1: <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"
2: "http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/loose.dtd"><HTML>
3: <META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="TtH 1.95">
4:
5: <title> Hurricanes and Earth Hum
6: </title>
7:
8: <H1 align=center>Hurricanes and Earth Hum
9: </H1>
10:
11: <H3 align=center>Randall D. Peters<br>
12: Department of Physics<br>
13: Mercer University<br>
14: Macon, Georgia
15: </H3>
16:
17: <p>
18:
19: <H2> Abstract</H2>
20: A modernized conventional pendulum has been used
21: to show that hurricanes Katrina and Ophelia
22: excited eigenmode oscillations of the Earth as well as microseisms.
23: <p>
24: <p>
25: <H2><A NAME="tth_sEc1">
26: 1</A> Background</H2>
27: The `simple' pendulum lost favor with the geoscience community
28: as a practical seismometer roughly a century ago. The primary reason
29: for its abandonment involves mechanical sensitivity. Horizontal
30: instruments of the `garden-gate' type provide a large mechanical
31: `amplification', which yields greatly enhanced sensitivity for frequencies
32: greater than about 0.1 Hz.
33:
34: <p>
35: The detector employed for decades
36: by seismometers was a Faraday-law velocity sensor. As compared to a
37: displacement sensor, its sensitivity falls
38: off rapidly below the lower corner frequency of the
39: electronics.
40: Although most modern instruments use a capacitive displacement
41: sensor, the style of force-feedback used with the sensor causes the system
42: at low frequencies to be analogous
43: to a Faraday-law detector.
44: For study of the increasingly important mHz range (as well as lower frequency)
45: motions of the Earth, velocity detection is
46: seriously deficient. Oscilloscope users will recognize the
47: source
48: of the deficiency immediately; i.e., one cannot view low-frequency signals
49: with the instrument when it is a.c., as opposed to d.c. coupled at the input.
50:
51: <p>
52: Low-frequency instrument limitations have disallowed conventional
53: seismometers from being an effective means to
54: study the anelasticity (source of internal friction) that is
55: present in their mechanical oscillatory parts. Conventional wisdom
56: about damping and
57: noise of these instruments is invalid at low energies, because of the
58: nonlinear (complex) processes of mesoanelasticity. An
59: instrument configured to amplify earth motions will also amplify the
60: `noises' of its own dynamic structure. Just as the Earth is not
61: a static body, but evolves in time, through chaotic processes due to
62: anelasticity; so a seismometer is never static. Strain of
63: materials, from which it is built, is not even continuous; it is
64: instead `jumpy' because of the
65: Portevin LeChatelier effect. Structural evolution never stops
66: completely, because
67: there is no level below which creep is no longer measureable with
68: modern sensors.
69:
70: <p>
71: An approach showing promise toward overcoming some of these difficulties
72: is the following. Sensor technology, and understanding of the
73: electronics whereby various detectors operate, has advanced much beyond our
74: understanding of the internal friction of materials [<a href="#01" name=CITE01>1</a>]. Thus, in the
75: compromise between `mechanical amplification' versus `electronic
76: amplification'; a greater
77: emphasis should be placed on the latter. This was
78: unnecessary when sensors
79: were primitive, and attention was focused on higher frequencies associated
80: with the p and s waves of earthquakes. It is no longer true as
81: interest increases in the low-frequencies of free-earth oscillations.
82:
83: <p>
84: <H2><A NAME="tth_sEc2">
85: 2</A> The conventional Pendulum</H2>
86: When seeking a better compromise between mechanical performance and
87: electronic performance,
88: the `simple' pendulum is possibly without equal. Although it
89: possesses no inherent mechanical means to amplify ground accelerations, it
90: can be made vastly superior to other instruments in terms of
91: stability. Although it has no mechanical
92: amplification, such as present in garden-gate instruments,
93: compensation for this loss can be realized in large measure by means
94: of an unconventional
95: capacitive sensor. An important requirement on the sensor is that it
96: have a large mechanical dynamic range. Such is not possible
97: with the half-differential capacitive sensors of conventional
98: instruments, because they
99: operate on the basis of gap-spacing variation. The fully-differential
100: sensors patented by the author are not constrained in the same way
101: because they operate on the basis of area-variation [<a href="#02" name=CITE02>2</a>].
102: A horizontal seismometer that was designed around these issues is illustrated in
103: Fig. 1. Additional details concerning the instrument, along with some
104: examples of its
105: capabilities are published elsewhere [<a href="#03" name=CITE03>3</a>].
106:
107: <p>
108: <img src="composite.jpg" alt="composite.jpg"><br><br><b>Figure 1</b> Photographs of the modernized conventional pendulum.<br>
109:
110: <p>
111: External damping is not used with this instrument, since it was
112: designed for monitoring frequencies well below resonance. Shown in
113: Fig. 2 is a free-decay record that illustrates (i) its low damping, with
114: a Q of 290, and (ii) the electronics threshold determined by the
115: Dataq adc (DI-700).
116:
117: <p>
118: <img src="low-level.gif" alt="low-level.gif"><br><b>Figure 2.</b> Example of pendulum sensor output for a free-decay.<br>
119:
120: <p>
121: The instrument was not designed to detect earthquakes, yet figure 3
122: shows
123: that it responds well to larger
124: and/or closer disturbances.
125:
126: <p>
127: <img src="banda.gif" alt="banda.gif"><br><img src="panama-eq.gif" alt="panama-eq.gif"><br><b>Figure 3</b>. Examples of earthquake records with some similarity
128: to the output from other seismometers.<br>
129:
130: <p>
131: In both of the cases shown the p and s waves cause a very large response
132: at the pendulum's eigenfrequency of about 0.7 Hz, which disallows use
133: of the instrument for many conventional purposes (unless one were to
134: remove the instrument response by means of post-processor deconvolution).
135:
136: <p>
137: The low-frequency advantages of this pendulum are illustrated in Fig. 4,
138: which shows: a precursor to the second of the earthquakes
139: illustrated in Fig. 3,
140: and also the presence of an Earth-mode during this same earthquake.
141: It is likely that these unusual modes were made more readily observable
142: because hurricane Katrina was very energetic over the Gulf of Mexico
143: on 27 Aug. 05.
144:
145: <p>
146: <img src="panama-precursor.gif" alt="panama-precursor.gif"><br><br><img src="mode-quake.gif" alt="mode-quake.gif"><br><b>Figure 4</b>. Short-lived coherent low-frequency oscillations
147: observed with the
148: pendulum, and associated with the earthquake south of Panama on 27 Aug. 05.
149:
150: <p>
151: <H2><A NAME="tth_sEc3">
152: 3</A> A mechanism for hurricane-generated Earth Hum</H2>
153: It is postulated that hurricanes excite eigenmode oscillations through
154: friction. The process is similar to that of the popular
155: `singing rod' demonstration used by physics educators. A high-Q metal
156: rod is held at its center by thumb and a finger of one hand, while a
157: thumb and finger
158: of the other hand is used to stroke the rod. The stroking fingers are
159: first coated with rosin of the type used on a violin bow. Shown in
160: Fig. 5 are the equations of the standing wave that results and
161: expressions for the time-averaged energy of oscillation
162: at the fundamental frequency (both kinetic K and total E).<br>
163: <img src="singer.gif" alt="singer.gif"><br><br>
164: <b>Figure 5.</b>. Analysis of the standing wave present in a `singing' rod.<br>
165:
166: <p>
167: Observe that the energy depends on the total mass of the rod m,
168: the square of the frequency f (where <font face=symbol>w</font
169: > = 2<font face=symbol>p</font
170: >f),
171: and the square of the amplitude A of oscillation. A precise extrapolation
172: of this case to that of
173: Earth oscillations is not trivial, since the standing waves are three
174: dimensional instead of one-dimensional; and the mathematics
175: involves spherical harmonics instead of a simple sine function.
176: Nevertheless, the shape factor <font face=symbol>g</font
177: > (for a general oscillator including
178: the Earth) is expected not to deviate from
179: unity by more than an order of magnitude. The large mass of the earth (first
180: measured by Henry Cavendish, approx. 6×10<sup>24</sup> kg) requires
181: large energy sources
182: if any of the eigenmodes are to be excited above the
183: noise level of a seismometer. It will be shown from energy estimates
184: of some modes that were observed, that hurricanes
185: and large earthquakes have plenty of energy to excite them.
186:
187: <p>
188: In the case of hurricane Ophelia, the eye of the storm was nearly
189: stationary for more than two days off the coast of Florida near Cape
190: Canaveral. During this stationary period, the eye was located very
191: close to the edge of the contintental shelf. In straddling the
192: edge in this manner, the northerly component of the
193: winds `stroked' the Florida
194: peninsula through the shallow waters over which they were blowing (near
195: the coast).
196: The sourtherly component of the winds, further out in the Atlantic,
197: were blowing over much deeper water. The conditions were ideal
198: for friction-generated oscillations.
199:
200: <p>
201: Shown in Fig. 6 is the largest of fourteen modes that were observed in
202: the three-day period devoted to the study of Ophelia. The mode that
203: is shown
204: occurred when the microseisms that
205: were continually present during this three-day period were at their
206: maximum intensity.<br>
207: <img src="bigoph.gif" alt="bigoph.gif"><br><br>
208: <b>Figure 6</b>. Characteristics of a large eigenmode oscillation
209: as Ophelia was leaving its stationary position
210: off the coast of Florida.<br>
211:
212: <p>
213: It should be noted that the lifetime of modes presented in this and
214: other studies by the author are much shorter than the free oscillations
215: seen after huge earthquakes, such as that of Mag 9.2 on 26 Dec., 2004.
216: The present modes are more like the low-level phonon modes of
217: solid state
218: physics, which according to the Debye theory, determine the specific
219: heat of a material. Just as phonon-phonon interactions disallow long lifetimes
220: in cm-sized samples, so the oscillations of the Earth being described
221: here do not usually
222: persist beyond about ten cycles. This is quite in contrast to some
223: of the oscillations that were observed following the huge Indonesian
224: earthquake of 2004. The Earth `rang like a bell' for days after that event,
225: and individual spectral lines persisted for times that are
226: much greater than the present case.
227:
228: <p>
229: <H2><A NAME="tth_sEc4">
230: 4</A> Energy Redistribution</H2>
231: Hurricanes are heat engines that crank out enormous powers. It is estimated
232: that an average storm generates nearly 10<sup>13</sup> W through frictional
233: contact with the ocean [<a href="#04" name=CITE04>4</a>].
234: Moreover, Emanuel provides quantitative evidence for a secular
235: increase in their power output over the last thirty years[<a href="#05" name=CITE05>5</a>].
236: Although hurricanes obviously lose energy to waves in the ocean, it is
237: presently postulated that a significant amount of energy is also
238: transformed into crustal motions giving rise ultimately to heat.
239:
240: <p>
241: Ocean currents are known to be a primary factor in the thermodynamics of
242: our planet, but body dynamics must also be important. After all,
243: as noted in the previous discussion of the Debye model, the oscillations
244: called phonons of a solid are what determine its temperature. Although
245: the vast majority of similar oscillations in the Earth are at much
246: greater (even incrediby higher) frequencies, the `phonon-equivalent'
247: spectra of the Earth must
248: include modes such as the ones being presently described. Support for the
249: importance of these low frequency modes, relative to energy
250: redistribution within
251: the Earth, is provided by the following observation.
252:
253: <p>
254: <H3><A NAME="tth_sEc4.1">
255: 4.1</A> Simultaneity of Ophenia weakening and mode-generation</H3>
256: Shown in Fig. 7 are fourteen eigenmode oscillations
257: observed in spectra of data recorded during the three-day study of Ophelia.<br>
258: <img src="eigens.gif" alt="eigens.gif"><br> <br>
259: <b>Figure 7</b>. Eigenmode oscillations excited by Ophelia. The `swarm'
260: of modes near -26 h corresponds to the time
261: at which Ophelia weakened and began to move.<br>
262:
263: <p>
264: The weakening of the storm, mentioned in the caption of Fig. 7, is
265: described in advisory #12 from the National Hurricane Center
266: (05 AM EDT, 9 Sep 05). In a three hour interval, coincident with this
267: reduction in power output from the storm, five eigenmodes were observed;
268: even though the average excitation rate for the entire three-day period
269: was only 0.2 per hour. The swarm of modes was found also to coincide
270: with the maximum in the graph of microseismic intensity, shown in
271: Fig. 8.<br>
272: <img src="micros.gif" alt="micros.gif"><br><br>
273: <b>Figure 8.</b> Spectral data of microseisms during cyclone Ophelia.
274: The single point that was selected from a given FFT, to
275: produce a datum in Fig 8, was the
276: spectral component with the
277: largest intensity within the `microseismic-hump' located
278: between 0.2 Hz and 0.3 Hz.<br>
279:
280: <p>
281: <H2><A NAME="tth_sEc5">
282: 5</A> Microseisms</H2>
283: As with the previous study of microseisms, generated during hurricane
284: Charley (using a vertical seismometer) [<a href="#06" name=CITE06>6</a>], it is seen that
285: the frequency of the peak, in their generally broad spectrum, decreases as the
286: water depth increases.
287:
288: <p>
289: The prevailing theory of microseisms is based on the coupling of
290: wave motion to the ocean floor through the conversion of water
291: wave-induced pressure variations to seismic energy[<a href="#07" name=CITE07>7</a>].
292: This author has been unable to find any mention
293: of earth modes in the theoretical
294: discussions. Yet the seismic energy must get distributed according to
295: the density of available states; which is determined by the geometry
296: of the Earth, both global and local. The breadth of the virtually
297: continuous microseismic
298: spectral `hump'is
299: suggestive of the excitation of numerous high frequency eigenmodes of the
300: Earth. At a typical peak frequency of 0.25 Hz, the density of modes of
301: an idealized spherical earth is
302: enormous, essentially a continuum. Occasionally, however, a sharp
303: spectral line emerges from the hump, as illustrated in Fig. 9.<br>
304:
305: <p>
306: <img src="katrina-case.gif" alt="katrina-case.gif"><br><br><b>Figure 9</b>. Sharp-spectral line in the background of
307: generic microseisms,
308: seven hours before the eye of hurricane Katrina crossed the Gulf coast.<br>
309:
310: <p>
311: <H3><A NAME="tth_sEc5.1">
312: 5.1</A> Nearly-monochromatic microseisms</H3>
313: Although the microseisms used to generate Fig. 8 were broadly
314: distributed in frequency with a peak in the vicinity of 0.25 Hz,
315: those of Fig. 9 are markedly different. The sharp line
316: suggests a different mechanism for the conversion of storm
317: energy to seismic energy.
318:
319: <p>
320: <H3><A NAME="tth_sEc5.2">
321: 5.2</A> Mechanism for nearly-monochromatic microseisms</H3>
322: It is postulated that friction is the primary mechanism for generating
323: microseisms with well defined frequencies.
324: As compared to the eigenmode oscillation of Fig. 6 (51 mHz), the line in
325: Fig. 9 is at a considerably higher frequency (170 mHz). This suggests
326: the frictional-stroking of a smaller geologic structure than the
327: peninsula of Florida. Whether Katrina actually interacted with such
328: an ocean-bottom discontinuity at the time corresponding to Fig. 9 is
329: unknown. The gross features of the continental shelf in the Gulf of
330: Mexico suggest this possibility. Also, as compared to the Atlantic,
331: there is a signficant difference in the gradient of water depth. Just
332: as generic microseisms occur at higher frequency in shallower waters;
333: so it is expected that friction-generated nearly monochromatic
334: microseisms should have higher frequencies when excited by hurricanes
335: in shallower water. Further data analysis will be necessary to
336: find such oscillations through exploratory spectral analysis.
337:
338: <p>
339: <H3><A NAME="tth_sEc5.3">
340: 5.3</A> Importance of user-friendly, yet powerful FFT code</H3>
341: The study of complex systems is most profitable when three experimental
342: factors are synergetically present; these are (i) a good sensor, (ii) a
343: good interface to the computer, and (iii) good software to analyze the
344: data stored in the computer. The absence of just a single piece of this
345: triad results in
346: severe limitations. At least two components of the triad seem to have
347: been largely missing from studies reported in much of the prevailing
348: literature concerned
349: with phenomena of the type presently discussed. The
350: mode of operation selected for capacitive sensor detection-although
351: good for old-fashioned earthquake work-
352: is not good for low-frequency studies (as previously noted). Force
353: balance is necessary to operate in
354: the variable-gap mode; and networks used to accomplish this behave
355: ``like an a.c. coupled instrument trying to view signals more nearly
356: d.c.''
357:
358: <p>
359: Insofar as post-processor software is concerned; prevailing literature
360: suggests that many of the algorithms being employed are antiquated and
361: virtually useless as compared to codes that are now available.
362: This probably explains why there are so many examples of
363: microseism time plots, yet a paucity of spectral plots.
364:
365: <p>
366: To extract meaningful spectral information from geophysical data
367: generally requires the ability
368: to easily position a time window of any size, anywhere within a
369: record-subject
370: to constraints of the data set. Only then can one identify
371: the transient spectral
372: features suggestive of physical mechanisms.
373:
374: <p>
375: Adjustments of compression type must not `throw away data' (reminiscent of
376: velocity detection), but instead average over subset values lest
377: there be loss of information that is otherwise available. It is not
378: enough to just generate any power spectrum. The ability to easily do
379: various post-processor filtering operations,
380: such as the examples shown in Fig. 9, is invaluable. Although one
381: can in principle accomplish all of these operations with a
382: spreadsheet [<a href="#08" name=CITE08>8</a>], such methods
383: are much too slow and cumbersome. Nevertheless,
384: such exercises are extremely beneficial for
385: appreciating the ideosynchrasies and power of the FFT[<a href="#09" name=CITE09>9</a>], where
386: the number of sampled points must be 2<sup>n</sup> where n is an integer.
387:
388: <p>
389: Fortunately, some engineers have already provided an entry-level
390: candidate for the
391: third component of the triad mentioned above (software). The code
392: that comes with all of Dataq's adc's (including their $25 10-bit
393: pedagogical instrument) does everything mentioned above. All spectra
394: presented in this article were generated with the Dataq code.
395:
396: <p>
397: The most serious limitation is that the Dataq code cannot presently
398: accommodate the word-bit
399: size of 24-bit interfaces. The highest resolution of any of their
400: instruments is based on 16-bit architecture. Additionally, the
401: algorithms are constrained to
402: operate only on data structured in their *.wdq format.
403:
404: <p>
405: <H2><A NAME="tth_sEc6">
406: 6</A> Power Estimates</H2>
407: It was previously mentioned that hurricanes and earthquakes both have
408: plenty of energy with which to excite eigenmode oscillations. We now
409: attempt to roughly estimate the power with which some of the observed
410: modes dissipate
411: hurricane energy. The equation used is the last
412: expression in Fig. 10.<br>
413: <img src="eigen-power.gif" alt="eigen-power.gif"><br> <br>
414:
415: <p>
416: <b>Figure 10</b>. Assumptions used in the development of an
417: equation to approximately estimate the power
418: dissipated by an eigenmode oscillation of frequency f, having
419: spectral `intensity' V.<br>
420:
421: <p>
422: One of the beauties of the simple pendulum is evident within the
423: derivation shown in Fig. 10; i.e., the ease with which
424: the instrument is calibrated. The calibration constant of 5800 V/rad
425: was measured by shining the beam from a He-Ne laser onto the mirror
426: pictured in Fig. 1.
427:
428: <p>
429: Shown in Fig. 11 is a graph of the estimated powers for each of
430: the 14 modes plotted in Fig. 7.<br>
431: <img src="powers.gif" alt="powers.gif"><br><br>
432: <b>Figure 11</b>. Estimated energy dissipation rates in GigaWatts for the
433: fourteen eigenmode oscillations plotted in Fig. 7.
434:
435: <p>
436: Although these numbers might seem large, remember the earlier stated
437: value for the power dissipated through friction by the winds of
438: an average hurricane
439: at the ocean surface; i.e., <font face=symbol> > </font
440: > 10<sup>12</sup> W.
441:
442: <p>
443: <H2><A NAME="tth_sEc7">
444: 7</A> 1/f Noise</H2>
445: One of the more interesting features of the data pictured in
446: Figures 7 and 11 is to be realized as one thinks of the
447: eigenmodes as `noise'. With the exception of the
448: large 51 mHz oscillation that occurred when Ophelia `kicked away' from
449: the continental shelf, none of the power values deviate radically from
450: the remaining mean value in the vicinity of 40 GW.
451: This is reminiscent of ubiquitous 1/f noise. Perhaps we shouldn't ignore
452: a now-old ditty, ``the physics is in the noise''.
453:
454: <p>
455: <H2>References</H2>
456: <DL compact>
457: <dt>[<a href="#CITE01" name=01>1</a>]</dt><dd> R. Peters, ``Friction at the mesoscale'', Contemporary
458: Physics, Vol. 45, No. 6, 475-490 (2004).
459: <dt>[<a href="#CITE02" name=02>2</a>]</dt><dd> R. Peters, ``Symmetric differential capacitance transducer employing
460: cross coupled conductive plates to form equipotential pairs",
461: U.S. Patent No. 5,461,319 (1995).
462: <dt>[<a href="#CITE03" name=03>3</a>]</dt><dd> R. Peters, ``Modernized conventional pendulum seismometer'',
463: online at http://arxiv.org/html/physics/0508028
464: <dt>[<a href="#CITE04" name=04>4</a>]</dt><dd> K. Emanuel, ``The power of a hurricane: an example of reckless
465: driving on the information superhighway'', Weather 54, 107-108 (1998).
466: <dt>[<a href="#CITE05" name=05>5</a>]</dt><dd> K. Emanuel, ``Increasing destructiveness of tropical cyclones
467: over the past 30 years", Nature, Vol. 436, 686-688 (2005).
468: <dt>[<a href="#CITE06" name=06>6</a>]</dt><dd> R. Peters, ``Hurricane excitation of earth eigenmodes'',
469: online at http://arxiv.org/html/physics/0506162
470: <dt>[<a href="#CITE07" name=07>7</a>]</dt><dd> P. Bormann </td><td width=150>
471: E. Bergman, <em>New Manual of Seismological
472: Observatory Practice, Global Seismological Services</em> (2002).
473: <dt>[<a href="#CITE08" name=08>8</a>]</dt><dd> R. Peters, ``Spreadsheet filtering by FFT Gaussian-based
474: Convolution'', online at http://arxiv.org/html/physics/0406087
475: <dt>[<a href="#CITE09" name=09>9</a>]</dt><dd> R. Peters, ``Graphical explanation for the speed of the
476: Fast Fourier transform", online at http://arxiv.org/html/math.HO/0302212
477:
478: <p>
479: </DL>
480: <p><hr><small>File translated from T<sub><font size="-1">E</font></sub>X by <a href="http://hutchinson.belmont.ma.us/tth/">T<sub><font size="-1">T</font></sub>H</a>, version 1.95.<br>On 13 Sep 2005, 10:32.</small>
481: </HTML>
482: