1: 

2: %\\

3: 

4: 

5: %--- updated in 29/9/93

6: 

7: %\documentstyle[twoside,epsf]{article}

8: 

9: \documentclass[11pt]{article}

10: \pagestyle{plain}

11: \textwidth 16cm

12: \textheight 22cm

13: \topmargin 0cm

14: \oddsidemargin 0mm

15: \usepackage{graphicx}

16: 

17: 

18: %--------------------NEW ADDITIONS TO EXISTING ARTICLE.STY---------------------

19: \catcode`\@=11

20: \long\def\@makefntext#1{

21: \protect\noindent \hbox to 3.2pt {\hskip-.9pt

22: $^{{\eightrm\@thefnmark}}$\hfil}#1\hfill}       %CAN BE USED

23: 

24: \def\thefootnote{\fnsymbol{footnote}}

25: \def\@makefnmark{\hbox to 0pt{$^{\@thefnmark}$\hss}}    %ORIGINAL

26: 

27: \def\ps@myheadings{\let\@mkboth\@gobbletwo

28: \def\@oddhead{\hbox{}

29: \rightmark\hfil\eightrm\thepage}

30: \def\@oddfoot{}\def\@evenhead{\eightrm\thepage\hfil

31: \leftmark\hbox{}}\def\@evenfoot{}

32: \def\sectionmark##1{}\def\subsectionmark##1{}}

33: 

34: %--------------------START OF FILE

35: %THIS STYLE FILE IS FOR REFERENCES FROM 1--9 ITEMS ONLY

36: 

37: %THIS STYLE FILE WILL PRODUCE

38: %$^1$ IN BODY TEXT AND 1. AT REFERENCE SECTION

39: 

40: \oddsidemargin=\evensidemargin

41: \addtolength{\oddsidemargin}{-30pt}

42: \addtolength{\evensidemargin}{-30pt}

43: 

44: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------

45: \newcommand{\symbolfootnote}{\renewcommand{\thefootnote}

46:     {\fnsymbol{footnote}}}

47: \renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\fnsymbol{footnote}}

48: \newcommand{\alphfootnote}

49:     {\setcounter{footnote}{0}

50:      \renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\sevenrm\alph{footnote}}}

51: 

52: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------

53: %NEWLY-DEFINED SECTION COMMANDS

54: \newcounter{sectionc}\newcounter{subsectionc}\newcounter{subsubsectionc}

55: \renewcommand{\section}[1] {\vspace{12pt}\addtocounter{sectionc}{1}

56: \setcounter{subsectionc}{0}\setcounter{subsubsectionc}{0}\noindent

57:     {\tenbf\thesectionc. #1}\par\vspace{5pt}}

58: \renewcommand{\subsection}[1] {\vspace{12pt}\addtocounter{subsectionc}{1}

59:     \setcounter{subsubsectionc}{0}\noindent

60:     {\bf\thesectionc.\thesubsectionc. {\kern1pt \bfit #1}}\par\vspace{5pt}}

61: \renewcommand{\subsubsection}[1] {\vspace{12pt}\addtocounter{subsubsectionc}{1}

62:     \noindent{\tenrm\thesectionc.\thesubsectionc.\thesubsubsectionc.

63:     {\kern1pt \tenit #1}}\par\vspace{5pt}}

64: \newcommand{\nonumsection}[1] {\vspace{12pt}\noindent{\tenbf #1}

65:     \par\vspace{5pt}}

66: 

67: %NEW MACRO TO HANDLE APPENDICES

68: %\newcounter{appendixc}

69: %\newcounter{subappendixc}[appendixc]

70: %\newcounter{subsubappendixc}[subappendixc]

71: %\renewcommand{\thesubappendixc}{\Alph{appendixc}.\arabic{subappendixc}}

72: %\renewcommand{\thesubsubappendixc}

73:      % {\Alph{appendixc}.\arabic{subappendixc}.\arabic{subsubappendixc}}

74: 

75: %\renewcommand{\appendix}[1] {\vspace{12pt}

76: %        \refstepcounter{appendixc}

77: %        \setcounter{figure}{0}

78: %        \setcounter{table}{0}

79: %        \setcounter{lemma}{0}

80: %        \setcounter{theorem}{0}

81: %        \setcounter{corollary}{0}

82: %        \setcounter{definition}{0}

83: %        \setcounter{equation}{0}

84: %        \renewcommand{\thefigure}{\Alph{appendixc}.\arabic{figure}}

85: %        \renewcommand{\thetable}{\Alph{appendixc}.\arabic{table}}

86: %        \renewcommand{\theappendixc}{\Alph{appendixc}}

87: %        \renewcommand{\thelemma}{\Alph{appendixc}.\arabic{lemma}}

88: %        \renewcommand{\thetheorem}{\Alph{appendixc}.\arabic{theorem}}

89: %        \renewcommand{\thedefinition}{\Alph{appendixc}.\arabic{definition}}

90: %        \renewcommand{\thecorollary}{\Alph{appendixc}.\arabic{corollary}}

91: %        \renewcommand{\theequation}{\Alph{appendixc}.\arabic{equation}}

92: %   \noindent{\tenbf Appendix \theappendixc. #1}\par\vspace{5pt}}

93: %        \noindent{\tenbf Appendix \theappendixc #1}\par\vspace{5pt}}

94: %\newcommand{\subappendix}[1] {\vspace{12pt}

95: %        \refstepcounter{subappendixc}

96: %        \noindent{\bf Appendix \thesubappendixc. {\kern1pt \bfit #1}}

97: %        \par\vspace{5pt}}

98: %\newcommand{\subsubappendix}[1] {\vspace{12pt}

99: %        \refstepcounter{subsubappendixc}

100: %        \noindent{\rm Appendix \thesubsubappendixc. {\kern1pt \tenit #1}}

101: %        \par\vspace{5pt}}

102: 

103: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------

104: %FOLLOWING THREE COMMANDS ARE FOR `LIST' COMMAND.

105: \topsep=0in\parsep=0in\itemsep=0in

106: \parindent=15pt

107: 

108: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------

109: \newcommand{\textlineskip}{\baselineskip=13pt}

110: \newcommand{\smalllineskip}{\baselineskip=10pt}

111: 

112: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------

113: %MACRO FOR COPYRIGHT BLOCK

114: \def\eightcirc{

115: \begin{picture}(0,0)

116: \put(4.4,1.8){\circle{6.5}}

117: \end{picture}}

118: \def\eightcopyright{\eightcirc\kern2.7pt\hbox{\eightrm c}}

119: 

120: \newcommand{\copyrightheading}[1]

121:     {\vspace*{-2.5cm}\smalllineskip{\flushleft

122:       {\footnotesize International Journal of Modern Physics B #1}\\

123:      %{\footnotesize \LaTeX $~$ by H.C. Rosu (1999); physics/9908019 #1}\\

124:    %{\footnotesize Los Alamos electronic archives: quant-ph/9911010 v3 #1}\\

125:       {\footnotesize $\eightcopyright$ World Scientific Publishing Company\\

126:       }\\

127:      }}

128: 

129: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------

130: %MACRO FOR PUBLISHER INFORMATION SECTION

131: \newcommand{\pub}[1]{{\begin{center}\footnotesize\smalllineskip

132:     Received #1\\

133:     \end{center}

134:     }}

135: 

136: \newcommand{\publisher}[2]{{\begin{center}\footnotesize\smalllineskip

137:     Received #1\\

138:     Revised #2

139:     \end{center}

140:     }}

141: 

142: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------

143: %MARCO FOR ABSTRACT BLOCK

144: \def\abstracts#1#2#3{{

145:     \centering{\begin{minipage}{4.5in}\baselineskip=10pt\footnotesize

146:     \parindent=0pt #1\par

147:     \parindent=15pt #2\par

148:     \parindent=15pt #3

149:     \end{minipage}}\par}}

150: 

151: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------

152: %MARCO FOR KEYWORDS BLOCK

153: \def\keywords#1{{

154:     \centering{\begin{minipage}{4.5in}\baselineskip=10pt\footnotesize

155:     {\footnotesize\it Keywords}\/: #1

156:      \end{minipage}}\par}}

157: 

158: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------

159: %NEW MACRO FOR BIBLIOGRAPHY

160: \newcommand{\bibit}{\nineit}

161: \newcommand{\bibbf}{\ninebf}

162: \renewenvironment{thebibliography}[1]

163:     {\frenchspacing

164:      \ninerm\baselineskip=11pt

165:      \begin{list}{\arabic{enumi}.}

166:         {\usecounter{enumi}\setlength{\parsep}{0pt}

167:      \setlength{\leftmargin 12.7pt}{\rightmargin 0pt} %FOR 1--9 ITEMS

168: %    \setlength{\leftmargin 17pt}{\rightmargin 0pt}   %FOR 10--99 ITEMS

169: %    \setlength{\leftmargin 22pt}{\rightmargin 0pt}   %FOR 100+ABOVE ITEMS

170:          \setlength{\itemsep}{0pt} \settowidth

171:     {\labelwidth}{#1.}\sloppy}}{\end{list}}

172: 

173: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------

174: %LIST ENVIRONMENTS

175: \newcounter{itemlistc}

176: \newcounter{romanlistc}

177: \newcounter{alphlistc}

178: \newcounter{arabiclistc}

179: \newenvironment{itemlist}

180:         {\setcounter{itemlistc}{0}

181:      \begin{list}{$\bullet$}

182:     {\usecounter{itemlistc}

183:      \setlength{\parsep}{0pt}

184:      \setlength{\itemsep}{0pt}}}{\end{list}}

185: 

186: \newenvironment{romanlist}

187:     {\setcounter{romanlistc}{0}

188:      \begin{list}{$($\roman{romanlistc}$)$}

189:     {\usecounter{romanlistc}

190:      \setlength{\parsep}{0pt}

191:      \setlength{\itemsep}{0pt}}}{\end{list}}

192: 

193: \newenvironment{alphlist}

194:     {\setcounter{alphlistc}{0}

195:      \begin{list}{$($\alph{alphlistc}$)$}

196:     {\usecounter{alphlistc}

197:      \setlength{\parsep}{0pt}

198:      \setlength{\itemsep}{0pt}}}{\end{list}}

199: 

200: \newenvironment{arabiclist}

201:     {\setcounter{arabiclistc}{0}

202:      \begin{list}{\arabic{arabiclistc}}

203:     {\usecounter{arabiclistc}

204:      \setlength{\parsep}{0pt}

205:      \setlength{\itemsep}{0pt}}}{\end{list}}

206: 

207: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------

208: %FIGURE CAPTION

209: %\newcommand{\fcaption}[1]{

210: %        \refstepcounter{figure}

211: %        \setbox\@tempboxa = \hbox{\footnotesize Fig.~\thefigure. #1}

212: %        \ifdim \wd\@tempboxa > 5in

213: %           {\begin{center}

214: %        \parbox{5in}{\footnotesize\smalllineskip Fig.~\thefigure. #1}

215: %            \end{center}}

216: %        \else

217: %             {\begin{center}

218: %             {\footnotesize Fig.~\thefigure. #1}

219: %              \end{center}}

220: %        \fi}

221: 

222: %TABLE CAPTION

223: %\newcommand{\tcaption}[1]{

224: %        \refstepcounter{table}

225: %        \setbox\@tempboxa = \hbox{\footnotesize Table~\thetable. #1}

226: %        \ifdim \wd\@tempboxa > 5in

227: %           {\begin{center}

228: %        \parbox{5in}{\footnotesize\smalllineskip Table~\thetable. #1}

229: %            \end{center}}

230: %        \else

231: %             {\begin{center}

232: %             {\footnotesize Table~\thetable. #1}

233: %              \end{center}}

234: %        \fi}

235: 

236: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------

237: %MACROS FOR SETTING \cite{x} OR \citeup{x}

238: \def\@citex[#1]#2{\if@filesw\immediate\write\@auxout

239:     {\string\citation{#2}}\fi

240: \def\@citea{}\@cite{\@for\@citeb:=#2\do

241:     {\@citea\def\@citea{,}\@ifundefined

242:     {b@\@citeb}{{\bf ?}\@warning

243:     {Citation `\@citeb' on page \thepage \space undefined}}

244:     {\csname b@\@citeb\endcsname}}}{#1}}

245: 

246: \newif\if@cghi

247: \def\cite{\@cghitrue\@ifnextchar [{\@tempswatrue

248:     \@citex}{\@tempswafalse\@citex[]}}

249: \def\citelow{\@cghifalse\@ifnextchar [{\@tempswatrue

250:     \@citex}{\@tempswafalse\@citex[]}}

251: \def\@cite#1#2{{$\null^{#1}$\if@tempswa\typeout

252:     {IJCGA warning: optional citation argument

253:     ignored: `#2'} \fi}}

254: \newcommand{\citeup}{\cite}

255: 

256: %________________________________________________________

257: %THIS IS FOR NORMAL-SIZED CITES LIKE (REF. 5).

258: %CALLED BY "\refcite{X}".

259: \def\@refcitex[#1]#2{\if@filesw\immediate\write\@auxout

260:     {\string\citation{#2}}\fi

261: \def\@citea{}\@refcite{\@for\@citeb:=#2\do

262:     {\@citea\def\@citea{, }\@ifundefined

263:     {b@\@citeb}{{\bf ?}\@warning

264:     {Citation `\@citeb' on page \thepage \space undefined}}

265:     \hbox{\csname b@\@citeb\endcsname}}}{#1}}

266: 

267: \def\@refcite#1#2{{#1\if@tempswa\typeout

268:         {IJCGA warning: optional citation argument

269:     ignored: `#2'} \fi}}

270: 

271: \def\refcite{\@ifnextchar[{\@tempswatrue

272:     \@refcitex}{\@tempswafalse\@refcitex[]}}

273: 

274: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------

275: 

276: 

277: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------

278: %FOR SUB/SUPERSCRIPT BOLDFACED + ITALICS

279: \def\pmb#1{\setbox0=\hbox{#1}

280:     \kern-.025em\copy0\kern-\wd0

281:     \kern.05em\copy0\kern-\wd0

282:     \kern-.025em\raise.0433em\box0}

283: \def\mbi#1{{\pmb{\mbox{\scriptsize ${#1}$}}}}

284: \def\mbr#1{{\pmb{\mbox{\scriptsize{#1}}}}}

285: 

286: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------

287: %FOR FNSYMBOL FOOTNOTE AND ALPH{FOOTNOTE}

288: \def\fnm#1{$^{\mbox{\scriptsize #1}}$}

289: \def\fnt#1#2{\footnotetext{\kern-.3em

290:     {$^{\mbox{\scriptsize #1}}$}{#2}}}

291: 

292: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------

293: %FOR CREATING THE OPENING PAGE NUMBER

294: \def\fpage#1{\begingroup

295: \voffset=.3in

296: \thispagestyle{empty}\begin{table}[b]\centerline{\footnotesize #1}

297:     \end{table}\endgroup}

298: 

299: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------

300: %MACRO FOR RUNNINGHEAD

301: \def\runninghead#1#2{\pagestyle{myheadings}

302: \markboth{{\protect\footnotesize\it{\quad #1}}\hfill}

303: {\hfill{\protect\footnotesize\it{#2\quad}}}}

304: \headsep=15pt

305: 

306: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------

307: \font\tenrm=cmr10

308: \font\tenit=cmti10

309: \font\tenbf=cmbx10

310: \font\bfit=cmbxti10 at 10pt

311: \font\ninerm=cmr9

312: \font\nineit=cmti9

313: \font\ninebf=cmbx9

314: \font\eightrm=cmr8

315: \font\eightit=cmti8

316: \font\eightbf=cmbx8

317: \font\sevenrm=cmr7

318: \font\fiverm=cmr5

319: 

320: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------

321: \newtheorem{theorem}{\indent Theorem}

322: %OR \newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}[sectionc] WHICH HAS SECTION NUMBER

323: 

324: \newtheorem{lemma}{Lemma}

325: %OR USE \newtheorem{lemma}{Lemma}[sectionc]

326: 

327: \newtheorem{definition}{Definition}

328: \newtheorem{corollary}{Corollary}

329: %USERS CAN ADD ON THEIR OWN NEW THEOREM-LIKE ENVIRONMENTS.

330: 

331: \newcommand{\proof}[1]{{\tenbf Proof.} #1 $\Box$.}

332: 

333: %--------------------END OF MPLA1.STY------------------------------------------

334: 

335: 

336: 

337: %--------------------START OF DATA FILE----------------------------------------

338: \textwidth=5truein

339: \textheight=7.8truein

340: 

341: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------

342: %DEFINITIONS

343: \def\qed{\hbox{${\vcenter{\vbox{            %HOLLOW SQUARE

344:    \hrule height 0.4pt\hbox{\vrule width 0.4pt height 6pt

345:    \kern5pt\vrule width 0.4pt}\hrule height 0.4pt}}}$}}

346: 

347: \renewcommand{\thefootnote}{\fnsymbol{footnote}}    %USE SYMBOLIC FOOTNOTE

348: 

349: 

350: \markboth{Rosu, Trevi\~no, Cabrera, Murgu\'{\i}a} {TALBOT EFFECT FOR

351: DISPERSION...}

352: 

353: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Publisher's Area please ignore %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

354: %

355: %\catchline{}{}{}{}{}

356: %

357: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

358: \begin{document}

359: 

360: \centerline{\bf TALBOT EFFECT FOR DISPERSION IN LINEAR OPTICAL

361: FIBERS}

362: 

363: \centerline{\bf  AND A WAVELET APPROACH}

364: %\footnote{

365: %This essay received an ``honorable mention'' in the

366:  %       Annual Essay Competition of the Gravity Research

367:     %    Foundation for the year 2000 - Ed.}}

368: \vspace*{0.035truein}

369: %\centerline{\bf MANUSCRIPTS USING COMPUTER SOFTWARE\footnote{For

370: %the title, try not to use more than 3 lines. Typeset the title

371: %in 10 pt Times Roman, uppercase and boldface.}}

372: \vspace*{0.37truein}

373: %\centerline{\footnotesize NAME}

374: %\footnote{Typeset names in

375: %10 pt Times Roman, uppercase. Use the footnote to indicate the

376: %present or permanent address of the author.}}

377: %\vspace*{0.015truein}

378: %\centerline{}

379: %\baselineskip=10pt

380: %\centerline{\footnotesize\it City, State ZIP/Zone,

381: %Country\footnote{State completely without abbreviations, the

382: %affiliation and mailing address, including country. Typeset in 8

383: %pt Times Italic.}}

384: \vspace*{10pt} \centerline{\footnotesize H.C.

385: ROSU$^{a}$\footnote{E-mail: hcr@ipicyt.edu.mx \hfill {\tt

386: physics/0510067}}, $\,$

387: J.P. TREVI\~NO$^{a}$, H. CABRERA$^{a}$,  and J.S. MURGU\'IA$^{b}$}%\footnote{E-mail: ondeleto@hotmail}}

388: \vspace*{0.015truein}

389: %\centerline{\footnotesize [Received 17 August 1999] }

390: %\baselineskip=10pt

391: \centerline{\footnotesize $a)$ {\em IPICyT} - Instituto Potosino de

392: Investigaci\'on Cient\'{\i}fica y Tecnol\'ogica,} \centerline{

393: \footnotesize Apdo Postal 3-74 Tangamanga, 78231 San Luis

394: Potos\'{\i}, M\'exico} \centerline{ \footnotesize $b)$ Universidad

395: Aut\'onoma de San Luis Potos\'{\i}, 87545 San Luis Potos\'{\i},

396: M\'exico} \vspace*{0.225truein}

397: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

398: %\publisher{(June 2002) - Mod Phys. Lett. A 17}

399: %{(May 14, 2000)}

400: 

401: %\centerline{\footnotesize Dated Feb 25th 2004 $\qquad$ file: DIRACC.TEX}

402: 

403: 

404: 

405: 

406: 

407: %\author{H.C. ROSU, J.P. TREVI\~NO, H. CABRERA}

408: 

409: 

410: %\author{J.S. MURGU\'IA}

411: 

412: %\address{Universidad

413: %Aut\'onoma de San Luis Potos\'{\i}, 87545 San Luis Potos\'{\i},

414: %M\'exico\\

415: %ondeleto@uaslp.mx}

416: 

417: %\maketitle

418: 

419: %\begin{history}

420: %\received{Day Month Year} \revised{Day Month Year}

421: %\accepted{(Day Month Year)}

422: %\comby{(xxxxxxxxxx)}

423: %\end{history}

424: 

425: \abstracts{ We shortly recall the mathematical and physical aspects

426: of Talbot's self-imaging effect occurring in near-field diffraction.

427: In the rational paraxial approximation, the Talbot images are formed

428: at distances $z=p/q$, where $p$ and $q$ are coprimes, and are

429: superpositions of $q$ equally spaced images of the original binary

430: transmission (Ronchi) grating. This interpretation offers the

431: possibility to express the Talbot effect through Gauss sums. Here,

432: we pay attention to the Talbot effect in the case of dispersion in

433: optical fibers presenting our considerations based on the close

434: relationships of the mathematical  representations of diffraction

435: and dispersion. Although dispersion deals with continuous functions,

436: such as gaussian and supergaussian pulses, whereas in diffraction

437: one frequently deals with discontinuous functions, the mathematical

438: correspondence enables one to characterize the Talbot effect in the

439: two cases with minor differences. In addition, we apply, for the

440: first time to our knowledge, the wavelet transform to the fractal

441: Talbot effect in both diffraction and fiber dispersion. In the first

442: case, the self similar character of the transverse paraxial field at

443: irrational multiples of the Talbot distance is confirmed, whereas in

444: the second case it is shown that the field is not self similar for

445: supergaussian pulses. Finally, a high-precision measurement of

446: irrational distances employing the fractal index determined with the

447: wavelet transform is pointed out.

448: %\end{abstract}

449: }{}{}

450: 

451: \bigskip

452: 

453: \keywords{ Talbot effect; Gauss sums; wavelet transform.}

454: %\section{General Appearance}    %) A SECTION HEADING

455: \section{Introduction}

456: 

457: Near field diffraction can produce images of periodic structures

458: such as gratings without any other means. This is known since 1836

459: when this self-imaging phenomenon has been discovered by H.F.

460: Talbot, one of the inventor pioneers of photography.\cite{hft} Take

461: for example a periodic object as simple as a Ronchi grating which is

462: a set of black lines and equal clear spaces on a plate repeating

463: with period $a$. In monochromatic light of wavelength $\lambda$ one

464: can reproduce its image at a ``focal" distance known as the Talbot

465: distance given by $z_{\rm T}=a^2 \lambda ^{-1}$ as shown in Fig.~1.

466: Actually, this famous focal distance has been first derived by Lord

467: Rayleigh in 1881.\cite{Rayleigh81} Moreover, more images show up at

468: integer multiples of the Talbot distance. It was only in 1989 that

469: the first and only one review on the Talbot effect has been written

470: by Patorski.\cite{pator}

471: 

472: In the framework of Helmholtz equation approach to the physical

473: optics of a $\delta$-comb grating, Berry and Klein\cite{ref1} showed

474: in 1996 that the Talbot diffraction wavefield has a highly

475: interesting arithmetic structure related to Gauss sums and other

476: fundamental relationships in number theory.

477: 

478: In this paper, after briefly reviewing the results of Berry \&

479: Klein, we show that analogous results can be obtained easily for the

480: case of dispersion in linear optical fibers. Moreover, we apply for

481: the first time in the literature the wavelet transform\cite{primer}

482: to the fractal Talbot problem. The point with the wavelet transform

483: is that it contains more information with respect to the Fourier

484: transform, which is behind the Helmholtz equation. Wavelet

485: transforms have been considered as a very suitable mathematical

486: microscope for fractals due to their ability to reveal the

487: construction rules of fractals and to resolve local scaling

488: properties as noticed before for the case of fractal

489: aggregates.\cite{arneodo88}

490: 

491: 

492: 

493: %22222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222

494: 

495: 

496: %...................................................................................   SECTION 2        GS BY HELMHOTZ

497: \section{Talbot effect for Helmholtz scalar diffraction fields}

498: 

499: The diffraction due to Ronchi gratings can be approached

500: analytically using the Helmholtz equation. Passing to dimensionless

501: transverse and paraxial variables $\xi=x/a$ and $\zeta = z/a$,

502: respectively, the scalar wave solution $\Psi (\xi , \zeta)$ of the

503: Helmholtz equation can be expressed as a convolution in $\xi$ of the

504: Ronchi unit cell square function

505: %....................

506: \begin{equation}\label{unit cell}

507: g(\xi) =\left\{\begin{array}{c}

508: 1\quad \xi\in [-\frac{1}{4},\frac{1}{4}]\\

509: 0\quad \xi \ni [-\frac{1}{4},\frac{1}{4}]~,

510: \end{array}\right.

511: \end{equation}

512: %.................

513: and the Dirac comb transmittance, i.e.

514: %........................

515: \begin{equation}\label{scalarH}

516: \Psi(\xi , \zeta) =\int _{-1/2}^{+1/2} g(\xi ^{'})\left(\sum

517: _{n=-\infty}^{\infty} \exp [i \, 2\pi n(\xi -\xi ^{'})]\exp [i\Theta

518: _n(\zeta)]\right)d\xi ^{'}~.

519: \end{equation}

520: %.....................................

521: In the previous formulas, the unit cell is the single spatial period

522: of the grating, which we take centered at the origin and of length

523: equal to unity and $\Theta _n(\zeta)=2\pi\zeta \frac{a^2}{\lambda

524: ^2} \sqrt{1-\left(\frac{n\lambda}{a}\right)^2}$ is a phase produced

525: by the diffraction of the Dirac comb `diagonal' rays. The so-called

526: Fresnel approximation for this phase, i.e., a Taylor expansion up to

527: the second order for the square root, leads to $\Theta _s(\zeta)

528: \approx -\pi n^2\zeta$. It can be easily shown now that in the

529: Fresnel approximation Eq.~\ref{scalarH} can be written as an

530: infinite sum of phase exponentials in both variables $\xi$ and

531: $\zeta$

532: %.......................

533: \begin{equation}\label{sum_exps}

534: \Psi_{\rm p}(\xi , \zeta) = \sum _{n=-\infty}^{\infty} g_n \exp [i\,

535: 2\pi n \xi - i\pi n^2\zeta]=\sum _{n=-\infty}^{\infty} g_n\psi _{\rm

536: p} (\xi ,

537: \zeta)~, %\Theta _s(\zeta)]~,

538: \end{equation}

539: %..............................

540: where the amplitudes $g_n$ are the Fourier modes of the

541: transmittance function of the Ronchi grating

542: %.....................

543: \begin{equation}\label{Fourier_g}

544: g_n=\int _{-1/4}^{+1/4} d\xi ^{'}\exp [-i \, 2\pi n\xi ^{'}]~.

545: \end{equation}

546: %........................

547: %On the other hand, $\Theta _s$ is a phase produced by the diffraction of the Dirac comb `diagonal' rays. The so-called Fresnel

548: %approximation for  $\Theta _s$, i.e., a Taylor expansion up to the second order for a

549: %square root coming from the `diagonal' feature of the ray, leads to $\Theta _s \approx -\pi \zeta n^2$.

550: %.................................................................

551: %Thus, the following form of the paraxial field is obtained

552: %...................

553: %\begin{equation}

554: %\Psi_p(\xi,\zeta)=\sum _{n=-\infty}^{\infty} g_n \exp (i2\pi n \xi

555: %-i\pi \zeta n^2)=\sum _{n=-\infty}^{\infty} g_n\psi _p (\xi ,

556: %\zeta)~.

557: %\end{equation}

558: %........................

559: Furthermore, by discretizing the optical propagation axis $\zeta$ by

560: means of rational numbers, one can write the rational paraxial field

561: as a shifted delta comb affected by phase factors, which is the main

562: result of Berry and Klein:

563: %.......................

564: \begin{equation}\label{rational}%.................................Equation 5

565: \psi _{\rm p}\left(\xi , \frac{p}{q}\right)=\frac{1}{q^{1/2}}\sum

566: _{n=-\infty}^{\infty}\delta\left(\xi _{p}-\frac{n}{q}\right)\exp

567: [i\Phi _{\rm diffr}(n;q,p)]~,

568: \end{equation}

569: where $\xi _p=\xi -e_p/2$ and $e_p = 0$(1) if $p$ is even (odd). The

570: paraxial phases $\exp[i\Phi_{\rm diffr}(n;q,p)]$ are specified in

571: Section 4 and appear to be the physical quantities directly

572: connected to number theory.

573: At the same time, %Eq.~(\ref{rational})

574: this rational approximation allows for the following physical

575: interpretation of the paraxial self-imaging process: {\em in each

576: unit cell of the plane $p/q$, $q$ images of the grating slits are

577: reproduced with spacing $a/q$ and intensity reduced by $1/q$}.

578: 

579: 

580: %333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333

581: 

582: 

583: 

584: %,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.....SECTION 3                                        WAVE PROPAGATION IN OPTICAL FIBERS

585: \section{Wave propagation in optical fibers}

586: %................................................

587: Field dispersion phenomena in dielectric media are described in

588: terms of wave equations with sources of the form

589: %.....................................................

590: \begin{equation}\label{eq:prop1}

591: \nabla^2{\bf E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2 {\bf E}}{\partial

592: t^2}=\mu_0\frac{\partial^2{\bf P}}{\partial t^2}

593: \end{equation}

594: %.........................................................

595: that can be obtained from the Maxwell equations under minimal

596: assumptions on the constitutive equations. As known, in fiber optics

597: technology, electromagnetic dispersion is defined in terms of the

598: {\em propagation constant} (wavenumber) of each frequency mode

599: $\beta(\omega) =n(\omega) \frac{\omega}{c}$. In the following we

600: will use one of the simplest optical fibers having a core-cladding

601: step profile of the index of refraction. In addition, the famous

602: slowly varying envelope approximation (henceforth SVEA) is a

603: realistic approach when treating the propagation of

604: quasi-monochromatic fields, such as laser fields and other types of

605: coherent beams within such materials. For more details we refer the

606: reader to textbooks.\cite{agr}

607: \medskip

608: 

609: %\subsection{SVEA}

610: 

611: 

612: {\em SVEA} means decomposing the electromagnetic fields in two

613: factors: a rapidly varying phase component and a slowly varying

614: amplitude field $A$ enveloping the rapid oscillatory fields. The

615: following Schr\"odinger-like dispersion equation can be obtained for

616: $A$ in the {\em SVEA} approximation

617: %..........................

618: \begin{equation}\label{eq:prop4}

619: 2i\frac{\partial A}{\partial z}=-{\rm sign}(\beta_2)\frac{\partial^2

620: A}{\partial {\tilde t}^2}~,

621: \end{equation}

622: %...........................

623: where $\beta _2$ is the second coefficient in the Taylor expansion

624: of the propagation constant in the neighbourhood of the central

625: resonance frequency. This is the simplest form of the dispersion

626: equation that one can envision in which actually no material

627: propagation shows up. It can be fulfilled in the practical situation

628: when the dielectric medium has sharp resonances ($\delta \omega

629: _r\ll \omega _r$). Because of technological requirements, $\beta _2$

630: is usually  a negative parameter corresponding to the so-called

631: anomalous dispersion region. As can be seen, the SVEA equation has

632: exactly the same mathematical form as the diffraction equation in

633: the paraxial approximation:

634: %........................................

635: \begin{equation}\label{eq:fresprop}

636: 2i\frac{\partial \Psi _{\rm p}}{\partial z}=\frac{\partial^2 \Psi

637: _{\rm p}}{\partial x^2}~,

638: \end{equation}

639: %.......................................

640: where $\Psi _{\rm p}$ is the electric field close to the propagation

641: axis.

642: 

643: 

644: 

645: %44444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444

646: 

647: 

648: 

649: %,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,SECTION 4                                          FROM DIFFRACTION TO DISPERSION

650: \section{From diffraction to fiber dispersion}

651: 

652: Many results in diffraction can be translated to the case of

653: dispersion in fibers by using the following substitutions

654: %.............................................

655: \[

656: \begin{array}{rcl}

657: x&\rightarrow&\tilde t\\

658: y&\rightarrow&{\bf r} \\

659: z&\rightarrow&z.

660: \end{array}

661: \]

662: %..............................................

663: In the first row one passes from the grating axis to the time axis

664: of a frame traveling at the group velocity of a pulse. In the second

665: row one passes from the second grating axis that here we consider

666: constant to the transverse section of the optical fiber. Finally,

667: the propagation axis remains the same for the two settings. This

668: {\it change of variables} will be used here to compare the results

669: obtained in the two frameworks.

670: %It can be readily seen that the form of both equations are similar to the Schr\"odinger equation in quantum mechanics

671: %...................................

672: %\begin{equation}\label{eq:sch}

673: %i\hbar\frac{\partial \Psi}{\partial t}=\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{\partial^2\Psi}{\partial x^2}+V\Psi

674: %\end{equation}

675: %................................

676: 

677: The general solution of the {\em SVEA} dispersion equation

678: ~(\ref{eq:prop4}) for the amplitude $A(z,\tilde t)$ depends on the

679: initial conditions. Assuming a periodic input signal written as a

680: Fourier series, i.e., $A(0,\tilde t)=\sum

681: _{n=-\infty}^{n=\infty}C_n^0e^{-i\omega _n \tilde t}$, where $C_n^0$

682: are the Fourier coefficients of the initial pulse at the entrance of

683: an optical fiber with linear response, one can write the pulse at an

684: arbitrary $z$ as follows:

685: %......................................................Equation 9

686: \begin{equation}\label{disp_ampl_solgral}

687: A(z,\tilde t)=\sum C^0_n\exp{\left[i\frac{\omega^2_nz}{2}-i\omega_n

688: \tilde t\right]} \qquad \mbox{where  }\omega_n=2\pi n/T.

689: \end{equation}

690: %....................................................

691: 

692: If the scaling of variables $\tau=\tilde t/T$, $\zeta=2z/z_{{\rm

693: T}}$

694: %....................................................................

695: is employed, $A(z,\tilde{t})$  can be rewritten as

696: %...................................................

697: \begin{equation}\label{eq:a}

698: A(\zeta,\tau)=\sum C^0_n\exp{\left[i\pi n^2\zeta-i2\pi

699: n\tau\right]},

700: \end{equation}

701: %...................................................

702: because the Talbot distance corresponding to this case is $z_{\rm

703: T}=T^2/\pi$. Just as in the context of diffraction, the convolution

704: of the unitary cell with the propagator can be equally done before

705: or after the paraxial approximation is employed. We notice that

706: Eq.~\ref{eq:a} can be also written as

707: %.................................................Equation 11

708: \begin{equation}\label{dispersed_amplitude_integral}

709: A(\zeta,\tau)=\int^{T/2}_{-T/2}A(0, \tau')\alpha (\zeta,\tau'-\tau)d

710: \tau '

711: \end{equation}

712: %...............................................

713: since $C^0_n$ are nothing but the Fourier coefficients of the input

714: signal and where

715: %.................................................Equation 12

716: \begin{equation}\label{Gsum_A}

717: \alpha (\zeta,\tau)=\sum^{\infty}_{n=-\infty} \exp{\left[i\pi

718: n^2\zeta-i2\pi n\tau\right]}

719: \end{equation}

720: %................................................

721: can be thought of as the analog of the paraxial

722: propagator.\cite{ref1} In this expression, the trick is to turn the

723: continuous propagation axis into the rational number axis and also

724: to perform the integer modulo division of $n$ with respect to the

725: rational denominator of the propagation axis, i.e.,

726: %................................................Equation 13

727: \begin{equation}\label{rational}

728: \zeta=\frac{p}{q},\qquad\quad n=lq+s.

729: \end{equation}

730: %...............................

731: Through this approximation, the sum over $n$ is divided into two

732: sums: one over negative and positive integers $l$, and the other one

733: over $s\equiv n\,\mbox{(mod}\,q)$

734: %..................................................Equation 14

735: \begin{equation}\label{double_sum}

736: \alpha (\zeta,\tau)=\sum^{\infty}_{l=-\infty}\sum^{q-1}_{s=0}

737: \exp{\left[i\pi (lq+s)^2\frac{p}{q}-i2\pi (lq+s)\tau\right]}.

738: \end{equation}

739: %.......................................

740: This form of  $\alpha(\zeta,\tau)$ is almost exactly the same as

741: given by Berry \& Klein\cite{ref1} and by Matsutani and

742: \^Onishi.\cite{ref2} The difference is that the sign of the exponent

743: is opposite. Following these authors one can express $\alpha$ in

744: terms of the Poisson formula leading to

745: %..................................................

746: \begin{equation}

747: \alpha (\zeta,\tau)=

748:                   %&=&\sum^{\infty}_{l=-\infty}\sum^{q-1}_{s=0} \exp{\left[i\pi (lq+s)^2\frac{p}{q}-i2\pi (lq+s)\tau\right]} \nonumber\\

749:                   %&=&\sum^{q-1}_{s=0} \exp{\left[i\pi\left(\frac{p}{q}s^2-2s\tau\right)\right]\sum^{\infty}_{l=-\infty}}

750:                   %\exp{\left[i\pi (l^2qp+2lsp-2lq\tau)\right]} \nonumber\\

751:           %=&\sum^{q-1}_{s=0} \exp{\left[i\pi\left(\frac{p}{q}s^2-2s\tau\right)\right]\sum^{\infty}_{l=-\infty}}

752:           %\exp{\left[i\pi (lqp+2lsp-2lq\tau)\right]}\\

753:                                \frac{1}{\sqrt{q}}\sum _{n=-\infty}^{\infty} \Bigg[\frac{1}{\sqrt{q}}\sum _{s=0}^{q-1}

754:                               \exp{\left[i\pi\left(\frac{p}{q}s^2-2s\tau\right)\right]}\Bigg]\delta(\tau _p+\frac{n}{q})~,

755: \end{equation}

756: %..........................................

757: where $\tau _p$ is a notation similar to $\xi _p$. %$e_p =

758: %0$(1)if$p$is even (odd).

759: The rest of the calculations are straightforwardly performed though

760: they are lengthy. By algebraic manipulations the phase factor can be

761: easily obtained and we reproduce below the two expressions for

762: direct comparison

763: %.................................................Equation 15

764: \begin{equation} \label{phase1}

765: {\Phi}_{\rm disp}(n;q,p)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{q}}\sum_{s=0}^{q-1}

766: \exp{\left\{   i\frac{\pi}{q} \left[ps^2-2s(n-\frac{qe_p}{2})

767: \right] \right\}}

768: \end{equation}

769: %................................................Equation 16

770: \begin{equation} \label{Phase2}

771:  \Phi _{\rm diffr}(n;q,p)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{q}}\sum_{s=0}^{q-1} \exp{\left\{   i\frac{\pi}{q} \left[ 2s(n+\frac{qe_p}{2})-ps^2  \right] \right\}}~.

772: \end{equation}

773: %............................................

774: Both phases are special types of Gauss sums from the mathematical

775: standpoint (see the Appendix). The difference of signs here appears

776: because of the sign convention chosen for the Fourier transform. Not

777: surprisingly, the changes in the mathematical formulation are

778: minimal although the experimental setup is quite different.

779: 

780: %\bigskip

781: 

782: If one tries to make computer simulations using the Fourier

783: transform method, the Gibbs phenomenon is unavoidable for

784: discontinuous transmittance functions. However, in the case of fiber

785: dispersion, one class of continuous pulses one could work with are

786: the supergaussian ones, i.e., functions of the following form

787: %................................................Equation 17

788: \begin{equation}\label{superG}

789: A(\zeta =0,\tau) = A_0\exp \bigg[\frac{-\tau ^N}{\sigma _0}\bigg] ~,  %\qquad N\geq 2~.

790: \end{equation}

791: %...........................

792: where $N$ is any even number bigger than two. The bigger the chosen

793: $N$ the more the supergaussian pulse resembles a square pulse. A

794: computer simulation of the evolution of a supergaussian pulse train

795: is given in Fig.~2.\cite{Trev1}

796: 

797: 

798: 

799: %555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555

800: 

801: 

802: %.........................................................................................................   SECTION 5  ------  FRACTAL TALBOT

803: \section{Irrational Talbot distances}

804: 

805: \subsection{Fractal approach}

806: 

807: 

808: 

809: 

810: In the Talbot terminology the self-reconstructed images in the

811: planes $z=(p/q)z_{\rm T}$ consist of $q$ superposed copies of the

812: grating as already mentioned, completed with discontinuities.

813: Although there is a finite number of images at fractional distances,

814: they still represent an infinitesimal subset of all possible images

815: that occur at the irrational distances.

816: 

817: 

818: 

819: 

820: 

821: 

822: 

823: However, in the planes located at irrational fractions of the Talbot

824: distance the light intensity is a {\em fractal function} of the

825: transverse variable. The field intensity has a definite value at

826: every point, but its derivative has no definite value. Such fractal

827: functions are described by a fractal dimension, $D$, between one

828: (corresponding to a smooth curve) and two (corresponding to a curve

829: so irregular that it occupies a finite area). In the case of  Ronchi

830: gratings, for example, the fractal dimension of the diffracted

831: intensity in the irrrational transverse

832: planes is 3/2.\cite{ref7}  %(fig. 5).

833: 

834: Moreover, one can define the so-called {\em carpets} which  are

835: %functions of the longitudinal coordinate $z$ (along the propagation direction) as well as the transverse coordinate $x$, so the

836: wave intensity patterns forming surfaces on the $(\xi \, , \zeta)$

837: plane, i.e., the plane of the transverse periodic coordinate and the

838: propagation

839: coordinate. % (see fig. 3$b$ in Ref.~4, for example).

840: Since they are surfaces, their fractal dimension takes values

841: between two and three. According to Berry, in general for a surface

842: where all directions are equivalent, the fractal dimension of the

843: surface is one unit greater than the dimension of an inclined curve

844: that cuts through it. Taking into account that for a Talbot carpet

845: the transverse image curves have fractal dimension $D=3/2$, then the

846: carpet's dimension is expected to be 5/2. However, Talbot landscapes

847: were found not to be isotropic. For fixed $\xi$, as the intensity

848: varies as a function of distance $\zeta$ from

849: the grating, the fractal dimension is found to be 7/4, one quarter more than in the transverse case. %(fig. 5).

850: Therefore the longitudinal fractals are slightly more irregular than

851: the transverse ones. In addition, the intensity is more regular

852: along the bisectrix canal because of the cancelation of large Fourier components that has fractal dimension of 5/4. %(fig. 5).

853: The landscape is dominated by the largest of these fractal

854: dimensions (the longitudinal one), and so is a surface of fractal

855: dimension 1+ 7/4 = 11/4.

856: 

857: %This fractal structure also applies to the evolving wave from a particle in a box with uniform initial wave amplitude.

858: %There are space fractals  (varying $x$ with constant $t$), where the graph of the probability density %has $D$ = 3/2; time fractals varying $t$

859: %with constant $x$), where the graph of the probability density has $D$ = 7/4; and space-time fractals (along the diagonal canals), where $D$ = 5/4.

860: %Some of these results about %fractals can be generalized to waves evolving in enclosures of any dimensions, even with shapes that do not

861: %give rise to revivals, provided the initial state is discontinuous, even if only at the boundary.

862: 

863: %5.2  5.2  5.2  5.2

864: 

865: \subsection{Wavelet approach}   %............................................. SUBSECTION 5.2

866: 

867: 

868: Wavelet transforms (WT) are known to have various advantages over

869: the Fourier transform and in particular they can add up

870: supplementary information on the fractal features.\cite{arneodo88} A

871: simple definition of the one-dimensional wavelet transform is

872: %...........

873: \begin{equation}\label{wvl 0a}

874: W({\rm m,n})=\int _{-\infty}^{\infty} f({\rm s}) h^{*}_{{\rm

875: m,n}}({\rm s})d{\rm s}

876: \end{equation}

877: %...............

878: where $h_{{\rm m,n}}$ is a so-called daughter wavelet that is

879: derived from the mother wavelet $h({\rm s})$ by dilation and shift

880: operations quantified in terms of the dilation (m) and shift (n)

881: parameters:

882: %.............

883: \begin{equation}\label{wvl 0b}

884: h_{{\rm m,n}}({\rm s})=\frac{1}{\sqrt{{\rm m}}}h\left(\frac{{\rm

885: s}-{\rm n}}{{\rm m}}\right)

886: \end{equation}

887: %................

888: In the following, we shall use the Morlet wavelets which are derived

889: from the typical Gaussian-enveloped mother wavelet which is itself a

890: windowed Fourier transform

891: %.............

892: \begin{equation}\label{wvl 0c}

893: h({\rm s})=\exp[-({\rm s}/{\rm s}_0)^2]\exp (i2\pi k{\rm s}).

894: \end{equation}

895: %..............

896: The point is that if the mother wavelet contains a harmonic

897: structure, e.g., in the Morlet case the phase $\exp(i2\pi k{\rm

898: s})$), the WT represents both frequency and spatial information of

899: the signal.

900: 

901: In the wavelet framework one can write the expansion of an arbitrary

902: signal $\varphi(t)$ in an orthonormal wavelet basis in the form

903: %...............................................................Equation 18

904: \begin{equation}\label{wvl_1}

905: \varphi(t)=\sum _{\rm m}\sum _{\rm n} \varphi _{\rm n}^{\rm m} W

906: _{{\rm m,n}}(t)~,

907: \end{equation}

908: %............................

909: i.e., as an expansion in the dilation and translation indices, and

910: the coefficients of the expansion are given by

911: %................................................................Equation 19

912: \begin{equation}\label{wvl_2}

913: \varphi _{\rm n}^{\rm m}=\int _{-\infty}^{\infty} \varphi(t)W _{{\rm

914: m,n}}(t)dt~.

915: \end{equation}

916: The orthonormal wavelet basis functions $W _{{\rm m,n}}(t)$ fulfill

917: the following dilation-translation property

918: %................................................................Equation 20

919: \begin{equation}\label{wvl_3}

920: W _{{\rm m,n}}(t)=2^{{\rm m}/2}W (2^{\rm m}t-{\rm n})~.

921: \end{equation}

922: %....................

923: 

924: 

925: In the wavelet approach the fractal character of a certain signal

926: can be inferred from the behavior of its power spectrum $P(f)$,

927: which is the Fourier transform of the autocovariance (also termed

928: autocorrelation) function and in differential form $P(f)df$

929: represents the contribution to the variance of a signal from

930: frequencies between $f$ and $f+df$.

931: % To this

932: %, one can calculate spectral quantities of interest, such as the

933: %power spectrum, by means of wavelet transforms in order to study the

934: %Talbot fractal effect.

935: Indeed, it is known that for self-similar random processes the

936: spectral behavior of the power spectrum is given by\cite{wor,stas}

937: %........................................................................Equation 21

938: \begin{equation}\label{wvl_4}

939: P_{\varphi}(\omega)\sim |\omega|^{-\gamma _f}~,

940: \end{equation}

941: %..................

942: where $\gamma _f$ is the spectral parameter of the wave signal. %(not

943: %to be confused with the propagation constant).

944: In addition, the variance of the wavelet coefficients possesses the

945: following behavior\cite{stas}

946: %..................

947: \begin{equation}

948: {\rm var} \,\varphi _{\rm n}^{\rm m} \approx \left(2^{{\rm

949: m}}\right)^{-\gamma _f}~.

950: \end{equation}

951: %.........................

952: 

953: These formulas are certainly suitable for the Talbot transverse

954: fractals because of the interpretation in terms of the regular

955: superposition of identical and equally spaced grating images. We

956: have used these wavelet formulas in our calculations related to the

957: same rational paraxiallity for the two cases of transverse

958: diffraction fields (Fig.~3) and the fiber-dispersed optical fields

959: (Fig.~4), respectively. The basic idea is that the above-mentioned

960: formulas can be employed as a checking test of the self-similarity

961: structure of the optical fields. The requirement is to have a

962: constant spectral parameter $\gamma _f$ over many scales. In the

963: case of supergaussian pulses, their dispersed fields turned out not

964: to have the self-similarity property as can be seen by examining

965: Fig.~4 where one can see that the constant slope is not maintained

966: over all scales. In Figs.~5 and 6 the behavior of the wavelet

967: transform using Morlet wavelets for the diffraction field is

968: displayed. A great deal of details can be seen in all basic

969: quantities of the diffracted field, namely in the intensity,

970: modulus, and phase. On the other hand, the same wavelet transform

971: applied to the N=12 supergaussian dispersed pulse (see Fig.~7),

972: although showing a certain similarity to the previous discontinuous

973: case, contains less structure and thus looks more regular. This

974: points to the fact that if in diffraction experiments one uses

975: continuous transmittance gratings the fractal behavior would turn

976: milder.

977: %The graphics of the results are displayed in Figs.~4-6.

978: 

979: More realistically, paraxial waves display electric and magnetic

980: polarization singularities.\cite{BJOA04} If the paraxial wavefield

981: is treated as a signal then it is worth pointing out here that

982: detection of signal singularities has been studied in quite detail

983: by the experts in wavelet processing.\cite{Mallat92} We plan to

984: study this aspect in future research.

985: 

986: %Conclusion    Conclusion     Conclusion    Conclusion     Conclusion   Conclusion    Conclusion

987: 

988: %%%%.......................................................................................

989: \section{Conclusion}

990: 

991: The fractal aspects of the paraxial wavefield have been probed here

992: by means of the wavelet transform for the cases of diffraction and

993: fiber dispersion. In the case of diffraction, the previous results

994: of Berry and Klein are confirmed showing that the wavelet approach

995: can be an equivalent and more informative tool. The same procedure

996: applied to the case of fiber dispersion affecting the paraxial

997: evolution of supergaussian pulses indicates that the self-similar

998: fractal character does not show up in the latter type of axial

999: propagation. This is a consequence of the continuous transmittance

1000: function of the supergaussian pulses as opposed to the singular one

1001: in the case of Ronchi gratings.

1002: 

1003: Finally, as a promising perspective, we would like to suggest the

1004: following experiment by which irrational distances can be

1005: determined. The idea is that the spectral index of the Talbot

1006: fractal images can be used as a very precise pointer of rational and

1007: irrational distances with respect to the Talbot one. Suppose that

1008: behind a Ronchi grating under plane wave illumination a CCD camera

1009: is mounted axially by means of a precision screw. The Talbot image

1010: at $z_{\rm T}$ can be focused experimentally and can be used to

1011: calibrate the whole system. An implemented real time wavelet

1012: computer software can perform a rapid determination of the fractal

1013: index $\gamma _f$, which in turn allows the detection of changes of

1014: the distance in order to determine if the CCD camera is at rational

1015: or irrational multiples of the Talbot distance. To the best of our

1016: knowledge, we are not aware of another experimental setup in which

1017: irrational distances can be determined in such an accurate way. This

1018: also points to high-precision applications in metrology.

1019: 

1020: %%%%................................................................................................................................

1021: \section{Acknowledgements}

1022: 

1023: The first author wishes to thank Dr. Michel Planat for encouraging

1024: him to study the Talbot effect from the perspective of this paper

1025: and for discussions related to the topic. The second author would

1026: like to thank Dr. V. Vyshloukh for the time he spent to introduce

1027: him in the research of the self image phenomena. The referee of this

1028: paper is gratefully acknowledged for his detailed remarks that led

1029: to substantial improvements.

1030: 

1031: %\newpage

1032: 

1033: \bigskip

1034: \bigskip

1035: 

1036: \noindent {\bf Appendix: Gauss sums}

1037: 

1038: \medskip

1039: 

1040: It is practically trivial to show that

1041: %...............

1042: \[

1043: \sum _{n=0}^{b-1}e^{i2\pi\frac{n}{b}}=0,

1044: \]

1045: for any integer $b$ bigger than one.

1046: %...............

1047: However, similar sums of nonlinear powers in $n$ are usually nonzero

1048: %................

1049: \[

1050: \sum _{n=0}^{b-1}e^{i2\pi\frac{n^k}{b}}\neq 0,

1051: \]

1052: %...............

1053: where $k\geq 2$, $b$ is a prime with $b\equiv 1 \,({\rm mod} \, k)$

1054: and the sum is over an arbitrary complete system of residues $({\rm

1055: mod} \, b)$. Such sums are really difficult to calculate. For $k=2$,

1056: they are known as (quadratic) Gauss sums because two centuries ago

1057: Gauss first gave explicit results for them but only after 4 years

1058: ``with all efforts". A paper by Berndt and Evans\cite{be81} is an

1059: excellent survey of the history of Gauss sums, see also the appendix

1060: of the work of Merkel {\em et al} in this volume. Gauss sums having

1061: linear phases added to the quadratic ones are of special interest in

1062: physical applications such as the optical ones discussed in this

1063: paper. We concentrate here on this type of Gauss sums following the

1064: papers of Hannay and Berry\cite{hb80} and also of Matsutani and

1065: \^Onishi.\cite{ref2}

1066: 

1067: At rational values of the propagation coordinate the diffraction and

1068: dispersion phases can be expressed through the infinite Gaussian sum

1069: 

1070: \[G_{\infty}(a,b,c)=\lim_{N\to \infty}\frac{1}{2abN}\sum^{Nab}_{m=-Nab}\exp{\left[i\frac{\pi}{b}\left(am^2+cm\right)\right]},\]

1071: which is an average over a period $2abN$. If $a$ and $b$ are

1072: co-prime numbers, %i.e. $(a,b)=1$,

1073: the sum is zero unless $c$ is an integer. Let $m=bn+s$, then the sum

1074: is divided into two sums

1075: 

1076: \[G_{\infty}(a,b,c)=\lim_{N\to \infty}\frac{1}{2abN}\sum_{n=-Na}^{Na}\sum_{s=0}^{b-1}\exp{\left[i\frac{\pi}{b}\left(a(bn+s)^2+c(bn+s)\right)\right]},\]

1077: 

1078: 

1079: %-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

1080: %\foilhead[-.7in]{-2-}

1081: %-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

1082: % Set the page color per slides

1083: %\pagecolor{red}

1084: %\includegraphics{cover.jpg}

1085: 

1086: The argument of the exponential in the sum becomes

1087: \[i\frac{\pi}{b}\left(a(bn+s)^2+c(bn+s)\right)=i2\pi ans+i \pi n (abn+c)+i\frac{\pi}{b}\left(as^2+bs\right)\]

1088:  and if $ab$ and $c$ are both odd or even at the same time, only terms in $s$ survive: if $n$ is even, the term is even and if $n$ is

1089:  odd, i.e. $n=2k_1+1$, and also $ab=2k_2+1$ and $c=2k_3+1$, the term is

1090: %...............

1091: \begin{eqnarray*}

1092: i \pi n (abn+c)&=&i\pi (2k_1+1)[(2k_2+1)(2k_1+1)+(2k_3+1)]\\

1093:                       &=&i\pi(2k_1+1)(4k_1k_2+2k_2+2k_1+2k_3+2)\\

1094:                       &=&i2\pi(2k_1+1)(2k_1k_2+k_2+k_1+k_3+1) \\

1095: \end{eqnarray*}

1096: 

1097: 

1098: %-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

1099: %\foilhead[-.7in]{-3-}

1100: %-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

1101: Thus $G_{\infty}$ is rewriten as

1102: 

1103: \[G_{\infty}(a,b,c)=\lim_{N\to \infty}\frac{1}{2abN}\sum_{n=-Na}^{Na}\sum_{s=0}^{b-1}\exp{\left[i\frac{\pi}{b}\left(as^2+cs\right)\right]},\]

1104: and taking the limit, $G_{\infty}$ coincides with the quadratic

1105: Gauss sum

1106: 

1107: \[G_{\infty}(a,b,c)=S(a,b,c)=\frac{1}{a}\sum^{a-1}_{m=0}\exp{\left[i\frac{\pi}{b}\left(am^2+cm\right)\right]}.\]

1108: Notice the following property: in the normalization fraction and the

1109: upper limit of the sum, $a$ can be interchanged for $b$

1110: simultaneously. We will use this property because it is appropriate

1111: from the standpoint of the physical application

1112: to run the sum over the denominator of the phase, i.e., over $b$. %The implications will be analyzed in detail.

1113: %-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

1114: %\foilhead[-.7in]

1115: 

1116: \medskip

1117: 

1118: %\medskip

1119: We consider now the various cases according to the odd even

1120: character of the parameters $a$, $b$ and $c$. Only the first case

1121: will be treated in detail.

1122: 

1123: \medskip

1124: 

1125: %-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

1126: \underline{Case $a$ and $c$ even, $b$ odd (because of coprimality to

1127: $a$)}

1128: 

1129: \medskip

1130: 

1131: \noindent A factor $\exp{(i\pi cmk)}$ can be added since $c$ is

1132: even. Then

1133: %........................

1134: \[

1135: S(a,b,c)%&=&\frac{1}{a}\sum^{a-1}_{m=0}e^{i\frac{\pi}{b}\left(am^2+cm\right)}\\

1136:         =\frac{1}{b}\sum^{b-1}_{m=0} e^{i\frac{\pi}{b}am^2}

1137: e^{i\frac{\pi}{b}cm(kb+1)}

1138: %\frac{1}{a}\sum^{a-1}_{m=0}e^{i\frac{\pi}{b}am^2}e^{i\frac{\pi}{b}cm}.\\

1139: \]

1140: %.......................

1141: %Since $c$ is even, a factor $\exp{(i\pi cmk)}$ can be added.

1142: 

1143: %\[

1144: %S(a,b,c)=\frac{1}{a}\sum^{a-1}_{m=0} e^{i\frac{\pi}{b}am^2}

1145: %e^{i\frac{\pi}{b}cm(kb+1)}

1146: %\]

1147: 

1148: %-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

1149: %\foilhead[-.7in]{}

1150: %-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

1151: Noticing that $kb+1\equiv 1({\rm mod}\,b)$ and defining $a\bar

1152: a_b\equiv 1({\rm mod}\,b)$ we can write

1153: \begin{eqnarray*}

1154: S(a,b,c) %&=&\frac{1}{a}\sum^{a-1}_{m=0}e^{i\frac{\pi}{b}am^2}e^{i\frac{\pi}{b}acm\bar a_b}\\

1155:         =\frac{1}{b}\sum^{b-1}_{m=0}\exp\left(\left[i\pi\frac{a}{b}\left(m^2+cm\bar

1156:         a_b\right)\right]\right)

1157: \end{eqnarray*}

1158: and completing the square in the argument of the exponential:

1159: \begin{eqnarray*}

1160: S(a,b,c)%&=&\frac{1}{b}\sum^{b-1}_{m=0}\exp{\left[i\pi\frac{a}{b}\left(m^2+cm\bar a_b\right)\right]}\\

1161:         &=&\frac{1}{b}\sum^{b-1}_{m=0}\exp\left(i\pi\frac{a}{b}\left[\left(m+\frac{c\bar a_b}{2}\right)^2-

1162:         \left(\frac{c\bar a_b}{2}\right)^2\right]\right)

1163: \end{eqnarray*}

1164: 

1165: Next, one should notice the following simpler form:

1166: \[

1167: \sum_{m=0}^{b-1} \exp{ \left[ i\pi \frac{a}{b}\left(m+\frac{c\bar

1168: a_b}{2}\right)^2  \right]

1169: }=\sum^{b-1}_{n=0}\exp{\left(i\pi\frac{a}{b}n^2\right)}

1170: \]

1171: since the linear term plus the independent one in the left hand side

1172: exponential lead to a different order of the terms with respect to

1173: the right hand side of the equation. Furthermore we note that

1174: 

1175: \[

1176: \sum_{n=0}^{b-1}\exp{\left(i\pi\frac{a}{b}n^2\right)}=\sum_{n=0}^{b-1}

1177: \left[1+\left({an/2}\over{b}\right)_L\right]\exp{\left(i\pi\frac{a}{b}n\right)}

1178: \]

1179: where $\left({l_1}\over{l_2}\right)_L$ denotes the Legendre symbol

1180: that for $l_2$ an odd prime number is defined as zero if $l_1$ is

1181: divided by $l_2$, 1 if $l_1$ is a quadratic residue mod $l_2$ (there

1182: exists an integer $k$ such that $k^2=l_1$ (mod $l_2$)), and -1 if

1183: $l_1$ is not a quadratic residue.

1184: 

1185: %-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

1186: %\foilhead[-.7in]{.}

1187: %-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

1188: Therefore the Gauss sum is expressed as follows:

1189: \begin{eqnarray*}

1190: S(a,b,c)

1191: %&=&\frac{1}{b}\sum_{n=0}^{b-1}\exp{\left\{i\pi\frac{a}{b}\left[\left(m+\frac{c\hat a_b}{2}\right)^2-\left(\frac{c\hat a_b}{2}\right)^2\right]\right\}}\\

1192:  &=&\frac{1}{b}\exp{\left(-i\pi\frac{a}{b}(c\bar a_b/2)^2\right)}

1193:  \sum_{n=0}^{b-1} \left[1+\left(\frac{an/2}{b}\right)_L\right]\exp{\left(i\pi\frac{a}{b}n\right)}\\

1194: \end{eqnarray*}

1195: and the latter sum under splitting into two sums yields zero in the

1196: first one. Making use of the Legendre symbol multiplicative property

1197: in the top argument we get:

1198: 

1199: \[

1200: S(a,b,c)=\frac{1}{b}\left(\frac{a/2}{b}\right)_L\exp{\left(-i\pi\frac{a}{b}(c\bar

1201: a_b/2)^2\right)}\sum_{n=0}^{b-1}\left(\frac{n}{b}\right)_L\exp{\left(i2\pi\frac{n}{b}\right)}.

1202: \]

1203: 

1204: The following result from number theory\cite{koblitz} should be used

1205: in order to get the most compact result for $S(a,b,c)$:

1206: 

1207: \[\left(\frac{1/2}{b}\right)_L=\left(\frac{2}{b}\right)_L=(-1)^{(b^2-1)/8}=\exp{\left(\pm i\pi\frac{b^2-1}{8}\right)}\]

1208: 

1209: and then

1210: \[

1211: \sum_{n=0}^{b-1}\left(\frac{n}{b}\right)_L\exp{\left(i2\pi\frac{n}{b}\right)}=\sqrt{b}\exp{\left(

1212: i\pi\frac{(b-1)^2}{8}\right)}\]

1213: 

1214: for $b\equiv 1\,({\rm mod}\, 4)$ or $b\equiv 3\,({\rm mod}\, 4)$.

1215: Then:

1216: %.......................

1217: \begin{eqnarray*}

1218: S(a,b,c)&=&\frac{1}{b}\left(\frac{a}{b}\right)_L\left(\frac{1/2}{b}\right)_L\exp{\left(-i\pi\frac{a}{b}(c\bar

1219: a_b/2)^2\right)}

1220: \sum_{n=0}^{b-1}\left(\frac{n}{b}\right)_L\exp{\left(i2\pi\frac{n}{b}\right)}\\

1221:     &=&\frac{1}{\sqrt{b}}\left(\frac{a}{b}\right)_L\exp{\left(\pm i\pi\frac{\left(b^2-1\right)}{8}-i\pi\frac{a}{b}(c\bar a_b/2)^2 +

1222:     i\pi\frac{(b-1)^2}{8}\right)}.\\

1223: \end{eqnarray*}

1224: 

1225: The terms in the exponential with the common factor $i\pi/8$ are

1226: rewritten

1227: 

1228: \[\frac{i\pi}{8} \left(\pm b^2\mp1+b^2-2b+1\right)=-\frac{i2\pi}{8}(b-1)\]

1229: %...........................................

1230: having chosen the lower sign (there is no final change if the $+$

1231: sign is picked up).

1232: 

1233: %-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

1234: %\foilhead[-.7in]{}

1235: %-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

1236: Recalling now that $a$ and $c$ are even we get

1237: 

1238: \[S(a,b,c)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{b}}\left(\frac{a}{b}\right)_L\exp\left(- i\pi\left[\frac{1}{4}\left(b-1\right)+\frac{a}{b}(c\bar a_b/2)^2\right]\right).\]

1239: 

1240: {\underline{Case $a$, $b$, and $c$ odd}

1241: 

1242: \medskip

1243: 

1244: \noindent Exactly the same expression can be worked out with the

1245: only minor modification that $a$ is \textit{replaced} by $2

1246: \bar{2}_ba$.

1247: 

1248: %\[S(a,b,c)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{b}}\left(\frac{a}{b}\right)_L

1249: %\exp\left(- i\pi\left[\frac{1}{4}\left(b-1\right)+\frac{2a}{b}\bar

1250: %2_b \left(c{\overline{2a}}_b\right)^2\right]\right).\]

1251: %........................................

1252: %and the cases $a$ even, $b$ odd; and $a$ odd, $b$ odd.

1253: 

1254: \underline{Case $a$ odd, $b$ even, $c$ odd}

1255: 

1256: \medskip

1257: 

1258: \noindent Similar arguments lead to a slightly different result.

1259: 

1260: %-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

1261: %\foilhead[-.7in]{}

1262: %-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

1263: 

1264: %\newpage

1265: 

1266: \noindent The three final results are as follows:

1267: 

1268: \[S(a,b,c)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{b}}\left(\frac{a}{b}\right)_L\exp\left(- i\frac{\pi}{4}\left[\left(b-1\right)+\frac{a}{b}(c\bar

1269: a_b)^2\right]\right) \qquad \quad \, \, \mbox{ $a$ even, $b$ odd,

1270: $c$ even},\]

1271: 

1272: \[S(a,b,c)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{b}}\left(\frac{a}{b}\right)_L\exp\left(- i\frac{\pi}{4}\left[\left(b-1\right)+\frac{2a}{b}\bar 2_b^3 \left(c\bar{a}_b

1273: \right)^2\right]\right)\quad \mbox{ $a$ odd, $b$ odd, $c$ odd},\]

1274: 

1275: \[S(a,b,c)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{b}}\left(\frac{b}{a}\right)_L\exp\left(- i\frac{\pi}{4}\left[-a+\frac{a}{b} (c\bar

1276: a_b)^2\right]\right) \qquad \qquad \quad\, \mbox{ $a$ odd, $b$ even,

1277: $c$ odd}.\]

1278: 

1279: These results were obtained under the assumption that $b$ is prime.

1280: For the general case where $b$ is not a prime the Legendre symbol

1281: should be substituted by the Jacobi symbol, which is a product of

1282: Legendre symbols defined in the following way. Let the prime

1283: decomposition of $b$ be $b=\prod_{i=1}^{i=n} p_{i}^{r_i}$. Then, by

1284: definition, the Jacobi symbol is

1285: 

1286: \[

1287: \left(\frac{a}{b}\right)_J=\prod

1288: _{i=1}^{i=n}\left(\frac{a}{p_i}\right)^{r_i}_{L}.

1289: \]

1290: 

1291: In this way, the evaluation of the Talbot phases are performed by

1292: identification of the parameters: $a=\pm p$, $b=q$, $c=\mp 2(n\mp

1293: qe_p/2)$, respectively, where $e_p=0$ (1) if $p$ even (odd). The

1294: upper sign is for dispersion and the lower for diffraction. Thus, we

1295: get:

1296: 

1297: \medskip

1298: 

1299: $p$ even, $q$ odd:

1300: \begin{eqnarray*}

1301: \Phi_{{\rm disp}}(n;p,q)&=&\left(\frac{p}{q}\right)_J\exp\left(-

1302: i\frac{\pi}{4}\left[\left(q-1\right)+\frac{p}{q}(2n\bar

1303: p_q)^2\right]\right) ,\\

1304: \Phi_{{\rm diffr}}(n;p,q)&=&\left(\frac{p}{q}\right)_J\exp\left(+

1305: i\frac{\pi}{4}\left[\left(q-1\right)+\frac{p}{q}(2n\bar

1306: p_q)^2\right]\right).

1307: \end{eqnarray*}

1308: 

1309: \medskip

1310: 

1311: $p$ odd, $q$ odd:

1312: \begin{eqnarray*}

1313: \Phi_{{\rm disp}}(n;p,q)&=&\left(\frac{p}{q}\right)_J\exp\left(-

1314: i\frac{\pi}{4}\left[\left(q-1\right)+2\bar

1315: 2_q^3\frac{p}{q}((2n-q)\bar

1316: p_q)^2\right]\right) ,\\

1317: \Phi_{{\rm diffr}}(n;p,q)&=&\left(\frac{p}{q}\right)_J\exp\left(+

1318: i\frac{\pi}{4}\left[\left(q-1\right)+2\bar

1319: 2_q^3\frac{p}{q}((2n+q)\bar p_q)^2\right]\right).

1320: \end{eqnarray*}

1321: 

1322: \medskip

1323: 

1324: $p$ odd, $q$ even:

1325: \begin{eqnarray*}

1326: \Phi_{{\rm disp}}(n;p,q)&=&\left(\frac{q}{p}\right)_J\exp\left(-

1327: i\frac{\pi}{4}\left[-p+\frac{p}{q}((2n-q)\bar

1328: p_q)^2\right]\right) ,\\

1329: \Phi_{{\rm diffr}}(n;p,q)&=&\left(\frac{q}{p}\right)_J\exp\left(+

1330: i\frac{\pi}{4}\left[-p+\frac{p}{q}((2n+q)\bar p_q)^2\right]\right).

1331: \end{eqnarray*}

1332: 

1333: 

1334: 

1335: \begin{thebibliography}{0}

1336: 

1337: %...........................................................REF 1

1338: \bibitem{hft} H.F. Talbot,

1339: % {\em Facts related to optical sciences: IV},

1340:   Phil. Mag. {\bf 9}, 401-407 (1836). %1

1341: 

1342: 

1343: %...........................................................REF 1B

1344: \bibitem{Rayleigh81} Lord Rayleigh,

1345: %{\em On copying diffraction-gratings, and on some phenomena connected therewith},

1346:   Phil. Mag. {\bf 11}, 196-205 (1881).

1347: 

1348: %...........................................................REF 2

1349: \bibitem{pator} An extensive review is given by K. Patorski,

1350: % {\em The self-imaging phenomenon and its applications},

1351:  Prog. Opt. XXVII,  1-108 (1989).

1352: 

1353: 

1354: %...........................................................REF 3

1355: \bibitem{ref1} M.V. Berry and S. Klein,

1356: % {\em Integer, fractional and fractal Talbot effects},

1357: J. Mod. Opt. {\bf 43}, 2139-2164 (1996).

1358: %A. Author, \textit{Book title} (Publisher, address, year).

1359: 

1360: \bibitem{primer} J.S. Walker, {\em A Primer on Wavelets and their

1361: Scientific Applications} (Chapman \& Hall, CRC Press, 1999).

1362: 

1363: \bibitem{arneodo88} A. Arneodo, G. Grasseau, M. Holschneider,

1364:  %{\em Wavelet transform of multifractals},

1365:  Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 61}, 2281

1366: (1988); E. Freysz, B. Pouligny, F. Argoul, A. Arneodo,

1367: % {\em Optical wavelet transform of fractal aggregates},

1368:   Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 64},

1369: 745 (1990); F. Argoul, A. Arneodo, J. Elezgaray, G. Grasseau, R.

1370: Murenzi,

1371: %{\em Wavelet analysis of the self-similarity of

1372: %diffusion-limited aggregates and electrodeposition clusters},

1373:  Phys.

1374: Rev. {\bf A41}, 5537 (1990).

1375: 

1376: %.........................................................REF 4

1377: \bibitem{agr} G.P. Agrawal, {\em Nonlinear Fiber Optics} (Second Ed., Academic Press, 1995).

1378: 

1379: 

1380: %..........................................................REF 5

1381: \bibitem{ref2} S. Matsutani and Y. \^Onishi,

1382: % {\em Wave-particle complementarity and reciprocity

1383: % of Gauss sums on Talbot effects},

1384: Found. Phys. Lett. {\bf 16}, 325 (2003); `` Wave-Particle

1385: Complementarity and Reciprocity of Gauss Sums on Talbot Effects '',

1386: math-ph/0207011.

1387: %talbot1.tex

1388: 

1389: 

1390: %...........................................................REF 6

1391: \bibitem{Trev1} J.P. Trevi\~no-Guti\'errez, {\em Propagation of Ultra-high Frequency Pulse Trains in Optical Fibers}

1392: (Graduate thesis at the Universidad de las Americas (in Spanish),

1393: Puebla, Mexico, (2004)).

1394: 

1395: 

1396: %\bibitem{ref3} V. Armitage and A. Rogers, {\em Gauss sums and quantum mechanics}, J. Phys. A \textbf{33}, 5993-6002 (2000).

1397: 

1398: 

1399: %...........................................................REF 7

1400: \bibitem{ref7} M. Berry, I. Marzoli, and W. Schleich,

1401:  %{\em Quantum carpets, carpets of light},

1402:  Phys. World, 33-44 (June 2001).

1403: %carpets.tex

1404: 

1405: %............................................................REF 8

1406: \bibitem{wor} G.W. Wornell and A.V. Oppenheim,

1407: %{\em Wavelet-based representations for a class of self-similar

1408: %signals with applications to fractal modulation},

1409:  IEEE Trans.

1410: Inform. Theory {\bf 38}, 785-800 (1992).

1411: 

1412: 

1413: %............................................................REF 9

1414: \bibitem{stas} W.J. Staszewski and K. Worden,

1415: %{\em Wavelet analysis of time series: Coherent structures, chaos and

1416: %noise},

1417:  Int. J. Bif. Chaos {\bf 3}, 455 (1999).

1418: 

1419: \bibitem{BJOA04} M.V. Berry,

1420: %{\em The electric and magnetic polarization singularities of paraxial waves},

1421: J. Opt. {\bf A6}, 475-481 (2004).

1422: 

1423: \bibitem{Mallat92} S. Mallat and W.L. Hwang,

1424: %{\em Singularity detection and processing with wavelets},

1425: IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory {\bf 38}, 617-643 (1992).

1426: 

1427: \bibitem{be81} B.C. Berndt and R.J. Evans,

1428: %{\em The determination of Gauss sums},

1429: Bull. Am. Math. Soc. {\bf 5}, 107 (1981).

1430: 

1431: \bibitem{hb80} J.H. Hannay and M.V. Berry,

1432: %{\em Quantization of

1433: %linear maps on a torus - Fresnel diffraction by a periodic grating},

1434: Physica {\bf D1}, 267 (1980).

1435: 

1436: \bibitem{koblitz} N. Koblitz, {\em A Course in Number Theory and Cryptography}

1437: (2nd Ed. Springer Verlag, 1994).

1438: 

1439: %O. Crasser, H. Mack and W.P. Schleich,

1440: %{\em Could Fresnel optics be quantum mechanics in phase space ?}

1441: %Fluct. and Noise Lett. {\bf 4}, L43 (2004)

1442: 

1443: 

1444: %\bibitem{1} J. Callaway, {\it Phys. Rev.} {\bf B35}, 8723 (1987).

1445: 

1446: %\bibitem{2} M. Tinkham, {\it Group Theory and Quantum Mechanics}

1447: %(McGraw-Hill, New York, 1964).

1448: 

1449: %\bibitem{3} T. Tel, in {\it Experimental Study and Characterization

1450: %of Chaos}, ed. Hao Bailin (World Scientific, Singapore, 1990),

1451: %p.~149.

1452: 

1453: %\bibitem{4} P. P. Edwards, in {\it Superconductivity and

1454: % --- Proc. Taiwan Int. Symp. on Superconductivity},

1455: %ed.~P. T. Wu {\it et al.} (World Scientific, Singapore, 1989), pp.~29--35.

1456: 

1457: %\bibitem{a5} W. J. Johnson, Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison, 1968.

1458: 

1459: %\bibitem{6} P. F. Marteau and H. D. I. Arbabanel, ``Noise reduction in

1460: %chaotic time series using scaled probabilistic methods'',

1461: %UCSD/INLS preprint, October 1990.

1462: 

1463: %\bibitem{7} J. I. Katz, ``The Ptolemaic Gamma-Ray Burst Universe '',

1464: %astro-ph/9204003.

1465: \end{thebibliography}

1466: 

1467: \newpage

1468: \centerline{{\bf Figure captions}}

1469: 

1470: \bigskip

1471: 

1472: 

1473: \noindent {\bf FIG. 1}: Image of a Ronchi grating as obtained on a

1474: photographic plate located at the Talbot distance $z_T=28.4$ cm.

1475: This and many similar images have been obtained in the graduate work

1476: of Trevi\~no-Guti\'errez\cite{Trev1} in which a He-Ne laser working

1477: at its usual wavelength $\lambda =632.8$ nm has been used.

1478: 

1479: \medskip

1480: 

1481: \noindent {\bf FIG. 2}: Computer simulation of $|A(\zeta, \tau)|^2$

1482: of a $N=12\, , \sigma _0=1.5$ supergaussian pulse train as given in

1483: Eq.~(\ref{superG}) in a linear fiber characterized by the

1484: Schr\"odinger-like dispersion relation given in

1485: Eq.~(\ref{eq:prop4}).

1486: 

1487: \medskip

1488: 

1489: \noindent {\bf FIG. 3}: (a) The fractal Talbot light intensity

1490: $|\Psi _{\rm p}|^2$ at $\zeta =144/377$ and (b) the plot of the

1491: logarithmic variance of its wavelet coefficients

1492: (Eq.~(\ref{wvl_2})). The line of negative slope of the latter

1493: semilog plot indicates fractal behaviour of the diffraction

1494: wavefield as we expected. The fractal coefficient is given by the

1495: slope and its calculated value is $\gamma _f$.

1496: 

1497: 

1498: \medskip

1499: 

1500: \noindent {\bf FIG. 4}: Snapshot of the dispersed supergaussian

1501: pulse for $N=12$ at $\zeta =144/377$ (close to the Golden Mean

1502: $\zeta _G =3/2-\sqrt{5}/2$).

1503: The log variance plot is monotonically decreasing %without any local maximum and

1504: %only

1505: displaying a plateau indicating a nonfractal behaviour of the $N=12$

1506: supergaussian pulse train.

1507: 

1508: \medskip

1509: 

1510: \noindent {\bf FIG. 5}: The wavelet transform of the intensity

1511: $|\Psi _{{\rm p}}|^2$ at $\zeta =144/377$ for (a) the unit cell and

1512: (b) half-period displaced grating unit cell. There is no difference

1513: because the square modulus is plotted.

1514: %and its fractal coefficient $\beta _F$.

1515: 

1516: \medskip

1517: 

1518: \noindent {\bf FIG. 6}: Wavelet representations of: (a) the squared

1519: modulus of the amplitude and (b) phase of the Talbot diffraction

1520: field for fixed $\zeta = 144/377$ and a displaced unit cell.

1521: 

1522: \medskip

1523: 

1524: %FIG. 7: The wavelet transform of (a) the amplitude $A$ at $\zeta

1525: %=144/377$ and (b) the intensity of a N=12 supergaussian pulse in the

1526: %unit cell.

1527: %and its fractal coefficient $\beta _F$.

1528: 

1529: \medskip

1530: 

1531: \noindent {\bf FIG. 7}: Wavelet representations of the (a) amplitude

1532: and (b) phase of the Talbot dispersed supergaussian field ($N=12$)

1533: for $\zeta = 144/377$.

1534: 

1535: 

1536: 

1537: \end{document}

1538: \bigodot

1539: