1: \documentclass[preprint, aps, pre, eqsecnum,amsmath, amssymb]{revtex4}
2: %\documentclass[draft,twocolumn, aps, pre, eqsecnum,amsmath, amssymb]{revtex4}
3:
4: % \usepackage[final]{graphicx} % to include figures
5: %\documentclass[aps,preprint,amssymb,twocolumn]{revtex4}
6: \usepackage[final]{graphicx}
7: %\usepackage{epsfig}
8:
9: \renewcommand{\arraystretch}{1.5} %faktor 1.5 fuer tabellenzeilenabstand
10:
11: \newcommand{\Nabla}{\mbox{\bf\boldmath $\nabla$}}
12: \newcommand{\ve}[1]{\stackrel{\rightharpoonup}{#1}}
13: \renewcommand{\vec}[1]{{\bf #1}}
14: \newcommand{\Vepsilon}{\mbox{\bf\boldmath $\epsilon$}}
15: \newcommand{\Vxi}{\mbox{\bf\boldmath $\xi$}}
16: \newcommand{\Vphi}{\mbox{\boldmath $\varphi$}}
17: \newcommand{\Vzeta}{\mbox{\boldmath $\zeta$}}
18: \newcommand{\VPsi}{\mbox{\boldmath $\Psi$}}
19: \newcommand{\Overrightarrow}[1]{\stackrel{\textstyle\rightarrow}{#1}}
20:
21: % info und seite in kopfzeile
22: \pagestyle{myheadings}
23: % datum in kopfzeile. falls 'twoside': {leftside}{rightside}
24: \markboth{\today}{\today}
25:
26: % \bibliographystyle{prsty}
27:
28:
29:
30: \begin{document}
31:
32:
33: \title{
34: Periodically forced ferrofluid pendulum: effect of polydispersity
35: }
36:
37: \author{
38: A.~Leschhorn, M.~L\"ucke
39: }
40: \affiliation{
41: Theoretische Physik,
42: Universit\"{a}t des Saarlandes, D-66041~Saarbr\"{u}cken, Germany\\}
43:
44: \date{\today}
45:
46:
47: \begin{abstract}
48:
49: We investigate a torsional pendulum containing a ferrofluid
50: that is forced periodically to undergo small-amplitude oscillations.
51: A homogeneous magnetic field is applied perpendicular to the pendulum axis.
52: We give an analytical formula for the ferrofluid-induced ``selfenergy'' in
53: the pendulum's dynamic response function for
54: monodisperse as well as for polydisperse ferrofluids.
55:
56:
57: \end{abstract}
58:
59:
60:
61:
62:
63: \maketitle
64: %\tableofcontents
65:
66: % skip 2/6inch
67: \vskip2pc
68:
69:
70:
71:
72:
73: \section{Introduction}
74:
75:
76: Real ferrofluids \cite{BIB:rosen} contain magnetic particles of different sizes
77: \cite{BIB:vert}. This polydispersity strongly influences the macroscopic
78: magnetic properties of the ferrofluid.
79: We investigate here the effect of polydispersity on the dynamic response of a
80: ferrofluid pendulum.
81:
82: A torsional pendulum containing a ferrofluid is forced periodically in
83: a homogeneous magnetic field ${\bf H}_{ext}=H_{ext} {\bf e}_x$ that is applied
84: perpendicular to the pendulum axis ${\bf e}_z$ (see fig. \ref{FIG:sys}).
85: Such a ferrofluid pendulum is used for measuring the rotational viscosity
86: \cite{BIB:tp}.
87: The cylindrical ferrofluid container is here of sufficiently large length to be
88: approximated as an infinite long cylinder. We consider rigid-body rotation of
89: the ferrofluid with the time dependent angular velocity
90: ${\bf \Omega} = \dot \varphi{\bf e}_z$ as can be realized with the set-up of
91: \cite{BIB:tp}. The fields ${\bf H}$ and ${\bf M}$ inside the
92: cylinder are spatially homogeneous and oscillating in time.
93:
94:
95:
96: \section{Equations}
97:
98: First, the Maxwell equations demand that the fields ${\bf H}$ and ${\bf M}$
99: within the ferrofluid are related to each other via
100: \begin{equation} \label{EQ:max}
101: {\bf H} + N {\bf M} = {\bf H}^{ext}
102: \end{equation}
103: with $N=1/2$ for the infinitely long cylinder.
104: Then we have the torque balance
105: \begin{equation} \label{EQ:tb}
106: \ddot \varphi
107: =
108: - \omega_0^2 \varphi
109: - \Gamma_0 \dot \varphi
110: - \frac{T}{\Theta}
111: + f(t)
112: \end{equation}
113: with the eigenfrequency $\omega_0$ and the damping rate
114: $\Gamma_0$ of the
115: pendulum without field and the total moment of inertia $\Theta$. The magnetic
116: torque reads
117: \begin{equation} \label{EQ:magtorque}
118: T
119: =
120: - \mu_0 \int dV ({\bf M} \times {\bf H})_z
121: =
122: - \mu_0 V ({\bf M} \times {\bf H}^{ext})_z \, ,
123: \end{equation}
124: and $f(t)$ is the external mechanical forcing.
125:
126: Finally, we need an equation describing the magnetization dynamics.
127: Here, we consider the polydisperse ferrofluid as a mixture of ideal
128: monodisperse paramagnetic fluids. Then the resulting magnetization is given by
129: ${\bf M}=\sum {\bf M}_j$, where ${\bf M}_j$ denotes the magnetization of the
130: particles with diameter $d_j$. We assume that each ${\bf M}_j$ obeys a
131: simple Debye relaxation dynamics described by
132: \begin{equation} \label{EQ:maggl}
133: d_t {\bf M}_j
134: - {\bf \Omega} \times {\bf M}_j
135: =
136: - \frac{1}{\tau_j} [{\bf M}_j - {\bf M}_j^{eq} ({\bf H})]
137: \end{equation}
138: We take the equilibrium magnetization to be given by a Langevin function
139: \begin{equation} \label{EQ:meq}
140: {\bf M}_j^{eq} ({\bf H})
141: =
142: \chi_j (H) {\bf H}
143: =
144: w_j {\cal L}\left( \frac{\mu_0 \pi M_{mat}}{6k_BT} d_j^3 H \right)
145: \, \frac{{\bf H}}{H}
146: \end{equation}
147: with the saturation magnetization of the material $M_{mat}$ and the
148: magnetization distribution $w_j (d_j)$.
149: Note that the magnetization equations (\ref{EQ:maggl}) for the different
150: particle sizes are
151: coupled by the internal field ${\bf H}={\bf H}^{ext}- N {\bf M}$.
152: As relaxation rate we combine Brownian and N\'eel relaxation
153: $
154: \frac{1}{\tau_j}
155: =
156: \frac{1}{\tau_B^j} + \frac{1}{\tau_N^j}
157: $.
158: The relaxation times depend on the particle size by
159: $\tau_B^j=\frac{\pi \eta}{2k_BT} (d_j+2s)^3$ and
160: $\tau_N^j=f_0^{-1} \exp\left(\frac{\pi Kd_j^3}{6k_BT}\right)$ with $\eta$ the
161: viscosity, $s$ the thickness of the nonmagnetic particle layer, and $K$ the
162: anisotropy constant.
163:
164: Altogether we use the following system of equations:
165: \begin{eqnarray} \label{EQ:GLS}
166: \dot \varphi
167: &=&
168: \Omega
169: \\
170: \dot \Omega
171: &=&
172: - \omega_0^2
173: \varphi
174: - \Gamma_0
175: \Omega
176: - \mu_0 \frac{V}{\Theta} H^{ext} M_y
177: + f(t)
178: \\
179: \dot M_x^j
180: &=&
181: - \Omega M_y^j
182: - \frac{1}{\tau_j} \left[ M_x^j - \chi_j(H) (H^{ext} - N M_x )\right]
183: \\
184: \dot M_y^j
185: &=&
186: \Omega M_x^j
187: - \frac{1}{\tau_j} M_y^j
188: - \frac{1}{\tau_j} N\chi_j(H) M_y \, .
189: \end{eqnarray}
190:
191:
192: \section{Linear response analysis}
193:
194: For the equilibrium situation of the unforced pendulum at rest that we denote
195: in the following by an index 0 one has
196: $\varphi_0 = \Omega_0 =M_y^{j0} = 0$ and $M_x^{j0}=M^j_{eq}(H_0)$.
197: Furthermore, $M_0 = \sum M^j_{eq}(H_0)$ with $H_0$ solving the equation
198: $H_0 = H^{ext} - N M_0(H_0)$.
199:
200: External forcing with small $|f|$ leads to small deviations of
201: $\varphi$, of $\Omega$, and of
202: $\delta {\bf H} = {\bf H} - {\bf H}_0 = -N({\bf M} - {\bf M}_0)
203: = - N\delta {\bf M}/2$
204: from the above described equilibrium state.
205: We expand each $\chi_j(H)$ up to linear order in $\delta {\bf H}$
206: \begin{eqnarray}
207: \chi_j (|{\bf H}_0 + \delta {\bf H}|)
208: &=&
209: \chi_{j0}
210: - \chi_{j0}' N \delta M_x
211: + {\cal O} (\delta {\bf H})^2 \,.
212: \end{eqnarray}
213: Here, $\chi_{j0} = \chi_j (H_0)$ and $\chi_{j0}'$ is the derivative of
214: $\chi_{j0}$. Then we get the linearized equations
215: \begin{eqnarray}
216: \dot \varphi
217: &=&
218: \Omega
219: \label{EQ:LGLS1} \\
220: \dot \Omega
221: &=&
222: - \omega_0^2 \varphi
223: - \Gamma_0 \Omega
224: - \kappa y
225: + f(t)
226: \\
227: \dot x_j
228: &=&
229: - \frac{1}{\tau_j} x_j
230: - \frac{1}{\tau_j} N
231: (\chi_{j0} + \chi_{j0}' H_0) x
232: \\
233: \dot y_j
234: &=&
235: \Omega x_j^0
236: - \frac{1}{\tau_j} y_j
237: - \frac{1}{\tau_j} N\chi_{j0} y \,.
238: \label{EQ:LGLS4}
239: \end{eqnarray}
240: We have intoduced the abbreviations $x_j = \delta M_x/M_0, \,
241: x_j^0 = M_x^{j,0}/M_0, \, y_j = \delta M_y/M_0$ and
242: $x = \sum_j x_j, \, y = \sum_j y_j$. The strength of the coupling constant
243: between the mechanical degrees of freedom $\varphi, \Omega$ and the magnetic
244: ones is $\kappa = \mu_0 H^{ext} M_0 V/\Theta$ .
245:
246: For periodic forcing $f(t)=\hat f e^{-i\omega t}$ we look for solutions in the
247: form
248: \begin{eqnarray} \label{EQ:ansatz}
249: \left(
250: \begin{array}{c}
251: \varphi(t) \\ \Omega(t) \\ x_j(t) \\ y_j(t)
252: \end{array}
253: \right)
254: &=&
255: \left(
256: \begin{array}{c}
257: \hat \varphi \\ \hat \Omega \\ \hat x_j \\ \hat y_j
258: \end{array}
259: \right)
260: \, e^{-i\omega t} \,.
261: \end{eqnarray}
262: Inserting the ansatz (\ref{EQ:ansatz}) into the linearized
263: equations (\ref{EQ:LGLS1}) --(\ref{EQ:LGLS4}) yields
264: \begin{eqnarray} \label{EQ:solut}
265: \hat \Omega
266: &=&
267: -i\omega \hat \varphi
268: \\
269: \hat x
270: &=&
271: 0
272: \, = \,
273: \hat x_j
274: \\
275: \hat y_j
276: &=&
277: - \left[
278: \frac{i\omega \tau_j}{1-i\omega \tau_j} x_j^0
279: - \frac{N \chi_{j0}}{1-i\omega \tau_j}
280: \frac{\omega}{\kappa} \Sigma
281: \right]
282: \hat \varphi
283: \\
284: \hat y
285: &=&
286: - \frac{\omega}{\kappa} \Sigma
287: \hat \varphi
288: \end{eqnarray}
289: and
290: \begin{equation}
291: \hat \varphi = G \hat f =
292: \left[ \omega_0^2 - \omega^2 - i\omega \Gamma_0 - \omega \Sigma
293: \right]^{-1} \, \hat f \, .
294: \end{equation}
295: The ferrofluid-induced ´selfenergy´ $\Sigma(\omega)$ in the expression for the
296: dynamical response function $G(\omega)$ of the torsional pendulum is
297: \begin{eqnarray} \label{EQ:Sigma_poly}
298: \Sigma(\omega)
299: &=&
300: i \kappa \left(
301: 1 + N \sum_j \frac{\chi_{j0}}{1 - i\omega \tau_j}
302: \right)^{-1}
303: \sum_j \frac{\tau_j x_j^0}{1 - i\omega \tau_j} \, .
304: \end{eqnarray}
305: Its imaginary part changes the damping rate $\Gamma_0$ of the pendulum for
306: $\kappa=0$, i.e., in zero field. The real part shifts the resonance frequency
307: of the pendulum. In the special case of a monodisperse ferrofluid on has
308: \begin{eqnarray} \label{EQ:Sigma_mono}
309: \Sigma(\omega)
310: &=&
311: \frac{i\kappa \tau}{1 - i\omega \tau + N \chi_0}
312: \end{eqnarray}
313:
314:
315:
316: \section{Results}
317:
318: We evaluated the linear response function
319: $G(\omega)=\hat \varphi(\omega)/\hat f$ of the
320: pendulum's angular deviation amplitude $\hat \varphi(\omega)$ to the applied
321: forcing amplitude $\hat f$ and the
322: selfenergy $\Sigma(\omega)$ for some experimental parameters from \cite{BIB:tp}:
323: $\omega_0/2\pi = 32.7 Hz$, $\Gamma_0 = 0.178 Hz$, $V/\Theta = 20 m/kg$.
324: The cylinder is filled with the ferrofluid APG 933 of FERROTEC.
325: Therefore, we used in equation (\ref{EQ:Sigma_mono}) an experimental
326: $\tau =0.6ms$ and the experimental $M_{eq}(H)$ shown in fig. \ref{FIG:meq}.
327: These monodisperse results were compared with the expression
328: (\ref{EQ:Sigma_poly}) for the polydisperse case for the typical parameter
329: values $M_{mat}=456kA/m$,
330: $\eta = 0.5 Pa\cdot s$, $s=2nm$, $K=44kJ/m^3$ and $f_0=10^9 Hz$.
331: The contributions $w(d_j)$ that enter into the formulas (\ref{EQ:meq}) for the
332: susceptibilities $\chi_j$ are given by a lognormal distribution
333: \cite{BIB:vert}:
334: \begin{eqnarray}
335: w(d_j)
336: =
337: M_{sat} \frac{g(d_j) d_j}{\sum_{k=1}^{30} g(d_k) d_k}
338: & {\rm with} &
339: g(d_j)
340: =
341: \frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi} d_j \ln{\sigma}}
342: \exp{\left(-\frac{\ln^2{(d_j/d_0)}}{2\ln^2{\sigma}}\right)}
343: \end{eqnarray}
344: Fitting the experimental $M_{eq}(H)$ with a sum of Langevin functions
345: (\ref{EQ:meq}) yields $M_{sat}=18149A/m$, $d_0=7nm$ and $\sigma = 1.47$
346: (see fig. \ref{FIG:meq}).
347: We used here 30 different particle sizes from $d_1=1nm$ to $d_{30}=30nm$
348: (see fig. \ref{FIG:maggew}).
349:
350:
351:
352: The calculations show the additional damping rate caused by the interaction
353: between ferrofluid and external field. An increasing magnetic field leads to
354: smaller amplitudes; in polydisperse ferrofluids the amplitude decreases faster
355: [fig. \ref{FIG:absG} and \ref{FIG:max} (a)].
356: Furthermore, one can see a shift of the peak position to higher frequencies
357: $\omega_{max}$, which is stronger in polydisperse ferrofluids
358: [fig. \ref{FIG:absG} and \ref{FIG:max} (b)].
359:
360:
361: \begin{acknowledgments}
362: This work was supported by DFG (SFB 277) and by INTAS(03-51-6064).
363: \end{acknowledgments}
364:
365:
366:
367: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
368:
369: %-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
370: \bibitem{BIB:rosen}
371: R.~E.~Rosensweig,
372: {\it Ferrohydrodynamics},
373: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1985).
374:
375: %-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
376: \bibitem{BIB:vert}
377: J.~Embs, H.~W.~M\"uller, C.~E.~Krill, F.~Meyer, H.~Natter, B.~M\"uller,
378: S.~Wiegand, M.~L\"ucke, R.~Hempelmann, K.~Knorr,
379: %{\it Particle size analysis of ferrofluids},
380: Magnetohydrodynamics {\bf 37}, 222 (2001).
381:
382:
383: %-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
384: \bibitem{BIB:tp}
385: J.~Embs, H.~W.~M\"uller, M.~L\"ucke and K.~Knorr,
386: %{\it Shear free measurement of the rotational viscosity of ferrofluids with a
387: % forced torsional pendulum},
388: Magnetohydrodynamics {\bf 36}, 387 (2000);
389: J.~Embs, H.~W.~M\"uller, C.~Wagner, K.~Knorr and M.~L\"ucke,
390: %{\it Measuring the rotational viscosity of ferrofluids without shear flow},
391: Phys. Rev. E {\bf 61}, R2196 (2000).
392:
393:
394: \end{thebibliography}
395:
396:
397:
398: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
399:
400: \vspace{2cm}
401:
402:
403: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
404:
405:
406: %-------------------------Fig. 1 ---------------------------
407: \begin{figure}[htp]
408: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=12cm,angle=0]{sys.eps}}
409: \caption{Schematic plot of the system}
410: \label{FIG:sys}
411: \end{figure}
412: %------------------------------------------------------
413:
414:
415:
416: %-------------------------Fig. 2 ---------------------------
417: \begin{figure}[htp]
418: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=12cm,angle=0]{meq.eps}}
419: \caption{x: Experimental equilibrium magnetization $M_{eq}(H)$ used as input for
420: the monodisperse calculations;
421: full line: fit with lognormal contribution.}
422: \label{FIG:meq}
423: \end{figure}
424: %------------------------------------------------------
425:
426:
427: %-------------------------Fig. 3 ---------------------------
428: \begin{figure}
429: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=12cm,angle=0]{maggew.eps}}
430: \caption{lognormal contribution $w(d_i)$ ($d_1=1nm \dots d_{30}=30nm$)
431: used as input for the polydisperse calculations.}
432: \label{FIG:maggew}
433: \end{figure}
434: %----------------------------------------------------------------
435:
436:
437: %-------------------------Fig. 4 ---------------------------
438: \begin{figure}
439: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=12cm,angle=0]{absG.eps}}
440: \caption{$|G|$ near the resonance $\omega_0$;
441: x $H^{ext} = 0 kA/m$, squares $H^{ext} = 5 kA/m$, circles $H^{ext} = 10 kA/m$;
442: filled symbols: polydisperse.}
443: \label{FIG:absG}
444: \end{figure}
445: %----------------------------------------------------------------
446:
447:
448:
449:
450: %-------------------------Fig. 5 ---------------------------
451: \begin{figure}
452: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=12cm,angle=0]{max.eps}}
453: \caption{Maximum value $max|G|$ (a) and peak position $\omega_{max}$ (b)
454: as a function of external field $H^{ext}$;
455: full line monodisperse, dashed line polydisperse.}
456: \label{FIG:max}
457: \end{figure}
458: %----------------------------------------------------------------
459:
460:
461:
462: %-------------------------Fig. 6 ---------------------------
463: \begin{figure}
464: \centerline{\includegraphics[width=12cm,angle=0]{sigma.eps}}
465: \caption{$Re(\Sigma)$ (a) and $Im(\Sigma)$ (b) at $\omega = \omega_{max}$;
466: full line monodisperse, dashed line polydisperse. }
467: \label{FIG:sigma}
468: \end{figure}
469: %----------------------------------------------------------------
470:
471:
472:
473: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
474:
475: \end{document}
476:
477:
478:
479:
480:
481:
482:
483:
484:
485:
486:
487: