1: % ****** Start of file apssamp.tex ******
2: %
3: % This file is part of the APS files in the REVTeX 3.1 distribution.
4: % Version 3.1 of REVTeX, September 1996.
5: %
6: % Copyright (c) 1992 The American Physical Society.
7: %
8: % See the REVTeX 3.1 README file for restrictions and more information.
9: %
10: %
11: %
12: \documentstyle[preprint,aps]{revtex}
13: \def\btt#1{{\tt$\backslash$#1}}
14: \def\BibTeX{\rm B{\sc ib}\TeX}
15: \tightenlines
16: \begin{document}
17: \draft
18: \input{epsf}
19: \preprint{HEP/123-qed}
20: \title{Laser induced collisions between Lithium isotopes}
21: \author{Evgueni V. Kovarski}
22: \address {ekovars@netscape.net}
23: \date{07.17.2001}
24: \maketitle
25: \begin{abstract}
26: The near resonant cooling mechanism have offered for
27: the experiment with laser induced excitation of Lithium isotopes
28: and its ionization by collisions.
29: \end{abstract}
30:
31: \pacs{32.80.}
32:
33: \narrowtext
34: \section {Introduction}
35:
36: Clearly defined spectrum is the main requirement for any spectroscopical
37: methods, which deal with two close isotopes as $\it{Li}_6$ and $\it{Li}_7$ ,
38: Is preferable to use the atomic beams, where it is easy to
39: realize the excitation of single spectral line of
40: $\it{Li}_6$ or $\it{Li}_7$ ~\cite{Sansonetti}. However there are many publications devoted to the
41: general study of Lithium vapor in the heat-pipe oven. There is the Doppler
42: broadening of spectral lines.
43: It is necessary to have a stability and accuracy frequency adjustments of the laser.
44: Usually for Lithium atom the single mode laser operation is need with stability and tuning
45: of the laser frequency better then 1 $\it{GHz}$ at the resonant frequency.
46: The first known publication with Lithium resonance ionization spectroscopy (RIS)
47: was in 1977~\cite{Karlov}.There were
48: photo-ionization cross section going from the $\it{2P}$ level and the
49: demonstration of the ion current by varying the dye laser wavelength
50: correspondent to $\it{2S-2P}$ transition.
51: Therefore this was the first work
52: about the possibility of Lithium laser isotope separation. Two
53: years later the US patent for Lithium laser isotope separation was accepted in
54: 1979 ~\cite{Yam}. The resonance ionization spectroscopy (RIS) of Lithium
55: use two lasers with different frequencies. It is depend on intensities of
56: both lasers for resonance excitation at
57: $\it{2S - 2P}$ and for the ionization from $\it{2P}$ ~\cite{Arisawa} (1982).
58: The mixture of two gases in heat pipe usually is present due to chemical activity of
59: Lithium contacts with optical windows of the heat-pipe oven. The Ar gas usually is present.
60: Therefore one can to compare ions production by RIS in the heat-pipe with another similar method
61: for the $\it{Li-Ar}$ contact ionization
62: based on the ion cyclotron resonance (ICR) isotope separation ~\cite{Suz}.
63: It should be noted here that we shall not discuss the effectiveness
64: methods of isotope separation, but on the other hand, both RIS and ICR can work
65: more successfully at experiments where the concentration of Lithium atoms is high.
66: To achieve high values of
67: concentration it is necessary to increase the temperature of $\it{Li}$ of a
68: vapor chamber with the metallic Lithium.
69: The ion generation process is important for some applications
70: at similar condition of environment.
71: We consider collisions at the experiment with heat-pipe oven, filled with $\it{Li-Ar}$ mixture
72: For such experiment the electromagnetic properties of gas mixture play an
73: important role due to relatively high concentration of charged particles
74: produced by emission, atomic collisions and proper RIS
75: for ionization. The geometric distribution of generated positive and negative
76: particles in the gas chamber is along the way of coaxial laser beams. If there is no
77: voltage applied to electrodes the small value of electric current is only due to
78: atom - field interaction. Because the heat pipe oven has two electrodes with
79: cylindrical symmetry and proper laser is as new cylindrical electrode that
80: produced charged particles along the laser way.
81:
82: We are going to present: the simplified method for spectroscopic investigation of the dense
83: vapor of $\it{Li-Ar}$ mixture, based on methods of atomic collision
84: estimations; the experimental setup for ionization experiment with lasers,
85: precisely tuned on transition frequency; the results of electric current
86: measurements. The ion generation is with both the RIS and without it.
87: Last process is most interesting to that the ultra-violet radiation is absent and
88: for achievement of a threshold of ionization is no sufficiently only to excite $\it{2S-2P}$ transition.
89: In both cases the quantity of the charged particles can appear so large, that it is possible
90: to speak about presence low density plasma ~\cite{E1}.
91: The measurement of the excitation and ionization of dense lithium vapor by cw- dye laser with
92: wavelength $610.3 \it{nm}$ were performed in Ref.~\cite{Vez}.
93: In present work the result was obtained by using only $670.8 \it{nm}$ wavelength.
94: When the DYE laser excite $\it{2P}$-level at 1,848 $\it{eV}$ it can not reach
95: to $\it{3D}$ energy level at 3,879 $\it{eV}$ due to 2,031 $\it{eV}$ difference
96: for two steps excitation and it can lower the ionization potential at 5,391
97: $\it{eV}$ of $\it{Li}$ atoms. For this
98: reason we think that there is not a special two-step absorption process, so we will to discuss
99: two mechanisms such as associative reaction and near resonance cooling.
100:
101: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
102: \section{Spectral characteristics of the dense Lithium vapor. }
103:
104: We begin with note that the main problem for such experiments is
105: about the relative values for concentrations of
106: neutral atoms and molecules in the same $\it{Li}$ vapor. Of course, special
107: measurements for molecules or clusters concentration are needed on time (for
108: $\it{Li}$ molecules studies see e.g. ref ~\cite{Koch} ).
109: The standard experimental absorption intensity spectrum of the $\it{2S-2P}$ of each Lithium
110: isotopes has two spectral lines $\it{D1}$ and $\it{D2}$ ~\cite{Sansonetti} with
111: correspondence to level isotope shifts~\cite{Niemax}.
112: The Lithium $\it{2S-2P}$ has one doublet with distance of 10
113: $\it{GHz}$ (0 ,012 $\it{nm}$) between $\it{D1}$ and $\it{D2}$ spectral lines.
114: The isotope shift between $\it{Li}_{6} \it{D2}$ (670 ,7922 $\it{nm}$) and
115: $\it{Li}_{7} \it{D2}$ ( 670 , 7764 $\it{nm}$) is 10 ,5333 $\it{GHz}$ and
116: between $\it{Li}_{6}\it{D1}$ (670 ,8073 $\it{nm}$) and $\it{Li}_{7}\it{D1}$
117: (670 ,7915 $\it{nm}$) is 10 ,5329 $\it{GHz}$ ~\cite{Sansonetti}.
118:
119: Usually the observable at heat-pipe experiment
120: $\it{2S - 2P}$ spectrum of natural Lithium consists of three lines, where the central
121: line is formed by the superposition of two lines going from two different
122: isotopes ~\cite{Yam}. At heat-pipe experiments with the
123: dense $\it{Li}$ vapor at high temperature, above 1000 $\it{K}$, all Gauss lines
124: profiles can not been clearly observed. There are only three observable normalized
125: profiles of absorption intensity received from experiment and fitted
126: numerically. The well known picture of the fine structure for each isotope was not
127: at high temperature heat pipe experiment, but particularly was revised with two diode laser for
128: calibration.
129:
130: The Voight profile approach can be applied for simple
131: analysis of the Doppler broadened line and for the Lorenzian line, which widths
132: are related to the correspondent Gauss to Lorentz $\it{(G/L)}$ damping
133: constant. With known value of the $\it{(G/L)}$ damping constant from fitted
134: profile, it is easy to obtain the line width for Lorentzian profile and
135: evaluate the summary of excitation transfer mechanisms. Also
136: special experiments and theory are needed for detailed investigation of
137: $\it{Li}$ atoms collisions ~\cite{Valda} - ~\cite{Shim}.
138:
139: We use the method based on dense gas absorption intensity spectrum [Fig.~2] that can be
140: analytically described by empirical approximation
141: for a Voight profile of the absorbed intensity in the Beer law,
142: where the absorption coefficient $\it{k}_{abs}$ is ~\cite{Zemansky}:
143:
144: \begin{equation}
145: k_{abs} = k_{G}\left[ e^{\eta}-\frac{ 2 a}{\sqrt{\pi}}
146: \left(1 - 2\eta F\right)\right] \\ ,
147: \end{equation}
148: The absorption coefficient for Gauss line profiles is $\it{k}_{G}$ . The
149: coefficient $\it{k}_{G}$ can be founded numerically from fitted profiles of
150: absorption intensity, because the application of the Beer
151: law with absorption coefficient as a constant, which no depend on Gauss
152: distribution is no correct for a dense vapor. Also at a maximum of one
153: unsaturated line is possible to compare $\it{k}_{G}$ form fitted spectrum
154: with the same value from the Beer law, therefore is possible to use the
155: thickness (8,5 $\it{cm}$) of dense vapor. There are two numerical
156: parameters for normalized profile of intensity $\it{I}_{abs}/\it{I}_{0}$, where
157: $\it{I}_{0}$ is the intensity of the laser. One of these parameters is
158: $\it{k}_{G}$, which depend on spectral lines saturation, e.g. for $\it{Li}_{6}$
159: and $\it{Li}_{7}$ due to accordingly concentrations. The $\eta$ is the second
160: numerical parameter. It dependent on wings of spectral line at frequency $\nu$,
161: which are far from the central line $\nu_0$ for both isotopes:
162:
163: \begin{equation}
164: \eta =
165: \frac{\left(\nu - \nu_{0}\right)}{\Delta\nu_{G}} \sqrt{l n 2} \\ ,
166: \end{equation}
167: For unsaturated spectral lines, as for left spectral profile in the [ Fig.~1 ],
168: that corresponds to $\it{Li}_6$ , the parameter $\eta$ leads to the function
169: $\it{F}$ for the Voight profile:
170:
171: \begin{equation}
172: - 2\eta \it{ F} = 1 -
173: 2\eta^{2}+\frac{4}{3}\eta^{2}-\frac{8}{15}\eta^{6}+.. \label{F} \\
174: \end{equation}
175: and the $\it{(G/L)}=a$ damping constant is
176:
177: \begin{equation}
178: a = \frac{\Delta\nu_{L}}{\Delta\nu_{G}}\sqrt{l n 2} \\ .
179: \end{equation}
180: The Eq.~(\ref{F}) is used only for the fitting $\it{Li}_6$ spectral lines,
181: because the parameter $\eta$ for $\it{Li}_6$ is not too large as for
182: $\it{Li}_7$, due to the relative concentrations of these isotopes. For
183: $\it{Li}_7$ isotope spectral line the saturation is much more greater than for
184: $\it{Li}_6$, thus in this case the Voight profile must be fitted by using the
185: other sequence:
186:
187: \begin{equation}
188: 1- 2\eta\it{ F} =
189: -\left(\frac{1}{2\eta^{2}}+\frac{3}{4\eta^{2}}+
190: \frac{15}{8\eta^{6}}+...\right) \\
191: \end{equation}
192: By fitting the experimental spectrum with above method
193: is possible to obtain a better result with experiment for each spectral line. Also
194: another empirical approximation of Voight profile ~\cite{Whit} can be used
195: successfully for all spectral lines at the narrow part of frequency spectrum.
196:
197: The $\it{(G/L)}$ damping constants for both
198: $\it{Li}_{6\ D1}$ and $\it{Li}_{7\ D2}$ have the same values
199: $\it{a}_{7} = \it{a}_{6} = 0.021 \pm 0.0005$ and both absorption coefficients
200: for $\it{Li}_7$ and $\it{Li}_6$ were estimated from fitted spectrum at a fixed temperature.
201:
202: The relation of two Gaussian profiles for $\it{Li}_7$ and $\it{Li}_6$ at fixed
203: temperature is:
204:
205: \begin{equation}
206: \frac{\Delta\nu_{G6}}{\Delta\nu_{G7}}=
207: \frac{\nu_{6D1}}{\nu_{7D2}}\sqrt{\frac{\mu_{7}}{\mu_{6}}}=1,08 ,\\
208: \end{equation}
209: where $\mu_{6}=6,01703\it{a.u.}$, $\mu_{7}=7,01823\it{a.u.}$ and resonance
210: frequencies corresponds to wavelength 670,7764 nm for $\it{Li}_{7}$ and
211: 670,8073 nm for $\it{Li}_{6}$. At temperature $\it{T}=831.84 \it{K}$ and
212: pressure $1.8 \it{torr}$, the full width of the half maximum (FWHM) is
213: $\Delta\nu_{G6}=3763.17 \it{MHz}$ for $\it{Li}_{6\ D1}$ and
214: $\Delta\nu_{G7}=3484.58 \it{MHz}$ for $\it{Li}_{7\ D2}$.
215:
216: For correspondent Lorentzian profiles one can easy to calculate the FWHM equal to
217: $\Delta\nu_{Li6} = 94.92 \it{MHz}$ for $\it{Li}_{6\ D1}$ and $\Delta\nu_{Li7} =
218: 87.89 \it{MHz}$ for $\it{Li}_{7\ D2}$.
219:
220: The heat velocity of atoms in the $\it{Li-Ar}$ mixture is:
221: \begin{equation}
222: \bar {v} =\sqrt{\frac{8k_{B}T}{\pi M}} \\
223: \end{equation}
224: Also the numerical equation for corresponded temperature dependence is
225: $\bar{v}= 63.64 \sqrt{T}$, where the reduction mass is
226: $M = (M_{Li} M_{Ar} /M_{Li} + M_{Ar}) = 0.8683 \cdot10^{-26} \it{kg}$.
227:
228: Therefore, with the temperature about 650 $\it{K}$ , the random velocity of the
229: $\it{Li-Ar}$ atoms vapor is about 160 000 $\it{cm/s}$ and the correspondent
230: Doppler shift for one laser wave is about 16 $\it{GHz}$.
231: There are some experimental possibilities for measurements.
232: When the laser has frequency scanning along
233: spectrum of Lithium, the relative datum can be used for the
234: line position in the spectrum due to the Doppler shift for each wavelengths.
235: The Doppler-free method, that used two opposite
236: propagated beams with the same frequency on the each laser beam is free of the
237: Doppler shift for detectors, thus the Lorentzian profile can be experimentally
238: received, but only calibrated relative scale of the frequency can be used for
239: estimation of the Lorentzian profile. Therefore the 20 $\it{GHz}$ scale between
240: known spectral lines captured from the literature datum for $\it{Li}$ is no
241: good for Doppler-free experimental estimations of the Lorentzian profile in the
242: gas chamber, because expected value of the FWHM is about 100 $\it{MHz}$ and
243: special calibration laser air wavelength is needed.
244: Also if the one of two laser beams
245: is controlled by wave meter and another laser is controlled by a power meter or
246: by photo diode with oscilloscope, thus the resolution of the wave meter is about
247: 0,0002 $\it{nm}$ or 133 $\it{MHz}$ at 670 $\it{nm}$ and can not permit well
248: accuracy for experiments with a Heat-pipe oven where all spectral lines are
249: Doppler broadened and saturated.
250: The $\it{2S-2P}$
251: transition of Lithium isotopes is well known for the all 4 principal spectral
252: lines including the fine structures $\it{(fs)}$. Each atom has the lowest
253: $\it{2S}$ level with two $\it{(fs)}$ levels, which can be observed only at the
254: special experiment with electric or magnetic fields.
255: The distance between both $\it{fs}$ levels is 803
256: $\it{MHz}$ for $\it{2S}$ and 18 $\it{MHz}$ for $\it{2P}$ level.
257: Yet, we can put fine structures $\it{(fs)}$ out of our consideration the
258: resonance $\it{2S-2P}$ transition with resonance frequency
259: $\omega_{0} =2,8\cdot10^ {15} \it{rad./s.}$, because
260: the Doppler - free
261: method can not to permit the accuracy experiment with a given transition.
262:
263: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
264: \section {Experimental setup}
265:
266: The selection and specification of special designed lasers instrumentation
267: for selective excitation of lithium isotopes and full ionization is important
268: because of the small frequency distance between the lithium lines is present
269: and it is necessary to study some laser spectral stability
270: characteristics. The experimental setup [ Fig.~2] consists of three lasers which path
271: is the same route across the heat-pipe oven. This is possible by use properties of Glan prisms
272: and rotators of polarization.
273:
274: The lasers wavelength was controlled by a serial pulsed Burleigh
275: wave meter Model WA 4500 with accuracy 0,0001 - 0,0002 nm at wavelength range from 1100 nm to 400 nm .
276: The laser line shape was measured by use of a
277: Burleigh Spectrum Analyzer System SA 385 with
278: SA-91 Etalon Assembly. Its maximum specified resolution is
279: 27 $\it{MHz}$ using 8 $\it{GHz}$ FSR mirror set with finesse about 300 and
280: the transmission more then 10 % at 250 - 5000 $\it{nm}$. It can also be used
281: as a Fabry-Perot filter with thermal sensitivity 70 $\it{nm} / ^{o}\it{C}$
282: changing in mirrors spacing.
283:
284: The laser power was measured with a cw - Laser Power Meter,
285: Spectra Physics, Mod 407 A. It has a wavelength range 250 -1100
286: $\it{nm}$, power range from 5 $\it{mW}$ to 20 $\it{W}$ with sensitivity
287: variation about 1 %. It is not designed to monitor $\it{Q}$-switched lasers,
288: because the damage peak energy density is 0,3 $\it{J/cm}^2$ at 50 $\it{ns}$
289: pulses. Also the 818 UV, Newport Power Meter was used for precisely measured
290: power of low intensity cw - lasers.
291:
292: For the ionization process we used a High Power $\it{Q}$-Switched,
293: $\it{TEM}_{00}$ frequency-doubled Nd-YAG $\it{Lee}$ Laser, Model
294: $\it{815 TQ}$. The power stability was 10 % peak-peak. The mean power at the
295: 1064 $\it{nm}$ was 15 $\it{W}$ at 5 $\it{kHz}$ repetition rate
296: (pulse energy 2 ,2 $\it{mJ}$ and pulse duration 90 $\it{ns}$) and the intensity
297: 3 $\it{MW/cm}^2$. In this configuration the second harmonic wavelength (532
298: $\it{nm}$) is emitted laterally from the optical axis of the laser resonator.
299: The SHG assembly contains a KTP (potassium titanyl phosphate crystal) which is
300: bounced inside a temperature controlled chamber. Because of the small crystal
301: cross section (4 x 4 $\it{mm)}$ ), there is a little box for misalignment of the
302: crystal with the Nd-YAG beam optical center line. The average power was 2,5
303: $\it{W}$, the average energy was 0,5 $\it{mJ}$ and the pulse duration was 100
304: $\it{ns}$. We worked with 1,5 $\it{W }$ for
305: obtaining UV 266 $\it{nm}$. For this purpose we used an $\it{INRAD}$
306: temperature stabilized crystal of
307: $\it{KDP}$ , obtaining 40 $\it{mW}$ of the average power. The non-critical
308: phase matching temperature (35 $^{o}\it{C}$ - 75 $^{o}\it{C}$) is quite
309: dependent on the deuteration level of the $\it{KDP}$. Also the incoming edge of
310: the crystal is at 90 $^ o$ with the optical axis of the crystal and the
311: reflection at the angle about 23 $^ o$ decrease the intensity of 532 $\it{nm}$
312: about two times. The lineal polarization of 532 $\it{nm}$ going from the
313: $\it{LEE}$ laser had an inclination with the angle 45 $^ o$ respect to the
314: optical path of our experiment. The specially oriented crystal $\it{KDP}$ for
315: second harmonic generation $(\it{SHG})$ was needed. From two waves within one
316: laser beam with $\lambda$ = 532 $\it{nm}$ the well known procedure of the
317: second harmonic generation was used. The wave with $\lambda$ = 266 $\it{nm}$
318: We obtained a UV-beam at 266 $\it{nm}$ with intensity 16 $\it{kW/cm} ^2$ after the prism
319: separation from incoming 532 $\it{nm}$ wave. The line width of
320: the UV line was 20 $\it{MHz}$ with high frequency stability.
321: Frequency stability of the ionization laser is no so critical as for the excitation process, because for
322: ionization we have a transition from $\it{2P}$ to above ionization limit.
323:
324: The group of calibration lasers consist both the 6202 $\it{New Focus}$ diode
325: laser and the $\it{EOSI}$ diode laser with
326: line width about 100 $\it{KHz}$ and the average power 6 $\it{mW}$. These lasers
327: was used for calibrating the experiment due to high stability parameters at
328: the needed wave length.
329:
330: We tested a cw - broadband
331: standing-wave Spectra Physics DYE Laser (Model 375 B), because we can change
332: the mode structure of outgoing laser wave as a special background for given laser
333: equipment ~\cite{E5}. The DYE laser was pumped by a power $\it{P}_{0}=6 \it{W}$ ,
334: Stability Multiline Ar-Ion Laser Spectra Physics Model 2017 -06 S. The Ar-ion laser had some measurable
335: spectral lines, such as: at 514,5 $\it{nm}$ with 0,393 $\it{P}_{0}$,
336: at 496,5$\it{nm}$ with 0,166 $\it{P}_{0}$, at 488 $\it{nm}$ with 0,285
337: $\it{P}_{0}$, at 476,5$\it{nm}$ with 0,109 $\it{P}_{0}$, at 457,9 $\it{nm}$ with
338: 0,047$\it{P}_{0}$. The amplitude stability of the DYE laser intensity
339: was best with pumping of the Ar-Ion laser at 514,5 nm. The DYE laser was based on DCM
340: 4 -$\it{(Dicyanomethylene)}$ - 2 -$\it{(methyl)}$ - 6
341: -$\it{(p-dimethylaminostyryl)}$- 4-$\it{H}$-$\it{(pyran)}$ with molecular
342: weight 303,37 $\it{a.u.}$ and concentration 1,5 $\it{(mmole/l)}$ , which was
343: prepared when 0 ,682$\it{g}$ of the DCM was solved in Prophylene carbonate (0
344: ,6 $\it{l}$) and Ethylene Glycol (0,9 $\it{l}$).
345: The absorption curve of DCM has
346: an absorbency region between 450 $\it{nm}$ and 550 $\it{nm}$ . The broad band
347: emission curve has the FWHM about 80 $\it{nm}$ at 650 $\it{nm}$,
348: which is close to the resonance $\it{2S-2P}$ transition of Lithium at 671
349: $\it{nm}$. The Spectra Physics data for the Model 375 B laser were: power 600 $\it{mW}$ at
350: 705 $\it{nm}$, line width 7 $\it{GHz}$, amplitude stability less then 0 ,5 % ,
351: accuracy of wavelength changing 0 ,5 $\it{nm}$.
352: The limit of wavelength changing is in the same order as a
353: Rayleigh selection rule for spectral lines $ 8/\pi^{2}$, that is about 0,5
354: $\it{nm}$ for a given laser line width.
355: We obtained characteristics of
356: Spectra Physics DYE laser, Model 375 B, such as: average power 1 ,2 $\it{W}$
357: at 671 $\it{nm}$ , accuracy of changing wavelength better then 0,01 $\it{nm}$
358: and frequency stability about 0,0001 $\it{nm/hour}$ during time of
359: the experiment. All parameters are depended on needed laser modes structure
360: and corresponds to properties of optical elements inside the resonator.
361: For our experiments with $\it{Li}$ we modified the mode structure and the spectral line width of
362: outgoing laser wave by inserting an additional etalon into a laser resonator.
363: We note that
364: broadband laser had the tuning accuracy 0,5 $\it{nm}$ without $\it{E1}$ due
365: to $\it{BF}$ frequency tuning accuracy. With $\it{BF}$ and $\it{E1}$ the
366: frequency tuning accuracy was measured $\approx$0,0001 $\it{nm}$. The first
367: air spaced etalon $\it{(E1)}$ had a temperature stability. When the $\it{BF}$
368: and $\it{E1}$ were used, the output frequency of the DYE laser was tuned to the
369: quite frequency 4,46789597$\cdot 10^{14}\it{Hz}$ by used the angle and
370: temperature tuning of $\it{E1}$. The FSR of output frequency was 19,655
371: $\it{GHz}$. Then the second etalon $\it{E2}$, with FSR = 15 $\it{GHz}$ was
372: installed inside the cavity and the same operation was repeated with angle
373: tuning of $\it{E2}$ for the same frequency. The $\it{E2}$ was chosen, because
374: the spectral lines of the Lithium have 10 $\it{Ghz}$ distance twice between 3
375: spectral lines and laser with $\it{BF}$ and $\it{E1}$ can excite both
376: $\it{Li}_{6}$ and $\it{Li}_{7}$. The single mode operation of the broad band
377: laser was achieved. The single mode selection was realized experimentally [Fig.~2]
378: by use the aperture with diameter 1 $\it{mm}$
379: for transverse mode selection and, by use two etalons $\it{(E1,E2)}$ and the
380: birefringent filter $\it{(BF)}$ for longitudinal mode selection.
381: The mode structure of the single laser beam is very important for selective
382: excitation. There are some experimental possibilities with the broad band DYE
383: laser, which depend on needed experiments. The sngle mode operation was necessary for
384: a RIS experiments. On the contrary for measured values of electric current
385: [Fig.3] of the laser induced low density plasma observation
386: experiment ~\cite{E1}, the DYE laser had the two longitudinal
387: modes with FWHM 100 $\it{MHz}$, separated exactly at
388: 20 $\it{GHz}$ with cavity etalon. This etalon had the free spectral range (FSR)
389: that correspondent the distance between two spectral lines of $\it{Li}_{6}$ and
390: $\it{Li}_{7}$ isotopes of the natural Lithium vapor. The laser was tuned
391: exactly on 670.8073 $\it{nm}$ for $\it{Li}_6$. Another wavelength 670.7716
392: $\it{nm}$ was not controlled. The average power at this experiment was 100
393: $\it{mW}$. There are some known methods of longitudinal mode selection by use interferometers
394: techniques as in ~\cite{Smith},~\cite{Skowronek}.
395: The free spectral range FSR is equal to the distance between two longitudinal
396: modes:
397:
398: \begin{equation}
399: F S R_{\nu} = \frac{c}{2\eta_{t} d \cos\Theta_{i}} \\
400: \end{equation}
401: Thus, with variation of the angle, some longitudinal modes of the laser will have
402: not losses for correspondent frequencies $\nu = \it{m}$, (FSR), and it is
403: possible to move the Airy spectrum of the etalon along the frequency axis up or
404: down to quite position. The longitudinal modes are
405: spaced in frequency by $\it{c/2L}$. We note that for near-confocal resonator
406: the free spectral range (FSR) is:
407:
408: \begin{equation}
409: \delta\nu = \frac{c}{4 L + \frac{x}{\rho^{3}}}, \\
410: \end{equation}
411: where $\it{(x)}$ - is the distance from the axis and $\rho$ is the radius of
412: mirrors, when $\it{L} = \rho $. Thus the series of longitudinal modes are
413: separated by $\it{c/4L}\approx 250 \it{MHz}$ for a cavity with
414: $\it{L}\approx 30 \it{cm}$. Transverse modes are important for a mode selection too.
415: Amplitude distribution of these modes is given with Hermit polynomial
416: $\it{TEM}_{ m n}$ modes. The separation of the first transverse mode ($\it{m = 0, n = 1}$) from the
417: axial mode is:
418:
419: \begin{equation}
420: \frac{\nu_{1}-\nu_{0}}{\nu_{0}} = 2,405\frac{\lambda^{2}}{ 8\pi^{2} r^{2}}, \\
421: \end{equation}
422: where $\it{(r)}$ is diameter of cylindrical laser material.
423: In deriving the Van Cittert-Zernike
424: theorem ~\cite{Bor} it follows that the diffraction pattern would be obtained
425: on replacing the source (the DYE luminescence cross section) by a diffraction
426: aperture of the same size and shape as the source. The amplitude distribution over the wave front
427: in the aperture being proportional to the intensity distribution across the source.
428: The calculation of the complex degree of coherence of light from an incoherent
429: source, by use the Hopkins formula ~\cite{Bor}, leads to the mirrors diameter
430: 0,32 $\lambda\it{f / h}$, where $\it{(f)}$- is focal distances ,
431: $\it{h}\approx 10 \mu \it{m}$ - is the diameter of the source, that dependent
432: on a pumping of the focused laser (6 $\it{W}$ Ar-Ion laser) and thermal lens. At
433: flow velocities of the DYE about 10 $\it{m/s}$ the time of flight for the dye
434: molecules through the focus is about 1 $\mu\it{s}$. By using a mirror whose
435: reflectively can be varied over its surface, it is possible to have some given
436: combination of transverse modes, if it is necessary.
437:
438: There are two problems of frequency stability of the DYE laser.
439: Firstly, we note that the material of installed cavity DYE laser etalon
440: was fused silica. Regardless of thickness it has a drift of airspace between
441: fused silica plates about 5 $\it{GHz}/ ^{o}\it{C}$ and would have to be
442: temperature stable about 0,1 $^{o}\it{C/hour}$.
443: Secondly, the environment conditions are very important for stable laser
444: experiment with atomic spectral lines. Therefore, there is the frequency drift:
445:
446: \begin{equation}
447: \frac{\Delta\nu}{\nu} = \frac{\Delta d}{ d} + \frac{\Delta n}{ n} \\
448: \end{equation}
449: where ($\it{d}$) is the cavity length and ($\it{n}$) is the refraction
450: coefficient.
451: For the quartz rod resonator structure of the DYE laser,$\it{Model 375 D}$, we
452: have with respect to the change of a cavity length a resulting temperature
453: sensitivity about 90 $\it{MHz}/ ^{0}\it{C}$. With respect to the refraction
454: coefficient of air we found a temperature sensitivity about
455: 410 $\it{MHz}/^{o}\it{C}$. The amplitude and frequency stability of the laser was maintained
456: during 3 hours of the experiment. The wavelength control had the accuracy
457: 0.0001 $\it{nm}$ by use the serial wave meter. The measured value of the line width
458: was about 100 $\it{MHz}$ for
459: cw -regime of DYE excitation by use the focused $\it{Ar-Ion}$ laser.
460: Another excitation of the same DYE laser was with 120 $\it{ns}$ pulses of twice doubled
461: Nd:YAG laser at 266 nm, with 5 $\it{KHz}$ pulse repetition and average power about
462: 1 $\it{W}$. Output pulses from the DYE laser were 100 $\it{ns}$.
463:
464: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
465: \section{Experimental result}
466:
467: For a known value of the $\it{(G/L)}$ damping constant and absorption
468: coefficient from described method of the fitting we can exam the concentration
469: of the both isotopes:
470:
471: \begin{equation}
472: N_{6G} =
473: k_{6G}\left[\frac{2\sqrt{\pi}}{\lambda^{2}_{6D1}}\right]\frac{1}{a} \\ ,
474: \end{equation}
475: \begin{equation}
476: N_{7G}= k_{7G}\left[\frac{\sqrt{\pi}}{\lambda^{2}_{7D2}}\right]\frac{1}{a} \\ ,
477: \end{equation}
478: where the absorption coefficients given from fitted profiles are
479: $\it{k}=0.6\it{cm}^{-1}$ for $\it{Li}_6$ and $\it{k}=14.75 \it{cm}^{-1}$ for
480: $\it{Li}_7$. The correspondent concentration going from above formulas is equal
481: to $2.25\cdot10^{10}\it{cm}^{-3}$ for $\it{Li}_6$ and
482: $27.65\cdot10^{10}\it{cm}^{-3}$ for $\it{Li}_7$. So the relation of two
483: concentrations is $\it{N_6/N_7}$ = 0.08135, which is in well agreement with
484: the characteristics of natural Lithium ~\cite{Shin}.
485:
486: On the other hand, one can to verify values of Lithium concentration by use the
487: following well known formula for the Lithium vapor
488: pressure (in $\it{torr}$) at fixed temperature (in $\it{K}$):
489:
490: \begin{equation}
491: P = 1 0^{5,055 -\frac{8023}{T}} , \\
492: \end{equation}
493: where the vapor pressure for given temperature is equal to
494: 0.003427 $\it{Pa}$ = 0.0000257 $\it{torr}$. By using the equation of the state
495: for ideal gas $\it{P=N k}_{B}\it{T}$ and Eq.(10 ), one can obtain the
496: concentration of the natural Lithium, which is equal to
497: $29.85\cdot10^{10}\it{cm}^{-3}$. The Heat-pipe was filled with $\it{Ar}$ gas
498: with the concentration $10^{17}\it{cm}^{-3}$.
499:
500: When resonance excitation of the considered system
501: $ \it{Li} (2^ {2} S) -(2^ {2} P)$ was realized by 671 $\it{nm}$ cw-laser, the
502: ionization process was registered. The result of ionization by 671 $\it{nm}$
503: was compared with additional UV laser for ionization from $\it{2S - 2P}$ energy
504: level (1,848 $\it{eV}$) to energy level of ionization limit (5,391 $\it{eV}$).
505:
506: Intensity values of both the cw-DYE laser and the pulsed UV laser
507: were changed correspondingly
508: to the beam diameter 3 $\it{mm}$ across the heat-pipe oven. We
509: did not worked with specially applied to the heat-pipe electrodes voltage or
510: load resistors.
511:
512: Direct measurements of the electric current were performed by
513: amper meter; maximum average value of the electric current was registered
514: about $30\mu \it{A}$ [ Fig.~3 ]. We denoted three curves, where three principal effects were
515: registered such as:
516: (a) is the upper dependence for the RIS by use excitation and ionization from
517: two lasers $671 nm$ and $266 nm$. The RIS is more effective between $450^o C$
518: and $650^o C$.
519: (b) is the ionization current due to only $2S$-$2P$ excitation with $671 nm$.
520: This specific ionization is more effective for highest temperatures.
521: (c) is the lowest dependence (the noise) for a emission.
522: Only small difference between average
523: value of electric current due to the RIS process [ Fig.~3 -(a)] and to resonance excitation
524: $\it{2S-2P}$ [ Fig.~3 -(b) ].
525: The noise or the
526: emission in temperature range from $450^o \it{C}$ up to $700^o \it{C}$ with
527: electric current up to $3 \mu \it{A}$ and capacitance up to $20 \it{nF}$ with
528: observable saturation [ Fig.~3 -(c) ].
529: Values of the electric current varies from $5 \mu A$ up to $30 \mu A$ [ Fig.~3 -(a)],
530: and capacitance from $10 \it{nF}$ up to $100 \it{nF}$ .
531: Also the capacitance of cylindrical heat-pipe
532: was measured. The results of the
533: current and capacitance measurements at the
534: temperature higher than $650^o \it{C}$ are the same for both mechanisms.
535: Also it is easy to
536: separate RIS from another ionization using the modulation signal measurements because
537: RIS use the pulse UV laser.
538:
539: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
540:
541: \section {Some mechanisms of collisions}
542:
543: If the colliding particles have no charge, the trajectory $\it{r(t)}$ is
544: assumed to be rectilinear: $\it{r(t)} = \rho + \it{vt}$ , where $\rho$ and
545: $\it{v}$ are the impact parameter and relative velocity. The elastic collisions
546: change the phase of damped oscillator, $\phi (t)$, but not the amplitude,
547: $\it{x(t)}$, due to the frequency shift $\Delta\omega$ during the
548: phase-perturbing collisions. If the duration of collision, $\tau_{c}$, is short
549: compared with the mean time between two consecutive collisions, one can neglect
550: the radiation during collisions and consider the collisions to be
551: instantaneous. Therefore the collisions are manifested only in phase shifts
552: (Impact broadening approximation), where the dimension parameter
553: $h = \rho^{3}\it{N}_{Ar}\ll 1$ determines the number of perturbers in the
554: Weisskopf sphere with the radius $\rho$, where the binary approximation holds.
555: Depending on the type and states of interacting atoms both attraction and
556: repulsion can take place at long distances. At short distances the potential is
557: repulsive. In general case the interaction force is depends not only on spatial
558: but also on angular variables. The results of calculations in which a more
559: realistic interaction $\it{r}^{-6}$ is used can not be described by a simple
560: Lorentzian distribution, that depends on the type of the transition. The
561: repulsive part of the interaction is usually taken into account in the form of
562: Lennard-Jones potential. In general case, when the mean distance between the
563: atoms is of the same order with the magnitude of atomic dimensions, simple
564: expression for potential $\it{V(r)}=\it{C}_{6}/\it{r}^{6}$ is valid with
565: approximations due to both instantaneous dipole-dipole interaction and
566: dipole-quadruple interaction with $ \it{C}_{8}/\it{r}^{8}$.
567:
568: The shift, $\Delta\omega = 2\pi\Delta\nu$, and broadening, $\Gamma$, of the Lorentz
569: spectral distribution~\cite{Sobelman} are:
570:
571: \begin{equation}
572: \Delta\nu = 2.91 C^{\frac{2}{5}}_{6} v^{\frac{3}{5}} N_{Ar} \ ,
573: \end{equation}
574:
575: \begin{equation}
576: \Gamma = 2 \pi\Delta\nu_{L} = 8.16 C^{\frac{2}{5}}_{6} v^{\frac{3}{5}} N_{Ar}
577: \ ,
578: \end{equation}
579: For a temperature $T=831K$, which we used for a fitting procedure, one can
580: easily obtain the value for a FWHM of the Lorentzian profile,
581: $\Gamma = 617 \it{rad} \cdot \it{s}^{-1}$ or $\Delta\nu = 98.2 \it{MHz}$
582: by using the coefficient in the length form
583: $\it{ C}_{6}$=1406 a.u.~\cite{Marinescu} for $ \it{Li} (2^ {2} S) -(2^ {2} P)$
584: , where two interacted atoms, one of which $2^2\it{P}$, are in different
585: angular momentum states with associated magnetic quantum numbers
586: $ \it{M}_{2}= \pm 1$ and attractive or repulsive interaction are.
587: Also for $\it{Li} (2^ {2} S) - \it{Li} (2^{2} S)$ the value of
588: $ C_{6}$=1390 a.u. = 1390
589: $ e^{2}a^{2}_{0} = 1.330786 \cdot10^{-76} Cl \cdot V \cdot m^{6}$ ~\cite{Fish}
590: is closely to estimation of $\it{ C}_{6}$ for
591: $ \it{Li} (2^ {2} S) -(2^ {2} P)$ interaction. For this reason the measured
592: ionization gives the answer about the nature of interaction in favor of
593: $ \it{Li} (2^ {2} S) -(2^ {2} P)$ .
594:
595: Therefore the value of $\Delta\nu = 98.2 \it{MHz}$ which can be obtained by
596: use$\it{C}_{6}$ coefficient well corresponded to experimental results
597: $\Delta\nu_{L6} = 94.92 \it{MHz}$ for $Li_{6\ D1}$ and $\Delta\nu_{L7} = 87.89
598: \it{MHz}$ for $\it{Li}_{7\ D2}$
599: from the fitting procedure.
600:
601: The shift of the spectral maximum position measured at two
602: temperature points are $0.0126 \it{MHz/K}$ or $1.26 \it{MHz/torr}$.
603: The value of the FWHM temperature deviation is
604: $0.0353\it{MHz/K}$ due to the principal temperature dependence
605: $\Delta\nu\simeq \it{T}^{0,3}$, which implies the correspondent pressure
606: changing as $3.53 \it{MHz/torr}$ (for a comparison see results for $\it{Li}$
607: in ref.~\cite{Demtroder}).
608:
609: The impact parameter or Weisskopf radius is~\cite{Sobelman}:
610:
611: \begin{equation}
612: \rho = \left(\frac{3\pi}{8}\frac{C_{6}}{v}\right)^{0,2}
613: \end{equation}
614: For a temperature range from $500^o \it{C}$ to $750^o \it{C}$
615: the impact parameter varies from $6.685\AA=12.63a_{0}$ to $6.5\AA =12.28 a_{0}$.
616: The cross section is
617: $\sigma\simeq\pi\rho^{2}=132.7\AA^{2}=1.33\cdot10^{-14}\it{cm}^{2}$.
618:
619: The minimum concentration of
620: charged particles in $\it{Li-Ar}$ mixture at temperature 1000 $\it{K}$ can be
621: estimated by taking into account the value of total current between two
622: electrodes of Heat pipe as $\it{n}_e \approx 10^6\it{cm}^{-3}$. Well-known Saha
623: equation for amount of ionization $\it{n_e/n}$ to be expected in a gas in
624: thermal equilibrium
625:
626: \begin{equation}
627: \frac{n_e}{n} \approx 2.4 \times 10^{15} \frac{T^{3/2}}{n_e} e^{-U_i/kT}
628: \label{Saha}
629: \end{equation}
630: gives the ionization degree $\approx 10^{-10}$ for $\it{Li}$ (which
631: concentration is $\it{n}_{Li}\approx10^{13}\it{cm}^{-3}$ and ionization energy
632: $\it{U}_i=5.4 \it{eV}$) and $10^{-36}$ for $\it{Ar}$ ,
633: ($\it{n}_{Ar}\approx10^{17}\it{cm}^{-3}$, $\it{U}_i=15\it{eV}$). So, the
634: inelastic collisions between unexcited $\it{Ar}$ and $\it{Li}$ atoms could not
635: provide the observed concentration of charge particles.
636:
637: Such value of electron gas density, when DYE laser is applied [ Fig.~3 -(b) ], can be
638: achieved due to the yield of the associative ionization reaction:
639:
640: \begin{equation}
641: Li(2p) + Li(2p) \rightarrow Li_2^+(^2{\sum}^+_g) + e^- \ .
642: \end{equation}
643: Such a process would be possible if the excited lithium atoms approached each
644: other with relative kinetic energy about of $0.46 \it{eV}$ \cite{Kon}.
645:
646: The simple approximation (\ref{Saha})
647: shows that above associative ionization reaction can provide the electron
648: densities up to $\it{n}_e \approx10^8\it{cm}^{-3}$ without the action of UV
649: laser [ Fig.~3 -(b) ]. As for the rather high current observed even in the case when both lasers (DYE
650: and UV) are shut down [Fig.~3 - (c)], such value of electron gas density
651: can be achieved due to the effects of emission, mainly from the
652: internal hot electrode with a mesh plating by Lithium.
653:
654: The space-charge average current in Heat-pipe can be estimated by using the
655: Child equation~\cite{Smyth}, due to the presence of cylindrical symmetry:
656:
657: \begin{equation}
658: - I = \frac{8\pi\epsilon}{9}\sqrt{\frac{2e}{m_e}}\frac{V^{3/2}}{a\beta^2} \ ,
659: \end{equation}
660: where the parameter ($\beta$) was determined in the Ref.~\cite{Smyth} and
661: ($\it{a}$) is the radius of the external cylinder. The mean values for current
662: and dielectric constant can be taken directly from current and capacitance
663: measurements.
664:
665: Given the natural line width equal to 5,8 $\it{MHz}$ for the $\it{2P}$ - energy
666: level we obtain the absorption cross section
667:
668: \begin{equation}
669: \sigma_{ 2 s - 2 p} = 0,054 A _ { 2 p - 2 s} \frac{\lambda
670: ^2}{\Delta\nu_{ D}} \\
671: \end{equation}
672:
673: where $ \it{A}_{ 2 p - 2 s}$ = 1 /$\it{t}_{s}$ , with $\it{t}_{s}$ = 27 ,1 ns. The
674: Doppler line width of the $\it{Li}$ was $\Delta\nu_{ D} $ = 2,5 GHz. The
675: absorption coefficient was 0,154 $\it{cm }^{-1}$ in our Heat-Pipe
676: experiment. For a given $\it{2S-2P }$ resonance excitation we measured
677: absorption cross section
678:
679: \begin{equation}
680: \sigma _{ a} = 1 , 4 . 1 0 ^{ - 1 2} c m ^ 2 \\
681: \end{equation}
682: and ionization cross section for 266 nm ionizer:
683:
684: \begin{equation}
685: \sigma _{ i} = 1 , 2 . 1 0 ^{ - 1 7} c m ^ 2 \\
686: \end{equation}
687:
688: The cathode emission current and the current of
689: positively charged ions were also discussed in the Ref.~\cite{Thomp}.
690:
691: The one-dimensional systems of driven charges can change symmetry in the phase pulses space,
692: when the classical phenomena in one direction take into account
693: quantization in others. It results in thermal drag effects in solids wires ~\cite{E16}, but can result
694: in thermal optical experiments too. Another effect is light-induced diffusive pulling (pushing)
695: of lithium atoms into a laser beam, which was studied in Ar noble gas, where the value of
696: diffusion coefficient 4.3$\it{cm}^2/\it{s}$ was measured ~\cite{At}.
697:
698: It should be noted here, that the peak concentration of charged particles
699: produced by the RIS [ Fig.~3 -(a) ] using 77 $\it{ns}$ UV pulses is much more higher than the
700: measured average value.
701:
702: An estimation, given even for the minimum value of
703: $\it{n}_e \approx 10^6 \it{cm}^{-3}$, gives the value of Debye length
704: $\lambda_D \sim 0.1 \it{cm}$, the number of charged particles inside the Debye
705: sphere $\it{N}_d \sim 10^5$ and $\omega_p \nu_{ei} \sim 10^4$,
706: where $\omega_{p}$ is the plasma frequency and $\nu_{ei}$ is the
707: collisions rate. It means that the $\it{Li-Ar}$ mixture at temperature in the
708: order of $10^3 \it{K}$ behaves like a plasma rather than a neutral gas ~\cite{E1}.
709:
710: By other hand we can discuss another mechanism for observed ionization .
711: \\
712: We will take the Doppler cooling as the one step to achieve the low temperature
713: for the Bose-Einstein Condensate (BEC) at very low temperature.
714: The limit of the temperature achieved for Lithium is 140 $\mu\it{K}$
715: by balance with a scattering force in a random direction~\cite{Hulet}.
716: The Doppler limit of achievable temperature $\it{(T)}$ is:
717:
718: \begin{equation}
719: k_{B}\cdot\it{T} =\frac{\hbar\Gamma}{ 2}
720: \end{equation}
721: where $\Gamma$ is a damping constant.
722:
723: Let's change this relation:
724:
725: \begin{equation}
726: k_{B} T =\hbar\cdot\frac{\it{R}}{R}_{0}=\hbar\cdot\it{R}_{1}
727: \end{equation}
728: where the rate of the power absorption $\it{R}_{1}$
729: for two level atomic system interacted with EM field is well known:
730:
731: \begin{equation}
732: R_{1} =\frac{ 2 \Omega^{2}\Gamma}{\Delta\omega^{2}+
733: 4\Omega^{2}+\Gamma^{2}} \\
734: \end{equation}
735: The Rabi frequency $\Omega_{\nu}$ measured in ($\it{MHz}$) is:
736:
737: \begin{equation}
738: \Omega_{\nu} = \frac{\it{d}_{1,2}\cdot\it{E}_{0}}{\hbar} \\
739: \end{equation}
740: with $\it{d}_{1,2}$ - as the matrix dipole momentum and $\it{E}$ as the amplitude of EM wave.
741: There is the frequency $\Omega$, that make a round oscillations between two levels.
742: When $\Delta\omega\not=0$ , one can used
743: for a given $\it{Li}$ atom the fixed value of the Rabi frequency 1000
744: $\it{MHz.rad.}$. Some inequalities are for given values in the denominator of
745: the profile. One of this inequalities is evidently for an application,
746: because the value of the Rabi frequency $\Omega=\Omega_{c}$ =1000
747: $\it{MHz.rad.}$ and $\Gamma= 37 \it{MHz.rad.}$ with $\Omega\gg\Gamma$ :
748:
749: \begin{equation}
750: R_{1}=\pi\Omega_{c}\Gamma\left[\frac{1}{ 2\pi}
751: \frac{ 4\Omega_{c}}{\left(\omega-\omega_{0}\right)^{2}+
752: \left( 2\Omega_{c}\right)^{2}}\right] \\
753: \end{equation}
754: The rate $ R_{1}$ can be represented by
755: use the parameter $\rho$ that depend on the Rabi frequency and the
756: frequency tuning value:
757:
758: \begin{equation}
759: \rho = \frac{\Omega}{\Delta\omega} = c o n s t \left[\frac{\sqrt{
760: I}}{\Delta\omega}\right] \\
761: \end{equation}
762: \begin{equation}
763: R_{1} =\frac{\Gamma}{2}\left[\frac{( 2\rho)^{2}}{1 + ( 2\rho)^{2}}\right] \\
764: \end{equation}
765: The well known saturation effect by intensity of the laser is clearly observed.
766: Is possible to fix at experiment both the frequency $\Delta\omega$ and the laser
767: intensity $\it I$. Therefore, the correspondent $\rho$ must depend on the intensity [ Fig.~4 ]
768: or on the frequency [ Fig.~5]. The simplest calculation show that the saturation is at
769: $\Delta\omega\simeq$ 0,02 $\Omega$ and absorption begin at $\Delta\omega\simeq\Omega$.
770: As the $\Gamma$ is return size of the time,
771: it is possible to transfer a condition of saturation to language of the time-table interaction
772: ~\cite{E9}. At the fixed frequency [ Fig.~4 ], when increase of intensity of the laser, the saturation
773: comes at the maximal size of $\Gamma$, that corresponds to the minimal time.
774: Very important the fact of weak growth is that means that the time too gradually
775: decreases aspiring to a limit. On the other hand at a weak intensity the time is very large
776: also grows indefinitely.
777: At the fixed size of intensity of the laser [ Fig.~5], the condition of an exact resonance coincides
778: with a condition when time is equally practically to zero and then it is gradually increased
779: to indefinitely in process of a distance from a resonance ~\cite{E9}.
780: If now to put in conformity a parity between frequency $\Delta\omega$ of a field and $\it{k}\cdot\it{v}$
781: where is the speed of atoms, becomes understandable that now it is possible to speak not only
782: about time of interaction or time of life ~\cite{E9},
783: but also about speeds of atoms, because it is supposed that is possible to replace one ($\Delta\omega$)
784: with another ($\it{k}\cdot\it{v})$ accordingly. However, if we can put ($\Delta\omega$) as a constant,
785: another $\it{v}$ is only one part of the distributions function.
786:
787: When the condition for the near resonant condition is
788: $\Delta\omega\gg\gamma$ for the quantum interference condition of the EM field,
789: then the rate $ \it{R}_{2}$ is simply ~\cite{E8}:
790:
791: \begin{equation}
792: R_{2} = \frac{\Gamma}{2}\left[1 - J_{0}\left( 2\rho\right)\right], \\
793: \end{equation}
794: where $\it{J}_{0}$ is a Bessel function. Practically situation is as
795: for one frequency, but with important features [ Fig.~6] due to a Bessel function.
796:
797: With relation between $\it{k}\cdot\it{T}$ and the rate $\it{R}$ all figures becomes
798: clearly observed due to connection of the temperature with the atomic velocity.
799: Other atoms have conserved high velocities. Therefore the inelastic collisions should be expected.
800: The general velocity distribution can be changed and the satellite distribution
801: can be observed due to laser induced collisions between atoms.
802:
803: \begin{references}
804:
805: \bibitem{Sansonetti} C.J.Sansonetti and B.Richou, R.Engelman,Jr., L.J.Radziemski,
806: {\it Phys. Rev. A}, {\bf 52}, 4, 2682 (1995 ).
807: \bibitem{Karlov}
808: N. V. Karlov, B. B. Krynetskii, O. M. Stel'makh. Sov. J. Quant. Electron., {\bf
809: 7}(10), 1305, (1977), (AIP 1978).
810: \bibitem{Yam} M. Yamashita, H. Kashiwagi. United
811: States Patent 4,149,077 , Apr.10, (1979).
812: \bibitem{Arisawa} T.Arisawa, Y.Maruama, Y.Suzuki, and K.Shiba, Appl.Phys. B.28,
813: 73-76 (1982).
814: \bibitem{Suz} T. Suzuki, N.
815: Nomura, M. Okamoto and Y. Fujii. Vacuum {\bf 47}, No. 6-8, 671, (1996).
816: \bibitem{E1} E.Kovarski, A. Esaulov, Laser induced Li-Ar plasma production,
817: Proceedings of International Conf. LAWPP-98, Argentina, (1998).
818: \bibitem{Vez} D. Veza, G. J. Sansonetti. Z. Phys. D - Atoms, Moleculs and
819: Clusters, {\bf 22}, 463, (1992).
820: \bibitem{Koch} Mark E. Koch et al. Phys. Rev. A. {\bf 19}, 3, 1052, (1979);
821: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 42}, 16, (1979).
822: \bibitem{Niemax} C-J. Lorenzen and K. Niemax. J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys. {\bf
823: 15}, L 139, (1982).
824: \bibitem{Valda} C. Valda, D.Veza et al. Z. Phys. D. - Atoms, Molecules and
825: Clusteres, {\bf 22}, 591, (1992).
826: \bibitem{Brust} J.Brust, D.Veza et al. Z. Phys. D. {\bf 32}, 305, (1995).
827: \bibitem{Kita} S. Kita and N. Shimakura, Phys. Rev. A. {\bf 55}, 5, 3504,
828: (1997).
829: \bibitem{Shim} G. Shimkaver et al. Phys. Rev. A. {\bf 48}, 2, 1409, (1993).
830: \bibitem{Zemansky} M.Zemansky, Molecular Spectroskopy, London, (1994).
831: \bibitem{Whit} E. E. Whiting,
832: J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer, {\bf 8}, 1379, (1968).
833: \bibitem{E5} E.Kovarski, Single mode operation for laser excitation of lithium,
834: Proceedings of SOCHIFI-98, Chile, (1998).
835: \bibitem{Smith} P.W.Smith, Proceedings of the IEEE,{\bf 60}, 4, 423 (1972).
836: \bibitem{Skowronek} S.Skowronek and A.Gonzalez Urena, Rev.Sci.Instrum.,
837: {\bf 67}, 7, 2463 (1996).
838: \bibitem{Bor} M.Born and E.Wolf, {\it Principles of Optics},
839: ISBN 0-08-026482,Sixth Ed.,Pergamon Press (1980).
840: \bibitem{Shin} N. Shinohara, K. Okamoto.
841: Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research {\bf A362}, 114, (1995).
842: \bibitem{Sobelman}I.I.Sobelman, L.A.Vainshtein, E.A.Yukov,
843: {\it Excitation of atoms and broadening of spectral lines},
844: Springer series on Atoms+Plasmas, Second Edition, ISBN 3-540-58686-5 (1995).
845: \bibitem{Marinescu} M.Marinescu, D.Dalgarno, Phys.Rev. {\bf A}52, 311, (1995)
846: \bibitem{Fish} D. D. Konowalow, J. L. Fish.
847: Chemical Physics, {\bf 77}, 435, (1983).
848: \bibitem{Demtroder} W. Demtr$\ddot{o}$der. Laser Spectroscopy, Springer V.,
849: (1996).
850: \bibitem{Kon} D. D. Konowalow, J. L. Fish.
851: Chemical Physics, {\bf 84}, 463, (1984).
852: \bibitem{Smyth} W. R. Smyth. Static and Dynamic Electricity,
853: New York, p. 251, (1950).
854: \bibitem{Thomp} D. C. Thompson, B. P. Stoicheff.
855: Rev. Sci. Instruments, {\bf 53}(6), 822, (1982).
856: \bibitem{E16} Evgueni V. Kovarski, Sov. J. Fizika Tverdogo Tela (Solid State Physics), {\bf 19}, 3, 905, (1977).
857: \bibitem{At} S. N. Atutov, B.V. Bondarev et al. Optic Communications,
858: {\bf 115}, No. 3 - 4, p. 276, (1995).
859: \bibitem{Hulet} Curtis C.Bradley and Randall G.Hulet,
860: {\it Experimental methods in the physical sciences}, {\bf 29 b}, 129 (1996).
861: \bibitem{E8} Evgueni V.Kovarski physics/0102018
862: \bibitem{E9} Evgueni V.Kovarski quant-ph/0107079
863:
864: \end{references}
865:
866: \section{Figure Caption}
867:
868: Fig.1.
869: Lithium 2S-2P absorption normalized spectrum with fitting
870:
871: Fig.2.
872: Experimental setup for RIS of Lithium isotopes with Heat-Pipe oven and
873: lasers.
874:
875: Fig.3.
876: The electric current measurement.
877:
878: Fig.4
879: Saturation of the rate at the fixed frequency.
880:
881: Fig.5
882: The rate at the fixed intensity.
883:
884: Fig.6
885: The quantum interference rate ar the fixed frequencies difference.
886:
887:
888: \end{document}