1: %Your temporary electronic submission ID is:

2: %36973.pdf and is proof of submission.

3: %We will review your submission and send you a confirmation of receipt by email. That email will %be sent within one week and will contain a permanent document ID number, which should be %used on your Copyright Transfer Agreement.

4: %DO NOT RESUBMIT!

5: %We have received your original file and will notify you if there is a problem processing it to %PDF.

6: %Questions or problems? Contact: OSA

7: 

8: 

9: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

10: %                   File: OSAmtg.tex                  %

11: %                   VERSION: 2.0                      %

12: %                   Date: August 3, 1998              %

13: %    LaTeX template file for use with OSA MEETINGS    %

14: %                                                     %

15: % This file requires a substyle file under the LaTeX  %

16: % Article style, OSAmeet.sty .                        %

17: %               FOR LATEX 2E USE                      %

18: %         \documentclass[10pt]{article}               %

19: %         \usepackage{OSAmeet}                        %

20: %                                                     %

21: %              FOR REVTeX 4.0 USE                     %

22: %         \documentstyle[osa,OSAmeet]{revtex4}        %

23: %                                                     %

24: % Copyright 1997, 1999 The Optical Society of America %

25: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

26: %

27: %\documentstyle[opex2]{article}

28: %\documentstyle[osa,opex2]{revtex4}

29: \documentclass[10pt]{article}

30: \usepackage{OSAmeet}

31: %\documentclass[preprint,showpacs,preprintnumbers,amsmath,amssymb]{revtex4}

32: \usepackage{graphicx}% Include figure files

33: 

34: \begin{document}

35: 

36: \title{Analysis of the ellipticity induced PMD and general scaling perturbation in a transmitting fiber.}

37: 

38: \author{Maksim Skorobogatiy, Mihai Ibanescu, Steven Johnson, Ori Weisberg, Torkel Engeness, Steven Jacobs, Yoel Fink}

39: \address{OmniGuide Communications, One Kendall Square, Build.

40: 100, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.} \email{maksim@omni-guide.com}

41: 

42: 

43: %\HeaderAuthorTitleMtg{Skorobogatiy et.al.}{Analysis of the

44: %ellipticity and general scaling perturbation induced PMD in a

45: %transmitting fiber.}{OFC}

46: 

47: 

48: 

49: \begin{abstract}

50: Presented is an analysis of general scaling perturbations in a

51: transmitting fiber. For elliptical perturbations, under some

52: conditions an intermode dispersion parameter characterizing modal

53: PMD is shown to be directly proportional to the mode dispersion.

54: \end{abstract}

55: 

56: 

57: \ocis{(060.24000) Fiber properties ; {060.2280}  Fiber design and

58: fabrication}

59: 

60: 

61: \noindent                      %%  YOUR SUMMARY BEGINS HERE

62: 

63: 

64: In the following paper we derive a generalized Hermitian

65: Hamiltonian approach for the treatment of Maxwell equations in

66: waveguides as well as develop a perturbation theory for the

67: general class of scaling perturbations that include ellipticity

68: and a uniform scaling of an arbitrary index profile. Because of

69: the Hermitian nature of the formulation most of the results from

70: the well developed perturbation theory of quantum mechanical

71: systems can be directly related to the light propagation in the

72: waveguides. Such formulation provides for an intuitive way of

73: understanding PMD and birefringence in the elliptically perturbed

74: fiber profiles. Region of validity of our theory extends to the

75: case of large variations of the dielectric constant across the

76: fiber crossection and is limited only by an amount of re-scaling.

77: Finally, we establish that if in some range of frequencies a

78: particular mode behaves like a mode of pure polarization $TE$,$TM$

79: (where polarization is judged by the relative amounts of the

80: electric and magnetic longitudinal energies in a modal

81: crossection) its inter-mode dispersion parameter

82: $\tau=|\frac{\partial\bigtriangleup\beta_{e}}{\partial\omega}|$ is

83: related to its dispersion $D$ as $\tau=\lambda\delta |D|$, where

84: $\delta$ is a measure of the fiber ellipticity and

85: $\bigtriangleup\beta_{e}$ is a split in a wavevector of a linearly

86: polarized doubly degenerate mode of interest due to an elliptical

87: perturbation.

88: 

89: While there has been a wide amount of work done on estimating such

90: quantities as local birefringence induced by perturbations in the

91: fiber profile most of the treatments were geared toward

92: understanding the low contrast, weakly guiding systems such as

93: ubiquitous silica waveguides and are not directly applicable to

94: the high contrast systems such as Bragg fibers, photonic crystal

95: fibers and integrated optics waveguides which are steadily

96: emerging as an integral part of the state of the art transmission

97: systems.

98: 

99: In deriving Hamiltonian formulation for the eigen fields of a

100: generic waveguide exhibiting translational symmetry in

101: longitudinal $\hat{{\bf z}}$ direction we start with a well known

102: set of Maxwell equations written in terms of transverse and

103: longitudinal fields \cite{jackson}. Assuming the form of the field

104: \begin{equation}

105: \left |

106: \begin{array}{c}

107: {\bf E}(x,y,z,t)\\

108: {\bf H}(x,y,z,t)

109: \end{array}

110: \right | = \left |

111: \begin{array}{c}

112: {\bf E}(x,y)\\

113: {\bf H}(x,y)

114: \end{array}

115: \right |exp(i\beta z-i\omega t) \label{eq:symmetry}

116: \end{equation}

117: and introducing the transverse and longitudinal components of the

118: fields as ${\bf F}={\bf F}_t+{\bf F}_z$, ${\bf F}_z={\bf \hat{z}}

119: F_z$, ${\bf F}_t=({\bf \hat{z}}\times {\bf F}) \times {\bf

120: \hat{z}}$ Maxwell equations can be rewritten as a generalized

121: Hermitian eigen problem \cite{johnson}

122: \begin{equation}

123: \beta \left \|

124: \begin{array}{cc}

125: 0 & -{\bf \hat{z}}\times\\

126: {\bf \hat{z}}\times & 0\\

127: \end{array}

128: \right \| \left |

129: \begin{array}{c}

130: {\bf E}_t\\

131: {\bf H}_t\\

132: \end{array}

133: \right |= \left \|

134: \begin{array}{cc}

135: \omega\epsilon - \frac{1}{\omega}{\bf \bigtriangledown}_t\times

136: [{\bf \hat{z}}({\bf \hat{z}}\cdot({\bf \bigtriangledown}_t \times))] & 0\\

137: 0 & \omega - \frac{1}{\omega}{\bf \bigtriangledown}_t\times

138: [{\bf\hat{z}}(\frac{1}{\epsilon}{\bf\hat{z}}\cdot({\bf

139: \bigtriangledown}_t \times))]

140: \end{array}

141: \right \| \left |

142: \begin{array}{c}

143: {\bf E}_t\\

144: {\bf H}_t\\

145: \end{array}

146: \right |. \label{eq:Maxwell}

147: \end{equation}

148: In this form operators on the left and on the right are Hermitian

149: thus defining a generalized Hermitian eigen problem and allowing

150: for all the convenient properties pertaining to such a form,

151: including real eigenvalues $\beta$ as well as orthogonality of the

152: modes corresponding to the different $\beta$'s (for more

153: discussion see \cite{johnson}). Defining hermitian operator on the

154: left of (\ref{eq:Maxwell}) as $\hat{B}$ and the one on the right

155: $\hat{A}$ and introducing Dirac notation $|\psi> = \left |

156: \begin{array}{c}

157: {\bf E}_t\\

158: {\bf H}_t\\

159: \end{array}

160: \right |$ we rewrite a generalized eigen problem as

161: \begin{equation}

162: \beta \hat{B}|\psi_{\beta}>=\hat{A}|\psi_{\beta}>

163: \end{equation}

164: with a condition of orthogonality between modes of $\beta$ and

165: $\beta'$ in the form

166: \begin{equation}

167: <\psi_{\beta}|\hat{B}|\psi_{\beta'}>=\delta_{\beta,\beta'}.

168: \label{eq:orthogonality}

169: \end{equation}

170: 

171: In the following we analyze uniform along ${\bf{\hat{z}}}$ axis

172: perturbations. If a perturbation such as general re-scaling of

173: coordinates $x_{scaled}=x(1+\delta_x)$,$y_{scaled}=y(1+\delta_y)$

174: is introduced into the system it will modify an operator

175: $\hat{A}$. A particular case of general re-scaling when

176: $\delta_x=\delta_y$ correspond to the uniform scaling of a

177: structure, while the case of  $\delta_x=-\delta_y$ corresponds to

178: a uniform ellipticity. Denoting a correction to an original

179: operator on the left of (\ref{eq:Maxwell}) $\delta\hat{A}$, the

180: new eigen values $\tilde{\beta}$ of the split doubly degenerate

181: eigen mode are found by solving a secular equation \cite{landau}

182: and gives

183: \begin{equation}

184: \beta^{\pm}=\beta+\frac{<\psi_{\beta,m}|\delta\hat{A}|\psi_{\beta,m}>}

185: {<\psi_{\beta,m}|\hat{B}|\psi_{\beta,m}>}

186: \pm\frac{<\psi_{\beta,m}|\delta\hat{A}|\psi_{\beta,-m}>}{|<\psi_{\beta,m}|\hat{B}|\psi_{\beta,m}>|}.

187: \label{eq:pert_deg}

188: \end{equation}

189: The inter-mode dispersion parameter being proportional to PMD

190: \cite{PMD} is defined to be equal to the mismatch of the inverse

191: group velocities of the split due to the perturbation modes

192: $\tau=\frac{1}{v^+_g}-\frac{1}{v^-_g}$ which is, in turn, can be

193: expressed in terms of the frequency derivative

194: $\tau=\frac{\partial(\beta^+-\beta^-)}{\partial\omega}$.

195: 

196: Now we derive a form of the perturbation operator for the cases of

197: uniform scaling and uniform ellipticity. We start with an

198: elliptical waveguide and a generalized Hermitian formulation

199: (\ref{eq:Maxwell}) where the derivatives in operator $\hat{A}$

200: should be understood as the derivatives over the coordinates

201: $x_{scaled}$ and $y_{scaled}$. We then transform into the

202: coordinate system in which an elliptical waveguide becomes

203: cylindrical. Assuming normalization (\ref{eq:orthogonality}) after

204: some combersome algebra \cite{skorobogatiy} we arrive at the

205: following expressions.

206: 

207: 

208: Case of uniform scaling $\delta_x=\delta_y=\delta$

209: \begin{equation}

210: \begin{array}{l}

211: \bigtriangleup\beta_s=<\psi_{\beta,m}|\delta\hat{A}|\psi_{\beta,m}>=

212: 2\delta\int_{S}ds \left |

213: \begin{array}{c}

214: E_r\\

215: E_\theta\\

216: H_r\\

217: H_\theta\\

218: \end{array}

219: \right |^+_{\beta,m} \left \|

220: \begin{array}{cccc}

221: \omega\epsilon & 0 & 0 & -\beta\\

222: 0 & \omega\epsilon & \beta & 0\\

223: 0 & \beta & \omega & 0\\

224: -\beta & 0 & 0 & \omega\\

225: \end{array}

226: \right \| \left |

227: \begin{array}{c}

228: E_r\\

229: E_\theta\\

230: H_r\\

231: H_\theta\\

232: \end{array}

233: \right |_{\beta,m}=2\eta\omega\int_{S}ds (\epsilon|E_z|^2+|H_z|^2)

234: \end{array}

235: \label{eq:db_scaling}

236: \end{equation}

237: 

238: Another important result about change in the propagation constant

239: of a mode under uniform scaling is that its frequency derivative

240: is proportional to the dispersion of a mode. To derive this result

241: we consider a dispersion relation for some mode of a waveguide

242: $\beta=f(\omega)$. From the form of Maxwell equations it is clear

243: that if we uniformly re-scale all the transverse dimensions in a

244: system by a factor of $(1+\delta)$ then the new

245: $\tilde{\beta}=\beta+\bigtriangleup\beta_s$ for the same $\omega$

246: will satisfy $\tilde{\beta}=\frac{f(\omega(1+\delta))}{1+\delta}$.

247: Decomposing the last expression in Taylor series and collecting

248: terms of the same order in $\delta$ we derive expressions for

249: $\bigtriangleup\beta_s$ and its derivative $\bigtriangleup\beta_s=

250: \delta(\omega\frac{\partial\beta}{\partial\omega}-\beta)$,

251: $\frac{\partial \bigtriangleup\beta_s}{\partial

252: \omega}=\delta\omega\frac{\partial^2 \beta}{\partial

253: \omega^2}=-\lambda\delta D(\omega)$ where $D(\omega)$ is a

254: dispersion of the mode.

255: 

256: Case of uniform ellipticity $\delta_x=-\delta_y=\delta$. A first

257: order correction to the split in the values of propagation

258: constants of the modes $(\beta,1)$ and $(\beta,-1)$ due to the

259: uniform re-scaling becomes (\ref{eq:pert_deg})

260: \begin{equation}

261: \begin{array}{l}

262: \bigtriangleup\beta_e=2|<\psi_{\beta,1}|\delta\hat{A}|\psi_{\beta,-1}>|=

263: 2\eta\omega|\int_{S}ds \left |

264: \begin{array}{c}

265: E_r\\

266: E_\theta\\

267: H_r\\

268: H_\theta\\

269: \end{array}

270: \right |^+_{\beta,1} \left \|

271: \begin{array}{cccc}

272: -\epsilon & -i\epsilon & 0 & 0\\

273: -i\epsilon & \epsilon & 0 & 0\\

274: 0 & 0 & -1 & -i\\

275: 0 & 0 & -i & 1\\

276: \end{array}

277: \right \| \left |

278: \begin{array}{c}

279: E_r\\

280: E_\theta\\

281: H_r\\

282: H_\theta\\

283: \end{array}

284: \right |_{\beta,-1}|=\\

285: 2\eta\omega|\int_{S}ds[(-\epsilon|E_z|^2+|H_z|^2)+2Im(\epsilon

286: E^*_r E_\theta-H^*_r H_\theta)]|

287: \end{array}

288: \label{eq:db_ellipticity}

289: \end{equation}

290: where $E$'s and $H$'s are those of the $(\beta,1)$ mode.

291: 

292: From expression (\ref{eq:db_ellipticity}) we find that the split

293: between the degenerate modes due to the ellipticity is

294: proportional to the difference in the longitudinal magnetic and

295: electric energies in the crossection of a fiber. The rest of the

296: crossterms in expression (\ref{eq:db_ellipticity}) usually do not

297: contribute substantially to the split, unless special structures

298: are considered where longitudinal magnetic and longitudinal

299: electric energies are of the same order.

300: 

301: An important conclusion about PMD of a structure can be drawn when

302: electric or magnetic longitudinal energy dominates substantially

303: over the other (for a longer discussion see \cite{skorobogatiy}).

304: In the case of pure-like $TE$ ($E_z\sim0$) or $TM$ ($H_z\sim0$)

305: modes split due to the uniform scaling (\ref{eq:db_scaling})

306: becomes almost identical to the split in the degeneracy of the

307: modes due to the uniform ellipticity perturbation

308: (\ref{eq:db_ellipticity}). Thus, in the case when the mode is

309: predominantly $TE$ or $TM$ as judged by the amounts of the

310: corresponding longitudinal energies in the crossection we expect

311: $\bigtriangleup\beta_s=\bigtriangleup\beta_e$. As PMD is

312: proportional to the intermode dispersion parameter

313: $\tau=\frac{\partial\bigtriangleup\beta_e}{\partial \omega}$ and

314: taking into account expressions for the frequency derivatives of

315: $\bigtriangleup\beta_s$ we arrive to the conclusion that for such

316: a mode PMD is proportional to the despersion of a mode

317: \begin{equation}

318: \tau=|\frac{\partial\bigtriangleup\beta_e}{\partial

319: \omega}|=|\frac{\partial\bigtriangleup\beta_s}{\partial

320: \omega}|=\lambda\delta |D(\omega)| \label{eq:ellip_disp}

321: \end{equation}

322: 

323: We conclude by presenting the results of calculations of the

324: normalized birefringence due to the uniform elliptical

325: perturbation in the case of a double core high dielectric contrast

326: fiber Fig.\ref{fig:fig_ring}. Fundamental doubly degenerate mode

327: of $m=1$ was studied in a ring-like fiber of $1.0$ to $1.5$ index

328: contrast. Excellent correspondence between the predictions of the

329: pertubation theory and, in principle, exact Finite Difference

330: numerical simulations is observed.

331: 

332: \begin{figure}

333: \centerline{\scalebox{.5}{\includegraphics{fig_ring}}}

334: \caption{\label{fig:fig_ring} Effective birefringence due to the

335: elliptical perturbation in a double core high dielectric contrast

336: fiber. Data is presented for the fundamental linearly polarized

337: doubly degenerate mode. While the width of a ring was kept at a

338: constant $1\mu m$ corresponding inner radii $R$ was varied in the

339: interval (3,10)$\mu m$. Split in a wavevector of an originally

340: degerate mode due to the uniform elliptical perturbation of

341: magnitude $\delta$ as predicted by the perturbation theory

342: (circles) is compared to the results of the Finite Difference

343: numerical simulations (crosses). Excellent correspondence over the

344: whole range of inner radii is observed.}

345: \end{figure}

346: 

347: \begin{thebibliography}{}

348: \bibitem{jackson} J.D. Jackson,"Classical Electrodynamics," John Wiley and Sons Inc., (p. 357, Eq's.

349: 8.23-8.25), (1998).

350: \bibitem{johnson} S. Jphnson, M. Skorobogatiy, M. Ibanescu, "Perturbation theory for lossless optical

351: waveguides," unpublished.

352: \bibitem{landau} L.D. Landau and E.M. Lifshitz,"Quantum Mechanics (Non-relativistic Theory)",

353: Butterworth Heinemann, (p. 140, Eq's. 1,2), (2000).

354: \bibitem{PMD} F. Curti, B. Daino, G. De Marchis, and F. Matera,

355: "Statistical treatment of the evolution of the principal states of

356: polarization in single-mode fibers", IEEE J. Lightwave Tech. {\bf

357: 8}, 1162 (1990)

358: \bibitem{skorobogatiy} M. Skorobogatiy, Mihai Ibanescu, Steven G. Johnson, Ori Weisberg,

359: Torkel D. Engeness, Marin Solja{\v{c}}i{\'{c}}, Steven A. Jacobs

360: and Yoel Fink, "Analysis of ellipticity and general scaling

361: perturbations in a transmitting fiber. The fundamental connection

362: between polarization mode dispersion and group-velocity

363: dispersion," submitted to JOSA B, December 2001.

364: \end{thebibliography}

365: 

366: \end{document}

367: