1: \documentstyle[12pt]{article}

2: \setlength{\parindent}{0em}

3: \setlength{\textwidth}{16cm}

4: \setlength{\textheight}{21cm}

5: \sloppy

6: \hoffset = -1. cm

7: \voffset = -0.5 cm

8: \newcommand{\bi}{\bibitem}

9: \newcommand{\e}{{\rm e}}

10: \newcommand{\Xrm}{{\rm X}}

11: \newcommand{\Mrm}{{\rm M}}

12: \newcommand{\mrm}{{\rm m}}

13: \newcommand{\NCrm}{{\rm NC}}

14: \newcommand{\ug}{\; = \;}

15: \newcommand{\ugg}{ \ = \ }

16: \newcommand{\equ}{\; \equiv \;}

17: \newcommand{\Vbf}{\mbox{\boldmath $V$}}

18: \newcommand{\ubf}{\mbox{\boldmath $u$}}

19: \newcommand{\imp}{\mbox{\boldmath $p$}}

20: \newcommand{\Ebf}{\mbox{\boldmath $E$}}

21: \newcommand{\Pbold}{\mbox{\boldmath $P$}}

22: \newcommand{\Hbf}{\mbox{\boldmath $H$}}

23: \newcommand{\rbf}{\mbox{\boldmath $r$}}

24: \newcommand{\zbf}{\mbox{\boldmath $z$}}

25: \newcommand{\nbf}{\mbox{\boldmath $n$}}

26: \newcommand{\phibf}{\mbox{\boldmath $\phi$}}

27: \newcommand{\Phibf}{\mbox{\boldmath $\Phi$}}

28: \newcommand{\nabf}{\mbox{\boldmath $\nabla$}}

29: \newcommand{\rhobf}{\mbox{\boldmath $\rho$}}

30: \newcommand{\TM}{{\rm TM}}

31: \newcommand{\TE}{{\rm TE}}

32: \newcommand{\ph}{{\rm ph}}

33: \newcommand{\Drm}{{\rm D}}

34: \newcommand{\pa}{\partial}

35: \newcommand{\uar}{\uparrow}

36: \newcommand{\dar}{\downarrow}

37: \newcommand{\text}{\rm}

38: \newcommand{\we}{\wedge}

39: \newcommand{\drm}{{\rm d}}

40: \newcommand{\grm}{{\rm g}}

41: \newcommand{\Rerm}{{\rm Re}}

42: \newcommand{\Imrm}{{\rm Im}}

43: \newcommand{\Lcal}{{\cal L}}

44: \newcommand{\Fcal}{{\cal F}}

45: \newcommand{\Ecal}{{\cal E}}

46: \newcommand{\Ccal}{{\cal C}}

47: \newcommand{\ga}{\gamma}

48: \newcommand{\nb}{\nonumber}

49: \newcommand{\Ga}{\Gamma}

50: \newcommand{\infi}{\infty}

51: \newcommand{\cd}{\cdots}

52: \newcommand{\la}{\lambda}

53: \newcommand{\La}{\Lambda}

54: \newcommand{\sig}{\sigma}

55: \newcommand{\var}{\varphi}

56: \newcommand{\Lra}{\Longrightarrow}

57: \newcommand{\longma}{\longmapsto}

58: \newcommand{\ra}{\rightarrow}

59: \newcommand{\lra}{\longrightarrow}

60: \newcommand{\al}{\alpha}

61: \newcommand{\be}{\beta}

62: \newcommand{\ze}{\zeta}

63: \newcommand{\eps}{\varepsilon}

64: \newcommand{\lan}{\langle}

65: \newcommand{\ma}{\mapsto}

66: \newcommand{\De}{\Delta}

67: \newcommand{\ran}{\rangle}

68: \newcommand{\bb}{\begin{equation}}

69: \newcommand{\ee}{\end{equation}}

70: \newcommand{\bega}{\begin{eqnarray}}

71: \newcommand{\ega}{\end{eqnarray}}

72: \newcommand{\begae}{\begin{eqnarray*}}

73: \newcommand{\egae}{\end{eqnarray*}}

74: \newcommand{\hook}{\hookrightarrow}

75: \newcommand{\Lef}{\Leftrightarrow}

76: \newcommand{\Long}{\Longleftrightarrow}

77: \newcommand{\up}{\uparrow}

78: \newcommand{\dow}{\downarrow}

79: \newcommand{\R}{I\!\!R}

80: \newcommand{\Ha}{I\!\!H}

81: \newcommand{\C}{I\!\!\!\!C}

82: \newcommand{\N}{I\!\!\!N}

83: \newcommand{\Z}{{Z\!\!\!Z}}

84: \newcommand{\h}{\hspace*{4ex}}

85: \newcommand{\dis}{\displaystyle}

86: \newcommand{\und}{\underline}

87: \newcommand{\tm}{\times}

88: \newcommand{\na}{\nabla}

89: \newcommand{\th}{\theta}

90: \newcommand{\Om}{\Omega}

91: \newcommand{\om}{\omega}

92: \newcommand{\Th}{\Theta}

93: \newcommand{\wid}{\widetilde}

94: \newcommand{\Rig}{\Rightarrow}

95: \newcommand{\wideq}{\widehat{q}}

96: \newcommand{\ove}{\overline}

97: \newcommand{\ovT}{{\overline{T}}}

98: \newcommand{\ovPsi}{{\overline{\Psi}}}

99: \newcommand{\sta}{\stackrel}

100: \newcommand{\cent}{\centerline}

101: \newcommand{\vs}{\vspace*}

102: \newcommand{\hs}{\hspace*}

103: \renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\fnsymbol{footnote}}

104: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%\input{SETBMP}

105: \begin{document}

106: 

107: \baselineskip 0.65cm

108: 

109: \begin{center}

110: 

111: {\large {\bf New localized Superluminal solutions to the wave equations

112: with finite total energies and arbitrary frequencies}$^{\: (\dag)}$}

113: \footnotetext{$^{\: (\dag)}$  Work partially supported by MIUR and INFN

114: (Italy), and by FAPESP (Brazil). \ This paper did first appear as e-print

115: physics/0109062 [and as preprint INFN/FM--01/02 (I.N.F.N.; Frascati, 2001)]. \

116: E-mail addresses for contacts: recami@mi.infn.it [ER]; giz.r@uol.com.br [MZR]}

117: 

118: \end{center}

119: 

120: \vs{5mm}

121: 

122: \cent{ M. Zamboni-Rached, }

123: 

124: \vs{0.2 cm}

125: 

126: \centerline{{\em DMO--FEEC, State University at Campinas,

127: Campinas, S.P., Brazil.}}

128: 

129: \vs{0.5 cm}

130: 

131: \cent{ Erasmo Recami }

132: 

133: \vs{0.2 cm}

134: 

135: \cent{{\em Facolt\`a di Ingegneria, Universit\`a statale di Bergamo,

136: Dalmine (BG), Italy;}}

137: \cent{{\em INFN---Sezione di Milano, Milan, Italy; \ {\rm and}}}

138: \cent{{\em C.C.S., State University at Campinas,

139: Campinas, S.P., Brazil.}}

140: 

141: \vs{0.2 cm}

142: 

143: \centerline{\rm and}

144: 

145: \vs{0.3 cm}

146: 

147: \cent{ H. E. Hern\'{a}ndez-Figueroa }

148: 

149: \vs{0.2 cm}

150: 

151: \cent{{\em DMO--FEEC, State University at Campinas,

152: Campinas, S.P., Brazil.}}

153: 

154: \vs{0.8 cm}

155: 

156: {\bf Abstract  \ --} \ By a generalized bidirectional decomposition

157: method, we obtain new Superluminal localized solutions to the wave equation

158: (for the electromagnetic case, in particular) which are suitable for

159: arbitrary frequency bands; several of them being endowed with {\em finite}

160: total energy.  We construct, among the others, an infinite family of

161: generalizations of the so-called ``X-shaped" waves. \ Results of this kind

162: may find application in the other fields in which an essential role is played

163: by a wave-equation (like acoustics, seismology, geophysics, gravitation,

164: elementary particle physics, etc.).\\

165: 

166: PACS nos.: \ 03.50.De ; \ \ 41.20;Jb ; \ \ 83.50.Vr ; \ \ 62.30.+d ; \ \

167: 43.60.+d ; \ \ 91.30.Fn ; \ \ 04.30.Nk ; \ \ 42.25.Bs ; \ \ 46.40.Cd ; \ \

168: 52.35.Lv \ .\\

169: 

170: {\em Keywords:} Wave equations; Wave propagation; Localized beams; Superluminal

171: waves; Bidirectional decomposition; Bessel beams; X-shaped waves; Microwaves;

172: Optics; Special relativity; Acoustics; Seismology; Mechanical waves;

173: Elastic waves; Gravitational waves.

174: 

175: 

176: \newpage

177: 

178: 

179: {\bf 1. -- Introduction}\\

180: 

181: \h Since many years it has been known that localized (non-dispersive)

182: solutions exist to the wave equation[1], endowed with

183: subluminal or Superluminal[2] velocities.

184: 

185: \h Particular attention has been paid to the localized Superluminal solutions,

186: which seem to exist and propagate not only in vacuum but also in media with

187: boundaries[3],

188: like normal-sized metallic waveguides[4] and possibly optical fibers.

189: 

190: \h It is well known that such Superluminal Localized Solutions (SLS) have

191: been {\em experimentally} produced in acoustics[5], in optics[6] and recently

192: in microwave physics[7].

193: 

194: \h However, all the analytical SLSs considered till now and known to us,

195: with one exception[8], are superposition of Bessel beams with a frequency

196: spectrum starting from $\nu=0$ and suitable for low frequency regions. In

197: this paper we shall set forth a new class of SLSs with a spectrum beginning

198: at any arbitrary frequency, and therefore well suited for the

199: construction also of high frequency (microwave, optical,...) pulses.\\

200: 

201: \

202: 

203: \

204: 

205: {\bf 2. -- ``$V$-cone" variables: A generalized bidirectional expansion}\\

206: 

207: \h Let us start from the axially symmetric solution (Bessel beam) to the wave

208: equation in cylindrical co-ordinates:

209: 

210: \

211: 

212: \hfill{$

213: \psi (\rho,z,t) \ug J_0(k\rho) \; \dis{\e^{+ik_z z} \; \e^{-i\om t}}

214: $\hfill} (1)

215: 

216: \

217: 

218: with the conditions

219: 

220: \

221: 

222: \hfill{$

223: k^2 = \dis{\frac{\om^2}{c^2} - k_z^2} \; ; \ \ \ \ \ \ k^2 \geq 0 \ ,

224: $\hfill} (2)

225: 

226: \

227: 

228: where $J_0$ is the zeroth-order ordinary Bessel function, and where (as

229: usual) $k_z$ is the longitudinal component of the wavenumber while

230: $k \equiv k_{\bot}$ is the wavenumber transverse component magnitude. \

231: The second condition (2) excludes the non-physical solutions.

232: 

233: \h It is essential to stress right now that the dispersion relation (2), with

234: positive (but not constant, a priori) $k^2$ and real $k_z$, while enforcing

235: the consideration of the truly propagating waves only (with exclusion of the

236: evanescent ones),

237: does allow for both subluminal and Superluminal solutions!; the latter being

238: the ones of interest here for us. \ Conditions (2) correspond in the

239: ($\om,k_z$) plane to confining ourselves to the sector shown in Fig.1; that

240: is, to the region delimited by the straight lines $\om = \pm ck_z$.

241: %\centerbmp{18cm}{8.2cm}{c:/usuarios/mr2/mr1.bmp}  %????????? Fig.1 ?

242: 

243: \

244: 

245: A general, axially symmetric superposition of Bessel beams (with $\Phi'$ as

246: spectral weight-function) will therefore be:

247: 

248: \

249: 

250: \hfill{$

251: \Psi(\rho,z,t) \ug \dis{\int_{0}^{\infi}\drm k\;\int_{0}^{\infi}\drm \om \;

252: \int_{-\om /c}^{+\om /c}\drm k_z} \ \psi(\rho,z,t) \ \delta \left(k-

253: \sqrt{{{\om^2} \over {c^2}} - k_z^2} \right) \ \Phi'(\om,k_z;k) \ .

254: $\hfill} (3)

255: 

256: \

257: 

258: Notice that it is $k\geq 0$; $\om\geq 0$ and $-\om /c \leq k_z \leq +\om /c$.

259: The question of the negative $k_z$ values entering expansion (3) will soon

260: be considered below.

261: %%%\centerbmp{7.7cm}{5cm}{c:/usuarios/mr2/fig1.bmp}

262: 

263: \h The base functions $\psi(\rho,z,t)$ can be however rewritten as

264: 

265: $$ \psi(\rho,\zeta,\eta) \ug J_0(k\rho) \; \exp{i[\al\ze - \be\eta]} \ , $$

266: 

267: where $(\al,\be)$, which will substitute in the following for the parameters

268: $(\om, k_z)$, are

269: 

270: \

271: 

272: \hfill{$

273: \al \equ \dis{{1 \over {2V}}(\om + V k_z)} \, ; \ \ \ \ \ \be \equ

274: \dis{{1 \over {2V}}(\om - Vk_z)} \ ,

275: $\hfill} (4)

276: 

277: \

278:   

279: in terms of the new ``$V$-cone" variables:

280: 

281: \

282: 

283: \hfill{$

284: \left\{\begin{array}{clr}

285: \zeta \equ z-Vt  \\

286: \eta \equ z+Vt \end{array} \right.

287: $\hfill} (5)

288: 

289: \

290: 

291: %%%\centerbmp{16cm}{5cm}{c:/usuarios/mr2/fig2.bmp}

292: \h The present procedure is a generalization of the so-called ``bidirectional

293: decomposition" technique[9], which was devised in the past for $V = c$.

294: 

295: \h The ``$V$-cone" (shown in Fig.2a) corresponds in the

296: ($\om ,k_z$) plane to the straight-lines $\om \pm Vk_z = 0$: that is, to the

297: lines $\al=0$ and $\be = 0$ (cf. Fig.2b); while conditions (2) become

298: [let us put $c=1$ {\em whenever convenient,} throughout this paper]:

299: 

300: \

301: 

302: \hfill{$

303: k^2 \ug V^2(\al + \be)^2 - (\al - \be)^2 \equ (\al^2 + \be^2)(V^2-1) +

304: 2(V^2+1)\al\be \; ; \ \ \  k^2\geq 0

305: $\hfill} (2')

306: 

307: \

308: 

309: {\em Inside} the allowed region shown in Fig.1, we can choose for simplicity

310: the sector delimited by the straight-lines $\om = \pm Vk_z$, which is shown

311: in Fig.2b ({\em provided that} $V > 1$).

312: 

313: \h Let us observe that integrating over the intervals $\al, \be \geq 0$

314: corresponds in eq.(3) to integrating over $k_z$ between $-\om /V$ and

315: $+\om /V$.  But we shall choose in eq.(3) spectral weights $\Phi'(\om,k_z;k)$,

316: and therefore spectral weights $\Phi(\al,\be;k)$ in eq.(3') below, such as to

317: either eliminate or make negligible the contribution from the negative values

318: of $k_z$, that is, from the backwards moving waves: thus curing from the start

319: the problem met by the ``bidirectional decomposition" technique in connection

320: with the so-called non-causal components. Therefore, our SLSs will all be

321: physical solutions.

322: 

323: \h Let us recall also that each Bessel beam is associated with an

324: (``axicone") angle $\th$, linked to its speed by the relations[10]:

325: 

326: \

327: 

328: \hfill{$

329: \tan\th = \sqrt{V^2 -1}; \ \ \ \ \sin\th = \dis{{{\sqrt{V^2 -1} \over V}}}; \ \ \ \

330: \cos\th = \dis{{1 \over V}} \ ,

331: $\hfill} (6)

332: 

333: \

334: 

335: where $V \ra 1$ when $\th \ra 0$, while $V \ra \infi$ when $\th \ra \pi / 2$.

336: 

337: \h Therefore, instead of eq.(3) we shall consider the (more easily

338: integrable) Bessel beam superposition in the new variables [with $V \geq 1$]

339: 

340: \

341: 

342: \hfill{$

343: \begin{array}{clr}\Psi(\rho,\ze,\eta) \ug \dis{\int_{0}^{\infi}\drm k\,\int_{0}^{\infi}

344: \drm \al \,\int_{0}^{\infi}\drm \be \; J_0(k\rho) \; \e^{i\al\ze} \; \e^{-i\be\eta}} \, \times\;\;\;\;

345: \;\;\;\\ \;\;\;\; \\ \;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;\;

346: \times \, \delta\left(k-\sqrt{(\al^2 + \be^2)(V^2-1) + 2(V^2+1)\al\be}\,

347: \right) \; \Phi(\al,\be;k)\end{array}

348: $\hfill} (3')

349: 

350: \

351: 

352: where the integrations over $\al, \ \be$ between $0$ and $\infi$ just

353: correspond to the dashed region of Fig.2b. \ Between the spectral weights 

354: $\Phi$ of eq.(3') and the previous $\Phi'$ of eq.(3) it holds the relation

355: 

356: $$\Phi(\al,\be;k) = 2V \; \Phi'\left( V(\al+\be),\,\al-\be;\,k \right) \ ,$$

357: 

358: quantity $2V$ being just a dispensable multiplicative factor.

359: 

360: For clarity's sake, let us comment a little more on our choice of the

361: integration limits which enter eq.(3'). \ From eq.(3) one has that

362: $0 \le \om < \infty$  and $-\om/c \le k_z \le \om/c$.  From such inequalities,

363: and from transformations (4) written in the form $k_z=\al-\be; \ \om=V(\al+\be)$,

364: one easily gets that the integration limits for $\al$ and $\be$ have to obey

365: the three inequalities

366: 

367: \

368: 

369: \hfill{$

370: 0 < \al+\be < \infty 

371: $\hfill} (4a)

372: 

373: \

374: 

375: \hfill{$

376: (1+V/c)\;\al \geq (1-V/c)\;\be 

377: $\hfill} (4b)              

378:             

379: \

380: 

381: and

382: 

383: \

384: 

385: \hfill{$

386: (1-V/c)\;\al \leq (1+V/c)\;\be  

387: $\hfill} (4c)  

388:            

389: \

390: 

391: At this point one has to carefully distinguish the case $V<c$ from $V>c$. \

392: In our case ($V>c$), we can write eqs.(4b) and (4c) as

393: 

394: \

395: 

396: \hfill{$

397: \al \geq \dis{\frac{1-V/c}{1+V/c} \; \be}   

398: $\hfill} (4b')  

399:            

400: \

401: 

402: and

403: 

404: \

405: 

406: \hfill{$

407: \al \geq \dis{\frac{1+V/c}{1-V/c} \; \be}     

408: $\hfill} (4c')  

409:            

410: \

411: 

412: Let us finally suppose both $\al$ and $\be$ to be positive [$\al,\be > 0$].

413: Inequation (4a) is then satisfied;  while the coefficients 

414: $(1-V/c) / (1+V/c)$  and  $(1+V/c) / (1-V/c)$  entering eqs.(4b'),(4c')

415: are both negatives (since $V>c$). As a consequence, the inequalities

416: (4b') and (4c') result to be {\em automatically} satisfied: This means that

417: we can actually choose $\al > 0$  and  $\be > 0$,  as we did in eq.(3'). \ In

418: other words, the integration limits of our eq.(3') are {\em contained}

419: by those discussed in connection with eq.(3), and are therefore acceptable.

420: Indeed, they constitute a rather suitable choice for facilitating all the

421: subsequent integrations.

422: 

423: \h We shall now go on to constructing new Superluminal Localized Solutions

424: for arbitrary frequencies, several of them possessing finite total energy.\\

425: 

426: \

427: 

428: \

429: 

430: {\bf 3. -- Some new Superluminal Localized Solutions for arbitrary

431: frequencies and/or with finite total energy}\\

432: 

433: \

434: 

435: {\bf 3.1} -- {\em The classical ``X-shaped solution" and its generalizations.} \\

436: 

437: \h Let us start by choosing the spectrum [with $a > 0$]:

438: 

439: \

440: 

441: \hfill{$

442: \Phi(\al,\be) \ug \delta(\be - \be') \; \e^{-a\al} \ ,

443: $\hfill} (7)

444: 

445: \

446: 

447: $a>0$ and $\be'\geq 0$  being constants (related to the transverse and

448: longitudinal localization of the pulse).

449: 

450: \h In the simple case when $\be'=0$, one completely dispenses with the

451: ``non-causal" (backwards-moving) components of the bidirectional Fourier-type

452: expansion (3'). For the sake of clarity, let us go back to examining Fig.2b:

453: The $\delta(\be)$ factor in spectrum (7) does actually imply the integrations

454: over $\al$ and $\be$ in eq.(3') to run along the $\al$-line only; i.e., along

455: the $\be = 0$ straight-line (where $\om = +V k_z$). \ In this case, even more

456: than in the

457: others, it is easy to verify that the group-velocity\footnote{Let us observe

458: that the group velocity of the solutions considered in this paper can

459: a priori be evaluated through the ordinary, simple derivation of $\om$ with

460: respect to the wavenumber only for the infinite total energy solutions, as

461: in the present case. \ However, for our SSP and SMPS solutions, below, and in

462: general for the finite total energy Superluminal solutions, the group-velocity

463: cannot be calculated through that simple relation, since in those cases it

464: does not even exist a one-to-one function $\om = \om(k_z)$.}

465: of the present solution [cf. eq.(8) below] is $\pa \om / \pa k_z = 1 / \cos

466: \th \equiv V > 1$. \ Let us, then, choose $\be' = 0$, and observe that for $\be

467: = 0$ all the solutions $\Psi(\rho,\ze,\eta)$ are actually functions only of

468: $\rho$ and $\ze \! = \! z-Vt$. \ [Let us also notice that in empty space such

469: solutions $\Psi(\rho,\, \ze \! = \! z-Vt)$ can be transversely localized only

470: if $V\neq c$, because if $V=c$ the function $\Psi$ has to obey the Laplace

471: equation on the transverse planes. Let us recall that in this paper we always

472: assume $V>0$].

473: 

474: In the present case, eq.(3') can be easily integrated over $\be$ and $k$

475: by having recourse to identity (6.611.1) of ref.[11], yielding

476: 

477: \

478: 

479: \hfill{$

480: \begin{array}{clr}\Psi_{\Xrm}(\rho,\ze) \ug \dis{\int_{0}^{\infi}\drm \al \,

481: J_0(\rho\al\sqrt{V^2-1}) \; \e^{-\al(a-i\ze)}} \ = \\ \; \\

482: 

483: \;\;\;\;\;\;\, \ug \left[(a-i\ze)^2 + \rho^2(V^2-1)\right]^{-1/2} \ , \end{array}

484: $\hfill} (8)

485: 

486: \

487: 

488: which is exactly the classical X-shaped solution proposed by Lu \&

489: Greenleaf[12] in acoustics, and later on by others[12] in electromagnetism,

490: once relations (6) are taken into account. See Fig.3a.

491: 

492: 

493: \h Many other SLSs can be easily constructed; for instance, by inserting

494: into the weight function (7) the extra factor $\al^m$, \ namely

495: $\Phi(\al,\be) = \al^m \, \delta(\be) \, \exp[-a\al]$, \ where $m$ is a

496: non-negative integer, while it is still

497: $\be'=0$.  Then an infinite family of new SLSs is

498: obtained (for $m \geq 0$), by using this time identity (6.621.4) of the

499: same ref.[11]:

500: 

501: \

502: 

503: \hfill{$

504: \Psi_{\Xrm,m}(\rho,\ze) \ug (-i)^{m}\dis{\frac{\drm^m}{\drm \ze^m}}

505: \left[(a-i\ze)^2 + \rho^2(V^2-1) \right]^{-1/2}

506: $\hfill} (9)

507: 

508: \

509: 

510: which generalize[13] the classical $\Xrm$-shaped solution, corresponding to

511: $m=0$: namely, $\Psi_{\Xrm} \equiv \Psi_{\Xrm,0}$. Notice that all the

512: derivatives of the latter with respect to $\ze$ lead to new SLSs, all of them 

513: being X-shaped.

514: 

515: In the particular case $m=1$, one gets the SLS

516: 

517: \

518: 

519: \hfill{$

520: \Psi_{\Xrm,1}(\rho,\ze) \ug \dis{\frac{-i \, (a-i\ze)}{\left[(a-i\ze)^2 +

521: \rho^2(V^2-1)\right]^{3/2}}}

522: $\hfill} (10)

523: 

524: \

525: 

526: which is the first derivative of the X-shaped wave, and is depicted 

527: in Fig.3b.  One can notice that, by increasing $m$, the pulse becomes

528: more and more localized around its vertex. All such pulses travel, however,

529: without deforming.

530: 

531: \h Solution (8) is suited for low frequencies only, since its

532: frequency spectrum (exponentially decreasing) starts from zero. \ One can see

533: this for instance by writing eq.(7) in the ($\om,k_z$) plane: by eqs.(4) one

534: obtains

535: 

536: $$\Phi(\om,k_z) = \delta\left(\frac{\om-Vk_z}{2V}-\be'\right) \;

537: \dis{\exp[-a \, {{\om+Vk_z} \over {2V}}]}$$

538: 

539: and can observe that $\be'=0$ in the delta implies $\om=Vk_z$. So that the

540: spectrum becomes $\Phi = \exp[-a\om / V]$, which starts from zero and has a

541: width given by $\Delta\om=V/a$.

542: 

543: \h By contrast, when the factor $\al^m$

544: is present, the frequency spectrum of the solutions can be ``bumped" in

545: correspondence with any value $\om_{\Mrm}$ of the angular frequency, provided

546: that $m$ is large [or $a/V$ is small]: in fact, $\om_{\Mrm}$ results to be

547: $\om_{\Mrm} = mV / a$. \ The spectrum, then, is shifted towards higher

548: frequencies (and decays only beyond the value $\om_{\Mrm}$).

549: 

550: \h Moreover, let us mention here that also in the spectra of the following

551: pulses (considered in subsections 3.2 and 3.3 below) one can insert the

552: $\al^m$ factor; in fact, in correspondence with the spectrum

553: 

554: \

555: 

556: \hfill{$

557: \Phi(\al,\be) \ug \al^m \; \Phi_0(\be) \; \e^{-a\al} \ ,

558: $\hfill} (7')

559: 

560: \

561: 

562: one obtains {\em as further solutions} the $m$-th order derivatives of

563: the basic ($m=0$) solution below considered. This is due to the circumstance

564: that our integrations over $\al$ (as in eq.(3')) are always Laplace-type

565: transformations.  We shall not write them down explicitly, however, for the

566: sake of conciseness.

567: 

568: \h Different SLSs can be obtained also by {\em modifying} (still with $\be'=0$)

569: the spectrum (7). Some interesting solutions are reported in Appendix A.

570: 

571: \h Let us now construct SLSs more suited for high frequencies (always

572: confining ourselves to pulses well localized not only longitudinally, but

573: also transversely).\\

574: 

575: \

576: 

577: {\bf 3.2} -- {\em The Superluminal ``Focus-Wave Modes"} (SFWM).\\

578: 

579: \h Let us go back once more to spectrum (7), but examining now the general

580: case with $\be'\neq 0$. After integrating over $k$ and $\be$, eq.{3') yields

581: [$a>0$; $\be'>0; \ V>c$]:

582: 

583: \

584: 

585: \hfill{$

586: \Psi(\rho,\ze,\eta)\ug \dis{\e^{-i\be'\eta} \int_{0}^{\infi} \drm \al \; J_0

587: \left(\rho\sqrt{V^2(\al+\be')^2 - (\al-\be')^2}\right) \; \e^{-\al(a-i\ze)}} \ .

588: $\hfill} (11)

589: 

590: \

591: 

592: %%%\centerbmp{12cm}{5cm}{c:/usuarios/mr2/fig3.bmp}

593: When releasing the condition $\be'=0$ we are in need also of

594: backwards-moving components for the construction of our pulses, since they

595: enter superposition (3') and therefore eq.(11). In fact, the spectrum

596: $\Phi=\delta(\be-\be') \, \exp[-a\al]$ does obviously entail that $\be=\be'$

597: and hence, by relations (4), that $\om =Vk_z + 2V\be'$. This means (see Fig.4)

598: that we are now integrating along the continuous line, i.e., also over the

599: interval $V\be' \leq \om < 2V\be'$, or $-\be' \leq k_z < 0$,

600: corresponding to the ``non-causal" components.  Nevertheless, we can obtain

601: physical solutions when making the contribution of that interval negligible,

602: by choosing small values of $a\be'$: so that the exponential decay of the weight

603: $\Phi$ with respect to $\om$ is very slow.  Actually, one can go

604: from the ($\al$,$\be$) space back to the ($\omega$,$k_z$) space by

605: use of eqs.(4), the weight being re-written (when $\be'=\be$) as

606: $\Phi= \exp(-a\omega /V) \cdot \exp(-a\be')$; \ wherefrom it is 

607: clear that\footnote{One can easily show that the condition $a \ll 1$ should

608: be actually replaced with the condition $a\be' \ll 1$.  In fact (see Fig.4),

609: the non-causal interval is $\Delta \om_{\NCrm} = V\be'$, while the total

610: spectral band-width is $\Delta \om = V/a$, so that the non-physical

611: components bring a negligible contribution to the solution in the case of

612: spectrum (7), provided that

613: $\Delta \om_{\NCrm} / \Delta \om \ll 1$, which just means $a\be' \ll 1$.}

614: for $a \ll 1$ the contribution of the interval $k_z \geq 0$ (or $\om \geq

615: 2V\be'$) overruns the $k_z<0$ contribution. Notice, incidentally, that

616: the corresponding solutions are associated with large frequency bandwidths

617: and therefore to pulses with very short extension in space and in time. Let

618: us mention even now that the spectral weight $\Phi=\exp[-a(\omega

619: -V\be')/V]$ entails the frequency band-width

620: 

621: $$\Delta\omega \ug {V \over a} \ ,$$

622: 

623: a relation that we shall find to be valid (at least approximately) for all

624: our solutions. We shall discuss this point in Sect.5 below.

625: 

626: \h An analytical expression for integral (11) can be easily found for

627: small positive $\be'$ values, when $\be'^2 \approx 0$. Under such a

628: condition we obtain, by using identity (6.616.1) of ref.[11] and calling now

629: $X$ the classical[12] X-shaped solution (8)

630: 

631: \

632: 

633: \hfill{$

634: X \ug X(\rho,\eta) \equ \left[(a-i\ze)^2 + \rho^2(V^2-1)\right]^{-1/2} \ ,

635: $\hfill} (12)

636: 

637: \

638: 

639: we obtain the new\footnote{Notice that another, slightly different solution

640: ---called the FXW--- appeared however as eq.(4.4) in ref.[14]} SLSs [$a>0$; $\be'\geq 0$; $V\geq c$]:

641: 

642: \

643: 

644: \hfill{$

645: \Psi_{\rm SFWM}(\rho,\ze,\eta) \ug \e^{-i\be'\eta} \; X \; \dis{\exp\left[

646: \frac{\be'(V^2+1)}{V^2-1} \, \left( (a-i\ze)-X^{-1} \right) \right]}

647: $\hfill} (13)

648: 

649: \

650: 

651: which for $V \ra c^+$ reduce to the well known FWM (focus-wave mode)

652: solutions[15], traveling with speed $c$:

653: 

654: \

655: 

656: \hfill{$

657: \Psi_{\rm FWM}(\rho,\ze,\eta) \ug \dis{\frac{\e^{-i\be'\eta}}{a-i\ze} \;

658: \exp\left[-\frac{\be'\rho^2}{a-i\ze}\right]} \ .

659: $\hfill} (14)

660: 

661: \

662: 

663: Our solutions (13) are a generalization of them for $V>c$; we shall call

664: eqs.(13) the {\em Superluminal focus wave modes} (SFWM). See Fig.5. Such

665: modes travel without deforming.

666: 

667: \h Let us emphasize that, when setting $\be'>0$, the spectrum (7) results

668: to be constituted (cf. Fig.4) by angular frequencies $\omega \geq V\be'$. \

669: Thus, our new solutions can be used to construct high frequency pulses

670: (e.g., in the microwave or in the optical regions): cf. also subsect.5B

671: below.

672: 

673: \h We are going now to build up suitable superpositions of

674: $\Psi_{\rm SFWM}(\rho,\ze,\eta)$ in order to get {\em finite} total energy

675: pulses, in analogy with what is currently attempted[16] for the $c$-speed

676: FWMs.\\

677: 

678: \

679: 

680: {\bf 3.3} -- {\em The Superluminal ``Splash Pulses"} (SSP).\\

681: 

682: 

683: \h In the case of the $c$-speed FWMs, in ref.[16] suitable superpositions

684: of them were proposed (the SPs and the ``MPS pulses") which possess finite

685: {\em total} energy (even without truncating them).

686: 

687:  \h Let us analogously go on from our solutions (13) to finite total energy

688: solutions, by integrating our SFWMs (13) over $\be' \;$:

689: 

690: \

691: 

692: \hfill{$

693: \Psi(\rho,\ze,\eta) \equ \dis{\int_0^\infi \drm \be' \; B(\be') \;

694: \e^{-i\be'\eta} \; X \; \exp\left[\frac{\be'(V^2+1)}{V^2-1} \, \left(

695: (a-i\ze)-X^{-1} \right) \right]} \ .

696: $\hfill} (15)

697: 

698: \

699: 

700: where it must be still $a \ll 1$, while the weight-functions $B(\be')$ must

701: be bumped in correspondence with {\em small} positive values of $\be'$ since

702: eq.(13) was obtained under the condition $\be'^2 \approx 0$. \ In the following,

703: for simplicity, we shall call $\be$, instead of $\be'$, the integration

704: variable.

705: 

706: \h First of all, let us choose in eq.(15) the simple weight-function [$\be'

707: \equiv \be$]:

708: 

709: \

710: 

711: \hfill{$

712: B(\be) \ = \ \e^{-b\be}

713: $\hfill} (16)

714: 

715: \

716: 

717: with $b \gg 0$ for the above-named reasons. Let us recall that such weight (16)

718: is the one yielding in the $V \ra c^+$ case the ordinary ($c$-speed) Splash

719: Pulses[16]; and notice that this choice is equivalent to inserting into eq.(3')

720: the spectral weight

721: 

722: \

723: 

724: \hfill{$

725: \Phi(\al,\be;k) \ \equiv \ \e^{-a\al} \; \e^{-b\be} \ .

726: $\hfill} (7' ')

727: 

728: \

729: 

730: \h Our {\em Superluminal Splash Pulses} (SSP) will therefore be:

731: 

732: \

733: 

734: \hfill{$

735: \Psi_{\rm SSP}(\rho,\ze,\eta) \ug X \; \dis{\int_0^\infi \drm \be \;

736: \e^{-\be (b+i\eta)} \; \e^{\be Y} \ug {X \over {b+i\eta-Y}}} \ ,

737: $\hfill} (17)

738: 

739: \

740: 

741: with

742: 

743: \

744: 

745: \hfill{$

746: Y \ \equiv \ \dis{\frac{V^2+1}{V^2-1} \; \left((a-i\ze)-X^{-1} \right)} \ .

747: $\hfill}

748: 

749: \

750: 

751: \h Let us repeat that our SSPs have {\em finite} total energy, as one can

752: easily verify; we shall come back to this result also from a geometric

753: point of view. \ They however get deformed while traveling, and their

754: amplitude decreases with time: see Figs.6a and 6b. \ It is worth mentioning

755: that, due to the form (7'') of the SSP spectrum, our solution (17) can be

756: regarded as {\em the finite energy version of the classical X-shaped

757: solution}.\\

758: 

759: \

760: 

761: \

762: 

763: {\bf 3.4} -- {\em The Superluminal ``Modified Power Spectrum"} (SMPS) {\em

764: pulses}.\\

765: 

766: \h In connection with eq.(15), let us now go on to a more general choice

767: for the weight-function:

768: 

769: \

770: 

771: \hfill{$

772: \left\{\begin{array}{clr}

773: &B(\be) \ug \e^{-b(\be - \be_0)} \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ & {\rm for} \

774: \be \geq \be_0  \\

775: 

776: &B(\be) \ug 0 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ & {\rm for} \

777: 0 \leq \be < \be_0

778: \end{array} \right.

779: $\hfill} (16')

780: 

781: \

782: 

783: which for $V \ra c^+$ yields the ordinary ($c$-speed) ``Modified Power

784: Spectrum" (MPS) pulses[16]. \ Such a choice is now equivalent to inserting

785: into eq.(3') for $\be \geq \be_0$ the spectrum 

786: 

787: \

788: 

789: \hfill{$

790: \Phi \ug \e^{-a\al} \; \e^{-b(\be - \be_0)} \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \

791: {\rm for} \ \be \geq \be_0 \ .

792: $\hfill} (7' ' ')

793: 

794: \

795: 

796: We then obtain the {\em Superluminal Modified Power Spectrum ({\rm SMPS})

797: pulses} as follows [for $\be_0 \ll \ 1$]:

798: 

799: \

800: 

801: \hfill{$

802: \Psi_{\rm SMPS}(\rho,\ze,\eta) \ug \dis{\e^{b\be_0} \; X \; \int_{\be_0}^\infi

803: \drm \be \; \e^{-(b+i\eta-Y)\be} \ug X \; \frac{\exp[(Y-i\eta)\be_0]}

804: {b-(Y-i\eta)}}

805: $\hfill} (18)

806: 

807: \

808: 

809: in which the integration over $\be$ runs {\em now} from $\be_0$ (no longer

810: from zero) to infinity.

811: 

812: \h It is worthwhile to emphasize that our solutions (18), like solutions (17),

813: possess a {\em finite total energy}.\footnote{One should recall that the first

814: finite energy solution, the MFXW, different from but analogous to our one,

815: appeared as eq.(4.6) in ref.[14].}  Even if this is easily verified, let us

816: address the question from an illuminating geometric point of view. \ Let us

817: add that their amplitude too (as for the SSPs) decreases with time: see

818: Figs.7a and 7b.

819: %%%\centerbmp{13cm}{5.4cm}{c:/usuarios/mr2/fig4.bmp}

820: 

821: \

822: 

823: \h With reference to Fig.8, let us observe that the {\em infinite} total

824: energy solutions $X$, in eq.(12), and SFWM, in eq.(13), correspond to

825: integrations along the $\be=0$ axis (i.e., the $\al$-axis) and the

826: $\be=\be_0$ straight-line, respectively; that is to say, correspond to a delta

827: factor, $\delta(\be-\be_0)$, in the spectrum (7), where $\be' \equiv \be_0$.

828: 

829: \h In order to go on to the {\em finite} total energy solutions (SMPS),

830: eq.(18), we replaced the delta factor with the function (16'), which is zero

831: in the region above the $\be=\be_0$ line, while it decays[17] in the region

832: below (as well as along) such a line. \ The same procedure was followed by

833: us for the solutions SSP, eq.(17), which correspond to the particular case

834: $\be_0 = 0$. \ The faster the spectrum decay takes place in the region below

835: the $\be=\be_0$ line [i.e. $b \gg 1$], the larger the field depth\footnote{The

836: ``depth of field" is the distance along which the pulse (approximately)

837: keeps its shape, besides its group-velocity; cf. refs.[16,2].}

838: of the corresponding pulse results to be: as we shall see in Sect.4.2C. \

839: Let us add that, since $b \gg 1$,  even in the present 

840: case the non-causal components contribution becomes negligible provided that

841: one chooses $a\be_0 \ll 1$; in analogy with what we obtained in the previous

842: SFWM case.

843: 

844: \ It seems important to stress also that, while the $X$ and SSP solutions,

845: eqs.(12) and (18), mainly consist in low-frequency (Bessel) beams, on the

846: contrary our solutions SFWM and SMPS, eqs.(13) and (18), can be constituted

847: by higher frequency beams (corresponding, namely, to $\om \geq V\be_0$). This

848: property can be exploited for constructing SLSs in the microwave or optics

849: fields, by suitable choices of the $V$ and $\be_0$ values.\\

850: 

851: \

852: 

853: \

854: 

855: {\bf 4. -- Geometric description of the new pulses in the} ($\om, k_z$)

856: {\bf plane}\\

857: 

858: \

859: 

860: {\bf 4.1} -- {\em A preliminary analysis of the localized pulses.}\\

861: 

862: \h Let us add some intuitive considerations about the {\em localized} solutions

863: $\Psi$ to the wave equation, which by our definition[18] must possess the

864: property

865: 

866: \

867: 

868: \hfill{$

869: \Psi(x,y,z;t) \ug \dis{\Psi(x,y,\,z+\Delta z_0;\,t+{{\Delta z_0} \over v})}

870: $\hfill} (19)

871: 

872: \

873: 

874: $v$ being the pulse propagation speed, that here can assume a priori any[1,2]

875: value: \ $0 \leq v < \infi$. \ Such a definition entails that the pulse

876: ``oscillates" while propagating, it being required that it resumes

877: (periodically) its shape only after each space interval $\Delta z_0$, that is,

878: with the time interval $\Delta t_0 = \Delta z_0 / v$ (cf. refs.[18,19]).

879: 

880: \h Let us write the Fourier-expansion of $\Psi$ 

881: 

882: \

883: 

884: \hfill{$

885: \Psi(x,y,z;t) \ug \dis{\int_{-\infi}^{\infi}\drm \om \int_{-\infi}^{\infi}

886: \drm k_z \; \ovPsi(x,y,k_z;\om) \; \e^{i k_z z} \; \e^{-i \om t}} \ ,

887: $\hfill} (19a)

888: 

889: \

890: 

891: functions $\ovPsi(x,y,k_z;\om)$ and $\ovPsi(x,y,k_z;\om) \;

892: \exp[i(k_z \, \Delta z_0 - \om \, \Delta z_0 / v)]$ being the Fourier

893: transforms (with respect to the variables $z,t$) of the l.h.s. and r.h.s.

894: functions in eq.(19), respectively; \ where we used the translation property

895: 

896: $${\cal T}[f(x+a)] \ug \e^{ika} \; {\cal T}[f(x)]$$

897: 

898: of the Fourier transformations. \ From condition (19), we then get[18] the

899: fundamental constraint

900: 

901: \

902: 

903: \hfill{$

904: \om \ug v k_z \pm 2 n \pi \, \dis{{\frac{v}{\Delta z_0}}}

905: $\hfill} (20)

906: 

907: \

908: 

909: linking $\om$ with $k_z$. \ Let us explicitly mention that constraint (20)

910: does {\em not} imply any breakdown of the wave-equation validity.  In fact,

911: when inserting expression (19a) into the wave equation, one gets ---in

912: cylindrical plane coordinates ($\rho,\phi$)--- the physical base-solution

913: 

914: \

915: 

916: \hfill{$

917: \Psi(\rho,\phi,k_z;\om) \ug J_\mu(k\rho) \, \exp[i\mu\phi]

918: $\hfill} (19b)

919: 

920: \

921: 

922: with $\mu$ an integer and

923: 

924: \

925: 

926: \hfill{$

927: k^2 \ug \om^2 - k_z^2 \geq 0 \ .

928: $\hfill} (19c)

929: 

930: \

931: 

932: One can realize that constraint (19c), which followed from the wave equation,

933: is compatible with constraint (20).

934: 

935: \h Relation (20) is important, since it clarifies the ``spectral origin"

936: of the various localized solutions introduced in the past literature

937: (e.g., for $v=c$), which originated from superpositions performed either by

938: running ``along" the straight-lines (20) themselves, or in terms of spectral

939: weights

940: favouring $\om, k_z$ values not far from lines (20). In particular, in our

941: case, in which $v \equiv V > c$, relation (20) brings in a formal further

942: support of our procedures, as stated in Figs.2, 4 and 8. One may also notice

943: that, when the pulse spectrum does strictly obey eq.(20), the pulse depth of

944: field is {\em infinite} (for instance, the classical X-shaped wave and the

945: SFWM can be regarded as corresponding to eq.(20) with $n=0$ and $n=1$,

946: respectively.\footnote{On a more rigorous ground, the classical X-shaped

947: solution does actually correspond to eq.(20) with $\Delta z_0 \ra \infi$.

948: For such a reason, it does not oscillate while propagating, and travels

949: rigidly.  Analogously, the SSPs will not oscillate: cf. subsect.4.2.} \

950: While, when the spectrum is {\em only} (well) localized in the $(\om,k_z)$

951: plane, {\em near} one of the lines (20), the corresponding pulse has a

952: {\em finite} field depth (as it is the case for our SSP and SMPS solutions).

953: The more ``localized" the pulse spectrum is, in the $(\om,k_z)$ plane, in the

954: vicinity of a line (20), the longer the pulse field depth will be. \ We

955: shall investigate all these points more in detail, in the next subsection.\\

956: 

957: \

958: 

959: {\bf 4.2} -- {\em Spectral analysis of the new pulses.}\\

960: 

961: \h Let us first recall that throughout this paper it is $\om \geq 0$, and

962: that, whenever we deal with Superluminal or luminal speeds $V \geq c$, we

963: are confining ourselves (cf. Fig.2b) to the region   %%%????????

964: 

965: \

966: 

967: \hfill{$

968: \dis{-{\om \over V} \leq k_z \leq {\om \over V}} \; ; \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \

969: [\om \geq 0] \ .

970: $\hfill} (21)

971: 

972: \

973: 

974: We are going now to generalize, among the others, what performed in ref.[18]

975: for the $V = c$.\\

976: 

977: \

978: 

979: \h {\bf A)} {\em Generalized $\Xrm$-shaped waves} --- In the case of the

980: classical X-shaped wave, {\em the spectrum} $\Phi(\al,\be) = \delta(\be) \;

981: \exp[-a\al]$ corresponds, because of eqs.(4), to $\Phi(\om,k_z) =

982: \delta(\om-Vk_z) \cdot \exp[-a(\om+Vk_z) / (2V)]$, which imposes the linear

983: constraint

984: 

985: \

986: 

987: \hfill{$

988: \om \ug V k_z \ ;

989: $\hfill} (20a)

990: 

991: \

992: 

993: starts from $\om = 0$; possesses the (frequency) width

994: 

995: $$\Delta \om \ug \dis{{\frac{V}{a}}} \ , \ \ \ \ \ \ $$

996: 

997: and results to be bumped for low frequencies.

998: 

999: \h Notice that this spectrum does exactly lies {\em along} one of the

1000: straight-lines in Fig.4. Actually, eq.(20a) agrees with eq.(20) for

1001: $\Delta z_0 \ra \infi$, in accord with the known fact that the pulse moves

1002: rigidly.

1003: 

1004: \h In the case of the {\em generalized} X-pulses, while the straight-line

1005: (20a) remains unchanged and the pulse go on being non-oscillating, the

1006: spectrum bump moves towards higher frequencies with increasing $m$ or/and

1007: $V/a$ (cf. subsect.3.1).\\

1008: 

1009: \

1010: 

1011: \h {\bf B)} {\em Superluminal Focus Wave Modes} --- In the case of the SFWMs,

1012: the spectrum $\Phi(\al,\be) = \delta(\be-\be') \; \exp[-a\al]$ corresponds

1013: (because of eqs.(4)) to $\Phi(\om,k_z) = \delta(\om-Vk_z-2V\be')) \cdot

1014: \exp[-a(\om+Vk_z) / (2V)]$, which imposes the linear constraint

1015: 

1016: \

1017: 

1018: \hfill{$

1019: \om \ug V k_z + 2V\be' \ .

1020: $\hfill} (20b)

1021: 

1022: \

1023: 

1024: The minimum value of $\om$ is given (see Fig.4 and relation (21)) by the

1025: intersection of the straight-lines (20b) and $\om=-Vk_z$.  This spectrum

1026: starts from $\om_{\rm min} = V \be'$ and possesses the (frequency)

1027: width

1028: 

1029: $$\Delta \om \ug \dis{{V \over a}} \ .$$

1030: 

1031: \h Notice that, once more, the spectrum runs exactly along the line (20b).

1032: By comparing eq.(20b) with eq.(20), one gets that for these oscillating

1033: solutions the {\em periodicity} space and time intervals are

1034: 

1035: $$\Delta z_0 \ug \dis{{\pi \over \be'}} \ ; \ \ \ \ \ \Delta t_0 \ug

1036: \dis{{\pi \over {V\be'}}} \ .$$

1037: 

1038: Let us recall from subsect.3.2 and Fig.4 that it must be $a\be' \ll 1$ in

1039: order to make negligible the non-causal component contribution (in the

1040: two-dimensional expansion). As mentioned in subsect.3.2, the

1041: relation $\om \geq V\be'$ can be exploited for obtaining high frequency

1042: SLSs.\\

1043: 

1044: \

1045: 

1046: \h {\bf C)} {\em Superluminal Splash Pulses} --- In the case of the SSPs, the

1047: spectrum $\Phi(\al,\be) = \exp[-b\be] \; \exp[-a\al]$ corresponds (because of

1048: eqs.(4)) to $\Phi(\om,k_z) = \exp[-b(\om-Vk_z) / (2V)] \cdot \exp[-a(\om+Vk_z)

1049: / (2V)]$. \ This time the spectrum is {\em no longer} exactly localized over

1050: one of the lines (20); however, if we choose $b \gg 1$ and $a \ll 1$, such a

1051: choice together with condition (21) implies $\Phi(\om,k_z)$ to be well

1052: localized in the neighborhood of the line

1053: 

1054: \

1055: 

1056: \hfill{$

1057: \om \ug V k_z \ ,

1058: $\hfill} (20c)

1059: 

1060: \

1061: 

1062: besides being almost exclusively composed of causal components. All this can

1063: be directly inferred also from the form of $\Phi(\al,\be)$, in connection

1064: with Fig.8. The spectrum starts from $\om_{\rm min} = 0$, with the frequency

1065: width

1066: 

1067: $$\Delta \om \simeq \dis{{V \over a}} \ . \ \ \ \ \ \ $$

1068: 

1069: \h  Equation (20) can be compared with eq.(20c) only when $b \gg 1$; \ under

1070: such a condition, we obtain that $\Delta z_0 \ra \infi$. \ However, since

1071: $b$ can be large but not infinite, the pulse is expected to be endowed in

1072: reality with a slowly decaying amplitude, as shown below in subsect.5.2.\\

1073: 

1074: \

1075: 

1076: \h {\bf D)} {\em Superluminal Modified Power Spectrum Pulses} --- In the case

1077: of the SMPS pulses, the spectrum is $\Phi(\al,\be) = 0$ for $0 \leq \be

1078: < \be_0$, and $\Phi(\al,\be) =\exp[b(\be-\be_0)] \; \exp[-a\al]$ for $\be

1079: \geq \be_0$. \ Under the condition $b \gg 1$ it is $\be \simeq \be_0$, that

1080: is to say, the spectrum is well localized (as it follows from eqs.(4)) in the

1081: vicinity of the straight-line

1082: 

1083: \

1084: 

1085: \hfill{$

1086: \om \ug V k_z + 2 V \be_0 \ .

1087: $\hfill} (20d)

1088: 

1089: \

1090: 

1091: To enforce causality, we choose (as before) also $a\be_0 \ll 1$.  Like in the SFDW

1092: pulse case, the spectrum starts from $\om_{\rm min} = V\be_0$, with the frequency

1093: width

1094: 

1095: $$\Delta \om \simeq \dis{{V \over a}} \ .$$

1096: 

1097: Once more, in the case when $b \gg 1$, one can compare eq.(20) with eq.(20d),

1098: obtaining $\Delta z_0 \simeq \pi / \be_0$ and $\Delta t_0 \simeq \pi /

1099: (V\be_0)$. \ Under the condition $b \gg 1$, the pulse is expected to possess

1100: a long depth of field, and propagate along it (in an oscillating way) with

1101: a maximum amplitude almost constant: we shall look more in detail at this

1102: behaviour in subsect.5.3.\\

1103: 

1104: \

1105: 

1106: \

1107: 

1108: {\bf 5. -- Some exact (Superluminal localized) solutions, and their field

1109: depth}\\

1110: 

1111: \

1112: 

1113: \h To inquiring more in detail into the field depth of our SLSs, we can

1114: confine ourselves to the propagation straight-line $\rho = 0$. Then, we can

1115: find {\em exact analytic} solutions holding for any value of $\be'$, without

1116: having to assume $\be'$ to be small, as we had on the contrary to assume for

1117: the SFWM, the SST and the SMPS solutions (see Sect.3, subsections 1, 2, 3).

1118: In fact, one is confronted with a simple integration of the type

1119: 

1120: \

1121: 

1122: \hfill{$

1123: \Psi(\rho=0,\ze,\eta) \ug \dis{\int_{0}^{\infi}\drm \al \, \int_{0}^{\infi}

1124: \drm \be \; \e^{-i\be\eta} \; \e^{i\al\ze} \; \Phi(\al,\be)} \ .

1125: $\hfill} (3' ')

1126: 

1127: \

1128: 

1129: Let us first study the infinite total energy solutions: namely, our

1130: SFWMs (skipping the generalized X-type solutions).\\

1131: 

1132: \

1133: 

1134: {\bf 5.1} -- {\em The case of the Superluminal Focus Wave Modes.}\\

1135: 

1136: \h In the case of the SFWMs, solution (11) may be integrated for $\rho=0$,

1137: without imposing the small $\be_0 \equiv \be'$ 

1138: approximation.\footnote{Also in the case of the SMPS pulses, below, we shall  

1139: arrive at analytical solutions without any need of imposing the condition

1140: that $\be_0 \equiv \be'$ be small.}

1141: In fact, by choosing $\Phi$ like in eq.(7), one obtains

1142: 

1143: \

1144: 

1145: \hfill{$

1146: \Psi_{\rm SFWM}(\rho=0,\ze,\eta) \ug \dis{\e^{-i\be_0\eta} \int_{0}^{\infi}

1147: \drm \al \; \e^{i\al\ze} \; \e^{-a\al} \ug \e^{-i\be_0\eta} \; (a-i\ze)^{-1}}

1148: $\hfill} (11a)

1149: 

1150: \

1151: 

1152: whose square magnitude $|\Psi|^2 = (a^2+\ze^2)^{-1}$ reveals that

1153: $\Psi_{\rm SFWM}$ is endowed with an infinite depth of field.

1154: 

1155: \h Due to the linearity of the wave equation, both the real and the imaginary

1156: part of  eq.(11a), as well as of all our (complex) solutions, are themselves

1157: {\em solutions} of the wave equation. \ In the following we shall confine

1158: ourselves to investigating the behaviour of the real part.

1159: 

1160: \h In the case of eq.(11a) it is

1161: 

1162: \

1163: 

1164: \hfill{$

1165: \Rerm\left[\Psi_{\rm SFWM}(\rho=0,\ze,\eta)\right] \ug \dis{{{a \,

1166: \cos(\be_0\eta) + \ze \, \sin(\be_0\eta)} \over {a^2 + \ze^2}}} \ .

1167: $\hfill} (11b)

1168: 

1169: \

1170: 

1171: The center $C$ of such a pulse (where the pulse reaches its maximum value,

1172: $M$, {\em oscillating} in space and time) corresponds to $z=Vt$, that is,

1173: to $\ze=0$ and $\eta=2z$; its value being

1174: 

1175: \

1176: 

1177: \hfill{$

1178: M_{\rm SFWM} \ug \dis{{{\cos(2\be_0z)} \over a}} \ .

1179: $\hfill} (11c)

1180: 

1181: \

1182: 

1183: Notice that: \ (i) at $C$ one meets the maximum value $M$ of the whole

1184: three-dimensional pulse: \ (ii) quantity $M$ is a periodic function of $z$

1185: (and $t$), with ``wavelength" $\Delta z_0$ (and oscillation period $\Delta

1186: t_0$) given by

1187: 

1188: \

1189: 

1190: \hfill{$

1191: \Delta z_0 \ug \dis{{\pi \over \be_0}} \ ; \ \ \ \ \ \Delta t_0 \ug

1192: \dis{{\pi \over {V\be_0}}} \ ,

1193: $\hfill} (11d)

1194: 

1195: \

1196: 

1197: respectively: in agreement with what anticipated in subsect.4.2-B.

1198: 

1199: \ The delta function entering our spectrum (7), entailing that $\be=\be_0$,

1200: requires that

1201: 

1202: \

1203: 

1204: \hfill{$

1205: \om \ug V k_z + 2 V \be_0

1206: $\hfill} (22)

1207: 

1208: \

1209: 

1210: which is nothing but the straight-line $\be=\be_0$ of Fig.8; \ this fact

1211: implying by the way (as we already saw) and infinite field depth, in

1212: accordance with the previous considerations in subsect.3.4.

1213: 

1214: \h By comparing eq.(22) with the important ``localization constraint" (20),

1215: with $n=1$, we just obtain the value $\Delta z_0$ of eq.(11d).  In other

1216: words, the previously got relations (11d) are exactly what needed for the

1217: localization properties (non-dispersiveness) of our SFWMs.

1218: 

1219: \h Finally, let us  examine the longitudinal localization of our oscillating

1220: beams. For simplicity, let us analyse the ``dispersion" of the beam when its

1221: amplitude is maximal; let us therefore skip considering the oscillations and

1222: go on to the pulse {\em magnitude}: one gets for the pulse half-height

1223: full-width the value $D=2\sqrt{3}a$ in the case of the magnitude itself, and

1224: 

1225: \

1226: 

1227: \hfill{$

1228: D \ug 2a

1229: $\hfill} (23)

1230: 

1231: \

1232: 

1233: in the case of the {\em square} magnitude.  Let us adhere to the latter

1234: choice in the following, due to a widespread use.\\

1235: 

1236: \

1237: 

1238: {\bf 5.2} -- {\em The finite total energy solutions.}\\

1239: 

1240: \h Let us now go on to the {\em finite} total energy solutions:\\

1241: 

1242: \

1243: 

1244: \h {\bf a)} {\em The case of the Superluminal Splash Pulses} --- In the case

1245: of the SSPs with $\rho=0$, one has to insert into eq.(3' ') the spectrum

1246: (7' '), namely $\Phi = \exp[-a\al] \; \exp[-b\be]$.  By integrating, we

1247: obtain

1248: 

1249: \

1250: 

1251: \hfill{$

1252: \Psi_{\rm SSP}(\rho=0,\ze,\eta) \ug \dis{\left[(a-i\ze)(b+i\eta)\right]^{-1}}

1253: \ ,

1254: $\hfill} (17a)

1255: 

1256: \

1257: 

1258: whose {\em real part} is

1259: 

1260: \

1261: 

1262: \hfill{$

1263: \Rerm\left[\Psi_{\rm SSP}(\rho=0,\ze,\eta)\right] \ug \dis{ {{ab+\eta\ze}

1264: \over {(ab+\eta\ze)^2 + (a\eta-b\ze)^2}} } \ .

1265: $\hfill} (17b)

1266: 

1267: \

1268: 

1269: \h Let us explicitly observe that the chosen spectrum, by virtue of eqs.(4),

1270: entails that these solutions (17a,b) do {\em not} oscillate, which correspond

1271: to $\Delta z_0 \ra \infi$ and $\Delta t_0 \ra \infi$ in eqs.(20): in agreement

1272: with what anticipated in subsect.4.2-C. \ Actually, the SSPs are the {\em finite

1273: energy} version of the classical X-shaped pulses.

1274: 

1275: \h The maximum value $M$ of eq.(17b) (a not oscillating, but slowly decaying

1276: only, solution) still corresponds to putting $z=Vt$, that is, to setting

1277: $\ze=0$ and $\eta=2z$:

1278: 

1279: \

1280: 

1281: \hfill{$

1282: M_{\rm SSP} \ug \dis{ {b \over a} \cdot {1 \over {b^2+4z^2}} } \ .

1283: $\hfill} (17c)

1284: 

1285: \

1286: 

1287: Initially, for $z=0, \ t=0$, we have $M=(ab)^{-1}$. \ If we now {\em define

1288: the field-depth Z as the distance over which the pulse's amplitude is 90\%

1289: at least of its initial value}, then we obtain the depth of field

1290: 

1291: \

1292: 

1293: \hfill{$

1294: Z_{\rm SSP} \ug \dis{{b \over 6}}

1295: $\hfill} (24)

1296: 

1297: \

1298: 

1299: which shows the dependence of $Z$ on $b$, namely, the dependence of $Z$ on

1300: the spectrum localization in the surroundings of the straight-line

1301: $\om=Vk_z$: Cf. also subsect.3.3.

1302: 

1303: \h At last, the longitudinal localization will be approximately given by

1304: 

1305: \

1306: 

1307: \hfill{$

1308: D \approx 2a \ ;

1309: $\hfill} (25)

1310: 

1311: \

1312: 

1313: namely, it is still given (for $a \ll 1$ and $b \gg 1$) by eq.(23).  Notice

1314: that, since solution (17a) does not oscillate, the same will be true for its

1315: real part, eq.(17b), as well as for the square {\em magnitude} of eq.(17a): as

1316: it can be straightforwardly verified. Of course, equation (25) holds for

1317: $t=0$. During the pulse propagation, the longitudinal localization $D$ seems

1318: to increase, while the amplitude $M$ decreases. Indeed, our preliminary

1319: calculations have verified that the $D$-increase rate is approximately equal

1320: to the $M$-decrease rate; so much so we obtain (practically) the same field

1321: depth, eq.(24), when requesting the longitudinal localization to suffer

1322: a limited increase (e.g., by 10\% only).\\

1323: %%%\centerbmp{13cm}{5.4cm}{c:/usuarios/mr2/fig9.bmp}

1324: %%%\centerbmp{13cm}{5.4cm}{c:/usuarios/mr2/fig10.bmp}

1325: 

1326: \

1327: 

1328: \h {\bf b)} {\em The case of the Superluminal Modified Power Spectrum

1329: pulses} --- In the case of the SMPS pulses with $\rho=0$, one has to insert

1330: into eq.(3' ') the spectrum (7' ' '), namely $\Phi = \e^{-a\al} \,

1331: \e^{-b(\be - \be_0)}$, with $\be \geq \be_0$. By integration, one gets

1332: 

1333: \

1334: 

1335: \hfill{$

1336: \Psi_{\rm SMPS}(\rho=0,\ze,\eta) \ug \dis{\e^{-i\be_0\eta} \; \left[(a-i\ze)

1337: (b+i\eta)\right]^{-1}} \ ,

1338: $\hfill} (18a)

1339: 

1340: \

1341: 

1342: whose real part is easily evaluated. \ These pulses do oscillate while

1343: traveling. Their field depth, then calculated by having recourse to the pulse

1344: square magnitude, happens still to be

1345: 

1346: \

1347: 

1348: \hfill{$

1349: Z_{\rm SMPS} \ug \dis{{b \over 6}}

1350: $\hfill} (26)

1351: 

1352: \

1353: 

1354: like in the SSP case. Even the longitudinal localization of the square

1355: amplitude results approximately given, for $t=0$, by

1356: 

1357: \

1358: 

1359: \hfill{$

1360: D \approx 2a

1361: $\hfill} (27)

1362: 

1363: \

1364: 

1365: as in the previous cases.

1366: 

1367: \h The field depth (26) depends only on $b$. \ However, the {\em behaviour} of

1368: the propagating pulse {\em changes} with the $\be_0$-value change, besides

1369: with $b$'s. \ Let us examine the maximum amplitude of the real part of

1370: eq.(18a), which for $z=Vt$ writes (when $\ze=0$ and $\eta=2z$):

1371: 

1372: \

1373: 

1374: \hfill{$

1375: M_{\rm SFWM} \ug \dis{{1 \over {ab}} \; {{\cos(2\be_0z) + 2[z/b] \,

1376: \sin(2\be_0 z)} \over {1+4[z/b]^2}}} \ .

1377: $\hfill} (18b)

1378: 

1379: \

1380: 

1381: Initially, for $z=0, \ t=0$, one has $M = (ab)^{-1}$ like in the SSP case.

1382: 

1383: \h From eq.(18b) one can infer that:

1384: 

1385: \h {\bf (i)} when $z/b \ll 1$, namely, when $z < Z$, eq.(18b) becomes

1386: 

1387: \

1388: 

1389: \hfill{$

1390: M_{\rm SMPS} \; \simeq \; \dis{{{\cos(2\be_0z)} \over {ab}}} \ , \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \

1391: [{\rm for} \ z<Z]

1392: $\hfill} (28)

1393: 

1394: \

1395: 

1396: and the pulse does actually oscillate {\em harmonically} with wavelength

1397: $\Delta z_0 = \pi / \be_0$ and period $\Delta t_0 = \pi/(V\be_0)$, all along

1398: its field depth: In agreement with what anticipated in subsect.4.2-D.

1399: 

1400: \h {\bf (ii)} when $z/b > 1$, namely, when $z > Z$, eq.(18b) becomes

1401: 

1402: \

1403: 

1404: \hfill{$

1405: M_{\rm SMPS} \; \simeq \; \dis{{{\sin(2\be_0z)} \over {ab}} \; {1 \over {2 \,

1406: [z/b]}}}  \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \

1407: [{\rm for} \ z>Z]

1408: $\hfill} (28')

1409: 

1410: \

1411: 

1412: Therefore, {\em beyond} its depth of field, the pulse go on oscillating

1413: with the same $\Delta z_0$, but {\em its maximum amplitude decays}

1414: proportionally to $z$ (the decay coefficient being $b/2$).\\

1415: %%%\h We show in Figs.9 and 10 two typical cases: one for $\be_0 \ll 1$

1416: %%%(Fig.9), and one for $\be_0 > 1$ (Fig.10).

1417: 

1418: \h Last but not least, let us add the observation that results of this kind

1419: may find application in the other fields in which an essential role is played

1420: by a wave-equation (like acoustics, seismology, geophysics, relativistic

1421: quantum physics, gravitational waves).\\

1422: 

1423: 

1424: {\bf Acknowledgements}\\

1425: 

1426: The authors are grateful, for stimulating discussions and kind cooperation,

1427: to A.Arecchi, C.E.Becchi, M.Brambilla, C.Cocca, R.Collina, R.Colombi,

1428: G.C.Costa, P.Cotta-Ramusino, F.Fontana, G.C.Ghirardi, L.C.Kretly, L.Lugiato,

1429: K.Z.N\'obrega, G.Pedrazzini, G.Salesi, A.Shaarawi and J.W.Swart, as well as

1430: J.Madureira and M.T.Vasconselos. \ This paper first appeared as e-print

1431: physics/0109062.

1432: 

1433: 

1434: 

1435: \newpage

1436: 

1437: 

1438: 

1439: {\centerline{{\bf APPENDIX A}}

1440: 

1441: \

1442: 

1443: \centerline{{\em Further families of ``X-type" Superluminal localized

1444: solutions}}

1445: 

1446: \

1447: 

1448: \h As announced in subsect.3.1, let us mention in this Appendix that one can

1449: obtain new SLSs by considering {\em for instance} the following modifications

1450: (still with $\be'=0$ of the spectrum (7), with $a$, $d$ arbitrary constants:

1451: 

1452: \

1453: 

1454: \hfill{$

1455: \Phi(\al,\be;k) \ug \delta(\be) \; J_0(2d\sqrt{\al}) \; \e^{-a\al}

1456: $\hfill} (A.1a)

1457: 

1458: \

1459: 

1460: 

1461: \hfill{$

1462: \Phi(\al,\be;k) \ug \delta(\be) \; \sinh(\al d) \; \e^{-a\al}

1463: $\hfill} (A.1b)

1464: 

1465: \

1466: 

1467: \hfill{$

1468: \Phi(\al,\be;k) \ug \delta(\be) \; \cos(\al d) \; \e^{-a\al}

1469: $\hfill} (A.1c)

1470: 

1471: \

1472: 

1473: \hfill{$

1474: \Phi(\al,\be;k) \ug \delta(\be) \; \dis{ { {\sin\al d} \over \al }  \; \e^{-a\al} }

1475: $\hfill} (A.1d)

1476: 

1477: \

1478: 

1479: Let us call $X$, as in eq.(8), the classical X-shaped solution

1480: 

1481: $$X \equ \left[(a-i\ze)^2 + \rho^2(V^2-1)\right]^{{1 \over 2}} \ .$$

1482: 

1483: 

1484: One can obtain from those spectra the new, different Superluminal localized

1485: solutions, respectively:

1486: 

1487: \

1488: 

1489: \hfill{$

1490: \begin{array}{clr}\Psi(\rho,\ze) \ug X \cdot J_0(\rho d^2 \, \sqrt{V^2-1} \; X^2)

1491: \times \\ \; \\

1492: 

1493: \;\;\;\;\;\;\, \ \ \times \exp\left[-(a-i\ze) \, d^2 \, X^2\right] \ , \end{array}

1494: $\hfill} (A.2a)

1495: 

1496: \

1497: 

1498: got by using identity (6.6444) in ref.[11];

1499: 

1500: \

1501: 

1502: \hfill{$

1503: \Psi(\rho,\ze) \ug \dis{ { {2d(a-i\ze) \sqrt{2(X^{-2}+d^2)}} \over {(X^{-2}+d^2) -

1504: 4 d^2 (a-i\ze)^2} } } \ ,

1505: $\hfill} (A.2b)

1506: 

1507: \

1508: 

1509: for $a > |d|$, by using identity (6.668.1) of ref.[11];

1510: 

1511: \

1512: 

1513: \hfill{$

1514: \Psi(\rho,\ze) \ug \left[ \dis{ { {X^{-2}-d^2+\sqrt{(X^{-2}-d^2)^2+4d^2(a-i\ze)^2}}

1515: \over {2 [ (X^{-2}-d^2)^2+4d^2(a-i\ze)^2 ]} } } \right]^{{1 \over 2}}

1516: $\hfill} (A.2c)

1517: 

1518: \

1519: 

1520: by using identity (6.751.3) of ref.[11]; \ and

1521: 

1522: \

1523: 

1524: \hfill{$

1525: \begin{array}{clr}\Psi(\rho,\ze) \ug {\sin}^{-1} \ 2d \, \left[ \dis{ \sqrt{X^{-2}

1526: +d^2+2\rho d \sqrt{V^2-1} } \; \ + } \right. \\

1527: 

1528: \ \ + \ \left. \dis{ \sqrt{X^{-2}+d^2-2\rho d \sqrt{V^2-1}} } \; \right] \ , \end{array}

1529: $\hfill} (A.2d)

1530: 

1531: \

1532: 

1533: for $a>0$ and $d>0$, by using identity (6.752.1) of ref.[11].

1534: 

1535: \

1536: 

1537: \h Let us recall that, due to the choice $\be'=0$ and the consequent presence

1538: of a $\delta(\be)$ factor in the weight, all such solutions are completely

1539: physical, in the sense that they {e\ don't} get {\em any} contribution from

1540: the non-causal components (i.e., from waves moving backwards). \ In fact,

1541: these new solutions are functions of $\rho, \ze$ only (and not of $\eta$). \

1542: In particular, solutions (A.2b), (A.2c), (A.2d), as well as others easily

1543: obtainable, are functions of $\rho$ via quantity $X$ only.  This may suggest

1544: to go on from the variables $(\rho, \ze)$ to the variables $(X, \ze)$ and

1545: write down {em the wave equation itself} in the new variables:  Some related

1546: results and consequences will be exploited elsewhere.

1547: 

1548: %

1549: %\

1550: %

1551: %\hfill{$

1552: %\left[ \dis{ F(X,\ze) \, {\pa \over {\pa X}} + G(X,\ze) \, {\pa^2 \over

1553: %{\pa X^2}} + {\pa^2 \over {\pa Z^2}} } \right] \; \Psi(X,\ze) \ugg 0

1554: %$\hfill} (A.3)

1555: %

1556: %\

1557: %

1558: %where $Z \equiv a - i \ze$ and

1559: %

1560: %\

1561: %

1562: %\hfill{$

1563: %F(X,\ze) \ \equiv \ -2X^3 - 6X^5 Z^2

1564: %$\hfill} (A.4a)

1565: %

1566: %\

1567: %

1568: %\hfill{$

1569: %G(X,\ze) \ \equiv \ (X^4 - Z^2 X^6) \, \sqrt{V^2-1} \ .

1570: %$\hfill} (A.4b)

1571: %

1572: %\

1573: %

1574: %Some consequences and results will be exploited elsewhere.

1575: %

1576: 

1577: \newpage

1578: 

1579: \centerline{{\bf Figure captions}}

1580: 

1581: Fig.1 -- Geometrical representation, in the plane ($\om,k_z$), of our 

1582: conditions (2), with $\om \geq 0$: see the text. It is essential to notice that the dispersion

1583: relation (2), with positive (but not constant, a priori) $k^2$ and real

1584: $k_z$, while enforcing the consideration of the truly propagating waves only

1585: (with exclusion of the evanescent ones), does allow for both subluminal and

1586: Superluminal solutions; the latter being the ones of interest for us. \

1587: Conditions (2) correspond to confining ourselves to the sector delimited

1588: by the straight lines $\om = \pm ck_z$.\\

1589: 

1590: Figs.2 -- The ``$V$-cone" (shown in figure $a$) corresponds in the

1591: ($\om ,k_z$) plane to the straight-lines $\om \pm Vk_z = 0$. \ Inside the

1592: allowed region, shown in Fig.1, we choose for simplicity (see the text)

1593: the sector depicted in figure $b$. \ We assume $V > 1$ and confine ourselves

1594: to $\om \geq 0$.

1595: 

1596: Figs.3 -- In Fig.3a it is represented (in arbitrary units) the square

1597: magnitude of the ``classical", $X$-shaped Superluminal Localized Solution (SLS)

1598: to the wave equation[12], with $V=5c$ and $a=0.1 \;$m: cf. eqs.(8) and (6). \

1599: An infinite family of SLSs however exists, which generalize the classical

1600: $X$-shaped solution; the Fig.3b depicts the first of them (its first

1601: derivative) with the same parameters: see the text and eq.(10). The

1602: successsive solutions in such a

1603: family are more and more localized around their vertex.  Quantity $\rho$ is

1604: the distance in meters from the propagation axis $z$, while quantity $\ze$

1605: is the ``$V$-cone" variable (still in meters) $\ze \equiv z-Vt$, with

1606: $V \geq c$. \ Since all

1607: these solutions depend on $z$ only ia the variable $\ze$, they propagate

1608: ``rigidly", i.e., without distortion (and are called ``localized", or

1609: non-dispersive, for such a reason).  In this paper we assume propagation in

1610: the vacuum (or in a homogeneous medium).\\

1611: 

1612: Fig.4 -- When releasing the condition $\be'=0$ (see the text), which

1613: excluded the ``backwards-traveling" components, one has to integrate

1614: in eq.(11) along the half-line $\om = Vk_z+\be'$, namely, also along the 

1615: ``non-causal" interval $V\be' < \om < 2V\be'$. \ We can obtain physical

1616: solutions, however, by making negligible the contribution of the

1617: unwanted interval, i.e., by choosing small values of $a$.  This can be

1618: even more easily seen in the ($\om, k_z$) plane.\\

1619: 

1620: Fig.5 -- Representation of our Superluminal Focus Wave Modes (SFWM), eq.(13),

1621: which are a generalization of the ordinary FWMs. The depicted pulse

1622: corresponds to $V=5c$, $a=0.001 \;$m; $\beta' = 1/(100 \, \mrm)$, and to

1623: arbitrary time $t$ (since these solutions too travel without deforming). \

1624: Such solutions correspond to high frequency (microwave, optical,...)

1625: pulses: see the text. \ The meaning of $\rho$, $\ze$, etc., is given in

1626: the caption of Fig.3.\\

1627: 

1628: Figs.6 --  Representation of our Superluminal Splash Pulses (SSP), eq.(17). \

1629: They are suitable superpositions of SFWMs (cf. Fig.5), so that their total

1630: energy is {\em finite} (even without any truncation). They however get deformed

1631: while propagating, since their amplitude decreases with time. \ In Fig.6a we

1632: represent, for $t=0$, the pulse corresponding to $V=5c$, $a=0.001 \;$m,

1633: and $b=200 \;$m. \ In Fig.6b it is depicted the same pulse after having

1634: traveled 50 meters.\\

1635: 

1636: Figs.7 -- Representation of our Superluminal Modified Power Spectrum (SMPS)

1637: pulses, eq.(18). Also these beams possess {\em finite} total energy, and

1638: therefore get deformed while traveling. \ Fig.7a depicts the shape of the

1639: pulse, for $t=0$, with $V=5c$, $a=0.001 \;$m, $b=100 \;$m, and $\beta_0 =

1640: 1/(100 \, \mrm)$. \ In Fig.7b it is shown the same pulse after a 50 meters

1641: propagation.\\

1642: 

1643: 

1644: Figs.8 -- From a geometric point of view, our infinite total energy SLSs,

1645: i.e., the $X$-solutions, eq.(12), and the SFWMs, eq.(13), correspond ---see

1646: the text--- to integrations along the $\be=0$ axis, or $\al$-axis, and the

1647: $\be=\be'$ straight-line, respectively. \ In order to go on to the {\em finite}

1648: total-energy SLSs, we had to replace the $\delta(\be-\be')$ factor in the

1649: spectrum (7) with the function (16'), which is different from $0$ in the region

1650: along and below the $\be=\be'$ line and suitably {\em decays} therein.  The

1651: faster the spectrum decays (below the $\be=\be'$ line), the larger

1652: the field depth of the pulse results to be. \ In such a manner we obtained

1653: the SMPSs, eq.(18), as well as the SSPs, which just correspond to the

1654: particular case $\be'=0$.

1655: 

1656: 

1657: \newpage

1658: 

1659: REFERENCES\\

1660: 

1661: [1] See, e.g., R.Courant and D.Hilbert: {\em Methods of Mathematical Physics}

1662: (J.Wiley; New York, 1966), vol.2, p.760; \ J.A.Stratton:  {\em

1663: Electromagnetic Theory}  (McGraw-Hill; New York, 1941), p.356; \ H.Bateman:

1664: {\it Electrical and Optical Wave Motion} (Cambridge Univ.Press; Cambridge,

1665: 1915). \ See also: V.K.Ignatovich: Found. Phys. 8 (1978) 565; \

1666: J.N.Brittingham: J. Appl. Phys. 54 (1983) 1179; \ R.W.Ziolkowski: J. Math.

1667: Phys. 26 (1985) 861; \ J.Durnin, J.J.Miceli and J.H.Eberly: Phys. Rev.

1668: Lett. 58 (1987) 1499; Opt. Lett. 13 (1988) 79; \ A.M.Shaarawi,

1669: I.M.Besieris and R.W.Ziolkowski: J. Math. Phys. 31 (1990) 2511; \

1670: A.O.Barut et al.: Phys. Lett. A143 (1990) 349; Found. Phys. Lett.

1671: 3 (1990) 303; Found. Phys. 22 (1992) 1267; Phys. Lett. A180 (1993) 5; A189

1672: (1994) 277; \ P.Hillion: Acta Applicandae Matematicae 30 (1993) 35; \

1673: R.Donnelly and R.W.Ziolkowski: Proc. Roy. Soc. London A440 (1993) 541; \

1674: J.Vaz and W.A.Rodrigues: Adv. Appl. Cliff. Alg. S-7 (1997) 457; \ S.Esposito:

1675: Phys. Lett. A225 (1997) 203.\hfill\break 

1676: %%%Hillion: JEINA (1991); Kiselev ???; Overleft ???

1677: 

1678: [2] E.Recami: Physica A252} (1998) 586; \ J.-y.Lu, J.F.Greenleaf

1679: and E.Recami: ``Limited diffraction solutions to Maxwell (and Schroedinger)

1680: equations'', Lanl Archives \# physics/9610012 (Oct.1996); \ R.W.Ziolkowski,

1681: I.M.Besieris and A.M.Shaarawi: J. Opt. Soc. Am. A10 (1993) 75; \

1682: J.-y.Lu and J.F.Greenleaf: IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control

1683: 39 (1992) 19. \ Cf. also E.Recami, in {\em Time's Arrows, Quantum

1684: Measurement and Superluminal Behaviour}, ed. by D.Mugnai, A.Ranfagni and

1685: L.S.Shulman (C.N.R.; Rome, 2001), pp.17-36.\hfill\break

1686: 

1687: [3] M.Zamboni-Rached and H.E.Hern\'andez-Figueroa: Optics Comm. 191 (2000)

1688: 49. \ From the experimental point of view, cf. S.Longhi, P.Laporta, M.Belmonte

1689: and E.Recami: ``Measurement of superluminal optical tunnelling in double-barrier

1690: photonic bandgaps", Phys. Rev. A65 (2002) 046610.\hfill\break

1691: 

1692: [4] M.Zamboni, E.Recami and F.Fontana: ``Localized Superluminal solutions to

1693: Maxwell equations propagating along a normal-sized waveguide", Phys. Rev.

1694: E64 (2001) 066603.\hfill\break

1695: 

1696: [5] J.-y.Lu and J.F.Greenleaf: IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq.

1697: Control 39 (1992) 441:  In this case the beam speed is larger than the

1698: {\em sound} speed in the considered medium.\hfill\break

1699: 

1700: [6] P.Saari and K.Reivelt: ``Evidence of X-shaped propagation-invariant

1701: localized light waves", Phys. Rev. Lett. 79 (1997) 4135.\hfill\break

1702: 

1703: [7] D.Mugnai, A.Ranfagni and R.Ruggeri: Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 (2000)

1704: 4830. \ For a panoramic review of the ``Superluminal" experiments, see

1705: E.Recami: [Lanl Archives physics/0101108], Found. Phys. 31 (2001)

1706: 1119.\hfill\break

1707: 

1708: [8] P.Saari and H.S\~{o}najalg: Laser Phys. 7 (1997) 32.\hfill\break

1709: 

1710: [9] A.Shaarawi, I.M.Besieris and R.W.Ziolkowski: J. Math. Phys. 30 (1989)

1711: 1254; \ A.Shaarawi, R.W.Ziolkowski and I.M.Besieris: J. Math. Phys. 36 (1995)

1712: 5565.\hfill\break

1713: 

1714: [10] E.Recami et al.: Lett. Nuovo Cim. 28 (1980) 151; 29 (1980) 241; \

1715: A.O.Barut, G. D.Maccarrone and E.Recami: Nuovo Cimento A71 (1982) 509. \

1716: See also E.Recami: Rivista N. Cim. 9(6) (1986) 1--178; \ E.Recami: ref.[2]; \

1717: E.Recami, F.Fontana and R.Garavaglia: Int. J. Mod. Phys. A15 (2000) 2793; \

1718: and E.Recami et al.: Il Nuovo Saggiatore 2(3) (1986) 20; 17(1-2) (2001) 21.

1719: \hfill\break

1720: 

1721: [11] I.S.Gradshteyn and I.M.Ryzhik: {\em Integrals, Series and Products},

1722: 4th edition (Ac.Press; New York, 1965).\hfill\break 

1723: 

1724: [12] J.-y.Lu and J.F.Greenleaf: in refs.[2]; \ E.Recami: in refs.[2].

1725: \hfill\break

1726: 

1727: [13] Similar solutions were considered in A T. Friberg, J. Fagerholm and

1728: M.M.Salomaa: Opt. Commun. 136 (1997) 207; and J.Fagerholm, A.T.Friberg,

1729: J.Huttunen, D.P.Morgan and M.M.Salomaa: Phys. Rev. E54 (1996) 4347; 

1730: as well as in P. Saari: in {\it Time's Arrows, Quantum Measurements

1731: and Superluminal Behavior}, ed. by D.Mugnai et al. (C.N.R.; Rome, 2001),

1732: pp.37-48.\hfill\break

1733: 

1734: [14] I.M.Besieris, M.Abdel-Rahman, A.Shaarawi and A.Chatzipetros:

1735: Progress in Electromagnetic Research (PIER) 19 (1998) 1.\hfill\break

1736: 

1737: [15] R.W.Ziolkowski: Phys. Rev. A39 (1989) 2005; J. Math. Phys. 26 (1985) 861; \

1738: P.A.Belanger: J. Opt. Soc. Am. A1 (1984) 723; \ A.Sezginer: J. Appl. Phys. 57

1739: (1985) 678.\hfill\break

1740: 

1741: [16] R.W.Ziolkowski: ref.[15]; \ A.Shaarawi, I.M.Besieris and R.W.Ziolkowski:

1742: ref.[9]; \ I.M.Besieris, M.Abdel-Rahman, A.Shaarawi and A.Chatzipetros:

1743: ref.[14]. \ Cf. also A.M.Shaarawi and I.M.Besieris: J. Phys. A: Math.Gen. 33

1744: (2000) 7227; 33 (2000) 7255; 33 (2000) 8559; Phys. Rev. E62 (2000) 7415.

1745: \hfill\break

1746: 

1747: [17] The relaxation of the spectral delta correlation has been discussed

1748: (even if for a different set of coordinates, i.e., over a different plane)

1749: also in the paragraphs associated with eqs.(3.5),(3.6) in A.M.Shaarawi: J.

1750: Opt. Soc. Am. A14 (1997) 1804-1816, and with eqs.(4.2),(4.3) in A.M.Shaarawi,

1751: I.M.Besieris, R.W.Ziolkowski and R.M.Sedky: J. Opt. Soc. Am. A12 (1995)

1752: 1954-1964; \ while the need for a relaxation of that kind in order to get

1753: finite energy solutions was mentioned (as we already said) in ref.[14],

1754: besides ref.[18].\hfill\break

1755: 

1756: [18] M.Zamboni-Rached: ``Localized solutions: Structure and Applications",

1757: M.Sc. thesis (Phys. Dept., Campinas State University, 1999).\hfill\break

1758: 

1759: [19] Cf. also Ruy H.A.Farias and E.Recami: ``Introduction of a Quantum of Time

1760: (``chronon"), and its Consequences for Quantum Mechanics", Lanl Archive \#

1761: quant-ph/9706059, and refs. therein; \ P.Caldirola: Rivista N. Cim. 2 (1979),

1762: issue no.13.

1763: 

1764: \end{document}

1765: \end

1766: 

1767: 

1768: