1: \documentclass[12pt]{article}

2: %\usepackage{fleqn, espcrc1,pstricks} 

3: \usepackage[dvips]{color}

4: \usepackage{mathtext}

5: %\usepackage[T2A]{fontenc}

6: \usepackage[koi8-r]{inputenc}

7: %\usepackage[russian]{babel}

8: %\usepackage{latexsym}

9: %\pagestyle{empty} 

10: \oddsidemargin 0mm

11: \evensidemargin 0mm

12: \topmargin -15mm

13: \textwidth 160mm 

14: \textheight 220mm 

15: %\pagestyle{plain}

16: %\pagenumbering{arabic}

17: % change this to the following line for use with LaTeX2.09

18: %\documentstyle[12pt,twoside,fleqn,espcrc1]{article}

19: %\documentstyle[12pt]{article}

20: % if you want to include PostScript figures

21: \usepackage{graphicx}

22: % if you have landscape tables

23: \usepackage[figuresright]{rotating}

24: %\usepackage{amstext}

25: %\usepackage{amsmath}

26: \usepackage{amssymb,eucal}

27: \usepackage{cite}

28: 

29: % put your own definitions here:

30: %   \newcommand{\cZ}{\cal{Z}}

31: %   \newtheorem{def}{Definition}[section]

32: %   ...

33: %\newcommand{\ttbs}{\char'134}

34: %\newcommand{\AmS}{{\protect\the\textfont2

35: %  A\kern-.1667em\lower.5ex\hbox{M}\kern-.125emS}}

36: \newcommand{\beq}{\begin{equation}}

37: \newcommand{\eeq}{\end{equation}}

38: \newcommand{\beqn}{\begin{eqnarray}}

39: \newcommand{\eeqn}{\end{eqnarray}}  

40: 

41: 

42: %\documentstyle[12pt,epsfig]{article}

43: %\setlength{\textwidth}{16.cm}

44: %\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{0.in}

45: %\setlength{\evensidemargin}{-0.25in}

46: %\setlength{\topmargin}{-0.5in}

47: %\setlength{\textheight}{24.0cm}

48: 

49: \date{}

50: \begin{document}

51: \title{Scintillator counters with multi-pixel avalanche 

52: photodiode  readout for the ND280 detector of the T2K experiment}

53: \author{O.~Mineev$^a$\thanks{Corresponding author.

54: {\it Email address:} oleg@inr.ru}, A.~Afanasjev$^a$, G.~Bondarenko$^b$,

55: V.~Golovin$^b$, E.~Gushchin$^a$,\\  

56: A.~Izmailov$^a$,  M.~Khabibullin$^a$, A.~Khotjantsev$^a$, Yu.~Kudenko$^a$, \\

57: Y.~Kurimoto$^c$, T.~Kutter$^d$, B.~Lubsandorzhiev$^a$, 

58: V.~Mayatski$^e$,  \\ 

59: Yu.~Musienko$^a$, T.~Nakaya$^c$,  T.~Nobuhara$^c$, B.A.J.~Shaibonov$^a$, \\

60:  A.~Shaikhiev$^a$,  M.~Taguchi$^c$,   N.~Yershov$^a$, M.~Yokoyama$^c$ \\ 

61:  {} \\

62: $^a${\it Institute for Nuclear Research RAS, 117312 Moscow, Russia} \\ 

63: $^b${\it Center of Perspective Technology and Apparatus,

64: 107076 Moscow, Russia} \\

65: $^c${\it Department of Physics, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan} \\

66: $^d${\it Department of Physics and Astronomy, Louisiana State University} \\

67: {\it Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803-4001, USA} \\

68: $^e${\it AO Uniplast, 600016 Vladimir, Russia}}

69: \maketitle

70: \begin{abstract} 

71: The Tokai--to--Kamioka (T2K) experiment is a second generation 

72: long baseline neutrino oscillation experiment which  aims at a sensitive 

73: search for the $\nu_e$ appearance. The main design

74: features of the T2K near neutrino detectors located at 280 m from the target are 

75: presented. Scintillator counters  developed for the T2K near detectors 

76: are described. Readout of the counters is provided via WLS fibers embedded into S--shape grooves 

77: in a scintillator and viewed from both ends by  multi--pixel avalanche

78: photodiodes operating in a limited Geiger mode. A description, operational

79: principles and the results of  tests of photosensors with a sensitive area of 

80: 1.1 mm$^2$ are presented. 

81: A time resolution of 1.5 ns, a spatial resolution of 9.9--12.4 cm, and 

82: a  MIP detection efficiency of  more than 99\% were obtained for scintillator 

83: detectors in a  beam test. 

84: \end{abstract}

85: ~\\

86: %{\it Key words}: neutrino detectors, scintillator/WLS counters, multi--pixel 

87: %avalanche photodiodes  \\

88: %{\it PACS:} 29.40.Wk; 29.40 Mc; 29.40.Wj

89: 

90: 

91: \section{Introduction}

92: The T2K project~\cite{t2k} is a second generation long baseline neutrino 

93: oscillation

94: experiment which will use a high intensity  off--axis neutrino beam produced 

95: by the JPARC 50 GeV (initially 40 GeV) proton beam. The first phase of the

96: T2K experiment   pursues two main goals: a sensitive 

97: measurement of ${\rm\theta}_{13}$  and  a more accurate determination of the 

98: parameters ${\rm sin^22\theta}_{23}$ and $\Delta m^2_{23}$ than any previous

99: experiment.

100: 

101: To achieve the physics goals, it is important to provide precise measurements 

102: of the neutrino beam properties, neutrino flux, spectrum and 

103: interaction cross sections. For these purposes, the near detector complex

104: (ND280~\cite{nd280})  will 

105: be built at the distance of 280 m from the target along the line between the average pion 

106: decay point and the Super-Kamiokande detector. In order to keep the systematics

107: uncertainties below the statistical error, the physics requirements for ND280, 

108: discussed in detail in Ref.~\cite{nd280}, can be briefly summarized as 

109: follows. The energy scale of the neutrino spectrum 

110: must

111: be understood at the 2\% level, and the neutrino flux should be monitored with 

112: better than 5\% accuracy. The  momentum resolution of muons from the 

113: charged current

114: quasi--elastic interactions should be less than 10\%, and the threshold for 

115: the

116: detection of the recoil protons  is required to be about 200~MeV/c. The 

117: $\nu_e$ fraction is to be measured with an uncertainty of better than 10\%.

118: The measurement of  the neutrino 

119: beam direction with precision much better than 1 mrad is expected to be 

120: provided by the

121: on--axis detector (neutrino monitor).

122: The off--axis ND280 is shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:nd280}

123: \begin{figure}[htb]

124: \centering\includegraphics[width=11cm,angle=0]{nd2.eps}   

125: \caption{The cutaway view of the T2K  near detector.}

126: \label{fig:nd280}

127: \end{figure}

128: and consists of the UA1 magnet operated with a magnetic field of 0.2 T, 

129: a Pi-Zero detector (POD), a tracking detector which includes  time projection 

130: chambers (TPC's) and fine grained scintillator detectors (FGD's), an 

131: electromagnetic calorimeter

132: (Ecal), and a side muon range detector (SMRD).

133: 

134:  The POD has been designed to be similar to the  

135:  MINER$\nu$A detector~\cite{minerva}.

136: It is installed in the upstream end of the magnet and 

137: optimized for measurement of the inclusive  $\pi^0$ production by 

138: $\nu_{\mu}$ on oxygen.  The POD consists of 76 tracking planes  composed of 

139: triangular polystyrene  scintillating bars (about $2\times 10^4$) alternating 

140: with 

141: thin (0.6 mm) lead foils. Each bar has a 3 cm base, 1.5 cm height and 

142: a central  hole for a WLS fiber.  Three TPC's will measure the 3--momenta of 

143: muons produced by charged current interactions in the detector  and will 

144: provide the 

145: most accurate measurements of the neutrino energy spectrum. The ND280 will 

146: contain two FGD's, each 

147: with dimensions $2\times 2\times 0.3$ m$^3$ resulting in a  total target mass 

148: of 1.2 tons.  

149: The first FGD will be an active scintillator detector, similar to the 

150: SciBar~\cite{scibar} detector of the K2K experiment~\cite{k2k}.

151: Each FGD layer  will

152: consist of 200 scintillator bars, and thirty layers will be  arranged 

153: in alternating vertical and horizontal layers perpendicular to the beam

154: direction.   The second FGD will consists of 

155: $x - y$ layers scintillator bars alternating with 3 cm thick layers of passive

156: water.  The Ecal surrounds the POD and 

157: tracking region and consists of 15 layers, each

158: of which has one sheet of 3 mm Pb alloy and one layer of 1 cm thick $\times$ 

159: 5 cm wide 

160: plastic scintillator bars (with signal readout by WLS fibers). Interior to this

161: section is the preradiator section, where each of the 3 layers consists of a

162: lead alloy sheet backed by 3 layers of scintillator bars. Air gaps in the 

163: UA1 magnet will be instrumented with plastic scintillator to measure the ranges

164: of muons which escape at large angles with respect to the neutrino 

165: beam and which can not be measured by the TPC's. The active component of the 

166: SMRD will use scintillators  with wavelength shifting fibers~(WLS) readout 

167: to transport the light into photosensors.

168: 

169: The ND280 detector will widely use WLS fiber readout with light

170: detection   from fibers by photosensors which have to operate 

171: in a magnetic field environment and  limited  space inside the UA1 magnet. The primary candidate

172: for the photosensor is the multi--pixel avalanche photo-diode operating in the 

173: limited Geiger multiplication mode~\cite{dev1,dev2,dev3,dev4}. Such photodiodes 

174: are compact, well matched to spectral emission of WLS fibers, and insensitive 

175: to magnetic fields~\cite{andreev,beznosko}.

176: 

177:  

178: \section{Geiger mode multi--pixel avalanche photodiodes }

179: \subsection{Overview}

180: The  

181: multi-pixel avalanche photodiodes  with a  metal--resistor--semiconductor 

182: layer  structure  operating in the limited Geiger mode 

183: (hereafter referred to as MRS APD's 

184: or MRS photodiodes) are invented and designed by the Center of Perspective

185: Technologies and Apparatus (CPTA), Moscow~\cite{dev1}. 

186: Detailed description of these devices and principles of operation 

187:  can be found in Refs.~\cite{dev-dop,dev3,si1}.

188: Such a  photosensor  consists of many pixels on a common p--type silicon 

189: substrate. A simplified topology of a MRS photodiode is shown in 

190: Fig.~\ref{fig:scheme_mrs}.

191: \begin{figure}[htb]

192: \centering\includegraphics[width=15cm,angle=0]{topology.eps}   

193: \caption{The schematic view of the MRS photodiode structure.}

194: \label{fig:scheme_mrs}

195: \end{figure}

196:  Each pixel operates as an independent

197: Geiger micro-counter with a gain of the same order as a vacuum 

198: photomultiplier. Geiger discharge is initiated by a photoelectron in the 

199: high electric field created  in a very thin layer of about 

200: 1~$\mu$m by the applied  bias voltage.  

201: The discharge current for each pixel produces a voltage drop at  

202: individual  resistors. As a result, the electric field density 

203: becomes small and can no longer  support the discharge quenched in such a way.

204: Small pixels are separated by grooves filled with an optically non--transparent 

205: material to suppress the cross--talks. The gain is determined by the charge 

206: accumulated in a pixel capacitance: $Q_{pixel} = C_{pixel}\cdot\Delta V$, 

207: where $\Delta V$ is difference between the bias voltage and the breakdown 

208: voltage of the diode (overvoltage). Since $\Delta V$ is about a few volts and 

209: $C_{pixel}\simeq 50$ fF, then typical  $Q_{pixel}\simeq 150$ fC, that 

210: corresponds to $10^6$ electrons.  A single incident photon can fire more 

211: than one pixel. Thus, the gain of the MRS photodiode is equal to the charge 

212: of a pixel multiplied by the average number of pixels fired by a 

213: single photon. 

214: 

215: The amplitude of a single pixel signal does not depend on the triggered 

216: number of

217: carriers in this pixel. In such a way, the photodiode signal is a sum of 

218: fired pixels. Each pixel operates as a binary device, but the multi--pixel 

219: photodiode as a  whole unit is 

220: an analogue detector 

221: with a dynamic range limited by the finite number of pixels.  

222: %make clear:size, diam,octagonal etc

223: The pixel size can be $15\times 15$ to $70\times 70$~$\mu$m$^2$, and the total 

224: number of pixels 

225: is 100--4000 per mm$^2$. We tested the CPTA MRS photodiodes with a 

226: sensitive area of 1.1~mm$^2$ 

227: with 556 pixels of $45\times45~\mu {\rm m}^2$ size (see Fig.~\ref{fig:mrs}). 

228: \begin{figure}[htb]

229: \centering\includegraphics[width=14cm,angle=0]{MRS_small.eps}

230: \caption{Face view of a MRS avalanche photodiode with 556 pixels,  

231: magnified 56 times (left) and 14 times (right). The sensitive area has an 

232: octagonal shape with an 1.2 mm side--to--side distance.}

233: \label{fig:mrs} 

234: \end{figure}

235:  

236: 

237: %--------------------------------------------------------------- 

238: \subsection{Basic properties of the CPTA MRS photodiodes}

239: %--------------------------------------------------------------- 

240: 

241: The main parameters of the MRS photodiodes such as the  gain, photon detection 

242: efficiency, 

243: intrinsic noise, cross--talk, depend on the applied bias voltage. The MRS

244: photodiodes were tested using a signal from  a green light emitting diode 

245: (LED).  The MRS signal was amplified and split into two signals: 

246: one was fed to a discriminator, another was measured by an ADC with a 

247: gate of about 100 ns.

248: 

249: {\it Gain.}

250: A typical operating  voltage is around 40~V for the tested  MRS photodiodes, 

251: although the voltage can differ by 

252: a few volts to provide the same gain in photodiodes.

253: The MRS photodiode has an excellent single photoelectron~(p.e.) resolution 

254: determined mainly 

255: by electronics noise even at room temperature. It means that there is only

256: a small pixel 

257: to pixel gain variation as well as small fluctuations in Geiger discharge 

258: development. The  absolute gain 

259: depends on the photodiode topology, bias voltage and 

260: temperature. The voltage and temperature sensitivities of the MRS photodiode 

261: gain are rather weak as will 

262: be demonstrated  below.   A 0.1~V  change in 

263: bias voltage corresponds to a 2--3\% variation in gain.     The charge 

264: of a single p.e. signal in a calibrated ADC was used 

265: to determine the MRS photodiode gain.

266: The typical gain value   at room temperature 

267: (22$^{\circ}$C) is obtained 

268: to be about $0.5\times 10^6$. 

269: 

270: {\it Photon detection efficiency.} 

271: The  photon detection efficiency (PDE) of a multi-pixel avalanche photodiode 

272: operating in the limited Geiger mode  is a product of 3  factors:

273: \begin{equation}

274: {\rm PDE} = QE\cdot\varepsilon_{Geiger}\cdot\varepsilon_{pixel},

275: \label{eq:pde}

276: \end{equation}

277:  where $QE$ is the 

278: wavelength 

279: dependent quantum efficiency, 

280: $\varepsilon_{Geiger}$ is the probability for a photoelectron to initiate the 

281: Geiger discharge, 

282: $\varepsilon_{pixel}$ is a fraction of the total photodiode  area 

283: occupied by sensitive pixels.

284:  The  bias voltage affects 

285: one parameter  in expression~(\ref{eq:pde}) $\varepsilon_{Geiger}$.   

286: The geometrical factor $\varepsilon_{pixel}$ 

287: is  completely determined by the MRS photodiode topology. Its value is 

288: estimated to be about 

289: 70--80\% in  an ideal case.  The absolute value of the PDE was measured using 

290: small pulses from a  green LED (525 nm) which illuminated a MRS photodiode 

291: through  a 0.5 mm diameter collimator. The number of

292: emitted photons was obtained using a calibrated PMT XP2020. 

293: The  normalized PDE  values at 525~nm  for different bias voltages are 

294: presented in  Fig.~\ref{fig:pde}.

295: \begin{figure}[htb]

296: \centering\includegraphics[width=12cm,angle=0]{pde_darkrate.eps}

297: \caption{The photon detection efficiency, cross--talk and dark rate 

298: as a function of the applied bias voltage.}

299: \label{fig:pde} 

300: \end{figure}

301:  The cross-talk 

302: contribution was subtracted from the signal to obtain  the correct value 

303: of the PDE,  the accuracy of which is estimated to be  about 20\%.

304: As seen in  Fig.~\ref{fig:pde},  

305: the PDE is about 12\% at a dark rate of 1~MHz. 

306: The PDE can be increased up to almost 30\% at the expense of much higher dark

307: rate.   

308:  

309: The PDE dependence on the wavelength of the detected light, as well as the 

310: emission spectrum of the WLS fiber Y11  are 

311: shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:y11_sipm}. 

312: %------------------------

313: \begin{figure}[htb]

314: \centering\includegraphics[width=12cm,angle=0]{y11_sipm.eps}

315: \caption{Light emission spectrum of the Y11(150) fiber (from Kuraray 

316: plots~\cite{kuraray}) 

317: and the PDE of a  MRS photodiode.}

318: \label{fig:y11_sipm} 

319: \end{figure}

320: %------------------------

321:  The peak emission of the fiber depends on its length due to the absorption of 

322:  the light. The spectral response of a MRS photodiode  was measured 

323: in a spectrophotometer  calibrated with a PIN--diode~\cite{si3}.

324: The PDE was measured at higher  $V_{bias}$ and, therefore,   

325: the dark rate was higher (about 2.3 MHz  for a discriminator 

326: threshold of  0.5 p.e.).   

327: The PDE decreases by about 50\%  when  $V_{bias}$  is lowered such that 

328: the dark rate is   $\sim 1$ MHz. 

329: 

330: 

331: {\it Dark rate.}

332: The limiting factor for a wide application of   the MRS photodiodes in 

333: the readout of scintillators is the  dark noise rate 

334: which originates from 

335:   thermally created carriers in the depletion region under high electric

336: fields. The dark rate mainly consists of  single p.e. pulses. Larger amplitude 

337: pulses also contribute

338:  to the dark rate, as shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:dark-rate}. 

339: %------------------------

340: \begin{figure}[htb]

341: \centering\includegraphics[width=12cm,angle=0]{thr.eps}

342: \caption{Dark  rate vs the discriminator threshold for two bias voltages. 

343: The discriminator threshold values of 100, 300, and 500 mV correspond to 

344: 0.5 p.e., 1.5 p.e., and 2.5 p.e., respectively, for $V_{bias} = 38.2$~V. }

345: \label{fig:dark-rate} 

346: \end{figure}

347: %-----------------------ensity of 1~p.e. dark pulses is about 1 MHz for $V_{bias} = 38.2$ V. 

348: However,  

349: the intensity of the  pulses with 2 p.e. amplitudes is about 15 times   less 

350: than the intensity 

351: of the single p.e. pulses. Large amplitudes ($> 1$ p.e.) are generated by 

352: the optical 

353: cross-talk as well as by accidental pile-ups between the independent pixels, 

354: though the second 

355: effect is relatively small. The dark rate decreases  to the level of a few kHz 

356: for the threshold of 2.5 p.e.   The intensity of 

357: 1 p.e. pulses  as well as 2 p.e. pulses is significantly higher 

358: for higher bias voltage, as can be seen from Fig.~\ref{fig:dark-rate} in case 

359: of $V_{bias} = 39.8$~V. 

360: Dark pulses and mostly leakages create  the 

361: dark current through a MRS photodiode in

362:  a typical range of $0.3 - 1.0~\mu A$. 

363: The dark rate decreases to about 1~kHz/mm$^2$ at $-70^{\circ}$C, 

364: i.e. decreases by a factor of 

365:  2  for every temperature drop of  $9 - 10^{\circ}$C   for a threshold of 0.5 p.e. and 

366: and the  condition of keeping the gain   at a constant value by tuning 

367: the bias voltage.

368: 

369: 

370: {\it Optical cross--talk.}

371: A single incident photon can create more than a single p.e. due to 

372: optical cross--talk. The mechanism of this effect is not quite clear. 

373: Models predict that during the Geiger discharge and recombination of carriers 

374: infrared photons are emitted. These photons penetrate into the  adjacent pixels 

375: and fire them. Optical cross--talk leads to a higher than expected signal 

376: as Geiger discharge occur in additional pixels. 

377: The absolute value of the cross--talk can be calculated by assuming a  Poisson 

378: distribution for the number of photoelectrons observed in response 

379: to the light from a  LED. When the MRS 

380: photodiode noise is 

381: small, the measured mean number of fired pixels  by the LED photons, 

382: ${\bar N}_{LED}$, 

383: is  compared with the calculated value ${\bar N}_{pe}$   given by

384: \begin{equation}

385: {\bar N}_{pe} = - lnP(0), 

386: \label{eq:poisson}

387: \end{equation} 

388: where $P(0)$ is the fraction of 0 p.e., or ``pedestal'' events. Then

389: the deviation of the ratio ${\bar N}_{LED}/{\bar N}_{pe}$ from 1 

390:  gives the cross--talk value. These values are 

391:  presented for several bias voltages   in Fig.~\ref{fig:pde}.

392: A cross--talk value of  about 5\%  was 

393: obtained at a  bias voltage that provides a dark noise rate of 

394: $\leq 1$ MHz 

395: at a discriminator threshold of 0.5 p.e.  The cross--talk  is larger for 

396: higher bias voltage. The sharp decrease of the dark rate shown in 

397: Fig.~\ref{fig:dark-rate} is a good 

398: demonstration of the low optical  cross--talk. It should be noted that 

399: the signal amplitude  in photoelectrons is less than  the measured 

400: amplitude determined 

401: as  the average number of fired pixels by the cross-talk value, 

402: i.e. by a few per cent.

403:  

404: {\it Temperature dependence.}

405: The PDE and gain of MRS photodiodes (as well as the  signal amplitude) 

406: are expected to be

407: sensitive to temperature because the breakdown voltage   depends on

408: temperature. The MRS signal amplitude (light yield) is proportional to 

409: $N_{\rm photons}\times 

410: {\rm PDE}\times {\rm gain}$, where  $N_{\rm photons}$ is the number of photons 

411: from the  LED which illuminate the photodiode.

412: The parameters of the MRS photodiodes  were measured over temperatures 

413: from 15$^{\circ}$ to 33$^{\circ}$C.  The temperature variation of 

414: the  MRS signal (a green LED was used as a light source)

415: is presented in Fig.~\ref{fig:signal_gain_temp}.

416: \begin{figure}[htb]

417: \centering\includegraphics[width=12cm,angle=0]{signal_gain.eps}

418: \caption{The MRS  signal from a green LED  and gain as a function of   

419: the ambient air temperature.}

420: \label{fig:signal_gain_temp} 

421: \end{figure}

422: %------------------------

423:  The  MRS signal   dependency of -1.5~\%/$^{\circ}$C is obtained for 

424:  increasing temperature.

425:  The MRS gain itself  decreases with temperature as   -1.2~\%/$^{\circ}$C 

426:  (see Fig.~\ref{fig:signal_gain_temp}), while the PDE varies with temperature 

427:  as -0.3~\%/$^{\circ}$C.

428:  The  dark rate  depends on temperature with a coefficient  of 

429:  62 kHz/$^{\circ}$C, as shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:dark_temp}.

430: \begin{figure}[htb]

431: \centering\includegraphics[width=12cm,angle=0]{darkrate_temp.eps}

432: \caption{The  dark rate for threshold of 0.5 p.e. vs 

433: the  ambient air temperature.}

434: \label{fig:dark_temp} 

435: \end{figure}

436:   Decreasing the temperature

437: below $0^{\circ}$C greatly reduces the noise and increases the PDE, 

438: as shown in Ref.~\cite{si3}.

439: %------------------------

440: 

441: {\it Recovery time.}

442: The ability of MRS photodiodes to operate at high counting rates was tested 

443: using 

444: two LED signals. We measured the amplitude of the second signal $A_2(t)$ as a 

445: function of 

446: the time difference $t$ between the first and second  signal. 

447: Fig.~\ref{fig:recovery} shows the  ratio 

448: $A_2(t)/A_2(0)$, where $A_2(0)$ is the amplitude of the second signal when 

449: the first LED

450: signal is off.  

451: \begin{figure}[htb]

452: \centering\includegraphics[width=11cm,angle=0]{dead_time.eps}

453: \caption{The relative amplitude of the MRS delayed signal from a LED 

454:  as a function 

455: of the time difference between the first LED pulse and the second one. 

456: The   amplitude is 

457: normalized to its value when the first LED signal is off.   The

458: amplitudes of 

459: the first  signal are  50, 100, 300, 600 photoelectrons.}

460: \label{fig:recovery} 

461: \end{figure}

462: As seen from Figure 9, a minimum time interval between the first 

463: and second pulse of about 5 $\mu$s is needed 

464:  to recover about 95\% of the full amplitude 

465: of the second signal. This long recovery time is due to the fact that 

466: the individual 

467: resistor of each pixel, $R_{pixel}$, has the value of about 20 M$\Omega$, 

468: the pixel capacitance 

469: $C_{pixel}$ is 

470: typically 50 fF that gives $\tau = R_{pixel}\cdot C_{pixel} \sim 1 \mu$s. 

471:  

472: {\it Dynamic range and linearity.} 

473: The  dynamic range of the MRS photodiode is limited by the finite number of 

474: pixels. The saturation of the  MRS photodiode in response to large light signals 

475: is shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:nonlin}.  

476: %------------------------

477: \begin{figure}[htb]

478: \centering\includegraphics[width=12cm,angle=0]{nonlin_new.eps}

479: \caption{The MRS photodiode response vs the PMT signal. The signal of the 

480: MRS photodiode is saturated at the level of the maximum number of 

481:  556 pixels.}

482: \label{fig:nonlin} 

483: \end{figure}

484: %------------------------

485: In this test, the LED signal was ajusted to obtain similar 

486: response for both PMT and MRS photodiode at the light yield below 150 p.e. 

487: The photodiode

488: signal is linear for low amplitutes.  A nonlinearity of about 10\% is already

489: seen for a signal of 150--200~p.e. 

490: For the PMT signal of 500~p.e., the MRS photodiode has  

491:  a 30\%  smaller signal than that of the PMT. Full saturation of the 

492:  556 pixel MRS photodiode starts at a reference (PMT) signal of more 

493:  than  2000~p.e.  

494: 

495: 

496: {\it Timing.}

497: The development of the Geiger discharge in a small depth ($\sim 0.8~\mu m$) 

498: of the depletion region takes a few hundred picoseconds. The typical rise time 

499: is 1~ns, the decay time is

500: determined by the pixel capacitance.   A laser with a wavelength of 635~nm and 

501: a pulse width of 35~ps (fwhm) was used to measure  the intrinsic  time 

502: resolution of  1 p.e. pulses. Very weak laser light created only 

503: 1 p.e. signals in a MRS photodiode. The time resolution obtained for a 

504: threshold of 0.2 p.e.  at $22^{\circ}$C is presented in 

505: Fig.~\ref{fig:timing_mrs}. 

506: %------------------------

507: \begin{figure}[htb]

508: \centering\includegraphics[width=10cm,angle=0]{laser_timing.eps}

509: \caption{Time spectrum of  single photoelectron signals obtained by a MRS

510: photodiode at $22^{\circ}$C.}

511: \label{fig:timing_mrs} 

512: \end{figure}

513: %------------------------

514:  

515: {\it Life time.} 

516: The failure rate of the MRS photodiodes is an important figure of merit for 

517: the overall detector performance, because most photodiodes can not be 

518: replaced without significant 

519: disassembly of  the  ND280 detector.

520: Exposures to elevated temperature  are used to evaluate the expected life time of 

521: semiconductor devices. We have placed 19 MRS photodiodes  in an oven 

522: at 80$^{\circ}$C for 30 days. All photodiodes were kept under bias 

523: voltages to provide 

524: the same dark current as at  room temperature. One of the devices 

525: started to conduct a large current after a week of heating. 

526: The failed device had the worst PDE among of the tested 

527: devices. This points to a possible defect in its structure.  

528: All other devices   

529: passed the test without residual effects, and the LED signals  measured 

530: by these MRS diodes after a period of 30 days of elevated  

531: temperatures did not show any significant 

532: degradation. 

533: The  signals of the tested photodiodes  in response to a LED photons 

534: were measured before  the heating and  

535: for a period of about 260 days after the heating. The results for two 

536: devices  are presented  in  Fig.~\ref{fig:oven}. 

537: \begin{figure}[htb] 

538: \centering\includegraphics[width=15cm,angle=0]{long.eps}

539: \caption{Light yields  of two MRS photodiodes measured 

540: with a green LED before and after the heating test. The heat exposure 

541: at 80$^{\circ}$C lasted for 30 days. Successively, the photodiodes were 

542: monitored for 260 days. The signals were corrected for temperature 

543: changes in the range from $18 - 27^{\circ}$C. Each point has an error 

544: of $\pm 2.0$ p.e.}

545: \label{fig:oven} 

546: \end{figure}

547: The accuracy of the l.y. measurements is about 2.0 p.e.~(rms) due to 

548: misalignments between the fiber and the MRS photodiodes that are estimated to 

549: be between 20 and 100 $\mu$m in this series of tests.  

550: For more than  7 months after  heating no degradation in the light yield was observed.

551: 

552: Two hundred MRS photodiodes fabricated from a few different wafers were tested.

553: In order  to meet 

554: the requirements of the experiment, the dark rate of each device 

555: should be kept  close to

556: a reference 

557: value of   1 MHz at room temperature 

558: 22$^{\circ}$C and  for a  discriminator threshold of 0.5 p.e. 

559: This required the individual adjustment of the bias voltage of 38 

560: to 42.1~V for each 

561: photodiode, that in turn  resulted in  a wide 

562: range  of 8.9--18.8\% for the PDE values,  and the  

563: gains of these 200 MRS photodiodes were found to be between    

564: $0.34\times 10^6$ and  $0.69\times 10^6$.  

565: 

566:  

567:  %--------------------------------------------------------------- 

568: \section{Scintillator detectors with WLS fiber readout}

569: %--------------------------------------------------------------- 

570: %perepisatj etu chastj

571: 

572: Several subdetectors of  the T2K near detector complex will be composed 

573:  of many 

574: scintillator detectors: 

575: rectangular and triangular scintillator bars, and various scintillating 

576: slabs. 

577: All these elements use  embedded WLS fibers to read light from the 

578: scintillators. 

579: A well known design will be adopted  for  the  bars with WLS fibers: 

580: one straight hole or groove on one surface for a WLS fiber.  For large 

581: scintillator

582: slabs (SMRD,  active elements of Ecal), the usage of the standard readout 

583: scheme with 

584: several

585: equidistant WLS fibers which run along the slab is not appropriate due to 

586: mechanical constraints  of the UA1 magnet. 

587: %%dopisatj luchshe 

588: We consider   

589: extruded scintillator slabs with a double--ended WLS fiber readout technique as 

590: active elements for the SMRD detector. Instead of a few parallel  WLS fibers 

591:  we propose to use a single long WLS fiber embedded in an 

592: S--shape groove 

593: which reduces the maximum path length that light has to travel within 

594: the scintillator to a few  cm.  

595:  The detector prototypes   

596: were manufactured using an extrusion technique 

597: developed at the Uniplast Factory, Vladimir, Russia. The scintillator is 

598: etched by a chemical agent that results in the formation of a micropore 

599: deposit over the plastic surface. The thickness of the 

600: deposit (30--100 $\mu$m) depends on the etching 

601: time.   Details can be found in 

602: Ref.~\cite{extrusion}. 

603:   A scintillator slab of 1x17x87~cm$^3$  with an 

604: S--shaped groove  of 3~mm depth was  manufactured for a test in a pion/proton

605: beam. 

606: The half--period of the S--shape groove   

607:  is 58~mm, as shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:s-counter}. 

608: %------------------------

609: \begin{figure}[htb] 

610: \centering\includegraphics[width=11cm,angle=0]{s-counter_1.eps}

611: \caption{Scintillator slab with S--shaped fiber readout: photograph (left) and 

612: schematic view (right).}

613: \label{fig:s-counter} 

614: \end{figure}

615: %------------------------

616: A 2.55~m long multi--clad  Kuraray Y11 (200 ppm dopant) WLS fiber of 1~mm 

617: diameter is 

618: embedded into the groove with an optical grease and both ends are attached to 

619: MRS photodiodes. To avoid the 

620:  degradation of the Y11 parameters in real SMRD counters, the bending procedure to make 

621:  3 cm radius loops will be done at 

622:  the temperature of about 80$^{\circ}$C.    

623:  

624: This module was first tested with cosmic muons. 

625: A light yield (l.y.) of 16.4~p.e. was obtained for MIP's 

626: in the center for  summed signals from both photodiodes. In order 

627: to suppress the timing spread caused by the trigger counters the 

628: combination  $(TDC_{left} - TDC_{right})/2$ was used to measure the time

629: resolution.  A time resolution of $\sigma = 1.57 $ ns  was obtained 

630: for MIP's which passed through the central part of the slab.

631: 

632: 

633: %--------------------------------------------------------------- 

634: \section{Beam tests of the SMRD  prototype}

635: %--------------------------------------------------------------- 

636: \subsection{Beam test setup}

637: A beam test of extruded scintillators with embedded WLS fibers was performed 

638: at the KEK 12-GeV proton synchrotron 

639: with 1.4 GeV/c protons and pions. Two counters were placed in a beam and 

640: tested simultaneously. One was the S--grooved scintillator (S--counter) 

641: described in the previous section, another one was a scintillator 

642: slab,  1x18x50~cm$^3$ in size, with a single straight groove 

643: in the middle of the plastic (W--counter). An 1.11~m long Kuraray Y11(200) fiber 

644: of 1~mm 

645: diameter was

646: embedded with  optical grease  into the straight groove  of the 

647: W--counter. The fiber 

648: in each counter is viewed from  

649: both ends by  MRS photodiodes. The fibers  are 

650: directly coupled  to  photosensors  

651: inside special sockets. The  detectors were mounted on a

652: platform which could be moved horizontally and vertically with 

653: respect to the beam line. Upstream of the counters, a TOF system was used 

654: to separate pions and protons. Finger trigger counters restricted 

655: the beam spot size  to a  $10\times 10 {\rm mm}^2$ square.   The signals 

656: were amplified by 

657: fast hybrid preamps mounted 

658: directly  behind the photodiodes. The bias voltage was set individually for 

659: each MRS photodiode to limit the dark rate to about 1.2~MHz for a

660: 0.5 p.e. threshold. A simplified electronic diagram of the beam test setup is shown in 

661: Fig.~\ref{fig:electronics}. 

662: %------------------------

663: \begin{figure}[htb] 

664: \centering\includegraphics[width=13cm,angle=0]{electronics.eps}

665: \caption{The electronic readout diagram used in the beam test.}

666: \label{fig:electronics} 

667: \end{figure}

668: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

669: 

670: Only pions were selected for analysis as their response is close to that 

671: expected from MIP's in the T2K experiment. The ambient temperature 

672:  drifted between 15--18$^{\circ}$C during the beam 

673: test. Typical ADC spectra from pions are  

674: shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:spectra-vs-bias}. 

675: \begin{figure}[htb] 

676: \centering\includegraphics[width=12cm,angle=0]{bias_voltage.eps}

677: \caption{The spectra of 1.4 GeV/c pions measured at two bias voltages.}

678: \label{fig:spectra-vs-bias} 

679: \end{figure}

680: %-------------------------

681: In this 

682: Figure, one spectrum is obtained with a bias voltage of 

683: 38.7~V which corresponds to a  dark rate of 0.86~MHz for a

684: discriminator threshold of 0.5 p.e. The 

685: second spectrum is measured with a bias voltage of 40.9~V corresponding to

686: a dark rate of almost 2~MHz.

687: The individual photoelectron peaks are  clearly separated  at 38.7~V 

688: and still visible at 40.9~V. 

689: 

690: \subsection{Detection efficiency of MIP's}

691: %-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

692: The light yield scan over the S--counter surface is presented in 

693: Table~\ref{table:s-ly}.  

694:  %------------------------

695: \begin{table}[htbp]

696: \caption{Light yield (p.e./MIP)  

697: over the S--counter.  Sum of the signals from  both ends.

698: The bias voltage of 38.7~V was applied to both MRS photodiodes.}

699: \vspace{.5cm}

700: \begin{center}

701: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|}

702: \hline

703:  ~~~$y$, mm & -80 & -60 & -40 & -20 & 0 & 20 & 40 & 60 & 80  \\

704: $x$, mm~~~  &\       &\      &\       &\     &\    &\  &\   &\   &\   \\

705: \hline

706: -406    & 6.3 & 11.9 & 13.2 & 16.0 & 17.8 & 18.6 & 18.7 & 18.8 & 13.8  \\

707: \hline

708: -319   & 10.2 & 11.6 & 14.7 & 15.7 & 15.9 & 16.4 & 17.3 & 16.7 & 13.2   \\

709: \hline

710: -200   & 10.2 & 12.7 & 14.3 & 16.0 & 15.5 & 16.6 & 18.2 & 18.7 & 15.0   \\

711: \hline

712: -87    & 10.4 & 11.7 & 13.0 & 15.0 & 15.0 & 15.4 & 16.3 & 14.5 & 11.0   \\

713: \hline

714: -30     & 8.8 & 14.4 & 16.4 & 16.2 & 15.3 & 14.6 & 13.8 & 12.9 & 10.9   \\

715: \hline

716: 0      & 11.0 & 12.9 & 14.8 & 14.3 & 15.3 & 16.2 & 14.9 & 13.9 & 11.7   \\ 

717: \hline

718: 30      & 9.3 & 11.8 & 12.6 & 14.4 & 14.8 & 15.8 & 16.8 & 16.0 & 13.0   \\

719: \hline

720: 87     & 12.3 & 14.4 & 15.1 & 14.6 & 14.2 & 14.7 & 14.2 & 12.9 & 11.8   \\

721: \hline

722: 200    & 11.0 & 15.2 & 16.0 & 15.9 & 15.6 & 15.5 & 13.7 & 12.9 & 11.3   \\

723: \hline

724: 319    & 12.6 & 16.1 & 17.4 & 16.3 & 15.5 & 15.2 & 14.5 & 12.3 & 10.4  \\

725: \hline

726: 406    & 11.8 & 12.9 & 17.9 & 19.9 & 20.0 & 19.1 & 19.1 & 16.2 & 11.9  \\

727: \hline

728: \end{tabular} 

729: \end{center}

730: \label{table:s-ly}  

731: \end{table}

732: %------------------------

733: The beam spot spreads beyond the scintillator area near the edges 

734: at $y = \pm 80$ mm 

735: causing the small l.y. values.  If the edges are ignored,  the light 

736: output over the 

737: S--counter (sum of both end signals) varies from 12 to 20~p.e./MIP. The largest l.y. 

738: is measured at the 

739: ends, close to either  of the two MRS photodiodes. In order to obtain 

740: the detection 

741: efficiency the ADC 

742: spectra were analyzed. The event is considered accepted  if its 

743: ADC amplitude exceeds a certain threshold set in number of p.e.  The 

744: average statistics 

745: in each location is about 2000 events.

746: Table~\ref{table:s-3}

747: \begin{table}[htbp]

748: \caption{Detection efficiency  over the S--counter for a threshold of 2.5 p.e.  

749: The bias voltage of 38.7~V was applied to both MRS photodiodes.}

750: \vspace{.5cm}

751: \begin{center}

752: \begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|c|}

753: \hline

754:  ~~~$y$, mm & -80 & -60 & -40 & -20 & 0 & 20 & 40 & 60 & 80  \\

755: $x$, mm~~~  &\       &\      &\       &\     &\    &\  &\   &\   &\   \\

756: \hline

757: -406    & 0.660 & 0.995 & 0.999 & 1.000 & 1.000 & 0.999 & 1.000 & 1.000 & 0.999 \\

758: \hline

759: -319   & 0.750 & 0.999 & 0.999 & 0.999 & 0.999 & 0.999 & 0.999 & 0.998 & 1.000   \\

760: \hline

761: -200   & 0.788 & 0.998 & 0.999 & 0.999 & 1.000 & 1.000 & 0.999 & 0.999 & 1.000   \\

762: \hline

763: -87    & 0.839 & 0.996 & 0.998 & 0.999 & 1.000 & 0.999 & 1.000 & 0.999 & 0.995  \\

764: \hline

765: -30     & 0.886 & 0.999 & 0.999 & 1.000 & 1.000 & 0.999 & 1.000 & 0.997 & 0.998   \\

766: \hline

767: 0      & 0.985 & 0.998 & 0.997 & 0.998 & 0.996 & 0.998 & 0.999 & 0.999 & 0.998   \\ 

768: \hline

769: 30      & 0.918 & 0.996 & 0.998 & 0.999 & 1.000 & 1.000 & 1.000 & 0.999 & 0.998  \\

770: \hline

771: 87     & 0.989 & 0.997 & 1.000 & 0.999 & 0.999 & 1.000 & 0.998 & 0.999 & 0.996   \\

772: \hline

773: 200    & 0.995 & 0.998 & 1.000 & 0.999 & 1.000 & 1.000 & 1.000 & 0.999 & 0.994   \\

774: \hline

775: 319    & 0.999 & 0.998 & 1.000 & 1.000 & 1.000 & 1.000 & 1.000 & 0.998 & 0.994  \\

776: \hline

777: 406    & 0.998 & 0.999 & 1.000 & 1.000 & 1.000 & 0.999 & 1.000 & 1.000 & 0.984  \\

778: \hline

779: \end{tabular} 

780: \end{center}

781: \label{table:s-3} 

782: \end{table}

783: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------

784: demonstrates the S--counter pion detection efficiency 

785:  when the threshold for the sum of both end signals is set to 2.5~p.e. 

786:    The detection efficiency is 

787:  close to 100~\% except 

788:  for the edge area where a part of the beam missed the counter due to  

789:  some misalignment between the beam counters and the tested detector. 

790:  For a higher threshold of 4.5~p.e set for the sum of the amplitudes from 

791:  the two ends, the MIP detection efficiency is greater than 98\%.  

792:   We can  conclude that  the l.y. of more 

793:  than 12~p.e. (sum of both ends)  satisfies the requirement  for the  

794:  S--counter

795:  to provide a detection 

796:  efficiency greater than 99\% for a MIP.  

797:  If we require that each MRS photodiode signal exceeds   0.5~p.e. 

798:   the MIP detection  efficiency is found  to  

799:  be about 99.5\%.

800: 

801: To make a detailed scan along the middle line of the S--counter the 

802: size of the beam spot  was reduced to 

803: $0.5\times 0.5$~cm$^2$.  The result is shown in 

804: Fig.~\ref{fig:scan-x-S}. 

805: %------------------------

806: \begin{figure}[htbp]

807: \centering\includegraphics[width=14cm,angle=0]{x-scan.eps}

808: \caption{The light yield scan of the S--counter along the x-axis. The 

809: beam spot 

810: size 

811: is $0.5\times 0.5$~cm$^2$, the scan step size is 1~cm. The sine--like waveform 

812: corresponds to the 

813: WLS fiber route with 58~mm spacing between neighboring segments.}

814: \label{fig:scan-x-S} 

815: \end{figure}

816: %------------------------

817: The WLS fiber route is clearly reflected in the pattern of the l.y. distribution 

818: along the x--axis. A maximum l.y. is observed in points where the beam crosses 

819: the fiber, while   the l.y. drops by about 20\% in between 

820: the fiber segments. Fig.~\ref{fig:scan-y-W} 

821: \begin{figure}[htbp] 

822: \centering\includegraphics[width=14cm,angle=0]{y-scan.eps}

823: \caption{The light yield scan of the W-counter along the  y--axis , that is 

824:  perpendicular to the 

825: fiber direction. The beam spot size is $0.5\times 0.5$~cm$^2$, and the scan step 

826: size is 1~cm.}

827: \label{fig:scan-y-W} 

828: \end{figure}

829: shows the result of the  transverse l.y. scan across the W--counter, 

830: which has a single 

831: straight groove running down the middle of the counter. The attenuation length of 

832: scintillation light  before capture by the WLS fiber is obtained to be 

833: $9.0 \pm 1.3$ cm and $7.2 \pm 1.2$ cm for the upper and the lower part of the

834: W--counter, respectively. These values are consistent within measurement

835: uncertainty, and 

836: the average attenuation length of such a counter is estimated to be about 

837: $8.1\pm 0.9$ cm. 

838: 

839: 

840: 

841: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

842: \subsection{Time and spatial resolution of the S--counter}

843: %-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

844: The time resolution was measured with 

845: the discriminator thresholds  set to a  level of 0.5~p.e. for each 

846: MRS photodiode.  

847:  To suppress 

848: the timing spread caused by the trigger  counters (as in the cosmic ray test) 

849:  we used 

850: the 

851: combination $(T_{left} - T_{right})/2$ to determine the 

852: time resolution. 

853: The dependence of the  time resolution  on the light yield is presented in 

854: Fig.~\ref{fig:timing}. 

855: %------------------------

856: \begin{figure}[htbp] 

857: \centering\includegraphics[width=10cm,angle=0]{light_timing.eps}

858: \caption{The time resolution versus light yield in the center of 

859: the S--counter.}

860: \label{fig:timing} 

861: \end{figure}

862: %------------------------

863: The time resolution depends on photostatistics and is proportional to 

864:  $1/\sqrt{N_{pe}}$.  

865:   At a typical 

866: l.y. of 15~p.e./MIP $\sigma_t = 1.75$~ns is obtained.  The time resolution of the

867: S--counter is mainly  determined  by the slow decay time of the Y11 fiber. 

868: Green light 

869: travels along a WLS fiber at a speed of 17~cm/ns while the signal propagates 

870: along the counter at a  smaller speed of 7.4~cm/ns because of the fiber routing. 

871: The time spectra for 3 positions of the beam along the S--counter are shown in 

872: Fig.~\ref{fig:time-shift}. 

873: %---------------------

874: \begin{figure}[htbp] 

875: \centering\includegraphics[width=13cm,angle=0]{space_time.eps}

876: \caption{Time spectra for 3 positions along the S--counter. A distance of 

877: 81.2~cm corresponds to the  time shift of 11 ns between the left and right 

878: MRS signals.}

879: \label{fig:time-shift} 

880: \end{figure}

881: %------------------------

882:  The obtained time difference between left and right signals 

883:  allows us to extract 

884: the beam coordinate along the S--counter using the expression

885: \begin{equation}

886: x(T)=7.4[\frac{\rm cm}{\rm ns}]\times(T_{left}-T_{right})/2.

887: \label{eq:coordin}

888: \end{equation}

889: A spatial resolution of $\sigma_x =13.4$ cm is obtained  in the center of 

890: the S--counter 

891: and  $\sigma_{x(T)} = 10.4$ cm near both ends. 

892: 

893: The spatial resolution can be improved taking into account the light  attenuation

894: along the fiber. The  asymmetry between the signals from 

895: the left and right MRS photodiodes  

896: $(A_{left} - A_{right})/(A_{left}+A_{right})$ is sensitive  to the hit 

897: position of a MIP, but the spatial resolution obtained using the l.y. 

898: attenuation 

899: is poor ($\sigma_{x(A)} \sim 35 $ cm) because of 

900: large fluctuations in the light yields. However, the combination of both 

901: methods 

902: \begin{equation} 

903: x=\frac{x(T) + wx(A)}{1+w},

904: \label{eq:combination}

905: \end{equation}

906:  where $x(T)$ and $x(A)$ are the MIP positions obtained 

907: from timing and amplitude asymmetry with accuracies of $\sigma_{x(T)}$ and 

908: $\sigma_{x(A)}$, respectively.  The 

909: weight  $w$ is given by  $w=\sigma_{x(T)}^2/\sigma_{x(A)}^2$,

910: allows us to slightly improve the spatial

911: resolution.   Fig.~\ref{fig:space_resol} 

912: %%peredelatj risunok i podpisj k risunku

913: %------------------------

914: \begin{figure}[htbp]

915: \centering\includegraphics[width=11cm,angle=0]{spacex.eps}

916: \caption{The spatial resolution along the S--counter at 3 beam positions: 

917: (a) the coordinate $x$ is obtained from timing; (b) the coordinate $x$ is 

918: obtained from the asymmetry  between light yields at the two counter ends; 

919: (c) the combined position resolution.}

920: \label{fig:space_resol} 

921: \end{figure}

922: %-------------------------

923: shows the spatial resolution for three  beam positions obtained for the

924: combination of the signal timing and amplitude. 

925: The spatial resolution in the center of the S--counter is obtained to be 12.4 cm, 

926: while it is about 9.9 cm at both ends.  

927: 

928: %------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

929: \section{Conclusion}

930: %-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

931: %conclusion about MRS performance

932: The scintillator counters for the SMRD of the T2K near detector have been

933: designed and tested.

934: The readout  of the  extruded  scintillator counters is provided via a WLS 

935: fiber which is embedded into an S--shape groove 

936:  and viewed from both ends by  multi--pixel avalanche

937: photodiodes operating in the limited Geiger mode. The studied 

938: MRS photodiodes demonstrate  good 

939: performance: a low cross-talk of a few per cent, the photon detection 

940: efficiency for green light of about 12\%,  and a long 

941: term stability. These devices are insensitive to magnetic fields, their 

942: calibration and stability control can be provided by means of the

943:  excellent p.e.  

944: peak resolution. The linearity range  of  the tested MRS photodiodes is less 

945: than 200 p.e. and the recovery 

946: time is about 5 $\mu$s. Although these parameters might be critical 

947: for some applications,  this  performance is  acceptable 

948: for  many detectors 

949: of the ND280 complex of the T2K experiment.  

950: 

951: An average l.y. of about 15~p.e./MIP, a  MIP detection efficiency 

952:  greater than 99.5\%,   a time resolution of 

953: 1.75~ns for a MIP, and a spatial resolution of  $\sigma_x = 9.9--12.4$~cm were 

954: obtained in a pion beam test.  

955:  

956:  

957: The authors are grateful to D.~Renker, A.~Akindinov and A.~Konaka 

958: for useful discussions.

959: This work was supported in part by the ``Neutrino Physics'' Programme 

960: of the Russian Academy of  Sciences.

961: 

962: %---------

963: \begin{thebibliography}{99}

964: \bibitem{t2k}Y.~Itow {\it et al.,} hep-ex/0106019.

965: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0106019;%%

966: \bibitem{nd280}``T2K ND280 Conceptual Design Report'',  T2K Internal 

967: Document.

968: %%CITATION = NONE;%% 

969: \bibitem{minerva}D.~Drakoulakos {\it et al.,} hep-ex/0405002.

970: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0405002;%%

971: \bibitem{scibar}K.~Nitta {\it et al.,} Nucl. Instr. Meth. {\bf A535} (2004)

972: 147;

973: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0406023;%%

974: S.~Yamamoto {\it et al.},

975: IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci.  {\bf 52} (2005) 2992.

976: %%CITATION = IETNA,52,2992;%%

977: \bibitem{k2k}E.~Aliu {\it et al.,} K2K Collaboration, Phys. Rev. Lett. 

978: {\bf 94}, 081802 (2005); 

979: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0411038;%%

980: S.~Yamamoto {\it et al.,} K2K Collaboration, Phys. Rev. Lett. 

981: {\bf 96}, 181801 (2006).

982: %%CITATION = HEP-EX 0603004;%%

983: \bibitem{dev1}

984: G.~Bondarenko, V.~Golovin, M.~Tarasov, Patent for invention in 

985: Russia No.~2142175, 1999.

986: %%CITATION = NONE;%%

987: \bibitem{dev-dop}V.~Golovin {\it et.al.,} Patent for invention in Russia, 

988: No. 1644708, 1989;

989: %%CITATION = NUIMA,A442,187;%%

990: A.G.~Gasanov {\it et al.,} Lett. J. Techn. Phys. {\bf 16} (1990) 14  

991: (in Russian). 

992: %%CITATION = NONE;%%

993: \bibitem{dev2}Z.Ya.~Sadygov {\it et al.},

994: Nucl. Instr. Meth. {\bf A504} (2003) 301.

995: \bibitem{dev3}G.~Bondarenko {\it et al.,} Nucl. Instr.  Meth., {\bf A442} 

996: (2000) 187.

997: %%CITATION = NUIMA,A442,187;%%

998: \bibitem{dev4}P.~Buzhan {\it et al.},

999: Nucl. Instr. Meth. {\bf A504} (2003) 48.

1000: %%CITATION = NUIMA,A504,48;%% 

1001: \bibitem{andreev}V.~Andreev {\it et al.,} Nucl. Instr.  Meth., {\bf A540} 

1002: (2005) 368.

1003: %%CITATION = NUIMA,A540,368;%%

1004: \bibitem{beznosko}D.~Beznosko {\it et al.,} FERMILAB-PUB-05-410.

1005: %%CITATION = NONE;%%

1006: \bibitem{si1} A.~Akindinov {\it et al.,} Nucl. Instr. Meth. 

1007: {\bf A387} (1997) 231.

1008: %%CITATION = NUIMA,A387,231;%%

1009: \bibitem{kuraray}Kuraray Co., Ltd., Scintillator Fiber Products, 1994.

1010: %%CITATION = NONE;%%

1011: \bibitem{si3} E.~Gushchin et al., "Multi-pixel Geiger-mode avalanche photodiodes with high

1012: quantum efficiency and low excess noise factor", Proceedings of the 4th

1013: Int. Conf. on New Developments in Photodetection, Beaune, 2005, to be 

1014: published in NIM.

1015: \bibitem{extrusion}Yu.G.~Kudenko {\it et al.,}  Nucl. Instr. Meth. 

1016: {\bf A469} (2001) 340;

1017: %%CITATION = NUIMA,A469,340;%%

1018: O.~Mineev {\it et al.}, Nucl. Instr. Meth. {\bf A494} (2002) 362;

1019: %%CITATION = PHYS-ICS 0207033;%%

1020: N.~Yershov {\it et al.}, Nucl. Instr. Meth. {\bf A543} (2005) 454. 

1021: %%CITATION = PHYS-ICS 0410080;%%

1022: 

1023: \end{thebibliography} 

1024: \end{document}

1025: