1: % ****** Start of file apssamp.tex ******
2: %
3: % This file is part of the APS files in the REVTeX 4 distribution.
4: % Version 4.0 of REVTeX, August 2001
5: %
6: % Copyright (c) 2001 The American Physical Society.
7: %
8: % See the REVTeX 4 README file for restrictions and more information.
9: %
10: % TeX'ing this file requires that you have AMS-LaTeX 2.0 installed
11: % as well as the rest of the prerequisites for REVTeX 4.0
12: %
13: % See the REVTeX 4 README file
14: % It also requires running BibTeX. The commands are as follows:
15: %
16: % 1) latex apssamp.tex
17: % 2) bibtex apssamp
18: % 3) latex apssamp.tex
19: % 4) latex apssamp.tex
20: %
21: \documentclass[twocolumn,showpacs,preprintnumbers,amsmath,amssymb]{revtex4}
22: %\documentclass[preprint,showpacs,preprintnumbers,amsmath,amssymb]{revtex4}
23:
24: % Some other (several out of many) possibilities
25: %\documentclass[preprint,aps]{revtex4}
26: %\documentclass[preprint,aps,draft]{revtex4}
27: %\documentclass[prb]{revtex4}% Physical Review B
28:
29: \usepackage{graphicx}% Include figure files
30: \usepackage{dcolumn}% Align table columns on decimal point
31: \usepackage{bm}% bold math
32:
33: %\nofiles
34:
35: \begin{document}
36:
37: \preprint{APS/123-QED}
38:
39: \title{The intruder feature of $^{31}{\bf Mg}$ and \\the
40: coexistence of many particle and many hole states }
41: \author{M. Kimura}
42: \affiliation{Institute of Physics, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba 305-8571, Japan<}
43: \date{\today}% It is always \today, today,
44: % but any date may be explicitly specified
45:
46: \begin{abstract}
47: The low-lying level structure of $^{31}{\rm Mg}$ has been investigated
48: by the antisymmetrized molecular dynamics (AMD) plus
49: generator coordinate method (GCM) with the Gogny D1S force. It is
50: shown that the N=20 magic number is broken and the ground state
51: has the pure neutron $2p3h$ configuration. The coexistence of many
52: particle and many hole states at very low excitation energy is
53: discussed.
54: \end{abstract}
55:
56: \pacs{Valid PACS appear here}% PACS, the Physics and Astronomy
57: % Classification Scheme.
58: \maketitle
59:
60: The breakdown of the neutron magic number N=20 and the change of
61: the shell order in neutron rich nuclei have been one of the great interest
62: in nuclear structure studies. Experimentally, it was firstly pointed
63: out from the observation of the anomalous binding energy and spin-parity
64: of $^{31}{\rm Na}$ \cite{Thibault,Huber}. More convincing
65: evidence was given by the observation of the small excitation energy
66: \cite{Detraz,Guillemaud} and the large $E2$ transition probability
67: \cite{Motobayashi} of the $2^+_1$ state of $^{32}{\rm
68: Mg}$. Theoretically, the Hartree-Fock calculation \cite{Campi} showed that shape
69: transition from spherical to prolate shapes possibly took place in
70: neutron-rich N=20 nuclei. Shell model calculations \cite{Poves,
71: Warburton, Fukunishi} that allowed particle hole excitations across the
72: N=20 shell gap explained these abnormal properties and suggested
73: strong deformation of $^{31}{\rm Na}$ and neighboring nuclei caused by
74: the inversion between the normal and intruder configurations. Since
75: then, many experimental \cite{Klotz, Pritychenko, Keim, Yoneda, Nummela,
76: Yanagisawa, Neyens, Marechal} and theoretical \cite{Wildenthal, Poves2,
77: Utsuno1, Utsuno2, Dean, Rodriguez, Caurier1, Caurier2, Kimura2, Kimura3,Yamagami}
78: studies have been made and now the systematic breaking of N=20 magic
79: number is theoretically investigated and some of them are
80: observed. Thus, our knowledge of the breakdown of the neutron magic
81: number N=20 in the neutron rich nuclei has been increasing rapidly in
82: this decade.
83:
84: To understand the shell structure and the shell order, the odd-neutron
85: nuclei such as $^{31}{\rm Mg}$ and $^{29}{\rm Ne}$ will provide
86: essential information, since the property of the single particle orbital
87: of the last neutron particle or hole will be strongly reflected to the
88: property of total system. Recently the spin-parity of the ground state
89: of $^{31}{\rm Mg}$ was experimentally fixed
90: to $1/2^+$ \cite{Neyens}. This result suggests that the
91: ground state of $^{31}{\rm Mg}$ has the intruder configuration in
92: which two neutron occupy the $pf$-orbital and a neutron hole
93: is in the Nilsson orbital [200,1/2]. However, mainly because
94: of the limitation of the models, theoretical investigation of
95: odd-neutron nuclei is not as vigorous as that of even-even
96: nuclei. Indeed, there are only a few shell model calculations
97: \cite{Wildenthal,Poves2,Neyens,Marechal} for $^{31}{\rm Mg}$, and they
98: do not reproduce the ground state properties or they study the ground
99: band and a few excited states using the modified interaction to
100: reproduce the ground state properties.
101:
102: In this work, we discuss the structure of the $^{31}{\rm Mg}$ based on
103: the theoretical framework of AMD+GCM \cite{Enyo1,Kimura1}. Since we do not assume
104: the time reversal symmetry and we perform the parity projection before
105: the variation, we can appropriately investigate the positive- and negative-parity
106: states and the coexistence of the many particle-hole states in
107: odd-mass nuclei. It will be shown that the ground state of $^{31}{\rm
108: Mg}$ has the pure intruder configuration that has the $2p3h$
109: configuration with respect to the N=20 shell closure. We have
110: successfully reproduced the observed properties of $^{31}{\rm Mg}$ such
111: as the magnetic moment and the $\beta$-decay strengths. We also predict
112: that other many particle-hole states ($0p1h$, $1p2h$ and
113: $3p4h$) also coexist at very small excitation energy.
114:
115: In the AMD, the intrinsic wave function is given by a Slater
116: determinant of the single particle wave packets,
117: \begin{eqnarray*}
118: \Phi_{\rm int} &=& {\mathcal A}
119: \{\varphi_1,\varphi_2,...,\varphi_A \} ,\quad
120: \varphi_i({\bf r}) = \phi_i({\bf r})\chi_i\xi_i ,
121: \end{eqnarray*}
122: where $\varphi_i$ is the $i$th single particle wave packet
123: consisting of the spatial $\phi_i$, spin $\chi_i$ and isospin
124: $\xi_i$ parts. The local Gaussian located at ${\bf Z}_i$ is employed as
125: $\phi_i$.
126: \begin{eqnarray*}
127: \phi_i({\bf r}) &=& \exp\biggl\{-\sum_{\sigma=x,y,z}\nu_\sigma
128: \Bigl(r_\sigma -
129: \frac{{\rm Z}_{i\sigma}}{\sqrt{\nu_\sigma}}\Bigr)^2\biggr\},
130: \nonumber\\
131: \chi_i &=& \alpha_i\chi_\uparrow + \beta_i\chi_\downarrow,
132: \quad |\alpha_i|^2 + |\beta_i|^2 = 1,\nonumber \\
133: \xi_i &=& {\rm proton} \quad {\rm or} \quad {\rm neutron}.
134: \end{eqnarray*}
135: Here the centroids of the Gaussian ${\bf Z}_i$, the spin direction
136: $\alpha_i$ and $\beta_i$ and the width parameters $\nu_x, \nu_y$
137: and $\nu_z$ are the variational parameters. As the variational wave
138: function, we employ the parity projected wave function,
139: $ \Phi^{\pi} = \hat{P}^\pi \Phi_{\rm int}$. The Gogny D1S force
140: \cite{Gogny} is employed as an effective nuclear force
141: $\hat{V}_n$. Coulomb force $\hat{V}_c$ is approximated by the sum of
142: seven Gaussians.
143:
144: The calculation is performed in the following three steps. First, we
145: carry out the energy variation and optimize the variational
146: parameters. The energy variation is made under the constraint on the
147: matter quadrupole deformation $\beta$ to obtain the optimum wave
148: function $\Phi^\pi(\beta)$ for given value $\beta$. We note that in
149: this calculation, we do not make any assumption on the spatial symmetry
150: of the wave function and do not put any constraint on the quadrupole
151: deformation parameter $\gamma$. Therefore, $\gamma$ has the optimal
152: value for each given value of $\beta$. The definition of $\beta$ and
153: $\gamma$ is given in Ref. \cite{Dote}. Then, we project out the
154: eigenstate of the total angular momentum $\hat{J}$ from the optimized
155: wave function, $ \Phi^{J\pi}_{MK}(\beta) =
156: \hat{P}^{J}_{MK}\Phi^{\pi}(\beta)$.
157: $\Phi^{J\pi}_{MK}(\beta)$ is referred as AMD wave function in the
158: following. Finally, we superpose all of the AMD wave functions on the
159: energy surface that have the same parity and the angular momentum but
160: have different $K$ and $\beta$,
161: \begin{eqnarray*}
162: \Phi_n^{J\pi} = c_n\Phi^{J\pi}_{MK}(\{\beta\})
163: + c_n^\prime\Phi^{J\pi}_{MK^\prime}(\{\beta^\prime\}) + \cdots.
164: \end{eqnarray*}
165: The coefficients $c_n$, $c'_n$,... are
166: determined by solving the Hill-Wheeler equation
167: \cite{Hill}. $\Phi_n^{J\pi}$ will be referred as AMD+GCM wave function.
168:
169: We have investigated the single particle configuration of each intrinsic
170: wave function by the AMD+HF method \cite{Dote}. Once we obtain the
171: intrinsic wave function,
172: $\Phi_{\rm int}(\beta)$, we transform the single particle wave packet
173: $\varphi_i$ into the orthnormalized basis $\widetilde{\varphi}_\alpha$,
174: \begin{eqnarray*}
175: \widetilde{\varphi}_\alpha = \sum_{i=1}^A
176: \frac{1}{\sqrt{\lambda}_\alpha}c_{i\alpha}\varphi_i,
177: \end{eqnarray*}
178: where $\lambda_\alpha$ and $c_{i\alpha}$ are the eigenvalue and
179: eigenvector of the matrix $B_{ij}$=$\langle\varphi_i|\varphi_j\rangle$.
180: From this new basis function, we construct and diagonalize the
181: Hartree-Fock single particle Hamiltonian,
182: \begin{eqnarray*}
183: h_{\alpha\beta} &\equiv&
184: \langle\widetilde{\varphi}_\alpha|\hat{t}|\widetilde{\varphi}_b\rangle
185: + \sum_{\gamma=1}^{A}\langle
186: \widetilde{\varphi}_\alpha\widetilde{\varphi}_\gamma
187: |{\hat{v}_n+\hat{v}_c}|\widetilde{\varphi}_\beta
188: \widetilde{\varphi}_\gamma -
189: \widetilde{\varphi}_\gamma\widetilde{\varphi}_\beta\rangle,\nonumber\\
190: &+&\frac{1}{2}\sum_{\gamma,\delta=1}^{A}\langle
191: \widetilde{\varphi}_\gamma\widetilde{\varphi}_\delta
192: |\widetilde{\varphi}_\alpha^*\widetilde{\varphi}_\beta
193: \frac{\partial\hat{v}_n}{\partial \rho}|\widetilde{\varphi}_\gamma
194: \widetilde{\varphi}_\delta - \widetilde{\varphi}_\delta
195: \widetilde{\varphi}_\gamma \rangle,\\
196: h_{\alpha\beta} f_{\beta s} &=& \epsilon_sf_{\alpha s}.
197: \end{eqnarray*}
198: The eigenvalue and eigenvector provide the single particle energy
199: $\epsilon_s$ and the single particle wave function $\psi_s$ =$\sum_{\alpha=1}^A
200: f_{\alpha s}\widetilde{\varphi}_\alpha$. To investigate the properties
201: of the single particle wave functions, we also calculate the magnetic
202: quantum number $\langle\psi_s|\hat{j_z}|\psi_s\rangle$ and the amount of
203: the positive-parity component
204: $\langle\psi_s|\hat{P}^+|\psi_s\rangle$. We note that by this method we
205: obtain only the occupied states. In the following, we denote the neutron
206: $m$ particle and $n$ hole configuration relative to the N=20 spherical
207: shell closure as $mpnh$.
208: \begin{figure}[bt]
209: \includegraphics[width=\hsize]{figure/surface31Mg.eps}
210: \caption{Energy surfaces of $^{31}{\rm Mg}$ as functions of matter
211: quadrupole deformation parameter $\beta$ for the positive- and
212: negative-parity states. The estimated neutron particle hole
213: configurations are also shown around the energy
214: minima.}\label{fig::surface31Mg}
215: \end{figure}
216:
217: \begin{figure}
218: \includegraphics[width=\hsize]{figure/spo_big.eps}
219: \caption{The single particle orbitals of the last 11 neutrons of the
220: positive-parity state (a) and the negative-parity state (b). Filled
221: (open) symbols show the orbitals occupied by two (one)
222: neutrons. Circles (boxes) show the orbital in which the amount of the
223: positive-parity component is larger than (smaller than) 50\%.}
224: \label{fig::spo31Mg}
225: \end{figure}
226: Fig. \ref{fig::surface31Mg} shows the calculated energy surface of
227: the positive- and negative-parity states. There are three local minima in
228: the positive-parity state and two local minima in the negative-parity
229: state. Though we do not assume the axial symmetry, the wave functions on
230: the energy surfaces are almost axially symmetric except for those located
231: at the transitional region between the energy minima. These minima have
232: different neutron single particle
233: configurations. Fig. \ref{fig::spo31Mg} shows the single particle
234: orbitals occupied by the last 11 neutrons in the positive-parity state
235: (a) and the negative-parity state (b). In this figure, the asymptotic
236: quantum number $[N,n_z,l_z,j_z]$ of each orbital evaluated from its
237: parity and magnetic quantum number is also shown. In the following,
238: we use the asymptotic quantum number to specify each neutron
239: orbital. Fig. \ref{fig::spo31Mg} (a) shows that in the spherical region
240: of the positive-parity state, the last neutron particle or the neutron
241: hole occupies [2,0,2,3/2] orbital that originates in the
242: $0d_{3/2}$-orbital. Therefore this configuration is understood as the $0p1h$
243: configuration. Around $\beta\sim0.3$, the neutron configuration changes
244: from $0p1h$ to $2p3h$. The last two neutron occupy [3,3,0,1/2]
245: orbital that intrudes from the $pf$-orbital. And a neutron hole occupies
246: [2,0,0,1/2] orbital that originates in the $0d_{3/2}$-orbital. Around
247: $\beta\sim 0.5$, the neutron configuration changes from $2p3h$ to
248: $4p5h$. [2,0,2,3/2] and [2,0,0,1/2] orbitals are no longer
249: occupied. Both of [3,3,0,1/2] and [3,2,1,3/2] orbitals intruding from
250: the $pf$-orbital are occupied by two neutrons. A neutron hole is in
251: [2,0,2,5/2] orbital that originates in the $0d_{5/2}$-orbital. In the
252: same way, Fig. \ref{fig::spo31Mg} (b) shows that there are two different
253: neutron configurations $1p2h$ and $3p4h$ in the negative-parity state.
254: The $1p2h$ configuration has the last neutron in [3,3,0,1/2] orbital and
255: [2,0,2,3/2] orbital is unoccupied. Around $\beta\sim 0.4$ the
256: configuration changes from $1p2h$ to $3p4h$. The $3p4h$ configuration
257: has the last neutron in [3,2,1,3/2] orbital and both of [2,0,2,3/2] and
258: [2,0,0,1/2] orbitals are unoccupied. Thus, the analysis of the single
259: particle configurations has revealed that the minima of the
260: positive-energy state correspond to the neutron $0p1h$, $2p3h$ and
261: $4p5h$ configurations and those of the negative-parity state correspond
262: to the neutron $1p2h$ and $3p4h$ configurations. It is also mentioned
263: that protons are always below the Z=20 shell closure and do not excited
264: from the $0p$-orbital to the $1s0d$-orbital, though the order of the
265: proton [2,2,0,1/2] and [1,0,1,1/2] orbitals has changed in the strongly
266: deformed region. Therefore, the parity of total system depends only
267: on the neutron configuration. There are some additional comments on
268: Fig. \ref{fig::surface31Mg} and \ref{fig::spo31Mg}. (1) All of the
269: $mpnh$ configurations except for the $4p5h$ configuration appear at very
270: small excitation energy. The energy difference between the lowest one
271: ($0p1h$) and the highest one ($3p4h$) is less than 5 MeV. This leads to
272: the coexistence of these particle-hole configurations within small
273: excitation energy after the angular momentum projection as shown
274: later. (2) The behavior of the neutron single particle orbitals of the
275: positive- and negative-parity states are qualitatively similar to each
276: other. As deformation becomes larger, [3,3,0,1/2] and [3,2,1,3/2]
277: orbital originate in the $pf$-orbital come down and [2,0,2,3/2] and
278: [2,0,0,1/2] orbital originate in the $0d_{3/2}$-orbital go up and cross
279: to each other. The change of the particle hole configuration occurs just
280: around the crossing points of these orbitals. This explains why the
281: particle hole configurations appear in the order of the particle and
282: hole numbers as deformation becomes larger. It is also mentioned that
283: the behavior of the single particle orbital is qualitatively understood
284: by the Nilsson model and it may explain why the Nilsson model
285: calculation was qualitatively successful in Ref. \cite{Marechal}. (3) The
286: energy of the $4p5h$ configuration is exceptionally higher than others
287: and it is understood as follows. As explained above, the change of the
288: neutron particle-hole configuration is caused by the crossing of four
289: neutron orbitals that originate in the $pf$- and
290: $0s1d$-orbitals. Therefore, up to four particle or four hole
291: configuration can appear at small excitation energy, but more than five
292: particle or hole configuration appear at rather high excitation
293: energy. This feature is common to other neighboring nuclei such as Ne
294: isotopes \cite{Kimura2, Enyo2} and Mg isotopes \cite{Kimura3}.
295:
296: \begin{figure}
297: \includegraphics[width=\hsize]{figure/level31Mg.eps}
298: \caption{Level scheme of $^{31}{\rm Mg}$ obtained by the AMD wave
299: functions at energy minima and by the AMD+GCM calculation together with
300: the partial level scheme suggested in Ref. \cite{Neyens}.
301: Solid (dashed) lines show the states dominated by the neutron $0p1h$
302: or $1p2h$ ($2p3h$ or $3p4h$) configurations. Numbers above or blow the
303: states show the calculated and observed excitation energy in MeV.}
304: \label{fig::level31Mg}
305: \end{figure}
306: \begin{table*}[tbh]
307: \begin{ruledtabular}
308: \begin{tabular}{ccccccccc}
309: \multicolumn{5}{c} {decay from $^{31}{\rm Na}(\rm g.s.)$} &
310: \multicolumn{4}{c} {decay to $^{31}{\rm Al}$} \\
311: $^{31}{\rm Mg}(J^\pi)$ & $E_x$ (MeV) & $\log ft$ & $0p1h$ (\%) & $2p3h$ (\%) &
312: $^{31}{\rm Al}(J^\pi)$ & $E_x$ (MeV) & $\log ft$ & $2p4h$ (\%)\\
313: \cline{1-5}\cline{6-9}
314: $1/2^+_1$ & 0 & 4.6 & 0 & 93 & $1/2^+_1$ & 1.22 & $6.1$ & 5 \\
315: $3/2^+_1$ & 0.14 & 5.2 & 25 & 61 & $3/2^+_1$ & 1.81 & 5.8 & 10 \\
316: $3/2^+_2$ & 0.81 & 5.8 & 68 & 20 & $1/2^+_2$ & 3.08 & 5.2 & 69 \\
317: $5/2^+_1$ & 0.89 & 5.3 & 21 & 63 & $3/2^+_2$ & 3.83 & 5.0 & 61 \\
318: $5/2^+_2$ & 1.85 & 5.9 & 67 & 11 & $3/2^+_3$ & 4.11 & 4.8 & 79 \\
319: & & & & & $1/2^+_3$ & 4.43 & 5.2 & 67 \\
320: \end{tabular}
321: \caption{The calculated $\log ft$ values of the $\beta$-decay from the
322: ground state of $^{31}{\rm Na}$ to the low-lying states of $^{31}{\rm
323: Mg}$ and from the ground state of $^{31}{\rm Mg}$ to the low-lying
324: states of $^{31}{\rm Al}$. } \label{tab::logft}
325: \end{ruledtabular}
326: \end{table*}
327: After the variational calculation, we have performed the angular
328: momentum projection of the wave functions on the energy surfaces.
329: The left side of FIG. \ref{fig::level31Mg} shows the excitation energies
330: of the AMD wave functions at the energy minima. In the case of the
331: positive-parity state, the $0p1h$ minimum generates the $3/2^+$, $5/2^+$
332: and $7/2^+$ states and the $2p3h$ minimum generates the $K^\pi$=$1/2^+$
333: rotational band with negative decoupling parameter. The $4p5h$ minimum
334: generates the $K^\pi$=$5/2^+$ rotational band, but it is not shown
335: since it is not involved in the low-lying states even after the GCM
336: calculation. In the case of the negative-parity state, $1p2h$ minimum
337: generates the $K^\pi$=$1/2^-$ rotational band with the large negative
338: decoupling parameter $a\sim-4$ (the last neutron that occupy the
339: $0f_{7/2}$ gives $a=-4$). It is interesting that the lowest state of
340: $1p2h$ configuration is not $7/2^-$ but $3/2^-$ because of its
341: deformation. The $3p4h$ configuration generates the $K^\pi$=$3/2^-$
342: rotational band. As clearly seen, the energy of the deformed states
343: becomes lower. For example, the $3/2^-$ state that has the $3p4h$
344: configuration is lowered by about 5.1 MeV from the minimum of the energy
345: surface, while the $3/2^+$ state that has the $0p1h$ configuration is
346: lowered only by about 1.8 MeV. This leads to the coexistence of many
347: particle-hole states within quite small excitation energy. However, it
348: should be noted that there is no $1/2^+$ state except for the $2p3h$
349: configuration. It is also mentioned that the $K$ quantum number of the
350: deformed bands ($K^\pi$=$1/2^+$, $1/2^-$ and $3/2^-$) correspond to the
351: asymptotic quantum number $j_z$ of the last neutron particle or hole.
352:
353:
354: To complete our calculation, we have performed the GCM calculation by
355: superposing all of the AMD wave functions on the energy surfaces. The
356: calculated level scheme is shown in the middle of
357: FIG. \ref{fig::level31Mg}. There are mixing between different
358: particle-hole configurations. For example, in the case of the $3/2^+$
359: states, the mixing between the $0p1h$ and $2p3h$ configurations lowers
360: the energy of the $3/2^+_1$ state that has the dominant $2p3h$
361: configuration, while it pushes up the $3/2^+_2$ state that has the
362: dominant $0p1h$ configuration. Since the AMD+GCM wave function is the
363: sum of many Slater determinants, its particle-hole configuration is
364: ambiguous. To evaluate it, we have calculated the squared overlap
365: between the AMD+GCM wave function of each state and the AMD wave
366: function at each energy minima that has the definite particle-hole
367: configuration. The energy gain by such configuration mixing does not
368: exist in the case of the $1/2^+_1$ state that purely consist of $2p3h$
369: configuration (it has no overlap with the $0p1h$ AMD wave function but
370: has 93\% overlap with the $2p3h$ AMD wave function), but it is the ground state
371: with a small margin and consistent with the experiment
372: \cite{Neyens}. The calculated total binding energy is 242.9 MeV.
373: The excitation spectrum also shows the good
374: agreement with the most recent spin-parity assignment \cite{Neyens}. The
375: first excited state is the $3/2^+_1$ state
376: that has the dominant $2p3h$ configuration. The squared overlap with the
377: $2p3h$ AMD wave function amounts to 61\%. The low-lying
378: negative-parity states appear as the second ($3/2^-_1$), third
379: ($7/2^-_1$) and fourth ($3/2^-_2$) excited states with the dominant $1p2h$,
380: $1p2h$ and $3p4h$ configurations, respectively. The normal configuration
381: ($0p1h$) appears as the fifth excited state $3/2^+_2$ at 0.81 MeV. Thus,
382: from $0p1h$ to $3p4h$ states, many particle-hole configurations coexist
383: below 1 MeV.
384: \begin{table}[tbh]
385: \begin{ruledtabular}
386: \begin{tabular}{cccccc}
387: $J^\pi$ & $Q$ & $Q_s$ & $J^\pi$ & $Q$ & $Q_s$ \\\cline{1-3}\cline{4-6}
388: $3/2^+_1$ & -18.9 & -17.1 & $3/2^+_2$ & 8.2 & 7.4 \\
389: $5/2^+_1$ & -19.1 & -21.6 & $5/2^+_2$ & 4.8 & -2.7 \\
390: $7/2^+_1$ & -23.2 & -22.5 & $7/2^+_2$ & -2.4 & -5.3 \\
391: $9/2^+_1$ & -17.2 & -19.5 &
392: \end{tabular}
393: \caption{The electric quadrupole moment of the positive-parity states
394: calculated by the AMD+GCM wave function ($Q$) and the rigid rotor
395: approximation ($Q_s$).} \label{tab::Qmom}
396: \end{ruledtabular}
397: \end{table}
398:
399: Finally, we discuss observables and compare them with available
400: experimental data. The magnetic moments of the ground state ($1/2^+_1$)
401: and the first excited state ($3/2^+_1$) calculated without the spin
402: quenching factor are $-0.91\mu_N$ and $0.43\mu_N$, respectively. The
403: magnetic moment of the ground state shows the reasonable agreement with
404: the observed value $-0.89\mu_N$ \cite{Neyens} and the shell model
405: result\cite{Marechal}, while
406: $3/2^+_1$ state has the opposite sign to the ground state.
407: The $\log ft$ value of the $\beta$ decay from
408: $^{31}{\rm Na}$ and to $^{31}{\rm Al}$ are summarized in TABLE
409: \ref{tab::logft}. The ground state of $^{31}{\rm Na}$ and the low-lying states
410: of $^{31}{\rm Al}$ are also calculated by the AMD+GCM. The squared
411: overlaps between the AMD+GCM wave function and the AMD wave function
412: are also listed to show the particle-hole nature of the low-lying states
413: $^{31}{\rm Mg}$ and $^{31}{\rm Al}$. It is found that
414: the ground state of $^{31}{\rm Na}$ ($3/2^+$) is the mixture of the neutron
415: $0p0h$, $2p2h$ and $4p4h$ configurations. The squared overlaps amount to
416: 10\%, 70\% and 5\%, respectively. These configurations feed the $0p1h$,
417: $2p3h$ and $4p5h$ configurations of $^{31}{\rm Mg}$. Here, we must
418: recall that the ground state of $^{31}{\rm Mg}$ purely consist of the
419: $2p3h$ configuration. Therefore, it is populated only from the
420: $2p2h$ configuration of $^{31}{\rm Na}$ that is the dominant component
421: of the $^{31}{\rm Na}$. Indeed, the calculated $\log ft$ shows the
422: stronger $^{31}{\rm Na({\rm g.s.})}\rightarrow {}^{31}{\rm Mg}({\rm g.s.})$
423: transition than others. It is also notable that the excited states of
424: $^{31}{\rm Mg}$ dominated by the $2p3h$ configuration have stronger
425: transition than those dominated by the $1p2h$ configuration. Though the
426: spin-parity assignment of the excited states are not fixed yet, the
427: tendency of the $\log ft$ is comparable with the experiment
428: \cite{Guillemaud,Klotz}. The $\beta$-decay from $^{31}{\rm Al}$ also
429: reflects the specific charactor of the $^{31}{\rm Mg}$. Since, the
430: ground state of $^{31}{\rm Mg}$ purely consist of the neutron $2p3h$
431: configuration, it feeds only the neutron $2p4h$ configuration of
432: $^{31}{\rm Al}$. The low-lying states of $^{31}{\rm Al}$ are dominated
433: by the neutron normal configuration ($0p2h$) and the intruder
434: configuration ($2p4h$). The $1/2^+_2$, $3/2^+_2$, $3/2^+_3$, and
435: $1/2^+_3$ states dominated by the neutron $2p4h$ configuration have
436: smaller $\log ft$ than those dominated by other neutron
437: configurations. The strength of $\log ft$ and the excitation energy
438: shows good agreement with the experimental data \cite{Marechal}. The
439: spin-parity assignment of those $^{31}{\rm Al}$ states are not
440: experimental fixed yet, but the present result and the shell model
441: calculation \cite{Caurier2, Marechal} shows the reasonable agreement.
442: Table. \ref{tab::Qmom} summarizes the quadrupole moments of the
443: positive-parity states calculated by the AMD+GCM wave function and those
444: evaluated by the rigid rotor approximation \cite{Bohr},
445: \begin{eqnarray*}
446: Q_s = \frac{3K^2-J(J+1)}{(J+1)(2J+3)}Q_0,
447: \end{eqnarray*}
448: where the intrinsic quadrupole moment $Q_0$ is calculated from the
449: intrinsic wave function $\Phi^\pi_{\rm int}(\beta)$ that is the dominant
450: component of each state. The K quantum number is taken as $1/2$ for the
451: states dominated by the $1p2h$ configuration and $3/2$ for those
452: dominated by the $3p4h$ configuration. Due to the strong
453: deformation, the yrast states that have the intruder
454: configuration show large collectivity. It is also notable that the
455: rigid rotor approximation qualitatively reproduces these states, even
456: though there are the configuration mixing in the AMD+GCM calculation.
457:
458: To summarize, we have investigated the low-lying level structure of
459: $^{31}{\rm Mg}$. The observed property of the ground state including the
460: spin-parity is successfully reproduced. The coexistence of the spherical
461: normal configuration and the strongly deformed intruder configuration at
462: vary small excitation energy is predicted. The analysis of the single
463: particle orbital has shown that the neutron $0p1h$, $1p2h$, $2p3h$ and
464: $3p4h$ configurations appear on the energy surface. The angular momentum
465: projection leads to the coexistence of these configurations and the GCM
466: calculation has shown the mixing between them. Among the obtained
467: states, only the ground state consists of the pure neutron $2p3h$
468: configuration and its spin-parity $1/2^+$ originates in a neutron hole in
469: the Nilsson $[2,0,0,1/2]$ orbital. This specific charactor is reflected
470: to the $\beta$-decay strengths from the ground state of $^{31}{\rm Na}$
471: and to the low-lying states of $^{31}{\rm Al}$.
472:
473: The author acknowledges helpful discussions with
474: Prof. Y. Kanada-En'yo. Most of the computational calculations are
475: carried out by the SX-5 super computer at Research Center for Nuclear
476: Physics, Osaka University (RCNP). This work is a part of the Research
477: Project for Study of Unstable Nuclei from Nuclear Cluster Aspects.
478:
479: \bibliography{apssamp}% Produces the bibliography via BibTeX.
480: \begin{references}
481:
482: \bibitem{Thibault} C. Thibault {\it et al}., Phys. Rev. C {\bf 12}, 644
483: (1975).
484: \bibitem{Huber} G. Huber {\it et al}., Phys. Rev. C {\bf 18}, 2342 (1978).
485: \bibitem{Detraz} C. D\'etraz {\it et al}., Phys. Rev. C {\bf 19}, 164 (1979).
486: \bibitem{Guillemaud} D. Guillemaud-Mueller {\it et al}.,
487: Nucl. Phys. A {\bf 426}, 37 (1984).
488: \bibitem{Motobayashi} T. Motobayashi {\it et al}., Phys. Lett. B {\bf
489: 346}, 9 (1995).
490: \bibitem{Campi} X. Campi, H. Flocard, A. K. Kerman and S. Koonin,
491: Nucl. Phys. A {\bf 251} 193, (1975).
492: \bibitem{Poves} A. Poves and J. Retamosa, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 184}, 311 (1986).
493: \bibitem{Warburton} E. K. Warburton, J. A. Becker and B. A. Brown,
494: Phys. Rev. C {\bf 41}, 1147 (1990).
495: \bibitem{Fukunishi} N. Fukunishi, T. Otsuka and T. Sebe,
496: Phys. Lett. B {\bf 296}, 279 (1992).
497:
498:
499: \bibitem{Klotz} G. Klotz {\it et al}., Phys. Rev. C {\bf 47}, 2502
500: (1993).
501: \bibitem{Pritychenko} B. V. Pritychenko, {\it et al}., Phys. Lett. B {\bf
502: 461}, 322 (1999); Phys. Lett. B {\bf 467}, 309 (1999).
503: \bibitem{Keim} M. Keim {\it et al}., Eur. Phys. J. A {\bf 8}, 31
504: (2000).
505: \bibitem{Yoneda} K.Yoneda, {\it et al}., Phys. Lett. B {\bf 499}, 233
506: (2001).
507: \bibitem{Nummela} Nummela, {\it et al}., Phys. Rev. C {\bf 64}, 054313
508: (2001).
509: \bibitem{Yanagisawa} Y. Yanagisawa, {\it et al}., Nucl. Phys. A {\bf
510: 734}, 374 (2004).
511: \bibitem{Neyens} G. Neyens {\it et al}., Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 94},
512: 022501 (2005).
513: \bibitem{Marechal} F. Marechal {\it et al}., Phys. Rev. C {\bf 72}, 044314
514: (2005).
515: \bibitem{Wildenthal} B. H. Wildenthal, M. S. Curtin and B. A. Brown,
516: Phys. Rev. C {\bf 28}, 28 (1983).
517: \bibitem{Poves2} A.Poves and J.Retamosa, Nucl. Phys. A {\bf 571}, 221 (1994).
518: \bibitem{Utsuno1} Y.Utsuno, T.Otsuka, T.Mizusaki and M.Honma,
519: Phys. Rev. C {\bf 60}, 054315 (1999).
520: \bibitem{Utsuno2} Y. Utsuno, T. Otsuka, T. Glasmacher, T. Mizusaki and
521: M. Honma, Phys. Rev. C {\bf 70}, 044307 (2004).
522: \bibitem{Dean} D.J.Dean, {\it et al}., Phys. Rev. C {\bf 59}, 2474 (1999).
523: \bibitem{Rodriguez} R. R. Rodriguez-Guzman, J. L. Egido and L. M. Robledo,
524: Phys. Rev. C {\bf 62}, 054319 (2000).
525: \bibitem{Caurier1} E. Caurier, F. Nowacki, A. Poves and J. Retamosa,
526: Phys. Rev. C {\bf 58}, 2033 (1998).
527: \bibitem{Caurier2} E. Caurier, F. Nowacki and A.Poves, Nucl. Phys. A {\bf
528: 693}, 374 (2001).
529: \bibitem{Kimura2} M. Kimura and H. Horiuchi, Prog. Theor. Phys. (Kyoto)
530: {\bf 111}, 841 (2004).
531: \bibitem{Kimura3} M. Kimura and H. Horiuchi, Prog. Theor. Phys. (Kyoto)
532: {\bf 107}, 33 (2002).
533: \bibitem{Yamagami} M. Yamagami and N. Van Giai, Phys. Rev. C {\bf 69},
534: 034301 (2004).
535: \bibitem{Enyo1} Y. Kanada-En'yo, H. Horiuchi and A. Ono, Phys. Rev. C {\bf
536: 52}, 628 (1995).
537: \bibitem{Enyo2} Y.Kanada-Enyo, M. Kimura and H.Horiuchi,
538: C. R. Physique {\bf 4}, 497 (2003).
539: \bibitem{Dote} A. Dote and H. Horiuchi, Phys. Rev. C {\bf 56}, 1844
540: (1997).
541: \bibitem{Kimura1} M. Kimura and H. Horiuchi, Phys.Rev. C {\bf 69},
542: 044319 (2004).
543: \bibitem{Gogny} J. Decharg\'e and D. Gogny, Phys. Rev. C {\bf 21}, 1568
544: (1980).
545: \bibitem{Hill} D. L. Hill and J. A. Wheeler, Phys. Rev. {\bf 89}, 112 (1953).
546: \bibitem{Bohr} A. Bohr and B. R. Mottelson: Nuclear Structure, Vol. II
547: (World Scientific, New York, 1975).
548:
549:
550:
551:
552:
553:
554:
555:
556:
557:
558:
559:
560: \end{references}
561: \end{document}
562: %
563: % ****** End of file apssamp.tex ******
564: