1: % -------------------------------------------------------------------------

2: % Ulrich D. Jentschura and P. J. Mohr

3: % -------------------------------------------------------------------------

4: % Self-energy values for $P$ states in hydrogen and low-Z hydrogenlike ions

5: % -------------------------------------------------------------------------

6: % Submission to Physical Review A - Brief Report

7: % -------------------------------------------------------------------------

8: \documentclass[twocolumn,aps,prd,showpacs,superscriptaddress,floatfix]{revtex4}

9: 

10: \usepackage{bm}

11: \usepackage{dcolumn}

12: \usepackage{graphicx}

13: \usepackage{epsf}

14: \usepackage{epsfig}

15: 

16: \usepackage{amsmath}

17: \usepackage{amsfonts}

18: \usepackage{amssymb}

19: \usepackage{nicefrac}

20: 

21: %\usepackage{showkeys}

22: 

23: \newcommand{\addrHD}{Max--Planck--Institut f\"ur Kernphysik,

24: Saupfercheckweg 1, 69117 Heidelberg, Germany}

25: 

26: \newcommand{\addrNIST}{National Institute of Standards and Technology,

27: Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899--8401}

28: 

29: \begin{document}

30: 

31: \bibliographystyle{myprsty}

32: 

33: \title{Self-energy values for $P$ states in hydrogen 

34: and low-$Z$ hydrogenlike ions}

35: 

36: \author{Ulrich~D.~Jentschura}

37: \affiliation{\addrHD}

38: \affiliation{\addrNIST}

39: 

40: \author{Peter~J.~Mohr}

41: \affiliation{\addrNIST}

42: 

43: \begin{abstract}

44: We describe a nonperturbative (in $Z\alpha$) 

45: numerical evaluation of the one-photon electron self

46: energy for $3P_{1/2}$, $3P_{3/2}$, $4P_{1/2}$ and 

47: $4P_{3/2}$ states in hydrogenlike atomic systems with 

48: charge numbers $Z=1$ to 5. The numerical results are 

49: found to be in agreement with known terms in 

50: the expansion of the self energy in

51: powers of $Z\alpha$ and lead to improved theoretical 

52: predictions for the self-energy shift of these states.

53: \end{abstract}

54: 

55: \pacs{12.20.Ds, 31.30.Jv, 06.20.Jr, 31.15.-p}

56: 

57: \maketitle

58: 

59: In this brief report, we consider the one-loop self-energy shift

60: for excited $P$ states in hydrogenlike systems.

61: High-accuracy numerical calculations of this 

62: effect are notoriously difficult especially in 

63: the region of low nuclear charge numbers $Z$,

64: because the renormalization entails a loss 

65: of up to nine decimal figures in the numerical 

66: calculation (the bound-electron self-energy is 

67: a residual effect which corresponds to the 

68: difference of the divergent self-energy 

69: of the bound electron, minus the corresponding, also 

70: divergent, shift for a free electron).

71: 

72: Furthermore, the calculations are needed for a 

73: self-consistent determination of fundamental constants,

74: which relies on the experimental/theoretical analysis

75: of a number of hydrogenic transitions.

76: 

77: One may obtain rather accurate values for the so-called self-energy 

78: remainder functions by an interpolation~\cite{Mo1975} of results 

79: for high and low nuclear charge numbers, which rely on two 

80: different approaches: (i) direct numerical calculations at high nuclear charge 

81: numbers (see e.g.~\cite{MoKi1992}, no $Z\alpha$-expansion), and

82: (ii) analytic calculations at low nuclear charge numbers,

83: employing the $Z\alpha$-expansion (see e.g.~\cite{JeEtAl2003}).

84: In this case, the values obtained for low nuclear charge

85: depend on the interpolation method used,

86: as well as (of course) on the reliability of both the 

87: numerical calculations at high $Z$ and the analytic calculations 

88: for low nuclear charge number. 

89: 

90: Here, we follow a third approach and calculate the self-energy 

91: without $Z\alpha$-expansion, at low $Z$, using a method described previously 

92: in~\cite{JeMoSo1999,JeMoSo2001pra,JeMo2004pra}. Essentially,

93: this method relies on an adequate formulation of the 

94: physical problem, by which divergent terms are suitably 

95: identified and calculated separately using semi-analytic 

96: approaches, and on the use of efficient numerical methods 

97: for the high-accuracy calculation of the Green function of the relativistic 

98: electron and for the 

99: evaluation of slowly convergent sums of intermediate 

100: angular momenta (it might be useful to mention the keyword ``convergence 

101: acceleration'' in that context~\cite{JeMoSoWe1999}).

102: On modern computer processors, it is not even necessary  

103: to parallelize the calculation; that latter approach had previously 

104: been employed in~\cite{JeMoSo1999,JeMoSo2001pra}.

105: 

106: All calculations reported here are carried out in the no-recoil limit,

107: which corresponds to an infinitely heavy nucleus. 

108: It might be instructive to recall the following 

109: subtlety, which is well known, and to include a slight detour:

110: At the current level of accuracy and especially at low $Z$, 

111: the reduced-mass dependence of the self energy

112: should be included for a comparison of the effect with experiment.

113: This can be done {\em a posteriori} by considering the semi-analytic expansion 

114: in Eq.~(\ref{defFLOnS}) below, using the formulas given 

115: in Eq.~(2.5b) of Ref.~\cite{SaYe1990}, which indicate the reduced-mass

116: dependence of the coefficients, and then the 

117: self-energy remainder values given in 

118: Tables~\ref{tableF3P12}---~\ref{tableF4P32} below in this 

119: brief report.

120: 

121: Returning to the discussion of our calculation,

122: we write the (real part of the) energy shift $\Delta E_{\rm SE}$ due to the

123: electron self-energy radiative correction as~\cite{SaYe1990}

124: %

125: \begin{equation}

126: \label{ESEasF}

127: \Delta E_{\rm SE} = \frac{\alpha}{\pi} \, 

128: \frac{(Z \alpha)^4 \, m_{\rm e} \, c^2}{n^3} \, 

129: F(nL_j,Z\alpha) \,,

130: \end{equation}

131: %

132: where $F$ is a dimensionless quantity ($m_{\rm e}$ is the 

133: electron mass, $\alpha$ is the fine-structure constant, 

134: and $c$ is the speed of light in vacuum).

135: In writing the expression $F(nL_j,Z\alpha)$, we follow the usual

136: spectroscopic notation for the quantum numbers of the single electron in 

137: a hydrogenlike ion; namely, we denote the principal quantum number

138: by $n$, the orbital angular momentum by $L$ and the

139: total electron angular momentum by $j$.  

140: 

141: \begin{table}[htb]

142: \begin{center}

143: \begin{minipage}{7.7cm}

144: \begin{center}

145: \caption{\label{tableF3P12} Numerical results for

146: the scaled self-energy function

147: $F$ ($3P_{1/2}, Z\alpha)$ and the self-energy remainder 

148: function $G_{\rm SE}$, as defined in Eq.~(\ref{ESEasF}),

149: in the regime of low nuclear charge numbers $Z$. See Fig.~\ref{fig1}.}

150: \begin{tabular}{l@{\hspace*{0.5cm}}r@{.}l@{\hspace*{0.5cm}}r@{.}l}

151: \hline

152: \hline

153: $Z$ &

154: \multicolumn{2}{l}{\rule[-3mm]{0mm}{8mm}

155:   $F(3P_{1/2},Z\alpha)$} &

156: \multicolumn{2}{l}{\rule[-3mm]{0mm}{8mm}

157:   $G_{\rm SE}(3P_{1/2},Z\alpha)$}\\

158: \hline

159: \rule[-1mm]{0mm}{6mm}

160: $1$ & $ -0$ & $115~459~16(5)$ & $ -1$ & $118~5(9)$ \\

161: \rule[-1mm]{0mm}{6mm}

162: $2$ & $ -0$ & $114~787~32(5)$ & $ -1$ & $089~7(2)$ \\

163: \rule[-1mm]{0mm}{6mm}

164: $3$ & $ -0$ & $113~831~60(5)$ & $ -1$ & $062~5(1)$ \\

165: \rule[-1mm]{0mm}{6mm}

166: $4$ & $ -0$ & $112~644~39(5)$ & $ -1$ & $036~30(6)$ \\

167: \rule[-3mm]{0mm}{8mm}

168: $5$ & $ -0$ & $111~258~78(5)$ & $ -1$ & $010~84(4)$ \\

169: \hline

170: \hline

171: \end{tabular}

172: \end{center}

173: \end{minipage}

174: \end{center}

175: \end{table}

176: 

177: \begin{table}[htb]

178: \begin{center}

179: \begin{minipage}{7.7cm}

180: \begin{center}

181: \caption{\label{tableF3P32} Same as Table~\ref{tableF3P12},

182: for the $3P_{3/2}$ state. See also Fig.~\ref{fig1}.}

183: \begin{tabular}{l@{\hspace*{0.5cm}}r@{.}l@{\hspace*{0.5cm}}r@{.}l}

184: \hline

185: \hline

186: $Z$ &

187: \multicolumn{2}{l}{\rule[-3mm]{0mm}{8mm}

188:   $F(3P_{3/2},Z\alpha)$} &

189: \multicolumn{2}{l}{\rule[-3mm]{0mm}{8mm}

190:   $G_{\rm SE}(3P_{3/2},Z\alpha)$}\\

191: \hline

192: \rule[-1mm]{0mm}{6mm}

193: $1$ & $  0$ & $134~414~38(5)$ & $ -0$ & $577~5(9)$ \\

194: \rule[-1mm]{0mm}{6mm}

195: $2$ & $  0$ & $134~792~58(5)$ & $ -0$ & $559~3(2)$ \\

196: \rule[-1mm]{0mm}{6mm}

197: $3$ & $  0$ & $135~332~45(5)$ & $ -0$ & $542~1(1)$ \\

198: \rule[-1mm]{0mm}{6mm}

199: $4$ & $  0$ & $136~006~06(5)$ & $ -0$ & $526~06(6)$ \\

200: \rule[-3mm]{0mm}{8mm}

201: $5$ & $  0$ & $136~795~05(5)$ & $ -0$ & $510~76(4)$ \\

202: \hline

203: \hline

204: \end{tabular}

205: \end{center}

206: \end{minipage}

207: \end{center}

208: \end{table}

209: 

210: \begin{table}[htb]

211: \begin{center}

212: \begin{minipage}{7.7cm}

213: \begin{center}

214: \caption{\label{tableF4P12} Same as Tables~\ref{tableF3P12} 

215: and~\ref{tableF3P32}, for the $4P_{1/2}$ state. See also Fig.~\ref{fig2}.}

216: \begin{tabular}{l@{\hspace*{0.5cm}}r@{.}l@{\hspace*{0.5cm}}r@{.}l}

217: \hline

218: \hline

219: $Z$ &

220: \multicolumn{2}{l}{\rule[-3mm]{0mm}{8mm}

221:   $F(4P_{1/2},Z\alpha)$} &

222: \multicolumn{2}{l}{\rule[-3mm]{0mm}{8mm}

223:   $G_{\rm SE}(4P_{1/2},Z\alpha)$}\\

224: \hline

225: \rule[-1mm]{0mm}{6mm}

226: $1$ & $ -0$ & $110~425~6(1)$ & $ -1$ & $164(2)$ \\

227: \rule[-1mm]{0mm}{6mm}

228: $2$ & $ -0$ & $109~720~3(1)$ & $ -1$ & $134~1(5)$ \\

229: \rule[-1mm]{0mm}{6mm}

230: $3$ & $ -0$ & $108~717~9(1)$ & $ -1$ & $105~5(2)$ \\

231: \rule[-1mm]{0mm}{6mm}

232: $4$ & $ -0$ & $107~471~8(1)$ & $ -1$ & $078~1(1)$ \\

233: \rule[-3mm]{0mm}{8mm}

234: $5$ & $ -0$ & $106~016~8(1)$ & $ -1$ & $051~20(8)$ \\

235: \hline

236: \hline

237: \end{tabular}

238: \end{center}

239: \end{minipage}

240: \end{center}

241: \end{table}

242: 

243: \begin{table}[htb]

244: \begin{center}

245: \begin{minipage}{7.7cm}

246: \begin{center}

247: \caption{\label{tableF4P32} Numerical results for

248: the scaled self-energy function

249: $F$ and the self-energy remainder

250: function $G_{\rm SE}$ for the $4P_{3/2}$ state. 

251: See also Fig.~\ref{fig2}.}

252: \begin{tabular}{l@{\hspace*{0.5cm}}r@{.}l@{\hspace*{0.5cm}}r@{.}l}

253: \hline

254: \hline

255: $Z$ &

256: \multicolumn{2}{l}{\rule[-3mm]{0mm}{8mm}

257:   $F(4P_{3/2},Z\alpha)$} &

258: \multicolumn{2}{l}{\rule[-3mm]{0mm}{8mm}

259:   $G_{\rm SE}(4P_{3/2},Z\alpha)$}\\

260: \hline

261: \rule[-1mm]{0mm}{6mm}

262: $1$ & $  0$ & $139~440~2(1)$ & $ -0$ & $609(2)$ \\

263: \rule[-1mm]{0mm}{6mm}

264: $2$ & $  0$ & $139~832~7(1)$ & $ -0$ & $590~4(5)$ \\

265: \rule[-1mm]{0mm}{6mm}

266: $3$ & $  0$ & $140~392~7(1)$ & $ -0$ & $572~9(2)$ \\

267: \rule[-1mm]{0mm}{6mm}

268: $4$ & $  0$ & $141~091~6(1)$ & $ -0$ & $555~5(1)$ \\

269: \rule[-3mm]{0mm}{8mm}

270: $5$ & $  0$ & $141~909~8(1)$ & $ -0$ & $539~41(8)$ \\

271: \hline

272: \hline

273: \end{tabular}

274: \end{center}

275: \end{minipage}

276: \end{center}

277: \end{table}

278: 

279: The leading terms 

280: in the semi-analytic expansion of $F(n{P}_j, Z\alpha)$

281: about $Z\alpha=0$ read

282: %

283: \begin{eqnarray}

284: \label{defFLOnS}

285: \lefteqn{F(n{P}_j, Z\alpha) = 

286: A_{40}(n{P}_j)  + \, (Z \alpha)^2} \, 

287:  \nonumber\\[2ex]

288: & & \times \left[A_{61}(n{P}_j) \,\ln(Z \alpha)^{-2} + 

289: G_{\rm SE}(n{P}_j, Z\alpha) \right]\,.

290: \end{eqnarray}

291: %

292: The $A$ coefficients have two indices, the first of which denotes the

293: power of $Z\alpha$ [including those powers explicitly shown in

294: Eq.~(\ref{ESEasF})], while the second index denotes the power of the

295: logarithm $\ln(Z \alpha)^{-2}$.  The evaluation of the coefficient 

296: %

297: \begin{equation}

298: \label{defa60}

299: A_{60}(nS_{1/2}) \equiv \lim_{Z\alpha \to 0} G_{\rm SE}(nS_{1/2},Z\alpha)

300: \end{equation}

301: %

302: has been historically problematic.

303: 

304: %

305: % Figure 1

306: %

307: \begin{figure}[htb]

308: \begin{center}

309: %!\begin{minipage}{8.6cm}

310: %

311: \centerline{\mbox{\epsfysize=3.8cm\epsffile{fig1a.eps}}}

312: %

313: \vspace{1cm}

314: %

315: \centerline{\mbox{\epsfysize=3.8cm\epsffile{fig1b.eps}}}

316: %

317: \caption{\label{fig1} Comparison of the self-energy remainder

318: for $3P_{1/2}$ and $3P_{3/2}$ states, as listed in 

319: Tables~\ref{tableF3P12} and~\ref{tableF3P32}, to their low-$Z$ 

320: limit which is the $A_{60}$ coefficient [see Eqs.~(\ref{defa60})

321: and~(\ref{a60})]. Here, $Z$ is the nuclear charge, and 

322: the self-energy remainder $G_{\rm SE}$ is a dimensionless quantity.

323: The nuclear charge number is denoted by $Z$.}

324: %

325: \end{center}

326: \end{figure}

327: 

328: 

329: We now list the analytic coefficients and the

330: Bethe logarithms relevant to the atomic states under

331: investigation, referring the reader to~\cite{JeSoMo1997} 

332: for a more detailed discussion and further references,

333: %

334: \begin{subequations}

335: \begin{eqnarray}

336: \label{coeffs1S12}

337: A_{40}(n{P}_{1/2}) & = & -\frac16 - \frac43\,\ln k_0(nP)\,, \\[1ex]

338: A_{40}(n{P}_{3/2}) & = & \frac{1}{12} - \frac43\,\ln k_0(nP)\,.

339: \end{eqnarray}

340: \end{subequations}

341: %

342: Numerical values for the Bethe logarithms $\ln k_0(nP)$ are 

343: well known~\cite{KlMa1973,DrSw1990}.

344: 

345: The $A_{61}$-coefficients for the states under investigation read

346: %

347: \begin{subequations}

348: \begin{eqnarray}

349: A_{61}(3{P}_{1/2}) & = & \frac{268}{405} \,, \quad

350: A_{61}(3{P}_{3/2}) \; = \; \frac{148}{405} \,,\\[1ex]

351: A_{61}(4{P}_{1/2}) & = & \frac{499}{720} \,, \quad

352: A_{61}(4{P}_{3/2}) \; = \; \frac{137}{360} \,.

353: \end{eqnarray}

354: \end{subequations}

355: %

356: The $A_{60}$ coefficients have been evaluated in~\cite{JeSoMo1997},

357: and more recently in~\cite{JeEtAl2003} to an increased accuracy,

358: %

359: \begin{subequations}

360: \label{a60}

361: \begin{eqnarray}

362: A_{60}(3{P}_{1/2}) & = & -1.148\,189\,956(1)\,,\\[1ex]

363: A_{60}(3{P}_{3/2}) & = & -0.597\,569\,388(1)\,,\\[1ex]

364: A_{60}(4{P}_{1/2}) & = & -1.195\,688\,142(1)\,,\\[1ex]

365: A_{60}(4{P}_{3/2}) & = & -0.630\,945\,796(1) \,.

366: \end{eqnarray}

367: \end{subequations}

368: %

369: Note that the result for $3P_{1/2}$ had been given inaccurately

370: as $-1.147\,68(1)$ in~\cite{JeSoMo1997}.

371: 

372: %

373: % Figure 2

374: %

375: \begin{figure}[htb]

376: \begin{center}

377: %!\begin{minipage}{8.6cm}

378: %

379: \centerline{\mbox{\epsfysize=3.8cm\epsffile{fig2a.eps}}}

380: %

381: \vspace{1cm}

382: %

383: \centerline{\mbox{\epsfysize=3.8cm\epsffile{fig2b.eps}}}

384: %

385: \caption{\label{fig2} The analog of Fig.~\ref{fig1}

386: for $4P_{1/2}$ and $4P_{3/2}$ states.}

387: %

388: \end{center}

389: \end{figure}

390: 

391: 

392: 

393: Our calculation of the nonperturbative (in 

394: $Z\alpha$) electron self-energy for the $3{P}_j$ state 

395: (see Tables~\ref{tableF3P12} and~\ref{tableF3P32}) has 

396: a numerical uncertainty of 2~Hz in atomic

397: hydrogen. For the $4P_j$ states, the

398: numerical uncertainty is 1.3$\times Z^4$~Hz 

399: (see Table~\ref{tableF4P12} and~\ref{tableF4P32}).

400: In the non-recoil limit, our result for $4P_{1/2}$,

401: $Z=1$, corresponds to a self-energy shift of

402: %

403: \begin{equation}

404: \label{eq:F4P1_exact}

405: \Delta E_{\rm SE}(4P_{1/2}, Z=1) = -1\,404.239(1) \mbox{ kHz}\,,

406: \end{equation}

407: %

408: which is in agreement with the result 

409: $-1\,404.240(2) \mbox{kHz}$ obtained in~\cite{LBJeInMo2005}

410: via an interpolation of the low-$Z$ analytic 

411: results and high-$Z$ numerical data,

412: confirming (in this particular case) the validity 

413: of the interpolation procedure used for various 

414: excited hydrogenic states

415: in the latest adjustment of the fundamental physical 

416: constants~\cite{MoTa2005}.

417: Indeed, all entries for the self-energy remainder 

418: function $G_{\rm SE}$ in Tables~\ref{tableF3P12}---\ref{tableF4P32}

419: are in agreement with those used 

420: in~\cite{MoTa2005,JeKoLBMoTa2005} for the 

421: determination of the fundamental constants,

422: and for the precise calculation of hydrogenic energy levels using the

423: method of least squares. Our all-order

424: evaluation eliminates any uncertainty due to the unknown

425: higher-order analytic terms that contribute to 

426: the bound electron self-energy of $3P$ and $4P$ 

427: states [see Eq.~(\ref{defFLOnS})] and

428: improves our knowledge of the spectrum of

429: hydrogenlike atoms (e.g.~atomic hydrogen, He$^+$).

430: Furthermore, the numerical data for the self-energy remainders

431: {\em check} the validity of the highly involved analytic 

432: approach that led to the evaluation of the $A_{60}$-coefficients

433: as listed in Eq.~(\ref{a60}).

434: 

435: \section*{Acknowledgments}

436: 

437: U. D. J. thanks the National Institute of Standards and Technology for

438: kind hospitality during a number of extended research appointments.

439: The authors acknowledge E.-O.~LeBigot for help in obtaining numerical

440: results for selected partial contributions to the electron self-energy,

441: for the hydrogenic energy levels discussed in this work.

442: 

443: 

444: \begin{thebibliography}{10}

445: 

446: \bibitem{Mo1975}

447: P.~J. Mohr, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 34},  1050  (1975).

448: 

449: \bibitem{MoKi1992}

450: P.~J. Mohr and Y.~K. Kim, Phys. Rev. A {\bf 45},  2727  (1992).

451: 

452: \bibitem{JeEtAl2003}

453: U.~D. Jentschura, E.-O. Le~Bigot, P.~J. Mohr, P. Indelicato, and G. Soff, Phys.

454:   Rev. Lett. {\bf 90},  163001  (2003).

455: 

456: \bibitem{JeMoSo1999}

457: U.~D. Jentschura, P.~J. Mohr, and G. Soff, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 82},  53

458:   (1999).

459: 

460: \bibitem{JeMoSo2001pra}

461: U.~D. Jentschura, P.~J. Mohr, and G. Soff, Phys. Rev. A {\bf 63},  042512

462:   (2001).

463: 

464: \bibitem{JeMo2004pra}

465: U.~D. Jentschura and P.~J. Mohr, Phys. Rev. A {\bf 69},  064103  (2004).

466: 

467: \bibitem{JeMoSoWe1999}

468: U.~D. Jentschura, P.~J. Mohr, G. Soff, and E.~J. Weniger, Comput. Phys. Commun.

469:   {\bf 116},  28  (1999).

470: 

471: \bibitem{SaYe1990}

472: J. Sapirstein and D.~R. Yennie,  in {\em Quantum Electrodynamics}, Vol.~7 of

473:   {\em Advanced Series on Directions in High Energy Physics}, edited by T.

474:   Kinoshita (World Scientific, Singapore, 1990), pp.\ 560--672.

475: 

476: \bibitem{JeSoMo1997}

477: U.~D. Jentschura, G. Soff, and P.~J. Mohr, Phys. Rev. A {\bf 56},  1739

478:   (1997).

479: 

480: \bibitem{KlMa1973}

481: S. Klarsfeld and A. Maquet, Phys. Lett. B {\bf 43},  201  (1973).

482: 

483: \bibitem{DrSw1990}

484: G.~W.~F. Drake and R.~A. Swainson, Phys. Rev. A {\bf 41},  1243  (1990).

485: 

486: \bibitem{LBJeInMo2005}

487: E.-O. Le~Bigot, U.~D. Jentschura, P. Indelicato, and P.~J. Mohr, Can. J. Phys.

488:   {\bf 83},  447  (2005).

489: 

490: \bibitem{MoTa2005}

491: P.~J. Mohr and B.~N. Taylor, Rev. Mod. Phys. {\bf 77},  1  (2005).

492: 

493: \bibitem{JeKoLBMoTa2005}

494: U.~D. Jentschura, S. Kotochigova, E.-O. Le~Bigot, P.~J. Mohr, and B.~N. Taylor,

495:   Precise calculation of hydrogenic energy levels using the method of least

496:   squares, Phys. Rev. Lett., in press (2005).

497: 

498: \end{thebibliography}

499: \end{document}

500: