1: %Andrei Derevianko, Cambridge 2000, Reno 2001
2: % RevTeX 4
3: %\documentstyle[preprint,eqsecnum,aps]{revtex}
4: %\documentstyle[preprint,aps]{revtex}
5: %\documentstyle[twocolumn,aps]{revtex}
6: %\documentstyle[preprint,aps,graphicx]{revtex}
7: %\usepackage{graphicx}
8: %\documentclass[pra,tightenlines,twocolumn,showpacs]{revtex4}
9: \documentclass[aps,preprint,tightenlines,showpacs]{revtex4}
10: \usepackage{bm,dcolumn,graphicx}
11: %\newcommand{\sss}{\scriptscriptstyle}
12: %\tightenlines
13: %\renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{2}
14:
15: %---------------------------------------------------------------------
16: \begin{document}
17: %\draft
18: %\preprint{ITAMP Nov 2000, UNR Feb 2001, revised Apr 2001 }
19: \title{
20: On the feasibility of cooling and trapping metastable alkaline-earth
21: atoms}
22:
23: \author{Andrei Derevianko\email{andrei@unr.edu}}
24: \affiliation { Department of Physics, University of Nevada, Reno,
25: Nevada 89557-0058}
26:
27:
28: \date{\today}
29:
30: \begin{abstract}
31: Metastability and long-range interactions of Mg, Ca, and Sr in the
32: lowest-energy metastable $^3P_2$ state are investigated.
33: The calculated lifetimes are 38 minutes for Mg$^*$, 118
34: minutes for Ca$^*$, and 17 minutes for Sr$^*$, supporting
35: feasibility of cooling and trapping experiments. The
36: quadrupole-quadrupole long-range interactions of two metastable
37: atoms are evaluated for various molecular symmetries. Hund's case
38: (c) $4_g$ potential possesses a large 100-1000 K potential
39: barrier. Therefore magnetic trap losses can possibly be reduced
40: using cold metastable atoms in a stretched $M=2$ state.
41: Calculations were performed in the framework of {\em ab initio}
42: relativistic configuration interaction method coupled with the
43: random-phase approximation.
44: \end{abstract}
45:
46:
47: \pacs{31.10.+z, 34.20.Cf, 32.10.Dk, 31.15.Ar}
48:
49:
50: \maketitle
51:
52:
53: \section{Introduction}
54:
55: This work is motivated by emerging experiments on cooling and
56: trapping of alkaline-earth atoms ( see, e.g.,
57: Ref.~\cite{ZinBinRie00,KatIdoIso99,DinVogHal99}). In particular,
58: the long-lived lowest-energy $^3\!P_2$ state can serve as an
59: effective ground state in such experiments. Recently Katori {\em
60: et al.}~\cite{KatIdoIso00} cooled and trapped metastable Sr and
61: proposed a scheme for a continuous atom laser with a possible
62: application in atom lithography. The purpose of this work is to
63: evaluate properties of metastable $nsnp\,^3\!P_2$ states for Mg
64: ($n=3$), Ca ($n=4$), and Sr ($n=5$). In particular, we calculated
65: decay rates of the $nsnp \,^3\!P_2$ states. The resulting
66: lifetimes are on the order of $10^3-10^4$ s supporting the
67: feasibility of the experiments.
68:
69:
70: Ultracold collision properties, including scattering lengths,
71: are sensitive to long-range atomic interactions. The dominant
72: van der Waals interaction of two atoms in their respective $^3P_2$
73: states is described in terms of the quadrupole moment of the
74: atomic state. To assist in determining molecular potentials,
75: the atomic quadrupole moments of Mg$^{*}$, Ca$^{*}$, and Sr$^{*}$
76: are also calculated here, and the relevant $C_5$ coefficients for
77: various molecular symmetries are tabulated. These coefficients are
78: substantially larger compared to those for metastable
79: noble-gases~\cite{DoeVreOdB98}. In particular, Hund's case (c)
80: $4_g$ potential possesses a large 100-1000 K potential barrier.
81: Therefore magnetic-trap losses can possibly be reduced using
82: cold metastable atoms in a stretched $M=2$
83: state~\cite{KatPrivate}.
84:
85:
86: \section{ Method}
87: {\em Ab initio} relativistic valence
88: configuration-interaction (CI) method coupled with random-phase
89: approximation (RPA) was employed here. A detailed description of
90: this method~\cite{Joh00} will be published elsewhere; only a brief
91: discussion is presented here. In this method the wave-function is
92: expanded in terms of two-particle basis functions as
93: \begin{equation}
94: \Psi \left( \pi JM\right) = \sum_{k\geq l}
95: c_{kl}\,\,\Phi_{kl}\left( \,\pi JM\right) \, .
96: \end{equation}
97: Here $J$ is the total
98: angular momentum with projection $M$, and $\pi$ is the parity
99: of the state $\Psi$. The weights $c_{kl}$ and energies are found
100: by solving the eigen-value problem based on the {\em no-pair}
101: Hamiltonian~\cite{BroRav51}. The basis functions are defined in
102: the subspace of virtual orbitals
103: \begin{equation}
104: \Phi _{kl}\left( \,\pi JM\right) =
105: %\Phi \left( n_{k}\kappa _{k},n_{l}\kappa_{l};\,\pi JM\right) =
106: \eta _{kl}\sum_{m_{k}m_{l}}
107: C_{j_{k}m_{k},j_{l}m_{l}}^{JM}\,
108: a_{\{n_{k}\kappa _{k}m_{k}\}}^{\dagger }
109: a_{\{n_{l}\kappa _{l}m_{l}\}}^{\dagger }|0_{\rm core} \rangle \, ,
110: \label{Eqn_bas}
111: \end{equation}
112: where sets $\{n \kappa m \}$ enumerate quantum numbers, $
113: \eta_{kl}^2 = 1 - \frac{1}{2} \delta_{n_k n_l} \delta_{\kappa_k
114: \kappa_l}$ is a normalization factor, $a^{\dagger}$ are creation
115: operators, and the quasi-vacuum state $|0_{\rm core} \rangle$
116: corresponds to a closed-shell core. The one-particle orbitals are
117: found in the-frozen core ($V^{N-2}$) approximation, i.e. the
118: Dirac-Hartree-Fock (DHF) equations are solved self-consistently
119: for core orbitals, and the virtual orbitals are determined using
120: the resulting DHF potential of the core. The employed set of basis
121: functions in Eq.~(\ref{Eqn_bas}) is essentially complete, and one
122: could interpret the solution of the eigen-value problem as
123: treating the strong Coulomb repulsion of the two valence electrons
124: to all orders of perturbation theory. This valence-CI method
125: being exact for He-like systems~\cite{JohPlaSap95}, represents an
126: approximation for the alkaline-earth systems. The
127: core-polarization effects and the Breit interaction are neglected
128: here.
129:
130: Once the wave-functions are determined, the matrix elements of a
131: one-particle operator $Z=\sum_{ij} z_{ij} a^{\dagger}_i a_j $ are
132: computed by forming products $\langle \Psi_F | Z | \Psi_I
133: \rangle$. The additional RPA approximation~\cite{AmuChe75},
134: describing shielding of an externally applied field by core
135: electrons, constitutes a substitution of the ``bare'' one-particle
136: matrix elements $z_{ij}$ by ``dressed'' matrix elements
137: $z_{ij}^{\rm RPA}$. Such an approach sums a certain class of
138: many-body diagrams to all orders of perturbation theory.
139:
140:
141: The configuration-interaction eigenvalue problem was
142: solved numerically using the B-spline basis set technique~\cite{JohBluSap88}. The
143: employed basis set included the partial waves $s_{1/2}$--$h_{11/2}$.
144: For each partial wave, 40 positive-energy basis functions
145: approximated by B-splines represented a complete set. An inclusion
146: of the 30 lowest-energy basis functions for each partial wave was
147: found to be sufficient for the goals of this work.
148:
149: \section{ Lifetime of $^3\!P_2$ states}
150: Single-photon transitions from the metastable $^3\!P_2$ state are
151: presented in Fig.~\ref{Fig_Ediag}. It will be demonstrated that
152: for Mg and Ca this level predominantly decays through
153: magnetic-quadrupole (M2) transition to the ground $^1\!S_0$ state.
154: For Sr the main decay channel is a magnetic-dipole (M1) transition
155: to the $J=1$ level of the same $^3\!P$ fine-structure multiplet.
156: Estimates show that the magnetic-octupole (M3) $^3\!P_2
157: \rightarrow ^3\!P_1$ transition and all second-order two-photon
158: decays contribute a negligibly small fraction to the total decay
159: rate. Further, cold-atom experiments are focused on isotopes
160: without nuclear spin to avoid negotiating molecular potentials
161: complicated by hyperfine structure; we will not consider otherwise
162: important electric-dipole hyperfine-structure induced
163: decays~\cite{Gar67}.
164:
165:
166:
167:
168: \begin{figure}
169: \centerline{\includegraphics*[scale=1.0]{Ediagram.eps}} %
170: \caption{ Single-photon decay channels from the lowest-energy
171: $^3\!P_2$ state of alkaline-earth atoms. \label{Fig_Ediag} }
172: \end{figure}
173:
174:
175: The data on magnetic-quadrupole transitions (M2) are scarce.
176: For Mg the $^3\!P_2- ^1\!S_0$ M2 rates were estimated by
177: Mizushima~\cite{Miz66} and Garstang~\cite{Gar67} more than three
178: decades ago and recently by J\"{o}nsson and
179: Fischer~\cite{JonFis97}. There are no published data on M2
180: transition rates for Ca and Sr.
181:
182: A general treatment of multipole electromagnetic transitions in
183: the relativistic framework can be found, for example, in
184: Ref.~\cite{JohPlaSap95}. The Einstein coefficient $A_{M2}$ for
185: a magnetic-quadrupole transition $I \rightarrow F$ is given
186: by\footnote{Unless specified otherwise, atomic units
187: $\hbar=|e|=m_e=1$ are used throughout the paper.}
188: \begin{equation}
189: A_{M2} = \frac{1}{60} \alpha^7 \omega^5
190: \frac{|\langle \Psi_F|| {\mathcal M}^{(2)}|| \Psi_I \rangle|^2 }{ 2J_I +1} \, ,
191: \end{equation}
192: where $\omega$ is the photon frequency and $\alpha$ is the
193: fine-structure constant. The relevant one-particle reduced matrix
194: element can be expressed as
195: \begin{eqnarray}
196: \langle \phi_i || {\mathcal M}^{(2)} || \phi_j \rangle &=&
197: \frac{2}{3 \, \alpha}
198: \langle -\kappa_i || C^{(2)} || \kappa_j \rangle
199: (\kappa_i+\kappa_j) \times \,
200: \nonumber \\ &&
201: \int_0^\infty
202: \left\{15 \, \frac{j_2(k r)}{ (k r)^2 } \right\} r^2
203: [ G_i(r) F_j(r) + F_i(r) G_j(r) ] dr \,. \label{Eq_melM2}
204: \end{eqnarray}
205: Here $C^{(2)}$ is the normalized spherical
206: harmonic~\cite{VarMosKhe88}, $G(F)$ are large (small) radial
207: components of a wavefunction, $\kappa=(l-j)(2j+1)$, and photon
208: wavevector is defined as $k = \omega/c$.
209: %
210: The term in curly brackets approaches unity in the long-wavelength
211: approximation. Although the full retarded form of the matrix
212: element was used in the calculations, the long-wavelength limit is
213: well satisfied for transitions between the lowest-energy valence
214: states of alkaline-earth atoms. While the matrix element is
215: largely independent of the transition frequency $\omega$, the rate
216: $A_{M2}$ depends on it strongly ( $\sim \omega^5$ ) and the
217: experimental energy intervals were used in the final tabulation.
218:
219: The calculated CI+RPA magnetic-quadrupole transition rates are
220: presented in Table~\ref{Tab_M2}. It was found that the
221: RPA-dressing of matrix elements affects these rates only on the order of 1\%.
222: The calculated M2 transition rate for Mg$^*$, $4.41 \times
223: 10^{-4}$ 1/s, is in a fair agreement with the multiconfiguration
224: Dirac-Fock result, $3.983 \times 10^{-4}$ 1/s, by J\"{o}nsson and
225: Fischer~\cite{JonFis97}. Both rates are as twice as large compared
226: to the earlier estimate~\cite{Gar67}, $1.6 \times 10^{-4}$
227: 1/s.
228:
229: Magnetic-dipole $^3\!P_2 \rightarrow ^3\!P_1$ transitions occur
230: between the levels of the same fine-structure multiplet. The
231: associated decay rate can be reliably estimated in the
232: nonrelativistic approximation as
233: \begin{equation}
234: A_{M1} = \frac{1}{6} \alpha^5 \omega^3 \, .
235: \end{equation}
236: The M1 rates, presented in Table~\ref{Tab_M2}, were computed using
237: experimental energy intervals. The determined rate for Mg is 3\%
238: larger than in calculations~\cite{JonFis97} where theoretical
239: fine-structure splittings were employed. The discrepancy is
240: accounted for by a difference between theoretical and experimental
241: energies.
242:
243: We also calculated electric-quadrupole (E2) decay rates to the
244: $^3\!P_{1,0}$ fine-structure levels. The results listed in
245: Table~\ref{Tab_M2} show that the contribution of these decay
246: channels is small compared to the M2 and M1 rates.
247:
248: From the analysis of Table~\ref{Tab_M2} one finds that for Mg and
249: Ca the $^3\!P_{2}$ state predominantly decays through
250: magnetic-quadrupole (M2) transition to the ground $^1\!S_0$ state.
251: For Sr the main decay channel is a magnetic-dipole (M1) transition
252: to the $J=1$ level of the same $^3\!P$ fine-structure multiplet.
253: Overall, the calculated lifetimes for Mg$^*$,Ca$^*$, and Sr$^*$
254: are on the order of $10^3-10^4$ seconds, thus favoring the usage of
255: these metastable alkaline-earth atoms in cooling and trapping
256: experiments.
257:
258: \section{ Quadrupole-quadrupole long-range interactions}
259: Ultracold collision properties, including scattering lengths,
260: are sensitive to long-range atomic interactions. Here we
261: focus on the long-range interactions of two alkaline-earths atoms
262: in their respective $^3\! P_2$ states. At large internuclear
263: separations, $R$, atomic wavefunctions are perturbed by the
264: axially-symmetric molecular potential, which itself depends on the electronic
265: coordinates and the internuclear distance. This potential can be
266: expanded in a sum of interactions of various atomic
267: multipoles~\cite{DalDav66}. The lowest-order correction to
268: molecular term energies correlating to two $^3\! P_2$ atomic
269: states arises from a quadrupole-quadrupole contribution~\cite{Kni38}
270: \begin{equation}
271: V_{QQ} = \frac{1}{R^5}
272: \sum_{\mu =-2}^{2}\frac{4!}{(2-\mu )!(2+\mu )!}
273: \left(Q_{\mu}\right)_{\rm I} \left(Q_{-\mu }\right)_{\rm II}\, .
274: \label{Eqn_QQ}
275: \end{equation}
276: Here subscripts I and II denote the subspaces of the electronic coordinates of the two atoms,
277: and the quadrupole spherical tensor is defined as
278: \begin{equation}
279: Q_{\mu }=-|e|\sum_{i}r_{i}^{2} C_{\mu }^{(2)}(\hat{{\mathbf r}}_{i}) \, ,
280: \label{Eq_Qten}
281: \end{equation}
282: where the summation is over atomic electrons,
283: ${\mathbf r}_i$ is the position vector of electron $i$,
284: and $C_{\mu }^{(2)}(\hat{{\mathbf r}}_{i})$
285: are normalized spherical harmonics~\cite{VarMosKhe88}.
286:
287: The quadrupole-quadrupole interactions are parameterized
288: by the quadrupole moment ${\mathcal Q}$ of the $^3\! P_2$ atomic state,
289: defined conventionally as
290: \begin{equation}
291: {\mathcal Q} = 2 \, \, \langle ^3\! P_2, M_J=2|\,Q_0\,|^3\! P_2, M_J=2 \rangle \, .
292: \end{equation}
293: This quadrupole moment is related to the reduced matrix element of the
294: tensor, Eq.~(\ref{Eq_Qten}), as
295: $
296: {\mathcal Q}(^3\! P_2) = \sqrt{\frac{8}{35}} \, \langle ^3\! P_2||Q||^3\! P_2 \rangle.
297: $
298: %
299: The associated one-particle reduced matrix element is given by
300: \begin{equation}
301: \langle \phi_i || Q || \phi_j \rangle =
302: \langle \kappa_i || C^{(2)} || \kappa_j \rangle
303: \,
304: \int_0^\infty r^2
305: [ G_i(r) G_j(r) + F_i(r) F_j(r) ] dr \,. \label{Eq_melQ}
306: \end{equation}
307: Using the valence CI-method coupled with the RPA dressing of
308: matrix elements we calculated the quadrupole moments (see
309: Table~\ref{Tab_QM}). It was found that the RPA sequence of
310: diagrams reduces the final result only by 0.1\% for Mg, 0.3\% for
311: Ca, and 0.5\% for Sr. Due to the diffuse nature of valence states,
312: these quadrupole moments are significantly larger than those found
313: for metastable noble-gas atoms~\cite{DoeVreOdB98}, where the hole
314: in the outer $p_{3/2}$ subshell determines the quadrupole moment.
315:
316: As in the case of metastable $^3\! P_2$ noble-gas atoms~\cite{DoeVreOdB98,DerDal00},
317: the long-range molecular potentials of metastable alkaline-earth
318: atoms depend on their spatial orientation,
319: i.e. the interactions are anisotropic.
320: Altogether, 15 distinct molecular states correlate to the two atomic $^3\! P_2$ states at
321: large separations. The first order correction to a
322: molecular term may be represented as
323: \begin{equation}
324: U^{(1)}(R) = \frac{C_5 }{R^5}\,.
325: \end{equation}
326: The relevant constants $C_5$ for various molecular symmetries are
327: given in Table~\ref{Tab_C5}, where the states are characterized
328: using Hund's case (c). These coefficients were obtained by
329: diagonalizing the quadrupole-quadrupole interaction,
330: Eq.~(\ref{Eqn_QQ}), in the basis of products of atomic states
331: \mbox{$| ^3P_2, M \rangle_{\rm I} \otimes | ^3P_2, M' \rangle_{\rm
332: II}$} for a given symmetry $\Omega$ satisfying $M + M' = \Omega$.
333:
334: %
335: Seven of the resulting quadrupole-quadrupole long-range potentials
336: are attractive at large distances and eight are repulsive. We
337: present the most repulsive $0^+_g$ and the most attractive $3_g$
338: potentials in Fig.~\ref{Fig_QQ}. It is worth discussing the
339: repulsive $4_g$ potential also shown in Fig.~\ref{Fig_QQ}.
340: Provided the metastable atoms in a magnetic trap are prepared in a
341: stretched $M=2$ state, the collisions would occur along this
342: repulsive $\Omega=4$ potential. Although the medium-range part of
343: the potential is attractive, the resulting barrier will be on the
344: order of 100-1000 K high. Therefore ultracold collisions of the
345: $^3\!P_2$ alkaline-earth atoms in a stretched $M=2$ state can be
346: effectively shielded from the losses occurring at small
347: internuclear distances~\cite{KatPrivate}. This barrier is more
348: pronounced compared to metastable noble-gas
349: atoms~\cite{DoeVreOdB98}, where the potential barriers were a few
350: nK high. Clearly, calculations of the second-order $C_6$ dispersion
351: coefficients and intermediate- and short-range parts of the
352: potentials are needed for a more quantitative description.
353:
354: \section{Conclusion}
355: To address the needs of emerging experiments on cooling and
356: trapping of alkaline-earth atoms, we performed {\em ab initio}
357: relativistic calculations of lifetimes and quadrupole moments of
358: metastable Mg, Ca, and Sr. The determined lifetimes are 38 minutes
359: for Mg$^*$, 118 minutes for Ca$^*$, and 17 minutes for Sr$^*$,
360: supporting the feasibility of experiments. In
361: addition, we investigated long-range quadrupole-quadrupole
362: interactions for molecular potentials correlating to two
363: metastable atoms. Several resulting potentials possess pronounced
364: barriers, which could be exploited to minimize trap losses.
365:
366:
367:
368: Thanks are due to H. Katori, C. Oates, and F. Riehle for
369: stimulating discussions and V. Davis for careful reading of the manuscript.
370: The developed numerical code was partially based on programs by Notre
371: Dame group led by W.R. Johnson. This work was supported in part by the Chemical Sciences,
372: Geosciences and Biosciences Division of the Office of Basic Energy
373: Sciences, Office of Science, U.S. Department of Energy.
374:
375: \begin{table}
376: \centering \caption{Einstein coefficients $A$ for decays from the
377: lowest-energy $^3\!P_2$ states in s$^{-1}$. Notation $x[y]$ stands
378: for $x \times 10^y$. \label{Tab_M2}}
379: %\begin{ruledtabular}
380: \begin{tabular}{lrrr}
381: \hline\hline
382: \multicolumn{1}{c }{Type, final state} %
383: & \multicolumn{1}{c }{Mg} %
384: & \multicolumn{1}{c }{Ca} %
385: & \multicolumn{1}{c }{Sr} %
386: \\
387: \hline M2,$ns^2\,^1\!S_0 $ &
388: 4.41[-4] & 1.25[-4]& 1.27[-4] \\
389: M1, $nsnp\,^3\!P_1 $ &
390: 9.12[-7] & 1.60[-5]& 8.26[-4] \\
391: E2, $nsnp\,^3\!P_1 $ &
392: 1[-12] & 3[-10] & 3[-7]\\
393: E2, $nsnp\,^3\!P_0 $ &
394: 3[-12] & 1[-9] & 1[-6]\\
395: \hline
396: $A$, total &
397: 4.42[-4] & 1.41[-4]& 9.55[-4]\\
398: \hline\hline
399: \end{tabular}
400: %\end{ruledtabular}
401: \end{table}
402:
403:
404: \begin{table}
405: \centering \caption{ Quadrupole moments ${\mathcal Q}$ of the
406: lowest-energy metastable $^3\! P_2$ states in a.u. \label{Tab_QM}}
407: %\begin{ruledtabular}
408: \begin{tabular}{ccc}
409: \hline\hline
410: Mg & Ca & Sr \\
411: \hline
412: 8.59 & 13.6 & 16.4\\
413: \hline\hline
414: \end{tabular}
415: %\end{ruledtabular}
416: \end{table}
417:
418: \begin{table}
419: \centering \caption{ $C_5$ coefficients in units of ${\mathcal
420: Q}^2$ for molecular states ( Hund's case (c)) asymptotically
421: correlating to two $^{3}\!P_2$ state atoms. The quadrupole moments
422: ${\mathcal Q}$ are listed in Table~\protect\ref{Tab_QM}, and
423: long-range interaction potentials are parameterized as $U(R)=
424: C_5/R^5$. \label{Tab_C5}}
425: %\begin{ruledtabular}
426: \begin{tabular}{ldld}
427: \hline\hline
428: \multicolumn{1}{c }{$\Omega$} & \multicolumn{1}{c
429: }{$C_5/ {\mathcal Q}^2$}& \multicolumn{1}{c }{$\Omega$} &
430: \multicolumn{1}{c }{$C_5/ {\mathcal Q}^2$} \\
431: \hline
432: $0^+_g$ & 2.85329 & $3_g$ & -2.25 \\
433: $0^-_u$ & 2.42705 & $2_u$ & -1.75 \\
434: $4_g$ & 1.5 & $2_g$ & -1.625 \\
435: $0^+_g$ & 1.31989 & $1_g$ & -1.23602\\
436: $1_u$ & 1.05202 & $0^{-}_u$ & -0.92705\\
437: $1_g$ & 0.98602 & $1_u$ & -0.80203\\
438: $2_g$ & 0.75 & $0^+_g$ & -0.42319 \\
439: $3_u$ & 0.75 & \\
440: \hline\hline
441: \end{tabular}
442: %\end{ruledtabular}
443: \end{table}
444:
445: \begin{figure}
446: \centerline{\includegraphics*[scale=0.75]{QQ.eps}} \caption{ The
447: most repulsive $0^+_g$ and the most attractive $3_g$ long-range
448: quadrupole-quadrupole interaction potentials correlating to two
449: metastable $5s5p\,^3\!P_2$ Sr atoms. The $4_g$ potential is also
450: shown. 1 K $= 0.69503$ cm$^{-1}$. \label{Fig_QQ} }
451: \end{figure}
452:
453:
454:
455: \begin{thebibliography}{18}
456: \expandafter\ifx\csname natexlab\endcsname\relax\def\natexlab#1{#1}\fi
457: \expandafter\ifx\csname bibnamefont\endcsname\relax
458: \def\bibnamefont#1{#1}\fi
459: \expandafter\ifx\csname bibfnamefont\endcsname\relax
460: \def\bibfnamefont#1{#1}\fi
461: \expandafter\ifx\csname citenamefont\endcsname\relax
462: \def\citenamefont#1{#1}\fi
463: \expandafter\ifx\csname url\endcsname\relax
464: \def\url#1{\texttt{#1}}\fi
465: \expandafter\ifx\csname urlprefix\endcsname\relax\def\urlprefix{URL }\fi
466: \providecommand{\bibinfo}[2]{#2}
467: \providecommand{\eprint}[2][]{\url{#2}}
468:
469: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Zinner et~al.}(2000)\citenamefont{Zinner, Binnewies,
470: Riehle, and Tiemann}}]{ZinBinRie00}
471: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{G.}~\bibnamefont{Zinner}},
472: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{T.}~\bibnamefont{Binnewies}},
473: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{F.}~\bibnamefont{Riehle}}, \bibnamefont{and}
474: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{E.}~\bibnamefont{Tiemann}},
475: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{85}},
476: \bibinfo{pages}{2292} (\bibinfo{year}{2000}).
477:
478: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Katori et~al.}(1999)\citenamefont{Katori, Ido, Isoya,
479: and Kuwata-Gonokami}}]{KatIdoIso99}
480: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{H.}~\bibnamefont{Katori}},
481: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{T.}~\bibnamefont{Ido}},
482: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{Y.}~\bibnamefont{Isoya}}, \bibnamefont{and}
483: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.}~\bibnamefont{Kuwata-Gonokami}},
484: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.}
485: \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{82}}(\bibinfo{number}{6}), \bibinfo{pages}{1116}
486: (\bibinfo{year}{1999}).
487:
488: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Dinneen et~al.}(1999)\citenamefont{Dinneen, Vogel,
489: Hall, and Gallagher}}]{DinVogHal99}
490: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{T.~P.} \bibnamefont{Dinneen}},
491: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{K.~R.} \bibnamefont{Vogel}},
492: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.~L.} \bibnamefont{Hall}}, \bibnamefont{and}
493: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Gallagher}},
494: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys.\ Rev.\ A}
495: \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{59}}(\bibinfo{number}{2}), \bibinfo{pages}{1216}
496: (\bibinfo{year}{1999}).
497:
498: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Katori et~al.}(2000)\citenamefont{Katori, Ido, Isoya,
499: and Kuwata-Gonokami}}]{KatIdoIso00}
500: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{H.}~\bibnamefont{Katori}},
501: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{T.}~\bibnamefont{Ido}},
502: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{Y.}~\bibnamefont{Isoya}}, \bibnamefont{and}
503: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.}~\bibnamefont{Kuwata-Gonokami}}, in
504: \emph{\bibinfo{booktitle}{{I}nternational Conference on Atomic Physics}}
505: (\bibinfo{year}{2000}).
506:
507: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Doery et~al.}(1998)\citenamefont{Doery, Vredenbregt,
508: {Op de Beek}, Beijerinck, and Verhaar}}]{DoeVreOdB98}
509: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.~R.} \bibnamefont{Doery}},
510: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{E.~J.~D.} \bibnamefont{Vredenbregt}},
511: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.~S.} \bibnamefont{{Op de Beek}}},
512: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{H.~C.~W.} \bibnamefont{Beijerinck}},
513: \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{B.~J.}
514: \bibnamefont{Verhaar}}, \bibinfo{journal}{Phys.\ Rev.\ A}
515: \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{58}}(\bibinfo{number}{5}), \bibinfo{pages}{3673}
516: (\bibinfo{year}{1998}).
517:
518: \bibitem[{Kat()}]{KatPrivate}
519: \bibinfo{note}{{Hidetoshi Katori}, private communication.}
520:
521: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Johnson et~al.}(2000)\citenamefont{Johnson, Derevianko,
522: and Savukov}}]{Joh00}
523: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{W.~R.} \bibnamefont{Johnson}},
524: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Derevianko}},
525: \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{I.~M.}
526: \bibnamefont{Savukov}} (\bibinfo{year}{2000}).
527:
528: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Brown and Ravenhall}(1951)}]{BroRav51}
529: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{G.~E.} \bibnamefont{Brown}} \bibnamefont{and}
530: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{D.~E.} \bibnamefont{Ravenhall}},
531: \bibinfo{journal}{Proc.\ Roy.\ Soc.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{A208}},
532: \bibinfo{pages}{552} (\bibinfo{year}{1951}).
533:
534: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Johnson et~al.}(1995)\citenamefont{Johnson, Plante, and
535: Sapirstein}}]{JohPlaSap95}
536: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{W.~R.} \bibnamefont{Johnson}},
537: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{D.~R.} \bibnamefont{Plante}},
538: \bibnamefont{and}
539: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.}~\bibnamefont{Sapirstein}},
540: \bibinfo{journal}{Adv. At. Mol. Phys.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{35}},
541: \bibinfo{pages}{255} (\bibinfo{year}{1995}).
542:
543: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Amusia and Cherepkov}(1975)}]{AmuChe75}
544: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.}~\bibnamefont{Amusia}} \bibnamefont{and}
545: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{N.}~\bibnamefont{Cherepkov}},
546: \bibinfo{journal}{Case Studies in Atomic Physics}
547: \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{5}}(\bibinfo{number}{2}), \bibinfo{pages}{47}
548: (\bibinfo{year}{1975}).
549:
550: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Johnson et~al.}(1988)\citenamefont{Johnson, Blundell,
551: and Sapirstein}}]{JohBluSap88}
552: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{W.~R.} \bibnamefont{Johnson}},
553: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.~A.} \bibnamefont{Blundell}},
554: \bibnamefont{and}
555: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.}~\bibnamefont{Sapirstein}},
556: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys.\ Rev.\ A}
557: \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{37}}(\bibinfo{number}{2}), \bibinfo{pages}{307}
558: (\bibinfo{year}{1988}).
559:
560: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Garstang}(1967)}]{Gar67}
561: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.~H.} \bibnamefont{Garstang}},
562: \bibinfo{journal}{Astrophys.\ J.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{148}},
563: \bibinfo{pages}{579} (\bibinfo{year}{1967}).
564:
565: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Mizushima}(1966)}]{Miz66}
566: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.}~\bibnamefont{Mizushima}},
567: \bibinfo{journal}{J. Phys. Soc. Jap.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{1966}},
568: \bibinfo{pages}{2335} (\bibinfo{year}{1966}).
569:
570: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{J\"{o}nsson and Fischer}(1997)}]{JonFis97}
571: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{P.}~\bibnamefont{J\"{o}nsson}} \bibnamefont{and}
572: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{C.~F.} \bibnamefont{Fischer}},
573: \bibinfo{journal}{J. Phys.\ B}
574: \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{30}}(\bibinfo{number}{24}), \bibinfo{pages}{5861}
575: (\bibinfo{year}{1997}).
576:
577: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Varshalovich et~al.}(1988)\citenamefont{Varshalovich,
578: Moscalev, and Khersonsky}}]{VarMosKhe88}
579: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{D.~A.} \bibnamefont{Varshalovich}},
580: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.~N.} \bibnamefont{Moscalev}},
581: \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{V.~K.}
582: \bibnamefont{Khersonsky}}, \emph{\bibinfo{title}{Quantum Theory of Angular
583: Momentum}} (\bibinfo{publisher}{World Scientific},
584: \bibinfo{address}{Singapore}, \bibinfo{year}{1988}).
585:
586: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Dalgarno and Davison}(1966)}]{DalDav66}
587: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Dalgarno}} \bibnamefont{and}
588: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{W.~D.} \bibnamefont{Davison}}, in
589: \emph{\bibinfo{booktitle}{Adv.\ At.\ Mol.\ Phys.}}, edited by
590: \bibinfo{editor}{\bibfnamefont{D.}~\bibnamefont{Bates}} \bibnamefont{and}
591: \bibinfo{editor}{\bibfnamefont{I.}~\bibnamefont{Estermann}}
592: (\bibinfo{publisher}{Academic Press}, \bibinfo{address}{New York},
593: \bibinfo{year}{1966}), vol.~\bibinfo{volume}{2}, pp. \bibinfo{pages}{1--32}.
594:
595: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Knipp}(1938)}]{Kni38}
596: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.~K.} \bibnamefont{Knipp}},
597: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys.\ Rev.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{53}},
598: \bibinfo{pages}{734} (\bibinfo{year}{1938}).
599:
600: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Derevianko and Dalgarno}(2000)}]{DerDal00}
601: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Derevianko}} \bibnamefont{and}
602: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Dalgarno}},
603: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys.\ Rev.\ A} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{62}},
604: \bibinfo{pages}{062501} (\bibinfo{year}{2000}).
605:
606: \end{thebibliography}
607: %\bibliographystyle{prsty}
608: %\bibliography{notes3P2,twoval,general,mypub,vdW,noble,exact,He}
609:
610: \end{document}
611: