1: \documentclass[eqsecnum,aps,ams,preprint,epsf]{revtex4}
2: \newcommand{\be}{\begin{eqnarray}&&}
3: \usepackage{graphicx}
4: \usepackage{wrapfig}
5: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
6: %% Definitions of some bold greek characters: to be used only in math mode!!!
7: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
8: \font\bi=cmmib10 scaled 1200 % bold math italic
9: \font\tenbifull=cmmib10 scaled 1200 % bold math italic
10: \font\tenbimed=cmmib9
11: \font\tenbismall=cmmib7
12: \textfont9=\tenbifull \scriptfont9=\tenbimed
13: \scriptscriptfont9=\tenbismall
14: \def\bmit{\fam9 }
15: \mathchardef\bbgamma="710D
16: \mathchardef\bbkappa="7114
17: \mathchardef\bbrho="711A
18: \mathchardef\bbsigma="711B
19: \mathchardef\bbtau="711C
20: \mathchardef\bbvarrho="7125
21: \mathchardef\bbvarsigma="7126
22: \mathchardef\bbPhi="7008
23: \mathchardef\bbxi="7118
24: \def\boldgamma{{\bmit\bbgamma}}
25: \def\boldkappa{{\bmit\bbkappa}}
26: \def\boldrho{{\bmit\bbrho}}
27: \def\boldsigma{{\bmit\bbsigma}}
28: \def\boldtau{{\bmit\bbtau}}
29: \def\boldvarrho{{\bmit\bbvarrho}}
30: \def\boldvarsigma{{\bmit\bbvarsigma}}
31: \def\boldPhi{{\bmit\bbPhi}}
32: \def\boldxi{{\bmit\bbxi}}
33: %%%%%%%% End definitions of Greek fonts
34: \def\boldeta{{\mbox{\boldmath$\eta$}}}
35: \def\bpi{{\mbox{\boldmath$\pi$}}}
36: \newcommand {\CM} {{\cal M}}
37: \newcommand{\ee}{\end{eqnarray}}
38: \def\bn{{\mbox{\boldmath$n$}}}
39: \def\ba{{\mbox{\boldmath$a$}}}
40: \def\dfrac{\displaystyle\frac}
41:
42: \textwidth 16.cm
43: \textheight 22.cm
44: \topmargin .5cm
45: %\renewcommand\baselinestretch{1.2}
46: \begin{document}
47:
48: \thispagestyle{empty}
49: \title{Di-electrons from $\eta$ meson Dalitz decay
50: in proton-proton collisions }
51:
52: \author{L.P. Kaptari$^{1,}$}
53: \altaffiliation{On leave of absence from
54: Bogoliubov Laboratory Theoretical Physics, JINR, 141980 Dubna, Russia}
55: \author{ B. K\"ampfer$^{1,2}$}
56: \affiliation{$^1$Forschungszentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, PF 510119, 01314 Dresden, Germany\\
57: $^2$TU Dresden, Institut f\"ur Theoretische Physik 01062 Dresden, Germany}
58:
59: \date{\today}
60:
61: \begin{abstract}
62: The reaction $ pp \to pp \eta \to pp \gamma e^+ e^-$ is discussed
63: within a covariant effective meson-nucleon theory.
64: The model is adjusted to data of the subreaction $pp \to pp \eta$.
65: Our focus is on
66: di-electrons from Dalitz decays of $\eta$ mesons,
67: $\eta\to \gamma \gamma^* \to\gamma e^+e^-$,
68: and the role of the corresponding transition form factor $F_{\eta \gamma \gamma^*}$.
69: Numerical results are presented for the intermediate energy
70: kinematics of HADES experiments.
71: \end{abstract}
72: \maketitle
73:
74: \section{Introduction}
75:
76: The $\eta$ meson as member of the octet of Goldstone bosons has the valence
77: quark structure $(\bar u u + \bar d d - \bar s s )/\sqrt{3}$
78: when choosing the mixing angle of 19.5$^o$ in superimposing the
79: octet-$\eta_8$ and singlet-$\eta_0$. Various conservations laws forbid
80: low-order decays causing the very narrow $\eta$ width. This makes the $\eta$ decays
81: sensitive for testing invariances of the standard model. The hidden strangeness
82: content lets one argue for some sensitivity to the strangeness content of the nucleon
83: when considering $\eta$ production off nucleons. Consequently, the $\eta$
84: production and various special decay channels were subject of intense investigations
85: since some time, both experimentally and theoretically.
86:
87: There is a rich data basis for $\eta$ production in nucleon-nucleon collisions
88: providing a test ground for meson production in strong interaction processes,
89: in particular near threshold. Due to the iso-scalar character of the $\eta$ meson,
90: $\eta$ production off the nucleon proceeds via selected baryon resonances thus
91: allowing differential access to resonance properties.
92:
93: Furthermore, the Dalitz decay $\eta \to \gamma e^+ e^-$ constitutes a prominent source of
94: di-electrons in intermediate-energy heavy-ion collisions. Indeed, the recent
95: HADES data \cite{HADES_PRL} exhibit a sizeable yield of $e^+ e^-$ in the
96: invariant-mass region 150 - 500 MeV which is essentially attributed \cite{HW_HADES} to
97: $\eta$ Dalitz decays, but $\Delta$ Dalitz decays and non-resonant virtual bremsstrahlung
98: \cite{ourNuclPhys} contribute in this region, too. The primary aim of the HADES
99: experiments \cite{HADES} is to seek for signals of chiral symmetry restoration in compressed
100: nuclear matter. For such an enterprize one needs good control of the competing
101: background processes, among them the mentioned $\eta$ Dalitz decays.
102:
103: $\eta$ Dalitz decays depend on the pseudo-scalar transition form factor.
104: Such form factors encode information on hadrons which is accessible in first-principle
105: QCD calculations or abridged variants thereof, such as effective
106: hadron theories or QCD sum rules. In so far, experimental information
107: on transition form factors is quite valuable \cite{LandPhysRep}.
108: Given this motivation we consider here
109: the process of Dalitz decay of the pseudo-scalar $\eta$ meson
110: \begin{equation}
111: \eta \to \gamma +\gamma^* \to \gamma + e^- + e^+,
112: \label{reac}
113: \end{equation}
114: where $\gamma^*$ denotes a virtual photon.
115: Obviously, the probability of emitting a virtual photon is
116: governed by the dynamical electromagnetic
117: structure of the dressed transition vertex $\eta \to \gamma \gamma^*$ which
118: is condensed in the transition form factor $F_{\eta \gamma \gamma^*}$.
119: If the decaying hadron were point like, then a calculation of mass distributions
120: and decay widths would be straightforward along the standard quantum
121: electrodynamics (QED). Deviations of the measured quantities from
122: QED predictions directly reflect the
123: effects of the form factor and thus the internal hadron structure.
124:
125: Often, the production process and the decay process are dealt with separately.
126: With respect to available new data from HADES \cite{hadeseta}
127: the reaction
128: \begin{equation}
129: p_1 + p_2 \to p_1' + p_2' + \eta \to p_1' + p_2' + \gamma +e^+ +e^-,
130: \label{dalitzpp}
131: \end{equation}
132: which will be improved in near future, we consider the complete reaction
133: (\ref{dalitzpp}) in which (\ref{reac}) figures as a subreaction.
134: The employed framework is that of an effective description in a hadronic basis.
135: To be specific, we are going to parameterize the $\eta$ production subreaction
136: in nucleon-nucleon ($NN$) collisions
137: within the one-boson exchange (OBE) model. Such an approach has been utilized
138: fairly successfully by various authors in the past. For instance,
139: in Ref.~\cite{wilkinEta} a model based on
140: OBE with nucleons only has been facilitated for
141: $pp\to pp\eta$ and $ pd\to pd\eta$ reactions.
142: A non-relativistic approach was proposed in Ref.~\cite{santraEta}.
143: In \cite{gedalinEta} a description based on OBE without internal meson conversion
144: and with the resonance $S_{11}(1535)$ has been elaborated for $NN\to NN\eta$
145: in a region sufficiently above the threshold.
146: A detailed analysis of $NN\to NN\eta$ has been worked out by
147: Nakayama and collaborators \cite{nakayamaEta}.
148: For a study of the role of nucleon resonances in $\eta$
149: photo-production we refer the interested reader to Ref.~\cite{moselEta}.
150:
151: In contrast to a factorized description with production of an on-shell
152: $\eta$ and an independent decay of an on-shell $\eta$ we attempt here
153: a complete description of the whole reaction (\ref{dalitzpp}).
154: That means we supplement the subreaction $NN \to NN \eta$
155: by the Dalitz decay part thus dealing with intermediate
156: off-shell $\eta$ meson.
157: %Particular attention is paid to the
158: This allows considering di-electron masses larger
159: than the pole-mass of the $\eta$ meson (for the on-shell $\eta$ meson
160: the invariant mass of the di-electron is restricted by the
161: mass of the $\eta$ meson).
162: % so that the transition formfactor,
163: %where it is off-mass shell.
164: This can furnish additional information on the transition form factor
165: in a larger kinematical region.
166:
167: Our paper is organized as follows. In section 2 we introduce the
168: $\eta \to \gamma \gamma^*$
169: transition form factor. Section 3 is devoted to the theoretical background for
170: dealing with the reaction $pp \to pp \eta \to pp \gamma e^+ e^-$.
171: It is essentially based on an extension of the effective model
172: \cite{ourOmega,ourPhi}
173: adjusted to vector (V) meson production in $NN \to NNV$ reactions. The model
174: utilizes a direct calculations of the relevant tree-level
175: Feynman diagrams within a phenomenological meson-nucleon theory.
176: The model parameters have been previously fixed from independent
177: experiments and adjusted to achieve a good description the
178: available experimental data \cite{ourOmega,ourPhi}. However, in the present paper
179: also diagrams with excitation of nucleon resonances with masses close
180: to the mass of a nucleon plus $\eta$ meson are included.
181: These are $S_{11}(1535)$ , $D_{13}(1520)$ and $P_{11}(1440)$ resonances.
182: The corresponding effective constants, whenever possible, are
183: obtained from the known decay widths of direct decay into $\eta$ channel or
184: radiative decay with subsequent use of vector meson dominance.
185: We use effective constants commonly adopted in the literature and
186: obtained from different considerations, e.g., SU(3) symmetry or adjustment
187: to photoabsorbtion etc.\ \cite{nakayamaEta}.
188: Numerical results are presented in section 4, where
189: we consider separately the reaction $NN \to NN \eta$.
190: Results for the full reaction (\ref{dalitzpp}) are described in section 5
191: with emphasis on the role of the $\eta \gamma \gamma^*$ transition form factor.
192: The conclusions are summarized in section 6, and some
193: formal relations are relegated to the appendices.
194:
195: \section{Dalitz decay and Transition Form Factor}
196:
197: Let us first consider first the process of a two-photon decay
198: of an $\eta$ meson.
199: %into a real and a virtual photon (di-electron) of the type (\ref{reac}).
200: %This is a
201: %two-stage process, when at first the meson decays into two photons,
202: %then one the virtual photon decays into a di-electron.
203: The effective Lagrangian describing
204: the vertex $\eta \to \gamma\gamma $ reads \cite{meissner,thomas,anisovich_FF,faessler}
205: \begin{equation}
206: {\cal L}_{\eta \gamma \gamma}=f_{\eta \gamma \gamma}\
207: \left( \epsilon_{\mu\nu\alpha\beta}
208: \partial^\mu A^\nu \partial^\alpha A^\beta
209: \right) \Phi_\eta,
210: \label{lag1}
211: \end{equation}
212: where $A^\nu$ is the electromagnetic four-potential, $\Phi_\eta$ denotes the
213: pseudo-scalar $\eta$ meson field and
214: $f_{\eta \gamma \gamma\,}$ is the corresponding coupling constant.
215: The fully antisymmetric Levi-Civita symbol $\epsilon_{\mu\nu\alpha\beta}$
216: is normalized as $\epsilon_{0123}=-1$.
217: The $\eta$ decay width
218: %for the production of two real photons is calculated
219: follows from (\ref{lag1}) as
220: \begin{eqnarray}
221: \Gamma_{\eta \to \gamma \gamma}=
222: \frac{s_\eta^{3/2}}{64\pi}
223: f_{\eta\gamma \gamma}^2
224: \label{g0}
225: \end{eqnarray}
226: and serves for a determination of the coupling constant $f_{\eta \gamma \gamma}$
227: from experimental data.
228: The square of the $\gamma \gamma$ invariant mass is denoted by $s_\eta$,
229: $s_\eta = m_\eta^2$ for an on-shell $\eta$ meson.
230: (Note that contrarily to the vector meson case \cite{ourFF},
231: instead of a factor $1/3$ [due to averaging over three projections of the
232: spin of the vector particle] in eq.~(\ref{g0}) a factor of $1/2$ appears due to
233: two photons in the final state.)
234: Experimentally, the branching ratio
235: $Br(\eta \to \gamma \gamma) = \Gamma_{\eta \to \gamma \gamma}/\Gamma_{\eta, tot}$
236: %for $\eta\to\gamma\gamma$
237: is known as $\left (39.38\pm 0.26\right )$\% \cite{dataGroup}.
238: Eq.~(\ref{g0}) yields
239: $|f_{\eta \gamma \gamma\,}|\simeq 0.025 \, GeV^{-1}$
240: for the known total width $\Gamma_{\eta, tot} = ( 1.3\pm 0.07) \, keV$.
241: Since in our further calculations the cross section is directly proportional to
242: $|f_{\eta \gamma \gamma\,}|^2$, the sign of the coupling constant
243: does not play a role and for definiteness it has been taken positively.
244:
245: In the decay (\ref{reac}), however, one of the emitted photons
246: is virtual with a time-like four-momentum and,
247: consequently, the Lagrangian (\ref{lag1}) must be supplemented by inclusion
248: of the corresponding transition form factor (FF). We employ the following procedure:
249: \begin{equation}
250: f_{ \eta \gamma \gamma}(0)\to f_{ \eta \gamma \gamma^*}(s_{\gamma^*})
251: = f_{\eta \gamma \gamma}(0) \,
252: F_{\eta \gamma {\gamma^*}}(s_{\gamma^*})
253: \label{defFF}
254: \end{equation}
255: where $s_{\gamma^*}$ is the di-electron invariant mass squared
256: and $f_{\eta \gamma \gamma}(0) \equiv |f_{\eta \gamma \gamma} \vert$.
257: Formally, eq.~(\ref{defFF}) can be considered as the definition of the transition
258: form factor. By a
259: direct calculation of the corresponding diagram for the decay rate
260: $d\Gamma / d s_{\gamma^*}$ for the $\eta$ meson one finds \cite{LandPhysRep}
261: \begin{eqnarray}
262: \dfrac{d\Gamma_{\eta\to \gamma e^+e^-}}{ds_{\gamma^*}} =
263: \dfrac{2\alpha}{3\pi s_{\gamma^*}}
264: \left(1 - \frac{s_{\gamma^*}}{m_\eta^2} \right)^3
265: \left(1 - \frac{4 \mu_e^2}{s_{\gamma^*}} \right)^{1/2}
266: \left(1 + 2 \frac{\mu_e}{s_{\gamma^*}} \right)
267: \Gamma_{\eta\to \gamma \gamma } \left | F_{ \eta \gamma \gamma^*\,}(s_{\gamma^*})\right |^2
268: \label{dgamma}
269: \end{eqnarray}
270: with $\alpha$ as electromagnetic fine structure constant
271: and $\mu_e$ the electron mass. In the kinematical region we are interested in
272: the terms with $\mu_e$ can be neglected.
273: Putting $\left | F_{ \eta \gamma \gamma^*\,}(s_{\gamma^*})\right |^2 = 1$
274: would mean neglecting the finite size and internal structure of $\eta$.
275: It is seen that the differential decay width
276: $d\Gamma_{\eta\to \gamma e^+e^-} / ds_{\gamma^*}$
277: is determined by
278: (i) a purely kinematical (calculable) factor,
279: (ii) the real photon decay vertex $\eta \to \gamma \gamma$
280: (known from experimental data), and
281: (iii) the (wanted) transition FF $ F_{ \eta \gamma \gamma^*\,}(s_{\gamma^*}) $.
282: Hence, eq.~(\ref{dgamma}) evidences that by measuring
283: the invariant mass distribution one can get direct experimental access to
284: the transition FF
285: \cite{LandPhysRep,omegaFrmf1,omegaFrmf2,omegaFrmf3}.
286: %Note that, as seen from eq.~(\ref{dgamma})
287: For a on-mass shell $\eta$ meson,
288: the value of the di-electron
289: mass $s_{\gamma^*}$ is kinematically restricted by
290: $s_{\gamma^*}\le m_\eta^2$. In case of reactions of the type (\ref{dalitzpp})
291: the intermediate $\eta$ meson can be off-shell and,
292: in principle, the value of the di-electron invariant mass can be larger than
293: the $\eta$ pole mass. This situation will be investigated below.
294:
295: A quite successful theoretical approach to FF's is based
296: on the vector meson dominance (VMD) conjecture \cite{faessler,meissner}.
297: Reasonably good descriptions of elastic FF's in the time-like region
298: has been accomplished, indeed.
299: By using the current-field identity \cite{meissner}
300: \begin{equation}
301: J^\mu = -e\frac{M_\rho^2}{f_{\gamma\rho}}\Phi_{\rho^0}^\mu
302: -e\frac{M_\omega^2}{f_{\gamma\omega}}\Phi_{\omega}^\mu
303: \label{currid}
304: \end{equation}
305: with coupling constants $f_{\gamma\rho}$ and $ f_{\gamma\omega}$
306: known \cite{friman1,friman2}
307: from experimentally measured electromagnetic decay widths,
308: one can also compute the transition form
309: factor $F^{VMD}_{ \eta \gamma \gamma^*\,}(s_{\gamma^*})$ by
310: evaluating the corresponding Feynman diagrams (see below). Contrary to the
311: transition FF of vector meson production \cite{ourFF},
312: the $\eta$ meson FF, computed
313: within such an approach, exhibits a rather good agreement with previous data
314: \cite{LandPhysRep,omegaFrmf1,omegaFrmf2,omegaFrmf3}.
315:
316: \section{Model }
317: \label{subsecOdin}
318:
319: We implement the discussed
320: Dalitz decay $\eta \to \gamma e^+ e^-$ into a more general process of di-electron production
321: in $NN$ reactions with intermediate $\eta$.
322: %We suppose that due to
323: %$NN$ interaction a pseudo-scalar meson (an off-mass shell $\eta$)
324: %is virtually created then it subsequently produces a photon and a di-electron.
325: Consider the reaction (\ref{dalitzpp}) for which
326: the process (\ref{reac}) enters as a subreaction.
327: The invariant cross section is
328: \begin{eqnarray}
329: d^{11}\sigma =
330: \frac{1}{2\sqrt{\lambda(s,m_N^2,m_N^2)}}\frac{1}{(2\pi)^{11}}
331: \frac14 \sum\limits_{\rm spins}\
332: \,|\ T(P_1',P_2',k_1,k_2,k_\pi,{\rm spins}) \ |^2 d^{11}\tau_f \ \frac{1}{n! },
333: \label{crossnn}
334: \end{eqnarray}
335: where the factor $1/n!$ accounts for $n$ identical
336: particles in the final state, $\vert T \vert^2$ denotes the invariant amplitude
337: squared and $d\tau_f$ is the invariant phase volume which is chosen
338: within the so-called "duplication" kinematics \cite{bykling},
339: i.e.\ the one which exploits
340: invariant two-dimensional phase volumes $R_2$ describing the
341: decay kinematics of a real or virtual particle with the
342: invariant mass squared $s$ ($s > 0$)
343: into two particles, which can also be either real or virtual.
344: This kinematics is schematically depicted in Fig.~\ref{fig1}.
345: Such a choice of kinematical variables is extremely useful if one
346: considers specific classes of Feynman diagrams which allow to separate
347: some vertices in a factorized form.
348: Then in the total cross section some integrations can be performed analytically
349: (see \cite{ourNuclPhys,ourFF}). For the present task we need to
350: consider only such types of diagrams which
351: allows to factorize the meson decay vertex from
352: the parts describing the creation of the meson in a $NN$ interaction.
353: Consequently, analytical integrations can be executed over the variables
354: connected with the decay vertex.
355:
356: \subsection{Nucleon Current}
357:
358: The invariant amplitude $T$ is evaluated here
359: within a phenomenological meson-nucleon theory based on
360: effective interaction Lagrangians which include
361: scalar ($\sigma$), pseudo-scalar isovector ($\pi$),
362: neutral pseudo-scalar ($\eta$) and
363: neutral vector ($\omega$) and vector isovector ($\rho$) mesons (see
364: \cite{nakayamaEta,ourPhi,ourOmega,ourNuclPhys})
365: \begin{eqnarray}
366: {\cal L}_{\sigma NN }&=& g_{\sigma NN} \bar N N \it\Phi_\sigma , \label{mnn1}\\
367: {\cal L}_{\pi NN}&=&
368: -\frac{f_{ \pi NN}}{m_\pi}\bar N\gamma_5\gamma^\mu \partial_\mu
369: ({\boldtau \boldPhi_\pi})N ,\\
370: {\cal L}_{\eta NN}&=&
371: -\frac{f_{\eta NN}}{m_\eta}\bar N\gamma_5\gamma^\mu \partial_\mu
372: \Phi_\eta N , \\
373: {\cal L}_{\rho NN}&=&
374: -g_{\rho NN }\left(\bar N \gamma_\mu{\boldtau}N{\boldPhi_ \rho}^\mu-\frac{\kappa_\rho}{2m_N}
375: \bar N\sigma_{\mu\nu}{\boldtau}N\partial^\nu{\boldPhi_\rho}^\mu\right) , \\
376: {\cal L}_{\omega NN}&=&
377: -g_{\omega NN }\left(
378: \bar N \gamma_\mu N {\it\Phi}_{\omega}^\mu-
379: \frac{\kappa_{\omega}}{2m_N}
380: \bar N \sigma_{\mu\nu} N \partial^\nu \it\Phi_{\omega}^\mu\right) ,
381: \label{mnn}
382: \end{eqnarray}
383: where $N$ and $\it\Phi$ denote the nucleon and meson fields, respectively
384: and bold face letters stand for isovectors.
385: All couplings with off-mass shell
386: mesons are dressed by monopole form factors
387: $F_M=\left(\Lambda^2_M-\mu_M^2\right)/\left(\Lambda^2_M-k^2_M\right)$,
388: where $k^2_M$ is the four-momentum of a virtual meson with mass $\mu_M$.
389:
390: The Lagrangians (\ref{mnn1} - \ref{mnn}) are needed in evaluations of
391: Feynman diagrams describing
392: the Dalitz decay of the $\eta$ meson created from nucleon
393: bremsstrahlung due to $NN$ interaction via
394: one-boson exchange, see Fig.~\ref{fig2}a.
395:
396: \subsection{Internal Conversion Current}
397:
398: The $\eta$ meson can also be produced by an internal conversion
399: of the exchanged mesons, the so-called conversion current.
400: The dominant exchange vector mesons ($V$) in this case
401: are $\omega$ and
402: $\rho$ mesons with the interaction Lagrangians
403: \begin{eqnarray}
404: {\cal L}_{\eta \omega\omega}&=& -\frac{g_{\eta \omega\omega}}{2m_\omega}\,
405: \varepsilon_{\mu\nu\alpha\beta}
406: \,\left (\partial^\mu\it \Phi_\omega^\nu \partial^\alpha\it
407: \Phi_\omega^\beta \right)\Phi_\eta, \\
408: {\cal L}_{\eta \rho\rho}&=& -\frac{g_{\eta \rho\rho}}{2m_ \rho}\,
409: \varepsilon_{\mu\nu\alpha\beta}
410: \,\left (\partial^\mu\it \boldPhi_ \rho^\nu \partial^\alpha\it
411: \boldPhi_ \rho^\beta \right)\Phi_\eta.
412: \label{conversion}
413: \end{eqnarray}
414: The corresponding diagrams are exhibited in Fig.~\ref{fig2}b.
415:
416: The $VV\eta$ vertices in the conversion diagrams have been calculated from the
417: radiative decay $V\to \eta\gamma$ within the VMD model \cite{nakayamaEta,durso}.
418: Correspondingly, the vertex form factor $VV\eta$ is chosen as
419: \begin{equation}
420: \label{convFF}
421: F_{VV\eta}(\Lambda,k_1^2,k_2^2)=
422: \frac{\Lambda^2-m_V^2}{\Lambda^2-k_1^2}\frac{\Lambda^2}{\Lambda^2-k_2^2}
423: \end{equation}
424: which, in accordance with the procedure of determining the
425: coupling constant,
426: is normalized to unity when one vector meson is on-mass shell and the other one
427: becomes massless, e.g., $F_{VV\eta}(\Lambda,k_1^2=m_V^2,k_2^2=0)=1$.
428:
429: \subsection{Nucleon Resonance Current}
430:
431: In the threshold-near kinematics for $\eta$ production in $NN$
432: reactions there are a few nucleon resonances with masses
433: $m_{N^*} \sim m_N + m_\eta$ which can contribute to the cross section.
434: These are $S_{11}(1535)$ and $D_{13}(1520)$ with odd parity and spins
435: $\frac12$ and $\frac 32$, respectively, and the spin-$\frac12$ even-parity
436: $P_{11}(1440)$ Roper resonance with nucleon quantum numbers.
437: The corresponding interaction Lagrangians
438: for $S_{11}(1535)$ are \cite{nimaiResonances,nakayamaEta}
439: \begin{eqnarray}
440: {\cal L}_{\eta NN_{1535} }&=& \frac{g_{\eta NN_{1535}}}{m_{N^*}-m_N}
441: \bar N^*\gamma_\mu \partial^\mu \Phi_\eta N +h.c. ,\label{res121}\\
442: {\cal L}_{\pi NN_{1535} }&=& \frac{g_{\pi NN_{1535}}}{m_{N^*}-m_N}
443: \bar N^*\gamma_\mu \partial^\mu \boldtau \boldPhi_\pi N +h.c., \\
444: {\cal L}_{\omega NN_{1535} }&=& \frac{g_{\omega NN_{1535}}}{m_{N^*}+m_N}
445: \bar N^* \gamma_5\sigma_{\mu\nu} \partial^\nu\Phi^\mu_\omega N +
446: h.c., \\
447: {\cal L}_{\rho NN_{1535} }&=& \frac{g_{\rho NN_{1535}}}{m_{N^*}+m_N}
448: \bar N^* \gamma_5\sigma_{\mu\nu} \partial^\nu \boldtau\boldPhi^\mu_\rho N +
449: h.c. .
450: \label{res12}
451: \end{eqnarray}
452:
453: For the spin-$\frac32$ resonance $D_{13}(1520)$ we employ
454: \begin{eqnarray}
455: {\cal L}_{\eta NN_{1520} }&=& \frac{g_{\eta NN_{1520}}}{m_\eta}
456: \bar N^{*\mu} \Theta_{\mu\nu}(z) \gamma_5 \partial^\nu \Phi_\eta N +h.c.,\label{res321}\\
457: {\cal L}_{\pi NN_{1520} }&=& \frac{g_{\pi NN_{1520}}}{m_\pi}
458: \bar N^{*\mu} \Theta_{\mu\nu}(z) \gamma_5 \partial^\nu \boldtau
459: \boldPhi_\pi N +h.c. ,\\
460: {\cal L}_{\omega NN_{1520} } &=&
461: i\frac{g^{(1)}_{\omega NN_{1520}}}{2m_N}
462: \bar N^{*\mu} \Theta_{\mu\nu}(z)\gamma_\alpha \omega^{\alpha\nu} N \, -\,
463: \frac{g^{(2)}_{\omega NN_{1520}}}{4m_N^2}
464: \partial_\alpha\bar N^{*\mu} \omega^{\alpha\mu} N + h.c.,\\
465: {\cal L}_{\rho NN_{1520} }&=&
466: i\frac{g^{(1)}_{\rho NN_{1520}}}{2m_N}
467: \bar N^{*\mu}\Theta_{\mu\nu}(z) \gamma_\alpha \boldtau\boldrho^{\alpha\nu} N
468: \, -\,\frac{g^{(2)}_{\rho NN_{1520}}}{4m_N^2}
469: \partial_\alpha\bar N^{*\mu} \boldtau\boldrho^{\alpha\nu} N + h.c.,
470: \label{res32}
471: \end{eqnarray}
472: where $\Theta_{\mu\nu}(z)=g_{\mu\nu} -(A(1+4z)/2+z)\gamma_\mu\gamma_\nu$.
473: The field strengths
474: $\omega^{\alpha\mu}$ and $\boldrho^{\alpha\nu}$ are
475: $\omega^{\alpha\mu}(x) = \partial^\alpha \Phi_\omega^\mu(x)-
476: \partial^\mu\Phi_\omega^\alpha(x)$
477: and
478: $\boldrho^{\alpha\nu}(x) = \partial^\alpha \boldPhi_\rho^\mu(x)-
479: \partial^\mu\boldPhi_\rho^\alpha(x)$,
480: respectively. The interactions (\ref{res321} - \ref{res32}) with
481: $\Theta_{\mu\nu}(z)$ have been extensively
482: discussed in the literature (see, e.g., Ref.~\cite{davitsonDelta} and
483: further references quoted therein).
484: The form of $\Theta_{\mu\nu}(z)$ is chosen in such a way that the
485: respective interaction Lagrangian
486: obeys the same point transformation as the free Lagrangian, which
487: ensures that the matrix elements are independent
488: of the parameter $A$, usually taken as $A=-1$. The off-shell parameter $z$
489: remains free thereby.
490: We employ here $z=-1/2$. Also, the choice of the form of higher
491: spin $\bar s \ge \frac32$ propagators has been a subject of discussion in the
492: literature \cite{ourNuclPhys,prop4,prop5,prop6,prop7}, e.g., with concerns
493: about the spin-projector operator ${\cal P}_{\frac32}$ (off-mass shell vs.\
494: on-shell) or the ordering of the product of energy projection
495: operator $\hat P_{N^*}+m_{N^*}$ and ${\cal P}_{\frac32}$
496: (only on the mass shell these two operators commute). In the present paper we
497: take the spin-$\frac32$ propagator in the form \cite{ourNuclPhys}
498: \begin{eqnarray}
499: \label{prop32}
500: S_{\frac32}^{\mu\nu}(P)&=&-i\frac{\hat P_{N^*}+m_{N^*}}{P^2-m_{N^*}^2}
501: {\cal P}_{\frac32}^{\mu\nu} (P),
502: \end{eqnarray}
503: where the spin projection operator is of the form
504: \begin{eqnarray}
505: \label{spr32}
506: {\cal P}_{\frac32}^{\mu\nu} (P) &=& g^{\mu\nu}-\frac13\gamma^\mu\gamma^\nu
507: -\frac{2P^\mu P^\nu}{3m_{N^*}^2}
508: -\frac{1}{3m_{N^*}}\left( \gamma^\mu P^\nu-\gamma^\nu P^\mu\right),
509: \end{eqnarray}
510: as commonly adopted within the Rarita-Schwinger formalism \cite{fron}.
511:
512: For $P_{11}(1440)$
513: the effective Lagrangians are similar to that for $S_{11}$,
514: %eq.~(\ref{res12}),
515: except for the relative signs in $\eta $ and $\pi$ couplings
516: and the $\sigma NN^*$ Lagrangian, i.e.
517: \begin{eqnarray}
518: {\cal L}_{\eta NN_{1440} }&=& -\frac{g_{\eta NN_{1440}}}{m_{N^*}+m_N}
519: \bar N^*\gamma_5\gamma_\mu \partial^\mu \Phi_\eta N +h.c.,\\
520: {\cal L}_{\pi NN_{1440} }&=&- \frac{g_{\pi NN_{1535}}}{m_{N^*}+m_N}
521: \bar N^*\gamma_5\gamma_\mu \partial^\mu \boldtau \boldPhi_\pi N +
522: h.c.,\\
523: {\cal L}_{\sigma NN_{1440} }&=& g_{\sigma NN_{1440}} \bar N^* N \it\Phi_\sigma
524: +h.c., \\
525: {\cal L}_{\omega NN_{1440} }&=& \frac{g_{\omega NN_{1440}}}{m_{N^*}+m_N}
526: \bar N^* \sigma_{\mu\nu} \partial^\nu\Phi^\mu_\omega N +h.c., \\
527: {\cal L}_{\rho NN_{1440} }&=& \frac{g_{\rho NN_{1440}}}{m_{N^*}+m_N}
528: \bar N^* \sigma_{\mu\nu} \partial^\nu \boldtau\boldPhi^\mu_\rho N +
529: h.c. .
530: \label{res14}
531: \end{eqnarray}
532: These interaction Lagrangians enter the nucleon resonance current
533: exhibited in Fig.~\ref{fig2}a.
534:
535: In order to account for the finiteness of the resonance widths $\Gamma$,
536: the resonance mass in the corresponding propagators is augmented by
537: an imaginary part, $m_{N^*}\to m_{N^*} -i\Gamma_{N^*}/2$.
538: Also for the resonance and conversion currents
539: all the vertices with off-shell hadrons
540: are dressed by form factors
541: \begin{equation}
542: \label{ffversh}
543: F(\Lambda,p^2)=\frac{\Lambda^4}{ \Lambda^4 +(p^2-m^2)^2 }.
544: \end{equation}
545:
546: \subsection{Effective parameters}
547:
548: The effective parameters of the Lagrangians (\ref{mnn1} - \ref{mnn}) which determine
549: the pure nucleon current diagrams are basically
550: the ones from the OBE Bonn potential \cite{bonncd} which have been used in
551: our previous calculations for vector meson ($\omega$, $\rho$ and $\phi$)
552: production in $NN$ interactions \cite{ourOmega,ourFF},
553: see Tab.~\ref{tb1}. The nucleon cut-off
554: parameter for the bremsstrahlung $NN\eta$ vertex is
555: $\Lambda^{br.}_{\eta N N}=1.2 \,GeV$.
556:
557: \begin{table}[!ht]
558: \caption{\it Coupling constants and cut-off
559: parameters for the nucleon current \cite{bonncd}.}
560: \begin{tabular}{l c l c c }\hline\hline
561: \multicolumn{5}{c}{}\\[-6mm]
562: %{Coupling constants and cut-off parameters for the nucleon current \cite{bonncd}}\\
563: % \hline\hline % after \\: \hline or \cline{col1-col2} \cline{col3-col4} ...
564: &\phantom{ppp} & $g_{MNN} $ & & $\Lambda_{MNN} \,[GeV]$ \\ \hline
565: $\pi $ & & $f_{ \pi NN}=1.0$ & & $ 1.3$ \\
566: $\eta$ & & $f_{ \eta NN}=1.79$ & & $ 1.8$ \\
567: $\sigma$ & & $g_{\sigma NN}=10.$ & & $ 1.8$ \\
568: $\rho$ & & $g_{\rho NN}=3.5$ & &$1.3$ \\
569: & & ($\kappa_\rho=6.1$) & & \\
570: $\omega$ & & $g_{\omega NN}=15.85$ & &$1.5$ \\
571: & & ($\kappa_\omega=0.0$) & & \\
572: \hline\hline
573: \end{tabular}
574: \label{tb1}
575: \end{table}
576:
577: The effective coupling constants for the nucleon resonance currents,
578: whenever possible, have been
579: obtained from the known decay widths of direct decay into $\eta$ channels or
580: radiative decay with subsequent use of VMD.
581: Otherwise, we use effective constants commonly utilized in the literature and
582: obtained from different considerations, e.g., SU(3) symmetry, fit of photo-absorbtion
583: reactions etc.\ (see, e.g.\ \cite{nakayamaEta}). The few remaining less known cut-off
584: parameters are taken either close to the ones from OBE potential
585: (for instance, the $\Lambda_{\rho N N^*}$ and $\Lambda_{\omega N N^*}$ cut off's are
586: chosen equal to $\Lambda_{\omega NN}=1.5\, GeV$;
587: $\Lambda_{\eta NN_{1535}}=\Lambda_{\eta NN_{1440}}=\Lambda_{\eta NN}=1.3\, GeV$,
588: cf.\ Tab.~\ref{tb2})
589: or adjusted to experimental data (see below). The resonance cut-off
590: parameters for the bremsstrahlung $N^*N\eta$ vertex have been taken as
591: $\Lambda^{br.}_{\eta N N_{1535}}=1.3 \,GeV$,
592: $\Lambda^{br.}_{\eta N N_{1520}}=1.1 \,GeV$ and
593: $\Lambda^{br.}_{\eta N N_{1440}}=1.2 \,GeV$,
594: respectively.
595:
596: \begin{table}[!ht]
597: \caption{\it Coupling constants and cut-off
598: parameters for the nucleon resonance current.
599: For the spin-$\frac32$ resonance
600: $D_{13}$ the off-shell parameter $z=-1/2$ is used and
601: the second coupling constant, eq.~(\ref{res32}), with
602: vector mesons is given in parenthesis.
603: For a reasoning of $g_{\pi NN^*}$ and $g_{\eta NN^*}$ for
604: $N^* = D_{13}(1520)$ see Appendix A.}
605: \begin{tabular}{cc cccc cccc cccc }\hline\hline
606: \multicolumn{2}{c}{\phantom{vert}}
607: &\multicolumn{4}{c }{$S_{11}(1535)$}
608: & \multicolumn{4}{ c }{$D_{13}(1520)$}
609: &\multicolumn{4}{c }{$P_{11}(1470)$} \\
610: & && $g_{MNN^*}$ &&$\Lambda \,[GeV]$ &&$g_{MNN^*}$ & &$\Lambda \, [GeV]$ &&$g_{MNN^*}$ & &$\Lambda \,[GeV]$ \\\hline
611: $\pi$&&& 1.25 & &1.2 && 1.55 &&1.0 &&6.54&&1.3\\
612: $\eta$&&& 2.02 & &1.3 && 8.3 &&1.2 &&0.49 &&1.3\\
613: $\omega$&&& -0.72& &1.5 && -2.1(0.7) &&1.5 &&-0.37&&1.5\\
614: $\rho$&&& -0.65 & &1.5 && 6(-2.1) &&1.5 &&-0.57 &&1.5\\ \hline\hline
615: \end{tabular}
616: \label{tb2}
617: \end{table}
618:
619: The coupling constants $g_{\omega\omega\eta}$ and
620: $g_{\rho\rho\eta}$ for the conversion current have been calculated \cite{nakayamaEta}
621: from a combined analysis of
622: the radiative decay within the VMD model and with a SU(3) effective
623: Lagrangian which provides
624: \begin{equation}
625: \label{omom}
626: g_{\omega\omega\eta} \simeq 4.85; \quad g_{\rho\rho\eta}\simeq 4.95.
627: \end{equation}
628: (Note that a naive direct calculations of these constants within the VMD model
629: can provide slightly larger values $g_{VV\eta}\sim 6.0$.) The corresponding
630: cut-offs are $\Lambda_{\omega\omega\eta}=\Lambda_{\rho\rho\eta}=1.6 \,GeV$.
631:
632: \subsection{Cross section for $\bf pp \to pp \boldeta$} % \to pp \boldgamma e^+e^-$}
633:
634: The invariant amplitude $T$ in eq.~(\ref{crossnn})
635: corresponding to the Feynman diagrams in Fig.~\ref{fig2}
636: %generated by the Lagrangians (\ref{mnn})-(\ref{res32}),
637: can be cast in a factorized form
638: \begin{eqnarray}
639: \label{ampl}
640: T=T^{(1)}_{NN\to NN\eta}\dfrac{i}{q^2-(m_\eta -\frac{i}{2} \Gamma_{\eta,tot})^2}\,
641: T^{(2)}_{\eta\to\gamma e^+e^-},
642: \end{eqnarray}
643: where the amplitude $T^{(1)}_{NN\to NN\eta}$
644: describes the process of production of an off-shell
645: $\eta$ meson in a $NN$ collision, while the amplitude
646: $T^{(2)}_{\eta\to\gamma e^+e^-}$ describes the Dalitz decay of the produced
647: $\eta$ meson into a real photon and a di-electron. In the propagator of the $\eta$ meson
648: the mass $m_\eta$ has been replaced by $m_\eta - i\Gamma_{\eta,tot}/2$ to take into account
649: the finite life time of the $\eta$ meson.
650:
651: As mentioned, for such factorized Feynman diagrams one can separate, in the cross section,
652: the dependence on the variables connected with the Dalitz decay vertex and
653: perform the phase space integration analytically.
654: Equation (\ref{ampl}) allows one to rewrite the differential cross section
655: (\ref{crossnn}) in a factorized form as well,
656: \begin{eqnarray}
657: \frac{d\sigma}{ds_\eta ds_{\gamma^*}} &=&
658: \frac{2 \alpha}{3 \pi^2} \, \vert F_{\eta \gamma \gamma^*} \vert^2 \,
659: \Gamma_{\eta \to \gamma \gamma}
660: \frac{(s_\eta - s_{\gamma^*})^3}{m_\eta^3 s_\eta s_{\gamma^*}}
661: \frac{1}{(s_\eta - m_\eta^2)^2 + m_\eta^2 \Gamma_{\eta, tot}^2}
662: \, d^5\sigma^{tot}_{NN\to NN\eta} \\
663: &\approx&\dfrac{d\Gamma_{\eta\to \gamma e^+e^-}}{ds_{\gamma^*}}\,
664: \frac{1}{4\pi}\frac{ s_\eta^{-1/2}}{(\sqrt{s_\eta}-m_\eta)^2 +\frac14 \Gamma_{\eta, tot}^2}
665: \, d^5\sigma^{tot}_{NN\to NN\eta},
666: \label{two}
667: \end{eqnarray}
668: where the integral over the final di-electron and
669: photon variables has been performed analytically
670: (see for details \cite{ourFF,ourNuclPhys}).
671: $d\Gamma_{\eta\to \gamma e^+e^-} / ds_{\gamma^*}$ is defined by
672: eq.~(\ref{dgamma}) but with $m_\eta \to s_\eta$
673: and the production cross section of a pseudo-scalar meson with
674: $\eta$ quantum numbers but with ${s_\eta}\neq m_\eta^2$ is
675: \begin{eqnarray}
676: \label{nneta}
677: d^5\sigma^{tot}_{NN\to NN\eta}
678: &=&\frac{1}{2(2\pi)^5\sqrt{\lambda(s,m_N^2,m_N^2)}} \nonumber\\
679: &\times& \frac14
680: \sum_{spins}| T_{NN\to NN\eta}^{(1)}|^2 ds_{12}dR_2(N_1N_2\to s_\eta s_{12})
681: dR_2 (s_{12}\to N_1'N_2'),
682: \end{eqnarray}
683: where the two-particle invariant phase space volume $R_2$ reads
684: \begin{equation}
685: R_2(ab\to cd)=\frac{\sqrt{\lambda(s_{ab},m_c^2,m_d^2)}}{8s_{ab}} d\Omega^*_c .
686: \label{ph}
687: \end{equation}
688: In what follows
689: we are interested in production and subsequent decay of intermediate $\eta$ mesons,
690: thus being off-mass shell, $s_\eta\neq m_\eta^2$.
691: We assume that for the off-shell
692: $\eta$ the net coupling constant
693: $f_{\eta\gamma\gamma}(0)$ in eq.~(\ref{defFF}) obtained from the experimental data
694: via eq.~(\ref{dgamma}) remains the same.
695: The off-mass shellness of $\eta$ mesons is taken into account by including
696: additional effective form factors in the corresponding vertices.
697:
698: \section{$\boldeta$ Production Cross Section}
699:
700: It can be seen from (\ref{two}) that the peculiarities of the
701: cross section for the full reaction $NN\to NN \gamma e^+e^-$
702: are basically determined by the subreaction $NN\to NN\eta$
703: with creation of a virtual $\eta$ meson. Hence, before
704: analyzing the full reaction, we proceed with a study of
705: the subreaction $NN\to NN\eta$ for production of an on-shell $\eta$ meson.
706:
707: \subsection{Initial and Final State Interactions}
708:
709: It ought to be mentioned that the Feynman diagrams
710: depicted in Fig.~\ref{fig2} cover only the process of creation and decay of
711: the pseudo-scalar $\eta$ meson, the so-called
712: production current. However, in the complete process (\ref{dalitzpp}) the two nucleons
713: can suffer initial state interaction (ISI)
714: and final state interaction (FSI), before and after the $\eta$ creation,
715: thus provoking distortions of the incoming and outgoing $N N$ waves.
716:
717: The ISI within a $NN$ pair before the $\eta$ creation
718: is to be evaluated at relatively high energies, larger than the
719: threshold of the $\eta$ meson production ($T_{kin}\sim 1.3 \,GeV$).
720: Therefore, one can expect that the variation of ISI effects
721: with the kinetic energy is small.
722: Indeed, as shown in Ref.~\cite{isi}, the effect of ISI
723: can be factorized in the total cross section and it plays effectively the role of a
724: reduction factor in each partial wave in the cross section. This reduction factor
725: depends on the inelasticity and phase shifts of the
726: partial waves at the considered energies.
727: Near the threshold, the number of initial partial waves is strongly limited
728: by the partial waves of the final states, and
729: one can restrict oneself to $^3P_0$ and $^1P_1$ waves.
730: Experimentally \cite{said} it is found that at kinetic energies of the order of few $GeV$
731: the phase shifts $^3P_0$ and $^1P_1$ are indeed almost energy independent and the
732: reduction factor for each partial wave can be taken as constant.
733: In our calculations we adopt for the reduction factor $\zeta$ the expression
734: from Ref.~\cite{isi}
735: \begin{eqnarray}
736: \label{isi}
737: \zeta_i= \varsigma_i(p)\cos^2 \delta_i(p)+\frac14\left( 1-\varsigma_i(p)\right)^2,
738: \end{eqnarray}
739: where $\varsigma_i$ and $\delta_i$ denote the inelasticity and phase shifts,
740: respectively. We employ in our calculations
741: $\zeta=0.277$ for the $^1P_1$ wave ($i = 1$) and
742: $\zeta=0.243$ for $^3P_0$ ($i = 2$) \cite{nakayamaEta}.
743:
744: FSI effects among the escaping $NN$ pair are accounted for within
745: the Jost function formalism \cite{gillespe}
746: which reproduces the singlet and triplet phase shifts at low energies,
747: as appropriate for reactions near threshold.
748: Details of calculations of FSI with the Jost function can be found in Ref.~\cite{fsiReznik}.
749:
750: \subsection{$\boldeta$ Meson Production in $\bf NN$ Collisions}
751:
752: Results for the energy dependence of the total cross section
753: $\sigma^{NN\to NN\eta}$, eq.~(\ref{nneta}), are presented in
754: Figs.~\ref{fig3} and \ref{fig4},
755: for proton-proton and proton-neutron reactions, respectively.
756: The amplitude $T_{NN\to NN\eta}^{(1)}$ represents a sum of
757: nucleon, meson conversion and nucleon resonance currents,
758: each of them being a sum over all the
759: considered exchanged mesons (see Fig.~\ref{fig2}).
760: Using the parameters listed in Tabs.~\ref{tb1} and \ref{tb2}
761: the nucleon current contribution
762: with parameters from the Bonn group \cite{bonncd}
763: is found to be fairly small in the present calculations (see dot-dashed curves).
764:
765: Also the contribution from the conversion
766: current (see doted curves) is not too large.
767: The main contribution to the cross section
768: comes from the nucleon resonance currents.
769: Here it is worth mentioning that, in spite of the
770: large number of the considered diagrams and
771: the large number of the effective
772: parameters, there is not too much freedom for fine-tuning of the cross section.
773: As mentioned, most parameters are restricted by independent experiments and they cannot
774: be varied in large intervals. We can slightly modify the less known parameters to achieve
775: improvement of the overall description with data.
776: In particular, in the present work we find a small contribution of
777: the resonance $D_{13}(1520)$ at small energies, but a rather strong energy dependence
778: due to $\pi$ and $\eta$ exchange diagrams with increasing energy.
779: Therefore, in order to reduce the influence of the $D_{13}(1520)$
780: at large excess energies, for these diagrams the cut-off parameters
781: have been chosen smaller than for others (see Tab.~\ref{tb2}).
782:
783: Note that, even achieving a good description of the cross section in proton-proton
784: reactions, it is not \textit{a priory}
785: clear that the obtained set of parameters equally well describes also the proton-neutron
786: reactions. The isospin dependence of the amplitude is determined by a subtle
787: interplay of different diagrams with different exchange mesons (scalar, vector,
788: isoscalar, isovector). Once the parameters for the $pp$ reaction
789: are fixed, the $pn$ amplitude follows directly without further parameters
790: (ISI and FSI are different for $pp$ and $pn$ systems, but fixed independently).
791: Figure \ref{fig4} demonstrates that the isospin dependence of the
792: amplitude is correctly described with respect to available data.
793:
794: In Fig.~\ref{fig5} the angular distribution
795: of $\eta$ mesons in the center of mass is presented for two excess energies,
796: $\Delta s^{1/2}=16 \,MeV$ (left panel) and $ \Delta s^{1/2}=37 \,MeV$ (right panel).
797: Here a few comments are in order.
798: Generally, at threshold-near energies the angular distributions
799: are rather flat. That means that the total
800: cross section at the corresponding energy is
801: $\sigma^{tot} \propto 4\pi d\sigma/d\Omega^*$ and
802: a quantitatively good description of the angular distribution
803: $d\sigma/d\Omega^*$ provides, of course, also a good description
804: of the total cross section. Therefore we compare our calculations with data at such
805: an energy, where we achieve a better description of the total cross section
806: (cf.\ Fig.~\ref{fig3}). The other existing experimental data at similar
807: energies (in particular, $\Delta s^{1/2}=15.5 \, MeV$, \cite{etaangular})
808: differ from each other
809: by an overall normalization factor, which can amount up to $40\%$ at these energies,
810: see Ref.~\cite{etacalen}. Another important issue for the analysis
811: of the angular distributions is the shape at forward and backward directions.
812: The conversion current provides an upward ($\bigcup$) shape of the distributions, while the
813: nucleon and nucleon-resonance currents generally give a downward ($\bigcap$) curve at
814: forward and backward directions. Since in our calculations the contribution
815: of the conversion current is much smaller than the one from the nucleon resonance current,
816: the resulting angular distribution,
817: albeit being rather flat, has however an upward ($\bigcup$) trend.
818:
819: In Fig.~\ref{fig6} the invariant mass distribution of the two final protons
820: is exhibited together
821: with experimental data at an excess energy of $\Delta s^{1/2}=15.5\, MeV$. Since our total
822: cross section has been optimized to describe the data at higher energies,
823: $\Delta s^{1/2}>16\,MeV$,
824: see Fig.~\ref{fig3}, the calculated curve in Fig.~\ref{fig6}
825: has been multiplied by a factor
826: of $\approx 1.4$ obtained from an attempt to reconcile the data
827: at $\Delta s^{1/2}=15.5\, MeV$ and $\Delta s^{1/2}=16 \,MeV$
828: (relevant comments and discussion about the normalization of data can be
829: found in Refs.~\cite{etaangular,etacalen}).
830:
831: The mild discrepancy of the angular distribution in Fig.~\ref{fig5}
832: and the slight underestimate of the total cross section data at
833: $\Delta s^{1/2} \sim 10 \, MeV$ let us argue that further reaction
834: details could be accommodated. For instance, the $\bar s s$ shake-off
835: considered in \cite{TitovBK} may be included. This, however, deserves
836: a separate consideration. As interim summary we believe to have at our disposal
837: an appropriate description of the $\eta$ production cross section.
838:
839: As mentioned in the introduction, in heavy-ion collisions a substantial part of
840: di-electrons stem from Dalitz decays of $\eta$ mesons. In the same invariant mass
841: region also $\Delta$ Dalitz and bremsstrahlung processes contribute to the total
842: yield. It is, therefore, important to have some reliable cross sections for elementary
843: $\eta$ production in $pp$ and $pn$ collisions as input for transport model simulations.
844: Here one faces the problem whether the free cross sections (say, simply parameterizations
845: of data) should be utilized or such ones where the FSI is ''switched off'', as in a dense
846: hadronic environment the outgoing nucleons are not asymptotically free out-states.
847: The same holds for the ISI. To have some indicator of the size of ISI and FSI effects
848: we show in Fig.~\ref{fig5A} the same as in Fig.~\ref{fig3} but with FSI switched off
849: (dashed curve) or both ISI and FSI switched off (dotted curve, which may be called
850: pure production cross section). A similar pattern
851: holds for $pn \to pn \eta$ (not displayed). One observes indeed sizeable effects
852: of ISI and FSI which point to the importance of a proper treatment of such effects
853: in accurate many-body simulations.
854:
855: \section{The Complete Reaction $\bf pp \to pp \boldeta \to pp \boldgamma e^+e^-$}
856:
857: In order to emphasize the dependence on the di-electron invariant mass we
858: rewrite the integrated cross section (\ref{two})
859: $d\sigma / ds_{\gamma^*} = \int ds_\eta \,(d\sigma / ds_\eta ds_{\gamma^*})$
860: in the form
861: \begin{eqnarray}&&
862: \frac{d\sigma}{ds_{\gamma^*}}=\frac{2\alpha}{3\pi^2}
863: |F_{\eta \gamma \gamma^*} (s_{\gamma^*})|^2
864: \frac{Br(\eta\to 2\gamma)}{m_\eta^2}{\cal I}(s_{\gamma^*}), \label{xi1} \\&&
865: {\cal I}(s_{\gamma^*})\equiv\int\limits_1^{\xi_{max}}
866: d \xi \frac{(\xi-1)^3}{\xi \, a}
867: \frac{b}{(\xi-a)^2+b^2}
868: \sigma^{tot}_{NN\to NN\eta}(\xi),
869: \label{xi}
870: \end{eqnarray}
871: where we introduced dimensionless variables $a$, $b$ and $\xi$
872: \begin{equation}
873: a\equiv \frac{m_\eta^2}{s_{\gamma^*}};\qquad b\equiv \frac{m_\eta\, \Gamma_\eta}{s_{\gamma^*}},
874: \qquad \xi\equiv \frac{s_\eta}{s_{\gamma^*}},
875: \quad \xi_{max}=\frac{(\sqrt{s}-2m_\eta)^2}{s_{\gamma^*}}.
876: \label{pae}
877: \end{equation}
878: %and $Br(\eta\to 2\gamma)$ is the branching ratio for the
879: %$\eta$ meson decay into two real photons.
880: $d \sigma / d s_{\gamma^*}$ may be considered as normalized contribution
881: to the di-electron invariant mass spectrum mediated by the $\eta$ Dalitz decay.
882:
883: Since the total width of the $\eta$ meson
884: is fairly small,
885: %$\Gamma_\eta = (1.3\pm 0.07)\, keV$,
886: the parameter $b$ in (\ref{xi}) provides a very sharp maximum of the integrand function
887: at $\xi=a$ as long as the parameter obeys $a>1$
888: (or, equivalently, the di-electron invariant mass fulfills
889: $s_\gamma^* < m_\eta^2$). This allows to pull out the smooth
890: function $\sigma^{tot}_{NN\to NN\eta}(\xi=a)$ from the integral and to calculate it at
891: $s_\eta=m_\eta^2$, i.e. for the on-shell $\eta$ meson. The remaining part can
892: be calculated analytically. However, for $a < 1$, when the di-electron mass is larger
893: than the $\eta$ pole mass, the integrand does not exhibit anymore a resonant shape and
894: the integral ought to be calculated numerically.
895:
896: Equation (\ref{xi1}) shows that the di-electron invariant mass distribution
897: $d\sigma / ds_{\gamma^*}$ is proportional to the transition form factor
898: $F_{\eta\gamma\gamma^*}(s_{\gamma^*})$ so that measurements of this distribution
899: provide direct experimental information about the FF.
900: It can be checked that
901: up to $a\sim 1.035$ (corresponding to $s_{\gamma^*} \simeq 0.29 \,GeV^2$) the
902: smooth part of the integrand, $\dfrac{b(\xi-1)^3}{a\xi}\,\sigma^{NN\to NN\eta}(\xi)$, can
903: be pulled out from the integral at $\xi=a$ obtaining
904: \begin{eqnarray}
905: \label{approxint}
906: {\cal I}(s_{\gamma^*})=
907: \dfrac{\pi(a-1)^3}{a^2}\,\sigma^{NN\to NN\eta} (s_\eta=m_\eta^2) .
908: \end{eqnarray}
909: Equations (\ref{xi1} - \ref{approxint}) allow then to define an experimentally
910: measurable ratio which is directly proportional to the form factor squared
911: \begin{eqnarray}
912: \label{epsFF}
913: R(s_{\gamma^*})=
914: \frac{d\sigma/ds_{\gamma^*}}{\left.
915: \left (d\sigma/ds_{\gamma^*}\right)\right|_{s_{\gamma^*}=s_{\gamma^*, min}}}
916: \frac{s_{\gamma^*} }{s_{\gamma^*, min}}
917: \left( \frac{1-s_{\gamma^*, min}/m_\eta^2}{1-s_{\gamma^*}/m_\eta^2}\right)^3=
918: \frac{|F_{\eta\gamma\gamma^*}( s_{\gamma^*})|^2}{|F_{\eta\gamma\gamma^*}( s_{\gamma^* , min})|^2}
919: \end{eqnarray}
920: where $s_{\gamma^* ,min} $ is the minimum value accessible experimentally
921: (in the ideal case this is the kinematical limit $s_{\gamma^* ,min}=4\mu_e^2 $
922: with electron mass $\mu_e$). At low
923: enough values of $s_{\gamma^* ,min} $, the transition FF is close to its normalization
924: point $F_{\eta\gamma\gamma^*}(0)=1$ and the ratio (\ref{epsFF}) is just the transition FF as
925: a function of $s_{\gamma^*}$.
926:
927: As $a$ approaches unity keeping the maximum position still within the integration range,
928: one can
929: again withdraw from the integral the smooth function
930: $\sigma^{NN\to NN\eta}$ at $s_\eta=m_\eta^2$.
931: However, now the function $(\xi-1)^3/\xi$ can not be considered as smooth enough
932: and must be kept under the integration. Nevertheless, even
933: in this case the remaining integral can be computed analytically
934: (see Appendix B) and one can still define a ratio analogous to (\ref{epsFF})
935: which allows for an experimental
936: investigation of the FF near the free $\eta$ threshold ($s_{\gamma^*}\to m_\eta^2$).
937: At $s_{\gamma^*}> m_\eta^2$ the integral ${\cal I}(s_{\gamma^*})$
938: does not have anymore a sharp
939: maximum and it must be calculated numerically as mentioned above.
940:
941: In Fig.~\ref{fig7} the di-electron invariant mass distribution
942: $d\sigma / d s_{\gamma^*}^{1/2}$
943: is exhibited as a function of the invariant mass $s_{\gamma^*}^{1/2}$ calculated from
944: formula (\ref{xi1}). The solid curve employs
945: the transition FF $F_{\eta\gamma\gamma^*}(s_{\gamma^*})$ calculated
946: within the VMD model \cite{LandPhysRep}
947: \begin{equation}
948: F_{\eta\gamma\gamma^*}^{VMD}(s_{\gamma^*}) =
949: \dfrac{m_\rho^2}{s_{\gamma^*} -(m_\rho- \frac{i}{2} \Gamma_\rho)^2}
950: \label{VMD_FF}
951: \end{equation}
952: with standard values for $m_\rho$ and $\Gamma_\rho$ \cite{dataGroup}.
953: (Note that in the kinematical region of interest the $\rho$ contribution
954: is sufficient.)
955: The dashed curve in Fig.~\ref{fig7} is for the pure QED part, i.e.\ without accounting for the
956: strong form factor, i.e.\ with $F_{\eta\gamma\gamma^*}(s_{\gamma^*})=1$.
957: % known also as Quantum Electro-Dynamics (QED) calculations.
958: The experimental data
959: in Fig.~\ref{fig7} are preliminary results
960: from HADES \cite{hadeseta}. It is clearly seen that without FF the calculated cross section
961: rapidly drops as $s_{\gamma^*}^{1/2}\to m_\eta$, while inclusion of the FF
962: only mildly modifies the shape
963: (factor 2 increase at $m_{\gamma^*} \sim 400 \,MeV$
964: High precision data are needed to arrive at a firm conclusion on the
965: validity of the employed VMD FF.
966:
967: With increasing $s_{\gamma^*}^{1/2}$, the effect of
968: the FF becomes more and more pronounced. This can be visualized if one calculates the
969: $e^+ e^-$ mass distribution beyond the free $\eta$ meson pole mass, i.e.
970: at $s_{\gamma^*}^{1/2}>m_\eta$. Figure \ref{fig8} exhibits the behavior
971: of the mass distribution at large values of $s_{\gamma^*}^{1/2}$.
972: The effect of the FF increases noticeably at large values of $s_{\gamma^*}$.
973: This is of interest since, as mentioned, the VMD calculations provides a good description of
974: the on-shell $\eta$ meson FF in the range $s_{\gamma^*}<m_\eta^2$.
975: An investigation of the FF
976: at $s_{\gamma^*} > m_\eta^2$ can provide information of the relevance of the VMD
977: model for off-shell hadrons at kinematical limit.
978: % values of the argument of FF's.
979: In particular, when calculating Dalitz type processes with (off-shell) vector mesons
980: created via bremsstrahlung off nucleon resonances,
981: one usually estimates the couplings in the corresponding vertices from the
982: radiative decay off an on-shell resonance with applying the VMD model.
983: An additional justification of such a procedure can be obtained
984: from investigating the transition FF beyond the on-mass shell limit.
985: It should be noted, however, that severe background processes will make difficult
986: an identification of the $\eta$ Dalitz yield in this kinematical region.
987:
988: \section{Summary}\label{sumary}
989:
990: In summary we have analyzed the di-electron production from Dalitz decays
991: of $\eta$ mesons produced in $pp$ collisions at intermediate energies.
992: The corresponding cross section has been
993: calculated within an effective meson-nucleon approach with
994: parameters adjusted to a large extent to describe the free vector meson production
995: %\cite{ourPhi,ourOmega}
996: in $NN$ reactions near the threshold. We argue that by studying
997: the invariant mass distribution of the final $e^+e^-$ system
998: in a large kinematical interval of %$s_{\gamma^*}$,
999: di-electron masses, one can directly measure
1000: the $\eta$ meson transition form factor $F_{\eta \gamma \gamma^*}$ in, e.g., $pp$
1001: collisions. Such experiments are already performed and will be further improved
1002: at HADES. Our results may serve as prediction for these
1003: forthcoming experiments. The uncertainties of such a procedure
1004: depend upon the scale of the background processes and is expected to be
1005: small if the interference is destructive \cite{ourFF}. Experimental information
1006: on transition form factors is useful for testing QCD predictions of hadronic quantities
1007: in the non-perturbative domain.
1008:
1009: \section*{Acknowledgements}
1010: We thank H.W. Barz and A.I. Titov for useful discussions.
1011: L.P.K. would like
1012: to thank for the warm hospitality in the Research Center Dresden-Rossendorf.
1013: This work has been supported by
1014: BMBF grants 06DR121, 06DR136, GSI and the Heisenberg-Landau program.
1015:
1016: \appendix
1017:
1018: \section{Coupling constants for spin-$\frac32$ resonances}
1019:
1020: The coupling constants of the spin-$\frac32$ resonance $D_{13}(1520)$ can be estimated
1021: from the known decay widths. For instance, for the decay $D_{13}(1520)\to N \eta$
1022: one has
1023: \begin{eqnarray}
1024: \label{b1}
1025: \Gamma_{N^*\to N\eta} &=&
1026: \frac{1}{8\pi}\frac{\sqrt{[m_{N^*}^2 -(m_N-m_\eta)^2][m_{N^*}^2 -(m_N+m_\eta)^2]}}{2m_{N^*}^3}
1027: \frac{g^2_{\eta NN^*}}{m_\eta^2}\frac14 \sum_{spins} | {\cal M}|^2\nonumber\\
1028: &=&
1029: \frac{1}{64\pi m_{N^*}^3 }\sqrt{[m_{N^*}^2 -(m_N-m_\eta)^2][m_{N^*}^2 -(m_N+m_\eta)^2]}
1030: \frac{g^2_{\eta NN^*}}{m_\eta^2} \frac23 \left(\frac{(P_{N^*} q_\eta)}{m_{N^*}^2}-m_\eta^2
1031: \right)\nonumber\\
1032: &\times&
1033: {\rm Tr} \left[(\hat P_N +m_N)\gamma_5(\hat P_{N^*}+m_{N^*})\gamma_5) \right],
1034: \end{eqnarray}
1035: where for the spin-$\frac32$ particles we use the Rarita-Schwinger spinors
1036: ${\cal U}^\mu (P_{N^*}, \bar s )$ for the spin $\bar s$ summation
1037: with the relation
1038: \begin{eqnarray}
1039: \label{r1}
1040: \sum_{\bar s} {\cal U}^\mu(P_{N^*}, \bar s) \bar {\cal U}^\nu(P_{N^*}, \bar s) &=&
1041: (\hat P_{N^*}+m_{N^*})\nonumber \\
1042: &\times&
1043: \left( -g_{\mu\nu} +\frac{ \gamma^\mu\gamma^\nu}{3} +
1044: \frac{(\gamma^\mu P_{N^*}^\nu-\gamma^\nu P_{N^*}^\mu)}{3m_{N^*}}
1045: + \frac{2 P_{N^*}^\mu P_{N^*}^\nu }{3m_{N^*}^2} \right).
1046: \end{eqnarray}
1047: We use the short hand notation $\hat p = (p \cdot \gamma)$.
1048: Equation (\ref{b1}) provides
1049: slightly larger coupling constants than that used in Ref.~\cite{nakayamaEta}
1050: in which, besides the decay widths, the coupling constants have been adjusted to fit also other
1051: processes involving $D_{13}(1520)$.
1052: An analog equation hold for $D_{13}(1520)\to N \pi$.
1053: In the present paper we take $g_{\pi NN^*}=1.55$ and
1054: $g_{\eta NN^*}=8.3$, see Tab.~\ref{tb2}.
1055:
1056: \section{Integration over the variable $\bf s_\boldeta$ }\label{appA}
1057:
1058: Since the parameter $b$ in eq.~(\ref{xi}) is very small
1059: in the whole kinematical region of $s_{\gamma^*}$ the
1060: integrand has a sharp maximum around $\xi=a$. If $a>x_{min}=1$ then the
1061: maximum is located inside the integration interval of $\xi$ and one can
1062: take advantage of the smoothness of the $\eta$ production cross section
1063: $\sigma^{NN\to NN\eta}$ to withdraw it from the integral. Then
1064: \begin{eqnarray}
1065: \label{appen1}
1066: {\cal I}_1(\xi)&\equiv &\int d\xi \frac{(\xi-a)^3}{\xi}\frac{b/a}{(\xi-a)^2 +b^2}\nonumber\\
1067: &=&
1068: \frac{b}{a}\xi +\frac{b}{a(a^2+b^2)}\left[
1069: -\ln \xi +\frac12 \ln\left( (\xi-a)^2 +b^2\right)\left (
1070: 2a^3 -3a^2 + 2ab^2 -3b^2+1\right) \right. \nonumber\\
1071: &+& \left.
1072: \frac{1}{b}{\rm arctan}\left(\frac{\xi-a}{b}\right)
1073: \left( a^4 -3a^3 +3a^2 -a -3ab^2 -b^4+3b^2\right) \right] .
1074: \end{eqnarray}
1075: It is seen that in case when $a\gg 1$, $b\ll 1$ the term $b \xi / a$ and terms
1076: containing logarithms in (\ref{appen1}) can be disregarded:
1077: \begin{eqnarray}
1078: \label{app2}
1079: {\cal I}_1(\xi) &\simeq &\frac{(a-1)^3}{a^2} {\rm arctan}\left(\frac{\xi-a}{b}\right),\\
1080: %\end{eqnarray}
1081: %or
1082: %\begin{eqnarray}
1083: \label{app3}
1084: {\cal I}_1(\xi_{max}) -{\cal I}_1(\xi_{min}) &\simeq &
1085: \pi\frac{(a-1)^3}{a^2}.
1086: \end{eqnarray}
1087: This corresponds to the case when in eq.~(\ref{xi}) one withdraws from the integral
1088: both the production cross section
1089: $\sigma^{NN\to NN\eta}$ and the combination $(\xi -1)^3 / \xi$ at $\xi=a$. Note that
1090: eq.~(\ref{appen1}) is a good approximation even for $a<1$, if $a+b >1$, i.e. for $a$ in the
1091: $b$ vicinity of unity.
1092:
1093: \begin{references}
1094: \bibitem{HADES_PRL} H. Agakishev et al. (HADES collaboration), %nucl-exp/0608031,
1095: Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 (2007) 052302
1096: \bibitem{HW_HADES} H.W. Barz, B. K\"ampfer, Gy. Wolf, M. Zetenyi, nucl-th/0605036.
1097: \bibitem{ourNuclPhys}
1098: L.P. Kaptari, B. K\"ampfer, Nucl. Phys. {\bf A764} (2006) 338.
1099: \bibitem{HADES}
1100: P. Salabura et al. (HADES Collaboration), Acta Phys. Pol. {\bf B35} (2004) 1119;\\
1101: R. Holzmann et al. (HADES Collaboration), Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. {\bf 53} (2004) 49.
1102: \bibitem{LandPhysRep}
1103: L.G. Landsberg, Phys. Rep. {\bf 128} (1985) 301.
1104: \bibitem{hadeseta}
1105: I. Fr\"ohlich et al. (HADES collaboration), nucl-ex/0610048.
1106: \bibitem{wilkinEta}
1107: G. F\"aldt, C. Wilkin, Phys. Scripta {\bf 64} (2001) 427;\\
1108: U. Tengblad, G. F\"aldt, C. Wilkin, Eur. Phys. J. {\bf A25} (2005) 267;\\
1109: C. Wilkin, U. Tengblad, G. F\"aldt, Acta Phys. Slov. {\bf 56} (2005) 205.
1110: \bibitem{santraEta}
1111: A.B. Santra, B.K. Jain, Nucl. Phys. {\bf A634} (1998) 309.
1112: \bibitem{gedalinEta}
1113: E. Gedalin, A. Moalem, L. Razodolskaja, Nucl. Phys. {\bf A634} (1998) 368.
1114: \bibitem{nakayamaEta}
1115: K. Nakayama, J. Speth, T.-S. Lee, Phys. Rev. {\bf C65} (2002) 045210;\\
1116: K. Nakayama, H.F. Arellano, J.W. Durso, J. Speth, Phys. Rev. {\bf C61} (1999) 024001;\\
1117: K. Nakayama, J. Haidenbauer, C. Hanhart, J. Speth, Phys. Rev. {\bf C68} (2003) 045201.
1118: \bibitem{moselEta}
1119: V. Shklyar, H. Lenske. U. Mosel, nucl-th/0611036.
1120: \bibitem{ourOmega}
1121: L.P. Kaptari, B. K\"ampfer, Eur. Phys. J. {\bf A23} (2005) 291.
1122: \bibitem{ourPhi}
1123: L.P. Kaptari, B. K\"ampfer, Eur. Phys. J. {\bf A14} (2002) 211;\\
1124: L.P. Kaptari, B. K\"ampfer, J. Phys. {\bf G30} (2004) 1115.
1125: \bibitem{meissner}
1126: U.-G. Mei\ss ner, Phys. Rep. {\bf 161} (1988) 213;\\
1127: N.M. Kroll, T.D. Lee, B. Zumino, Phys. Rev. {\bf 157} (1967) 1376.
1128: \bibitem{thomas}
1129: H.B. O'Connell, B.C. Pearce, A.W. Thomas, A.G. Williams, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. {\bf 39} (1997) 201.
1130: \bibitem{anisovich_FF}
1131: A.V. Anisovich, V.V. Anisovich, V.A. Nikonov, Eur. Phys. J. {\bf A12} (2001) 103;\\
1132: A.V. Anisovich, V.V. Anisovich, V.A. Nikonov, hep-ph/0305216.
1133: \bibitem{faessler}
1134: A. Faessler, C. Fuchs, M. Krivoruchenko, Phys. Rev. {\bf C61} (2000) 035206;\\
1135: H.C. D\"onges, M. Sch\"afer, U. Mosel, Phys. Rev. {\bf C51} (1995) 950.
1136: \bibitem{ourFF}
1137: L.P. Kaptari, B. K\"ampfer, nucl-th/0610068, Eur. Phys. J. {\bf A31} (2007) in print.
1138: \bibitem{dataGroup}
1139: S. Eidelman et al. (Particle Data Group), Phys. Lett. {\bf B592} (2004) 1.
1140: \bibitem{omegaFrmf1}
1141: R.I. Dzhelyadin, S.V. Golovkin, M.V. Gritsuk, D.B. Kakauridze et al.,
1142: Phys. Lett. {\bf B84} (1979) 143; Phys. Lett. {\bf B88} (1979) 379.
1143: \bibitem{omegaFrmf2}
1144: R.I. Dzhelyadin, S.V. Golovkin, A.S. Konstantinov, V.P. Kubarovski et al.,
1145: Phys. Lett. {\bf B102} (1981) 296.
1146: \bibitem{omegaFrmf3}
1147: V.A. Viktorov, S.V. Golovkin, R.I. Dzhelyadin, V.P. Kubarovski et al.,
1148: Yad. Fiz. {\bf 32} (1980) 998, 1002, 1005; Phys. Lett. {\bf B94} (1980) 548.
1149: \bibitem{friman1}
1150: M.F.M. Lutz, B. Friman, M. Soyeur, Nucl. Phys. {\bf A713} (2003) 97.
1151: \bibitem{friman2}
1152: B. Friman, M. Soyeur, Nucl. Phys. {\bf A600} (1996) 477.
1153: \bibitem{bykling}
1154: E. Byckling, K. Kajantie, "Particle Kinematics", John Wiley \& Sons 1973.
1155: \bibitem{durso}
1156: J.W. Durso, Phys. Lett. {\bf B184} (1987) 348.
1157: \bibitem{nimaiResonances}
1158: M. Benmerrouche, N.C. Mukhopadhyay, Phys. Rev. {\bf D51} (1995) 3237.
1159: \bibitem{davitsonDelta}
1160: R.M. Davidson, N.C. Mukhopadhyay, R.S. Wittman, Phys. Rev. {\bf D43} (1991) 71.
1161: \bibitem{prop4}
1162: M.J. Dekker, P.J. Brussaard, J.A. Tjon, Phys. Rev. {\bf C49} (1994) 2650.
1163: \bibitem{prop5}
1164: A.I. Titov, B. K\"ampfer, B.L. Reznik, Phys. Rev. {\bf C65} (2002) 065202.
1165: \bibitem{prop6}
1166: M.Post, S. Leupold, U. Mosel, Nucl. Phys. {\bf A689} (2001) 753.
1167: \bibitem{prop7}
1168: H.T. Williams, Phys. Rev. {\bf C39} (1989) 02339.
1169: \bibitem{fron}
1170: R.E. Behrends, C. Fronsdal, Phys. Rev. {\bf 106} (1957) 345.
1171: \bibitem{bonncd}
1172: R. Machleidt, Adv. Nucl. Phys. {\bf 19} (1989) 189;
1173: \bibitem{isi}
1174: C. Hanhart, K. Nakayama, Phys. Lett. {\bf B454} (1999) 176.
1175: \bibitem{said}
1176: http://said-hh.edsy.de
1177: \bibitem{gillespe}
1178: J. Gillespie, {\it " Final State Interactions"}, Holden-Day Advanced Physics Monographs, 1964.
1179: \bibitem{fsiReznik}
1180: A.I. Titov, B. K\"ampfer, B.L. Reznik, Eur. Phys. J. {\bf A7} (2000) 543.
1181: \bibitem{etaangular}
1182: H. Calen, J. Dyring, G. F\"aldt, K. Fransson et al., Phys. Lett. {\bf B458} (1999) 190.
1183: \bibitem{etacalen}
1184: H. Calen, S. Carius, K. Fransson, L. Gustafsson et al., Phys. Lett. {\bf B366} (1996) 39;\\
1185: H. Calen, J. Dyring, K. Fransson, L. Gustafsson et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 79} (1997) 2642;\\
1186: H. Calen, J. Dyring, K. Fransson, L. Gustafsson et al., Phys. Rev. {\bf C58} (1998) 2667.
1187: \bibitem{TitovBK} A.I. Titov, B. K\"ampfer, V.V. Shklyar, Phys. Rev. {\bf C 59} (1999) 999.
1188: \bibitem{etaexper}
1189: E. Chiavassa, G. Dellacasa, N. De Marco, C. De Oliveira Martins et al.,
1190: Phys. Lett. {\bf B322} (1994) 270;\\
1191: F. Hibou, O. Bing, M. Boivin, P. Courtat et al., Phys. Lett. {\bf B438} (1998) 41;\\
1192: J. Smyrski, P. W\"ustner, J.T. Balewski, A. Budzanowski et al., Phys. Lett. {\bf B474} (2000) 182.
1193: \bibitem{etaexper1}
1194: F. Balestra, Y. Bedfer, R. Bertini, L.C. Bland et al., Phys. Lett. {\bf B491} (2000) 29;\\
1195: F. Balestra, Y. Bedfer, R. Bertini, L.C. Bland et al., Phys. Rev. {\bf C69} (2004) 064003.
1196: \bibitem{etaexper2}
1197: A.M. Bergodolt, G. Bergodolt, O. Bing, A. Bouchakour et al., Phys. Rev. {\bf D48} (1993) R2969.
1198: \bibitem{etaexper3}
1199: P. Moskal, H.-H. Adam, A. Budzanowski, R. Czyzkiewich et al.,
1200: Phys. Rev. {\bf C69} (2004) 025203;\\
1201: see also EPAPS Document No.~E-PRVCAN-68-015312\\
1202: (http://www.aip.org/pubservs/epaps/html).
1203:
1204: \end{references}
1205:
1206: \newpage
1207:
1208: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% BEGIN FIGURES %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
1209: \begin{figure}[h] % Fig1
1210: \vskip -9mm
1211: \includegraphics[width=0.6\textwidth]{fig1x.eps} %
1212: \caption{Illustration of the choice of the independent variables
1213: for the process $N_1 + N_2 \to N_1' + N_2' + \gamma +l_1 + l_2$ ($l_1 = e^+$, $l_2 = e^-$)
1214: within the duplication
1215: kinematics \cite{bykling}. The invariant mass squared of the two final nucleons
1216: is denoted by $s_{12}$, while the invariant mass of the subsystem
1217: $\gamma e^+e^-$ is $s_\eta$. }
1218: \label{fig1}
1219: \end{figure}
1220:
1221: \begin{figure}[h] % Fig2
1222: \vskip 3mm
1223: \includegraphics[width=1.0\textwidth]{fig2.eps} %
1224: \vskip -3mm
1225: \caption{Diagrams for the process
1226: $N N \to N N \gamma e^+e^-$ within an effective meson-nucleon theory.
1227: % with Lagrangians defined by eqs.~(\ref{mnn})-(\ref{res14}).
1228: a) Dalitz decays of $\eta$ mesons from bremsstrahlung like diagrams.
1229: The intermediate
1230: baryon $N^*$ (triple line) can be either a nucleon or one of the nucleon resonances
1231: $S_{11}(1535)$, $P_{11}(1440)$ or $D_{13}(1520)$. Analog diagrams for the
1232: emission from Fermion line $N_2$.
1233: b) Dalitz decay of $\eta$ mesons from internal meson conversion.
1234: Exchange diagrams for identical nucleons in exit channel are not displayed.}
1235: \label{fig2}
1236: \end{figure}
1237:
1238: \newpage
1239:
1240: \begin{figure}[h] % Fig3 pp \to pp eta
1241: \includegraphics[width=1.0\textwidth]{fig3.eps}
1242: \vskip -9mm
1243: \caption{Total cross section for the reaction $pp\to pp\eta$
1244: as a function of the excess energy $\Delta s^{1/2} = \sqrt{s}-2m-m_\eta$.
1245: The dot-dashed line corresponds to the nucleon
1246: current contribution (without resonances, Fig.~\ref{fig2}a),
1247: while the dotted line is for the
1248: internal meson conversion diagram (Fig.~\ref{fig2}b).
1249: The dashed curve exhibits the contribution
1250: of the $S_{11}(1535)$ resonance (nucleon resonance current
1251: in Fig.~\ref{fig2}a). Contributions from
1252: $P_{11}(1440)$ and $D_{13}(1520)$ are smaller and not displayed.
1253: The solid curve is the total contribution with all interferences.
1254: Data are from Refs.~\cite{{etacalen},etaexper,etaangular,etaexper1,etaexper2,etaexper3};
1255: error bars are suppressed.}
1256: \label{fig3}
1257: \end{figure}
1258:
1259: \begin{figure}[h] % Fig4 pn \to pn eta
1260: \includegraphics[width=1.0\textwidth]{fig4.eps}
1261: \vskip -9mm
1262: \caption{The same as in Fig.~\ref{fig3} but for the reaction $pn\to pn\eta$.}
1263: \label{fig4}
1264: \end{figure}
1265:
1266: \begin{figure}[h] % Fig5 Angular
1267: \vskip -9mm
1268: \includegraphics[width=1.0\textwidth]{fig5.eps} %
1269: \vskip -9mm
1270: \caption{Angular distributions of $\eta$ mesons in the $pp$ center of
1271: mass system for the excess energies $\Delta s^{1/2} = 16 \,MeV$
1272: (left panel) and $37 \, MeV$ (right panel). The dotted lines depict the contribution
1273: of the conversion currents, while the solid lines correspond to the
1274: total differential cross section, including also nucleon and resonance
1275: currents and interferences. Data are from Ref.~\cite{etaangular}.}
1276: \label{fig5}
1277: \end{figure}
1278:
1279: \begin{figure}[h] % Fig5A Angular
1280: \vskip -13mm
1281: \includegraphics[width=1.0\textwidth]{ISIFSI.eps} %
1282: \vskip -9mm
1283: \caption{Effect of ISI and FSI for the reaction $pp \to pp \eta$.
1284: The dashed curve depicts the cross section when switching off the FSI,
1285: while the dotted curve is without both FSI and ISI.
1286: The solid curve and data are as in Fig.~\ref{fig3}.}
1287: \label{fig5A}
1288: \end{figure}
1289:
1290: \begin{figure}[h] % Fig6 Spp
1291: \includegraphics[width=1.0\textwidth]{fig6.eps} %
1292: \vskip -9mm
1293: \caption{Distribution of the proton-proton invariant mass
1294: $s_{12}$ for the reaction $pp\to pp\eta$ at excess energy
1295: $\Delta s^{1/2}=15.5 \,MeV$.
1296: %The solid line corresponds to results of calculations within the present model.
1297: Since there is an overall normalization uncertainty of data at
1298: $\Delta s^{1/2}=15.5 - 16.0 \,MeV$ obtained by different groups
1299: %(COSY-TOF, PROMICE/WASA)
1300: our curve has been normalized to the data
1301: (see Ref.~\cite{etacalen,etaexper3}, normalization factor $\approx 1.4$).
1302: Data are from Ref.~\cite{etaexper3}.}
1303: \label{fig6}
1304: \end{figure}
1305:
1306: \begin{figure}[h] % Fig7 HADES
1307: \includegraphics[width=1.0\textwidth]{fig7.eps} %
1308: \vskip -9mm
1309: \caption{Invariant mass distribution
1310: of di-electrons produced by Dalitz decay of $\eta$ mesons in
1311: the reaction $pp\to pp \gamma e^+e^-$ at initial
1312: kinetic energy $T_{kin}=2.2 \,GeV$.
1313: The solid line is for results with
1314: the $\eta\gamma\gamma^*$ transition FF computed within the VMD model,
1315: while the dashed line corresponds to a pure QED calculation of the
1316: $\eta\gamma\gamma^*$ vertex, i.e., for $\vert F_{\eta \gamma \gamma^*} \vert^2 = 1$.
1317: The position of $\eta$ pole mass is exposed.
1318: Preliminary experimental data are from Ref.~\cite{hadeseta}.}
1319: \label{fig7}
1320: \end{figure}
1321:
1322: \begin{figure}[h] % Fig8 HADES
1323: \includegraphics[width=1.0\textwidth]{fig8.eps} %
1324: \vskip -9mm
1325: \caption{ The same as in Fig.~\ref{fig7} but
1326: in the kinematical region beyond the "$\eta$ threshold", i.e.
1327: for di-electron masses larger than the $\eta$ pole mass
1328: being accessible for intermediate off-shell $\eta$ mesons.}
1329: \label{fig8}
1330: \end{figure}
1331:
1332: \end{document}
1333: