1:
2:
3: %LATEX FILE OF MANUSCRIPT
4: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
5:
6:
7:
8: %LATEX file of the manuscript
9:
10:
11: %\documentstyle[eqsecnum,aps,epsf]{revtex} % PH. REV. FINAL FORMAT STYLE
12: %%% <<< epsf commands in the next two lines >>>
13: %\newcommand{\postscript}[2] {\setlength{\epsfxsize}{#2\hsize}
14: %\centerline{\epsfbox{#1}}}
15:
16: \documentstyle[preprint,aps]{revtex}
17: %\documentstyle[eqsecnum,aps]{revtex}
18: %\documentstyle[aps]{revtex}
19: \voffset=1.5 true cm
20: \hoffset=-.6 true cm
21: \renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{1.42}
22: %\renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{1.0}
23: \begin{document}
24: %\twocolumn[\hsize\textwidth\columnwidth\hsize\csname@twocolumnfalse\endcsname
25:
26: \title{Resonances in
27: positronium-rubidium and positronium-cesium scattering}
28:
29: \author{Sadhan K. Adhikari}
30: \address{Instituto de F\'{\i}sica Te\'orica,
31: Universidade Estadual Paulista,
32: 01.405-900 S\~ao Paulo, S\~ao Paulo, Brazil\\}
33:
34:
35: \date{\today}
36: \maketitle
37:
38:
39:
40: \begin{abstract}
41:
42: Scattering of ortho positronium (Ps) by cesium and rubidium atoms has been
43: investigated employing a three-Ps-state coupled-channel model with
44: Ps(1s,2s,2p) states using a time-reversal-symmetric regularized
45: electron-exchange model potential.
46: We find a narrow S-wave singlet resonance at 5.057 eV of width 0.003 eV in
47: the
48: Ps-Rb system and at 5.067 eV of width 0.003 eV in the Ps-Cs system.
49: Singlet P-wave
50: resonances in both systems are found at 5.3 eV of width 0.4 eV. Singlet
51: D-wave structures are found at 5.4 eV in both systems.
52: The pronounced P- and D-wave resonances in these systems lead to easily detectable
53: local minima in the
54: low-energy elastic cross sections.
55: We also report results for elastic and Ps-excitation cross sections for Ps
56: scattering by Rb and Cs.
57:
58:
59:
60:
61: {\bf PACS Number(s): 34.10.+x, 36.10.Dr}
62:
63: \end{abstract}
64:
65: %\vskip1.5pc]
66:
67:
68:
69: \newpage
70:
71:
72:
73:
74: Recent measurements of ortho positronium
75: (Ps) scattering cross section by H$_2$, N$_2$, He, Ne, Ar, C$_4$H$_{10}$, and
76: C$_5$H$_{12}$ \cite{r1,r2,r3,r4,r5,r6,r7} have
77: initiated new theoretical
78: investigations
79: \cite{r8,r9,r10,r11,r12,r13,r13x} in this subject.
80: We suggested \cite{r14,r15,r16} a regularized, symmetric, nonlocal
81: electron-exchange
82: model potential and used it
83: in the
84: study of Ps scattering by H \cite{r17}, He \cite{r15,r16,r18},
85: Ne
86: \cite{r18}, Ar \cite{r18}, H$_2$ \cite{r19}, Li \cite{r20}, Na \cite{pus} and K
87: \cite{pus}. The
88: low-energy
89: cross sections obtained in these studies
90: are in
91: agreement with experimental measurements
92: for He \cite{r3,r4} , Ne \cite{r7}, Ar \cite{r7} and H$_2$ \cite{r3,r4}.
93: These
94: investigations also produced
95: correct results for resonance and binding energies for the S
96: wave electronic
97: singlet state of Ps-H \cite{r9,r10,r11,r12,r17} and
98: Ps-Li \cite{r20} systems in addition to experimental pick-off quenching
99: rate in
100: Ps-He \cite{r16} scattering. These studies also predicted
101: low-energy resonances in lower
102: partial waves
103: of the Ps-Na and Ps-K systems \cite{pus}.
104:
105:
106: In this Letter we apply the above symmetric model-exchange potential to
107: study
108: Ps-Rb and
109: Ps-Cs scattering using the three-Ps-state coupled-channel method. The
110: interaction in the singlet channel is attractive in nature as in the
111: corresponding channel of the Ps-H system \cite{r17} and we find
112: resonances in this channel at low energies in S, P and D waves of
113: both systems near the Ps(2) excitation threshold. We also report
114: angle-integrated elastic and Ps-excitation cross sections for both
115: systems.
116:
117:
118:
119: The resonances
120: in electron-atom \cite{r21,r22,r23} and positron-atom
121: \cite{r24}
122: systems, and in other atomic systems in general, are of great
123: interest.
124: Several resonances in the
125: electron-hydrogen
126: system have been found in the close-coupling calculation and later
127: reconfirmed in the variational calculation \cite{r25,r26,r27}. Resonances
128: have also
129: been found in the close-coupling calculation of electron scattering by
130: Li, Na
131: and K \cite{r28,r29}. These resonances provide the
132: necessary testing ground for a theoretical formulation and can
133: eventually be detected experimentally. A proper dynamical description of
134: scattering in a theoretical formulation is necessary
135: for the appearance of these resonances. The ability of the present
136: exchange potential to reproduce the resonances in diverse Ps-atom
137: systems \cite{r17,r20,pus} assures its realistic nature.
138:
139:
140:
141:
142:
143:
144: For target-elastic
145: scattering
146: we solve the following
147: Lippmann-Schwinger scattering integral
148: equation in momentum space \cite{r15,r17} \begin{eqnarray} f^\pm_{\nu
149: ',\nu} (
150: {\bf k',k})&=& {\cal B}^\pm _{\nu ',\nu}({\bf k ',k}) \nonumber
151: \\ &-&\sum_{\nu ''} \int \frac{ {\makebox{d}{\bf k''}} } {2\pi^2}
152: \frac { {\cal B}^ \pm _ {\nu ', \nu''} ({\bf k ',k''}) f^ \pm
153: _{ \nu'' ,\nu} ({\bf k'',k}) } {{k}^2_{\nu ''}/4-k''^2/4+
154: \makebox{i}0}, \label{4} \end{eqnarray} where the singlet (+) and triplet
155: ($-$)
156: ``Born"
157: amplitudes, ${\cal B}^\pm$, are given by $
158: {\cal B}^\pm_{\nu ',\nu}({\bf k',k}) =
159: g^D_{\nu ',\nu}({\bf
160: k',k})\pm g^ E_{\nu ',\nu}({\bf k',k}),$
161: where $g^D$ and $g^E$ represent the direct and exchange Born amplitudes
162: and the $f^ \pm$ are the singlet and triplet scattering amplitudes,
163: respectively. The quantum states are labeled by the indices $\nu$,
164: referring to the Ps atom. The
165: variables ${\bf k}$, ${\bf k'}$, ${\bf k''}$ etc denote the appropriate
166: momentum states of Ps; ${\bf k}_{\nu ''}$ is the on-shell relative
167: momentum of Ps in the channel $\nu ''$. We use
168: units $\hbar = m = 1$ where $m$ is the electron mass.
169:
170:
171: To avoid
172: the complication
173: of calculating exchange potential with a many-electron wave function,
174: we consider a frozen-core one-valence-electron
175: approximation for the targets Rb and Cs. Such wave
176: functions have been successfully used for scattering of
177: alkali metal atoms in other contexts and also for positronium scattering
178: by Li \cite{r13,r13x}.
179: The Rb(5s) and Cs(6s) frozen-core hydrogen-atom-like wave functions are
180: taken as
181: \begin{eqnarray}\label{na}
182: \phi_{\mbox{Rb}}({\bf r})= \frac{1}{300\sqrt 5\sqrt{4\pi\bar
183: a_0^3}}(120-240\rho+120\rho^2-20\rho^3+\rho^4)e^{-\rho/2},
184: \end{eqnarray}
185: \begin{eqnarray}\label{k}
186: \phi_{\mbox{Cs}}({\bf r})= \frac{1}{2160\sqrt 6\sqrt{4\pi\bar
187: a_0^3}}(720-1800\rho+1200\rho^2-300\rho^3+30\rho^4-\rho^5)e^{-\rho/2},
188: \end{eqnarray}
189: where $\rho=2r\alpha $ with
190: $\alpha=1/(n\bar a_0)$. Here $n=5$ for Rb and = 6 for Cs and $\bar
191: a_0=(2n^2E_i)^{-1}a_0$ with $E_i$ the ionization energy of the target in
192: atomic unit and $a_0$ the Bohr radius of H. Here we use
193: the following experimental values for ionization energies for Rb and
194: Cs, respectively: 4.176 eV and 3.893 eV \cite{r30}.
195:
196: In this coupled-channel calculation we employ the above frozen-core
197: approximation for
198: the target wave function. In addition we shall neglect the excited states of the
199: target and employ only the lowest Ps(2) excitations of the Ps. Although, such an
200: approximation is not entirely realistic, specially when these excitations are
201: energetically open,
202: it makes this complicated scattering
203: process mathematically tractable. Moreover, previous experience with Ps-Li, Ps-Na,
204: and Ps-K systems in similar three-Ps-state model has revealed interesting physics in
205: producing resonances and correct binding energies \cite{r20,pus}. The reproduction of
206: correct
207: binding energies assures of physically plausible low-energy cross sections.
208: Hence we believe that the present study of Ps-Rb and Ps-Cs scattering should lead to
209: physically reasonable results. However, it would be interesting to repeat this
210: investigation
211: in the future including the excited states of the target, as has been by Ray in the
212: Ps-Li system \cite{r13x}, as well as of Ps, and compare the results for
213: low-energy scattering with the present investigation.
214:
215:
216: The direct Born amplitude of Ps scattering is given by \cite{r15}
217: \begin{eqnarray}\label{1x}
218: g^D_{\nu',\nu} ({\bf k_f,k_i})&= &
219: \frac{4}{Q^2}
220: \int \phi^*({\bf r})\left[ 1-\exp ( \makebox{i} {\bf Q.
221: r})\right]\phi({\bf r})
222: \makebox{d}{\bf r}\nonumber \\ &\times&
223: \int \chi^*_{\nu '}({\bf t })2\mbox{i} \sin ( {\bf Q}.{\bf t
224: }/
225: 2)\chi_{\nu}({\bf t } ) \makebox{d}{\bf t },
226: \end{eqnarray}
227: where $\phi({\bf r})$ is the target wave function and $\chi({\bf t})$ is
228: the Ps wave function.
229: The (parameter-free) exchange amplitude corresponding to the model potential
230: is given by \cite{r17} \begin{eqnarray}\label{1}
231: g^E_{\nu',\nu} ({\bf k_f,k_i})&= &
232: \frac{4(-1)^{l+l'}}{D}
233: \int \phi^*({\bf r})\exp ( \makebox{i} {\bf Q. r})\phi({\bf
234: r})
235: \makebox{d}{\bf r}\nonumber \\ &\times&
236: \int \chi^*_{\nu '}({\bf t })\exp ( \makebox{i}{\bf Q}.{\bf t }/
237: 2)\chi_{\nu}({\bf t } ) \makebox{d}{\bf t },
238: \end{eqnarray}with
239: $D=(k_i^2+k_f^2)/8+\alpha^2+(\beta_\nu^2+
240: \beta_{\nu'}^2)/2$
241: where $l$ and $l'$ are the angular momenta of the initial and final Ps
242: states. The initial and
243: final Ps momenta are ${\bf k_i}$ and ${\bf k_f}$, ${\bf Q = k_i -k_f}$,
244: and $\beta_\nu^2$
245: and $\beta_{\nu '}^2$ are the binding energies of the initial and final
246: states of Ps in atomic unit,
247: respectively.
248: The exchange potential
249: for Ps scattering is considered
250: \cite{r14} to be a
251: generalization
252: of the Ochkur-Rudge exchange potential for electron scattering
253: \cite{r33,r34}.
254: It is possible to introduce an adjustable parameter in the above exchange potential
255: to fit the scattering result to an accurately known low-energy observable, such as
256: the Ps-atom
257: scattering length or binding energy \cite{r18}. However, in Ps-Rb and Ps-Cs systems
258: there is no
259: such observable and we use the parameter-free exchange amplitude (\ref{1}) in this
260: investigation.
261:
262:
263:
264:
265:
266:
267: After a partial-wave projection, the system of coupled equations (\ref{4})
268: is solved by the method of matrix inversion.
269: Forty Gauss-Legendre quadrature points are
270: used in the discretization of
271: each momentum-space integral. The calculation is performed with the
272: exact Ps wave functions and frozen-core orbitals (\ref{na}) and (\ref{k})
273: for Rb(5s) and Cs(6s) ground
274: state. We consider Ps-Rb and Ps-Cs scattering using the
275: three-Ps-state model
276: that includes the
277: following states:
278: Ps(1s)Rb(5s), Ps(2s)Rb(5s), Ps(2p)Rb(5s), and
279: Ps(1s)Cs(6s), Ps(2s)Cs(6s),
280: Ps(2p)Cs(6s), for Rb and Cs, respectively.
281:
282:
283: The Ps-Rb and Ps-Cs systems have an effective attractive interaction in
284: the singlet channel as in the Ps-H \cite{r17} and Ps-Li \cite{r20}
285: systems. The targets of these systems have one active valence electron
286: outside a
287: closed shell. In the coupled-channel calculation we find resonances in both systems
288: in the singlet state.
289: No resonances appear in the triplet state.
290: For the resonances to appear, the inclusion of the excited states of Ps is
291: fundamental in a coupled-channel calculation. The static-exchange model
292: with both the target and Ps in the ground state does not lead to these
293: resonances. A detailed investigation of these resonances in coupled-channel model
294: of Ps-H \cite{r9,r10,r11,r17} and Ps-Li \cite{r20} systems in the singlet
295: state
296: has appeared in the literature.
297:
298: Here to study the resonances, first we calculate the S-, P- and D-wave
299: elastic phase shifts and cross sections in the singlet channel of the
300: Ps-Rb and Ps-Cs systems
301: using the 3-Ps-state model. The phase shifts are calculated in the usual fashion
302: \cite{bran} from the partial-wave scattering amplitude or from the partial-wave $S$
303: matrix. The energy and width of resonance are obtained by fitting the corresponding
304: partial-wave cross section to the well-known
305: Breit-Wigner formula
306: \begin{equation}
307: \sigma (E) \sim \frac{\pi}{k^2} \frac {\Gamma ^2 }{(E-E_R)^2+ \Gamma^2/4},
308: \end{equation}
309: where $\sigma (E)$ is the cross section at energy $E=6.8 k^2$ eV,
310: $E_R$ is the resonance energy and $\Gamma$ the width.
311: The S-wave phase shifts are shown in Fig.
312: 1. The Ps-Rb system has a resonance at 5.057 eV of width 0.003 eV. The
313: resonance in the Ps-Cs system appears at 5.067 eV and also has a width
314: 0.003
315: eV. The phase shift curves in Fig. 1
316: clearly show the resonances where the phase shifts jump by $\pi$.
317:
318:
319: In Fig. 2 we show the P-wave Ps-Rb and Ps-Cs phase shifts in the singlet
320: state. Both systems possess resonances at 5.2 eV of width of 0.3 eV. The
321: P-wave singlet elastic cross section at low energies shown in the off-set
322: clearly exhibits these resonances. In Fig. 3 we plot the D-wave singlet
323: elastic cross section for Ps-Rb and Ps-Cs systems at low energies. There
324: is
325: a structure in both systems at 5.4 eV which is more diffuse than in S and
326: P waves.
327:
328: Next we calculate the different partial cross sections of Ps-Rb and Ps-Cs
329: scattering. The convergence of the cross sections with respect to partial
330: waves is slower in
331: this case than in the case of Ps-H scattering. At a incident Ps energy of
332: 50 eV, 40 partial waves were used to achieve convergence of the
333: partial-wave scheme. In Figs. 4 and 5 we plot different angle-integrated
334: cross sections of Ps-Rb and Ps-Cs scattering, respectively. Specifically,
335: we plot the elastic, Ps(2s) and Ps(2p) excitation cross sections using the
336: three-Ps-state model. For comparison we also plot the elastic cross
337: section obtained with the static-exchange model. The elastic cross section
338: is large at low energies in both systems. In the off-set of Figs.
339: 4 and 5 we plot the corresponding low-energy elastic cross sections. The
340: effect of the inclusion of highly polarizable Ps(2) states in the coupling
341: scheme could be considerable, specially at low energies.
342:
343: From Figs. 4 and 5 we see that the P and D-wave
344: resonances of large widths
345: predicted in this Letter have lead to local minima in the elastic
346: cross
347: section below the Ps excitation threshold at 5.1 eV. Hence these resonances can be
348: easily detected
349: experimentally after an analysis of the elastic scattering cross section at low
350: energies. This makes these resonances of great experimental interest. Similar minima
351: appear in the cross section for electron scattering by alkali-metal atoms due to
352: appearance of resonances in these systems \cite{r18,r29}.
353: However, the
354: S-wave
355: resonances in the Ps-Rb and Ps-Cs systems are narrow and may not be easily noted
356: experimentally from a simple analysis of the cross sections.
357:
358:
359: To summarize, we have performed a three-Ps-state coupled-channel
360: calculation of Ps-Rb and Ps-Cs scattering at low energies using a
361: regularized symmetric nonlocal electron-exchange model potential
362: \cite{r14,r15} successfully used \cite{r15,r17,r18,r19,r20} previously in
363: different Ps scattering problems. We present the results of
364: angle-integrated partial cross
365: sections at different Ps energies. We also present results for
366: singlet phase
367: shifts and partial-wave cross sections at low energies to study
368: the resonances in these systems. We find resonances in S, P and D waves
369: near the Ps(2) excitation threshold.
370: In this Letter we have used a three-Ps-state model. Similar resonances have
371: been found in the coupled-channel model of electron-H
372: \cite{r25,r26,r27},
373: electron-Na, electron-K \cite{r28,r29}, positron-hydrogen \cite{r24}, Ps-H
374: \cite{r10,r11,r17} and Ps-Li \cite{r20} systems. In most cases, a more
375: complete
376: calculation and (in some cases) experiments have reconfirmed these
377: resonances. In view of this we do not believe that the appearance of these
378: resonances in the present three-state calculation to be so peculiar as to
379: have no general validity. However, the resonance energies might change
380: slightly after a more complete calculation as in electron-H,
381: positron-H and Ps-H systems and it would be
382: intersting to study the present resonances using more complete theoretical
383: models in the future in addition to compare the present results with
384: future experiments.
385:
386:
387:
388:
389: The work is supported in part by the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento -
390: Cient\'\i fico e Tecnol\'ogico, Funda\c c\~ao de Amparo
391: \`a Pesquisa do Estado de S\~ao Paulo, and Finan\-ciadora de Estu\-dos e
392: Projetos of Brazil.
393:
394:
395:
396:
397: \begin{references}
398:
399:
400:
401: \bibitem{r1}M. Charlton, G. Laricchia, {Comments At. Mol. Phys.}
402: { 26} (1991) 253.
403:
404: \bibitem{r2} S.
405: Tang, C. M. Surko,
406: { Phys. Rev. A} { 47} (1993) R743.
407:
408:
409: \bibitem{r3}A. J.
410: Garner, G. Laricchia, A. \"Ozen, { J. Phys. B} { 29} (1996) 5961.
411: \bibitem{r4}A. J.
412: Garner, A. \"Ozen, G. Laricchia, { J. Phys. B} { 33} (2000) 1149.
413:
414: \bibitem{r5}Y.
415: Nagashima, T. Hyodo, K. Fujiwara, A. Ichimura, { J. Phys.
416: B 31} (1998) 329.
417:
418:
419:
420:
421: \bibitem{r6}G. Laricchia, { Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B }
422: { 99} (1995) 363.
423:
424:
425:
426: \bibitem{r7} M. Skalsey, J. J. Engbrecht, R. K. Bithell, R. S. Vallery,
427: D. W.
428: Gidley, { Phys. Rev. Lett.} { 80} (1998) 3727.
429:
430:
431:
432:
433: \bibitem{r8}P. K. Biswas,
434: { Nucl. Instrum. \& Methods Phys. Res.
435: B} { 171} (2000) 135.
436:
437:
438:
439: \bibitem{r9} A. M.
440: Frolov, V. H. Smith, Jr., { Phys. Rev. A} { 55} (1997)
441: 2662.
442:
443: \bibitem{r10}
444: Z. C.
445: Yan, Y. K.
446: Ho,
447: { Phys. Rev. A} { 59} (1999) 2697.
448: \bibitem{r11}Z. C.
449: Yan, Y. K.
450: Ho,
451: { Phys. Rev. A} {60} (1999) 5098.
452:
453: \bibitem{r12}N.
454: Jiang, D. M. Schrader, { J. Chem. Phys.} {109} (1998) 9430.
455:
456:
457: \bibitem{r13}H. Ray, { J. Phys. B} { 32} (1999) 5681.
458:
459: \bibitem{r13x}H. Ray, { J. Phys. B} { 33} (2000) 4285.
460:
461:
462:
463:
464:
465:
466: \bibitem{r14}P. K.
467: Biswas, S. K. Adhikari, { Phys. Rev. A} { 59} (1999)
468: 363.
469:
470:
471: \bibitem{r15}S. K.
472: Adhikari, { Phys. Rev. A} { 62} (2000) 062708.
473:
474: \bibitem{r16}S. K.
475: Adhikari, P. K. Biswas, R. A. Sultanov,
476: { Phys.
477: Rev.
478: A} { 59} (1999) 4829.
479:
480:
481: \bibitem{r17}S. K.
482: Adhikari, P. K. Biswas, { Phys. Rev. A} {
483: 59} (1999)
484: 2058.
485:
486:
487:
488: \bibitem{r18}
489: P. K. Biswas, S. K. Adhikari, { Chem. Phys.
490: Lett.}
491: { 317} (2000)
492: 129.
493:
494:
495:
496:
497: \bibitem{r19} P. K. Biswas, S. K. Adhikari,
498: { J. Phys. B} { 33} (2000) 1575.
499:
500:
501: \bibitem{r20}P. K. Biswas, {
502: Phys. Rev. A } { 61} (2000) 012502.
503:
504: \bibitem{pus}S. K. Adhikari, P. Mandal, J. Phys. B 34 (2001) 1361.
505:
506:
507: \bibitem{r21}J. Callaway, { Phys. Rep. } { 45} (1978) 89.
508:
509: \bibitem{r22}A.
510: Pathak, P. G. Burke, K. A. Berrington,
511: { J. Phys. B} { 22} (1989) 2759.
512:
513:
514:
515: \bibitem{r23}W. C.
516: Fon, K. A. Berrington, P. G. Burke, A. E. Kingston,
517: { J. Phys. B 22} (1989) 3939.
518:
519: \bibitem{r24}G. J. Seiler, R. S. Oberoi, J. Callaway, { Phys.
520: Rev. A}
521: { 3} (1971) 2006.
522:
523: \bibitem{r25}P. G. Burke, H. M. Schey, { Phys. Rev.} {126} (1962)
524: 147.
525:
526: \bibitem{r26}I.
527: Shimamura, {J. Phys. Soc. (Japan)} { 31} (1971) 852.
528: \bibitem{r27}J. N.
529: Das, M. R. H. Rudge,
530: { J. Phys. B 9} (1976) 1131.
531:
532: \bibitem{r28}D. L.
533: Moores, D. W. Norcross,
534: { J. Phys. B 5} (1972) 1482.
535: \bibitem{r29}D. L.
536: Moores,
537: { J. Phys. B 9} (1976) 1329.
538:
539:
540:
541: \bibitem{r30}G. A. Hart, P. L. Goodfriend, { Chem. Phys.
542: Lett.}
543: { 53} (1970) 448.
544:
545:
546: \bibitem{r33} M. R. H. Rudge, { Proc. Phys. Soc. (London) }
547: { 86} (1965) 763.
548:
549:
550: \bibitem{r34}V. I. Ochkur, { Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.} { 45}
551: (1963) 734.
552: %[English Transl. 1964 {\it Sov. Phys. JETP} {\bf 18} 503 ]
553:
554:
555: \bibitem{bran}B. H. Bransden, Atomic Collision Theory, (W. A. Benjamin, Inc., New
556: York, 1970), pp 11 and 139-140.
557:
558:
559:
560:
561:
562:
563: \end{references}
564:
565:
566:
567: %\newpage
568: {\bf Figure Caption:}
569:
570: 1. Singlet S-wave elastic phase shift at different Ps energies for Ps-Rb
571: (dashed
572: line) and Ps-Cs (full line) scattering.
573:
574: 2. Singlet P-wave elastic phase shift at different Ps energies for Ps-Rb
575: (dashed
576: line) and Ps-Cs (full line) scattering. The corresponding P-wave singlet
577: cross section is shown in the off-set.
578:
579: 3. Singlet D-wave elastic cross section at different Ps energies for
580: Ps-Rb
581: (dashed line) and Ps-Cs (full line) scattering.
582:
583: 4. Partial cross sections for Ps-Rb scattering at different Ps energies:
584: three-Ps-state elastic (full line), three-Ps-state Ps(2s) (dashed-dotted
585: line), three-Ps-state Ps(2p) (short-dashed line), static-exchange elastic
586: (long-dashed line). Three-Ps-state (full line) and static-exchange
587: (long-dashed line) elastic results at low energies are also shown in the
588: off-set.
589:
590: 5. Same as in Fig. 4 for Ps-Cs scattering.
591:
592:
593:
594:
595: \end{document}
596:
597:
598:
599: