1: \documentclass[twocolumn]{article}
2: %\documentclass[11pt]{article}
3:
4: \usepackage[dvips]{graphicx}
5:
6: \addtolength{\hoffset}{-1cm}
7: \addtolength{\textwidth}{2cm}
8: \addtolength{\voffset}{-0.6cm}
9: \addtolength{\textheight}{1.2cm}
10:
11:
12: \begin{document}
13:
14: \begin{titlepage}
15:
16: \hfill{LIGO TD-000012-R}
17:
18: \begin{center}
19:
20: \vfill
21: {\Large\bf Doppler-Induced Dynamics of Fields in Fabry-Perot
22: Cavities with Suspended Mirrors}\footnote{published in
23: {\it Applied Optics}, Vol. 40, No. 12, 20 April 2001, pp. 1942-1949}
24:
25:
26: \vspace{1cm}
27: {Malik~Rakhmanov}
28: \vspace{0.5cm}
29:
30: {\it Physics Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611}
31:
32:
33: \end{center}
34:
35: \vfill
36: \begin{abstract}
37: The Doppler effect in Fabry-Perot cavities with suspended mirrors is
38: analyzed. Intrinsically small, the Doppler shift accumulates in the
39: cavity and becomes comparable to or greater than the line-width of the
40: cavity if its finesse is high or its length is large. As a result,
41: damped oscillations of the cavity field occur when one of the mirrors
42: passes a resonance position. A formula for this transient is derived.
43: It is shown that the frequency of the oscillations is equal to the
44: accumulated Doppler shift and the relaxation time of the oscillations
45: is equal to the storage time of the cavity. Comparison of the predicted
46: and the measured Doppler shift is discussed, and application of the
47: analytical solution for measurement of the mirror velocity is described.
48: \end{abstract}
49:
50: %\ocis{120.2230, 120.5700, 120.7250, 140.4780, 280.3340}
51:
52: \vfill
53: \end{titlepage}
54:
55:
56: \section*{Introduction}
57:
58: Fabry-Perot cavities with the length of several kilometers are
59: utilized in laser gravitational wave detectors such as LIGO
60: \cite{Abramovici:1992}. The mirrors in these Fabry-Perot cavities
61: are suspended from wires and therefore are free to move along the
62: direction of beam propagation. Ambient seismic motion excites the
63: mirrors, causing them to swing like pendulums with frequencies of
64: about one hertz and amplitudes of several microns. To maintain the
65: cavity on resonance the Pound-Drever locking technique
66: \cite{Drever:1983} is used. During lock acquisition the mirrors
67: frequently pass through resonances of the cavity. As one of the mirrors
68: approaches a resonant position the light in the cavity builds up.
69: Immediately after the mirror passes a resonance position, a field
70: transient in the form of damped oscillations occurs. This transient
71: depends mostly on the cavity length, its finesse, and the relative
72: velocity of the mirrors. Thus, careful examination of the transient
73: reveals useful information about the cavity properties and the mirror
74: motion.
75:
76: The oscillatory transient was observed in the past in several
77: experiments with high-finesse Fabry-Perot cavities. The oscillations
78: were recorded in the intensity of reflected light by Robertson {\it
79: et al.} \cite{Robertson:1989}. In this experiment the oscillations
80: were used for measurements of the storage time of a Fabry-Perot cavity
81: and its finesse. The oscillations were also observed in the intensity
82: of transmitted light by An {\it et al.} \cite{An:1995}. In this
83: experiment the oscillations were used for measurements of the cavity
84: finesse and the mirror velocity. The transient was also studied by
85: Camp {\it et al.} \cite{Camp:1995} for applications to cavity lock
86: acquisition. This time the oscillations were observed in the
87: Pound-Drever locking signal. Recently the transient has been revisited
88: by Lawrence {\it et al.} \cite{Lawrence:1999}. In this study both the
89: cavity length scans and the frequency scans were analyzed using all
90: three signals: the intensities of the reflected and transmitted fields
91: as well as the Pound-Drever signal.
92:
93: Although the transient has been frequently observed in experiments,
94: its theory is far from being complete. It is known that the
95: oscillations in the transient appear through the beatings of
96: different field components in the cavity. However, different authors
97: propose slightly different beat mechanisms \cite{An:1995,
98: Lawrence:1999}. Moreover, it is not understood why the rate of the
99: oscillations always increases in time, and what causes this
100: chirp-like behavior.
101:
102: In this paper we show that the transient can be explained by the
103: Doppler effect which appears in a Fabry-Perot cavity with moving
104: mirrors. Intrinsically small, the Doppler shift is amplified by the
105: cavity and results in the modulation of the intracavity field. Based
106: on this observation, we derive a simple formula for the transient and
107: explain its chirp-like behavior. In this approach the frequency of
108: the oscillations can be easily found from the cavity parameters and
109: the mirror velocity. The predictions based on the formula and
110: numerical simulations are compared with the measurements taken with
111: the 40m Fabry-Perot cavity of the Caltech prototype interferometer.
112: In both cases good agreements are found.
113:
114: Currently the transient is studied in connection with locking of the
115: kilometer-sized Fabry-Perot cavities of LIGO interferometers
116: \cite{Yamamoto:1999}. The analysis presented in this paper serves as
117: a basis for calculations of the cavity parameters in these studies.
118:
119:
120:
121: \section{Reflection of Light off a Moving Mirror}
122:
123: To set grounds for the analysis in this paper, consider a simple
124: process of reflection of light (electromagnetic wave) off a moving
125: mirror. Let the mirror be moving along the $x$-axis with an arbitrary
126: trajectory $X(t)$. Assume that the light is propagating along the
127: positive $x$-direction and is normally incident on the mirror. The
128: wave-front of the reflected wave observed at the location $x$ and
129: time $t$ is reflected by the mirror at some earlier time $t'$ which,
130: according to Fig.~\ref{fig1}, satisfies the equation:
131: %
132: \begin{equation}\label{tp}
133: %
134: c (t - t') = X(t') - x .
135: %
136: \end{equation}
137: %
138: This equation defines the time $t'$ as an implicit function of $x$
139: and $t$.
140:
141: %
142: \begin{figure}[ht]
143: \centering\includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{fig1.eps}
144: \caption{Reflection of light off a moving mirror.}
145: \label{fig1}
146: \end{figure}
147: %
148:
149: Let the electric field of the incident and reflected waves be
150: $\mathcal{E}_{\mathrm{in}}(x,t)$ and
151: ${\mathcal{E}}_{\mathrm{ref}}(x,t)$. Due to continuity of the waves
152: at the mirror surface, the two fields are related according to
153: %
154: \begin{equation}\label{refWave}
155: %
156: {\mathcal{E}}_{\mathrm{ref}}(x,t) =
157: {\mathcal{E}}_{\mathrm{in}}(X(t'), t') .
158: %
159: \end{equation}
160: %
161: For simplicity we assumed that the mirror is perfect (100\%
162: reflective), and no phase change occurs in the reflection.
163:
164:
165: Equations (\ref{tp}) and (\ref{refWave}) allow us to calculate the
166: wave reflected by a mirror moving along an arbitrary trajectory.
167: Let the incident wave be plane and monochromatic,
168: %
169: \begin{equation}
170: %
171: {\mathcal{E}}_{\mathrm{in}}(x,t) =
172: \exp \left\{ i(\omega t - k x) \right\} ,
173: %
174: \end{equation}
175: %
176: where $\omega$ is the frequency and $k$ is the wavenumber
177: ($k=\omega/c$). Then the reflected wave is given by
178: %
179: \begin{equation}
180: %
181: {\mathcal{E}}_{\mathrm{ref}}(x,t) =
182: \exp \left\{ i[\omega t' - k X(t')] \right\} .
183: %
184: \end{equation}
185: %
186: Substituting for $t'$ from Eq.~(\ref{tp}) we obtain that the
187: electric field of the reflected wave is given by
188: %
189: \begin{equation}
190: %
191: {\mathcal{E}}_{\mathrm{ref}}(x,t) = \exp \left\{
192: i(\omega t + k x) \right\} \exp \left[-2 i k X(t')\right] .
193: %
194: \end{equation}
195: %
196:
197:
198: The extra phase, $-2kX(t')$, appears due to the continuity of the
199: waves at the mirror surface, and leads to two closely related
200: effects. On one hand, it gives rise to the {\it phase} shift of the
201: reflected wave which appears because the mirror position is changing.
202: On the other hand, it gives rise to the {\it frequency} shift of the
203: reflected wave which appears because the mirror is moving. Indeed,
204: the frequency of the reflected wave can be found as
205: %
206: \begin{equation}\label{freqRWdef}
207: %
208: \omega'(t) = \omega - 2 k \frac{d X}{d t'}
209: \frac{\partial t'}{\partial t}.
210: %
211: \end{equation}
212: %
213: Note that $dX/dt$ is the instantaneous mirror velocity $v(t)$, and
214: %
215: \begin{equation}\label{dtpdt}
216: %
217: \frac{\partial t'}{\partial t} = \frac{c}{c + v(t')} ,
218: %
219: \end{equation}
220: %
221: which can be derived from Eq.~(\ref{tp}). Combining
222: Eqs.~(\ref{freqRWdef}) and (\ref{dtpdt}), we obtain the
223: formula for the frequency of the reflected wave:
224: %
225: \begin{equation}\label{freqRWexact}
226: %
227: \omega'(t) = \frac{c - v(t')}{c + v(t')} \; \omega .
228: %
229: \end{equation}
230: %
231:
232:
233: At any given location the electric field oscillates at a very high
234: frequency ($\mathcal{E} \propto e^{i\omega t}$). It is convenient
235: to remove the high-frequency oscillating factor $e^{i\omega t}$ and
236: consider only the slowly varying part of the wave:
237: %
238: \begin{equation}
239: %
240: E(t) \equiv {\mathcal{E}}(x,t) \; e^{-i\omega t} .
241: %
242: \end{equation}
243: %
244: The two amplitudes, $E_1(t)$ and $E_2(t)$, which correspond to the
245: same wave but defined at different locations, $x$ and $x'$, are
246: related:
247: %
248: \begin{equation}
249: %
250: E_2(t) = E_1(t - L/c) \; e^{ -i k L},
251: %
252: \end{equation}
253: %
254: where $L$ is the distance between the two locations ($L=x'-x$).
255:
256:
257: We now obtain a formula for the reflection off the moving mirror in
258: terms of the ``slowly-varying'' field amplitudes. This can be done
259: by tracing the incident beam from the mirror surface back to the point
260: with the coordinate $x$:
261: %
262: \begin{equation}\label{refWaveX}
263: %
264: {\mathcal{E}}_{\mathrm{ref}}(x,t) =
265: {\mathcal{E}}_{\mathrm{in}}(x, t'') ,
266: %
267: \end{equation}
268: %
269: where the time $t''$ is further in the past and according to
270: Fig.~\ref{fig1} is given by
271: %
272: \begin{equation}\label{tpp}
273: %
274: t'' = 2 t' - t .
275: %
276: \end{equation}
277: %
278: Equations (\ref{refWaveX}) and (\ref{tpp}) lead to the following
279: relation between the field amplitudes:
280: %
281: \begin{equation}
282: %
283: E_{\mathrm{ref}}(t) = E_{\mathrm{in}}(t'') \;
284: \exp\{- 2ik [X(t') - x] \} .
285: %
286: \end{equation}
287: %
288: This formula is used below for calculations of fields in Fabry-Perot
289: cavities with moving mirrors.
290:
291:
292: For non-relativistic mirror motion ($|v|\ll c$) the frequency of the
293: reflected light can be approximated as
294: %
295: \begin{equation}\label{freqRWapprox}
296: %
297: \omega'(t) \approx \left[1 - 2 \frac{v(t')}{c} \right] \omega ,
298: %
299: \end{equation}
300: %
301: which differs from the exact formula, Eq.~(\ref{freqRWexact}),
302: only in the second order in $v/c$.
303:
304:
305:
306:
307:
308: \section{Doppler Shift in Fabry-Perot Cavities}
309: \subsection{Critical Velocity}
310:
311: Fabry-Perot cavities of laser gravitational-wave detectors are very
312: long and have mirrors that can move. The Doppler shift in such
313: cavities can be described as follows. Let the cavity length be
314: $L$ and the light transit time be $T$:
315: %
316: \begin{equation}
317: %
318: T = \frac{L}{c}.
319: %
320: \end{equation}
321: %
322: Assume that one of the mirrors is moving with the constant velocity $v$.
323: Then the frequency of light reflected off the moving mirror is Doppler
324: shifted, and the shift in one reflection is
325: %
326: \begin{equation}\label{dw}
327: %
328: \delta \omega \equiv \omega' - \omega = - 2 kv .
329: %
330: \end{equation}
331: %
332: Subsequent reflections make this frequency shift add, forming the
333: progression:
334: %
335: \begin{equation}\label{prog}
336: %
337: \delta \omega, \; 2 \delta \omega, \; 3 \delta \omega, \ldots .
338: %
339: \end{equation}
340: %
341: Therefore, the Doppler shift of light in the cavity accumulates with
342: time.
343:
344: A suspended mirror in such cavities moves very little. Its largest
345: velocity is typically of the order of a few microns per second.
346: The corresponding Doppler shift is of the order of a few hertz, which
347: is very small compared to the laser frequency $2.82\times10^{14}$
348: Hz for an infra-red laser with wavelength $\lambda = 1.06 \mu$m.
349: However, the line-width of the long Fabry-Perot cavities of the laser
350: gravitational wave detectors is also very small, typically of the
351: order of 100 Hz. Therefore, the small Doppler shift, as it accumulates
352: with time, can easily exceed the line-width.
353:
354:
355: The characteristic time for light to remain in the cavity is the
356: storage time, which is defined as $1/e$-amplitude folding time:
357: %
358: \begin{equation}\label{storTime}
359: %
360: \tau = \frac{2T}{|\ln (r_a r_b)|} ,
361: %
362: \end{equation}
363: %
364: where $r_a$ and $r_b$ are the amplitude reflectivities of the cavity
365: mirrors. Then the Doppler shift accumulated within the storage time is
366: %
367: \begin{equation}
368: %
369: |\delta \omega| \frac{\tau}{2T} = \omega \frac{v\tau}{cT} .
370: %
371: \end{equation}
372: %
373: It becomes comparable to the line-width of the cavity if the relative
374: velocity of the mirrors is comparable to the critical velocity defined
375: as
376: %
377: \begin{equation}
378: %
379: v_{\mathrm{cr}} = \frac{\lambda}{2 \tau {\mathcal{F}}}
380: \approx \frac{\pi c \lambda}{4 L {\mathcal{F}}^2} ,
381: %
382: \end{equation}
383: %
384: where ${\mathcal{F}}$ is the finesse of the cavity:
385: %
386: \begin{equation}
387: %
388: {\mathcal{F}} = \frac{\pi \sqrt{r_a r_b}}{1 - r_a r_b} .
389: %
390: \end{equation}
391: %
392: Note that the mirror moving with the critical velocity passes the
393: width of a resonance within the storage time. These qualitative
394: arguments show that the Doppler effect becomes significant if
395: the time for a mirror to move across the width of a resonance is
396: comparable to or less than the storage time of the cavity.
397:
398:
399:
400:
401: \subsection{Equation for Fields in a Fabry-Perot Cavity}
402:
403: The response of Fabry-Perot cavities is usually expressed in terms of
404: amplitudes of the electro-magnetic field circulating in the cavity.
405: The equation for the dynamics of this field can be derived as follows.
406: Assume, for simplicity, that one of the mirrors (input mirror) is at
407: rest and the other (end mirror) is freely swinging. Let the trajectory
408: of this mirror be $X(t)$. It is convenient to separate the constant
409: and the variable parts of the mirror trajectory:
410: %
411: \begin{equation}
412: %
413: X(t) = L + x(t) .
414: %
415: \end{equation}
416: %
417: In Fabry-Perot cavities of gravitational wave detectors $L$ is of the
418: order of a few kilometers and $x$ is of the order of a few microns.
419: Without loss of generality we can assume that the cavity length $L$ is
420: equal to an integer number of wavelengths and therefore $e^{-2ikL}=1$.
421:
422: \begin{figure}[ht]
423: \centering\includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{fig2.eps}
424: \caption{Schematic diagram of a Fabry-Perot cavity with
425: a moving mirror.}
426: \label{fig2}
427: \end{figure}
428:
429:
430: Let the amplitude of the input laser field be $E_{\mathrm{in}}(t)$ and
431: the amplitudes of the fields inside the cavity be $E(t)$ and $E'(t)$,
432: both defined at the reflective surface of the input mirror as shown in
433: Fig.~\ref{fig2}. Then the equation for reflection off the end
434: mirror can be written as follows
435: %
436: \begin{equation}\label{reflEnd}
437: %
438: E'(t) = - r_b E(t - 2T) \exp \left[ -2ik x(t - T) \right] ,
439: %
440: \end{equation}
441: %
442: where $r_b$ is the amplitude reflectivity of the end mirror. A similar
443: equation can be written for the reflection off the front mirror:
444: %
445: \begin{equation}\label{reflFront}
446: %
447: E(t) = - r_a E'(t) + t_a E_{\mathrm{in}}(t) ,
448: %
449: \end{equation}
450: %
451: where $t_a$ is the transmissivity of the front mirror.
452:
453:
454: Finally, the amplitudes of the transmitted and the reflected field are
455: given by
456: %
457: \begin{eqnarray}
458: %
459: E_{\mathrm{tr}}(t) & = & t_b E(t - T) , \label{Etr} \\
460: %
461: E_{\mathrm{ref}}(t) & = & r_a E_{\mathrm{in}}(t) + t_a E'(t) ,
462: \label{Eref}
463: %
464: \end{eqnarray}
465: %
466: where $t_b$ is the transmissivity of the end mirror. Note that the
467: reflected field is a superposition of the intracavity field leaking
468: through the front mirror and the input laser field reflected by the
469: front mirror, as shown in Fig.~\ref{fig2}.
470:
471:
472: It is convenient to reduce Eqs.~(\ref{reflEnd}) and
473: (\ref{reflFront}) to one equation with one field:
474: %
475: \begin{equation}\label{eqE}
476: %
477: E(t) = t_a E_{\mathrm{in}}(t) + r_a r_b E(t - 2T)
478: \exp \left[-2ik x(t - T)\right] .
479: %
480: \end{equation}
481: %
482: Further analysis of field dynamics in the Fabry-Perot cavities is
483: based on this equation.
484:
485:
486:
487:
488: \section{Transient due to Mirror Motion}
489:
490: The mirrors in Fabry-Perot cavities of laser gravitational wave
491: detectors are suspended from wires and can swing like pendulums
492: with frequencies of about 1 Hz. The amplitude of such motion is of
493: the order of a few microns. During the swinging motion, the mirrors
494: frequently pass through resonances of the cavity. Each passage
495: through a resonance gives rise to the field transient in the form of
496: damped oscillations. Such a transient can be described in terms of
497: the complex amplitude of the cavity field as follows. For the entire
498: time when the mirror moves through the width of a resonance (a few
499: milliseconds), its velocity can be considered constant, and its
500: trajectory can be approximated as linear: $x=vt$. Often the
501: amplitude of the incident field is constant: $E_{\mathrm{in}}(t)=A$.
502: Then amplitude of the intracavity field satisfies the equation:
503: %
504: \begin{equation}\label{AmpE}
505: %
506: E(t) = t_a A + r_a r_b E(t - 2T) \exp \left[
507: -2ik v \cdot (t - T) \right] ,
508: %
509: \end{equation}
510: %
511: which is a special case of equation (\ref{eqE}).
512:
513:
514: Numerical solutions of this equation can be easily obtained on the
515: computer. Examples of the numerical solution with the parameters of
516: LIGO 4km Fabry-Perot cavities are shown in Fig.~\ref{fig3}.
517:
518: \begin{figure}[ht]
519: \centering\includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{fig3.eps}
520: \caption{Modeled response of the LIGO 4km Fabry-Perot cavity
521: (finesse 205). The two curves correspond to the slow and the fast
522: motion of the mirror ($v_{\mathrm{cr}} = 1.48 \times 10^{-6}$ m/s).}
523: \label{fig3}
524: \end{figure}
525:
526: Such numerical solutions provide an accurate description for the field
527: transient but give little insight into the physics of the process.
528: Therefore, it is worthwhile to obtain an approximate analytical
529: solution for this equation.
530:
531:
532:
533:
534: \subsection{Approximate Solution for the Transient}
535:
536: An approximate solution can be derived as follows. A general solution
537: of Eq.~(\ref{AmpE}) can be represented as a sum:
538: %
539: \begin{equation}\label{CpD}
540: %
541: E(t) = C(t) + D(t) .
542: %
543: \end{equation}
544: %
545: Here $C(t)$ is a particular solution of the non-homogeneous equation
546: and $D(t)$ is a general solution of the homogeneous equation:
547: %
548: \begin{eqnarray}
549: %
550: C(t) - r_a r_b C(t - 2T) \exp \left[-2ik v \cdot
551: (t - T)\right] & = & t_a A ,\label{EqC} \\
552: %
553: D(t) - r_a r_b D(t - 2T) \exp \left[-2ik v \cdot
554: (t - T)\right] & = & 0 .\label{EqD}
555: %
556: \end{eqnarray}
557: %
558: Both amplitudes, $C(t)$ and $D(t)$, change very little during one
559: round-trip. In the case of $C$-field the approximation
560: $C(t-2T) \approx C(t)$ yields the solution:
561: %
562: \begin{equation}\label{Ct}
563: %
564: C(t) \approx \frac{t_a A}{1 - r_a r_b \exp (- 2ik vt)} ,
565: %
566: \end{equation}
567: %
568: which is generally known as the adiabatic field. (Here we also made
569: the approximation: $v \cdot (t - T) \approx vt$.) The adiabatic
570: component was introduced empirically by Yamamoto \cite{Yamamoto:1999}.
571:
572:
573: In the case of $D$-field the approximation $D(t - 2T) \approx D(t)$
574: yields only a trivial solution: $D(t)=0$. Fortunately, the equation
575: for $D$-field can be solved exactly. A trial solution for $t > 0$ is
576: %
577: \begin{equation}
578: %
579: D(t) = D_0 (r_a r_b)^{t/2T} \exp [i \phi(t)] ,
580: %
581: \end{equation}
582: %
583: where $D_0$ is the value of $D$-field at time $t = 0$ and $\phi(t)$ is
584: an arbitrary phase. Then Eq.~(\ref{EqD}) reduces to the equation
585: for the phase:
586: %
587: \begin{equation}
588: %
589: \phi(t) = \phi(t - 2T) - 2kv \cdot (t - T) .
590: %
591: \end{equation}
592: %
593: Its solution, up to an additive constant, is
594: %
595: \begin{equation}
596: %
597: \phi(t) = - \frac{k v}{2T} t^2 .
598: %
599: \end{equation}
600: %
601: Thus, we obtain the solution for $D$-field:
602: %
603: \begin{equation}\label{Dt}
604: %
605: D(t) = D_0 \exp \left( - \frac{t}{\tau} -
606: i \frac{kv}{2T} t^2 \right) ,
607: %
608: \end{equation}
609: %
610: where $\tau$ is the cavity storage time defined in
611: Eq.~(\ref{storTime}). This expression is valid for $t > 0$ and describes
612: the phase modulation of the cavity field due to the Doppler effect.
613: The constant $D_0$ can be found from the asymptotic behavior of the
614: field \cite{Rakhmanov:PhD} and is given by
615: %
616: \begin{equation}\label{D0}
617: %
618: D_0(kv) = t_a A \; \left( \frac{i\pi}{2kvT} \right)^{\frac{1}{2}}
619: \exp \left( \frac{iT}{2 kv \tau^2} \right) .
620: %
621: \end{equation}
622: %
623: Equation (\ref{Dt}) shows that $D$-field is oscillating with the
624: frequency which linearly increases with time:
625: %
626: \begin{equation}\label{Omega}
627: %
628: \Omega(t) \equiv \left| \frac{d\phi}{dt} \right| =
629: \frac{k |v|}{T} t .
630: %
631: \end{equation}
632: %
633: Note that the frequency of the oscillations is equal to the
634: accumulated Doppler shift:
635: %
636: \begin{equation}
637: %
638: \Omega(t) = |\delta \omega| \frac{t}{2T} ,
639: %
640: \end{equation}
641: %
642: where $\delta \omega$ is the frequency shift which occurs in one
643: reflection off the moving mirror, Eq.~(\ref{dw}).
644:
645: Combining the above results we obtain the approximate formula for
646: the transient:
647: %
648: \begin{eqnarray}
649: %
650: E(t) & \approx & \frac{t_a A}{1 - r_a r_b \exp (- 2ik vt)}
651: \nonumber \\
652: & & + D_0(kv) \exp \left( - \frac{t}{\tau} -
653: i \frac{kv}{2T} t^2 \right) \label{Ecomp} .
654: %
655: \end{eqnarray}
656: %
657: Thus the transient, which occurs during a passage of the mirror
658: through a resonance, is caused by the Doppler effect amplified by the
659: cavity. The frequency of oscillations linearly increases in time with
660: the rate proportional to the mirror velocity.
661:
662:
663: Comparison of the approximate analytical solution given by
664: Eq.~(\ref{Ecomp}) with the numerical simulations based on
665: Eq.~(\ref{AmpE}) shows that the two solutions agree very well in the
666: region past the resonance ($t \gg T$). However, the two solutions
667: differ substantially in the region near the center of the resonance
668: ($t \approx 0$). This is because the center of the resonance is the
669: boundary of the validity of the approximate analytical solution.
670:
671:
672: The above analysis leads to the following explanation of the
673: oscillatory transient. As the mirror approaches the resonance position
674: ($x = 0$), the light is rapidly building in the cavity. At the time
675: when the mirror passes the center of the resonance, a substantial
676: amount of light accumulates in the cavity. From this moment on, the
677: light stored in the cavity ($D$-component) decays according to the
678: exponential law, and its frequency is continuously shifting due to
679: the Doppler effect. At the same time there is a constant influx of
680: the new light from the laser ($C$-component). The new light is not
681: affected by the Doppler shift and therefore evolves according to the
682: usual adiabatic law.
683:
684:
685:
686:
687: \subsection{Observation of the Transient via Beats}
688:
689: The small frequency shifts of the light circulating in the cavity are
690: usually observed through beats. There are several beat mechanisms
691: which take place in Fabry-Perot cavities with moving mirrors. Here we
692: describe the three most frequently occurred beat mechanisms in detail.
693:
694:
695: The Doppler-induced oscillations of the intracavity field can be
696: observed in the intensity of the transmitted field. The above
697: analysis shows that the Doppler effect gives rise to {\it phase}
698: modulation of $D$-field. As a result, the cavity field $E$, which
699: is the sum of $D$ and $C$ fields, becomes {\it amplitude} modulated.
700: This amplitude modulation can be observed as the intensity modulation
701: of the field transmitted through the cavity. According to
702: Eqs.~(\ref{Etr}) and (\ref{CpD}) the intensity of the transmitted
703: field is proportional to
704: %
705: \begin{eqnarray}\label{ampMod}
706: %
707: |E(t)|^2
708: & \approx & |C(t)|^2 + |D(t)|^2 \nonumber \\
709: %
710: & & + 2 \; {\mathrm{Re}} \{ C(t)^* \; D(t) \} ,
711: %
712: \end{eqnarray}
713: %
714: where an asterisk stands for complex conjugation.
715: Note that neither $|C(t)|^2$ nor $|D(t)|^2$ are oscillating functions.
716: Therefore, the oscillations come from the last term, which represents
717: a beating between $D$ and $C$-components of the intracavity field.
718:
719:
720: Similarly, the oscillations of the intracavity field can be observed
721: in the intensity of the reflected field. According to
722: Eqs.~(\ref{reflEnd}) and (\ref{Eref}) the amplitude of the reflected
723: field can be found as
724: %
725: \begin{equation}
726: %
727: E_{\mathrm{ref}}(t) = [ (r_a^2 + t_a^2)
728: E_{\mathrm{in}}(t) - t_a E(t) ]/r_a .
729: %
730: \end{equation}
731: %
732: For high-finesse cavities ($r_a \approx 1$) with low losses
733: ($r_a^2 + t_a^2 \approx 1$) the complex amplitude of the reflected
734: field can be approximated as
735: %
736: \begin{equation}
737: %
738: E_{\mathrm{ref}}(t) \approx E_{\mathrm{in}}(t) - t_a E(t) .
739: %
740: \end{equation}
741: %
742: Then the intensity of the reflected light is given by
743: %
744: \begin{eqnarray}
745: %
746: |E_{\mathrm{ref}}(t)|^2 & \approx &
747: |E_{\mathrm{in}}(t)|^2 + t_a^2 |E(t)|^2 \nonumber \\
748: %
749: & & - 2 t_a {\mathrm{Re}} \{ E_{\mathrm{in}}(t)^* E(t)\}.
750: %
751: \end{eqnarray}
752: %
753: The second term in the right hand side of this equation represents
754: the amplitude modulation of the intracavity field as described in
755: Eq.~(\ref{ampMod}). The last term represents a beating of the
756: intracavity field transmitted through the front mirror and the input
757: laser field promptly reflected by the front mirror. Both terms give
758: rise to the oscillations in the intensity of the reflected field.
759: Therefore the decay of the reflected intensity is described by the
760: double exponential function with two decay times, $\tau$ and $\tau/2$,
761: as was noticed by Robertson {\it et al.} \cite{Robertson:1989}.
762:
763:
764: The oscillations can also be observed in the Pound-Drever signal,
765: which requires optical sidebands be imposed on the light incident on
766: the cavity. In this case the signal is obtained from beating of the
767: carrier reflected field with the sideband reflected fields. Since the
768: carrier field propagates in the cavity, it becomes Doppler-shifted
769: due to the motion of the cavity mirrors. The sideband fields are
770: promptly reflected by the front mirror of the cavity. Therefore their
771: amplitudes are proportional to the amplitude of the incident carrier
772: field. Then the signal can be approximated by the formula:
773: %
774: \begin{equation}\label{PDdef}
775: %
776: V(t) = - {\mathrm{Im}} \{ e^{i\gamma}
777: E_{\mathrm{in}}(t)^* E(t) \} ,
778: %
779: \end{equation}
780: %
781: where $\gamma$ is the phase of a local oscillator in the optical
782: heterodyne detection.
783:
784:
785: If the amplitude of the input laser field is constant
786: ($E_{\mathrm{in}}(t) = A$) then the Pound-Drever signal becomes a
787: linear function of the cavity field:
788: %
789: \begin{eqnarray}
790: %
791: V(t) & = & - A \; {\mathrm{Im}} \{ e^{i\gamma} E(t) \}
792: \label{PDsig}\\
793: %
794: & \approx & - A \; {\mathrm{Im}} \{ e^{i\gamma} [C(t) + D(t)] \} .
795: %
796: \end{eqnarray}
797: %
798: Since $C$-component is a monotonic function, the oscillations come
799: from $D$-component only. Unlike the signals derived from the
800: intensity of the transmitted or reflected fields, the Pound-Drever
801: signal is linearly proportional to the amplitude of the intracavity
802: field and therefore presents a direct way to observe the oscillations.
803:
804:
805:
806:
807: \section{Experimental Analysis of the Transient}
808:
809: The measurements of the oscillatory transient analyzed in this paper
810: were taken with the 40m Fabry-Perot cavity of the LIGO-prototype
811: interferometer at Caltech. The experimental setup was previously
812: described by Camp {\it et al.} \cite{Camp:1995}. Figure \ref{fig4}
813: shows the Pound-Drever signal of the 40m Fabry-Perot cavity recorded
814: with a digital oscilloscope (dashed line). The theoretical prediction
815: shown in the same Figure (solid line) is obtained by numerical
816: simulations of the intracavity field using Eq.~(\ref{AmpE}).
817: After adjustment of the demodulation phase ($\gamma\approx-0.28$ rad)
818: a good agreement between the theoretical and the experimental curves
819: was achieved. It is important to note that the mirror velocity
820: ($v \approx 5.5 \times 10^{-6}$ m/s) used for the numerical
821: simulations was not a fit parameter. It was obtained from the
822: interpolation of the mirror trajectory using the optical vernier
823: technique \cite{Rakhmanov:optVer}.
824:
825:
826: \begin{figure}
827: \centering\includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{fig4.eps}
828: \caption{Transient response of the Fabry-Perot cavity of the
829: Caltech 40m prototype interferometer ($v/v_{\mathrm{cr}}=1.93$).}
830: \label{fig4}
831: \end{figure}
832:
833: The formula for the transient, Eq.~(\ref{Ecomp}), can be used
834: for extracting the cavity parameters from the Pound-Drever signal.
835: In such an analysis it is convenient to remove the adiabatic
836: component from the Pound-Drever signal. The result is the function
837: very similar to $D(t)$, which is given by
838: %
839: \begin{eqnarray}
840: %
841: V_D(t) & = & - A |D_0| \exp \left( -\frac{t - t_0}{\tau}
842: \right) \nonumber \\
843: & & \times \sin \left[ \gamma + \delta -
844: \frac{kv}{2T} (t - t_0)^2 \right] \label{VD} .
845: %
846: \end{eqnarray}
847: %
848: Here we introduced $t_0$, the time when the mirror passes a center
849: of the resonance, and $\delta = \arg D_0$. The measured Pound-Drever
850: signal (with the adiabatic component removed) and the theoretical
851: prediction based on this formula are shown in Fig.~\ref{fig5}
852: (upper plot).
853:
854:
855:
856: \subsection{Measurement of the Cavity Finesse}
857:
858: The oscillatory transient can be used for measurements of the cavity
859: finesse. The present approach is based on the exponential decay of the
860: Pound-Drever signal. The finesse can be found by studying the absolute
861: value of the adjusted Pound-Drever signal:
862: %
863: \begin{equation}
864: %
865: |V_D(t)| \propto \exp(- t/\tau) .
866: %
867: \end{equation}
868: %
869: Indeed, by fitting the exponential function to the envelope of the
870: oscillations $|V_D(t)|$, one can find the storage time of the cavity,
871: $\tau$, and therefore its finesse:
872: %
873: \begin{equation}
874: %
875: {\mathcal{F}} = \frac{\pi}{2 \sinh (T/\tau)} .
876: %
877: \end{equation}
878: %
879: Applied to the data shown in Fig.~\ref{fig4}, this method yields the
880: following value for the finesse of the Caltech 40m Fabry-Perot cavity:
881: %
882: \begin{equation}
883: %
884: {\mathcal{F}} = 1066 \pm 58 .
885: %
886: \end{equation}
887: %
888: This result is close to the one previously obtained from the
889: measurement of the mirror reflectivities (${\mathcal{F}}\approx1050$).
890: The present approach to measure the cavity storage time is similar to
891: the one described by Robertson {\it et al} \cite{Robertson:1989}.
892:
893:
894:
895: \subsection{Measurement of the Mirror Velocity}
896:
897: The oscillatory transient can also be used for measurements of the
898: mirror velocity. The present approach is based on the linear shift
899: of the frequency of the Pound-Drever signal. The velocity can be
900: found by studying either the peaks or the zero crossing of the
901: adjusted Pound-Drever signal, $V_D(t)$.
902:
903: Let the times for the zero crossings be $t_n$, where $n$ is integer.
904: The values for $t_n$ are defined by the functional form of the
905: adjusted Pound-Drever signal, Eq.~(\ref{VD}), and are given by
906: %
907: \begin{equation}
908: %
909: \frac{k v}{2T} (t_n - t_0)^2 = \pi n + \gamma + \delta .
910: %
911: \end{equation}
912: %
913: This relation depends on the demodulation phase $\gamma$, which is
914: not always known in the experiment. However, the difference:
915: %
916: \begin{equation}\label{identity}
917: %
918: \frac{k v}{2T} \left[ (t_{n + 1} - t_0)^2 -
919: (t_n - t_0)^2 \right] = \pi ,
920: %
921: \end{equation}
922: %
923: does not depend on the demodulation phase and therefore is more
924: suitable for this analysis. Define the spacings between the zero
925: crossings, $\Delta t_n$, and the positions of their midpoints,
926: $\bar{t}_n$, as follows:
927: %
928: \begin{eqnarray}
929: %
930: \Delta t_n & = & t_{n + 1} - t_n , \\
931: \bar{t}_n & = & \frac{1}{2} \left( t_n + t_{n + 1} \right) .
932: %
933: \end{eqnarray}
934: %
935: Then the ``average'' frequency of the oscillations of $V_D(t)$, can
936: be defined as
937: %
938: \begin{equation}
939: %
940: \bar{\nu}_n = \frac{1}{2 \Delta t_n} .
941: %
942: \end{equation}
943: %
944: Using the identity, Eq.~(\ref{identity}), we can show that the
945: average frequencies satisfy the equation:
946: %
947: \begin{equation}\label{linFreq}
948: %
949: \bar{\nu}_n = \frac{v}{\lambda T} (\bar{t}_n - t_0) .
950: %
951: \end{equation}
952: %
953: This equation is a discrete analog of the continuous evolution,
954: Eq.~(\ref{Omega}).
955:
956: If the times $t_n$ correspond to the peaks and not the zero crossings
957: of the signal, the predicted average frequency becomes
958: %
959: \begin{equation}
960: %
961: \bar{\nu}_n = \frac{v}{\lambda T} (\bar{t}_n - t_0) +
962: \delta \bar{\nu}_n ,
963: %
964: \end{equation}
965: %
966: where $\delta \bar{\nu}_n$ is a small correction which accounts for
967: the exponential decay of the signal present in Eq.~(\ref{VD}). The
968: correction can be found from Eq.~(\ref{VD}) using a perturbation
969: expansion in powers of $T/\tau$. In the lowest order, it is given by
970: %
971: \begin{equation}
972: %
973: \delta \bar{\nu}_n = - \frac{4 \lambda v T (\bar{t}_n - t_0)^2}
974: {\pi^2 \tau \left[ 16 v^2 (\bar{t}_n - t_0)^4 -
975: \lambda^2 T^2 \right]} .
976: %
977: \end{equation}
978: %
979: Such a correction becomes significant only if the oscillations are
980: close to being critically damped.
981:
982: \begin{figure}
983: \centering\includegraphics[width=0.45\textwidth]{fig5.eps}
984: \caption{Upper diagram: Theoretical prediction (solid line)
985: and the measurement (dashed line) of the adjusted Pound-Drever
986: signal. Lower diagram: measured Doppler shift $\bar{\nu}_n$ and
987: the linear fit $\bar{\nu}(t)$.}
988: \label{fig5}
989: \end{figure}
990:
991: In general the zero crossings can be affected by the subtraction of
992: the adiabatic component. Therefore, we prefer to use the peaks of the
993: signal. The peak-positions $t_n$ are found from the measured
994: Pound-Drever signal, which is shown in Fig.~\ref{fig5} (upper plot).
995: Since the oscillations are far from being critically damped,the
996: correction $\delta \bar{\nu}_n$ can be neglected. In this experiment,
997: the first order correction is much less than the error in
998: determination of the average frequencies. As a result the measured
999: values of the average frequencies $\nu_n$ appear very close to the
1000: linear function, Eq.~(\ref{linFreq}). This can also be seen in
1001: Fig.~\ref{fig5} (lower plot). Therefore, we can apply a linear fit
1002: to the data:
1003: %
1004: \begin{equation}
1005: %
1006: \bar{\nu}(t) = a t + b ,
1007: %
1008: \end{equation}
1009: %
1010: where $a$ and $b$ are the slope and the intercept of the linear function.
1011: The least square adjustment of the fit gives the following values for
1012: these parameters:
1013: %
1014: \begin{eqnarray}
1015: %
1016: a & = & (86.8 \pm 0.6) \times 10^{6}\ {\mathrm{Hz/s}} ,\\
1017: b & = & (-0.5 \pm 1.0) \times 10^{3}\ {\mathrm{Hz}} .
1018: %
1019: \end{eqnarray}
1020: %
1021: The slope is related to the mirror velocity, and the intercept is
1022: related to the time when mirror passes through the center of the
1023: resonance:
1024: %
1025: \begin{eqnarray}
1026: %
1027: v & = & \lambda T a ,\\
1028: t_0 & = & - b/a.
1029: %
1030: \end{eqnarray}
1031: %
1032: From these relations we obtain
1033: %
1034: \begin{eqnarray}
1035: %
1036: v & = & (5.7 \pm 0.4) \times 10^{-6}\ {\mathrm{m/s}} ,\\
1037: t_0 & = & (0.6 \pm 1.2) \times 10^{-5}\ {\mathrm{s}} .
1038: %
1039: \end{eqnarray}
1040: %
1041: The errors are due to uncertainty in the peak positions, which are
1042: limited in this measurement by the resolution of the oscilloscope.
1043:
1044:
1045:
1046:
1047: \section*{Conclusion}
1048:
1049: The Doppler effect in Fabry-Perot cavities with suspended mirrors can
1050: be significant and manifests itself in the oscillations of the field
1051: transient, which can be directly observed via the Pound-Drever signal.
1052: The transient can be used for accurate measurements of the cavity
1053: finesse and the mirror velocities. Implemented in real-time computer
1054: simulations the formula for the transient can be used in lock
1055: acquisition algorithms.
1056:
1057:
1058: The analysis presented in this paper explains the chirp-like
1059: behavior of the transient and leads to a simple formula for its
1060: frequency. However, the approximate analytical solution given in this
1061: paper describes only the ringdown part of the transient. The buildup
1062: part is yet to be explained. Also it is not clear at the present time
1063: why oscillations always appear after the mirror passes the center of
1064: the resonance and not before.
1065:
1066:
1067:
1068:
1069: \section*{Acknowledgment}
1070:
1071: I thank Guoan Hu for assistance with the experiment, and Hiro Yamamoto
1072: and Matt Evans for helpful discussions. I also thank Barry Barish and
1073: other scientists of LIGO project: Rick Savage, David Shoemaker and
1074: Stan Whitcomb for their suggestions about the manuscript during the
1075: draft process. Finally, I thank David Reitze and David Tanner of the
1076: University of Florida for the discussions of the transient and their
1077: comments on the paper. This research was supported by the National
1078: Science Foundation under Cooperative Agreement PHY-9210038.
1079:
1080:
1081:
1082:
1083: \begin{thebibliography}{1}
1084:
1085: \bibitem{Abramovici:1992}
1086: A.~Abramovici, W.E. Althouse, R.W. Drever, Y.~G\"{u}rsel, S.~Kawamura,
1087: F.J. Raab, D.~Shoemaker, L.~Sievers, R.E. Spero, K.S. Thorne,
1088: R.E. Vogt, R.~Weiss, S.E. Whitcomb, and M.E. Zucker,
1089: ``LIGO: The Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory,''
1090: Science {\bf 256}, 325-333 (1992).
1091:
1092: \bibitem{Drever:1983}
1093: R.W.P. Drever, J.L. Hall, F.V. Kowalski, J.~Hough, G.M. Ford,
1094: A.J. Munley, and H.~Ward,
1095: ``Laser Phase and Frequency Stabilization Using an Optical
1096: Resonator,'' Appl. Phys. B {\bf 31}, 97-105 (1983).
1097:
1098: \bibitem{Robertson:1989}
1099: N.A. Robertson, K.A. Strain, and J.~Hough,
1100: ``Measurements of losses in high reflectance mirrors coated for
1101: $\lambda = 514.5$ nm,'' Opt. Comm. {\bf 69}, 345-348 (1989).
1102:
1103: \bibitem{An:1995}
1104: K. An, C. Yang, R.R. Dasari, and M.S. Feld,
1105: ``Cavity ring-down technique and its application to the measurement of
1106: ultraslow velocities,'' Opt. Lett. {\bf 20}, 1068-1070 (1995).
1107:
1108: \bibitem{Camp:1995}
1109: J. Camp, L. Sievers, R. Bork, and J. Heefner,
1110: ``Guided lock acquisition in a suspended Fabry-Perot cavity,''
1111: Opt. Lett. {\bf 20}, 2463-2465 (1995).
1112:
1113: \bibitem{Lawrence:1999}
1114: M.J. Lawrence, B.~Willke, M.E. Husman, E.K. Gustafson, and R.L. Byer,
1115: ``Dynamic response of a Fabry-Perot interferometer,''
1116: J. Opt. Soc. Am. B {\bf 16}, 523-532 (1999).
1117:
1118: \bibitem{Yamamoto:1999}
1119: H.~Yamamoto, ``Fringe structure of LIGO Hanford 2km Fabry-Perot
1120: cavity,'' LIGO technical report G990130, California Institute of
1121: Technology, (1999).
1122:
1123: \bibitem{Rakhmanov:PhD}
1124: M.~Rakhmanov, ``Dynamics of Laser Interferometric Gravitational Wave
1125: Detectors,'' Ph.D. Thesis, California Institute of Technology (2000).
1126:
1127: \bibitem{Rakhmanov:optVer}
1128: M.~Rakhmanov, M.~Evans, and H.~Yamamoto, ``An optical vernier
1129: technique for in situ measurement of the length of long Fabry-Perot
1130: cavities,'' Meas. Sci. Tech. {\bf 10}, 190-194 (1999).
1131:
1132: \end{thebibliography}
1133:
1134: \end{document}
1135: