1: % Converted from Microsoft Word to LaTeX

2: % by Chikrii Softlab Word2TeX converter (version 3.0)

3: % Copyright (C) 1999-2003 Chikrii Softlab. All rights reserved.

4: % http://www.chikrii.com

5: % mailto: info@chikrii.com

6: % License: CSL#0022AB

7: 

8: \documentclass{article}

9: \usepackage{latexsym}

10: \usepackage{graphicx}

11: \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{0cm}

12: \setlength{\evensidemargin}{0cm}

13: %\linespread{1.6}

14: \textwidth 154truemm    

15: \textheight 232truemm   

16: 

17: \begin{document}

18: \begin{center}

19: \textbf{\LARGE Instantaneous Interaction between Charged Particles}

20: \end{center}

21: \begin{large}

22: \vspace{.3cm}

23: \begin{center}

24: W. Engelhardt\footnote{ Home address: Fasaneriestrasse 8, D-80636 

25: M\"{u}nchen, Germany\par Electronic address: 

26: wolfgangw.engelhardt@t-online.de}, retired from:

27: \end{center}

28: 

29: \begin{center}

30: Max-Planck-Institut f\"{u}r Plasmaphysik, D-85741 Garching, Germany

31: \end{center}

32: \vspace{1. cm} 

33: 

34: \noindent \textbf{Abstract} \hspace{.1cm} The interaction between charged particles through 

35: quasi-static fields must occur instantaneously; otherwise a violation of the 

36: energy principle would occur. As a consequence, the instantaneous 

37: transmission of both energy and information over macroscopic distances is 

38: feasible by using the quasi-static fields which are predicted by Maxwell's 

39: equations.

40: \vspace{1. cm} 

41: 

42: \noindent

43: \textbf{P.A.C.S.:} 41.20.Cv, 41.20.Gz, 41.20.Jb

44: \vspace{1. cm} 

45: 

46: \noindent

47: \textbf{Keywords:}

48: 

49: \begin{itemize}

50: \item Classical electrodynamics

51: \item Quasi-static electromagnetic fields

52: \item Transmission of information

53: \end{itemize}

54: \vspace{1. cm} 

55: 

56: \noindent

57: \textbf{I Introduction}

58: 

59: \noindent

60: Since the Special Theory of Relativity has become a constitutive part of 

61: physics, it is commonly believed that the transmission of energy or 

62: information between distant locations can only occur with the maximal speed 

63: of light. Maxwell's equations are usually formulated as wave equations for 

64: the scalar and vector potentials suggesting (in Lorenz gauge) that the 

65: influence of a source propagates with finite speed to a field point where an 

66: observer may be placed. This conception is undoubtedly true as far as 

67: electromagnetic waves are concerned. There exists, however, a further method 

68: of energy transmission effected by quasi-static fields which are also 

69: predicted by Maxwell's theory. In contrast to the radiation fields, they 

70: decay in the far field zone inversely proportional to the third power of the 

71: distance from the sources so that the range of transmission is much shorter 

72: than in case of travelling waves. As far as the magnetic quasi-static fields 

73: are concerned, they have a most important application for the transmission 

74: of energy in transformers.

75: 

76: If one drops the displacement current in Maxwell's equations, the 

77: quasi-static fields can be calculated by application of Helmholtz's 

78: decomposition theorem for vector fields to yield [1]:

79: \begin{equation}

80: \label{eq1}

81: \vec {E}\left( {\vec {x},\,t} \right)=\int\!\!\!\int\!\!\!\int {\left[ {\rho 

82: \left( {\vec {x}',\,t} \right)\left( {\vec {x}-\vec {x}'} 

83: \right)-\frac{1}{\,4\pi \,c}\frac{\partial \vec {B}\left( {\vec {x}',\,t} 

84: \right)}{\partial t}\times \left( {\vec {x}-\vec {x}'} \right)} 

85: \right]\frac{d^3x'}{\left| {\vec {x}-\vec {x}'} \right|^3}} \,

86: \end{equation}

87: \begin{equation}

88: \label{eq2}

89: \vec {B}\left( {\vec {x},\,t} \right)=\int\!\!\!\int\!\!\!\int {\left[ 

90: {\frac{1}{c}\vec {j}\left( {\vec {x}',\,t} \right)\times \left( {\vec 

91: {x}-\vec {x}'} \right)} \right]\frac{d^3x'}{\,\left| {\vec {x}-\vec {x}'} 

92: \right|^3}} \,

93: \end{equation}

94: Inclusion of the displacement current would lead to wave equations in 

95: integral formulation. This results, however, in certain inconsistencies 

96: which were recognized in [2] and worked out further in [3].

97: 

98: In this note we show that the transmission of energy by quasi-static fields 

99: must occur instantaneously as suggested by (\ref{eq1}) and (\ref{eq2}); otherwise the energy 

100: principle would be violated. In Sect. II we discuss the interaction of two 

101: charges, and in Sect. III the interaction of two current loops. In both 

102: cases we come to the conclusion that energy can be transmitted 

103: instantaneously. 

104: \vspace{1. cm} 

105: 

106: \noindent

107: \textbf{II Interaction of two charges coupled by the Coulomb field}

108: 

109: \noindent

110: Let us consider two positive charges which are placed at a distance $R$. In 

111: Fig. 1 charge B is rigidly attached to a heavy wall, whereas charge A can be 

112: moved by a mechanical force along a distance $r$. When charge A is pushed 

113: against B, a force must be applied against the repulsive electric force, and 

114: a certain amount of potential energy is invested. Since charge A moves in a 

115: conservative potential which does not vary in time, the invested work is 

116: recovered when the charge returns to its initial position. 

117: 

118: \begin{figure}[htbp]

119: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=5.02in,height=2.0in]{inst1.eps}}

120: \caption{Interaction of two charges (charge B rigidly attached)}

121: \label{fig1}

122: \end{figure}

123: 

124: Next we consider Fig. 2 where charge B is attached to a flexible spring. 

125: Initially the spring is somewhat compressed due to the repulsive force 

126: between the charges. When charge A is pushed against B, the spring is 

127: compressed even more, and, because of its inertia, charge B will oscillate 

128: after charge A has returned to its initial position. 

129: 

130: \begin{figure}[htbp]

131: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=4.89in,height=1.65in]{inst2.eps}}

132: \caption{Interaction of two charges (charge B elastically attached)}

133: \label{fig2}

134: \end{figure}

135: 

136: Obviously, energy has been transmitted from A to B through the quasi-static 

137: electric field. The oscillation energy must have been supplied by the 

138: mechanical force acting on charge A. This is easily explained, since charge 

139: A was moving in a conservative potential which was, however, not constant in 

140: time, since charge B was yielding to the increased force due to its elastic 

141: fixture. If one carries out the exact calculation assuming that the charges 

142: were coupled by the Coulomb force:

143: \begin{equation}

144: \label{eq3}

145: F\left( t \right)=\frac{q_A {\kern 1pt}q_B }{4\pi \,\varepsilon _0 R^2\left( 

146: t \right)}

147: \end{equation}

148: one finds, of course, that the energy appearing in the oscillation of charge 

149: B was exactly supplied by the mechanical force which moved charge A.

150: 

151: In this seemingly trivial example we have assumed in (\ref{eq3}) that both charges 

152: are coupled instantaneously. Let us now assume that a time $R 

153: \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {R c}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} c$ 

154: elapses before charge B can ``realize'' that charge A is moving. If the 

155: cyclic motion of charge A is completed within a short time $\tau <R 

156: \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {R c}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} c$, 

157: charge B cannot react during the cycle so that charge A still moves in a 

158: constant conservative potential like in Fig. 1. The mechanical force does 

159: not produce any total work during the cycle, but after a delay time $R 

160: \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {R c}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} c$ 

161: charge B will start to oscillate. Its energy comes out of nothing as a 

162: consequence of our assumption that the action of charge A on B is delayed. 

163: As long as we believe in the conservation of energy we must conclude that 

164: the coupling is determined by (\ref{eq3}), and the energy transfer occurred 

165: instantaneously. 

166: 

167: One might argue that the acceleration of charge A produced a wave containing 

168: energy which was transported to B at finite velocity. It is, of course, true 

169: that the acceleration of charges produces waves according to Maxwell's 

170: theory. This holds, however, in both cases of Fig. 1 and Fig. 2. It is 

171: entirely independent of charge B being rigidly or elastically attached to 

172: the wall. In both cases the mechanical force must supply a small amount of 

173: energy which is carried away by the wave and must be accounted for in the 

174: energy balance. Furthermore, the wave travels perpendicular to the 

175: acceleration and does not reach charge B which is placed in line with the 

176: acceleration vector. Thus, the production of waves cannot explain the 

177: missing energy source in case of Fig. 2, when delayed action is postulated. 

178: 

179: \vspace{1. cm} 

180: 

181: \noindent \textbf{III Interaction of two current loops}

182: 

183: \noindent

184: All the power produced by the electric companies and transmitted to the 

185: consumers passes several times through transformers. In this Section we show 

186: that the transmission from the primary to the secondary circuits must occur 

187: instantaneously as described by Maxwell's equations.

188: 

189: \begin{figure}[htbp]

190: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=4.60in,height=1.90in]{inst3.eps}}

191: \caption{Interaction of two current loops}

192: \label{fig3}

193: \end{figure}

194: 

195: In principle, a transformer consists of two current loops as sketched in 

196: Fig. 3. Applying Faraday's law of induction and the laws of Amp\`{e}re and 

197: Ohm one has the transformer equations [4]:

198: \begin{equation}

199: \label{eq4}

200: U=L_1 \frac{dI_1 }{dt}+M\frac{dI_2 }{dt}

201: \end{equation}

202: \begin{equation}

203: \label{eq5}

204: 0=L_2 \frac{dI_2 }{dt}+M\frac{dI_1 }{dt}+R\,I_2 

205: \end{equation}

206: where $L_{1,{\kern 1pt}2} $ are the self-inductances of the loops and $M$ is 

207: the coupling inductance. When there is no resistive load in the secondary 

208: circuit ($R=0)$, it follows from (\ref{eq5}): $L_2 \,I_2 +M\,I_1 =0$ for alternating 

209: currents. $I_1 $ and $I_2 $ are out of phase by 180 degrees. From (\ref{eq4}) 

210: follows then that there is a phase difference of 90 degrees between the 

211: applied voltage $U$ and the current $I_1 $. The power $U\,I_1 $ injected 

212: into the primary circuit oscillates forth and back so that no energy is 

213: deposited into the (ideal) transformer on average. If the secondary 

214: resistance is finite, a phase shift occurs which may be calculated by 

215: solving the differential equations (\ref{eq4}) and (\ref{eq5}). As a result the time 

216: integral $\int {U\,I_1 {\kern 1pt}dt} $ does not vanish anymore, but 

217: supplies the energy $\int {R\,I_2^2 \,dt} $ which is dissipated in the 

218: secondary circuit. Energy is obviously transmitted over the distance between 

219: the loops. Since in (4, 5) Maxwell's displacement current was neglected, the 

220: coupling of the loops was assumed to be instantaneous which holds then also 

221: for the energy transfer. In industrial transformers the distance between 

222: primary and secondary circuit is chosen to be very small, but one could 

223: arrange the two loops of Fig. 3 on a common axis at an appreciable distance 

224: to measure the time of transmission.

225: 

226: If we would assume that it takes some time for the magnetic field produced 

227: in loop 1 to travel to loop 2, induce a current there which in turn produces 

228: a magnetic field travelling back to loop 1, one would have a phase shift of 

229: more than 90 degrees between voltage and current in the primary circuit, 

230: even in the case of vanishing resistance ($R=0)$. The integral $\int {U\,I_1 

231: {\kern 1pt}dt} $ would not be zero on average, and energy would be lost in 

232: the ideal transformer which is supposed to contain only superconducting 

233: loops. As in the previous Section, we must conclude that the coupling in a 

234: transformer cannot be effected by an electromagnetic wave, but must be 

235: caused by quasi-static instantaneous fields, in order to avoid a clash with 

236: the energy principle. The quasi-static magnetic field can apparently be used 

237: like the quasi-static electric field to transmit information faster than 

238: light. 

239: \vspace{1. cm} 

240: \newpage

241: \noindent

242: \textbf{IV Conclusion}

243: 

244: \noindent

245: In two simple examples it was demonstrated that the coupling of electric 

246: charges and currents through quasi-static fields must occur instantaneously, 

247: in order to maintain the conservation of energy. In technical applications 

248: this kind of coupling is assumed anyway, but it is frequently thought that 

249: engineers just use a practical approximation, whereas the correct 

250: description requires inclusion of the displacement current. Our analysis 

251: shows that this is not the case. It proves that instantaneous transmission 

252: of information over macroscopic distances is possible in agreement with 

253: Maxwell's theory. The argument brought forward in Sect. II may also be 

254: applied to the mechanical force acting between the current loops of Fig. 3. 

255: It could be extended to the gravitational force as well. 

256: \vspace{1. cm} 

257: \begin{thebibliography}{99}

258: \bibitem{ Jackson }

259: { J. D. Jackson, \textit{Classical Electrodynamics, }Second Edition, John Wiley {\&} Sons, Inc., New York (1975).}

260: \bibitem { Dunn } { D. A. Dunn, \textit{Models of Particles and Moving Media, }Academic Press, New York and London (1971). }

261: \bibitem{ Engelhardt } { W. Engelhardt, \textit{Gauge invariance in classical electrodynamics, }to appear in: Annales de la Fondation Louis de Broglie, Vol. 30 No. 2 (2005). }

262: \bibitem{ Becker } { R. Becker, F. Sauter, \textit{Theorie der Elektrizit\"{a}t, }Erster Band, B. G. Teubner Verlagsgesellschaft, Stuttgart (1962). }

263: 

264: \end{thebibliography}

265: 

266: \end{large}

267: \end{document}

268: 

269: