (QMD)
85: are Monte Carlo approaches targeted at the
86: description of nucleon-ion and ion-ion collisions. We have developed
87: a QMD code, which has been used for the simulation of the fast stage
88: of ion-ion collisions, considering a wide range of system masses and
89: system mass asymmetries. The slow stage of the collisions has been
90: described by statistical methods. The combination of both stages
91: leads to final distributions of particles and fragments, which have
92: been compared to experimental data available in literature.
93: A few results of these comparisons,
94: concerning neutron double-differential production cross-sections
95: for C, Ne and Ar ions impinging on C, Cu and Pb targets
96: at 290 - 400 MeV/A bombarding energies
97: and fragment isotopic distributions
98: from Xe + Al at 790 MeV/A, are shown in this paper.
99: \end{abstract}
100:
101: \begin{keyword}
102: % keywords here, in the form: keyword \sep keyword
103: heavy-ion collisions \sep QMD \sep fragmentation \sep evaporation
104: % PACS codes here, in the form: \PACS code \sep code
105: \PACS 24.10-i \sep 25.70.Mn \sep 21.60.Ka
106: \end{keyword}
107:
108: \end{frontmatter}
109:
110: % main text
111: \section{Introduction}
112: \label{intro}
113: Since several years, Quantum Molecular Dynamics models (QMD)
114: have been introduced
115: to simulate heavy-ion
116: collisions (see e.g. \citet{aiche} and re\-fe\-ren\-ces therein,
117: \citet{jap}).
118: They are semi-classical approaches (\citet{cana}),
119: derived from the Classical Molecular Dynamics ones, by adding a few quantum
120: features. The main one is that each nucleon is described by a
121: coherent state, and is thus identified by gaussian spatial coordinate
122: and momentum distributions, centered around mean values, and characterized
123: by gaussian widths whose product minimizes the Heisenberg
124: uncertainty relationship. A second quantum feature
125: is the fact that nucleon-nucleon scattering cross-sections taken
126: from the experiments are used to
127: describe nucleon-nucleon collisions occurring in the fast-stage
128: of the reactions between ions, when nuclei can overlap, depending on the
129: impact parameter value.
130: The impact parameters are randomly chosen,
131: according to a Monte Carlo procedure. Thus both very peripheral reactions
132: and more central ones can occur, on an event by event basis.
133: Actually the measured free nucleon-nucleon cross-sections are used when
134: a nucleon-nucleon collision occurs in these reactions, while
135: the effects on each nucleon of all other nucleons
136: present both in the projectile ion and
137: in the target one are taken into account
138: by means of effective potentials, included in the interaction part
139: of the Hamiltonian, during the whole simulation.
140: Another quantum feature is the fact that the collisions which lead a nucleon
141: in an already occupied phase-space region are forbidden,
142: according to the
143: Pauli blocking principle. This is especially effective at non-relativistic
144: e\-ner\-gies, where nucleon-nucleon potentials are increasingly
145: more important than nucleon-nucleon collisions
146: to determine the fragmentation process, since most
147: nucleon-nucleon collisions are blocked.
148: Finally, a few authors have also de\-ve\-lo\-ped fully antisymmetrized versions
149: of QMD models (e.g. Fermionic Molecular Dynamics by~\citet{fmd1, fmd2},
150: and Antisymmetrized Molecular
151: Dynamics by~\citet{amd1, amd2}),
152: by fully antisymmetrizing the nuclear wave-functions, which
153: in the original QMD versions are merely given by the product of nucleon
154: wave-functions. At present, these advanced versions are succesfully used
155: in very specific problems, such as the study of exotic nuclear structure,
156: mainly for light nuclei
157: due to the complexity of the underlying approaches,
158: and their intensive CPU requirement.
159: We limit to the original approximation for the nuclear
160: wave-functions, instead of using a more advanced approach, since
161: our final aim is developing a code to be used real-time
162: to microscopically describe ion-ion collisions
163: in general applicative problems, which can involve even
164: the heaviest ions and composite targets. To accomplish this aim,
165: a preliminary version of our code has been interfaced to the general
166: purpose Monte Carlo FLUKA code, allowing the simulation of fragment
167: formation and the study of the emission of fragmentation products,
168: in thin and thick targets, even in complex geometries.
169: Nevertheless, to better characterize and investigate
170: the nuclear reaction processes,
171: the results of si\-mu\-la\-tions
172: performed in the simplest theoretical case of generating
173: thousands of single ion-ion collision events
174: are shown in this paper. This means that ion-ion
175: overlapping and nuclear de-excitation
176: effects have been accurately considered, while target thickness effects,
177: such as ion energy loss and reinteraction in matter,
178: were neglected in making these simulations.
179:
180: \section{Theoretical elements of our simulations}
181: \label{theo}
182: A QMD code has recently been developed by our Collaboration
183: and interfaced to the FLUKA code.
184: FLUKA (\citet{flukacern}) is a particle tran\-sport and interaction code,
185: used since several years
186: in many fields of Physics. It is currently developed
187: according to an INFN - CERN official agreement
188: and is made available on the web ({\it http://www.fluka.org}).
189: It is based, as far as possible, on
190: theoretical microscopic models, which are continuously updated and
191: improved, and benchmarked with respect to newly available experimental
192: data. Nucleon-nucleus collisions are simulated in FLUKA by means of the
193: module called PEANUT (PreEquilibrium
194: And NUclear Thermalization,~\citet{trieste}),
195: which contains also a de-excitation sub-module. This sub-module has also
196: been used to describe the de-excitation processes which may occur
197: at the end of the overlapping stage of ion-ion collisions, which
198: has been simulated in this work by means of our QMD code.
199: In particular, the QMD code has been used
200: to follow the ion-ion system evolution
201: for a few hundreds of fm/c, while de-excitation processes can occur
202: on a time scale far larger (up to $\sim 10^7$ fm/c), and have been
203: simulated by means of the statistical models contained
204: in the FLUKA de-excitation sub-module. De-excitation is provided by different
205: mechanisms, sometime in competition. Evaporation has been considered,
206: both of light particles and fragments, up to a mass~A~=~24.
207: Fission processes
208: can occur, as well as Fermi break-up of light nuclei, with a maximum
209: of six bodies in the final state in the present implementation.
210: Finally, de-excitation by photon emission
211: is also included in FLUKA.
212: A correct description of de-excitation is crucial, since it deeply
213: modifies the particle and fragment
214: pattern present at the end of the fast stage
215: of ion-ion collisions. In fact, while peripheral collisions give often
216: rise to slightly excited projectile-like and target-like fragments,
217: with masses very similar to the
218: projectile and target ones, respectively,
219: very central collisions are capable of generating
220: intermediate mass
221: fragments (IMF), characterized by lower masses and higher excitation
222: energies: hot fragments in turn decay, deeply affecting the final
223: fragment and particle emission distributions.
224: A few features of our QMD code are presented in Subsection~\ref{qmd},
225: while the results of our simulations are shown in Section~\ref{results}.
226:
227: \subsection{QMD specific features}
228: \label{qmd}
229: As explained in the Introduction, several
230: QMD versions and codes have already been developed,
231: characterized by some common features, and some specific differences,
232: depending on the working group and the intended application.
233: Here some features of the code we have developed are briefly sketched.
234: The Hamiltonian is made by a kinetic and an effective interaction part.
235: Our code can switch between non-relativistic and relativistic kinematics,
236: according to a user initial choice, while only instantaneous interactions are
237: included. A fully relativistic version, including relativistic potentials,
238: is also under development thanks to the cooperation with the University of
239: Houston and NASA, and is the object of a separate work (\citet{zapp}).
240: Neutrons and protons are distinguished both for their
241: interaction and for their mass. The initial nuclear states, used in
242: the ion-ion collision simulation processes, are prepared in advance, stored
243: off-line and exactly fullfill the experimental constraints
244: on bin\-ding energies.
245: Binding energies are calculated by summing the kinetic energy
246: and the potential energy of all nucleons in the nucleus. The potential
247: energy is given by a superposition
248: of different terms, due to the interaction of
249: each nucleon with all other nucleons present in the ion. In particular,
250: Skyrme-type two-body and three-body interaction terms are included,
251: as well as two-body symmetry and surface terms. The symmetry term helps
252: taking into account the difference among neutrons and protons, by assigning
253: different weights to the interactions between nucleons with the same isospin
254: and nucleons with different isospin. Furthermore, a Coulomb term
255: is included, which acts only on protons. Further details on the effect
256: of each term in determining the total potential energy of each ion can
257: be found in~\citet{garzvar06}. When two ions collide, each nucleon is
258: subject to the effects of both the nucleons in the same nucleus and those
259: in the other one. At ion-ion distances ex\-cee\-ding a few fm,
260: only the Coulomb force is important,
261: while nuclear interaction among nucleons of different nuclei
262: becomes significant only at lower distances, i.e. during the ion-ion
263: overlapping process.
264: Also nucleon-nucleon collisions can occur in this stage, which are
265: implemented in our code taking into account free {\it n}-{\it p} and
266: {\it p}-{\it p} ({\it n}-{\it n}) reaction
267: cross-sections. As an approximation, this process is assumed
268: to be isotropic, i.e. the
269: angular dependendence of the cross-sections is neglected, as well as
270: the pion production channel. Further extensions of the model will include
271: these elements.
272: Ion-ion system evolution is followed for
273: a time of $\sim 150 - 200$ fm/c after the overlapping stage.
274: At the end,
275: hot excited fragments may be present, as well as emitted
276: neutrons and protons. The de-excitation of hot fragments has been simulated
277: thanks to the interface to the FLUKA de-excitation module, as explained
278: at the beginning of Section~\ref{theo}.
279:
280: \section{Results of the simulations and comparisons with experimental data}
281: \label{results}
282: As explained in Section~\ref{theo},
283: the results presented in this paper have been obtained by the interface
284: between our QMD code and the FLUKA nuclear de-excitation routines.
285: In Subsection~\ref{neut}
286: double-differential neutron production cross-sections for several
287: projectile-target systems at energies 290 and 400 MeV/A are compared
288: to available experimental data, while in Subsection~\ref{isot} fragment
289: isotopic distributions from Xe projectiles impinging on an Aluminium target
290: at 790 MeV/A are shown. QMD + FLUKA has also been tested at energies
291: around and below 100 MeV/A. A few results of these lower-energy tests
292: have been presented in~\citet{paviamv, garzvar06, garzrila06}.
293:
294: \subsection{Double-differential neutron production cross-sections}
295: \label{neut}
296: Several papers presenting neutron double-differential production
297: cross-section data have been published. Most of them consider thick targets.
298: Nevertheless, at the aim of investigating the reliability and
299: the prediction capabilities
300: of theoretical ion-ion reaction models,
301: it is better disentangling transport effects,
302: thus data from thin target experiments are more suited.
303: ~\citet{iwata} present double-differential neutron production
304: cross-sections for
305: many systems, mostly considering thin targets.
306: Therefore, the experimental
307: data presented by these authors have been considered for our simulations.
308: The targets used in their experiment
309: are made of Carbon, Copper and Lead. The results of our simulations
310: for a Carbon beam at a 290 MeV/A bombarding energy and Neon and Argon
311: beams at 400 MeV/A, hitting Carbon, Copper and Lead ions, are shown
312: in Fig.~\ref{figneu}, and compared to the experimental data.
313: Different histograms refer to different emission angles. In particular,
314: from the top to the bottom of each panel one can distinguish neutrons
315: emitted at 5$^{\mathrm{o}}$, 10$^{\mathrm{o}}$, 20$^{\mathrm{o}}$,
316: 30$^{\mathrm{o}}$, 40$^{\mathrm{o}}$, 60$^{\mathrm{o}}$ and
317: 80$^{\mathrm{o}}$ angles with respect to the incoming beam direction
318: in the laboratory frame.
319: The results at different angles have been multiplied
320: by the same factors used in~\citet{iwata} for display purposes.
321: The results of the theoretical simulations show an overall reasonable agreement
322: with the experimental data, especially
323: at emission angles $\geq 20^{\mathrm{o}}$. On the other side, at forward
324: emission angles (5$^{\mathrm{o}}$ - 10$^{\mathrm{o}}$),
325: the simulations give rise to neutron emission peaks lower than those
326: experimentally observed. In the case of Carbon projectiles at 290 MeV/A
327: these peaks are located at higher energies than the experimentally measured
328: ones,
329: and this can be an evidence of the fact that target thickness effects
330: can not be neglected and have to be included in the simulations.
331: In fact, our simulations have been made in the bare approximation
332: of neglecting all target geometry effects, i.e. each target is
333: merely given by a single ion. The same real targets used in the experiments
334: with Carbon projectiles at 290 MeV/A have
335: also been used by~\citet{iwata} with Neon projectiles at 400 MeV/A.
336: In this last case,
337: the agreement of the results of the theoretical simulations
338: with the
339: experimental data is more satisfactory, both regarding the location
340: of the peaks and their height.
341: This point can be ascribed to the fact
342: that projectiles at higher energies can pe\-ne\-tra\-te more deeply,
343: so that ion energy loss and reinteraction effects
344: can be neglected more safely.
345: To better investigate this aspect,
346: we have planned
347: to repeat the same simulations, taking into account geometry effects.
348: This would be possible thanks to the FLUKA geometry package.
349: Another source of di\-scre\-pan\-cy could be ascribed to the fact that
350: isotropic {\it n}-{\it p} and {\it p}-{\it p}
351: cross-sections have been used in the simulations,
352: instead of considering the angular dependence really observed in
353: nucleon-nucleon scattering experiments.
354: We expect that including the last one can further
355: improve the agreement of the theo\-re\-ti\-cal simulations
356: with the experimental data.
357: As far as intermediate emission angles are concerned, the agreement
358: is instead already quite satisfactory. We emphasize that the absolute results
359: of our simulations shown in Fig.~\ref{figneu} have been obtained
360: without making use of any normalization factor. The spectra at intermediate
361: and backward angles
362: have been attributed by~\citet{iwata} to the partial
363: superposition of two components. The equilibrium
364: component corresponds to the lower kinetic energy ($E_n < $ 20 MeV)
365: part of the spectra, where an increasing number
366: of emitted neutrons
367: with decreasing energy
368: can be observed (shoulder), while the cascade/pre-equilibrium component
369: is given by a wide peak extending up to
370: a few hundreds MeV/A. The theoretical si\-mu\-la\-tions made by QMD + FLUKA
371: appear to agree in predicting the presence of both these distributions.
372:
373: \subsection{Fragment isotopic distributions}
374: \label{isot}
375: When two ions collide at energies of a few hundreds MeV/A, highly
376: excited fragments can be formed, which in turn decay to lower
377: mass and charge ones by de-excitation processes. Isotopic distributions
378: for projectile-like fragments
379: have been measured by~\citet{xe790} at GSI in the
380: case of $^{129}\mathrm{Xe}$ ions at a 790 MeV/A bombarding energy,
381: impinging on an Aluminium target. We have simulated about 10,000
382: $^{129}\mathrm{Xe}$ + $^{27}\mathrm{Al}$
383: reaction events at the same bombarding energy using QMD + FLUKA.
384: The results of our simulations are presented in Fig.~\ref{figuraiso}.
385: In each panel the production cross-section is shown for the isotopes
386: of a different element, ranging from Z = 54 to Z = 40
387: (projectile-like isotopes).
388: Together with the results of our theoretical simulations,
389: also the experimental measures taken from~\citet{xe790} are plotted.
390: We can appreciate a better agreement between the theoretical
391: and experimental distributions
392: for the elements whose atomic number is very close to
393: the projectile Z value (Z~$\sim$~54~-~50),
394: than for the lighter
395: fragments (Z~$\sim$~44~-~40).
396: While the first ones are more copiously produced, the last ones
397: are more rarely emitted, as follows by comparing their production
398: cross-sections.
399: The results of our simulations refer to fragment emitted over
400: the whole solid angle.
401: At the considered energy,
402: higher mass and charge fragments are produced in more peripheral collisions,
403: and propagate in forward direction, while the lower mass and charge
404: ones can be
405: emitted also at larger angles.
406: Furthermore,
407: at fixed Z, the simulations seem to overestimate the N richer tails,
408: while underestimating the higher Z ones. Indeed, an asymmetry between the two
409: tails is evident also from the experimental data, but to a lesser extent
410: than obtained by the theoretical simulations.
411: ~\citet{xe790} explain their results suggesting
412: that neutron-deficient fragments are formed
413: from prefragments with high excitation energies, and consequently
414: a crucial contribution to their formation could be played by evaporation
415: processes. Since neutrons can evaporate more easily than protons, due
416: to Coulomb barrier effects on the last ones,
417: the evaporation of neutrons would give rise to
418: these fragments. According to this scenario,
419: the theoretical excess of N richer fragments could be ascribed
420: to the fact that the excitation energies of the fragments at the
421: end of the fast stage of the collision process are not high enough.
422: We observe that repeating the same simulations by using a completely
423: different model to describe the fast stage of ion-ion collisions,
424: i.e. the relativistic QMD code RQMD2.4 developed
425: at Frankfurt a few years ago by~\citet{sorge1, sorge2},
426: and already coupled to FLUKA by our
427: Collaboration (\citet{aigi}),
428: leads to very similar results, also plotted in
429: Fig.~\ref{figuraiso}. A comparison between the results of the two
430: models shows that at a 790 MeV/A bombarding energy
431: the isotopic distributions are rather insensitive
432: to the fact that fully relativistic potentials are used,
433: or non-relativistic ones, as are the cases of RQMD and QMD, respectively.
434: Including a pre-equilibrium phase after the fast stage of the
435: collisions, with a smooth transition to the
436: equilibrium stage described by statistical models,
437: could help in gaining further
438: insight on the reasons of the discrepancies with experimental data.
439: Furthermore, another source of possible discrepancies
440: could be the fact
441: that the Aluminium target thickness has not been taken into account in our
442: simulations. All these points are currently under investigation.
443: The total theoretical charge fragment yield as a function of Z
444: is presented in Fig.~\ref{spettroz} for completeness, including
445: also fragments with Z $<$ 40, whose distributions
446: have not been measured in the experiment by~\citet{xe790}.
447:
448:
449: \section{Conclusions}
450: \label{conclu}
451: We have performed simulations of ion-ion collision events, in the
452: approximation of neglecting target geometry effects such as
453: beam energy loss and re\-in\-te\-rac\-tion during propagation,
454: by using the QMD we have developed
455: in the last few years, interfaced to the statistical de-excitation module
456: taken from the general purpose Monte Carlo
457: FLUKA code. Results of simulations at bombarding energies around
458: and below 100 MeV/A have been shown is other papers, while here
459: results have been shown concerning different projectile-target combinations
460: at energies of a few hundreds MeV/A. Specific observables,
461: such as neutron double-differential
462: production cross-sections at different angles and fragment isotopic
463: distributions, have been calculated.
464: Comparisons of the results with experimental data
465: suggest an overall reasonable agreement, even if some discrepancies
466: also appear, which need further investigation. In particular,
467: a precise reproduction of the target geometry and the experimental setup,
468: as well as the inclusion in the model of the angular dependence of
469: nucleon-nucleon cross-sections, are in our opinion crucial to
470: further improve the agreement with the experimental data.
471:
472: % The Appendices part is started with the command \appendix;
473: % appendix sections are then done as normal sections
474: % \appendix
475:
476: % \section{}
477:
478: % \label{}
479:
480: % Bibliographic references with the natbib package:
481: % Parenthetical: \citep{Bai92} produces (Bailyn 1992).
482: % Textual: \citet{Bai95} produces Bailyn et al. (1995).
483: % An affix and part of a reference:
484: % \citep[e.g.][Ch. 2]{Bar76}
485: % produces (e.g. Barnes et al. 1976, Ch. 2).
486:
487: \begin{thebibliography}{}
488:
489: \bibitem[Aichelin(1991)]{aiche}
490: J. Aichelin, {\it ``Quantum'' molecular dynamics -
491: a dynamical microscopic n-body approach
492: to investigate fragment formation and the nuclear
493: equation of state in heavy-ion collisions},
494: Phys. Rep. {\bf 202}, 233 - 360 (1991).
495:
496: \bibitem[Aiginger et al.(2005)]{aigi}
497: H. Aiginger, V. Andersen, F. Ballarini et al.,
498: {\it ``The FLUKA code: New developments and application to 1 GeV/n iron
499: beams''}, Adv. Space Res. {\bf 35}, 214 - 222 (2005).
500:
501: \bibitem[Boal and Glosli (1988) ]{cana}
502: D.H. Boal, J. Glosli,
503: {\it ``Computational model for nuclear reaction studies: Quasiparticle
504: dynamics''}, Phys. Rev. C {\bf 38}, 2621 - 2629 (1988).
505:
506: \bibitem[Fass\`o et al.(2005)]{flukacern}
507: A. Fass\`o, A. Ferrari, J. Ranft and P.R. Sala,
508: {\it ``FLUKA: a multi-particle transport code''}, CERN Yellow Report
509: 2005 - 10, INFN/TC\_05/11, 1 - 387 (2005).
510:
511: \bibitem[Feldmeier(1990)]{fmd1}
512: H. Feldmeier, {\it ``Fermionic Molecular Dynamics''},
513: Nucl. Phys. A {\bf 515}, 147 - 172 (1990).
514:
515: \bibitem[Feldmeier and Schnack(2000)]{fmd2}
516: H. Feldmeier, J. Schnack, {\it ``Molecular dynamics for fermions''},
517: Rev. Mod. Phys. {\bf 72}, 655 - 688 (2000).
518:
519: \bibitem[Ferrari and Sala(1996)]{trieste}
520: A. Ferrari and P.R. Sala,
521: {\it ``The Physics of High Energy Reactions''},
522: Proceedings of the Workshop on Nuclear Reaction Data and
523: Nuclear Reactors Physics, Design and Safety, Trieste, Italy, April~1996,
524: A.~Gandini and G.~Reffo eds., 2 - 424 (1998).
525:
526: \bibitem[Garzelli et al.(2006a)]{paviamv} M.V. Garzelli, F. Ballarini,
527: G. Battistoni et al.,
528: {\it ``Heavy-ion collisions: preliminary results of a new QMD model
529: coupled with FLUKA''},
530: Journal of Physics: Conference Series {\bf 41}, 519 - 522 (2006a).
531:
532: \bibitem[Garzelli et al.(2006b)]{garzvar06} M.V. Garzelli, F. Ballarini,
533: G. Battistoni et al.,
534: {\it ``Heavy-ion collisions described by a new QMD code interfaced to FLUKA:
535: model validation by comparisons with ex\-pe\-ri\-men\-tal
536: data concerning neutron
537: and charged fragment production''},
538: Proceedings of the $11{^\mathrm{th}}$ International Conference on
539: Nuclear Reaction Mechanisms, June 12 - 16 2006, Varenna, Italy,
540: E. Gadioli edt., Ricerca Scientifica ed Educazione Permanente Suppl.
541: {\bf 126}, Univ. Milano, 515 - 524 (2006b), nucl-th/0610018.
542:
543: % \bibitem[Names(Year)]{label} or \bibitem[Names(Year)Long names]{label}.
544: % (\harvarditem{Name}{Year}{label} is also supported.)
545: % Text of bibliographic item
546: \bibitem[Garzelli et al.(2006c)]{garzrila06} M.V. Garzelli, P.R. Sala,
547: G. Battistoni et al., {\it ``A QMD description of the interaction of
548: ion beams with matter''}, Proceedings of the $25{^\mathrm{th}}$ Workshop
549: on Nuclear Theory, June 26 - July 1 2006, Rila mountains, Bulgaria,
550: S. Dimitrova edt., Heron press, Sofia, in press (2006c), nucl-th/0610050.
551:
552: \bibitem[Iwata et al.(2001)]{iwata} Y. Iwata, T. Murakami, H. Sato et al.,
553: {\it ``Double-differential cross sections for the neutron production from
554: heavy-ion reactions at energies E/A = 290 - 600 MeV''},
555: Phys. Rev. C {\bf 64}, 054609 - 1,10 (2001).
556:
557: \bibitem[Niita et al.(1995)]{jap} K. Niita, S. Chiba, T. Maruyama et al.,
558: {\it ``Analysis of the (N,xN) reactions by quantum molecular dynamics plus
559: statistical decay model''}, Phys. Rev. C {\bf 52}, 2620 - 2635 (1995).
560:
561: \bibitem[Ono et al.(1992a)]{amd1}
562: A. Ono, H. Horiuchi, T. Maruyama, A. Ohnishi,
563: {\it ``Fragment formation studied with Antisymmetrized Version of Molecular
564: Dynamics with two-nucleon collisions''},
565: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 68}, 2898 - 2900 (1992a).
566:
567: \bibitem[Ono et al.(1992b)]{amd2}
568: A. Ono, H. Horiuchi, T. Maruyama, A. Ohnishi,
569: {\it ``Antisymmetrized Version of Molecular Dynamics with Two-Nucleon
570: Collisions and its Application to Heavy Ion Reactions''},
571: Progr. Theor. Phys. {\bf 87}, 1185 - 1206 (1992b).
572:
573: \bibitem[Reinhold et al.(1998)]{xe790} J. Reinhold, J. Friese, H.J. Korner
574: et al., {\it ``Projectile fragmentation of $^{129}\mathrm{Xe}$ at $E_{lab}$ = 790A MeV''},
575: Phys. Rev. C {\bf 58}, 247 - 255 (1998).
576:
577: \bibitem[Sorge et al.(1989a)]{sorge1} H. Sorge, H. Stocker, W. Greiner,
578: {\it ``Poincar\`e invariant Hamiltonian dynamics: Mo\-del\-ling multi-hadronic
579: interactions in a phase-space approach''},
580: Ann. of Phys. {\bf 192}, 266 - 306 (1989a).
581:
582: \bibitem[Sorge et al.(1989b)]{sorge2} H. Sorge, H. Stocker, W. Greiner,
583: {\it ``Relativistic quantum molecular dynamics approach to nuclear
584: collisions at ultrerelativistic energies''},
585: Nucl. Phys. A {\bf 498}, 567 - 576 (1989b).
586:
587: \bibitem[Zapp et al.(2006)]{zapp} N. Zapp, A. Ferrari, A. Empl
588: et al. {\it ``A Hamiltonian molecular dynamics model for use in event
589: generators for relativistic nucleus-nucleus interactions''}, Poster
590: presented at the 36th COSPAR Scientific Assembly, July 16 - 23 2006,
591: Bejing, China, COSPAR paper number F2.2-0040-06 (2006).
592: \end{thebibliography}
593:
594: \begin{figure}[p!]
595: \begin{center}
596: \includegraphics[bb=51 51 613 793, width=0.32\textwidth]{guracc290.eps}
597: \includegraphics[bb=51 51 613 793, width=0.32\textwidth]{guracra290.eps}
598: \includegraphics[bb=51 51 613 793, width=0.32\textwidth]{guracpi290.eps}
599: \\
600: \includegraphics[bb=51 51 613 793, width=0.32\textwidth]{guranec400.eps}
601: \includegraphics[bb=51 51 613 793, width=0.32\textwidth]{guranera400.eps}
602: \includegraphics[bb=51 51 613 793, width=0.32\textwidth]{guranepi400.eps}
603: \\
604: \includegraphics[bb=51 51 613 793, width=0.32\textwidth]{guraarc400.eps}
605: \includegraphics[bb=51 51 613 793, width=0.32\textwidth]{guraarra400.eps}
606: \includegraphics[bb=51 51 613 793, width=0.32\textwidth]{guraarpi400.eps}
607: \end{center}
608: \caption{\label{figneu} Double-differential neutron production cross-section
609: for C (top), Ne (center) and Ar (bottom) projectiles impinging on
610: C (left), Cu (center) and Pb (right)
611: at 290, 400, 400 MeV/A bombarding energies, respectively.
612: The results of the theoretical simulations made by QMD + FLUKA are shown
613: by solid histograms, while the experimental data measured by~\citet{iwata}
614: are shown by filled circles. In each panel, distributions at
615: 5$^{\mathrm{o}}$, 10$^{\mathrm{o}}$, 20$^{\mathrm{o}}$,
616: 30$^{\mathrm{o}}$, 40$^{\mathrm{o}}$, 60$^{\mathrm{o}}$ and
617: 80$^{\mathrm{o}}$ angles with respect to the incoming beam direction
618: in the laboratory frame,
619: have been multiplied by decreasing even powers of 10,
620: for display purposes. The details
621: of target geometry (thickness and shape) have not been taken into
622: account in our theoretical simulations.}
623: \end{figure}
624:
625: \begin{figure}[p!]
626: \begin{center}
627: \includegraphics[bb=51 51 550 680, width=0.99\textwidth]{provaxeal2.eps}
628: \caption{\label{figuraiso} Isotopic distributions of projectile-like
629: fragment production cross-sections (barn) for a 790 MeV/A
630: $^{129}\mathrm{Xe}$ beam hitting an Al target.
631: Each panel contains the results
632: for the isotopes of a different element. The results of the theoretical
633: simulations of about 10,000 $^{129}\mathrm{Xe}$ + $^{27}\mathrm{Al}$
634: reaction events made by QMD + FLUKA
635: are shown by open squares, while the experimental
636: data taken from~\citet{xe790} are shown by crosses.
637: The results obtained by a modified version of the fully relativistic code
638: RQMD2.4 + FLUKA are also superimposed on each plot (dotted lines).
639: }
640: \end{center}
641: \end{figure}
642:
643: \begin{figure}[p!]
644: \begin{center}
645: \includegraphics[bb=51 51 402 300, width=0.99\textwidth]{spettroZxeal.eps}
646: \caption{\label{spettroz} Charge fragment yield for the same
647: projectile-target combination considered in Fig.~\ref{figuraiso}. The
648: theoretical results predicted by QMD + FLUKA (filled squares) are
649: compared to those predicted by RQMD2.4 + FLUKA (asterisks).
650: }
651: \end{center}
652: \end{figure}
653:
654: \end{document}
655:
656: