1:
2: %\documentclass[aps,prl,preprint,groupedaddress]{revtex4}
3: %\documentclass[aps,prl,twocolumn,superscriptaddress,showpacs]{revtex4}
4: \documentclass[aps,pra,twocolumn,groupedaddress,showpacs,floatfix]{revtex4}
5:
6: %\bibliographystyle{Thadtitle}
7: \usepackage{graphicx}
8:
9: %\bibliographystyle{Thad2}
10:
11: \newcommand{\expect}[1]{{\langle #1 \rangle}}
12: \newcommand{\expectz}[1]{{\langle #1_z \rangle}}
13: \newcommand{\dens}[1]{{\rm [#1]}}
14: \newcommand{\syserr}[2]{ ^{#1}_{#2} }
15: \newcommand{\tHe}{\mbox{$^3$He}}
16: \newcommand{\GHe}{\Gamma_{\rm He}}
17: \newcommand{\GRb}{\Gamma_{\rm Rb}}
18: \newcommand{\etal}{{\it et al.}}
19: \newcommand{\actionitem}[1]{\marginpar{\footnotesize #1}}
20:
21:
22:
23: \input BoxedEPS.tex
24: \SetTexturesEPSFSpecial
25: %\SetepsfEPSFSpecial %For LANL archive
26: \HideDisplacementBoxes
27:
28: \begin{document}
29:
30: \title{Dense Atom Clouds in a Holographic Atom Trap}
31:
32: \author{R. Newell}\author{J. Sebby}\author{T. G. Walker}
33: \affiliation{Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison,
34: Madison, Wisconsin 53706 }
35: \date{\today}
36:
37: \pacs{1234567}
38:
39:
40: \begin{abstract}
41: We demonstrate the production of high density cold atom samples ($2\times10^{14}$ atoms/cm$^3$) in a simple optical lattice formed
42: with YAG light that is diffracted from a holographic phase plate. A loading protocol is described that results in 10,000 atoms per
43: lattice site. Rapid free evaporation leads to phase space densities of 1/150 within 50 msec. The resulting small, high
44: density atomic clouds are very attractive for a number of experiments, including ultracold Rydberg atom physics.
45: \end{abstract}
46:
47: \maketitle
48:
49:
50: Conventional light-force atom traps, in particular the magneto-optical trap (MOT), are limited in density by radiation trapping to
51: typically 10$^{11}$ cm$^{-3}$
52: \cite{Walker90,Ketterle93}. In the experiments described here, we attain densities in far-off-resonance traps (FORTs) that
53: exceed this density by 3 orders of magnitude, and are comparable to BEC densities. We show
54: that FORTs can achieve these densities in tens of milliseconds, as compared to tens of seconds for magnetic traps. Such rapidly
55: produced high density sources are of particular interest for studying novel collision phenomena that do not require the coherence
56: of BECs and yet can be exploited for quantum manipulation and entanglement of atoms. They are also attractive for evaporative
57: cooling; several groups have recently cooled atoms to quantum degeneracy using FORTs \cite{Barrett01,Granade02}.
58:
59: FORTs \cite{Miller93} use spatially varying intensities $I({\bf r})$ to produce a
60: conservative potential
61: $U({\bf r})=-2\pi\alpha(\lambda) I({\bf r})/c$, where $\alpha(\lambda)$ is the polarizability of the atom at the FORT laser
62: wavelength
63: $\lambda$. At a given temperature $T$ and number of trapped atoms $N$ the peak density depends not directly on the trap depth but
64: rather on its curvature:
65: $n\sim N(\kappa/T)^{3/2}$, where
66: $\kappa=-\partial^2_{\bf r} U$. Therefore much higher densities can be obtained at roughly the same trap depth by
67: forming an interference pattern (optical lattice) to obtain a rapid spatial variation in the intensity. In general, for a
68: fixed laser power and beam area, forming an interference pattern (lattice) of cell size $\Lambda$ from
69: $M$ beams increases the trap depth over a single-beam FORT by a factor $O(M)$ and the spring constant by a
70: factor $O(M/\Lambda^2)$. However, the number of atoms per lattice site is reduced by
71: $O(\Lambda^3)$ so that the geometrical factors cancel and the density scales as $M^{3/2}$.
72: Thus there is considerable freedom in choosing the geometry of lattice FORTs without sacrificing density.
73:
74: \begin{figure}[htb]
75: \includegraphics[scale=0.33]{HATgeom.EPS}
76: \caption{Optical train used to produce the HAT, and calculation of the interference pattern formed at the intersection of the five
77: HAT beams.}\label{HATgeom}
78: \end{figure}
79:
80: For phenomena occurring at high densities ($>10^{13}$ cm$^{-3}$) it is desirable to construct a lattice FORT with sufficient unit
81: cell volume that many atoms can be loaded into a given lattice site. This has been demonstrated by several groups using a variety
82: of trap geometries: 3D lattice \cite{Han00}, crossed dipole \cite{Barrett01}, a single retro-reflected beam \cite{Friebel98,
83: Granade02}, a beam focused with an array of microlenses \cite{Dumke02}, and the interference of light diffracted from a holographic
84: phase plate
85: \cite{Boiron98}. All save the last two require interferometric stability and single-mode lasers. In an early experiment Boiron
86: {\it et al.} used a holographic phase plate and a YAG laser to construct a large $\Lambda$ Cs lattice. After applying blue Sisyphus
87: cooling,
88: they obtained
89: densities of order 10$^{13}$ cm$^{-3}$. In this work we use higher intensities, optimized loading, and evaporation without the
90: aid of Sisyphus cooling to attain Rb densities exceeding 10$^{14}$ cm$^{-3}$ and phase space densities approaching 1/150 after
91: loading for only tens of milliseconds. Furthermore our use of a multimode flashlamp-pumped laser demonstrates the robust nature of
92: the trap.
93:
94:
95:
96: In our experiments we use a YAG laser to acheive an optical lattice, called a Holographic Atom Trap (HAT), by interfering five
97: diffracted beams from a holographic phase plate \cite{MEMS} (Fig.~\ref{HATgeom}). At the intersection of the 5 laser
98: beams an interference pattern
99: \begin{equation}
100: {I({\bf r})\over I_0}=\left|e^{ikz}+2\beta e^{ikz(1-\theta^2/2)}\left(\cos kx\theta +\cos ky\theta\right)\right|^2
101: \end{equation}
102: is produced and Rb atoms ($\alpha(1.06 \mu {\rm m})=105
103: $\AA$^3$\cite{KadarKallen92,Marinescu94b}) are trapped at the intensity maxima. Here $k=2\pi/\lambda$, $\theta=0.1$ rad is the
104: diffraction angle of the four first-order beams, $\beta^2=0.20$ is the ratio of the intensity of a single first-order
105: diffracted beam to that of the zeroth order beam $I_0$. Along the $\hat{z}$ propagation direction of the light the interference
106: arises from the Talbot effect\cite{Boiron98}. The resulting lattice sites (microtraps) are 10
107: $\mu$m$\times$ 10
108: $\mu$m $\times$ 100 $\mu$m in size. With the individual beams focussed to 80
109: $\mu$m and a total power of 8 W the depth of the central microtrap is 500 $\mu$K and the oscillation frequencies
110: %for atoms trapped
111: %in the microtraps
112: are 17 kHz, 17 kHz, and 0.7 kHz. These calculated frequencies were experimentally confirmed by parametric
113: heating of the HAT atoms \cite{Friebel98}.
114: \begin{figure}[htb]
115: %\includegraphics[scale=0.6]{HATpot.EPS}
116: \includegraphics[scale=0.36]{HATdensdist.EPS}
117: \caption{Calaculate density distribution of atoms in the HAT, assuming a Boltzmann distribution with a temperature
118: equal to 1/10 the maximum trap depth. Distances are in microns, densities in arbitrary units.}\label{HATpot}
119: \end{figure}
120: Since the lasers are nearly copropagating, the potential is quite stable against vibrations and the YAG laser can have a large
121: bandwidth. Our multi-longitudinal mode laser has a bandwidth of approximately 25 GHz. Heating due to intensity noise
122: \cite{Gehm98} was easily eliminated with an acousto-optic intensity stabilizer. The relatively large lattice sites allow many
123: atoms ($\sim 10^4$) to be trapped in each site.
124:
125:
126: Fig.~\ref{HATpot} shows a calculated density distribution for atoms trapped in the HAT at 50 $\mu$K temperature.
127: We use a probe laser
128: propagating along the
129: $\hat{y}$-direction to take spatial heterodyne \cite{Kadlecek01} phase images that show the atoms' isolation within the Talbot
130: fringes and the microtraps (Fig.~\ref{Bragg}).
131: \begin{figure}[htb]
132: \includegraphics[scale=0.22]{Bragg.EPS}
133: \caption{Top: Image showing
134: microtraps. Bottom: first order Bragg diffraction is shown in the fringes. }
135: \label{Bragg}
136: \end{figure}
137: We observe Bragg
138: diffraction of the probe beam from the atoms in the microtraps by interference with the probe beam, also shown in
139: Fig.~\ref{Bragg}. An interesting observation from Fig.~\ref{HATpot} is that there should be a relative misalignment of the
140: microtraps in successive Talbot fringes. This is confirmed by the spatial profiles shown in Fig.~\ref{TalbotProfile}.
141: \begin{figure}[htb]
142: \includegraphics[scale=0.6]{TalbotProfile.EPS}
143: \caption{Spatial profiles of two neighboring Talbot images. The microtrap structure is shifted between the two, as expected.}
144: \label{TalbotProfile}
145: \end{figure}
146: Analysis of such images gives about $4\times10^5$ atoms per Talbot fringe. Time-of-flight temperature measurements of 50
147: $\mu$K coupled with knowledge of the trapping potential implies peak densities exceeding
148: $2\times 10^{14}$ cm$^{-3}$ and phase space densities of 1/150. Typically 25 microtraps are occupied within
149: each Talbot fringe, with 10\% of the atoms in the central microtrap.
150:
151:
152:
153: Key to the HAT's success is an efficient loading protocol. We begin with a vapor cell forced dark spot MOT \cite{Anderson94} with
154: 50\% of the 10$^7$ atoms in each of the hyperfine ground states (5S$_{1/2}$ F=1,2) of $^{87}$Rb. The dark spot is acheived by
155: imaging an opaque object in the hyperfine repumping beam (F=1$\rightarrow$5P$_{3/2}$ F$'$=2). The trapping light
156: (F=2$\rightarrow$F$'$=3) is tuned 3 linewidths $\Gamma$ below resonance and has an intensity of 72 mW/cm$^2$. We add a
157: depumping laser, tuned to the high frequency side of the F=2$\rightarrow$F$'$=2 resonance, to optically pump more atoms down to
158: the F=1 ground state. To load the HAT from the MOT, we compress the cloud by decreasing the trapping light intensity by
159: a factor of 3, then increasing the MOT magnetic field. After 20 msec we
160: turn on the HAT laser. AC Stark shifts tune the repumping and trapping beams away from resonance and the depumping beam towards
161: resonance, causing the atoms in the HAT to be extremely dark (estimated $\sim 0.001$ in F=2 inside the FORT)
162: \cite{Kuppens00}. During the HAT loading phase we shift the trapping laser detuning to $-9\Gamma$. The number of trapped atoms
163: increases until it reaches steady state in about 50 msec, after which the MOT lasers are extinguished. The MOT to HAT transfer
164: efficiency is as high as 15\%.
165:
166: We show in Fig.~\ref{evap} the temperature and number of atoms vs time after the loading ceases. The temperature rapidly
167: decreases to a value of about 50 $\mu$K, approximately 1/10 of the trap depth, as expected for free evaporation of atoms from the
168: HAT \cite{OHara01}. The evaporation is rapid due to the very high densities; we estimate the elastic collision rate to exceed
169: 3000/s. Such high collision rates make evaporative cooling very promising for the HAT and such experiments are underway in our
170: laboratory. Trap lifetime studies show that after the evaporation ceases the temperature stays fixed but the atoms are slowly
171: ejected from the trap and/or heated \cite{Bali99} by background gas collisions with a time constant of about 500 msec. For
172: comparison, the MOT lifetime is typically 2-3 seconds for our vapor-loaded trap.
173:
174:
175: \begin{figure}[tb]
176: \includegraphics[scale=0.56]{numtemp.EPSF}
177: \caption{Evaporative cooling of the atoms occurs after the cooling lasers are switched off. The number of atoms in a
178: single Talbot fringe(circles) and the temperature (triangles) rapidly decrease until the temperature reaches roughly 1/10 the
179: trap depth.}
180: \label{evap}
181: \end{figure}
182:
183:
184:
185:
186:
187:
188:
189: These high density samples are of potential interest for a variety of experiments. In addition to obvious examples such as
190: evaporative cooling and cold collisions, many groups are interested
191: in ultracold Rydberg atoms. Excitation of Rydberg states of principal quantum number
192: $\sim$100 in our HAT will give rise to strong, long-range dipole-dipole interactions. Because atoms in our microtraps are
193: localized within a 15 $\mu$m region, these interaction energies are in excess of 1 MHz for atoms on opposite sides of a
194: microtrap. Consequently, excitation by a narrow-band laser of more than one Rydberg atom at a time per microtrap should be
195: greatly suppressed. This ``dipole blockade'' is of great interest for applications in quantum information
196: processing\cite{Lukin01} and single atom and photon sources\cite{Saffman02}. Similarly, the densities are high enough to expect
197: efficient excitation of novel long-range Rydberg molecules such as those recently proposed \cite{Greene00,Boisseau02}. In
198: addition, it will be interesting to see how the very much higher densities acheived in the HAT as compared to MOTs affect the
199: production of cold plasmas\cite{Killian01}.
200:
201:
202: The authors are grateful for the support of NASA, the NSF, and the ARO. We thank Steve Kadlecek and
203: Jason Day for pivotal contributions to the imaging system, and David Steele and Nathan Harrison for work on early stages of the
204: experiment.
205:
206: %\bibliography{lasercooling}
207: \newcommand{\noopsort}[1]{} \newcommand{\printfirst}[2]{#1}
208: \newcommand{\singleletter}[1]{#1} \newcommand{\switchargs}[2]{#2#1}
209: \begin{thebibliography}{23}
210: \expandafter\ifx\csname natexlab\endcsname\relax\def\natexlab#1{#1}\fi
211: \expandafter\ifx\csname bibnamefont\endcsname\relax
212: \def\bibnamefont#1{#1}\fi
213: \expandafter\ifx\csname bibfnamefont\endcsname\relax
214: \def\bibfnamefont#1{#1}\fi
215: \expandafter\ifx\csname citenamefont\endcsname\relax
216: \def\citenamefont#1{#1}\fi
217: \expandafter\ifx\csname url\endcsname\relax
218: \def\url#1{\texttt{#1}}\fi
219: \expandafter\ifx\csname urlprefix\endcsname\relax\def\urlprefix{URL }\fi
220: \providecommand{\bibinfo}[2]{#2}
221: \providecommand{\eprint}[2][]{\url{#2}}
222:
223: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Walker et~al.}(1990)\citenamefont{Walker, Sesko, and
224: Wieman}}]{Walker90}
225: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{T.}~\bibnamefont{Walker}},
226: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{D.}~\bibnamefont{Sesko}}, \bibnamefont{and}
227: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{C.}~\bibnamefont{Wieman}},
228: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. Lett.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{64}},
229: \bibinfo{pages}{408} (\bibinfo{year}{1990}).
230:
231: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Ketterle et~al.}(1993)\citenamefont{Ketterle, Davis,
232: Joffe, Martin, and Pritchard}}]{Ketterle93}
233: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{W.}~\bibnamefont{Ketterle}},
234: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{K.}~\bibnamefont{Davis}},
235: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.~A.} \bibnamefont{Joffe}},
236: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Martin}}, \bibnamefont{and}
237: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{D.~E.} \bibnamefont{Pritchard}},
238: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. Lett.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{70}},
239: \bibinfo{pages}{2253} (\bibinfo{year}{1993}).
240:
241: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Barrett et~al.}(2001)\citenamefont{Barrett, Sauer, and
242: Chapman}}]{Barrett01}
243: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.~D.} \bibnamefont{Barrett}},
244: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.~A.} \bibnamefont{Sauer}}, \bibnamefont{and}
245: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.~S.} \bibnamefont{Chapman}},
246: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. Lett.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{87}},
247: \bibinfo{pages}{010404} (\bibinfo{year}{2001}).
248:
249: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Granade et~al.}(2002)\citenamefont{Granade, Gehm,
250: O'Hara, and Thomas}}]{Granade02}
251: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.~R.} \bibnamefont{Granade}},
252: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.~E.} \bibnamefont{Gehm}},
253: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{K.~M.} \bibnamefont{O'Hara}},
254: \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.~E.}
255: \bibnamefont{Thomas}}, \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. Lett.}
256: \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{88}}, \bibinfo{pages}{120405}
257: (\bibinfo{year}{2002}).
258:
259: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Miller et~al.}(1993)\citenamefont{Miller, Cline, and
260: Heinzen}}]{Miller93}
261: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.~D.} \bibnamefont{Miller}},
262: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.~A.} \bibnamefont{Cline}}, \bibnamefont{and}
263: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{D.~J.} \bibnamefont{Heinzen}},
264: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. A} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{47}},
265: \bibinfo{pages}{R4567} (\bibinfo{year}{1993}).
266:
267: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Han et~al.}(2000)\citenamefont{Han, Wolf, Oliver,
268: McCormick, DePue, and Weiss}}]{Han00}
269: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{D.~J.} \bibnamefont{Han}},
270: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.}~\bibnamefont{Wolf}},
271: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.}~\bibnamefont{Oliver}},
272: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{C.}~\bibnamefont{McCormick}},
273: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.~T.} \bibnamefont{DePue}}, \bibnamefont{and}
274: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{D.~S.} \bibnamefont{Weiss}},
275: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. Lett.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{85}},
276: \bibinfo{pages}{724} (\bibinfo{year}{2000}).
277:
278: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Friebel et~al.}(1998)\citenamefont{Friebel,
279: Scheunemann, Walz, Hansch, and Weitz}}]{Friebel98}
280: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.}~\bibnamefont{Friebel}},
281: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.}~\bibnamefont{Scheunemann}},
282: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.}~\bibnamefont{Walz}},
283: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{T.~W.} \bibnamefont{Hansch}},
284: \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.}~\bibnamefont{Weitz}},
285: \bibinfo{journal}{Appl. Phys. B} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{B67}},
286: \bibinfo{pages}{699} (\bibinfo{year}{1998}).
287:
288: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Dumke et~al.}(2002)\citenamefont{Dumke, Volk, Muther,
289: Buchkremer, Birkl, and Ertmer}}]{Dumke02}
290: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.}~\bibnamefont{Dumke}},
291: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.}~\bibnamefont{Volk}},
292: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{T.}~\bibnamefont{Muther}},
293: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{F.~B.~J.} \bibnamefont{Buchkremer}},
294: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{G.}~\bibnamefont{Birkl}}, \bibnamefont{and}
295: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{W.}~\bibnamefont{Ertmer}},
296: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. Lett.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{89}},
297: \bibinfo{pages}{097903} (\bibinfo{year}{2002}).
298:
299: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Boiron et~al.}(1998)\citenamefont{Boiron, Michaud,
300: Fournier, Simard, Sprenger, Grynberg, and Salomon}}]{Boiron98}
301: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{D.}~\bibnamefont{Boiron}},
302: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Michaud}},
303: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.~M.} \bibnamefont{Fournier}},
304: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{L.}~\bibnamefont{Simard}},
305: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.}~\bibnamefont{Sprenger}},
306: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{G.}~\bibnamefont{Grynberg}}, \bibnamefont{and}
307: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{C.}~\bibnamefont{Salomon}},
308: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. A} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{57}},
309: \bibinfo{pages}{R4106} (\bibinfo{year}{1998}).
310:
311: \bibitem[{MEM()}]{MEMS}
312: \bibinfo{note}{MEMS Optical, Huntsville, AL}.
313:
314: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Kadar-Kallen and Bonin}(1992)}]{KadarKallen92}
315: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.~A.} \bibnamefont{Kadar-Kallen}}
316: \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{K.~D.} \bibnamefont{Bonin}},
317: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. Lett.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{68}},
318: \bibinfo{pages}{2015} (\bibinfo{year}{1992}).
319:
320: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Marinescu et~al.}(1994)\citenamefont{Marinescu,
321: Sadeghpour, and Dalgarno}}]{Marinescu94b}
322: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.}~\bibnamefont{Marinescu}},
323: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{H.~R.} \bibnamefont{Sadeghpour}},
324: \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Dalgarno}},
325: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. A} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{49}},
326: \bibinfo{pages}{5103} (\bibinfo{year}{1994}).
327:
328: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Gehm et~al.}(1998)\citenamefont{Gehm, O'Hara, Savard,
329: and Thomas}}]{Gehm98}
330: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.~E.} \bibnamefont{Gehm}},
331: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{K.~M.} \bibnamefont{O'Hara}},
332: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{T.~A.} \bibnamefont{Savard}},
333: \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.~E.}
334: \bibnamefont{Thomas}}, \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. A}
335: \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{58}}, \bibinfo{pages}{3914} (\bibinfo{year}{1998}).
336:
337: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Kadlecek et~al.}(2001)\citenamefont{Kadlecek, Sebby,
338: Newell, and Walker}}]{Kadlecek01}
339: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.}~\bibnamefont{Kadlecek}},
340: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.}~\bibnamefont{Sebby}},
341: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.}~\bibnamefont{Newell}}, \bibnamefont{and}
342: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{T.~G.} \bibnamefont{Walker}},
343: \bibinfo{journal}{Opt. Lett.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{26}},
344: \bibinfo{pages}{137} (\bibinfo{year}{2001}).
345:
346: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Anderson et~al.}(1994)\citenamefont{Anderson, Petrich,
347: Ensher, and Cornell}}]{Anderson94}
348: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.~H.} \bibnamefont{Anderson}},
349: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{W.}~\bibnamefont{Petrich}},
350: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.~R.} \bibnamefont{Ensher}},
351: \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{E.~A.}
352: \bibnamefont{Cornell}}, \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. A}
353: \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{50}}, \bibinfo{pages}{R3597} (\bibinfo{year}{1994}).
354:
355: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Kuppens et~al.}(2000)\citenamefont{Kuppens, Corwin,
356: Miller, Chupp, and Wieman}}]{Kuppens00}
357: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.~J.~M.} \bibnamefont{Kuppens}},
358: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{K.~L.} \bibnamefont{Corwin}},
359: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{K.~W.} \bibnamefont{Miller}},
360: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{T.~E.} \bibnamefont{Chupp}}, \bibnamefont{and}
361: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{C.~E.} \bibnamefont{Wieman}},
362: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. A} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{62}},
363: \bibinfo{pages}{013406} (\bibinfo{year}{2000}).
364:
365: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{O'Hara et~al.}(2001)\citenamefont{O'Hara, Gehm,
366: Granade, and Thomas}}]{OHara01}
367: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{K.~M.} \bibnamefont{O'Hara}},
368: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.~E.} \bibnamefont{Gehm}},
369: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.~R.} \bibnamefont{Granade}},
370: \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.~E.}
371: \bibnamefont{Thomas}}, \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. A}
372: \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{64}}, \bibinfo{pages}{051403}
373: (\bibinfo{year}{2001}).
374:
375: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Bali et~al.}(1999)\citenamefont{Bali, O'Hara, Gehm,
376: Granade, and Thomas}}]{Bali99}
377: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.}~\bibnamefont{Bali}},
378: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{K.~M.} \bibnamefont{O'Hara}},
379: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.~E.} \bibnamefont{Gehm}},
380: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.~R.} \bibnamefont{Granade}},
381: \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.~F.}
382: \bibnamefont{Thomas}}, \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. A}
383: \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{60}}, \bibinfo{pages}{R29} (\bibinfo{year}{1999}).
384:
385: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Lukin et~al.}(2001)\citenamefont{Lukin, Fleischhauer,
386: Cote, Duan, Jaksch, Cirac, and Zoller}}]{Lukin01}
387: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.~D.} \bibnamefont{Lukin}},
388: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.}~\bibnamefont{Fleischhauer}},
389: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.}~\bibnamefont{Cote}},
390: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{L.~M.} \bibnamefont{Duan}},
391: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{D.}~\bibnamefont{Jaksch}},
392: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.~I.} \bibnamefont{Cirac}}, \bibnamefont{and}
393: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{P.}~\bibnamefont{Zoller}},
394: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. Lett.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{87}},
395: \bibinfo{pages}{037901} (\bibinfo{year}{2001}).
396:
397: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Saffman and Walker}(2002)}]{Saffman02}
398: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.}~\bibnamefont{Saffman}} \bibnamefont{and}
399: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{T.~G.} \bibnamefont{Walker}},
400: \bibinfo{journal}{quant-ph/0203080} (\bibinfo{year}{2002}).
401:
402: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Greene et~al.}(2000)\citenamefont{Greene, Dickinson,
403: and Sadeghpour}}]{Greene00}
404: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{C.~H.} \bibnamefont{Greene}},
405: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.~S.} \bibnamefont{Dickinson}},
406: \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{H.~R.}
407: \bibnamefont{Sadeghpour}}, \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. Lett.}
408: \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{85}}, \bibinfo{pages}{2458} (\bibinfo{year}{2000}).
409:
410: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Boisseau et~al.}(2002)\citenamefont{Boisseau, Simbotin,
411: and Cote}}]{Boisseau02}
412: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{C.}~\bibnamefont{Boisseau}},
413: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{I.}~\bibnamefont{Simbotin}}, \bibnamefont{and}
414: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.}~\bibnamefont{Cote}},
415: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. Lett.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{88}},
416: \bibinfo{pages}{133004} (\bibinfo{year}{2002}).
417:
418: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Killian et~al.}(2001)\citenamefont{Killian, Lim, Kulin,
419: Dumke, Bergeson, and Rolston}}]{Killian01}
420: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{T.~C.} \bibnamefont{Killian}},
421: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.~J.} \bibnamefont{Lim}},
422: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.}~\bibnamefont{Kulin}},
423: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.}~\bibnamefont{Dumke}},
424: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.~D.} \bibnamefont{Bergeson}},
425: \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.~L.}
426: \bibnamefont{Rolston}}, \bibinfo{journal}{Phys. Rev. Lett.}
427: \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{86}}, \bibinfo{pages}{3759} (\bibinfo{year}{2001}).
428:
429: \end{thebibliography}
430:
431:
432: \end{document}
433:
434:
435: