1: %132-column file
2: %========================
3: \documentstyle[epsfig,fleqn,rotating]{basi}
4: %\newcommand{\mb}{\mbox{\boldmath$}
5: %
6: %================================
7: % Authors' macros will go here
8: %================================
9: %
10: \begin{document}
11: %\title[Aerosol properties at Nainital]
12: \title[]
13: {Aerosol contents at an altitude of ~2 km in central Himalayas}
14: %\author[Ram Sagar et al.]
15: \author[]{Ram Sagar,$^{1}$\thanks{e-mail: sagar@upso.ernet.in} B. Kumar,$^{1}$ P. Pant,$^{1}$ U.C. Dumka,$^{1}$
16: K.K. Moorthy$^{2}$
17: \newauthor
18: and R. Sridharan$^{2}$ \\ \\
19: $^{1}$State Observatory, Manora Peak, Nainital 263 129, India\\
20: $^{2}$Space Physics Laboratory, Vikram Sarabhai Space Centre, Thiruvananthapuram 695 022, India}
21: %\pubyear{2002}
22: %\volume{29}
23: %\pagerange{\pageref{firstpage}--\pageref{lastpage}}
24: %\setcounter{page}{17}
25: %\date{Received 2001 May 30; accepted 2001 June 07}
26: \maketitle
27: \label{firstpage}
28:
29: \section{Introduction}
30: \hskip 10pt Aerosols, both natural and anthropogenic, play an important role in the atmospheric science, by imparting
31: radiative forcing and
32: perturbing the radiative balance of the Earth atmosphere
33: system as well as by degrading the environment. To understand the effect of aerosols on our geo/biosphere system, it
34: is essential to characterize their physical and chemical properties regionally because of the regional nature of their
35: properties and the short lifetime (Moorthy et al. 1999, 1989, Satheesh et al. 2001). As most of the aerosol sources
36: are of terrestrial origin the
37: variability of their properties will be very large close to the surface. At higher altitudes, above the mixing region, and
38: in the free troposphere, the aerosol characteristics have a more synoptic perspective; would be indicative of the
39: background level and are useful to understand long-term impacts. Such systematic measurements of aerosols at high altitudes
40: are practically non-existing in India. Realising the potential and need for such studies, an activity has been initiated
41: at Manora Peak, Nainital in the Shivalik Hills of Central Himalayas at an altitude of $\sim$2 km.
42: The present paper provides the preliminary results of these aerosol measurements. These daytime measurements are compared
43: with the existing earlier nighttime measurements.
44:
45: \section{Observational data and analysis}
46: The daytime observations for aerosol optical depths were made for 68 clear-sky days during January 2002 to June 2002, with
47: Multi-Wavelength Solar Radiometer (MWR) designed and developed by the Space Physics Laboratory (SPL), Thiruvananthapuram.
48: The MWR was installed at Manora Peak, Nainital (1965 m msl). The instrument provides aerosol spectral optical depth at ten
49: narrow (FWHM of 6 to 10 nm) spectral bands centered at 380, 400, 450, 500, 600, 650, 750, 850, 935, and 1025 nm, by making
50: continuous spectral extinction measurements of directly transmitted solar radiation (Moorthy et al. 1999).
51: The nighttime extinction measurements were carried out regularly at the observatory using broad band (FWHM $\sim$ 60 nm)
52: filters with effective wavelengths around 360, 450 and 550 nm using stellar sources. These mesurements are available for about 800
53: nights between 1964 to 1988 (Kumar et al. 2000).
54:
55: %Figures
56: \begin{figure}[t]
57: \centerline{\psfig{file=fig01.ps, height=10cm}}
58: {{\bf Figure 1.} Temporal variation of the daytime aerosol optical depth.}
59: \end{figure}
60:
61: Each set of MWR observation comprises time measured with seconds accuracy and the output voltage V$_{\lambda}$. The data
62: are recorded from morning to evening and optical depths are estimated following the Langley technique (Moorthy et al. 1999).
63: A preliminary analysis of the aerosol measurements indicated the occurence of different least squares fit to the data on
64: several days, with different slopes for the forenoon (FN) and afternoon (AN) parts of the same day implying different
65: optical depths. As such, these data were analysed separately and in total we have 90 data sets spanning over the 68
66: observation days spread over nearly 6 months.
67:
68: \section{Results and discussions}
69: The temporal variation of the daytime aerosol optical depths estimated using the MWR are shown
70: in Fig. 1 as a function of the Julian days. Except a few days in April, FN AODs are lower by 0.02 to 0.2 than the
71: corresponding AN values. With a view to examine the temporal variation with the earlier nighttime values, the
72: archived nighttime aerosol measurements (broad bands) at 0.36 $\mu$m and 0.44 $\mu$m, were used. The individual values were
73: grouped into fortnightly ensembles and averaged separately for the daytime data (at 380 nm and 450 nm) and nighttime
74: data (at 360 nm and 440 nm). The temporal variations are shown in Fig. 2; on the top panel of which the
75: AOD at 750 nm from MWR are also given. The wavelength dependence of aerosol optical depths in different months for
76: the MWR data is plotted in Fig. 3.
77:
78: %Figures
79: \begin{figure}[t]
80: \centerline{\psfig{file=fig02.ps,height=10cm}}
81: {{\bf Figure 2.} Temporal variation of mean aerosol optical depths during the year at Nainital.}
82: \end{figure}
83:
84: The primary features of the aerosol optical depths (Fig. 1) are (i) low values in winter; (ii) a rather spontaneous increase
85: from spring and (iii) reaching a peak by summer; when the AOD values are nearly 4 times the winter values.
86: The increase is more spontaneous at the longer wavelengths ($0.75\mu$m), while at the shorter wavelengths
87: it is more gradual. This is attributed to increased convective activity in summer taking place in the lower plains due to
88: increased solar heating and the resulting aerosols are lifted to higher altitudes by turbulent exchange. As the turbulence
89: increases towards summer, even larger particles are lifted up causing a spontaneous increase in the AOD at the long
90: wavelength also.
91: Another feature, the FN AOD being lower than the AN values, arises due to the environmental difference; in the FN, the solar ray
92: path is primarily through the cleaner mountain ranges in the east whereas in the evening the dusty and inhabitated valley
93: intercepts the ray path. Both the daytime and nighttime AOD's show similar trends; except that the nighttime AOD's tend to be
94: higher than the daytime counter parts during winter and vice versa in summer. This aspect and its relation to the micrometerology
95: as well as the effect of the bandwidth need further investigation.
96:
97: %Figures
98: \begin{figure}[t]
99: \centerline{\psfig{file=fig03.ps,height=10cm}}
100: {{\bf Figure 3.} Wavelength dependence of the aerosol optical depth.}
101: \end{figure}
102:
103: \section*{Acknowledgements}
104: The authors thank the technical staff of the State Observatory, Nainital for providing valuable help during observations.
105:
106: \begin{thebibliography}{10}
107: \bibitem{}Kumar B., Sagar R., Rautela B.S., Srivastava J.B. and
108: Srivastava R.K., 2000, {\it Bull. Astron. Soc. India}, {\bf 28}, 675.
109: \bibitem{}Moorthy K.K., Nair P.R., Murthy B.V.K., 1989, {\it Ind. J. Rad. Space Phy.}, {\bf 18}, 194.
110: \bibitem{}Moorthy K.K. et al., 1999, {\it Aerosol Climatology over India}, 1 - ISRO GBP MWR Network and Database, ISRO GBP SR-03-99.
111: \bibitem{}Satheesh S.K., Moorthy K.K., Das I., 2001, {\it Current Science}, {\bf 81}, 1618.
112: \end{thebibliography}
113:
114: \label{lastpage}
115: \end{document}
116: