1: \documentstyle[preprint,aps,graphicx]{revtex}
2: \tightenlines
3: \begin{document}
4: \newcommand{\bref}[1]{eq.~(\ref{#1})}
5: \newcommand{\be}{\begin{equation}}
6: \newcommand{\en}{\end{equation}}
7: \newcommand{\bs}{$\backslash$}
8: \newcommand{\us}{$\_$}
9:
10: \title{Roles of polarization, phase and amplitude in
11: solid immersion lens systems}
12: \author{Lars Egil Helseth}
13: \address{University of Oslo, Department of Physics, N-0316 Oslo, Norway}
14:
15:
16: \maketitle
17: \begin{abstract}
18: By altering the polarization, phase and amplitude at the exit pupil, the
19: intensity distribution near the focal plane of a Solid Immersion Lens(SIL)
20: system can be changed. We have studied how the resolution and focal depth
21: changes for a few particular cases. It was seen that by impinging radial
22: polarization on a SIL system, we may obtain a rotational symmetric
23: z-component of the focused wavefront with spot size similar to that predicted
24: by scalar theory. We also observed that it was possible to manipulate
25: the contributions from the homogeneous and inhomogeneous waves behind the SIL
26: by changing the amplitude and phase distribution at the aperture. In
27: this way it may be possible to improve both the resolution and focal depth
28: of the system.
29: \end{abstract}
30:
31:
32: \narrowtext
33:
34: \newpage
35:
36: \section{Introduction}
37: The maximum resolution achievable with conventional optical techniques is
38: determined by the classical diffraction limit. The minimum optical spot
39: diameter can be expressed as $\lambda/2NA$, where $\lambda$ is the wavelength
40: in air, and $NA=nsin\alpha$ is the numerical aperture(n is the refractive
41: index and $\alpha$ is the convergence semiangle). Fortunately, the diffraction
42: limit can be circumvented by use of scanning near-field optical systems, where resolutions less than 50nm can be
43: achieved. Unfortunately, near-field techniques have been troubled by low
44: transmission efficiencies, and therefore poor signal to noise ratios. Although
45: recent research have improved the transmission efficiency considerably, it is
46: still only $1\%$ at 100nm spot size\cite{Minh}.
47: Another way to increase the resolution is by application of a Solid Immersion
48: Lens(SIL)\cite{Ichimura,Milster}. This method is currently not capable of the same resolution as
49: the near-field techniques, but the light transmission efficiency is considerably
50: better.
51: The aim of the present paper is to describe how the polarization, phase and
52: amplitude at the exit pupil influences the intensity distribution near the
53: focal plane of a SIL. Although this is not a new
54: issue in optics(see ref.\cite{Ichimura,Milster,Stamnes} and references therein),
55: we believe it is of interest to gain further understanding of SIL-systems as they
56: may become an integral part of the future data storage systems.
57: Since our focusing system has high NA and the focal point is placed many
58: wavelengths away from the aperture, the diffracted field near the focal plane
59: can be calculated using the Debye approximation\cite{Stamnes,Torok1}.
60: Let us consider focusing through a dielectric interface(see fig. \ref{f1}).
61: The electric field inside medium $i(=1,2)$ can be written
62: as\cite{Stamnes,Torok1}:
63: \begin{equation}
64: \mbox{\boldmath $E$}_{i} =-\frac{ik_{i}}{2\pi}\int \int_{\Omega_{i}}
65: \mbox{\boldmath $T$} (\mbox{\boldmath $s$}_{i})
66: exp[ik_{i}(s_{ix}x+s_{iy}y+s_{iz}z)] ds_{ix}ds_{iy}
67: \label{a}
68: \end{equation}
69: Where $k_{i}=2\pi n_{i}/\lambda_{0}$ is the wavenumber,
70: $\mbox{\boldmath$s$}_{i}=(s_{ix},s_{iy},s_{iz})$ is the unit vector along a
71: typical ray, $\Omega_{i}$ is the solid angle formed by all the geometrical
72: rays, $\mbox{\boldmath$T$}(\mbox{\boldmath $s$}_{i})$ is the vector pupil
73: distribution, which accounts for the polarization, phase and amplitude
74: distribution at the exit pupil. We can find the electric field near the focal
75: plane by matching the fields in the first and second medium at the
76: interface, $z=-d$. The resulting electric field in the second medium
77: becomes\cite{Torok1}:
78: \begin{equation}
79: \mbox{\boldmath $E$}_{2} =C\int \int_{\Omega_{1}} \frac{\mbox{\boldmath $T$}
80: (s_{1x},s_{1y})}{s_{1z}}
81: exp[id(k_{2}s_{2z} -k_{1}s_{1z})]exp[ik_{2}s_{2z}z] exp[ik_{1}(s_{1x}x+s_{1y}y)] ds_{1x}ds_{1y}
82: \label{c}
83: \end{equation}
84: $C$ is a complex constant(which will be ignored in the rest of this paper).
85: The unit wave-vector is defined in spherical coordinates:
86: \begin{equation}
87: \mbox{\boldmath $s$}_{i}=[sin(\theta_{i}) cos(\phi), sin(\theta_{i}) sin(\phi), cos(\theta_{i})]
88: \label{d}
89: \end{equation}
90: The position vector can be written as(see also fig. \ref{f1}):
91: \begin{equation}
92: \mbox{\boldmath $r$}_{c}=r_{c}[sin(\theta_{c}) cos(\phi_{c}), sin(\theta_{c}) sin(\phi_{c}),
93: cos(\theta_{c})]
94: \label{e}
95: \end{equation}
96: This gives the following diffraction integral:
97: \begin{equation}
98: \mbox{\boldmath $E$}_{2} =\int_{0}^{\alpha} \int_{0}^{2\pi} \mbox{\boldmath $T$}(\theta_{1}, \phi)
99: exp[ik_{0}(r_{c} \kappa +\Psi)] sin(\theta_{1})d\theta_{1} d\phi
100: \label{f}
101: \end{equation}
102: \begin{equation}
103: \mbox{\boldmath $T$}(\theta_{1},\phi) = \mbox{\boldmath $P$}(\theta_{1},\phi) A(\theta_{1},\phi)
104: \label{g}
105: \end{equation}
106: where $\alpha$ is the convergence semiangle, $\mbox{\boldmath
107: $P$}(\theta_{1},\phi)$ is the polarization and $A(\theta_{1},\phi)$ represents
108: the amplitude and phase distribution at the exit pupil. We will for the rest of
109: this paper assume that our optical system obeys the sine condition,
110: $A(\theta_{1})\propto\sqrt{cos(\theta_{1})}$, see e.g. ref.\cite{Stamnes,Torok1}.
111:
112: \begin{equation}
113: \kappa =n_{2}cos(\theta_{2}) cos(\theta_{c}) +n_{1}sin(\theta_{1})
114: sin(\theta_{c}) cos(\phi -\phi_{c})
115: \label{h}
116: \end{equation}
117: and
118: \begin{equation}
119: \Psi =d[n_{2}cos(\theta_{2}) -n_{1}cos(\theta_{1})]
120: \label{i}
121: \end{equation}
122: $\Psi$ represents the aberration function introduced due to the
123: mismatch in refractive index.
124: A detailed derivation of this integral was first presented
125: in reference\cite{Torok1}. We have presented it in a
126: slightly different form to enlight the further discussion in this
127: paper. We will consider two particular cases:
128: 1)Focusing of electromagnetic waves in a homogeneous media(air). In this case
129: $n_{1}=n_{2}=1$. 2)Focusing of electromagnetic waves with a SIL, which means
130: that d=0(note that $n_{1}>n_{2}$).
131: In both cases the aberration function $\Psi$ is identically zero\cite{Torok2}.
132:
133: \section{The influence of polarization}
134: The state of the polarization incident on the focusing system will influence
135: the resolution near the focal plane(see e.g. \cite{Stamnes,Sheppard}).
136: To discuss this question quantitatively, we must find a general expression for the polarization vector.
137: We assume a incident polarization which may in general depend on
138: the polar and azimuthal angle:
139: \begin{displaymath}
140: \mathbf{P_{0}} =
141: \left[ \begin{array}{ccc}
142: a(\theta_{1}, \phi) \\
143: b(\theta_{1}, \phi) \\
144: 0 \\
145: \end{array} \right]
146: \end{displaymath}
147:
148: The polarization vector can be written as\cite{Torok1}:
149: \begin{equation}
150: \mathbf{P}(\theta_{1},\phi)=R^{-1}[L^{(2)}]^{-1}IL^{(1)}CRP_{0}
151: \end{equation}
152:
153: \begin{displaymath}
154: \mathbf{R} =
155: \left[ \begin{array}{ccc}
156: cos(\phi) & sin(\phi) & 0 \\
157: -sin(\phi) & cos(\phi)& 0 \\
158: 0 & 0 & 1 \\
159: \end{array} \right]
160: \end{displaymath}
161:
162: which describes the rotation of the co-ordinate system around the optical axis;
163:
164: \begin{displaymath}
165: \mathbf{C} =
166: \left[ \begin{array}{ccc}
167: cos(\theta_{1}) & 0 &sin(\theta_{1}) \\
168: 0 & 1 & 0 \\
169: -sin(\theta_{1}) &0 & cos(\theta_{1}) \\
170: \end{array} \right]
171: \end{displaymath}
172:
173: which describes the change of polarization on propagation through the lens;
174:
175: \begin{displaymath}
176: \mathbf{L^{(j)}} =
177: \left[ \begin{array}{ccc}
178: cos(\theta_{j}) & 0 &-sin(\theta_{j}) \\
179: 0 & 1 & 0 \\
180: sin(\theta_{j}) &0 & cos(\theta_{j}) \\
181: \end{array} \right]
182: \end{displaymath}
183:
184: which describes a rotation of the co-ordinate system into s and p-polarized
185: vectors;
186:
187: \begin{displaymath}
188: \mathbf{I} =
189: \left[ \begin{array}{ccc}
190: t_{p} & 0 &0 \\
191: 0 &t_{s} & 0 \\
192: 0 &0 &t_{p} \\
193: \end{array} \right]
194: \end{displaymath}
195: which represents the transmission(Fresnel coefficients) through the plane
196: dielectric interface.
197:
198: This results in:
199: \begin{displaymath}
200: \mathbf{P}(\theta_{1},\phi) =
201: \left[ \begin{array}{ccc}
202: a[t_{p}cos(\theta_{2})cos^{2}(\phi) +t_{s}sin^{2}(\phi)]
203: +b[t_{p}cos(\theta_{2})sin(\phi)cos(\phi)-t_{s}sin(\phi)cos(\phi)] \\
204: a[t_{p}cos(\theta_{2})cos(\phi)sin(\phi)-t_{s}sin(\phi)cos(\phi)] +
205: b[t_{p}cos(\theta_{2})sin^{2}(\phi)+t_{s}cos^{2}(\phi)] \\
206: - at_{p}sin(\theta_{2})cos(\phi)-bt_{p}sin(\theta_{2})sin(\phi) \\
207: \end{array} \right]
208: \end{displaymath}
209: In the special case of x-polarized incident light($a=1$ and b=$0$) this matrix
210: reduces to\cite{Torok1};
211: \begin{displaymath}
212: \mathbf{P}(\theta_{1},\phi) =
213: \left[ \begin{array}{ccc}
214: \frac{1}{2}(t_{p}cos(\theta_{2}) +t_{s}) +\frac{1}{2}(t_{p}cos(\theta_{2})
215: -t_{s})cos(2\phi) \\
216: \frac{1}{2}(t_{p}cos(\theta_{2})-t_{s})sin(2\phi) \\
217: -t_{p}sin(\theta_{2})cos(\phi)\\
218: \end{array} \right]
219: \end{displaymath}
220: It is seen that different angles have different amplitudes, and that the
221: polarization is dependent on $\phi$.
222: Another possibillity was explored by Quabis et. al. \cite{Quabis}, who found
223: that radial polarized light may increase the resolution. We extend their
224: analysis to a SIL system. We may write $a(\phi)=cos\phi$ and
225: $b(\phi)=sin\phi$:
226:
227: \begin{displaymath}
228: \mathbf{P}(\theta_{1},\phi) =
229: \left[ \begin{array}{ccc}
230: t_{p}cos(\theta_{2})cos(\phi) \\
231: t_{p}cos(\theta_{2})sin(\phi) \\
232: -t_{p}sin(\theta_{2}) \\
233: \end{array} \right]
234: \end{displaymath}
235: When inserted in eq. (\ref{f}), this gives:
236: \begin{equation}
237: E_{2x}=iI_{1}^{rad}cos(\phi_{c})
238: \label{j}
239: \end{equation}
240: \begin{equation}
241: E_{2y}=iI_{1}^{rad}sin(\phi_{c})
242: \label{k}
243: \end{equation}
244: \begin{equation}
245: E_{2z}=-I_{0}^{rad}
246: \label{l}
247: \end{equation}
248: \begin{equation}
249: I_{0}^{rad}=\int_{0}^{\alpha} B(\theta_{1})t_{p}sin(\theta_{2})
250: sin(\theta_{1})J_{0}(k_{1}r_{c}sin(\theta_{1})sin(\theta_{c}))exp(ik_{0}\Psi )exp(ik_{2}zcos(\theta_{2})) d\theta_{1}
251: \label{m}
252: \end{equation}
253: \begin{equation}
254: I_{1}^{rad}=\int_{0}^{\alpha} B(\theta_{1})t_{p}cos(\theta_{2})
255: sin(\theta_{1})
256: J_{1}(k_{1}r_{c}sin(\theta_{1})sin(\theta_{c}))exp(ik_{0}\Psi )exp(ik_{2}zcos(\theta_{2})) d\theta_{1}
257: \label{n}
258: \end{equation}
259: where $B(\theta_{1})=\sqrt{cos(\theta_{1})}$, and $J_{n}$ is the Bessel function
260: of the first kind, of order $n$.
261: The z-component is completely independent of the azimuthal angle, and its
262: importance increases with increasing NA.
263: Let us assume that we are able to find a medium which
264: is only sensitive to the z-component of the polarization. That is, we may use
265: the z-component, and disregard the x and y-components. Fig. \ref{f2} shows the energy density at the bottom
266: surface(the focal plane) of a SIL with $n_{1}=2$(and $n_{2}=1$), for both
267: radial(solid line) and x-polarized incident light(the dashed line represents
268: $\phi_{c}=0^{\circ}$, whereas the dotted line represents
269: $\phi_{c}=90^{\circ}$). In this example, we assume that
270: $\alpha=60^{\circ}$ and the wavelength $\lambda_{0}=635nm$. Fig. \ref{f2}
271: indicates that it is possible to increase the resolution, and perhaps reproduce
272: the result predicted by scalar theory.
273: However, it is worth noting that in practice one must combine the radial polarizer in
274: front of the focusing system with an annular aperture, both to increase
275: resolution and to avoid a singularity on the axis. This was discussed by Quabis
276: et. al.\cite{Quabis}. Therefore, if one could find a material which is sensitive
277: only to the z-component, a more detailed calculation using an annular aperture
278: is required to determine the real resolution.
279:
280: \section{The influence of amplitude and phase}
281: The spatial amplitude and phase distribution(at the exit pupil) will also
282: influence the energy distribution near the focal plane(see e.g.
283: \cite{Stamnes,Sheppard,Poon}). As with the incident polarization, there are countless ways to alter the phase
284: and transmittance. We will limit our discussion to the special class of amplitude/phase filters called
285: annular apertures(see ref.\cite{Ando,Yang} and references therein). Annular
286: apertures that modifies the transmittance and/or phase distribution at the exit
287: pupil may improve the resolution at the expense of higher sidelobes. In this
288: section we will discuss the effect of such an aperture in front of a focusing
289: system containing a SIL. The transmittance through an annular aperture can be
290: expressed as:
291: \begin{displaymath}
292: A(\theta_{1}) =B(\theta_{1}) \left\{ \begin{array}{ll}
293: T_{1} & \textrm{if $0<\theta_{1}<\alpha_{1}$}\\
294: T_{2} & \textrm{if $\alpha_{1}<\theta_{1}<\alpha_{2}$}\\
295: \vdots & \\
296: T_{i} & \textrm{if $\alpha_{i-1}<\theta_{1}<\alpha_{i}$}\\
297: \vdots & \\
298: T_{N} & \textrm{if $\alpha_{N-1}<\theta_{1}<\alpha_{N}$}\\
299: \end{array} \right.
300: \end{displaymath}
301: where $T_{i}$ are complex constants(phase and amplitude) for the various zones in the aperture, and
302: $B(\theta_{1})=\sqrt{cos(\theta_{1})}$. If the incident light is polarized in the x-direction(a=1, b=0), the resulting
303: field can be found by inserting the transmittance into eq. (\ref{f}):
304:
305: \begin{equation}
306: E_{2x}=i[I_{0} +I_{2}cos(2\phi_{c})]
307: \label{o}
308: \end{equation}
309: \begin{equation}
310: E_{2y}=iI_{2}sin(2\phi_{c})
311: \label{p}
312: \end{equation}
313: \begin{equation}
314: E_{2z}=2I_{1}cos(\phi_{c})
315: \label{q}
316: \end{equation}
317: where
318: \begin{equation}
319: I_{0}=\sum_{i=1}^{N} (T_{i}-T_{i+1}) \int_{0}^{\alpha_{i}}
320: A^{0x}(\theta_{1})J_{0}(k_{1}r_{c}sin(\theta_{1})sin(\theta_{c}))exp(ik_{0}\Psi )exp(ik_{2}zcos(\theta_{2}))d\theta_{1}
321: \label{r}
322: \end{equation}
323: \begin{equation}
324: I_{1}=\sum_{i=1}^{N} (T_{i}-T_{i+1}) \int_{0}^{\alpha_{i}} A^{1x}(\theta_{1})
325: J_{1}(k_{1}r_{c}sin(\theta_{1})sin(\theta_{c}))exp(ik_{0}\Psi ) exp(ik_{2}zcos(\theta_{2}))d\theta_{1}
326: \label{s}
327: \end{equation}
328: \begin{equation}
329: I_{2}= \sum_{i=1}^{N} (T_{i}-T_{i+1})\int_{0}^{\alpha_{i}} A^{2x}(\theta_{1})
330: J_{2}(k_{1}r_{c}sin(\theta_{1})sin(\theta_{c}))exp(ik_{0}\Psi )exp(ik_{2}zcos(\theta_{2}))d\theta_{1}
331: \label{t}
332: \end{equation}
333: \begin{equation}
334: A^{0x}=B(\theta_{1})(t_{s} +t_{p}cos(\theta_{2}))sin(\theta_{1})
335: \label{u}
336: \end{equation}
337: \begin{equation}
338: A^{1x}=B(\theta_{1})t_{p}sin(\theta_{2})sin(\theta_{1})
339: \label{v}
340: \end{equation}
341: \begin{equation}
342: A^{2x}=B(\theta_{1})(t_{s} -t_{p}cos(\theta_{2}))sin(\theta_{1})
343: \label{w}
344: \end{equation}
345: Where $T_{N+1}$ is defined to be zero, and we have used that
346: $\int_{\alpha_{i}}^{\alpha_{i+1}}=\int_{0}^{\alpha_{i+1}}-\int_{0}^{\alpha_{i}}$
347: to derive these equations.
348: Similar expressions can be applied to the case of radial polarized light.
349: From eqs. (\ref{r}), (\ref{s}) and (\ref{t}) we can see that the total field is
350: a sum of electric fields from zones with increasing angular extent, and we
351: expect that the terms with the smallest $\alpha_{i}$ must be
352: carefully balanced against each other in order to reduce the energy in the
353: sidelobes. For high NA systems, the z-component becomes particularly important, and may
354: increase the sidelobe intensity substantially. Thus it is necessary to keep the
355: center peak ratio high in order to avoid a dominating z-component, which may
356: increase the the sidelobes as well as the spot size.
357: In total one must not only balance the terms from the various zones, buth also
358: keep the sidelobes due to the z-(and y)component at an acceptable level. This is a
359: difficult task, and is best treated by numerical analysis, e.g. by binary search
360: methods\cite{Yang}. To keep the physics simple, we will limit ourselves to
361: apertures with two and three zones. The profiles(the
362: time-averaged energy density distributions) will be normalized, for simple
363: comparison between systems.
364:
365: \subsection{Focusing in a homogenous media}
366: In order to compare with the situations occuring in a SIL-system, we first
367: observe what happens when we place a three-zone aperture in front of a
368: system focusing in a homogeneous media. As pointed out by Ando\cite{Ando}, the
369: center-peak intensity ratio can be maximized by using a phase aperture, and the
370: sidelobes can be made small by maintaining the same phase for the light passing
371: through the center and outer portion of the aperture.
372: On the basis of these results, let us assume that $T_{1}=1$, $T_{2}=-1$ and
373: $T_{3}=1$. Such an aperture can be produced by e.g. lithographical methods, and
374: was experimentally tested by Ando et. al.\cite{Ando1}. Let $\alpha_{1}=15^{\circ}$, $\alpha_{2}=30^{\circ}$,
375: $\alpha_{3}=60^{\circ}$ and $\lambda_{0}=635nm$.
376: Fig. \ref{f3} shows the focused beam profile for the three-zone phase aperture when
377: $\phi_{c}=0^{\circ}$(solid line) and $\phi_{c}=90^{\circ}$(dash-dotted line).
378: For comparison we have also plotted the profile of the focused beam with no
379: aperture when $\phi_{c}=0^{\circ}$(dashed line) and
380: $\phi_{c}=90^{\circ}$(dotted line).
381: The resolution due to the three-zone aperture is
382: improved as compared to no aperture, but the peak sidelobe
383: intensity is almost $20\%$. We could probably bring this number down by
384: increasing the number of zones in the annular aperture.
385: Fig. \ref{f4} shows the axial energy density distribution for the three-zone
386: annular aperture(solid line) and no annular aperture(dashed line).
387: Note that the focal depth is larger with the three-zone aperture.
388:
389: \subsection{Focusing with a SIL}
390: The last ten years much research has been done on SIL systems\cite{Ichimura,Milster,Hasegawa,Guo,Shimura}.
391: As mentioned in the introduction, a major goal has been
392: to improve the resolution and focal depth. To that end, an interesting
393: possibility is the application of an annular aperture in
394: front of a SIL. As have been pointed out by Milster $et$ $al$\cite{Milster},
395: plane waves incident on the bottom surface of the SIL will experience total
396: reflection above the critical angle, $\theta_{c}=arcsin(n_{2}/n_{1})$. Thus we
397: may divide the plane waves at the exit pupil into two parts; a homogeneous part
398: where the angles are smaller than the critical angle at the interface, and an
399: inhomogeneous part where the plane waves
400: experience total reflection at the interface, corresponding to evanescent waves
401: below the bottom surface of the SIL.
402: Let us first see what happens when we put a simple two-zone
403: annular aperture with $T_{1}=0$ and $T_{2}=1$ in front of the SIL.
404: The dotted lines in figs. \ref{f5} and \ref{f6} show the transverse
405: profiles behind the bottom surface of the SIL($n_{1}=2.0$, $n_{2}=1.0$ and
406: $\lambda_{0}=635nm$) when
407: $\phi_{c}=0^{\circ}$ and $\phi_{c}=90^{\circ}$, respectively.
408: We assume that $\alpha_{1}=54^{\circ}$ and $\alpha_{2}=60^{\circ}$.
409: For comparison, the profiles for a SIL with no
410: annular aperture are also shown(the dashed lines in figs. \ref{f5} and \ref{f6}).
411: Note that as the center(dark) disk increases, the profile becomes more
412: compressed, but the sidelobes increases. The increase in resolution
413: is more pronounced when $\phi_{c}=90^{\circ}$ than $\phi_{c}=0^{\circ}$,
414: since the z-component of the electric field depends on
415: $cos\phi_{c}$(which is zero when $\phi_{c}=90^{\circ}$, see eq. (\ref{q})).
416: Fig. \ref{f7} shows the axial distribution behind the SIL with(dotted line) or
417: without(dashed line) a two-zone annular aperture. When the
418: center disk increases, the focal depth decreases, contrary to what happens
419: during focusing in a homogeneous media\cite{Poon}. This behaviour occur since the
420: evanescent waves becomes more dominating when we block out the homogeneous
421: waves, and since the amplitude of evanescent waves are decreasing exponentially
422: behind the SIL. To increase the light transmission efficiency, one may
423: replace the two-zone amplitude aperture with an axicon, thus creating a bright
424: ring.
425:
426: Next we place a three-zone phase aperture(with the same properties as in the
427: previous section) in front of the SIL. In
428: particular, we are interested in observing what happens when
429: 1)$\alpha_{1}<\alpha_{2}\leq\theta_{c}$ and 2)$\alpha_{2}>\alpha_{1}\geq\theta_{c}$.
430: The first case($\alpha_{1}<\alpha_{2}\leq\theta_{c}$) is in some ways similar to
431: focusing in a homogeneous media. That is, we
432: expect the spot size to decrease, if the convergence semiangles have proper
433: values. However, we also expect the focal depth to
434: decrease, since we balance terms with homogeneous waves against each other,
435: thus increasing the importance of the evanescent waves. As an example, let us
436: consider the same SIL-system as above, but now replace the two-zone aperture
437: with a three-zone annular aperture with
438: $\alpha_{1}=20^{\circ}$, $\alpha_{2}=30^{\circ}$ and $\alpha_{3}=60^{\circ}$ .
439: The dash-dotted lines in
440: figs. \ref{f5} and \ref{f6} shows the resulting profiles when
441: $\phi_{c}=0^{\circ}$ and $\phi_{c}=90^{\circ}$, respectively.
442: Note that the profile is slightly smaller than the dashed line(no annular
443: aperture) when $\phi_{c}=90^{\circ}$, whereas for $\phi_{c}=0^{\circ}$ it
444: is slightly larger.
445: The dash-dotted line in fig. \ref{f7} shows the axial distribution. As expected,
446: the focal depth is smaller with the annular aperture.
447:
448: In the second case($\alpha_{2}>\alpha_{1}\geq \theta_{c}$) the opposite
449: behaviour may take place. That is, we are able to balance terms with
450: inhomogeneous waves against each other, thus increasing
451: the importance of the homogeneous waves. In this way we can produce some kind
452: of enhancement of the focal depth, and if the the angles $\alpha_{1}$ and $\alpha_{2}$ are properly
453: chosen, the beam profile may become narrower as well. As an example we consider an
454: annular aperture with $\alpha_{1}=31^{\circ}$ and $\alpha_{2}=43^{\circ}$.
455: The solid lines in
456: figs. \ref{f5} and \ref{f6} are representing the transverse profiles
457: when $\phi_{c}=0^{\circ}$ and $\phi_{c}=90^{\circ}$, respectively. Now the
458: situation is almost opposite compared with the previous annular aperture. That
459: is, the profile is smaller than the dashed line(no aperture) when $\phi_{c}=0^{\circ}$,
460: but larger when $\phi_{c}=90^{\circ}$.
461: The axial distribution(solid line in fig. \ref{f7}) is decaying more slowly than
462: with no annular aperture, which confirms the discussion above.
463:
464: \section{conclusion}
465: The choice of incident
466: polarization, phase and amplitude may change the intensity
467: distribution near the focal plane of a focusing system.
468: It was seen that by impinging radial polarization on a SIL system, we
469: may obtain a rotational symmetric z-component of the focused wavefront with spot
470: size similar to that predicted by scalar theory.
471: We also discussed how annular apertures may change the resolution and focal depth.
472: It was shown that when we place a three-zone phase aperture in front of a
473: focusing system, both the resolution and focal depth may increase.
474: When applied to SIL-systems, we observed that it was possible to manipulate
475: the contributions from the homogeneous and inhomogeneous waves behind the SIL
476: by changing the phase and transmittance distribution at the aperture. In
477: this way it may be possible to improve both the resolution and focal depth. Future investigations may be directed towards the use of more
478: than three zones to improve the resolution and focal depth.
479: We would like to point out that only a few special cases were discussed in this
480: paper, and that our examples were not optimized for any particular
481: applications.
482:
483: \acknowledgements
484: I would like to thank all the people working in the
485: Superconductivity and Magnetooptics group at the University of Oslo for creating a
486: very active and inspiring enviroment, which resulted in the ideas presented in
487: this work. The research was financially supported by The Norwegian Research
488: Council.
489:
490:
491: \begin{references}
492:
493: \bibitem{Minh} P.N.Minh, T.Ono:
494: {\em Rev. Sci. Instr., 71 (2000), 3111}.
495:
496: \bibitem{Ichimura} I.Ichimura, S.Hayashi, G.S.Kino:
497: {\em Appl. Opt., 36(1997), 4339}.
498:
499: \bibitem{Milster} T.D.Milster, J.S.Jo, K.Hirota:
500: {\em Appl. Opt. , 38 (1999), 5046}.
501:
502: \bibitem{Stamnes} J.J.Stamnes
503: {\em Waves in focal regions} 1st ed.(Adam Hilger, Bristol, UK, 1986)
504:
505: \bibitem{Torok1} P.T$\ddot{o}$r$\ddot{o}$k, P.Varga, Z.Laczik and G.R.Booker:
506: {\em J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 12(1995), 325}.
507:
508: \bibitem{Torok2} P.T$\ddot{o}$r$\ddot{o}$k, C.J.R.Sheppard, P.Varga:
509: {\em J. Mod. Opt. 43(1996), 1167}.
510:
511: \bibitem{Sheppard} C.J.R.Sheppard, K.G.Larkin:
512: {\em J. Mod. Opt. 41(1994), 1495}.
513:
514: \bibitem{Quabis} S.Quabis, R.Dorn, M.Eberler, O.G. Gl$\ddot{o}$ckl,
515: G.Leuchs: {\em Opt. Commun., 179 (2000), 1}.
516:
517: \bibitem{Poon} T.C.Poon, M.Motamedi:
518: {\em Appl. Opt., 26 (1987), 4612}.
519:
520: \bibitem{Ando} H.Ando:
521: {\em Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. ,31 (1992), 557}.
522:
523: \bibitem{Yang} G.Yang:
524: {\em Opt. Commun., 159 (1999), 19}.
525:
526: \bibitem{Ando1} H.Ando, T.Yokota, K.Tanoue:
527: {\em Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. ,32 (1993), 5269}.
528:
529: \bibitem{Hasegawa} S.Hasegawa, N.Aoyama, A.Futamata, T.Uchiyama:
530: {\em Appl. Opt. ,38 (1999), 2297}.
531:
532: \bibitem{Guo} F.Guo, T.E.Schlesinger, D.D.Stancil:
533: {\em Appl. Opt. ,39 (2000), 324}.
534:
535: \bibitem{Shimura} K.Shimura, T.D.Milster, J.S.Jo, K.Hirota:
536: {\em Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. ,39 (2000), 897}.
537:
538: \end{references}
539:
540:
541:
542: \newpage
543:
544: \begin{figure}
545: \caption{The general geometry for focusing through a planar dielectric
546: interface, located at z=-d. The focal plane is located at z=0.
547: \label{f1}}
548: \end{figure}
549:
550: \begin{figure}
551: \caption{The transversal time-averaged electric energy density when
552: $n_{1}=2$, $n_{2}=1$ and $\alpha=60^{\circ}$.
553: 1)z-component of the radial polarized focused beam.
554: 2)Total energy density for incident x-polarized light(a=1 and b=0) when
555: $\phi_{c}=0^{\circ}$.
556: 3)Total energy density for incident x-polarized light(a=1 and b=0) when
557: $\phi_{c}=90^{\circ}$.
558: \label{f2}}
559: \end{figure}
560:
561: \begin{figure}
562: \caption{The transversal time-averaged electric energy density with and without
563: a three-zone annular aperture($\alpha_{1}=15^{\circ}$ and
564: $\alpha_{2}=30^{\circ}$) when $n_{1}=n_{2}=1$ and
565: $\alpha=60^{\circ}$.
566: 1)Three-zone annular aperture when $\phi_{c}=0^{\circ}$
567: 2)No annular aperture when $\phi_{c}=0^{\circ}$.
568: 3)No annular aperture when $\phi_{c}=90^{\circ}$.
569: 4)Three-zone annular aperture when $\phi_{c}=90^{\circ}$
570: \label{f3}}
571: \end{figure}
572:
573: \begin{figure}
574: \caption{The axial time-averaged electric energy density when
575: $n_{1}=n_{2}=1$ and $\alpha=\alpha_{3}=60^{\circ}$.
576: 1)Three-zone annular aperture with $\alpha_{1}=15^{\circ}$ and
577: $\alpha_{2}=30^{\circ}$.
578: 2)No annular aperture.
579: \label{f4}}
580: \end{figure}
581:
582: \begin{figure}
583: \caption{The transversal time-averaged electric energy density when
584: $\phi_{c}=0^{\circ}$, $n_{1}=2$, $n_{2}=1$ and $\alpha=\alpha_{3}=60^{\circ}$.
585: 1)Three-zone phase aperture with $\alpha_{1}=31^{\circ}$ and
586: $\alpha_{2}=43^{\circ}$.
587: 2)No annular aperture.
588: 3)Two-zone annular aperture with $\alpha_{1}=54^{\circ}$.
589: 4)Three-zone aperture with $\alpha_{1}=20^{\circ}$ and
590: $\alpha_{2}=30^{\circ}$.
591: \label{f5}}
592: \end{figure}
593:
594: \begin{figure}
595: \caption{The transversal time-averaged electric energy density when
596: $\phi_{c}=90^{\circ}$, $n_{1}=2$, $n_{2}=1$ and $\alpha=\alpha_{3}=60^{\circ}$.
597: 1)Three-zone phase aperture with $\alpha_{1}=31^{\circ}$ and
598: $\alpha_{2}=43^{\circ}$.
599: 2)No annular aperture.
600: 3)Two-zone annular aperture with $\alpha_{1}=54^{\circ}$.
601: 4)Three-zone aperture with $\alpha_{1}=20^{\circ}$ and
602: $\alpha_{2}=30^{\circ}$.
603: \label{f6}}
604: \end{figure}
605:
606: \begin{figure}
607: \caption{The axial time-averaged electric energy density when
608: $n_{1}=2$, $n_{2}=1$ and $\alpha=\alpha_{3}=60^{\circ}$.
609: 1)Three-zone phase aperture with $\alpha_{1}=31^{\circ}$ and
610: $\alpha_{2}=43^{\circ}$.
611: 2)No annular aperture.
612: 3)Two-zone annular aperture with $\alpha_{1}=54^{\circ}$.
613: 4)Three-zone aperture with $\alpha_{1}=20^{\circ}$ and
614: $\alpha_{2}=30^{\circ}$.
615: \label{f7}}
616: \end{figure}
617:
618: \newpage
619: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=14cm]{figart21.ps}}
620: \vspace{2cm}
621: \centerline{Figure~\ref{f1}}
622:
623: \newpage
624: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=14cm]{figart2e2.eps}}
625: \vspace{2cm}
626: \centerline{Figure~\ref{f2}}
627:
628: \newpage
629: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=14cm]{figart2e3.eps}}
630: \vspace{2cm}
631: \centerline{Figure~\ref{f3}}
632:
633:
634: \newpage
635: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=14cm]{figart2e4.eps}}
636: \vspace{2cm}
637: \centerline{Figure~\ref{f4}}
638:
639:
640: \newpage
641: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=14cm]{figart2e5.eps}}
642: \vspace{2cm}
643: \centerline{Figure~\ref{f5}}
644:
645:
646: \newpage
647: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=14cm]{figart2e6.eps}}
648: \vspace{2cm}
649: \centerline{Figure~\ref{f6}}
650:
651: \newpage
652: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=14cm]{figart2e7.eps}}
653: \vspace{2cm}
654: \centerline{Figure~\ref{f7}}
655:
656:
657:
658:
659:
660: \end{document}
661:
662: