1: %----------------- Settings ----------------------------
2: \documentclass[preprint, aps, pre, eqsecnum, amsmath,amssymb,showpacs]{revtex4}
3: %\documentclass[preprint, aps, pre, preprintnumbers,amsmath,amssymb,showpacs]{revtex4}
4: %\documentclass[preprint, aps, pre, eqsecnum,amsmath,amssymb,showpacs]{revtex4}
5: %\documentclass[draft,twocolumn, aps, pre, eqsecnum,amsmath, amssymb,showpacs]{revtex4}
6:
7: \usepackage[final]{graphicx} % to include figures
8: %\usepackage[draft]{graphicx} % includes only space for figures
9: %\usepackage{psfig}
10:
11: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.5} %faktor 1.5 fuer tabellenzeilenabstand
12: \newcommand{\Nabla}{\mbox{\bf\boldmath $\nabla$}}
13: \newcommand{\ve}[1]{\stackrel{\rightharpoonup}{#1}}
14: \renewcommand{\vec}[1]{{\bf #1}}
15: \newcommand{\Vxi}{\mbox{\bf\boldmath $\xi$}}
16: \newcommand{\Vphi}{\mbox{\boldmath $\varphi$}}
17: \newcommand{\Vzeta}{\mbox{\boldmath $\zeta$}}
18: \newcommand{\VPsi}{\mbox{\boldmath $\Psi$}}
19: \newcommand{\Overrightarrow}[1]{\stackrel{\textstyle\rightarrow}{#1}}
20:
21: % info und seite in kopfzeile
22: \pagestyle{myheadings}
23: % datum in kopfzeile. falls 'twoside': {leftside}{rightside}
24: \markboth{\today}{\today}
25:
26: \bibliographystyle{prsty}
27:
28: \begin{document}
29:
30: \title{Spiral and Taylor vortex fronts and pulses in axial through-flow}
31:
32: \author{A.~Pinter, M.~L\"ucke, and Ch.~Hoffmann}
33: \affiliation{Institut f\"ur Theoretische Physik, Universit\"at des Saarlandes,
34: Postfach 151150, \\ D-66041 Saarbr\"ucken, Germany}
35:
36: \date{\today}
37:
38: %-------------- Abstract --------------------------------
39: \begin{abstract}
40: %-----------------------------------------------------
41: The influence of an axial through-flow on the spatiotemporal
42: growth behavior of different vortex structures in
43: the Taylor-Couette system with radius ratio $\eta=0.5$ is determined.
44: The Navier Stokes equations (NSE) linearized around the basic
45: Couette-Poiseuille flow are solved numerically with a shooting method in a wide
46: range of through-flow strengths $Re$ and different rates of co- and
47: counterrotating cylinders for
48: toroidally closed vortices with azimuthal wave number $m=0$ and for spiral vortex
49: flow with $m= \pm 1$. For each of these three different vortex varieties we have
50: investigated ({\it i}) axially extended vortex structures, ({\it ii}) axially
51: localized vortex pulses, and ({\it iii}) vortex fronts.
52: The complex dispersion relations of the linearized NSE for vortex modes with
53: the three different $m$ are evaluated for real axial wave numbers for ({\it i})
54: and over the plane of complex axial wave numbers for ({\it ii}, {\it iii}).
55: We have also determined the Ginzburg-Landau amplitude equation (GLE) approximation
56: in order to analyze its predictions for the vortex stuctures
57: ({\it ii}, {\it iii}). Critical bifurcation thresholds for
58: extended vortex structures are evaluated. The boundaries between
59: absolute and convective instability of the basic state for vortex pulses
60: are determined with a saddle-point analysis of the dispersion relations.
61: Fit parameters for power-law expansions of the boundaries up to $Re^4$ are
62: listed in two tables. Finally, the linearly selected front behavior of growing
63: vortex structures is investigated using saddle-point analyses of the dispersion
64: relations of NSE and GLE. For the two front intensity
65: profiles (increasing in positive or negative axial direction) we have determined
66: front velocities, axial growth rates, and the wave numbers and frequencies of
67: the unfolding vortex patterns with azimuthal wave numbers $m=0, \pm 1$,
68: respectively.
69: \end{abstract}
70:
71: \pacs{PACS number(s): 47.20.-k, 47.54.+r, 47.32.-y, 47.10.+g}
72: %****************************************************************
73: % 47.20.-k : Hydrodynamic stability
74: % 47.54.+r Pattern selection; pattern formation
75: % 47.32.-y Rotational flow and vorticity
76: % 47.10.+g : General theory (of fluid dynamics)
77: % 47.60.+i Flows in ducts, channels, nozzles, and conduits
78: %****************************************************************
79: \maketitle
80:
81: %\newpage
82: % skip 2/6inch
83: %\vskip2pc
84:
85: %im gegenstz zu \widetext (z.b. bei formeln)
86: %halbe zeitenbreite f"ur spaltentext
87: %\narrowtext
88: %\tableofcontents
89: %\draft
90:
91:
92: %-------------- Sec. I ---------------------------------
93: \section{INTRODUCTION} \label{SEC.INTRO}
94: The Taylor-Couette system \cite{review} of fluid flow in the annulus between
95: concentric cylinders with the inner
96: and the outer one rotating with different velocities is one of the simplest
97: examples of a driven nonlinear dissipative system that shows spontaneous pattern
98: formation out of an unstructured basic state that is stable at small driving
99: \cite{CRO-HOH}.
100: This basic flow state is stationary and axially and azimuthally homogeneous and
101: shows only a radial variation across the annular gap. It consists of a
102: superposition of circular Couette flow (CCF) in azimuthal direction
103: and of an annular Poiseuille flow (APF) in axial direction if as in our case
104: an axial through-flow is imposed. Axially periodic vortex flow solutions
105: bifurcate \cite{CHO-IOO,GOL-STE-SCH-LAN} out of this homogeneous
106: basic flow when the rotation rate of the inner cylinder is sufficiently
107: high. These primary bifurcation thresholds to periodic vortex stuctures have
108: been the aim of many linear stability analyses of the basic flow state
109: \cite{DIP-PRI,TAK-JAN,NG-TUR,LAN-TAG-KOS-SWI-GOL,GEB-GRO,MES-MAR}.
110:
111: For the radius ratio $\eta =0.5$ and the parameter ranges of rotation
112: rates and through-flow investigated here in this work three spatiotemporally
113: differing primary vortex structures are relevant: Rotationally
114: symmetric, toroidally closed vortices with
115: azimuthal wave number $m=0$ that move in downstream direction with the APF ---
116: for shortness we call this flow state Taylor vortex flow (TVF) although the
117: presence of an axial through-flow modifies the genuine stationary TVF
118: stucture. And, furthermore, spiral vortex flow (SPI) consisting of either left
119: spiral vortices (L-SPI) with $m=1$ or right spiral vortices (R-SPI) with
120: $m=-1$.
121:
122: L-SPI and R-SPI are axial mirror images of each other in the absence of axial
123: through-flow with the latter breaking the mirror symmetry of the former.
124: While rotating azimuthally into the same direction as the inner cylinder
125: L-SPI propagate axially opposite to R-SPI. This spiral dynamics is largely
126: induced by the advective properties of the basic flow state.
127: Furthermore, without through-flow the symmetry degenerate bifurcation treshold
128: for these two symmetry degenerate SPI
129: solutions is simultaneously also the bifurcation threshold for a vortex flow
130: solution called ribbons \cite{CHO-IOO}. This solution consists right at threshold
131: of a linear superposition
132: of L-SPI and R-SPI with equal amplitude and it becomes further away from
133: threshold a genuine nonlinear vortex flow solution. However, here
134: we are dealing only with linear vortex flow fields that may be superimposed
135: with arbitrary amplitudes as well as wave numbers and that are evolving
136: separately from each other according to the linear field equations. Thus we do
137: not need to discuss
138: ribbons separately from our general investigation of linear vortex modes with
139: general axial and azimuthal wave numbers.
140:
141: In this work we quantitatively determine the influence of an axial through-flow
142: on the spatiotemporal growth properties of linear perturbations of the basic
143: flow state with azimuthal wave numbers $m=0$ and $m=\pm 1$, i.e., of toroidally
144: closed vortices and of spiral vortices, repectively. In each case we investigate
145: ({\it i}) axially extended structures, ({\it ii}) pulses of axially localized
146: wave packets of vortices, and ({\it iii}) vortex fronts.
147:
148: In Sec.~\ref{SEC.SYSTEM} we describe the system, we
149: briefly review the linearized Navier-Stokes equations (NSE) for the eigenvalue
150: problem describing vortex perturbations, and
151: we give details of our numerical procedure to solve the eigenvalue problem.
152: In Sec.~\ref{SEC.EXTENDED_VORTICES}
153: we discuss the spatiotemporal structure, symmetry properties, and
154: bifurcation thresholds for onset of axially extended
155: vortex perturbations of the form $e^{i(kz + m\varphi)}$ with real axial wave
156: number $k$ and different azimuthal wave numbers $m$ in the absence and presence
157: of an axial through-flow. In Sec.~\ref{SEC.LOCAL-PERTUB}
158: we consider axially localized wave packets
159: consisting of superpositions of vortex eigenmodes of the linear NSE. Here we
160: determine among others the boundary between convective and absolute instability
161: of the basic flow against growth of vortices with a particular $m$ by a
162: saddle point analysis of the linear complex dispersion relation of the NSE
163: over the plane of complex axial wave numbers. In addition we also determine
164: the Ginzburg-Landau amplitude
165: equation (GLE) approximation for the dispersion relation for the sake of
166: comparison. In Sec.~\ref{FRONTS} we evaluate the spatiotemporal properties of
167: linearly selected vortex fronts using a saddlepoint analysis of the dispersion
168: relation. Also here we compare with GLE results. The final section contains a
169: summary.
170:
171: %\clearpage
172: %-------------- Sec. II --------------------------------
173: \section{System} \label{SEC.SYSTEM}
174: %---------------------------------------------------------
175: Here we describe the system and we provide definitions and equations. Then we
176: briefly review the linearized equations for the eigenvalue problem describing
177: vortex perturbations of the basic flow state. Finally
178: we give details of our numerical procedure to solve the eigenvalue problem.
179: %-------------- Sec. II A--------------------------------
180: \subsection{Setup} \label{SEC.SETUP}
181: %---------------------------------------------------------
182: We consider the flow of an incompressible fluid in the annulus between two
183: concentric cylinders of inner radius $r_1$ and outer radius $r_2$ with a gap width
184: $d=r_2-r_1$. The boundary conditions at $r_1$ and $r_2$ are no-slip. The angular
185: velocity of the inner and outer cylinder is $\Omega_{1}$ and $\Omega_{2}$,
186: respectively. The associated Reynolds numbers are
187: \begin{equation}
188: R_{1}=\frac{d}{\nu}r_1\Omega_{1}, \quad
189: R_{2}=\frac{d}{\nu}r_2\Omega_{2},
190: \end{equation}
191: where $\nu$ is the kinematic viscosity. An externally imposed axial through-flow
192: is measured by the axial Reynolds number
193: \begin{equation}
194: Re=\frac{d}{\nu} \langle w \rangle
195: \end{equation}
196: where the mean axial velocity $\langle w \rangle$ averaged over the annular
197: cross section describes the total through-flow. We use also the relative control
198: parameters
199: \begin{equation}
200: \mu = \frac{R_{1}}{R_{1c}(Re)}-1,\quad \epsilon = \frac{R_{1}}{R_{1c}(Re=0)}-1,
201: \end{equation}
202: measuring the relative distance of the inner Reynolds number $R_{1}$ from
203: the critical onset $R_{1c}$ of axially extended spiral vortices or Taylor
204: vortices in the presence and in the absence $(Re=0)$ of through-flow,
205: respectively \cite{epsT}. In this notation
206: \begin{equation} \label{epsilon_c}
207: \mu_c = 0 \quad \mbox{and} \quad
208: \epsilon_c (Re) = \frac{R_{1c}(Re)}{R_{1c}(Re=0)} -1
209: \end{equation}
210: is the critical threshold for onset of the vortex flow in question. The relation
211: between $\mu$ and $\epsilon$ is
212: \begin{equation}
213: \mu= \frac{\epsilon-\epsilon_{c}(Re)}{1+\epsilon_c (Re)}.
214: \end{equation}
215: With infinitely long cylinders the only relevant parameter
216: characterizing the geometry is the radius ratio $\eta=r_1/r_2$.
217:
218: The velocity field $\bf u$ of the fluid is described by the Navier-Stokes
219: equations (NSE) for incompressible fluid flow
220: \begin{equation} \label{NAVIER2}
221: \partial_t {\mathbf u}= \Nabla^2 {\bf u} -
222: R_{1} ({\bf u}\cdot \Nabla){\bf u} - \Nabla p,\quad \Nabla \cdot {\bf u} = 0.
223: \end{equation}
224: Here and in the following we scale positions by the gap width $d$, the velocity
225: ${\bf u}$ by the velocity $r_1\Omega_{1}$ of the inner cylinder, time $t$ by
226: the momentum diffusion time $d^{2}/\nu$ across the gap, and the pressure $p$ by
227: $\rho r_1 \Omega_{1}\nu/d$ with $\rho$ denoting the constant mass density of the
228: fluid. Furthermore we decompose the velocity field
229: \begin{equation}
230: {\bf u} = u{\bf e}_r + v{\bf e}_{\varphi} + w{\bf e}_z
231: \end{equation}
232: into radial ($u$), azimuthal ($v$), and axial ($w$) components
233: using cylindrical coordinates $r,\varphi,z$.
234: %-------------- Sec. II B--------------------------------
235: \subsection{Basic flow state} \label{SEC.BASIC_FLOW}
236: %---------------------------------------------------------
237: The basic flow state ${\bf u}_0$ that is realized
238: in the absolutely stable regime of inner Reynolds numbers $R_1$ below the
239: thresholds for onset of Taylor and spiral vortex flow is rotationally symmetric,
240: axially homogeneous, and constant in time. It consists of a linear superposition
241: of circular Couette flow (CCF) in azimuthal direction, ${\bf e}_{\varphi}$, and
242: of annular Poiseuille flow (APF) in axial direction, ${\bf e}_z$,
243: \begin{equation}\label{u_0}
244: {\bf u}_0 = v_{CCF}(r){\bf e}_{\varphi}+w_{APF}(r){\bf e}_{z}
245: \end{equation}
246: without any radial component. Here
247: \begin{equation}
248: v_{CCF}(r)=Ar+B/r,
249: \end{equation}
250: and
251: \begin{equation}
252: w_{APF}(r)=Re\frac{r^{2}+C ln(r)+D}{E},
253: \end{equation}
254: with
255: \begin{eqnarray}
256: A&=&-\frac{\eta^{2}-\Omega_{2}/\Omega_{1}}{\eta(1+\eta)},\\
257: B&=&\frac{\eta(1-\Omega_{2}/\Omega_{1})}{(1-\eta)(1-\eta^{2})},\\
258: C&=&\frac{1+\eta}{(1-\eta)ln(\eta)},\\
259: D&=&\frac{(1+\eta)\ln(1-\eta)}{(1-\eta)\ln(\eta)}-\frac{1}{(1-\eta)^{2}},\\
260: E&=&-\frac{1}{2}R_{1}\frac{1-\eta^{2}+(1+\eta^{2})\ln(\eta)}{(1-\eta)^{2}\ln(\eta)}.
261: \end{eqnarray}
262: %-------------- Sec. II C -------------------------------
263: \subsection{Linear eigenvalue problem of vortex perturbations}
264: \label{SEC.LIN-STAB-ANALYSIS}
265: %----------------------------------------------------------------------
266: Let $\psi =(u,v,w,p)$ abbreviate the deviation fields from the basic flow state
267: (\ref{u_0}). Then the general solution of the NSE linearized in the deviation
268: fields can be written as a superposition of modes of the form
269: \begin{equation}\label{Ansatz}
270: \psi(r,\varphi,z,t) = \phi(r)e^{i(kz + m\varphi)}e^{\sigma t}
271: \end{equation}
272: with axial wave number $k=2\pi/\lambda$ and integer azimuthal wave number $m$.
273: The complex amplitude functions
274: \begin{equation}
275: \phi(r) = \left[ U(r),V(r), W(r),P(r) \right]
276: \end{equation}
277: depend on the mode indices $k,m$ and the radial coordinate $r$. The characteristic
278: exponent $\sigma(k,m)$ is in general complex. It is decomposed here as follows
279: \begin{equation}
280: \sigma = \Re \sigma + i\, \Im \sigma = \gamma - i \omega
281: \end{equation}
282: into the growth rate $\gamma$ and the characteristic frequency $\omega$ of the
283: $k-m$ mode. Substituting the above solution ansatz into the linearized NSE yields
284: \begin{eqnarray}
285: \label{Linear1}
286: & & \sigma U = \left( \partial_r^2 + \frac{1}{r} \partial_r
287: - \frac{1+m^2}{r^2} - k^2 \right) U + 2 F V \nonumber\\
288: & & \qquad - \partial_r P -im \left( \frac{2}{r^2} V + F U \right)- ik H U \\
289: \label{Linear2}
290: & & \sigma V = \left( \partial_r^2 + \frac{1}{r}\partial_r
291: - \frac{1+m^2}{r^2} - k^2 \right) V + 2GU \nonumber\\
292: & & \qquad -\frac{im}{r} P + im \left( \frac{2}{r^2} U - F V \right)-ikH V \\
293: \label{Linear3}
294: & & \sigma W = \left( \partial_r^2 + \frac{1}{r} \partial_r
295: - \frac{m^2}{r^2} - k^2 \right) W -ikP \nonumber\\
296: & & \qquad -im F W - I U-ikH W \\
297: \label{Linear4}
298: & & \quad 0 = \partial_r U + \frac{1}{r} U + \frac{im}{r} V + ikW .
299: \end{eqnarray}
300: The solution of this eigenvalue problem yields the characteristic exponent
301: $\sigma$ and the associated eigenfunctions $\phi(r)$ as functions of $k,m$.
302: Here
303: \begin{eqnarray} \label{FGHIKonstanten}
304: F(r) & = &\frac{R_1}{r} v_{CCF}(r) \quad , \quad G = -R_1 A,\\
305: H(r) & = & R_1 w_{APF}(r) \quad , \quad I(r) = \partial_r H(r)
306: \end{eqnarray}
307: are quantities defining the basic flow state (\ref{u_0}). The latter enters via
308: the linearized advective term of the NSE.
309:
310: In order to rewrite (\ref{Linear1} - \ref{Linear4}) into a system of first-order
311: differential equations -- which is advantageous for numerical reasons -- we
312: introduce three additional complex amplitude functions
313: \cite{LAN-TAG-KOS-SWI-GOL}
314: \begin{eqnarray}
315: \label{DefX}
316: X &=& \partial_r U + \frac{1}{r} U - P \, , \\
317: Y &=& \partial_r V + \frac{1}{r} V \, , \\
318: Z &=& \partial_r W \, .
319: \end{eqnarray}
320: Using (\ref{DefX}) and the continuity equation (\ref{Linear4}) one can then
321: eliminate the pressure in Eq.(\ref{Linear2}) by $P=-X-ikW-\frac{im}{r}V.$
322: All in all one obtains in this way a system of 6 coupled, first-order
323: differential equations
324: \begin{equation} \label{resultEW}
325: \partial_r {\bf X} = {\cal L}\ {\bf X},
326: \end{equation}
327: for the six variables
328: \begin{equation} \label{start.vector}
329: {\mathbf X}=\left( U,V,W,X,Y,Z \right)^{T}
330: \end{equation}
331: with
332: \begin{equation} \label{Result.Operator}
333: {\cal L} = \left(
334: \begin{array}{cccccc}
335: -\frac{1}{r} & - i\frac{m}{r} & -ik & 0 & 0 & 0\\
336: 0 & -\frac{1}{r} & 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\
337: 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1\\
338: L & 2(i\frac{m}{r^2} - F) & 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\
339: - 2(i\frac{m}{r^2} + G) & L + \frac{m^2}{r^2} & \frac{mk}{r} & -i\frac{m}{r} & 0 & 0 \\
340: I & \frac{mk}{r} & L + k^2 & -ik & 0 & -\frac{1}{r} \\
341: \end{array} \right)
342: \end{equation}
343: where
344: \begin{equation} \label{defineL}
345: L = \sigma + \frac{m^2}{r^2} + k^2 + imF + ikH.
346: \end{equation}
347: %-------------- Sec. II D -----------------------------
348: \subsection{Numerical procedures} \label{SEC.NUM-PROC1}
349: %------------------------------------------------------------------
350: We have solved the eigenvalue equations (\ref{resultEW}) numerically with a
351: standard shooting method subject to the six boundary conditions,
352: \begin{equation} \label{result.boundary}
353: U=V=W=0 \quad \textrm{at} \quad r_1=\eta/(1-\eta) \,\,
354: \textrm{and} \,\, r_2 = 1/(1-\eta) \, ,
355: \end{equation}
356: which make the eigenvalue spectrum discrete.
357: To integrate from $r_1$ to $r_2$ we used a fourth-order Runge-Kutta formula
358: \cite{STO-BUR} with two step widths ( $\Delta r = 1/200$ and 1/400,
359: respectively) for a Richardson
360: extrapolation. A Newton-Raphson method \cite{PRE-TEU-VET-FLA} was then used to
361: find the roots of the complex
362: determinant of the $3 \times 3$ matrix which ensures the vanishing of
363: $U,V,W$ at the outer cylinder. We therefore vary in the Newton-Raphson
364: procedure only two of the parameters ($\sigma,\eta, R_{1}, R_{2}, Re, m, k$)
365: \cite{DIP-PRI} that enter into (\ref{resultEW}) while keeping the others
366: fixed. In this way we
367: determine on the one hand the marginal threshold values of $R_1$ and $\omega$
368: with $\gamma=0$ for which the basic state is marginally stable against the
369: growth of an extended perturbation with given $m$ and real axial wave number
370: $k$ at specified parameters $\eta, R_2, Re$. On the other hand we calculate for
371: given $m, \eta, R_1, R_2, Re$ the complex eigenvalue $\sigma$ over the
372: {\em complex} wave number plane -- including as special case also the real
373: $k$-axis. In each case we are interested only in the vortex modes with the
374: largest growth rates for which the associated amplitude functions $\phi(r)$
375: display the least radial variation with the fewest number of nodes.
376:
377: We present here results for the radius ratio $\eta=0.5$ in a range of outer
378: Reynolds numbers $-150 \leq R_2 \leq 50$. In this parameter regime the vortex
379: perturbations with the
380: largest growth rates have in the absence of through-flow azimuthal wave numbers
381: of either $m=0$ or $m=\pm 1$ \cite{{LAN-TAG-KOS-SWI-GOL}}. We investigate here
382: linear properties of such vortices with $m=0$ and $m=\pm 1$ in a through-flow of
383: Reynolds numbers $0\leq Re \leq 20$.
384: %\clearpage
385: %-------------- Sec. III -----------------------------
386: \section{Axially extended vortex structures}
387: \label{SEC.EXTENDED_VORTICES}
388: %------------------------------------------------------
389: Here we discuss the spatiotemporal structure, symmetry properties, and
390: bifurcation thresholds for onset of axially extended
391: vortex perturbations with real axial wave number $k$ and different azimuthal
392: wave numbers $m$ in the absence and presence of an axial through-flow.
393: %-------------- Sec. III A -----------------------------
394: \subsection{Spatiotemporal structure} \label{SEC.STRUCTURE}
395: %------------------------------------------------------
396: Structure and dynamics of the vortex modes (\ref{Ansatz}) are dominated by the
397: fact that their phases are constant on any cylindrical surface,
398: $r=const$, along lines given by the equation
399: \begin{equation} \label{z_phase}
400: z_0 = - \frac{m}{k}\varphi + \frac{\omega(k,m)}{k}t \, .
401: \end{equation}
402: Here the constant phase coming from the amplitude $\phi(r)$ is suppressed.
403: Thus, on the $\varphi-z$ plane of such an 'unrolled' cylindrical surface these
404: lines of constant phase are straight.
405: %------------------------------------------------------
406: \subsubsection{Taylor vortex like patterns --- $m$=0}
407: %------------------------------------------------------
408: For rotationally symmetric Taylor vortex like perturbations the line pattern of
409: constant phases, $kz_0 = n 2 \pi$, is parallel to ${\bf e}_\varphi$. The $m$=0
410: pattern is stationary for $Re=0$. Only for finite through-flow it
411: propagates axially with phase velocity
412: \begin{equation} \label{w_phase_TVF}
413: w_{phase} = \frac{\omega}{k}
414: \end{equation}
415: that is proportional to $Re$. The main reason for this is that the azimuthal
416: flow of the basic
417: CCF state is precisely parallel to the vortex lines of constant phase
418: while the APF flow being perpendicular to them can advect them. The latter
419: happens in our axially periodic system that does not exert any phase pinning
420: at the axial boundaries as soon as $Re > 0$.
421: %------------------------------------------------------
422: \subsubsection{Spiral patterns --- $m \neq 0$}
423: %------------------------------------------------------
424: The vortex modes (\ref{Ansatz}) with axial wave number $m \neq 0$ have spiral
425: structure. When $m/k$ is positive (negative) the lines of constant phase
426: $z_0(\varphi,t)$ (\ref{z_phase}) wind in a left spiral L-SPI (right spiral
427: R-SPI) around the cylindrical surface $r=const$ with negative (positive) slope
428: $\partial_{\varphi} z_0 = -m/k$. The lines of constant phase and with it the
429: whole spiral stucture rotates in $\varphi$ rigidly with angular velocity
430: \begin{equation} \label{phidot_phase}
431: \dot{\varphi}_{SPI} = \frac{\omega}{m} \, .
432: \end{equation}
433: In the absence of an externally imposed through-flow, $Re$=0, this rotation
434: proceeds for L-SPI and R-SPI alike into the same direction as the rotation of
435: the inner cylinder. The reason is that
436: the spiral perturbations are advected by the inner part of the azimuthal CCF
437: which is relevant for the centrifugal instability leading to vortex
438: generation. A model explaining this effect is presented in \cite{HOF-LUE}.
439:
440: There
441: are two immediate consequences of this advective origin of the spiral dynamics
442: induced by the inner cylinder's rotation: ({\it i}) With the latter being
443: by definition positive -- in this work the inner cylinder is taken to rotate in
444: positive $\varphi$-direction -- also $\omega (k,m) /m $ is positive for $Re$=0.
445: Hence, say, an $m=1$ ($m=-1$) spiral has positive (negative) frequency for
446: $Re$=0. ({\it ii}) Then a L-SPI (R-SPI) being defined by $m/k > 0$ ($m/k < 0$)
447: propagates for $Re$=0 upwards (downwards) with positive (negative) axial phase
448: velocity
449: \begin{equation}
450: w_{phase} = \frac{\omega}{k} = \frac{m}{k} \dot{\varphi}_{SPI}
451: \end{equation}
452: that is directly related to its {\em positive} angular
453: velocity $\dot{\varphi}_{SPI}$.
454:
455: An externally applied axial through-flow changes the axial phase velocities and
456: frequencies of the $m=0$ and $m \neq 0$ vortex modes roughly proportional to
457: $Re$, i.e.,
458: \begin{equation}
459: w_{phase}(k,m,Re) - w_{phase}(k,m,Re=0) \propto Re \, .
460: \end{equation}
461: Simultaneously the rotation rates, $\dot{\varphi}_{SPI} = w_{phase} k /m$, of
462: the spirals are changed accordingly. Thus, in each case the vortex frequencies
463: are largely determined by the basic state's advective properties, i.e., by the
464: combination of azimuthal advection by $v_{CCF}$ and axial advection by
465: $w_{APF}$.
466: %-------------- Sec. III B -----------------------------
467: \subsection{Symmetries} \label{SEC.SYMM-EIGENVALUE}
468: %------------------------------------------------------
469: Here we consider symmetry properties of axially extended vortex perturbations of
470: the form (\ref{Ansatz}) with real wave number $k$. Symmetry relations between
471: different vortex fronts with complex wave number $Q$ are discussed later on in
472: Sec.~\ref{SEC.FRONT-SYMM}.
473:
474: Table \ref{TAB.MOD-SYMM} shows the symmetry transformations that leave the
475: eigenvalue problem unchanged. They reflect ({\it i}) that ${\cal L}$ transforms
476: under complex conjugation (indicated by an overline) as
477: \begin{equation} \label{Lcomplexconj}
478: \overline {{\cal L}(k,m,\sigma)} = {\cal L} (-k,-m, \overline {\sigma})
479: \end{equation}
480: and ({\it ii}) that the NSE (\ref{NAVIER2}) are invariant under an axial
481: reflection $(z,Re,w) \longrightarrow (-z,-Re,-w)$.
482:
483: Thus one infers, for example, that the growth rate (frequency) of the
484: characteristic exponent $ \sigma = \gamma - i \omega$ for $m = 0$ vortices is
485: an even (odd) function of $k$ and $Re$. For perturbations with $m\ne 0$ one
486: finds that
487: \begin{eqnarray}
488: \gamma(k,m,Re) = \gamma(-k,-m,Re) &=& \gamma(-k,m,-Re) = \gamma(k,-m,-Re) \\
489: \omega(k,m,Re) = -\omega(-k,-m,Re) &=& \omega(-k,m,-Re) = -\omega(k,-m,-Re)
490: \end{eqnarray}
491: and that the spatiotemporal structure including the amplitude functions of a
492: L-spiral perturbation ($k/m > 0$) at $Re > 0$ is the same as that of a R-spiral
493: ($k/m < 0$) at $Re < 0$. Note, however, that any finite through-flow breaks
494: the axial mirror symmetry between L- and R-spirals at $Re=0$ so that, among
495: others,
496: \begin{equation}
497: \gamma_R (- Re) = \gamma_L (Re) \ne \gamma_R (Re) = \gamma_L (- Re)
498: \end{equation}
499: when $Re \ne 0$. But the symmetry relations are such that it
500: suffices to investigate, say, positive $k$ combined together with
501: either ({\em i}) $m>0$ only for positive {\em and} negative $Re$ or, equivalently,
502: ({\em ii}) $m$ positive {\em and} negative for $Re>0$ only in order to get the
503: complete linear information on both spiral vortex types.
504: %-------------- Sec. III c -----------------------------
505: \subsection{Bifurcation thresholds} \label{SEC.RESULTS1}
506: %----------------------------------------------------
507: Figure~\ref{FIG.R1c_R2} shows the {\em critical} bifurcation thresholds
508: $R_{1c}(R_2)$ for $m=0$ and $m=\pm 1$ vortex patterns with the respective
509: {\em critical} wave numbers, $k_c(R_2)$, as functions of $R_2$ in the absence of
510: through-flow.
511:
512: The vertical lines in Fig.~\ref{FIG.R1c_R2} mark the two outer
513: Reynolds numbers $R_2 = 0$ and $R_2 = -125$ for which we show in
514: Fig.~\ref{FIG.R1c_Re} as representative examples how the critical thresholds
515: evolve with through-flow Reynolds number $Re$. The above discussed
516: symmetry relation $\gamma_R (- Re) = \gamma_L (Re)$ between the growth rates
517: of R- and L-spirals implies the corresponding relation between the respective
518: bifurcation thresholds (full and dashed lines in Fig.~\ref{FIG.R1c_Re}).
519: In the remainder of this paper we therefore restrict ourselves without loss of
520: information to positive $Re$.
521:
522: For small $Re>0$ the axial flow stabilizes the basic state against growth of
523: TVF ($m=0$) and R-SPI ($m=-1$) perturbations. On the other hand, the
524: bifurcation threshold for
525: L-SPI ($m=1$) vortex patterns that propagate into the same direction as the
526: through-flow decreases at small $Re$ and increases only at larger $Re$.
527: The upwards shift of the $m=0$ threshold with increasing $Re$ is
528: stronger than the one for $m=1$. Thus, eventually the latter comes to lie below
529: the former and consequently the growth of L-spirals propagating into the same
530: direction as the through-flow is favored for sufficiently large $Re$ even when
531: $R_2=0$.
532:
533: Dotted lines in Fig.~\ref{FIG.EPSILON} show the reduced critical threshold
534: curves $\epsilon_c(Re)$ (\ref{epsilon_c}) as functions of $Re$ for the two
535: representative outer Reynolds numbers $R_2=0$ and $R_2=-125$. The other lines
536: in Fig.~\ref{FIG.EPSILON} are discussed in Sec. \ref{SEC.LOCAL-PERTUB}. Our
537: numerical results for $\epsilon_c(Re)$ that were obtained in steps of
538: $\delta Re = 1$ were fitted in the range $Re=-20\cdots20$ to the following
539: expression
540: \begin{equation} \label{fitfunction}
541: f=a_{1}Re+a_{2}Re^{2}+a_{3}Re^{3}+a_{4}Re^{4} \, .
542: \end{equation}
543: The fit parameters $a_n$ are listed for different $R_2$ in Tables
544: \ref{TAB.FITPARA} and \ref{TAB.FITPARA2} for TVF ($m=0$) and L-SPI $(m=1)$,
545: respectively. The threshold curves for R-SPI $(m=-1)$ are obtained according to
546: Sec.~\ref{SEC.SYMM-EIGENVALUE} from those for L-SPI by $Re \rightarrow -Re$,
547: i.e., by changing the sign of the odd coefficients in Table~\ref{TAB.FITPARA2}.
548: %\clearpage
549: %-------------- Sec. IV -----------------------------
550: \section{Localized vortex perturbations} \label{SEC.LOCAL-PERTUB}
551: %-------------------------------------------------------------
552: So far we have considered axially extended vortex perturbations of the form
553: $\psi(r,\varphi,z,t) = \phi(r)e^{i(kz + m\varphi)}$
554: which are single eigenmodes of the operator ${\cal L}$~(\ref{Result.Operator}).
555: For supercritical control parameters, $R_1 > R_{1c}(m)$, a finite band of axial
556: wave numbers can grow and with it also axially localized wave packets
557: consisting of superpositions of vortex modes.
558: %****************** IV A**********************************************
559: \subsection{Vortex packets} \label{SEC.PACKETS}
560: %****************************************************************
561: Let us consider first an infinitesimal initial perturbation with azimuthal
562: wave number $m$ that is axially localized, i.e., a wave packet that
563: consists of a superposition of vortex modes of different $k$ but common $m$ --
564: an initial perturbation containing different $m$-modes would be just a sum of
565: the above described vortex packets that would evolve independently of each other
566: as long as the linear description is valid.
567:
568: After fast transients have decayed a pulse like perturbation survives
569: with axial wave numbers within the unstable band centered around the wave
570: number of maximal growth $k_{max}(m) \simeq k_c(m)$. Since the above described
571: wave packet contains vortex modes that can grow the pulse will grow as well.
572: Simultaneously the pulse center travels axially for small $\epsilon$ with
573: the critical goup velocity
574: \begin{equation}
575: v_{g}=\left. \frac{\partial \omega(k)}{\partial k} \right|_{k_{c}}.
576: \end{equation}
577: Hence when at a bifurcation threshold the frequency is nonzero with a finite
578: group velocity then the supercritical spatiotemporal growth behavior of an
579: axially {\it localized} vortex perturbation differs significantly from an axially
580: {\it extended} vortex mode. The growth of the latter is axially uniform which is
581: not the case for the former.
582:
583: Furthermore,
584: one has to distinguish between two different supercritical regimes for the
585: former: ({\em i}) In the so-called convectively unstable parameter regime
586: of the basic state the vortex packet moves with the velocity $v_{g}$ faster
587: away than it grows -- while growing in the frame comoving with $v_{g}$ the
588: pulse moves out of the system so that the basic state is restored
589: \cite{b&b,HUE}. In other words, the two fronts that join
590: the pulse intensity envelope to the structureless state propagate
591: both in the direction in which the packet center moves.
592: {\em(ii)} In the so called absolutely unstable parameter regime
593: the growth rate of the packet is so large that one front propagates in the
594: laboratory frame opposite to the center motion. Thus, the packet expands not
595: only into the direction of the pulse motion but also opposite to it
596: \cite{b&b} so that eventually the initial perturbation can fill the entire
597: system. But the linear growth analysis of the vortex fields does not
598: determine in what nonlinear final stable state the system will end nor what
599: possible intermediate nonlinear transient behavior might occur.
600:
601: However, this analysis has an important implication for experiments with
602: through-flow:
603: Developed vortex structures can be seen in finite systems with vortex
604: suppressing inlet conditions only in the absolutely unstable regime which is
605: typically realized at larger $R_1 > R_{1c}$ (cf. Fig.~\ref{FIG.EPSILON}) if one
606: leaves aside noise-sustained patterns \cite{Deissler85,BAC-Pre94} in the
607: convectively unstable regime. In this latter regime the vortex front that
608: connects to the zero amplitude inlet condition moves downstream (we assume that
609: the fronts of our forwards bifurcating vortex structures are linearly selected
610: thus excluding the buildup of nonlinear fronts that might revert their
611: propagation direction). In the absolutely unstable regime, on the other hand,
612: an upstream motion of this front is stopped by the inlet condition at a
613: characteristic downstream growth length from the inlet. This growth length
614: of the downstream evolving vortex structure diverges \cite{MLK89,BLRS96} when
615: approaching the boundary between convective and absolute instability from the
616: latter regime.
617:
618: It is remarkable that based on the experimental observations of Takeuchi and
619: Jankowski \cite{TAK-JAN} such a behavior was discussed already in 1979 [cf.
620: figures 4 and 5(a) and their discussion in Sec. 6 of ref.~\cite{TAK-JAN}], albeit
621: without invoking the concept of absolute and convective instability \cite{b&b}
622: which was introduced to a broader fluid dynamics community only a few years
623: later \cite{HUE}.
624:
625: %-------------- Sec. IV B ---------------------------
626: \subsection{Boundary between convective and absolute instability:
627: saddle point analysis} \label{SEC.SADDLE-POINT}
628: %---------------------------------------------------------------
629: The boundary between convective and absolute instability of the basic flow
630: against growth of vortices with a particular azimuthal wave number $m$
631: is marked by those parameter combinations for which one of the fronts of the
632: linear packet of $m$-vortices reverts its propagation direction in the
633: laboratory frame: In the convectively unstable parameter regime this front
634: propagates in the same direction as the
635: center of the packet, in the absolutely unstable regime it moves opposite to
636: it, and right on the boundary between the two regimes the front is stationary
637: in the laboratory frame.
638:
639: This parameter combination can be determined
640: by a saddle point analysis of the linear complex dispersion relation
641: $\sigma(Q)$ over the plane of complex wave numbers \cite{HUE,CRO-HOH}
642: \begin{equation}
643: Q = \Re Q + i\Im Q = k - i K \, .
644: \end{equation}
645: Here we do not display the dependence of
646: \begin{equation}
647: \sigma(Q) = \Re \sigma(Q) + i\Im \sigma(Q) = \gamma(Q) - i \omega(Q)
648: \end{equation}
649: on the parameters $R_1, R_2, Re, \eta$ and we also do not indicate that the
650: dispersion relations for vortex perturbations with different azimuthal wave
651: numbers $m$ are different. The boundary condition of no growth for a front that
652: is stationary in the laboratory system is
653: \begin{equation} \label{Wachsbed.}
654: \Re\sigma = 0
655: \end{equation}
656: at the appropriate saddle position, $Q^\ast$, of $\sigma(Q)$ in the complex
657: wave number plane \cite{HUE}. Here $Q^\ast$ follows from
658: \begin{equation} \label{saddle}
659: \frac{d\sigma(Q)}{dQ}\Big|_{Q^\ast} = 0.
660: \end{equation}
661: For fixed $m, R_2, Re,\eta$ eqs.(\ref{Wachsbed.},\ref{saddle}) yield
662: $R_{1c-a}$. Here and in the following the subscript $c-a$ identifies
663: boundaries between convective and absolute instability. Thus, e.g., the basic
664: flow state is convectively [absolutely] unstable against vortex perturbations
665: with azimuthal wave number $m$ for $R_{1c}(m) < R_1 < R_{1c-a}(m)$
666: [$R_1 > R_{1c-a}(m)$] and absolutely stable when $R_1 < R_{1c}(m)$.
667:
668: We are interested here in the $Re$ dependence of these thresholds and we will
669: discuss to that end the reduced boundary quantities
670: \begin{equation}
671: \mu_{c-a}(Re)=\frac{R_{1c-a}(Re)}{R_{1c}(Re)}-1
672: \end{equation}
673: and
674: \begin{equation}
675: \epsilon_{x}(Re)=\frac{R_{1x}(Re)}{R_{1c}(Re=0)}-1,
676: \ \textrm{where}\ x=c\ \textrm{or}\ x=c-a \, .
677: \end{equation}
678: Because of the symmetries of $\sigma(Q)$, of its saddle-point $Q^\ast$, and of
679: the resulting boundary $R_{1c-a}(m, Re)$ one has
680: \begin{eqnarray}
681: k^{\ast}(-m,-Re)&=&k^{\ast}(m,Re)\\
682: K^{\ast}(-m,-Re)&=&-K^{\ast}(m,Re)\\
683: \mu_{c-a}(-m,-Re)&=&\mu_{c-a}(m,Re)\\
684: \epsilon_{c-a}(-m,-Re)&=&\epsilon_{c-a}(m,Re)
685: \end{eqnarray}
686: so that it suffices again to investigate only positive through-flow.
687:
688: %-------------- Sec. IV C ---------------------------
689: \subsection{Numerical procedures} \label{SEC.NUM-PROC2}
690: %----------------------------------------------------------------
691: In order to determine the boundary between convective and
692: absolute instability via the solution of eqs.~(\ref{Wachsbed.}, \ref{saddle})
693: one has to evaluate the dispersion relation $\sigma(Q)$ for complex $Q$
694: \cite{TAG-EDW-SWI,BAC-Pre94}.
695: To that end we solved the eigenvalue problem (\ref{resultEW}) of
696: the full field equations for {\em complex} $Q$ (cf., Sec.~\ref{SEC.NSE1}).
697: In addition
698: and for comparison we used for $\sigma(Q)$ the Ginzburg-Landau amplitude
699: equation approximation which only requires knowledge of
700: $\sigma(k)$ along the real $k$-axis.
701: %-------------- Sec. IV C 1 -------------------------
702: \subsubsection{Ginzburg-Landau amplitude equation approximation}
703: \label{SEC.GLA1}
704: %---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
705: Within this approximation the dispersion relation $\sigma(Q)$ for vortex
706: modes is expanded in $Q$ and $R_1$ around the critical point $k_c, R_{1c}$
707: \begin{eqnarray}
708: \sigma(Q,R_1)&=&\sigma_c+\left(\frac{\partial \sigma}{\partial Q}
709: \right)_c(Q-k_c)+\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{\partial^2 \sigma}{\partial
710: Q^2} \right)_c (Q-k_c)^2\nonumber\\
711: & &+\left(\frac{\partial \sigma}{\partial R_1}
712: \right)_c(R_1-R_{1c}) + h.o.t. \\
713: &=&-i\omega_c-iv_g(Q-k_c)
714: -\frac{\xi_0^2}{\tau_0}(1+ic_1)(Q-k_c)^2 \nonumber\\
715: & &+ \frac{(1+ic_0)}{\tau_0}\mu + h.o.t. \, . \label{Ginz-Landau-Naeherung}
716: \end{eqnarray}
717: The expansion coefficients in the above expressions appear also in the linear
718: parts of the Ginzburg-Landau amplitude equation \cite{CRO-HOH}. They are
719: obtained from the numerical solution of the eigenvalue problem (\ref{resultEW})
720: of the full field equations for real $k$ close to the
721: critical point \cite{REC-LUE-MUE,PIN}.
722:
723: Within the GLE approximation one gets from eqs.~(\ref{Wachsbed.}, \ref{saddle})
724: \begin{equation} \label{QstarGLE}
725: Q^\ast=\underbrace{k_c-\frac{c_1 \tau_0 v_g}{2(1+c_1^2)\xi_0^2}}_{k^\ast}
726: -i \underbrace{\frac{\tau_0 v_g}{2(1+c_1^2)\xi_0^2}}_{K^\ast},
727: \end{equation}
728: \begin{equation}
729: \mu_{c-a}=\frac{v_{g}^{2}\tau_{0}^{2}}{4(1+c_{1}^{2})\xi_{0}^{2}},
730: \end{equation}
731: and
732: \begin{equation}
733: \epsilon_{c-a}(Re)= \epsilon_{c}(Re) +
734: \frac{v_g^2\tau_0^2}{4(1+c_1^2)\xi_0^2} \left[1 + \epsilon_c(Re)\right].
735: \end{equation}
736: Note that the GLE coefficients $v_g, \tau_0, \xi_0, c_0, c_1$ depend on
737: $m, R_2, Re, \eta$. For $m=0$ and $R_2=0$ also the nonlinear coefficients of the
738: GLE have been obtained for several $\eta$ as functions of $Re$ \cite{REC-LUE-MUE}.
739:
740: %-------------- Sec. IV C 2 -------------------------
741: \subsubsection{Dispersion relation $\sigma(Q)$ of the NSE for complex $Q$}
742: \label{SEC.NSE1}
743: %-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
744: To assess the quality of the GLE results for the boundary between convective and
745: absolute instability we determined the dispersion relation of the NSE not only
746: for real $k$ close to the critical point but for complex axial wave numbers $Q$
747: that lie in the vicinity of the relevant saddle locations $Q^\ast$ of
748: $\sigma(Q)$. Having determined $\sigma(Q)$ as described in
749: Sec.~\ref{SEC.NUM-PROC1} we solved the equations (\ref{Wachsbed.},\ref{saddle})
750: for $R_{1c-a}$ in the form
751: \begin{equation}
752: \gamma (Q^\ast)=0 ; \quad
753: \frac{\partial \gamma(Q)}{\partial K} \Big|_{Q^\ast}=0 ; \quad
754: \frac{\partial \gamma(Q)}{\partial k} \Big|_{Q^\ast}=0
755: \end{equation}
756: that follows from using the Cauchy-Riemann relations for $\sigma(Q)$.
757:
758:
759: %-------------- Sec. IV D ----------------------------
760: \subsection{Results} \label{SEC.RESULTS2}
761: %------------------------------------------------------------------------
762:
763: In Fig.~\ref{FIG.SATTEL} we show the $Re$-variation of the real and imaginary
764: parts of the relevant saddle-point $Q^\ast = k^\ast - i K^\ast$ at the boundary
765: $R_{1c-a}$ for two characteristic cases: (a) L-SPI ($m=1$) at $R_2=0$ and (b)
766: R-SPI ($m=-1$) at $R_2=-125$. In each case full (dashed) lines were obtained
767: from the correct NSE (approximate GLE) dispersion relation $\sigma(Q)$.
768:
769: Case (a) is representative for a situation where the GLE approximation
770: reasonably well reproduces the correct result -- at least for small $Re$ -- and
771: starts to deviate significantly only for larger $Re$. On the other hand, in case
772: (b) the GLE approximation to $k^\ast$ displays a smooth variation with $Re$
773: that reflects the smooth variation of the saddle $Q^\ast_{GLE}$ (\ref{QstarGLE})
774: of $\sigma_{GLE}(Q)$ (\ref{Ginz-Landau-Naeherung})
775: while the real part $k^\ast$ of the saddle location of the correct dispersion
776: relation undergoes a dramatic change around $Re \simeq 0.8$. The reason is that
777: the surfaces of $\gamma(Q) = \Re \sigma(Q)$ over the $Q$-plane for the two
778: largest eigenvalues intersect and change their order along the $\gamma$ axis.
779: Thus, the saddle that is relevant for the $c-a$ transition and that has the
780: largest $\gamma$ value switches from one eigenvalue surface to another. Similarly
781: the eigenvalue surface might have another saddle and their ordering
782: in $\gamma$ changes.
783: In contrast to that the GLE approximation produces only a
784: single eigenvalue tracing out the smooth surface $\sigma_{GLE}(Q)$
785: (\ref{Ginz-Landau-Naeherung}).
786:
787: To give an impression of such an intersection of the correct dispersion
788: surfaces we show in Fig.~\ref{FIG.2EW} their real parts over the complex
789: $Q-$plane at $Re=5,\mu=\mu_{c-a}$. Full lines in Fig.~\ref{FIG.SATTEL-SCHNITTE}
790: show different constant-$k$ sections through them in the intersection range.
791: At $Re=5,\mu=\mu_{c-a}$ the saddle has moved already away from the
792: intersection region. The saddle coordinates
793: ($Q^\ast \simeq 4.73 -i 1.76, \gamma^\ast=0$) are indicated in
794: Figs.~\ref{FIG.SATTEL}, \ref{FIG.2EW} by full dots.
795:
796: While the saddle locations $Q^\ast_{GLE}$ of the GLE approximation
797: $\sigma_{GLE}(Q)$ (\ref{Ginz-Landau-Naeherung}) can differ substantially from
798: the saddle $Q^\ast$ of the correct dispersion relation the difference in the
799: boundaries between convective and absolute instability is typically much less
800: pronounced -- cf, e.g., the dashed and full curves for $\epsilon_{c-a}$ in
801: Fig.~\ref{FIG.EPSILON}. There the GLE results (dashed lines) agree in each case
802: quite well with the correct boundaries (full lines) up to, say $Re =5$.
803: However, as a consequence of the typical increase of the reduced boundary
804: $\mu_{c-a}$ with increasing $Re$ the quality of the GLE results for
805: $\mu_{c-a}$ generally
806: deteriorates. After all the GLE is strictly valid only for $\mu \to 0$.
807: Fig.~\ref{FIG.EPSILON-RE=20} shows an example ($m=1, R_2=-125$) where the GLE
808: prediction for the boundary shows even a qualitative different variation with
809: $Re$ for, say, $Re>15$. We have observed similar behavior -- partly at larger
810: $Re$ -- also for other combinations of $m, R_2$.
811:
812: Tables~\ref{TAB.FITPARA} and \ref{TAB.FITPARA2} contain the coefficients for
813: fitting our results for $\epsilon_{c-a}(m=0, R_2, Re)$ and
814: $\epsilon_{c-a}(m=1, R_2, Re)$ in the same way as described in
815: Sec.~\ref{SEC.RESULTS1}. Also here the
816: boundary curves for R-SPI $(m=-1)$ are obtained according to
817: Sec.~\ref{SEC.SYMM-EIGENVALUE} from those for L-SPI $(m=1)$ by
818: $Re \rightarrow -Re$, i.e., by changing the sign of the odd coefficients in
819: Table~\ref{TAB.FITPARA2}.
820: %\clearpage
821: %-------------- Sec. V ------------------------------
822: \section{Fronts and pulses} \label{FRONTS}
823: %---------------------------------------------------------------
824: The vortex fronts that we are investigating here and that appear also as
825: constituents of vortex pulses are
826: perturbations of the basic state where the fields (locally) have the form
827: \begin{equation} \label{Einhullende}
828: \psi \sim e^{i (k^\ast z - \omega^\ast t)}
829: e^{K^\ast (z - v^\ast t)}e^{im\varphi}
830: \end{equation}
831: in the laboratory frame. This form describes long-time spatiotemporal
832: properties of uniquely selected linear fronts \cite{CRO-HOH}.
833: Axial front velocity $v^\ast$, axial growth rate $K^\ast$ of the front envelope,
834: wave number $k^\ast$ of the vortex pattern under the front, and its frequency
835: $\omega^\ast$ are determined
836: by the saddle behavior of the linear complex dispersion relation
837: $\sigma(Q,m) = \gamma (Q,m) - i \omega (Q,m)$ of the field equations over the
838: plane of complex axial wave numbers $Q = k - i K$. Since superpositions of vortex
839: perturbations with different $m$ evolve independently from each other within the
840: linear description as mentioned already in Sec.~\ref{SEC.PACKETS} we consider
841: here only fronts of vortex perturbations that have a common azimuthal wave
842: number $m$ and we do not always display the latter explicitly.
843:
844: The saddle condition is \cite{CRO-HOH}
845: \begin{equation} \label{saddlecondition}
846: \frac{d}{dQ} \left[\sigma \left(Q\right) \: \: + \: \: i \: v \: Q \right]
847: \Big|_{Q=Q^\ast} = 0 .
848: \end{equation}
849: And the stationarity requirement that the temporal growth rate of the front
850: vanishes in the frame comoving with the front velocity $v^\ast$ demands that
851: \begin{equation}
852: \label{gammasaddle}
853: 0 = \Re \left[ \sigma (Q) + i v Q \right] \Big|_{Q = Q^\ast}
854: = \gamma (Q^\ast) + v^\ast K^\ast .
855: \end{equation}
856: We combine (\ref{saddlecondition}) and (\ref{gammasaddle}) into the three
857: equations
858: \begin{equation} \label{Bedingungen2}
859: v^\ast = - \frac{\gamma (Q^\ast)}{K^\ast}
860: = - \frac{\partial \gamma (Q)}{\partial K} \Big|_{Q^\ast} \quad ; \quad
861: \frac{\partial \gamma (Q)}{\partial k} \Big|_{Q^\ast} = 0
862: \end{equation}
863: that we have solved for $v^\ast, k^\ast, K^\ast$.
864:
865: %-------------- Sec. V A ----------------------------
866: \subsection{Notation} \label{SEC.FRONT-NOTATION}
867: %---------------------------------------------------
868:
869: The front envelope of (\ref{Einhullende}) varies axially with $e^{K^\ast z}$.
870: If $K^\ast>0$, then the perturbation
871: grows at $z=-\infty$ out of the basic state. We call such a front to be of type
872: $+$ and identify the associated front
873: properties by a subscript $+$. On the other hand, for $K^\ast<0$ we have a front
874: of type $-$ with an intensity envelope that joins at $z=\infty$ with the basic
875: state. So the two subscripts $\pm$ identify
876: the axial variations of the front envelopes. A pulse-like perturbation of the
877: basic state would consist suffiently away
878: from its center of a $+$ front for $z \to -\infty$ and of a $-$ front
879: for $z \to \infty$. Correspondingly the eqs.~(\ref{Bedingungen2}) have two
880: different solutions: one of them describes a
881: $-$ front and the other one a $+$ front. A schematic plot of the
882: different envelope types can be seen in Fig. \ref{FIG.FRONTDIRECT}.
883:
884: We identify the vortex pattern
885: that is unfolded under a front either by its azimuthal wave number $m$ or by
886: the superscripts T, L, R. Here T refers to a TVF-like pattern of vortices with
887: $m=0$, L denotes L-spiral vortices with $m=1$, and R identifies R-spiral vortices
888: with $m=-1$. Hence $m$ or equivalently the
889: superscripts identify the spatiotemporal structure of the vortex pattern growing
890: under the front. In this work we restrict ourselves to these three vortex
891: varieties. Since they appear under the above
892: described two front envelopes there are six different fronts that we have
893: investigated here.
894:
895: %-------------- Sec. V B ----------------------------
896: \subsection{Results} \label{SEC.RESULTS3}
897: %--------------------------------------------------------
898:
899: In Fig.~\ref{FIG.FRONTEN} the results of our investigations are shown for
900: fronts with azimuthal wave numbers $m$ = 0, 1, and -1 for axial
901: through-flow Reynolds numbers $Re$ =0, 10, and 20. In each case the outer
902: cylinder is at rest, $R_2=0$. The front properties are presented as functions of
903: $\mu$. Within each 2$\times$2 block of figures (a)-(i) the left column shows
904: real part $k^\ast$ and negative imaginary part $K^\ast$ of the saddle point and
905: the right column shows the front velocity $v^\ast$ and the frequency
906: $\omega^\ast$, respectively. They all start at $\mu = 0$ since vortex growth is
907: possible only above the critical threshold, i.e., for $R_1 > R_{1c}(Re)$.
908: The two {\em critical} fronts at this threshold are degenerate ($k^\ast_- =
909: k^\ast_+ = k_c, \, \omega^\ast_- = \omega^\ast_+ = \omega_c, \,
910: v^\ast_- = v^\ast_+ = v_g$) with vanishing axial growth rates
911: $K^\ast_- = K^\ast_+ = 0$. For $\mu>0$, however, $+$ and $-$ fronts differ from
912: each other thus reflecting differences in the respective saddle points.
913:
914: The variation of $k^\ast, K^\ast, v^\ast$, and $\omega^\ast$ with $\mu$ and
915: $Re$ is best understood by
916: comparison with the corresponding GLE approximation (cf. Sec.~\ref{SEC.GLA2}) and
917: by invoking symmetry relations (cf. Sec.~\ref{SEC.FRONT-SYMM}). We therefore
918: continue the discussion of our results in the following two sections
919: \ref{SEC.GLA2} and \ref{SEC.FRONT-SYMM}.
920:
921: %-------------- Sec. V B 1 --------------------------
922: \subsubsection{Ginzburg-Landau amplitude equation approximation} \label{SEC.GLA2}
923: %----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
924:
925: The saddle point analysis (\ref{saddlecondition} - \ref{Bedingungen2}) of the
926: GLE approximation (\ref{Ginz-Landau-Naeherung}) yield the following
927: front properties
928: %\begin{eqnarray} \label{GL-Front1}
929: \begin{eqnarray}
930: K^{\ast}_{\pm}&=&\pm \sqrt{\frac{\mu}{(1+c_{1}^{2})\xi_{0}^{2}}},\label{K-GLE} \\
931: k^{\ast}_{\pm}&=&k_{c}-c_{1}K^{\ast}_{\pm},\label{k-GLE}\\
932: v^{\ast}_{\pm}&=&v_{g}-2(1+c_{1}^{2})\frac{\xi_{0}^{2}}{\tau_{0}}K^{\ast}_{\pm},
933: \label{v-GLE}\\
934: \gamma^{\ast}_{\pm}&=&-v^{\ast}_{\pm}K^{\ast}_{\pm},\label{gamma-GLE}\\
935: \omega^{\ast}_{\pm}&=& \omega_c +v_g (k^\ast_\pm - k_c)
936: +(c_1-c_0)\frac{\mu}{\tau_0} \label{omega-GLE}\, .
937: %\label{GL-Front2}
938: \end{eqnarray}
939: for the two fronts with $K_+^{\ast} >0 $ and $K_-^{\ast} < 0 $, respectively.
940: {\em All} quantities appearing in (\ref{K-GLE} - \ref{omega-GLE}) depend on
941: whether they refer to T ($m$ = 0), L ($m$ = 1), or R ($m$ = -1) vortex fronts.
942: These GLE results are shown in Fig.~\ref{FIG.FRONTEN} by dashed lines.
943:
944: They reasonably
945: well describe the small-$\mu$ behavior of the correct front properties
946: (full lines in Fig.~\ref{FIG.FRONTEN}) which
947: were obtained from the correct dispersion relation of the NSE: As predicted
948: by the small-$\mu$ GLE approximation (\ref{K-GLE} - \ref{omega-GLE}) one finds
949: that for small $\mu$ the axial growth rates
950: $K^\ast$ vary $\propto \sqrt \mu$, that consequently also $k^\ast - k_c$
951: and $v^\ast - v_g$ vary $\propto \sqrt \mu$, and that
952: $\omega^\ast - \omega_c$ can have in addition also a contribution
953: $\propto \mu$ when $c_1 - c_0 \neq 0$. The latter is the case for $m=\pm 1$
954: irrespective of $Re$ and for $m=0$ if $Re \neq 0$.
955:
956: Note that for TVF fronts with $m=0, Re = 0$ the GLE predicts $\omega^\ast = 0$
957: whereas the correct dispersion in Fig.~\ref{FIG.FRONTEN}(a) seems to show for
958: small $\mu$ a variation of
959: $\omega^\ast \propto \mu^2$ that is beyond the range of applicability of the
960: GLE. Thus, under the linear part of a moving
961: TVF front there should be a non zero phase propagation in the laboratory
962: frame with phase velocity $\omega^\ast / k^\ast$. The analogous behavior was
963: found also for convection rolls in the Rayleigh-B\'enard system \cite{BUE-LUE}.
964:
965: At the boundary between convective and absolute
966: instability, $\mu =\mu_{c-a}$, the velocity
967: $v_+^{\ast}$ and the temporal growth rate $\gamma^{\ast}_+$ of the $+$ front
968: vanish in the laboratory frame while $v_-^{\ast}$ is positive there
969: (and given by 2 $v_g$ within the GLE approximation). Note that
970: according to Fig.~\ref{FIG.EPSILON} and
971: tables~\ref{TAB.FITPARA} and \ref{TAB.FITPARA2} $\mu_{c-a}$ is zero for $m=0,
972: Re=0$ and very small for $m= \pm 1, Re=0$. Only for large enough
973: through-flow $\mu_{c-a}$ becomes sizeable.
974: In the convectively unstable regime $0 < \mu < \mu_{c-a}$ both, the $+$ front
975: as well as the $-$ front of a vortex pulse move into the same downstream
976: direction as the through-flow, $0 < v_+^{\ast} < v_-^{\ast}$. In the absolutely
977: unstable regime $\mu > \mu_{c-a}$, however, the $+$ front moves upstream and
978: the $-$front moves downstream, $v_+^{\ast} < 0 < v_-^{\ast}$.
979:
980: In ref.~\cite{NG-TUR} it was remarked that the phase velocity of spiral patterns
981: in axial flow through a system of radius ratio $\eta=0.95$ \cite{SNY}
982: deviates from the critical one, $\omega_c/k_c$, of axially extended vortex
983: perturbations. While we have done only
984: calculations for $\eta=0.5$ our results of Fig.~\ref{FIG.FRONTEN} and of the
985: small-$\mu$ GLE approximation (\ref{K-GLE} - \ref{omega-GLE}) shed some light on
986: the existence of such deviations. Since the experimental vortex structures grow
987: in downstream direction under intensity fronts one strictly speaking would have
988: to compare with the phase velocity under such fronts that connect in the
989: absolutely unstable regime to the fully developed downstream vortex pattern.
990: Such a nonlinear analysis has been done for $m=0$ patterns \cite{BLRS96} but not
991: for spirals. However, already the phase velocities $\omega_+^\ast /k_+^\ast$
992: under our linear $+$ fronts that grow in downstream direction differ from the
993: corresponding critical phase velocities $\omega_c /k_c$ of axially extended
994: patterns --- cf. Fig.~\ref{FIG.FRONTEN} and eqs.~(\ref{K-GLE} - \ref{omega-GLE}).
995:
996: %-------------- Sec. V B 2 --------------------------
997: \subsubsection{Symmetries} \label{SEC.FRONT-SYMM}
998: %-------------------------------------------------------
999: The front properties shown in Fig.~\ref{FIG.FRONTEN} are largely influenced by
1000: the symmetry properties of the system {\em without} through-flow although
1001: a finite $Re$ changes them.
1002:
1003: Invariance of the field equations under $z \to -z$ for $Re=0$ implies that
1004: stationary perturbations with
1005: $\omega_{c}=0$ (TVF) under a $+$ front are mirror images of those under a $-$
1006: front. This implies for $Re=0$ the symmetry relations
1007: \begin{equation} \label{symmet1}
1008: (K,\omega,v)_{+}^{\ast T}=-(K,\omega,v)_{-}^{\ast T};\quad
1009: k_{+}^{\ast T}=k_{-}^{\ast T}.
1010: \end{equation}
1011: These symmetry properties of the two front types of T-perturbations can be seen
1012: in Fig. \ref{FIG.FRONTEN}(a).
1013:
1014: Now consider L and R perturbations. Here the invariance of the field equations
1015: under $z \to -z$ for $Re=0$ implies
1016: first of all that a spatially extended L-SPI with uniform amplitude is the
1017: mirror image of a spatially extended R-SPI.
1018: Furthermore, a L-SPI under a $+$ front with positive $K$ is symmetry degenerate
1019: with a R-SPI under a $-$ front with
1020: negative $K$. Similarly a R-SPI under a $+$ type front is the mirror image of a
1021: L-SPI under a $-$ front. This implies for $Re=0$ the symmetry relations
1022: \begin{equation} \label{symmet2}
1023: (K,\omega,v)_{+}^{*L}=-(K,\omega,v)_{-}^{*R};\quad k_{+}^{*L}=k_{-}^{*R},
1024: \end{equation}
1025: \begin{equation} \label{symmet3}
1026: (K,\omega,v)_{+}^{\ast R}=-(K,\omega,v)_{-}^{\ast L};\quad
1027: k_{+}^{\ast R}=k_{-}^{\ast L}.
1028: \end{equation}
1029: They can be seen to be realized in Fig.~\ref{FIG.FRONTEN}(b) and
1030: Fig.~\ref{FIG.FRONTEN}(c).
1031:
1032: The GLE approximation (\ref{K-GLE}) - (\ref{omega-GLE}) shows beyond the relations
1033: (\ref{symmet1})-(\ref{symmet3}) the following additional relations
1034: \begin{equation}
1035: k_{+}^{\ast T}=k_{-}^{\ast T}=k_c^T \quad ;
1036: \quad \omega_{+}^{\ast T}=\omega_{-}^{\ast T}=0
1037: \end{equation}
1038: \begin{equation} \label{GLE-Symmetrie2}
1039: K_{+}^{\ast L}=-K_{-}^{\ast L}=K_{+}^{\ast R}=-K_{-}^{\ast R},
1040: \end{equation}
1041: \begin{equation}
1042: \omega_{+}^{\ast L}=\omega_{-}^{\ast L}=-\omega_{+}^{\ast R}=-\omega_{-}^{\ast R}
1043: \end{equation}
1044: that follow from the fact, that $\omega_c^T = v_g^T = c_0^T = c_1^T = 0$,
1045: $k_c^R=k_c^L$, $v_g^R=-v_g^L$,
1046: $\tau_0^R=\tau_0^L$, $c_0^R=-c_0^L$, $c_1^R=-c_1^L$, and
1047: $\xi_0^{R}=\xi_0^{L}$ for $Re=0$ \cite{PIN}.
1048:
1049: %-------------- Sec. VI ----------------------------
1050: \section{Summary}
1051: %----------------------------------------------------
1052: We have determined the influence of an axial through-flow on the spatiotemporal
1053: growth behavior of structurally different vortex perturbations of the basic
1054: Couette-Poiseuille flow in
1055: the Taylor-Couette system with radius ratio $\eta=0.5$. To that end we
1056: have solved the linearized NSE numerically with a shooting method for vortex
1057: perturbations with azmuthal wave numbers $m=0$ (TVF), $m=1$ (L-SPI), and $m=-1$
1058: (R-SPI) in a wide range of the parameters $Re, R_1$, and $R_2$. Here symmetry
1059: properties allowed us to restrict ourselves to positive through-flow Reynolds
1060: numbers $Re$. For each of the three different vortex varieties we have
1061: investigated ({\it i}) axially extended vortex structures with homogeneous
1062: amplitudes, ({\it ii}) axially localized vortex pulses consisting of a linear
1063: superposition of axially extended vortex modes with different real axial wave
1064: numbers $k$, and ({\it iii}) vortex fronts.
1065:
1066: Central to our analysis is the determination of the complex dispersion
1067: relations $\sigma(Q)$ of the linearized NSE for vortex modes with the three
1068: different $m$. We have evaluated $\sigma$ over the plane of complex wave
1069: numbers $Q = k - i K$ for patterns ({\it ii}, {\it iii}) and along
1070: the real $k$-axis for pattern ({\it i}). We have also determined
1071: the Ginzburg-Landau amplitude equation approximation $\sigma_{GLE}(Q)$ in order
1072: to analyze its predictions for the vortex stuctures ({\it ii}, {\it iii}) in
1073: comparison with the correct NSE dispersion relation $\sigma(Q)$. In each case
1074: symmetry relations are elucidated.
1075:
1076: First we have
1077: evaluated the critical bifurcation thresholds $R_{1c}(Re, R_2, m)$ for axially
1078: extended vortex structures. Then using a saddle-point analysis of $\sigma(Q)$
1079: we have determined the boundaries $R_{1c-a}(Re, R_2, m)$ between absolute and
1080: convective instability of the basic state at which one of the fronts of the
1081: expanding vortex pulses reverts its propagation direction in the laboratory
1082: frame. Here we have elucidated also in some detail how the different saddle
1083: topologies of $\sigma(Q)$ and of $\sigma_{GLE}(Q)$ explain some of the
1084: shortcomings of the latter. Fit parameters for power-law expansions of
1085: the reduced boundaries $\epsilon_c, \epsilon_{c-a}$, and $\epsilon_{c-a}^{GLE}$
1086: up to $Re^4$ are listed in two tables.
1087:
1088: Finally we have determined the linearly selected front
1089: behavior of growing vortex patterns with $m=0, \pm 1$ for $R_2=0$ under two
1090: different types of front intensity envelopes: type $+$ shows growth in positive
1091: z-direction while type $-$ locates growth in negative z-direction. The
1092: combination of the
1093: three different dynamics of the constituent vortex modes ($m=0, \pm 1$) and of
1094: the two different spatial intensity profiles ($+$, $-$) leads to six different
1095: fronts $\sim e^{i (k^\ast z - \omega^\ast t)}e^{K^\ast (z - v^\ast t)}$
1096: in the laboratory frame. Their velocity $v^\ast$, spatial growth rate $K^\ast$,
1097: wave number $k^\ast$, and frequency $\omega^\ast$ as
1098: determined via a saddle point analysis of the respective dispersion
1099: relations differ in general from each other in the presence of a through-flow.
1100:
1101: \acknowledgments
1102: This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft.
1103:
1104: \clearpage
1105: %----------------- Bibliography ---------------------
1106: \begin{thebibliography}{999}
1107: %----------------------------------------------------
1108: \bibitem{review}
1109: For a review see refs.~\cite{DIPS-Springer-81,DON,TAG,CRO-HOH}.
1110: %-----------------------------------------------
1111: \bibitem{DIPS-Springer-81}
1112: R.~C.~DiPrima and H.~L.~Swinney, in
1113: {\it Hydrodynamic Instabilities and Transition to Turbulence}, edited
1114: by H.~L.~Swinney and J.~P.~Gollub (Springer, Berlin, 1981), p.~139.
1115: %---------------------------------------------------------
1116: \bibitem{DON}
1117: R.~J.~Donnelly,
1118: % {\it Taylor-Couette Flow: The early days},
1119: Physics Today {\bf 44}, 332 (1991).
1120: %----------------------------------------------------
1121: \bibitem{TAG}
1122: R.~Tagg,
1123: %{\it The Couette-Taylor Problem},
1124: Nonlinear Science Today {\bf 4}, 1 (1994).
1125: %----------------------------------------------------
1126: \bibitem{CRO-HOH}
1127: M.~C.~Cross and P.~C.~Hohenberg,
1128: %{\it Pattern formation outside of equilibrium},
1129: Rev. Mod. Phys. {\bf 65}, 851 (1993).
1130: %----------------------------------------------------
1131: \bibitem{CHO-IOO}
1132: P.~Chossat and G.~Ioos,
1133: {\it The Couette-Taylor Problem} (Springer, Berlin, 1994).
1134: %----------------------------------------------------
1135: \bibitem{GOL-STE-SCH-LAN}
1136: M.~Golubitsky, I.~Stewart, D.~G.~Schaeffer, and W.~F.~Langford,
1137: {\it Case Study 6: The Taylor-Couette system}, in {\it Singularities and Groups in
1138: Bifurcation Theory}, Vol. 2 (Springer, New York, 1988), p. 485.
1139: %---------------------------
1140: \bibitem{DIP-PRI}
1141: R.~C.~DiPrima and A.~Pridor,
1142: %{\it Yhe stability of viscous flow between rotating concentric cylinders with an
1143: % axial flow}
1144: Proc.~R.~Soc.~London Ser. A {\bf 366}, 555 (1979).
1145: %----------------------------------------------------
1146: \bibitem{TAK-JAN}
1147: D.~I.~Takeuchi and D.~F.~Jankowski,
1148: %{\it A numerical and experimental investigation of the stability of spiral Poiseuille flow},
1149: J. Fluid. Mech. {\bf 102}, 101 (1981).
1150: %----------------------------------------------------
1151: \bibitem{NG-TUR}
1152: B.~S.~Ng and E.~R.~Turner,
1153: %{\it On the linear stability of spiral flow between rotating cylinders},
1154: Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A {\bf 382}, 83 (1982).
1155: %----------------------------------------------------
1156: \bibitem{LAN-TAG-KOS-SWI-GOL}
1157: W.~F.~Langford, R.~Tagg, E.~Kostelich, H.~Swinney, and M.~Golubitsky,
1158: %{\it Primary instabilities and bicriticality in flow between counter-rotating cylinders},
1159: Phys. Fluids {\bf 31}, 776 (1988).
1160: %----------------------------------------------------
1161: \bibitem{GEB-GRO}
1162: Th.~Gebhardt and S.~Grossmann,
1163: %{\it The Taylor-Couette eigenvalue problem with independently rotating cylinders},
1164: Z. Phys. {\bf B 90}, 475 (1993).
1165: %----------------------------------------------------
1166: \bibitem{MES-MAR}
1167: A.~Meseguer and F.~Marques,
1168: %{\it On the competition between centrifugal and shear instability in spiral Poiseuille flow},
1169: J. Fluid Mech. {\bf 455}, 129 (2002).
1170: %---------------------------------------------------------
1171: \bibitem{epsT}
1172: In the literature one uses also $\epsilon_T = \frac{T_{1}}{T_{1c}(Re=0)}-1$ as
1173: control parameter where the inner cylinder's Taylor number $T_1$ is proportional
1174: to $\Omega_1^2$. Thus, $\epsilon_T = 2 \epsilon + \epsilon^2$.
1175: %----------------------------------------------------
1176: \bibitem{STO-BUR}
1177: J.~Stoer and R.~Bulirsch,
1178: {\it Einf\"uhrung in die Numerische Mathematik II}
1179: (Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1972).
1180: %----------------------------------------------------
1181: \bibitem{PRE-TEU-VET-FLA}
1182: W.~Press, S.~Teukolsky, W.~Vetterling, and B.~Flannery, {\it Numerical Recipes}
1183: (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1992).
1184: %----------------------------------------------------
1185: \bibitem{HOF-LUE}
1186: C.~Hoffmann and M.~L\"ucke,
1187: %{\it ??? Spirals and TVF ???},
1188: manuscript in preparation.
1189: %----------------------------------------------------
1190: \bibitem{b&b}
1191: R.~J.~Briggs,
1192: {\it Electron-Stream Interaction with Plasmas},
1193: Research Monograph No. 29 (M.I.T. Press, Cambridge Mass, 1964);
1194: A.~Bers,
1195: {\it Linear Waves and Instabilities}
1196: (Physique des Plasmas, New York, 1975).
1197: %-----------------------------------------------
1198: \bibitem{HUE}
1199: P.~Huerre, in {\it Instabilities and Nonequilibrium Structures}, edited by
1200: E.~Tirapegui and D.~Villaroel (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1987), p. 141; P.~Huerre and
1201: P.~A.~Monkewitz, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. {\bf 22}, 473 (1990).
1202: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1203: \bibitem{Deissler85}
1204: R.~J.~Deissler,
1205: %{\it Noise-Sustained Structure, Intermittency, and the Ginzburg-Landau Equation},
1206: J.~Stat.~Phys.~{\bf 40}, 371 (1985).
1207: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1208: \bibitem{BAC-Pre94}
1209: K.~L.~Babcock, G.~Ahlers, and D.~S.~Cannell,
1210: %{\it Noise amplification in open Taylor-Couette flow},
1211: Phys.~Rev.~E {\bf 50}, 3670 (1994).
1212: %----------------------------------------------------
1213: \bibitem{MLK89}
1214: H.~W.~M\"uller, M.~L\"ucke, M.~Kamps,
1215: % {\it Convective patterns in horizontal flow},
1216: Europhys.~Lett.~ {\bf 10}, 451 (1989);
1217: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1218: \bibitem{BLRS96}
1219: P.~B\"uchel, M.~L\"ucke, D.~Roth, R.~Schmitz,
1220: %{\it Pattern selection in the absolutely unstable regime as a nonlinear eigenvalue problem:
1221: % Taylor vortices in axial flow },
1222: Phys.~Rev.~E {\bf 53}, 4764 (1996).
1223: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1224: \bibitem{TAG-EDW-SWI}
1225: R.~Tagg, W.~S.~Edwards, and H.~L.~Swinney,
1226: %{\it Convective versus absolute instability in flow between counterrotating cylinders}
1227: Phys.~Rev.~A {\bf 42}, 831 (1990).
1228: %---------------------------------------------------------
1229: \bibitem{REC-LUE-MUE}
1230: A.~Recktenwald, M.~L\"ucke, and H.~W.~M\"uller,
1231: %{\it Taylor vortex formation in axial through-flow: Linear and weakly nonlinear analysis},
1232: Phys. Rev. E {\bf 48}, 4444 (1993).
1233: %----------------------------------------------------
1234: \bibitem{PIN}
1235: A.~Pinter,
1236: %{\it Spiralwirbel im Taylor-Couette System},
1237: Diploma thesis, Universit\"at des Saarlandes, Saarbr\"ucken, 2001.
1238: %----------------------------------------------------
1239: \bibitem{BUE-LUE}
1240: P.~B\"uchel and M.~L\"ucke,
1241: %{\it Localized perturbations in binary fluid convection with and without throughflow},
1242: Phys. Rev. E {\bf 63}, 016307 (2000).
1243: %----------------------------------------------------
1244: \bibitem{SNY}
1245: H.~A.~Snyder,
1246: %{\it Experiments on the stability of spiral flow at low axial Reynolds numbers},
1247: Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A {\bf 285}, 198 (1962).
1248: %----------------------------------------------------
1249: \end{thebibliography}
1250: \clearpage
1251:
1252: %----------------- Figures-------------------------------------------------
1253: %----------------- FIG 1 --------------------------------------------------
1254: \begin{figure}
1255: \includegraphics[clip=true,width=10cm,angle=0]{./FIG/fig1.ps}
1256: \caption{ Critical bifurcation thresholds $R_{1c}(R_2)$ for $m=0$ and
1257: $m=\pm 1$ vortex patterns with the respective
1258: critical wave numbers, $k_c(m, R_2)$, as functions of $R_2$ in the absence of
1259: axial through-flow. The vertical lines mark the two
1260: representative outer Reynolds numbers $R_2 = 0$ and $R_2 = -125$ that are
1261: investigated in more detail in this work. The radius ratio is $\eta=0.5$.
1262: \label{FIG.R1c_R2}}
1263: \end{figure}
1264: %----------------- FIG 2 --------------------------------------------------
1265: \begin{figure}
1266: \includegraphics[clip=true,width=10cm, angle=0]{./FIG/fig2.ps}
1267: \caption{ Evolution of the critical bifurcation thresholds $R_{1c}(Re)$
1268: for $m=0$ and $m=\pm 1$ vortex patterns
1269: with through-flow Reynolds number $Re$. The two outer Reynolds
1270: numbers $R_2 = 0$ and $R_2 = -125$ are marked in Fig.~\ref{FIG.R1c_R2}.
1271: The radius ratio is $\eta=0.5$.
1272: \label{FIG.R1c_Re}}
1273: \end{figure}
1274: %----------------- FIG 3 --------------------------------------------------
1275: \begin{figure}
1276: \includegraphics[clip=true,width=9cm, angle=0]{./FIG/fig3.ps}
1277: \caption{Stability boundaries of the basic flow state as functions of the
1278: through-flow Reynolds number $Re$. Dotted lines show the reduced critical
1279: bifurcation thresholds
1280: $\epsilon_c$ (\ref{epsilon_c}) for axially extended vortex patterns.
1281: The full (dashed) boundary lines, $\epsilon_{c-a}$, between the
1282: convectively and absolutely unstable parameter regions for vortex growth
1283: were obtained from the eigenvalues of the full NSE (the GLE approximation) --
1284: cf. Sec.~\ref{SEC.LOCAL-PERTUB}. The radius ratio is $\eta=0.5$.
1285: \label{FIG.EPSILON}}
1286: \end{figure}
1287: %----------------- FIG 4 --------------------------------------------------
1288: \begin{figure}
1289: \includegraphics[clip=true,width=10cm, angle=0]{./FIG/fig4.ps}
1290: \caption{Evolution of the coordinates $k^\ast$ and $K^\ast$ of the saddle point
1291: that determines the boundary, $R_{1c-a}$, between convective and absolute
1292: instability with through-flow Reynolds number $Re$. Full (dotted) lines are
1293: evaluated with the correct NSE (approximate GLE) dispersion relation. Filled
1294: circles in (b) at $Re=5$
1295: mark the coordinates of the saddle in
1296: Fig.~\ref{FIG.2EW}. The radius ratio is $\eta=0.5$.
1297: \label{FIG.SATTEL}}
1298: \end{figure}
1299: %----------------- FIG 5 --------------------------------------------------
1300: \begin{figure}
1301: \includegraphics[clip=true,width=10cm, angle=0]{./FIG/fig5.ps}
1302: \caption{Real parts $\gamma (Q)$ of the two biggest eigenvalues of the NSE over
1303: the complex $Q-$plane for $m=-1$, $R_2=-125$, $Re=5$,
1304: $\mu=\mu_{c-a}$, $\eta=0.5$. The filled circle
1305: marks the saddle at
1306: $\gamma (Q^\ast) = 0$ that determines the boundary beteen convective and
1307: absolute instability.
1308: \label{FIG.2EW}}
1309: \end{figure}
1310: %----------------- FIG 6 --------------------------------------------------
1311: \begin{figure}
1312: \includegraphics[clip=true,width=10cm, angle=0]{./FIG/fig6.ps}
1313: \caption{Full lines are sections through the surfaces of $\gamma (Q)$
1314: (Fig.~\ref{FIG.2EW}) for the two biggest eigenvalues of the NSE at constant
1315: values of $k$ in the vicinity of the intersection of the surfaces. Dashed
1316: lines show $\gamma (K)$ obtained from the GLE approximation to the dispersion
1317: relation. Parameters are $m=-1$, $R_2=-125$, $Re=5$, $\mu=\mu_{c-a}$,
1318: $\eta=0.5$.
1319: \label{FIG.SATTEL-SCHNITTE}}
1320: \end{figure}
1321: %----------------- FIG 7 --------------------------------------------------
1322: \begin{figure}
1323: \includegraphics[clip=true,width=10cm, angle=0]{./FIG/fig7.ps}
1324: \caption{Stability boundaries of the basic flow state as functions of the
1325: through-flow Reynolds number $Re$ for $m=1$, $R_2=-125$. The full (dashed)
1326: boundary lines, $\epsilon_{c-a}$, between the
1327: convectively and absolutely unstable parameter regions for vortex growth
1328: were obtained from the eigenvalues of the full NSE (the GLE approximation) --
1329: cf. Sec.~\ref{SEC.LOCAL-PERTUB}. Dotted lines show the reduced critical
1330: bifurcation thresholds
1331: $\epsilon_c$ (\ref{epsilon_c}) for axially extended vortex patterns.
1332: The radius ratio is $\eta=0.5$.
1333: \label{FIG.EPSILON-RE=20}}
1334: \end{figure}
1335: %----------------- FIG 8 --------------------------------------------------
1336: \begin{figure}
1337: \includegraphics[clip=true,width=10cm, angle=0]{./FIG/fig8.ps}
1338: \caption{Schematic plot of different vortex fronts. Thick full lines in (a) and
1339: thin full lines in (b) show intensity envelopes of $+$ type and of $-$ type
1340: fronts connecting to the basic state at $z \to -\infty$ and at
1341: $z \to \infty$, respectively. This line convention --- thick ones for $+$ type
1342: fronts and thin ones for $-$ type fronts --- is used also in
1343: Fig.~\ref{FIG.FRONTEN}. Dashed lines indicate the vortex field
1344: growing under the front.
1345: \label{FIG.FRONTDIRECT}}
1346: \end{figure}
1347: %----------------- FIG 9 --------------------------------------------------
1348: \begin{figure}
1349: \includegraphics[clip=true, width=13cm, angle=0]{./FIG/fig9.ps}
1350: \caption{Front properties of vortices with azimuthal wave numbers $m=0, 1, -1$
1351: in systems with and without through-flow $Re$ for $R_2$ = 0, $\eta=0.5$ as
1352: functions of $\mu = R_1/R_{1c}(Re) -1$. Within each
1353: 2$\times$2 block of figures (a)-(i) the left column shows the axial wave number
1354: $k^\ast$ and the axial growth rate $K^\ast$. The right column shows the front
1355: velocity $v^\ast$ and the frequency $\omega^\ast$ in the laboratory frame.
1356: Thick lines correspond to $+$ fronts, thin lines to $-$ fronts, respectively.
1357: Full (dashed) lines result from the saddle point analysis of the
1358: dispersion relation of the NSE (GLE approximation).
1359: \label{FIG.FRONTEN}}
1360: \end{figure}
1361: \clearpage
1362:
1363: %----------------- Tables--------------------------------------------------
1364: %----------------- TAB 1 --------------------------------------------------
1365: \begin{table}[h]
1366: \begin{center}
1367: \begin{tabular}{c|cccc}
1368: %\hline
1369: &\multicolumn{4}{c}{Operation}\\
1370: &\ \ A&\ \ B&\ \ C&\ \ D \\
1371: \hline
1372: \hline
1373: $k \rightarrow$&$\quad k$&$\ -k$&$\ -k$&$\quad k$\\
1374: %\hline
1375: $m \rightarrow$&$\quad m$&$\ -m$&$\quad m$&$\ -m$\\
1376: %\hline
1377: $Re \rightarrow$&$\quad Re$&$\quad Re$&$\ -Re$&$\ -Re$\\
1378: %\hline
1379: %&\multicolumn{4}{c}{Transformation}\\
1380: %\hline
1381: %\hline
1382: $\sigma \rightarrow$&$\quad \sigma$&$\quad {\overline \sigma}$&$\quad \sigma$&$\quad {\overline \sigma}$\\
1383: %\hline
1384: $U \rightarrow$&$\quad U$&$\quad {\overline U}$&$\quad U$&$\quad {\overline U}$\\
1385: %\hline
1386: $V \rightarrow$&$\quad V$&$\quad {\overline V}$&$\quad V$&$\quad {\overline V}$\\
1387: %\hline
1388: $W \rightarrow$&$\quad W$&$\quad {\overline W}$&$\ -W$&$\ -{\overline W}$\\
1389: %\hline
1390: $X \rightarrow$&$\quad X$&$\quad {\overline X}$&$\quad X$&$\quad {\overline X}$\\
1391: %\hline
1392: $Y \rightarrow$&$\quad Y$&$\quad {\overline Y}$&$\quad Y$&$\quad {\overline Y}$\\
1393: %\hline
1394: $Z \rightarrow$&$\quad Z$&$\quad {\overline Z}$&$\ -Z$&$\ -{\overline Z}$\\
1395: %\hline
1396: \end{tabular}
1397: \end{center}
1398: \caption{Transformation behavior of the eigenvalues and eigenfunctions of the
1399: eigenvalue problem (\ref{resultEW} - \ref{defineL}) under symmetry operations.
1400: Here A denotes the identity, B complex conjugation, C axial reflection, and
1401: D complex conjugation (indicated by an overbar) combined with axial reflection.
1402: \label{TAB.MOD-SYMM}}
1403: \end{table}
1404: %----------------- TAB 2 --------------------------------------------------
1405: \begin{table}[h]
1406: \begin{tabular}{|c||c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|}
1407: \hline
1408: $R_{2}$&-150&-125&-100&-75&-50&-25&0&25&50\\
1409: \hline
1410: %\multicolumn{10}{c}{} \\
1411: \hline
1412: \multicolumn{10}{|c|}{$\epsilon_{c}=a_{2}Re^{2}+a_{4}Re^{4}$} \\
1413: \hline
1414: $a_{2}*10^{4}$&0.590&0.795&1.089&1.502&2.083&3.115&3.679&2.447&1.307\\
1415: \hline
1416: $a_{4}*10^{9}$&5.181&3.966&1.151&-2.804&-3.385&-15.62&-34.97&-14.55&-0.958\\
1417: \hline
1418: %\multicolumn{10}{c}{} \\
1419: \hline
1420: \multicolumn{10}{|c|}{$\epsilon_{c-a}=a_{2}Re^{2}+a_{4}Re^{4}$} \\
1421: \hline
1422: $a_{2}*10^{3}$&1.181&1.451&1.854&2.516&3.906&5.588&6.238&4.338&2.483\\
1423: \hline
1424: $a_{4}*10^{6}$&0.116&0.139&0.182&0.293&-2.583&-4.642&-5.716&-3.682&-1.740\\
1425: \hline
1426: \multicolumn{10}{|c|}{$\epsilon_{c-a}^{GLE}=a_{2}Re^{2}+a_{4}Re^{4}$} \\
1427: \hline
1428: $a_{2}*10^{3}$&1.161&1.416&1.800&2.517&4.068&6.547&7.732&5.152&2.762\\
1429: \hline
1430: $a_{4}*10^{6}$&-0.164&-0.268&-0.481&-1.011&-2.106&-3.807&-4.900&-3.022&-1.425\\
1431: \hline
1432: \end{tabular}
1433: \caption{Fitparameters for the $Re$-dependence of the stability boundaries of
1434: the basic state against growth of TVF $(m=0)$ perturbations for different
1435: $R_2$: reduced critical bifurcation threshold $\epsilon_c$ of axially extended
1436: vortex patterns and boundary $\epsilon_{c-a}$ between convectively and
1437: absolutely unstable parameter regime. Here $\epsilon_{c-a}^{GLE}$ is obtained
1438: from the GLE approximation (cf. Sec.~\ref{SEC.GLA1}).
1439: \label{TAB.FITPARA}}
1440: \end{table}
1441: %----------------- TAB 3 --------------------------------------------------
1442:
1443: \begin{table}
1444: \begin{tabular}{|c||c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|}
1445: \hline
1446: $R_{2}$&-150&-125&-100&-75&-50&-25&0&25&50\\
1447: \hline
1448: %\multicolumn{10}{c}{} \\
1449: \hline
1450: \multicolumn{10}{|c|}{$\epsilon_{c}=a_{1}Re+a_{2}Re^{2}+a_{3}Re^{3}+a_{4}Re^{4}$} \\
1451: \hline
1452: $a_{1}*10^{3}$&-1.582&-2.365&-3.513&-4.887&-6.143&-5.833&-3.372&-1.402&-0.514\\
1453: \hline
1454: $a_{2}*10^{4}$&0.957&1.199&1.496&1.925&2.520&3.174&3.197&1.806&0.581\\
1455: \hline
1456: $a_{3}*10^{7}$&-9.181&-9.001&-8.485&-7.678&-6.741&-4.172&-3.832&-3.572&-3.685\\
1457: \hline
1458: $a_{4}*10^{9}$&1.018&-0.378&-0.180&-0.563&-3.673&-21.77&-36.15&-5.707&19.92\\
1459: \hline
1460: %\multicolumn{10}{c}{} \\
1461: \hline
1462: \multicolumn{10}{|c|}{$\epsilon_{c-a}=a_{0}+a_{1}Re+a_{2}Re^{2}+a_{3}Re^{3}+a_{4}Re^{4}$} \\
1463: \hline
1464: $a_{0}*10^{3}$&2.358&5.497&3.775&-1.237&4.095&12.25&18.96&10.09&2.610 \\
1465: \hline
1466: $a_{1}*10^{3}$&-3.268&-3.578&-3.048&-0.449&0.926&1.159&1.012&1.217&1.455 \\
1467: \hline
1468: $a_{2}*10^{3}$&1.532&1.964&2.618&3.539&4.351&5.535&6.036&4.357&2.603 \\
1469: \hline
1470: $a_{3}*10^{6}$&8.408&11.87&14.97&9.992&6.487&4.919&3.680&1.367&-0.143 \\
1471: \hline
1472: $a_{4}*10^{6}$&-0.169&-0.368&-0.815&-1.977&-2.809&-4.068&-4.827&-3.203&-1.549 \\
1473: \hline
1474: \multicolumn{10}{|c|}{$\epsilon_{c-a}^{GLE}=a_0+a_1Re+a_2Re^2+a_3Re^3+a_4Re^4$} \\
1475: \hline
1476: $a_{0}*10^{3}$&1.101&-2.541&1.405&2.529&3.458&3.998&3.641&1.320&0.062\\
1477: \hline
1478: $a_{1}*10^{3}$&-4.117&0.755&-1.044&-0.318&0.831&2.063&1.495&1.377&1.625\\
1479: \hline
1480: $a_{2}*10^{3}$&2.030&2.792&2.820&3.435&4.437&6.166&7.265&4.981&2.723 \\
1481: \hline
1482: $a_{3}*10^{6}$&-8.845&-30.34&-7.121&4.780&10.58&8.229&-8.191&-12.58&-10.03 \\
1483: \hline
1484: $a_{4}*10^{6}$&-0.822&-2.713&-1.136&-1.004&-1.674&-2.923&-3.799&-2.234&-0.854 \\
1485: \hline
1486: \end{tabular}
1487: \caption{Fitparameters for the $Re$-dependence of the stability boundaries of
1488: the basic state against growth of L-SPI $(m=1)$ perturbations for different
1489: $R_2$: reduced critical bifurcation threshold $\epsilon_c$ of axially extended
1490: vortex patterns and boundary $\epsilon_{c-a}$ between convectively and
1491: absolutely unstable parameter regime. Here $\epsilon_{c-a}^{GLE}$ is obtained
1492: from the GLE approximation (cf. Sec.~\ref{SEC.GLA1}). The results for
1493: R-SPI $(m=-1)$ perturbations are obtained according to
1494: Sec.~\ref{SEC.SYMM-EIGENVALUE} from those for L-SPI $(m=1)$ by
1495: $Re \rightarrow -Re$, i.e., by changing the sign of the odd coefficients in
1496: the table.
1497: \label{TAB.FITPARA2}}
1498: \end{table}
1499: %---------------------------------------------------------------------------
1500: \end{document}
1501: