1: %cu-like. Sept.23, 2002
2: %\documentclass[aps,pra,showpacs,twocolumn,floatfix]{revtex4}
3: \documentclass[aps,pra,showpacs,twocolumn,floatfix]{revtex4}
4: %\documentclass[aps,pra]{revtex4}
5: \usepackage{graphicx}% Include figure files
6: \usepackage{dcolumn}% Align table columns on decimal point
7:
8:
9: \begin{document}
10:
11: \title{Relativistic many-body calculations of excitation energies
12: and transition rates from core-excited states
13: in copperlike ions}
14:
15: \author{U. I. Safronova and W. R. Johnson}
16: \affiliation{ Department of Physics, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46566}
17:
18: \author{A. Shlyaptseva and S. Hamasha}
19: \affiliation{Physics Department/220, University of Nevada, Reno, NV
20: 89557}
21:
22:
23:
24: \date{\today}% It is always \today, today,
25: % but any date may be explicitly specified
26:
27:
28:
29:
30: \begin{abstract}
31: Energies of $(3s^23p^63d^94l4l')$, $(3s^23p^53d^{10}4l4l')$, and
32: $(3s3p^63d^{10}4l4l')$ states for Cu-like ions with $Z$ = 30 -100
33: are evaluated to second order in relativistic many-body
34: perturbation theory (RMBPT) starting from a Ni-like Dirac-Fock potential.
35: Second-order Coulomb and Breit-Coulomb interactions are included.
36: Correction for the frequency-dependence of the Breit interaction
37: is taken into account in lowest order. The Lamb shift correction
38: to energies is also included in lowest order. Intrinsic
39: particle-particle-hole contributions to energies are found to be
40: 20-30\% of the sum of one- and two-body contributions. Transition rates and line
41: strengths are calculated for the $ 3l-4l'$
42: electric-dipole (E1)
43: transitions in Cu-like ions with nuclear charge $Z$ = 30 - 100.
44: RMBPT including the Breit interaction is used to evaluate retarded
45: E1 matrix elements in length and velocity forms. First-order
46: RMBPT is used to obtain intermediate coupling coefficients and
47: second-order RMBPT is used to calculate transition matrix
48: elements. A detailed discussion of the various contributions to
49: the dipole matrix elements and energy levels is given for
50: copperlike tungsten ($Z$ = 74). The transition energies used in
51: the calculation of oscillator strengths and transition rates are
52: from second-order RMBPT. Trends of the transition rates as
53: functions of $Z$ are illustrated graphically for selected
54: transitions.
55: Comparisons are
56: made with available experimental data.
57: These atomic data are important in modeling of M-shell
58: radiation spectra of heavy ions generated in electron beam ion trap
59: experiments and in M-shell diagnostics of plasmas.
60:
61: \end{abstract}
62:
63: \pacs{31.15.Ar, 31.15.Md, 31.25.Jf, 32.30.Rj}
64:
65: %31.15.Ar Ab-initio Calculations
66: %31.15.Md Perturbation Theory
67: %31.25.Jf Electron correlation calculations for atoms and ions: excited states
68: %32.30.Rj X-ray spectra
69:
70: %\keywords{Suggested keywords}%Use showkeys class option if
71: %keyword display desired
72:
73: \maketitle
74:
75:
76:
77:
78:
79: \section{Introduction}
80: This work further develops the application of the relativistic
81: many-body perturbation theory (RMBPT) to the studies of atomic characteristics of
82: particle-particle-hole excitations of closed-shell ions.
83: Recently, RMBPT calculations of energies \cite{na-en} and transition rates
84: \cite{na-tr} in Na-like ions have been performed.
85: The present paper focuses on the RMBPT calculations of energies and
86: transition rates in Cu-like ions.
87: These transitions form satellite lines to the brightest Ni-like ions and
88: are of a great importance for M-shell diagnostics of heavy ions.
89:
90: The second-order RMBPT calculations for Cu-like ions start from a
91: $1s^22s^22p^63s^23p^63d^{10}$ [Ni] Dirac-Fock potential.
92: All possible $3l$ holes and $4l4l'$ particles leading to 563
93: odd-parity and 571 even-parity $3l^{-1}4l'4l"(J)$ states are considered.
94: The energies of the 1134 states and transition probabilities
95: of the 2294 electric-dipole lines are calculated for Cu-like ions
96: with $Z$ = 30-100. Transitions from the $(3s^23p^63d^94l4l')$,
97: $(3s^23p^53d^{10}4l4l')$, and $(3s3p^63d^{10}4l4l')$ states to the
98: ground ($3s^23p^63d^{10}4s$) or singly excited
99: ($3s^23p^63d^{10}4l$) states (with $l=p, d, f$) form satellite
100: lines to the bright electric-dipole (E1) lines in Ni-like ions.
101: These core-excited states
102: (or often called doubly-excited states) in copperlike ions have been
103: studied extensively both experimentally and theoretically in the
104: past 15-20 years.
105:
106: Experimentally, these configurations
107: have been studied by photon and electron emission spectroscopy.
108: To our knowledge, the first measurements of $3d-4p$ transitions in Cu-like W and Tm
109: were done by ~\citet{cu1} by classification of
110: x-ray spectra from laser
111: produced plasmas in the range 6 - 9 \AA. It was shown
112: that most of the Cu-like $3d-4p$ line radiation
113: came from $(3s^23p^63d^{10}4s-3s^23p^63d^94s4p)$,
114: $(3s^23p^63d^{10}4p-3s^23p^63d^94p^2)$,
115: $(3s^23p^63d^{10}4d-3s^23p^63d^94p4d)$, and
116: $(3s^23p^63d^{10}4f-3s^23p^63d^94p4f)$ transitions.
117: Wavelengths and transition probabilities were calculated in ~\cite{cu1}
118: by the relativistic parametric potential method ~\cite{RPPM}.
119: The same method was extended by ~\citet{klapisch} to study x-ray
120: spectra from laser produced plasmas of atoms from Tm ($Z$ = 69) up
121: to Pt ($Z$ = 78). An extended analysis of x-ray spectra of laser
122: produced gold plasmas has been performed by ~\citet{luc} including
123: $3d-4f$, $3d-4p$, and $3p-4s$ transitions in Ni-, Co-, Cu-, Zn-,
124: and Ga-like Au. The Ni-, Co-, Cu-, Zn-, Ga-, Ge-, and As-like
125: isoelectronic sequences have been considered in Ref.~\cite{wyart}
126: to investigate the x-ray spectra of laser-irradiated elements from
127: tantalum ($Z$ = 73) to lead ($Z$ = 82). In addition to the above
128: mentioned isoelectronic sequences, the Fe- and Mn-like states have
129: been included by ~\citet{zigler} to analyze x-ray spectra emmited
130: by laser-produced plasmas of lanthanum ($Z$ = 57) and praseodymium
131: ($Z$ = 59). The wavelengths and transition probabilities have been
132: calculated in ~\cite{luc,wyart,zigler}
133: by the relativistic parametric potential method ~\cite{RPPM}.
134: Investigation of the x-ray spectrum emitted by laser produced barium
135: plasmas has been recently described by ~\citet{doron-ba,doron-pra98}.
136: The RELAC relativistic atomic
137: code ~\cite{RPPM} has been used to identify $3d-nl$ ($n$ = 4 to 8),
138: $3p-4s$, and $3p-4d$ transitions of Ni-like Ba$^{28+}$ and
139: corresponding satellite transitions in neighboring ionization
140: states: Fe-, Co-, Cu-, Zn-, Ga-, and Ge-like ions.
141: The X-ray spectrum emitted by a laser produced cerium plasma in the range
142: 7.5 - 12 \AA~ has been recently investigated in detail by ~\citet{doron-pra,doron-scr}.
143: The RELAC computer code
144: ~\cite{RPPM} has been used to study x-ray spectra from highly charged
145: tungsten ions in tokamak plasmas in the range 7 - 10 \AA~
146: \cite{fourner}.
147: %Refs.~\cite{w-pra,w-scr,recomb,china}.
148:
149: In the present paper, RMBPT is implemented to determine energies of
150: $(3s^23p^63d^94l4l')$, $(3s^23p^53d^{10}4l4l')$, and
151: $(3s3p^63d^{10}4l4l')$ states for Cu-like ions with nuclear
152: charges in the range of $Z$ = 30 --100. The calculations are
153: carried out to second order in perturbation theory and include
154: second-order Coulomb and Breit interactions. Corrections for the
155: frequency-dependent Breit interaction are taken into account in
156: the lowest order. Screened self-energy and vacuum polarization
157: data given by \citet{kim} are used to
158: determine the QED correction.
159:
160:
161: RMBPT is used to evaluate matrix elements, line strengths, and
162: transition rates for 2294 allowed and forbidden electric-dipole
163: transitions between the 1332 even-parity core-excited states
164: [Ni]($3d^{-1}+3s^{-1})(4s^2+4s4d+4p^2+4d^2+4p4f+4f^2)$ +
165: [Ni]($3p^{-1})(4s4p+4s4f+4p4d+4d4f)$, and the singly excited
166: [Ni]($4p+4f$) states and the 962 odd-parity core-excited states
167: [Ni]($3p^{-1})(4s^2+4s4d+4p^2+4d^2+4p4f+4f^2)$ +
168: [Ni]($3d^{-1}+3s^{-1})(4s4p+4s4f+4p4d+4d4f)$ and the ground state
169: [Ni]($4s$) together with the singly excited [Ni]($4d$) states in
170: Cu-like ions with nuclear charges ranging from $Z$ = 30 to 100.
171: Retarded E1 matrix elements are
172: evaluated in both length and velocity forms. These calculations
173: start from a [Ni] Dirac-Fock potential. First-order perturbation
174: theory is used to obtain intermediate coupling coefficients and
175: second-order RMBPT is used to determine transition matrix
176: elements. The transition energies employed in the calculations of line
177: strengths and transition rates are derived from second-order
178: RMBPT.
179:
180:
181: \begin{table*}
182: \caption{\label{tab-e2}
183: Second-order contributions to the energy matrices
184: (a.u.)\
185: for odd-parity states with
186: $J$=1/2 in the case of Cu-like tungsten, $Z$=74. One-body,
187: two-body, ant three-body second-order Coulomb contributions
188: are given in columns labelled $E^{(2)}_{1}$, $E^{(2)}_{2}$, and
189: $E^{(2)}_{3}$, respectively.}
190: \begin{ruledtabular}
191: \begin{tabular}{llrrrr}
192: \multicolumn{1}{c}{$4l_{1}j_{1}4l_{2}j_{2}[J_{12}]3l_{3}$}&
193: \multicolumn{1}{c}{$4l_{1}j_{1}4l_{2}j_{2}[J_{12}]3l_{3}$}&
194: \multicolumn{1}{c}{$E^{(2)}_{1}$}&
195: \multicolumn{1}{c}{$E^{(2)}_{2}$}&
196: \multicolumn{1}{c}{$E^{(2)}_{3}$}&
197: \multicolumn{1}{c}{$E^{(2)}_{\rm tot}$\rule{0ex}{2.3ex}}\\
198: \hline
199: $4s_{1/2}4p_{1/2}(1)3d_{3/2}$&$4s_{1/2}4p_{1/2}(1)3d_{3/2}$& -0.247886& 0.104563& 0.025088& -0.118235\\
200: $4s_{1/2}4p_{3/2}(2)3d_{5/2}$&$4s_{1/2}4p_{3/2}(2)3d_{5/2}$& -0.226244& 0.113517& 0.020801& -0.091926\\
201: $4s_{1/2}4p_{3/2}(1)3d_{3/2}$&$4s_{1/2}4p_{3/2}(1)3d_{3/2}$& -0.237415& 0.076978& 0.029703& -0.130734\\
202: $4s_{1/2}4p_{3/2}(2)3d_{3/2}$&$4s_{1/2}4p_{3/2}(2)3d_{3/2}$& -0.237415& 0.124305& 0.021436& -0.091674\\
203: $4p_{1/2}4d_{3/2}(2)3d_{5/2}$&$4p_{1/2}4d_{3/2}(2)3d_{5/2}$& -0.240289& 0.122424& 0.028030& -0.089836\\
204: $4p_{1/2}4d_{5/2}(2)3d_{5/2}$&$4p_{1/2}4d_{5/2}(2)3d_{5/2}$& -0.236161& 0.031594& 0.009588& -0.194980\\
205: $4p_{1/2}4d_{5/2}(3)3d_{5/2}$&$4p_{1/2}4d_{5/2}(3)3d_{5/2}$& -0.236161& 0.001311& -0.002282& -0.237132\\
206: $4p_{1/2}4d_{3/2}(1)3d_{3/2}$&$4p_{1/2}4d_{3/2}(1)3d_{3/2}$& -0.251460& 0.040039& 0.036490& -0.174931\\
207: $4p_{1/2}4d_{3/2}(2)3d_{3/2}$&$4p_{1/2}4d_{3/2}(2)3d_{3/2}$& -0.251460& 0.060163& 0.026395& -0.164902\\
208: $4s_{1/2}4f_{5/2}(2)3d_{5/2}$&$4s_{1/2}4f_{5/2}(2)3d_{5/2}$& -0.229530& 0.067699& 0.039638& -0.122194\\
209: \end{tabular}
210: \end{ruledtabular}
211: \end{table*}
212:
213:
214:
215: \begin{table*}
216: \caption{\label{tab-e4} Energies of selected odd-parity levels with
217: $J$=1/2 of Cu-like tungsten, $Z$=74 in
218: a.u. $E^{(0+1)} \equiv E_{0} + E_{1} + B_{1}$. }
219: \begin{ruledtabular}
220: \begin{tabular}{lrrrrr}
221: \multicolumn{1}{c} {$jj$ coupling} &
222: \multicolumn{1}{c}{$E^{(0+1)}$} &
223:
224: \multicolumn{1}{c}{$ B_{1} $}&
225: \multicolumn{1}{c}{$ E_{2} $} &
226: \multicolumn{1}{c}{$E_{\rm LAMB}$}&
227:
228: \multicolumn{1}{c}{$E_{\rm tot}$\rule{0ex}{2.3ex}}\\
229: \hline
230: $4s_{1/2}4p_{1/2}(1)3d_{3/2}$& -25.954298& -0.013561& -0.112483& 0.069035& -26.011307\\
231: $4s_{1/2}4p_{3/2}(2)3d_{5/2}$& -24.879634& -0.005093& -0.090398& 0.065104& -24.910021\\
232: $4s_{1/2}4p_{3/2}(1)3d_{3/2}$& -22.639268& -0.054704& -0.090313& 0.073682& -22.710603\\
233: $4s_{1/2}4p_{3/2}(2)3d_{3/2}$& -21.914637& -0.057899& -0.125159& 0.073518& -22.024177\\
234: $4p_{1/2}4d_{3/2}(2)3d_{5/2}$& -16.127594& 0.032360& -0.088446& -0.001127& -16.184807\\
235: $4p_{1/2}4d_{5/2}(2)3d_{5/2}$& -14.892864& -0.001171& -0.108506& 0.001320& -15.001221\\
236: $4p_{1/2}4d_{5/2}(3)3d_{5/2}$& -14.149853& 0.000699& -0.136464& 0.003373& -14.282246\\
237: $4p_{1/2}4d_{3/2}(1)3d_{3/2}$& -13.066261& -0.033638& -0.123168& 0.007346& -13.215720\\
238: $4p_{1/2}4d_{3/2}(2)3d_{3/2}$& -12.799288& -0.034773& -0.108188& 0.050678& -12.891570\\
239: $4s_{1/2}4f_{5/2}(2)3d_{5/2}$& -12.654131& -0.048963& -0.119286& 0.050671& -12.771709\\
240: \end{tabular}
241: \end{ruledtabular}
242: \end{table*}
243:
244: \begin{table*}
245: \caption{Uncoupled reduced matrix elements in length $L$ and
246: velocity $V$ forms for transitions between the selected odd-parity
247: core-excited states with $J$ = 1/2 and the ground $4s$ and
248: singly excited $4d_{3/2}$ states in W$^{45+}$ ion.}
249: \begin{ruledtabular}\begin{tabular}{lrrrrrrrr}
250: \multicolumn{1}{c}{$4lj4l'j'(J_1)3l''j''$}&
251: \multicolumn{1}{c}{$Z^{(1)}_L$} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{$Z^{(1)}_V$}
252: & \multicolumn{1}{c}{$Z^{(2)}_L$} &
253: \multicolumn{1}{c}{$Z^{(2)}_V$} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{$B^{(2)}_L$}
254: & \multicolumn{1}{c}{$B^{(2)}_V$} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{$P^{(\rm
255: derv)}_L$} &
256: \multicolumn{1}{c}{$P^{(\rm derv)}_V$}\\[0.25pc]
257: \hline
258: \multicolumn{9}{c} {[$4lj4l'j'(J_1)3l''j''\ (1/2)$-- $4s_{1/2}$] transitions} \\
259: \hline
260: $4s_{1/2}4p_{1/2}(1)3d_{3/2}$& 0.047738& 0.044870& 0.002168&-0.000123&-0.000050& 0.001693& 0.047424& 0.000014\\
261: $4s_{1/2}4p_{3/2}(2)3d_{5/2}$& 0.052275& 0.049040& 0.003284& 0.000010&-0.000034& 0.002425& 0.051930&-0.000079\\
262: $4s_{1/2}4f_{5/2}(2)3d_{5/2}$& 0.041125& 0.038959&-0.001778& 0.000268& 0.000087&-0.000826& 0.041123& 0.000270\\
263: $4s_{1/2}4f_{5/2}(3)3d_{5/2}$& 0.034757& 0.032927&-0.001517& 0.000227& 0.000074&-0.000842& 0.034756& 0.000225\\
264: $4s_{1/2}4d_{3/2}(1)3p_{1/2}$&-0.067725&-0.064364& 0.000594& 0.000439&-0.000594& 0.000216&-0.066887&-0.000685\\
265: $4s_{1/2}4p_{3/2}(1)3s_{1/2}$&-0.043751&-0.041541&-0.017203& 0.000579&-0.000761&-0.015917&-0.042845&-0.000890\\
266: \hline
267: \multicolumn{9}{c} {[$4lj4l'j'(J_1)3l''j''\ (1/2)$-- $4d_{3/2}$] transitions} \\
268: \hline
269: $4p_{1/2}4d_{3/2}(2)3d_{3/2}$& 0.046223& 0.043446& 0.002084&-0.000119&-0.000054& 0.001629& 0.045918& 0.000010\\
270: $4p_{3/2}4d_{3/2}(3)3d_{5/2}$& 0.048898& 0.045873& 0.002691& 0.000010&-0.000028& 0.002093& 0.048576&-0.000065\\
271: $4s_{1/2}4d_{3/2}(2)3p_{3/2}$& 0.062272& 0.058739& 0.001399&-0.000036& 0.000201& 0.001391& 0.061840& 0.000223\\
272: $4d_{3/2}4f_{7/2}(2)3d_{5/2}$& 0.189383& 0.179458&-0.008551&-0.001590& 0.000298&-0.003992& 0.187961& 0.000470\\
273: $4d_{3/2}4f_{7/2}(3)3d_{5/2}$&-0.146695&-0.139008& 0.006235& 0.001231&-0.000236& 0.003225&-0.145594&-0.000376\\
274: $4d_{3/2}4f_{5/2}(1)3d_{3/2}$& 0.146008& 0.138475&-0.007222&-0.000623& 0.000324&-0.003488& 0.145197& 0.000535\\
275: \end{tabular}\end{ruledtabular}
276: \label{tab-uncl}
277: \end{table*}
278:
279: \begin{table}
280: \caption{Line strengths (a.u.) calculated in length $L$ and
281: velocity $V$ forms for transitions between the selected odd-parity
282: core-excited states with $J$ = 1/2 and the ground $4s$ and
283: singly excited $4d_{3/2}$ states in W$^{45+}$ ion.}
284: \begin{ruledtabular}\begin{tabular}{lrrrrrrrr}
285: \multicolumn{1}{c}{}&
286: \multicolumn{2}{c}{First order}& \multicolumn{2}{c}{RMBPT}\\
287: \multicolumn{1}{c}{Upper level}& \multicolumn{1}{c}{$L$} &
288: \multicolumn{1}{c}{$V$} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{$L$} &
289: \multicolumn{1}{c}{$V$} \\[0.25pc]
290: \hline
291: \multicolumn{5}{c} {[$4lj4l'j'(J_1)3l''j''\ (1/2)$-- $4s_{1/2}$] transitions} \\
292: \hline
293: $4s_{1/2}4p_{1/2}(1)3d_{3/2}$& 0.002056& 0.001818& 0.002152& 0.002151\\
294: $4p_{3/2}4d_{3/2}(2)3d_{5/2}$& 0.019622& 0.017609& 0.017775& 0.017794\\
295: $4s_{1/2}4f_{5/2}(2)3d_{3/2}$& 0.004205& 0.003780& 0.003862& 0.003865\\
296: $4p_{3/2}4d_{3/2}(2)3d_{3/2}$& 0.071111& 0.063933& 0.065253& 0.065476\\
297: $4s_{1/2}4d_{5/2}(2)3p_{3/2}$& 0.009202& 0.008321& 0.009124& 0.009165\\
298: $4p_{3/2}4p_{3/2}(2)3p_{3/2}$& 0.001041& 0.000942& 0.001092& 0.001093\\
299: \hline
300: \multicolumn{5}{c} {[$4lj4l'j'(J_1)3l''j''\ (1/2)$-- $4d_{3/2}$] transitions} \\
301: \hline
302: $4s_{1/2}4d_{3/2}(2)3p_{3/2}$& 0.003858& 0.003437& 0.004065& 0.004078\\
303: $4d_{3/2}4f_{7/2}(3)3d_{5/2}$& 0.006774& 0.006079& 0.006224& 0.006230\\
304: $4d_{5/2}4f_{5/2}(3)3d_{5/2}$& 0.014631& 0.013129& 0.013505& 0.013423\\
305: $4p_{1/2}4p_{1/2}(0)3p_{1/2}$& 0.003732& 0.003355& 0.003401& 0.003407\\
306: $4d_{5/2}4f_{5/2}(1)3d_{3/2}$& 0.057817& 0.051983& 0.052786& 0.052932\\
307: $4d_{5/2}4f_{7/2}(2)3d_{3/2}$& 0.006813& 0.006127& 0.006215& 0.006210\\
308: \end{tabular}
309: \end{ruledtabular}
310: \label{tab-str}
311: \end{table}
312:
313:
314:
315: \section{Method}
316: Details of the RMBPT method were presented in Ref.~\cite{na-en}
317: for calculation of energies of particle-particle-hole states and
318: in Ref.~\cite{na-tr} for calculation of radiative transition rates
319: from particle-particle-hole state to one-particle state.
320: Differences between calculations for Na-like and Cu-like ions are
321: due to the increased size of the model space ($4l'4l''3l^{-1}$
322: instead of $3l'3l''2l^{-1}$) and differences in the Dirac-Fock
323: potential ($1s^22s^22p^63s^23p^63d^{10}$ instead of
324: $1s^22s^22p^6$), leading to 1134 states instead of 106 and more
325: laborious numerical calculations.
326:
327: As a first step, we determine and store the single-particle
328: contributions to the energies for five $n$=3 hole states ($3s$,
329: $3p_{1/2}$, $3p_{3/2}$, $3d_{3/2}$, and $3d_{5/2}$) and the
330: seven $n$=4 valence states ($4s$, $4p_{1/2}$, $4p_{3/2}$,
331: $4d_{3/2}$, $4d_{5/2}$, $4f_{5/2}$, and $4f_{7/2}$) in lowest,
332: first, and second orders.
333: Next, we
334: evaluate and store the 664 two-particle $\langle 4l 4l'\: J |
335: H^{\rm eff} |4l''4l''' \: J \rangle$ matrix elements and the 1127
336: hole-particle $\langle 3l 4l'\: J | H^{\rm eff} |3l''4l''' \: J
337: \rangle$ matrix elements of the effective Hamiltonian in first
338: and second orders. It should be noted that these one-particle,
339: two-particle, and hole-particle matrix elements were used
340: previously to evaluate energies of the $4l4l'$ levels in Zn-like
341: ions \cite{saf1} and energies of the $3l^{-1}4l'$ levels in
342: Ni-like ions \cite{ni}. Finally, second-order
343: particle-particle-hole matrix elements are evaluated \cite{na-en}.
344: Combining these data using the method described below, we calculate
345: one-, two-, and three-body contributions to the energies of
346: Cu-like ions.
347:
348: The calculations are carried out using sets of basis
349: Dirac-Hartree-Fock (DHF) orbitals. The orbitals used in the
350: present calculation are obtained as linear combinations of
351: B-splines. These B-spline basis orbitals are determined using the
352: method described in Ref.~\cite{2wrj}. Forty B-splines of order
353: of eight for each single-particle angular momentum state are used and
354: all orbitals with orbital angular momentum $l \leq 7$ are included in the basis
355: set.
356:
357:
358:
359:
360:
361: \subsection{Model space}
362: The model space for core-excited $4l4l'3l^{-1}$ states of
363: copperlike ions includes 563 odd-parity states consisting of 78
364: $J$=1/2 states, 131 $J$=3/2 states, 143 $J$=5/2 states, 125
365: $J$=7/2 states, and 86 $J$=9/2 states. Additionally, there are 571
366: even-parity states consisting of 78 $J$=1/2 states, 131 $J$=3/2
367: states, 148 $J$=5/2 states, 125 $J$=7/2 states, and 89 $J$=9/2
368: states. The distribution of some of the 1134 states in the model
369: space is summarized in Table I of the accompanying EPAPS document
370: \cite{EPAPS}.
371: % Instead of using the $4l'4l''[J_{1}]3l^{-1}(J)$ designations,
372: % we use simpler
373: %designations $4l'4l''[J_{1}]3l(J)$ in this table. The same
374: %($4l'4l''3l$) designations are used for simplicity in all
375: %following tables and the text below.
376:
377:
378: \subsection{Energy-matrix elements }
379:
380: The evaluation of the second-order energies for the
381: $4l4l'(J_{1})3l''\ (J)$ states in Cu-like ions follows the pattern
382: of the corresponding calculation for Zn-like and Ni-like ions
383: given in Refs.~\cite{saf1,ni}. In particular, we use the
384: second-order one- and two-particle matrix elements for Zn-like
385: ions calculated in \cite{saf1} and hole-particle matrix elements
386: for Ni-like ions calculated in \cite{ni}, but recoupled as
387: described below, to obtain the one- and two-particle contributions
388: for Cu-like ions.
389: We will discuss how these matrix
390: elements are combined to obtain the one- and two-particle
391: contributions to energies of Cu-like ions. We refer the reader to
392: Ref.~\cite{saf1,ni} for a discussion of the how the basic one- and
393: two-particle matrix elements were evaluated. An intrinsic
394: particle-particle-hole diagram also contributes to the
395: second-order energy for Cu-like ions. It should be noted that the
396: angular part of the expression for the particle-particle-hole
397: diagram differs from the corresponding expression for the
398: three-particle matrix elements given in Ref.~\cite{bor2}. A
399: detailed discussion of this difference is given in
400: Ref.~\cite{na-en}.
401:
402:
403:
404:
405: Table~\ref{tab-e2} (see also Table II of \cite{EPAPS})
406: provides an illustration of various contributions to the second-order energies for the
407: special case of Cu-like tungsten, $Z$ = 74. In this table, we show
408: the one-body, two-body and three-body second-order Coulomb
409: contributions to the energy matrix labelled as $E^{(2)}_{i}$, $i$ = 1, 2, 3,
410: The one-body second-order energy, $E^{(2)}_{1}$ is
411: obtained as the sum of the two valence and one hole $E^{(2)}_v$
412: energies. The values of $E^{(2)}_{1}$ are non-zero only for
413: diagonal matrix elements. Even for odd-parity states with $J$=1/2
414: there are 78 diagonal and 6006 non-diagonal matrix elements for
415: $4l4l'(J_{1})3l''\ (J)$ core-excited states.
416: We list data only for the first ten diagonal matrix elements
417: of odd-parity states with $J$=1/2 in
418: Table~\ref{tab-e2} (a more complete set of data is given in Table
419: II of \cite{EPAPS}). It can be seen from the table that two-body
420: and three-body second-order contributions are positive, when the
421: one-body contributions are negative.
422: The three-body contributions give about 20\% in the
423: total second-order contributions. The values of
424: the $E^{(2)}_{3}$ and $E^{(2)}_{2}$ non-diagonal contributions
425: are smaller than values of diagonal contributions by factor of 3-5.
426:
427:
428: After evaluating the energy matrices, eigenvalues and eigenvectors
429: are calculated for states with given values of $J$ and parity.
430: There are two possible methods to carry out the diagonalization:
431: (a) diagonalize the sum of zeroth- and first-order matrices,
432: then calculate the second-order contributions using the resulting
433: eigenvectors; or (b) diagonalize the sum of the zeroth-, first-
434: and second-order matrices together. Following Ref.~\cite{bor2},
435: we choose the second method here.
436:
437: Table \ref{tab-e4} lists the energies of ten
438: excited states of W$^{45+}$ from Table \ref{tab-e2}
439: including the total energies $E_{\rm {tot}}$. The latter is the sum of
440: the following contributions: $E^{(0+1)}$ =
441: $E^{(0)}$ +$E^{(1)}$+$B^{(1)}$, the second-order Coulomb and Breit
442: energy $E^{(2)}$, and the QED correction $E_{\rm {LAMB}}$. The QED correction is
443: approximated as the sum of the one-electron self energy and the
444: first-order vacuum-polarization energy. The screened self-energy
445: and vacuum polarization data given by Kim {\it et al.\/}
446: \cite{kim} are used to determine the QED correction $E_{\rm
447: {LAMB}}$ (see, for detail Ref.~\cite{na-en}). As can be seen,
448: the second order correction contributes to the total energy
449: from 0.4 \% for lowest levels up to 8 \% for high-excited levels.
450: The levels in this table (see also Table III of
451: \cite{EPAPS}) could be divided into groups corresponding to
452: excited $4l4l'$ states and $3l$ hole states.
453:
454: \begin{figure}[tbp]
455: \centerline{\includegraphics[scale=0.35]{fig1.eps}}
456: \caption{Weighted transition rates between core-excited odd-parity
457: states with $J$ = 1/2 and $4s\ ^2S_{1/2}$ states as function of
458: $Z$ in Cu-like ions.} \label{od1}
459: \end{figure}
460:
461:
462:
463: \begin{figure}[tbp]
464: \centerline{\includegraphics[scale=0.4]{fig2.eps}}
465: \caption{Weighted transition rates between core-excited
466: even-parity states with $J$ = 1/2 and $4p\ ^2P_{3/2}$ states as
467: function of $Z$ in Cu-like ions. } \label{ev1}
468: \end{figure}
469:
470: \begin{table*}
471: \caption{Wavelengths ($\lambda$ in \AA) and transition rates
472: ($A_r$ in $s^{-1}$) for transitions from core-excited states $QJ$
473: ($Q = 4lj4l'j'(J_1)3l''j''$) to the the ground $4s$ and
474: singly excited $4p_{1/2}$ states in W$^{45+}$ ion. Comparison with
475: theoretical data obtained by using {\sc cowan} code from
476: Ref.~\protect\cite{cowan}.
477: Numbers in brackets represent powers of 10.}
478: \begin{ruledtabular}\begin{tabular}{lrrrrrl}
479: \multicolumn{1}{c} {$jj$ coupling} & \multicolumn{1}{c} {$\lambda_{\rm
480: MCDF}$}& \multicolumn{1}{c} {$\lambda_{\rm RMBPT}$}&
481: \multicolumn{1}{c} {$A_{r}^{\rm RMBPT}$}& \multicolumn{1}{c}
482: {$\lambda_{\sc cowan}$}&
483: \multicolumn{1}{c} {$A_{r}^{\sc cowan}$}&
484: {$LS$ coupling}\\
485: \hline
486: \multicolumn{6}{c} {[$4lj4l'j'(J_1)3l''j''$-- $4s_{1/2}$] transitions} \\
487: $4p_{3/2}4d_{3/2}(1)3d_{5/2}$& 5.919& 5.9248& 2.763[14]& 5.9110& 3.020[14]& $4s4f3d(^3D)\ ^4D_{3/2}$\\
488: $4p_{3/2}4d_{3/2}(2)3d_{5/2}$& 5.912& 5.9200& 1.735[14]& 5.9069& 1.786[14]& $4s4f3d(^3D)\ ^4D_{1/2}$\\
489: $4s_{1/2}4f_{7/2}(3)3d_{3/2}$& 5.752& 5.7589& 1.863[14]& 5.7578& 1.832[14]& $4p4d3d(^3P)\ ^4F_{3/2}$\\
490: $4p_{3/2}4d_{3/2}(0)3d_{3/2}$& 5.744& 5.7512& 2.824[14]& 5.7501& 3.295[14]& $4p4d3d(^3P)\ ^4F_{3/2}$\\
491: $4p_{3/2}4d_{3/2}(2)3d_{3/2}$& 5.718& 5.7291& 7.026[14]& 5.7274& 7.954[14]& $4s4f3d(^3D)\ ^2P_{1/2}$\\
492: $4p_{3/2}4d_{3/2}(2)3d_{3/2}$& 5.715& 5.7239& 8.195[14]& 5.7243& 9.738[14]& $4s4f3d(^3D)\ ^2P_{3/2}$\\
493: $4p_{1/2}4p_{1/2}(0)3p_{3/2}$& 5.615& 5.6347& 9.915[13]& 5.6419& 1.003[14]& $4p4d3d(^3P)\ ^2P_{3/2}$\\
494: $4s_{1/2}4d_{5/2}(2)3p_{3/2}$& 5.230& 5.2409& 3.212[14]& 5.2322& 3.023[14]& $4s4d3p(^1P)\ ^2P_{3/2}$\\
495: $4s_{1/2}4d_{5/2}(2)3p_{3/2}$& 5.222& 5.2328& 1.289[14]& 5.2252& 1.288[14]& $4s4d3p(^3P)\ ^2P_{1/2}$\\
496: \multicolumn{6}{c} {[$4lj4l'j'(J_1)3l''j''$-- $4p_{1/2}$] transitions} \\
497: $4s_{1/2}4p_{3/2}(1)3p_{3/2}$& 5.912& 5.9175& 4.245[14]& 5.9093& 5.406[14]& $4p4f3d(^3F)\ ^4F_{3/2}$\\
498: $4s_{1/2}4p_{3/2}(1)3p_{3/2}$& 5.910& 5.9179& 2.314[14]& 5.9074& 2.855[14]& $4p4f3d(^3F)\ ^4D_{1/2}$\\
499: $4p_{1/2}4f_{7/2}(3)3d_{3/2}$& 5.752& 5.7544& 5.714[13]& 5.7407& 1.497[14]& $4d4d3d(^1G)\ ^2D_{3/2}$\\
500: $4d_{3/2}4d_{5/2}(1)3d_{5/2}$& 5.732& 5.7349& 1.680[14]& 5.7206& 6.059[14]& $4d4d3d(^3P)\ ^2D_{3/2}$\\
501: $4d_{3/2}4d_{5/2}(2)3d_{5/2}$& 5.723& 5.7325& 1.235[15]& 5.7256& 8.290[14]& $4p4f3d(^1D)\ ^2D_{3/2}$\\
502: $4d_{3/2}4d_{5/2}(2)3d_{5/2}$& 5.722& 5.7267& 4.256[14]& 5.7210& 7.570[14]& $4p4f3d(^3F)\ ^2P_{1/2}$\\
503: $4d_{3/2}4d_{5/2}(3)3d_{5/2}$& 5.719& 5.7268& 2.074[14]& 5.7130& 4.057[13]& $4p4f3d(^1D)\ ^2P_{1/2}$\\
504: $4p_{1/2}4d_{5/2}(2)3p_{3/2}$& 5.233& 5.2431& 1.086[14]& 5.2354& 7.306[13]& $4p4d3p(^3S)\ ^2D_{3/2}$\\
505: $4p_{1/2}4d_{5/2}(3)3p_{3/2}$& 5.230& 5.2400& 2.323[14]& 5.2548& 2.845[14]& $4p4d3p(^3D)\ ^2D_{3/2}$\\
506: $4p_{1/2}4d_{5/2}(2)3p_{3/2}$& 5.229& 5.2395& 1.825[14]& 5.2546& 1.680[14]& $4p4d3p(^3D)\ ^2P_{1/2}$\\
507: \end{tabular}
508: \end{ruledtabular}
509: \label{tab-cowan1}
510: \end{table*}
511:
512:
513: \begin{table}
514: \caption{Wavelengths ($\lambda$ in \AA) and transition rates ($A_r$ in $s^{-1}$) for transitions from
515: core-excited states $QJ$ ($Q = 4lj4l'j'(J_1)3l''j''$) to the
516: the ground $4s$ and
517: singly excited $4l_{j}$ states in Cu-like Ce, W, and Au ions.
518: Comparison of theoretical data obtained by using RMBPT code with experimental measurements
519: ($\lambda_{\rm expt}$) from
520: Ref.~\protect\cite{doron-scr} ($a$), Ref.~\protect\cite{klapisch}
521: ($b$), and Ref.~\protect\cite{luc} ($c$)). Numbers in brackets
522: represent powers of 10.}
523: \begin{ruledtabular}\begin{tabular}{rrrrr}
524: \multicolumn{2}{c} {Transition} & \multicolumn{1}{c}
525: {$\lambda_{\rm RMBPT}$}& \multicolumn{1}{c} {$A_{r}^{\rm RMBPT}$}&
526: \multicolumn{1}{c} {$\lambda_{\rm expt}$}\\
527: \hline
528: \multicolumn{4}{c} {Cu-like Ce, $Z$=58} \\
529: $4s_{1/2}4f_{5/2}(3) 3p_{1/2}(5/2)$&$ 4p_{3/2}$& 9.4558& 4.16[13]& 9.452$^a$\\
530: $4s_{1/2}4p_{3/2}(2) 3s_{1/2}(5/2)$&$ 4d_{3/2}$& 9.9569& 8.32[12]& 9.940$^a$\\
531: $4d_{5/2}4d_{5/2}(2) 3p_{3/2}(5/2)$&$ 4d_{5/2}$& 10.0518& 1.58[13]& 10.051$^a$\\
532: $4p_{3/2}4d_{3/2}(2) 3p_{3/2}(1/2)$&$ 4p_{3/2}$& 10.1114& 1.96[13]& 10.111$^a$\\
533: $4d_{3/2}4d_{5/2}(4) 3p_{3/2}(5/2)$&$ 4d_{3/2}$& 10.1435& 3.52[13]& 10.141$^a$\\
534: $4p_{3/2}4f_{7/2}(2) 3d_{3/2}(3/2)$&$ 4p_{1/2}$& 11.3223& 8.62[11]& 11.321$^a$\\
535: $4p_{1/2}4p_{3/2}(2) 3p_{1/2}(5/2)$&$ 4d_{3/2}$& 11.4202& 7.77[12]& 11.412$^a$\\
536: $4d_{3/2}4d_{5/2}(1) 3d_{3/2}(1/2)$&$ 4p_{1/2}$& 11.4912& 1.24[14]& 11.491$^a$\\
537: $4d_{5/2}4f_{5/2}(3) 3d_{5/2}(3/2)$&$ 4d_{3/2}$& 11.8120& 1.64[13]& 11.816$^a$\\
538: \multicolumn{4}{c} {Cu-like W, $Z$=74} \\
539: $4p_{3/2}4d_{5/2}(3) 3d_{3/2}(5/2)$&$ 4d_{5/2}$& 6.8197& 2.83[12]& 6.816$^b$\\
540: $4p_{3/2}4f_{7/2}(3) 3d_{3/2}(5/2)$&$ 4f_{7/2}$& 6.8269& 4.26[12]& 6.827$^b$\\
541: $4p_{1/2}4p_{3/2}(2) 3d_{3/2}(1/2)$&$ 4p_{1/2}$& 6.8577& 2.32[12]& 6.858$^b$\\
542: $4s_{1/2}4p_{3/2}(1) 3d_{3/2}(3/2)$&$ 4s_{1/2}$& 6.8885& 3.93[12]& 6.884$^b$\\
543: $4d_{3/2}4d_{5/2}(4) 3d_{3/2}(5/2)$&$ 4f_{7/2}$& 6.8947& 1.89[12]& 6.896$^b$\\
544: $4p_{3/2}4d_{5/2}(3) 3d_{5/2}(7/2)$&$ 4d_{5/2}$& 7.0724& 3.41[13]& 7.075$^b$\\
545: $4p_{3/2}4f_{7/2}(3) 3d_{5/2}(5/2)$&$ 4f_{7/2}$& 7.1095& 1.31[12]& 7.108$^b$\\
546: $4p_{3/2}4f_{7/2}(3) 3d_{5/2}(9/2)$&$ 4f_{7/2}$& 7.1117& 6.78[12]& 7.113$^b$\\
547: $4p_{3/2}4f_{5/2}(3) 3d_{5/2}(5/2)$&$ 4f_{7/2}$& 7.1302& 1.96[13]& 7.131$^b$\\
548: $4p_{3/2}4d_{5/2}(1) 3d_{5/2}(7/2)$&$ 4d_{5/2}$& 7.1354& 1.59[13]& 7.137$^b$\\
549: $4s_{1/2}4f_{7/2}(4) 3d_{5/2}(5/2)$&$ 4d_{5/2}$& 7.2396& 1.61[12]& 7.242$^b$\\
550: $4s_{1/2}4d_{5/2}(2) 3d_{5/2}(3/2)$&$ 4p_{3/2}$& 7.2479& 2.06[13]& 7.248$^b$\\
551: $4s_{1/2}4f_{7/2}(3) 3d_{5/2}(3/2)$&$ 4d_{5/2}$& 7.2608& 1.58[13]& 7.262$^b$\\
552: $4p_{1/2}4d_{3/2}(1) 3d_{3/2}(5/2)$&$ 4d_{3/2}$& 7.2916& 1.64[13]& 7.293$^b$\\
553: \multicolumn{4}{c} {Cu-like Au, $Z$=79} \\
554: $4d_{5/2}4d_{5/2}(4) 3p_{3/2}(7/2)$&$ 4d_{5/2}$& 4.3974& 1.65[14]& 4.39$^c$\\
555: $4d_{3/2}4f_{7/2}(4) 3p_{3/2}(9/2)$&$ 4f_{7/2}$& 4.4690& 1.79[14]& 4.69$^c$\\
556: $4d_{5/2}4f_{7/2}(2) 3d_{3/2}(5/2)$&$ 4d_{3/2}$& 4.7690& 1.66[14]& 4.76$^c$\\
557: $4f_{7/2}4f_{7/2}(4) 3d_{3/2}(7/2)$&$ 4f_{7/2}$& 4.7997& 4.53[15]& 4.80$^c$\\
558: $4f_{5/2}4f_{7/2}(4) 3d_{3/2}(7/2)$&$ 4f_{5/2}$& 4.8214& 1.98[15]& 4.82$^c$\\
559: $4d_{5/2}4d_{5/2}(4) 3d_{5/2}(5/2)$&$ 4p_{3/2}$& 4.9373& 2.51[14]& 4.93$^c$\\
560: $4d_{5/2}4f_{5/2}(3) 3d_{5/2}(3/2)$&$ 4d_{3/2}$& 4.9610& 2.58[14]& 4.96$^c$\\
561: $4s_{1/2}4p_{3/2}(2) 3p_{3/2}(1/2)$&$ 4p_{3/2}$& 5.2208& 1.15[13]& 5.22$^c$\\
562: $4d_{3/2}4d_{5/2}(3) 3d_{3/2}(7/2)$&$ 4f_{5/2}$& 5.7207& 2.08[12]& 5.72$^c$\\
563: $4s_{1/2}4p_{3/2}(2) 3d_{5/2}(3/2)$&$ 4s_{1/2}$& 5.9029& 3.93[13]& 5.90$^c$\\
564: $4p_{3/2}4d_{5/2}(1) 3d_{5/2}(7/2)$&$ 4d_{5/2}$& 5.9427& 2.10[13]& 5.94$^c$\\
565: $4p_{3/2}4d_{3/2}(2) 3d_{5/2}(7/2)$&$ 4d_{5/2}$& 6.0107& 1.28[12]& 6.01$^c$\\
566: $4s_{1/2}4d_{5/2}(3) 3d_{5/2}(1/2)$&$ 4p_{3/2}$& 6.0801& 1.61[13]& 6.08$^c$\\
567: \end{tabular}
568: \end{ruledtabular}
569: \label{tab-expt}
570: \end{table}
571:
572:
573:
574: \subsection{Dipole matrix element}
575:
576: We designate the first-order dipole matrix element by $Z^{(1)}$,
577: the Coulomb-correction to the second-order matrix element
578: $Z^{(2)}$, and the second-order Breit correction $B^{(2)}$. The
579: evaluation of $Z^{(1)}$, $Z^{(2)}$, and $B^{(2)}$ for Cu-like ions
580: follows the pattern of the corresponding calculation for Na-like
581: ions in Ref.~\cite{na-tr}. These matrix elements are calculated in
582: both length and velocity gauges.
583:
584: Table~\ref{tab-uncl} lists values of uncoupled first-and second-order
585: dipole matrix elements $Z^{(1)}$, $Z^{(2)}$,
586: $B^{(2)}$, together with derivative terms $P^{({\rm derv})}$ for
587: Cu-like tungsten, $Z$ = 74. For simplicity, only the values
588: for the selected dipole transitions between odd-parity states
589: with $J$ = 1/2 and the ground $4s$ and excited $4d_{3/2}$ states are presented.
590: The more comprehensive set of data is given in Table IV of \cite{EPAPS}).
591: The derivative terms shown in Table~\ref{tab-uncl} arise because
592: transition amplitudes depend on energy, and the transition energy
593: changes order-by-order in RMBPT calculations. Both length ($L$)
594: and velocity ($V$) forms are given for the matrix elements. We
595: find that the first-order matrix elements $Z^{(1)}_L$ and
596: $Z^{(1)}_V$ differ by 10\%; the $L$ - $V$ differences between
597: second-order matrix elements are much larger for some transitions.
598: The term $P^{({\rm derv)}}$ in length form almost equals
599: $Z^{(1)}$ in length form but
600: in velocity form is smaller than $Z^{(1)}$
601: in length form by three to four orders of magnitude.
602:
603: Values of line strengths calculated as a square of coupled reduced
604: matrix element \cite{na-tr} in length and velocity forms are given
605: in Table \ref{tab-str} for the selected dipole transitions
606: between odd-parity states with $J$ = 1/2 and the ground $4s$ and
607: excited $4d_{3/2}$ states. A more complete set of data is given
608: Table V of \cite{EPAPS}. Although we use an intermediate-coupling
609: scheme, it is nevertheless convenient to label the physical states
610: using the $jj$ scheme. We see that $L$ and $V$ forms of the
611: coupled matrix elements in Table~\ref{tab-str} differ only in the
612: third or fourth digits. These $L$--$V$ differences arise because
613: our RMBPT calculations start with a non-local Dirac-Fock (DF)
614: potential. If we were to replace the DF potential by a local
615: potential, the differences would disappear completely. The first
616: two columns in Table \ref{tab-str} show $L$ and $V$ values of
617: line strengths calculated in the first-order approximation which differ
618: by factor of 10. Thr last two columns indicate that including of the second-order
619: contribution almost removes the $L-V$ differences.
620:
621: \section{Results and comparisons with other theory and experiment}
622: We calculate energies of core-excited even-parity $4lj4l'j'(J_1)3l''j''$
623: as well as the singly excited $4lj$ states in Cu-like ions with $Z$ = 30 -100.
624: Reduced matrix elements, line strengths, oscillator
625: strengths, and transition rates are also determined for
626: electric dipole transitions between the above mentioned core-excited
627: and singly excited states in Cu-like ions for the same range of $Z$.
628:
629:
630: Table~\ref{tab-cowan1} lists theoretical data for
631: selected transitions from core-excited levels to the ground
632: $4s$ and a singly excited $4p_{1/2}$ levels with largest values of transition rates in
633: W$^{45+}$. Also, the comparison of theoretical data produced
634: by the different methods and codes is inlcuded. Specifically, three values for
635: wavelengths:
636: $\lambda_{\rm MCDF}$, $\lambda_{\rm RMBPT}$, and $\lambda_{\sc cowan}$
637: are compared. The first values,
638: $\lambda_{\rm MCDF}$, were obtained as the first-order RMBPT values.
639: It can be seen from Table~\ref{tab-cowan1} that the results
640: obtained by {\sc cowan} code~\cite{cowan}, $\lambda_{\sc cowan}$, better agree with
641: the MCDF results, $\lambda_{\rm MCDF}$ than with
642: the RMBPT results, $\lambda_{\rm RMBPT}$.
643:
644: {\sc cowan} code \cite{cowan} gives results
645: which are generally in good agreement with experimental energies
646: by scaling the electrostatic Slater parameters to include the
647: correlation effects (Refs.~\cite{sataka})
648: and here the scaling factor of 0.85 was used.
649: Also, in {\sc cowan} code the $LS$ coupling scheme is
650: implemented and corresponding $LS$ designations were added to $jj$
651: designations in all tables which include comparisons
652: with theoretical data produced by {\sc cowan} code.
653: %We mentioned previously neither $jj$ nor $LS$ coupling can
654: %describe the physical states
655: % properly but more often the $LS$ designations are chosen to
656: %compare with available experimental data, especially, for low-$Z$ ions.
657: % The $jj$
658: %designations are used in RMBPT code as initial to calculate the energy matrix. These
659: %primary designations do not coincide with the $jj$ designations
660: %obtained by largest mixing coefficients. Using $jj$ designations by the
661: %largest mixing coefficients leads to crossing of levels. To avoid
662: %crossing of levels, we do not follow the $jj$ label of the largest
663: %mixing coefficient and write the $jj$ label used as initial for
664: %%noncouple matrix elements. Sometimes, this is not convenient
665: %since it leads to the difference in designations chosen for
666: %small-$Z$ ions. In {\sc cowan} code, the $LS$-labels are chosen by largest mixing coefficients.
667: %This choice leads to use the same label for two levels with different energies.
668: % We used a different coupling in RMBPT ($jj$
669: %coupling) and {\sc cowan} code ($LS$ coupling) and an agreement of both
670: %results confirm our identification of levels when sometimes even
671: %configurations are different.
672:
673: A comprehensive set of theoretical data and comparisons
674: for transitions with largest values of transition rates in
675: W$^{45+}$ similar to presented in Table~\ref{tab-cowan1}
676: is given in Table VI of the accompanying EPAPS document \cite{EPAPS}.
677: It includes transitions from core-excited levels not only to the ground $4s$
678: and to one singly excited level $4p_1/2$ as in Table~\ref{tab-cowan1} but
679: to all singly excited $4l_{j}$ levels.
680:
681: The similar comprehensive set of theoretical data and
682: comparisons for transitions between core-excited states
683: $4lj4l'j'(J_{1}) 3l''\ J$ to the ground $4s$ and
684: singly excited $4l_{j}$ states is presented for Ce$^{29+}$
685: ion in Table VII of Ref.~\cite{EPAPS} and for Au$^{50+}$ ion in Table VIII of Ref.~\cite{EPAPS}.
686: Comparisons with theoretical data obtained by using
687: RMBPT, MCDF, and {\sc cowan} codes show that
688: the difference in results can be
689: explained by the second-order corrections to energy and dipole
690: matrix elements included in RMBPT.
691:
692: The trends of the $Z$-dependence of transition rates for the
693: transitions from core-excited odd-parity states with $J$ = 1/2 to
694: the ground state $4s\ ^2S_{1/2}$ states are presented in
695: Fig.~\ref{od1} . The trends for the transitions from core-excited
696: even-parity states with $J$ = 1/2 to the singly excited state $4p\
697: ^2P_{3/2}$ are shown in Fig.~\ref{ev1}. More transition rate
698: figures are given in \cite{EPAPS}.
699:
700: We see from the graphs that transitions with smooth $Z$-dependence
701: are rarer than transitions with sharp features. Smooth
702: $Z$-dependence occurs for transitions from doublet and quartet
703: core-excited states. Usually, singularities happen in the
704: intermediate interval of $Z$ = 40 - 60 when neither $LS$ nor $jj$ coupling
705: schemes describe the states of these ions properly.
706: One general conclusion
707: that can be derived from these graphs is that the smooth
708: $Z$-dependence occurs more frequently for transitions from
709: low-lying core-excited states.
710:
711: Singularities in the transition-rate curves have two distinct
712: origins: avoided level crossings and zeros in dipole matrix
713: elements. Avoided level crossings result in changes of the
714: dominant configuration of a state at a particular value of $Z$ and
715: lead to abrupt changes in the transition rate curves when the
716: partial rates associated with the dominant configurations below
717: and above the crossing point are significantly different. Zeros in
718: transition matrix elements lead to cusp-like minima in the
719: transition rate curves. Examples of each of these two singularity
720: types can be seen in Figs.~\ref{od1} and ~\ref{ev1}, as well as in
721: Figs.~1 - 10 presented in EPAPS document \cite{EPAPS}.
722:
723:
724: In Table~\ref{tab-expt}, wavelengths and electric-dipole
725: transition rates along with comparison with experimental data
726: are presented for transitions in Cu-like Ce, W, and Au.
727: The table is limited to identification of experimentally measured transitions
728: given in Refs.~\cite{doron-scr,klapisch,luc}. A more comprehensive set of
729: theoretical data assigned to each experimental transition
730: is presented in Table~IX of EPAPS document
731: \cite{EPAPS}. We mentioned previously that all possible
732: $4l_1j_14l_2j_2(J_1)3l_3j_3 (J)$ - $4l_{j}$ transitions produce
733: 2294 spectrum lines. These lines in Ce$^{29+}$, W$^{45+}$, and
734: Au$^{50 +}$ cover the spectral regions from 6.8 -- 21.9~\AA~,
735: 3.5 -- 9.8 ~\AA~, and 2.9 -- 8.7~\AA~, respectively. A number of
736: spectral lines becomes smaller by a factor of ten when we consider
737: transitions with largest values of transition rates, $gA_r$. The
738: number of transitions with $gA_r>$ 10$^{13}$~s$^{-1}$ is about 200
739: for Ce$^{29+}$,
740: and a number of transitions with $gA_r>$ 10$^{14}$ ~s$^{-1}$ is about 130
741: for W$^{45+}$ and about 190 for Au$^{50 +}$.
742: Those transitions with the largest values of $gA_r$ cover
743: the spectral regions smaller by factor of 3-4 than that mentioned for all lines.
744: We can see that the number of predicted spectral lines even with
745: the largest values of $gA_r$ still much larger than a number of experimental
746: lines shown in Table~\ref{tab-expt}. Also, the interval between these lines
747: is about 0.01~\AA~ or less which is comparable with
748: the accuracy of experimental measurements. In this case, it
749: could be reasonable to assign not a single transition as in Table~\ref{tab-expt}
750: but 3-5 transitions
751: to identify the experimental peak, as it is demonstrated in Table IX of EPAPS
752: document \cite{EPAPS}.
753:
754: \begin{figure}[tbp]
755: \centerline{\includegraphics[scale=0.35]{fig3.eps}}
756: \caption{Synthetic spectra of Cu-like W calculated using the
757: RMBPT atomic data and Gaussian profiles
758: with ($\Delta \lambda$ = 0.02~Angstrom). The scale in the ordinate is in
759: units of 10$^{13}$~s$^{-1}$.}\label{cun-mbpt}
760: \end{figure}
761:
762:
763:
764: \begin{figure}[tbp]
765: \centerline{\includegraphics[scale=0.35]{fig4.eps}}
766: \caption{Synthetic spectra of Cu-like W calculated using the
767: RMBPT atomic data and Gaussian profiles with
768: ($\Delta \lambda$ = 0.002~Angstrom). The scale in the ordinate is in
769: units of 10$^{13}$~s$^{-1}$.}\label{cun1-mbpt}
770: \end{figure}
771:
772:
773: These atomic data are important in modeling of M-shell
774: radiation spectra of heavy ions generated in electron beam ion trap
775: experiments and in M-shell diagnostics of plasmas.
776: For example, x-ray M-shell spectra of W ions collected
777: at the different energies of the electron beam at LLNL
778: electron beam ion trap indicate the existence of strong
779: Cu-like spectral features \cite{alla1}.
780: Also,the distinct features of x-ray M-shell spectra of W
781: ions in a spectral region from 5 to 6~\AA~ produced by
782: laboratory plasmas are the brightest Ni-like lines
783: and Co- and Cu-like spectral features.
784: In particular, Cu-like satellite lines constitute most
785: of the Cu-like spectral features, and Cu-like autoionization
786: levels make an important contribution in ionization
787: balance calculations \cite{alla2}.
788: Synthetic x-ray spectra of Cu-like W computed with
789: different resolution of 0.02~\AA~ and
790: 0.002~\AA~ are presented in Fig.~\ref{cun-mbpt} ~and ~\ref{cun1-mbpt},
791: respectively.
792: It was assumed that spectral lines have the intensities proportional
793: to the weighted
794: transition probabilities and are fitted with the Gaussian profile.
795: Specifically, the spectrum in Fig.~\ref{cun-mbpt} includes
796: $3l-4l'$ transitions and covers the spectral region from 4 \AA~ to 6.4 \AA.
797: The most intense peaks at about 5.72 \AA~ and 5.9 \AA~ are
798: formed by $3d-4f$ transitions and
799: are shown with better resolution in Fig.~\ref{cun1-mbpt}.
800:
801:
802: \section{Conclusion}
803: In summary, a systematic second-order RMBPT study of the energies
804: and transition rates for [$4l_1j_14l_2j_2(J_1)3l_3j_3\ (J)$ -
805: $4lj$] electric-dipole transitions in Cu-like ions with the
806: nuclear charges $Z$ ranging from 30 to 100 has been presented.
807: The retarded $E1$ matrix elements included
808: correlation corrections from Coulomb and Breit interactions. Both
809: length and velocity forms of the matrix elements were evaluated
810: and small differences (0.4 - 1 \%), caused by the non locality of
811: the starting DF potential, were found between the two forms.
812: Second-order RMBPT transition energies were used in the evaluation
813: of transition rates. These calculations were compared with other
814: calculations and with available experimental data. For $Z \geq
815: 40$, we believe that the present theoretical data are more
816: accurate than other theoretical or experimental data for
817: transitions between the $4l_1j_14l_2j_2(J_1)3l_3j_3\ (J)$
818: core-excited states and the $4lj$ singly excited states in
819: Cu-like ions. The results could be further improved by including
820: third-order correlation
821: corrections.These calculations are presented as a theoretical
822: benchmark for comparison with experiment and theory.
823: In addition, the application of generated atomic data to modeling and interpreting
824: of x-ray M-shell spectra of heavy ions is discussed.
825:
826:
827: \begin{acknowledgments}
828: The work of W.R.J. was supported in part by National Science
829: Foundation Grant No.\ PHY-01-39928. U.I.S. acknowledges partial
830: support by Grant No.\ B516165 from Lawrence Livermore National
831: Laboratory. The work of A.S. was supported by the DOE-NNSA/NV
832: Cooperative Agreement DE-FC08-01NV14050 and Sandia National Laboratories.
833: \end{acknowledgments}
834:
835: \begin{thebibliography}{23}
836: \expandafter\ifx\csname natexlab\endcsname\relax\def\natexlab#1{#1}\fi
837: \expandafter\ifx\csname bibnamefont\endcsname\relax
838: \def\bibnamefont#1{#1}\fi
839: \expandafter\ifx\csname bibfnamefont\endcsname\relax
840: \def\bibfnamefont#1{#1}\fi
841: \expandafter\ifx\csname citenamefont\endcsname\relax
842: \def\citenamefont#1{#1}\fi
843: \expandafter\ifx\csname url\endcsname\relax
844: \def\url#1{\texttt{#1}}\fi
845: \expandafter\ifx\csname urlprefix\endcsname\relax\def\urlprefix{URL }\fi
846: \providecommand{\bibinfo}[2]{#2}
847: \providecommand{\eprint}[2][]{\url{#2}}
848:
849: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Safronova
850: et~al.}(2002{\natexlab{a}})\citenamefont{Safronova, Johnson, Safronova, and
851: Albritton}}]{na-en}
852: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{U.~I.} \bibnamefont{Safronova}},
853: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{W.~R.} \bibnamefont{Johnson}},
854: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.~S.} \bibnamefont{Safronova}},
855: \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.~R.}
856: \bibnamefont{Albritton}}, \bibinfo{journal}{Phys.\ Rev.\ A}
857: \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{66}}, \bibinfo{pages}{042506}
858: (\bibinfo{year}{2002}{\natexlab{a}}).
859:
860: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Safronova
861: et~al.}(2002{\natexlab{b}})\citenamefont{Safronova, Johnson, Safronova, and
862: Albritton}}]{na-tr}
863: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{U.~I.} \bibnamefont{Safronova}},
864: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{W.~R.} \bibnamefont{Johnson}},
865: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.~S.} \bibnamefont{Safronova}},
866: \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.~R.}
867: \bibnamefont{Albritton}}, \bibinfo{journal}{Phys.\ Rev.\ A}
868: \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{66}}, \bibinfo{pages}{052511}
869: (\bibinfo{year}{2002}{\natexlab{b}}).
870:
871: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Klapisch et~al.}(1981)\citenamefont{Klapisch,
872: Mandelbaum, {Bar-Shalom}, Schwob, Zigler, and Jackel}}]{cu1}
873: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.}~\bibnamefont{Klapisch}},
874: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{P.}~\bibnamefont{Mandelbaum}},
875: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{{Bar-Shalom}}},
876: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.~L.} \bibnamefont{Schwob}},
877: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Zigler}}, \bibnamefont{and}
878: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.}~\bibnamefont{Jackel}},
879: \bibinfo{journal}{J.\ Opt.\ Soc.\ Am.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{71}},
880: \bibinfo{pages}{1276} (\bibinfo{year}{1981}).
881:
882: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Klapisch et~al.}(1977)\citenamefont{Klapisch, Schwob,
883: Fraenkel, and Oreg}}]{RPPM}
884: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.}~\bibnamefont{Klapisch}},
885: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.~L.} \bibnamefont{Schwob}},
886: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{B.~S.} \bibnamefont{Fraenkel}},
887: \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.}~\bibnamefont{Oreg}},
888: \bibinfo{journal}{J. Opt.\ Soc.\ Am.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{67}},
889: \bibinfo{pages}{148} (\bibinfo{year}{1977}).
890:
891: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Mandelbaum et~al.}(1983)\citenamefont{Mandelbaum,
892: Klapisch, Bar-Shalom, and Schwob}}]{klapisch}
893: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{P.}~\bibnamefont{Mandelbaum}},
894: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.}~\bibnamefont{Klapisch}},
895: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Bar-Shalom}},
896: \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.~L.}
897: \bibnamefont{Schwob}}, \bibinfo{journal}{Phys.\ Scr.}
898: \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{27}}, \bibinfo{pages}{39} (\bibinfo{year}{1983}).
899:
900: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Busquet et~al.}(1985)\citenamefont{Busquet, Pain,
901: Bauche, and Luc-Koenig}}]{luc}
902: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.}~\bibnamefont{Busquet}},
903: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{D.}~\bibnamefont{Pain}},
904: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.}~\bibnamefont{Bauche}}, \bibnamefont{and}
905: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{E.}~\bibnamefont{Luc-Koenig}},
906: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys.\ Scr.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{31}},
907: \bibinfo{pages}{137} (\bibinfo{year}{1985}).
908:
909: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Tragin et~al.}(1988)\citenamefont{Tragin, Ghendre,
910: Monier, Gauthier, C, Wyart, and Bauche-Arnoult}}]{wyart}
911: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{N.}~\bibnamefont{Tragin}},
912: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.~P.} \bibnamefont{Ghendre}},
913: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{P.}~\bibnamefont{Monier}},
914: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.~C.} \bibnamefont{Gauthier}},
915: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{C.-P.} \bibnamefont{C}},
916: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.~F.} \bibnamefont{Wyart}}, \bibnamefont{and}
917: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{C.}~\bibnamefont{Bauche-Arnoult}},
918: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys.\ Scr.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{37}},
919: \bibinfo{pages}{72} (\bibinfo{year}{1988}).
920:
921: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Zigler et~al.}(1994)\citenamefont{Zigler, Mandelbaum,
922: Schwob, and Mitnik}}]{zigler}
923: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Zigler}},
924: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{P.}~\bibnamefont{Mandelbaum}},
925: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.~L.} \bibnamefont{Schwob}},
926: \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{D.}~\bibnamefont{Mitnik}},
927: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys.\ Scr.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{50}},
928: \bibinfo{pages}{61} (\bibinfo{year}{1994}).
929:
930: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Doron et~al.}(1998{\natexlab{a}})\citenamefont{Doron,
931: Fraenkel, Mandelbaum, Zigler, and Schwob}}]{doron-ba}
932: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.}~\bibnamefont{Doron}},
933: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.}~\bibnamefont{Fraenkel}},
934: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{P.}~\bibnamefont{Mandelbaum}},
935: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Zigler}}, \bibnamefont{and}
936: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.~L.} \bibnamefont{Schwob}},
937: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys.\ Scr.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{58}},
938: \bibinfo{pages}{19} (\bibinfo{year}{1998}{\natexlab{a}}).
939:
940: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Doron et~al.}(1998{\natexlab{b}})\citenamefont{Doron,
941: Behar, Fraenkel, Mandelbaum, Zigler, Schwob, Faenov, and
942: Pikuz}}]{doron-pra98}
943: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.}~\bibnamefont{Doron}},
944: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{E.}~\bibnamefont{Behar}},
945: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.}~\bibnamefont{Fraenkel}},
946: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{P.}~\bibnamefont{Mandelbaum}},
947: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Zigler}},
948: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.~L.} \bibnamefont{Schwob}},
949: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.~Y.} \bibnamefont{Faenov}},
950: \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{T.~A.} \bibnamefont{Pikuz}},
951: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys.\ Rev.\ A} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{58}},
952: \bibinfo{pages}{1859} (\bibinfo{year}{1998}{\natexlab{b}}).
953:
954: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Doron et~al.}(2000)\citenamefont{Doron, Behar,
955: Fraenkel, Mandelbaum, Schwob, Zigler, Faenov, and Pikuz}}]{doron-pra}
956: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.}~\bibnamefont{Doron}},
957: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{E.}~\bibnamefont{Behar}},
958: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.}~\bibnamefont{Fraenkel}},
959: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{P.}~\bibnamefont{Mandelbaum}},
960: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.~L.} \bibnamefont{Schwob}},
961: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Zigler}},
962: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.~Y.} \bibnamefont{Faenov}},
963: \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{T.~A.} \bibnamefont{Pikuz}},
964: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys.\ Rev.\ A} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{62}},
965: \bibinfo{pages}{052508} (\bibinfo{year}{2000}).
966:
967: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Doron et~al.}(2001)\citenamefont{Doron, Behar,
968: Fraenkel, Mandelbaum, Schwob, Zigler, Faenov, and Pikuz}}]{doron-scr}
969: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.}~\bibnamefont{Doron}},
970: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{E.}~\bibnamefont{Behar}},
971: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.}~\bibnamefont{Fraenkel}},
972: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{P.}~\bibnamefont{Mandelbaum}},
973: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.~L.} \bibnamefont{Schwob}},
974: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Zigler}},
975: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.~Y.} \bibnamefont{Faenov}},
976: \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{T.~A.} \bibnamefont{Pikuz}},
977: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys.\ Scr.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{63}},
978: \bibinfo{pages}{22} (\bibinfo{year}{2001}).
979:
980: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Neu et~al.}(1997)\citenamefont{Neu, Fournier, Schlogl,
981: and Rice}}]{fourner}
982: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{R.}~\bibnamefont{Neu}},
983: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{K.~B.} \bibnamefont{Fournier}},
984: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{D.}~\bibnamefont{Schlogl}}, \bibnamefont{and}
985: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.}~\bibnamefont{Rice}}, \bibinfo{journal}{J.\
986: Phys.\ B} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{30}}, \bibinfo{pages}{5057}
987: (\bibinfo{year}{1997}).
988:
989: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Kim et~al.}(1991)\citenamefont{Kim, Baik, Indelicato,
990: and Desclaux}}]{kim}
991: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{Y.~K.} \bibnamefont{Kim}},
992: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{D.~H.} \bibnamefont{Baik}},
993: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{P.}~\bibnamefont{Indelicato}},
994: \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.~P.}
995: \bibnamefont{Desclaux}}, \bibinfo{journal}{Phys.\ Rev.\ A}
996: \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{44}}, \bibinfo{pages}{148} (\bibinfo{year}{1991}).
997:
998: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Safronova}(2000)}]{saf1}
999: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{U.~I.} \bibnamefont{Safronova}},
1000: \bibinfo{journal}{Mol.\ Phys.} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{98}},
1001: \bibinfo{pages}{1213} (\bibinfo{year}{2000}).
1002:
1003: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Safronova et~al.}(2000)\citenamefont{Safronova,
1004: Johnson, and Albritton}}]{ni}
1005: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{U.~I.} \bibnamefont{Safronova}},
1006: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{W.~R.} \bibnamefont{Johnson}},
1007: \bibnamefont{and}
1008: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.~R.}~\bibnamefont{Albritton}},
1009: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys.\ Rev.\ A} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{62}},
1010: \bibinfo{pages}{052505} (\bibinfo{year}{2000}).
1011:
1012: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Johnson et~al.}(1988)\citenamefont{Johnson, Blundell,
1013: and Sapirstein}}]{2wrj}
1014: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{W.~R.} \bibnamefont{Johnson}},
1015: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.~A.} \bibnamefont{Blundell}},
1016: \bibnamefont{and}
1017: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.}~\bibnamefont{Sapirstein}},
1018: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys.\ Rev.\ A} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{37}},
1019: \bibinfo{pages}{2764} (\bibinfo{year}{1988}).
1020:
1021: \bibitem[{EPA()}]{EPAPS}
1022: \bibinfo{note}{See EPAPS Document No. [number will be inserted by publisher ]
1023: for additional nine tables and ten figures. Tables I - IX. Possible
1024: particle-particle-hole states in the Cu-like ions; jj-coupling scheme.
1025: Uncoupled and coupled reduced matrix elements in length and velocity forms
1026: for transitions between the odd-parity core-excited states with J = 1/2 and
1027: the ground and singly-excited states. Wavelengths (in Angstrom) and
1028: transition rates (Ar in 1/sec) for transitions between core-excited states
1029: and excited states in Cu-like ions. Comparison with theoretical and
1030: experimental data Figs. 1-10. Transition rates for the transitions from
1031: core-excited odd-parity states with J = 1/2 -- 7/2 and even-parity states
1032: with J = 1/2 - 9/2 as function of Z in Cu-like ions. This document may be
1033: retrieved via the EPAPS homepage (http://www.aip.org/pubservs/epaps.html) or
1034: from ftp.aip.org in the directory /epaps/. See the EPAPS homepage for more
1035: information.}
1036:
1037: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Safronova et~al.}(1996)\citenamefont{Safronova,
1038: Johnson, and Safronova}}]{bor2}
1039: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.~S.} \bibnamefont{Safronova}},
1040: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{W.~R.} \bibnamefont{Johnson}},
1041: \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{U.~I.}
1042: \bibnamefont{Safronova}}, \bibinfo{journal}{Phys.\ Rev.\ A}
1043: \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{54}}, \bibinfo{pages}{2850} (\bibinfo{year}{1996}).
1044:
1045: \bibitem[{cow()}]{cowan}
1046: \urlprefix\url{ftp://aphysics.lanl.gov/pub/cowan}.
1047:
1048: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Sataka et~al.}(2002)\citenamefont{Sataka, Imai,
1049: Kawatsura, Komaki, Tawara, Vasilyev, and Safronova}}]{sataka}
1050: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.}~\bibnamefont{Sataka}},
1051: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{M.}~\bibnamefont{Imai}},
1052: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{K.}~\bibnamefont{Kawatsura}},
1053: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{K.}~\bibnamefont{Komaki}},
1054: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{H.}~\bibnamefont{Tawara}},
1055: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.}~\bibnamefont{Vasilyev}}, \bibnamefont{and}
1056: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{U.~I.} \bibnamefont{Safronova}},
1057: \bibinfo{journal}{Phys.\ Rev.\ A} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{65}},
1058: \bibinfo{pages}{052704} (\bibinfo{year}{2002}).
1059:
1060: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Shlyaptseva et~al.}(2003)\citenamefont{Shlyaptseva,
1061: Fedin, Hamasha, Hansen, Harris, Kantsyrev, Neill, Ouart, Beiersdorfer, and
1062: Safronova}}]{alla1}
1063: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.~S.} \bibnamefont{Shlyaptseva}},
1064: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{D.~A.} \bibnamefont{Fedin}},
1065: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.~M.} \bibnamefont{Hamasha}},
1066: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.~B.} \bibnamefont{Hansen}},
1067: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{C.}~\bibnamefont{Harris}},
1068: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{V.~L.} \bibnamefont{Kantsyrev}},
1069: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{P.}~\bibnamefont{Neill}},
1070: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{N.}~\bibnamefont{Ouart}},
1071: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{P.}~\bibnamefont{Beiersdorfer}},
1072: \bibnamefont{and} \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{U.~I.}
1073: \bibnamefont{Safronova}}, \bibinfo{journal}{Rev.\ Sci. \ Instr.}
1074: \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{74}}, \bibinfo{pages}{00} (\bibinfo{year}{2003}).
1075:
1076: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Shlyaptseva et~al.}(2002)\citenamefont{Shlyaptseva,
1077: Hamasha, Hansen, Ouart, and Safronova}}]{alla2}
1078: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{A.~S.} \bibnamefont{Shlyaptseva}},
1079: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.~M.} \bibnamefont{Hamasha}},
1080: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{S.~B.} \bibnamefont{Hansen}},
1081: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{N.}~\bibnamefont{Ouart}}, \bibnamefont{and}
1082: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{U.~I.} \bibnamefont{Safronova}},
1083: \bibinfo{journal}{AIP Proceedings} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{CP651}},
1084: \bibinfo{pages}{412} (\bibinfo{year}{2002}).
1085:
1086: \end{thebibliography}
1087:
1088:
1089: %\bibliography{cu}
1090:
1091:
1092: \end{document}
1093: