1: \documentstyle[times,pramana,epsfig,floats]{ias}
2: \def\chio{\tilde\chi{^0_1}}
3: \def\mchio{\mbox{$m_{\chio}$}}
4: \def\mt{\mbox{$m_{\rm \tilde{\rm t}_1}$}}
5: \def\mchi{m_{\chio}}
6: \def\cost{\mbox{$\cos\theta_{\rm \tilde t}$}}
7: \newcommand{\neu}{\tilde{\chi}^0}
8: \newcommand{\mst}{m_{\rm \tilde{t}_1}}
9: \newcommand{\mneu}[1]{m_{\tilde{\chi}^0_{#1}}}
10:
11: \begin{document}
12: \newcommand{\stp}{\tilde t_1}
13: \def\chio{\textstyle\raise.4ex\hbox{$\textstyle\tilde\chi{^0_1}$}}
14:
15: \begin{titlepage}
16:
17: \thispagestyle{empty}
18: \def\thefootnote{\fnsymbol{footnote}} % symbols for footnotes
19:
20: \begin{center}
21: \mbox{ }
22:
23: \end{center}
24: \begin{flushright}
25: \vspace* {-3.0cm}
26: \Large
27: \mbox{\hspace{10.2cm} physics/0609017} \\
28: \end{flushright}
29: \begin{center}
30: \vskip 1.0cm
31: {\Huge\bf
32: Scalar Top Study:
33: }
34: \vspace{2mm}
35:
36: {\Huge\bf
37: Detector Optimization
38: }
39: \vskip 1cm
40: {\LARGE\bf C. Milst\'ene$^1$, A. Sopczak$^2$}
41: \smallskip
42:
43: \Large $^1$Fermilab, USA; $^2$Lancaster University, UK
44:
45: \vskip 2.5cm
46: \centerline{\Large \bf Abstract}
47: \end{center}
48:
49: \vskip 3.5cm
50: \hspace*{-0.5cm}
51: \begin{picture}(0.001,0.001)(0,0)
52: \put(,0){
53: \begin{minipage}{\textwidth}
54: \Large
55: \renewcommand{\baselinestretch} {1.2}
56: A vertex detector concept of the Linear Collider Flavour Identification
57: (LCFI) collaboration, which studies pixel detectors for heavy quark flavour identification,
58: has been implemented in simulations for c-quark tagging in scalar top studies.
59: The production and decay of scalar top quarks (stops) is particularly interesting
60: for the development of the vertex detector as only two c-quarks
61: and missing energy (from undetected neutralinos) are produced for light stops.
62: Previous studies investigated the vertex detector design in
63: scenarios with large mass differences between stop and neutralino, corresponding
64: to large visible energy in the detector. In this study we investigate the tagging
65: performance dependence on the vertex detector design in a scenario with small visible energy
66: for the International Linear Collider (ILC).
67: \renewcommand{\baselinestretch} {1.}
68:
69: \normalsize
70: \vspace{2.5cm}
71: \begin{center}
72: {\sl \large
73: Presented at the 2006 International Linear Collider Workshop - Bangalore,
74: India, \\
75: to be published in the proceedings.
76: \vspace{-6cm}
77: }
78: \end{center}
79: \end{minipage}
80: }
81: \end{picture}
82: \vfill
83:
84: \end{titlepage}
85:
86: \newpage
87: \thispagestyle{empty}
88: \mbox{ }
89: \newpage
90: \setcounter{page}{1}
91:
92: \mark{{Linear Collider Workshop}{C. Milst\'ene and A. Sopczak}}
93: \title{Scalar Top Study: Detector Optimization}
94:
95: \author{C. Milst\'ene$^1$ and A. Sopczak$^2$}
96: \address{$^1$Fermilab, USA; $^2$Lancaster University, UK}
97:
98: \abstract{
99: A vertex detector concept of the Linear Collider Flavour Identification
100: (LCFI) collaboration, which studies pixel detectors for heavy quark flavour identification,
101: has been implemented in simulations for c-quark tagging in scalar top studies.
102: The production and decay of scalar top quarks (stops) is particularly interesting
103: for the development of the vertex detector as only two c-quarks
104: and missing energy (from undetected neutralinos) are produced for light stops.
105: Previous studies investigated the vertex detector design in
106: scenarios with large mass differences between stop and neutralino, corresponding
107: to large visible energy in the detector. In this study we investigate the tagging
108: performance dependence on the vertex detector design in a scenario with small visible energy
109: for the International Linear Collider (ILC).
110: }
111:
112: \maketitle
113: \section{Introduction}
114: The development of a vertex detector for a Linear Collider
115: is an important and challenging enterprise.
116: A key aspect is the distance of the innermost layer to the interaction point,
117: which is related to radiation hardness and beam background. Another key aspect
118: is the number of radiation lengths the particles go through, since it determines
119: the multiple scattering which affects the vertex reconstruction.
120:
121: The optimization of the vertex detector tagging performance
122: is of great importance for studies of physics processes.
123: While mostly at previous and current accelerators (e.g. SLC, LEP, Tevatron) b-quark
124: tagging has revolutionized many searches and measurements, c-quark tagging will
125: be very important at a future Linear Collider, for example, in studies of Supersymmetric
126: dark matter~\cite{Carena:2005gc}.
127: Therefore, c-quark tagging could be a benchmark for vertex detector developments.
128: The scalar top production and decay process, and the implemented vertex detector geometry
129: are shown before~\cite{det_snowmass05}.
130:
131: The analysis for a large mass difference with the SPS-5 parameter point (ISAJET)
132: $\mt = 220.7$~GeV, $\mchi = 120.0$ GeV and $\cost = 0.5377$ was previously
133: performed~\cite{andre_lcws04}.
134: For 25\% (12\%) efficiency 3800 (1800) signal events and 5400 (170) background events
135: without c-quark tagging were obtained,
136: while the background was reduced to 2300 (68) events with c-quark tagging.
137:
138: The vertex detector radiation length was varied between single thickness (TESLA TDR)
139: and double thickness. In addition, the number of vertex detector layers was varied between
140: 5 layers (innermost layer at 1.5 cm as in the TESLA TDR) and 4 layers (innermost layer at
141: 2.6 cm).
142: For SPS-5 parameters the following numbers of background events remain~\cite{andre_lcws04}:
143: \begin{center}
144: \vspace*{-1mm}
145: \begin{tabular}{l|c|cc}
146: Thickness& layers & 12\% signal efficiency~~~~ &25\% signal efficiency \\
147: \hline
148: Single & 5 (4) & 68 (82) & 2300 (2681) \\
149: Double & 5 (4) & 69 (92) & 2332 (2765)
150: \end{tabular}
151: \vspace*{-6mm}
152: \end{center}
153: A significant larger number of background events was expected if the first layer of the
154: vertex detector is removed. The distance of the first layer to the interaction point is also
155: an important aspect from the accelerator physics (beam delivery) perspective. The interplay between
156: the beam delivery and vertex detector design in regard to critical tolerances like hardware damage of the
157: first layer and occupancy (unable to use the data of the first layer) due to beam background goes
158: beyond the scope of this study and will be addressed in the future.
159:
160: For large visible energy (large mass difference) no significant increase in the expected background was
161: observed for doubling the thickness of the vertex detector
162: layers~\cite{andre_lcws04,susy05}. In this study the effect of the vertex
163: detector design for events with smaller visible energy in the detector is addressed.
164:
165: \section{Signal and Background Simulations}
166:
167: The production of simulated light stops at a 500 GeV Linear Collider is
168: analyzed using high luminosity ${\cal L} = 500~{\rm fb}^{-1}$.
169: The signature for stop pair production at an $\rm e^+e^-$ collider is two
170: charm jets and large missing energy:
171: \begin{equation}
172: \rm e^+e^- \to \tilde{t}_1 \, \bar{\tilde{t}}_1 \to c \, \neu_1 \, \bar{c} \, \neu_1.
173: \end{equation}
174: For small $\Delta m = \mst - \mneu{1}$, the jets are
175: relatively soft and separation from backgrounds is very challenging.
176: Backgrounds arising from various Standard Model processes can have
177: cross-sections that are several orders of magnitude larger than the signal.
178: Thus, it is necessary to study this process with a realistic detector simulation.
179: Signal and background events are generated with {\sc Pythia 6.129}~\cite{Sjostrand:2000wi},
180: including a scalar top signal generation~\cite{sopczak-stop-gen}
181: previously used in Ref.~\cite{as_stopsnew}. The detector simulation is
182: based on the fast simulation {\sc Simdet}~\cite{Pohl:2002vk},
183: describing a typical ILC detector. Good agreement in comparisons with
184: {\sc SGV}~\cite{berggren} detector simulations was obtained~\cite{andre_lcws04,susy05}.
185:
186: Cross-sections for the signal process and the relevant backgrounds
187: have been computed with code used in Ref.~\cite{slep} and
188: by {\sc Grace 2.0} \cite{grace}, with cross-checks to {\sc CompHep 4.4}~\cite{comphep}.
189: A minimal transverse momentum cut, $p_{\rm t} > 5$ GeV, is applied for the two-photon
190: background, to avoid the infrared divergence. Details of the event selection are given in
191: Ref.~\cite{Carena:2005gc}.
192:
193: The c-tagging with the LCFI detector is based on the vertex identification and a neural network
194: application~\cite{kuhl}. The vertex identification considered three cases for
195: each jet independently:
196: \begin{itemize}
197: \item [a)] only a primary vertex. In this case, the two tracks with the largest
198: separation in the $r$-$\phi$ plane are considered and for these tracks the neural network
199: variables include, the impact parameter and its significance
200: (impact parameter divided by uncertainty)
201: both in the $r$-$\phi$ plane and in the $z$-direction, their momenta, and the
202: joined probability in $r$-$\phi$ plane and $z$ direction.
203: \item [b)] one secondary vertex. In addition to the previous variables, the decay length significance
204: of the secondary vertex, the multiplicity and momenta of all associated tracks, and
205: the $P_t$ corrected mass of the secondary vertex (corrected for neutral hadrons
206: and neutrinos), the $P_t$ of the decay products perpendicular to the flight direction
207: between primary and secondary vertex, and the joint probability in $r$-$\phi$ and
208: $z$-direction.
209: \item [c)] more than one secondary vertex. Two secondary vertices are considered,
210: where the tracks are assigned to the vertex closest to the primary vertex, and
211: the neural network input variables are defined as in case b).
212: \end{itemize}
213: The neural network is tuned with 255,000 simulated signal and 240,000 $\rm W e \nu$ background
214: events. The signal events are a combination of all simulated signal events for the
215: scalar top mass range between 120 to 220 GeV and for $\Delta m=5,10$ and~15~GeV.
216:
217: After a preselection which substantially reduces the background while keeping about
218: 70\% of the signal, six sequential cuts are applied: number of jets,
219: missing energy, acollinearity, thrust angle, transverse momentum, and the
220: jet-jet invariant mass and c-tagging~\cite{Carena:2005gc}.
221: The background consists of the following processes $\rm W^+W^-$, $\rm ZZ$, $\rm W e\nu$,
222: $\rm e e Z$, $\rm q \bar{q} (\,q \neq t)$, $\rm t \bar{t}$, and two-photon.
223: After all cuts, the total background of about 5680 events is dominated by about 5044 $\rm W e\nu$ events~\cite{Carena:2005gc}.
224: A scalar top signal of 120 GeV has been simulated with a neutralino mass of 110 GeV.
225: The selection efficiency is about 20\%\footnote{The retuning of the c-tagging neural
226: network increased the selection efficiency from 19\%~\cite{Carena:2005gc} to 20\%
227: and the $\rm We\nu$ background from 5044~\cite{Carena:2005gc} to $5322\pm280$ events.}
228: and 11,500 signal events are expected for a standard LCFI vertex detector configuration as given in the
229: TESLA TDR.
230:
231: \section{Varying the Vertex Detector Design}
232:
233: This study of the vertex detector design is based on 50,000 simulated 120 GeV signal and 210,000
234: $\rm W e \nu$ background events for each detector design.
235: After preselection 29,842 signal and 53,314 $\rm We\nu$ events are selected, corresponding to
236: 34,318 and 779,450 events per 500~fb$^{-1}$, respectively.
237: This preselection signal efficiency of 59.7\% does not depend on the vertex detector design.
238: Four detector designs are compared:
239: \begin{itemize}
240: \item[VX$_{12}$:] the TESLA TDR design with 5 layers and single (0.064\% $X_0$ radiation length
241: per layer).
242: \item[VX$_{22}$:] 4 layers (the innermost layer removed). This scenario could for example occur if
243: the vertex detector is exposed to a large dose of machine background from the
244: accelerator.
245: The optimization of the radius of the innermost layer is an important
246: aspect in the design of a vertex detector for a Linear Collider.
247: \item[VX$_{32}$:] 5 layers and double material thickness (0.128\% $X_0$ radiation length per layer).
248: As the rigidity of the sensitive elements and the support structure is another
249: important aspect in the detector design, the material budget has to be taken into account.
250: \item[VX$_{42}$:] 4 layers (the innermost layer removed) and double thickness
251: (0.128\% $X_0$ radiation length per layer).
252: \end{itemize}
253: The c-tagging efficiency per event is normalized to the number of signal events
254: after the preselection and requiring two jets. At least one c-tagged jet is required
255: and the efficiency is given in Fig.~\ref{fig:design} as a function of the purity,
256: where purity is defined as the ratio of the number of simulated signal events after the c-tagging
257: to all c-tagged events assuming the same luminosity for signal and background.
258: The different purities are obtained by varying the cut on the c-tagging neural network variable.
259: The effect of the detector design variation increases with increasing purity (harder c-tagging neural network cut).
260: For the second set of points in the plot with purities about 18\% and c-tagging efficiencies between 85\% and 90\%,
261: the variation of the signal efficiency and the number of $\rm We\nu$ background events is given in the
262: table after all selection cuts.
263: \begin{center}
264: \begin{tabular}{l|c|c|c|c}
265: Thickness& layers & signal efficiency (in \%)&$\rm We\nu/210k$ &$\rm We\nu/500~fb^{-1}$ \\
266: \hline
267: Single & 5 (4) & 20.46 (19.67)& 364 (369)&5322 (5396) \\
268: Double & 5 (4) & 20.32 (19.52)& 366 (385)&5352 (5630) \\
269: & & $\pm 0.18$ & $\pm 19$ & $\pm 280$
270: \end{tabular}
271: \end{center}
272:
273: \begin{figure}[htbp]
274: \vspace*{-0.2cm}
275: \begin{center}
276: \includegraphics[width=\textwidth,height=6cm]{eff.eps}
277: \end{center}
278: \vspace*{-0.3cm}
279: \caption{Left: scalar top c-tagging efficiency and purity with $\rm W e\nu$ background
280: for different detector designs. The VX$_{12}$ curve is for a detector design with 5 layers
281: (innermost at 15~mm) and single density, curve VX$_{22}$ is for a detector design with 4
282: layers (innermost at 26~mm). Curves VX$_{32}$ and VX$_{42}$ are for double density
283: (0.128\% $X_0$ radiation length per layer) with 4 and 5 layers, respectively.
284: Right: expected signal efficiency and number of $\rm We\nu$ background events for the four
285: detector designs. The statistical uncertainties are also given.
286: } \label{fig:design}
287: \vspace*{-0.6cm}
288: \end{figure}
289:
290: \section{Results}
291: \vspace*{-0.2cm}
292: These results for small visible energy ($\Delta m = 10$~GeV) lead to the same
293: observation as for large visible energy (SPS-5 scenario with $\Delta m = 100.7$~GeV).
294: The radius of the innermost layer of the vertex detector has a large effect on
295: the c-quark tagging performance.
296: Curves VX$_{12}$ and VX$_{22}$ of Fig.~\ref{fig:design} show the performance for radii 15 and
297: 26~mm, respectively.
298: There is no significant effect on the c-quark tagging performance from doubling the material
299: budget (e.g. curves VX$_{12}$ and VX$_{32}$ of Fig.~\ref{fig:design}).
300: The increase of multiple scattering is not significant between single and double
301: thickness (0.128\% $X_0$ radiation length per layer).
302:
303: In order to quantitatively estimate the multiple scattering effect, the number of tracks
304: per signal event and the visible energy have been determined. The minimum visible energy
305: per event is about 10~GeV and the maximum number of tracks is about 20, therefore the minimum
306: track energy is about 0.5~GeV. The analytical calculation of the multiple scattering angle
307: is given by $ \theta\approx 13.6/P\cdot \sqrt{x/X_0},$
308: where the track momentum $P$ is given in MeV.
309: The displacement at the interaction point is $d\approx R\theta$, where $R$ is the radius
310: of the innermost layer of the vertex detector. For $P=500$~MeV, $x/X_0=0.128\%$ and $R=15$~mm,
311: $d=15\mu$m.
312: This small value compared to the flight distance of charm mesons explains the insignificant effect on
313: the c-quark tagging from the multiple scattering increase by doubling the vertex detector layer
314: thickness.
315:
316: \section{Conclusions}
317:
318: In conclusion, the studies with a small visible energy signal lead to the same results
319: as in the previous study for large visible energy regarding the vertex detector design.
320: A strong dependence on the detector performance on the radius of the innermost
321: vertex detector layer has been observed, while doubling the material thickness
322: has no significant effect on the c-quark tagging performance in scalar
323: top studies at the ILC.
324: The optimization of the radius of the innermost vertex detector layer will have
325: to take into account the accelerator background which depends on the machine optics
326: and the collimation system.
327:
328: \section*{Acknowledgements}
329: AS\,would\,like\,to\,thank\,the\,organizers\,of\,the\,workshop\,for\,making\,this\,presentation\,possible.
330:
331: \vspace*{-3mm}
332: \begin{thebibliography}{99}
333: \vspace*{-3mm}
334:
335: \bibitem{Carena:2005gc}
336: M.~Carena, A.~Finch, A.~Freitas, C.~Milst\`ene, H.~Nowak and A.~Sopczak, Phys. Rev. {\bf D72} (2005) 115008.
337:
338: \bibitem{det_snowmass05}
339: C.~Milst\'ene and A.~Sopczak, Econf C0508141:ALCPG1431, 2005.
340:
341: \bibitem{andre_lcws04}
342: A. Finch, H. Nowak and A. Sopczak, ``CCD Vertex Detector Charm-Tagging Performance in Studies of Scalar\,Top
343: Quark Decays'', Proc. of the Int. Conference on Linear Colliders (LCWS 04), Paris, France, 19-24 April 2004.
344:
345: \bibitem{susy05} A.~Sopczak, M.~Carena, A.~Finch, A.~Freitas, C.~Milst\'ene, H.~Nowak,
346: ``Scalar Top Quark Studies with Various Visible Energies'',
347: presented at the 13th Int. Conference on Supersymmetry and Unification of Fundamental Interactions
348: (SUSY'05), Durham, UK, July 18-23, 2005.
349:
350: \bibitem{Sjostrand:2000wi}
351: T.~Sj\"ostrand et al., Comput.\ Phys.\ Commun.\ {\bf 135}, 238 (2001).
352:
353: \bibitem{sopczak-stop-gen} A.\,Sopczak,\,in\,PHYSICS\,AT\,LEP2,\,``Event\,Generators\,for\,Discovery\,Physics'',
354: CERN\,Yellow\,Report\,CERN 96-01.
355:
356: \bibitem{as_stopsnew} A. Finch, H. Nowak and A. Sopczak,
357: contributed paper EPS370, Int. Conference on High-Energy Physics
358: (HEP 2003), Aachen, Germany, 17-23 July 2003 [LC Note LC-PHSM-2003-075].
359:
360: \bibitem{Pohl:2002vk}
361: M.~Pohl and H.~J.~Schreiber, hep-ex/0206009.
362:
363: \bibitem{berggren}
364: M.\,Berggren,\,Simulation\,Grand\,Vitesse\,(SGV),\,http://berggren.home.cern.ch/berggren/sgv.html
365:
366: \bibitem{slep}
367: A.~Freitas, D.~J.~Miller and P.~M.~Zerwas, Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 21} (2001) 361;\\
368: A.~Freitas, A.~von Manteuffel and P.~M.~Zerwas, Eur.\ Phys.\ J.\ C {\bf 34} (2004) 487.
369:
370: \bibitem{grace}
371: F.~Yuasa et al., Prog.\ Theor.\ Phys.\ Suppl.\ {\bf 138}, 18 (2000).
372:
373: \bibitem{comphep} E.~Boos et al. [CompHEP Collaboration], Nucl.\ Instrum.\ Meth.\ A {\bf 534}, 250 (2004).
374:
375: \bibitem{kuhl}
376: T.~Kuhl, ``Hadronic branching ratio of a SM-like Higgs boson at a future linear collider'',
377: Proc. of the Int. Conference on Linear Colliders (LCWS 04), Paris, France, 19-24 April 2004.
378:
379: \vspace*{-0.7cm}
380: \end{thebibliography}
381:
382: \end{document}
383: