1: \documentclass[aps,prd,twocolumn,superscriptaddress,showpacs,preprintnumbers,nofootinbib,altaffilletter,bibnotes]{revtex4}
2:
3: \usepackage{amsmath}
4: \usepackage{amssymb}
5: \usepackage{epsfig}
6:
7: \begin{document}
8: \def\simle{\mathrel{\rlap{\raise 0.511ex \hbox{$<$}}{\lower 0.511ex \hbox{$\sim$}}}}
9: %\newcommand{\be}{\begin{equation}}
10: %\newcommand{\ee}{\end{equation}}
11: %\newcommand{\bad}{\begin{array}{ccc}}
12: %\newcommand{\bea}{\begin{equation} \begin{array}{c}}
13: %\newcommand{\eea}{ \end{array} \end{equation}}
14: %\newcommand{\ea}{\end{array}}
15: %\newcommand{\cal}{\mathcal}
16:
17: %\begin{frontmatter}
18:
19: % Title, authors and addresses
20:
21: % use the thanksref command within \title, \author or \address for footnotes;
22: % use the corauthref command within \author for corresponding author footnotes;
23: % use the ead command for the email address,
24: % and the form \ead[url] for the home page:
25: % \title{Title\thanksref{label1}}
26: % \thanks[label1]{}
27: % \author{Name\corauthref{cor1}\thanksref{label2}}
28: % \ead{email address}
29: % \ead[url]{home page}
30: % \thanks[label2]{}
31: % \corauth[cor1]{}
32: % \address{Address\thanksref{label3}}
33: % \thanks[label3]{}
34:
35: \title{Performance Of A Liquid Argon Time Projection Chamber Exposed
36: To The WANF Neutrino Beam}
37:
38: %%% Author list %%%
39: \input{authorlist}
40:
41:
42: %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
43:
44: \begin{abstract}
45: We present the results of the first exposure of a Liquid Argon TPC to a
46: multi-GeV neutrino beam. The data have been collected with a 50 liters
47: ICARUS-like chamber located between the CHORUS and NOMAD experiments
48: at the CERN West Area Neutrino Facility (WANF). We discuss both the
49: instrumental performance of the detector and its capability to
50: identify and reconstruct low multiplicity neutrino interactions.
51: \end{abstract}
52:
53: %\begin{keyword}
54: % keywords here, in the form: keyword \sep keyword
55: %Liquid Argon \sep TPC \sep Neutrino Interactions
56:
57: % PACS codes here, in the form: \PACS code \sep code
58: \pacs{29.40.Gx, 13.15.+g}
59: %\end{keyword}
60: \maketitle
61:
62: % main text
63: \section{Introduction}
64: \label{introduction}
65:
66: The Liquid Argon Time Projection Chamber (LAr TPC) technology was
67: originally proposed by C. Rubbia in 1977~\cite{ref:Rubbia77},
68: as a novel concept for a massive neutrino detector that allows
69: three-dimensional event reconstruction with high accuracy and precise
70: calorimetric measurement. The feasibility of the technology, developed
71: inside the context of the ICARUS project~\cite{ref:proposal}, has
72: been demonstrated by an extensive R$\&$D programme
73: that addressed the main technological challenges of the LAr
74: detection technique (i.e. argon purification, wire chambers, electronics,
75: DAQ, etc.). The ICARUS collaboration has been able to operate prototypes of
76: increasing mass (3 tons~\cite{ref:3ton,ref:purification}, 14 tons~\cite{ref:14ton},
77: 600 tons~\cite{ref:600ton}) and therefore the LAr TPC
78: can now be considered as a mature technology
79: able to produce multi-kton detectors for astroparticle and neutrino
80: physics.
81:
82: Within the broad physics programme of the ICARUS project, an important
83: issue is the study of oscillations through the detection of
84: long-baseline neutrino interactions. The possibility to observe
85: $\nu_\mu \to \nu_e$ and $\nu_\mu \to \nu_\tau$ by means of kinematic
86: criteria is known to be limited, among others, by the knowledge we have of
87: nuclear effects (Fermi motion, nuclear re-scattering and absorption, etc.).
88: Therefore it is very important to acquire experimental data in order
89: to tune the existing Monte-Carlo models. In addition, the exposure of a LAr TPC
90: to a neutrino beam is mandatory to demonstrate the high recognition
91: capability of the technique and gain experience with real neutrino events.
92:
93: In 1997, the ICARUS collaboration together with a group from
94: INFN and Milano University~\cite{ref:Stefano} proposed to expose a 50 liter LAr TPC
95: to the multi-GeV wide band neutrino beam of the CERN West Area Neutrino Facility
96: (WANF)~\cite{ref:wanf}, during the NOMAD~\cite{ref:NOMAD} and
97: CHORUS~\cite{ref:CHORUS} data taking. The test was part of an
98: R\&D program for a medium baseline
99: $\nu_\tau$ appearance experiment~\cite{ref:icarus-cern-mi}. The idea
100: was to collect a substantial sample of quasi-elastic interactions
101: ($\nu_\mu$ + n $\to$ p + $\mu^-$) to study the following physics items:
102: \begin{itemize}
103: \item Measurement of the acoplanarity and missing transverse momentum
104: in events with the $\mu$-p topology in the final state, in order to
105: assess Fermi motion and proton re-scattering inside the nucleus.
106: \item Appearance of nuclear fragments (short tracks and {\it blobs}
107: around the primary interaction vertex) in quasi-elastic events.
108: \item A preliminary evaluation of e/$\gamma$ and e/$\pi^0$
109: discrimination capability by means of the specific ionization measured
110: on the wires at the beginning of the candidate track. This measurement
111: is limited by the size of the chamber.
112: \end{itemize}
113:
114: The data collected in 1997 offer the unique opportunity to study
115: nuclear effects in the Argon nucleus and to assess the identification and
116: reconstruction capability of a LAr TPC for low-multiplicity neutrino events.
117: The present work shows, for the first time, a comprehensive set of results
118: from the 1997 test (see \cite{ref:pietropaolo,ref:tesi_alessandro,ref:tesi,ref:curioni}
119: for preliminary results). The structure of the paper is as follows: the
120: experimental setup and the instrumental performance of the 50 liters TPC
121: are discussed in Sec.~\ref{sec:Setup} and Sec.~\ref{sec:TPC},
122: respectively. In Sec.~\ref{sec:event_reconstruction} the event
123: reconstruction and particle identification are detailed. The analysis
124: of a ``golden-sample'' of quasi-elastic (QE) $\nu_\mu$ CC interactions is presented in
125: Sec.~\ref{sec:Analysis_QE} together with a comparison with theoretical
126: expectations.
127:
128: \section{The experimental setup}
129: \label{sec:Setup}
130:
131: The LAr TPC was placed on a platform 4.5 meters above
132: ground, right in between the CHORUS and NOMAD detectors
133: (Fig.~\ref{fig:setup}). The modest size of the LAr TPC fiducial
134: volume ($\sim$50 liters), coupled with the high energy of the WANF
135: $\nu$ beam, made necessary a muon spectrometer downstream the TPC. A
136: coincidence with the NOMAD DAQ was set up to use the detectors located
137: into the NOMAD magnetic dipole as a magnetic spectrometer. The
138: experimental setup was completed with additional counters for the
139: trigger and veto systems.
140:
141: \begin{figure*}[htbp]
142: \centering
143: \epsfig{file=50LNOMADsetup.eps,width=14cm}
144: \caption{A sketch of the experimental setup (top view). Relative sizes are not
145: to scale.}
146: \label{fig:setup}
147: \end{figure*}
148:
149: \begin{figure*}[htbp]
150: \begin{center}
151: \begin {tabular}{cc}
152: \epsfysize=8.cm\epsfxsize=6.cm\epsffile{50L_cryogenic.eps} &
153: \epsfysize=8.cm\epsfxsize=6.cm\epsffile{50L_schema.eps}
154: \end{tabular}
155: \caption{The 50 liters Liquid Argon Time Projection Chamber.}
156: \label{fig:50L_schema}
157: \end{center}
158: \end{figure*}
159:
160: The LAr TPC (Fig.\ref{fig:50L_schema}) has an active volume of
161: 32$\times$32$\times$46.8~cm$^3$, enclosed in a stainless steel vessel
162: in the shape of a bowed-bottom cylinder 90 cm high and with a radius
163: of 35 cm. The active volume corresponds to 67 kg of Liquid
164: Argon ($T=87 $K at 1 atm, $\rho=1.395$ g/cm$^3$).
165: Ionization electrons produced by the passage of charged
166: particles drift vertically toward the anode by
167: means of a constant electric field of 214~V/cm. The readout area
168: (anode) is made up of two orthogonal wire planes mounted at a distance
169: of 4~mm. Each stainless steel wire has a diameter of 100~$\mu$m; the
170: distance between the wires is 2.54~mm and each plane is made up of 128
171: wires. The cathode and the lateral field-shaping electrodes are copper
172: strips (5~mm thickness) positioned on a vetronite support with printed
173: board techniques. The support was glued on a honeycomb structure
174: to ensure rigidity. The distance between two adjacent strips is
175: 10~mm. The 10~KV drift voltage is distributed to the strips by means
176: of 100~M$\Omega$ resistors. The ionization electrons drift through the
177: first wire plane (induction plane) so that the integrated signal
178: induced in it is zero. The second plane (collection plane) stops the
179: electrons and acts as charge collector. The mean charge per unit
180: pitch (2.54~mm) for a mip crossing the chamber horizontally
181: corresponds to about $2.3 \times 10^4$ electrons ($\sim$4 fC) assuming
182: no charge loss along the drift volume. The smallness of the signal
183: and the absence of an amplification phase requires very low noise
184: charge preamplifiers. They were based on JFET transistors and have
185: been operated into the liquefied gas in the
186: proximity of the readout wires. The polarization voltage (15~V) is
187: distributed separately to each preamplifier to minimize the number of
188: dead channels in case of failure of one of the components during data
189: taking. The output signal is transmitted up to the amplifiers, which
190: have been operated in current mode and are located at room
191: temperature. The amplified signal is brought up to a set of fast 8-bit
192: ADC. This configuration~\cite{ref:pietropaolo}
193: allowed a signal to noise ratio of 11 with mip signals equivalent
194: to 10 ADC counts and no saturation even in the occurrence of
195: e.m. showers. The signal is sampled with a 2.5~MHz frequency for a
196: duration of 500~$\mu$s, corresponding to the highest possible drift
197: time (primary ionization at the cathode). The stream is recorded into
198: a buffer. The arrival of a subsequent trigger causes the switch of
199: the data stream to another buffer (up to 8 buffers are available). The
200: multi-buffer writing procedure minimize the dead time for signal
201: recording to less than one sampling time (i.e. 500~$\mu$s).
202:
203: As mentioned above, the active part of the detector is located inside
204: a stainless steel cylinder. The connection to the outside area is
205: obtained through a set of UHV flanges housing the signal, the high
206: voltage cables and the vacuum feed-through. The cylinder is positioned
207: into a 1~m diameter dewar partially filled with low purity Liquid
208: Argon acting as a thermal bath and it is rotated 30$^\circ$ along
209: the vertical axis with respect to the nominal beam direction to reduce
210: the number of particles crossing just one readout wire. The ceiling of
211: the external dewar is in direct contact with air. The level of Argon
212: in the dewar is so small that the pure Ar in the inner cylinder can
213: evaporate as well. The gaseous Ar in the active volume crosses the
214: feed-through and reaches an Oxisorb filter for
215: purification~\cite{ref:purification}. After, it is liquefied
216: inside a second buffer cooled by low-purity Ar and, finally,
217: recollected into the active volume. During this test, the Argon has
218: been doped with Tetramethyl Germanium in order to partially reconvert
219: scintillation light into ionization \cite{ref:TMG}.
220: Continuous recirculation of the Argon through
221: the purifier keeps the level of contamination stable against
222: micro-leaks or outgassing. The total Argon consumption necessary to
223: circulate the pure liquefied gas and to compensate for the heat losses
224: was $\sim$200 liters per day.
225: The performance of the recirculation system
226: %is depicted in Fig.~\ref{fig:purification_system} while its performance
227: is described in Sec.~\ref{sec:TPC}.
228:
229: The chamber has been exposed to the $\nu$ beam produced at the CERN
230: West Area Neutrino Facility (WANF~\cite{ref:wanf,ref:flux_nomad}). The
231: primary 450~GeV protons from the CERN SPS are extracted every 14.4~s
232: in two spills of 6~ms duration each and separated by 2.5~s. On
233: average, $1.8 \times 10^{13}$ protons per spill hit a segmented
234: beryllium target. Secondaries are selected in momentum and focused by
235: a system of collimators and magnetic lenses. They reach a 289.9~m
236: decay tunnel followed by an iron and earth absorber. The experimental
237: area is located 835~m downstream the target. The mean energy of the
238: $\nu_\mu$ reaching the detectors is 24.3~GeV when integrating over the active
239: NOMAD area ($2.6\times 2.6$ $m^2$), while contaminations from other flavors
240: are below 7\% for $\bar{\nu}_\mu$ and $\sim 1$\% for $\nu_e$~\cite{ref:flux_nomad}.
241: Being the TPC centered on the beam axis and covering a smaller surface,
242: an harder neutrino flux is expected (with a mean energy of about 30 GeV).
243:
244: %In the present test, the 50~l TPC did not operate in standalone mode.
245: The trigger is provided by a set of scintillators located between the
246: chamber and the NOMAD apparatus (Fig.~\ref{fig:setup}). Each of
247: the 3 trigger scintillator counters has a dimension of
248: 110$\times$27~cm$^2$. They are positioned in a half-circle 60~cm
249: beyond the center of the chamber. Incoming charged particle are
250: vetoed by 5 scintillators mounted in front of the chamber, 50~cm
251: before its center, and by the last scintillator plane of CHORUS. The
252: latter vetoes particles deflected by the CHORUS magnetic field
253: entering the chamber at large angles with respect to the nominal beam
254: direction.
255:
256: The trigger requires the coincidence of the SPS beam spill and at
257: least one of the trigger scintillators, vetoed by the scintillators
258: put in front of the chamber and the CHORUS plane. This trigger is put
259: in coincidence with the two trigger scintillator planes of NOMAD (T1
260: and T2 in Fig.~\ref{fig:setup})~\cite{ref:trigger_NOMAD}. Moreover, a
261: trigger is rejected if the NOMAD acquisition system is in BUSY mode or
262: if the delay with respect to the previous trigger is lower than
263: 500~$\mu$s (``drift protection'')\footnote{This condition inhibits the
264: occurrence of event overlaps in the multibuffer readout system.}.
265: %In this configuration $\sim 11$\% of the recorded events show a vertex
266: %in the fiducial volume of the TPC.
267: The kinematic reconstruction of the outgoing muon from NOMAD
268: (see Sec.\ref{sec:muon_rec})
269: allowed us to identify the events produced outside the fiducial volume
270: that trigger the chamber. The vast majority are $\nu$ interactions
271: in the dewar or in the thermal bath plus a contamination of crossing
272: muons due to veto inefficiencies. Note that the request of a charged
273: particle triggering the chamber locally and reaching NOMAD up to T1
274: and T2 inhibits the acquisitions of neutral-current and $\nu_e$
275: charged-current events, limiting the sample of the present test to
276: $\nu_\mu$ charged-current interactions. The trigger efficiency has
277: been monitored during data taking through a dedicated sample of
278: through-going muons. It turned out to be 97\% averaged over the whole
279: data taking period.
280:
281:
282:
283: \section{Instrumental performance of the 50 liters TPC}
284: \label{sec:TPC}
285:
286: \subsection{Liquid Argon purification and electron lifetime}
287: \label{sec:electron_lifetime}
288:
289: A crucial working parameter for a TPC operating with liquefied rare
290: gases is the lifetime of free electrons in the medium. Primary
291: electrons produced by the passage of charged particles drift toward
292: the anode crossing macroscopic distances. In the present case, for an
293: ionization electron created in the proximity of the cathode, the drift
294: path-length exceeds 46~cm. The effectiveness of charge collection at
295: the readout plane is related to the purity of the Argon since
296: electron-ion recombination is mainly due to oxygen molecules present
297: in the LAr bulk~\cite{ref:bettini}. The contamination of
298: electronegative molecules must be at the level of 0.1~ppb to allow
299: drifts over ${\cal O(1)}$ meters. The electron lifetime $\tau_e$ is
300: defined by:
301:
302: \begin{equation}
303: Q(t) \ = \ Q_0 e^{-\frac{t-t_0}{\tau_e}}
304: \label{equ:exp_law}
305: \end{equation}
306:
307: $Q_0$ being the primary deposited ionization charge and $t$ the electron drift
308: time. The $t_0$ is provided by the trigger scintillation counters.
309:
310: The effectiveness of the purification system through direct
311: measurements of $\tau_e$ has been monitored during data taking by a
312: dedicated setup first developed by the ICARUS Collaboration in
313: 1989~\cite{ref:monitor_purity}. It consists of a small double-gridded
314: drift chamber located below the readout planes. Electrons are
315: generated near the cathode via photoelectric effect driven by a 20~ns
316: UV laser pulse. Each pulse produces a bunch of 10$^7$ electrons. They
317: drift toward the anode along the electric field lines and cross a 50
318: cm drift region between the two transparent grids. The ratio of the
319: induced signal in the proximity of the grids provides a real time
320: estimate of $\tau_e$ during data taking and, hence, a measurement of
321: the Ar contamination (see Fig.~\ref{fig:eLifetime}).
322: An independent estimate of $\tau_e$ can be obtained monitoring the
323: charge attenuation for muons crossing the chamber at various heights.
324: Both methods provided consistent results and the electron lifetime averaged
325: along the whole data taking period turned out to be always higher than 10~ms.
326: This performance was excellent since the maximum drift time was about 400 $\mu$s
327: and therefore the attenuation of the ionization over the drift
328: distance was negligible.
329:
330: \begin{figure*}[htbp]
331: \centering
332: \epsfig{file=eLivetime.eps,width=10cm}
333: \caption{Lifetime of the drifting electrons in the 50 liters Liquid Argon TPC
334: at the CERN $\nu$ beam. The filling of the chamber with LAr was performed on
335: the fourth of April 1997. }
336: \label{fig:eLifetime}
337: \end{figure*}
338:
339:
340: \subsection{Drift velocity}
341:
342: An absolute determination of the drift velocity and its uniformity
343: along the fiducial volume of the chamber has been obtained exploiting
344: the external scintillators and the additional information from NOMAD.
345: A dedicated trigger selecting through-going muons (``mip sample'')
346: has been put into operation adding two additional scintillators
347: (30$\times$30 cm$^2$) before and after the external dewar. The
348: relative position of the chamber with respect to the NOMAD reference
349: frame has been obtained by residual minimization of the track
350: parameters recorded both by the TPC and the NOMAD data acquisition
351: system~\cite{ref:tesi}. The drift velocity is obtained by fitting the
352: absolute vertical position of the muon as reconstructed by NOMAD
353: trackers versus the drift time measured locally by the TPC. The
354: corresponding drift velocity is $v_d = 0.905 \pm 0.005$ mm/$\mu$s
355: (this value differs from the one quoted in~\cite{ref:purity} due to
356: different running conditions of pressure and temperature). No
357: systematic biases have been observed in the fiducial volume used for
358: the neutrino interaction analysis (Sec.\ref{sec:Analysis_QE}).
359:
360: \section{Event reconstruction and particle identification}
361: \label{sec:event_reconstruction}
362:
363: \subsection{Spatial reconstruction}
364: \label{sec:sparec}
365:
366: Interactions happening in the TPC fiducial volume were fully registered in
367: two 2D images with a common coordinate (time), with full calorimetric
368: information associated to each point.
369: Each 2D-image represents the signal amplitude digitized by the ADC (in
370: a linear gray scale) versus the time sample (drift coordinate) and the
371: wire number. Fig.~\ref{fig:Golden_rec} and Fig.~\ref{fig:DIS_rec} (top part)
372: show the raw images of two $\nu_\mu$ CC events in the collection (left panel)
373: and induction plane (right panel).
374: These raw images represent the time evolution (in vertical axis)
375: of the signal induced in the wires (in horizontal axis).
376:
377:
378: \begin{figure*}[htbp]
379: \centering
380: \epsfig{file=GoldenEvent_103-4142_Reconstructed.eps,width=14cm}
381: \caption{Example of the 3D reconstruction of a low-multiplicity $\nu_{\mu}$ CC event.
382: The raw image from collection and induction wire planes (on top):
383: Hits and 2D track projections have been identified.
384: Three dimensional view of the reconstructed event (bottom picture) embedded in a
385: 3D recreation of the experimental setup described in Sec.~\ref{sec:Setup}. }
386: \label{fig:Golden_rec}
387: \end{figure*}
388:
389: The purpose of the reconstruction procedure is to extract the physical information
390: provided by the wire output signals, i.e. the energy deposited by the different
391: particles and the point where such a deposition has occurred, to build a complete 3D
392: and calorimetric picture of the event. In this sense, the spatial reconstruction of
393: different tracks is needed first in order to compute the calibration factors
394: entering in the calorimetric reconstruction of the events, as explained in
395: Sec.~\ref{sec:calrec}. A detailed description of the spatial reconstruction tools
396: was reported elsewhere \cite{ref:600ton,ref:ricotesi}. For the present analyses
397: new significant improvements have been carried out \cite{ref:delaossatesi}.
398:
399: The basic building block of a track is called a hit, defined as the segment of track
400: whose energy is detected by a given wire.
401: A precise determination of the hit position and charge is carried out
402: fitting the wire signal to an analytical function which describes the detector response
403: \cite{ref:600ton}. Identified nearby hits are associated into 2-dimensional
404: clusters. Track candidates are searched for by means of a tree algorithm
405: as in \cite{ref:TreeFin} and/or using a neural network-based algorithm as
406: in \cite{ref:NNFin}. Both methods efficiently detect interaction vertexes and finally,
407: split clusters into smooth 2D tracks. Finally, 3D tracks are built matching 2D track
408: projections from both views.
409:
410: %Moreover, all the reconstruction algorithms have been integrated into a Qt based program
411: %called {\it Qscan}, which provides an user's interface for visualizing and analyzing
412: %the events, and allows to correct anomalies and fine tune complex signals in the detector.
413: %They constitute a set of tools which allow an excellent measurement and visualization
414: %of low-multiplicity neutrino events.
415:
416: In Fig.~\ref{fig:Golden_rec}, we show an example of the full reconstruction procedure
417: for a low-multiplicity $\nu_{\mu}$ CC event. This algorithm allows the reconstruction
418: of more complicated event topologies (see Fig.~\ref{fig:DIS_rec}).
419: This is the first time that interactions of multi-GeV accelerator neutrinos occurring
420: in a LAr TPC are fully reconstructed in 3D.
421:
422: \begin{figure*}[htbp]
423: \centering
424: \epsfig{file=DISEvent_75-349_Reconstructed.eps,width=14cm}
425: \caption{(Top) The raw images of a high multiplicity event ($\nu_\mu$ CC DIS)
426: in the collection (left panel) and induction plane (right panel). Below,
427: the 3D reconstruction of a high multiplicity event ($\nu_\mu$ CC DIS) with
428: eight primary particles. Two of them stop in LAr and are recognized as protons.}
429: \label{fig:DIS_rec}
430: \end{figure*}
431:
432:
433: \subsection{Calorimetric reconstruction}
434: \label{sec:calrec}
435:
436: The ionization charge is precisely measured at the collection wire plane. The energy $E$
437: associated to a given hit is:
438: %
439: \begin{equation}
440: E \ = \ \frac{CW}{R} \ Q(t)
441: \label{equ:QtoE}
442: \end{equation}
443: %
444: where $C$ is the calibration factor; $W$ is the average energy needed for the
445: creation of an electron-ion pair (i.e. 23.6 eV); $R$ is the electron-ion recombination factor
446: and $Q(t)$ is the corrected charge by the electron lifetime from (\ref{equ:exp_law})
447: in Sec.~\ref{sec:electron_lifetime}.
448:
449: The calibration factor $C$ converts the detector measuring units (ADC counts) into charge
450: units (fC). To measure the overall calibration factor $\alpha \equiv \frac{CW}{R}$
451: in (\ref{equ:QtoE}), we have collected a sample of around 3000 through-going muons coming
452: from $\nu_\mu$ CC interactions.
453: The deposited charge per unit of length ($dQ/dx$) is precisely measured
454: (see Fig.~\ref{fig:dqdx_muons}) and fitted to a convoluted
455: Landau-Gaussian function to obtain the most probable
456: energy loss for mips in terms of detector charge units:
457: $\left\langle dQ/dx \right\rangle_{mip} = 216.7 \pm 0.1$ ADC counts.
458: The most probable energy loss is a better defined quantity than the average value
459: in the case of a Landau distribution, moreover it slightly depends on
460: the energy in the range of the muons being considered.
461: From this measurement, $\alpha$ can be obtained assuming that according to
462: the theoretical prediction for muons in the range of energies of the beam, the most probable
463: energy loss $\left\langle dE/dx \right\rangle_{mip} = 1.736 \pm 0.002$ MeV/cm:
464: %
465: \begin{equation}
466: \alpha_{mip} \ \equiv \ \frac{CW}{R_{mip}} \ = \
467: \frac{\left\langle dE/dx \right\rangle_{mip}}{\left\langle dQ/dx \right\rangle_{mip}}
468: \ = \ 8.01 \pm 0.01 \times 10^{-3} \ MeV/ADC
469: \label{equ:cal_factor}
470: \end{equation}
471: %
472:
473: %
474: \begin{figure*}[htbp]
475: \centering
476: \epsfig{file=Muons-dqdx.eps,width=10cm}
477: \caption{$dQ/dx$ of crossing muons. The distribution is fitted to a convoluted
478: Landau-Gaussian distribution.}
479: \label{fig:dqdx_muons}
480: \end{figure*}
481: %
482:
483: The recombination factor $R$ in (\ref{equ:QtoE})
484: depends on the absorber medium, on the applied electric field and on the density
485: of released charge, i.e. on $dE/dx$. This is the reason why we take in (\ref{equ:cal_factor})
486: $R_{mip}$ (its value for mips).
487: The dependence of $R$ with $dE/dx$ can be modeled by Birk's law
488: \cite{ref:Birks} which has been successfully applied
489: to LAr detectors in \cite{ref:Rec_factor}:
490: %
491: \begin{equation}
492: \frac{dQ}{dx} \ = \ \frac{ a \ dE/dx }{ 1\ +\ k_B \ dE/dx }
493: \label{equ:birks}
494: \end{equation}
495: %
496: $dE/dx$ being the pure Bethe-Bloch ionization loss,
497: $a$ the energy to charge conversion factor and $k_B$ the Birks
498: coefficient accounting for quenching due to recombination.
499:
500: %
501: \begin{figure*}[htbp]
502: \begin{center}
503: \mbox{\epsfig{file=dQdXvsRange.eps,width=10cm}}
504: \end{center}
505: \caption{$dQ/dx$ as a function of the residual range for protons.
506: Dots are direct measurements from the reconstructed hits of the proton tracks, while
507: the points with errors bars are the estimated most probable of $dQ/dx$ for each bin
508: of the residual range. Data is fitted with a Bethe-Bloch corrected by the detector
509: response function (Birk's law) in the hypothesis of pion (dashed line) and proton (full
510: line)}
511: \label{fig:dqdx}
512: \end{figure*}
513: %
514:
515: The size of the range of the fully contained protons collected in the ``golden sample''
516: considered in Sec.~\ref{sec:Analysis_QE},
517: offers the opportunity to precisely test the energy loss pattern in the active
518: medium. Fig.~\ref{fig:dqdx} shows the observed charge per unit length
519: ($dQ/dx$) versus the residual range for the protons\footnote{The
520: residual range is the actual range minus the range already covered at
521: the time of the deposition of a given $dQ/dx$.}. Dots are direct measurements
522: from the reconstructed hits of the proton tracks. From this distribution
523: we estimate the most probable value of $dQ/dx$ for each bin of the residual range.
524: Finally, from this data we fit $k_B~= 0.035 \pm 0.001$ cm/MeV in
525: (\ref{equ:birks}) for the proton hypothesis (continuous line).
526: %; while the value of $a$ is constrained to
527: %be in agreement with (\ref{equ:cal_factor}):
528: %$a = (1+k_B\left\langle dE/dx \right\rangle_{mip}) / \alpha_{mip}$.
529:
530: Based on the knowledge of the calibration parameters, a precise
531: determination of the deposited energy can be obtained through direct charge
532: measurements by means of (\ref{equ:birks}). Moreover, pure Bethe-Bloch ionization loss
533: can be corrected by the detector response in the region of high $dQ/dx$, where quenching
534: effects are more sizable. This correction is important for particle identification
535: in LAr, which exploits the different energy loss of particles near the stopping point.
536:
537: \subsection{Proton reconstruction}
538: \label{sec:prec}
539:
540: Proton identification and momentum measurement were
541: performed using only information provided by the TPC. The discrimination
542: between protons and charged pions is performed exploiting their
543: different energy loss behavior as a function of the range.
544: For the case of candidates stopping in the fiducial volume of the chamber,
545: as the ones of the ``golden sample'', p/$\pi^\pm$ separation is
546: unique (see Fig.~\ref{fig:dqdx_evt} [left]): $dQ/dx$ is measured along
547: the proton candidate track and is compared with the different particle
548: hypothesis. Monte-Carlo studies reveal that almost 100\% of protons are
549: identified as such on the basis of their $dQ/dx$ shape on the vicinity of the
550: stopping point; in addition, the fraction of pions and kaons misidentified
551: as protons is negligible.
552:
553: %Clearly, the exploitation of this technique for partially contained
554: %candidates requires a much better assessment of the charge response of
555: %the TPC and of the size of the quenching effects, since the energy
556: %constraint from the range is missing and proton identification is
557: %based only on the visible pattern of the energy loss.
558:
559: Once we identify a contained proton, its kinetic energy is calculated
560: from range, which only depends on the spatial reconstruction of the tracks.
561: In this case, the momentum uncertainty is dominated by
562: the finite pitch of the wires (2.54 mm)\footnote{The equivalent pitch in the
563: vertical direction (drift direction) is much smaller due to the high
564: sampling rate of the fast ADC ($360\ \mu$m)} and the performance of the
565: reconstruction tools. These have been tested using a Monte-Carlo simulation
566: of the detector. The resolution on the kinetic energy ($T_p$) varies from
567: 3.3\% for protons with $T_p=50$ MeV up to 1\% for $T_p$ larger than
568: 200 MeV. The angular resolution in the collection or induction view
569: depends on the number of wires $N$ hit by the particle along its path;
570: it is $\sigma \simeq 0.36\sqrt{12}/(2.54\ N^{3/2})$, corresponding
571: e.g. to 15 mrad for N=10.
572:
573: %For horizontal protons of
574: %$p=400$~MeV/c the uncertainty is of the order of 7~MeV/c. The angular
575: %resolution in the collection or induction view depends on the number
576: %of wires $N$ hit by the particle along its path; it is $\sigma \simeq
577: %0.36\sqrt{12}/(2.54\ N^{3/2})$, corresponding e.g. to 15 mrad for
578: %N=10.
579:
580: \begin{figure*}[htbp]
581: \begin{center}
582: \begin {tabular}{cc}
583: \epsfysize=7.cm\epsfxsize=6.8cm\epsffile{dQdXvsRange_103-4142.eps} &
584: \epsfysize=7.cm\epsfxsize=6.8cm\epsffile{dEdX_103-4142.eps}
585: \end{tabular}
586: \caption{(left) $dQ/dx$ as a function of the residual range for the
587: reconstructed proton in the event shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:Golden_rec}: continuous (dashed)
588: line represents the expected behavior of protons (pions) in the detector.
589: (right) $dE/dx$ distribution for the muon reconstructed in
590: Fig.~\ref{fig:Golden_rec}: data is fitted to a convoluted Landau-Gaussian distribution.}
591: \label{fig:dqdx_evt}
592: \end{center}
593: \end{figure*}
594:
595:
596: % plantilla para tablas de plots. CortesÃa del Melga
597: %\begin{figure*}
598: %\begin{center}
599: % \begin {tabular}{cc}
600: % \epsfysize=7.cm\epsfxsize=7.cm\epsffile{psfigs/histo_0.25.eps} &
601: % \epsfysize=7.cm\epsfxsize=7.cm\epsffile{psfigs/histo_0.5.eps} \\
602: % \epsfysize=7.cm\epsfxsize=7.cm\epsffile{psfigs/histo_1.0.eps} &
603: % \epsfysize=7.cm\epsfxsize=7.cm\epsffile{psfigs/histo_1.5.eps} \\
604: % \epsfysize=7.cm\epsfxsize=7.cm\epsffile{psfigs/histo_2.0.eps} &
605: % \epsfysize=7.cm\epsfxsize=7.cm\epsffile{psfigs/histo_3.0.eps}
606: % \end{tabular}
607: % \caption{\small Momentum distributions as given by the Kalman
608: %Filter for different MC muon momenta.}
609: % \label{fig:histo}
610: %\end{center}
611: %\end{figure*}
612:
613:
614: \subsection{Muon reconstruction}
615: \label{sec:muon_rec}
616:
617: The kinematic reconstruction of the outgoing muons exploits the
618: tracking capability of NOMAD. An event triggering the chamber will
619: have at least one penetrating track reaching the T1 and T2 trigger
620: scintillators bracketing the TRD of
621: NOMAD~\cite{ref:trigger_NOMAD}. The corresponding track, nearly
622: horizontal at the entrance of the NOMAD drift chamber volume, is
623: reconstructed with an average momentum precision of $\sigma_p/p \sim
624: 0.05/\sqrt{L} \oplus 0.008p/L^{5/2}$, $L$ being the visible range in
625: the volume itself expressed in meters and $p$ the particle momentum in
626: GeV.
627: A 10~GeV horizontal muon crossing all the chambers
628: ($L\sim 5m$) is reconstructed with a precision of 2.2\%. The
629: reconstructed particle is traced back to the TPC accounting for the
630: magnetic field and the presence of the forward NOMAD calorimeter. The
631: latter introduces an additional - in fact, dominant - source of
632: uncertainty due to multiple scattering (MS) in iron (190~cm for a
633: horizontal muon). For small scattering angles ($\theta \ll 1$~rad), the
634: MS uncertainty on the transverse momentum is independent of $p$ and it
635: turns out to be $\sim 140$~MeV. The correctness of the back-tracing
636: procedure has been cross checked comparing the direction angles of the
637: particles belonging to the mip sample, as measured by the TPC, with
638: the corresponding quantity from NOMAD\footnote{Due to the high
639: sampling rate of the TPC, the angular resolution in the $y-z$ plane,
640: i.e. in the vertical plane along the nominal beam direction
641: ($z$-axis), is dominated by the NOMAD uncertainty.}. Due to the
642: large amount of material between the TPC and the NOMAD trackers (more
643: than 11 interaction lengths) and the small distance between the
644: chamber and the calorimeter, the $\pi/\mu$ misidentification
645: probability is negligible for the present study, even accounting for
646: possible $\pi$ decays in flight.
647:
648: \section{Analysis of quasi elastic $\nu_\mu$ interaction}
649: \label{sec:Analysis_QE}
650:
651: \subsection{Data taking and event selection}
652: \label{sec:Sel_QE}
653:
654: The data set recorded with the 50L chamber amounts to
655: $1.2\times 10^{19}$ protons on target.
656: As mentioned in Sec.\ref{sec:Setup}, the trigger efficiency was monitored
657: during data taking and its integrated value is 97\%. Additional losses
658: of statistics are due to the TPC (3\%) and NOMAD (15\%) dead time and
659: to detector faults. These contributions add up to give an effective
660: lifetime of 75\%. Over the whole data taking period around 70000 triggers
661: were collected in the TPC from which 20000 have at least
662: a reconstructed muon possibly transversing the fiducial volume
663: (see Sec.~\ref{sec:muon_rec}). From all these a priory $\nu_\mu$ CC candidates,
664: a visual scanning reveals that around half of them show a vertex in the
665: fiducial volume, the rest are $\nu$ interactions in the surrounding LAr bath
666: (which also give trigger) plus a contamination of crossing muons due to veto
667: inefficiencies. Therefore, we have a collection of around 10000 $\nu_\mu$ CC events
668: from which we have selected a set of 86 events called the ``golden sample''.
669: This set consists of events with an identified proton
670: of kinetic energy larger than 40~MeV fully contained in the TPC
671: and one muon whose direction extrapolated from NOMAD matches the outgoing
672: track in the TPC (see Sec.\ref{sec:event_reconstruction}).
673: The distance of the primary interaction vertex to any of the
674: TPC walls has to be greater than 1~cm. The muon candidate track
675: projected onto the wire plane must be longer than 12 wire pitches. The
676: event is accepted even in the presence of other stopping particles, as
677: far as their visible range does not exceed the range of a proton of 40
678: MeV kinetic energy. If other tracks than the
679: identified muon leave the TPC or at least one converted photon with
680: energy greater than 10~MeV is present in the fiducial volume, the
681: event is rejected. The tightness of these selections makes the ``golden sample'' a very
682: clean topology for visual scanning (Fig.~\ref{fig:Golden_rec}).
683:
684: The request of containment is very severe since the chamber volume is small.
685: For lower $T_p$ values, the proton range is comparable with
686: the wire pitch and neither the proton momentum nor the interaction
687: vertex can be reconstructed with due precision. However, for
688: $T_p>40$ MeV the $\pi^{\pm}$/p misidentification probability is
689: negligible (see Sec.~\ref{sec:prec}). The ``golden sample'' contains pure
690: QE interactions ($\nu_\mu \ n \ \rightarrow \mu^- \ p$) plus
691: an intrinsic background dominated by resonant production followed by pion
692: absorption in the nucleus ( $\nu_\mu \ p \
693: \rightarrow \Delta^{++} \mu^- \rightarrow \mu^- \ p \ \pi^+$,
694: $\nu_\mu \ n \ \rightarrow \Delta^{+} \mu^- \rightarrow
695: \mu^- \ p \ \pi^0$). There is also an instrumental background due to final
696: state neutral particles ($\pi^0$'s, $n$'s and $\gamma$'s) that scape undetected.
697: On the other hand, the $\nu_\mu \ n \ \rightarrow \Delta^{+} \mu^- \rightarrow \mu^- \ n \ \pi^+$
698: contamination is negligible in this tightly selected sample due to the superb
699: $\pi^{\pm}$/p identification capabilities of the LAr TPC.
700:
701: \subsection{The Monte-Carlo data sample}
702: \label{sec:montecarlo}
703:
704: The selection efficiency for QE interactions and their
705: intrinsic background have been evaluated using a Monte-Carlo sample
706: generated using the FLUKA package~\cite{ref:FLUKA, ref:FLUKATWO},
707: which offers a full description
708: of nuclear effects in neutrino interactions. About 18000 $\nu_\mu$ CC
709: QE events have been generated simulating the WANF beam for the 50L chamber
710: geometrical acceptance and final state particles were tracked in LAr
711: using the GEANT4 package \cite{ref:geant}. The energy deposition of all final
712: particles is digitized emulating the TPC wire read-out, in order to
713: reproduce detector resolutions and offline reconstruction efficiencies
714: (see Sec.~\ref{sec:event_reconstruction}).
715: %In Fig.~\ref{fig:Ptmiss_MC} we show distributions of missing transverse
716: %momentum from Monte-Carlo with and without nuclear effects included.
717: We saw that 16~\% of the whole sample of generated QE interactions belong
718: to the ``golden sample''.
719: On the other hand, we have analyzed a sample of $10^5$
720: $\nu_\mu$ CC deep-inelastic (DIS) and resonant (RES) events in order to evaluate
721: inefficiencies of the vetoing selections for
722: $\nu_\mu~n~\rightarrow \Delta^{+} \mu^- \rightarrow \mu^-~p~\pi^0$
723: (i.e. the probability to miss both the decay photons of the
724: $\pi^0 \rightarrow \gamma \gamma$ or the $e^+e^- \gamma$ system in
725: case of $\pi^0$ Dalitz decay) and for events with several neutral particles
726: (neutrons and energetic photons from nuclear interactions) which scape from the detector
727: (see Fig.~\ref{fig:resonance}).
728: The search for this irreducible background in the DIS plus RES samples reveals
729: that 0.14\% are ``golden-like'' events.
730:
731: Taking into account the relative weight between QE and
732: non-QE events\footnote{Respect to the total number of $\nu_\mu~CC$ events,
733: 2.3\% are QE, 91.5\% are DIS and the remaining 6.2\% corresponds to resonances events.
734: The simulation of the latest is not done treating each resonance individually,
735: an average of them is taken into account instead.},
736: we find that the total expected contamination of the ``golden sample''
737: is 20\% (around 40\% of them correspond to events with an escaping
738: $\pi^0$). The Monte-Carlo prediction for escaping $\pi^0$
739: can be checked using test samples that consist of golden events with one ($N_1$) or
740: two ($N_2$) converted photons pointing to the interaction
741: vertex. Assuming the gamma identification probability to be
742: uncorrelated for the two photons, we have
743: $N_1=2N(1-\epsilon_\gamma)\epsilon_\gamma$ and
744: $N_2=N\epsilon_\gamma^2$, $N$ being the (unknown) overall rate of $p \
745: \mu^- \ \pi^0$ final states and $\epsilon_\gamma$ the photon
746: identification efficiency. After the scanning of the test samples,
747: $\epsilon_\gamma = (N_1/2N_2 +1)^{-1}$ turned out to be (43$\pm$ 9) \%.
748: Hence, the probability of missing both gammas is (32$\pm$10) \% to
749: be compared with the MC calculation of 20.4\%.
750:
751: \subsection{Event rates}
752: \label{sec:Ev_rates}
753:
754: We use Monte-Carlo to estimate the expected number of
755: events in the detector. The simulation of the beam predicts a flux of
756: $2.37 \times 10^{-7} \nu_\mu$CC/$cm^2$/p.o.t.
757: over the TPC exposing area. This flux convoluted with the neutrino cross sections
758: and scaled to the fiducial mass of the detector gives an event rate of
759: $2.05 \times 10^{-15} \nu_\mu$CC/p.o.t.
760: Now assuming a total exposure of $1.2\times 10^{19}$ p.o.t. and an effective lifetime
761: of 75\% (see Sec.~\ref{sec:Sel_QE}), the total number of $\nu_\mu$ CC is equal
762: to 18450. Out of this 18450 events, only muons above a certain momentum threshold and
763: within angular acceptance will trigger the detector.
764: Taking the real data muons that triggered the system, we saw that most of
765: them are above 8 GeV in momentum and below 300 mrad in angle.
766: If we apply those cuts to the Monte-Carlo samples, we end up
767: with 18450 $\times$ 0.023 (QE fraction) $\times$ 0.95 (efficiency
768: of the acceptance cuts for QE), equal to 400 quasi-elastic events.
769: For DIS+RES events: 18450 $\times$ 0.977 (fraction of DIS+RES) $\times$ 0.65 (efficiency
770: of acceptance cuts) gives 11700.
771: In total we expect 12100 events to be compared with the 10000 $\nu_\mu$ CC we have
772: after visual scanning of {\it good triggers} (see Sec.~\ref{sec:Sel_QE}).
773:
774: The expected number of ``golden events'' is obtained taking the 16\% (golden fraction)
775: of the total QE, and adding the corresponding 20\% due to background
776: contribution (see Sec.~\ref{sec:montecarlo}), which finally gives $80\pm9(stat)\pm13(sys)$
777: ``golden events'' to be compared with the 86 we observe. The systematic uncertainty
778: is dominated by the fraction of QE events (2.3\%) and the beam simulation (8\%).
779:
780:
781:
782: \begin{figure*}[htbp]
783: \centering
784: \epsfig{file=ResonantEvent_75-4453.eps,width=14cm}
785: \caption{The raw image of a low multiplicity event in the
786: collection (left) and induction plane (right). The event
787: is reconstructed as ($\nu_\mu \ n \rightarrow \mu^- \Delta^+
788: \rightarrow \mu^- \ p \ \pi^0$) with a mip leaving the chamber, an
789: identified stopping proton and a pair of converted photons from the
790: $\pi^0$ decay. When these photons escape from the chamber, the event is
791: tagged as a ``golden event''.}
792: \label{fig:resonance}
793: \end{figure*}
794:
795:
796: %Accounting for the detector lifetime, the trigger (see
797: %Sec.\ref{sec:Setup}) and selection efficiency and the sample purity,
798: %we expect 73.5 events and we observe 61 ($\sim$1.5 $\sigma$ deficit).
799:
800: %\begin{figure*}[htbp]
801: %\centering
802: %\epsfig{file=Ptmiss_MC.eps,width=10cm}
803: %\caption{Distribution of the missing transverse momentum from
804: %Monte-Carlo simulations. First dotted line are basic calculations without
805: %taking into account nuclear effects, second dotted line are pure MC
806: %variables with full description (with FLUKA) of nuclear effects, continuous line
807: %represent same variables with detector resolution in measuring proton includes,
808: %and green hitograms are full simulated variables with resolution in measuring
809: %muon includes.}
810: %\label{fig:Ptmiss_MC}
811: %\end{figure*}
812:
813: \subsection{Analysis of quasi-elastic interactions}
814:
815: In spite of the limited statistics (86 events), the ``golden sample'' provides
816: information on the basic mechanisms that modify the kinematics of
817: neutrino-nucleus interactions with respect to the corresponding
818: neutrino-nucleon process. Nuclear matter perturbs the initial state of
819: the interaction through Fermi motion; it also affects the formation of
820: the asymptotic states through nuclear evaporation, hadronic
821: re-scattering or hadronic re-absorption. Several kinematic variables
822: are only marginally affected by nuclear effects; in this case, the
823: corresponding distributions can be reproduced once the $\nu$-nucleon
824: interaction is corrected for Fermi motion and Pauli blocking.
825: %e.g. a Saxon-Woods potential for the nucleus\footnote{In this
826: %model, nucleons are treated as a Fermi degenerate gas located in a
827: %potential well of the form $E(r) = E_0/(1+e^{(r-R)/a}) $ where $a$ is
828: %0.6~fm; $E_0=46$~MeV is the maximum well depth and $R$ is the nuclear
829: %radius ($R=3.6$~fm for the Argon).}.
830: Clearly, purely leptonic variables belong to this category.
831: There are also a few hadronic variables whose distribution is strongly influenced by
832: the selection cuts but show limited sensitivity to nuclear effects. In
833: particular, the proton kinetic energy is bounded by the $T_p>40$~MeV
834: cut and the requirement of full containment in the fiducial volume.
835: This distribution is shown in Fig.~\ref{fig:proton_var} together with
836: the transverse momentum of the proton for the ``golden sample''.
837: Similarly, in Fig.~\ref{fig:muon_var} we show the kinetic energy
838: and the transverse momentum distributions of the muon.
839: Figs.~\ref{fig:proton_var} and \ref{fig:muon_var} can
840: be used as a consistency check. They demonstrate that Monte-Carlo reproduces
841: the kinematic selection performed during the scanning and analysis of
842: the ``golden channel''. They also show that our selected sample contains
843: a non-negligible contamination from non-QE events. As already indicated, we
844: estimate this contamination to be 20~\%.
845:
846: \begin{figure*}[htbp]
847: \begin{center}
848: \begin {tabular}{cc}
849: \epsfysize=7.cm\epsfxsize=6.8cm\epsffile{Pkin.eps} &
850: \epsfysize=7.cm\epsfxsize=6.8cm\epsffile{Ppt.eps}
851: \end{tabular}
852: \caption{Distribution of the proton kinetic energy for the ``golden
853: sample'' (squared marks).
854: Dotted histogram represents the expectation from simulated Monte-Carlo QE events,
855: while the hatched one represents the simulated background from non-QE events.
856: Both contributions are summed in the filled histogram and normalized to the golden sample data. }
857: \label{fig:proton_var}
858: \end{center}
859: \end{figure*}
860:
861:
862: \begin{figure*}[htbp]
863: \begin{center}
864: \begin {tabular}{cc}
865: \epsfysize=7.cm\epsfxsize=6.8cm\epsffile{Mkin.eps} &
866: \epsfysize=7.cm\epsfxsize=6.8cm\epsffile{MNpt.eps}
867: \end{tabular}
868: \caption{Distribution of the muon energy and the muon transverse momentum
869: for the ``golden sample''.
870: Dotted histogram represents the expectation from simulated Monte-Carlo QE events,
871: while the hatched one represents the simulated background from non-QE events.
872: Both contributions are summed in the filled histogram and normalized to the golden sample data. }
873: \label{fig:muon_var}
874: \end{center}
875: \end{figure*}
876:
877: Other variables embedding the reconstructed kinematics of the protons
878: are sensitive to genuine nuclear effects. In particular,
879: we analyzed two of them: the acollinearity and the missing transverse momentum of the event.
880: The former is defined as
881: \begin{equation}
882: A \equiv \mathrm{acos} \left[ \frac{ p_{xp} \ p_{x\mu} + p_{yp} \ p_{y\mu} }
883: {\sqrt { (p_{xp}^2 + p_{yp}^2) (p_{x\mu}^2 + p_{y\mu}^2) } } \right]
884: \end{equation}
885: $p_{xp}$ and $p_{yp}$ being the transverse momentum components of the
886: proton and $p_{x\mu}$ and $p_{y\mu}$ the corresponding quantities for
887: the muon. For a purely QE scattering on a nucleon, the muon and the
888: proton ought to be back-to back in the transverse plane so that the
889: acollinearity is zero. Fig.~\ref{fig:event_var} (right) shows the
890: acollinearity distribution for the ``golden sample'' and the
891: expectation from simulations. For this particular variable, the inclusion of nuclear effects
892: in the Monte-Carlo does not show a striking difference with respect to the case where
893: no nuclear effects are taken into account. The selection cuts (in particular, the fact that
894: the proton should be fully contained), the resolution NOMAD has for muon reconstruction
895: and the contamination from non-QE events are the main reasons for the appearance of events
896: with large acollinearity values. The distortion introduced in the tail of the acollinearity
897: distribution by nuclear effects is much smaller than the one due to detector effects.
898: Hence this variable is not adequate to show how the event kinematics varies in the presence
899: of nuclear matter.
900:
901: The influence of nuclear effects on the event kinematics
902: is best seen when we consider the missing transverse momentum $p_T^{\mathrm{miss}}$
903: (see left plot on Fig.~\ref{fig:event_var}).
904: %However, nuclear effects
905: %have been observed as perturbations in event kinematics, especially at higher values
906: %of acollinearity and missing transverse momentum (Fig.~\ref{fig:event_var}), and
907: %therefore they must be included in the Monte-Carlo.
908: We observe that a naive approach that takes into account Fermi motion
909: and Pauli blocking disregarding nuclear effects (dashed histograms in
910: Fig.~\ref{fig:event_var} left) does not reproduce the $p_T^{\mathrm{miss}}$ data.
911: Once nuclear effects are added, simulated events show a good agreement with data.
912:
913: In summary, we have seen that nuclear effects are an important
914: source of perturbation for the kinematics of quasi-elastic neutrino interactions,
915: however the smallness of the accumulated statistics does not allow a systematic survey of
916: these effects~\cite{ref:nuint}. Still, these results empirically demonstrate the
917: effectiveness of LAr imaging in the characterization of low-multiplicity multi-GeV
918: neutrino interactions. In particular, a good description of transverse variables is
919: fundamental since they are key to a kinematic-based approach for
920: $\nu_\mu~\rightarrow~\nu_\tau(\nu_e)$ oscillation appearance \cite{ref:oscsearch}.
921:
922: \begin{figure*}[htbp]
923: \begin{center}
924: \begin {tabular}{cc}
925: \epsfysize=7.cm\epsfxsize=6.8cm\epsffile{Ptmiss.eps} &
926: \epsfysize=7.cm\epsfxsize=6.8cm\epsffile{Acoll.eps}
927: \end{tabular}
928: \caption{Distribution of the missing transverse momentum (left) and
929: acollinearity (right) for the ``golden sample''.
930: Dotted histogram represents the expectation from simulated Monte-Carlo QE events,
931: while the hatched one represents the simulated background from non-QE events.
932: Both contributions are summed in the filled histogram and normalized to the golden sample data.
933: The dashed histograms show the expected distributions in case no nuclear
934: effects are taken into account.}
935: \label{fig:event_var}
936: \end{center}
937: \end{figure*}
938:
939:
940: %In order to quantify the level of agreement between the theoretical
941: %expectations and the data, a background subtraction procedure has been
942: %applied; this is based on the test samples mentioned in
943: %Sec.\ref{sec:Sel_QE}. If the QE analysis is applied to the
944: %test-sample where a clear resonance has been identified (converted
945: %photons pointing toward the interaction vertex) and the presence of
946: %the $\pi^0$ is ignored, an artificial acollinearity excess is
947: %generated; in particular, 36\% of the sample has $A>60^\circ$. Similar
948: %results are obtained for $p_T^{\mathrm{miss}}$, where 72\% of the
949: %identified resonance events shows a $p_T^{\mathrm{miss}}$ greater than
950: %400~MeV.
951: %The corresponding background subtracted cumulatives are shown
952: %in Fig.\ref{fig:cumul_nobackg}. Both of them show a rather good
953: %agreement between data and the expectation from FLUKA and support the
954: %rejection of the simple SW description. The Kolmogorov probabilities
955: %of the acollinearity (missing transverse momentum) distributions are
956: %0.52 (0.30) for FLUKA and 0.003 (0.027) for SW.
957:
958: \section{Conclusions}
959: We discussed the first exposure of a LAr TPC to a multi-GeV
960: neutrino beam. The data collected at the CERN WANF exploited the 3D
961: reconstruction capabilities of the LAr technology with
962: low-multiplicity events. The instrumental performances (size and stability of the
963: electron lifetime, reproducibility of the charge response for
964: mip and highly ionizing particles) and current off-line reconstruction tools
965: show that LAr TPC allows for an excellent particle identification and
966: a precise measurement of the event kinematics.
967: In spite of the limited size of the detector, nuclear effects beyond Fermi motion
968: and Pauli blocking (e.g. hadron re-scattering or pion absorption) have
969: been observed as perturbations of the quasi-elastic $\nu_\mu$ CC interaction kinematics.
970: Variables in the transverse plane, which are the most sensitive to nuclear effects
971: and key for neutrino oscillation searches, are well reproduced.
972:
973: \section{Acknowledgments}
974: We wish to express our gratitude to the members of the NOMAD and
975: CHORUS collaboration for their support during the setting-up of the
976: test and data taking. We specially thank the help of the NOMAD Collaboration
977: which agreed to increase slightly its dead-time to include the new dedicated trigger
978: needed to acquire the escaping muons. We acknowledge the CERN SPS accelerator and
979: beam-line staff for the excellent performance of the WANF neutrino
980: beam. We thank the CERN PH Division since a large fraction of the LAr consumption
981: costs were financially supported by it. The spanish group has been supported
982: by M.E.C. through grant FPA2002-01835. The Polish authors acknowledge the support of
983: the State Committee for Scientific Research in Poland, 105, 160, 620, 621/E-344,
984: E-340, E-77, E-78/SPS/ICARUS/P-03/DZ211-214/2003-2005.
985:
986: \begin{thebibliography}{00}
987:
988: \bibitem{ref:Rubbia77} C.~Rubbia, {\it The Liquid-Argon Time
989: Projection Chamber: A New Concept For Neutrino Detector}, CERN-EP/77-08 (1977).
990: \bibitem{ref:proposal} The ICARUS Collaboration, {\it ICARUS-I. A proposal
991: for the Gran Sasso laboratory}, Proposal, INFN/AE-85/7, Frascati
992: (Italy, 1985); \\
993: {\it ICARUS-II. A second generation proton decay experiment and neutrino observatory at the Gran Sasso laboratory},
994: Proposal, VOL I (1993) $\&$ II (1994), LNGS-94/99; \\
995: {\it A first T600 ton ICARUS detector installed at the Gran Sasso laboratory},
996: Addendum to Proposal, LNGS 95-10 (1995).
997: \bibitem{ref:3ton} P.~Bennetti {\it et al.}, {\it A 3 ton liquid argon time projection chamber}, Nucl. Instr. Meth. A {\bf 332} (1993) 395.
998: \bibitem{ref:purification} P.~Cennini {\it et al.}, {\it Performance of a three-ton liquid argon time projection chamber},
999: Nucl. Instr. Meth. A {\bf 345} (1994) 230.
1000: \bibitem{ref:14ton} F.~Arneodo {\it et al.}, {\it Performance of the
1001: 10 m$^3$ ICARUS liquid argon prototype},
1002: Nucl. Instr. Meth. A {\bf 498} (2003) 293.
1003: \bibitem{ref:600ton} S.~Amerio {\it et al.}, {\it Design, construction and tests of the ICARUS T600 detector},
1004: Nucl. Instr. Meth. A {\bf 527} (2004) 329.
1005: \bibitem{ref:Stefano}S.~Ragazzi {\it et al.}, {\it Request for test of liquid argon TPC on neutrino beam}, SPSLC/M 594, 1997.
1006: \bibitem{ref:wanf} G.~Acquistapace {\it et al.}, {\it The West Area neutrino facility for CHORUS and NOMAD experiments},
1007: CERN-ECP/95-14 (1995).
1008: \bibitem{ref:NOMAD} J.~Altegoer {\it et al.}, {\it The NOMAD experiment at the CERN SPS },
1009: Nucl. Instr. Meth. A {\bf 404} (1998) 96.
1010: \bibitem{ref:CHORUS} E. Eskut {\it et al.}, {\it The CHORUS experiment to search for $\nu_\mu \rightarrow \nu_\tau$ oscillation},
1011: Nucl. Instr. Meth. A {\bf 401} (1997) 7.
1012: \bibitem{ref:icarus-cern-mi} A.~Rubbia {\it et al}, {\it A search programme of explicit $\nu$-oscillations with the ICARUS detector at long distances},
1013: CERN-SPSLC-96-58, SPSLC-P-304.
1014: \bibitem{ref:pietropaolo} F.~Arneodo {\it et al.}, {\it The ICARUS 50-l LAr TPC in the CERN neutrino beam},
1015: hep-ex/9812006.
1016: \bibitem{ref:tesi_alessandro} A.~Curioni, {\it Esposizione di una camera a proiezione temporale di 50 litri al fascio di neutrini del CERN}
1017: (in Italian), Diploma Thesis, Milano, 1997.
1018: \bibitem{ref:tesi} B.~Boschetti, {\it Studio sperimentale di interazioni di neutrino quasi-elastiche in argon liquido}
1019: (in Italian), Diploma Thesis, Milano, 1997.
1020: \bibitem{ref:curioni} A.~Curioni on behalf of the ICARUS-Milano Collaboartion
1021: {\it Experimental study of quasi-elastic neutrino interactions on Ar with a liquid Ar TPC exposed to the WANF neutrino beam}, hep-ex/0603009.
1022: \bibitem{ref:TMG} P.~Cennini {\it et al.}, {\it Improving the performance of the liquid argon TPC by doping with tetramethyl germanium},
1023: Nucl. Instr. Meth. A {\bf 355} (1995) 660.
1024: \bibitem{ref:flux_nomad} P.~Astier {\it et al.}, {\it Prediction of neutrino fluxes in the NOMAD experiment},
1025: Nucl. Instr. Meth. A {\bf 515} (2003) 800.
1026: \bibitem{ref:trigger_NOMAD} J.~Altegoer {\it et al.}, {\it The trigger system of the NOMAD experiment},
1027: Nucl. Instr. Meth. A {\bf 428} (1999) 299.
1028: \bibitem{ref:bettini} A. Bettini {\it et al.}, {\it A study of the factors affecting the electron lifetime in ultra-pure liquid argon},
1029: Nucl. Instr. Meth. A {\bf 305} (1991) 177.
1030: \bibitem{ref:monitor_purity} G.~Carugno {\it et al.}, {\it Electron lifetime detector for liquid argon},
1031: Nucl. Instr. Meth. A {\bf 292} (1990) 580.
1032: \bibitem{ref:purity} S.~Amoruso {\it et al.} [ICARUS Coll.], {\it Analysis of the liquid argon purity in the ICARUS T600 TPC},
1033: Nucl. Instr. Meth. A {\bf 516} (2004) 68.
1034: \bibitem{ref:ricotesi} J. Rico, {\it First Study of the Stopping Muon Sample with the ICARUS T600 Detector},
1035: Ph.D. Dissertation, ETH 14906, 2002. Available at: http://neutrino.ethz.ch/diplomathesis.html.
1036: \bibitem{ref:delaossatesi} A.~Martinez de la Ossa, {\it Study Of Accelerator Neutrino Interactions in the ICARUS Liquid Argon TPC},
1037: Ph.D. Thesis, Universidad de Granada, 2006.
1038: \bibitem{ref:TreeFin} D.G. Cassel and H. Kowalski, {\it Pattern Recognition in Layered Track Chambers Using a Tree Algorithm},
1039: Nucl. Instr. Meth. A {\bf 185} (1981) 235.
1040: \bibitem{ref:NNFin} G.~Stimpfl-Abele and L. Garrido, {\it Fast Track finding with Neural Networks},
1041: Comp. Phys. Comm. {\bf 64} (1991) 46.
1042: \bibitem{ref:Birks} J.~Birks, {\it Theory and Practice of Scintillation Counting},
1043: Pergamon Press, New York, 1964.
1044: \bibitem{ref:Rec_factor} S.~Amoruso {\it et al.} [ICARUS Coll.], {\it Study of electron recombination in liquid Argon with the ICARUS TPC},
1045: Nucl. Instr. Meth. A {\bf 523} (2004) 275.
1046: \bibitem{ref:FLUKA} A. Fasso, A. Ferrari, J. Ranft, and P.R. Sala, {\it FLUKA: a multi-particle transport code}, CERN-2005-10 (2005), INFN/TC-05/11, SLAC-R-773.
1047: \bibitem{ref:FLUKATWO} A. Fasso {\it et al.}, {\it The physics models of FLUKA: status and recent developments}, hep-ph/0306267.
1048: \bibitem{ref:geant} S. Agostinelli {\it et al.}, {\it Geant4 - A Simulation Toolkit},
1049: Nucl. Instr. Meth. A {\bf 506} (2003) 250.
1050: \bibitem{ref:nuint} For a review of the experimental perspectives to
1051: explore nuclear effects in this kinematic regime we refer to the
1052: Proceedings of the {\it Third International Workshop on Neutrino-Nucleus Interactions in the Few-GeV Region},
1053: F.~Cavanna, T.~Keppel, P.~Lipari, M.~Sakuda eds., Nucl. Phys. B (Proc. Suppl.) {\bf 439} (2004) 1.
1054: \bibitem{ref:oscsearch} A. Bueno {\it et al.}, {\it Statistical pattern recognition: Application to $\nu_\mu~\rightarrow~\nu_\tau$ oscillation searches based on kinematic criteria},
1055: JHEP {\bf 11} (2004) 14.
1056:
1057: \end{thebibliography}
1058:
1059: \end{document}
1060:
1061: