1: %% ****** Start of file slactemplate.tex ****** %
2: %%
3: %%
4: %% This file is part of the APS files in the REVTeX 4 distribution.
5: %% Version 4.0 of REVTeX, August 2001
6: %%
7: %%
8: %% Copyright (c) 2001 The American Physical Society.
9: %%
10: %% See the REVTeX 4 README file for restrictions and more information.
11: %%
12: %
13: % This is a template for producing manuscripts for use with REVTEX 4.0
14: % Copy this file to another name and then work on that file.
15: % That way, you always have this original template file to use.
16: %
17: \documentclass[slac_one]{revtex4}
18: \usepackage{graphicx}
19: \usepackage{fancyhdr}
20: \pagestyle{fancy}
21: \fancyhead{} % clear all fields
22: \fancyfoot{} % clear all fields
23: %\fancyhead[C]{\it {2005 International Linear Collider Workshop -
24: %Stanford U.S.A.}}
25:
26: %%%%Footnote PSN number below
27: \fancyfoot[LE,LO]{0829}
28: %%%%
29: \renewcommand{\headrulewidth}{0pt}
30: \renewcommand{\footrulewidth}{0pt}
31: \renewcommand{\sfdefault}{phv}
32: \renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{1.2}
33: \setlength{\textheight}{235mm}
34: \setlength{\textwidth}{178mm}%{170mm}
35: \setlength{\topmargin}{-20mm}
36:
37: \begin{document}
38:
39: %Title of paper
40: \title{{\small{2005 International Linear Collider Workshop - Stanford,
41: U.S.A.}}\\ %% Please keep this conference title here
42: \vspace{12pt}
43: Spatial Resolution of a Micromegas-TPC Using the Charge Dispersion Signal} %% Paper title goes here
44:
45: % Repeat the \author .. \affiliation etc. as needed
46: %
47: % \affiliation command applies to all authors since the last
48: % \affiliation command. The \affiliation command should follow the
49: % other information
50: %
51:
52: \author{A.~Bellerive, K.~Boudjemline, R.~Carnegie, M.~Dixit, J.~Miyamoto,
53: % H. Mes,
54: E.~Neuheimer, A.~Rankin, E.~Rollin, K.~Sachs}
55: \affiliation{Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada}
56:
57: \author{J.-P. Martin}
58: \affiliation{University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada}
59:
60: \author{V. Lepeltier}
61: \affiliation{LAL, Orsay, France}
62:
63: \author{P. Colas, A. Giganon, I. Giomataris}
64: \affiliation{CEA, Saclay, France}
65:
66: \begin{abstract}
67: \setlength{\unitlength}{1mm}
68: \begin{picture}(0,0)
69: \put(120,88){\parbox[t]{5cm}{\normalsize
70: Carleton Phys0508\\
71: DAPNIA 05-232 \\ LAL 05-99}}
72: \end{picture}%
73: The Time Projection Chamber (TPC) for the International Linear Collider will
74: need to measure about 200 track points with a resolution close to 100 $\mu$m. A
75: Micro Pattern Gas Detector (MPGD) readout TPC could achieve the desired
76: resolution with existing techniques using sub-millimeter width pads at the
77: expense of a large increase in the detector cost and complexity. We have
78: recently applied a new MPGD readout concept of charge dispersion to a
79: prototype GEM-TPC
80: and demonstrated the feasibility of achieving good resolution with pads
81: similar in width to the ones used for the proportional wire TPC. The charge dispersion
82: studies were repeated with a Micromegas
83: TPC amplification stage. We present here our first results on the Micromegas-TPC
84: resolution with charge dispersion. The TPC resolution with the Micromegas
85: readout is compared to our earlier GEM results and to the resolution expected
86: from electron statistics and transverse diffusion in a gaseous TPC.
87: \end{abstract}
88:
89: %\maketitle must follow title, authors, abstract
90: \maketitle
91:
92: \thispagestyle{fancy}
93:
94: % body of paper here - Use proper section commands
95: % References should be done using the \cite, \ref, and \label commands
96: % Put \label in argument of \section for cross-referencing
97: %\section{\label{}}
98:
99: \section{INTRODUCTION} % Section title should be in all capitals.
100: The Time Projection Chamber (TPC) for the future International Linear Collider
101: will need to measure about 200 track points with a resolution of better than 100
102: $ \mu$m. The resolution goal, close to the fundamental limit from ionization
103: electron statistics and transverse diffusion in the gas, is nearly two times better
104: than what has been achieved by conventional wire/pad TPCs. A TPC with a Micro
105: Pattern Gas Detector (MPGD) readout could, in principle, reach the target
106: resolution. However, it may require sub-millimeter wide pads resulting in a
107: large increase in the number of electronics channels, detector cost and
108: complexity over conventional TPCs.
109:
110: We have recently developed a new concept of position sensing from charge
111: dispersion in MPGDs with a resistive anode \cite{Ref1}. With charge dispersion
112: wide readout pads similar in width to the ones used with proportional
113: wire/cathode pad TPCs can be used without sacrificing resolution. This was
114: demonstrated recently with cosmic ray tracks for a TPC read out with a GEM
115: with a resistive anode \cite{Ref2}. We present here new results on the cosmic
116: ray track resolution of a TPC read out with a Micromegas instrumented for charge
117: dispersion with a resistive
118: anode. The GEM and the Micromegas TPC resolution measurements made with the
119: resistive readout are compared to our earlier GEM-TPC resolution results with a
120: conventional readout \cite{Ref3} and to the expected resolution from transverse
121: diffusion and ionization electron statistics in a gaseous TPC.
122:
123:
124:
125: \section{MEASUREMENT SETUP AND ANALYSIS}
126:
127: A small 15 cm drift length test TPC used earlier with a conventional
128: direct charge GEM readout \cite{Ref3} was modified for charge dispersion
129: studies. The readout endcap was modified such that it could accommodate either a
130: GEM or a Micromegas with a resistive anode \cite{Ref2} readout system. The
131: gas used, Ar:CO$_2$/90:10, was chosen to simulate the reduced transverse diffusion
132: conditions of a TPC in a magnetic field. Charge signals on 60 pads, 2 mm
133: x 6 mm each (see Figure \ref{Simulation}), were read out using Aleph wire TPC
134: preamplifiers and digitized directly using 200 MHz custom built 8 bit FADCs.
135:
136: % If in two-column mode, this environment will change to single-column
137: % format so that long equations can be displayed. Use
138: % sparingly.
139: %\begin{widetext}
140: % put long equation here
141: %\end{widetext}
142:
143: \begin{figure*}[t]
144: \centering
145: \includegraphics[width=175mm]{ev2874.eps}
146: \caption{Pad layout and observed signals for a cosmic ray track in a GEM-TPC
147: with a resistive anode readout. Also shown are simulated signals for the central
148: row of pads. Detailed model simulation includes longitudinal and transverse
149: diffusion, gas gain, detector pulse formation, charge dispersion on a resistive anode and
150: preamplifier rise and fall time effects.} \label{Simulation}
151: \end{figure*}
152:
153: \begin{figure*}[t]
154: \centering
155: \includegraphics[width=85mm]{md_prf_gem.eps}
156: \includegraphics[width=85mm]{md_prf_mm.eps}
157: \caption{Examples of the pad response function (PRF). The PRFs were determined
158: from a subset of the cosmic ray data set. The PRF peak for
159: longer drift distances is lower due to Z dependent normalization. Compared to the GEM, the
160: PRF width for the Micromegas
161: is narrower due to the use of a higher surface resistivity anode and smaller diffusion after gain.}
162: \label{PRFs}
163: \end{figure*}
164:
165: Track reconstruction techniques used for the conventional direct charge
166: GEM-TPC readout \cite{Ref3} cannot be used for the resistive anode MPGD
167: readout since non charge collecting pads nearby also have measurable signals.
168: Not only the observed amplitude, but also the pulse shape depends on the relative
169: location of the pad
170: with respect to the track path. In theory, a first principle determination
171: of the track PRF is possible. For the present, we have chosen to determine
172: the PRF empirically from the internal consistency of cosmic ray track data.
173:
174: For the purpose of analysis, the cosmic ray data were divided into two parts;
175: one used for calibration and the other for resolution studies. We use the
176: calibration data set to determine the PRF associated with the pads in a given
177: row. The PRFs were determined for 15 seperate 1 cm wide regions in drift
178: distance. Figure \ref{PRFs} shows examples of PRFs for the GEM and the Micromegas
179: readout.
180: The measured PRFs have been parameterized with a ratio of two symmetric 4th
181: order polynomials:
182: \begin{equation}
183: PRF(x,\Gamma,\Delta,a,b ) = \frac{1 + a_2 x^2 + a_4 x^4}{1 + b_2 x^2 + b_4 x^4} \; ,
184: \label{eq:prf}
185: \end{equation}
186: The coefficients of the two 4th order polynomials $a_2$ and $a_4$, and $b_2$ and $b_4$ can
187: be expressed in terms of the FWHM $\Gamma$, the base width $\Delta$ of the
188: PRF, and two scale defining parameters a and b.
189:
190: The track fitting parameters $x_0$ and $\phi$ are
191: determined by fitting the PRF to the pad amplitudes for the full event by
192: $\chi^2$ minimization.
193: The position in a row
194: $x_{\rm row}$ is determined from a seperate one-parameter track fit
195: to this
196: row only using the known track angle $\phi$. Figure \ref{bias}
197: shows examples of bias in position determination with GEMs and Micromegas. The bias is
198: the mean difference $x_{\rm row}-x_{\rm track}$ as a function of
199: $x_{\rm track} = x_0 + \tan{\phi}*y_{\rm row}$, where $y_{\rm row}$ is
200: the $y$ position of the row. A bias of up to 150 $\mu$m is observed
201: which may be attributed to a non-uniform RC constant due to inhomogeneities
202: in the gap size and the resistivity of the foil.
203: However, this bias is due to geometry only and can easily be corrected.
204: Figure \ref{bias} also shows the remaining bias after correction,
205: which is negligible.
206:
207: \begin{figure*}[t]
208: \centering
209: \includegraphics[width=85mm]{bias_gem.eps}
210: \includegraphics[width=85mm]{bias_mm.eps}
211: \caption{Bias corrections for pads in row 4 for the GEM and the Micromegas resistive anode TPC cosmic ray data.
212: The lower set of figures show the remaining bias after correction.}\label{bias}
213: \end{figure*}
214: \begin{figure*}[t]
215: \centering
216: \includegraphics[width=57mm]{tpc1b.eps}
217: \includegraphics[width=57mm]{tpc1c.eps}
218: \includegraphics[width=57mm]{tpc1d.eps}
219: \caption{Charge dispersion improves TPC resolution over that from direct charge
220: for low diffusion gases like Ar:CO$_2$ with limited charge sharing between pads.
221: Compared to direct charge readout, resistive readout gives better resolution for
222: the GEM and for the Micromegas both.}\label{Res1}
223: \end{figure*}
224:
225:
226: Figure~\ref{Res1} shows the measured resolution for Ar:CO$_2$/90:10.
227: With GEMs we have results with and without the resistive anode; for Micromegas we
228: have results with the resistive anode only. The resolution is fitted
229: to the function:
230: \begin{equation}
231: s = \sqrt{ s_0^2 + C_{\rm D}^2/N_{\rm eff} \ast z} \; ,\label{eq:reso}
232: \end{equation}
233: where $s_0$ is the resolution at zero drift distance $z$. Here $C_D$ is the
234: diffusion constant and
235: $N_{\rm eff}$ is the effective number of track ionization electrons over the length of a pad.
236: $N_{\rm eff}$ is not the average number of electrons. Rather, it is given by:
237: $N_{\rm eff} ={1/ \langle \sqrt{1/N} \rangle}^2$,
238: where N is the number of electrons following the Landau distribution. N is determined
239: from the measured pad-signal amplitudes scaled using the most probable number of track
240: ionization electrons obtained from simulation.
241:
242: Electronic noise and remaining systematic effects contribute to the constant
243: term $s_0$. The constant term $s_0$ is about 75$ \mu$m for the resistive
244: readout for both the GEM and the Micromegas. It can be compared to the larger
245: 97$ \mu$m constant term for the normal GEM readout.
246:
247: As shown in Figure \ref{Res1}, the TPC resolution obtained with the resistive
248: anode readout for both the GEM and the Micromegas is better than our previous
249: result with a conventional GEM readout \cite{Ref3}, where at long drift distance
250: the observed resolution
251: was about 40\% worse than expected.
252: Apart from the constant term, the dependence of resolution on drift distance
253: with the resistive readout
254: follows the expectation from transverse diffusion in the gas and electron statistics.
255:
256:
257:
258: \section{SUMMARY AND OUTLOOK}
259:
260: In summary, the charge dispersion on a resistive anode improves the MPGD-TPC
261: resolution significantly over that achievable with conventional direct charge
262: readout for 2 mm wide pads. Bias errors due to RC inhomogeneities can be
263: corrected. With no magnetic field, the measured dependence of resolution on
264: drift distance follows the behavior expected from transverse diffusion in
265: the gas.
266:
267:
268: % If you have acknowledgments, this puts in the proper section head.
269: \begin{acknowledgments}
270: We wish to thank Ron Settles for lending us the ALEPH wire TPC
271: amplifiers used in these measurements.
272: The research was supported by a project grant from the
273: Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada and the Ontario Premier's
274: Research Excellence Award (IPREA).
275: \end{acknowledgments}
276:
277:
278: \begin{thebibliography}{9} % Use for 1-9 references
279: %\begin{thebibliography}{99} % Use for 10-99 references
280:
281: \bibitem{Ref1}
282: M.S.Dixit, J. Dubeau, J.-P.Martin, and K.Sachs,
283: ``Position sensing from charge dispersion in micro-pattern gas detectors with a resistive anode'',
284: Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A518 (2004) 721.
285:
286: \bibitem{Ref2}
287: R.K.Carnegie, M.S.Dixit, H.Mes, E.Neuheimer, A.Rankin, K.Sachs and
288: J.-P.Martin, ``1st Tracking Experience for MPGD TPC readout with Charge
289: Dispersion on a Resistive Anode'', International Conference on Linear
290: e$^+$e$^-$ Colliders, LCWS2004, Paris (2004)
291:
292: \bibitem{Ref3}
293: R.K.Carnegie, M.S.Dixit, J.Dubeau, D.Karlen, J.-P.Martin, H.Mes, and K.Sachs,
294: ``Resolution studies of cosmic ray tracks in a TPC with GEM readout'',
295: Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, A538 (2004) 372.
296:
297:
298:
299:
300:
301:
302: \end{thebibliography}
303:
304:
305: \end{document}
306: %\fancyhead[C]{\it {XXII Texas Symposium on Relativistic Astrophysics at Stanford University,
307: %December 13-19, 2004}}
308: