1: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% file template.tex %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
2: %
3: % This is a template file for The European Physical Journal
4: %
5: % Copy it to a new file with a new name and use it as the basis
6: % for your article
7: %
8: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Springer-Verlag %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
9: %
10: \documentclass[epj]{svjour}
11: % Remove option referee for final version
12: %
13: % Remove any % below to load the required packages
14: %\usepackage{latexsym}
15: \usepackage{epsfig}
16: \usepackage{graphics}
17: \def\nA{nucleon-nucleus\ }
18: \def\pA{proton-nucleus\ }
19: \def\aA{$\alpha$-nucleus\ }
20: \def\AA{nucleus-nucleus\ }
21: \begin{document}
22: \title{Isovector deformation and its link to the neutron shell closure}
23: %\subtitle{Do you have a subtitle?\\ If so, write it here}
24: \author{Dao T. Khoa}
25: \institute{Institute for Nuclear Science {\rm \&} Technique, VAEC, P.O. Box
26: 5T-160, Nghia Do, Hanoi, Vietnam \\ \email{khoa@vaec.gov.vn}}
27: %
28: \date{Received: date / Revised version: date}
29: % The correct dates will be entered by Springer
30: %
31: \abstract{DWBA analysis of the inelastic $^{30-40}$S$(p,p')$ and
32: $^{18-22}$O$(p,p')$ scattering data measured in the inverse kinematics has been
33: performed to determine the isoscalar ($\delta_0$) and isovector ($\delta_1$)
34: deformation lengths of the 2$^+_1$ excitations in the Sulfur and Oxygen isotopes
35: using a compact folding approach. A systematic $N$-dependence of $\delta_0$ and
36: $\delta_1$ has been established which shows a link between $\delta_1$ and the
37: neutron-shell closure. Strong isovector deformations were found in several
38: cases, e.g., the 2$^+_1$ state in $^{20}$O where $\delta_1$ is nearly three
39: times larger than $\delta_0$. These results confirm the relation
40: $\delta_1>\delta_0$ anticipated from the core polarization by the valence
41: neutrons in the open-shell (neutron rich) nuclei. The effect of neutron shell
42: closure at $N=14$ or 16 has been discussed based on the folding model analysis
43: of the inelastic $^{22}$O+$p$ scattering data at 46.6 MeV/u measured recently at
44: GANIL.
45: %
46: \PACS{ 25.40.Ep, 21.10.Re, 24.10.Eq, 24.10.Ht}
47: % end of PACS codes
48: } %end of abstract
49: %
50: \maketitle
51: %
52: The neutron and proton contributions to the structure of the lowest 2$^+$
53: excited states are known to be quite different in the neutron-rich nuclei due,
54: in particular, to a strong polarization of the core by valence neutrons
55: \cite{Be83}. In the distorted-wave Born approximation (DWBA) for the inelastic
56: hadron scattering, the different neutron and proton contributions to the nuclear
57: excitation are explicitly determined by the isospin dependence of the inelastic
58: form factor (FF).
59:
60: In general, the isospin-dependent nucleon optical potential (OP) can be written
61: in terms of the isoscalar (IS) and isovector (IV) components \cite{La62} as
62: \begin{equation}
63: U(R)=U_0(R)\pm\varepsilon U_1(R), \ \varepsilon=(N-Z)/A, \label{e1}
64: \end{equation}
65: where the + sign pertains to incident neutron and - sign to incident proton.
66: While the strength of the Lane potential $U_1$ has been studied since a long
67: time \cite{La62} in the $(p,p)$ and $(n,n)$ elastic scattering and $(p,n)$
68: reaction studies, very few attempts were made to study the isospin dependence of
69: the inelastic FF. Within a collective-model prescription, the inelastic FF for
70: the \nA scattering is obtained by ``deforming" the OP (\ref{e1}) with scaling
71: factors $\delta$ known as the nuclear deformation lengths
72: \begin{equation}
73: F(R)=\delta\frac{dU(R)}{dR}=\delta_0\frac{dU_0(R)}{dR}\pm\varepsilon\
74: \delta_1\frac{dU_1(R)}{dR}. \label{e2}
75: \end{equation}
76: The explicit knowledge of the isoscalar ($\delta_0$) and, especially, isovector
77: ($\delta_1$) deformation lengths would give us vital information on the
78: structure of the nuclear excitation under study. There are only two types of
79: experiment that might allow one to determine the IV deformation length
80: $\delta_1$ based on the prescription (\ref{e2}):
81:
82: i) $(p,n)$ reaction leading to the \emph{excited} isobar analog state. It was
83: shown \cite{Fi79}, however, that the two-step mechanism usually dominates this
84: process and the calculated DWBA cross sections are not sensitive to $\delta_1$.
85:
86: ii) Another way is to extract $\delta_0$ and $\delta_1$ from the $(p,p')$ and
87: $(n,n')$ inelastic scattering measured at the same incident energy and exciting
88: the same target state \cite{Fi79,Gr80}. Such double measurements are presently
89: not feasible with the beams of unstable nuclei.
90:
91: We have recently suggested a compact folding method \cite{Kh03} to determine
92: $\delta_{0(1)}$ based on the DWBA analysis of the $(p,p')$ data only. In this
93: approach, instead of deforming the OP, we build up the proton and neutron
94: transition densities of a $2^{\lambda}$-pole excitation ($\lambda\ge 2$) by
95: using the Bohr-Mottelson prescription \cite{Bo75} separately for protons and
96: neutrons
97: \begin{equation}
98: \rho^\tau_\lambda(r)=-\delta_\tau\frac{d\rho^\tau_{\rm g.s.}(r)}{dr},\ {\rm with}
99: \ \tau=p,n. \label{e3}
100: \end{equation}
101: Here $\rho^\tau_{\rm g.s.}(r)$ are the proton and neutron ground-state (g.s.)
102: densities and $\delta_\tau$ are the corresponding deformation lengths. Given the
103: explicit proton and neutron transition densities, one can obtain from the
104: folding model \cite{Kh02} the inelastic \pA FF in terms of the IS and IV parts
105: as
106: \begin{equation}
107: F(R)=F_0(R)-\varepsilon F_1(R), \label{e4}
108: \end{equation}
109: where $F_0(R)$ and $F_1(R)$ are determined \cite{Kh02} from the sum
110: ($\rho^n_\lambda+\rho^p_\lambda$) and difference
111: ($\rho^n_\lambda-\rho^p_\lambda$) of the neutron and proton transition densities
112: (\ref{e3}), respectively. One can see that $F_1(R)$ is just the prototype of the
113: Lane potential in the inelastic nucleon scattering. It is natural to represent
114: the IS and IV parts of the nuclear transition density as
115: \begin{equation}
116: \rho^{0(1)}_{\lambda}(r)=\rho^n_{\lambda}(r)\pm\rho^p_{\lambda}(r).
117: \label{e5}
118: \end{equation}
119: On the other hand, $\rho^{0(1)}_{\lambda}(r)$ can be obtained using the same
120: Bohr-Mottelson method, by deforming the IS and IV parts of the g.s. density
121: \begin{equation}
122: \rho^{0(1)}_\lambda(r)=-\delta_{0(1)}\frac{d[\rho^n_{\rm g.s.}(r)\pm
123: \rho^p_{\rm g.s.}(r)]}{dr}.
124: \label{e6}
125: \end{equation}
126: It is straightforward to derive in this compact approach \cite{Kh03} a
127: consistent one-to-one correspondence between $\delta_{p(n)}$ and
128: $\delta_{0(1)}$, which can be used to determine $\delta_{0(1)}$ values from
129: $\delta_{p(n)}$ values given by the DWBA analysis. If one assumes that the
130: excitation is purely \emph{isoscalar} and the neutron and proton densities have
131: the same radial shape, scaled by the ratio $N/Z$, then
132: $\delta_n=\delta_p=\delta_0=\delta_1$. Therefore, any significant difference
133: between $\delta_0$ and $\delta_1$ would directly indicate a different isospin
134: distribution in the structure of the nuclear excitation under study.
135:
136: In the present work, we have studied the elastic and inelastic $^{30,32}$S+$p$
137: scattering data at 53 MeV/u \cite{El01} and $^{34,36,38,40}$S+$p$ data
138: \cite{Al85,Ho90,Ke97,Ma99} at energies of 28 to 39 MeV/u. The IS and IV
139: contributions of the inelastic FF were considered explicitly to find out a
140: systematic behavior of $\delta_1$ along the Sulfur isotopic chain, passing by
141: the magic number $N=20$. Then, the folding + DWBA analysis of the elastic and
142: inelastic $^{18,20}$O+$p$ data at 43 MeV/u \cite{El00} and $^{22}$O+$p$ data at
143: 46.6 MeV/u \cite{Be06} has been done to find out the $N$-dependence of
144: $\delta_1$ in the Oxygen case.
145:
146: To have the accurate ``distorted" waves for the DWBA calculation of inelastic
147: scattering, the optical model (OM) analysis of the elastic data was done using
148: the real folded potential \cite{Kh02} obtained with the density- and isospin
149: dependent CDM3Y6 interaction \cite{Kh97} and nuclear g.s. densities given by the
150: Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov (HFB) calculation \cite{Gr01}. The imaginary part of the
151: OP was taken in the Woods-Saxon (WS) form from the global systematics CH89
152: \cite{Va91}. All the considered elastic data were well reproduced (see
153: Figs.~\ref{f2} and \ref{f4}) with the depth of the WS imaginary potential
154: slightly adjusted by the OM fit (keeping the radius and diffuseness unchanged).
155: The experimental reduced electric transition rate $B(E2\uparrow)$ was used in
156: each case to fix $\delta_p$ value in the expression (\ref{e3}) for $\rho^p_2(r)$
157: which is further used in the folding calculation \cite{Kh03,Kh02}. As the only
158: parameter, $\delta_n$ was adjusted iteratively in the folding + DWBA calculation
159: to fit the measured inelastic cross section. Since the CDM3Y6 interaction is
160: real, the imaginary nuclear FF was obtained by deforming the imaginary part of
161: the OP with $\delta_0$ and $\delta_1$ values at each iteration step of the
162: folding + DWBA fit to the inelastic data. In each case, the final set of
163: deformation lengths $\delta_0$ and $\delta_1$ was fixed only after the best-fit
164: $\delta_n$ has been obtained.
165: \begin{figure}[ht]
166: \centering\vspace{-0.5cm}\mbox{\epsfig{file=DeltaS.ps,height=11.5cm}}
167: \vspace{-1cm}\caption{The measured $B(E2\uparrow)$ transition strength (upper
168: part), and the extracted isoscalar and isovector deformation lengths (lower
169: part) of 2$^+_1$ states in Sulfur isotopes. The lines are to guide the eye.}
170: \label{f1}
171: \end{figure}
172:
173: An earlier folding + DWBA analysis \cite{Kh02} of the same inelastic
174: $^{30-40}$S+$p$ scattering data, using inelastic FF given by the microscopic
175: transition densities obtained in the Quasiparticle Random Phase Approximation
176: (QRPA) \cite{El01}, has shown that the neutron and proton contributions to the
177: 2$^+_1$ excitation in $^{30,32,34}$S follow approximately the \emph{isoscalar}
178: rule \cite{Kh03} which implies $\delta_0\approx\delta_1$. The present folding
179: model analysis using the collective-model transition densities (\ref{e3}) has
180: shown about the same results (see $\delta_0$ and $\delta_1$ values extracted for
181: $^{30,32,34}$S in Fig.~\ref{f1}). With the neutron shell becomes closed at
182: $N=20$, a significant ``damping" of the neutron transition strength occurs and
183: suppresses strongly the IV deformation length $\delta_1$ of the 2$^+_1$ state of
184: $^{36}$S. In fact, $\delta_1$ is reaching its minimum as the neutron number $N$
185: approaches the magic number 20. The $N$-dependence of the IV deformation length
186: $\delta_1$ is well correlated with the $N$-dependence of the reduced transition
187: rate $B(E2\uparrow)$ which also reaches its minimum at $N=20$ (see
188: Fig.~\ref{f1}). The shell closure effect is so strong in this case that the
189: proton and neutron QRPA transition densities needed to be scaled down by a
190: factor of 0.63 and 0.88, respectively, for a correct description of the measured
191: 2$^+$ cross section in our earlier DWBA analysis \cite{Kh02} of the inelastic
192: $^{36}$S+$p$ scattering.
193: \begin{figure}[ht]
194: \centering\vspace{-0.5cm}\mbox{\epsfig{file=38S_sig.ps,height=11.5cm}}
195: \vspace{-1cm}\caption{Elastic and inelastic $^{38}$S+$p$ scattering data at 39
196: MeV/u \cite{Ke97} in comparison with the DWBA cross sections given by the folded
197: FF. The dashed curve is inelastic cross section obtained in the isoscalar limit
198: ($\delta_n=\delta_p=\delta_0=\delta_1$).} \label{f2}
199: \end{figure}
200: The contribution by the two valence neutrons in $^{38}$S to the 2$^+_1$
201: excitation is quite strong and $\delta_n$ turned out to be larger than
202: $\delta_p$ by around 30\% (see Fig.~\ref{f2}). This difference between the
203: proton and neutron transition strengths results on the IV deformation length
204: $\delta_1$ larger than $\delta_0$ by about 64\% (see Fig.~\ref{f1}). Note that
205: such a strong core polarization by the two valence neutrons in the $^{38}$S case
206: could not be fully accounted for by the QRPA calculation and the QRPA neutron
207: transition density has been scaled by a factor of 1.25 for a good agreement of
208: calculated DWBA cross section with the data \cite{Kh02}. Since the inelastic
209: $^{40}$S+$p$ scattering data at 30 MeV/u \cite{Ma99} consist of only two data
210: points with significant error bars, the extracted $\delta_{0(1)}$ values for
211: $^{40}$S might not be as reliable as those extracted for $^{30-38}$S. The new
212: measurement is, therefore, needed for an accurate estimate of the IV deformation
213: length of 2$^+_1$ state of $^{40}$S.
214:
215: The present analysis of the inelastic $^{18,20,22}$O+$p$ scattering data has
216: shown an interesting $N$-dependence of $\delta_1$. Except for the double-magic
217: ($N=Z$) $^{16}$O, where one has exact relation $\delta_0=\delta_1$, the results
218: obtained for $^{18}$O already indicate a rather strong IV deformation for the
219: 2$^+_1$ state of this nucleus (see Fig.~\ref{f3}). We recall that the IS and IV
220: deformation parameters of the 2$^+_1$ state of $^{18}$O have been determined
221: long ago by Grabmayr {\it et al.} \cite{Gr80} in a simultaneous DWBA analysis of
222: the $(p,p')$ and $(n,n')$ inelastic scattering data at 24 MeV using the
223: collective form factor (\ref{e2}). It is easy to deduce from the results of
224: Ref.~\cite{Gr80} the corresponding deformation lengths $\delta_0\approx 1.1$ and
225: $\delta_1\approx 2.6\pm 1.3$ fm for the 2$^+_1$ state of $^{18}$O. These values
226: agree reasonably with the results of our folding + DWBA analysis (see
227: Fig.~\ref{f3}) of the inelastic $^{18}$O+$p$ scattering data at 43 MeV/u
228: \cite{El00}. Note that the $\delta_1$ value extracted from our analysis has a
229: much smaller uncertainty compared to that deduced from the results of
230: Ref.~\cite{Gr80}. The error bars for $\delta_{0(1)}$ plotted in Figs.~\ref{f1}
231: and \ref{f3} were accumulated from the experimental uncertainties of the
232: measured $B(E2)$ values and $(p,p')$ cross section.
233: \begin{figure}[ht]
234: \centering\vspace{-0.5cm}\mbox{\epsfig{file=DeltaO.ps,height=11.5cm}}
235: \vspace{-1cm}\caption{The measured $B(E2\uparrow)$ transition strength (upper
236: part) and the extracted IS and IV deformation lengths (lower part) of 2$^+_1$
237: states in the Oxygen isotopes. The values for $^{24}$O are deduced from the QRPA
238: prediction by Khan {\it et al.} \cite{El02}. The lines are to guide the eye.}
239: \label{f3}
240: \end{figure}
241:
242: As already mentioned above, a double measurement of $(p,p')$ and $(n,n')$
243: inelastic scattering is not possible with unstable Oxygen isotopes, and our
244: folding method is the only alternative way to determine $\delta_1$. The present
245: analysis (with a more consistent treatment of the IV part of the imaginary FF)
246: has confirmed again the large IV deformation length of the 2$^+_1$ state of
247: $^{20}$O found earlier in Ref.~\cite{Kh03}. With the IV deformation about three
248: times the IS deformation (see Fig.~\ref{f3}), the contribution by the Lane form
249: factor $F_1$ to the 2$^+_1$ excitation of $^{20}$O amounts up to 40-50\% of the
250: total inelastic cross section \cite{Kh03}. If we consider $^{20}$O as consisting
251: of the $^{16}$O (or $^{18}$O) core and four (or two) valence neutrons, then a
252: large value of IV deformation length $\delta_1$ indicates a strong core
253: polarization by the valence neutrons in the 2$^+_1$ state of $^{20}$O.
254:
255: In such a ``core + valence neutrons" picture, it is natural to expect that the
256: 2$^+_1$ state of $^{22}$O should be more collective and have a larger IV
257: deformation length due to the contribution of two more valence neutrons.
258: However, the inelastic $^{22}$O+$p$ scattering data at 46.6 MeV/u measured
259: recently at GANIL \cite{Be06} show clearly the opposite effect, with the
260: $(p,p')$ cross section about 3 to 4 times smaller than that measured for the
261: $2^+_1$ state of $^{20}$O at 43 MeV \cite{El00} over a wide angular range. The
262: folding + DWBA analysis \cite{Be06} of these data using the QRPA transition
263: densities for the $2^+_1$ state of $^{22}$O has pointed to a much weaker neutron
264: transition strength compared to that of the $2^+_1$ state of $^{20}$O. Given a
265: significantly higher excitation energy of this state (1.5 MeV higher than that
266: of the $2^+_1$ state of $^{20}$O), the newly measured inelastic $^{22}$O+$p$
267: scattering data were suggested \cite{Be06} as an important evidence for the
268: neutron shell closure at $N=14$ or 16.
269: \begin{figure}[ht]
270: \centering\vspace{-0.5cm}\mbox{\epsfig{file=22O_sig.ps,height=11.5cm}}
271: \vspace{-1cm}\caption{The same as Fig.~\ref{f2} but for the elastic and
272: inelastic $^{22}$O+$p$ scattering data at 46.6 MeV/u \cite{Be06}.}
273: \label{f4}\end{figure}
274:
275: With the proton deformation length $\delta_p$ fixed by the adopted
276: $B(E2\uparrow)$ value for the $2^+_1$ state of $^{22}$O \cite{Ra01}, the present
277: analysis has given the \emph{upper limit} for the neutron deformation length as
278: $\delta_n\leq 1.2~\delta_p$ (see Fig.~\ref{f4}), which implies $\delta_1\leq
279: 1.1$ fm. As a result, the extracted $\delta_1$ value is just slightly larger
280: than $\delta_0$ and the $N$-dependence shown in Fig.~\ref{f4} indicates that
281: $\delta_1$ reaches its minimum at either $N=14$ or 16. Based on the results
282: obtained above for the Sulfur isotopes, we conclude that the deduced
283: $N$-dependence of $\delta_1$ for the $2^+_1$ states of Oxygen isotopes suggests
284: the neutron shell closure at either $N=14$ or 16. We note further that the
285: $B(E2\uparrow)$ value predicted by the QRPA calculation \cite{El02} for the
286: $2^+_1$ state of $^{24}$O is even smaller than that adopted for the $2^+_1$
287: state of $^{22}$O, a fact which could favor the shell closure at $N=16$. We have
288: also deduced $\delta_0$ and $\delta_1$ of the $2^+_1$ state of $^{24}$O from
289: these QRPA results and they are nearly the same as those deduced from the
290: $(p,p')$ data in $^{22}$O case. If we take into consideration 4 MeV gap between
291: the 2s$_{1/2}$ and 1d$_{3/2}$ subshells predicted recently by a consistent HFB
292: calculation \cite{Ob05}, then it is also likely that the neutron shell closure
293: occurs at $N=16$. In any case, more measurements for $^{24}$O are highly
294: desirable for a definitive conclusion on a new magic number $N=16$ in the
295: neutron rich nuclei.
296:
297: In summary, we have shown that the behavior of the dynamic isovector deformation
298: of the $2^+_1$ states in neutron rich nuclei is closely correlated with the
299: evolution of the valence neutron shell. This interesting result emphasizes again
300: the importance of $(p,p')$ reactions measured with unstable nuclei in the
301: inverse kinematics.
302:
303: \section*{Acknowledgement}
304: This research project has been supported, in part, by the Natural Science
305: Council of Vietnam, EU Asia-Link Program CN/Asia-Link/008 (94791) and Vietnam
306: Atomic Energy Commission (VAEC).
307: % Non-BibTeX users please use
308: \begin{thebibliography}{}
309: \bibitem{Be83} A.M. Bernstein, V.R. Brown, V.A. Madsen,
310: Comments Nucl. Part. Phys. {\bf 11}, 203 (1983).
311: \bibitem{La62} A.M. Lane, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 8}, 171 (1962).
312: \bibitem{Fi79} R.W. Finlay, J. Rapaport, V.R. Brown, V.A. Madsen,
313: J.R. Comfort, Phys. Lett. {\bf 84B}, 169 (1979).
314: \bibitem{Gr80} P. Grabmayr, J. Rapaport, R.W. Finlay, Nucl. Phys. A
315: {\bf 350}, 167 (1980).
316: \bibitem{Kh03} D.T. Khoa, Phys. Rev. C {\bf 68}, 011601(R) (2003).
317: \bibitem{Bo75} A. Bohr, B.R. Mottelson, {\it Nuclear Structure}
318: (Benjamin, New York, 1975), Vol.~2.
319: \bibitem{Kh02} D.T. Khoa, E. Khan, G. Col\`o, N. Van Giai,
320: Nucl. Phys. A {\bf 706}, 61 (2002).
321: \bibitem{El01} E. Khan {\it et al.}, Nucl. Phys. A {\bf 694}, 103 (2001).
322: \bibitem{Al85} R. Alarcon, J. Rapaport, R.T. Kovzes, W.H. Moore, B.A. Brown,
323: Phys. Rev. C {\bf 31}, 697 (1985).
324: \bibitem{Ho90} A. Hogenbirk, H.P. Blok, M.G.E. Brand, A.G.M. van Hees, J.F.A.
325: van Hienen, F.A. Jansen, Nucl. Phys. A {\bf 516}, 205 (1990).
326: \bibitem{Ke97} J.H. Kelley {\it et al.}, Phys. Rev. C {\bf 56}, R1206 (1997).
327: \bibitem{Ma99} F. Mar\'echal {\it et al.}, Phys. Rev. C {\bf 60}, 034615 (1999).
328: \bibitem{El00} E. Khan {\it et al.}, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 490}, 45 (2000).
329: \bibitem{Be06} E. Becheva {\it et al.}, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 96},
330: 012501 (2006).
331: \bibitem{Kh97} D.T. Khoa, G.R. Satchler, W. von Oertzen, Phys. Rev. C
332: {\bf 56}, 954 (1997).
333: \bibitem{Gr01} M. Grasso, N. Sandulescu, N. Van Giai, R.J. Liotta,
334: Phys. Rev. C {\bf 64}, 064321 (2001).
335: \bibitem{Va91} R.L. Varner, W.J. Thompson, T.L. McAbee, E.J. Ludwig,
336: T.B. Clegg, Phys. Rep. {\bf 201}, 57 (1991).
337: \bibitem{Ra01} S. Raman, C. W. Nestor, Jr., P. Tikkanen, At. Data and
338: Nucl. Data Tables {\bf 78}, 1 (2001).
339: \bibitem{El02} E. Khan, N. Sandulescu, M. Grasso, N. Van Giai,
340: Phys. Rev. C {\bf 66}, 024309 (2002).
341: \bibitem{Ob05} A. Obertelli, S. Peru, J.-P. Delaroche, A. Gillibert, M. Girod,
342: H. Goutte, Phys. Rev. C {\bf 71}, 024304 (2005).
343: \end{thebibliography}
344:
345:
346: \end{document}
347:
348: % end of file template.tex
349: