1: \documentclass[aps]{revtex4}

2: 

3: \usepackage{amssymb}

4: \usepackage[tbtags]{amsmath}

5: \usepackage{graphicx}

6: \usepackage{subfigure}

7: 

8: \DeclareMathOperator{\grad}{grad}

9: \newcommand{\abs}[1]{\lvert#1\rvert}

10: 

11: \begin{document}

12: \title{Phase Difference Function in Coherent Temporal-spatial Region\\

13: and Unified Equations of Steady, Non-steady Interference}

14: 

15: \author{Ji Luo}

16: \email{luoji@mail.ihep.ac.cn}

17: \affiliation{Accelerator Center, Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing, China}

18: 

19: \date{\today}

20: 

21: \begin{abstract}

22: Phase difference function is established by means of phase transfer function between

23: time domains of source and interference point. The function reveals a necessary

24: interrelation between outcome of two-beam interference, source's frequency and measured

25: subject's kinematic information. As inference unified equations on steady and

26: non-steady interference are derived. Meanwhile relevant property and application are

27: discussed.

28: \end{abstract}

29: 

30: \maketitle

31: 

32: \section{Introduction}

33: On two beam interference, the explicit interrelationship among source's frequency

34: parameter, time functions of the beams between time domains of source and interference

35: point \cite{luoji:timefunction} and instantaneous outcome of the interference constructs a necessary

36: foundation for any two-beam interferometry's design and interpretation of measured

37: data. By means of phase transfer function between time domains of source and observer

38: \cite{luoji:transferrelation}, the accumulated phase or phase function for either of the wave beams at

39: any spatial point in the coherent temporal spatial region can be determined by source's

40: parameter and corresponding instant. Upon the beam's phase function in the coherent

41: temporal-spatial region, the phase difference function, two variables function in

42: interference temporal-spatial region, is established. Is the phase difference function

43: a general interrelationship itself. From it, the unified equations on steady and

44: non-steady interference are inferred directly under the cases respectively. For steady

45: interference, conventional rule on the interference spatial distribution is a

46: particular example of the unified equation as the two beam's wavelengths are same. In

47: addition Michelson-Morley experiment result is reinterpreted with the equation. For

48: non-steady interference two sets of the equations are derived for different

49: interferometry outcomes: beat frequency and fringe's instantaneous displacing velocity;

50: moreover on some of typical dynamical measurement: history of distance, velocity and

51: acceleration as well as source frequency property, the principle formulas are presented

52: for application illustration.

53: 

54: 

55: \section{Derivation of Phase Difference Function in Interferometry Temporal-spatial

56: Region}

57: In beam's transfer time-space $t' \in \tau_i'(r)$, $r \in V_i$, there is phase transfer functions (Ref.\ %

58: \cite{luoji:transferrelation}):

59: \begin{subequations}

60: \begin{equation}

61: \label{E:1a} \begin{split}

62: \varphi_i(r,t')&=\int_{t_{oi}'}^{t'}\omega_{i}'(r,\dot{t})\,d\dot{t}+\varphi_i(r,t_{oi}')\\

63: &=\int_{t_{oi}'-T_i(r,t_{oi}')}^{t'-T_i(r,t')}\omega_i(\dot{t})\,d\dot{t}+\varphi_i(t_{oi})\\

64: &=\varphi_i[t'-T_i(r,t')]=\varphi[t'-T_i(r,t')]

65: \end{split}

66: \end{equation}

67: here $

68: \varphi_i(r,t_{oi}')=\varphi_i[t_{oi}'-T_i(r,t_{oi}')]=\varphi_i(t_{oi})%

69: =\varphi[t_{oi}'-T_i(r,t_{oi}')] $, and

70: \begin{equation}

71: \label{E:1c}

72: \begin{split}\frac{\partial\varphi_i(r,t')}{\partial

73: t'}&=\omega_i'(r,t')=\omega[t'-T_i(r,t')]\frac{\partial t_i(r,t')}{\partial t'}\\

74: &=\omega[t'-T_i(r,t')]\left[1-\frac{\partial T_i(r,t')}{\partial t'}\right]

75: \end{split}

76: \end{equation}

77: \begin{widetext}

78: \begin{equation}

79: \label{E:1d}

80: \begin{split}\grad\varphi_i(r,t')&=-\omega[t'-T_i(r,t')]\grad T_i(r,t')\\

81: &=-\omega[t'-T_i(r,t')]\frac{1}{v_{ioi}(r,t')}\frac{\partial t_i(r,t')}{\partial

82: t'}\Vec n(\grad T_i)\\

83: &=-\omega[t'-T_i(r,t')]\frac{1}{v_{ioi}(r,t')}\left[1-\frac{\partial

84: t_i(r,t')}{\partial t'}\right]\Vec n(\grad T_i)

85: \end{split}

86: \end{equation}

87: \begin{equation}

88: \label{E:1e} \frac{\partial\varphi_i(r,t')}{\partial

89: t'}=\rho_{\varphi}(r,t')v_{ioi}(r,t')=\abs{\grad\varphi_i(r,t')}v_{ioi}(r,t')

90: \end{equation}

91: \end{widetext}

92: \end{subequations}

93: 

94: 

95: In coherent temporal-spatial region $r \in V_{c12} \in V_1 \cap V_2$, $t' \in

96: [\,t_0'(r), t_0'(r)+\tau_{c12}'(r)\,] \in \tau_1'(r)\cap \tau_2'(r)$; where $V_{c12}$ %

97: --- coherent spatial volume of wave beam 1 and 2, $\tau_{c12}'$ --- coherent time

98: interval of beam 1 and beam 2; two beams are split by same source but have different

99: main trajectories to reach interference point.

100: 

101: Now define the phase difference function in this coherent temporal-spatial region,

102: \begin{equation}\label{E:2}

103: \begin{split}\psi(r,t')&=\varphi_2(r,t')-\varphi_1(r,t')\\

104: &=\int_{t_0'}^{t'}\omega_2'(r,\dot{t})\,d\dot{t}+\varphi_2(r,t_0')-\int_{t_0'}^{t'}\omega_1'(r,\dot{t})\,d

105: \dot{t}-\varphi_1(r,t_0')\\

106: &=\varphi[t'-T_2(r,t')]-\varphi[t'-T_1(r,t')]\\

107: &=\int_{t'-T_1(r,t')}^{t'-T_2(r,t')}\omega(\dot{t})\,d\dot{t}

108: \end{split}

109: \end{equation}

110: 

111: \begin{widetext}

112: Thus there are the derivative property of the function:

113: \begin{equation}\label{E:3}

114: \begin{split}

115: \frac{\partial \psi(r,t')}{\partial t'}&=\omega_2'(r,t')-\omega_1'(r,t')\\

116: &=\omega[t'-T_1(r,t')]\frac{\partial T_1(r,t')}{\partial

117: t'}-\omega[t'-T_2(r,t')]\frac{\partial T_2(r,t')}{\partial

118: t'}+\omega[t'-T_2(r,t')]-\omega[t'-T_1(r,t')]

119: \end{split}

120: \end{equation}

121: \begin{equation}\label{E:4}

122: \begin{split}

123: \grad \psi(r,t')&=\grad \varphi[t'-T_2(r,t')]-\grad \varphi[t'-T_1(r,t')]\\

124: &=\grad \int_{t'-T_1(r,t')}^{t'-T_2(r,t')}\omega(\dot{t})\,d \dot {t}\\

125: &=\left\{-\omega[t'-T_2(r,t')]\frac{\partial T_2(r,t')}{\partial \Vec n (\grad

126: \psi)}+\omega[t'-T_1(r,t')]\frac{\partial T_1(r,t')}{\partial \Vec n (\grad

127: \psi)}\right\}\Vec n (\grad \psi)\\

128: &=\Biggl\{\biggl\{-\omega[t'-T_2(r,t')]\grad T_2(r,t')+\omega[t'-T_1(r,t')]\grad

129: T_1(r,t')\biggr\}\cdot\Vec n (\grad \psi)\Biggr\}\Vec n (\grad \psi)\\

130: &=\Biggl\{\biggl\{-\omega[t'-T_2(r,t')]\frac{\Vec n (\grad

131: T_2)}{v_{io2}(r,t')}\left[1-\frac{\partial T_2(r,t')}{\partial

132: t'}\right]\\

133: &\phantom{=\Bigg\{\bigg\{}+\omega[t'-T_1(r,t')]\frac{\Vec n (\grad

134: T_1)}{v_{io1}(r,t')}\left[1-\frac{\partial T_1(r,t')}{\partial t'}\right]\biggr\}\cdot

135: \Vec n (\grad \psi)\Biggr\}\Vec n (\grad \psi)

136: \end{split}

137: \end{equation}

138: \end{widetext}

139: 

140: where (See Appendix):

141: \[

142: \abs{\grad T(r,t')}=\frac{1}{v_{io}(r,t')}\frac{dt}{dt'}=\frac{1}{v_{io}(r,t')}\left[1-\frac{\partial

143: T(r,t')}{\partial t'}\right]

144: \]

145: 

146: \begin{equation}

147: \label{E:5}

148: \begin{split}

149: \frac{\partial \psi(r,t')}{\partial t'}&=\rho_{_{\!\mathrm{\psi}}}(r,t')v_{_{\mathrm{fringe}}}(r,t')\\

150: &=\abs{\grad \psi(r,t')}v_{_{\mathrm{fringe}}}(r,t')

151: \end{split}

152: \end{equation}

153: 

154: \section{Unified Equations of Steady and Non-steady Interference}

155: \renewcommand{\labelenumi}{\Alph{enumi}.}

156: \begin{enumerate}

157: \item When $\frac{\partial \psi(r,t')}{\partial t'}\equiv 0$ or $v_{_{\mathrm{

158: fringe}}}(r,t')\equiv 0$ and $\omega[t'-T_i(r,t')]=constant$, $\frac{\partial

159: T_i(r,t')}{\partial t'}=\frac{\partial T_i(r)}{\partial t'}=0$\\

160: there steady or static spatial distribution of interference

161: \begin{subequations}

162: \begin{equation}\label{E:6a}

163: \frac{2\pi}{\tau^*}[T_1(r)-T_2(r)]=\begin{cases}2k\pi&\quad\text{max.}\\

164: (2k+1)\pi&\quad\text{min.}\end{cases}\quad k=0,\pm 1,\dots

165: \end{equation}

166: or

167: \begin{equation}\label{E:6ab}

168: \int_r^{r+d}\abs{\grad\psi(r,t')}\,dr=2\pi \end{equation} \hfill $d$ -- short distance

169: between two fringes\hfill{}

170: \begin{equation}\label{E:6b}

171: T_1(r)-T_2(r)=\begin{cases}k\tau^*&\quad\text{max.}\\

172: (2k+1)\frac{\tau^*}{2}&\quad\text{min.}\end{cases}

173: \end{equation}

174: 

175: When $v_{io2}(r)=v_{io1}(r)=constant$, there is conventional rule on static spatial

176: distribution of steady interference

177: \begin{equation}\label{E:6c}

178: L_1(r)-L_2(r)=\begin{cases}k\lambda&\quad\text{max.}\\

179: (2k+1)\frac{\lambda}{2}&\quad\text{min.}\end{cases}

180: \end{equation}

181: \end{subequations}

182: 

183: \item For dynamical interferometry there exist general beat equation and fringe's

184: instantaneous displacement velocity equation as following

185: \begin{subequations}

186: \begin{equation}\label{E:7a}

187: \int_{t'}^{t'+\tau_b}\omega_b(r,\dot{t})\,d \dot

188: {t}=\int_{t'}^{t'+\tau_b}[\omega_2'(r,\dot{t})-\omega_1'(r,\dot t)]\, d\dot t=\pm 2\pi

189: \end{equation}

190: or

191: \begin{widetext}

192: \begin{equation}\label{E:7b} \int_{t'}^{t'+\tau_b}\left\{\omega[\dot t-T_2(r,\dot

193: t)]-\omega[\dot t-T_1(r,\dot t)]+\omega[\dot t-T_1(r,\dot t)]\frac{\partial T_1(r,\dot

194: t)}{\partial \dot t}-\omega[\dot t-T_2(r,\dot t)]\frac{\partial T_2(r,\dot t)}{\partial

195: \dot t}\right\}\, d \dot t=\pm 2\pi

196: \end{equation}

197: \end{widetext}

198: \begin{equation}\label{E:7c}

199: \int_{t'}^{t'+\tau_b}\left\{\omega[t_2(r,\dot t)]\frac{\partial t_2(r,\dot t)}{\partial

200: \dot t}-\omega[t_1(r,\dot t)]\frac{\partial t_1(r,\dot t)}{\partial \dot

201: t}\right\}\,d\dot t=\pm 2\pi

202: \end{equation}

203: \end{subequations}

204: 

205: \begin{equation}\label{E:8}

206: v_{_{\mathrm{fringe}}}(r,t')=-\frac{\partial \psi(r,t')}{\partial t'}\Vec n (\grad

207: \psi)\bigg/\abs{\grad \psi(r,t')}

208: \end{equation}

209: 

210: \item The principle formulas for a series of typically dynamical parameter measurement

211: \begin{figure}[htbp]

212: \subfigure[interferometer for measuring velocity and distance history]{\centering

213: \includegraphics[width=7cm]{4fig1a.eps}\label{F:1a:measure-v-r}}

214: \subfigure[interferometer for measuring acceleration history]{\centering

215: \includegraphics[width=7cm]{4fig1b.eps}\label{F:1b:measure-a}}

216: \caption{Schematic of dynamic measurement}

217: \label{F:1:measurement}

218: \end{figure}

219: 

220: \renewcommand{\labelenumii}{(\roman{enumii})}

221: \begin{enumerate}

222: \item Ref.\ Fig.\ \ref{F:1a:measure-v-r}, $T_2(r,t')=T_2(r)$, $\omega(t)=\frac{2\pi}{\tau^*}=constant$,

223: from Eq.\ \eqref{E:7b}, there $\frac{2\pi}{\tau^*}\left.\frac{\partial

224: T_1(r,t')}{\partial t'}\right|_{\xi '}\tau_b=\pm 2\pi$ or $\left.\frac{\partial

225: T_1(r,t')}{\partial t'}\right|_{\xi '}=\frac{1}{\nu}\nu_b$, the $v(t_1)$ can be

226: resolved from $\frac{\partial T_1(t')}{\partial t'}$, here $T_1(t')=t'-t_1+t_1-t$.

227: 

228: \item To measure $R(t')$ history by two-beam interferometry with modulated frequency

229: source, Ref.\ Fig.\ \ref{F:1a:measure-v-r}, $\frac{d\omega(t)}{dt}=constant$, $T_2(t')=T_2\doteq 0$,

230: $T_1(t')-T_2(t')=\frac{2R(t')}{c}$, from Eq.\ \eqref{E:7c}

231: \begin{widetext}

232: \[

233: \int_{t'}^{t'+\tau_b}\left\{\int_{t(\dot t)-\frac{2R(\dot t)}{c}}^{t(\dot

234: t)}\frac{d\omega(\hat t)}{d\hat t}\,d\hat t+\omega\left[t(\dot t)-\frac{2R(\dot

235: t)}{c}\right]\frac{2}{c}\frac{dR(\dot t)}{d\dot t}\right\}\,d\dot t=2\pi

236: \]

237: \end{widetext}

238: \[

239: R(t')\doteq\left\{\pi

240: c\nu_b-\omega\left[t'-\frac{2R(t')}{c}\right]\frac{dR(t')}{dt'}\right\}\bigg/\frac{d\omega(t)}{dt}

241: \]

242: 

243: 

244: \item To measure $a(t_1)$ history by VISAR~\cite{goosman:laserinterfer,barker:laserinterfer,luoji:visar}, %

245: Ref.\ Fig.\ \ref{F:1b:measure-a},

246: $\frac{dT_1(t')}{dt'}=\left.\frac{dT_2(\dot t)}{d\dot t}\right|_{t'-\tau}$ and

247: $\omega(t)=\frac{2\pi}{\tau^*}=constant$;

248: from Eq.\ \eqref{E:7b} there $\omega \int_{t'}^{t'+\tau_b}\left[\frac{dT_2(\dot

249: t)}{d\dot t}-\left.\frac{dT_2(\dot t)}{d \dot t}\right|_{\dot t-\tau}\right]\,d\dot

250: t=2\pi$, or $ \left.\frac{d^2T_2(\dot t)}{d\dot t^2}\right|_{\xi '}=\frac{\nu_b}{\tau

251: \nu}$, $\xi '\in(t',t'+\tau_b)$.

252: 

253: The $a(t_1)$ can be resolved form $\left.\frac{d^2 T_2(\dot t)}{d\dot t^2}\right|_{\xi

254: '}$~\cite{luoji:visar}. Moreover from Eq.\ \eqref{E:8} there $v_{_{\mathrm{

255: fringe}}}(r,t')=2\pi\nu\tau\frac{d^2T_2(t')}{dt'^2}\big/\abs{\grad\psi}$, so $a(t_1)$ is

256: also resolved by fringe's displacing speed.

257: 

258: \item To measure the rate of radiant frequency of electron in magnetic dipole ---

259: $\frac{d\nu(t)}{dt}$, Ref.\ Fig.\ 2, insert high dispersion medium with length between

260: radiant source and interferometer. If $\frac{d\nu(t)}{dt}$ does not exist, short

261: distance of fringes will be independent to the medium length $L$; if

262: $\frac{d\nu(t)}{dt}$ exists, the fringes' distance will be proportional to the length

263: and refractive index of dispersion medium.

264: \end{enumerate}

265: \end{enumerate}

266: 

267: \section{Discussion}

268: \renewcommand{\labelenumi}{\Alph{enumi}.}

269: \begin{enumerate}

270: \item Phase difference function, through phase transfer function and involved time

271: function, reflects the theoretical interrelation between outcome of two-beam

272: interference, frequency characteristics of two autonomic wave sources, for example,

273: as beat equation

274: $\int_{t'}^{t'+\tau_b}\!\left\{\omega_2[t_2(r,\dot t)]\frac{\partial t_2(r,\dot t)}{\partial

275: \dot t}-\omega_1[t_1(r,\dot t)]\frac{\partial t_1(r,\dot t)}{\partial \dot

276: t}\right\}\,d\dot t=\pm 2\pi$

277: and subject's

278: kinematic information involved in corresponding time function. The time function

279: applied in phase transfer function must be reversible, in most cases it is positive

280: reversible, that is, $\frac{dt'}{dt}=1+\frac{dT(t')}{dt}>0$; all inference and property

281: of the phase difference function can be applied in case of two autonomic wave sources,

282: although in most cases two coherent wave sources are derived from one by splitting.

283: Since phase difference function is consisted of or can be expressed by spatial frame

284: independent physical quantities, the theoretical relation and consequent inferences do

285: no depend upon spatial-frame's selection.

286: 

287: \item Explanation of zero fringe displacing result of Michelson-Morley experiment.

288: 

289: According to steady interference equation \eqref{E:6a} \eqref{E:6ab}, the only existing

290: explanation for the experimental result is phase difference at observing interference

291: point remains same or invariable in two cases, that is, light speed with respect to

292: interferometer remains same in both cases.

293: \end{enumerate}

294: 

295: 

296: \section{Conclusion}

297: Phase difference function reveals the necessary interrelation between outcome of

298: two-beam interference, frequency parameter of two autonomic wave sources, and concrete

299: time function's information affected by subject kinematic movement. Unified equation on

300: steady and non-steady two-beam interference can be derived from the phase difference

301: function. Phase difference function and related inference are independent to

302: spatial-frame's selection or remain invariable under frame transformation \cite{luoji:frametransform}.

303: 

304: 

305: \appendix*

306: \section{Derivation of $\abs{\grad T(r,t')}$}

307: \label{appendix1}

308: \[

309: \begin{split}

310: \abs{\grad T(r,t')}&=\lim_{\Delta r \to 0}\frac{T(r+\Delta r,t')-T(r,t')}{\Delta

311: r}\\

312: &=\lim_{\Delta r \to 0}\frac{t'-T(r,t')-[t'-T(r+\Delta r,t')]}{\Delta r}\\

313: &=\lim_{\Delta r \to 0}\frac{t(r,t')-t(r+\Delta r,t')}{\Delta r}=\lim_{\Delta r \to

314: 0}\frac{1}{\frac{\Delta r}{\Delta t'}}\frac{\Delta t}{\Delta t'}\\

315: &=\frac{1}{v_{io}(r,t')}\frac{dt}{dt'}=\frac{1}{v_{io}(r,t')}\left[1-\frac{\partial

316: T(r,t')}{\partial t'}\right]

317: \end{split}

318: \]

319: or from

320: \[

321: \begin{split}

322: \abs{\grad T(r,t')}&=\abs{\grad T[r,t'-T(r,t')]}=\abs{\grad T[r,t(r,t')]}\\

323: &=\frac{\partial T(r,t')}{\partial r}=\frac{d T[r,t(r,t')]}{dr}

324: \end{split}

325: \]

326: and

327: \[

328: \begin{split}

329: \frac{\partial T(r,t)}{\partial r}&=\lim_{\Delta r \to 0}\frac{T(r+\Delta

330: r,t)-T(r,t)}{\Delta r}\\

331: &=\lim_{\Delta r \to 0}\frac{t+T(r+\Delta r,t)-[t+T(r,t)]}{\Delta

332: r}\\&=\lim_{\Delta r \to 0}\frac{\Delta t'}{\Delta r}=\frac{1}{v_io(r,t)}

333: \end{split}

334: \]

335: there (Ref.\ \cite{luoji:timefunction})

336: \[

337: \begin{split}

338: \abs{\grad T(r,t')}&=\frac{\partial T(r,t')}{\partial r}=\frac{\partial

339: T(r,t)}{\partial r}\Bigg/\left[1+\frac{\partial T(r,t)}{\partial t}\right]\\

340: &=\frac{1}{v_{io}(r,t)}\left[1-\frac{\partial T(r,t')}{\partial t'}\right]

341: \end{split}

342: \]

343: 

344: \begin{thebibliography}{6}

345: \expandafter\ifx\csname natexlab\endcsname\relax\def\natexlab#1{#1}\fi

346: \expandafter\ifx\csname bibnamefont\endcsname\relax

347:   \def\bibnamefont#1{#1}\fi

348: \expandafter\ifx\csname bibfnamefont\endcsname\relax

349:   \def\bibfnamefont#1{#1}\fi

350: \expandafter\ifx\csname citenamefont\endcsname\relax

351:   \def\citenamefont#1{#1}\fi

352: \expandafter\ifx\csname url\endcsname\relax

353:   \def\url#1{\texttt{#1}}\fi

354: \expandafter\ifx\csname urlprefix\endcsname\relax\def\urlprefix{URL }\fi

355: \providecommand{\bibinfo}[2]{#2}

356: \providecommand{\eprint}[2][]{\url{#2}}

357: 

358: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Luo}({\natexlab{a}})}]{luoji:timefunction}

359: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.}~\bibnamefont{Luo}},

360:   \emph{\bibinfo{title}{Time function of signal transportation between time

361:   domains of signal source and observer}}, \bibinfo{note}{(In Preparation)}.

362: 

363: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Luo}({\natexlab{b}})}]{luoji:transferrelation}

364: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.}~\bibnamefont{Luo}},

365:   \emph{\bibinfo{title}{Differential transfer relations of physicsal flux

366:   density between time domains of source and observer}}.

367: 

368: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Goosman}(1975)}]{goosman:laserinterfer}

369: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{D.~R.} \bibnamefont{Goosman}},

370:   \bibinfo{journal}{Journal of Applied Physics} \textbf{\bibinfo{volume}{46}},

371:   \bibinfo{pages}{3516} (\bibinfo{year}{1975}).

372: 

373: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Barker}()}]{barker:laserinterfer}

374: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{L.~M.} \bibnamefont{Barker}},

375:   \emph{\bibinfo{title}{Laser interferometry in shock-wave research}}.

376: 

377: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Luo and Tian}()}]{luoji:visar}

378: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.}~\bibnamefont{Luo}} \bibnamefont{and}

379:   \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{Q.-Z.} \bibnamefont{Tian}},

380:   \emph{\bibinfo{title}{Theoretical analysis on {VISAR}}}.

381: 

382: \bibitem[{\citenamefont{Luo}({\natexlab{c}})}]{luoji:frametransform}

383: \bibinfo{author}{\bibfnamefont{J.}~\bibnamefont{Luo}},

384:   \emph{\bibinfo{title}{Spatial frame transformation and critera for

385:   classification of the frame}}, \bibinfo{note}{(In Preparation)}.

386: 

387: \end{thebibliography}

388: 

389: 

390: \end{document}

391: