1: %
2: % TeX'ing this file requires that you have AMS-LaTeX 2.0 installed
3: % as well as the rest of the prerequisites for REVTeX 4.0
4: %
5: %\documentclass[preprint,pra,showpacs,showkeys]{revtex4}
6: %\documentclass[preprint,pra,showpacs,showkeys,tightenlines]{revtex4}
7: \documentclass[twocolumn,pra,showpacs,showkeys]{revtex4}
8:
9: %\usepackage{graphicx}% Include figure files
10: \usepackage{dcolumn}% Align table columns on decimal point
11: \usepackage{bm}% bold math
12:
13: %------------------------------------------------------------------
14: \def\veps{\varepsilon}
15: \def\etal{\emph{et~al.}}
16: \newcommand{\eref}[1]{(\ref{#1})}
17: \newcommand{\Eref}[1]{Eq.~(\ref{#1})}
18: \newcommand{\tref}[1]{Table~\ref{#1}}
19: \newcommand{\rtw}{\rightarrow}
20: \newcommand{\cm}{cm$^{-1}$}
21: %------------------------------------------------------------------
22: %\nofiles
23:
24: \begin{document}
25:
26: \title{Improved calculation of relativistic shift and isotope shift in Mg~I}
27:
28: \author{J. C. Berengut}
29: \email{jcb@phys.unsw.edu.au}
30: \affiliation{School of Physics, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, Australia}
31: \author{V. V. Flambaum}
32: \affiliation{School of Physics, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, Australia}
33: \author{M. G. Kozlov}
34: \affiliation{Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute, Gatchina, 188300, Russia}
35:
36: \date{1 July 2005}
37:
38: \begin{abstract}
39:
40: We present an \emph{ab initio} method of calculation of isotope shift
41: and relativistic shift in atoms with a few valence electrons. It is based on an energy calculation involving combination of the configuration interaction method and many-body perturbation theory. This work is motivated by analyses of quasar absorption spectra that suggest that the fine structure constant $\alpha$ was smaller at an early epoch. Relativistic shifts are needed to measure this variation of $\alpha$, while isotope shifts are needed to resolve systematic effects in this study. The isotope shifts can also be used to measure isotopic abundances in gas clouds in the early universe, which are needed to study nuclear reactions in stars and supernovae and test models of chemical evolution. This paper shows that isotope shift in magnesium can be calculated to very high precision using our new method.
42:
43: \end{abstract}
44:
45: \pacs{06.20.-f, 31.30.Gs, 31.25.Jf}
46: \keywords{isotope shift; mass shift; alkaline-earth; magnesium}
47:
48: \maketitle
49:
50: \section{\label{sec:intro} Introduction}
51:
52: The motivation for this work comes from recent studies of quasar
53: absorption spectra designed to probe $\alpha$ in the distant past.
54: Atomic transition frequencies depend on $\alpha$, and by comparing
55: frequencies on Earth with those in quasar absorption spectra, one
56: can deduce whether or not $\alpha$ was different in the early universe.
57: While some studies have revealed a significant deviation from zero
58: (Refs.~\cite{webb99prl,webb01prl,murphy01mnrasA,webb03ass}) other
59: groups using a different telescope have not
60: (Refs.~\cite{quast04aap,srianand04prl}).
61:
62: One of the possible major sources of
63: systematic effects in these studies is that the isotopic abundance
64: ratios in gas clouds in the early universe could be
65: very different to those on Earth. A ``conspiracy'' of several isotopic
66: abundances may provide an alternative explanation for the observed
67: variation in spectra \cite{murphy01mnrasB,murphy03ass,murphy03mnras}.
68: In order to test this possibility
69: it is necessary to have accurate values for the isotope shift (IS) for
70: the relevant atomic transitions \cite{kozlov04pra}.
71: Experimental data are available for
72: very few of them; therefore, accurate calculations are needed
73: in order to make the most comprehensive analysis possible.
74:
75: The need for accurate isotope shifts is further motivated by a wish
76: to study isotopic evolution in the universe. The isotopic abundances
77: of gas clouds may be measured independently of a variation in $\alpha$
78: \cite{kozlov04pra}. This is important for testing models of nuclear reactions in
79: stars and supernovae and of the chemical evolution of the universe.
80:
81: Previously we have calculated isotope shift in atoms with one valence
82: electron using many-body perturbation theory (MBPT) \cite{berengut03pra},
83: and for neutral magnesium using the configuration interaction (CI) method \cite{berengut04praA}.
84: Both of these papers used the finite-field scaling
85: method for the perturbation. In a sense our method combines
86: these two methods by including core-valence correlations into our CI method
87: using MBPT. Magnesium is one of the simplest and
88: well studied two-valence-electron atoms. Because of that it is often used as a
89: test ground for different methods of atomic calculations. In this
90: paper we show that we can calculate the isotope shift of some
91: magnesium transitions for which experimental values are available.
92:
93: \section{\label{sec:method} Method}
94:
95: The isotope shifts of atomic transition frequencies come from two
96: sources: the finite size of the nuclear charge distribution (the
97: ``volume'' or ``field'' shift), and the finite mass of the nucleus
98: (see, e.g. \cite{sobelman72book}). The energy shift due to recoil of the
99: nucleus is $(1/2M)\bm{p}_N^2~=~(1/2M)(\Sigma \bm{p}_i)^2$.
100: Furthermore this ``mass shift'' is traditionally divided
101: into the normal mass shift (NMS) and the specific mass shift (SMS). The
102: normal mass shift is given by the operator $(1/2M)\Sigma \bm{p}_i^2$,
103: which is easily calculated from the transition frequency. The
104: SMS operator is $(1/M)\Sigma_{i<j}(\bm{p}_i \cdot \bm{p}_j)$ which is
105: difficult to evaluate accurately.
106:
107: The shift in energy of any transition in an isotope with mass number
108: $A'$ with respect to an isotope with mass number $A$ can be expressed
109: as
110: \begin{equation}
111: \label{eq:is}
112: \delta \nu^{A', A} = \left( k_{\rm NMS} + k_{\rm SMS} \right) \left(
113: \frac{1}{A'} - \frac{1}{A} \right) + F \delta \langle r^2 \rangle
114: ^{A', A} \ ,
115: \end{equation}
116: where the normal mass shift constant is
117: \begin{equation}
118: k_{\rm NMS} = -\frac{\nu}{1823}
119: \end{equation}
120: and $\langle r^2 \rangle$ is the mean square nuclear radius. The value
121: 1823 refers to the ratio of the atomic mass unit to the electron mass.
122:
123: In this paper we develop a method for calculating the specific mass
124: shift $k_{\rm SMS}$ for atoms with several valence electrons.
125: It is worth noting that in this paper we use the
126: convention $\delta \nu^{A', A}~=~\nu^{A'} - \nu^{A}$.
127:
128: Following our previous work, we are looking for an ``all orders'' method of
129: calculation. Again we have found that the finite-field scaling method
130: is very useful in this respect. The rescaled SMS operator is added to
131: the many-particle Hamiltonian
132: \begin{eqnarray}
133: \label{eq:H_sms}
134: H_{\lambda} = H_0 + \lambda H_{\rm SMS} = H_0
135: + \lambda \sum_{i<j}\bm{p}_i \cdot \bm{p}_j.
136: \end{eqnarray}
137: The eigenvalue problem for the new Hamiltonian is solved for various
138: $\lambda$, and then we recover the specific mass shift constant as
139: \begin{equation}
140: k_{\rm SMS} = \lim_{\lambda \rtw 0} \frac{dE}{d\lambda}.
141: \end{equation}
142: The operator \eref{eq:H_sms} has the same symmetry and structure as
143: the initial Hamiltonian $H_0$ (see the Appendix, Ref.~\cite{berengut03pra}).
144:
145: We have also calculated the relativistic shift for transitions in magnesium using
146: a similar method. These are needed in order to measure variation of $\alpha$
147: \cite{webb99prl,webb01prl,murphy01mnrasA,webb03ass,quast04aap,srianand04prl}.
148: The dependence of transition frequencies on $\alpha$ can be
149: expressed as
150: \begin{equation}
151: \label{eq:alpha}
152: \omega = \omega_0 + q x,
153: \end{equation}
154: where $x = \left( \alpha / \alpha_0 \right)^2 - 1$, $\alpha_0$ is the laboratory value
155: of the fine-structure constant, and $\omega$ and $\omega_0$ are the frequencies of the
156: transition in the absorption clouds and in the laboratory, respectively.
157: We vary $\alpha$ directly in codes and hence calculate $q$. This method is described
158: in detail in our earlier works (Refs.~\cite{dzuba99prl,dzuba02pra,berengut04praB}).
159:
160: To calculate the energy, we use a combination of configuration interaction (CI) and
161: many-body perturbation theory (MBPT), as was done in Refs.~\cite{dzuba96pra,dzuba98pra}.
162: We generate a basis set that includes the core and valence orbitals and a number of
163: virtual orbitals. Then we do the full configuration interaction calculation in the
164: frozen-core approximation. Core-valence correlation effects are taken into account using MBPT by altering the Coulomb integrals
165: ($\tilde Q = 1/\left| \bm{r}_i - \bm{r}_j \right|
166: + \lambda \bm{p}_i \cdot \bm{p}_j$)
167: in the CI calculation. The MBPT operator
168: is separated into two parts: $\Sigma_1$ and $\Sigma_2$, which include all
169: one-valence-electron diagrams and two-valence-electron diagrams, respectively.
170: The operators are calculated to
171: second-order, which was shown to be sufficient for single-valence-electron atoms when
172: used with a finite-field method \cite{berengut03pra}.
173:
174: \section{Calculation and results}
175:
176: The CI part of the calculation is very similar to the large basis set calculation in Ref.~\cite{berengut04praA}. We first solved the Dirac-Fock equations for the core electrons; we use the $V^{N-2}$ approximation, so the core includes the orbitals $1s_{1/2}$, $2s_{1/2}$, $2p_{1/2}$, and $2p_{3/2}$.
177: For valence and virtual orbitals we used a basis formed by diagonalizing the Dirac-Fock operator on the basis set of B-splines and excluding orbitals with high energy (for a description of this method as applied in atomic physics, see, e.g.~Refs.~\cite{johnson86prl,johnson87pra,johnson88pra}).
178:
179: The full two-electron CI uses the basis $17spdf$, which includes the orbitals
180: $1 - 17s_{1/2}$, $2 - 17p_j$, $3 - 17d_j$, and $4 - 17f_j$.
181: It is very close to the saturation of the valence CI. The MBPT basis can be larger, since the calculation merely involves a summation over the virtual orbitals; we have therefore used the basis $32spdfg$ for this part of the calculation, which is essentially complete.
182:
183: \tref{tab:energy} shows that our \emph{ab initio} calculation of the
184: spectrum is within 0.4\% of the experimental spectrum for all considered levels.
185: The relativistic shifts ($q$-values) are presented in \tref{tab:relshift}.
186: \tref{tab:SMSshifts} presents the resulting SMS level shift constants, $k_{\rm SMS}$ of \Eref{eq:is}.
187: In each table we present results of the pure CI calculation
188: (which agree with our previous calculation Ref.~\cite{berengut04praA}),
189: as well as calculations including $\Sigma_1$ only,
190: and both $\Sigma_1$ and $\Sigma_2$.
191:
192: %----------------------------------------------------------------------
193: \begin{table}
194: \caption{Energy of Mg~I levels relative to the ground state ($3s^2\ ^1S_0$).}
195: \label{tab:energy}
196: \begin{tabular}{lcccc}
197: \hline \hline
198: & \multicolumn{4}{c}{Energy (\cm)} \\
199: \multicolumn{1}{c}{Level} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{Experiment} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{CI}
200: & \multicolumn{1}{c}{CI + $\Sigma_{1}$}
201: & \multicolumn{1}{c}{CI + $\Sigma_{1}$ + $\Sigma_{2}$} \\
202: \hline
203: $3s3p\ ^3\!P_0^o$ &$ 21850 $&$ 20910 $&$ 21676 $&$ 21772 $\\
204: $3s3p\ ^3\!P_1^o$ &$ 21870 $&$ 20930 $&$ 21698 $&$ 21794 $\\
205: $3s3p\ ^3\!P_2^o$ &$ 21911 $&$ 20971 $&$ 21742 $&$ 21837 $\\
206: $3s3p\ ^1\!P_1^o$ &$ 35051 $&$ 34491 $&$ 35474 $&$ 35050 $\\
207: $3s4s\ ^3\!S_1$ &$ 41197 $&$ 40406 $&$ 41469 $&$ 41126 $\\
208: $3s4s\ ^1\!S_0$ &$ 43503 $&$ 42667 $&$ 43744 $&$ 43431 $\\
209: $3s3d\ ^1\!D_2$ &$ 46403 $&$ 45123 $&$ 46475 $&$ 46306 $\\
210: $3s4p\ ^3\!P_0^o$ &$ 47841 $&$ 46919 $&$ 48079 $&$ 47756 $\\
211: $3s4p\ ^3\!P_1^o$ &$ 47844 $&$ 46923 $&$ 48082 $&$ 47760 $\\
212: $3s4p\ ^3\!P_2^o$ &$ 47851 $&$ 46929 $&$ 48090 $&$ 47767 $\\
213: $3s3d\ ^3\!D_3$ &$ 47957 $&$ 46973 $&$ 48227 $&$ 47880 $\\
214: $3s3d\ ^3\!D_2$ &$ 47957 $&$ 46973 $&$ 48227 $&$ 47879 $\\
215: $3s3d\ ^3\!D_1$ &$ 47957 $&$ 46973 $&$ 48227 $&$ 47879 $\\
216: $3s4p\ ^1\!P_1^o$ &$ 49347 $&$ 48490 $&$ 49672 $&$ 49277 $\\
217: $3s4d\ ^1\!D_2$ &$ 53135 $&$ 52041 $&$ 53337 $&$ 53037 $\\
218: $3s4d\ ^3\!D_1$ &$ 54192 $&$ 53243 $&$ 54486 $&$ 54111 $\\
219: $3p^2\ ^3\!P_0$ &$ 57813 $&$ 56182 $&$ 58003 $&$ 57706 $\\
220:
221: \hline\hline
222: \end{tabular}
223: \end{table}
224: %----------------------------------------------------------------------
225:
226: %----------------------------------------------------------------------
227: \begin{table}
228: \caption{Relativistic shift of Mg~I transitions relative to the ground state ($3s^2\ ^1S_0$).}
229: \label{tab:relshift}
230: \begin{tabular}{lcccc}
231: \hline \hline
232: Upper & Energy & \multicolumn{3}{c}{$q$ (\cm)} \\
233: Level & (\cm) & CI & CI + $\Sigma_{1}$ & CI + $\Sigma_{1}$ + $\Sigma_{2}$ \\
234: \hline
235: $3s3p\ ^3\!P_0^o$ &$ 21850 $&$ 61 $&$ 66 $&$ 68 $\\
236: $3s3p\ ^3\!P_1^o$ &$ 21870 $&$ 81 $&$ 88 $&$ 89 $\\
237: $3s3p\ ^3\!P_2^o$ &$ 21911 $&$ 122 $&$ 132 $&$ 133 $\\
238: $3s3p\ ^1\!P_1^o$ &$ 35051 $&$ 86 $&$ 94 $&$ 94 $\\
239: $3s4s\ ^3\!S_1$ &$ 41197 $&$ 55 $&$ 61 $&$ 61 $\\
240: $3s4s\ ^1\!S_0$ &$ 43503 $&$ 60 $&$ 65 $&$ 66 $\\
241: $3s3d\ ^1\!D_2$ &$ 46403 $&$ 117 $&$ 123 $&$ 122 $\\
242: $3s4p\ ^3\!P_0^o$ &$ 47841 $&$ 67 $&$ 73 $&$ 73 $\\
243: $3s4p\ ^3\!P_1^o$ &$ 47844 $&$ 70 $&$ 76 $&$ 77 $\\
244: $3s4p\ ^3\!P_2^o$ &$ 47851 $&$ 77 $&$ 83 $&$ 84 $\\
245: $3s3d\ ^3\!D_3$ &$ 47957 $&$ 79 $&$ 85 $&$ 86 $\\
246: $3s3d\ ^3\!D_2$ &$ 47957 $&$ 79 $&$ 85 $&$ 86 $\\
247: $3s3d\ ^3\!D_1$ &$ 47957 $&$ 79 $&$ 85 $&$ 86 $\\
248: $3s4p\ ^1\!P_1^o$ &$ 49347 $&$ 80 $&$ 86 $&$ 87 $\\
249: $3s4d\ ^1\!D_2$ &$ 53135 $&$ 94 $&$ 101 $&$ 102 $\\
250: $3s4d\ ^3\!D_1$ &$ 54192 $&$ 73 $&$ 79 $&$ 80 $\\
251: $3p^2\ ^3\!P_0$ &$ 57813 $&$ 198 $&$ 214 $&$ 214 $\\
252:
253: \hline\hline
254: \end{tabular}
255: \end{table}
256: %----------------------------------------------------------------------
257:
258: %----------------------------------------------------------------------
259: \begin{table}
260: \caption{Calculations of the specific mass shift constants $k_{\rm
261: SMS}$ for Mg~I transitions to the ground state (in $ \rm GHz \cdot amu$).}
262: \label{tab:SMSshifts}
263: \begin{tabular}{lcccc}
264: \hline \hline
265: Upper & \multicolumn{1}{c}{Energy} & \multicolumn{3}{c}{$k_{\rm SMS}$ (GHz.amu)} \\
266: Level & \multicolumn{1}{c}{(\cm)}
267: & \multicolumn{1}{c}{CI}
268: & \multicolumn{1}{c}{CI + $\Sigma_{1}$}
269: & \multicolumn{1}{c}{CI + $\Sigma_{1}$ + $\Sigma_{2}$} \\
270: \hline
271: $3s3p\ ^3\!P_0^o$ &$ 21850 $&$ -378 $&$ -487 $&$ -492 $\\
272: $3s3p\ ^3\!P_1^o$ &$ 21870 $&$ -377 $&$ -486 $&$ -491 $\\
273: $3s3p\ ^3\!P_2^o$ &$ 21911 $&$ -375 $&$ -485 $&$ -489 $\\
274: $3s3p\ ^1\!P_1^o$ &$ 35051 $&$ 231 $&$ 120 $&$ 134 $\\
275: $3s4s\ ^3\!S_1$ &$ 41197 $&$ 43 $&$ -59 $&$ -49 $\\
276: $3s4s\ ^1\!S_0$ &$ 43503 $&$ 13 $&$ -94 $&$ -85 $\\
277: $3s3d\ ^1\!D_2$ &$ 46403 $&$ -345 $&$ -500 $&$ -477 $\\
278: $3s4p\ ^3\!P_0^o$ &$ 47841 $&$ -17 $&$ -136 $&$ -126 $\\
279: $3s4p\ ^3\!P_1^o$ &$ 47844 $&$ -16 $&$ -136 $&$ -126 $\\
280: $3s4p\ ^3\!P_2^o$ &$ 47851 $&$ -16 $&$ -136 $&$ -126 $\\
281: $3s3d\ ^3\!D_3$ &$ 47957 $&$ 52 $&$ -87 $&$ -77 $\\
282: $3s3d\ ^3\!D_2$ &$ 47957 $&$ 52 $&$ -87 $&$ -77 $\\
283: $3s3d\ ^3\!D_1$ &$ 47957 $&$ 52 $&$ -87 $&$ -77 $\\
284: $3s4p\ ^1\!P_1^o$ &$ 49347 $&$ 5 $&$ -120 $&$ -108 $\\
285: $3s4d\ ^1\!D_2$ &$ 53135 $&$ -100 $&$ -246 $&$ -239 $\\
286: $3s4d\ ^3\!D_1$ &$ 54192 $&$ 32 $&$ -99 $&$ -88 $\\
287: $3p^2\ ^3\!P_0$ &$ 57813 $&$ -225 $&$ -469 $&$ -464 $\\
288:
289: \hline\hline
290: \end{tabular}
291: \end{table}
292: %----------------------------------------------------------------------
293:
294: It is worth noting a few points. Firstly, the core-valence effects, included
295: using MBPT, make little difference to the $q$-values (less than 10\%).
296: This again justifies the fact that in previous works for atoms with several
297: valence electrons these have either been
298: neglected entirely or included using a simple fitting procedure based on the
299: polarisability of the core \cite{berengut04praB}.
300:
301: The core-valence effects are much more important for the SMS calculation. In
302: particular the single-valence-electron diagrams (included in $\Sigma_1$) can improve
303: accuracy drastically in cases where the pure CI method is not very good.
304: Although $\Sigma_2$ is important for energy calculation, it appears to make little
305: difference to $k_{\rm SMS}$. This is easily understood since the most important
306: two-body diagram (the direct diagram, corresponding to the screening of the electron-electron
307: interaction by the core electrons) makes no contribution to the SMS. The exchange diagrams in
308: $\Sigma_2$ do have an effect, but this is much smaller than the one-body contribution.
309:
310: In \tref{tab:comparisons} we compare experimental and calculated frequency
311: shifts between isotopes $^{26}{\rm Mg}$ and $^{24}{\rm Mg}$ ($\delta \nu^{26, 24}$).
312: We compare the SMS part only, which is extracted from experiment by subtracting the NMS.
313: We have ignored the volume shift for simplicity; it is approximately
314: \hbox{20-30~MHz}, which
315: is less than the experimental uncertainty in most cases and is of the order of the
316: error in our SMS calculations. Furthermore despite numerous convergent
317: theoretical calculations of the field shift parameter ($F$ of \Eref{eq:is}),
318: our knowledge of the field shift in magnesium
319: is limited by our lack of knowledge of the change in mean-square nuclear radius
320: $\delta \left< r^2 \right>^{26, 24}$.
321:
322: Also presented in \tref{tab:comparisons}, for a theoretical comparison, are
323: the results of Veseth (Ref.~\cite{veseth87jpb}, 1987) and
324: J\"onsson \etal~(Ref.~\cite{jonsson99jpb}, 1999).
325: Veseth used non-relativistic many-body perturbation theory within the algebraic
326: approximation to calculate the isotope shift to third order for some transitions.
327: J\"onsson \etal~used a non-relativistic multiconfiguration Hartree-Fock approach,
328: which allowed for both core and valence excitations in the CI.
329:
330: %----------------------------------------------------------------------
331: \begin{table*}[htb]
332: \caption{Comparison of our calculated SMS with that extracted from experiment
333: for several transitions (in MHz). The isotope shifts are between
334: $^{26}{\rm Mg}$ and $^{24}{\rm Mg}$.
335: Also presented are the results of Refs.~\cite{veseth87jpb}
336: and~\cite{jonsson99jpb} for theoretical comparison.
337: We have neglected the field shift; it is of the order of 20-30 MHz.}
338: \label{tab:comparisons}
339: \begin{tabular}{lccccccccc}
340: \hline \hline
341: &\multicolumn{1}{c}{$\lambda$}
342: &\multicolumn{1}{c}{IS(expt.)}
343: &\multicolumn{1}{c}{NMS}
344: &\multicolumn{6}{c}{SMS} \\
345: \multicolumn{1}{l}{Transition}
346: &\multicolumn{1}{c}{(\AA)}
347: & & &\multicolumn{1}{c}{CI}
348: &\multicolumn{1}{c}{CI + $\Sigma_1$}
349: &\multicolumn{1}{c}{CI + $\Sigma_1$ + $\Sigma_2$}
350: &\multicolumn{1}{c}{Expt.}
351: &\multicolumn{1}{c}{Ref.~\cite{veseth87jpb}}
352: &\multicolumn{1}{c}{Ref.~\cite{jonsson99jpb}} \\
353: \hline
354: $3s^2\ ^1\!S_0 \rtw 3s3p\ ^3\!P_1^o$ & 4572 & 2683(0)\footnotemark[1]
355: & 1153 & 1208 & 1559 & 1573 & 1530 & 1378 & 1666 \\
356: $3s^2\ ^1\!S_0 \rtw 3s3p\ ^1\!P_1^o$ & 2853 & 1412(21)\footnotemark[2]
357: & 1848 & -740 & -383 & -428 & -436 & & -409 \\
358: & & 1390(31)\footnotemark[3]
359: & & & & & -458 & & \\
360: $3s3p\ ^3\!P_0^o \rtw 3s4s\ ^3\!S_1$ & 5169 & -396(6)\footnotemark[4]
361: & 1020 & -1347 & -1371 & -1419 & -1416 & & \\
362: $3s3p\ ^3\!P_1^o \rtw 3s4s\ ^3\!S_1$ & 5174 & -390(5)\footnotemark[4]
363: & 1019 & -1345 & -1369 & -1416 & -1409 & & \\
364: $3s3p\ ^3\!P_2^o \rtw 3s4s\ ^3\!S_1$ & 5185 & -390(7)\footnotemark[4]
365: & 1017 & -1339 & -1363 & -1411 & -1407 & & \\
366: $3s3p\ ^3\!P_1^o \rtw 3p^2\ ^3\!P_0$ & 2782 & 1810(80)\footnotemark[5]
367: & 1895 & -486 & -56 & -86 & -85 & & \\
368: $3s3p\ ^3\!P_0^o \rtw 3s3d\ ^3\!D_1$ & 3830 & 60(15)\footnotemark[2]
369: & 1376 & -1377 & -1283 & -1329 & -1316 & -1269 & \\
370: $3s3p\ ^3\!P_1^o \rtw 3s3d\ ^3\!D_{1,2}$ & 3833 & 61(3)\footnotemark[2]
371: & 1375 & -1374 & -1280 & -1326 & -1314 & & \\
372: $3s3p\ ^3\!P_2^o \rtw 3s3d\ ^3\!D_{1,2,3}$ & 3839 & 58(4)\footnotemark[2]
373: & 1373 & -1368 & -1274 & -1321 & -1315 & & \\
374: $3s3p\ ^3\!P_1^o \rtw 3s4d\ ^3\!D_1$ & 3094 & 420(20)\footnotemark[5]
375: & 1704 & -1309 & -1241 & -1291 & -1284 & & \\
376: $3s3p\ ^1\!P_1^o \rtw 3s4d\ ^1\!D_2$ & 5530 & 2107(15)\footnotemark[4]
377: & 953 & 1059 & 1173 & 1195 & 1154 & & \\
378:
379: \hline\hline
380: \end{tabular}
381: \footnotetext[1]{Sterr \etal, 1993 \cite{sterr93apb}}
382: \footnotetext[2]{Hallstadius, 1979 \cite{hallstadius79zpa}}
383: \footnotetext[3]{Le Boiteux \etal, 1988 \cite{boiteux88jpf}}
384: \footnotetext[4]{Hallstadius and Hansen, 1978 \cite{hallstadius78zpa}}
385: \footnotetext[5]{Novero \etal, 1992 \cite{novero92nc}}
386: \end{table*}
387: %----------------------------------------------------------------------
388:
389: An under-studied transition that is seen in quasar absorption spectra is the
390: $2026$~\AA~line of MgI ($3s^2\ ^1\!S_0 \rtw 3s4p\ ^1\!P_1^o$).
391: From \tref{tab:SMSshifts}, we calculate the isotope shift
392: of this line as $\delta \nu^{26, 24} = 2950(50)$~MHz (the error here is
393: based on the absence of field shift as well as the incompleteness of saturation
394: of the basis set used to calculate $k_{\rm SMS}$).
395:
396: \section{Conclusion}
397:
398: We have presented a method for the calculation of the isotope-shift in
399: many-electron atoms. It is based on the finite-field method, with an
400: energy calculation that combines CI for the valence electrons and
401: MBPT for the core-valence correlations. We have tested the method in
402: magnesium, and the agreement was found to be very good for all
403: transitions. In particular, for the purposes of resolving systematic
404: errors in the search for $\alpha$-variation, and for studies of
405: isotopic evolution of the universe, such accuracy is high enough.
406:
407: We have also used the method to generate more precise values for the
408: relativistic shift ($q$-values). These were found to be within 10\% of those
409: found using previous methods, as expected.
410:
411: \section{Acknowledgments}
412:
413: This work is supported by the Australian Research Council,
414: Gordon Godfrey fund, and Russian Foundation for Basic Research,
415: grant No.~05-02-16914.
416: The authors would like to thank V. A. Dzuba for providing an updated
417: version of the Dzuba - Flambaum - Sushkov atomic code. We are
418: grateful to the APAC National Facility for providing computer time.
419:
420: \bibliography{references}
421:
422: \end{document}
423: