1: %% ****** Start of file template.aps ****** %
2: %%
3: %%
4: %% This file is part of the APS files in the REVTeX 4 distribution.
5: %% Version 4.0 of REVTeX, August 2001
6: %%
7: %%
8: %% Copyright (c) 2001 The American Physical Society.
9: %%
10: %% See the REVTeX 4 README file for restrictions and more information.
11: %%
12: %
13: % This is a template for producing manuscripts for use with REVTEX 4.0
14: % Copy this file to another name and then work on that file.
15: % That way, you always have this original template file to use.
16: %
17: % Group addresses by affiliation; use superscriptaddress for long
18: % author lists, or if there are many overlapping affiliations.
19: % For Phys. Rev. appearance, change preprint to twocolumn.
20: % Choose pra, prb, prc, prd, pre, prl, prstab, or rmp for journal
21: % Add 'draft' option to mark overfull boxes with black boxes
22: % Add 'showpacs' option to make PACS codes appear
23: % Add 'showkeys' option to make keywords appear
24: \documentclass[aps,prl,preprint,groupedaddress]{revtex4}
25: %\documentclass[aps,prl,preprint,superscriptaddress]{revtex4}
26: %\documentclass[aps,prl,twocolumn,groupedaddress]{revtex4}
27:
28: % You should use BibTeX and apsrev.bst for references
29: % Choosing a journal automatically selects the correct APS
30: % BibTeX style file (bst file), so only uncomment the line
31: % below if necessary.
32: \bibliographystyle{apsrev}
33: \usepackage{graphicx}
34: \begin{document}
35:
36: % Use the \preprint command to place your local institutional report
37: % number in the upper righthand corner of the title page in preprint mode.
38: % Multiple \preprint commands are allowed.
39: % Use the 'preprintnumbers' class option to override journal defaults
40: % to display numbers if necessary
41: %\preprint{}
42:
43: %Title of paper
44: \title{Efficiency optimization in a correlation ratchet with asymmetric unbiased fluctuations}
45:
46: % repeat the \author .. \affiliation etc. as needed
47: % \email, \thanks, \homepage, \altaffiliation all apply to the current
48: % author. Explanatory text should go in the []'s, actual e-mail
49: % address or url should go in the {}'s for \email and \homepage.
50: % Please use the appropriate macro foreach each type of information
51:
52: % \affiliation command applies to all authors since the last
53: % \affiliation command. The \affiliation command should follow the
54: % other information
55: % \affiliation can be followed by \email, \homepage, \thanks as well.
56: \author{Bao-Quan Ai$^{1}$}\author{Xian-Ju Wang$^{1}$}\author{Guo-Tao Liu$^{1}$}
57: \author{De-Hua Wen$^{1, 2}$}\author{Hui-Zhang Xie$^{2}$}\author{Wei Chen$^{3}$}\author{Liang-Gang Liu$^{1}$}
58: %\email[]{Your e-mail address}
59: %\homepage[]{Your web page}
60: %\thanks{}
61: %\altaffiliation{}
62: \affiliation{$^{1}$ Department of Physics, ZhongShan University,
63: GuangZhou, China\\ $^{2}$ Department of Physics, South China
64: University of technology, GuangZhou, China \\
65: $^{3}$ Department of Physics, JiNan University, GuangZhou, China}
66:
67: %Collaboration name if desired (requires use of superscriptaddress
68: %option in \documentclass). \noaffiliation is required (may also be
69: %used with the \author command).
70: %\collaboration can be followed by \email, \homepage, \thanks as well.
71: %\collaboration{}
72: %\noaffiliation
73:
74: \date{\today}
75:
76: \begin{abstract}
77: The efficiency of a Brownian particle moving in periodic potential
78: in the presence of asymmetric unbiased fluctuations is
79: investigated. We found that there is a regime where the efficiency
80: can be a peaked function of temperature, which proves that
81: thermal fluctuations facilitate the efficiency of energy
82: transformation, contradicting the earlier findings (H. kamegawa et
83: al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 (1998) 5251). It is also found that the
84: mutual interplay between asymmetry of fluctuation and asymmetry
85: of the potential may induce optimized efficiency at finite
86: temperature. The ratchet is not most efficiency when it gives
87: maximum current.
88: \end{abstract}
89:
90: % insert suggested PACS numbers in braces on next line
91: \pacs{05. 40. -a, 02. 50.Ey, 87. 10. +e}
92: % insert suggested keywords - APS authors don't need to do this
93: %\keywords{efficiency optimization, asymmetric unbiased
94: %fluctuations, correlation ratchet}
95:
96: %\maketitle must follow title, authors, abstract, \pacs, and \keywords
97: \maketitle
98:
99: % body of paper here - Use proper section commands
100: % References should be done using the \cite, \ref, and \label commands
101: \section{1. Introduction}
102: \indent Much of the interest in non-equilibrium induced
103: transport processes in concentrated on stochastically driven
104: rachet \cite{1}\cite{2}\cite{3}. This subject was motivated by the
105: challenge to explain unidirectional transport in biological
106: systems, as well as their potential novel technological
107: applications ranging from classical non-equilibrium models
108: \cite{4}\cite{5} to quantum systems \cite{6}\cite{7}\cite{8}.
109: Several models have been proposed to describe muscle's
110: contraction\cite{9}\cite{10}\cite{11}, or the asymmetric
111: polymerization of actin filaments responsible of cell
112: motility\cite{1}\cite{12}.
113:
114: \indent Rectification of noise leading to unidirectional motion in
115: ratchet systems has been an active field of research over the last
116: decade. In these systems directed Brownian motion of particles is
117: induced by nonequilibrium noise in the absence of any net
118: macroscopic forces and potential gradients. Several physical
119: models have been proposed: rocking ratchets \cite{13}, fashing
120: ratchets \cite{14}, diffusion ratchets \cite{15}, correlation
121: ratchets \cite{16}, etc. In all these studies the potential is
122: taken to be asymmetric in space. It has also been shown that one
123: can obtain unidirectional current in the presence of spatially
124: asymmetric potentials. For these nonequilibrium systems external
125: random force should be time asymmetric or the presence of space
126: dependent mobility is required.
127:
128: \indent The energetics of these systems, which rectify the
129: zero-mean fluctuations, are investigated in recent years
130: \cite{17}\cite{18}\cite{19}. To define optimal models for such
131: ratchet systems, the maximization of the efficiency of energy
132: transformation is inevitable. Much of interest was motivated by
133: the elegant piece of work done by Magnasco \cite{13}, which showed
134: that a Brownian particle, subject to external fluctuations, can
135: undergo a non-zero drift while moving under the influence of an
136: asymmetric potential. The temperature dependence of the current
137: has been studied and it has been shown that the current can be a
138: peaked function of temperature. He claimed that there is a region
139: where the efficiency can be optimized at finite temperatures and
140: the existence of thermal fluctuations facilitate the efficiency of
141: energy transformation. Based on energetic analysis of the same
142: model Kamegawa et al. \cite{19} made a important conclusion that
143: the efficiency of energy transformation cannot be optimized at
144: finite temperatures and that the thermal fluctuations does not
145: facilitate it. Recently, investigation of Dan et al. \cite{17}
146: showed that the efficiency can be optimized at finite temperatures
147: in inhomogeneous systems with spatially varying friction
148: coefficient in an adiabatically rocked rachet, and efficiency
149: optimization in homogeneous nonadiabatical rachet systems was
150: observed by Sumithra et al.\cite{18}. The equation of whether the
151: thermal fluctuations actually facilitate the energy transformation
152: in forced homogeneous adiabatical ratchet systems is still unknown
153: and it is the subject of the current investigation.
154: \section{2. The model}
155: \indent We consider a rocking ratchet system subject to an
156: external load:
157: \begin{equation}\label{1}
158: \frac{dx}{dt}=-\frac{\partial V_{0}(x)}{\partial x}-\frac{\partial
159: V_{L}(x)}{\partial x}+F(t)+\sqrt{2k_{B}T}\xi(t),
160: \end{equation}
161:
162: \begin{figure}[htbp]
163: (a)\begin{center}\includegraphics[width=11cm,height=8cm]{fig1a.eps}
164: \end{center}
165: (b)
166: \begin{center}
167: \includegraphics[width=11cm,height=8cm]{fig1b.eps}
168: \end{center}
169: \caption{(a) Schematic illustration of the potential, $V(x)=V_{0}(x)+V_{L}(x)$, $V_{0}(x)$ is a piecewise
170: linear and periodic potential. $V_{L}$ is a potential due to the load.
171: The period of the potential is $\lambda=\lambda_{1}+\lambda_{2}$,
172: and $\Delta=\lambda_{1}-\lambda_{2}$. (b) The driving force
173: $F(t)$ which preserved the zero mean $<F(t)>=0$, where the
174: temporal asymmetry is given by the parameter $\varepsilon $.}
175: \label{3}
176:
177: \end{figure}
178:
179: where $x$ represents the state of the ratchet. $V_{0}$ is a
180: periodic potential, $\xi(t)$ is a randomly fluctuating Gaussian
181: white noise with zero mean and with autocorrelation
182: function$<\xi(t)\xi(s)>=\delta(t-s)$. Here $<...>$ denotes an
183: ensemble average over the distribution of the fluctuating forces
184: $\xi(t)$. $V_{L}$ is a potential against which the work is done
185: and $\frac{\partial V_{L}}{\partial x}=L>0$ is the load force. The
186: geometry of potential $V(x)=V_{0}(x)+V_{L}(x)$ is displayed in
187: Fig. 1a. $F(t)$ is some external driving force which is shown in
188: Fig.1b. The evolution of the probability density for $x$ is given
189: by the associated Fokker-Planck equation,
190: \begin{equation}\label{2}
191: \frac{\partial P(x,t)}{\partial t}=\frac{\partial}{\partial
192: x}[k_{B}T\frac{\partial P(x,t)}{\partial
193: x}+(V^{'}(x)-F(t))P(x,t)]=-\frac{\partial j}{\partial x} .
194: \end{equation}
195: If $F(t)$ changes very slowly, there exists a quasi-stationary
196: state. In this case, the average current of the particle can be
197: solved by evaluating the constants of integration under the
198: normalization condition and the periodicity condition of $P(x)$,
199: and the current can be obtained and expressed as \cite{13}
200: \begin{equation}\label{3}
201: j(F(t))=\frac{P_{2}^{2}\sinh[\lambda(F(t)-L)/2k_{B}T]}{k_{B}T(\lambda/Q)^{2}P_{3}-(\lambda/Q)P_{1}P_{2}\sinh[\lambda(F(t)-L)/2k_{B}T]},
202: \end{equation}
203: where
204: \begin{equation}\label{e1}
205: P_{1}=\Delta+\frac{\lambda^{2}-\Delta^{2}}{4}\frac{F(t)-L}{Q},
206: \end{equation}
207: \begin{equation}\label{e2}
208: P_{2}=(1-\frac{\Delta(F(t)-L)}{2Q})^{2}-(\frac{\lambda(F(t)-L)}{2Q})^{2},
209: \end{equation}
210: \begin{equation}\label{e3}
211: P_{3}=\cosh\{[Q-0.5\Delta(F(t)-L)]/k_{B}T\}-\cosh[\lambda(F(t)-L)/2k_{B}T],
212: \end{equation}
213:
214: where $\lambda=\lambda_{1}+\lambda_{2}$ and
215: $\Delta=\lambda_{1}-\lambda_{2}$. The average current, the
216: quantity of primary interest, is given by
217: \begin{equation}\label{4}
218: J=\frac{1}{\tau}\int_{0}^{\tau}j(F(t))dt,
219: \end{equation}
220: where $\tau$ is the period of the driving force $F(t)$, which is
221: assumed longer than any other time scale of the system in this
222: adiabatic limit. Magnasco considered this case, but only for
223: $F(t)$ symmetric in time. Here will again consider a driving with
224: a zero mean, $<F(t)>=0$, but which is asymmetric in time \cite{20}
225: \begin{eqnarray}\label{7}
226: F(t)=\frac{1+\varepsilon}{1-\varepsilon}F, (n\tau\leq
227: t<n\tau+\frac{1}{2}\tau(1-\varepsilon)), \\
228: =-F, (n\tau+\frac{1}{2}\tau(1-\varepsilon)<t\leq
229: (n+1)\tau).
230: \end{eqnarray}
231: \indent In this case the time averaged current is easily
232: calculated,
233: \begin{equation}\label{8}
234: J=\frac{1}{2}(j_{1}+j_{2}),
235: \end{equation}
236: where
237: $j_{1}=(1-\varepsilon)j(\frac{1+\varepsilon}{1-\varepsilon}F)$ and
238: $j_{2}=(1+\varepsilon)j(-F)$.
239:
240:
241: \indent The input energy $R$ per unit time from external
242: force to the ratchet and the work $W$ per unit time that the
243: ratchet system extracts from the fluctuation into the work are
244: given respectively\cite{19}:
245: \begin{equation}\label{9}
246: R=\frac{1}{t_{j}-t_{i}}\int^{x(t_{j})}_{x(t_{i})}F(t)dx(t),
247: \end{equation}
248: \begin{equation}\label{10}
249: W=\frac{1}{t_{j}-t_{i}}\int^{x(t_{j})}_{x(t_{i})}dV(x(t)).
250: \end{equation}
251: For the square wave, they yield:
252: \begin{equation}\label{11}
253: <R>=\frac{1}{2}F(j_{1}-j_{2}),
254: \end{equation}
255: \begin{equation}\label{12}
256: <W>=\frac{1}{2}L(j_{1}+j_{2}).
257: \end{equation}
258: \indent Thus the efficiency $\eta$ of the system to transform the
259: external fluctuation to useful work is given by
260: \begin{equation}\label{13}
261: \eta=\frac{<W>}{<R>}=\frac{L(j_{1}+j_{2})}{F(j_{1}-j_{2})}.
262: \end{equation}
263: which in turn, being $\frac{j_{2}}{j_{1}}<0$, can be written as
264: \begin{equation}\label{14}
265: \eta=\frac{L}{F}(\frac{1-|j_{2}/j_{1}|}{1+|j_{2}/j_{1}|}).
266: \end{equation}
267: \section{3. Results and discussion}
268: \indent we have calculated the efficiency and the net current as a
269: function of temperature $T$ for the case where asymmetric unbiased
270: fluctuations are applied, and the results are shown in Fig. 2-
271: Fig. 6.
272:
273: \begin{figure}[htbp]
274: \begin{center}\includegraphics[width=11cm,height=8cm]{fig2.eps}
275: \caption{Efficiency $\eta$ as a function of temperature $T$ for different values of
276: asymmetric parameters $\varepsilon=-0.5, -0.6, -0.7, -0.8$, $F=1.0$, $\lambda=1.0$
277: ,$\Delta=0.7$, $Q=1.0$ and $L=0.01$. The inset shows the net current $J$ as function of $T$ for the same parameters.}\label{2}
278: \end{center}
279: \end{figure}
280: In Fig. 2 we plot the efficiency $\eta$ as a function of the
281: temperature for different values of $\varepsilon$
282: ($\varepsilon<0$) with the parameter values, $F=1.0$,
283: $\lambda=1.0$, $\Delta=0.7$, $Q=1.0$ and $L=0.01$. From the figure
284: we can see that the efficiency is a decreasing function of
285: temperature for the cases of $\varepsilon=-0.5$ and
286: $\varepsilon=-0.6$, which shows that the presence of thermal
287: fluctuation dose not help efficient energy transformation by
288: ratchet. But for the cases of $\varepsilon=-0.7$ and
289: $\varepsilon=-0.8$ the efficiency can be optimized at finite
290: temperatures. In contradiction with the results of Ref (19) we
291: found a region where the efficiency attains a maximum at a finite
292: temperature. This shows that thermal fluctuations may facilitate
293: the energy conversion for asymmetric unbiased fluctuations. The
294: current is a peaked function of temperature for corresponding
295: parameters as shown in the inset. The highest temperature of the
296: ratchet decreases with the value of the asymmetric parameters
297: $\varepsilon$ of fluctuations and the lowest temperature of the
298: ratchet does not change with the $\varepsilon$, which indicates
299: that the asymmetric parameters are sensitive to the highest
300: working temperature of the ratchet. The peak shift to lower
301: temperature region with decreasing value of the asymmetric
302: parameters $\varepsilon$. Comparing Fig. 2 with the inset we can
303: see that the temperature corresponding to maximum current is not
304: the same as the temperature at which the efficiency is maximum,
305: which is consistent with the previous results
306: \cite{17}\cite{18}\cite{19}.
307:
308: \indent From Eq. (16) we can know that the efficiency $\eta$
309: depends on the ratio $|\frac{j_{2}}{j_{1}}|$. If the function is
310: monotonically increasing, $\eta$ should be a monotonically
311: decreasing function of the temperature.
312: \begin{figure}[htbp]
313: \begin{center}\includegraphics[width=11cm,height=8cm]{fig3.eps}
314: \caption{Plot of currents $j_{1}$, $j_{2}$ and $|\frac{j_{2}}{j_{1}}|$. The condition is the same as the case $\varepsilon=-0.5$ in Fig. 2}\label{3}
315: \end{center}
316: \end{figure}
317: \begin{figure}[htbp]
318: \begin{center}\includegraphics[width=11cm,height=8cm]{fig4.eps}
319: \caption{Plot of currents $j_{1}$, $j_{2}$ and $|\frac{j_{2}}{j_{1}}|$. The condition is the same as the case $\varepsilon=-0.7$ in Fig. 2}\label{4}
320: \end{center}
321: \end{figure}
322: In Fig. 3 we plot the fluxes obtained for the case of
323: $\varepsilon=-0.5$ (shown in Fig. 2). From Fig. 3 we can see that
324: the ratio $|\frac{j_{2}}{j_{1}}|$ is a monotonically increasing
325: function of temperature, which indicates that the efficiency
326: $\eta$ is decreasing function of temperature. However, for the
327: case of $\varepsilon=-0.7$ (see Fig. 4) the ratio
328: $|\frac{j_{2}}{j_{1}}|$ displays a clear minimum at the same value
329: of the temperature which corresponds to maximum of $\eta$ in Fig.
330: 2.
331:
332:
333: \begin{figure}[htbp]
334: \begin{center}\includegraphics[width=11cm,height=8cm]{fig5.eps}
335: \caption{Efficiency $\eta$ as a function of temperature $T$ for different values of
336: asymmetric parameters $\Delta=-0.6, -0.7, -0.8$, $F=1.0$, $\lambda=1.0$
337: ,$\varepsilon=0.7$, $Q=1.0$ and $L=0.01$. The inset shows the net current $J$ as function of $T$ for the same parameters.}\label{2}
338: \end{center}
339: \end{figure}
340: In Fig. 5 we plot the efficiency $\eta$ as a function of the
341: temperature $T$ for different values of slope degree of potenial
342: $\Delta$ ($\Delta<0$) with the parameter values, $F=1.0$,
343: $\lambda=1.0$, $\varepsilon=0.7$, $Q=1.0$ and $L=0.01$. From the
344: figure, we can see that with decreasing of $\Delta$ the
345: efficiency function of temperature becomes from a monotonically
346: decreasing function to a peaked function. This shows that the
347: thermal fluctuations actually facilitate the energy transformation
348: in some region. The corresponding current is a peaked function of
349: temperature for the same parameters as shown in the inset. The
350: height of the peak decreases with the value of $\Delta$. The
351: lowest temperature of the ratchet changes with $\Delta$
352: drastically while the highest temperature of the ratchet does not
353: change with the $\Delta$ and the peak shift to higher temperature
354: region with decreasing value of $\Delta$, which is opposite to the
355: inset of the Fig. 2.
356: \begin{figure}[htbp]
357: \begin{center}\includegraphics[width=11cm,height=8cm]{fig6.eps}
358: \caption{Plot of currents $j_{1}$, $j_{2}$ and $|\frac{j_{2}}{j_{1}}|$. The condition is the same as the case $\Delta=-0.7$ in Fig. 5}\label{2}
359: \end{center}
360: \end{figure}
361:
362: \indent In Fig. 6, we plot the fluxes of the temperature for the
363: case of $\Delta=-0.7$ (shown in Fig. 5). From the Fig. 6 we can
364: see that the ratio $|\frac{j_{2}}{j_{1}}|$ displays a minimum at
365: the same value of the temperature , which corresponds to maximum
366: of $\eta$ in Fig. 5\\
367: \section{4. Conclusion}
368: \indent In present paper, the transport of a Brownian particle
369: moving in spatially asymmetric potential in the presence of
370: asymmetric unbiased fluctuations is investigated. In
371: contradiction with the previous findings, our results show that
372: the mutual interplay between asymmetry of fluctuation and
373: asymmetry of potential may cause an optimized efficiency of energy
374: conversion. This proves the claim made by Magnasco that there is a
375: region of the operating regime where the efficiency can be
376: optimized at finite temperatures. The temperature corresponding to
377: maximum current is not the same as the temperature at which the
378: efficiency is maximum. The asymmetry $\varepsilon$of fluctuation
379: is sensitive to the high temperature working region of the ratchet
380: while the asymmetry $\Delta$ of potential affects the low
381: temperature working region drastically.
382:
383: \indent In this paper, the main features introduced by the
384: temporal asymmetry are the interplay of lower potential barriers
385: in positive direction relative to negative direction and the
386: corresponding shorter and longer times respectively the force is
387: felt. These type of competitive effects appear ubiquitously in
388: systems \cite{20} where there is an interplay between thermal
389: activation and dynamics.
390:
391: % If in two-column mode, this environment will change to single-column
392: % format so that long equations can be displayed. Use
393: % sparingly.
394: %\begin{widetext}
395: % put long equation here
396: %\end{widetext}
397:
398: % figures should be put into the text as floats.
399: % Use the graphics or graphicx packages (distributed with LaTeX2e)
400: % and the \includegraphics macro defined in those packages.
401: % See the LaTeX Graphics Companion by Michel Goosens, Sebastian Rahtz,
402: % and Frank Mittelbach for instance.
403: %
404: % Here is an example of the general form of a figure:
405: % Fill in the caption in the braces of the \caption{} command. Put the label
406: % that you will use with \ref{} command in the braces of the \label{} command.
407: % Use the figure* environment if the figure should span across the
408: % entire page. There is no need to do explicit centering.
409:
410: % \begin{figure}
411: % \includegraphics{}%
412: % \caption{\label{}}
413: % \end{figure}
414:
415: % Surround figure environment with turnpage environment for landscape
416: % figure
417: % \begin{turnpage}
418: % \begin{figure}
419: % \includegraphics{}%
420: % \caption{\label{}}
421: % \end{figure}
422: % \end{turnpage}
423:
424: % tables should appear as floats within the text
425: %
426: % Here is an example of the general form of a table:
427: % Fill in the caption in the braces of the \caption{} command. Put the label
428: % that you will use with \ref{} command in the braces of the \label{} command.
429: % Insert the column specifiers (l, r, c, d, etc.) in the empty braces of the
430: % \begin{tabular}{} command.
431: % The ruledtabular enviroment adds doubled rules to table and sets a
432: % reasonable default table settings.
433: % Use the table* environment to get a full-width table in two-column
434: % Add \usepackage{longtable} and the longtable (or longtable*}
435: % environment for nicely formatted long tables. Or use the the [H]
436: % placement option to break a long table (with less control than
437: % in longtable).
438: % \begin{table}%[H] add [H] placement to break table across pages
439: % \caption{\label{}}
440: % \begin{ruledtabular}
441: % \begin{tabular}{}
442: % Lines of table here ending with \\
443: % \end{tabular}
444: % \end{ruledtabular}
445: % \end{table}
446:
447: % Surround table environment with turnpage environment for landscape
448: % table
449: % \begin{turnpage}
450: % \begin{table}
451: % \caption{\label{}}
452: % \begin{ruledtabular}
453: % \begin{tabular}{}
454: % \end{tabular}
455: % \end{ruledtabular}
456: % \end{table}
457: % \end{turnpage}
458:
459: % Specify following sections are appendices. Use \appendix* if there
460: % only one appendix.
461: %\appendix
462: %\section{}
463:
464: % If you have acknowledgments, this puts in the proper section head.
465: \begin{acknowledgments}
466: The project supported by National Natural Science Foundation of
467: China (Grant No. of 10275099) and GuangDong Provincial Natural
468: Science Foundation (Grant No. of 021707 and 001182).
469: \end{acknowledgments}
470:
471:
472: \begin{thebibliography}{reference}
473: \baselineskip 0.2in
474: \bibitem{1}F. Julicher, A. Adjari, J. Prost, Rev. Mod. Phys.
475: 69 (1997) 1269.
476: \bibitem{2}B. Q. Ai, X. J. Wang, G. T. Liu and L. G. Liu, Phys.
477: Rev. E 67 (2003) 022903.
478: \bibitem{3}P. Reimann, C. Van den Broeck, H. Linke, P.
479: Hanggi,etc., Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001) 010602.
480: \bibitem{4} J. Rousselet, L. Salome, A. Adjari and J. Prost,
481: Nature 370 (1994) 446.
482: \bibitem{5}L. P. Faucheux et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 74 (1995) 1504.
483: \bibitem{6}I. Derenyi, C. Lee, A. L. Barabasi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80
484: (1998) 1473.
485: \bibitem{7}C. Mennerat-Robilliard et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 82
486: (1999) 851.
487: \bibitem{8}C. S. Lee et al., Nature 400 (1999) 337.
488: \bibitem{9}R. D. Astumian, M. Bier, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72 (1994) 1766.
489: \bibitem{10}B. Q. Ai, X. J. Wang, L. G. Liu, M. Nakano and H. Matsuura, Chin. Phys. Lett.19 (2002) 137.
490: \bibitem{11}B. Q. Ai, X. J. Wang, L. G. Liu, M. Nakano and H. Matsuura, Commun. Theor. Phys.37 (2002) 125.
491: \bibitem{12}B. Q. Ai, X. J. Wang, L. G. Liu, M. Nakano and H.
492: Matsuura, Information, VOL.6 (2003)187.
493: \bibitem{13}M. O. Magnasco, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 (1993) 1477.
494: \bibitem{14}P. Hanggi and R. Bartussek, Nonlinear physics of
495: complex system - Current status and Future Trends, 476, Spring,
496: Berlin, (1996), 294.
497: \bibitem{15}P. Reimann, R. Bartussek, R. Haussler and P. Hanggi,
498: Phys. Lett. A 215 (1994) 26.
499: \bibitem{16}C. R. Doering, W. Horsthemke and J. Riordan, Phys. Rev.
500: Lett. 72 (1994) 2984.
501: \bibitem{17}D. Dan, M. C. Mahato and A. M. Jayannavar, Phys. Rev.
502: E 63 (2001) 056307.
503: \bibitem{18}K. Sumithra and T. Sintes, Physica A 297 (2001) 1.
504: \bibitem{19}H. Kamgawa, T. Hondou and F. Takagi, Phys. Rev. Lett.
505: 80 (1998) 5251.
506: \bibitem{20}D. R. Chialvo and M. M. Millonas, Phys.
507: Lett. A 209 (1995) 26.
508: \end{thebibliography}
509:
510:
511:
512:
513: \end{document}
514: %
515: % ****** End of file template.aps ******
516: