1: %%%=======================================================
2: %%% =
3: %%% = Sample layout file for the class "aipproc"
4: %%% =
5: %%% = DO NOT USE THIS FILE AS A TEMPLATE FOR YOUR DOCUMENTS
6: %%% =
7: %%% = Instead use the file template-xx.tex
8: %%% =
9: %%%=======================================================
10:
11:
12: \input{aipcheck.tex}
13:
14: \newcommand\sps{\space\space\space\space}
15: \typeout{}
16: \typeout{!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!}
17: \typeout{!! \sps\sps\sps\sps\sps\sps\sps\sps\sps\sps\sps\sps!!}
18: \typeout{!! This is *NOT* a template file for producing \sps!!}
19: \typeout{!! new documents. \sps\sps\sps\sps\sps\sps\sps\sps\space!!}
20: \typeout{!!\sps\sps\sps+---------------+\sps\sps\sps\sps\sps!!}
21: \typeout{!! Please use |template-xx.tex| for this purpose! \space!!}
22: \typeout{!!\sps\sps\sps+---------------+\sps\sps\sps\sps\sps!!}
23: \typeout{!! (the 'xx' depends on the distribution) \sps\sps\space!!}
24: \typeout{!! \sps\sps\sps\sps\sps\sps\sps\sps\sps\sps\sps\sps!!}
25: \typeout{!! This file is for testing and displaying the \sps!!}
26: \typeout{!! AIP layouts only. \sps\sps\sps\sps\sps\sps\sps\space\space!!}
27: \typeout{!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!}
28: \typeout{}
29:
30:
31: \typeout{}
32: \typeout{**********************************************}
33: \typeout{*}
34: \typeout{* Here you can type in any options for the class.}
35: \typeout{* A full list of supported options is described in}
36: \typeout{* the aipguide documentation.}
37: \typeout{*}
38: \typeout{* Or you may simply press the <RETURN> key in which}
39: \typeout{* case the file is processed with the standard settings.}
40: \typeout{*}
41: \typeout{**********************************************}
42: \typeout{}
43: %\typein[\selectedoptions]{Any options to the class?}
44: %\ifx\empty\selectedoptions
45: % \def\selectedoptions{final}
46: %\fi
47: \def\selectedoptions{final}
48:
49: \documentclass[
50: \selectedoptions
51: ]
52: {aipproc}
53:
54:
55:
56: \newcommand\sample{%
57: Infandum, regina, iubes renovare dolorem, Troianas ut opes et
58: lamen\-ta\-bile regnum cruerint Danai; quaeque ipse miserrima vidi, et
59: quorum pars magna fui. Quis talia fando Myrmidonum Dolopumve aut duri
60: miles Ulixi temperet a lacrimis? \smallsample
61: }
62:
63: \newcommand\smallsample{%
64: Et iam nox umida caelo praecipitat,
65: suadentque cadentia sidera somnos.
66: Sed si tantus amor casus cognoscere
67: nostros et breviter Troiae supremum audire laborem, quamquam animus
68: meminisse horret, luctuque refugit, incipiam.
69: }
70:
71: \typeout{}
72: \typeout{**********************************************}
73: \typeout{*}
74: \typeout{* Type in the layout style name to be used:}
75: \typeout{*}
76: \typeout{* `6x9' for AIP proceedings 6x9 inch single column}
77: \typeout{* `8x11single' for AIP proceedings 8x11 inch single column}
78: \typeout{* `8x11double' for AIP proceedings 8x11 inch double column}
79: \typeout{* `arlo' for Acoustics Research Letters Online}
80: \typeout{*}
81: \typeout{* ATTENTION:}
82: \typeout{*}
83: \typeout{* \space Typesetting the guide with different styles might
84: produce}
85: \typeout{* \space errors if the .aux file is kept between runs!}
86: \typeout{*}
87: \typeout{**********************************************}
88: \typeout{}
89: %\typein[\selectedlayoutstyle]{What layout?}
90: \def\selectedlayoutstyle{6x9}
91: \layoutstyle\selectedlayoutstyle
92:
93: \SetInternalRegister\hbadness{8000} % pseudo latin isn't breaking very well :-)
94:
95:
96: % We need something to show special stuff for ARLO only.
97: %
98: \newcommand\doingARLO[2][]{%
99: \ifx\mmref\undefined #1\else #2\fi
100: }
101:
102:
103: \begin{document}
104:
105: \title
106: [Infandum, regina, iubes renovare dolorem]
107: {Performance of the PRIMEX Electromagnetic Calorimeter}
108:
109: %\classification{43.35.Ei, 78.60.Mq}
110: \classification{}
111: \keywords{calorimeter, photon, energy resolution}
112:
113: \author{M.Kubantsev}{
114: address={Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics,
115: Moscow, Russia/Northwestern University, Evanston, Il 60208, USA},
116: email={kubants@fnal.gov}
117: }
118:
119: \iftrue
120: \author{I. Larin}{
121: address={Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics,
122: Moscow, Russia},
123: email={larin@itep.ru},
124: }
125:
126: \author{A. Gasparyan}{
127: address={Physics Department NC A\&T State University Greensboro, NC 27411, USA},
128: email={david@dcarlisle.demon.co.uk},
129: }
130: \fi
131:
132: % \copyrightholder{Acoustical Scociety of America}
133: \copyrightyear {2001}
134:
135:
136:
137: \begin{abstract}
138: \normalsize
139: We report the design and performance of the hybrid
140: electromagnetic calorimeter for the PRIMEX experiment
141: at Jefferson Laboratory. The detector was designed,
142: constructed and used for high precision measurement
143: of the lifetime of the neutral pion via the Primakoff
144: effect. Calorimeter installation and commissioning was
145: completed with first physics run in fall of 2004.
146: Especially we present calorimeter energy and position
147: resolution at the transition region between PWO crystals
148: and lead glass.
149: \end{abstract}
150:
151:
152: \date{2006/07/05}
153:
154:
155: \maketitle
156:
157: \bigskip
158:
159: \section{Introduction}
160:
161:
162: Measurement of the partial width of the
163: decay $\pi^{0} \to \gamma\gamma$ provides an unique test of low energy
164: QCD in confinement scale regime. The experiment PRIMEX (Primakoff
165: Experiment) \ref{prop} was designed to
166: make a high precision (one percent level) measurement of this decay.
167: Tagged photon beam at Hall B of the Jefferson Laboratory was used for
168: forward production of neutral pions in the Coulomb field of the target
169: nucleus (Primakoff effect). The two photons from the pion decay are
170: detected in the Hybrid Calorimeter (HYCAL). The HYCAL was designed to
171: provide high efficiency registration of the photons with high resolution
172: in energy and space. In present talk we describe physics requirements
173: for calorimeter, design and construction of the setup, calibration and
174: performance during the physics data taking. We summarize calorimeter
175: characteristics in the conclusion.
176:
177: \section{Physic Requirements}
178: As we measure absolute value of the cross section
179: high photon efficiency is essential for precise measurements as well as accurate
180: monitoring of the tagged photon beam. The Primakoff production cross section
181: is peaked at $~0.3 mrad$ for nucleon target at energies of this experiment
182: ($E_{\gamma} = 4.9 - 5.5 GeV$).
183: \newpage
184: High angular and energy resolutions are required to cleanly distinguish the
185: Primakoff mechanism from $\pi^{0}$ production by other processes, and good
186: invariant mass reconstruction is essential for rejection of backgrounds.
187:
188:
189: Using Intensive Monte Carlo studies and data from the beam test of the
190: prototypes we formulated requirements for the calorimeter performance:
191:
192: $\gamma\gamma$ invariant mass resolution is to be better than 2.5 $MeV/c^2$
193:
194: angular resolution for reconstructed $\pi^0$ is better than 0.35 mrad.
195:
196: \section{Design of the Calorimeter}
197: We have chosen a hybrid calorimeter scheme where the central
198: part of the detector is made of high resolution scintillating crystals
199: with a hole in the middle for the passage of the photon beam and the
200: peripheral part is consisting of lead glass Cherenkov modules.To ensure
201: high performance of the calorimeter the central part of the detector
202: was constructed from 1152 lead tungstate (PWO) scintillating crystals
203: surrounded with 576 lead glass blocks. The transverse dimensions of the
204: HYCAL ($116 x116 cm^2$) were chosen to have sufficient geometrical
205: acceptance with fixed central hole ($4 x 4 cm^2$) in
206: the middle of the detector.This design is based on an optimization of the
207: cost and performance of the calorimeter.
208: It allows us to have maximal efficiency for $\pi^0$ decay photons without
209: prohibitive cost of the large area crystal calorimeter.
210: At a distance of 7.3 m from the production
211: target, the calorimeter has about 70\% geometrical acceptance for forward
212: neutral pions.
213: Since the area
214: around the photon beam is under high rate irradiation the crystals used should
215: be radiation hard. The
216: best crystals available now are lead tungstate ($PbWO_4$) which were developed
217: for the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter Collaboration at Russia and China.
218: Since the Russian crystal production is saturated by LHC experiments
219: under construction we worked with Shanghai Institute of Ceramics which
220: provided the crystals of high quality under our strict specifications.
221: The crystals dimensions of 20.5 x 20.5 x 180 $mm^3$ were chosen.
222: The individual crystals were wrapped in 100 ${\mu}m$ VM2000 sheets. The crystals were
223: viewed by the Hamamatsu R4125HA photomultiplier tubes coupled to them with optical
224: grease. As the PWO crystal light yield is highly temperature dependent
225: (~2\%/${\deg}C$ at room temperature) and increasing with decrease of temperature, so
226: temperature stabilization of the calorimeter is mandatory.
227: The operational temperature was chosen to be 14$^{0}C$ using cooled water circulation
228: through tubes installed in the outer body of the calorimeter to provide
229: thermal stabilization.
230:
231: The lead glass modules supplied by IHEP (Serpukhov, Russia) with
232: dimensions 38 x 38 x450 $mm^2$ were made from the same type of glass
233: used in many experiments at high energies and in the Jefferson Laboratory
234: and its properties are well known. The lead glass blocks are wrapped in 25
235: ${\mu}m$ aluminized Mylar foil. The Cherenkov light produced in lead
236: glass radiator is detected by The FEU-84-3 photomultiplier tube.
237:
238:
239: The photograph of the detector during assembly is shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:calpix}
240: The HYCAl calorimeter on its support stand in the run configuration is
241: shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:cal1a}
242: \clearpage
243:
244: \begin{center}
245: \begin{figure}
246: \caption{Photograph of the HYCAL calorimeter during assembly:
247: crystal and lead glass arraysare shown}
248: \label{fig:calpix}
249: \includegraphics[angle=270,width=0.5\textwidth]{hycal_pix.eps}
250: \end{figure}
251:
252: \begin{figure}[!h]
253: %\includegraphics[angle=270,width=1.0\textwidth]{cal11a.eps}
254: \caption{Scheme of the HYCAL calorimeter}
255: \label{fig:cal1a}
256: \special{psfile=cal11a.eps
257: hoffset=-200
258: voffset=0
259: hscale=50
260: vscale=50
261: angle=270}
262:
263: \end{figure}
264: \end{center}
265:
266: \vspace{10.0cm}
267:
268: The PrimEx DAQ system read out over 2200 channels of ADC and TDC and utilize
269: a CODA based Fastbus system with Trigger Supervisor module. A big advantage
270: of this system (see Fig.~\ref{fig:electr}) is the ability to operate in fully
271: buffered mode. Namely, events are buffered in the digitization modules themselves
272: allowing the modules to be "live" during readout. This significantly reduce the
273: dead time of the experiment. It is particularly important to have a low dead time
274: for the absolute cross section measurements of the $\pi^{0}$ Primakoff production.
275:
276: \section{Calibration}
277:
278:
279: To make possible calibration of all modules of the calorimeter with
280: photon beam, the HYCAL is assembled in a steel box in the calorimeter frame.
281: To do this the entire assembly with weight of about five tons is movable in
282: both horizontal and vertical directions with position accuracy of
283: $\pm 0.7 mm$. A transporter has been designed and built to provide
284: movement of the entire assembly with support frame, thermo-stabilization
285: system light monitoring and the delay cables. The calorimeter position is
286: remotely movable during calibration, so each module positioned in the beam.
287:
288: In order to maintain high performance of the calorimeter, periodic energy
289: calibration with tagged photon beam is required. As this procedure may take
290: significant beam time and can not be performed often, so an optical monitorting
291: system is used meantime as relative calibration.
292: The Light Monitoring System consists of the following main parts: a light source,
293: a light mixing box, a light distribution system, reference detectors with DAQ
294: system. The light source comprises an assembly of NICHIA super bright blue LEDs
295: (peak wavelenght 470 nm). Light mixing is done using a six inch diameter
296: integrating sphere (ORIEL) providing 2000 distribution channels. Light is distributed
297: to the individual calorimeter modules via a bundle of plastic fibers. Each fiber
298: is attached to the front face of the individual detector module. As a reference stable
299: detector a HAMAMATSU PIN photodiode (S3399, 3 mm diameter) with AMPTEC
300: low noise charge amplifier was used. Light from the light monitoring system is
301: periodically injected into the detector modules between real events during data
302: taking.
303: \begin{center}
304: \begin{figure}
305: \includegraphics[angle=0,width= 0.7\textwidth]{crystal_res.eps}
306: \caption{Energy resolution of the PWO crystals}
307: \label{fig:pwor}
308: \end{figure}
309: \begin{figure}
310: \includegraphics[angle=0,width=0.7\textwidth]{glass_res.eps}
311: \caption{Energy resolution of the lead glass}
312: \label{fig:lgr}
313: \end{figure}
314: \end{center}
315:
316: Tagged photon beam irradiated each module of the calorimeter during
317: calibration runs. A "snake scan" scheme was used. After calibration
318: relative gains of the modules
319: and energy resolution of the detector are found.
320: Measured dependence of energy resolution on photon energy for PWO and lead
321: glass parts of the detector are shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:pwor} and
322: Fig.~\ref{fig:lgr}.
323:
324: The final fine-tuning of the modules gains was made using photons from decays of
325: neutral pions observed in the experiment.
326:
327:
328: \clearpage
329:
330: \section{Physics Run performance}
331:
332: The experiment has took physics data in November 2004. Several exposures with
333: beryllium, carbon, tin and lead targets were taken. Performance of the calorimeter
334: was studied using several observed physics processes: quasielastic and inelastic
335: neutral pion photoproduction, Compton scattering and pair production.
336:
337: First, we consider Compton scattering which provides four constraints of the
338: reaction kinematics and allows to study energy and space resolutions of the
339: detector however in limited range of small angles for the central PWO region
340: of the calorimeter. In Fig.~\ref{fig:p15} three
341: distributions of ratio of observed total energy in the calorimeter to the
342: incident energy of the tagged photon (~5.2 GeV) is plotted. The width of the
343: distribution of 1.5\% after calibration reduced to 1.1\% after the transverse
344: momentum correction ($P_t = 0$). If no calorimeter energy information is used but
345: only coordinate of the showers detected is considered the width became 1.7\%
346: showing importance of energy resolution.
347:
348:
349: \begin{center}
350: \begin{figure}[!h]
351: %\includegraphics[angle=0,width=0.7\textwidth]{p15.eps}
352: \special{psfile=p15.eps
353: hoffset=-220
354: voffset=-400
355: hscale=70
356: vscale=70}
357: \special{psfile=abc.eps
358: hoffset=-170
359: voffset=-70
360: hscale=70
361: vscale=70}
362:
363: \caption{Ratio of sum of electron and photon energies measured in the calorimeter
364: and tagged $\gamma$ energy at $5.2 \pm 0.3 GeV$}
365: \label{fig:p15}
366: \end{figure}
367: \end{center}
368:
369: \vspace{5.0cm}
370:
371:
372: The Fig.~\ref{fig:p16} shows resolution in $\pi^0$ mass in the central (PWO)
373: region of the calorimeter. The left part shows the distribution after the final
374: calibration on the nominal mass of the neutral pion (observed width of $2.3 MeV/c^2$)
375: and on the right the peak of quasielastic neutral pion production after correction
376: on the primary tagged photon energy is presented. The observed width of $1.3 Mev/c^2$
377: in latter case reflects angular resolution of the calorimeter. As the calorimeter
378: also detects many events of inelastic $\pi^0$ production we see a high mass tail of
379: the peak corresponding to this process: due to lower energy of such pions the
380: energy constrain shifts its mass to the higher value.
381: We studied $\pi^0$ mass resolution for transition region of the detector as well as
382: lead glass periphery. the results are shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:p17} and
383: Fig.~\ref{fig:p18}.
384:
385: \clearpage
386:
387: \begin{center}
388: \begin{figure}[!h]
389: %\includegraphics[angle=0,width=0.7\textwidth]{p16.eps}
390: \special{psfile=p16.eps
391: hoffset=-220
392: voffset=-400
393: hscale=70
394: vscale=70}
395:
396: \special{psfile=ab.eps
397: hoffset=-170
398: voffset=-70
399: hscale=70
400: vscale=70}
401:
402:
403: \caption{$\pi^0$ mass resolution for the PWO array. Left:after final calibration
404: on the nominal $\pi^0$ mass; Right: after correction on the tagged phot energy:
405: remaining width mostly due to coordinate resolution}
406: \label{fig:p16}
407: \end{figure}
408:
409: \vspace{6.5cm}
410:
411: \begin{figure}[!h]
412: %\includegraphics[angle=0,width=0.7\textwidth]{p17.eps}
413: \special{psfile=p17.eps
414: hoffset=-220
415: voffset=-400
416: hscale=70
417: vscale=70}
418:
419: \special{psfile=ab.eps
420: hoffset=-170
421: voffset=-70
422: hscale=70
423: vscale=70}
424:
425:
426: \caption{$\pi^0$ mass resolution for the PWO-Lead Glass border. Left:after final calibration
427: on the nominal $\pi^0$ mass; Right: after correction on the tagged photon energy:
428: remaining width mostly due to coordinate resolution}
429: \label{fig:p17}
430: \end{figure}
431: %\end{center}
432:
433: \vspace{6.5cm}
434:
435: %\begin{center}
436: \begin{figure}[!h]
437: %\includegraphics[angle=0,width=0.7\textwidth]{p18.eps}
438: \special{psfile=p18.eps
439: hoffset=-220
440: voffset=-400
441: hscale=70
442: vscale=70}
443:
444: \special{psfile=ab.eps
445: hoffset=-170
446: voffset=-70
447: hscale=70
448: vscale=70}
449:
450: \caption{$\pi^0$ mass resolution for the lead glass array. Left:after final calibration
451: on the nominal $\pi^0$ mass; Right: after correction on the tagged phot energy:
452: remaining width mostly due to coordinate resolution}
453: \label{fig:p18}
454: \end{figure}
455: \end{center}
456:
457: \clearpage
458:
459: \section{Conclusion}
460:
461: Resolution is decreasing from $2.6 MeV/c^2$ on the border
462: to $4.5 MeV/c^2$ in the lead glass. Correction on the
463: primary energy significantly improve the resolution, at the same time we see
464: increase of the tail of the inelastic production as detection angles are increasing.
465:
466: The success of the experiment is determined how well the low angle pion production
467: is measured. In the Fig.~\ref{fig:p19} pion angular distributions for quasielastic
468: (corrected) neutral pion production presented for Carbon and Lead exposures.
469: Clearly Primakoff production peak is seen for both data sets. This shows good
470: calorimeter performance which should be adequate for the precision measurement of
471: the $\pi^0$ lifetime.
472:
473: The high precision hybrid electromagnetic calorimeter (HYCAL) was designed,
474: constructed and run in physics experiment to measure lifetime of the neutral
475: pion via Primakoff effect. The measured characteristics of the detector fully
476: correspond to the design parameters. It allowed collecting a rich high quality
477: data sets to extract $\pi^0$ lifetime. The preliminary results are expected
478: in the end of this summer. Authors thank all PrimEx collaboration for excellent
479: work of design, construction, running and data analysis of the experiment.
480: Stable performance of the CEBAF accelerator is gratefully acknowledged.
481: The work was supported by the US NSF grant (PHY-0079840) and RFBR grant
482: (04-02-17466).
483:
484: %\clearpage
485:
486: \doingARLO[\bibliographystyle{aipproc}]
487: {\ifthenelse{\equal{\AIPcitestyleselect}{num}}
488: {\bibliographystyle{arlonum}}
489: {\bibliographystyle{arlobib}}
490: }
491: \bibliography{sample}
492: \begin{thebibliography}{sample}
493:
494: \bibitem{prim_prop}
495: Primex Proposal
496: (http://www.jlab.org/primex/primex\_notes/PR99-014.ps) \\
497: Primex Collaboration, December 17, 1998\\
498: \bibitem{prim_cdr}
499: Primex Conceptual Design Report
500: (http://www.jlab.org/primex/primex\_notes/PrimEx\_CDR.ps) \\
501: Primex Collaboration, March 3, 2000\\
502: \bibitem{ashot2004}
503: High Performance PbWO4 Hybrid Calorimeter at Jefferson Lab \\
504: A. Gasparian, Proceedings to Calor-2004, March 30 \\
505: \\
506: \bibitem{prim_lms}
507: LED Based Light Monitoring System for the PrimEx Experiment at Jefferson Lab
508: (Proceedings Contribution to Calor-2002)
509: (http://www.jlab.org/primex/primex\_lmc\_c.ps) \\
510: Samuel Danagulian, 2002\\
511: \end{thebibliography}
512:
513:
514: \end{document}
515:
516: