1: \documentclass[prc,twocolumn,superscriptaddress,showpacs,amssymb,amsmath,amsfonts,aps]{revtex4}
2: \setlength{\topmargin}{-1.0cm}
3: \usepackage{graphicx}
4: \usepackage{dcolumn}
5: \usepackage{epsfig}
6: \begin{document}
7: \title{Electroexcitation of the Roper resonance\footnotetext{Notice: Authored by
8: The Southeastern Universities Research Association, Inc. under U.S. DOE Contract
9: No. DE-AC05-84150. The U.S. Government retains a non-exclusive, paid-up, irrevocable,
10: world-wide license to publish or reproduce this manuscript for U.S. Government purposes.
11: }\\in relativistic quark models}
12:
13: \newcommand*{\JLAB }{ Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, Newport
14: News, Virginia 23606, USA}
15: \affiliation{\JLAB }
16:
17:
18: \newcommand*{\YEREVAN }{ Yerevan Physics Institute, 375036 Yerevan, Armenia}
19: \affiliation{\YEREVAN }
20:
21: \author{I.G.~Aznauryan}
22: \affiliation{\JLAB}\affiliation{\YEREVAN}
23:
24: \thispagestyle{empty}
25:
26: \begin{abstract}
27: {The amplitudes of the transition
28: $\gamma^* N\rightarrow P_{11}(1440)$ are calculated within
29: light-front relativistic quark model
30: assuming that the $P_{11}(1440)$
31: is the first radial excitation
32: of the $3q$ ground state.
33: The results are presented along with the predictions obtained in
34: other relativistic quark models.
35: In comparison with the previous calculations, we have extended
36: the range of $Q^2$ up to $4.5~GeV^2$
37: to cover
38: the kinematic interval of the forthcoming experimental data.
39: Using approach based on PCAC,
40: we have checked the relative sign between
41: quark model predictions for the $N$ and $P_{11}(1440)$ contributions
42: to the $\pi$ electroproduction found
43: in previous investigations.
44: }
45: \end{abstract}
46:
47: \pacs{12.39.Ki, 13.40.Gp, 13.40.Hq, 14.20.Gk }
48: \maketitle
49:
50:
51: \section{Introduction}
52: The amplitudes of the electroexcitation
53: of the Roper resonance on proton
54: are expected to be obtained from the CLAS
55: $\pi^+$ electroproduction data
56: at $1.7<Q^2<4.2~GeV^2$. There are already
57: results \cite{1} extracted from
58: the preliminary data \cite{2,3}, and the final results
59: will be available soon.
60: The results at $1.7<Q^2<4.2~GeV^2$
61: combined with the previous CLAS
62: data at $Q^2=0.4,~0.65~GeV^2$ \cite{4,5,6}
63: and with the information at $Q^2=0$ \cite{7} will
64: give us knowledge of
65: the $Q^2$ evolution of the $P_{11}(1440)$
66: electroexcitation
67: in wide $Q^2$ region. This information can be very important
68: for understanding of the nature of the Roper resonance
69: which has been the subject
70: of discussions since its
71: discovery \cite{8}, because the simplest and most natural
72: assumption that this is a first radial excitation
73: of the $3q$ ground state led to the difficulties
74: in the description of the mass of the resonance.
75:
76: To use the information
77: on the the electroexcitation
78: of the Roper resonance,
79: it is important to
80: understand
81: the quark model predictions for
82: the $Q^2$ evolution of the transition
83: $\gamma^* N\rightarrow P_{11}(1440)$.
84: It is known that
85: with increasing $Q^2$, when the momentum
86: transfer becomes larger than the masses of the constituent quarks,
87: a relativistic treatment of the electromagnetic excitations,
88: which is important already at $Q^2=0$,
89: becomes crucial.
90: The consistent way to realize the relativistic
91: treatment of the
92: $\gamma^* N \rightarrow N^*$ transitions
93: is to consider
94: them in the light-front (LF) dynamics \cite{9,10,11}.
95: Within this framework, one can set up an impulse approximation
96: and avoid difficulties caused by different
97: momenta of initial and final hadrons
98: in the $\gamma^* N \rightarrow N^*$ transition.
99:
100: For the
101: $P_{11}(1440)$, the LF calculations have been realized
102: in Refs. \cite{12,13,14,15,16}.
103: However,
104: quantitatively
105: the obtained results
106: differ from each other and there are inconsistencies
107: in the signs of the amplitudes
108: presented in Refs. \cite{12,13,14,15,16}.
109: In particular,
110: the relative sign between the $NN\pi$ and
111: $P_{11}(1440)N\pi$ amplitudes,
112: which is necessary for comparison of quark-model
113: predictions for the $\gamma^* N\rightarrow P_{11}(1440)$
114: amplitudes with experimental data, was found and taken
115: into account only
116: in Ref. \cite{13}, where
117: for this purpose
118: the ${}^3P_0$ model of Ref. \cite{17} was used.
119:
120: For this reason, we found it important
121: to perform calculations of the
122: $\gamma^* N\rightarrow P_{11}(1440)$ amplitudes
123: in the LF relativistic quark model, and also to check
124: the relative sign between the $NN\pi$ and
125: $P_{11}(1440)N\pi$ amplitudes,
126: using a different approach. We will present and discuss
127: the results of all relativistic quark models.
128: All results will be given within a unified
129: definition of the $\gamma^* N\rightarrow P_{11}(1440)$
130: helicity amplitudes.
131:
132: We will find the relative sign between the $NN\pi$ and
133: $P_{11}(1440)N\pi$ amplitudes
134: by using the hypothesis of
135: partially conserved axial-vector current (PCAC)
136: in the way used in Ref. \cite {18}
137: for the description of the $hadron\rightarrow hadron+\pi$
138: transitions. This method was previously used in Ref. \cite {19}
139: for evaluation of the relative signs between the $NN\pi$
140: and $N^*N\pi$ amplitudes for the resonances of the multiplet
141: $[70,1^-]$.
142: Using an approach based on PCAC
143: we have confirmed the sign obtained in Ref. \cite {13}.
144:
145:
146: In Sec. II we will
147: specify definitions
148: of the
149: $\gamma^* p\rightarrow P_{11}(1440)$
150: helicity amplitudes
151: in quark models and will give relations between
152: these amplitudes and the amplitudes extracted from
153: experimental data.
154: In Sec. III the formulas for the
155: $\gamma^* p\rightarrow P_{11}(1440)$ amplitudes
156: obtained
157: in the LF relativistic quark model of Ref. \cite {20}
158: will be given. The relative sign between the $NN\pi$ and
159: $P_{11}(1440)N\pi$ amplitudes
160: will be found in Sec. IV.
161: The results of numerical calculations
162: of the
163: $\gamma^* p\rightarrow P_{11}(1440)$ amplitudes
164: will be presented and discussed in Sec. V along with the
165: results obtained in Refs. \cite{12,13,14,15,16}.
166: Summary will be done in Sec. VI.
167:
168: \section{Definitions of the
169: $\gamma^* N\rightarrow P_{11}(1440)$ helicity amplitudes}
170: The relations between
171: the $\gamma^* p\rightarrow P_{11}(1440)$ helicity amplitudes
172: extracted from $\pi$ electroproduction data
173: and the $P_{11}(1440)$ contribution
174: to the
175: $\gamma^* p\rightarrow
176: \pi N$ multipole amplitudes
177: have the following form
178: \cite{21,22}:
179: \begin{eqnarray}
180: &&A_{1/2}=aImM^R_{1-}(W=M),\\
181: &&S_{1/2}=-\frac{a}{\sqrt{2}}ImS^R_{1-}(W=M),\\
182: &&a=
183: \sqrt{2\pi\frac{q_{\pi}}{K}\frac{M}{m}
184: \frac{\Gamma}{\beta_{\pi N}}}/C,\\
185: &&C=-\sqrt{\frac{1}{3}}~~for~~\gamma^* p\rightarrow p\pi^0,\\
186: &&C=-\sqrt{\frac{2}{3}}~~for~~\gamma^* p\rightarrow n\pi^+.
187: \end{eqnarray}
188: Here $\Gamma$ and $M$ are the total width and mass of the
189: resonance, $\beta_{\pi N}$ is its branching ratio
190: to $\pi N$ channel,
191: $m$ is the mass of the
192: nucleon, $K\equiv (M^2-m^2)/2M$, $q_{\pi}$ is the center of mass
193: momentum
194: of the pion at the resonance position.
195:
196: The helicity amplitudes defined through Eqs. (1-5)
197: include the relative sign between $g_{NN\pi}$ and
198: $g_{RN\pi}$ coupling constants that determine the relative
199: contributions of
200: the Born term and the $P_{11}(1440)$
201: to the reaction $\gamma^* N\rightarrow\pi N$.
202:
203: In Refs. \cite{12,14,15,16} and in this work,
204: the quark model predictions for the transition
205: $\gamma^* N\rightarrow P_{11}(1440)$ are found in terms
206: of form factors that enter
207: the matrix element of the transition current.
208: Following Ref. \cite{12}, we define this matrix element in
209: the following form:
210: \begin{eqnarray}
211: &&<N^*|J_{\mu}|N>=e\bar{u}(P^*)\Gamma_{\mu}u(P),\\
212: &&\Gamma_{\mu}=
213: \left(q^2\gamma_{\mu}-(q\gamma)q_{\mu}
214: \right)F^*_1(Q^2)
215: +i\sigma_{\mu\nu}q^{\nu}F^*_2(Q^2).
216: \end{eqnarray}
217:
218: Helicity amplitudes of the $\gamma^* p\rightarrow P_{11}(1440)$
219: transition are related to
220: the form factors $F^*_{1p}(Q^2)$ and $F^*_{2p}(Q^2)$
221: by:
222: \begin{eqnarray}
223: &A^q_{1/2}=c\left[-Q^2F^*_{1p}(Q^2)+(M+m)F^*_{2p}(Q^2)\right] , \\
224: &S^q_{1/2}=-c\frac{q^{*}_{cms}}{\sqrt{2}}
225: \left[(M+m)F^*_{1p}(Q^2)+F^*_{2p}(Q^2)\right],\\
226: &c=\sqrt{\pi\alpha\frac{Q^2+(M-m)^2}{MmK}},\nonumber
227: \end{eqnarray}
228: where $\alpha=e^2/4\pi=1/137$.
229:
230: The expressions for the helicity amplitudes
231: $A^q_{1/2},~S^q_{1/2}$ in Refs. \cite{14,15,16}
232: coincide with Eqs. (8,9).
233: In Ref. \cite{12}, the formulas for both
234: amplitudes contain inaccuracies in the coefficients
235: that we have corrected in the results from that work
236: presented below.
237:
238: In quark model calculations another definition of
239: the $\gamma^* N\rightarrow P_{11}(1440)$
240: helicity amplitudes
241: through the $\gamma^* N\rightarrow N^{*}$
242: transition current matrix elements
243: also is used \cite{12,13,23}:
244: \begin{eqnarray}
245: &&A^q_{1/2}=b
246: <N^{*+},S_z^*=\frac{1}{2}|J\epsilon|p,S_z=-\frac{1}{2}>,\\
247: &&S^q_{1/2}=b
248: \frac{q^*_{cms}}{Q}
249: <N^{*+},S_z^*=\frac{1}{2}|J\epsilon|p,S_z=\frac{1}{2}>,\\
250: &&b=\left[\frac{2\pi
251: \alpha}{K}\right]^{1/2} \nonumber.
252: \end{eqnarray}
253: Here it is supposed that the virtual photon moves
254: along the z-axis in the $N^*$ rest frame and its 3-momentum is
255: $q^*_{cms}$, $P^*=P+q$, $Q^2\equiv -q^2$.
256:
257: The helicity amplitudes $A^q_{1/2},~S^q_{1/2}$
258: found in different works can not be directly compared
259: with each other and with amplitudes extracted from
260: experimental data for the following reasons:
261:
262: (i) The signs of the amplitudes $A^q_{1/2},~S^q_{1/2}$
263: in quark models depend on the sign
264: of the $P_{11}(1440)$ wave function,
265: which is different in different works.
266: Let us define
267: the $P_{11}(1440)$ wave function
268: in the nonrelativistic approximation in the form:
269: \begin{equation}
270: \Psi_R \sim \zeta (\sum {\bf{k}}_i^2
271: -\alpha^2)\Psi_N,
272: \end{equation}
273: where ${\bf{k}}_i~(i=1,2,3)$ are the
274: quark
275: three-momenta in the center-of-mass system and $\alpha$ is
276: the parameter
277: that depends on interquark forces.
278: With this definition,
279: the wave functions of Refs. \cite{12,14,15,16}
280: and Ref. \cite{13} correspond
281: to $\zeta=+$ and $-$, respectively.
282: Our definition of
283: the sign of the $P_{11}(1440)$ wave function used below
284: coincides with that
285: in Ref. \cite{13}.
286:
287: (ii) The amplitudes $A^q_{1/2}$, $S^q_{1/2}$
288: found in quark models through relations (8-11)
289: are related to the amplitudes $A_{1/2}$, $S_{1/2}$
290: extracted from experimental data using definitions (1-5)
291: in the following way
292: \begin{equation}
293: A_{1/2}=-\xi_RA^q_{1/2},~ S_{1/2}=-\xi_RS^q_{1/2}.
294: \end{equation}
295: Here $\xi_R$ is
296: the relative sign between $g_{NN\pi}$ and
297: $g_{RN\pi}$ coupling constants, which also depends on $\zeta$.
298: The sign $\zeta$
299: drops out from the amplitudes $A_{1/2}$, $S_{1/2}$,
300: therefore, these amplitudes do not depend on
301: the sign of the $P_{11}(1440)$ wave function.
302:
303: In the previous investigations, the sign $\xi_R$
304: has been found and taken into account only in Ref. \cite{13},
305: where it was obtained
306: that $\xi_R=-\zeta$.
307: We have obtained the same sign in this work using a different
308: approach.
309:
310: In Refs. \cite{12,14,15,16}, only the results for the
311: amplitudes $A^q_{1/2}$, $S^q_{1/2}$ are given.
312: Corresponding results
313: for the amplitudes $A_{1/2}$, $S_{1/2}$
314: we will present using the sign $\xi_R$
315: found in this work and in Ref. \cite{13}.
316:
317: \section{The
318: $\gamma^* p\rightarrow P_{11}(1440)$ amplitudes in the
319: relativistic quark model}
320:
321: The calculations of the
322: $\gamma^* N\rightarrow P_{11}(1440)$ amplitudes
323: we have performed
324: in the relativistic quark model of Ref. \cite{20},
325: constructed for radiative transitions
326: of hadrons in the infinite momentum frame (IMF),
327: where
328: \begin{eqnarray}
329: && \mathbf{P}\parallel z,~~P\rightarrow \infty, \\
330: && q=\left(\mathbf{q}_{\perp}, -\frac {M^2-m^2-\mathbf{q}^2_{\perp}}{4P},
331: \frac {M^2-m^2-\mathbf{q}^2_{\perp}}{4P}\right). \nonumber
332: \end{eqnarray}
333: Here $P$ is the momentum of the initial hadron and $q$ is
334: the photon momentum, $Q^2=\mathbf{q}_{\perp}^2$.
335: Such approach is analogous to the
336: LF calculations \cite{9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16}.
337: The derivation of the formulas for the transition
338: $\gamma^* N(\frac{1}{2}^+)\rightarrow N(\frac{1}{2}^+)$
339: are presented in detail in Ref. \cite{24},
340: where the model
341: of Ref. \cite{20} was used for investigation of the $Q^2$
342: evolution of the nucleon
343: form factors. Here we will give
344: final expressions for the form factors $F^*_{1p}(Q^2)$,
345: $F^*_{2p}(Q^2)$ that follow from the results
346: of Ref. \cite{24}:
347: \begin{eqnarray}
348: &&Q^2F^*_{1p}(Q^2)=\int {\cal
349: F}_{1p}\Phi_N(M^2_0)\Phi_R(M'^2_0)d\Gamma,\\
350: &&QF^*_{2p}(Q^2)=\int {\cal F}_{2p}\Phi_N(M^2_0)\Phi_R(M'^2_0)d\Gamma,
351: \end{eqnarray}
352: where $\Phi_N(M^2_0)$ and $\Phi_R(M'^2_0)$ are radial parts
353: of the nucleon and $P_{11}(1440)$ wave functions,
354: $M_0$ and $M'_0$ are invariant masses of quarks in the
355: initial and final hadrons.
356:
357: Let us parametrize quark momenta in the initial
358: and final hadrons by:
359: \begin{equation}
360: \mathbf{p}_i=x_i\mathbf{P}+\mathbf{k}_{i\perp},~~
361: \mathbf{p}'_i=x_i\mathbf{P}'+\mathbf{k}'_{i\perp},
362: \end{equation}
363: where $i=a,b,c$ denotes the quarks in the hadrons,
364: and we will suppose that the current interacts
365: with the quark $a$. It is convenient to
366: parametrize the variables $x_i,\mathbf{k}_{i\perp}$
367: and $\mathbf{k}'_{i\perp}$ in the following way:
368: \begin{eqnarray}
369: &&\mathbf{k}_{i\perp}=\mathbf{K}_{i\perp}-\frac{1}{2}y_iQ,
370: ~~\mathbf{k}'_{i\perp}=\mathbf{K}_{i\perp}+\frac{1}{2}y_iQ,\\ \nonumber
371: &&x_a=1-\eta,~~y_a=x_a-1,~~\mathbf{K}_{a\perp}=-\mathbf{K}_{\perp},\\\nonumber
372: &&x_b=(1-\xi)\eta,~y_b=x_b,~
373: \mathbf{K}_{b\perp}=-\mathbf{k}_{\perp}+(1-\xi)\mathbf{K}_{\perp},\\ \nonumber
374: &&x_c=\xi\eta,~~y_c=x_c,~~
375: \mathbf{K}_{c\perp}=\mathbf{k}_{\perp}+\xi\mathbf{K}_{\perp}. \nonumber
376: \end{eqnarray}
377: In terms of the variables
378: $\mathbf{k}_{\perp},\mathbf{K}_{\perp},\xi,\eta$
379: the phase space volume has the form
380: \begin{equation}
381: 4(2\pi)^6d\Gamma=\frac
382: {d\mathbf{k}_{\perp}d\mathbf{K}_{\perp}d\xi d\eta}
383: {\xi(1-\xi)\eta(1-\eta)},
384: \end{equation}
385: the invariant masses of quarks are equal to
386: \begin{eqnarray}
387: &&M_0^2(M'^2_0)=\frac{\mathbf{K}_{\perp}^2+m_q^2\eta}{\eta(1-\eta)}
388: +\frac{\mathbf{k}_{\perp}^2+m_q^2}{\eta\xi(1-\xi)}\\
389: &&+\frac{\eta Q^2}{4(1-\eta)}\mp\frac{K_x Q}{1-\eta},\nonumber
390: \end{eqnarray}
391: and the functions ${\cal F}_{1p},~{\cal F}_{2p}$
392: in Eqs. (15) and (16) have the form
393: \begin{eqnarray}
394: &&{\cal F}_{1p}=\frac{R^a_{++}(R^b_{++}R^c_{--}-R^b_{+-}R^c_{-+})}
395: {D_aD_bD_c},\\
396: &&{\cal F}_{2p}=\frac{R^a_{-+}(R^b_{-+}R^c_{+-}-R^b_{--}R^c_{++})}
397: {D_aD_bD_c},
398: \end{eqnarray}
399: where
400: \begin{eqnarray}
401: &&R^i_{\pm \pm}=m_i m'_i+\mathbf{K}^2_{i\perp}-
402: \frac{1}{4}y_i^2Q^2\pm iy_iQK_{iy},\\
403: &&R^i_{\pm \mp}=\mp \frac{1}{2}y_i(m_i+m'_i)Q\\ \nonumber
404: &&~~~~~~~~+x_i(M_0-M'_0)(iK_{iy}\mp K_{ix}),\\
405: && m_i=m_q+M_0 x_i,~~m'_i=m_q+M'_0 x_i,\\
406: &&
407: D_i=[(m_i^2+\mathbf{k}^2_{i\perp})(m_i^2+\mathbf{k}'^2_{i\perp})]^{1/2},
408: \end{eqnarray}
409: $m_q$ is the quark mass,
410: $i=a,b,c$.
411:
412: Under the assumption
413: that $P_{11}(1440)$ is a radial excitation of the
414: nucleon considered as the $3q$
415: ground state, we have defined $\Phi_R(M^2_0)$
416: in the form:
417: \begin{equation}
418: \Phi_R(M^2_0)=N(\beta^2-M_0^2)\Phi_N(M^2_0).
419: \end{equation}
420: The parameters $N$ and $\beta$ are determined by the conditions:
421: \begin{equation}
422: \int \Phi_R(M^2_0)\Phi_N(M^2_0)d\Gamma=0,~~\int
423: \Phi^2_{N(R)}(M^2_0)d\Gamma=1.
424: \end{equation}
425:
426: As in Refs. \cite{20,24}, we will take
427: the radial part of the nucleon wave function
428: in the Gaussian form:
429: $\Phi_N(M_0^2)\sim exp(-M_0^2/6\alpha_{HO}^2)$.
430: The only parameters of the approach, the quark mass
431: ($m_q=0.22~GeV$) and
432: the harmonic-oscillator parameter ($\alpha_{HO}=0.38~GeV$),
433: were found in Ref. \cite{20} from the description
434: of the static properties of the nucleon.
435:
436:
437:
438: \section{The relative sign between the $NN\pi$ and
439: $P_{11}(1440)N\pi$ amplitudes}
440:
441: In order to find the relative sign between the $NN\pi$ and
442: $P_{11}(1440)N\pi$ amplitudes, we
443: utilize PCAC
444: in the way used in Ref. \cite {18}
445: for the description of the $hadron\rightarrow hadron+\pi$
446: transitions.
447: PCAC relates the divergence of the charged axial-vector
448: current to the pion field:
449: \begin{equation}
450: \partial_
451: {\lambda}(J^{a\lambda}_1+iJ^{a,\lambda}_2)=
452: m^2_{\pi}f_{\pi}\phi_{\pi^-},
453: \end{equation}
454: where $f_{\pi}=132~MeV$ is the $\pi\rightarrow \mu\nu$
455: coupling constant.
456:
457: In IMF (14),
458: the matrix element of Eq. (29)
459: between two
460: spin $\frac{1}{2}$ particles with momenta $P_1$ and $P_2$
461: at $\mathbf{q}_{\perp}=0$
462: gives:
463: \begin{equation}
464: f_{\pi}g(N_1N_2\pi)=
465: g^{12}_A\frac{m_1+m_2}{\sqrt{2}},
466: \end{equation}
467: where
468: \begin{equation}
469: g^{12}_A=\frac{1}{2P}
470: <P_2,S_z=\frac{1}{2}|J^{a,0}_{1+i2}|
471: P_1,S_z=\frac{1}{2}>|_{P\rightarrow \infty}
472: \end{equation}
473: and $g(N_1N_2\pi)$ is the coupling constant
474: in the $N_1N_2\pi$ vertex:
475: \begin{equation}
476: {\cal L}_{N_1N_2\pi}=ig(N_1N_2\pi)\bar{\psi_2}\gamma_5
477: {\vec{\tau}}\psi_1{\vec{\phi}}.
478: \end{equation}
479: According to the results of Ref. \cite{20},
480: we have:
481: \begin{eqnarray}
482: &g^{12}_A=\frac{5}{3}\int
483: \frac{(m_q+M_0x_a)^2-\mathbf{K}^2_{\perp}}
484: {(m_q+M_0x_a)^2+\mathbf{K}^2_{\perp}}
485: \Phi_1(M^2_0)\Phi_2(M^2_0)d\Gamma.
486: \end{eqnarray}
487: Using Eqs. (30) and (33) one can find the relative sign
488: between the $NN\pi$ and
489: $P_{11}(1440)N\pi$ coupling constants: $\xi_{R}$.
490: In the limit when $\alpha_{HO}\ll m_q$,
491: the ratio of the coupling constants (31)
492: for the $P_{11}(1440)N$ and $NN$ transitions
493: that follows from Eq. (33) can be found
494: in analytical form and is equal to:
495: \begin{equation}
496: \frac{g_A^{RN}}{g_A^{NN}}=-\zeta\frac{\alpha^2_{HO}}{3\sqrt{6}m_q^2}.
497: \end{equation}
498: We have also calculated the ratio (34) numerically
499: for the values of the quark mass in the range $0<m_q<m/3$
500: and
501: in the wide range of the harmonic oscillator
502: parameter which includes the values of
503: $\alpha_{HO}$
504: from Refs. \cite{12,13,20}.
505: For all these values of $m_q$ and $\alpha_{HO}$,
506: we have found the same sign as in Eq. (34).
507: So, using approach based on PCAC we have obtained
508: that the relative
509: sign between $NN\pi$ and $P_{11}(1440)N\pi$
510: coupling constants is equal to $\xi_{R}=-\zeta$.
511: The same sign was obtained in Ref. \cite{13}
512: using ${}^3P_0$ model.
513: \section{Results}
514: Our results for the $\gamma^* p \rightarrow P_{11}(1440)$
515: helicity amplitudes are presented in Fig. 1 along with the results
516: obtained in Refs. \cite{12,13,14,15,16}
517: and with experimental data.
518: The thick lines correspond to the results obtained
519: in the LF formalism
520: using the $\it {plus}$ component of the electromagnetic
521: current $J^+\equiv J^0+J^3$ in the frame where
522: $q^+\equiv q^0+q^3=0$. These results are more favorable,
523: because in this case the contributions of
524: virtual $q\bar{q}$ pairs are eliminated, and the processes
525: $\gamma^* N\rightarrow N^*$ are determined only
526: by the $N(N^*)\rightarrow 3q$ vertices
527: (Refs. \cite{9,10,11,20,25}).
528: Therefore, the matrix elements
529: of $J^+$ in the frame $q^+=0$ can be presented in analogy
530: with the nonrelativistic case through a sum of one-body
531: currents for constituent quarks.
532: Let us stress that in such approach when we
533: evaluate electromagnetic form factors by utilizing only
534: $\it {plus}$ component of the electromagnetic
535: current, it is supposed that other components
536: have proper behavior in order to fulfill
537: the current conservation.
538:
539: The thin dash-dotted lines are the results of Ref. \cite{15}
540: obtained in the LF formalism; however, in this investigation
541: transverse component of the electromagnetic current,
542: which can contain contributions of virtual $q\bar{q}$ pairs,
543: is also used.
544:
545: The thin solid and dashed lines correspond to the results
546: of Ref. \cite{16} obtained in the relativistic quark models
547: with instant-form and point-form kinematics.
548:
549:
550: The results of all quark models presented in Fig. 1
551: correspond to the sign $\xi_{R}$
552: found in this work and in Ref. \cite{13}.
553:
554: It is important to note that in all approaches
555: \cite{12,13,14,15,16} and in the approach
556: used in this work, a good description of elastic
557: nucleon form factors has been obtained.
558: Within the approach of this work,
559: the proton and neutron electromagnetic form factors
560: and the nucleon axial-vector form factor
561: were described up to $Q^2=4~GeV^2$ \cite{24}.
562: The predictions obtained in Ref. \cite{24} are also in reasonable
563: agreement
564: with the experimental data obtained later, for example,
565: with the data from Refs. \cite{26,27}.
566: A good description of
567: nucleon form factors up to $Q^2=4~GeV^2$ was obtained
568: also in Ref. \cite{13}.
569: In the approaches of Refs. \cite{14,15,16}
570: the available data on nucleon form factors were described
571: up to $Q^2=10~GeV^2$. The approach of Ref. \cite{12}
572: describes these form factors in more narrow
573: region of $Q^2$: $Q^2<1.5~GeV^2$.
574:
575:
576: In this work and in Refs. \cite{12,13,16},
577: a simple algebraic form for the radial part of the $3q$ ground
578: state wave function is used. In our approach
579: and in Refs. \cite{12,13},
580: this is a Gaussian form with one parameter:
581: the harmonic-oscillator parameter. In
582: Ref. \cite{16}, the radial part of the ground
583: state wave function has powerlike form with two parameters.
584: The parameters of all these approaches, except Ref. \cite{13},
585: were found from the description of elastic nucleon
586: form factors in the ranges of $Q^2$ discussed above.
587: In Ref. \cite{13}, the harmonic-oscillator parameter
588: was taken from Ref. \cite{28}, were it was found from the description
589: of baryon masses in the nonrelativistic approximation.
590: This parameter is very close to that used in this
591: work and found in Refs. \cite{20,24} from the description
592: of the nucleon elastic form factors.
593:
594: In contrast with the approaches used in this work and in Refs.
595: \cite{12,13,16}, the wave functions of Refs. \cite{14,15}
596: were found from the solution of the
597: equation for the light-front mass operator with
598: the one-gluon exchange between quarks taken in the form
599: used in the relativized quark model of Ref. \cite{29}.
600: However, it turned out that for the description
601: of the nucleon form factors with the nucleon wave function
602: found in this way, a significant deviation
603: from the pointlike constituent quarks should be introduced.
604: Let us emphasize that in Refs. \cite{12,13,16,24}, the
605: nucleon form factors were described
606: with pointlike constituent quarks.
607: Another difference with the wave functions used
608: in this work and in Refs. \cite{12,13,16} is the presence
609: of the configuration mixings in the $N$ and $P_{11}(1440)$
610: wave functions that arise from the
611: one-gluon exchange between quarks.
612:
613: The values of the quark mass
614: used in this work
615: and in Refs.
616: \cite{13,14,15,16} are close to
617: the light-quark mass obtained from
618: the description of baryon masses in Ref. \cite{29}.
619:
620: From Fig. 1, it can be seen that
621: although all approaches under consideration
622: give good description
623: of nucleon form factors,
624: the predictions for the
625: $\gamma^* p \rightarrow P_{11}(1440)$ helicity amplitudes
626: are different. As it was mentioned above,
627: we consider as more preferable the predictions obtained in
628: the LF approaches based on the utilization
629: of the $\it{plus}$ component of the electromagnetic current.
630: These approaches
631: are close to each other,
632: and the differences in their predictions
633: are caused mainly by the
634: differences
635: in the N and $P_{11}(1440)$ wave functions.
636: In spite of the differences,
637: the predictions obtained in the LF approaches
638: have common features that are in agreement
639: with existing experimental data:
640: \begin{itemize}
641: \item The sign of the transverse amplitude
642: $A_{1/2}$ at $Q^2=0$
643: is negative.
644: \item The sign
645: of the longitudinal
646: amplitude $S_{1/2}$ at small $Q^2$ is positive.
647: \item All LF approaches predict the change of the sign
648: of $A_{1/2}$ at small $Q^2$. The existing experimental data
649: show a tendency that is in agreement with such sign change.
650: The confirmation of this prediction
651: by forthcoming experimental data will be important
652: for understanding of the nature of the $P_{11}(1440)$
653: resonance.
654: \end{itemize}
655: These predictions are obtained
656: assuming that the $N$ and the $P_{11}(1440)$
657: resonance are the $3q$ ground state
658: and the first radial excitation
659: of the $3q$ ground state, respectively. The admixtures of other
660: configuration states in the $N$ and $P_{11}(1440)$
661: taken into account
662: in Refs. \cite{14,15} do not affect these results.
663:
664: \begin{figure*}[tb]
665: \begin{center}
666: \epsfig{file=p11.eps,width=12cm}
667: \end{center}
668: \caption{Helicity amplitudes
669: for the $\gamma^* p \rightarrow P_{11}(1440)$ transition
670: (in $10^{-3}~GeV^{-1/2}$ units).
671: Thick solid lines are the results obtained in this work.
672: Thick dashed, dash-dotted and
673: long-dashed lines
674: correspond to the LF
675: relativistic quark models
676: of Refs. \cite{13,14,16}, respectively.
677: Thick dotted lines correspond to the results of Ref. \cite{12}
678: corrected according to the discussion in Sec. II.
679: Thin dash-dotted lines are the results of Ref. \cite{15}.
680: Thin solid and dashed lines correspond to
681: the results of relativistic quark models
682: with instant-form and point-form kinematics of Ref. \cite{16}.
683: Full boxes and circles are the results obtained
684: in the analysis of $\pi$ electroproduction data in Ref. \cite{4}
685: and in the combined analysis of $\pi$ and $2\pi$
686: electroproduction data in Ref. \cite{5}, respectively.
687: Full triangle at $Q^2=0$ is the
688: PDG estimate \cite{7}.}
689: \label{fig:fig1}
690: \end{figure*}
691: \section{Summary}
692: In this work we have calculated the
693: $\gamma^* p\rightarrow P_{11}(1440)$ transition amplitudes in the
694: LF relativistic quark model in the range of $Q^2$:
695: $0\leq Q^2 \leq 4.5~GeV^2$.
696:
697: We have also calculated the relative sign
698: between $g_{NN\pi}$ and $g_{RN\pi}$ coupling constants
699: which is necessary for comparison
700: of quark-model predictions for the
701: $\gamma^* p\rightarrow P_{11}(1440)$ amplitudes
702: with those extracted from experimental data.
703: The relative sign between the $NN\pi$ and
704: $P_{11}(1440)N\pi$ vertices was found
705: by relating these vertices to
706: the matrix elements of the axial-vector current
707: using PCAC.
708: The obtained sign is in agreement with the sign
709: found in Ref. \cite{13} using different approach,
710: namely, the ${}^3P_0$ model of Ref. \cite{17}.
711:
712: The obtained $P_{11}(1440)$ electroexcitation
713: helicity amplitudes are presented along with the
714: results found in relativistic quark
715: models of Refs. \cite{12,13,14,15,16}.
716: All results are given
717: using the sign $\xi_R$ found in this work
718: and in Ref. \cite{13}.
719:
720: All approaches under consideration
721: give good description
722: of nucleon form factors; however
723: the predictions for the
724: $\gamma^* p \rightarrow P_{11}(1440)$ helicity amplitudes
725: are different.
726:
727: In Fig. 1, the thick lines present the results
728: obtained in the LF approaches using the
729: $\it {plus}$ component of the electromagnetic
730: current, which we consider as more favorable.
731: These approaches
732: are close to each other, and the differences
733: in their predictions
734: are caused mainly by the differences
735: in the $N$ and $P_{11}(1440)$ wave functions.
736: Nevertheless,
737: there are several features which are common
738: for the predictions
739: of all LF approaches.
740: One of the features is the nontrivial
741: behavior of the transverse amplitude $A_{1/2}$
742: connected with the change of the sign
743: of $A_{1/2}$ with increasing $Q^2$.
744: The existing experimental data cover a
745: very limited region of small $Q^2$ up to $0.65~GeV^2$ and
746: have a tendency that is in agreement with such behavior.
747: The confirmation of this prediction
748: by forthcoming experimental data
749: will be very important
750: for understanding of the nature of the $P_{11}(1440)$
751: resonance.
752:
753: All approaches fail to describe the value
754: of the transverse amplitude $A_{1/2}$ at $Q^2=0$.
755: This can be an indication
756: on the large pion cloud contribution
757: to the $\gamma^* N \rightarrow P_{11}(1440)$ transition
758: that is expected to be significant
759: at small $Q^2$.
760: When the final data on the helicity amplitudes at
761: $1.7<Q^2<4.2~GeV^2$ will become available, complete
762: simultaneous description of the nucleon form factors
763: and the $\gamma^* N \rightarrow P_{11}(1440)$ amplitudes
764: will be necessary. Such research will be important
765: to find the size of the pion cloud contribution,
766: to specify the form of the $N$ and $P_{11}(1440)$ wave functions,
767: including the configuration mixings in these
768: states, to understand the role of
769: the quark form factors and anomalous magnetic moments,
770: as well the role of other
771: effects, for instance, the quark mass
772: dependence
773: on the quark virtualities and therefore on $Q^2$.
774:
775:
776: \section{Acknowledgments}
777: I am grateful to the participants of the JLab Theory Group seminar
778: for interest to this problem that stimulated this work,
779: and to V.Burkert, H.Lee, A.Thomas for encouraging interest.
780: I am thankful to B.Julia-Diaz and
781: S.Stepanyan for their help in numerical calculations,
782: to T.Sato for discussions of the definitions of
783: the $\gamma^* N \rightarrow P_{11}(1440)$ helicity amplitudes,
784: to H.Matevosyan for discussion of the problems
785: related to the pion cloud contribution,
786: and to M.Paris for valuable remarks while reading
787: the draft of this article.
788: \begin{thebibliography}{999}
789:
790: \bibitem{1} I. G. Aznauryan,
791: Proceedings of the Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons,
792: NSTAR 2005, Tallahassee, October 12-15
793: (World Scientific, Singapore, 2006), p.265.
794:
795: \bibitem{2} K. Park,
796: Proceedings of the Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons,
797: NSTAR 2005, Tallahassee, October 12-15,
798: (World Scientific, Singapore, 2006), p.281.
799:
800: \bibitem{3} K. Park, V. Burkert et al.,
801: CLAS Collaboration, to be submitted to Phys.Rev.C.
802:
803: \bibitem{4} I. G. Aznauryan, V. D. Burkert, H. Egiyan
804: et al., Phys. Rev. $\bf{C71}$, 015201 (2005).
805:
806: \bibitem{5} I. G. Aznauryan, V. D. Burkert
807: et al., Phys. Rev. $\bf{C72}$, 045201 (2005).
808:
809: \bibitem{6} H. Egiyan, I. G. Aznauryan, V. D. Burkert
810: et al., Phys. Rev. $\bf{C73}$, 025204 (2006).
811:
812: \bibitem{7} Review of Particle Physics, S. Eidelman et al.,
813: Phys. Lett. $\bf{B 592}$, 1 (2004).
814:
815: \bibitem{8} L. Roper, Phys. Rev. Lett.
816: $\bf 12$, 340 (1964).
817:
818: \bibitem{9} S. D. Drell and T. M. Yan, Phys. Rev. Lett.
819: $\bf 24$, 181 (1970).
820:
821:
822: \bibitem{10} V. B. Berestetskii and M. V. Terent'ev,
823: Sov. J. Nucl. Phys., $\bf 24$, 1044 (1976);
824: $\bf 25$, 347 (1977).
825:
826: \bibitem{11} S. J. Brodsky and S. D. Drell, Phys. Rev.
827: $\bf D22$, 2236 (1980).
828:
829:
830: \bibitem{12} H. J. Weber, Phys. Rev.
831: $\bf C41$, 2783 (1990).
832:
833: \bibitem{13} S. Capstick and B. D. Keister, Phys. Rev.
834: $\bf D51$, 3598 (1995).
835:
836: \bibitem{14} F. Cardarelli, E. Pace, G. Salme, and S. Simula,
837: Phys. Lett. $\bf{B397}$, 13 (1997).
838:
839: \bibitem{15} S. Simula,
840: Proceedings of the Workshop on the Physics of Excited Nucleons,
841: NSTAR 2001, Mainz (Germany), March 7-10,
842: (World Scientific, Singapore, 2001), p.135.
843:
844: \bibitem{16} B. Juli$\acute{a}$-D$\acute{i}$az,
845: D. O. Riska, F. Coester, Phys. Rev.
846: $\bf C69$, 035212 (2004).
847:
848: \bibitem{17} S. Capstick and W. Roberts, Phys. Rev.
849: $\bf D47$, 1994 (1980); Phys. Rev. $\bf{D49}$, 4570 (1994).
850:
851: \bibitem{18} F. J. Gilman, M. Kugler, and S. Meshkov,
852: Phys. Rev., $\bf D9$, 715 (1974).
853:
854: \bibitem{19} I. G. Aznauryan and A. S. Bagdasaryan,
855: Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. $\bf{41}$, 158 (1985).
856:
857: \bibitem{20} I. G. Aznauryan, A. S. Bagdasaryan,
858: and N. L. Ter-Isaakyan,
859: Phys. Lett. $\bf{B112}$, 393 (1982);
860: Yad. Fiz. $\bf{36}$, 1278 (1982).
861:
862: \bibitem{21} R. A. Arndt et al., Phys. Rev.
863: $\bf C42$, 1864 (1990).
864:
865: \bibitem{22} L. Tiator, D. Drechsel, S. Kamalov,
866: and S. N. Yang, $\pi N$ Newslett.
867: $\bf 16$, 41 (2002).
868:
869: \bibitem{23} L. A. Copley, G. Karl, and E. Obryk,
870: Nucl. Phys. $\bf{B13}$, 303 (1969).
871:
872: \bibitem{24} I. G. Aznauryan,
873: Phys. Lett. $\bf{B316}$, 391 (1993);
874: Z. f$\ddot{u}$r Phys. $\bf{A346}$, 297 (1993).
875:
876: \bibitem{25} L. Frankfurt and M. Strikman,
877: Nucl. Phys. $\bf{B148}$, 107 (1979).
878:
879: \bibitem{26} M. K. Jones et al.,
880: Phys. Rev. Lett. $\bf{84}$, 1398 (2000).
881:
882: \bibitem{27} O. Gayou et al.,
883: Phys. Rev. Lett. $\bf{88}$, 092301 (2002).
884:
885: \bibitem{28} R. Koniuk and N. Isgur,
886: Phys. Rev. $\bf{D21}$, 1868 (1980).
887:
888: \bibitem{29} S. Capstick and N. Isgur,
889: Phys. Rev. $\bf{D34}$, 2809 (1986).
890:
891: \end{thebibliography}
892: \end{document}
893:
894:
895:
896:
897:
898:
899: