1: % Required: REVTeX 4.0
2: \documentclass[prl,twocolumn,showpacs,superscriptaddress,showkeys]{revtex4}
3: \usepackage{graphicx}
4: \usepackage{dcolumn}
5: \usepackage{bm}
6: \begin{document}
7:
8: \title{Generation of High Quality Laser Accelerated Ion Beams}
9:
10: \author{T.~Zh.~Esirkepov}
11: \altaffiliation[Also at ]{Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Dolgoprudny, Moscow region 141700, Russia}
12: \email{timur@ile.osaka-u.ac.jp}
13: \affiliation{Institute of Laser Engineering, Osaka University, Osaka 565-0871, Japan}
14:
15: \author{S.~V.~Bulanov}
16: \altaffiliation[Also at ]{General Physics Institute of RAS, Moscow 119991, Russia}
17: \affiliation{Advanced Photon Research Center, JAERI, Kyoto-fu 619-0215, Japan}
18:
19: \author{K.~Nishihara}
20: \affiliation{Institute of Laser Engineering, Osaka University, Osaka 565-0871, Japan}
21:
22: \author{T.~Tajima}
23: \affiliation{Advanced Photon Research Center, JAERI, Kyoto-fu 619-0215, Japan}
24:
25: \author{F.~Pegoraro}
26: \affiliation{University of Pisa and INFM, Pisa 56100, Italy}
27:
28: \author{V.~S.~Khoroshkov}
29: \affiliation{Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, Moscow 117259, Russia}
30:
31: \author{K.~Mima}
32: \affiliation{Institute of Laser Engineering, Osaka University, Osaka 565-0871, Japan}
33:
34: \author{H.~Daido}
35: \author{Y.~Kato}
36: \affiliation{Advanced Photon Research Center, JAERI, Kyoto-fu 619-0215, Japan}
37:
38: \author{Y.~Kitagawa}
39: \author{K.~Nagai}
40: \author{S.~Sakabe}
41: \affiliation{Institute of Laser Engineering, Osaka University, Osaka 565-0871, Japan}
42:
43:
44: \date{June 16, 2002} % any date may be explicitly specified
45:
46: \begin{abstract}
47: In order to achieve
48: a high quality, i. e. monoergetic, intense ion beam,
49: we propose the use of a double layer target.
50: The first layer, at the target front, consists of high-Z atoms,
51: while the second (rear) layer is a thin coating of low-Z atoms.
52: The high quality proton beams from the double layer target,
53: irradiated by an ultra-intense laser pulse,
54: are demonstrated with three dimensional Particle-in-Cell simulations.
55: \end{abstract}
56:
57: \pacs{52.50.Jm, 52.59.-f, 52.65.Rr}
58:
59: \keywords{Ion acceleration, monoenergetic ion beams,
60: laser plasma interaction, Particle-in-Cell simulation}
61:
62: \maketitle
63:
64: \begin{figure}
65: \includegraphics{fig-1s.eps}
66: \caption{\label{fig:E}
67: Electric field near the target is shown as the 3D vector field,
68: the length of each vector corresponds to the magnitude of electric field.
69: Vectors with $|eE_x/(m_e\omega c)|\le 1$ are violet.
70: The laser pulse is presented by isosurfaces of the transverse component
71: $E_z$ corresponding to dimensionless values $\pm 10$.
72: The time unit is the laser period $2\pi /\omega$.}
73: \end{figure}
74:
75: \begin{figure}
76: \includegraphics{fig-2s.eps}
77: \caption{\label{fig:Z}
78: Plasma species.
79: The envelopes of
80: heavy ions (thick red shell) and
81: light ions (thin blue shell) are shown.
82: Electron density is shown as a `green gas'
83: using ray tracing technique.}
84: \end{figure}
85:
86: \begin{figure}
87: \includegraphics{fig-3s.eps}
88: \caption{\label{fig:spectra}
89: The proton (blue) and heavy ion (red) energy spectra at $t=80\cdot 2\pi /\omega$.}
90: \end{figure}
91:
92: The high efficiency of ion acceleration recently observed in the
93: interaction of petawatt laser pulses \cite{Mourou98} with solid
94: targets \cite{ions1} has lead to important applications such as
95: the use of laser produced fast ion beam injection to conventional
96: accelerators (see Ref. \cite{injector-00}), the fast ignition of
97: thermonuclear targets, as discussed in Refs. \cite{Roth01}, and
98: hadrontherapy in oncology
99: \cite{BKh}.
100: Laser accelerated protons have been used
101: for proton imaging of small scale objects
102: in laser produced plasmas
103: with high time resolution \cite{Borghesi}.
104: The process of ion
105: acceleration has been studied in detail with multi-dimensional
106: Particle-in-Cell (PIC) simulations \cite{Es99}.
107: In the recent
108: experimental results presented in Refs. \cite{ions1},
109: electron
110: energy in a range of hundreds of MeV was observed, while
111: the proton energy was about tens of MeV with a number of fast
112: protons from $10^{12}$ to $10^{13}$ per pulse and with the transformation of
113: $12\%$ of the laser energy into fast
114: ion energy.
115: In Refs. \cite{Es99} it was shown with PIC simulations
116: that, by optimizing the laser-target parameters, it becomes
117: possible to accelerate protons up to several
118: hundreds MeV with a number of fast ions approximately
119: $10^{13}$ particles per pulse.
120:
121: The typical energy spectrum of laser accelerated particles
122: observed both in the experiments and in the computer simulations
123: can be approximated by a quasi-thermal distribution with a cut-off
124: at a maximum energy ${\cal E}_{\max}$.
125: The effective temperature
126: $T$, that may be attributed to the fast ion beams,
127: is much less than the maximal energy.
128: On the other hand, almost all above mentioned applications
129: require high quality proton beams, i.e., beams with sufficiently
130: small energy spread $\Delta {\cal E}/{\cal E}$.
131: For example, for the hadron therapy it is highly desirable
132: to have a proton beam with
133: $\Delta {\cal E}/{\cal E}\leq 2\%$ in order to provide the
134: conditions for a high irradiation dose being delivered to the
135: tumor saving neighboring healthy tissues \cite{KhM}.
136: In the concept of Fast Ignition with laser accelerated ions presented in
137: Refs. \cite{Roth01}, the proton beam was assumed to be
138: quasi-monoenergetic.
139: An analysis carried out in Ref. \cite{Atzeni}
140: has shown that the Fast Ignition with a
141: quasi-thermal beam of fast protons requires
142: several times larger energy
143: than that with a monoenergetic beam.
144: Similarly, in the case of the injector (see
145: Ref. \cite{injector-00}), a high-quality beam is needed in order
146: to inject the charged particles into the optimal
147: accelerating phase efficiently.
148: Thus we see that the generation of high
149: quality beams is a key problem for many applications.
150: However
151: energy spectra of the laser accelerated ions at present are rather
152: far from required ones.
153:
154: In this Letter we show with three dimensional (3D) PIC simulations that such a
155: required beam of laser accelerated ions can be obtained using a
156: double layer target (see also Refs. \cite{BKh}). Multi layer
157: targets have been used for a long time in order to increase the
158: efficiency of the laser energy conversion into plasma and fast
159: particle kinetic energy (see Refs. in \cite{Double}). In contrast to
160: the configurations discussed previously, we propose to use
161: a double layer target to produce fast proton beams with controlled
162: quality.
163:
164: In the proposed scheme the target is made of two layers.
165: The first layer consists of high-Z atoms (atomic mass $m_i$),
166: while the second layer is
167: a very thin coating of low-Z atoms (atomic mass $m_a$).
168: Such the target can be a metal foil
169: coated with a thin hydrogeneous film.
170: An ultra-intense laser pulse is incident on the first layer,
171: and so we say that the first layer is at the target front,
172: while the second layer is at the rear side of the target.
173: We use the term `longitudinal' for the direction of
174: propagation of the laser pulse, and the term `transverse'
175: for perpendicular directions.
176:
177: When an ultra-intense laser pulse irradiates the target,
178: heavy atoms are partly ionized and
179: electrons are expelled from the foil.
180: A quasi-static electric field is generated due to charge separation.
181: The first layer of heavy ions (the foil)
182: should be sufficiently thick so as to produce a large enough
183: quasi-static electric field, and, at the same time,
184: it should be sufficiently thin to be able to produce
185: strong electric field at the rear side.
186: Such an electric field has
187: opposite signs on the two sides of the target,
188: and vanishes inside the target and at some finite distance from it.
189: The number of low-Z ions in the second layer (the coating)
190: should be sufficiently small not to
191: produce any significant effect on the electric field.
192: The quasi-static electric field accelerates
193: both high-Z ions (with average charge $e Z_i$) and
194: low-Z ions (with average charge $e Z_a$).
195: If the ratio $m_i Z_a/(m_a Z_i)$ is sufficiently large,
196: light ions are accelerated much more efficiently than heavy ones.
197: The coated thin layer can be then accelerated forward.
198: It detaches from the foil, and moves as a whole
199: in the longitudinal direction.
200: The light ions within a small solid angle have a
201: quasi-monoenergetic energy spectrum.
202: The thinner the coating the narrower
203: energy spectrum of light ions is.
204:
205: The important requirement is that
206: the transverse size of the coating
207: must be smaller than the laser waist
208: since an inhomogeneity in the laser pulse causes
209: nonuniform accelerating electric field and thus a
210: degradation of beam quality, as seen in experiments presented
211: in Refs. \cite{ions1} where the exposed targets
212: had a thin proton layer on their surface.
213: The laser pulse inhomogeneity results in an additional energy spread of the ion
214: beam as seen in the experiments. The effect of the finite waist of the
215: laser pulse leads also to an undesirable defocusing of the fast
216: ion beam. In order to compensate for this effect and to focus the
217: ion beam, we can use properly deformed targets, as suggested in
218: Refs. \cite{Es99,W}.
219:
220: In a target, whose transverse size is much greater than the laser
221: focal spot,
222: quasi-static electric field can be affected
223: by background `cold' electrons from the periphery.
224: To increase the quality and life-time of the quasi-static electric field,
225: we should use targets with transverse size less than the laser waist.
226:
227: In order to estimate the typical energy gain of fast ions, we
228: assume that the main portion of the free electrons produced by ionization in
229: the irradiated region of the foil are expelled. In this case the
230: generated electric field near the positively charged layer is equal to
231: $E_{0} = 2\pi n_{0}e Z_{i} l$. Here $n_{0}$ is the ion density
232: and $e Z_{i}$ is an average ion electric charge in the foil,
233: and $l$ is the foil thickness.
234: The region of strong electric field has a transverse
235: size of the order of the diameter $2R_{\perp}$ of the focal spot.
236: Thus
237: the longitudinal size of the region where the electric field
238: remains essentially one-dimensional is of the order of
239: $R_{\perp }$
240: and the typical energy of an ion with charge $e Z_{a}$
241: accelerated by this electric field can be
242: estimated as ${\cal E}_{max} = 2\pi n_{0}Z_{a}Z_{i}e^{2}lR_{\perp}$.
243: We have assumed that the electron energy in the
244: laser field is well above the ion energy and larger than the
245: energy required for the electrons
246: to leave the irradiated region.
247: The maximum
248: electron energy in the electromagnetic wave is given by ${\cal
249: E}_{e} = m_{e}a^{2}/2$, where $a=eE/(m_{e}c\omega) $ is the
250: dimensionless amplitude of the laser pulse. From this condition we
251: can find the required value of the laser pulse intensity and its
252: power.
253:
254: Consider a double layer target in the form of a
255: prolate ellipsoid coated at the rear side
256: with a very thin proton layer.
257: We assume that ellipsoid semiaxes are $R_\perp$ and $l/2$.
258: We can estimate the energy spectrum of protons,
259: using formulae for the electric field of the
260: electrically charged prolate ellipsoid \cite{LLEDCM}.
261: Let the $x$-axis be in the longitudinal direction, originating
262: from the target center.
263: On this axis the $x$-component of the electric field is given by
264: $E_{x}(x) = (E_{0}/3) R_{\perp}^{2}/(R_{\perp}^{2}-(l/2)^{2}+x^{2})$.
265: The
266: distribution function of the
267: fast protons $f(x,v,t)$ obeys the kinetic equation
268: $\partial_{t}f+v\partial_{x}f+\left( eE(x)/m_{p}\right) \partial _{v}f=0$.
269: If particles trajectories do not intersect or self-intersect
270: (for our ellipsoidal target this it true),
271: we have $f(x,v,t)=f_{0}(x_{0},v_{0})$,
272: where $f_{0}(x_{0},v_{0})$ is the distribution
273: function at the initial time $t=0$.
274: The
275: number of particles per unit volume in
276: phase space, $dxdv$, is equal to $ dn=fdxdv=fvdvdt=f\ d{\cal E\ }dt/m_{p}.$ We
277: assume that at $t=0$ all particles are at rest and that their spatial
278: distribution is given by $ n_{0}(x_{0})$ which corresponds to the distribution
279: function $ f_{0}(x_{0},v_{0})=n_{0}(x_{0})\delta (v_{0})$, with $\delta
280: (v_{0})$ the Dirac delta function. For the applications discussed in this paper
281: we are interested in the particle distribution function integrated over time.
282: Time integration of the distribution $fvdvdt$ gives the energy spectrum of the
283: beam $N({\cal E})d{\cal E}=\left( n_{0}(x_{0})/m_{p}\right) \left|
284: dt/dv\right|_{v=v_{0}}d{\cal E}.$ Here the Lagrange coordinate of the particle
285: $x_{0}$ and the Jacobian $\left| dt/dv\right| _{v=v_{0}}$ are functions of the
286: particle energy ${\cal E}$. The Lagrange coordinate dependence on the energy
287: $x_{0}=x_{0}({\cal E})$ is given implicitly by the integral of the particle
288: motion: ${\cal E}(x,x_{0})={\cal E}_{0}+e[\varphi (x)-\varphi (x_{0})]$, where
289: $\varphi (x)$ is the electrostatic potential. In the case under consideration, we
290: have ${\cal E}_{0}=0$ and $x=\infty $. The Jacobian $\left| dt/dv\right|
291: _{v=v_{0}}$ is equal to the inverse of the particle acceleration at $t=0$, i.e.
292: $\left| dt/dv\right| _{v=v_{0}}=1/|eE_{x}(x_{0})|$. On the other hand the
293: function $|dt/dv|_{v=v_{0}}$ is equal to $|dx_{0}/d{\cal E}|$. Hence, we obtain
294: the expression for the energy spectrum in the form
295: \begin{equation} N({\cal E})d{\cal E}=
296: n_{0}(x_{0})d{\cal E}/|d{\cal E}/dx_{0}|_{x_{0}=x_{0}({\cal E})}. \label{N2}
297: \end{equation}
298: We notice that the expression for the energy spectrum follows
299: from the general condition of particle flux continuity in the
300: phase space.
301:
302: As we can see, in the vicinity of the target the
303: electric field on the axis is homogeneous and equals to
304: $E_{x}(l/2) = 2\pi n_{0}Z_{i}el/3$.
305: Therefore, the form of the energy spectrum
306: (\ref{N2}) is determined from the distribution of the proton density
307: $n_{0}(x=\varphi ^{-1}({\cal E}/e))$. We see that in general a
308: highly monoenergetic proton beam can be obtained when the function
309: $n_{0}(x_{0})$ is a strongly localized function, i.e. when the
310: thickness of the proton layer $\Delta x_{0}$ is sufficiently
311: small, and then $\Delta{\cal E}/{\cal E}\approx\Delta x_0/R_\perp$.
312:
313: The longitudinal emittance of the beam is defined as the product
314: of the energy spread $\Delta {\cal E}$ and the time length $\Delta
315: t$ of the beam: $ \epsilon _{||}=\Delta {\cal E}\Delta t$.
316: Using the expressions obtained above we find the longitudinal emittance
317: of the accelerated proton beam
318: $\epsilon_{||}=\left( \Delta x_{0}/R_{\perp }\right) ^{2}
319: \sqrt{m_{p}{\cal E}R_{\perp }^{2}/2}$.
320: For ${\cal E}=100$MeV, $R_{\perp }=5\mu$m
321: and $\Delta x_{0}/R_{\perp }=6\cdot 10^{-3}$ we obtain
322: $\epsilon_{||}\approx 1.3\cdot 10^{-4}$MeV~ps which
323: is about 150 times
324: smaller than the emittance observed in the experiments with
325: non-optimized targets in Ref. \cite{Roth02}.
326:
327: Near the axis, the radial component of the electric field depends
328: linearly on the radius $r =\sqrt{y^{2}+z^{2}}$:
329: $E_r(r) = ( E_{0} l / 6R_{\perp}^{2}) r$.
330: We find that the particle
331: trajectory is described by $r = r_{0}\exp (\sqrt{kx}),$
332: where $r_{0}$ is the initial radial coordinate of the particle
333: and $k=l/R_{\perp }^{2}$.
334: From
335: this expression, for
336: $l/R_{\perp }\ll 1$ we find the transverse emittance
337: $\epsilon_\perp=\pi r_{0}\Delta \theta $ of the fast proton beam:
338: $\epsilon_\perp=\pi r_{0}\sqrt{l/R_\perp}.$ Here
339: $r_{0}$ is the transverse size of the proton layer and $\Delta
340: \theta =\exp (\sqrt{kR_{\perp }})-1$ is the beam divergence angle.
341: For $r_{0}\approx 2.5\mu$m, $R_{\perp }=5\mu$m and
342: $l\approx 0.5\mu$m the transverse emittance is of the order
343: of 2.5~mm~mrad.
344:
345: For the hadron therapy
346: the particle flux must be approximately
347: $10^{10}$ to $5\cdot 10^{10}$ protons per second \cite{KhM}.
348: If the laser pulse is focused onto
349: a spot with diameter $10\mu$m,
350: CH layer with average density 1g/cm$^3$
351: and thickness $0.03 \mu$m
352: provides $10^{11}$ fast protons per pulse.
353:
354: In order to take into account the numerous nonlinear and kinetic effects as
355: well as to extend our consideration to a multidimensional geometry, we
356: performed numerical simulations of the proton acceleration during the
357: interaction of a short, high power laser pulse with a two-layer target. We
358: used the three dimensional massively parallel and fully vectorized code REMP
359: (Relativistic Electro-Magnetic Particle-mesh code) \cite{REMP}. In these
360: simulations the largest number of grid cells was $2560\times 1024\times 1024$
361: and the number of quasiparticles was up to $820\cdot 10^{6}$. The boundary
362: conditions for the particles and for the fields are periodic
363: in the transverse directions and correspond to absorption
364: at the ends of the computation box along the $x$ axis.
365: The simulations were performed on 64 processors of the vector supercomputer NEC
366: SX-5 at CMC, Osaka University.
367:
368: Here we present the results of these simulations.
369: The size of the simulation
370: box is $80\lambda \times 32\lambda \times 32\lambda $. A linearly polarized
371: laser pulse with dimensionless amplitude $a=30$ propagates along the $x$-axis.
372: The pulse size is $15\lambda \times 12\lambda \times 12\lambda $. The pulse
373: has a trapezoidal shape (growth-plateau-decrease), with $3\lambda -2\lambda
374: -10\lambda $ in the $x$-direction, and $1\lambda -10\lambda -1\lambda $
375: in the $y$- and $z$-directions. The plasma consists of three species:
376: electrons, protons with $m_{p}/m_{e}=1836$, and heavy ions (gold with
377: $Z_{i}=+2$) with $m_{i}/m_{e}Z_{i}=195.4\times 1836/2$.
378:
379: The first layer (gold) is placed at $x=5.5\lambda $. It has the
380: form of a disk with diameter $10\lambda $ and thickness
381: $0.5\lambda $. The second layer (protons) also has the form of a
382: disk with diameter $5\lambda $ and thickness $0.03\lambda $, and
383: is placed at the rear of the first layer, at $x=6\lambda $. The
384: electron density in the heavy ion layer corresponds to the ratio
385: $\omega _{pe}/\omega =3.0$ between the plasma and the laser
386: frequencies, for the proton layer it corresponds to
387: $\omega _{pe}/\omega=0.53$.
388: The number of electrons in the first layer is approximately
389: $2000$ times larger than that in the proton layer.
390:
391: The simulation results are shown in Figs. \ref{fig:E} to \ref{fig:spectra},
392: where the
393: coordinates are measured in wave lengths of the laser light and
394: the time in laser periods.
395: In Fig. \ref{fig:E} we present the electric field inside
396: the computation box, to show the shape of the transmitted laser pulse
397: and the longitudinal electric field accelerating the protons.
398: The electric field
399: is shown as a three-dimensional vector field;
400: it is localized in the vicinity of the first layer
401: (the layer of heavy ions) of the target and can be described as an electrostatic
402: field from a positively charged disk. The transmitted laser pulse is
403: presented by the isosurfaces of constant value of the
404: $z$-component of the electric field.
405: In Fig. \ref{fig:Z} we show the densities of plasma species
406: inside the computation box.
407: We see
408: that the proton layer moves along the $x$-axis and that the
409: distance between the two layers increases. The heavy ion layer
410: expands due to Coulomb explosion and tends to become rounded.
411: Part of the electrons is blown off by the laser pulse,
412: while the rest forms a
413: hot cloud around the target. We notice that for the
414: simulation parameters the electrons do not expelled from the region
415: irradiated by the laser light completely.
416: Even if only a portion
417: of the electrons is accelerated and heated by the laser pulse, the
418: induced quasi-static electric field appears to be strong enough to
419: accelerate the protons up $65~MeV$, as seen in
420: Fig. \ref{fig:spectra} presenting the energy
421: spectra of the protons and heavy ions.
422: The energy per nucleon
423: acquired by the heavy ions is approximately 380 times smaller than
424: the proton energy.
425: The heavy ions have a wide
426: energy spectrum while the protons form a quasi-mono-energetic
427: bunch with $\Delta {\cal E}/{\cal E}<5\%$.
428: We emphasize that the thinner the proton layer (or low-Z coating)
429: the better the beam quality is.
430: The proton beam
431: remains localized in space for a long time due to the bunching
432: effect of the linearly decreasing electric field in the acceleration direction.
433:
434: In conclusion, the use of the multi-layer targets with different
435: shapes and compositions opens up new opportunities for controlling
436: and optimizing the parameters of the fast proton (ion) beam,
437: such as
438: the energy spectrum, the number of particles per bunch,
439: the beam focusing and the size of the region where the
440: beam deposits its energy.
441:
442: \bigskip
443:
444: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
445: \bibitem{Mourou98} G. A. Mourou, C. P. J. Barty, M. D. Perry, Physics Today
446: {\bf 51}, 22 (1998).
447:
448: \bibitem{ions1} A. Maksimchuk, S. Gu, K. Flippo, D. Umstadter, et al.,
449: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 84}, 4108 (2000); E. L. Clark, K. Krushelnick, M. Zepf,
450: et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 85}, 1654 (2000); S. P. Hatchett, C. G. Brown, T.
451: E. Cowan, et al., Phys. Plasmas {\bf 7}, 2076 (2000); R. Snavely, M.H. Key,
452: S.P. Hatchett, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., {\bf 85}, 2945 (2000); A. J.
453: Mackinnon, M. Borghesi, S. Hatchett, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 86}, 1769
454: (2001).
455:
456: \bibitem{injector-00} K. Krushelnik, E.L. Clark, R. Allot, et al., IEEE
457: Trans. Plasma Science {\bf 28}, 1184 (2000).
458:
459: \bibitem{Roth01} M. Roth, T. E. Cowan, M. H. Key, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett.
460: {\bf 86}, 436 (2001); V. Yu. Bychenkov, V. Rozmus, A. Maksimchuk, D. Umstadter,
461: Plasma Phys. Rep. {\bf 27}, 1076 (2001).
462:
463: \bibitem{BKh} S. V. Bulanov, V. S. Khoroshkov, Plasma Phys. Rep. {\bf 28}%
464: , 453 (2002); S. V. Bulanov, T. Zh. Esirkepov, A. V. Kuznetsov, V. S.
465: Khoroshkov, F. Pegoraro, Phys. Lett. A, in press (2002).
466:
467: \bibitem{Borghesi} M. Borghesi et al, Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion {\bf %
468: 43}, A267 (2001); M. Borghesi et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 88}, 135002-1
469: (2002); M. Borghesi et al, Phys. Plasmas {\bf 9}, 2214 (2002).
470:
471: \bibitem{Es99} T. Zh. Esirkepov, Y. Sentoku, K. Mima, et al., JETP Lett.
472: {\bf 70}, 82 (1999); S. V. Bulanov, N. M. Naumova, T. Zh. Esirkepov, et al.,
473: JETP Lett. {\bf 71}, 407 (2000); Y. Sentoku, T. V. Lisseikina, T. Zh.
474: Esirkepov, et al., Phys. Rev. E {\bf 62}, 7271 (2000); H. Ruhl, S. V. Bulanov,
475: T. E. Cowan, et al., Plasma Phys. Rep. {\bf 27}, 411 (2001); A. M. Pukhov,
476: Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 86}, 3562 (2001); Y. Sentoku, V. Yu. Bychenkov, K.
477: Flippo, et al., Appl. Phys. B {\bf 74}, 207215 (2002); A. J. Mackinnon, Y.
478: Sentoku, P. K. Patel, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 88}, 215006-1 (2002).
479:
480: \bibitem{KhM} V. S. Khoroshkov, E. I. Minakova, Eur. J. Phys. {\bf 19},
481: 523 (1998); G. Kraft, Physica Medica - Vol. XVII, Supplement 1, p. 13
482: (2001); U. Amaldi, Physica Medica - Vol. XVII, Supplement 1, p. 33 (2001).
483:
484: \bibitem{Atzeni} S. Atzeni, M. Temporal, J.J. Honrubia, Nucl. Fusion
485: {\bf 42}, L1 (2002).
486:
487: \bibitem{Double} J . Badziak, E. Woryna, P. Parys, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett.
488: {\bf 86}, 215001 (2001).
489:
490: \bibitem{W} S. C. Wilks, A. B. Langdon, T. E. Cowan, et al., Phys. Plasmas
491: {\bf 8}, 542 (2001).
492:
493: \bibitem{Roth02} M. Roth, et al., in: Proceed. Second International
494: Conference on Superstrong Fields in Plasmas, Villa Monastero, Varenna (Lc),
495: Italy, August 27 - September 1, 2001// edited by M. Lontano et al. (American
496: Institute of Physics 0-7354-0057-1/02), p. 199.
497:
498: \bibitem{LLEDCM} L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshits, Electrodynamics of
499: Continouos Media (Pergamon. Oxford, 1988).
500:
501: \bibitem{REMP} T. Zh. Esirkepov, Comput. Phys. Comm. {\bf 135}, 144
502: (2001).
503: \end{thebibliography}
504:
505:
506:
507: \end{document}
508: